ReportWire

Tag: Facebook Fact-checks

  • Taylor Swift didn’t lose $125 million for endorsing Harris

    Taylor Swift didn’t lose $125 million for endorsing Harris

    [ad_1]

    Is it true that the U.S. singer-songwriter Taylor Swift lost millions of dollars in a brand contract after endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign? 

    That’s what a Sept. 14 Facebook post claimed, but its source was not a legitimate news source. 

    “Hot News: Taylor Swift unexpectedly lost a $125 million brand contract after a massive advertising campaign,” the post said. It showed an image of Harris on the left and Swift on the right, with tears in her eyes.

    The claim was also shared in Spanish. 

    (Screengrab from Facebook)

    The post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    PolitiFact contacted Swift publicists, but we received no response.

    Swift posted Sept. 10 on Instagram that she will be voting for Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

    But PolitiFact found no credible news stories in the Nexis database or public statements by Swift saying she lost millions of dollars in a brand contract for supporting Harris.

    When we did a Google search of the post’s headline, we found a Sept. 12 article with a similar title published on Esspots, a website that describes itself as a creator of satirical content. The article also had a tag that says “satire.”

    The Facebook post also sent users to a link for the supposed “full story” on the URL celebtoday24h.com. But this story is a copy-and-paste from the Esspots article — only without the satire disclaimer.

    The Facebook post’s image of Swift is from a 2020 documentary about the making of her album “Folklore.”

    We rate this claim False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Claims about Kamala Harris’ college studies began as satire

    Claims about Kamala Harris’ college studies began as satire

    [ad_1]

    More than 30 years after Vice President Kamala Harris graduated from Howard University in Washington, D.C., and law school in California, her former college professors are speaking out about her poor performance. At least that’s what viral social media posts claim.

    “Howard University professors confirm: “Kamala was the worst student ever,” read a now-deleted Sept. 13 Facebook post. The post features a photo of Harris and a man seated behind a desk and links to a website for more information. We saw similar claims on X.

    A different Instagram post uses similar language but features a different man, purportedly another professor. “Kamala’s Berkeley law professor says she topped his ‘worst student ever’ list,” the Sept. 12 post claimed. 

    The Facebook and Instagram posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Threads and Instagram.)

    Neither professor’s critique actually happened. These claims started as satire but were shared out of context. It also appears one satirical post inspired another on a second satire website.

    The Facebook post’s language originated Sept. 10 from a satire website, Esspots.com, and was shared on that site’s Facebook account. The website and its Facebook account, SpaceX Fanclub, are marked as satire.

    A reverse-image search shows the photo of the man in the Facebook claim is Bradford Grant, Howard University architecture professor. Grant came to Howard in 2007, according to his CV, long after Harris graduated in 1986 with her bachelor’s degree in political science and economics.

    The man in the Instagram post, meanwhile, is Jerry Sandusky, a reverse-image search found. Sandusky, a former assistant football coach at Penn State University, was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison in 2012 after being convicted of 45 counts of child sex abuse.

    The Instagram post also claims to quote Harris’ Berkeley law professor, but Harris graduated law school in 1989 at what was then University of California Hastings, now called the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, or UC Law SF — not Berkeley Law in Berkeley, California. (Harris was born in Oakland and spent much of her childhood in nearby Berkeley but did not attend graduate school there.) 

    The Instagram post’s language comes from America’s Last Line of Defense, a network of satirical websites and social media pages that posts memes and made-up headlines involving political and cultural figures designed to make fun of conservatives. 

    Satire websites have been the sources of recent viral false social media posts posing as news about politics and culture. Christopher Blair, the man behind America’s Last Line of Defense, told The New York Times in June that more accounts and websites were using AI to mimic his  content.

    We rate these claims about Harris’ college professors dissing her academic acumen Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CMT didn’t boycott Taylor Swift

    CMT didn’t boycott Taylor Swift

    [ad_1]

    Singer-songwriter Taylor Swift hasn’t been banned from Country Music Television despite an old satirical post that’s regaining traction online. 

    “In a move that shocked the country music community and beyond, Country Music Television (CMT) has announced a permanent boycott of Taylor Swift,” a Sept. 16 Facebook post said. “Bold decision accompanied by harsh statement ‘Her music is worse than Garth Brooks.’”

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    Paramount, which owns CMT, didn’t immediately respond to PolitFact’s questions about the claim. But we found no press releases from the company or other credible evidence, such as public statements or news coverage, to corroborate the Facebook post. 

    Rather, an April post on CMT’s website featured three of Swift’s music videos in a story about past CMT Music Awards winners for Video of the Year.  

    What’s more: We found a nearly identical report of CMT denouncing Swift on a self-described satire site. 

    “Breaking,” the Feb. 14 headline said. “CMT issues lifetime ban on Taylor Swift, ‘She’s worse than Garth Brooks.’”

    This blog post is clearly labeled satire. 

    This Facebook post isn’t. We rate it False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No evidence ramen noodles contain deadly bacteria

    No evidence ramen noodles contain deadly bacteria

    [ad_1]

    Ramen noodle lovers everywhere can slurp in peace. A social media claim that a deadly bacteria was found in the products is bogus.

    The claim appears to have been instantly generated using artificial intelligence. 

    “A deadly outbreak linked to ramen noodles has sparked global fear as multiple deaths have been reported,” a Sept. 17 Instagram video said through a talking fish. 

    The video also said children have gotten sick and died within hours and that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned that a third of infected adults may die. Experts traced it to “a dangerous bacteria named streptococcal,” the video said.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    The Instagram account’s profile page links to a product called Headlines, which, for a fee, says subscribers can “experience the future of news with AI-driven personalized content texted directly to you.” It promises to send “fact-checked news texts based on your preferences.”

    It appears the fact-check of this Instagram post failed, however.

    (Instagram screenshot)

    The video shows screenshots of three online articles that describe five children from other countries dying after eating instant noodles. Two of the incidents happened in South Africa in 2021, and the third in Pakistan happened in May. 

    We found other social media users making similar claims, citing the five overseas deaths.

    None of the articles mentioned streptococcal bacteria. A 2022 news report said Grandisync, the noodle manufacturer, said the children in South Africa died from ingesting an insecticide, not the noodles. We contacted the National Consumer Commission in South Africa, which was investigating the company, but received no response.

    It’s unclear from other Pakistan news reports what caused the children’s deaths.

    Back in the U.S., the CDC website shows no press releases or active investigations about foodborne outbreaks in ramen noodles, or about streptococcal being found in them.

    Streptococcus is a contagious bacteria that can cause different types of infections, from minor ones such as strep throat to potentially deadly ones such as necrotizing fasciitis, a flesh-eating disease. Streptococcus is usually spread by respiratory droplets or direct contact, but rarely can be spread through improperly handled food, the CDC said.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, meanwhile, in May announced the company Sun Noodle voluntarily recalled about 37,000 cases of a frozen noodle product it said contained undeclared egg white powder. In December, New India Bazar recalled Maggi 2 Minute Noodles because of undeclared peanuts.

    In 2019, a brand of veggie ramen was recalled because of hard-boiled eggs potentially contaminated with listeria.

    But there are no recent ramen noodle recalls. We searched the FDA’s recalls, market withdrawals and safety alerts website and found nothing about ramen noodle products being recalled because of a deadly bacteria.

    The claim that the CDC warned that people are at risk of death from a deadly bacteria found in ramen noodles is not backed by evidence. We rate it False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No proof ABC lost advertising because of presidential debate

    No proof ABC lost advertising because of presidential debate

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump were the stars of the Sept. 10 presidential debate, but following the faceoff, some social media users have focused on ABC News, the debate’s television host. 

    “ABC lost $27M in ad revenue after advertisers pulled ads from the network after the way they hosted the debate on Tuesday, September 10th, stating that it wasn’t conducted fairly,” read a Sept. 13 Threads post. “GREAT. WONDERFUL. I COULD NOT BE HAPPIER.” 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.  (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.) 

    (Screengrab from Threads)

    The post cited no particular reports as evidence, but a Google search of “ABC lost” and “$27 million” turned up a page on SpaceXMania.com that was clearly labeled “satire.” 

    “ABC Loses $27 Million in Advertising After Debate Fallout, ‘Won’t Be Hosting Any Debates In The Future,’” the story’s headline read. Without naming specific brands or advertisers, the piece claimed “five major advertisers” dropped their ABC News advertising, including “a luxury car brand,” “a major fast-food chain” and “a high-end fashion label and a beverage giant.” 

    Additionally, SpaceXMania.com’s “about us” page said the site’s “mission” is “to bring you the freshest fake news, some sassy analysis, and a good dose of satire,” with some additional focus on topics connected to Elon Musk, who owns SpaceX. 

    “Quick heads up, though — every single article on our site is about as real as a unicorn sipping on a rainbow smoothie,” the page said. “They’re pure fantasy, folks, not a snapshot of reality.”

    SpaceXMania.com’s “disclaimer” page further clarified its use of the satire tag.

    “Please note that the article(s) under the category ‘SATIRE’ are satirical in nature and are not meant to be taken seriously,” it said. “These articles are meant to be humorous and are often entirely made up.”

    We searched using Google and the Nexis news database and found no credible reports that ABC lost advertisers or ad revenue because of its handling of the Sept. 10 presidential debate in Philadelphia. We also found no statements from ABC saying that the network had lost major advertisers.

    We contacted ABC News and received no response before publication. 

    This wasn’t the first baseless claim about the network that hosted the debate between Harris and Trump. PolitiFact rated claims that ABC fired the debate moderators Pants on Fire!

    This fabricated story about ABC’s post-debate revenue merits the same: Pants on Fire!

    RELATED: No, ABC News did not fire presidential debate moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis

    RELATED: Fact-checking Kamala Harris and Donald Trump’s first 2024 presidential debate

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Title 1 schools lists are being misleadingly described

    Title 1 schools lists are being misleadingly described

    [ad_1]

    Following a Sept. 4 shooting at Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia, where four people were killed, social media posts began circulating lists of schools claiming the lists showed they had been targeted for violence. 

    “Don’t know how true this school shooting list is but I’m not taking this lightly at all,” the caption on a Sept. 8 Facebook post said. “It’s going around with so many schools on the list … and being sent to a lot of kids, this is nothing to play about.”

    The post included photographs and screenshots listing Georgia schools. 

    A similar Sept. 12 Facebook post featured an image listing schools in New Mexico. A caption referred to it as a “list of schools who is to be hit with a shooting” and said it had been sent to students through the social media platform Snapchat.  

    The post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    Claims of campuses being targeted using similar lists have also surfaced in Nebraska, Missouri and Alabama. Law enforcement agencies in those states confirmed the lists were shared with students through Snapchat and TikTok. 

    But officials who investigated the lists said they did not find they were created in relation to school violence threats. Rather, the lists show names of schools that receive federal funding to provide schoolwide and targeted assistance programs for students. 

    The list in the Facebook post featuring the Georgia schools even has a title that says “2024 Title I Schools Schoolwide (SWP) and Targeted Assisted (TA),” and the list by that name can be found on the Georgia Department of Education website. The list of New Mexico campuses is available on the state’s public education department website

    Title I schoolwide programs are designed to improve a school’s entire educational program so that every student can “demonstrate proficient and advanced levels of achievement on state academic standards,” according to the Georgia Department of Education. 

    Title I targeted assistance programs are geared toward students at risk of failing who need additional help. 

    Spokespeople for the Georgia Department of Education and New Mexico Public Education Department declined to comment on the lists used in the social media posts. 

    Meghan Frick with the Georgia Department of Education referred us to law enforcement agencies including the Georgia Bureau of Investigations “given the sensitivity of the situation.” 

    Nelly Miles, Georgia Bureau of Investigations director of public and government affairs, said she could not comment directly on the posts as the agency “has had a significant number of online threat allegations this past week” following the Apalachee shooting. However, threats are analyzed and sent to local law enforcement agencies for further follow-up.  

    A sheriff in central Georgia directly addressed the lists, warning anyone who uses them to incite a panic by making a fake threat will be arrested. 

    “While I don’t know what the [academic programs] means for the Georgia Department of Education, I can assure you that by creating the picture for purposes of creating and inciting a panic and then spreading it, you have become targeted to us,” Bleckley County Sheriff Daniel Cape said in a Facebook post. “I’ve given ample warning, it will not be tolerated here.”

    The Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Department in Albuquerque investigated the list featuring New Mexico schools and found the threat was not credible, Janelle Garcia, communications director for the state’s public education department, said. 

    We rate the claim that photos that show lists of school names are “school shooting lists” False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ESPN hasn’t fired Shannon Sharpe as of Sept. 13, 2024

    ESPN hasn’t fired Shannon Sharpe as of Sept. 13, 2024

    [ad_1]

    After sports commentator and former National Football League player Shannon Sharpe accidentally livestreamed a sexual encounter, social media users claimed ESPN had fired him from the network’s TV programs.

    “Dang he got fired on his day off,” one Facebook user wrote Sept. 11 in the caption of a post that included a screenshot of a social media post that said “BREAKING: ESPN has fired Shannon Sharpe, per @ESPNNBA,” referring to an official social media handle of the ESPN brand.

    This post and others were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    But ESPN told PolitiFact on Sept. 13 that Sharpe would continue to appear on the network as normally scheduled.

    Sharpe’s Instagram account livestreamed video Sept. 10 that included audio of Sharpe’s sexual encounter with an unnamed woman.

    Sharpe described the video as an accident and apologized in a Sept. 11 episode of the “Nightcap” podcast he co-hosts.

    He said he had talked to ESPN about the event and would continue to appear on the network.

    USA Today Sports and other news outlets reported Sept. 12 that ESPN said Sharpe would continue to appear on the network. 

    We rate the claim that “ESPN has fired Shannon Sharpe” False. 

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Deceptive clip warps Walz’s Nebraska antigay laws comment

    Deceptive clip warps Walz’s Nebraska antigay laws comment

    [ad_1]

    Since Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz was tapped as the Democratic vice presidential pick, he has received national attention for his long-term support of the LGBTQ+ community. So it made sense when the Human Rights Campaign, a national LGBTQ+ advocacy group, asked him to headline its annual dinner. 

    But a deceptively edited clip from his speech that evening has gone viral. 

    “Tampon Tim falsely claims that being gay in Nebraska is ‘illegal,’” read the caption on an Instagram post shared by the conservative media outlet Townhall Media. (Walz’s conservative critics have used the moniker in a derogatory manner to refer to his advocacy for making free menstrual products available in schools.)

    The post included a clip in which Walz said, “Think about this, when I was a kid growing up in Nebraska being gay was illegal, still technically illegal.”

    The post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    A look at Walz’s full remarks at the Sept. 7 Human Rights Campaign event in Washington, D.C., however, shows Walz was not saying it is currently illegal to be gay in Nebraska.

    His full statement:

    “Think about this, when I was a kid growing up in Nebraska, being gay was illegal, still technically illegal. Look how much has changed since this organization was founded 40 years ago. Can you imagine, can you imagine going back to me, a high schooler in the early ’80s and saying, you know what, we’re going to kick down the barriers, we’re going to open doors, we’re going to pass laws that let you bring your authentic self, love who you want to love, and live the life that you want to live all by yourself with not interference from government.” 

    When put in the full context, it is more clear that Walz’s phrase “still technically illegal” is restating his claim about the past rather than making a claim about current law.

    A Harris-Walz campaign spokesperson told PolitiFact by email that “the Governor was clarifying his own delivery,” and shared the prepared remarks with PolitiFact which read: “When I was a kid, growing up in Nebraska, being gay was still technically illegal there.” 

    According to the University of Nebraska library, Nebraska had antisodomy laws on the books until 1977 when the Legislature passed a revised criminal code. Walz, born in 1964, would have been around 13 when law was repealed. The 2003 Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas nullified antisodomy laws nationally.

    We rate the claim that Walz “falsely claims that being gay in Nebraska is ‘illegal’” False. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, this video doesn’t show Tim Walz dancing to Beyoncé

    No, this video doesn’t show Tim Walz dancing to Beyoncé

    [ad_1]

    This ain’t Texas. And this ain’t Tim Walz dancing to Beyoncé’s “Texas Hold ‘Em.”

    A Sept. 5 Instagram video showed a man who resembled the Democratic vice presidential candidate and Minnesota governor dancing in a red cowboy hat and black leather crop top and pants.

    “Is it 2024 Democratic Party vice presidential candidate Tim Walz,” text on the video read.

    Other users on Instagram, TikTok and X also shared this supposed video of Walz.

    (Screengrab from Instagram)

    The Instagram posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    But this video was altered.

    The original video, posted Feb. 19 on Instagram, does not show Walz dancing. The person in the video is a performer named Matthew Krumpe.

    That’s not to say the Harris-Walz campaign isn’t part of the BeyHive. Vice President Kamala Harris has been using Beyoncé’s song “Freedom” as her presidential campaign anthem. The song was played at the Democratic National Convention and has been used in campaign ads.

    We rate the claim that a video shows Walz dancing to Beyoncé in a cowboy hat and crop top False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tim Walz’s ‘entire family’ isn’t supporting Trump

    Tim Walz’s ‘entire family’ isn’t supporting Trump

    [ad_1]

    They say blood is thicker than water, but maybe not during a presidential year. 

    An image started circulating on social media Sept. 4 that showed eight people standing in front of a banner supporting former President Donald Trump. They all wore shirts that said “Nebraska Walz’s for Trump.” 

    And so began claims that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee, was a black sheep with no relatives to back him. 

    “The entire family of Kamala Harris’ running mate Tim Walz — they are all supporting Donald Trump,” actor Steve Hanks said in a Sept. 4 Instagram post that shared the image.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    The Harris campaign didn’t respond to PolitiFact’s questions about the photo. Neither did Charles Herbster, a former Nebraska governor candidate who first posted the photo on X. 

    Herbster, however, didn’t claim Walz’s entire family supported Trump. 

    “Tim Walz’s family back in Nebraska wants you to know something … ” he said, sharing the image. 

    Of course, anyone who watched the Democratic National Convention would know that Walz’s entire family doesn’t support Trump.

    Walz’s wife, daughter and son appeared emotional on camera during the event and later joined him on stage after he accepted the nomination. 

    Walz has two surviving siblings. His brother, Jeff Walz, recently drew media attention after posting about his brother on Facebook, saying they hadn’t spoken in eight years and that he was “100% opposed to all his ideology.”

    His sister, Sandy Dietrich, meanwhile, told The Associated Press that she and her family were “Democrats for Tim.” 

    A spokesperson for Herbster also told the AP that the people in the photo wearing Trump shirts “are descendants of Francis Walz, who was brother to Tim Walz’s grandfather.” 

    That side of the family confirmed to the AP that their “grandfathers were brothers.”

    “We weren’t close with them,” Dietrich said. “We didn’t know them.”

    We rate claims that Walz’s “entire family” is supporting Trump False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No proof Kamala Harris injured pedestrian in 2011 car crash

    No proof Kamala Harris injured pedestrian in 2011 car crash

    [ad_1]

    On Sept. 2, a website styled to look like a news organization known as “KBSF San Francisco News” posted a story about a hit-and-run crash cover-up implicating Vice President Kamala Harris. Within two days, the baseless claims had spread widely on X. 

    In video clips shared Sept. 4 on X, a woman identified as “Alicia Brown” claimed Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, drove a car that struck and injured her June 7, 2011. 

    “Well it happened on the corner of Post Street and Jones Street,” the woman recounted. “Me and my mom were walking home from the movie theater after watching ‘Pirates of the Caribbean.’”

    She said a car driving the wrong way down a one-way street struck her as she crossed the road. She was thrown into the road, where she observed the woman who hit her looking back at her before driving away from the scene.

    “Of course, back then, I didn’t know that it was Kamala Harris, California attorney general,” the woman said.

    Harris was in her first year as attorney general in 2011. A voice-over said the woman injured her pelvis, ribs and spine in the crash and underwent 11 surgeries but never regained her ability to walk. 

    The day after the incident, Brown said two men talked with her mom at the hospital. 

    “When my mom came back to me I asked, ‘Who are those people?’ She said that the woman who hit me was Kamala Harris, a very powerful woman and those men were her people,” the woman said. “She was told that if this story gets out we would be in very big trouble, and if she loves me, she shouldn’t report this or look for any justice.”

    The claim emerged from a blog post on a website identifying itself as “KBSF San Francisco News.” That website was unresponsive by midday Sept. 4, but the source code on an archived version of the story showed that the video and the story were posted around 6 a.m. Sept. 2.

    By around 11 a.m. Sept. 3, the narrative was being amplified by a member of a pro-Donald Trump “meme” account network and paid subscribers on X.

    (Screenshot from archived KBSF-tv.com website)

    A woman and news station with no history, a crash with no documentation

    KBSF is not a reputable San Francisco news outlet. 

    The Federal Communications Commission, which regulates television communications and maintains a register of TV stations, has no record of KBSF. The domain name www.kbsf-tv.com was created Aug. 20.  

    The video identified the woman as “Alicia Brown,” but the KBSF story that accompanied it also spelled Brown’s name “Alisha Brown,” so we checked that, too. 

    We found no WhitePages.com records for a person living in San Francisco for either name. Google searches before Sept. 1 did not show an “Alicia Brown” or “Alisha Brown” in California who matched the woman in the video. 

    The intersection of Post and Jones streets  — where Brown said the purported incident occurred — exists. Google Maps confirmed the location was within walking distance of a movie theater in 2011. 

    San Francisco Police Department spokesperson Allison Maxie said the agency found no calls for service or other reports involving a hit-and-run or car crash in the vicinity of the intersection of Post and Jones streets on or around this date in 2011. 

    “Our search for such an incident turned up with negative results,” Maxie said. “We believe there is no merit to this incident.”

    Because the woman in the video claimed her mother had been intimidated into silence, our search went beyond police records. 

    We used Google and Nexis to search and found: 

    • No results in Nexis news archives for an “Alicia Brown” or “Alisha Brown” involved in a 2011 hit-and-run car crash in California. 

    • Four results when searching “Kamala” with the phrase hit-and-run in 2011, but none of those reports said Harris had been driving. Each mention was included in a news story about California crime statistics or multitopic stories that, in a separate section, identified Harris as California’s attorney general. 

    • No Google results for hit-and-run crashes near the intersection in June 2011.

    The woman in the video claimed that she decided to go public with her story after her mother died. But we found no recent obituaries naming an Alicia Brown or Alisha Brown as a surviving daughter. 

    Video contains image of a 2018 Guam crash, other unrelated scenes

    The video includes generic images that are linked to other incidents or could have been pulled off the internet and used as generic stock photos. 

    For example, about one minute into the full video, KBSF showed a picture of a car with a broken mirror and windshield. 

    But that photo was from a 2018 crash in Guam involving a Toyota Yaris that struck a pedestrian, Pacific Daily News reported.

    (Screenshot from video on X)

    The video also showed two X-ray images about three minutes in. Using Bing reverse-image searches, we found that one, showing multiple rib fractures, was published in an October 2010 article in BMC Gastroenterology about Cronkhite-Canada syndrome causing rib fractures.

    The other shows a “type C pelvic ring injury in a 12-year-old girl,” according to a 2017 article in the Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 

    No evidence that video is AI-generated, experts say

    Digital forensics experts told PolitiFact that based on their analysis, the clips of “Alicia Brown” don’t appear to be generated by artificial intelligence.

    “I think most likely this is a good old fashioned (and not particularly well done or convincing) cheap fake where the interview is simply staged,” said Hany Farid, University of California, Berkeley, professor specializing in digital forensics and misinformation.

    Siwei Lyu, a computer science and engineering professor at the University at Buffalo, performed an algorithmic and visual analysis of the video and “cannot confirm the video itself was created with generative AI.” AI models have difficulty producing sighing and slurring sounds that he found in the audio. Features like inconsistent teeth in the mouth area, which are usually markers for AI-generated content, are also absent, he said. 

    Meme accounts, paid X subscribers circulated false claim

    On X, the earliest mention of the claim that we found seemed to be a post from an X user named Liz Churchill. Churchill describes herself as a “conspiracy theorist” in her bio and is also a paid X subscriber, meaning her posts are promoted by the site’s algorithm. The original post is now unavailable, but a cached copy can be found here. The cached version’s time stamp is 3 p.m., but we found posts that reshared the now-deleted post before 11 a.m. ET. 

    The X post linked to the KBSF-TV article and said, “Kamala Harris was involved in a ‘hit and run’ accident in 2011 where she hit a 13-year old.”

    (Screenshot from X)

    Minutes later, a paid X account called “miguelifornia” shared the article link and a screenshot of the headline, then made another post including the video. The second post drew more than 700,000 views. In the next two hours, the video was shared by a paid X subscriber called  “I Meme Therefore I Am,” gaining 11,000 reposts and more than 1.8 million views. After the Baltimore bridge collapse in March, that account spread an anti-Ukraine narrative

    Miguelifornia is part of a network of “meme” accounts supported by the “Dilley Meme Team,” also known as “Trump’s Online War Machine,” which previously circulated a deepfake video of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis dropping out of the presidential race. Former President Donald Trump, Harris’ rival for the presidency, has been found to have interacted with the group, whether by resharing their content or suggesting edits to one of the videos they produced.

    Our ruling

    A viral video claimed that Harris was involved in a June 7, 2011, hit-and-run crash in San Francisco that injured a woman named Alicia Brown.

    We found no evidence that any of this is real. The story emerged from a website that claimed to share news from a TV channel that does not exist. We couldn’t find a person matching the supposed crash victim’s identity. The San Francisco Police Department searched its records and found no incident reports or emergency calls matching the described crash. Multiple images shared in the video were traced to unrelated incidents including a car crash in Guam and images published in medical research journals. 

    We found no evidence to substantiate this hit-and-run claim. We rate it Pants on Fire!

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tiger Woods didn’t say Kamala Harris had a fake Black accent

    Tiger Woods didn’t say Kamala Harris had a fake Black accent

    [ad_1]

    History-making golf pro Tiger Woods famously told talk show host, actor and entrepreneur Oprah Winfrey that he struggled to “check a box” that described his ethnic background. Between his parents, his traceable roots were Black, Chinese, Native American, Thai and Dutch.

    Now, an Instagram post says Woods publicly criticized Vice President Kamala Harris, whose father is Jamaican and whose mother was Indian, as not being authentically Black. Harris is the 2024 Democratic nominee for president.

    “‘Kamala’s fake black accent is embarrassing and extremely offensive – Tiger Woods’,” text on an Instagram photo said. The photo looked like a screengrab of an X featuring images of Woods and Harris.

    The Instagram post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Threads, and Instagram.)

    But Woods didn’t say this.

    Although the Instagram post doesn’t say so, the X post pictured is a self-described parody account with the username @PGATUOR. That’s not to be confused with @PGATOUR, the account belonging to the organization that runs several professional golf tournaments in North America. 

    But not everyone was in on the joke. Roderick Campbell, a rapper popularly known as “Uncle Luke,” for example, criticized Woods for the comment.

    Neither Woods’ main social media accounts nor his website show he said anything recently about  Harris, let alone her accent. 

    When we searched news clips, all we found about this topic were stories that debunked the viral post.

    We messaged Woods through emails listed on his and his foundation’s websites but received no reply.

    We rate the claim that Woods criticized Harris’ accent Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Viral clip mislead with Kamala Harris ‘swipe of pen’ remark

    Viral clip mislead with Kamala Harris ‘swipe of pen’ remark

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris’ record as a California prosecutor has come into renewed focus as she runs for the White House. Harris touts her record of prosecuting violent criminals and her Back On Track initiative, which aimed to reduce reoffending.

    But a viral video appears to show her speaking boastfully about how she could ruin lives as a prosecutor. “Power hungry Kamala Harris describing how she can ruin lives with the ‘swipe of a pen,’” an Aug. 16 X post said. The X post included a video of Harris.

    “I learned that with the swipe of my pen, I could charge someone with the lowest-level offense, and because of the swipe of my pen, that person could be arrested,” she said in a 2019 New Hampshire speech.

    Harris also listed consequences, including potential lost work, jail time and costly attorney fees for the person charged. “Weeks later, I could dismiss the charges but their life would forever be changed. So, I learned at a very young age, the power,” the video ends abruptly. 

    We saw a similar video on Facebook with text on the video that said: “How can anyone trust her with executive power.”

    The Facebook video was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Threads, and Instagram.)

    But the viral is misleading and omits important context. We reviewed the 2019 speech given in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, at an annual banquet by the state’s Democratic Party members. Harris was then running for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

    We found that rather than bragging about her prosecutorial power, Harris was discussing the importance of leaders using power responsibly because of the potential for harm if power is misused. She said that it was something she realized early in her 20s when she started work as a prosecutor.

    In her 2019 speech, Harris sought to describe then-President Donald Trump as using his power irresponsibly. The viral clip ends before a crucial part of her speech.

    “And I was just a lowly deputy DA,” she went on to say to laughter from the audience. “Yet we have a person in the White House who holds the office of president of the United States, who does not fully, or even partially, understand what it means to have power,” she said of Trump. “When you truly understand what it means to be powerful, you understand that the greatest measure of your strength is not who you beat down, it is who you lift up.”

    Harris had used the “swipe of my pen” rhetoric before. In 2010, she described prosecutorial power in similar terms while running to become California’s attorney general, at an event organized by Google. At the time, she was San Francisco’s district attorney.

    After talking about her pen swipe’s power, she added: “It is an incredible amount of power, and you want to make sure that the people who have this kind of power are taking seriously, the responsibility, in terms of understanding as much as anything the impact on the people who will be affected by that.”

    PolitiFact has previously fact-checked claims about Harris’ record as a prosecutor.

    We rate the claim that this video shows Harris describing ruining lives with her pen False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why an unrealized capital gains tax won’t affect most people

    Why an unrealized capital gains tax won’t affect most people

    [ad_1]

    Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign recently said she supports a proposed policy aimed at the ultrawealthy that President Joe Biden has pushed for years: a new tax on unrealized capital gains, or unsold assets that have increased in value.

    But some social media users exaggerated how such a tax would affect the majority of Americans.

    An Aug. 25 Facebook post read, “Home Owner Do you Realize that Harris plan to tax unrecognized Capital Gains mean(s) if your house goes up in value you will have to pay that Tax Even if you don’t sell your House!”

    (Screengrab from Facebook)

    Another Facebook post showed a photo of a Fox News segment about Harris’ tax plan with the words “unrealized gains tax: 25%; currently: 0%” circled. Below that, text on the photo read, “This means they will tax you for the house you own extra every year!”

    Other posts on Facebook and Threads made similar claims about the proposed tax. They were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    Harris’ opponent, former President Donald Trump, said at an Aug. 23 campaign rally in Las Vegas that this unrealized capital gains tax “will soon be applied to small business owners and you will be forced to sell your restaurant immediately.”

    Harris’ official campaign account, Kamala HQ, responded on X that the tax would apply only to people with $100 million in wealth.

    How would Harris’ plan to tax unrealized capital gains work?

    Harris has not released any tax policies. Harris’ campaign said she supports tax provisions in Biden’s 2025 budget proposal, including a tax on unrealized capital gains, Axios, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal reported.

    When PolitiFact contacted the Harris campaign for more information about Harris’ tax plan, the campaign declined to comment, pointing instead to reporting from Axios and Minneapolis-based news outlet KMSP-TV.

    Biden’s budget proposes tax hikes for the wealthiest Americans; it would not raise taxes for people earning less than $400,000 a year.

    One of Biden’s proposals is a 25% minimum tax on income, including unrealized capital gains, for taxpayers with a net worth — meaning assets minus liabilities — of more than $100 million.

    If instituted, the White House said, this so-called billionaires tax would apply only to the wealthiest 0.01% of Americans — not the vast majority of the country’s taxpayers. In the U.S., there are about 9,850 centimillionaires, or people with at least $100 million in wealth, according to a March 2024 report from Henley & Partners, a wealth and migration advisory firm, and New World Wealth, a global wealth research firm.

    So, of this small ultrawealthy group, only the people who have more than 20% of their wealth in tradable assets — for example, publicly traded stock — would pay taxes on unrealized capital gains, Biden’s budget proposal states.

    Taxpayers with more than 80% of their wealth in nontradable assets, such as real estate and shares in private startups, would be considered “illiquid.” These taxpayers could choose to include only unrealized gain in tradable assets when determining how much they owe in taxes, according to the budget proposal. 

    Currently, capital gains are taxed only after a realized event, such as when someone sells an asset. If an asset remains unrealized — never sold — it’s not subject to taxes.

    Some economists said an unrealized capital gains tax would promote more equity in the tax code.

    “As it is now, normal workers are taxed on their entire income, but we have a situation where the very rich can have hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars of capital gains which go altogether untaxed,” said Dean Baker, co-founder and senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    Wealthy people can hold stocks until they die, and then pass the assets to their heirs without paying taxes as long as their gains are unrealized, Baker said.

    Biden’s budget proposal argues that tax-free accumulation of wealth over generations exacerbates income-and-wealth disparities in the U.S.

    Adam Michel, tax policy studies director at the libertarian Cato Institute, said an unrealized capital gains tax would  overly burden the Internal Revenue Service and would discourage investment in burgeoning businesses.

    “Such a system would encourage investors to put their money in safer investments, such as government bonds, rather than new innovative industries, like new energy sources, biopharmaceuticals, or AI,” Michel said.

    Economic experts told PolitiFact that this proposed tax change is not certain, even if Harris wins the presidency. Any changes would require congressional approval, and control of the House and Senate will also be decided in November.

    It’s also unclear whether a wealth tax, such as this one, would survive legal challenges.

    Our ruling

    Social media posts claimed Harris’ “plan to tax unrecognized Capital Gains mean(s) if your house goes up in value you will have to pay that Tax Even if you don’t sell your House.”

    That claim ignores several critical facts about Harris’ plan, which is derived from Biden’s 2025 budget proposal. Most crucially: Most Americans wouldn’t have to pay a tax on the appreciated value of their unsold assets and this tax would apply only to people with more than $100 million in wealth. That’s fewer than 10,000 people in the U.S.

    Although this tax would affect the country’s top 0.01% of taxpayers, the claim that American homeowners, broadly, would be taxed is an overstatement. We rate this claim Mostly False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘There’s no such thing as menopause’? That’s Pants on Fire!

    ‘There’s no such thing as menopause’? That’s Pants on Fire!

    [ad_1]

    Menopause. The word likely calls to mind both aging and its common symptoms, such as hot flashes, changing moods and difficulty sleeping. 

    But for one Facebook user, the entire concept is fake — the result of social conditioning.  

    “There’s no such thing as menopause,” read the Aug. 25 post, which included an image making the same claim. “Listen to nothing but your Intuition with a clear empty mind. All you’ve been conditioned by society to accept as reality is a lie.” 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    This claim is inaccurate. Numerous clinics, groups of health care professionals and medical research organizations say menopause exists, and generally define it as the point at which a woman has naturally gone 12 months without a menstrual period.

    Dr. Somi Javaid, an OB-GYN and member of the medical advisory board of Let’s Talk Menopause, a group focused on menopause education and health care advocacy, said the claim reflected a “long history of women being dismissed and overlooked in the field of medicine.”

    “Menopause is an inevitable stage of life, one that every woman will experience if fortunate enough to live that long,” Javaid said. “It is a phase we can and should acknowledge, diagnose, treat, and ultimately celebrate.”

    (Screenshot from Facebook)

    Among various organizations, definitions are broadly similar with slight variations.

    • The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists: “Menopause is the time in your life when you naturally stop having menstrual periods. … Menopause marks the end of the reproductive years.”

    • National Institute on Aging: “Menopause is a point in time 12 months after a woman’s last period. The years leading up to that point, when women may have changes in their monthly cycles, hot flashes, or other symptoms, are called the menopausal transition or perimenopause.”

    • Cleveland Clinic: “Menopause is a point in time when a person has gone 12 consecutive months without a menstrual period. Menopause is a natural part of aging and marks the end of your reproductive years.” 

    • Johns Hopkins Medicine: “When a woman permanently stops having menstrual periods, she has reached the stage of life called menopause. Often called the change of life, this stage signals the end of a woman’s ability to have children.” 

    • World Health Organization: “Natural menopause is deemed to have occurred after 12 consecutive months without menstruation for which there is no other obvious physiological or pathological cause and in the absence of clinical intervention.”

    • Mayo Clinic: “Menopause is when periods stop for good. It’s diagnosed after 12 months without a menstrual period, vaginal bleeding or spotting.”

    What causes menopause?

    Menopause occurs naturally when ovaries stop making reproductive hormones such as estrogen and stop releasing eggs for fertilization, according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists, Cleveland Clinic and World Health Organization. 

    “Estrogen receptors are present throughout the body, from head to toe. When an individual undergoes menopause, estrogen levels plummet dramatically,” Javaid said. “It is now well understood that the reduction in estrogen can lead to significant symptoms, and to deny this reality is both irresponsible and dismissive of the profound impact it has on an individual’s health and well-being.”

    That process doesn’t happen overnight. The clinical terms for the time leading up to menopause are “perimenopause” or “menopausal transition,” although people commonly refer to this period as when someone is “going through menopause.” That transitionary period typically begins between ages 45 and 55, the National Institute on Aging said. Johns Hopkins said perimenopause lasts about four years on average. 

    The average age of menopause — which is reached 12 months after a final period — in the U.S. is about 51 years old, according to Mayo Clinic. For women worldwide, the World Health Organization said natural menopause occurs “generally between 45 and 55 years.”

    Naturally occurring menopause isn’t even the only kind: Some people might experience something called induced menopause, which is caused by a surgery or medical treatment.

    How do you know when it’s happening?

    Menopause symptoms include irregular periods, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, insomnia, night sweats and mood changes, according to medical research and health organizations

    “As a general rule, one-third of women will transition into menopause with only mild symptoms or none at all,” Dr. Katie Lessman, an OB-GYN, told Nebraska Medicine in 2022. “Another third will experience bothersome symptoms for a few years. The final third will have symptoms that improve but never go away.”

    Menopause exists and this Facebook post made a ridiculous claim. We rate it Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fox did not air ‘Tim Walz’s communist agenda’ graphic

    Fox did not air ‘Tim Walz’s communist agenda’ graphic

    [ad_1]

    A social media post shared a graphic that appeared to come from Fox Business, highlighting items in Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s agenda as the Democratic nominee for vice president.

    “Fox News doing their best to make Walz look cool,” the Aug. 25 Facebook photo’s text read. It attached a graphic, which read:

    “Tim Walz’s Communist Agenda

    (Screenshot from Facebook)

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The image was altered. A Fox Business spokesperson told PolitiFact this image did not air on Fox Business Network.

    It was shared in an Aug. 7 Reddit post and labeled as “satire,” but subsequently spread across social media without the label.

    The Aug. 7 episode of “Mornings with Maria Bartiromo” did include a graphic titled “Tim Walz’s Economic Scorecard,” that looked similar to the altered one. But the real graphic contained a different list than the one in the Facebook post. 

    We rate the claim that this image shows a Fox Business graphic titled “Tim Walz’s Communist Agenda” False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNN veteran video was altered

    CNN veteran video was altered

    [ad_1]

    What looks like a CNN breaking news segment about car insurance for veterans is drawing attention on social media, but maybe not the attention the account posting the video hoped for. 

    “Scam,” many comments said. 

    The video in the Aug. 18 Facebook post features CNN’s logo and a “breaking news” chyron that says: “Veterans are cancelling their auto insurance and doing this instead.”

    “As a veteran, I qualified for the 2024 Veteran & Military Monetary Relief Plan AND apparently you can use it to cut down on your auto insurance,” the post said. “All I did to qualify was to tap the button below, answer a quick questionnaire, and they got me the same coverage at almost $1,600 less per year!”

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    We saw no button to click to “answer a quick questionnaire,” but some people commenting on the post reported that it yielded only phone calls and quotes from major insurers. 

    The video itself is altered. The audio is out of sync with the person supposedly talking in the video. No such story exists on CNN’s website. And the network spells canceling with one L, not two, as the word appears in the purported chyron. 

    We rate claims this is an authentic CNN segment False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nike didn’t announce end of Griner contract

    Nike didn’t announce end of Griner contract

    [ad_1]

    Phoenix Mercury center Brittney Griner signed a deal with Nike in 2013 after she was selected as the No. 1 pick in the WNBA draft. 

    More than a decade later, a viral Facebook post claims the Nike deal has ended. 

    “Nike announces termination of contract with Brittney Griner after ‘strong backlash’ from online community: ‘We need more athletes like Riley Gaines and less woke Brittney Griner!’” an Aug. 14 Facebook post said, referring to former University of Kentucky swimmer Gaines, who opposes transgender athletes’ participation in women’s sports.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    We found no evidence, such as credible news reports or public statements from Griner, Gaines or Nike to support this claim. 

    Neither Nike nor Griner’s representatives immediately responded to PolitiFact’s questions about the post. But a spokesperson for Griner told Reuters the claim is false and that the Mercury player still has an active partnership with the company. 

    As of Aug. 26, Nike was selling Griner jerseys on its website. Two weeks earlier, the brand featured Griner in a video shared on its X account celebrating the U.S. women’s basketball team’s gold medal victory in the 2024 Olympics. Griner also was named in Nike’s press release about the win the same day. 

    We rate claims Nike announced it’s ending its contract with Griner False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro didn’t skip the DNC

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro didn’t skip the DNC

    [ad_1]

    Although Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro was once deemed a likely running mate for Vice President Kamala Harris in her presidential bid, he won’t be on the 2024 ticket. Harris, who’s expected to accept the Democratic party’s presidential nomination Aug. 22, instead tapped Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for the role. 

    But that doesn’t mean Shapiro signaled his displeasure by skipping the Democratic National Convention, as some social media posts have suggested. 

    “PA Gov Josh Shapiro isn’t attending the DNC at all,” a screenshot of an X post shared Aug. 19 on Threads said. “Don’t buy their ‘one big happy communist family’ BS this week.” 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    That’s because Shapiro has been at the convention, which started Aug. 19. 

    He addressed Pennsylvania’s presidential delegation breakfast Aug. 19 and talked to reporters. Politico reported Aug. 21 that Shapiro “has been a hot commodity at the state delegation breakfasts this week, hitting at least three on Wednesday alone.”

    On Aug. 20, Shapiro took the mic during the DNC’s ceremonial roll call vote, which was broadcast and streamed live, and led the Pennsylvania delegation in submitting their votes for Harris as the Democratic nominee.

    He’s scheduled to address the convention around 9 p.m. Aug. 21, the same night Walz is expected to accept the nomination to be Harris’ running mate.

    Dozens of photos show Shapiro at the convention, and he’s appeared on live television during the event. 

    We rate claims he isn’t attending the convention False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, Kamala Harris did not walk out of this 2021 interview

    No, Kamala Harris did not walk out of this 2021 interview

    [ad_1]

    Did Vice President Kamala Harris walk out of an interview with comedian and political commentator Lenard McKelvey, popularly known as Charlamagne Tha God?

    No, but that’s what Donald Trump Jr. claimed happened when he twice reshared an old social media post from a fellow conservative.

    “Triggered Kamala Harris walks out on Charlamagne Tha God after he exposed Joe Biden’s dementia,” read the text across the Facebook video Trump Jr. shared Aug. 1 and Aug. 13.

    The video showed McKelvey asking Harris, “Is it Joe Manchin or Joe Biden, Madam Vice President?” Harris began her answer with, “Come on, Charlamagne. It is Joe Biden. It is Joe Biden.”

    The video was a repost of a May 2023 video originally shared by conservative podcaster Benny Johnson, a supporter of former President Donald Trump.

    The Facebook videos were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Threads, and Instagram.)

    The clip originated from a Dec. 17, 2021, episode of “Tha God’s Honest Truth,” a Comedy Central show McKelvey hosts. And this video’s caption is wrong on two fronts: Harris did not walk out on the video, and the conversation didn’t cover dementia. 

    PolitiFact reviewed the full episode and found that throughout the nearly 21-minute interview, Harris, who appeared virtually and was seated behind a desk, answered McKelvey’s questions about the administration’s first year achievements and challenges. 

    One challenge the pair discussed was West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin’s blockade of legislation including the Biden-Harris administration’s Build Back Better plan. Manchin, who has since changed his party affiliation to independent, was a Democrat then and his vote in a Senate without a clear Democratic majority was crucial for the passage of bills.

    At around the 15:20 minute mark, an aide for the vice president could be heard off-screen saying the interview had to wind down. The aide interrupted again at around the 18:20 minute mark to call time on the interview. 

    McKelvey then asked his last question: “So, who is the real president of the country? Is it Joe Manchin or Joe Biden?” Harris rebuffed McKelvey’s assertion that Manchin controlled the government and defended the Biden administration’s record.

    McKelvey and Harris ended with an exchange of pleasantries and greetings to each other’s families.

    PolitiFact contacted Trump Jr. through his website and emailed the Trump Organization, for which Trump Jr. is executive vice president. We received no reply.

    We rate the claim that Harris walked out of this 2021 interview False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link