ReportWire

Tag: Facebook Fact-checks

  • Video of Dr. Oz pitching supplement is fake

    Video of Dr. Oz pitching supplement is fake

    [ad_1]

    Videos of Mehmet Oz, a celebrity doctor and former U.S. Senate candidate, have again been altered to sell weight loss products. 

    A Facebook post about an “odd coffee loophole” includes a video of Oz in front of a coffee shop. In the video, he appears to say, “There’s a lot to say about the health benefits of coffee, but I think the reason why so many Americans have their favorite coffee joint or habit is because they’re finding out it can help drop as much as 2.2 pounds of stubborn body fat overnight.” 

    Oz goes on to promote a weight loss coffee supplement, and a link redirects users to another video selling a dietary supplement. 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The video of Oz has telltale signs of being a deepfake, — a manipulated video that uses artificial intelligence to mimic a person’s voice or facial expressions. For example, the speaker’s lips do not match up with the audio. 

    We found the original video on Oz’s Instagram page using a reverse image search.

    In the unedited video posted July 28, 2023, Oz says the same first sentence as the altered video. But he does not go on to promote a weight loss supplement. In the full video, he says: 

    “There’s a lot to say about the health benefits of coffee, but I think the reason so many Americans have their own favorite coffee joint or habit is because they get to sit with themselves for just a few minutes and think about what’s going on in their lives. Maybe sit with our friends or just think through something that’s challenging us. Whatever it may be, those few moments of silence are truly valuable. And for that reason alone, I”m supportive of drinking coffee and whatever habits you may have around it. And I’m curious, what’s your favorite place and why?”

    Oz’s official website contains a disclaimer warning people to be wary of scammers selling fake products using his “name and likeness — sometimes even using AI to generate fake videos of what looks like me, but isn’t.” The disclaimer adds that the only real videos of him are on his verified social media accounts. 

    Oz is a global advisor for iHerb, a website that sells health products. But that website does not sell the dietary supplement Java Burn. 

    We’ve previously factchecked other altered videos of Oz that falsely show him selling weight loss products. Oz wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal in 2019 criticizing Facebook scam ads that use his videos. 

    We rate the claim that Dr. Oz promoted a weight loss supplement that can be added to coffee Pants on Fire! 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stormy Daniels mushroom dress photo altered

    Stormy Daniels mushroom dress photo altered

    [ad_1]

    A recent Threads post purports to show adult film actor Stormy Daniels striding into the courthouse April 22 for former President Donald Trump’s Manhattan criminal trial.

    Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up a payment to Daniels, who has said she had an affair with the former president. 

    In the Threads post’s image, Daniels appears to wear a blue dress with a mushroom pattern. 

    “Stormy Daniels chose to wear this dress to court today,” the April 22 Threads post said. “I can’t imagine why.” 

    But this image was altered, and it doesn’t show Daniels en route to the courtroom — or in  2024.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    A reverse-image search of the photo led us to Reuters photographs that show Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, arriving in April 2018 at ABC studios in New York to appear on the talk show “The View.”

    The dress she wore then  was blue, but there were no mushrooms on it. 

    Daniels is expected to take the stand as a witness in Trump’s criminal trial, but she hasn’t yet. 

    We rate this post False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Posts mislead about mass store closures under Biden

    Posts mislead about mass store closures under Biden

    [ad_1]

    Some social media users are claiming that a number of businesses have reported hundreds of store closures under Joe Biden’s presidency.

    An April 19 Facebook post shared a photo of eight retail, fast food, entertainment and grocery stores with their purported number of closures: “Dollar Tree: 1,000 stores closing. Walgreens: 900 stores closing. Macy’s: 150 stores closing. Foot Locker: 400 stores closing. Gap: 350 stores closing. Burger King: 400 stores closing. Regal Cinemas: 429 locations closing. Kroger: 413 stores closing.”

    Text on the photo read, “Is this building back better?” referring to Biden’s 2020 campaign slogan and presidential agenda, Build Back Better. The post also criticized “Bidenomics.”

    (Screengrab from Facebook)

    This post and others like it were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    Some of these figures lack context; others are incorrect. Here’s a breakdown of how many of these eight businesses’ stores have closed during Biden’s presidency. These closures are largely because of lower sales or business rebrands; none cited Biden’s policies as the reason for the closures.

    “Dollar Tree: 1,000 stores closing”

    This is largely accurate. Dollar Tree acquired Family Dollar in 2015 for $8 billion, and plans to close hundreds of Family Dollar stores.

    In March, Dollar Tree said it plans to close about 600 Family Dollar stores across the U.S. in this year’s first half, The Associated Press reported. Over the next several years, Dollar Tree plans to close another 370 Family Dollar stores and 30 Dollar Tree locations.

    “Walgreens: 900 stores closing”

    This is inaccurate. This number refers to the number of recent store closings for CVS, not Walgreens.

    Walgreens said in June 2023 that it plans to close 150 U.S. locations by August 2024, CNN reported. In 2019, when Donald Trump was president, Walgreens said it was closing 200 stores in the U.S.

    CVS said in November 2021 that it planned to close 900 stores by 2024.

    Shoppers enter a Macy’s department store in Bay Shore, Long Island, New York, Dec. 12, 2023. (AP)

    “Macy’s: 150 stores closing”

    This number is correct, but needs context.

    Macy’s Inc. said in February that it planned to close 150 “underproductive” stores in the U.S. through 2026. Fifty of these stores will close by Dec. 31.

    In February 2020, when Trump was in office, Macy’s announced 125 store closings, the AP reported.

    “Foot Locker: 400 stores closing”

    This is missing context. Foot Locker said in March 2023 that it plans to close 400 stores in “underperforming” malls across North America by 2026, CBS News reported. However, the company also said it will open about 300 free-standing locations focused on its “Community,” “Power” and “House of Play” store concepts.

    The company said these decisions are part of its “Lace Up” strategic plan to “reset” its business and increase revenue to $9.5 billion by 2026.

    “Gap: 350 stores closing”

    This number is accurate, but the closures weren’t announced on Biden’s watch.

    Gap said in October 2020, when Trump was president, that it would close 350 stores, including 220 of its namesake Gap stores and 130 Banana Republic stores, in North America (not just the U.S.) by 2024, CBS News reported.

    Gap’s website lists all of the completed store closures since 2020; it says 189 Gap stores and 134 Banana Republic stores have closed.

    A “Home of the Whopper” sign welcomes customers outside the Burger King fast food restaurant, on Feb. 1, 2021, in Epping, N.H. (AP)

    “Burger King: 400 stores closing”

    This figure is largely accurate. Joshua Kobza, CEO of Restaurant Brands International Inc., which owns Burger King, said in May 2023 that the company planned to close 300 to 400 U.S. locations by the end of 2023.

    Kobza said the company typically closes “a couple (of) hundred” Burger King locations each year, Restaurant Dive reported.

    When contacted by PolitiFact, a Burger King spokesperson provided no details about the chain’s exact number of closures in 2023.

    “Regal Cinemas: 429 stores closing”

    We found no reports that this many Regal Cinemas movie theaters were closing.

    Cineworld, the company that owns Regal Cinemas, said in January 2023 that it was planning to reject leases for 39 U.S. movie theaters. This announcement came a few months after Cineworld filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, CNN reported. (Chapter 11 bankruptcy lets companies keep operating as they reorganize their assets and debts.)

    In September 2022, Regal Cinemas closed 12 locations.

    It’s unclear how many Regal Cinemas locations closed after January 2023. We contacted Regal Cinemas, but received no response. The company’s website says it has 426 theaters in the U.S.

    “Kroger: 413 stores closing”

    This is wrong. Kroger has not announced store closures.

    To clear a path for a merger, announced in 2022, grocery store chains Kroger and Albertsons said in 2023 they were selling 413 stores to C&S Wholesale Grocers for $1.9 billion, the AP reported.

    But the federal government sued to block the merger in February, saying the merger would lead to a less competitive market and higher prices for consumers. On April 22, Kroger and Albertsons said they would sell an additional 166 stores to appease the government’s concerns, the AP reported.

    Erin Rolfes, a Kroger spokesperson, told PolitiFact that Kroger will not close any stores as a result of the merger.

    “Stores divested to C&S are not stores that will be closed — they are stores that will be run in the same manner they are today, just by C&S instead of Kroger or Albertsons,” Rolfes said.

    Our ruling

    A Facebook post claimed there have been mass closures across several businesses during Biden’s presidency.

    Some information in the post lacked context, including that some closing announcements preceded Biden’s presidency and that some businesses were opening new stores. The post also shared inaccurate information about the number of stores closing for three businesses.

    Although some information in the post is accurate, the claim omits important details. We rate this claim Half True.

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • John Mellencamp not booed off stage for praising Joe Biden

    John Mellencamp not booed off stage for praising Joe Biden

    [ad_1]

    Was John Mellencamp forced to leave the stage at his own concert for praising President Joe Biden? A viral Facebook post said this happened at a Toledo, Ohio, show.

    The April 16 post said, “Famous rock star BOOED off stage for praising Joe Biden,” and linked to a story that identified the “Pink Houses” singer as the star in question. The story also included a video of a March 17 incident.

    The Facebook post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Similar claims have been shared on Instagram and X.

    But Mellencamp, 72, was not booed off the stage for praising the president. Some audience members heckled him as he talked between songs, according to The Blade, a local newspaper. None of the news reviews of the concert mentioned praise for the president; neither did a viral video posted on TikTok.

    While talking about his late grandmother, Mellencamp was interrupted by an audience member who shouted, “Play some music!” which appeared to upset Mellencamp. His expletive-laden response to the interruption received cheers and applause from the rest of the audience. When Mellencamp resumed talking, another person shouted “Authority Song!” urging him to play the 1980s hit song by that name.

    Mellencamp, now visibly upset, as the viral TikTok shows, threatened to end the show, and the audience can be heard urging him not to. Shortly after, he began performing his 1982 hit “Jack & Diane.” 

    But then he stopped abruptly and said, “You know what? Show is over,” and left the stage.

    Reviewers of the concert said Mellencamp later returned to complete the show. 

    “I do expect etiquette inside of the theater, the same way you would at a Broadway show,” he told The Washington Post in an April 10 story. “And if you want to come and scream and yell and get drunk, don’t come to my show.”

    There was booing and jeering during the exchange between Mellencamp and the hecklers, but they were directed at the hecklers, according to video of the incident and news reports.

    Mellencamp has had links to Democrats. He campaigned with Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign and performed at Obama’s 2009 inauguration and at the White House in 2010. He previously asked 2008 Republican presidential candidate John McCain to stop playing his song at campaign events. But we found no evidence that he mentioned politics or the president at his Toledo show.  

    We rate the claim that Mellencamp was booed off stage for praising Biden False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Video of drone stuck in wires not from Iran attack on Israel

    Video of drone stuck in wires not from Iran attack on Israel

    [ad_1]

    A day after Iran sent 300 missiles and drones toward Israel, social media users shared a video of a drone that appeared to be tangled in wires and claimed it was among those launched by Iran.

    An April 14 Facebook reel shared a video of the drone, with sticker text that read, “One of the Iranian drones got stuck in electric pole wires in Iraq.”

    The post didn’t mention Israel, but it was posted a day after Iran launched more than 300 drones and missiles at Israel, 99% of which were intercepted, the Israeli military said.

    We also found social media posts on Instagram, X, TikTok and YouTube sharing the same video and claiming it was a drone sent by Iran to Israel that didn’t hit its target.

    But a reverse-image search on key frames from the video shows a different story. The drone was not tangled in wires in Iraq and had no connection to Iran’s April 13 attack on Israel.

    (Facebook screenshot)

    We found an X account called Vlogging NW Syria that posted images Feb. 20 showing the same drone tangled in wires with the same background seen in the video. The post caption contained a typo and read, “An unidentified drone crashes into electroc cables in the town of Qamar al-Din in the Hasakah countryside.”

    An April 14 X post shared the video and said it was old, attaching a screenshot of a Feb. 20 post that showed a vertical photo of the drone with the words, “Syria: photo of the day. An unidentified drone stuck in electric wires in Hasakah province.”

    Al-Hasakah is in northeastern Syria. A Syrian news site also posted the video on X in February and described it as “an unidentified drone crashed in the village of Qamar Al-Din of the town Abu Khashab northwest of Deir Ezzor.” Abu Khashab is about 65 miles southwest of Al-Hasakah, according to Google maps.

    We also found a video posted Feb. 20 on YouTube and Instagram by Syria TV, a Turkish station that focuses on Syria news. The station’s YouTube page, translated using Google, described it as “an unidentified military drone gets stuck on telephone lines in eastern Syria.” The Instagram post said, “In an unfamiliar scene Unidentified military aircraft stuck in eastern telephone lines.”

    A Syria TV article, also translated by Google, described an armed drone that got stuck on telephone lines in Qamar al-Din, a village in the Hasakah countryside. It added that local sources said the drone belonged to Iranian militias.

    The video of the drone tangled in wires is not related to Iran’s attack on Israel. The claim is False. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, table salt doesn’t contain sand and glass

    No, table salt doesn’t contain sand and glass

    [ad_1]

    Does the salt in your kitchen contain shards of glass? A Facebook video claims it does.

    An April 9 Facebook video was filmed in a supermarket aisle in which a person reaches for Morton Salt and Walmart’s plain salt.

    “This item has killed more people than COVID,” a man’s voice says. “Why do I say this? Because it is 50% sea salt, 25% sand and 25% glass,” he added.

    The voice then claims that consuming the salt “cuts up your arterial and venous network and that’s how you get high blood pressure.”

    The Facebook video was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The ingredients listed in Morton iodized table salt are salt, potassium iodide (a type of salt used to add iodine to table salt), dextrose (a type of sugar added to prevent the iodine added from evaporating), and calcium silicate (a compound added to prevent salt crystals from sticking together). Morton also sells table salt that does not contain iodine, a mineral in foods such as eggs and fish. Iodine deficiency can lead to swelling of the thyroid gland.

    Walmart’s Great Value plain salt contains salt and yellow prussiate of soda, another compound that prevents salt crystals from sticking together.

    Glass is in neither salt’s ingredients list.

    The Facebook post gave no evidence that table salt contains sand and glass; a screenshot in the video has text that matches a website promoting natural wellness — which also provides no evidence that table salt contains sand and glass.

    PolitiFact contacted Morton Salt and Walmart for a statement. Neither replied.

    This is not the first time this claim has circulated online. A February 2018 Reddit post asked whether a similar claim was true and linked to a YouTube video, which the site has removed for violating community standards.

    Although high blood pressure, also known as hypertension, and salt consumption are linked, this is because salt contains sodium, and a high-sodium diet “can increase your blood pressure and your risk for heart disease and stroke,” the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports. The CDC adds, “Together, heart disease and stroke kill more Americans each year than any other cause.”

    Canned foods, pizza and savory snacks contain high sodium.

    More than 1.2 billion people globally have hypertension, according to the World Health Organization. Eating a low-sodium diet is a key recommendation for reducing hypertension risk. 

    We rate the claim that Morton Salt and other plain and iodized table salts contain glass that cuts arteries and sparks high blood pressure Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, Michelle Obama isn’t running for president as a man

    No, Michelle Obama isn’t running for president as a man

    [ad_1]

    As if the 2024 presidential race couldn’t get more chaotic, do we have a new candidate in the running?

    A TikTok video reposted on Facebook appeared to include audio of former first lady Michelle Obama announcing her presidential bid as a man.

    “I decided to wake up and run as a male to push my husband’s vision to the next level and save America from Donald Trump,” says a voice in the video that resembles Michelle Obama’s. The April 12 video shows an X post claiming this announcement was made in a “recent interview” with Oprah Winfrey. 

    “She will be following her husband’s footsteps and run for President in 2024 as a man to also stand in unison with Transgenders,” the post says. 

    But Obama has not announced she is running for president, and the original X post referred to was shared on April Fools’ Day.

     
    (Screenshot of Facebook Reel)

    The post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    PolitiFact reviewed news reports and Nexis news archives and found no evidence that Obama made an announcement that she was running for president.

    A public announcement with Oprah Winfrey would have made massive headlines, but they don’t exist.

    The social media post’s image comes from a 2020 interview that Winfrey conducted with Michelle Obama as a part of Winfrey’s 2020 Vision Tour. The transcript shows they did not discuss a potential presidential run, and interview coverage made no mention of such an announcement. 

    PolitiFact could not determine how the audio was generated, but artificial intelligence has been used increasingly to create deceiving audio of political figures.

    The post, originally shared April 1 by popular X account “Dom Lucre,” appears to combine two common pieces of misinformation swirling around Obama. One, that she is running for president — which she has frequently denied. And two, that she is a man – a false and ridiculous claim we have repeatedly fact-checked.

    The X post has a community note on it saying the audio is “fake.” Community notes are submitted by certain users and become public if “enough contributors from different points of view rate that note as helpful,” according to X. Similarly, a note can be taken down if enough users downvote it.

    We rate the claim that Michelle Obama announced she is “running for President in 2024 as a man” Pants on Fire! 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump attended Ivanka’s graduation

    Trump attended Ivanka’s graduation

    [ad_1]

    Former President Donald Trump has requested delaying his Manhattan criminal trial so that he could attend his son Barron’s high school graduation May 17. 

    But some social media users have suggested the ask isn’t genuine because he didn’t bother to attend his eldest daughter’s graduation. 

    “Where’s Daddy?” reads the text in an April 18 Threads post above an image of Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump posing in a graduation cap and gown with family but not the former president. 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The photo in the Threads post shows Ivanka Trump at her 2004 graduation from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. 

    On May 20, 2011, she posted two photos of herself on Facebook wearing the same cap and gown as in the Threads post with the caption, “In honor of graduation season, here are a few photos from my own graduation from Wharton. I remember that day so clearly, it was such an incredible feeling.” 

    In one photo, from a Facebook photo album titled “Wharton Graduation,” Ivanka Trump stands next to her father. 

    A May 19, 2004, column in the Philadelphia Daily News also put the former president at the graduation. 

    “The Donald and ex-wife Ivana attended a Wharton ceremony Sunday at which their daughter got her degree,” the column said, using a nickname for the former president. “The proud parents also took in Penn’s commencement Monday at Franklin Field.” 

    We rate claims Donald Trump didn’t attend Ivanka Trump’s graduation False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Post overstates Putin’s comments on Israel, Iran

    Post overstates Putin’s comments on Israel, Iran

    [ad_1]

    Iran launched drones and missiles at Israel on April 13, but subsequent claims about Russia’s support for the Islamic Republic don’t reflect news reports about the attack.

    “BREAKING: Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared that RUSSIA will SUPPORT IRAN if the United States attacks Iran’s soil in support of Israel,” read the text in an April 13 Facebook post, above an image of Putin and Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi smiling and shaking hands.

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    We found no credible news reports that Putin made such a declaration. 

    Rather, on April 16, Putin’s first public comments about the attack called for a ceasefire and urged “all sides” in the Middle East to “show reasonable restraint and prevent a new round of confrontation fraught with catastrophic consequences for the entire region,” according to the Kremlin.

    Iranian state media, meanwhile, quoted Putin as saying Tehran’s response to Israel was the best way to punish the country, Reuters reported

    The photo of Putin and Raisi predates Iran’s attack on Israel. It was taken in December, when the two presidents met in Moscow. 

    We rate the claim that Putin has declared that Russia “will support Iran if the United States attacks Iran’s soil in support of Israel” False.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sorry, the government doesn’t owe you more than $10,000

    Sorry, the government doesn’t owe you more than $10,000

    [ad_1]

    A social media post claims the federal government is giving away more than $10,000 to low-income Americans. In fact, the government owes you that money, the post said.

    “Exposing the secret worth THOUSANDS! Don’t let them hide this any longer,” an April 15 Facebook post’s caption said.

    In the video, a narrator said, “Did you know that the government owes you $8,832?” 

    The narrator says the government owes that amount to people ages 18 to 64 making less than $50,000, and they’ll also get a $2,000 spending card. The money can be used for medical and personal expenses, he said.

    The post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    But claims offering free government money are often not what they seem, the federal government has warned.

    (Facebook screenshot)

    The Facebook post linked to a website called todayshealthbenefit.com, where a chatbot named “Emily from Subsidy Aid” awaits to ask if you want to find out if you qualify to unlock a “$6,400 health subsidy,” a different figure than the $8,332 mentioned in the video. It said the subsidy can be used “to pay for your medical expenses and provide instant relief for rent, bills and groceries,” and warns that enrollment ends at midnight.

    If the $6,400 figure sounds familiar to PolitiFact readers, it’s because we’ve seen these claims before. We have debunked two social media claims advertising $6,400. In December, one Facebook post said the government was giving away $6,400 monthly subsidies after an Inflation Reduction Act update from Congress. Another Facebook post in January also said Congress had passed a $6,400 subsidy for low-income people. 

    A conversation with the chatbot revealed some red flags. After asking about our income and whether we were on Medicare and Medicaid, we received a telephone number. We called the number and reached an unnamed phone operator in Illinois. He said the subsidy was from Affordable Care Act plans. People with employer-provided health insurance didn’t qualify for the money, the operator said.

    The website is not affiliated with the government and misleads about how government health insurance subsidies work. The government often subsidizes Affordable Care Act plans, but the government site does not mention specific dollar amounts — the subsidies hinge on a person’s income. 

    The subsidies also provide no cash payments to Americans, but pay directly to insurance companies. The subsidies are available as premium tax credits, which can be paid in advance directly to recipients’ insurance companies, or can be claimed when recipients file their tax returns, KFF reported. Another subsidy is a cost-sharing reduction that lowers deductible, copayments and coinsurance under some Affordable Care Act plans. In neither case are the payments made directly to consumers.

    Healthcare.gov is the official website where consumers can sign up for the Affordable Care Act marketplace. Brokers and agents can also sign consumers up for a marketplace plan. It’s unclear whether the company behind todayshealthbenefit.com are brokers and agents.

    Open enrollment for the Affordable Care Act ended in January; it doesn’t end at midnight April 18 as the website in the Facebook post claims. 

    The federal government has warned that offers of free money or grants from the government are often scams. Government-funded assistance programs are offered only through official government websites. The Federal Trade Commission offered tips for spotting scams, such as ones that offer government money to pay for personal expenses.

    PolitiFact found no evidence the government is paying people $8,832 plus a $2,000 spending card. The claim is False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • There are real photographs of satellites on Google

    There are real photographs of satellites on Google

    [ad_1]

    Flat-earth conspiracy theorists have long believed photos from space are fake. A Facebook video from the “Bradley Martyn Show” podcast amplified this claim. 

    In the Facebook video, Martyn says, “Do you know the one thing about flat earth that does trip me out? Google images of satellites. They’re all just like renders. I’ve never seen a satellite that was real.” 

    Another man then says, “The sun and the moon is real, outer space is not.” 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    A satellite is any object that orbits a planet or a star, meaning the Earth, moon and spacecraft are all considered satellites. A Google image search of satellites will yield some rendered images, or 3-D modeled realistic images of satellites. But there are also plenty of real photos of satellites.

    For example, this image of the International Space Station was taken in 2001 by a space shuttle Discovery crew member. A camera on NASA’s Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite took these photographs in 2015 of the moon in front of the Earth. 

    A man in the Facebook video also repeats the debunked theory that the Earth is flat and covered by a dome with the moon and sun. The first image of Earth from outer space was taken in 1946. Since then, there have been many more photos of a round Earth taken from outer space, proving that the Earth is not flat. We also know the Earth is a sphere because of the pull of gravity, different time zones and the Earth’s shadow on the moon. 

    And contrary to the video’s assertion that outer space isn’t real, NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope has shown that the universe contains at least two trillion galaxies.

    We rate the claim that there are no real pictures of satellites on Google Images because outer space is not real Pants on Fire! 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mike deGruy died in chopper crash, not for sinister reasons

    Mike deGruy died in chopper crash, not for sinister reasons

    [ad_1]

    Did filmmaker Mike deGruy die for exposing hidden truths he found underwater? A viral Facebook video suggests so. 

    “This is why exposing the truth is scary!!” the text on an April 12 video read. In the next scene, a computer-generated voice says “people who expose the truth.” After that, the post shows a clip of deGruy speaking about his work filming underwater in the Gulf of Mexico for the BBC’s 2001 “Blue Planet” series.

    The filmmaker discussed the wonders of an underwater brine lake he and his crew members saw and their difficulties filming it. The video then flashes text about deGruy’s 2012 death in a helicopter crash and ends with the scene of a helicopter crash in a field.

    The Facebook video was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    But deGruy’s death is neither conspiratorial nor linked to his deep-sea filming of this brine lake. DeGruy died Feb. 4, 2012, in a helicopter crash in Australia 11 years after “Blue Planet” was released. DeGruy, 60, died alongside Australian filmmaker Andrew Wight, 52, who was piloting the helicopter. Both were collaborators with “Titanic” director James Cameron, and the trio shared a passion for undersea exploration.

    Similar claims have been shared on TikTok and have drawn thousands of comments.

    The crash happened because the pilot’s door wasn’t properly closed before takeoff from an aerodrome, an Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigation found. “It says the pilot probably let go of the cyclic control while trying to close the door, causing the nose to pitch up, and the tail to hit the ground,” the Australian Broadcasting Corp. reported.

    DeGruy was not the first to discover brine lakes, pools of toxic, highly salty water caused by “the dissolution of buried salt deposits,” according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The specific lake he filmed had been found several years before the documentary. Scientists have discovered brine lakes elsewhere, including the Red Sea and other parts of the Gulf of Mexico.

    We rate the claim that Mike deGruy died for “exposing the truth” Pants on Fire!

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • COVID-19 vaccination safety data mischaracterized

    COVID-19 vaccination safety data mischaracterized

    [ad_1]

    A collection of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data is being characterized as if it proves COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous.

    “Covid vaccine injuries exposed in newly uncovered data,” declared multiple April 5 Facebook posts that linked to an article by American Military News, a publication about the U.S. military and foreign affairs, published the same day. That article cited information from an Epoch Times story that said data released by the CDC shows 780,000 vaccine injury reports were made after individuals were vaccinated against COVID-19. 

    The Epoch Times, a news outlet tied to China’s religious movement, Falun Gong, has a history of sharing misinformation; PolitiFact has rated some of its past claims about COVID-19 vaccines False and Pants on Fire

    These posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The data these posts reference is from v-safe, a CDC COVID-19 monitoring system that allows people to self-report health symptoms weekly for six weeks following COVID-19 vaccination. 

    In 2022, the Informed Consent Action Network, a Texas-based anti-vaccine group, filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, seeking public release of CDC data from more than 10 million people who used the system to self-report symptoms from December 2020 to September 2022. 

    After the CDC released the data, the group created an interactive visualization of this data on its website showing that more than 780,000 people said they required medical care after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

    But public health officials said it’s inaccurate to characterize the data as proof of causation.  

    Martha Sharan, a CDC spokesperson, told PolitiFact that the adverse events reported in v-safe have not been verified by the CDC as having been caused byCOVID-19 vaccines. To verify the symptoms’ causes, an individual’s medical histories and records would have to be reviewed. 

    CDC spokesperson Nick Spinelli said that v-safe participants who reported receiving medical care after vaccination were called by the CDC and encouraged to submit a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System report. 

    The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, also called VAERS, is another CDC safety monitoring system that allows anyone to submit reports about post-vaccination health effects. Researchers use it as a means of detecting possible trends that could merit a closer look. But none of the reports themselves constitute verified cases of vaccine-related symptoms or injury.

    “V-safe is not designed to capture reports of unusual events, but more common symptoms like fevers, chills, or sore throats,” Kawsar Talaat, a co-director of clinical research for the Institute of Vaccine Safety said in a story published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “You cannot take the material from one of these systems and expand it beyond the limitations of the data collection.”

    A 2022 peer-reviewed study of COVID-19 vaccines using v-safe data published in The Lancet, a peer-reviewed medical journal, found that individuals seeking medical care after an mRNA vaccine were rare. V-safe surveys also did not ask participants which symptoms led them to seek medical care. 

    Studies of COVID-19 vaccines have found them to be safe and effective by public health officials across the world. Adverse effects are rare, and the World Health Organization estimated that COVID-19 vaccines saved about 14.4 million lives worldwide in 2021 alone. 

    We rate the claim that COVID-19 vaccine injuries were exposed in newly uncovered data False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • By mid-April, Taylor Swift hadn’t endorsed a 2024 candidate

    By mid-April, Taylor Swift hadn’t endorsed a 2024 candidate

    [ad_1]

    Sorry, Joe Biden. As Taylor Swift might say, “You’re on your own, kid.” At least for now —  Swift still hasn’t endorsed anyone for president in 2024. Popular social media posts said otherwise, however.

    “You’ve probably heard that Taylor Swift is endorsing Joe B,” posts from April 6 and April 11 said. Joe B is a reference to President Biden, who is seeking reelection for a second four-year term.

    The Facebook posts were flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    You have probably not heard Swift’s endorsement because it hasn’t happened. Swift endorsed Biden a month out from the 2020 presidential election but has not made a public endorsement in 2024.

    On March 5, Super Tuesday, Swift posted a message to her 282 million Instagram followers encouraging them to vote, along with a link to the website of nonpartisan group Vote.org, which lets people find local polling stations and hours. She sent a similar get-out-the-vote message in 2023, after which Vote.org said it recorded 35,000 registrations.

    Although some election watchers are reportedly eager to see Swift, whom Time named its 2023 Person of the Year, throw her support behind either Biden or his competitor, former President Donald Trump, experts told PolitiFact that they are skeptical that her involvement would tip the race decisively to her chosen candidate.

    An endorsement would draw attention, but her fans already lean left. And for celebrity endorsements to move the needle in elections, there usually needs to be more than one action or message, experts said. Younger people exhibit consistently poor voter turnout. 

    Swift endorsed Democrat Phil Bredesen in a 2018 Tennessee U.S. Senate race, but Bredesen lost that election to Republican Marsha Blackburn.

    We rate the claim that Swift endorsed Biden False. 

    PolitiFact Staff Writer Grace Abels contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Yes, bat boxes covering ULEZ cameras can be legally removed

    Yes, bat boxes covering ULEZ cameras can be legally removed

    [ad_1]

    People in London have devised with a unique way to block cameras that enforce emissions standards: They’re luring bats.

    In London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone or ULEZ, people with vehicles that fail to meet certain emissions standards are asked to pay 12.50 pounds per day to drive within the zone. Cameras help enforce the rule. A social media post said, detractors are pushing back by installing bat boxes — roosts for the flying mammals — that can’t be legally removed.

    “ULEZ protesters covering cameras with bat boxes. Authorities not allowed to remove under their own law,” read a March 31 Instagram post.

    (Screenshot from Instagram)

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    News outlets reported in March that bat boxes were installed under number plate recognition cameras in London areas Chessington and North Cheam. British law protects bat species and their roosts. According to the Bat Conservation Trust, a nongovernmental organization dedicated to bat conservation, the following could be considered criminal offenses:

    But there are cases when bat boxes can be removed.

    “You need a licensed bat (worker) to carry out a check on a bat box but that does not mean they cannot be legally removed with the correct authority,” said Joe Nuñez-Miño, communications and fundraising director for the Bat Conservation Trust, in an email to PolitiFact. He said the licensing authority — in this case Natural England — has the “power to make decisions based on the evidence available.” 

    Natural England, a public body that advises the government for England’s natural environment, licenses people who want to “carry out work that may affect bats.”

    How likely bats are to bat boxes depends on factors including their surrounding habitat, available alternative roosting sites and how the boxes were placed. 

    “In this case, it seems highly unlikely that the bat boxes will be occupied,” Nuñez-Miño said. “While we don’t have the details of where these bat boxes have been placed, it is highly unlikely that bat boxes next to busy roads will be used by any bat species. The noise and artificial light would act as a powerful deterrent and the bat boxes are likely to remain unoccupied.”

    A Transport for London spokesperson told PolitiFact that the agency is working with environmental specialists to remove the boxes. According to Transport for London, it is illegal to install materials on its infrastructure without consent. 

    We rate the claim that authorities cannot legally remove bat boxes covering ULEZ cameras False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No Oval Office speech from Biden after Iran attacked Israel

    No Oval Office speech from Biden after Iran attacked Israel

    [ad_1]

    When a U.S. president speaks to Americans from the Oval Office, it’s often regarding a crisis or an issue of utmost importance. 

    It’s where former President George W. Bush addressed Americans the evening of the 9/11 terror attack and where former President Donald Trump spoke about the coronavirus outbreak on March 11, 2020. 

    After Iran launched hundreds of drones and missiles at Israel on April 13, one social media user claimed President Joe Biden planned to address the American public in a similar way. 

    “BREAKING NEWS: 5:34 President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. will address the nation from the Oval Office tonight, following Iran’s attack on Israel,” read a screenshot shared April 13 on Threads

    The post featured five siren emojis and the words: “I was really hoping not to see this. This isn’t good.” 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads.)

    It’s easy to understand why the idea of Biden addressing the nation from the Oval Office might have alarmed social media users, but there’s one problem: The claim was inaccurate.

    (Screenshot from Threads.)

    We found no media reports about Biden addressing the nation from the Oval Office the same day Iran attacked Israel. Biden released an April 13 statement condemning the attacks and describing how the U.S. military had helped defend Israel. 

    “The U.S. military moved aircraft and ballistic missile defense destroyers to the region over the course of the past week,” he said in the statement. “Thanks to these deployments and the extraordinary skill of our servicemembers, we helped Israel take down nearly all of the incoming drones and missiles.”

    Biden said he would meet with other leaders of the Group of Seven, or G7, the world’s leading economies, “to coordinate a united diplomatic response to Iran’s brazen attack.” The G7 leaders also released an April 14 statement condemning the attack. 

    Biden did not announce plans to address the nation, and there is no record of such an address on the White House website or the White House’s YouTube channel

    Politico reported that Biden “deliberately kept a low public profile” following Iran’s attacks against Israel in an effort to deescalate the situation. 

    White House advisers speaking on condition of anonymity told Politico a public address was discussed, but there weren’t immediate plans for Biden to deliver one. Two officials said advisers felt that a televised presidential address “would likely escalate the tensions,” Politico reported April 14.

    Oval Office addresses are infrequent. 

    President Joe Biden addresses the nation June 2, 2023, from the White House’s Oval Office. He speech covered the budget deal that lifts the federal debt limit and averts a U.S. government default. (AP)

    Biden gave his first Oval Office address in June 2023 after Congress passed a bipartisan bill that would raise the federal borrowing limit and keep the U.S. from defaulting on its debt. In October, following Hamas’ attack on Israel, Biden gave his second Oval Office address, explaining why he believed financial support for Ukraine and Israel was critically important. 

    We contacted the White House for comment and received no reply. 

    We rate the claim that Biden addressed the nation from the Oval Office on April 13 “following Iran’s attack on Israel” False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Footage does not show Iran’s April 13 attack on Israel

    Footage does not show Iran’s April 13 attack on Israel

    [ad_1]

    A social media post sharing a video of rockets firing in quick succession said it showed Iran’s April 13 attack on Israel. But it doesn’t.

    “Iranian media shows rockets Fired at Israel,” read text in an April 14 Instagram video

    (Screenshot from Instagram)

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Reverse image search results showed that the video has been online since at least 2016. We found the same footage dated June 14, 2016, on a Russian website (timestamp: 0:31), with a caption that Google translated to: “News today ATO DPR Donbass Grad Armed Forces of Ukraine Shelling.”

    We also saw the clip in a YouTube video uploaded Feb. 21, 2017, titled, “Night volley of Russian MLRS ‘Grad’. Fire!!!” Grad is a multiple launch rocket system, also called MLRS.

    This video does not show Iran’s April 13 attack on Israel. We rate that claim False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Doctor’s office notice not proof of COVID-19 vaccine danger

    Doctor’s office notice not proof of COVID-19 vaccine danger

    [ad_1]

    A Facebook post shared a photo of a New Jersey doctor’s office notice as evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous for student athletes.

    The April 9 post highlighted parts of the notice that said “COVID-19 vaccinations affect your risk” of “sudden cardiac death on the playing field,” and that the office “may not be able to clear” vaccinated athletes’ sports physicals without “lab work and possibly an echocardiogram to rule out potential heart damage.” 

    The post resonated with people who oppose COVID-19 vaccines. “Amazing, even after they knew early on that the vaccine was affecting children’s hearts, they still kept pushing it for even younger kids,” one commenter wrote. “And they called us all names for 3 years,” said another.

    The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

    The notice from the doctor’s office — Morris Sussex Family Practice in Lake Hopatcong, New Jersey (now called Morris Sussex Direct Family Practice) — is real. But one notice from a single doctor’s office does not equate to evidence that COVID-19 vaccines increase the risk of sudden cardiac arrests in young athletes.

    (Facebook screenshot)

    The notice was shared in a New Jersey school’s Facebook group in July 2022 and it has been on the practice’s website since at least March 2022, according to the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine.

    The notice was updated in January 2023 to say that having a COVID-19 infection also may lead the office to require additional tests for sports physicals. The notice now says, “COVID infection and COVID vaccinations affect your risk” of sudden cardiac death.

    But scientific studies have found no link between COVID-19 vaccinations and increased risk of cardiac arrest in young athletes. The narrative that the two are associated, widespread throughout the pandemic by groups opposed to COVID-19 vaccines, has been consistently debunked by journalists, including PolitiFact.

    Sports cardiology experts told PolitiFact in January 2023 that they haven’t seen a sharp rise in athlete cardiac arrest episodes since the COVID-19 vaccines came out.

    There is a rare, but increased risk of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) mostly in male teens and young adults within seven days of receiving a second dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said.

    A 2022 study in England showed the risk of myocarditis from COVID-19 infection is substantially higher than the risk of myocarditis after a vaccine.

    Health experts say myocarditis usually goes away quickly but severe cases can permanently damage the heart muscle and in some cases lead to sudden cardiac arrest.

    But an April CDC study that focused on young people, although not specifically athletes, provides more evidence that there’s no connection between the vaccines and sudden cardiac deaths.

    Investigators examined Oregon death certificate data from June 2021 to December 2022 for 1,292 people ages 16 to 30. None of the death certificates listed vaccination as an immediate or contributing cause of death. 

    Of the total, 101 deaths could not exclude a cardiac cause. Vaccination records were available for 88 of those people, and 40 had received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Of those 40, three died within 100 days of a vaccine dose. 

    Two of those people had underlying illnesses such as congestive heart failure and chronic respiratory failure, and the cause of death of the other was “undermined natural cause.” A “follow-up with the medical examiner could neither confirm nor exclude a vaccine-associated adverse event as a cause of death for this decedent,” the study said.

    “The data do not support an association of COVID-19 vaccination with sudden cardiac death among previously healthy young persons,” the study concluded.

    We rate the claim that a notice from a New Jersey doctor’s office proves that COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous for athletes False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Migrants not secretly flown to Florida on taxpayer dime

    Migrants not secretly flown to Florida on taxpayer dime

    [ad_1]

    A parole program for migrants from Latin American countries has been the target of misinformation online, with social media users claiming that taxpayers fund it. 

    The  @NashvilleTeaParty Instagram account, which has 77,000 followers and links to the same-named conservative group’s website, posted a graphic about the program and captioned it, “YOUR taxpayer dollars at work!” 

    The post’s image includes a map from Fox News that says 326,000 migrants were flown to Florida and thousands more to other U.S. cities, attributing the figures to the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank advocating for reduced immigration. 

    This post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    The map image aired April 2 on “Fox & Friends First.” 

    But these flights were not paid for by taxpayers. Nor are they secret, as the Instagram post also alleges. 

    The migrants who flew to the U.S. did so as part of a parole program for  Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans that is meant to reduce the number of migrants crossing the southern U.S. border. The U.S. grants parole based on “significant public benefit or urgent humanitarian reasons.”

    People coming through the program are lawfully entering the U.S.

    The Department of Homeland Security publicly introduced the program in October 2022, initially for 24,000 Venezuelans.

    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Jan. 6, 2023 extended the program to admit 30,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti and Nicaragua each month. Under the program, applicants who meet qualifications, including having a U.S.-based sponsor who will support them financially and passing a background check, can request an “advanced authorization to travel and a temporary period of parole for up to two years for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit,” according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. 

    The agency also says that migrants in the program must pay for their own air travel to the United States. PolitiFact previously rated False a social media claim that “300,000 illegal immigrants were able to use a simple app to get a free flight to our country.” 

    An April 1 report by the Center for Immigration Studies, which opposes this Biden administration program, said 326,000 migrants arrived in Florida through the parole program since October 2022. 

    But the report does not say taxpayers paid for those flights. A March 7 article by the center says that taxpayers did not. 

    The center’s April 1 report also said that although 326,000 migrants in the parole program landed in Miami, Florida might not have been their final destination. Miami International Airport is a large transit hub, particularly for flights between the United States and Latin America

    We rate the claim that 326,000 migrants were secretly flown to Florida with taxpayer money False. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No, this post doesn’t reveal any wrongdoing by Nancy Pelosi

    No, this post doesn’t reveal any wrongdoing by Nancy Pelosi

    [ad_1]

    Did House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., just expose trouble with Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., as some social media users are claiming? No, that’s misleading.

    An April 6 Facebook post shared side-by-side photos of Johnson and Pelosi with text above it that read, “Nancy Pelosi Busted, Speaker Johnson Just Released It For Everyone To See.”

    In the comments, the Facebook user who posted the image said, “Everyone needs to see this!!” and shared a link to a March 20 article by Conservative Brief, a conservative media website. The article headline reads, “GOP-Led House Votes To Ban Housing Migrants On Public Lands.”

    (Screengrab from Facebook)

    This Facebook post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

    Although the post says Pelosi, the former House speaker, was “busted,” the linked article doesn’t reveal any wrongdoing.

    First, the article mentions a bill passed by the House in November 2023 that would ban the use of public lands for temporary migrant housing. This bill is unlikely to pass in the Senate, where Democrats hold a slim majority.

    Then, the article changes the subject to note that House Republicans voted in December 2023 to approve an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

    The article suggests the two votes are linked, but this is not so. The Republican impeachment inquiry seeks to find evidence of wrongdoing in Biden’s family business dealings.

    Pelosi is mentioned in the Conservative Brief’s article only when it says she criticized Johnson’s decision to hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry in a December 2023 MSNBC interview.

    We rate the claim that Pelosi was “busted” and Johnson “released it for everyone to see” False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link