ReportWire

Tag: Equity Markets

  • S&P 500 breaks below key level for first time since March as stocks erase summer gains

    S&P 500 breaks below key level for first time since March as stocks erase summer gains

    The S&P 500 index capped off a busy week for U.S. markets on Friday by breaking below its 200-day moving average for the first time in more than six months. It also erased the last of its gains from a summer advance that peaked in late July.

    The index
    SPX
    fell 53.84 points, or 1.26%, on Friday to finish the week at 4,224.16 after falling for a fourth straight day, marking the lowest closing level for the index since June 1, and also the first close below its 200-day moving average — which stood at 4,233.17 — since March 17. The S&P 500 fell 2.4% this week, its worst week in a month, and has now finished lower during five of the past seven weeks.


    DOW JONES

    The index has fallen 6.8% from its July 31 closing high, FactSet data show but remains up 10% year to date.

    Although a break below the moving average is usually seen as a bearish signal, other indicators suggest that the S&P 500 has fallen into oversold territory which could portend a fresh turn higher beginning as soon as next week, technical analysts said.

    “From my perspective, this market has gotten to be pretty oversold,” said Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    A proprietary Piper Sandler database of all U.S. traded stocks with a market capitalization greater than $25 million and a share price above $2 showed that just 18% of stocks were trading above a 40-week moving average, a level that’s only been reached 10 times since 1987, Johnson said. Often, when so many stocks are trading at such low levels relative to their recent performance, it signals that a turnaround could be near.

    “It’s really rare to see readings this low,” Johnson added.

    Furthermore, more than 65% of S&P 500 stocks were trading below their 200-day moving average as of Friday’s close, the highest reading in a year, FactSet data show. All of this is consistent with what Johnson and others have described as a “washout” for stocks.

    Back in March, when the index last closed below its 200-day moving average, it only remained below it for six sessions. Dow Jones data showed that the S&P 500 closed below its 200-day moving average for five straight days from March 9 to March 15, then closed below the average again for a single day on March 17.

    Also read: A contrarian ‘buy signal’ for stocks has been triggered, as investors flee cash, says Bank of America

    Source link

  • S&P 500’s slump this week wipes out October gains

    S&P 500’s slump this week wipes out October gains

    U.S. stocks are sliding this week, erasing October’s gains, as higher Treasury yields weigh on markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA , S&P 500 SPX and Nasdaq Composite COMP were all down heading toward the closing bell on Friday, with each index on pace for a weekly loss. Investors saw this month’s gains evaporate on Thursday, as equities fell under pressure from rising interest rates in the bond market as investors weighed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks that another rate hike may be needed to slow the economy and bring down inflation. So far this month, the Dow has slumped 1%, the S&P 500 has…

    Source link

  • Wall Street warns of ‘Black Monday’ repeat just in time for 36th anniversary

    Wall Street warns of ‘Black Monday’ repeat just in time for 36th anniversary

    As the anniversary of “Black Monday” approaches, some on Wall Street are observing it by swapping ominous-looking charts and speculating that one of the most terrifying days in markets history might recur.

    One could even go as far to say that on social media, some seem eager to relive it, evidenced by a proliferation of viral markets charts, some comparing the stock market’s recent trading action to 1987. Here’s one example from The Market Ear which adheres to a template that caught on following the publication of a column by Bloomberg’s John Authers.


    THE MARKET EAR

    Authers pointed out that the Nasdaq in 2023 has followed a similar pattern to the Dow in 1987, and that this pattern has also played out in Treasury yields.

    To be sure, there are plenty of differences between markets today and in 1987. For one, stock exchanges have strengthened circuit-breaker mechanisms in order to prevent major indexes from crashing by double digits during a single session.

    Here is another: While the S&P 500
    SPX
    has climbed this year in spite of rising yields, the index’s gains have been concentrated in a handful of stocks. Outside of these lucky few, much of the market has lagged or has continued to slide following losses in 2022.

    Skeptics contend fretful investors are hearing echoes of 1987, while ignoring important differences.

    “In 1987, the market was more overbought, the October decline before the crash was far more pronounced, interest rates were higher, economic growth and inflation were accelerating, and cyclical sectors were stronger” — all in contrast with the current setup, noted Ed Clissold and Thanh Nguyen, strategists at Ned Davis Research, in a note last week.

    That hasn’t daunted doomsayers on social media, eager to augur a crash ahead of this year’s anniversary, which falls on Thursday.

    On Oct. 19, 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    plunged 508 points, a decline of almost 23%, in a daylong selling frenzy that ricocheted around the world and tested the limits of the financial system. The S&P 500 dropped more than 20%. At current levels, an equivalent percentage drop would translate into a one-day loss of over 7,700 points. Circuit breakers make a drop of similar magnitude nearly impossible.

    Even on Wall Street, some are using the anniversary as an opportunity to take another look at Treasury yields and the dark cloud they’re casting over stocks.

    Jefferies’ Global Head of Equity Strategy Christopher Wood recently shared a couple of charts comparing the relationship between stocks and bond yields in 2023 to 1987, driving home the point that stocks appeared resilient to higher yields in 1987 until they finally capitulated with an economy-shaking selloff.


    JEFFERIES


    JEFFERIES

    “The potential similarity with what occurred in October 1987 is that the historic stock market crash was preceded by a big sell-off in the 10-year Treasury over the summer months,” Woods said in the report.

    But suppose, for argument’s sake, that stocks did experience a 1987-style selloff. How then might the bond market react? Would yields tumble like they did in 1987, opening the door for stocks to bolt higher once again? Some on Wall Street have posited that a stock-market rout is necessary to stem the bleeding in bonds.

    Woods delved into this line of thinking in his report.

    “But the other salient point to note is that when the S&P 500 subsequently collapsed by 28.5% in four days, and by 20.5% on 19 October 1987 alone, the Treasury bond market staged a classic flight-to-safety rally in the context of a then dramatic decline in the 10-year Treasury bond yield,” Woods added.

    Société Générale’s sharp-tongued strategist Albert Edwards has also warned about the possibility of a 1987-style crash.

    See: ‘Just like in 1987.’ Here’s what could deliver a ‘devastating blow’ to stocks, says SocGen strategist Albert Edwards.

    But NDR’s Clissold and Nguyen argued that “while there are several high-level similarities, not enough line up to conclude that a crash-like event is likely.

    Source link

  • S&P 500 books best day since late-August as stocks rally to start the week

    S&P 500 books best day since late-August as stocks rally to start the week

    U.S. stocks rallied on Monday to finish the first trading day of the week in the green as investors shrugged off concerns the conflict erupted last week between Israel and Hamas may lead to a broader war in the Middle East, while looking ahead to the start of the third-quarter earnings season to better gauge the economy’s temperature. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.93%

    advanced 313 points, or 0.9%, to end at 33,984, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +1.06%

    rose 1.1% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +1.20%

    gained 1.2%. The rally in the traditional safe-haven assets paused on Monday, with the most-active December gold contract settled lower, at $1,934.30 an ounce on Comex, reversing course after rising safe-haven demand spurred a series of gains in the yellow metal. U.S. Treasury yields rose on Monday afternoon, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury up 8.1 basis points to 4.709%, while the yield on the 30-year Treasury jumped 8.8 basis points to 4.865%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    Source link

  • Charles Schwab stock drops after revenue falls a bit shy of expectations, amid trading weakness

    Charles Schwab stock drops after revenue falls a bit shy of expectations, amid trading weakness

    Shares of Charles Schwab Corp.
    SCHW,
    +5.42%

    fell 1.5% toward a five-month low in premarket trading Monday, after the financial services and discount brokerage giant beat third-quarter profit expectations but fell a bit shy on revenue. Net income dropped to $1.02 billion, or 56 cents a share, from $1.88 billion, or 99 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Excluding nonrecurring items, adjusted earnings per share of 77 cents beat the FactSet consensus of 74 cents. Revenue declined 16.3% to $4.606 billion, below the FactSet consensus of $4.615 billion. Net interest revenue fell 23.5% to $2.237 billion to beat the FactSet consensus of $2.218 billion, while asset management and administration fee revenue rose 16.9% to $1.224 billion, in line with expectations, and trading revenue was down 17.4% to $768 million to miss expectations of $804 million. New brokerage accounts were flat from a year ago but down 7% from the sequential second quarter. The stock has declined 12.3% over the past three months through Friday while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +1.19%

    has slipped 3.9%.

    Source link

  • Wall Street’s Q3 expectations have been all over the place. Now, a swing to profit growth is ‘likely’ — with a bigger rebound next year

    Wall Street’s Q3 expectations have been all over the place. Now, a swing to profit growth is ‘likely’ — with a bigger rebound next year

    Wall Street spent much of this year getting more tepid on third-quarter corporate profits, with expectations for subdued growth giving way to expectations for a slight decline.

    But after results from a handful of companies soundly beat estimates in recent days, one analyst who tracks the ebbs and flows of earnings data says at least a slight profit gain for the quarter is more likely — with potentially double-digit percentage growth next year.

    FactSet Senior Earnings Analyst John Butters, in a report out Friday, said that of the 32 companies in the S&P 500 Index
    SPX
    that reported third-quarter results through Friday, 84% have reported per-share profits that were above Wall Street’s expectations, and he said they were beating those expectations by a greater degree than usual.

    The index collectively, so far, was putting up a third-quarter earnings growth rate of 0.4% — compared to estimates on Oct. 6 for a 0.3% decline. Most companies, he said, tend to turn in earnings results that beat estimates.

    “Based on the average improvement in the earnings growth rate during the earnings season, the index will likely report year-over-year growth in earnings or more than 0.4% for Q3,” he said.

    That assessment follows quarterly results from big companies like JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Delta Air Lines, Inc.. Both the bank and the airline reported better-than-expected profits. JPMorgan
    JPM,
    +1.50%

    Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said U.S. consumers and businesses “generally remain healthy,” despite thinning pandemic-era savings, while Delta
    DAL,
    -2.99%

    pointed to enduring “robust” travel demand.

    More broadly, the quarter will be a look at how customers are faring amid still-high prices, an approaching holiday season and borrowing costs that could stay higher for longer. Recession pessimism has shown signs of easing. But Citigroup Inc.’s chief financial officer, Mark Mason, said on Friday that the bank expected a soft economic landing with a “mild recession” in the first half of 2024. However, he said such an outcome was “hard to call,” amid a strong job market.

    Financial forecasts tend to fluctuate as analysts digest real-life financial data. For now, they expect S&P 500 index earnings growth of 7.6% for the fourth quarter, and 0.9% for 2023 overall, according to FactSet. Next year, at the moment, looks better, with expected earnings growth of 12.2%.

    This week in earnings

    More names from the financial sector will report in the week ahead, following results from JPMorgan, Citigroup
    C,
    -0.24%

    and Wells Fargo & Co.
    WFC,
    +3.07%
    .
    Reports from Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    -0.03%

    and Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
    GS,
    -0.18%

    will offer more context on deal-making and market sentiment, while earnings from credit-card giants Discover Financial Services
    DFS,
    -1.47%

    and American Express
    AXP,
    -0.12%

    will get more granular on customer spending.

    More airlines, like United Airlines Holdings Inc.
    UAL,
    -2.76%

    and American Airlines Group Inc.
    AAL,
    -2.82%
    ,
    will also report, providing more detail on whether revenge travel still has any life left. Earnings are also due from Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +0.33%

    and AT&T Inc.
    T,
    -0.62%
    .

    In total 55 S&P 500 companies total will report quarterly results this week, including five from the Dow, according to FactSet.

    The call to put on your calendar

    Has Netflix become a utility? Hollywood’s writers will start returning to work, while talks with actors and studios have stalled. But the TV-and-film production limbo hasn’t been the only headache for streaming platform Netflix Inc., which reports quarterly results on Wednesday. The company will report amid greater pressure to boost profits, as the entertainment industry tries to find its footing in the streaming era. Ahead of the results, Wolfe Research analyst Peter Supino recently expressed concern that Netflix’s
    NFLX,
    -1.53%

    ad-supported plan was slow to catch on with viewers. Bernstein analysts likened the company to a mature, durable “utility.” But they also compared the stock to a long-running TV show that, while still good, might be starting to bore its audience. Executives will be hoping for better a better reception from investors.

    The number to watch

    Tesla margins: When EV maker Tesla Inc. reports results on Wednesday, it will be “all about margins,” Deepwater Asset Management’s Gene Munster said in note recently. Those results, and the focus on margins, will follow price cuts, and questions over profit growth and enthusiasm for Tesla’s
    TSLA,
    -2.99%

    new Cybertruck. And Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, in a research note, said the year ahead could be “volatile.”

    Source link

  • Why Treasurys could give the U.S. stock market a green light for a year-end rally

    Why Treasurys could give the U.S. stock market a green light for a year-end rally

    The volatility in the world’s biggest bond market in recent weeks has been too much for U.S. stocks to handle as investors come to terms with the likelihood that interest rates will remain high deep into 2024 until underlying inflationary pressures ease. 

    The U.S. Treasury market, the bedrock of the global financial system, has been hammered by repeated selling since late September, sending the yields on the 10-year and 30-year Treasurys to levels last seen when the economy was moving toward the financial crisis in 200, before yields fell again in the past week.

    Back in September a bond market selloff was fueled by a hawkish outlook from the Federal Reserve, along with mounting concern about the U.S. fiscal deficit and federal debt amid the potential for a government shutdown if a budget for the 2024 fiscal year is not settled by mid-November.

    Earlier this week though, increased uncertainty about the conflict in the Middle East propelled demand for safer assets and caused longer-term bond prices to jump and their yields to fall.

    Then, on Thursday, a Treasury bond auction which saw a pullback in demand despite notably higher yields, sent longer-term rates higher again while investors were already digesting inflation data that showed consumer prices remained elevated in September. The U.S. stocks fell and booked their worst day in five sessions on Thursday. 

    Investors are now wondering what it will take for interest rates and bond yields to fall in the months ahead and whether a retreat in yields could eventually push stocks higher to rally into the year-end. 

    Tim Hayes, chief global investment strategist at Ned Davis Research, said “excessive pessimism” in the bond market is setting up for a relief rally both in stock and bond prices as “there’s not as much inflationary pressures as the market has been pricing in,” he told MarketWatch in a phone interview on Thursday.

    Hayes said his team found the bond sentiment data has started to reflect a “decisive reversal” away from too much pessimism in the Treasury market which could send bond yields lower and boost equities given the inverse correlations between the S&P 500
    SPX
    and the 10-year Treasury note yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y.
     

    See: Here is what needs to happen for the S&P 500 to hold on to this year’s gains

    Meanwhile, some analysts said disinflation may not be enough for the Federal Reserve to drop its “higher-for-longer” interest rate narrative which was primarily responsible for the big spike in yields since September. 

    The economy needs a slowdown in the consumer sector for some relaxation in the Fed’s “higher-for-longer” narrative and to maybe push policymakers to adopt a more flexible outlook for its long-term guidance, said Thierry Wizman, global FX and interest rates strategist at Macquarie. 

    “Of course, the Fed right now is certainly not saying anything that’s remotely suggestive of ‘high-for-long’ being taken away or being removed or negated, so I don’t expect yields to fall a lot unless we start to get reasons to believe the Fed is going to remove that narrative based on the economic data,” Wizman told MarketWatch via phone. 

    However, Wizman said he is confident that the U.S. consumption data will weaken over the next few months when major consumer-product and -service companies start to provide guidance for the fourth quarter, and when U.S. consumers, which have been trapped in a web of conflicting signals on the health of the economy, open their wallet for the holiday shopping season. 

    “This will produce some weakness on the consumer side of the market and there’s no doubt the slowdown will be more pronounced than most people expect in the economy, [but] that will be the positive scenario for bonds,” said Marco Pirondini, head of U.S. equities at Amundi U.S., in an interview with MarketWatch. 

    However, that also means investors should not be “too anxious to buy dips in the stock market” because it would be very unusual if the stock market doesn’t see “multiple compression” with Treasury yields at 16-year highs, Wizman said. “Stocks would still look too rich even if the Fed drops the ‘higher-for-longer’ narrative in the first quarter of 2024.”

    See: Fed skips rate hike for now, but doesn’t rule out another increase this year

    The “higher-for-longer” mantra is an idea Fed officials have tried to get the market to absorb in recent months, with Fed Chair Powell hardening his rhetoric at the September FOMC meeting, pointing potentially to more rate hikes or, more importantly, interest rates that stay higher for longer.

    Fed officials saw interest rates coming down to 5.1% in 2024, higher than June’s outlook for rates to finish next year at 4.6%, according to the latest Summary of Economic Projections at the September policy meeting.

    See: Stock-market moves show bond traders are still in charge as yields renew rise

    However, Wizman characterized the “higher-than-longer” narrative as a “publicity stunt,” as he thought Fed officials simply wanted to signal to the market that they were frustrated that financial conditions hadn’t measurably tightened enough in 2023, so they utilized the narrative to get rising Treasury yields to do some of the “heavy lifting.” 

    “… Fed officials are not really serious about ‘higher-for-longer’ – they just did it to drive long-term yields higher for now,” he added. 

    If a slowdown in the consumer sector of the economy and ongoing disinflation are powerful enough to sap Fed’s rate expectations, Treasury yields could continue to decline without having to have a calamity or big recession in the U.S. economy to drive investors back to the safe-haven assets like Treasurys, strategists said.  

    See: U.S. stock-market seasonality suggests a potential rally in the fourth quarter. Why this time might be different.

    Meanwhile, stock-market seasonality may also help lift sentiment. Historically, the fourth quarter has been the best quarter for the U.S. stock market, with the large-cap S&P 500 index up nearly 80% of the time dating back to 1950 and gaining more than 4% on average. 

    The S&P 500 has risen 0.9% so far in the fourth quarter, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    is up 0.5% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    has advanced 1.4% in October, according to FactSet data.

    “So you have this situation where sentiment got stretched and now sentiment is reversing with more confidence that bond yields have reached their peak, so equities can rally moving into the end of the year, and that should start to become increasingly evident,” said Hayes.

    The yield on the 10-year Treasury note dropped 8.2 basis points to 4.628% on Friday, while the yield on the 30-year Treasury 
    BX:TMUBMUSD30Y
    declined by 9.2 basis points to 4.777%. The 30-year yield fell 16.4 basis points this week, its largest weekly drop since the period that ended March 10, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    Source link

  • Dow Jones ekes out gain Friday, stocks mostly advance for the week as Israel-Gaza war escalates

    Dow Jones ekes out gain Friday, stocks mostly advance for the week as Israel-Gaza war escalates

    U.S. stocks closed mostly lower Friday, but the Dow Jones and S&P 500 posted weekly gains, as the Israel-Gaza war appeared to escalate heading into the weekend. The Dow Jones Industries
    DJIA,
    +0.12%

    rose about 39 points, or 0.1%, on Friday, ending near 33,670, according to preliminary FactSet data. The S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.50%

    fell 0.5% and the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    -1.23%

    closed 1.2% lower. The S&P 500’s energy segment outperformed Friday, gaining 2.3%, as U.S. benchmark crude surged nearly 6% after Israel ordered more than a million people in Gaza to evacuate to the south. Treasury yields fell, with the 10-year Treasury
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    4.626%

    rate retreating to 4.628% Friday, snapping a 5-week yield climb, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Bond prices and yields move in the opposite direction. Investors bought other haven assets too, including gold
    GC00,
    +0.23%

    and the U.S. dollar
    DXY,
    +0.07%
    .
    Wall Street’s “fear gauge”
    VIX,
    +15.76%

    also touched its highest level in more than a week. Even so, the Dow Jones booked at 0.8% weekly gain, the S&P 500 advanced 0.5% and the Nasdaq fell 0.2%.

    Source link

  • Subprime car-loan rates are hitting 17%-22%. Should investors be worried?

    Subprime car-loan rates are hitting 17%-22%. Should investors be worried?

    Many borrowers with subprime credit have been paying 17% to 22% rates on new auto loans this year as the Federal Reserve’s inflation fight takes a toll on lower-income households.

    That borrowing range reflects the average cost, or annual percentage rate, for a loan in recent subprime auto bond deals, according to Fitch Ratings, an increase from last year’s average APR of closer to 14%.

    Higher borrowing costs can mean households need to put more of their income into monthly auto payments, ramping up the risks of late payments, defaults and car repossessions. Those risks, however, have yet to make investors flinch.

    The subprime auto sector already has cleared almost $30 billion of new bond deals this year, according to Finsight, a pace that’s slightly below volumes from the past two years, but still above historical levels since 2008.

    The subprime auto bond market is revved up, even as borrowing rate soar


    Finsight

    “I do believe there has to be a reckoning if rates stay higher for longer,” said Tracy Chen, a portfolio manager on Brandywine Global Asset Management’s global fixed income team.

    Figuring out when the tumult might hit has proven difficult. Instead of slowing, the economy has shown resilience despite the Fed lifting its policy rate to a 22-year high of 5.25% to 5.5%. The central bank also indicated it might need to keep rates higher for some time to fight inflation. Longer-duration bond yields, as a result, have pushed higher, but still hover below 5%.

    Subprime standoff

    Inflation eats away at paychecks, especially those of lower-wage workers, a problem the Fed hopes to solve by keeping borrowing rates elevated. A gauge of inflation out Thursday showed consumer prices were steady at a 3.7% yearly rate in September, above the Fed’s 2% target.

    “This recession has been on everyone’s mind for the past three years,” Chen said. While she thinks the economy will likely contract in the middle of 2024, a lot of damage could be done before that. “The longer rates stay here, the harder the landing.”

    For now, the Fed is widely expected to hold rates steady at its next meeting in November. “Fed policy makers are now shifting their focus from ‘how high’ to raise the policy rate to ‘how long’ to maintain it at restrictive levels,” said EY Chief Economist Gregory Daco, in emailed comments.

    Stocks were flat to slightly higher in choppy trade at midday Thursday after the inflation report came in hotter than forecast, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    near unchanged and the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    up 0.2%.

    Past recessions and the burden of higher interest costs typically hit lower-wage workers harder, making subprime credit a canary in the coal mine for the rest of financial markets. Even so, investors in subprime auto bonds have yet to demand significantly more spread, or compensation, to offset potentially higher defaults among these borrowers.

    Related: Subprime auto defaults on path toward 2008 crisis levels, say portfolio managers

    Take the AAA rated 2-year slice of a new bond deal issued in mid-October by one of the subprime auto sector’s biggest players. It priced at a spread of 115 basis points above relevant risk-free rate, up from a spread of 90 basis points on a similar bond issued in August, according to Finsight, which tracks bond data.

    When factoring in Treasury rates, the yield on the bonds bumped up to about 6% and 5.7%, respectively. The shot at higher returns and low delinquencies in subprime auto bonds have likely helped with investor confidence. The rate of subprime auto loans at least 60-day past due in bond deals was about 5% in September, according to Intex, up from historic lows around 2.5% two years ago.

    “I think people still feel confident,” Chen said of subprime auto bonds. When putting a recent bond out on a Wall Street list to gauge its market value, she said bids come in right away.

    Source link

  • ‘Banks fail. It’s OK,’ says former FDIC chair Sheila Bair.

    ‘Banks fail. It’s OK,’ says former FDIC chair Sheila Bair.

    Higher interest rates may be painful in the short term, but banks, savers and the financial ecosystem will be better off in the long run, said Sheila Bair, former chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

    “When money is free, you squander it,” Bair said in an interview with MarketWatch. “It’s like anything. If it doesn’t cost you anything, you’re going to value it less. And we’ve had free money for quite some time now.”

    Bair, who led the FDIC from 2006 to 2011, caused a stir recently in criticizing “moonshots,” the crypto industry and “useless innovations” like Bored Ape NFTs, which proliferated because of speculation and near-zero interest rates.

    Her main message has been that the path to higher rates, while potentially “tricky,” ultimately will lead to a more stable financial system, where “truly promising innovations will attract capital” and where savers can actually save.

    Former FDIC Chair Sheila Bair was dubbed “the little guy’s protector in chief” by Time Magazine in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis.

    Bair sat down for an interview with Barron’s Live, MarketWatch edition, to talk about the ripple effects of higher rates, what could trigger another financial crisis and why more regional banks sitting on unrealized losses could fail in the wake of Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse in March.

    “We probably will have more bank failures,” Bair said. “But you know what? Banks fail. It’s OK. The system goes on. It’s important for people to understand that households stay below the insured deposit caps.”

    The FDIC insures bank deposits up to $250,000 per account. It also has overseen 565 bank failures since 2001.

    “I know borrowing costs are going up, but your rewards for saving it are going up too,” she said. “I think that’s a very good thing.”

    However, Bair isn’t focused only on money traps and pitfalls for grown-ups. She also has two new picture books coming out that aim to explain big financial themes to young readers, including where easy-money ways, speculation and inflation come from.

    “One thing that I’ve learned from the kids is to not ask them what a loan is, because when I did that, a little hand when up, and she said: ‘That’s when you’re by yourself,’” Bair said.

    Source link

  • Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    The stock market always overreacts, and this year it seems as if investors believe dividend stocks have become toxic. But a look at yields on quality dividend stocks relative to the market underlines what may be an excellent opportunity for long-term investors to pursue growth with an income stream that builds up over the years.

    The current environment, in which you can get a yield of more than 5% yield on your cash at a bank or lock in a yield of 4.57% on a10-year U.S. Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    or close to 5% on a 20-year Treasury bond
    BX:TMUBMUSD20Y
    seems to have made some investors forget two things: A stock’s dividend payout can rise over the long term, and so can it is price.

    It is never fun to see your portfolio underperform during a broad market swing. And people have a tendency to prefer jumping on a trend hoping to keep riding it, rather than taking advantage of opportunities brought about by price declines. We may be at such a moment for quality dividend stocks, based on their yields relative to that of the benchmark S&P 500
    SPX.

    Drew Justman of Madison Funds explained during an interview with MarketWatch how he and John Brown, who co-manage the Madison Dividend Income Fund, BHBFX MDMIX and the new Madison Dividend Value ETF
    DIVL,
    use relative dividend yields as part of their screening process for stocks. He said he has never seen such yields, when compared with that of the broad market, during 20 years of work as a securities analyst and portfolio manager.

    Dividend stocks are down

    Before diving in, we can illustrate the market’s current loathing of dividend stocks by comparing the performance of the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD,
    which tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, with that of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY.
    Let’s look at a total return chart (with dividends reinvested) starting at the end of 2021, since the Federal Reserve started its cycle of interest rate increases in March 2022:


    FactSet

    The Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index is made up of “high-dividend-yielding stocks in the U.S. with a record of consistently paying dividends, selected for fundamental strength relative to their peers, based on financial ratios,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

    The end results for the two ETFs from the end of 2021 through Tuesday are similar. But you can see how the performance pattern has been different, with the dividend stocks holding up well during the stock market’s reaction to the Fed’s move last year, but trailing the market’s recovery as yields on CDs and bonds have become so much more attractive this year. Let’s break down the performance since the end of 2021, this time bringing in the Madison Dividend Income Fund’s Class Y and Class I shares:

    Fund

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

    14.9%

    -18.2%

    -6.0%

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    -3.8%

    -3.2%

    -6.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class Y

    -4.7%

    -5.4%

    -9.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class I

    -4.7%

    -5.3%

    -9.7%

    Source: FactSet

    Dividend stocks held up well during 2022, as the S&P 500 fell more than 18%. But they have been left behind during this year’s rally.

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund was established in 1986. The Class Y shares have annual expenses of 0.91% of assets under management and are rated three stars (out of five) within Morningstar’s “Large Value” fund category. The Class I shares have only been available since 2020. They have a lower expense ratio of 0.81% and are distributed through investment advisers or through platforms such as Schwab, which charges a $50 fee to buy Class I shares.

    The opportunity — high relative yields

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund holds 40 stocks. Justman explained that when he and Brown select stocks for the fund their investible universe begins with the components of the Russell 1000 Index
    RUT,
    which is made up of the largest 1,000 companies by market capitalization listed on U.S. exchanges. Their first cut narrows the list to about 225 stocks with dividend yields of at least 1.1 times that of the index.

    The Madison team calculates a stock’s relative dividend yield by dividing its yield by that of the S&P 500. Let’s do that for the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD
    (because it tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index) to illustrate the opportunity that Justman highlighted:

    Index or ETF

    Dividend yield

    5-year Avg. yield 

    10-year Avg. yield 

    15-year Avg. yield 

    Relative yield

    5-year Avg. relative yield 

    10-year Avg. relative yield 

    15-year Avg. relative yield 

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    3.99%

    3.41%

    3.20%

    3.16%

    2.6

    2.1

    1.8

    1.6

    S&P 500

    1.55%

    1.62%

    1.79%

    1.92%

    Source: FactSet

    The Schwab U.S. Equity ETF’s relative yield is 2.6 — that is, its dividend yield is 2.6 times that of the S&P 500, which is much higher than the long-term averages going back 15 years. If we went back 20 years, the average relative yield would be 1.7.

    Examples of high-quality stocks with high relative dividend yields

    After narrowing down the Russell 1000 to about 225 stocks with relative dividend yields of at least 1.1, Justman and Brown cut further to about 80 companies with a long history of raising dividends and with strong balance sheets, before moving further through a deeper analysis to arrive at a portfolio of about 40 stocks.

    When asked about oil companies and others that pay fixed quarterly dividends plus variable dividends, he said, “We try to reach out to the company and get an estimate of special dividends and try to factor that in.” Two examples of companies held by the fund that pay variable dividends are ConocoPhillips
    COP,
    -0.29%

    and EOG Resources Inc.
    EOG,
    +0.52%
    .

    Since the balance-sheet requirement is subjective “almost all fund holdings are investment-grade rated,” Justman said. That refers to credit ratings by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings. He went further, saying about 80% of the fund’s holdings were rated “A-minus or better.” BBB- is the lowest investment-grade rating from S&P. Fidelity breaks down the credit agencies’ ratings hierarchy.

    Justman named nine stocks held by the fund as good examples of quality companies with high relative yields to the S&P 500:

    Company

    Ticker

    Dividend yield

    Relative yield

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    2.04%

    1.3

    31%

    -23%

    1%

    Home Depot, Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    2.79%

    1.8

    -3%

    -22%

    -25%

    Lowe’s Cos., Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    2.17%

    1.4

    3%

    -21%

    -19%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    4.24%

    2.7

    -3%

    -10%

    -13%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.89%

    3.8

    -22%

    -19%

    -37%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    3.62%

    2.3

    1%

    -23%

    -22%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    3.30%

    2.1

    -3%

    -10%

    -12%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    4.17%

    2.7

    -8%

    -16%

    -23%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    2.52%

    1.6

    2%

    -16%

    -15%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company, fund or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Now let’s see how these companies have grown their dividend payouts over the past five years. Leaving the companies in the same order, here are compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for dividends.

    Before showing this next set of data, let’s work through one example among the nine stocks:

    • If you had purchased shares of Home Depot Inc.
      HD,
      -0.39%

      five years ago, you would have paid $193.70 a share if you went in at the close on Oct. 10, 2018. At that time, the company’s quarterly dividend was $1.03 cents a share, for an annual dividend rate of $4.12, which made for a then-current yield of 2.13%.

    • If you had held your shares of Home Depot for five years through Tuesday, your quarterly dividend would have increased to $2.09 a share, for a current annual payout of $8.36. The company’s dividend has increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.2% over the past five years. In comparison, the S&P 500’s weighted dividend rate has increased at a CAGR of 6.24% over the past five years, according to FactSet.

    • That annual payout rate of $8.36 would make for a current dividend yield of 2.79% for a new investor who went in at Tuesday’s closing price of $299.22. But if you had not reinvested, the dividend yield on your five-year-old shares (based on what you would have paid for them) would be 4.32%. And your share price would have risen 54%. And if you had reinvested your dividends, your total return for the five years would have been 75%, slightly ahead of the 74% return for the S&P 500 SPX during that period.

    Home Depot hasn’t been the best dividend grower among the nine stocks named by Justman, but it is a good example of how an investor can build income over the long term, while also enjoying capital appreciation.

    Here’s the dividend CAGR comparison for the nine stocks:

    Company

    Ticker

    Five-year dividend CAGR

    Dividend yield on shares purchased five years ago

    Dividend yield five years ago

    Current dividend yield

    Five-year price change

    Five-year total return

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    9.46%

    2.44%

    1.55%

    2.04%

    20%

    42%

    Home Depot Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    15.20%

    4.32%

    2.13%

    2.79%

    54%

    75%

    Lowe’s Cos, Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    18.04%

    4.14%

    1.81%

    2.17%

    91%

    109%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    23.16%

    7.62%

    2.69%

    4.24%

    80%

    108%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.34%

    3.60%

    2.78%

    5.89%

    -39%

    -26%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    6.65%

    2.90%

    2.10%

    3.62%

    -20%

    -9%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    11.04%

    5.24%

    3.10%

    3.30%

    59%

    82%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    12.23%

    5.56%

    3.12%

    4.17%

    33%

    56%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    10.20%

    3.37%

    2.07%

    2.52%

    34%

    49%

    Source: FactSet

    This isn’t to say that Justman and Brown have held all of these stocks over the past five years. In fact, Lowe’s Cos.
    LOW,
    +0.27%

    was added to the portfolio this year, as was United Parcel Service Inc.
    UPS,
    -0.16%
    .
    But for most of these companies, dividends have compounded at relatively high rates.

    When asked to name an example of a stock the fund had sold, Justman said he and Brown decided to part ways with Verizon Communications Inc.
    VZ,
    -0.94%

    last year, “as we became concerned about its fundamental competitive position in its industry.”

    Summing up the scene for dividend stocks, Justman said, “It seems this year the market is treating dividend stocks as fixed-income instruments. We think that is a short-term issue and that this is a great opportunity.”

    Don’t miss: How to tell if it is worth avoiding taxes with a municipal-bond ETF

    Source link

  • U.S. stocks post 3-session climb as bond yields, oil retreat

    U.S. stocks post 3-session climb as bond yields, oil retreat

    U.S. stocks booked a 3-session win streak Tuesday as oil prices and bond yields retreated. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.40%

    climbed about 134 points, or 0.4%, ending near 33,739, according to preliminary FactSet data. That was the longest streak of straight wins for the blue-chip index in a month, and the best three days of gains since late August, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +0.52%

    advanced 0.5% and the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    +0.58%

    gained 0.6%. It was the third session in a row of gains for all three indexes. The brighter backdrop for stock market came as oil prices
    CL00,
    -0.69%

    and bond yields
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    4.663%

    retreated and after Raphael Bostic, head of the Atlanta Fed, said he didn’t think additional rate hikes were needed to bring inflation down to the central bank’s 2% annual target, but also that he still sees rates staying high for a “long time.”

    Source link

  • Emerging-market stocks look poised for a comeback after a difficult decade. Here’s what U.S. investors need to know.

    Emerging-market stocks look poised for a comeback after a difficult decade. Here’s what U.S. investors need to know.

    Emerging-market stocks are coming off a tough quarter after facing down a triple threat of rising Treasury yields, a stronger U.S. dollar, and a lackluster recovery in China’s economy and markets.

    But amid the pain, some see opportunity for a lasting rebound.

    The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
    EEM,
    which tracks the widely followed MSCI Emerging Markets Index, fell 4.1% during the quarter ended in September, outpacing a 3.7% decline for the S&P 500
    SPX,
    the deeply liquid U.S. benchmark. Both benchmarks endured their worst performance in a year.

    It is just the latest chapter in what has been a decade of persistent underperformance during both good times and bad. The EM ETF fell 22.4% amid the global equity-market rout in 2022, compared with a 19.4% drop for the S&P 500, FactSet data show.

    But while the selloff in Chinese stocks has dominated headlines this year, some corners of the emerging markets universe have held up surprisingly well. Greek and Mexican stocks have even outperformed U.S. stocks in dollar terms, while other major markets like Brazil and India are trailing by only a modest margin.

    This hasn’t gone unnoticed by Wall Street, where some are advising clients to consider expanding their exposure to markets once deemed too risky for many U.S. investors saving for retirement.

    In a research note shared with MarketWatch, a team of equity strategists at Goldman Sachs Group
    GS,
    +0.69%

    pointed out that emerging-market stocks excluding China had outperformed developed-market stocks excluding the U.S. so far this year.

    Meanwhile, dissatisfaction with lofty valuations in the U.S., well as the prospect of another recession potentially looming around the corner have helped to embolden portfolio managers to seek out better returns elsewhere.

    Country ETF

    Ticker

    Performance YTD (USD)

    Brazil

    EWZ +9.2%

    India

    INDA +7%

    South Korea

    EWY +4%

    Colombia

    GXG +2.5%

    Chile

    ECH -7.6%

    Mexico

    EWW +13%

    China

    MCHI -7.6%

    Indonesia

    EIDO -2%

    Saudi Arabia

    KSA +0.3%

    Greece

    GREK +22%

    MSCI Emerging Markets

    EEM +0.8%

    U.S. (S&P 500 index)

    SPX +13%

    Times are changing

    Over the past 10 years, rock-bottom interest rates helped U.S. stocks best practically all comers. During the 10 years through Monday’s close, the S&P 500 has risen 161.8% excluding dividends, while the MSCI ACWI Index
    ACWI,
    a broad index of developed- and emerging-market stocks, gained nearly 74%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    Emerging markets performed pretty poorly by comparison, with the MSCI EM Index down 9.6%.

    But just because EM stocks have lagged their developed-world peers for a decade doesn’t mean they are doomed to repeat this dismal performance forever. Some pointed to the torrid gains for Japanese stocks in 2023 as an example of how a market that trailed the U.S. for decades can see its prospects suddenly brighten.

    Japan’s Nikkei 225
    NIY00,
    +0.47%

    has risen more than 21% since the start of the year in U.S. dollar terms, according to FactSet.

    To that end, a chorus of investment bank equity strategists along with big-name investors like GMO’s Jeremy Grantham have said a similar dynamic could play out in emerging markets.

    Equity strategists like Bank of America’s Michael Hartnett and Barclays Emmanuel Cau have urged clients to look beyond the U.S. for returns. According to a research report from Cau and his team, emerging markets offer “better tactical risk-reward.” Hartnett told clients that U.S. stocks appear extremely overvalued compared with the rest of the world, and that it is time to diversify away from the U.S.

    “From the perspective of relative performance, the U.S. market has been really strong the past 10 years. It wasn’t like that the prior 20 years, and at some point, a reversion will happen,” said Dina Ting, head of global index portfolio management at Franklin Templeton, during an interview with MarketWatch.

    “That is helping to make the case for international markets.”

    The bull case for emerging markets

    With the possible exception of India, emerging-market stocks generally enjoy much lower valuations compared with their counterparts in the U.S.

    That is according to a table of valuations and projected returns shared by analysts at Goldman. Many local equity markets enjoy forward price-to-earnings ratios below 10. By comparison, the S&P 500, considered the U.S. benchmark, presently enjoys a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 18.11, according to FactSet.

    Country

    NTM P/E

    12-month return forecast (USD)

    Brazil

    7.5

    +35%

    Mainland China

    9.4

    +23%

    Mexico

    10.7

    +27%

    India

    20

    +8%

    Colombia

    4.6

    +55%

    Egypt

    6.7

    0%

    South Korea

    11.1

    36%

    Indonesia

    13.8

    +20%

    Chile

    8

    +37%

    Saudi Arabia

    14.9

    +13%

    Total EM

    11.3

    +27%

    Developing economies have more rosy growth prospects, according to the International Monetary Fund, which released its latest batch of projections on Tuesday.

    As a group, the IMF expects developing economies to grow by 4% in 2024, compared with 1.4% for a group of advanced economies that includes the U.S.

    As Ting and other portfolio managers have pointed out, financials, producers of consumer goods and other industries are accounting for a growing share of emerging-market equity benchmarks. After so many years of being so heavily weighted toward China, and the commodity space, more diversity is seen as a welcome development.

    Although few, if any, emerging-market economies enjoy the trifecta of rule of law, deeply liquid capital markets, and institutional independence that investors take for granted in the U.S., progress has been made. Ting cited India as a great example of a country that’s recently made major strides toward becoming more friendly toward international investors.

    At the same time, paralysis in the U.S. Congress has raised concerns about potential political instability diminishing the attractiveness of the U.S. As House speakers are deposed and budget battles rage, some on Wall Street expect Moody’s Investors Service could join Fitch Ratings and S&P Global Ratings in stripping the U.S. of its AAA credit rating, as the agency has threatened to do.

    Central banks in Mexico, Brazil and India have also had far less trouble tamping down inflation compared with the Federal Reserve, which also bodes well for future equity returns.

    “In India and other emerging markets, certainly Brazil and others, their central banks have been much further ahead than the U.S. in fighting inflation,” said Ashish Chugh, a portfolio manager of long-only and long-short global emerging market equity strategies at Loomis, Sayles & Co.

    “The U.S. government handed out free money during COVID-19, but these emerging-market countries didn’t do that. They gave out food and other stuff, but they didn’t send checks in the mail. Because of that, you didn’t have as big of an inflation problem.”

    A word of caution

    While emerging markets have matured in many ways, the sheer number of disparate economies and governments can make risk management difficult. The emerging-market space as defined by MSCI consists of two dozen countries.

    Chinese stocks are still the most heavily represented in popular EM equity indexes like the MSCI Emerging Markets index, which is roughly 30% weighted toward the world’s second-largest economy.

    Many investors in the West are already familiar with the risks of investing in China, including those emanating from China’s authoritarian system to the fallout from burgeoning geopolitical tensions with the U.S. But the potential pitfalls of investing in India or Brazil may not be quite as well understood.

    That is why Zak Smerczak, an analyst and portfolio manager specializing in global equities at Comgest, would advise newcomers interested in the sector to start by investing in only the most established companies, even if their valuations don’t look quite as attractive.

    “Being selective is the key,” he said during an interview with MarketWatch. “Making a broad investment in emerging markets right now seems risky to us, but there are pockets of opportunities and in specific companies.”

    Source link

  • Stock market likely to see 12% retreat ahead of recession, says trader who called ’87 crash

    Stock market likely to see 12% retreat ahead of recession, says trader who called ’87 crash

    ‘The stock market, typically, right before recession declines about 12%.That’s probably going to happen at some point from some level.’


    — Paul Tudor Jones, founder and CIO, Tudor Investment Corp.

    That’s famed hedge-fund manager Paul Tudor Jones in an interview with CNBC Tuesday morning, explaining why he’s not enthusiastic about U.S. stocks and other risky assets as he awaits a recession induced by the Federal Reserve’s aggressive monetary tightening.

    Jones said it’s difficult to be positive on equities amid what he described as “the most threatening and challenging geopolitical environment that I’ve ever seen,” which is occurring “at the same time the United States is at its weakest fiscal position since World War II. It’s a really difficult time.”

    A 2023 rally in U.S. stocks has stalled, with the S&P 500 index
    SPX
    pulling back 5.5% from a 2023 high set on July 31, leaving the large-cap benchmark up 12.9% for the year to date through Monday’s close. The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    is up just 1.4% so far this year.

    Jones is widely credited with predicting, and profiting, from the stock-market crash on Oct. 19, 1987, which saw the Dow lose nearly 23% of its value, marking the largest one-day percentage decline for the blue-chip benchmark in its history.

    So what does Jones like?

    “I would love gold and bitcoin, together,” he said.

    “I think [bitcoin and gold] probably take on a larger percentage of your portfolio than historically they would because we’re going to go through a challenging political time here in the United States and…we’ve obviously got a geopolitical situation” in Israel and Ukraine, Jones said.

    Bitcoin
    BTCUSD,
    -0.72%

    was off 0.8% near $27,380 Tuesday morning and has rallied around 65% so far in 2023. Gold
    GC00,
    +0.59%

    has retreated from a high above $2,000 an ounce earlier this year, slumping below $1,850 last week as Treasury yields marched higher and the dollar strengthened.

    A pullback in U.S. bond yields has seen gold bounce 1.4% this week, trading recently near $1,871 an ounce.

    Large, speculative short positions in gold will provide fuel for a rally as a recession takes hold, the investor said.

    “In a recession, the market is typically really long assets like bitcoin and gold,” he said. “So there’s probably $40 billion worth of buying that has to come into gold at some point between now and if that recession actually occurs.

    “So yeah, I like bitcoin and I like gold right here,” Jones said.

    Source link

  • Here’s the real reason the stock market is so horrid. And, yes, it’s rather spooky.

    Here’s the real reason the stock market is so horrid. And, yes, it’s rather spooky.

    Some say it’s the fear of stagflation.

    Some say it’s chaos on Capitol Hill.

    Some say it’s turmoil in the Middle East.

    But we all know the real reason the stock market is so crummy, right?

    It’s October! Of course stocks are down!

    It is a bizarre, inexplicable, and yet undeniable, fact that, throughout history, Wall Street has produced almost all of its gains during the winter months of the year — from Nov. 1 to April 30. It is an even more bizarre, inexplicable and yet undeniable fact that the rest of the world’s stock markets have done the same thing.

    The so-called summer months, meaning the half of the year from May 1 to Halloween, have generally given you bupkis or worse. 

    Around the world, over the course of centuries of recorded financial history, stock-market returns have averaged four full percentage points higher from November to April than from May to October, report researchers Ben Jacobsen at Tilburg University and Cherry Yi Zhang at Nottingham University’s Business School in China. This so-called Halloween Effect seems “remarkably robust,” they concluded, after studying the financial returns of 114 different countries going back as far as they could find reliable monthly data — starting with the stock market in 1693 London. 

    Even more extreme: In the 65 countries for which they had extensive data both about the stock market and about short-term interest rates, it’s fair to say you would have been better off selling your stocks on May 1, putting the money in the bank, then taking it out again at the end of October and buying back your stocks (ignoring fees and taxes, of course).

    “In none of the 65 countries for which we have total returns and short-term interest rates available — with the exception of Mauritius — can we reject a Sell in May effect based on our new test. Only for Mauritius do we find evidence of significantly positive excess returns during summer.”

    Italics mine. Mauritius? 

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    is now lower than it was at the end of April. So is the Russell 2000
    RUT
    index of small-cap U.S. stocks. The benchmark international stock index, the MSCI EAFE, is down about 6%. Japan’s Nikkei
    NIY00,
    +1.90%

    is slightly up, as the yen has tanked.

    The S&P 500
    SPX
    is hanging on to a small gain, but that is only because of the early summer gains of a few tech titans. The average S&P stock is down about 2.5% since the end of April — while an investment in no-risk Treasury bills is up more than 2%.

    Meanwhile, let the record show that, over the same period, according to the record keepers at MSCI, the stock market in Mauritius is up 12%.

    Booyah!

    Every time I write about this Halloween or “sell in May” effect, I make the same two points, and I make no apologies for repeating them here, because they are unavoidable.

    The first is that, every spring, after looking at this data, I am tempted to sell all my stocks at the end of April, and every year I don’t, because I think it’s absolutely ridiculous. (And someone on Wall Street who is much smarter than me usually persuades me not to.) And most years I end up kicking myself for not doing it.

    The second is to recall the old economists’ joke: “I don’t care if it works in practice! Does it work in theory?” Selling in May — or, sure, the Halloween Effect — has absolutely no reason that anyone can find for working in theory. But apparently, it works in practice — which is pretty much where we are now.

    Does this mean stocks are going to rally? It’s anyone’s guess. It would be crazy if it were that simple. But, then, the whole Halloween Effect is crazy.

    If history is any guide, now is the time to buy stocks, not sell them, because the next six months are likely to be the time when they make you money. And if history isn’t any guide, well, aren’t we all sunk anyway?

    Source link

  • PepsiCo’s stock climbs after earnings beat consensus and company raises guidance

    PepsiCo’s stock climbs after earnings beat consensus and company raises guidance

    Shares of PepsiCo Inc.
    PEP,
    +0.67%

    rose 2.5% in premarket trading Tuesday, after the beverage and snack giant reported third-quarter earnings that topped consensus and raised its full-year guidance.

    Net income rose to $3.092 billion, or $2.24 a share, from $2.702 billion, or $1.95 a share, in the same period a year ago.

    Excluding nonrecurring items, core earnings per share of $2.25 were ahead of the FactSet consensus of $2.15.

    Revenue grew to $23.453 billion from $21.971 billion, also ahead of the FactSet consensus of $23.413 billion.

    “We are pleased with our performance as our businesses and associates displayed tremendous agility and resilience across geographies and categories in an evolving and dynamic environment,” Chief Executive Ramon Laguarta said in a statement.

    Revenue at Frito-Lay North America rose 7%, while it was up 5% at Quaker Foods North America. PepsiCo Beverages North America rose 8%, while Latin America was up 21% and Europe up 2%.

    Revenue for Africa, Middle East and South Asia fell 6%, while Asia Pacific, Australia and New Zealand and China Region’s revenue was up 4%.

    For 2023, the company revised its core EPS guidance to $7.54 from $7.47 previously.

    “For fiscal year 2024, we expect to deliver results towards the upper end of our long-term target ranges for both organic revenue and core constant currency EPS growth,” said the statement.

    The company’s long-term target ranges for both organic revenue growth — 4% to 6% growth — and core constant currency EPS growth– high-single-digit percentage increase– remain unchanged.

    The stock has fallen 11% in the year to date, while the S&P 500
    SPX
    has gained 13%.

    Source link

  • 1970s-style stagflation may be at risk of repeating itself, Deutsche Bank warns

    1970s-style stagflation may be at risk of repeating itself, Deutsche Bank warns

    A major Wall Street bank is warning about the risk that inflation expectations could become unanchored in a fashion similar to the 1970s stagflation era.

    Weekend attacks on Israel by Hamas illustrate how geopolitical risks can suddenly return — adding to the surprise shocks of the current decade, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, said macro strategist Henry Allen and research analyst Cassidy Ainsworth-Grace of Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank
    DB,
    -1.40%
    .

    Read: Questions emerge over how Israeli intelligence missed Hamas attack

    Oil prices settled more than 4% higher on Monday as traders weighed the impact of the war in the Middle East on crude supplies. The spike in energy prices is adding to the growing list of similarities to the 1970s era — which also includes consistently above-target inflation across major economies and repeated optimism about how quickly it would fall; strikes by workers; and even increasing chances that this winter will be dominated by the El Niño weather pattern, similar to what took place in 1971 and which is historically tied to higher commodity prices, according to Deutsche Bank.

    Inflation remains above central banks’ targets in every G-7 country — the U.S., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. How long it will remain high is one of the most important questions facing financial markets, and a destabilization of expectations would make it even harder for policy makers to restore price stability.

    “So given inflation is still above its pre-pandemic levels, it is important not to get complacent about its path,” Allen and Ainsworth-Grace wrote in a note released on Monday. “After all, if there is another shock and inflation remains above target into a third or even a fourth year, it is increasingly difficult to imagine that long-term expectations will repeatedly stay lower than actual inflation.”

    History indicates that the last mile of inflation is often the hardest. One of the key lessons of the 1970s was that inflation failed to return to previous levels after the first oil shock of 1973 and U.S. recession of 1973-1975, and went even higher following a second oil shock in 1979. Now that inflation has been above target for the last two years, “a fresh inflationary spike could well lead expectations to become unanchored,” according to the Deutsche Bank note.


    Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank

    For now, the public’s inflation expectations, as measured by a New York Fed survey of consumers in August, remain largely stable, though still above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

    The current period differs from the 1970s era in a number of ways, the Deutsche Bank team also points out. Long-term inflation expectations remain “impressively” well-anchored, commodity prices have fallen substantially from their peaks over the past 12 to 18 months, and supply-chain disruptions that emerged during the pandemic have “broadly healed.” In addition, the U.S. is less energy intensive than in the past and less susceptible to damage from a 1970s-style energy shock.

    Even so, “it is vitally important to avoid complacency,” Allen and Ainsworth-Grace wrote. “Indeed, with the benefit of hindsight, one of the mistakes of the 1970s was that policy was eased up too early, which contributed to a resurgence in inflation.”

    Risk-off sentiment prevailed in financial markets during the early part of Monday, before stocks turned higher during the New York afternoon. All three major U.S. stock indexes
    DJIA

    SPX

    COMP
    finished higher in a volatile session. Trading in U.S. government-debt futures reflected greater demand and gold rallied as a flight to safety took hold. The cash market for Treasurys was closed for Columbus Day and Indigenous Peoples Day.

    Source link

  • Will Israel-Gaza war sink stocks and shake the global economy? Watch oil prices.

    Will Israel-Gaza war sink stocks and shake the global economy? Watch oil prices.

    Wall Street on Monday shook off a bout of selling sparked by the Israel-Gaza war.

    That’s in keeping with the historical tendency of investors to look past geopolitical conflict and human tragedy, but it isn’t necessarily the last word. That last word will likely belong to oil traders.

    “Oil rallied today yet remains below the near-term peak from last month. If oil prices rise higher for longer, the global economy could feel a resurgence of inflation during a period when investors are hoping inflation is clearly decelerating,” said Jeffrey Roach, chief economist for LPL Financial, in emailed comments.

    Roach also noted that, in general, markets tend to have difficulty pricing the difference between a temporary shock and a permanent shock.

    For now, however, the jump in oil prices isn’t signaling a permanent shock. Sure, Brent crude
    BRN00,
    +0.11%
    ,
    the global benchmark, jumped 4.2% on Monday to end at $88.15 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate crude
    CL.1,
    +0.07%

    CL00,
    +0.07%

    surged $3.59, or 4.3% to $86.38 a barrel — the biggest one-day jump for both grades since April 3.

    See: Here’s what Israel-Gaza war means for oil prices as fighting continues

    The jump was impressive, but it comes after a big pullback last week that saw both WTI and Brent retreat from 2023 highs near $100 a barrel.

    So if crude can manage to close above those highs — $93.68 a barrel for WTI — investors across other markets will likely take notice.

    What would it take to drive crude back toward the highs? The focus is on Iran.

    The Wall Street Journal on Sunday reported that Iranian security officials helped plan the attack by Hamas. The Israeli military has said there is no concrete evidence of Iranian involvement, according to news reports.

    A direct role by Iran, a longtime ally of Hamas, would raise the threat of a broader conflict.

    Some analysts have put Iranian crude production at more than 3 million barrels a day and exports above 2 million barrels a day — the highest levels since the Trump administration pulled the U.S. out of the Iranian nuclear accord in 2018, according to the Wall Street Journal. Sales fell to around 400,000 barrels a day in 2020 as the U.S. reimposed sanctions.

    “If Israel discovers that Iran played a role in Hamas’ attack, it could retaliate militarily. At the very least, any warming of relations between Iran and the West is now on hold and this will limit incremental oil supply,” said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Monday note.

    It’s a reminder that “while neither Israel nor Gaza are major oil producers, everything that happens geopolitically in the Middle East invariably ends up affecting oil prices,” he said.

    The potential for a broader conflict could lead to a “sharp market correction,” argued Olivier d’Assier, head of applied research, APAC, at Axioma.

    The scale of the conflict, the largest since the Yom Kippur War 50 years ago, renders comparisons with how markets have shaken off past geopolitical incidents, but they may be irrelevant in terms of stress testing, he argued.

    “The closest historical scenarios we could use would be 9/11 and the start of the Ukraine war. But because both took place on Western soil, they might not be adequate,” d’Assier said.

    On Monday, however, remarks by Federal Reserve officials ultimately trumped the rise in crude prices and jitters over the Middle East. Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan and Fed Vice Chair Philip Jefferson both noted the rise in long-term Treasury yields and their role in tightening financial conditions, which investors took as a signal the Fed may not be as likely to further raise interest rates.

    See: An Israel-Hamas war could change what the Fed does about interest rates

    Stocks turned north after a morning dip, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    rising nearly 200 points, or 0.6%, while the S&P 500
    SPX
    also advanced 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    gained 0.4%.

    For now, market participants appear set to look ahead to economic data later this week, including September consumer-price index and producer-price index readings.

    Source link