ReportWire

Tag: evergreen

  • Can I Tell Someone They Need Therapy?

    [ad_1]

    You’ve seen the signs for months: the spiraling texts, the ill-timed meltdowns, the same painful story on repeat. You care about this person. You’re exhausted by this person. And you’re starting to wonder: Can you tell them they need therapy?

    The short answer is “yes,” experts agree. But the delivery makes all the difference. “It needs to happen in a very gentle and vulnerable way,” says Melissa Gluck, a psychologist in New York whose clients often ask her how to suggest that their boyfriend, best friend, or mom go to therapy. “Your vulnerability is the greatest asset you have when you’re trying to encourage someone else to be vulnerable.”

    We asked experts how to suggest that your loved one try therapy without pushing them away.

    Setting expectations

    Almost anyone could benefit from seeing a therapist, but certain signs suggest it’s time to move from “maybe someday” to “sooner rather than later.” If your friend or family member is struggling to keep up with daily responsibilities, constantly ruminating about relationship issues, or expressing a sense of hopelessness, consider bringing it up, says Francesca Emma, a therapist in New York. The same is true if you’ve noticed a consistent shift in mood. “It’s not just having a bad day. When you see someone you love with either a really anxious mood shift or a depressing mood shift,” it’s time to urge them to seek help, she says.

    Some people—especially those in older generations—aren’t sure what therapy entails; or, they picture a Freudian-like scene featuring a patient stretched out on a leather couch while a silent analyst takes notes. It can be helpful to explain exactly what to expect. Therapy isn’t just about talking through feelings; rather, it often centers on practical skill-building. Therapists teach their clients how to set boundaries, express their needs clearly, navigate conflict, recognize unhealthy dynamics, repair after disagreements, and much more. “We’re not fixing you,” Emma says. “We’re helping make you a better version of yourself.”

    Read More: The Worst Things to Say to Someone With OCD—and What to Say Instead

    Your friend might protest that they already have people to talk to—hello, aren’t they in conversation with you? When that happens, remind them that having supportive friends isn’t the same as having professional support. “Therapy isn’t the place where you’re just venting about all the things that are wrong,” Gluck says. While she’s happy to listen to people blow off steam when they need to, therapy is so much more than letting it all out to a sympathetic ear. “It’s about having a space where you have someone who’s in the driver’s seat who’s going to help guide you through whatever problem you’re going through, and help shift your perspective,” she says. “They’re going to ask you meaningful questions. They’re going to challenge you when you’re feeling really resistant, and they’re going to push you to get out of your comfort zone and grow.”

    Finding the right words

    When you approach your friend or family member, keep your tone casual yet straightforward. Gluck suggests wording your initial check-in like this: “Hey, I feel like we’ve been talking about X, Y, and Z a lot, and I’ve noticed you’re really struggling. I’ve struggled like this in the past, and I tried therapy and it’s really helped. Would you want to explore that?”

    The more you open up about your own experience with therapy, the better, Gluck says. You don’t need to reveal the nitty-gritty of what your sessions focus on, but a bit of personal context can go a long way toward easing their resistance. For example: “I thought it would be scary, too, and it actually isn’t.” 

    If you feel like your partner could benefit from therapy—and you’re having a tough time in your relationship because they’re not working on themselves—it can help to explain how their stress is affecting you, too. Gluck suggests leading with empathy: “You’ve been dealing with all that stuff with your family, and I’m feeling like it’s taking away from our relationship. That’s making me scared and sad. You know how much I love you and want to be with you, and it’s really important to me that you take care of yourself and have a space outside of our relationship to talk about this.”

    Read More: The Worst Thing to Say to Someone Who’s Depressed

    No matter which exact words you choose, focusing on “I” statements is key, Emma stresses. For example, you might say: “I hear what you’re saying right now, and it sounds really difficult. I think a therapist might be able to help with that.”

    “You” statements, on the other hand—“You need help”—rarely land well. “The minute we use that word, it takes on more of a defensive nature,” she says. “To someone who can’t handle constructive criticism, it feels as though there’s something wrong with them, or they did something wrong.”

    There are other harmful comments to avoid, too. “You definitely don’t want to say, ‘You’re crazy,’ or ‘You’re never going to get better if you don’t get therapy,’” Emma says. Ultimatums and threats don’t work. They’ll only drive the person you care about deeper into defensiveness.

    When to drop it

    In order to benefit from therapy, somebody has to want to be there. Gluck has had plenty of clients shuffle into her office because their parents or romantic partner pressured them to make an appointment, yet they weren’t actually open to the idea. “If you’re not invested, you’re not going to get anything out of it,” she says. “Don’t force anyone.”

    If your friend is adamant that therapy won’t help them, Emma suggests letting the conversation go. “You put it out there and let it simmer, because if you continue to go back and forth, it’s like you’re the expert in something,” she says. “We are not the expert in someone else’s life.”

    Gluck, meanwhile, is partial to this phrasing when someone resists: “I totally get that—I used to feel the same way. Sometimes it’s nice to have a third party, but if you’re really not interested right now, I’ll drop it.” Or you could keep it short and sweet: “No worries, it was just a suggestion.”

    Read More: Stop Saying These 5 Things to People With Social Anxiety

    If a few weeks or months pass, and your loved one is still struggling, it’s OK to try again. Gluck recommends bringing it up like this: “I know we talked about therapy a couple months ago. It sounds like whatever you’re going through is still really intense, and I think it’s time we figure out a plan, because you shouldn’t have to live like this.”

    “It’s all coming from, ‘This isn’t fair to you to be living with your head like this,’” she says. “There could be another path.”

    When and where to bring it up

    You don’t need to wait for the perfect environment to start talking about therapy. Whenever and wherever the topic comes up organically or feels natural is best. “As mental-health professionals, we’re really pushing toward destigmatizing therapy,” Gluck says. She wants more people to normalize mental-health care as part of everyday life. “If you’re at dinner and someone’s talking, you could just be like, ‘Hey, have you thought about therapy? I feel like you would really like it,’” she says.

    If you dramatically pull someone aside, on the other hand, and tell them you need to have a talk, they’ll probably be freaked out by your serious tone—and are less likely to respond well to your suggestion. It risks turning a supportive nudge into a confrontation.

    “This doesn’t need to be a life-or-death conversation. You’re having a conversation with someone you love and talking about this really normal, healthy thing,” Gluck says. “If your friend came to you and said they were getting migraines and they were feeling nauseous all the time, you would say, ‘You need to go to a neurologist. Go see a doctor right now.’ Let this be the exact same thing.”

    Wondering what to say in a tricky social situation? Email timetotalk@time.com

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link

  • Which Of Britney Broski’s “Royal Court” Guests Are You?

    [ad_1]

    Which Britney Broski Royal Court Member Are You?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why You Can’t Remember Being a Toddler

    [ad_1]

    Think back to the first thing you remember: Candles on your birthday cake, the wiry fur of a childhood dog, the smell of your mother’s perfume. Whatever the memory, chances are you were already at least a couple years old when those events took place. Children younger than three are intensely aware of the world around them—just look at any toddler, delightedly mouthing a toy or screaming at fireworks—and they seem to remember things from the recent past. Until, one day, they don’t.  

    Between us and our earliest experiences lies a mysterious barrier. And that’s not just true for  humans. Experiments have shown that mice show a similar pattern of forgetting. Mice that learn to escape a maze when they’re just a couple weeks old forget by the time they are adults. Young mice conditioned to fear a chamber where they’ve received a shock don’t recognize it after they grow up.

    In recent years, scientists who study this phenomenon—sometimes called childhood or infantile amnesia—have made some surprising findings that illuminate how this nearly universal form of forgetting works.

    Are the memories gone, or just out of reach?

    It might seem like the memories of early life simply get erased. But some research suggests that in mice, those memories still exist, and can be brought back. 

    At the lab of Paul Frankland, a senior scientist at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, researchers tagged the cells in the brain that were activated as young mice learned to fear a chamber. Three months later, when the full-grown mice had forgotten their fear, the researchers activated those cells again—and suddenly, the mice remembered

    This suggests that—at least in mice—memories formed in early life are not wiped or destroyed; they’re just out of reach of normal recall. It may be that something about how the brain grows makes those memories inaccessible, locked rooms whose keys have been lost.

    Read More: How to, Like, Stop Saying Filler Words

    Indeed, animals whose brains tend to add smaller crops of neurons after birth—guinea pigs, for instance—do not show signs of this amnesia, Frankland and colleagues have found

    The lab of Tomás Ryan, a neuroscientist at Trinity College Dublin, has also revealed that some mice are less prone to forgetting. Male mice whose mothers’ immune systems were activated during pregnancy do not show the same pattern of amnesia as their female siblings or control mice.

    What’s more, Ryan’s group has highlighted the role of immune cells in the brain called microglia in infantile amnesia: Knock down microglia activity in a key developmental window, and mice don’t forget the solution to a maze as they mature. This suggests that the immune system may be involved in infantile amnesia.

    But what about humans? 

    It’s tricky to figure out what is going on inside the brains of babies and very young children. (To name one barrier: Sitting motionless for brain scans is not their strong suit.) However, Nick Turk-Browne at Yale University and his colleagues have managed to scan the brains of a growing number of little kids, and they’ve discovered that kids as young as a year old do appear to be forming memories, in the same way that adults create recollections of past events, called episodic memory. This suggests that humans, too, may be making memories that later just can’t be reached.

    Is it worth taking your two-year-old on vacation, if it’s all going to disappear? “I get asked this all the time: ‘What can we do to prevent this from happening?’” says Turk-Browne. “You can talk about it a lot, or show pictures. But the true, pure thing—where he had this memory that he hasn’t thought about in a long time, that you haven’t talked about with him—that will soon be gone, for better or worse.” 

    Read More: Stressed Out? Try Putting Together a Kids’ Puzzle

    To get a better sense of precisely when memories are formed and forgotten, Sarah Power at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and her colleagues built a media room where children have experiences they will never encounter in the outside world. “One of the really important things about the task is that everything only exists inside the lab space. We wanted to make sure it was completely unique in the sense that…the contextual environments don’t exist anywhere outside in the real world, so that we could know that if they did remember these associations, it could only be from the fact that they had been in the lab,” she says. They have so far observed 400 toddlers between the ages of 18 and 24 months, having them form memories of the lab space, and they intend to follow them over time. The project is still in its early stages, but “from the preliminary data, we’ve been very surprised at their ability to encode and retain these episodic-like memories,” she says.

    For a smaller experiment Turk-Browne is running, parents filmed footage of events from the children’s perspective. Then, he and his colleagues showed the children their videos and videos from strangers while scanning their brains, at several sessions spread out over two years. The idea is to assess whether videos of a child’s own view of the world elicit remembering that’s detectable on brain scans, and, if so, exactly when that effect disappears. 

    Why do we forget?

    It’s a mystery why our brains, and those of other mammals, forget our early lives. “I do wonder what it tells us about human memory in general, education, early life, learning…Is this a biological switch, or is this just a product of exuberant learning?” says Ryan. “In other words, is our brain actually intentionally saying we’re going to shut down these memories? Or is it just a byproduct of heavy learning in that period?”

    Does retaining our earliest memories pose a threat, somehow, to our survival? Or does the value of those memories lie in something that does not require their conscious retrieval—so if we forget them, it does not matter?

    Perhaps the point of our earliest memories is that they allow us to build a mental database of the way things work, Turk-Browne speculates. The specifics—the things we hang onto in episodic memory—might not be what’s valuable about them. 

    “Most memory researchers think of the adaptive value of memory as being able to behave appropriately in new situations based on past experience,” he says. “There’s tons of behavioral evidence that even newborn infants are really good at aggregating statistics”—building a picture of the world that stands up over time, that helps us make decisions and control our environments. Whatever the reasons behind the disappearance of our memories, they might still be with us in ways we don’t recognize.

    [ad_2]

    Veronique Greenwood

    Source link

  • “She Hid A Gram Of Cocaine In Her Shoe”: 25 Shocking Celebrity Facts That Are So Freaking Wild

    [ad_1]

    25 Shocking Celebrity Pop Culture Facts

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Def Leppard’s MTV Revolution: Pioneers of Music Video Storytelling

    [ad_1]

    Before streaming and download platforms, there was MTV, and there was Def Leppard, staring straight into the camera like they already knew this glowing box was about to change everything.

    It’s easy now to forget how strange music videos felt in the early ’80s. Rock bands weren’t sure what to do with them. Some treated them like an obligation tacked onto a single. Some flat-out didn’t trust the format. The cool kids rolled their eyes and swore it was all surface.

    Def Leppard didn’t roll their eyes. They leaned in, hard.

    Def Leppard’s Journey into Music Videos

    “Bringing on the Heartbreak” hit MTV in 1982, and it didn’t just sit there politely waiting for attention. It lived there. Heavy rotation. Daytime, nighttime, middle-of-the-night insomnia slots. Before Pyromania exploded, before they were competing with Thriller on the charts, that video was already doing the groundwork in America.

    Black leather. Moody lighting. Slow pans across faces that looked carved for television. It wasn’t flashy in a modern, CGI-heavy sense, but it understood something critical: this wasn’t radio with pictures attached. This was mythology-building in real time, and the camera was the new amplifier.

    While other bands were still debating whether MTV even mattered, Def Leppard treated it like oxygen.

    Then came Pyromania in 1983, and everything went widescreen. “Photograph” wasn’t just a song blasting out of car stereos; it became a visual loop you couldn’t escape. The band chasing a larger-than-life Marilyn Monroe image through neon-drenched sets and quick-cut edits that felt electric and modern at the time. It was glossy without tipping into plastic. Playful without becoming disposable. And most importantly, it was unforgettable.

    MTV turned that video into a constant presence. You didn’t have to buy the record to know Def Leppard. You just had to turn on your TV and wait a few minutes.

    “Rock of Ages” followed and doubled down on that visual confidence. Industrial backdrops. Big hooks. Bigger hair. The band looked like they belonged in arenas even if you’d never set foot in one. The videos didn’t simply support the songs — they amplified them and made them feel larger than life.

    And here’s the part people sometimes gloss over: Pyromania was competing with Michael Jackson’s Thriller for the #1 spot in the United States.

    That’s not small company, and you don’t hang in that orbit by accident. Def Leppard understood the assignment early. MTV wasn’t just promotion; it was narrative, repetition, identity. It was brand-building before the word “brand” swallowed the music industry whole. The band’s anthemic sound — those stacked vocals, those arena-sized choruses — translated perfectly to the screen. Everything felt heightened and polished, already built for maximum impact.

    They embodied the 1980s MTV aesthetic before it curdled into cliché. Glossy. High-energy. Cinematic without being overly conceptual. They weren’t trying to make art-house short films. They were making moments you wanted to replay.

    And moments replay, especially when a network decides to spin them hourly. By the time Hysteria arrived in 1987, MTV wasn’t a novelty anymore. It was the pipeline to mass consciousness. Def Leppard didn’t just ride it. They helped define how a rock band could dominate it.

    The Ultimate 1980s Music Video

    “Pour Some Sugar on Me” might be the ultimate example. The live-performance energy. The sweat. The crowd shots. The camera practically vibrating with the beat as Joe Elliott stalked the stage. It made you feel like you were already there, already part of something enormous and slightly dangerous.

    The song itself was pure sugar-rush rock, engineered to detonate in arenas. But the video locked it into pop culture permanently, welding sound and image together so tightly you couldn’t separate them even if you tried.

    That’s pioneering in a very real sense. Not because they were the first band to make a music video, but because they were among the first to fully understand that the video could be as important as the single itself. In some cases, it could even lead the charge.

    Some artists of that era still treated MTV like a necessary evil, something to endure between tours. Def Leppard treated it like a stage extension, a second arena that reached millions at once.

    And they showed up dressed for it. Joe Elliott had the stare and the swagger that translated through glass screens into suburban living rooms. Phil Collen and Steve Clark looked like they’d stepped directly out of the decade’s fever dream — all angles, riffs, and attitude. Rick Allen, after losing his arm in 1984 and returning behind the kit, became part of the visual narrative too: resilience, defiance, a band that refused to disappear.

    That story played out on MTV as much as it did in magazines or on radio. There’s something almost surgical about how well their sound matched the medium. The production on Pyromania and Hysteria was massive and meticulously layered. Guitars stacked like skyscrapers. Harmonies piled high. Every chorus engineered to explode in a way that demanded a visual equal.

    MTV provided the platform, but Def Leppard supplied the spectacle. The heavy rotation of “Bringing on the Heartbreak” before Pyromania even dropped gave the band a foothold in America that many British acts struggled to secure. It built anticipation and familiarity. By the time the album landed in stores, audiences already felt like they knew the faces behind the sound.

    That’s power in a pre-internet world. Radio used to be the gatekeeper. MTV added a second door, and Def Leppard didn’t just walk through it politely — they kicked it open with volume and eyeliner intact.

    You can draw a straight line from those early videos to the way bands began budgeting serious money for visuals. To the understanding that image wasn’t shallow fluff; it was strategy. To the realization that if you paired an anthemic sound with iconic, repeatable imagery, you didn’t just sell records. You built a universe.

    Did they invent the music video? No.

    But they helped redefine what it could accomplish for a hard rock band in America.

    They proved that television could turn riffs into rituals and choruses into communal events. And in the early ’80s, that world flickered across cathode-ray screens in bedrooms and basements and bars across the country.

    It’s funny now, in an era where we scroll past videos in seconds and attention spans fracture by the hour. Back then, if MTV decided you mattered, you mattered loudly and repeatedly.

    Def Leppard didn’t stumble into that spotlight by luck. They understood it, crafted for it, and owned it.

    And in doing so, they helped turn the music video from a promotional afterthought into a cultural force that could launch, and sustain, rock stardom.

    [ad_2]

    Anne Erickson

    Source link

  • Eric Dane’s Most Memorable Roles: A Career to Rewatch

    [ad_1]

    Many remember Dane as Dr. Mark Sloan, the instantly recognizable “McSteamy” of Grey’s Anatomy. But his career extended far beyond one nickname or one towel scene. Over two decades, Dane appeared in action thrillers, superhero films, prestige cable dramas, and romantic comedies, displaying a versatility that surprised viewers who only knew him from television.

    Grey’s Anatomy

    Dane joined Grey’s Anatomy as a guest star in 2006 and became a series regular by Season 3. That infamous towel scene, when Mark Sloan emerged from the shower, became a cultural moment, dubbed a “watercooler moment” by the show itself.

    But Dane’s performance was more than eye candy. Mark Sloan’s journey from a self-absorbed womanizer to a devoted father figure and Lexie Grey’s true love offered Dane an emotional arc rich with complexity. Over six seasons, he balanced charm, arrogance, vulnerability, and heartbreak in a way that made Mark Sloan a fully realized character. Dane left the show in 2012, ending one chapter of his career while setting the stage for new challenges.

    Euphoria

    As Cal Jacobs in Euphoria, Dane delivered one of his most intense performances. Cal is a closeted father whose repressed desires turn into predatory behavior. Dane’s portrayal required the ability to evoke both sympathy and discomfort, showing a man broken by shame who also harms others.

    Acting alongside Zendaya, Hunter Schafer, and Jacob Elordi, Dane’s work stood out in a series famous for its raw approach to trauma. He continued filming Season 3 even after his ALS diagnosis, with those episodes scheduled to premiere on April 12, 2026. Knowing his real-life circumstances adds an additional layer of admiration for his dedication and courage.

    The Last Ship

    After leaving Grey’s Anatomy, Dane took his first leading role in TNT’s The Last Ship, produced by Michael Bay. He played Navy Commander Tom Chandler, tasked with saving humanity after a global pandemic wipes out 80% of the population.

    The series, which ran from 2014 to 2018, combined action, leadership, and high-stakes drama. Dane carried the show with authority, portraying Chandler as both strong and human, capable of doubt, fear, and hope. Unlike other roles that emphasized his looks, here he anchored a show with gravitas, proving his range as an actor. In hindsight, the show’s pandemic storyline has a new resonance, highlighting the intensity of Dane’s performance.

    X-Men: The Last Stand

    Dane appeared briefly as Jamie Madrox, also known as Multiple Man, in Brett Ratner’s 2006 X-Men sequel. Playing a mutant who creates duplicates of himself, Dane was a henchman for Ian McKellen’s Magneto during the film’s climactic battle.

    Though small, the role demonstrates Dane’s willingness to embrace comic book and genre projects early in his career. It’s a reminder that he could navigate both serious drama and playful, imaginative worlds with ease.

    Marley & Me

    In Marley & Me (2008), Dane played Sebastian Tunney, a polished colleague who receives the more glamorous assignments while Owen Wilson’s character is left with mundane work.

    While the film focuses on John and Jennifer Grogan’s family life with a mischievous Labrador, Dane’s presence adds charm and subtle humor. He never overshadows the leads but enhances the dynamic, proving his ability to support and complement a story rather than dominate it.

    Burlesque

    In the 2010 musical Burlesque, Dane played Marcus, a wealthy developer threatening to buy and demolish the titular club. Starring Cher and Christina Aguilera, the film is flamboyant and campy, and Dane leans fully into the role of the slick villain.

    The movie required him to play a foil without undermining its over-the-top tone. He brought a grounded presence to a world of glittering costumes and big musical numbers, balancing charisma with menace.

    Bad Boys: Ride or Die

    His co-star Martin Lawrence reflected on working with Dane after his death, writing on Instagram: “My condolences go out to the family of @realericdane 🙏🏾 I can tell you firsthand — solid brotha, true professional, and brought that presence every single time. Much love! #ericdane #badboysfamilyforlife.” Knowing Dane was already experiencing early symptoms of ALS adds depth to his appearance in the film, showing his professionalism and commitment.

    Notable Mentions

    While Eric Dane is best remembered for roles like Mark Sloan in Grey’s Anatomy and Cal Jacobs in Euphoria, his career included many other projects that showcase his versatility. These performances may be less well-known but are worth revisiting.

    In television, Dane appeared in the mini-series Kabul (2025), a tense drama exploring conflict and human resilience, and Borderline (2025), where he played a complex character navigating moral gray areas.

    His film roles spanned genres and tones. In One Fast Move (2024) and Dangerous Waters (2023), he embraced action and suspense, proving again that he could carry high-stakes roles. In character-driven stories like Americana (2023), Little Dixie (2023), and American Carnage (2022), Dane delivered layered performances that balanced charm and emotional depth.

    Earlier in his career, Dane also appeared in The Ravine (2021) and the 2006 romantic comedy Wedding Wars alongside Jon Stamos, showing a lighter, approachable side to his work. Beyond these, Dane appeared in numerous supporting roles across television and film, consistently adding presence, nuance, and credibility to every project he joined.

    These roles serve as a reminder that while certain characters became iconic, Eric Dane’s career was built on steady dedication, range, and a willingness to take on a wide variety of stories.

    Final Performances and Legacy

    Dane’s final projects included Amazon’s Countdown (June 2025) and a guest role in NBC’s Brilliant Minds (November 2025), where he played a firefighter living with ALS. His portrayal of a character confronting the same disease he faced in real life was described by co-stars as “heartbreaking” and “brave.”

    In a 2025 interview with The Washington Post, Dane said, “I don’t really have a dog in the fight when it comes to worrying about what people think about me. This is more of a: ‘How can I help? How can I be of some service?’” He added, “If I’m going out, I’m gonna go out helping somebody.”

    Dane’s career was defined by range, courage, and dedication. From hospital hallways to high seas, from comic book battles to intimate family dramas, he left a lasting impression that goes far beyond one nickname. Rewatching his work now is both a tribute and a reminder of the talent, heart, and resilience Eric Dane brought to every role.

    [ad_2]

    Kayla Morgan

    Source link

  • How to, Like, Stop Saying Filler Words

    [ad_1]

    The tiniest quirks in our speech can change how we’re perceived. But, um, filler words aren’t the villains they’re made out to be. They’re, you know, working behind the scenes.

    “We group them all together as these kind of garbage words,” says Valerie Fridland, a professor of linguistics at the University of Nevada, Reno, and the author of Like, Literally, Dude: Arguing for the Good in Bad English. “We call them ‘filler words,’ and fillers are things we don’t like—you don’t want fillers in your food. So when you use that same word to refer to things in conversation, it sounds like things you don’t want.”

    Yet in reality, they serve important cognitive and social functions. We talked to experts about why we rely on them—and how to rein them in when it matters.

    The surprisingly useful life of ‘um’

    When you use filler words, your brain isn’t glitching. It’s buffering.

    Linguists divide these verbal loading bars into two categories. First, there are “filled pauses” such as “um” and “uh,” which people love to hate. They’re unusual because they aren’t stand-ins for anything else; you can’t swap in a more polished synonym. There is no elevated version of “um,” Fridland points out. 

    Instead, they serve a specific function. We tend to deploy them right before we wade into something linguistically heavier: a long clause, an unfamiliar term, a syntactic maze. “It’s our brain’s way of indicating it needs a moment,” Fridland says. The more complex the thought, the more likely your brain is to build in a beat.

    Filled pauses don’t just buy time for the speaker—they manage the conversation for everyone else involved, too. An audible “um” or “uh” signals that a thought is still under construction. Otherwise, the person you’re talking to might assume you’ve finished and jump in, or wonder whether you’ve lost your train of thought. “Either they think you’re done and take over, or they’re like, ‘What’s your problem? Why can’t you come up with something?’” Fridland says. By contrast, slipping in an “um” or “uh” telegraphs something more reassuring: “Hold on, I’m coming up with it. Give me a sec.” Interestingly, Fridland adds, research suggests people tend to use “uh” for shorter delays, and opt for “um” when they anticipate needing a bit more time.

    Read More: 12 Communication Habits to Ditch in 2026

    The other category of filler words includes what linguists call “discourse markers”—words such as “like,” “literally,” “you know,” “well,” “I mean,” and “so.” Rather than acting as mental timeouts, these are social tools. They help structure what you’re saying and subtly guide how listeners interpret it. “It’s how I want you to understand what I’m saying in terms of how things relate to each other,” Fridland says. For example, starting a sentence with “well” can signal that what follows may not be what someone expects. 

    In everyday communication, all of these filler words “serve really good interpersonal functions,” Fridland says. “They definitely help us in casual conversations. If we didn’t use discourse markers, people would think we were very robotic and unpleasant.”

    The perception problem

    While filler words can help conversations flow, research suggests overusing them may signal uncertainty or a shaky command of the material (or language in general). In professional settings—like work presentations—that perception can erode a speaker’s credibility and clarity.

    “Unfortunately, the audience may perceive you as less intelligent or less prepared if you use vocal fillers excessively,” says Heather Hayes, a clinical assistant professor in the media, communications, and visual arts department at Pace University in New York. “You’re going to distract your audience. It can do a disservice for you as a speaker.”

    Other research has found that filler words don’t go over well in high-stakes situations like job interviews, either. The more filler words someone uses, the lower they’re rated in professional and personal credibility and communication competence, which can influence hiring decisions.

    Read More: 7 Polite Phrases That Are Still Worth Saying

    Roger Love, a Los Angeles–based vocal coach who trains high-profile public speakers and performers, finds it difficult to conceal his contempt for filler words. “They’re destroying the English language,” he says (especially “like,” which he detests most of all). Imagine, he says, that you start a presentation or job interview like this: “As a rocket scientist, I’ve discovered the true meaning of matter.” Then you follow up with a rogue “um.” “The audience thinks, ‘Wow, I thought that person was really intelligent—but they don’t sound so smart anymore,’” he says.

    Love dislikes filler words so much that he launched a domestic crackdown when his children were young. “When we had our first child, we decided to tell her that fillers were a swear word,” he says. “Any time she started saying ‘um,’ we’d say, ‘We don’t swear in this house, honey.’” The intervention, he says, stuck. As adults, his children—one of whom is an acclaimed songwriter—are careful with their words and sparing with the fillers.

    How to dial it down

    You don’t have to purge every “um” from your vocabulary. But in high-stakes moments—job interviews, presentations, big meetings—cutting back can sharpen how you’re perceived. Experts say a few small adjustments can make a noticeable difference.

    Record yourself speaking

    The idea of watching (or merely listening to) yourself speak may make you shudder. But it’s one of the best ways to figure out which filler words you lean on. “If you just know you’re using some, but you don’t really know which ones you use, where you use them, how you use them, or how frequently you use them, you’re sort of just taking a shot in the dark,” Fridland says.

    That’s why she suggests recording yourself having a video chat and then poring over the auto-generated transcript. Ideally, it’ll be a long, casual conversation, so you’ll forget you clicked the record button; otherwise, you risk becoming hyper-vigilant of the way you’re speaking, and not capturing your natural speech patterns.

    The exercise will give you a clearer sense of your personal filler habits. “When you’re actually face-to-face is when you tend to really lean on these markers more,” Fridland says, “and therefore you get a really good representation of the type that you use.”

    Ask a friend for their opinion

    There’s another way to find out if you’re, like, always overusing a certain filler word: Outsource the diagnosis. Hayes suggests approaching a close friend with a straightforward ask: “Hey, do you notice that I use any vocal fillers?” The answer might be that you squeeze “you know” into nearly every sentence. That information can be humbling—and extremely useful.

    “Awareness is the first step in overcoming any bad habit,” she says. “Once you become cognizant of your personal filler word, you can be more mindful when you speak and actively try to avoid using it.”

    Take inspiration from music

    Love believes that the real solution isn’t to eliminate pauses—it’s to replace filler words with melody. “What you want to do before silence is you want to go up,” he says. Instead of letting your voice drop at a comma, which signals you’re finished, he teaches clients to end phrases on a slightly higher note or sustained tone, which is called an ascending melody. “If you used more melody, you wouldn’t need a filler word. They would know you weren’t done,” Love says. In other words, your voice can signal continuation without resorting to “um.” “The melody of your voice tells them there’s more to come,” he says. 

    Read More: The 4-Word Trick to Saying a Great Goodbye

    Descending melodies, meanwhile—which mean pitch and volume drop at the end of the sentence—make you sound sad, which will likely rub off on the person listening to you. When your voice drops in this manner, “people think it’s their turn to talk,” Love says, which is why it’s best to replace your filler word with an ascending melody.

    Breathe in a specific way

    Another of Love’s favorite fixes is deceptively simple: change how you breathe. He teaches his clients diaphragmatic breathing, which means breathing in through the nose and expanding the stomach rather than the chest.

    The key, he says, is to keep your lips closed until you have an actual word ready to say. “I tell people to close their lips before they start a sentence,” he says. “At commas, close your mouth again and inhale through your nose. I don’t care how long it takes to think of what to say next—you’re not allowed to open up your mouth until you have an actual word to say that isn’t ‘um’ or ‘uh.’”

    Sometimes, as they’re practicing, Love’s clients even put their hand over their mouth to physically prevent themselves from blurting out a filler word. It may sound like “a child’s trick,” he says, “but it works.”

    Slow down

    Speed is rocket fuel for “um.” “When you speak very fast, you’ll start to spew out those vocal fillers while your brain is trying to catch up with your mouth,” Hayes says. The solution is deliberate deceleration. Many people rush because they’re nervous or eager to get a presentation over with—but that urgency backfires. “If you slow down, you won’t rely on filling the silence,” she says.

    Say it out loud

    Another smart fix: practice out loud. “What people make the mistake of doing is they think through what they’re going to say, but they don’t talk through what they’re going to say,” Fridland explains. “You should practice that. Say it out loud,” because thinking through your remarks means focusing on big ideas—not how you’ll actually articulate them. When you rehearse verbally, your brain “has already mapped out that pathway,” so it’s less likely to stall with an “um” or “uh” when you’re speaking in real time, she says.

    Get comfortable with silence

    A moment of silence can feel like an eternity, especially when the mic is in your hands and a sea of expectant eyes are staring right at you. “It can feel embarrassing to sit in that silence, and we may fill the pause with a filler word,” Hayes says. “Time feels so slow, so you may think taking a pause is ‘cringe,’ but rest assured that it isn’t.”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link

  • When Honesty Is Overrated in Relationships

    [ad_1]

    From childhood, honesty is framed as a moral north star. Tell the truth. Don’t lie. Say what you mean, no matter the cost. But adult relationships quickly expose the limits of that lesson. Instead of building closeness, some truths erode it—especially when honesty is delivered without care, context, or concern for the person on the receiving end.

    “When honesty is just a mic drop, it doesn’t facilitate connection. It’s just someone monologuing at the other person,” says Jennifer C. Veilleux, a professor of clinical psychology at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, who studies emotion. Imagine, for example, that a woman tells her husband she’s happier when he’s not around. “That is honest, but it feels like an arrow to the soul—and it’s hard not to take that really personally and get dejected by those honest feelings,” Veilleux says. “People struggle hearing honesty from their partner, especially in relationships that are a little bit rocky already.”

    We asked experts when honesty helps—and when it harms.

    When honesty isn’t welcome

    Trust is the No. 1 ingredient to a healthy relationship, says Dr. Terri Orbuch, a sociology professor at Oakland University and a research professor at the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research, where she directed one of the longest-running studies of married couples in the U.S. You can’t have trust without honesty—yet some nuance is required. Your partner also has to have your best interests at heart, she says.

    “You have to do the weighing act, thinking about how important the information is to your partner and your relationship,” Orbuch says. From there, “it’s how you say it and what you say. It’s thinking about the impact on the other person, and how it will make them feel. And that’s a learned skill.”

    There’s a difference between meaningful honesty and unbridled self-expression, says Kate Engler, a marriage and family therapist in Evanston, Ill. Honesty rooted in a genuine place “usually, if not always, involves some level of self-reflection, vulnerability, and the goal of improving, deepening, or repairing the relationship,” she says. The problematic kind, on the other hand, is typically “some form of venting, driven by dysregulated or reactive emotions, and is harsh or retaliatory.”

    Read More: Are You Gaslighting Yourself? Here’s How to Tell

    Veilleux thinks of the struggling couples she works with as two medieval castles that have been at war for a long time. Sometimes, one person might decide that because their kingdom has been under attack, they’re going to weaponize their honesty, hoping it takes out the other side. That tactic might take the form of an honest but cutting and unnecessary remark. “A lot of people have this tit-for-tat attitude, like, ‘Well, you hurt me, so I’m going to hurt you back,’” she says.

    Other times, however, people are simply oblivious about how their honesty will land. “They don’t know that they’re hitting on someone else’s emotional sensitivity, and that the honest thing they’re saying is going to be hurtful to the other person,” Veilleux says. “It’s not always intentional, but sometimes it is.”

    How it causes harm

    No-filter honesty can cause deep hurt and shame. It also diminishes connection and trust in a relationship. “Why would someone want to be vulnerable or open with a person who weaponizes honesty?” Engler says. “It would be unwise to do so.” 

    Engler points to Gottman’s Four Horsemen—criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling—identified by psychologists John and Julie Gottman to describe what they call the four destructive communication patterns that often cause a relationship to break down. Contempt, criticism, and defensiveness go hand-in-hand with harsh honesty, she says. “Those things will wear somebody down to the point that they’re ready to leave,” she says. “You really can’t underestimate the damage they can do.”

    Read More: 7 Polite Phrases That Are Still Worth Saying

    Blunt-force honesty isn’t good for the person being honest in a harmful way, either, Engler adds: It keeps them from getting what they need in a relationship, and creates a dynamic in which that’s the norm.

    What to do when you hear it

    If you’re on the receiving end of harshness dressed up as honesty, there are ways to stick up for yourself.

    “One thing I tell people is to acknowledge the hurt in the moment, even by saying, ‘Ouch,’” Veilleux says. “It’s a simple little statement,” but it helps the other person understand the impact of their words. Plus, you can gauge their reaction: If they say, “Oh, yikes, I didn’t mean that,” that opens the door to a productive conversation. But if they come back with, “Well, yeah, because you hurt me first,” that’s telling, too. “Are they trying to take power?” Veilleux says. “Or are they able to receive the insight that they hurt someone unintentionally?”

    Engler recommends calmly telling your partner that you’re open to hearing their feedback—but not in that way. Let them know that when they’re ready to have an actual discussion, you will be, too.

    How to be honest in a tactful way

    If you’re considering withholding the truth, Orbuch suggests asking yourself: “What’s the reason for being dishonest? Is it because it protects you and makes you feel better or look better, or is it because you’re protecting or thinking about your partner?”

    If you have a bank account you never mentioned to your wife, for example, you’re being dishonest by concealing it. “That leads to betrayal and distrust,” Orbuch says, and you need to come clean. If you think another person in the restaurant where you’re having dinner is attractive, on the other hand—but would never act on it—bringing it up would likely feel unkind. “That’s protecting your partner,” she says. “It’s editing information, and omitting non-important information that’s only going to hurt them.”

    When it becomes clear you need to tell the truth, there are compassionate ways to do so. 

    For example, it’s helpful to frame what you say as opinion, not fact, Veilleux says. You could use phrases like these: “From my perspective,” “My impression is,” or “Well, my take is…”

    “That takes ownership of the thought,” she says. “Like, ‘It’s my thought, it’s not a fact, and you can disagree with it, and that’s OK.’”

    Read More: 12 Communication Habits to Ditch in 2026

    The most effective honesty is buffered, not blunt, experts agree. For example, if your husband said something to one of your kids that you didn’t like, don’t lash out: “You’re a terrible parent!” Instead, Engler suggests, preface your honest feedback with something positive: “First, I want you to know you’re such an amazing dad.” Then, ask him if he’s open to a little feedback. “It’s such a small thing, but you establish buy-in from someone when you do that, and you’re setting the stage to say, ‘I’m about to say something that might be hard to hear.’” That’s better than simply dumping on them, she says, which is more in line with unbridled self-expression.

    Once you start the conversation, shift into a back-and-forth. You might say: “It seemed like emotions ran high, and I think it had a rough impact. Does this resonate with you? Does it sound familiar or true to you? What are your thoughts?”

    “That way,” she says, “it’s a dialogue.”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link

  • Alysa Liu’s Dad Spent Nearly $1M on Her Figure Skating Career: ‘I Spared No Money’

    [ad_1]

    As one of the faces of US Olympic figure skating, Alysa Liu wouldn’t have gotten to where she is now without the incredible support of her parents.

    Alysa Liu was hailed as an ice skating prodigy from the young age of 5 and held out a promising future. She competed at the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics at 16-years-old and shocked the skating community by announcing her retirement shortly after. Fast forward to 2026, Alysa’s back on the ice and chasing after the gold medal in the women’s short program at the Milan Cortina Winter Olympics.

    Related: Ilia Malinin’s Parents Are Also Olympic Figure Skaters—His Mom’s Grandma Sold Her Wedding Ring So She Could Buy Her 1st Skates

    Who is Alysa Liu’s dad, Arthur Liu?

    OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 31: Alysa Liu, 13, of Richmond, center, along with her father Arthur Liu, and her coach Laura Lipetsky hold a press conference after practice at Oakland Ice Center in Oakland, Calif., on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2019. Liu returned home after becoming the youngest person ever to win the U.S. Figure Skating championship in Detroit last week. She also is the first American to land to triple axels (3 1/2 rotations with a forward take off) in one program.

    Alysa Liu’s dad is Arthur Liu. Her father was involved in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and emigrated to the US, where he started his own law firm. He has five children, including Alysa, with different anonymous egg donors. When Alysa was 5-years-old, he brought her to the Oakland Ice Center, and she trained under Laura Lipetsky.

    In an interview with 60 Minutes, Arthur Liu revealed that he has spent between $500,000 to $1 million for his daughter’s skating career. “I spared no money, no time. I just saw talent.”

    At the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing, Arthur and Alysa were targeted in a spying operation that the US Justice Department alleges was ordered by the Chinese government.

    “They are probably just trying to intimidate us, to … in a way threaten us not to say anything, to cause trouble to them and say anything political or related to human rights violations in China,” Arthur Liu said. “I had concerns about her safety. The U.S. government did a good job protecting her.”

    “I’ve kind of accepted my life to be like this because of what I chose to do in 1989, to speak up against the government. And I know the Chinese government will extend their long hands into any corner in the world,” Arthur Liu said. “I’m going to continue to enjoy life and live life as I want to live. I’m not going to let this push me down, and I’m not going to let them succeed.”

    Throughout her retirement, Arthur supported her through the tough times. “She became really unhappy,” he told USA TODAY Sports. “She avoided the ice rink at all costs. She’s traumatized. She was just traumatized. She was suffering from PTSD and she wouldn’t go near the ice rink.”

    Arthur has had a hand in Alysa’s coaching directly, by firing and rehiring Phillip DiGuglielmo and Massimo Scali. “Once in person, and two by text,” Phillip DiGuglielmo told 60 Minutes. When asked if he was a “tiger dad,” Arthur said that he was a “laissez-faire dad” by constantly monitoring his daughter’s coaches during practice.

    When she was coming out of retirement, she reached out to both of her former coaches and made it clear that she wanted to have more say in her training and her programs and that she would compete because she wanted to.

    Who is Alysa Liu’s mom, Yan “Mary” Quinxin?

    Alysa Liu was born with an anonymous egg donor and surrogate mother. According to a report by Sports Illustrated (via Romper), Liu’s donors were white women in hopes that his children would “benefit from a diverse gene pool.”

    Arthur currently considers himself a single father. However, Alysa and her siblings were also raised by Arthur’s ex-wife, Yan “Mary” Quinxin. When Alysa was 8, she noticed that she and her mother had different physical qualities. “That’s how I figured out she wasn’t my real mom,” the Olympian told the magazine, “because she was Asian and I did not look Asian.”

    [ad_2]

    Lea Veloso

    Source link

  • Is Bleach Really Necessary for a Clean Home?

    [ad_1]

    Bleach has a reputation for going scorched earth on bacteria. But not everyone is comfortable with using it; bleach can interact dangerously with other common chemicals and has to be handled with care. For those reasons, many people avoid it altogether. 

    That may not be a bad strategy. Experts say that although there are a handful of instances when bleach is useful, it doesn’t need to be used as a regular cleaning product in one’s home.

    Here’s what to know about how best to use bleach and when easier-to-handle alternatives work better.

    What is bleach, anyway?

    Bleach, the chemical compound sodium hypochlorite, is a disinfectant. There’s a difference between cleaning and disinfecting, says Katie Sullivan, director of issue communications at the American Cleaning Institute, an industry trade group. “Cleaning is the physical removal of dirt, germs, and debris by scrubbing, washing, and rinsing,” she says. Disinfecting involves killing any remaining germs on a surface after it’s been cleaned.

    Read More: The New Way to Predict Your Risk of a Heart Attack

    When routinely cleaning your home, soap and warm water is almost always adequate, says Rebecca Fuoco, director of science communications at the Green Science Policy Institute, a nonprofit that advocates for safer chemical use. “The bottom line is that you often don’t need to disinfect your home,” she says. “You just need to clean your home.”

    When to use bleach

    There are a few instances in which bleach is worth using. Fuoco says disinfecting with bleach is warranted for sanitizing surfaces contaminated with bodily fluids, feces, or vomit from someone who was sick. 

    Hot, soapy water is generally sufficient for cleaning up everyday messes on kitchen countertops, cutting boards, and kitchen sinks, says Taylor Dunivin, a toxicologist with the Environmental Working Group, an environmental health nonprofit. Very diluted bleach can be used to disinfect surfaces where food with potentially harmful bacteria, like raw chicken, was prepared, but Dunivin recommends using other food-contact sanitizers instead. She adds that you should avoid using general home disinfectant products that aren’t made for food surfaces as they can leave behind a harmful residue.

    Read More: 5 Weird Symptoms of Dehydration

    Bleach isn’t even necessary or recommended for cleaning your bathroom or shower. “If you notice a little mold in your shower, you can scrub the area with detergent and water—you don’t need to use bleach,” Dunivin says. For toilets, she recommends using cleaning products with lactic acid.

    If you must use bleach, avoid using it around children and people with asthma, Dunivin says. “Children’s lungs are still developing and can be more sensitive to breathing in bleach fumes.” Plus, people who use bleach frequently are at an increased risk of developing asthma and other respiratory problems, she says.

    If you’re disinfecting a surface, bleach isn’t the only option. You could instead use disinfectants with citric acid, ethanol, or acetic acid as active ingredients, Dunivin says. Fuoco recommends avoiding products that contain quaternary ammonium compounds, as they’ve been linked to various health issues. 

    How to use bleach safely

    Bleach can be a powerful disinfectant, Sullivan says. “It just needs to be used correctly.”

    When using bleach, keep these best practices in mind: 

    • Don’t mix it with other chemicals. You should never mix bleach with other cleaners or disinfectants, especially vinegar and ammonia, as the mixture could release a toxic gas, Sullivan says.
    • Store it safely. As is the case with all household cleaners, bleach should be stored out of reach from children and pets.
    • Protect yourself. Bleach can irritate the eyes and skin. If you must use it, experts recommend opening windows or doors, turning on household fans, wearing gloves, and even wearing eye protection.
    • Use soap and water first. If you’re using bleach to disinfect a surface, you should always clean that surface with soap and water first. If you don’t clean the surface first, the sanitizer won’t be as effective.
    • Always read the product label. Bleach typically must be diluted with a certain amount of water before use. “I encourage people to always read the label because different bleach brands may have different concentrations of bleach in the bottle,” says Lillian Nabwiire, a food safety extension educator at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
    • Don’t save it. You should always dispose of bleach that you’ve diluted immediately after using it—not only because it’s toxic, but also because it loses its effectiveness over time, Nabwiire says.

    [ad_2]

    Jamie Friedlander Serrano

    Source link

  • Evergreen shooter shot up equipment, was a patient at primary care office, sheriff’s office says

    [ad_1]

    A 62-year-old man who opened fire inside a primary care doctor’s office in Evergreen on Thursday night before taking his own life was previously a patient at the facility, the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office said Friday.

    Investigators identified Lance Black, an Evergreen resident, as the person who fired a shotgun 19 times inside the CommonSpirit Primary Care office at 32214 Ellingwood Trail.

    Deputies began responding to calls about gunshots in the medical office at 4:23 p.m. Thursday and arrived on scene at 4:28 p.m., where they found broken windows, the sheriff’s office said in a news release Friday afternoon.

    Deputies entered the building and found Black, armed with a shotgun, the sheriff’s office said. They tried to de-escalate the situation, but Black fatally shot himself.

    Investigators found that Black shot at doors, walls, computers and other equipment during the shooting. No one was injured and no other businesses were damaged, other than a single round that entered a vacant office.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Which “The Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air” Character Matches Your ’90s Kid Soul?

    [ad_1]

    But are you fun-loving Will, sweet Ashley, or the original bougie icon, Miss Hilary Banks? Take this quiz below to finally come face-to-face with your Fresh Prince character twin.

    Now, if you could only brag about your results in the schoolyard again. Those were the days, y’all.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to Say When Someone Tells You to Smile More

    [ad_1]

    Four words have echoed across every boardroom, dating app, and city street in the world: You should smile more.

    Anastasia Ryan has heard it her whole life, but perhaps never more than in a role where the people she was speaking to couldn’t see her at all. “The majority of what I did was over the phone, and I still had my supervisor coming through and making gestures that I needed to smile while on a call,” she says. “And then eventually, I was told that my facial expressions weren’t appropriate in the office.”

    After being let go, Ryan channelled her rage into a novel called You Should Smile More, a workplace revenge fantasy about a telemarketer who’s fired for her neutral expression. Through its protagonist, Ryan was able to say all the things she wished she’d been able to say when those smile directives were lobbed at her.

    The same remarks might have inspired a rewarding career turn, but that doesn’t negate the damage they caused. “It is absolutely infuriating because it’s being singled out for your appearance and for the way you’re presenting yourself, in a way that’s not equal across gender standards,” she says. “It’s frustrating because we’re so much more than that.”

    Why it happens

    People (usually men) have been advising other people (almost always women) to smile more for as long as anyone can remember. “Men feel that it’s OK, if not entirely required, to tell women to smile, which is a really interesting assumption,” says Marianne LaFrance, an emerita professor of psychology and of women’s, gender, and sexuality studies at Yale University, and author of Why Smile? The Science Behind Facial Expressions. “The gender status quo is that women should smile more.”

    That stems largely from a sense of entitlement, she says. “Men laugh it off, as though it’s a male prerogative to tell a woman what to do with her body,” LaFrance says. People in certain industries, like health care workers and service workers, are especially likely to be told that “they need to constantly display their femininity. And one of the best ways to do that is to smile.”

    Read More: 15 Things to Say When Someone Comments on Your Weight

    Another reason people deploy this line is because they feel uncomfortable when someone else’s face isn’t easy to read. Neutral expressions can be unsettling to people who expect emotional reassurance. “It’s less about me, and it’s all about your comfort, because you want to see me smile,” says Minda Harts, an assistant professor at NYU’s Wagner Graduate School of Public Service and author of Talk to Me Nice: The Seven Trust Languages For A Better Workplace. “It’s not about me being joyful.”

    Comments like these do more than create momentary discomfort. They send a subtle signal about whose feelings matter—and whose don’t. “Being told to smile sends a message that ‘you’re inconveniencing me,’ and over time, that erodes trust—not just with others, but with ourselves,” Harts says. “I used to internalize when people would say, ‘Oh, you need to smile more,’ and I’m like, ‘Is there something wrong with me? What’s going on with my face?’”

    When saying nothing says enough

    Figuring out how to respond when someone tells you to smile more can be complicated. The truth is, experts agree, that it’s not always practical to respond the way you’d like to.

    It’s sometimes easiest to address the comment nonverbally. Some people opt to just flash a smile, because they want the interaction to end quickly. “They feel awful for having done it, but they feel that they have no choice,” LaFrance says. “Unfortunately, it reduces the woman in some small way. She’s been caught not being appropriately feminine.”

    Another option is to remain stoic and hold your expression, letting your eyes do the work of signaling that the request isn’t welcome. Or you could do what LaFrance defaults to: offer a fake smile. “We all have a bunch of those, and it sort of looks like the smile is plastered on the face and it’s held too long—because the key to a genuine smile is that they’re very brief,” she says. 

    Will the person on the receiving end be able to tell? “It depends how good the fake is,” LaFrance says. “There are fakes that look like the real thing, and then there are fakes that look like it’s a satire. It’s a put on. It conveys a, ‘You want one? I’ll show you one’ sort of attitude.”

    That’s almost irrelevant, though, LaFrance adds. What matters is the way it lands internally. “I know that what I’m doing inside isn’t obeying the premise that he gets to call me out on something,” she says, “but that I get to decide in what form.”

    Redirecting without rewarding the comment

    Different scenarios call for different responses. Say a family member or someone else with good intentions phrases their remark like this: “You seem so serious lately—you should smile more.” It can work well to acknowledge their intent without changing your behavior, says Tatiana Teppoeva, founder and CEO of One Nonverbal Ecosystem, an organization that teaches business leaders how to decode nonverbal behavior, communication patterns, and personality dynamics. You might say, “Thank you for caring,” or “I appreciate you checking in.” You’re validating their intentions, she says, without accepting the idea that your expression needs correction.

    When people tell their colleagues to smile more, it’s often an attempt to redirect attention, minimize authority, or interrupt momentum, Teppoeva says. For example, you might be making a point in a meeting when someone interjects: “You’d come across better if you smiled more,” shifting focus away from whatever you were saying. In that case, neutral redirection or ignoring the comment entirely usually works best. You can continue your point without responding or calmly redirect: “Let’s stay on topic.” “Engaging emotionally or defensively reinforces the power move,” Teppoeva says. Continuing calmly, on the other hand, “signals authority and shows that your presence doesn’t require external approval.”

    Or consider this scenario: A colleague instructs you to smile more because it helps other people feel more at ease. Teppoeva suggests light acknowledgement without commitment: “That’s an interesting perspective,” or “I’ll think about it.”

    Occasionally, when she was still working in an office, Ryan would respond to comments suggesting she smile more like this: “Would you say that to a man?” You could even follow up with something like this, she adds: “It’s not your job to provide me with any sort of feedback on my appearance.”

    Read More: Can I Ask Someone if They’re on Ozempic?

    Though LaFrance prefers to respond nonverbally, she can think of a few effective comebacks. One of her favorites: “I will if you will.” Or, if you’re walking down the street and someone shouts at you—“Come on, honey, I want to see you smile”—you could say: “I wouldn’t if I were you, because it’s not pretty.”

    Some people feel best keeping their response light and defusing the tension with humor. You could make a joke like this, Harts says: “Smiling costs extra.” Another favorite: “I save my feelings for after meetings.”

    If you’d rather be direct, she likes this way of framing things: “I’m comfortable with how I’m showing up right now.” Or, you could flip the conversation back on the other person: “Why do you think so?” Or: “Can you say more about what you’re noticing? Is there something specific you need from me right now?”

    Ultimately, how you respond is a choice—not an obligation. The idea isn’t to be nicer; it’s to reclaim control. “I always tell people that you don’t need a perfect response. You just need one that protects your dignity and makes you feel safe,” Harts says. “You don’t have to perform happiness to be respected. You can be professional without providing joy on demand for somebody else.”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link

  • Why You Should Handwrite Someone You Love a Card

    [ad_1]

    Dashing off an email or text takes seconds. Handwriting a card takes a little courage—and five minutes with a pen. Putting in the extra time and effort matters more than you might think.

    “We all have a need to matter—to be considered and to be seen,” says Alison McKleroy, an art therapist in San Francisco. “When you get a homemade card, it’s sending a message: ‘I spent time doing this thing with you in mind.’ It lands differently.”

    Here’s what to know about the benefits of sending and receiving handwritten cards—and how to make one yourself.

    What makes handwritten cards so special

    The research is clear: People underestimate the emotional boost they get from writing and receiving positive letters or cards.

    Writing a card can make you feel more relaxed and quietly pleased. “Even five minutes of making something can put you in a flow state, and afterward you feel calmer and more settled,” McKleroy says. “Making a card is very tactile—cutting, gluing, touching—and that kind of tactile input actually calms your nervous system.”

    Plus, you might find it’s fun. There’s joy in choosing a color, tearing paper, or getting one small detail just right, McKleroy says. It gives your brain a break from overthinking and pulls you into the present moment. “This is a very low-stakes way to reconnect with fun and play—parts of ourselves that can feel a little exiled,” she adds. “I think we underestimate how much we benefit from these micro-moments of joy.”

    Read More: 14 Things to Say Besides ‘I Love You’

    Meanwhile, if you’re the recipient, you’ll likely feel extra loved knowing that someone took the time to express their feelings in such a thoughtful way. It’s also a physical reminder of the connection you share—you can save the card and look at it any time you need a boost. That’s especially true if your loved one struggles to articulate their feelings.

    “It’s a way to express affection and warmth and care without having to actually say it,” McKleroy says. “Sometimes it just starts with a willingness to do something differently.”

    How to get started

    You don’t need any special art skills to make a card. “It’s not about being Picasso. It’s really about the message: ‘You matter to me. I care about you. I was thinking about you when I made this,’” McKleroy says. “When my 7-year-old makes a rainbow for me, I’m not thinking, ‘This could use some work.’ I’m thinking, ‘That was generous. She was thinking about me.’”

    People often tell Melissa Tract that they’re self-conscious about their handwriting: They think it’s too messy or hard to read. But there are ways to have fun with it. You could try calligraphy, write in cursive, or play around with the size of your words, maybe writing in all caps or only lowercase. “You can make it funky,” says Tract, a psychotherapist who integrates professional training in the arts into her clinical work.

    You can also add small personal touches, like choosing the recipient’s favorite pen color, drawing tiny hearts or smiley faces, using glue pens to attach glitter, or wrapping the card in ribbon or lace, Tract suggests.

    What to write

    Don’t focus on finding the perfect words. There’s no such thing, Tract says. If you’re staring at a blank page, she suggests starting with one of these prompts: “One thing I love about you is…” or “A moment with you I keep thinking about is….” 

    “Think about the last time you saw this person,” she says. “What did you do? What were you laughing about? What did you love that they said to you?” The answers to those questions might spark inspiration and guide your words.

    Keep in mind that a handwritten card can do something a store-bought one can’t: it’ll sound unmistakably like you. It leaves room for inside jokes, shared memories, and the small details that only make sense to two people. “What’s great about handwritten cards is they afford you the opportunity to tailor your message to reflect you, your partner, and your relationship,” says Laura Kurtz, a social psychologist and program manager of the Love Consortium, a group of researchers who study social connections. “The power is in the personalization.”

    Read More: Love Languages Actually Do Improve Your Relationship

    Kurtz suggests considering what qualities you most admire about that person, and working them into your message. “What do you love about them?” she asks. “Try not to focus on what they do or how they make you feel, but rather emphasize what it is about them—who they are as a person—that you find most remarkable.”

    If that feels like a lot to put into words, that’s OK. The message itself can stay simple.

    “Your card doesn’t have to be a grand overture of love,” Kurtz says. “A simple, thoughtful note that speaks to the positive qualities of your partner and relationship can be just as powerful.”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link

  • ‘No known victims’ after shooter reported dead in Evergreen, Jeffco sheriff says

    [ad_1]

    Jefferson County law enforcement is responding to an “active shooter incident” in north Evergreen and said the shooter is down after shooting themselves, sheriff’s officials said.

    Officials said on social media that there were no known victims as of 5:25 p.m. The shooter was found dead at the scene, sheriff’s office spokesperson Jacki Kelley told Denver7.

    [ad_2]

    Katie Langford

    Source link

  • Black Celebrities Who Have Been Married For Over A Decade, And I’m Honestly Jealous Of Their Love

    [ad_1]

    Black Celeb Couples Who’ve Been Married For 10+ Years

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The 1 Question to Deepen Your Romantic Relationship

    [ad_1]

    Couples ask each other countless questions over the course of a day, a year, an entire relationship. Many are trivial: Chinese or Thai for dinner? Need anything from the store? Few probe how each person is actually feeling.

    Yet taking the time to ask thoughtful, intentional questions can deepen connection. Laura Todd, a therapist in Silicon Valley, thinks of relationships as vines that either grow together or apart; the goal is for them to intertwine so they become stronger and fuller. “Just because you’ve been together for a long time doesn’t mean that the vines always grow together,” she says. “You have to be mindful of making sure they don’t start growing apart, and part of that is asking really deep questions or having really meaningful conversations that continue to strengthen that relationship.”

    We asked experts which single question they recommend starting with.

    A deceptively simple check-in

    The No. 1 question Todd recommends couples ask each other is a simple way to take the temperature of where they stand: “If you could describe our relationship in three words, what would they be and why?”

    “It gives a really quick summary snapshot of where you and your partner are at emotionally,” she says. “We don’t always know how to verbalize what we’re feeling or thinking—we just know that something’s off, or maybe some things are good.”

    Articulating your feelings in just three words—rather than jumping straight into a long, emotionally charged conversation—can make it easier to open a conversation about what’s working and what isn’t. Todd recommends doing this low-pressure check-in once a year, or more often in difficult seasons, like when you’re navigating a major change. “You’re encouraging that open dialogue without feeling threatening, or like it’s attacking anybody or you’re trying to do a ‘gotcha’ moment,” she says. “You can bring it up any time and just be like, ‘How are things going? Are we feeling aligned right now, or are we not feeling aligned?’”

    Read More: 11 Questions to Ask on a First Date

    When Todd’s clients do this exercise, they report hearing a range of words: disconnected, heavy, supportive, pressure, caring, connected. If it’s clear you need to talk something through, aim to follow up as soon as you have the space and time to do so, she says. If it’s 9 p.m. and you’re both exhausted, it’s probably a good idea to save the conversation until another day. Consider, too, whether you’ve both had the opportunity to digest the words you shared with each other.

    When you start talking, aim to use “I” statements and make it clear you’re open to feedback. “It’s so easy to take things personally and to be accusatory and be like, ‘You did this, you did that,’” Todd says. “At the end of the day in a relationship, you want to be able to meet each other’s needs, but in order to understand what the other person’s needs are, you need to communicate that to that person, and they need to hear it.”

    A bonus question

    Another question can help you build on what you’ve already learned from your partner: “I love the life we have together—but what do you want more of?” 

    It often helps people realize that, even if they’re generally content, there are still things they’d like to do that they’re afraid to bring up. “There’s a hesitation around asking for what you really, really want, and there’s a possibility that your partner could let you down,” says April Lancit, an  assistant professor of marriage and family therapy at La Salle University in Philadelphia. Yet it’s better to ask than to keep your feelings quiet and risk feeling regretful and resentful down the road.

    Some of the couples Lancit works with have told each other they’d like to be more spontaneous, go on special trips together, try new restaurants, have more conversations, or simply sleep in and watch Netflix on a Sunday morning instead of sticking to a tight schedule. “It’s a wonderful thing to be able to explore,” she says, “especially if you’ve gotten a little stagnant and are used to the monotony of what you’ve been doing.”

    Read More: 14 Things to Say Besides ‘I Love You’

    Lancit suggests checking in like this every six months to a year—and being intentional about following through on what each partner wants more of. To make those ideas more concrete, some couples create relationship vision boards, she says, imagining what they’d like to do together in the year ahead. “It starts with having the conversation, putting it on paper, visualizing it, and then using a shared calendar to pencil it in,” she says. Taking turns adding one meaningful activity to the calendar each month can help ensure that both partners feel engaged and involved.

    “I’ve had a good track record with couples coming back and telling me what they’ve done and what they’ve tried and the progress they’ve made,” Lancit says. “It allows them to be a dreamer again.”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link

  • Do Recovery Shoes Actually Work?

    [ad_1]

    Slipping achy feet into recovery shoes after a long day or tough workout can feel like getting a mini-massage with every step. It’s a luxe experience, and, clearly, people are into it: The recovery footwear market is predicted to hit $18 billion this year—and jump up to over $28 billion by 2034. 

    But do these cushy, slipper-like shoes actually speed up recovery, or do they just feel good? Here’s what experts have to say about the trend. 

    What makes recovery shoes unique

    To the naked eye, the thick soles of recovery shoes don’t look all that different from what you see in maximally cushioned sneakers. But while athletic shoes are meant to keep your feet safe and your movements efficient during activities like running, playing pickleball, or walking around all day at work, recovery shoes are designed to help your muscles and joints recuperate from those activities, says sports medicine foot and ankle surgeon Gideon J. Lewis. 

    “Compared to other shoes, recovery shoes are giving your feet a break,” says Sally Crawford, a biomechanical expert who’s conducted research commissioned by OOFOS, the brand that popularized recovery shoes. 

    Although the exact design of recovery shoes can vary, there are a number of common features intended to help your feet bounce back from whatever kinds of stress you put them through.  

    Read More: The Internet’s New Favorite Insult: ‘Did AI Write That?’

    For starters, whether it’s a sandal or sneaker, a recovery shoe is typically made with an extra-wide toe box to give your forefoot plenty of space to spread out. There’s usually arch support and often a heel drop (meaning the heel sits higher up than the toes). Many recovery shoes are also designed with a curved rocker bottom, which rolls underneath you as you step through your stride, and that means your foot doesn’t have to move as much while you walk. These elements place the foot in a position that allows the plantar fascia along the bottom of the sole and the flexor tendons of the toes to relax and stretch out, says Dr. Sean Bryan, a primary sports medicine physician at Hospital for Special Surgery in New York.

    Almost all of these shoes offer lots of cushy foam for ample shock absorption. “The thought is that by having extra cushioning and that positioning, it allows the tissues to rest and feel better, and possibly recover from repetitive stress,” Bryan says. 

    Most recovery shoes are also made to let your sweaty feet air out, either through a sandal design or breathable materials in the upper fabric of a sneaker. “It’s not just recovering from a musculoskeletal issue or pain—it’s also for skin protection as well,” Lewis says. 

    Some footwear manufacturers have recently begun taking things a step further, injecting more advanced tech into these shoes. Last year, Nike and the athletic recovery brand Hyperice released the “Hyperboot,” a $799 battery-powered shoe that blasts your feet with heat and compressed air as you walk around. There are also some shoes that integrate red light therapy that claim to bring more blood flow to your feet. Lewis predicts we’ll soon see shoes with vibration and cooling mechanisms. 

    Do recovery shoes actually help you recover?

    Unfortunately, there’s not much hard data on recovery shoes outside of research funded by footwear companies. “I’m not aware of any clear scientific evidence that proves that recovery shoes actually speed recovery at a cellular level or a tissue level,” Bryan says. 

    That doesn’t necessarily mean they have nothing to offer. Plenty of anecdotal evidence suggests that recovery shoes can help reduce symptoms like foot pain, muscle fatigue, tightness, and soreness in people who repeatedly subject their feet to large amounts of stress, Bryan says. He also points out that several recovery sandals and sneakers have been given the American Podiatric Medical Association’s Seal of Acceptance, a distinction awarded by a committee of podiatrists to products that promote good foot health. 

    Read More: 7 Ways to Reduce Fatigue Naturally

    When it comes to the more high-tech recovery shoes, some small studies have found that air compression can temporarily reduce muscle soreness, while heat can speed up post-workout muscle recovery, and red light therapy can decrease inflammation and oxidative stress in muscles. But research is early, and these futuristic shoes are still more likely to be found on the feet of pro athletes than everyday exercisers on a budget. 

    How to get the most out of recovery shoes

    If you’re looking to make your feet and legs feel a bit better after exercise, experts agree that wearing recovery shoes might help. But only in moderation. For the most part, these shoes are not designed to support long bouts of walking around, since they’re typically pretty unstable. Also, because they can alter your gait and posture, Bryan believes long-term wear could put abnormal kinds of stress on soft tissues like the plantar fascia and ankle tendons, which could lead to “degeneration, discomfort, and pain,” he says.

    Lewis says he typically tells his clients to only wear a recovery sandal at home after a big workout or competition. That way they’re not wearing them for too long (or trying to walk far), and they’re in a controlled environment where the instability is less likely to make them trip. 

    Bryan also reminds patients that recovery shoes don’t magically erase all the strain you put on your feet and legs throughout the day. “I try to encourage [patients] to use them appropriately, not thinking that they can get away with as much standing, walking, and running as they want just because they have recovery shoes,” he says. He adds that to truly let your tissues recover, you need adequate time off from whatever activity is stressing them, as well as sleep and proper nutrition—not just another pair of shoes.   

    [ad_2]

    Jennifer Heimlich

    Source link

  • The New Way to Predict Your Risk of a Heart Attack

    [ad_1]

    More than 99% of people who suffer a heart attack, stroke, or heart failure have at least one risk factor beforehand—yet many have no idea until it’s too late. That’s part of the reason why heart disease has been the leading cause of death in the U.S. since at least 1950. Now, scientists hope that a new generation of tools—like a first-of-its-kind risk calculator—can turn those invisible warning signs into something people can see, understand, and act on years before the worst-case scenario strikes.

    “This is a disease that’s impacted by choices we make in life. And I think that we as humans can make wiser choices if we understand our risk—and perhaps even more importantly, if we understand the connection between risk and the choices that we make,” says Dr. Matthew Tomey, a cardiologist at Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital. “Understanding and communicating risk are profoundly difficult things to do, and it’s especially difficult for individuals who are younger and feel fine.”

    Here’s a look at the new science of predicting heart risk, and what challenges remain.

    A new way to assess risk earlier

    In a study published in 2025 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, researchers introduced a free online calculator that calculates a person’s 30-year risk of developing heart disease. It’s designed for adults ages 30 to 59, and people should ideally use it once a year, says senior study author Dr. Sadiya Khan, a professor of cardiovascular epidemiology at Northwestern Medicine.

    The new calculator—which is based on the American Heart Association’s PREVENT equations—is an update to an older tool that estimated a person’s 10-year risk of a first-time atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event, like a heart attack or stroke. The old version was geared toward people 40 or over, and research found that it often failed to identify a significant proportion of the people who ultimately went on to experience a heart attack.

    Read More: What to Do If Your High Cholesterol Is Genetic

    In addition to including younger adults and forecasting predictions further into the future, the new model predicts a broader range of outcomes, including heart failure.

    “It’s really trying to push the envelope on prevention starting earlier,” Khan says. “We know that more and more young adults are facing obesity or diabetes or hypertension, and we want to make sure we’re starting that conversation early, so we’re not waiting until someone has a heart attack or presents in heart failure.”

    The calculator is straightforward, as long as you have key health metrics in hand. Users plug in data like sex, age, body mass index, blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking status, and diabetes history, and then—based on that snapshot of their current stats—they’re provided with both a 10-year and 30-year percentage risk for developing heart disease.

    The value of taking early action

    Many experts consider the new online calculator a promising addition to the repertoire of tools available to help prevent heart disease. It’s meant to inspire conversations with clinicians, not replace care—an important distinction, says Dr. Nishant Shah, a preventive cardiologist at Duke University Medical Center. 

    The earlier these conversations start, the better, Shah says. He starts talking with people about their risk for heart disease around age 18, especially if they have a strong family history of disease. Online, easy-to-access tools like the calculator can open the door to those conversations—and meaningful change. “Talking about these things with patients before a problem happens is crucial,” he says. After patients learn their heart disease risk score, he educates them on preventive steps they can take, like exercising regularly, following a good diet, getting enough sleep, starting a medication like a statin if warranted, and keeping up with blood pressure and cholesterol screenings. “These are all really important things to prevent a surprise,” he says. “A story I hear a lot is, ‘He or she was doing great yesterday, and then today they just woke up dead.’ That’s what we’re trying to avoid.”

    One of the key reasons why tools that predict risk can be so helpful is that many people simply aren’t aware of their likelihood of developing heart disease. “A lot of these risk factors are silent,” Shah says. “Someone could be running around with high blood pressure, and they’re not going to feel the effects of it until it gets super high. People don’t feel like something’s wrong; it’s different from if you have a rash on your face.” For some people, he adds, quantifying risk is all it takes to get engaged with protecting their heart—and potentially saving their life.

    Lingering pain points

    No single risk assessment will ever perfectly predict someone’s chance of having a heart event.

    “By necessity, there’s no risk calculator that incorporates every relevant variable,” Tomey says. “The PREVENT equations are a really admirable advance in risk prediction, but they’re parsimonious in the number of variables and the nature of variables that they include.”

    Other relevant factors, he says, include whether someone has calcification of a coronary artery or plaque in an artery; genetic risks; high levels of lipoprotein(a); and inflammation metrics, including C-reactive protein. It also doesn’t account for most lifestyle factors, like exercise and sleep quality. All of these “might be important asterisks in any number you get from the calculator,” says Tomey, whose research has found that the PREVENT equations underestimate risk in some people. “We can’t just hang our hats on scores like this,” he says. “It’s really important to understand the value that they bring, but they’re not some sort of guarantee of protection if you have a lower score.”

    Plus, risk scores in general resonate differently depending on the person. Some people take them seriously, while others shrug them off or misunderstand them. These scores are “only fruitful in so much as they motivate you to make healthy choices,” Tomey says. If learning your risk score propels you to take stock of your daily choices, and how you can get healthier, then “that’s something that can materially improve individual health and public health.” Otherwise, it’s just a number.

    A multi-pronged approach

    There are other ways to predict heart risk, too. Some people benefit from knowing their coronary artery calcium score, for example, which is produced by a low-dose CT scan that detects calcium buildup in the heart’s arteries. That test can help diagnose early coronary artery disease and is often recommended for people with a family history of disease.

    Compared to a risk calculator, “neither is superior,” says Dr. Luke Laffin, a preventive cardiologist at the Cleveland Clinic. “They’re complementary.”

    In practice, doctors rarely rely on a single test. Regular checkups and labs are still informative, and some people benefit from stress tests, echocardiograms, and advanced lipid testing—like for lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein B. Clinicians can also assess risk through taking a thorough family history and understanding lifestyle patterns.

    Read More: 9 Weird Symptoms Cardiologists Say You Should Never Ignore

    No matter which tool or test makes the most sense, having a meaningful understanding of individual heart-disease risk gives people a chance to intervene sooner rather than later. “Everyone should have their cardiovascular risk calculated,” Laffin says. He says he’s seeing interest increase: As people become more invested in longevity, more younger people are showing up in his office and saying, “My dad died of a heart attack or had a heart attack in his 50s. What can I do to not befall that fate?”

    “There are all kinds of ways to calculate risk, but this PREVENT calculator is the most contemporary version that we have,” Laffin says. “I’d encourage people to talk with their doctor about their risk, and that can help guide conversations about preventive actions they can take.”

    [ad_2]

    Angela Haupt

    Source link