ReportWire

Tag: Fatal Attraction

  • Play Misty For Me: The California Blueprint for Fatal Attraction

    Play Misty For Me: The California Blueprint for Fatal Attraction

    [ad_1]

    Although the era of “free love” that commenced in the 1960s was initially looked upon by men with salivation over the opportunity to “get the milk for free” without having to “buy the cow” (that old grotesque chestnut), a new view on the matter was gradually starting to take shape in the 1970s, eventually morphing into the ultimate cautionary tale about “putting your dick in crazy,” 1987’s Fatal Attraction. But it’s quite obvious that said movie owes a great debt to the blueprint it all started with: 1971’s Play Misty For Me

    As Clint Eastwood’s first outing as director, the film might have felt like an unusual choice for the star best known as a “hero” of Western movies, and yet, who knew better than Eastwood what it meant to be “like catnip for the ladies” at that time? What’s more, the same year as Play Misty For Me was released, The Beguiled came out as well. Also a psychological thriller starring Eastwood that involved “crazy women.” Or rather, women who have gone crazy with lust. While Don Siegel’s version of The Beguiled (before Sofia Coppola came along) is based on Thomas P. Cullinan’s 1966 novel of the same name, Play Misty For Me wouldn’t get a novelization until after the screenplay by Jo Heims and Dean Riesner was written. Another “don’t become this woman” narrative that emerged in the late 70s, Looking For Mr. Goodbar, was also based on a novel, specifically by Judith Rossner. The novel itself based on the story of Roseann Quinn’s 1973 murder by a man she picked up at a bar (what was then called a “singles bar,” despite such a modifying adjective not really needing to be there). Which is exactly what Evelyn Draper (Jessica Walter) does in her bid to ensnare local Carmel radio DJ Dave Garner (Eastwood) in her spiderweb of calculated lies. The lies that include her presentation as a casual, cool, all-around “groovy chick” who just wants a one-night stand with “no strings attached.” This being the phrase that, as far as “smart men” are concerned, connotes the famous last words of a woman “trying to get her hooks in” under false pretenses.

    Apparently, though, Dave isn’t exactly a smart man. In fact, he seems so casually nonchalant in the way that only someone from California can be that there are many times when the viewer wants to shake him and shout, “Call the fuckin’ cops on this bitch, okay?!” This, at certain moments, leading one to ask who the real “psycho” is: Evelyn or Dave. Because surely any sane person surely would have sent up a red flag to authorities soon after Evelyn starts to openly stalk him at his house and his favorite local hangout, The Sardine Factory (still standing in Carmel to this very day), which also happens to be the place where she first let him believe that he was luring her. This goes for Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas) with Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) in Fatal Attraction as well, only with Dan it makes a bit more sense as he’s still trying to protect his reputation as a “family man.” In either situation, however, the failure of both men to seek help more immediately is a direct commentary on the extent of male pride. The kind of hubris that 1) makes them believe they can do whatever they want in the first place and 2) not face any sort of fallout for it.

    Accordingly, Dave decides to write Evelyn off as nothing more than a “California kook” (that’s the trouble with California kooks: you never know for sure just how kooky they can get) as he goes back to pursuing “the one that got away,” Tobie Williams (Donna Mills), who he learns is back in town after four months spent hiding out from him and his philandering ways in Sausalito. In fact, it’s Tobie’s house we first see Dave skulking around at the beginning of the movie, a stalker element at play in two forms: for one, he’s prowling outside her house uninvited and, for another, there’s a painting of him in the window that indicates someone (i.e., Tobie) is rather fond of him. Or at least she was until he kept “catting around” with all the other available women in Carmel. And yes, there were probably a lot more to choose from back then because it was still vaguely affordable. Even to someone as “cuckoo” and ostensibly unemployed as Evelyn, who seems to spend all of her free time tracking Dave like a hunted animal. Tobie, meanwhile, can be as hippie-dippy and artistic as she wants to be thanks to having the ability to rent out a room in her picturesque house (left to her, conveniently, by her father) overlooking the sea (it is, after all, Carmel-by-the-Sea). The bottom line is, maybe the curmudgeonly bartender at The Sardine Factory is right when he shades Dave with the line, “Heard your show tonight. Sure beats the hell out of working for a living.” 

    With everyone so loosey-goosey about work (“Hey, it’s California, man”), no wonder Evelyn has enough time to develop a near-erotomaniac obsession with Dave. This in contrast to the “career woman” stylings of Alex in Fatal Attraction. A film which originated from James Dearden’s fifty-minute 1980 movie, Diversion (and yes, Dearden would go on to write the Fatal Attraction screenplay). Despite their “coastal differences,” Alex initially tries to “play it cool” in much the same way as Evelyn, offering sex up to Dan with a casual shrug and reminder, “We’re two adults.” This after asking seductively if Dan is “discreet.” The implication being: can he keep a secret about having an affair? Little does he know, it’s Alex who lacks all discretion (despite her insistence to the contrary). Much the same as Evelyn, who turns up at Dave’s house in the dead of night begging to come in. When he won’t let her, she drops her coat to reveal she’s naked so that Dave will bring her inside to avert any potential prying neighbors’ eyes. While Dave might not be a married man, he’s certainly got a lot to lose now that he’s convinced Tobie to get back together with him because he’s finally decided he’s ready for monogamy. Evelyn’s fierce and tireless presence in his life doesn’t exactly make that assertion seem true.

    Alex couldn’t care less about getting in the way of Dan and his “old lady” either. Except, in contrast to Tobie, Beth (Anne Archer), is the embodiment of the “safe,” “boring” wife trope. Tobie, instead, has far more appeal than Evelyn for her “California cool” look and attitude. Indeed, the tropes presented in Fatal Attraction are far more cliche and damaging with regard to the representation of women. This no doubt because they’re presented through Dearden’s male perspective. 

    As for Jo Heims, the “female representative” of the writing duo behind Play Misty For Me, she was the one who initially wrote the script. With later input and “polishes” from Riesner making one wonder if the overall narrative came across as slightly less misogynistic in its original form. At the same time, the internalized misogyny of most women during this period in American history (and also during this one) might have meant the script wouldn’t have been all that different from its original form. For both Evelyn and Alex lack much in the way of a, shall we say, “complex backstory.” Each one is simply a “desperate woman” who has decided to latch onto a guy who was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Or, in Dave’s case, on the wrong radio airwaves at the wrong time. 

    Similar to Alex’s outrage about Dan just deciding to “throw her away” after one fuck (even though both parties agreed it couldn’t be anything more), Evelyn cry-yells at Dave, “Why are you playing these games? Why are you pretending you don’t love me?” Dave snaps back, “You haven’t got the vaguest idea what love is. We don’t even know each other.” Dan feels trapped in the same fucked-up scenario wherein he’s effectively stuck with a woman who got too drunk off the oxytocin release while they had sex. Both women’s vacillation between the “tactics” of sobbing/sadness displays and verbal venom unleashed upon the object of their so-called affection are also consistent throughout the films. Evelyn even sets Alex up with the attention-grabbing emotional manipulation of slitting her wrists when Dave tries, yet again, to rid himself of her. Though, “at least,” she waits a little more than one fuck to start displaying that kind of behavior. Alex, not so much, delving right into her Madama Butterfly behavior the second she senses Dan is really leaving and can’t be talked out of it again with more faux jovial convincing. Just as Misty can’t be bothered with pretending to play the “laid-back dame” anymore either. Which, one supposes, is the only shared trait between crazy women who live in California and New York, respectively. 

    And yes, ableist language or not, the only word to describe this pair of obsessive temptresses-turned-nightmares is “crazy.” This being part and parcel of the era during which each movie came out. For it was apparent that, as mentioned, pop culture wanted to ensure that male viewers were “scared straight.” Aware that the boon of “free love” that arose in the 60s wasn’t really free at all. It came with a price for men who thought they were finally going to get to “bang a broad” without fear of her wanting to “tie him down.” The message of Play Misty For Me and Fatal Attraction is that a man will always be punished for such foolishness. In this sense, they serve not only as fables to uphold the capitalistic status quo ensured by monogamous marriage, but to remind men that treating women, no matter how “chill” or “up for it” they might seem, disposably is not going to fly as it once did in a pre-mid-twentieth century world. Except that, oh wait, it actually does, with Evelyn and Alex both meeting brutal, watery deaths in the final scenes.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Why Amanda Peet Was Attracted to ‘Fatal Attraction’

    Why Amanda Peet Was Attracted to ‘Fatal Attraction’

    [ad_1]

    Amanda Peet is attracted to good writing—and, thankfully, she can afford to be picky. “Because of Game of Thrones”—the monster hit her husband, David Benioff, cocreated— “I am able to say no to some of the lousy writing,” she says. But the new Paramount+ limited series Fatal Attraction, a remake of the iconic 1987 psychological thriller, presented an irresistible package: Great scripts, from a writer she had previously collaborated with, and a chance to work with two of her biggest crushes in costars Joshua Jackson and Lizzy Caplan.

    While Jackson and Caplan take on the lead roles that Michael Douglas and Glenn Close memorably played in the film, Peet stars as Beth Gallagher, whose world is shattered when her husband, Dan (Jackson), has an affair with a colleague (Caplan’s Alex Forrest). Anne Archer was Oscar-nominated for her performance as Beth—but with more real estate and a 2023 outlook, Peet and showrunner Alexandra Cunningham (Dirty John) expanded Beth’s presence, showing more of the story from her point of view. With the series jumping between two timelines, Beth deals both with the immediate impact and fallout of Dan’s actions, as well as his eventual reentry into her life and that of their adult daughter.

    “The movie’s so brilliant, but there just isn’t enough time,” Peet tells Vanity Fair. “And, because it’s 1987, we’re going to be in the perspective of the middle-aged white man. So it felt like there’s a huge opportunity here, and Alexandra was interested in having Beth be a bit more than just a lovely homemaker.”

    Ahead of the first three episodes of Fatal Attraction dropping Sunday on Paramount+, we spoke with Peet about being obsessed with Jackson and Caplan, feeling grateful for Bruce Willis, and our love of her short-lived 2012 sitcom Bent.

    Vanity Fair: What are your memories of first seeing Fatal Attraction?

    Amanda Peet: I saw it on 19th Street and Broadway, opening weekend, packed theater. I went with a girlfriend and her boyfriend, and he fainted on the way out, which made us think that he might have cheated on her. But he hadn’t; he was just a sensitive soul.

    From your view, why was Fatal Attraction ripe for a new, updated version?

    I had worked with Alexandra [on Dirty John], and I love her and her writing. For my generation, Glenn Close’s character became a joke. Like, if you were dating somebody and that person became super clingy or seemed a little too eager, you’d be like, “Oh, be careful or she’ll boil your bunny!” And despite Glenn Close’s insanely nuanced, masterful performance, it just wasn’t enough screen time or character development for you to sympathize with her. So that’s what Alexandra wanted to play with. And, also, Dan’s accountability, which was non-existent.

    What was like working with Josh to explore this complicated dynamic and marriage?

    Just a total delight. I had a crush on him before, and now I feel like I have a talent crush on him. And a crush on him! It’s not like he got less attractive. He’s the real deal. He can play anything; he can be a monster, he can be so winsome and adorable. I’m blown away by his performance.  And then he’s also really lovely to work with. Being famous for that long, you’d think you would end up being an arrogant schmuck, but he isn’t. He’s very self-deprecating and goofy and generous and thoughtful to other people on set.

    You being paired up with Josh got me thinking about your interesting résumé of onscreen romantic interests, which includes Bruce Willis, Jason Biggs, Jack Nicholson, Jason Bateman, Ben Affleck and Matt Damon. And somehow you’ve managed to have chemistry with all of them! What do you attribute that to?

    I think I’ve been really lucky. Bruce Willis [in 2000’s The Whole Nine Yards] was my first break. I remember we had callbacks and there were probably about 20 actresses there, and we were all lined up outside to read with Bruce Willis. It was so scary, but he was just so fun. He was so flirty, so present, and just started improvising with me. And he picked me! So I feel very sentimental about Bruce right now. Because I was nobody. I was just some rando. Like, I showed up for my callback and he was like, “That girl.” And then I was like, “Okay, I’ll do it, but I’m not going to take my clothes off,” and they were like, “Okay, bye!” I was like, “Wait! Okay, fine, I’ll take my top off,” and they were like, “Bye!” I was like, “Okay, fine, I’ll take my undies off too!” It was a different era.

    [ad_2]

    Derek Lawrence

    Source link

  • Fatal Attraction: A Tragic Easter Movie for Rabbits

    Fatal Attraction: A Tragic Easter Movie for Rabbits

    [ad_1]

    It’s said that Fatal Attraction is a cautionary tale about having an affair, but what few people fail to mention is how it qualifies as an Easter movie. For how can one deny that a central part of the plot is the innocent rabbit named Whitey? The sweet pet belonging to the Gallagher family, but more than anyone Ellen (Ellen Hamilton Latzen), Dan’s (Michael Douglas) naïve six-year-old daughter who turns out to be collateral damage in Alex Forrest’s (Glenn Close) game of “psychotic seduction” in that she must suffer the fallout of Alex’s rage directed at her father. De facto the rabbit (and yes, a real [dead] one was actually used for the infamous scene in question). And even though Whitey doesn’t make her official entrance into the Gallagher household until around the one hour and twenty-minute mark of the movie, well over halfway into it, she is arguably the biggest icon of the film.

    Like dogs in any movie or TV show of a “thriller-y” nature, the rabbit is probably the second-most assured animal to be harmed or killed in some way (see also: the second episode of Yellowjackets). Something about their purity just seems to set people off on a murderous rampage. To boot, the Gallaghers also happen to have a dog named Quincy, a yellow Labrador retriever who isn’t much for paying attention to potential intruders like Alex. Nonetheless, the dog appears to be spared thanks to the addition of the rabbit to their “brood” in the third act. Indeed, Dan buys the rabbit after initially resisting the notion of getting one for Ellen, but then decides to buy one likely due to the sustained guilt of stepping out on his wife, Beth (Anne Archer). Attempting to pay for his sins by going so far down the, um, rabbit hole with Alex. A woman who remains undeterred by the fact that Dan has moved to Bedford in terms of her stalking capabilities, which she’s only too happy to engage in the night that Dan brings home the rabbit in a generically oppressive black cage.

    In a certain regard, that rabbit in its cage is representative of Dan, suddenly all willing to commit completely to being domesticated after he’s been subjected to the wilds of what’s “out there,” i.e. “crazy bitches” such as Alex that make Beth look like a wholesome, obsequious wet dream. After all, Fatal Attraction also seeks to reiterate the Madonna/whore tropes that women are “required” to be lumped into. In pop culture, the tropes have often mutated into various opposing “character types” on the spectrum, from Marilyn and Jackie to Samantha and Charlotte, all symbolizing the same classic “syndrome.” One in which men can only see a woman as his noble, virtuous wife or tartish mistress material in the vein of Alex.

    But Alex is not so cavalier about having an affair as Dan would initially like to believe. She’s a “good woman,” she wants him to know, as she also seethes on a tape recording she sends to him, “You thought you could just walk into my life and turn it upside down without a thought for anyone but yourself.” Wanting Dan to suffer the consequences for his actions is the main crux for why she desires to have his “adultery baby,” though she insists it’s because, “I’m thirty-six years old, it may be my last chance to have a child” (oh how things have come a long way for women since that was evidently deemed the “cut-off age” for child-bearing).

    Alex eventually chooses to boil the family rabbit—an ultimate symbol of fertility—that she sees the Gallaghers fawning over from afar. This being a metaphorical indication of how she’s given up not only on Dan, but herself. Or rather, the idea of herself as “fit for motherhood”/being the matriarch of a conventional nuclear family. Not if she’s going to have to do it alone, without the one she supposedly “loves.” For this movie is, lest one forget, a transparent riff on Madame Butterfly (which Alex and Dan both discuss their love of early on in the narrative)—embedded in the screenplay’s text long before Mike White decided to create the character of Tanya (Jennifer Coolidge) in The White Lotus. However, it seems even Cio-Cio-San wouldn’t go so far as to hurt an innocent creature like Whitey, who is shown being discovered by Beth in the boiling pot in her kitchen just as Ellen is running to an outdoor wooden cage to check on Whitey, only to find the bunny is missing. Thus, at the exact same moment, mother and daughter let out a shriek of terror, the former because of what she sees before her and the latter because of what she doesn’t.

    But the rabbit ultimately serves as the key catalyst for getting Dan to confess to his affair. Otherwise, he wouldn’t be able to tell his wife the true culprit behind Whitey’s watery assassination. Thus, with this being Beth’s first glimpse of what Alex is capable of, she’s not all that shocked to find Alex standing behind her in the bathroom in the final scenes of the movie. Brandishing a knife, naturally. Being that the original ending of Fatal Attraction revealed that Alex had killed herself and made Dan look like the murderer, seeing her casually stab at her own thigh while she talks to Beth and accuses her of keeping Dan away from her isn’t that out of depth. Nor is the moment when Alex “reanimates” after Dan is given no choice but to drown her in the bathtub to stave her off from stabbing him and his wife.

    Lying there in the tub the same way the rabbit did in the pot, the karmic justice is complete when Alex, too, is rendered as bloody as Whitey after Beth finishes the job with a gun. This leaving Alex to stew in the hot red water just as Whitey was left to do. Despite the poetic “full-circle” scene, Fatal Attraction remains a movie that Easter bunnies and normal bunnies alike are cautioned against watching.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link