ReportWire

Tag: Fact-checking

  • Grindr didn’t threaten to expose lawmakers using app

    Grindr didn’t threaten to expose lawmakers using app

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM:

    The gay dating app Grindr says if Florida doesn’t stop passing homophobic and transphobic laws, it will reveal every Republican legislator and party official who secretly uses the app.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT:

    False. This claim originated on a satirical account. A spokesperson for Grindr denounced anti-LGBTQ legislation while confirming the app “protects the privacy of all its users.”

    THE FACTS:

    A popular dating app for the gay, bisexual, transgender and queer community isn’t threatening to expose the identities of its high-profile Republican users, despite widely shared posts claiming otherwise.

    Facebook and Twitter users were spreading the claim as real after a Twitter account posted it Wednesday. The Twitter account that initially posted the claim identifies its content as “halfway true content and satire.”

    The claim that Grindr said it would expose users reached thousands of likes and shares across social platforms, with some commenters saying they supported the idea.

    But a spokesperson for the app confirmed it was unfounded in an email to The Associated Press.

    “This claim is false,” said Grindr spokesperson Patrick Lenihan. “Grindr protects the privacy of all its users. Anti-LGBTQ legislation is abominable and cruel, and we vehemently condemn any laws that restrict, deny, or abolish the rights of LGBTQ people.”

    Grindr has previously faced criticism and been fined for sharing personal data with third parties that could potentially identify users. The privacy policy on the company’s website outlines how it uses and aims to protect user data. It adds that its goal “is to put you in control of as much of the Personal Information that you share within the Grindr Properties as possible.”

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration is moving to ban classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in all grades, expanding the controversial law that critics call Don’t Say Gay.”

    The state’s Republican-led legislature also has proposed a range of laws related to gender and sexuality, including legislation that would ban discussion of periods and other human sexuality topics in elementary grades.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bill Gates not arrested in Philippines over COVID-19 shots

    Bill Gates not arrested in Philippines over COVID-19 shots

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: A court in the Philippines has issued an international arrest warrant for Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates over crimes related to COVID-19 vaccines.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The Philippine court cited as issuing the arrest order for Gates does not exist. The clerk of court in Manila confirmed to The Associated Press that there is no such case involving Gates in any of the country’s courts. A spokesperson for Gates also said the claim is false.

    THE FACTS: Social media users are spreading a fabricated article from a hoax news site to baselessly claim that the billionaire philanthropist is under an international arrest order for “premeditated murder” as part of an investigation into the COVID-19 vaccine roll out.

    Some users shared the article, published by News Punch, or screenshots of it, suggesting it was accurate. The site has published numerous stories based on conspiracy theories and has promoted fabricated information and quotes in the past.

    “WOAH‼️ WOAH‼️ WOAH‼️ An arrest warrant was just issued for BILL GATES?! Yes! This is REAL!!” wrote on user on Instagram in a post that was liked nearly 4,000 times.

    The article claimed without evidence that the Heinous Crimes Court in Manila “issued the order for the arrest of Gates under article 248 of the revised penal code (RPC), which carries a minimum prison term of 20 years and one day.”

    However, no such court currently exists in the Philippines, according to attorney Jennifer Buendia, the clerk of court in Manila.

    She told the AP that so-called heinous crimes courts have not existed in Manila for more than 10 years, and its functions were transferred to other special courts. There is also no case involving Gates across the 71 Regional Trial Courts and 30 Metropolitan Trial Courts, Buendia said.

    “We don’t have heinous crimes courts in Manila,” Buendia said. “They have ceased to exist since 10 years ago. There is nothing about Bill Gates in our system.”

    An arrest warrant can only be issued by a court if there is a criminal case against someone, she added.

    “There is none in this case,” she said. “This is really fake news.”

    Further, a spokesperson for Gates also confirmed in a statement to the AP was baseless.

    A disclaimer under News Punch’s terms of use states that its content may not be accurate or reliable.

    “News Punch, LLC and/or its suppliers make no representations about the suitability, reliability, availability, timeliness, and accuracy of the information, software, products, services and related graphics contained on the site for any purpose,” the disclaimer states.

    Representatives for News Punch and the author of the article did not return a request for comment.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Jim Gomez in Manila, Philippines, contributed to this report.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Radiation found in humans isn’t lethal, despite claims

    Radiation found in humans isn’t lethal, despite claims

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: 100 million humans in the same place would emit enough radiation to be deadly.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Radiation experts confirm the human body contains trace amounts of radiation, but the levels aren’t nearly enough to be lethal, even if 100 million people were somehow packed into a single place.

    THE FACTS: Social media users are claiming that if you put enough people together in one place, they’d emit so much radiation that it would be deadly.

    Many are sharing a post with the headline “Humans are Radioactive” along with the statement: “If 100 million average humans kept in an isolated place for eight hours, they will admit enough radiation to kill each one of them within 20 days.”

    The post also includes a picture of actor Rosamund Pike holding up a glowing green vial from the 2019 film “Radioactive,” about famed Polish scientist Marie Curie who conducted pioneering research on radioactivity.

    While it’s true that humans, like other living organisms, contain radioactive material, the levels are “extremely low” — thousands of times smaller than an x-ray, according to Melissa Sullivan, a spokesperson for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    The radiation also can’t be easily transmitted to others, experts say. To reach a dangerous level, the radiation would somehow have to be gathered from millions of people and then distilled into an extremely confined space.

    “The claim is indeed ridiculous,” Christopher Clement, CEO of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, a Canada-based group of scientists that advocates for radiation safety, wrote in an email.

    “If you concentrated the radioactive material from many millions of people into a very small space, the result could be a radioactive source that would need to be handled with care to avoid being dangerous,” he wrote. “But not as harmful as squeezing a hundred million people into a phone booth.”

    The social media claims also show a misunderstanding of the kind of radiation found in our bodies, said George Chabot, a physics professor at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell who delved into greater detail about the claim ina 2021 post for the Health Physics Society, another group of scientists that advocates for radiation safety.

    Human radiation largely comes from eating foods that contain potassium — a tiny fraction of which is radioactive potassium-40, he explained in an email.

    “What may confuse people is that most of the dose to an individual from eating potassium-40 comes from the beta radiation emitted during the decay of the radioactive atoms,” Chabot wrote. “This beta radiation is not very penetrating so that practically all of the energy emitted remains within the individual and cannot irradiate anyone else.”

    Michael Short, a nuclear science professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, agreed, arguing that the radiation produced by 100 million people still wouldn’t be deadly, despite what social media users claim.

    Every few hours, a person emits roughly 0.00000001 Sieverts, which is a unit of measure for radiation that quantifies the risk of negative effects on the human body, he said.

    If multiplied by 100 million people — as the social media posts appear to have done — that amount would produce a single Sievert of radiation, or enough to cause radiation sickness, but not likely fatal enough for an otherwise healthy person, Short said.

    “All that radiation would have to be localized in one person-sized place, or smaller, to be that damaging,” he explained in an email. “100,000,000 people would take up a tremendous amount of space, spreading out their radiation dose over that space. The dose one gets from being near a source of radiation decreases quickly with distance away from that dose.”

    What’s more, the human body acts as a sort of buffer, absorbing much of its own radiation and mitigating its wider impacts, added Christopher Baird, a physics professor at West Texas A&M University.

    “If one human absorbs a bit of ionizing radiation, then this bit of radiation is no longer available to affect another human,” he wrote in an email. “A hundred million humans will be emitting a hundred-million worth of human background radiation, but there will be a hundred million people absorbing this radiation.”

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Posts misrepresent rioter’s actions in Jan. 6 Capitol attack

    Posts misrepresent rioter’s actions in Jan. 6 Capitol attack

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol shows that Jacob Chansley, who participated in the riot sporting face paint, no shirt and a fur hat with horns, was “led through the Capitol by police the entire time he was in the building.”

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Court documents and video footage from the attack on the Capitol make clear that Chansley, who is widely known as the “QAnon Shaman” and is one of the most recognizable Jan. 6 rioters, entered the Capitol without permission, was repeatedly asked to leave the building and was not accompanied at all times.

    THE FACTS: After Fox News host Tucker Carlson broadcast Jan. 6 security footage previously unseen by the public on his Monday night primetime show, social media users began sharing segments from his program that misrepresented Chansley’s involvement in the riot.

    “BREAKING: Never before seen video of January 6 shows Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, being led through the Capitol by police the entire time that he was in the building,” reads a tweet that had received more than 189,000 likes and more than 65,000 shares as of Tuesday.

    The tweet includes a clip from Carlson’s show in which Chansley can be seen calmly walking around the Capitol with officers in tow. Similar social media posts received hundreds of thousands of additional likes and shares.

    But the footage in these posts, provided to Carlson by Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, leaves out important context about Chansley’s time in the Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot.

    A statement prepared by the Department of Justice, which was signed by Chansley and his attorney, provides a timeline of the rioter’s movement in the Capitol.

    For example, the statement explains that Chansley entered the Capitol through a broken door as part of a crowd that “was not lawfully authorized to enter or remain in the building” and that he was one of the first 30 rioters inside. It goes on to note that although officers asked Chansley and others multiple times to leave the Capitol, he did not comply and actively riled up his fellow rioters. The statement describes Chansley’s interactions with officers, but also points out that he “entered the Gallery of the Senate alone.”

    Many of Chansley’s actions on Jan. 6 are documented in video footage from that day.

    Chansley pleaded guilty in September 2021 to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding. He was sentenced in November 2021 to 41 months in prison for his guilty plea, as well as 36 months of supervised release and a fine of $2,000 in restitution.

    Asked about claims that protesters were led through the building, a Capitol Police spokesperson pointed The Associated Press to an HBO documentary about the riot, “Four Hours at the Capitol,” in which an officer describes his encounter with Chansley, including how he asked the rioter and others to leave the Senate wing.

    Footage from the interaction, which appears in the documentary at the approximately 47:30 mark, was filmed by New Yorker writer Luke Mogelson.

    “Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” the officer says as Chansley sits in the presiding officer’s chair on the Senate Dais. “I just want to let you guys know, this is like the sacredest place.”

    A video of Chansley walking into the Capitol through the broken door is publicly available on the website of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

    U.S. Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger lambasted Carlson’s segment on the Jan. 6 footage in an internal memo Tuesday. The Capitol Police spokesperson confirmed the memo’s authenticity to the AP.

    “Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,” Manger wrote. “The opinion program never reached out to the Department to provide accurate context. One false allegation is that our officers helped the rioters and acted as ‘tour guides.’ This is outrageous and false.”

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Brussels bus stop ‘Mystère’ is no mystery

    Brussels bus stop ‘Mystère’ is no mystery

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: A public bus called “Not the 48” in Brussels takes riders to a mystery location for free.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. No such bus exists, although the real 48 bus in Brussels does have a stop near the street Rue du Mystère called “Mystère/Mysterie.” The Twitter user who started the rumor revealed in later comments that he intended it as a joke.

    THE FACTS: If a free, adventurous mystery bus in the heart of Belgium seems too good to be true, it’s because it is.

    The false claims fooled social media users this week after a Twitter user posted a photo of a Brussels city bus with “Mystère” displayed across its front screen and “Mysterie” along the side.

    “Not only is public transport free in Brussels, but they even have a bus called ‘Not The 48’ which takes you to a mystery location if you’re feeling a bit down or you just don’t have anything to do that day,” read the tweet, which was shared more than 4,000 times. “Something for other cities to consider.”

    But the bus pictured in the image is the 48 bus in Brussels, which has a stop along its line called “Mystère/Mysterie.” A street near the stop is called Rue du Mystère.

    The image in the tweet shows the bus is labeled 48, with a red slash through the number. Social media users suggested the slash means the bus isn’t terminating at its usual stop.

    The Twitter post’s claim that public transport is free in Brussels is also false, though children under 6 years old do ride free and students and seniors get heavily discounted rates.

    The claim spread to Reddit and Facebook before the Twitter user clarified the joke in comments.

    “The amount of people not getting the joke(s) in this tweet is quite outstanding,” one Twitter user commented in the thread. “It’s always an education :D,” the original poster replied.

    The Twitter user made the same joke in a tweet in 2019.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, the military hasn’t recorded a 500% increase in HIV cases

    No, the military hasn’t recorded a 500% increase in HIV cases

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: The U.S. military has recorded a 500% increase in new HIV infections since COVID-19 vaccines were introduced.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The U.S. military has not recorded any such increase. New HIV diagnoses among military members increased slightly from 237 in 2020 to 309 in 2021, then fell to 124 new infections recorded in 2022, according to figures from the U.S. Department of Defense. That’s a peak increase of 30% from 2020 to 2021, when COVID-19 vaccines were first introduced, and a decrease of nearly 60% from 2021 to 2022 when the rollout was well underway.

    THE FACTS: Conservative commentators are claiming that rates of HIV in the military have skyrocketed since COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out, baselessly linking the two together to sow suspicion about the shot.

    “The Armed Forces of the United States recorded a five hundred percent (500%) increase in AIDS after administering the COVID-19 Vaccine to US Troops. The COVID-19 Vaccine is implicated,” wrote Hal Turner, a right-wing radio host, on his website last week in a post titled “Vaccine-Induced AIDS” – Military Records 500% Increase in HIV after COVID-19 Vax.”

    Turner gave no evidence for his claims, nor did he point to specific data to support that percentage. He did not respond to a request for comment. The claim was also repeated in a tweet that was shared more than 7,000 times.

    But figures from the Defense Department and the Congressional Research Service show that the 500% figure is massively exaggerated. Further, medical experts have repeatedly emphasized that COVID-19 vaccination has not been linked to developing HIV, or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, which is caused by HIV. Nor does a condition called “VAIDS”vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome — exist.

    A total of 1,581 service members, including those in the National Guard and Reserves have been diagnosed with HIV infections since 2017, said Cmdr. Nicole Schwegman, a spokesperson for the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

    Data from an independent legal firm that represented service members with HIV in a 2022 lawsuit has also cited similar numbers, estimating that approximately 2,000 service members had HIV.

    According to Defense Department figures provided to The Associated Press, 317 service members were diagnosed with HIV in 2017; 280 in 2018; 314 in 2019; 237 in 2020; 309 in 2021; and 124 in 2022. The average number of new cases per year over that 6-year period is about 264.

    These rates are consistent with figures that were cited in a 2019 Congressional Research Service report on HIV/AIDS in the military. That report cited estimates from the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center showing that approximately 350 service members are diagnosed with HIV annually.

    COVID-19 vaccinations first became available to the public in December 2020. In 2021, 72 more cases of HIV were diagnosed compared to 2020, constituting a 30% increase — but nowhere near the 500% claimed. And in 2022, when the vaccine rollout was well underway, 185 fewer new HIV cases were diagnosed, marking a 60% drop from 2021.

    Though Turner did not give the source of his data, it matches claims spread about other illnesses purportedly linked to COVID-19 vaccination among military members that have been shared in the past.

    In those cases, the numbers stemmed from what the bloggers and social media users said was “leaked” data from Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, or DMED, an internal database that documents military and medical experiences of service members throughout their careers. It is only accessible by military medical providers, epidemiologists, medical researchers, safety officers or medical operations and clinical support staff.

    However, Schwegman told the AP that the claims citing this database were flawed due to an error in the data for the years 2016 to 2020.

    The Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division reviewed the data in the system, comparing it to the source data, and found that the total number of medical diagnoses from 2016 to 2020 that were accessible in DMED “represented only a small fraction of actual medical diagnoses for those years,” said Schwegman.

    In contrast, the total number of medical diagnoses for the year 2021 were accurate, which temporarily made it appear that there was a disproportionate increase in many medical conditions between the 2016 to 2020 figures and the ones reported in 2021.

    “Comparison of 2021 to 2016-2020 resulted in the appearance of significant increased occurrence of all medical diagnoses in 2021 because of the under reported data for 2016-2020,” Schwegman wrote in a statement.

    She said that the Armed Forces Surveillance Division has since corrected “the root-cause of the data corruption and it has been restored to full functionality.”

    Overall, there is no evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines cause any kind of immune deficiency condition, let alone AIDS, multiple experts have told the AP in the past. Nor is there evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines damage the immune system.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hospital COVID payments tied to patient treatment, not deaths

    Hospital COVID payments tied to patient treatment, not deaths

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: U.S. hospitals are earning a $48,000 government subsidy for every patient that dies from COVID-19 in their care.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Hospital industry officials and public health experts confirm the federal government provides hospitals with enhanced payments for treating COVID-19 patients, but the payments are only currently applicable to those on Medicare. The enhanced payments, which are slated to end in May, also aren’t contingent on a patient’s death but on the treatment or services provided to the patient, they said.

    THE FACTS: Social media users are claiming American hospitals have a financial incentive to let people with coronavirus die under their watch.

    Many posts are sharing a screengrab of a post featuring an image of a group of health professionals posing together while fully covered in personal protective equipment.

    “Wait until everyone finds out that hospitals nationwide murdered people simply to collect COVID subsidies at $48,000 per death,” the screenshot reads in part.

    “That should give people a bit of clarification on how our medical system works if they didn’t know already,” wrote one Instagram user in a lengthy post that included the screengrab.

    But hospitals have never been compensated by the federal government based on a patient dying of COVID-19 in one of their facilities, say industry officials and public health experts.

    During the pandemic, hospitals have received additional money for treating COVID-19 patients as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES, the 2020 law meant to address the economic fallout of the pandemic.

    But those increased payments don’t apply to every COVID-19 patient treated in a hospital, just the ones under Medicare, which is the federal healthcare program serving people 65 and over.

    Colin Milligan, a spokesperson for the American Hospital Association, confirmed that hospitals are currently eligible to receive a 20% increase in Medicare payments for caring for COVID-19 patients.

    “These patients are often very costly and time and labor-intensive for hospitals to treat,” he explained in an email Wednesday. “In addition, it is important to highlight that Medicare and Medicaid both reimburse hospitals far less than the cost of actually providing care.”

    Milligan also pointed to a statement the hospital trade group released in 2020 when concerns about the industry’s profits during the pandemic became a focus of debate.

    “Hospitals do not receive extra funds when patients die from COVID-19,” Rick Pollack, the association’s president, said in the statement. “They are not over-reporting COVID-19 cases. And, they are not making money on treating COVID-19.”

    And despite what the social media posts claim, the enhanced COVID-19 payments aren’t based on whether the patient lives or dies, experts said.

    “This is a stupid lie that apparently, like a zombie, refuses to die,” Gerald Kominski, a senior fellow and former director at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, wrote in an email. “The most common lie about this fact is that every COVID hospitalization (i.e., including on-Medicare) meant more payment (FALSE) and hospitals only got paid more if the patient died (FALSE).”

    In general, Medicare payments are based on the severity of the patient’s condition and the types of treatments provided, said Juliette Cubanski, deputy director of Medicare policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, a San Francisco nonprofit focused on health policy issues. A sicker patient will require more medical services, meaning their Medicare bill will be larger.

    The average cost of a COVID-19 hospitalization for a Medicare patient is about $24,000, she said, citing claims data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that oversees the government healthcare programs. But the reimbursement for more severely ill patients — such as those placed on a ventilator for multiple days — is roughly $40,000, according to KFF’s analysis.

    Social media posts citing a $48,000 subsidy for COVID-19 deaths appear to be taking that $40,000 average cost for treating the sickest COVID-19 patients and factoring in the special 20% reimbursement rate increase. But Cubanski argued that’s not a fair assessment of the potential payout to hospitals.

    “My understanding of the estimates from CMS is that they already include the 20% payment increase in the stated amount,” she wrote in an email. “So the payment for an extreme case would be $40k including the 20% increase, not $40k plus 20%.”

    Spokespersons for CMS and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the agency, didn’t respond to emails seeking comment this week.

    But President Joe Biden has announced the federal government’s declaration of a public health emergency for COVID-19 will end on May 11.

    That means the enhanced Medicare payments — along with other measures the federal government enacted to weather the pandemic — will soon be a thing of the past.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida blogger bill falsely tied to DeSantis

    Florida blogger bill falsely tied to DeSantis

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wants bloggers to register with the state or face fines.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. A bill filed in the Florida Senate would require bloggers to register with the state and submit periodic reports if they are paid for posts about elected officials. However, the bill was filed by Republican Florida Sen. Jason Brodeur, not DeSantis. The Republican governor said at a press conference on Tuesday that he does not support the bill.

    THE FACTS: Social media users have erroneously claimed in recent days that DeSantis is in favor of the bill, which was filed last week and introduced to the Senate on Tuesday.

    “Ron DeSantis wants bloggers who write about him to register with the state or face fines,” one tweet states. “This is exactly what fascism looks like.” It had received nearly 30,000 likes and more than 6,000 shares as of Wednesday.

    But it was Brodeur who filed the bill and DeSantis has not publicly supported the legislation since it was filed. DeSantis clarified his position on Tuesday at a press conference following his State of the State address.

    “I see these people filing bills and then there’s articles with my face on the article saying that oh, they’re going to have to — bloggers are going to have to register for the state,” he said. “And then it’s like, attributing it to me. And I’m like, ok, that’s not anything that I’ve ever supported, I don’t support.”

    Brodeur’s bill would require bloggers to register with the state of Florida if they are paid for posts about its governor, lieutenant governor, cabinet members or legislative officials. They would also have to file periodic reports with the state disclosing information such as who paid them and how much. Failure to file a report would result in fines of $25 a day, up to $2,500. The legislation states that it would not apply to content “on the website of a newspaper or other similar publication.”

    Bryan Griffin, the governor’s press secretary, confirmed to The Associated Press in an email that DeSantis “does not support the bill.” Griffin noted that the governor was clear about his position during Tuesday’s press conference.

    However, Griffin also explained that “the governor will ALWAYS consider every bill on its merits in final form if and when a bill passes the legislature and reaches his desk” before making a decision.

    The AP previously reported that DeSantis’ office was not aware of the blogger registration legislation until it was filed.

    First amendment groups have argued that the proposal violates press freedoms, according to the AP, and former Republican U.S. House speaker Newt Gingrich called the bill “insane” on Twitter. Brodeur is also sponsoring a separate bill that would make it easier to sue media for defamation, a proposal that DeSantis has pushed, the AP reported.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fake, combative dialogue added to Bill Gates interview

    Fake, combative dialogue added to Bill Gates interview

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Video of an interview between an Australian journalist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates shows the two sparred over what he has contributed to the world, and whether he has a behavioral pattern of stealing complex technology and profiting from it.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. This made-up dialogue was edited into the original interview, which didn’t address these topics. The audio appears to have been generated by artificial intelligence tools, according to an expert in manipulated media.

    THE FACTS: The altered clip circulating widely on social media this week appears to show Gates and a female journalist sitting across a table from each other in a contentious exchange.

    “In your own words, what have you contributed to the world?” she appears to ask. “I’m not sure if you’re aware, but I created the world’s most popular computer operating system,” Gates seems to reply.

    She then appears to challenge him on that and other points, suggesting he profited billions from COVID-19 vaccines, and asking him if he has a behavioral pattern of “taking technology from other people that you don’t understand, selling a product full of bugs, causing massive damage and profiting from it in a spectacular way.”

    After a few more tense back-and-forths, Gates appears to end the interview abruptly.

    However, an internet search and a closer analysis of the clip reveal that it has been altered from the original interview, which was cordial and featured different dialogue.

    The original interview video, published by ABC News Australia in January, covered different topics than those featured in the clip, including new AI tools, climate change, philanthropy, misinformation and dinners Gates had with the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, which Gates has repeatedly said he regrets.

    An analysis of the video and audio also shows the audio in the clip circulating on social media does not exactly match the facial movements in the video.

    “This is obviously a fake,” confirmed Hany Farid, a digital forensics expert at the University of California, Berkeley. “In addition to having access to the original for a point of comparison, the lip-sync in the fake video is quite poorly done. It does seem like the audio is AI-generated.”

    Farid said while it is difficult to sync audio and video with today’s easily-accessible AI tools, that will change as the tools improve. He urged people to stop sharing sensational and obviously fake content, understanding “that we all have a responsibility to create a trusted online ecosystem.”

    The altered clip also spreads some false or unverified claims, including the unfounded claim that COVID-19 vaccines have killed large numbers of people. Deaths caused by vaccination are extremely rare.

    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation confirmed the audio in the altered clip was fake.

    ___

    This story has been updated to add a response from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Posts promote unproven cancer remedies

    Posts promote unproven cancer remedies

    [ad_1]

    Cancer patients have long turned to alternative and supplementary treatments – but along with them comes the risk of ineffective, and potentially dangerous, bunk cures.

    These were on display on social media this week in widely shared posts that falsely suggested apricot pits, baking soda, a sugar-free diet or hot water with lemon would magically eradicate the disease.

    Medical experts warn that while alternative treatments can play a role in cancer care, using them inappropriately or instead of conventional care can be harmful. The FDA on its website warns against unproven cancer treatments, and advises patients to discuss cancer treatment options with a licensed health care provider.

    Here’s a look at the facts:

    CLAIM: Vitamin B17, found in apricot pits, kills cancer cells.

    THE FACTS: This isn’t supported by evidence. Though the naturally occurring chemical compound amygdalin, sometimes referred to as “vitamin B17,” has historically been proposed as an alternative cancer treatment, clinical research hasn’t shown it having any benefit, according to experts and the National Cancer Institute.

    Nor has a synthetic version called Laetrile proved effective at reducing tumor size or slowing tumor growth, said Dr. Dawn Mussallem, a cancer survivor and physician at the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center. On the contrary, the compound transformed into cyanide in the bodies of some patients, posing a risk of cyanide poisoning.

    Early studies of Laetrile in laboratory animals did not reduce tumor size or slow tumor growth and in cancer patients using amygdalin did not have any benefits; however, some showed cyanide toxicity,” Mussallem wrote in an email to The Associated Press.

    The National Cancer Institute’s website adds that “anecdotal reports and case reports have not shown laetrile to be an effective treatment for cancer.”

    The Food and Drug Administration hasn’t approved Laetrile as a cancer drug, and has banned its sale in interstate commerce. The product is still available in other countries.

    “Serious side effects have been reported with use of amygdalin or apricot kernels including nausea and vomiting, neuropathy, liver damage, confusion, coma, and even death,” said Mussallem.

    While there remains interest in studying amygdalin, she said cancer patients should only use it as part of a clinical trial at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.

    ___

    CLAIM: Baking soda is a “dirt cheap cure” for cancer.

    THE FACTS: That’s misleading. While some studies and clinical trials have looked into the effects of baking soda, or sodium bicarbonate, on cancer, there’s “limited evidence to date” that it has any effect, said Mussallem.

    One study, for example, found that water infused with baking soda activated breast and colon cells in mice, potentially making them more sensitive to chemotherapy.

    Another clinical trial looked at making the diets of pancreas cancer patients more alkaline using plant-based foods and sodium bicarbonate, finding it may help chemotherapy be more effective. But “larger studies are warranted,” Mussallem said.

    The idea that baking soda could have an effect on cancer comes from the idea that the pH of tumors differs from other body cells, according to Tim Rebbeck, a professor of medical oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

    “The state of pH, and things like that, are interesting features of cancer, but there’s no evidence that changing that pH by baking soda or anything else will impact cancer cure,” Rebbeck said in an interview.

    Sodium bicarbonate is generally considered safe but it can be toxic when consumed in large amounts, according to the National Capital Poison Center.

    ___

    CLAIM: You can “starve” cancer and heal it by eating a sugar-free diet.

    THE FACTS: That’s false. Reducing sugar intake is a good idea for general health, but there’s no evidence to suggest it will cure cancer.

    It’s true that there are indirect benefits of reducing sugar intake on cancer. For example, obesity is linked to higher risks of cancer, and higher sugar intake can contribute to higher caloric intake, which can lead to obesity, according to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

    It’s also true that all cells, including cancer cells, need sugar to survive and function, according to Rebbeck.

    However, there’s no evidence that cancer patients can selectively “starve” cancer cells of sugar without affecting other cells that we need to function, Rebbeck said.

    Plus, the body produces its own glucose if sugar from dietary intake gets too low, so dietary changes alone wouldn’t completely starve cells of sugar, Memorial Sloan Kettering explained on its website.

    ___

    CLAIM: Hot lemon water kills cancer cells.

    THE FACTS: There’s no scientific basis for this claim, according to Mussallem.

    “Neither hot water, nor lemon have proven anti-cancer action,” she said.

    While lab studies have shown citrus fruits may have some anti-cancer properties, no reputable human studies have shown they can cure cancer, she added.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zelenskyy didn’t say US troops needed to fight in Ukraine

    Zelenskyy didn’t say US troops needed to fight in Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: A video clip shows Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy saying that Americans will have to send their “sons and daughters” to the war in Ukraine.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. Zelenskyy was explaining that if Russia attacked NATO member states, which are U.S. allies, the U.S would likely send troops to protect those countries. He was not suggesting Americans would have to fight in Ukraine.

    THE FACTS: The clip, cut from a two-hour livestreamed news conference on the somber one-year anniversary of Russia’s war on Ukraine, shows Zelenskyy speaking with the audio dubbed by a translator.

    “The U.S. will have to send their sons and daughters exactly the same way as we are sending their sons and daughters to war,” he says. “And they will have to fight. Because it’s NATO that we’re talking about, and they will be dying, god forbid, because it’s a horrible thing.”

    Social media users posted the clip this week with claims Zelenskyy was calling for Americans to fight in Ukraine.

    “Zelensky’ is a dangerous sociopath who wants your children to fight his war,” reads a tweet shared more than 4,000 times.

    But the full context of the clip reveals that the Ukrainian president was talking about a hypothetical situation in which Russia invades NATO member countries, not calling for Americans to fight in his country.

    Video of the conference shows that Zelenskyy was answering a question about his message to Americans who believe the U.S. is giving too much support to Ukraine. He started by thanking Americans for their ongoing support, then addressed what might happen if Ukraine loses the war.

    “The U.S. is never going to give up on the NATO member states,” Zelenskyy says in the video. “If it happens so that Ukraine, due to various opinions and weakening, depleting of assistance, loses, Russia is going to enter Baltic states, NATO member states, and then the U.S. will have to send their sons and daughters exactly the same way as we are sending their sons and daughters to war. And they will have to fight. Because it’s NATO that we’re talking about, and they will be dying, god forbid, because it’s a horrible thing.”

    While the U.S. has sent weapons and other forms of aid to Ukraine, the Pentagon has said there are no American forces in the country besides a small number of troops assigned to the U.S. embassy.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Yes, you are legally required to pay your taxes

    Yes, you are legally required to pay your taxes

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: There are no laws requiring people to pay their taxes.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The Internal Revenue Service and several tax experts confirmed to The Associated Press that Title 26 of the U.S. Code requires individuals to pay income taxes. They said that faulty legal arguments claiming there’s no such law have been around for decades but have not been successful in court.

    THE FACTS: With April’s federal income tax deadline approaching, social media users are reviving claims that paying taxes isn’t even legally required.

    Many are sharing a short video compiling interviews from a number of purported experts, including a tax lawyer, a tax advisor and a former IRS agent — all of whom claim they discovered through their own research that Americans aren’t obligated to pay income taxes because it isn’t spelled out in law.

    “If there’s no law that binds us to paying taxes. The question I have is, why are we?” wrote one Facebook user who shared the more than three-minute video. The post has been liked or shared more than 5,000 times as of Tuesday.

    But federal officials and tax experts dismiss the arguments as frivolous and say the law is clear: paying federal taxes is a requirement.

    Raphael Tulino, a spokesperson for the IRS, directed the AP to a website it maintains to address many of the common claims made by those opposed to following tax laws, including the notion that paying federal income taxes is purely voluntary.

    “The requirement to pay taxes is not voluntary,” the IRS’ response on the website reads. “Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code clearly imposes a tax on the taxable income of individuals, estates, and trusts, as determined by the tables set forth in that section.”

    The IRS also notes on its website that the obligation to pay income taxes is described in section 6151, which requires taxpayers to submit payment with their tax returns.

    Jonathan Siegel, a professor at George Washington University’s law school who has written about income tax myths, agreed with the agency’s assessment.

    “No, there isn’t even a grain of truth to the theories in the video, nor does it contain any new or surprising arguments,” he wrote in an email, directing the AP to his personal website breaking down income tax myths. “There is indeed a law that requires ordinary, working Americans to pay income tax, assuming they earn enough to be over the minimum income threshold.”

    Federal tax laws are contained in the Internal Revenue Code, also known as Title 26 of the United States Code, Siegel explains on his website. The U.S. Code is the compilation of all the laws passed by Congress.

    “The Internal Revenue Code is the law that requires people to pay taxes,” he writes on the website. “The most important statutory provision with regard to income taxes is the very first: section one of the tax code, 26 U.S.C. § 1. Section one imposes the income tax.”

    Garrett Watson, a senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan tax policy research group in Washington, said tax protesters continue to misinterpret the IRS’ use of the phrase “voluntary compliance” in its publications as meaning paying taxes and filing tax returns isn’t legally required.

    But the term refers to the notion that individuals are, at least initially, responsible for determining and paying the correct amount of tax and filling out the necessary forms, rather than the government determining the tax for them.

    Watson also noted that legal arguments against paying taxes have been around for decades but have seen little success in courts.

    In fact, one of the people featured in a widely circulating version of the social media video is Sherry Jackson, a former IRS employee and tax preparer who was convicted of willfully and intentionally failing to file tax returns.

    The Georgia resident raised several common tax defier arguments in federal court but was ultimately sentenced to four years in federal prison in 2008.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court will not hear case to oust Biden, reinstate Trump

    Supreme Court will not hear case to oust Biden, reinstate Trump

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case to remove President Joe Biden from office and reinstate former President Donald Trump in his place.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The Supreme Court has not decided to hear such a case. On Feb. 21, the justices rejected for a second time to hear a case that cites baseless 2020 election fraud claims to call for the court to oust from office hundreds of elected officials, including Biden, as well as to prevent them from holding any elected government position again. Several days later, a website published an article incorrectly stating that the case was going ahead, but the post has since been taken down.

    THE FACTS: Nearly one week after the Supreme Court justices doubled down on their decision not to hear the suit, social media users falsely claimed the opposite.

    One Instagram post shared a screenshot of a headline reading: “Supreme Court To Hear Case To Reinstate Donald Trump Over ‘Rigged’ Election.” It had received nearly 1,400 likes as of Wednesday.

    The full article, which was published on Feb. 26, four days after the decision, stated that the court was “reconsidering hearing” the lawsuit “after previously dismissing it earlier this year.” It has since been taken down, and an article published on Feb. 28 by the same author correctly reports that the court rejected the case.

    Other posts made days after the decision echoed the original article’s claim that the case still had a chance of being heard. They received tens of thousands of likes and shares on Twitter.

    The suitAdams v. Brunson, et al.was previously dismissed by a lower court, and that ruling was upheld on appeal, according to court documents. It was then appealed to the Supreme Court in October 2022. The suit argues that Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence and 385 members of Congress committed treason when they failed to probe baseless claims that the 2020 election was rigged.

    Further, it calls for the removal of these officials and a ban on their future ability to hold elected office, as well as “the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.” It does not specifically name Trump.

    In January 2023, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case and an appeal was filed later that month. The court rejected the case for a second time on Feb. 21.

    Aziz Huq, a professor of law at the University of Chicago who is an expert on constitutional law, told The Associated Press that it is unlikely the Supreme Court will ever hear a case such as Adams v. Brunson, given that it relies on a false narrative.

    “Certainly something that is founded upon the irresponsible conspiracy mongering fallacies that this petition is based upon seems to me an unlikely fodder for the Supreme Court,” he said.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Experts: Earthquakes can’t be predicted

    Experts: Earthquakes can’t be predicted

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Astrologists and geologists predict that a massive earthquake similar to the quake that hit Turkey on Monday will strike India and Pakistan in 15 days.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. It is not possible to predict earthquakes, according to experts. While parts of India and Pakistan are very seismically active and scientists do calculate the probability that earthquakes will occur in various regions, there is no way to predict when and where earthquakes will take place.

    THE FACTS: Following Monday’s 7.8 magnitude earthquake that struck Turkey and Syria, claims spread on social media saying astrologists and geologists were predicting that a similar quake would hit India and Pakistan.

    “Astrologists and geologists predict Turkey like massive earthquake in Pakistan & India in next 15 days,” reads one Instagram post. The post has garnered more than 4,000 likes since it was posted Monday.

    But scientists can’t predict earthquakes, experts say. No scientists have ever predicted a major earthquake, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

    “There’s no science, magic, or wizardry right now that exists that makes one able to predict an earthquake within a certain window,” said Michel Bruneau, a professor at the University at Buffalo and an expert in earthquake engineering. “Currently, scientists cannot predict earthquakes on a precise date.”

    “We don’t understand some fundamental physics of earthquakes,” said Egill Hauksson, a research professor of geophysics at the California Institute of Technology. “Telling the time when an earthquake will happen has not been possible so far.”

    Scientists do estimate the probability that earthquakes will occur in specific regions during certain time frames, according to the USGS.

    “You can still do averages. You can still run statistics,” Bruneau said. “You can say, what’s the return period between small, medium and large earthquakes, and then run statistical analysis through all of that.”

    India and Pakistan are very seismically active areas, Hauksson said. But the supposed prediction that a major earthquake will hit India and Pakistan in the next 15 days has no scientific merit.

    “Scientists have tried every possible method to try to predict earthquakes,” Bruneau said. “Nobody has been able to crack it and make a credible prediction.”

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Posts exaggerate insurance incentives for child vaccinations

    Posts exaggerate insurance incentives for child vaccinations

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Blue Cross Blue Shield pays doctors a $40,000 bonus for administering childhood immunizations to at least 100 patients under 2 years old and an $80,000 bonus for vaccinating 200 children.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association is a national federation of more than three dozen locally operated companies, and doesn’t offer such an incentive across the board, the group confirmed. Every company can set its own performance-based incentives, and while vaccinations may be one category, that wouldn’t be the only measure taken into account, multiple experts agreed. The numbers being cited were incorrectly estimated based on data included in a 2016 incentive program for a Michigan Blue Cross Blue Shield plan, and actual payouts that year were well under $40,000.

    THE FACTS: Social media users are recirculating a myth that’s been spreading online for years that the insurance group Blue Cross Blue Shield is using a hefty monetary incentive to entice doctors into administering as many childhood vaccinations as possible.

    “In case you missed it, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays their pediatricians a $40,000 bonus if they have 100 patients under the age of two fully vaxxed,” one conservative social media personality said in an Instagram video that received nearly 19,000 likes. “But they’ll lose the entire bonus unless 63% of them are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu.”

    Other posts also claimed this incentive doubles as patient volume increases, paying up to an $80,000 bonus for vaccinating 200 kids, while also tying it to COVID-19 vaccines to suggest that these incentives are being leveraged to push COVID-19 vaccinations based on volume and profit alone.

    The users do not offer any evidence for their claims. However, the same numbers were cited in a 2016 blog post titled: “How Much Money Do Pediatricians Really Make From Vaccines?”

    The document that blog post referred to was a 2016 edition of a Performance Recognition Program specifically for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Blue Care Network of Michigan. In a table titled “Quality Incentive Measures,” the program lays out that doctors who meet 63% of their plan goal for childhood immunizations receive a $400 payout.

    The blog then took these numbers and estimated that “the average American pediatrician has 1,546 patients,” though it gave no source for that information. It then used that figure to suggest that “if your pediatrician has just 100 fully-vaccinated patients turning 2 this year, that’s $40,000,” and “if your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000.”

    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan said in a statement to The Associated Press that it “periodically provides financial incentives for physicians for administering the recommended vaccines for children under the age of two.”

    In 2016, the payments per provider for its HMO’s incentive program ranged between $400 to $9,600, according to the Michigan group — well under the $40,000 to $80,000 range claimed.

    Such incentives are common, said Thomas Buchmueller, a professor of risk management and insurance at the University of Michigan.

    Different companies offer plans with varying incentives to physicians for performance targets, and employers can choose among a variety of plans, added Mark V. Pauly, a professor emeritus of Health Care Management at the University of Pennsylvania, who studies health insurance and medical economics. Vaccination percentages may be one such target, though it would be paired with other quality measures, he said. Incentives are usually tied to quality metrics such as patient satisfaction.

    “I think a key point is that these incentives apply to vaccines that are widely understood to be very beneficial, which means that a greater vaccination rate indicates higher quality of care,” Buchmueller said.

    Other incentives may be tied to practices such as promoting chlamydia screening due to negative side effects of infections that go undiagnosed, or checking young children for cavities, said Nadereh Pourat, a health policy and management professor in the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health.

    “I can say in general that insurance companies or public payers have used both financial incentives and penalties to promote use of important preventive care in the past, but I don’t think the amounts are excessive or such incentives are long term,” Pourat said. “The hope is to get providers used to routinely providing evidence-based care but not to continue doing so forever.”

    Blue Cross Blue Shield Association said in a statement to the AP that every Blue Cross Blue Shield company sets its own value-based contracts with local providers, and these vary from state to state, though vaccinations would not be the only measure to which an incentive is tied.

    “The purpose of performance-based incentives, where they exist, is to reward implementation of well-established evidence-based best practices in the care of our members,” the association said. “While vaccinations may fall into that category, they would not be the sole performance measure. Any incentives cover a broad collection of best practices.”

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chemical on derailed Ohio train isn’t banned in all products

    Chemical on derailed Ohio train isn’t banned in all products

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: A train that derailed in East Palestine, Ohio, was carrying a chemical that was banned in 1974.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. Vinyl chloride, one of the chemicals on the freight train that derailed in East Palestine last month, was banned for use in aerosol products in 1974 by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. However, the compound is still allowed to be used in other products, such as plastic.

    THE FACTS: Weeks after the Feb. 3 derailment, conspiratorial claims are continuing to spread on social media. One such post suggests the train was filled with a chemical that was banned in 1974.

    “Trying to understand why a train was carrying over 300,000 gallons of a chemical that was banned in 1974,” reads the text over a close-up image of a person’s narrowed eyes surrounded by math symbols. One Twitter post that shared the image had received more than 7,000 likes as of Thursday.

    The image doesn’t name vinyl chloride as the chemical to which it is referring. However, the compound, which was being carried by the train that derailed in East Palestine, was banned for use in aerosol products in 1974 by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    “The Commission has determined that the degree and nature of the hazard presented by aerosol products containing vinyl chloride is such that the public health and safety can be adequately served only by keeping these products out of the marketplace,” the commission’s 1974 statement on the ban reads. “Therefore, all such products would be banned.”

    But the ban did not affect vinyl chloride’s use in plastic products and the chemical is still found in such items today. For example, it is commonly used to make polyvinyl hard plastic resin, a material in PVC plastic piping, Neil Donahue, a professor of chemistry at Carnegie Mellon University, told The Associated Press.

    “To the best of my knowledge the only ban is indeed the use of vinyl chloride in spray cans,” Donahue said. He also noted that it’s not uncommon for hazardous materials to be transported by rail.

    According to Donahue, the reason vinyl chloride was banned in aerosol products was because spray cans allow people to directly breathe in the toxic chemical. Vinyl chloride is associated with an increased risk of liver and other cancers, according to the federal government’s National Cancer Institute.

    According to the National Transportation Safety Board’s Feb. 22 preliminary report on the derailment, there were five tank cars carrying 115,580 gallons of vinyl chloride, not 300,000 as the social media post states. The AP reported that about 1.8 million gallons of liquid waste has been collected from the derailment site, according to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

    Following the derailment, the compound was slowly released into the air and intentionally burned to prevent an uncontrolled blast.

    A group of senators including Ohio Sens. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat, and JD Vance, a Republican, introduced bipartisan legislation on Wednesday that aims to improve rail safety. The bill seeks to address regulatory questions that arose from the incident in East Palestine, including why the state of Ohio was not told about the hazardous load and why the train’s crew didn’t learn sooner of an impending equipment malfunction, according to AP reporting.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US has provided money, not just equipment, to Ukraine

    US has provided money, not just equipment, to Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: The U.S. is not providing cash to Ukraine; it only supports the country through donated military equipment.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. While the U.S. is indeed providing weapons and equipment to Ukraine, it has also provided billions in financial assistance to the country following Russia’s invasion.

    THE FACTS: Former Congressman Adam Kinzinger, a Republican from Illinois, made the inaccurate suggestion recently while taking aim at Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has been critical of U.S. aid to Ukraine.

    “People like MTG in re: #Ukraine. The aid is not pallets of cash. It’s in the form of military equipment, assigned a value, that is donated,” Kinzinger wrote in a tweet. “That equipment is usually older and would be replaced in the next few years anyway, at a cost. I’m sure she doesn’t understand this.”

    But while the U.S. has indeed sent Bradley vehicles, ammunition, weapons and other equipment to Ukraine during its war with Russia, the support doesn’t stop there.

    “We’re not providing only military assistance,” Tom Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations with expertise on U.S. foreign policy and Ukraine, told The Associated Press. “We are obviously providing financial assistance — budgetary support — and there’s humanitarian assistance as well.”

    Between January 2022 and January 2023, the U.S. committed more than $26 billion to Ukraine in financial assistance, according to data compiled by the Ukraine Support Tracker at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank. That’s about a third of the roughly $77 billion in total aid noted by Kiel, including humanitarian and military assistance, pledged by the U.S. government. The numbers represent money promised, not entirely distributed.

    Another tally from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget places the total amount of aid approved by Congress in 2022 for supporting the Ukrainian government and allies at about $113 billion. That includes about $27 billion in economic support funds, $7.9 billion for international disaster assistance and $6.6 billion to support and relocate refugees.

    Graham noted that the war has wrecked Ukraine’s economy and that U.S. assistance has helped keep the government functioning.

    The U.S. Agency for International Development has in releases and a report to Congress outlined how budgetary support to the Ukrainian government has been used. Some of the funding has been spent, for example, on social assistance payments and salaries for health care workers, first responders and educators. It also helps cover pensions and support Ukrainians displaced by the war.

    Still, the largest bucket of overall U.S. aid committed to Ukraine — more than $46 billion, according to Kiel’s tracker — is military support.

    U.S. funding to support Ukraine, while appropriated by Congress, comes from different sources. For example, in some cases, assistance comes from funding that is periodically tapped by the Biden administration in the form of a “presidential drawdown.” There’s also the Defense Department’s Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.

    Much of the military equipment has indeed been pulled directly from existing U.S. military inventory, as Kinzinger noted in his tweet. But funding has also been used to purchase new weapons from industry manufacturers as well.

    Graham said in some cases assistance is also used to replenish existing equipment provided to Ukraine by U.S. allies. He added that military support also comes in the form of things such as training and logistical support.

    Members of Congress have questioned how closely the U.S. is tracking its aid to Ukraine to ensure that it is not subject to fraud or ending up in the wrong hands. The Pentagon’s inspector general told lawmakers at a Tuesday hearing that his office has found no evidence of such corruption or wrongdoing, but cautioned that investigations are only in their early stages.

    An AP inquiry to Kinzinger through his group, Country First, was not returned.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, ivermectin isn’t being withheld as cancer ‘cure’

    No, ivermectin isn’t being withheld as cancer ‘cure’

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Searches on the National Institutes of Health website show that ivermectin is a cure for cancer but it is being suppressed.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The website shows that some studies have explored the use of ivermectin in relation to cancer. There are no studies demonstrating the drug cures cancer in humans, experts say, but some are researching the use of ivermectin in combination with other therapies to treat breast cancer.

    THE FACTS: A popular Facebook video is falsely suggesting that ivermectin, an approved antiparasitic drug that was peddled as an unproven treatment for COVID-19, is a known cure for cancer but is being withheld by officials.

    “If you go to the NIH website and search for ivermectin and cancer, you will see that they have known for years — years, probably decades — that they have the cure for cancer,” a woman in the video claims. “And they had the cure for numerous other diseases and ailments and they’ve been hiding it from us.”

    But experts say there is no data showing the drug is a “cure” for cancer.

    A search on the NIH website for “ivermectin” and “cancer,” as the video instructs, simply shows that there have been early studies exploring if ivermectin can play a role in slowing cancer cell growth or treating tumors.

    Dr. Susanne Arnold, associate director for clinical translation at the Markey Cancer Center in Kentucky, told The Associated Press that there have been preclinical studies exploring using ivermectin and similar drugs to slow cancer cell growth in labs, with some interesting results. She noted, however, that such studies aren’t the same as proving the drugs work in humans.

    “I know of no reports of clinical trials that yielded successful results in humans with cancer,” Arnold said in an email.

    That said, some cancer researchers believe ivermectin could be promising when used in combination with other drugs and are conducting further studies.

    Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of the immuno-oncology department at City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in California, has studied using ivermectin in combination with a specific antibody, referred to as anti-PD1, for treating breast cancer — with positive results in mice. In short, the research explores ivermectin’s role in inducing cancer cell death and allowing T cells to infiltrate tumors. Lee and fellow researchers are preparing to run a clinical trial in humans.

    “Certainly by itself ivermectin is not a cure or even an effective treatment for breast cancer,” Lee said in an interview.

    Lee acknowledged that ivermectin has been a controversial subject in relation to COVID-19, but he said his research suggests the drug should continue to be explored for its potential as part of cancer treatments.

    “I pride myself as a rigorous, fair-minded scientist,” Lee said. “And in our hands, through many years of experiments, it has promise — but not by itself.”

    The National Cancer Institute, part of the National Institutes of Health, said in a statement that it “disseminates evidence-based, scientifically accurate information about cancer to the public. It does not appear from a search of our resources that the NCI maintains any information supporting the claim that ivermectin is a ‘cure for cancer.’”

    ___

    This story has been updated to add a statement from the National Cancer Institute.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Photos, videos of dead birds are unrelated to Ohio derailment

    Photos, videos of dead birds are unrelated to Ohio derailment

    [ad_1]

    The recent burning of toxic chemicals at the site of a train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, has left concerned residents seeking answers about potential health effects on their families as well as pets, livestock and wildlife in the area.

    As residents seek details about the environmental impact, false and misleading information online has stepped into the void. For example, social media posts sharing photos and videos of dead birds in states beyond Ohio are spreading with false claims that the deaths are related to the chemical release. The posts have amassed thousands of shares this week even though they are unrelated.

    Here’s a closer look at the facts.

    CLAIM: Photo shows birds that “dropped dead” in Kentucky following the Ohio derailment.

    THE FACTS: This is false. The photo, which shows several birds lying dead on a road, was taken in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 2018.

    A Facebook user shared the photo, falsely claiming the incident was related to the toll left by the Ohio train derailment and the toxic chemicals that were intentionally burned.

    “Maybe we should be concerned with what’s going on In Ohio,” the user’s post reads. “These birds dropped de@d in Ky.”

    A reverse image search shows that the photo was featured in an article published by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, a statewide newspaper, on April 9, 2018. The photo’s caption states that several dead birds were found near the intersection of Main Street and 7th Street in downtown Little Rock that month. A local ornithologist told the paper that the birds likely ate fermented berries, which can intoxicate them, causing them to fall out of trees, or off of buildings, and die.

    ___

    CLAIM: A video shows birds in northern Indiana that died from hazardous chemicals released after the Ohio train derailment.

    THE FACTS: False. The video misrepresents dead birds near New Carlisle, Indiana, as an example of the event’s ill-effects.

    The video shows a flock of birds hanging side-by-side on a power line upside down, some with their beaks open. More birds can be seen lying, apparently dead, on the ground as the camera pans down.

    “Dead birds on a line in Indiana – nothing to see here,” a tweet that shared the video reads, along with hashtags such as “#OhioChemicalDisaster” and “#OhioCoverup.” It had received more than 2,400 likes and shares as of Saturday.

    But the original video appeared on Facebook nearly two weeks before the derailment, making it impossible for the two incidents to be related.

    Shelly Lister Struss, a resident of Buchanan, Michigan, a small city located about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from New Carlisle, posted the video on Jan. 22. She confirmed to the AP that she was the one who filmed it, about 2 miles (3 kilometers) outside of the center of New Carlisle.

    While the death of these birds was not due to the derailment, experts were uncertain of the precise cause.

    Marty Benson, a spokesperson for the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, told the AP that although the DNR “has not been on the site of this incident,” it is possible the birds “suffered electrocution from a power surge on the line.” He noted that disease is an unlikely culprit, as that would result in “a wider dispersion of the birds on the ground.”

    Michael Bianski, a spokesperson for Indiana Michigan Power Co., which services the area in which the video was shot, said that a more plausible explanation is a phenomenon called conductor, or line, gallop — the sudden, rapid movement of power lines caused by wind gusts.

    “This can kill birds perched on power lines as whiplash from the motion can break their necks,” he wrote in an email to the AP.

    According to Bianski, it is “highly unlikely” the birds were electrocuted, given that they only appeared to be touching one power line and “electricity is dangerous when it is trying to move between two objects or finding a path to the ground.”

    — Associated Press writer Melissa Goldin in New York contributed this report.

    ___

    CLAIM: A photo shows birds that died in a Lexington, Kentucky, parking lot due to the hazardous chemicals released in East Palestine.

    THE FACTS: False. Social media users are sharing a post that includes three photos of the parking lot from different angles along with a close up of a dead black bird to suggest that toxic chemicals from the derailment have spread as far as Lexington, more than 300 miles away.

    “Here’s a parking lot full of DEAD BIRDS in Lexington, KY. 350 miles SW of East Palestine, OH,” reads one post on Twitter with hashtags such as “#OhioChemicalDisaster” and “#OhioCoverup.”

    “Dead birds falling from the sky in LEXINGTON KY. Did Ohio chemical spill make it to Lexington?! The rain won’t help!,” reads another post on Twitter.

    The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources told the AP that the birds were likely killed due to a storm that moved through the region overnight Wednesday into Thursday.

    Weather reports confirm there was a thunderstorm Thursday morning at 3:54 a.m.

    The bird carcasses were located in the parking lot of Haltech, a company that manufactures motor vehicle equipment. Local media also reported that the birds were found in the Haltech parking lot.

    Kevin Kelly, a spokesperson with the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, told the AP that the bird’s carcasses were examined Friday by Dr. Christine Casey, wildlife veterinarian at the state’s fish and wildlife resources.

    Casey concluded the deaths were likely caused by blunt force trauma due to the broken bones, hemorrhaging, bruising and abrasions on the birds.

    “The birds probably got startled by thunder and/or lightning, took flight and flew into a solid surface,” Kelly said.

    — Associated Press writer Karena Phan in Los Angeles contributed this report.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Ali Swenson in New York contributed to this report.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Video recycles dubious statistics about lawmakers’ crimes

    Video recycles dubious statistics about lawmakers’ crimes

    [ad_1]

    CLAIM: Statistics show that among members of Congress, 117 have bankrupted at least two businesses, 71 can’t receive credit cards due to bad credit and 84 have been arrested for drunk driving.

    AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Those purported statistics have circulated via email and social media posts for years, but are not backed by evidence. The numbers were largely lifted from a dubious 1999 blog post that did not provide specific sources or details. While members of Congress have been accused of various crimes over the years, experts say there are no known databases that track such crimes committed by members of Congress.

    THE FACTS: An old copy-and-paste missive purporting to offer statistics about crimes committed by members of Congress has found renewed energy online.

    In a TikTok video viewed by millions and also shared on Instagram, a 2012 video clip shows Mark Bailey, now chancellor of the Dallas Theological Seminary, relaying a text from a son and asking whether the statistics are “NBA or NFL?”

    “Thirty-six have been accused of spousal abuse. Seven have been arrested for fraud. Nineteen have been accused of writing bad checks,” he says. “One-hundred seventeen have directly or indirectly been bankrupted at least two businesses. Three have done time for assault. Seventy-one, I repeat 71, cannot get a credit card due to their bad credit. Fourteen have been arrested on drug-related charges. Eight have been arrested for shoplifting. Twenty-one currently are defendants in lawsuits and 84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year.”

    Bailey adds: “How many of you think NBA? How many of you think NFL? Well the answer is neither. It’s the 435 members of the United States Congress.”

    But there is no factual support for those statistics, which have been routinely recycled in emails and social media posts for years — long before Bailey rattled them off in 2012. Additionally, Congress is made up of 535 members: 100 senators and 435 representatives.

    The purported numbers are largely lifted from a political blog post, whose author isn’t named, that was published in 1999. That post claimed to have scoured public records, media reports and court records, but it offered no specific sources for the information and didn’t offer details about the lawmakers supposedly accused of each crime.

    The post has since been deleted, but the figures have continued to spread online — with some deviations made along the way.

    Experts contacted by The Associated Press said they were unaware of any sources or databases that track crimes among members of Congress in such a way.

    “In general, I’ve never heard of such a list and doubt that one exists,” said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist and professor in Dartmouth College’s Department of Government.

    Bailey told the AP in an email that he was surprised to learn that people were circulating the video of him speaking in 2012 and reiterated that he was reading from a piece that a son passed along to him.

    “I haven’t used the piece since and with the information you sent – I wouldn’t unless I could fact check it,” he said.

    ___

    Arijeta Lajka contributed to this report.

    ___

    This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.

    [ad_2]

    Source link