ReportWire

Tag: exoneration

  • Wayne County prosecutors accused of freeing innocent man only if he agreed not to sue – Detroit Metro Times

    [ad_1]

    Before Gregory Berry could walk out of prison in December 2020 after more than 17 years behind bars for a murder he didn’t commit, he said he had faced a difficult choice: Agree not to sue for wrongful imprisonment or remain incarcerated for life.

    Berry says his attorney told him that Wayne County prosecutors insisted on the waiver and that he had to make a decision soon whether to accept the offer. At the time, he says he was extremely ill with COVID-19 and feared he was going to die in custody. It was one week before Christmas, and he wanted to see his family. 

    It seemed like a great deal at first. He was serving a life sentence for his alleged role in a fatal shooting at a gas station in Detroit. 

    The case was rushed through so quickly that the judge acknowledged she had not been given time to review the file in advance, according to court files obtained by Metro Times.

    “I only had about a day to consider the deal,” Berry says. “They told me the only way they would release me was if I took the plea. It’s unheard of.”

    The Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office adamantly disputes that claim, calling it “completely untrue.” 

    In a detailed written response to Metro Times, spokeswoman Maria Miller said prosecutors “did not in any way make Mr. Berry’s plea contingent on an agreement that he agree not to file a civil suit.” 

    Miller added, “The CIU has never done that in any case. There is nothing that supports his contention.”

    Miller said no such arrangement was discussed on or off the record and described Berry’s version as “completely disingenuous.”

    “His voluntary no contest plea basically amounted to an effective waiver of his rights to file any lawsuit because he has a conviction arising from the criminal incident,” Miller wrote.

    The Wayne County Prosecutor Office’s Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU), which investigates potential wrongful convictions, got involved in the case after Berry’s co-defendant Antonio Hamilton, an illiterate high school dropout, swore in an affidavit in 2016 that he lied about Berry’s involvement. During his original interview with police in 2004, Hamilton said a Detroit cop punched him, kicked him in the ribs, and choked him, demanding he say Berry gave him the gun and encouraged him to rob the victim. Hamilton also said he gave Berry the firearm after the shooting. 

    In exchange for testifying against Berry, Hernandez’s murder charge was reduced, even though he was the shooter, and he was sentenced to 13½ to 22½ years in prison. He was paroled in September 2019.

    A second witness later came forward and passed a polygraph, saying Hamilton had given him the gun after the killing, which contradicts Hamilton’s original claim that Berry supplied and retrieved the weapon.

    What Berry didn’t know at the time was that the detective who took Hamilton’s statement was Barbara Simon, who has a long history of coercive interrogations, false confessions, and tactics that courts have found unconstitutional. At least 18 federal lawsuits have been filed against Simon, according to a complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Four of them have resulted in roughly $25 million in taxpayer-funded settlements

    The DOJ complaint also alleges that dozens of people may still be imprisoned because of Simon’s tactics.

    Hamilton said he told Simon about a cop beating him, but she “brushed it off.” 

    Berry says he would not have taken the plea if he had known about Simon’s controversial past.

    “For them not to make me aware of the misconduct history of Barbara Simon and her coworkers — that was flat-out wrong,” he tells Metro Times. “If I had known her history, I would never have taken the plea. I would have fought for a new trial.”

    He claims Wayne County prosecutors intentionally withheld Simon’s history from him so he would take the plea deal and not sue. In the years since his release, Berry has fought to withdraw his plea, arguing that he was misled, rushed, and deprived of critical information, including the CIU’s investigative file, which he has repeatedly requested.

    His current attorney, Cecilia Quirindongo, argues in court filings that the CIU’s records about Simon should have been disclosed and constituted Brady material, which is evidence prosecutors are required to share if it could aid the defense. She also claims that requiring defendants to waive civil suits is “a customary practice” in Wayne County, a point the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office strongly denies.

    In August, a Wayne County Circuit Court denied Berry’s request to withdraw his plea. He plans to appeal. 

    The Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office countered that Newman explicitly placed Simon’s role on the record during the hearing. 

    “That was not a hidden fact,” Miller said.

    Although Simon’s name was mentioned, Berry said he didn’t know about her controversial past. 

    The case dates back to September 2003, when 23-year-old Octavio Hernandez was fatally shot at 4:30 a.m. while pumping gas on Vernor Highway in Detroit. Berry and Hamilton were together that night. Berry admits he drove to the gas station but says he had no idea Hamilton was armed or intending to rob anyone. According to trial testimony, Hamilton fired the fatal shot, then dove through Berry’s car window as Berry sped away. 

    The case against Berry depended almost entirely on Hamilton. At Berry’s trial, Hamilton said Berry planned the robbery, provided the gun, and ordered him to commit the crime.

    Two other witnesses testified that Berry was not involved, but they didn’t sway the jury, which found him guilty. He was sentenced to life in prison. 

    By late 2020, the CIU had concluded that Hamilton’s testimony was unreliable and that “significant problems” had emerged “that undermine the integrity of the verdict.” 

    On Dec. 18, 2020, Valerie Newman, head of the CIU, told Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Kelly Ramsey that a new trial would likely produce “a different result.”

    “That is the reason why the prosecutor’s office agreed to vacate his convictions and sentence in this matter,” Newman told Ramsey.

    Still, the prosecutor’s office said it could not substantiate “actual innocence,” and Berry was given a choice: Plead no contest to accessory after the fact, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison, or remain convicted of murder and serve the rest of his life in prison. 

    The judge then sentenced Berry to time served and ordered his immediate release.

    “I’m certainly pleased to see that that information came forward to change your role in this unfortunate set of circumstances,” Ramsey told Berry. “And on behalf of the court, we wish you the very best.”

    The transcript shows the hearing was hurried. The judge had received the file only that morning and noted from the bench that it was “too thick to go through.” Newman asked the judge to consult Berry about the charges because she could not recall all three. The plea form wasn’t transmitted ahead of time, and the judge asked whether Berry’s attorney could sign for him if he wasn’t available.

    Miller said the timing of the release reflected the realities of the pandemic. She noted it was Newman who coordinated with the Michigan Department of Corrections to ensure Berry could speak with his attorney both before and on the day of the hearing. The judge also “thoroughly questioned” Berry about his appellate rights, Miller said, and he stated on the record that he understood them.

    Berry argues that he was manipulated by prosecutors. He was sick with COVID, the holidays were days away, the judge did not have the file until the morning of the hearing, the plea form was missing, and prosecutors had already acknowledged that the case was deeply flawed.

    “They waited until I was sick with COVID and seven days before Christmas,” Berry said. “I feel like I got hoodwinked in that plea.”

    Berry’s case raises new questions about how Wayne County prosecutors are handling convictions tainted by the work of Simon. Despite multiple federal lawsuits, millions in settlements, and findings that Simon coerced statements in other cases, prosecutors say they can only act on evidence specific to each case.

    Exoneree Lamarr Monson, who spent nearly 30 years in prison after Simon obtained a false confession from him, recently filed a civil rights complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice warning that “men whose convictions were tied to Simon remain incarcerated, unable to secure justice due to lost files, missing evidence, and institutional resistance.”

    Berry says he believes his case shows why “outside agencies should be looking at Barbara Simon,” and why defendants need full access to CIU records to make informed decisions.

    “I don’t understand how the Prosecutor’s Office is going to police itself,” he says. “We are never going to get a fair investigation without outside oversight.”


    [ad_2]

    Steve Neavling

    Source link

  • He was wrongfully imprisoned for 43 years. Moments after being released, ICE took him

    [ad_1]

    Subramanyam ‘Subu’ Vedam arrives at the Centre County Courthouse for his Post-Conviction Relief Act hearing on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2025.

    Subramanyam ‘Subu’ Vedam arrives at the Centre County Courthouse for his Post-Conviction Relief Act hearing on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2025.

    adrey@centredaily.com

    On the morning of Oct. 3, 2025, Subramanyam “Subu” Vedam walked out of Huntingdon State Correctional Institution, the Pennsylvania prison that had confined him for more than four decades. The 64-year-old had spent nearly his entire adult life behind bars for a murder he did not commit. His conviction had been vacated weeks earlier after a court found that prosecutors had concealed evidence that would have dismantled the state’s case. The Centre County district attorney formally withdrew all charges a day before his expected release.

    But Subu never made it home.

    As he stood on the threshold of freedom, officers from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were waiting. Acting on a decades-old deportation order, they detained him and transferred him to the Moshannon Valley Processing Center, an ICE detention facility in central Pennsylvania.

    His family, who had prepared to welcome him home, instead learned that Subu would remain in custody — not as a prisoner of the state, but as a detainee of the federal government.

    “To our disappointment, Subu was transferred to ICE custody and is currently being held at the Moshannon Valley Processing Center,” the family said in a statement posted on a website dedicated to building support for Vedam’s case.

    “This immigration issue is a remnant of Subu’s original case. Since that wrongful conviction has now been officially vacated and all charges against Subu have been dismissed, we have asked the immigration court to reopen the case and consider the fact that Subu has been exonerated. Our family continues to wait — and long for the day we can finally be together with him again.”

    Subu’s legal odyssey began in 1982, when he was arrested for the 1980 murder of his friend, 19-year-old Thomas Kinser, in Centre County. Prosecutors argued that Subu had shot Kinser with a .25-caliber pistol — a weapon that was never recovered — and based their case largely on circumstantial evidence. He was initially arrested in 1982 and convicted the following year, being finally sentenced to life without parole.

    An undated photo of Subramanyam ‘Subu’ Vedam.
    An undated photo of Subramanyam ‘Subu’ Vedam. StateCollege

    For the next 42 years, Subu maintained his innocence. His appeals were repeatedly denied, and his case languished until the Pennsylvania Innocence Project joined his defense team. In 2022, the project’s attorneys discovered previously undisclosed evidence in the files of the Centre County District Attorney’s Office — including an FBI report and handwritten notes suggesting that the bullet wound in Kinser’s skull was too small to have been caused by a .25-caliber bullet. That revelation undermined the entire prosecution theory.

    In August 2025, Judge Jonathan Grine of the Centre County Court of Common Pleas ruled that the concealed evidence represented a constitutional violation of due process. “Had that evidence been available at the time,” Grine wrote, “there would have been a reasonable probability that the jury’s judgment would have been affected.” One month later, District Attorney Bernie Cantorna dismissed the murder charge, saying a retrial would be both impossible and unjust.

    By then, Subu had become the longest-serving exoneree in Pennsylvania history — and one of the longest-serving in the United States.

    Freedom, however, came with a new peril.

    Legacy Deportation Order

    ICE cited a “legacy deportation order” dating back to the 1980s, tied not only to the murder charge but also to an earlier drug conviction from Subu’s youth. Before his arrest for murder, he had pleaded guilty at age 19 to intent to distribute LSD — a charge his family describes as a youthful mistake. Although that conviction carried its own immigration consequences, Subu, who was born in India but arrived in the United States when he was 9 months old, was never deported because he was serving a life sentence.

    Now, after his exoneration, ICE has revived the decades-old order.

    In a statement sent to the Herald, ICE said Philadelphia officers Vedam into custody immediately after his release because his criminal past.

    “Pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act, individuals who have exhausted all avenues of immigration relief and possess standing removal orders are priorities for enforcement. ERO notes that Mr. Vedam, a career criminal with a rap sheet dating back to 1980, is also a convicted controlled substance trafficker,” ICE said in an email. “Mr. Vedam will be held in ICE custody while the agency arranges for his removal in accordance with all applicable laws and due-process requirements”.

    Mike Truppa, a spokesperson for the family, says the move blindsided Vedam’s family. “They’re emotionally reeling from the fact that he could be sent to a country he doesn’t know,” he said. “There’s some ancestry in India where he might have some nominal relations, but his entire family — all of his family relationships — are here and in Canada.”

    Subu’s niece, Zoë Miller Vedam, said the family has little sense of what to expect from the immigration proceedings but continues to hold on to hope. “I’m not sure we have expectations. We definitely have hope,” she said. “It’s been a very long journey toward exonerating my uncle. He spent the last 44 years incarcerated for a crime he did not commit, and we’ve been fighting and supporting him this whole time.”

    Mike Truppa, left, and Zoë Miller-Vedam, Subramanyam Vedam's neice, address the crowd outside the Centre County Courthouse Monday, July 22, 2024.
    Mike Truppa, left, and Zoë Miller-Vedam, Subramanyam Vedam’s neice, address the crowd outside the Centre County Courthouse Monday, July 22, 2024. StateCollege

    Zoë described her uncle as a deeply compassionate man who transformed his decades of imprisonment into a mission of service. “He really did so much over those years to show the person that he is,” she said. “He worked as a teacher, helping many, many people get their degrees — people who’ve spoken to us afterwards about how having him support them while they were incarcerated really changed their lives. He completed multiple degrees himself. He was always learning and caring.”

    She added that Subu’s potential deportation to India would be devastating. “India, in many ways, is a completely different world to him,” she said. “He left India when he was nine months old. None of us can remember our lives at nine months old. He hasn’t been there for over 44 years, and the people he knew when he went as a child have passed away. His whole family — his sister, his nieces, his grand-nieces — we’re all U.S. citizens, and we all live here.”

    Zoë said her uncle’s wrongful conviction had robbed him of the chance to build a normal life and left him unprepared for exile in a country he doesn’t know. “He’s never been able to work outside the prison system,” she said. “He’s never seen a modern film, he’s never been on the internet, he doesn’t know technology. To send him to India at 64, on his own and away from his family and community, would be just extending the harm of his wrongful incarceration.”

    Still Fighting

    Subu’s legal team has filed a motion to reopen the immigration case and a petition for a stay of deportation while the motion is pending. The government has until Oct. 24 to respond.

    Over the decades, Subu built a life of quiet purpose inside prison walls. By all accounts, he was a model inmate. He designed and led literacy programs, raised funds for Big Brothers Big Sisters, and tutored hundreds of fellow prisoners working toward high school diplomas. He became the first person in the 150-year history of the facility to earn a master’s degree, completing his coursework by correspondence with a 4.0 GPA.

    “Subu’s true character is evidenced in the way he spent his 43 years of imprisonment for a crime he didn’t commit,” said his sister, Saraswathi Vedam, in a statement. “Rather than succumb to this dreadful hardship and mourn his terrible fate, he turned his wrongful imprisonment into a vehicle of service to others.”

    Supporters for Subramanyam ‘Subu’ Vedam hold posters as Saraswathi Vedam talks about seeking justice for her brother before his Post-Conviction Relief Act hearing on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2025 at the Centre County Courthouse.
    Supporters for Subramanyam ‘Subu’ Vedam hold posters as Saraswathi Vedam talks about seeking justice for her brother before his Post-Conviction Relief Act hearing on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2025 at the Centre County Courthouse. Abby Drey adrey@centredaily.com

    At the heart of the current dispute lies a question of legal timing — and humanity. Because Subu was never formally naturalized, his earlier drug conviction technically makes him deportable under U.S. immigration law. The wrongful murder conviction, now vacated, had kept him in state custody for decades, effectively freezing that process. With his exoneration, ICE argues that the original deportation order can now be executed.

    To Subu’s defenders, that logic defies both fairness and decency. The government is portraying him as a “career criminal and drug trafficker.” The defense intends to argue that the totality of circumstances — Subu’s wrongful imprisonment, his lifelong residence in the United States, and his record of rehabilitation — warrants reopening the case.

    For his niece, the fight is about more than legal arguments. “After 43 years of having his life taken from him because of a wrongful conviction, to send him to the other side of the world — to a place he doesn’t know, away from everyone who loves him — would just compound that injustice,” Zoë said. “We’re going to keep supporting him and doing everything we can to make sure that, now that he’s finally been exonerated, he’ll be able to be home with his family.”

    Antonio Maria Delgado

    el Nuevo Herald

    Galardonado periodista con más de 30 años de experiencia, especializado en la cobertura de temas sobre Venezuela. Amante de la historia y la literatura.

    [ad_2]

    Antonio María Delgado

    Source link

  • Teenager charged for January SEPTA shooting released amid video evidence

    Teenager charged for January SEPTA shooting released amid video evidence

    [ad_1]

    A 16-year-old has been cleared of all charges related to a fatal shooting at 15th Street Station after an investigation showed that he was not involved.

    The shooting took place on Jan. 11 on the station’s Market-Frankford Line westbound platform. Tyshaun Welles, 16, was struck in the head by a stray bullet after a shooter opened fire at a crowd. Welles died of his injuries on Jan. 16. 

    Zaire Wilson, 16, and Quadir Humphrey, 18, were arrested separately at the scene for the shooting. Police at the time said that Wilson had pulled out a gun before Humphrey began firing.

    Wilson, however, maintained his innocence. Surveillance footage showed that Wilson was “clearly not involved” in the shooting and that Humphrey had acted alone, said Jane Roh from the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office in an email.

    According to Roh, the footage was not immediately available to the district attorney’s office after Wilson’s arrest.

    As a result, the office requested a hearing on the matter. On Feb. 29, the district attorney’s office dropped all charges against Wilson and Judge Joffie Pittman ordered his release. Wilson was reunited with his family soon after.

    “When presented with evolving or new information, the criminal legal system should move as quickly in the interest of justice,” said District Attorney Larry Krasner in the email. “…whether that means being prepared to meet the Commonwealth’s burden at trial or releasing from detention people who did not actually participate in a crime.”

    Meanwhile, the district attorney’s office is still prosecuting Humphrey for murder and other related charges. 

    [ad_2]

    Chris Compendio

    Source link

  • Judge Says Man Who Spent 48 Years In Prison On False Murder Conviction Is Innocent

    Judge Says Man Who Spent 48 Years In Prison On False Murder Conviction Is Innocent

    [ad_1]

    Oklahoma man Glynn Simmons, 71, served the longest wrongful imprisonment in U.S. history, according to the National Registry of Exonerations.

    [ad_2]

    Source link