ReportWire

Tag: expense ratio

  • Looking For More Bond Exposure? These ETFs May Be Solid Options

    [ad_1]

    Both the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NASDAQ:BND) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:FBND) aim to provide core fixed-income exposure for investors seeking regular income and a buffer against stock market volatility. This comparison explores the opportunities and risks associated with these bond ETFs.

    Metric

    BND

    FBND

    Issuer

    Vanguard

    Fidelity

    Expense ratio

    0.03%

    0.36%

    1-yr return (as of Jan. 24, 2026)

    4.3%

    2.6%

    Dividend yield

    3.85%

    4.7%

    Beta

    0.27

    0.29

    AUM

    $149 billion

    $24 billion

    Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

    BND is more affordable with its 0.03% annual fee, while FBND’s 0.36% expense ratio is over 10 times higher. However, FBND currently offers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to income-focused investors.

    Metric

    BND

    FBND

    Max drawdown (5 y)

    -17.93%

    -17.23%

    Growth of $1,000 over 5 years

    $852

    $862

    Launched in 2014, FBND casts a wide net of bond holdings with 4459 assets, and 67% of its bond holdings are rated AAA, the highest rating for a bond, indicating a very low risk of default from the issuer. However, the ETF also invests up to 20% of its assets in lower-quality debt securities, such as BBB-rated debt, which are riskier but can offer a higher yield.

    BND has been around for 7 years longer; thus, its holdings are substantially higher at 15,000. It has a higher concentration of AAA stocks at 72.45%.

    While fixed-income ETFs are generally less volatile than stock-based funds, investors should still understand the risks and opportunities they carry. Because BND and FBND invest entirely in bonds, their prices often track similar interest-rate trends.

    Bond prices typically rise when interest rates fall because older bonds with higher fixed coupons become more attractive than newly issued bonds. When interest rates rise, bond prices can inversely drop, and volatility can become significant, especially for certain bond types.

    Both BND and FBND hold most of their assets in high-quality, investment-grade bonds, which helps reduce volatility compared with lower-rated debt. However, because FBND allocates around 20% of its portfolio to lower-quality bonds such as BBB- and BB-rated bonds, it carries a higher-risk/higher-reward profile, since lower-rated bonds tend to offer higher yields but come with greater default risk.

    Both funds have monthly dividend payouts, so the frequency is higher than the common quarterly pattern, which may be more appealing. Overall, both ETFs are similar, but if investors prefer a higher-paying dividend yield with more risk, then FBND edges out BND. Those looking for a cheaper, more stable investment would find BND more ideal.

    ETF: Exchange-traded fund that trades on stock exchanges like a stock, holding a basket of assets.
    Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average assets.
    Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund divided by its current share price, expressed as a percentage.
    Beta: Measure of a fund’s price volatility compared with a benchmark index, often the S&P 500.
    AUM: Assets under management; the total market value of all assets a fund manages.
    1-yr return: Total return an investment generated over the past 12 months, including price changes and income.
    Max drawdown: Largest peak-to-trough decline in a fund’s value over a specified period.
    Growth of $1,000: Illustration showing how a $1,000 investment would have changed in value over time.
    Core fixed income exposure: Foundational bond holdings intended to provide income and reduce overall portfolio volatility.
    Investment-grade bond: Bond rated as relatively low risk of default by major credit rating agencies.
    Sector tilt: When a fund holds more investments in certain industries than the broad market weightings.
    Market-weighted approach: Strategy that weights holdings based on each security’s market value relative to the total market.

    For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

    Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.

    On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:

    • Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $486,764!*

    • Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $47,187!*

    • Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $464,439!*

    Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.

    See the 3 stocks »

    *Stock Advisor returns as of January 20, 2026

    Adé Hennis has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Looking For More Bond Exposure? These ETFs May Be Solid Options was originally published by The Motley Fool

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dividend ETFs: HDV Offers Higher Yield Than VIG

    [ad_1]

    • VIG has delivered stronger recent returns and holds a much larger, more diversified portfolio than HDV

    • HDV offers a higher dividend yield and lower volatility, with heavier exposure to defensive and energy sectors

    • VIG costs slightly less to own and trades with high liquidity, but its yield is about half that of HDV

    • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

    The comparison between iShares Core High Dividend ETF (NYSEMKT:HDV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT:VIG) reveals key differences in dividend yield, sector focus, and diversification that could appeal to distinct income and growth preferences.

    Both HDV and VIG target U.S. stocks with a dividend emphasis, but their approaches diverge: HDV concentrates on higher-yielding companies, while VIG seeks firms with a consistent record of growing dividends. This analysis explores how their costs, performance, risk, and portfolio makeup stack up for investors weighing income versus growth potential.

    Metric

    HDV

    VIG

    Issuer

    IShares

    Vanguard

    Expense ratio

    0.08%

    0.05%

    1-yr return (as of 2026-01-02)

    12.0%

    14.4%

    Dividend yield

    3.2%

    2.0%

    Beta

    0.64

    0.85

    AUM

    $12.0 billion

    $102.0 billion

    Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

    VIG is marginally less expensive to own, with an expense ratio of 0.05% compared to HDV’s 0.08%, and it offers significantly greater scale with assets under management of about 10 times that of HDV. However, HDV pays a much higher dividend yield, which could appeal to those prioritizing income.

    Metric

    HDV

    VIG

    Max drawdown (5 y)

    -15.41%

    -20.39%

    Growth of $1,000 over 5 years

    $1,683

    $1,737

    VIG tracks large-cap U.S. companies that have consistently increased their dividends, resulting in a portfolio of 338 holdings with a notable tilt toward Technology (30%), Financial Services (21%), and Healthcare (15%). Its top holdings — Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)— reflect this sector slant. The fund’s nearly 20-year track record and broad diversification may appeal to those seeking steady growth from dividend growers.

    HDV, in contrast, focuses more narrowly on 74 U.S. stocks with higher current yields, leading to greater weighting in Consumer Defensive, Energy, and Healthcare sectors. Its largest positions — Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), and Chevron (NYSE:CVX)— underscore this defensive, income-oriented approach. Compared to VIG, HDV’s sector mix and concentrated portfolio may appeal to those prioritizing yield and lower volatility.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • VXUS vs. VT: Global Exposure With Major Differences

    [ad_1]

    • VXUS offers a higher dividend yield and slightly lower expense ratio compared to VT

    • VT includes U.S. stocks while VXUS focuses strictly on international equities, resulting in different sector exposures and top holdings

    • Both funds are highly liquid and passively managed, but VT has delivered higher five-year growth and shallower drawdowns

    • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

    Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (NYSEMKT:VT) covers both U.S. and international stocks, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (NASDAQ:VXUS) excludes the U.S., resulting in a higher yield but greater recent volatility and a different sector tilt.

    Both VT and VXUS aim for broad diversification, but with a key distinction: VT invests across the entire globe, including the U.S., whereas VXUS holds only non-U.S. stocks. For those deciding between the two, differences in cost, recent returns, risk, and portfolio makeup may help clarify which fund aligns better with specific investing goals.

    Metric

    VT

    VXUS

    Issuer

    Vanguard

    Vanguard

    Expense ratio

    0.06%

    0.05%

    1-yr return (as of December 19, 2025)

    19.0%

    26.7%

    Dividend yield

    1.8%

    3.2%

    Beta

    1.02

    1.0

    AUM

    $74.9 billion

    $558.2 billion

    Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

    VXUS is slightly more affordable with a lower expense ratio and offers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to cost-conscious or income-focused investors.

    Metric

    VT

    VXUS

    Max drawdown (5 y)

    (28.0%)

    (32.7%)

    Growth of $1,000 over 5 years

    $1,523

    $1,239

    VXUS seeks to replicate the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, holding 8,663 stocks across developed and emerging non-U.S. markets. The fund’s sector mix leans into financial services (22%), industrials (16%), and technology (15%). Its largest positions include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TWSE:2330), Tencent (SEHK:700), and ASML (ENXTAM:ASML). With a fund age of nearly 15 years, VXUS provides deep international diversification without U.S. exposure.

    In contrast, VT invests in both U.S. and foreign companies, with its largest allocation to technology (28%), followed by financial services (16%) and industrials (11%). Its top holdings are NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), offering exposure to some of the world’s largest tech firms. This global approach results in a different sector blend and performance profile than VXUS.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 2 Vanguard ETFs to Buy Before 2026

    [ad_1]

    Courtesy of The Vanguard Group

    There are many different exchange-traded fund (ETF) providers in the industry, but Vanguard stands out as one of the best. Its plethora of offerings, low cost, and interface make it a top choice for investors. It has a strong history of providing funds that manage to outperform the broader market. There’s plenty to like about Vanguard ETFs, and if you’re looking to add them to your portfolio, consider the Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEARCA:VUG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSE:VIG). Here’s why I think they’d make a great investment before 2026.

    • Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) allocates 63% to technology and has returned 133% over five years.

    • VUG holds mega-cap tech companies including Nvidia and Apple with a 0.04% expense ratio.

    • Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) invests in companies with 10+ years of dividend increases and excludes the highest-yielding 25%.

    • If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, there are three quick questions causing many Americans to realize they can retire earlier than expected. take 5 minutes to learn more here

    The Vanguard Growth ETF is a reliable ETF that has outperformed the market. It tracks the performance of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index and is a passively managed fund with an expense ratio of 0.04%. Tech companies have become a reliable investment in the market due to their return potential, and about 63% of VUG’s portfolio lies in the tech sector.

    While it isn’t a pure-play tech ETF, it invests in growth-focused stocks, and most of these are tech companies. The ETF allocates 63.3% to the technology sector, followed by 17.80% to the consumer discretionary sector. It weighs stocks based on the market cap, and large-cap companies account for more of the fund than small-cap companies. Its top 10 holdings include global giants such as Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, and Google. The fund has a yield of 0.38% and has seen steady upside since May 2025.

    If you believe in the future of the technology sector and are a fan of the mega-cap tech companies, VUG is a smart way to gain exposure to the sector. One reason to own the ETF is the history of outperforming the market. The fund has generated a cumulative return of 127.84% in 3 years and 132.72% in 5 years. It has gained 16.34% in 2025 and is exchanging hands for $476.

    The Vanguard ETF will grow your money with little effort. Since growth stocks have outperformed value stocks in the past five years, VUG could be an ideal pick for 2026. By focusing on sectors like tech and consumer discretionary, VUG could outperform the broader market in the coming years.

    Businessman draw growing line symbolize growing Dividends
    Vadi Fuoco / Shutterstock.com

    The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF tracks the performance of the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index and holds 338 stocks. The fund invests in large-cap stocks with a record of increasing dividends for 10 years. VIG is the right option for growth-oriented investors because dividend growth matters in the long term.

    The companies in this index rarely have high yields, but they are producing earnings at a significant rate, ensuring steady returns for investors who hold the stock for the long term. The fund excludes the highest-yielding 25% of the list and includes the remaining stocks using a market cap weighting; hence, the largest companies have the highest impact on performance. VIG can help navigate market uncertainty due to the massive portfolio diversification and steady income potential.

    Similar to VUG, this is a tech-focused fund and allocates 28.50% to the sector. This is followed by 21.60% in the financial sector and 15.50% in healthcare. Its top 10 stocks include dividend stalwarts such as Eli Lilly, Walmart, Johnson & Johnson, and Exxon Mobil. The fund has a yield of 1.59% and an expense ratio of 0.05%. While it has a lower yield, it tends to deliver a higher passive income over time.

    VIG has a cumulative 3-year return of 54.60% and a 5-year return of 89.46%. It has gained 10.34% year to date and is exchanging hands for $215. VIG gives an opportunity to invest in solid blue chip stocks without taking high risk. The fund has remained a solid performer and could be a great investment for 2026.

    You may think retirement is about picking the best stocks or ETFs, but you’d be wrong. See even great investments can be a liability in retirement. The difference comes down to a simple: accumulation vs distribution. The difference is causing millions to rethink their plans.

    The good news? After answering three quick questions many Americans are finding they can retire earlier than expected. If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, take 5 minutes to learn more here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link