ReportWire

Tag: EU-US trade talks

  • American takeover of French nuclear firm raises concerns in Paris

    American takeover of French nuclear firm raises concerns in Paris

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    Voiced by artificial intelligence.

    PARIS — France’s feisty Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire has another opportunity to pick a fight with Washington as a sensitive investment screening case is about to land on his desk.

    The French government wants to prevent nuclear-submarine parts supplier Segault from falling into American hands just as France and the U.S. are experiencing new tensions over the Inflation Reduction Act, a $369 billion package of green subsidies and tax breaks that Paris and Brussels slammed as a protectionist move in breach of global trade rules.

    The two countries have seen an ebb and flow in tensions in recent years that reached worrying levels back in 2021, when the U.S. infuriated France by snatching away a multibillion-euro submarine contract Paris had signed with Canberra. 

    Now, the American takeover of the small France-based company with less than 100 employees, which was virtually unknown to most French people until a few weeks ago, is turning into a test of France’s industrial sovereignty ambitions.

    Segault’s current owner, Canada’s industrial valves group Velan, is being bought by American industrial machinery giant Flowserve in a takeover deal announced earlier this year. Segault supplies components for nuclear-propelled submarines built by state-owned shipbuilder Naval Group and also makes industrial valves that are used on France’s flagship Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier. If the deal goes through, Segault would become American-controlled, raising concerns in Paris’ halls of power that Washington would then have access to strategic French technology. 

    The deal has become a hot political issue in recent weeks, with right-wing MPs urging Le Maire to block the American buyer, and with a surprise left-wing candidate emerging as a bidder.

    The government is currently “looking for a French buyer,” according to a spokesperson for France’s defense ministry, who declined to comment on offers received so far, noting that the French economy ministry has the final word on it.

    Under French law, the economy ministry must be informed of the takeover of companies in strategic sectors in order to green-light or veto deals. The government confirmed that Segault’s takeover falls within the scope of France’s investment screening powers and will be examined as soon as it is officially notified to French authorities.

    Investment screening decisions are first assessed at the technical level within France’s powerful economy ministry, known as Bercy, but they also have a political dimension as they are ultimately taken by the economy minister himself via a decree. In the past, Le Maire has not hesitated to use his veto powers for politically sensitive cases, turning investment screening cases into political battles. In a bid to cast himself as a defender of French industrial jewels, Le Maire widened the scope of investment screening powers in 2019, during his first term.

    As in many other EU countries, the scope of France’s veto powers was further extended during the coronavirus pandemic, to prevent the risk that companies weakened by the crisis could be bought by foreign investors. Those new powers, which were meant to be temporary, have been repeatedly extended amid the economic crisis linked to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The Segault case is also seen as an opportunity for Paris to show its muscle.

    For socialist Michel Sapin, who served several times as France’s finance and economy minister, the deal gives the government an opportunity to present itself as a defender of national gems by taking “a braggart position on re-industrialization and industrial sovereignty” that, according to him, has not been backed up by action so far. 

    MEP Marie-Pierre Vedrenne noted that France’s investment screening won’t discriminate against U.S. buyers | Alexis Haulot/European Parliament

    “We can’t deny that we have some irritants with Americans, especially the IRA in this phase,” said Macron’s ally Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, vice chair of the European Parliament’s trade committee, while noting that France’s investment screening won’t discriminate against U.S. buyers. 

    But Macron’s allies were also quick to insist that Paris’ efforts to take Segault away from its American buyer was not a protectionist attempt to block a U.S. investment.

    “The criteria won’t be friendship or mistrust toward Washington,” said a French minister, who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, adding that “the context” should not prevent Paris from “controlling some sovereignty aspects” of the deal.  

    For Vedrenne, Macron’s ally in the European Parliament, “the Americans are first of all in a mindset of prior defense of their interests and we see it with this case … sovereignty is at stake so we have to be vigilant whatever the nationality [of the buyer] is, even if it is an ally, because the defense of the French interests must be examined above all.”

    Despite some displays of friendship, tensions between Paris and Washington have risen at a steady pace over recent months and increased after French President Emmanuel Macron told POLITICO that Europe should not be “America’s followers” when it comes to China policy. 

    Le Maire has also been particularly harsh with the U.S., accusing Washington of using Russia’s war in Ukraine to establish “economic domination” and of breaching WTO rules with its massive subsidy package, the Inflation Reduction Act. Earlier this month, he said that Europe should, much like the the U.S. and China, put first its own industrial interests and stop obeying the free-trade dogma. 

    Earlier in the month, as he visited Washington, he accused “some” in the U.S. of applying double standards when it comes to trade with China. “I see that the volume of trade between China and the United States has never been so high … we are asking Europe to give up trade that has increased between the United States and China. We don’t want to be the village idiots, who get screwed and let other powers trade with China while we would no longer have the right to do so,” the minister said.

    Should France decide to veto the deal, Segault could be carved out from Flowserve’s acquisition of Velan. However it is unclear whether the American buyer would still be interested in buying Velan without Segault.

    Le Maire’s quest for a French buyer might be a tough mission to accomplish.

    Another former economy minister and “Made in France” champion, socialist Arnaud Montebourg urged Le Maire to block the deal earlier this month and offered to buy Segault together with the help of Pierre-Edouard Stérin, a businessman who in the past has been close to far-right former presidential candidate Eric Zemmour.

    A person with direct knowledge of the file but who was not authorized to speak publicly said that it is unlikely Le Maire would back Montebourg’s offer.

    Elisa Braun contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Giorgio Leali

    Source link

  • Sanctions on China loom large as von der Leyen to meet Biden in US

    Sanctions on China loom large as von der Leyen to meet Biden in US

    [ad_1]

    BRUSSELS — European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will travel to Washington next week, with China’s potential supply of weapons to Russia expected to be high on the agenda of a meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden. 

    Her trip next Friday, confirmed by the White House, comes as EU officials are taking a wait-and-see approach to Washington’s claim that Beijing is considering providing Moscow with weapons. In a White House statement, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Biden will discuss “our work together to address the challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China” with von der Leyen.

    U.S. officials are reportedly seeking to call on close allies to impose unprecedented sanctions on China, if Beijing provides military support to Russia for its war against Ukraine. 

    On Thursday, top Brussels-based diplomats from Ukraine, the U.S., Canada, Poland, the Baltic states, Japan and South Korea gathered for a lunch meeting. A spokesman for the Polish permanent representation to the EU, which organized the lunch, refused to disclose details of the discussion but said that the meeting was aimed at showing support for Ukraine. 

    A senior diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said at least one representative at the meeting said the EU should not act without proof of Chinese delivery of weapons to Russia. “Clearly a red line is crossed” if there is such proof, the diplomat added.

    Another EU official, who was not at the gathering, said that the U.S. has fallen short of presenting evidence of China planning to provide weapons.

    “There is a lot of talk out there … that China may be beginning to consider to deliver lethal weapons ammunition. We have not seen on our side, any concrete evidence of that so far,” the official said. “And I think if you look at the messaging from our U.S. friends, you’re seeing even slightly contradictory messaging at times, Biden was much softer … than others have been.”

    In remarks aired on ABC News on Friday, Biden said: “I don’t anticipate — we haven’t seen it yet — but I don’t anticipate a major initiative on the part of China providing weaponry to Russia.”

    That came after U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Chinese firms were already providing “non-lethal support” to Russia, with new information suggesting that Beijing could provide “lethal support.”

    National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said in a press briefing Thursday that “there are tools available to not only the United States but to our allies and partners,” should China make moves to send weapons to Russia.

    China’s Foreign Ministry has criticized Washington for “slandering” the country and questioning the U.S. sale of weapons to Taiwan while also supplying military support to Ukraine.

    In Europe, officials have stepped up warnings targeted at Beijing. Addressing China in front of German lawmakers, Chancellor Olaf Scholz said on Thursday: “Do not supply weapons to the aggressor Russia.”

    Earlier in the day, Dutch Foreign Minister Wopke Hoekstra said helping Moscow militarily “will have consequences if countries crossed that line.”

    “What I will convey to each of the colleagues, including my Chinese colleagues here, is that the truth here is not somewhere in the middle. There is only one country responsible and that is Russia,” Hoekstra added.

    As well as China, talks on the Inflation Reduction Act and broader security issues are expected to be discussed during von der Leyen’s White House visit.

    Europe and the U.S. have been at odds for months over Washington’s landmark green subsidies plan, which Brussels fears will drain the continent of investment and green technology.

    Before Washington, von der Leyen will travel to Canada to meet Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

    Von der Leyen and Trudeau are expected to discuss the supply of raw materials, as the European Commission prepares to unveil its Critical Raw Materials Act this month. Another hot potato is trade, since the EU-Canada trade deal has still to be ratified by a number of EU countries, although significantly Germany gave it the green light in December. 

    [ad_2]

    POLITICO Europe

    Source link

  • Scholz and Macron threaten trade retaliation against Biden

    Scholz and Macron threaten trade retaliation against Biden

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    BERLIN/PARIS — After publicly falling out, Olaf Scholz and Emmanuel Macron have found something they agree on: mounting alarm over unfair competition from the U.S. and the potential need for Europe to hit back.

    The German chancellor and the French president discussed their joint concerns during nearly three-and-a-half hours of talks over a lunch of fish, wine and Champagne in Paris on Wednesday.

    They agreed that recent American state subsidy plans represent market-distorting measures that aim to convince companies to shift their production to the U.S., according to people familiar with their discussions. And that is a problem they want the European Union to address.

    The meeting of minds on this issue followed public disagreements in recent weeks on key political issues such as energy and defense, fracturing what is often seen as the EU’s central political alliance between its two biggest economies.

    But even though their lunch came against an awkward backdrop, both leaders agreed that the EU cannot remain idle if Washington pushes ahead with its Inflation Reduction Act, which offers tax cuts and energy benefits for companies investing on U.S. soil, in its current form. Specifically, the recently signed U.S. legislation encourages consumers to “Buy American” when it comes to choosing an electric vehicle — a move particularly galling for major car industries in the likes of France and Germany.

    The message from the Paris lunch is: If the U.S. doesn’t scale back, then the EU will have to strike back. Similar incentive schemes for companies will be needed to avoid unfair competition or losing investments. That move would risk plunging transatlantic relations into a new trade war.

    Macron was the first to make the stark warning public. “We need a Buy European Act like the Americans, we need to reserve [our subsidies] for our European manufacturers,” the French president said Wednesday night in an interview with TV channel France 2, referring specifically to state subsidies for electric cars.

    Scholz and Macron agreed the EU must act if the US progresses a ‘Buy American’ act offering incentives for companies investing on US soil, which would particularly affect French and German electric vehicle industries | David Hecker / Getty Images

    Macron also mentioned similar concerns about state-subsidized competition from China: “You have China that is protecting its industry, the U.S. that is protecting its industry and Europe that is an open house,” Macron said, adding: “[Scholz and I] have a real convergence to move forward on the topic, we had a very good conversation.”

    Crucially, Berlin — which has traditionally been more reluctant when it comes to confronting the U.S. in trade disputes — is indeed backing the French push. Scholz agrees that the EU will need to roll out countermeasures similar to the U.S. scheme if Washington refuses to address key concerns voiced by Berlin and Paris, according to people familiar with the chancellor’s thinking.

    Scholz is not a big fan of Macron’s wording of a “Buy European Act” as it evokes the nearly 90-year-old “Buy American Act,” which is often criticized for being protectionist because it favors American companies. But the chancellor shares Macron’s concerns about unfair competitive advantages, the people said.

    Earlier this month, Scholz said publicly that Europe will have to discuss the Inflation Reduction Act with the U.S. “in great depth.”

    In a blow to Germany’s industrial core, chemical giant BASF announced plans Wednesday to reduce its business activities and jobs in Germany, with company chief Martin Brudermüller citing heightened gas prices — which he criticized for being six times as high as in the U.S. — as well as increasing EU regulation as the reason.

    “The decisions of a successful company like BASF show that we need to improve the overall attractiveness of Germany as a business location,” German Finance Minister Christian Lindner said in a tweet, vowing to take various measures such as “tax relief for private investments.”

    Before bringing out the big guns, though, Scholz and Macron want to try to reach a negotiated solution with Washington. This should be done via a new “EU-U.S. Taskforce on the Inflation Reduction Act” that was established during a meeting between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Mike Pyle on Tuesday.

    The taskforce of EU and U.S. officials will meet via videoconference toward the end of next week, underlining the seriousness of the European push.

    On top of that, EU trade ministers will gather for an informal meeting in Prague next Monday, with U.S. trade envoy Katherine Tai planning to attend to discuss the tensions.

    In Brussels, the Commission is also looking with concern at Macron’s wording of a “Buy European Act,” which evokes protectionist tendencies that the EU institution has long sought to fight.

    “Every measure we take needs to be in line with the World Trade Organization rules,” a Commission official said, adding that Europe and the U.S. should resolve differences via talks and “not descend into tit-for-tat trade war measures as we experienced them under [former U.S. President Donald] Trump.”

    This article is part of POLITICO Pro

    The one-stop-shop solution for policy professionals fusing the depth of POLITICO journalism with the power of technology


    Exclusive, breaking scoops and insights


    Customized policy intelligence platform


    A high-level public affairs network

    [ad_2]

    Hans von der Burchard and Clea Caulcutt

    Source link

  • France plays bad cop as transatlantic trade tensions ramp up

    France plays bad cop as transatlantic trade tensions ramp up

    [ad_1]

    Press play to listen to this article

    PARIS — U.S. President Joe Biden needs to watch out; France is resuming its traditional role as Europe’s troublemaker on the transatlantic trade front.

    It had seemed like the bad blood between Brussels and Washington was easing on Biden’s watch. Facing a common foe in China, the EU and the U.S. last year struck a truce on the tariffs that former President Donald Trump slapped on European steel and aluminium. Over this year, Russia’s war against Ukraine has meant that America and Europe needed to present a united front, at least politically.

    Cracks are now starting to re-emerge, however. The EU is furious that the U.S. is pouring subsidies into the homegrown electric car industry. Accusing Washington of protectionism, Europe is now threatening to draw up its own defenses.

    Unsurprisingly, French President Emmanuel Macron is leading the charge. “The Americans are buying American and pursuing a very aggressive strategy of state aid. The Chinese are closing their market. We cannot be the only area, the most virtuous in terms of climate, which considers that there is no European preference,” Macron told French daily Les Echos.

    Upping the ante, he called on Brussels to support consumers and companies that buy electric cars produced in the EU, instead of ones from outside the bloc. 

    There are good reasons why the Europeans are fretting about their trade balances.

    The war has delivered a huge terms-of-trade shock, with spiraling energy costs hauling the EU into a yawning bloc-wide trade deficit of €65 billion in August, from only €7 billion a year earlier. In one manifestation of those strains, Europe’s growing reliance on American liquefied natural gas to substitute for lost Russian supplies has re-ignited tensions.

    Macron’s comments are a reflection of EU consternation over Washington’s Inflation Reduction Act, which incentivizes U.S. consumers to “Buy American” when purchasing a greener car. The EU argues that requiring that car needs to be assembled in North America and contain a battery with a certain percentage of local content discriminate against the EU and other trade partners.

    The European Commission hopes to convince Washington to find a diplomatic compromise for European carmakers and their suppliers. If not, that leaves the EU no choice but to challenge Washington at the World Trade Organization, EU officials and diplomats told POLITICO — even if a new transatlantic trade war is the last thing both sides want to spend their time and money on.

    Macron’s comments “are clearly a response against the Inflation Reduction Act,” noted Elvire Fabry, a trade policy expert at the Institut Jacques Delors in Paris. “Macron plays the role of the bad cop, compared to the European Commission, which left Washington some political room to make adjustments,” she noted. 

    ‘American domination’

    The Commission hopes to find a diplomatic compromise with the U.S. for European carmakers and their suppliers | Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images

    France has traditionally been the bloc’s most outspoken country when it came to confronting Washington on a wide range of trade files. Paris, for instance, played a key role in killing a transatlantic trade agreement between the EU and U.S. (the so-called “TTIP”). Its digital tax angered U.S. Big Tech and triggered a trade war with the Trump administration.

    More recently, during its rotating Council of the EU presidency, Paris focused on trade defense measures, which will give Brussels the power to retaliate against unilateral trade measures, including from the U.S.

    New tensions are bad news for the upcoming meeting of the Trade and Tech Council early December, which so far has had trouble to show that it’s more than a glorified talking shop. 

    France won’t be left alone in a possible trade war on electric cars. According to Fabry, these tensions will bring Paris and Berlin closer, as the German car industry is also particularly affected by the U.S. measures.

    But the “Buy American” approach is not the only bone of contention. The fact that Europe is increasingly relying on gas imports from the U.S. brought European discontent to the next level.

    Although gas import prices fell in September from their all-time highs in August, they were still more than 2.5 times higher than they were a year ago. And, taking into account increased purchase volumes, France’s bill for imports of LNG multiplied more than tenfold in August, year on year, by one estimate.

    Economy and Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire last week warned that Russia’s war against Ukraine should not result in “American economic domination and a weakening of Europe.” Le Maire criticized the U.S. for selling LNG to Europe “at four times the price at which it sells it to its own companies,” and called on Brussels to take action for a “more balanced economic relationship” between the two continents.

    That very same concern is shared by some Commission officials, POLITICO has learned, but also among French industrialists.

    It is “hardly contestable” that the U.S. had some economic benefits from the war in Ukraine and suffered less than Europe from its economic consequences, said Bernard Spitz, head of international and European affairs at France’s business lobby Medef. 

    This article is part of POLITICO Pro

    The one-stop-shop solution for policy professionals fusing the depth of POLITICO journalism with the power of technology


    Exclusive, breaking scoops and insights


    Customized policy intelligence platform


    A high-level public affairs network

    [ad_2]

    Giorgio Leali and Barbara Moens

    Source link