ReportWire

Tag: Energy

  • GE Vernova Inc. $GEV Shares Acquired by Synergy Asset Management LLC

    [ad_1]

    Synergy Asset Management LLC grew its holdings in shares of GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEVFree Report) by 300.0% in the 3rd quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 1,884 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 1,413 shares during the period. Synergy Asset Management LLC’s holdings in GE Vernova were worth $1,078,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

    Other institutional investors have also recently made changes to their positions in the company. First City Capital Management Inc. acquired a new position in GE Vernova during the 3rd quarter valued at about $216,000. Simon Quick Advisors LLC grew its stake in shares of GE Vernova by 21.4% during the third quarter. Simon Quick Advisors LLC now owns 937 shares of the company’s stock worth $576,000 after acquiring an additional 165 shares during the last quarter. Signaturefd LLC increased its holdings in shares of GE Vernova by 7.0% during the third quarter. Signaturefd LLC now owns 6,484 shares of the company’s stock valued at $3,987,000 after acquiring an additional 423 shares in the last quarter. Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of GE Vernova during the third quarter valued at about $2,305,000. Finally, GAM Holding AG purchased a new position in shares of GE Vernova in the 3rd quarter valued at approximately $419,000.

    Analysts Set New Price Targets

    Several analysts have weighed in on the stock. Melius Research set a $740.00 target price on shares of GE Vernova and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, September 15th. Morgan Stanley boosted their price objective on shares of GE Vernova from $710.00 to $822.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a report on Tuesday, December 16th. BMO Capital Markets upped their target price on GE Vernova from $710.00 to $780.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research report on Wednesday, December 10th. Seaport Res Ptn cut GE Vernova from a “strong-buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Thursday, December 11th. Finally, Cowen reissued a “buy” rating on shares of GE Vernova in a report on Thursday, October 23rd. Four research analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, twenty-two have issued a Buy rating, six have given a Hold rating and two have issued a Sell rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat, the stock presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $691.11.

    Get Our Latest Report on GE Vernova

    GE Vernova Price Performance

    NYSE GEV opened at $678.29 on Friday. GE Vernova Inc. has a 1 year low of $252.25 and a 1 year high of $731.00. The company has a market capitalization of $184.03 billion, a PE ratio of 110.47, a P/E/G ratio of 2.85 and a beta of 1.67. The company has a fifty day moving average of $612.80 and a 200 day moving average of $601.50.

    GE Vernova (NYSE:GEVGet Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, October 22nd. The company reported $1.64 earnings per share for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.72 by ($0.08). The company had revenue of $9.97 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $9.15 billion. GE Vernova had a net margin of 4.52% and a return on equity of 17.07%. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 11.8% on a year-over-year basis. During the same quarter in the previous year, the business posted ($0.35) EPS. Research analysts expect that GE Vernova Inc. will post 6.59 earnings per share for the current year.

    GE Vernova Increases Dividend

    The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Monday, February 2nd. Shareholders of record on Monday, January 5th will be issued a $0.50 dividend. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, January 5th. This is a boost from GE Vernova’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.25. This represents a $2.00 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 0.3%. GE Vernova’s dividend payout ratio is presently 16.29%.

    GE Vernova Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    GE Vernova is the energy-focused company formed from the energy businesses of General Electric and operates as a publicly listed entity on the NYSE under the ticker GEV. It is organized to design, manufacture and service equipment and systems used across the power generation and energy transition value chain, bringing together legacy capabilities in conventional power, renewables and grid technologies under a single corporate platform.

    The company’s offerings span large-scale power-generation equipment such as gas and steam turbines and associated generators and controls, as well as renewable energy technologies including onshore and offshore wind platforms and hydro solutions.

    Read More

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding GEV? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE:GEVFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV)



    Receive News & Ratings for GE Vernova Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for GE Vernova and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Lawmakers demand answers on offshore wind projects

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts’ two U.S. senators are demanding answers from the Trump administration about the “national security threats” it cited in the decision to scuttle several multibillion-dollar offshore wind projects.

    In a letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey demanded a sit-down meeting with the agencies to review “recently completed classified reports” behind the “national security risks” the Trump administration cited in its decision to halt construction of the offshore wind projects.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“pD >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD H9@ 2C6 23=6 E@ G:6H 4=2DD:7:65 :?7@C>2E:@? 3J E96 G:CEF6 @7 @FC A@D:E:@?D – 2?5 H9@ C6AC6D6?E 2 DE2E6 2?5 H@C<6CD 92C>65 3J E9:D 564:D:@? – H6 C6BF6DE 2446DD E@ E96D6 4=2DD:7:65 C6A@CED[” E96J HC@E6] “%96D6 AFCA@CE65 =62D6 A2FD6D H:== 92G6 E96 67764E @7 AFEE:?8 p>6C:42?D @FE @7 H@C<[ 56DE23:=:K:?8 @FC 6?6C8J 8C:5[ 2?5 42FD:?8 6=64EC:4:EJ AC:46D E@ D@2C 5FC:?8 E96 6IA6?D:G6 9@>6 962E:?8 D62D@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E 2??@F?465 |@?52J E92E :E 😀 92=E:?8 7656C2= =62D6D 7@C =2C86D42=6 @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED 4FCC6?E=J F?56C 4@?DECF4E:@?[ H9:49 :?4=F56D ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 `[ #6G@=FE:@? (:?5 @77 E96 |2DD249FD6EED 4@2DE[ r@2DE2= ‘:C8:?:2 ~77D9@C6 (:?5[ $F?C:D6 (:?5 2?5 E96 t>A:C6 (:?5 ` AC@;64E 😕 }6H *@C<]k^Am

    kAmx?E6C:@C $64C6E2CJ s@F8 qFC8F> 4:E65 F?DA64:7:65 ?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ C:D:ED 7@C E96 AC@;64ED[ 3FE D2:5 E96 >@G6 😀 2:>65 2E “AC@E64E:?8” E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J ;@:?65 76==@H s6>@4C2E:4 8@G6C?@CD @7 }6H *@C<[ |2DD249FD6EED[ r@??64E:4FE 2?5 #9@56 xD=2?5 😕 :DDF:?8 2 DE2E6>6?E D2J:?8 E96 >@G6 H:== 4@DE E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D[ 5C:G6 FA E96 4@DE @7 6?6C8J 2?5 D6E324< E96 C68:@?’D 4=:>2E6 492?86 8@2=D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 2??@F?46>6?E J6DE6C52J A2FD:?8 @77D9@C6 H:?5 =62D6D 😀 :ED =2E6DE 68C68:@FD 2EE24< @? 4=62? 6?6C8J 2?5 :E =2?5D =:<6 2 =F>A @7 5:CEJ 4@2= 7@C E96 9@=:52J D62D@? 7@C p>6C:42? H@C<6CD[ 4@?DF>6CD[ 2?5 :?G6DE@CD[” E96J HC@E6] “!2FD:?8 24E:G6 =62D6D[ 6DA64:2==J 7@C 4@>A=6E65 2?5 ?62C=J 4@>A=6E65 AC@;64ED[ 567:6D =@8:4[ H:== 9FCE @FC 3:5 7@C 6?6C8J :?56A6?56?46[ H:== 5C:G6 FA 4@DED 7@C p>6C:42 C2E6A2J6CD[ 2?5 H:== >2<6 FD =@D6 E9@FD2?5D @7 8@@5A2J:?8 ;@3D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 8@G6C?@CD D2:5 E96 DE2E6D 2C6 “H@C<:?8 92C5 E@ 3F:=5 >@C6 6?6C8J E@ >66E C:D:?8 56>2?5 2?5 =@H6C 4@DED” 2?5 E96 H:?5 AC@;64ED F?56C 4@?DECF4E:@? 92G6 “4C62E65 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D 2?5 :?;64E65 3:==:@?D 😕 64@?@>:4 24E:G:EJ :?E@ @FC 4@>>F?:E:6D]”k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 32D6=6DD[ C64<=6DD 2?5 6CC2E:4 24E:@? 7C@> E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 x?E6C:@C H:== 2=D@ :?;64E 7FCE96C F?46CE2:?EJ :?E@ E96 >2C<6ED[ >2<:?8 :E 92C56C 7@C DE2E6D 2?5 AC:G2E6 4@>A2?:6D E@ D64FC6 7:?2?4:?8 7@C AF3=:4 H@C6 56DA:E6 92G:?8 8@?6 E9C@F89 2== E96 ?646DD2CJ =@42= 2?5 7656C2= 2AAC@G2= AC@46DD6D[” E96J HC@E6]k^Am

    kAm%96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E’D 5:C64E:G6 4@>6D EH@ H66A @C56C E92E 92=E65 D6G6C2= @77D9@C6 H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2=@?8 E96 pE=2?E:4 r@2DE 7C@> |2:?6 E@ }6H y6CD6J]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 92D G@H65 E@ 6?5 7656C2= DFAA@CE 7@C @77D9@C6 H:?5 2?5 @E96C 4=62? 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2D 96 7@4FD6D @? 3@@DE:?8 7@DD:= 7F6= AC@5F4E:@? 2D A2CE @7 3C@256C 677@CED E@ :>AC@G6 E96 ?2E:@?’D 6?6C8J :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAmx? $6AE6>36C[ E96 AC6D:56?E 5:C64E65 E96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 %C2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 42?46= Sefh >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 5@K6? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED[ D2J:?8 E96 A=2?D “H6C6 ?@E 2=:8?65 H:E9 E96 8@2=D 2?5 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C 86EE:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D6E D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 6?G:C@?>6?E2= C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H:E9 2 8@2= @7 C6249:?8 “?6EK6C@” 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D C6=2E:G6 E@ `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_] %@ >66E E9@D6 8@2=D[ E96 DE2E6 A=2?D E@ 86?6C2E6 2E =62DE d[e__ >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5 A@H6C 3J a_af]k^Am

    kAm%96 ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 AC@;64E @77 |2CE92’D ‘:?6J2C5 😀 23@FE d_T 4@>A=6E6] %96 AC@;64E 42==D 7@C ea EFC3:?6D 42A23=6 @7 D6?5:?8 FA E@ c__ >682H2EED E@ E96 C68:@?2= 6=64EC:4 8C:5] |62H9:=6[ E96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 2?@E96C AC@;64E – $@FE9 r@2DE (:?5 – H@F=5 A@H6C @G6C ` >:==:@? 9@>6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 4C62E6 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D]k^Am

    kAm(:?5 AC@G:56D 23@FE `_T @7 E96 6=64EC:4:EJ 86?6C2E65 😕 E96 &]$][ >2<:?8 :E E96 ?2E:@?’D =2C86DE D@FC46 @7 C6?6H23=6 6?6C8J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 7656C2= 52E2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • 3 New England governors demand briefing on power project risks

    [ad_1]

    Four Northeast governors on Wednesday demanded a classified briefing from the Trump administration to understand the national security risks underlying the pause on offshore wind project leases.

    Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont and Rhode Island Gov. Dan McKee also called for the pause to be lifted immediately on the five offshore wind projects, including Vineyard Wind 1 off the coast of Nantucket.

    “It strains credulity to believe that vital, substantial projects that underwent many federal reviews and processes, including by the DoD (Department of Defense), all of a sudden present new, existential, unforeseen threats,” the governors wrote in a letter to U.S. Department of Interior Secretary Doug Burgum.

    The Department of Interior announced Monday that it was pausing all large-scale offshore wind leases immediately in response to “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports.” The department said it would work with the Department of War and other government agencies to “assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects.”

    In their requested briefing, the governors said they want a “clear description of the specific national security risks” and “[i]dentification of the particular project components, if any, alleged to give rise to those risks.”

    The governors wrote that federal officials did not notify states about “any purportedly new risk” before the project suspensions.

    “The sudden emergence of a new ‘national security threat’ appears to be less a legitimate, rational finding of fact and more a pretextual excuse to justify a predetermined outcome consistent with the President’s frequently stated personal opposition to offshore wind,” their letter says.

    In its announcement, the Department of Interior pointed to national security risks that are “inherent” to large offshore wind projects and invoked unclassified federal government reports that “have long found that the movement of massive turbine blades and the highly reflective towers create radar interference called ‘clutter.’”

    The governors argued that, “If ‘clutter’ were such a grave threat, it might also apply to the thousands of oil rigs and other seaborne infrastructure in our coastal waters.” They also emphasized the projects have already been vetted by federal officials, including at the Department of Defense.

    “The military had the opportunity to raise concerns and object. They did not, and further certified there was no threat to national security,” their letter says. “To claim a threat exists now, after billions of dollars have been invested in these projects and reviews fully completed, is the height of irrationality.”

    Fifty iron workers lost their jobs just before the holidays due to the halted work on Vineyard Wind, Ironworkers Local 7 said Tuesday. The union said it is “thoroughly disgusted and furious” at the administration’s action.

    “If we are serious about making energy more affordable and strengthening American industry, we need more energy projects of all types, not fewer,” the union said. “We call on the president to reverse this decision so our members can get back to work providing reliable, affordable power for Massachusetts.”

    [ad_2]

    Alison Kuznitz

    Source link

  • Major Russian drone, missile attack on Ukraine kills at least 3 people, cuts power

    [ad_1]

    Russia fired more than 600 drones and three dozen missiles at Ukraine in a large-scale attack that began during the night and stretched into daylight hours Tuesday, officials said. At least three people were killed, including a 4-year-old child, two days before Christmas.The barrage struck homes and the power grid in 13 regions of Ukraine, causing widespread outages in bitter temperatures, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, a day after he described recent progress on finding a peace deal as “quite solid.”The bombardment demonstrated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intention of pursuing the invasion of Ukraine, Zelenskyy said in a post on the Telegram messaging app. Ukrainian and European officials have complained that Putin is not sincerely engaging with U.S.-led peace efforts.The attack “is an extremely clear signal of Russian priorities,” Zelenskyy said. “A strike before Christmas, when people want to be with their families, at home, in safety. A strike, in fact, in the midst of negotiations that are being conducted to end this war. Putin cannot accept the fact that we must stop killing.”For months, U.S. President Donald Trump has been pressing for a peace agreement, but the negotiations have become entangled in the very different demands from Moscow and Kyiv.U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday he held “productive and constructive” talks in Florida with Ukrainian and European representatives. Trump was less effusive Monday, saying, “The talks are going along.”Initial reports from Ukrainian emergency services said the child died in Ukraine’s northwestern Zhytomyr region, while a drone killed a woman in the Kyiv region, and another civilian death was recorded in the western Khmelnytskyi region, according to Zelenskyy.Russia launched 635 drones of various types and 38 missiles, Ukraine’s air force said. Air defenses stopped 587 drones and 34 missiles, it said.It was the ninth large-scale Russian attack on Ukraine’s energy system this year and left multiple regions in the west without power, while emergency power outages were in place across the country, acting Energy Minister Artem Nekraso said. Work to restore power would begin as soon as the security situation permitted, he said.Ukraine’s largest private energy supplier, DTEK, said the attack targeted thermal power stations in what it said was the seventh major strike on the company’s facilities since October.DTEK’s thermal power plants have been hit more than 220 times since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022. Those attacks have killed four workers and wounded 59.Authorities in the western regions of Rivne, Ternopil and Lviv, as well as the northern Sumy region, reported damage to energy infrastructure or power outages after the attack.In the southern Odesa region, Russia struck energy, port, transport, industrial and residential infrastructure, according to regional head Oleh Kiper.A merchant ship and over 120 homes were damaged, he said.

    Russia fired more than 600 drones and three dozen missiles at Ukraine in a large-scale attack that began during the night and stretched into daylight hours Tuesday, officials said. At least three people were killed, including a 4-year-old child, two days before Christmas.

    The barrage struck homes and the power grid in 13 regions of Ukraine, causing widespread outages in bitter temperatures, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, a day after he described recent progress on finding a peace deal as “quite solid.”

    The bombardment demonstrated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intention of pursuing the invasion of Ukraine, Zelenskyy said in a post on the Telegram messaging app. Ukrainian and European officials have complained that Putin is not sincerely engaging with U.S.-led peace efforts.

    The attack “is an extremely clear signal of Russian priorities,” Zelenskyy said. “A strike before Christmas, when people want to be with their families, at home, in safety. A strike, in fact, in the midst of negotiations that are being conducted to end this war. Putin cannot accept the fact that we must stop killing.”

    For months, U.S. President Donald Trump has been pressing for a peace agreement, but the negotiations have become entangled in the very different demands from Moscow and Kyiv.

    U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday he held “productive and constructive” talks in Florida with Ukrainian and European representatives. Trump was less effusive Monday, saying, “The talks are going along.”

    Initial reports from Ukrainian emergency services said the child died in Ukraine’s northwestern Zhytomyr region, while a drone killed a woman in the Kyiv region, and another civilian death was recorded in the western Khmelnytskyi region, according to Zelenskyy.

    Russia launched 635 drones of various types and 38 missiles, Ukraine’s air force said. Air defenses stopped 587 drones and 34 missiles, it said.

    It was the ninth large-scale Russian attack on Ukraine’s energy system this year and left multiple regions in the west without power, while emergency power outages were in place across the country, acting Energy Minister Artem Nekraso said. Work to restore power would begin as soon as the security situation permitted, he said.

    Ukraine’s largest private energy supplier, DTEK, said the attack targeted thermal power stations in what it said was the seventh major strike on the company’s facilities since October.

    DTEK’s thermal power plants have been hit more than 220 times since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in February 2022. Those attacks have killed four workers and wounded 59.

    Authorities in the western regions of Rivne, Ternopil and Lviv, as well as the northern Sumy region, reported damage to energy infrastructure or power outages after the attack.

    In the southern Odesa region, Russia struck energy, port, transport, industrial and residential infrastructure, according to regional head Oleh Kiper.

    A merchant ship and over 120 homes were damaged, he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How America Gave China an Edge in Nuclear Power

    [ad_1]

    You can see the early dynamic of U.S.-China coöperation play out in a video of SINAP’s first presentation at Berkeley, delivered in August, 2012. As the institute’s representative, SINAP sent Kun Chen, who had done his Ph.D. at Indiana University and was still in his thirties. The audience skewed much older: about two-thirds of them looked to be in their fifties or sixties. The attendees tried to suss out the practicality of SINAP’s ambitious plan. One man asked about the budget, which was about three hundred and fifty million dollars, spread over five years. Another man asked where SINAP planned to get molten salt, since “to my understanding, there are no facilities in the world that can produce” it. Chen replied that China had several facilities that could.

    It’s hard to tell from the video what the Chinese side got out of these exchanges, but when I spoke with Chen he stressed how helpful it was to have interlocutors in the U.S. “From the start, we didn’t believe we could get this far,” he said. Molten salt was no less niche in China than it was anywhere else. Chen estimated that, back in 2011, there were only thirty or forty people in the whole world working seriously on using the substance for fission reactors. Connecting with some of those individuals in the U.S. made the project seem possible.

    For the Americans, there was the curiosity of seeing how far the Chinese could go with resources that simply didn’t exist here. Coöperating with SINAP was also a way to prod the U.S. federal government. The logic was “If the Chinese are doing it, it must be relevant,” Forsberg said.

    In that sense, the coöperative research-and-development agreement that Oak Ridge signed with SINAP cut out the middleman. To fund the molten-salt loop, SINAP paid Oak Ridge around four million dollars, according to Chen. With such a loop, researchers could test materials and all the plumbing components needed to circulate molten salt. The project also gave a focal point to people working on molten salt in the U.S. Speaking to a reporter from the MIT Technology Review, David Holcomb explained his motivations. “One of the important things to realize is that a number of key people in molten-salt reactors are retiring very fast or passing away,” he said. “China is providing the funding that allows us to transfer that knowledge, to gain practical experience at building and operating these reactors.”

    That article ran in August, 2016. By 2018, the U.S. had withdrawn from almost all coöperation with China. “I wouldn’t say it’s a total surprise,” Chen told me. He and the SINAP team figured that the relationship would probably deteriorate under Trump. “But it was just happening very suddenly. It’s similar to what we have learned in the tariff issue.”

    I asked Chen if he ran into any challenges once his team was going it alone. “The challenges are, I think, mostly, first of all, if you have the money,” he said. But the SINAP team certainly had that. The Chinese Academy of Sciences had been extending the project’s grant every year. By 2018, China promised three billion dollars for molten-salt reactors over the next two decades, while Chinese planners have called for a $1.3 trillion investment in nuclear energy as a whole by 2050.

    During Chen’s first presentation at Berkeley, in August, 2012, one of the few young people to ask him a question was a man with a shock of dark brown hair and an ample goatee. I had watched the recording several times before I realized the man was Mike Laufer, who would go on to help found Kairos Power, a privately held nuclear company that is attempting to commercialize the fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactor originally designed by Forsberg, Pickard, and Peterson, who is also a co-founder of Kairos. Once I recognized Laufer, his question to Chen, about “the biggest challenges or obstacles to overcome” in order to build a salt-cooled reactor, had a new resonance. Was Laufer, who at the time was a graduate student at the university, already putting together a business plan?

    Kairos represents a new era for the U.S. nuclear industry. Inspired by SpaceX, it is effectively trying to rebuild U.S. industrial capacity within a single company. The business model calls for a vertically integrated network of facilities that can fabricate fuel and salt for Kairos, and can manufacture a large share of what the company needs to build its reactors. The hope behind all this is that by running things internally Kairos will be able to offer nuclear energy at a competitive price in the market. And it has had some success. Last year, Google committed to buying five hundred megawatts from the firm by 2035. Kairos is also one of only two U.S. companies with a permit from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build a new reactor. Construction of the reactor building, located in Oak Ridge, broke ground last year. “We’re working to get that reactor up and running this decade,” Laufer told me.

    [ad_2]

    Colin Jones

    Source link

  • Critical fire weather, strong winds may cause Colorado power outages

    [ad_1]

    Coloradans on the Front Range may lose power this week as strong winds and critical wildfire conditions hit the state, Xcel Energy warned customers on Monday.

    Strong winds will blow across Colorado starting Wednesday afternoon and may prompt a “targeted Public Safety Power Shutoff” to reduce wildfire risks, according to the Xcel alert.

    Fire danger will be elevated because of warm, dry weather over the last several weeks, including a recent 10-day stretch of near-record temperatures on the Front Range, the utility said.

    Denver weather: Near-record temperatures forecast for city

    Up to 40 mph wind gusts are forecast for the Denver area on Wednesday, according to the National Weather Service.

    “Energy crews will restore power as quickly as safe conditions permit,” Xcel officials stated in a news release. “Xcel Energy’s top priority is protecting customers and communities.”

    During a public safety power shutoff, Xcel proactively cuts off power to areas with an elevated wildfire risk, according to the utility.

    “Proactively shutting off power is not a step we take lightly,” the company stated on its website. “We consider weather, wind speeds, relative humidity, fuel moisture and temperature as well as critical customers and infrastructure before deciding to implement a PSPS.”

    Power restoration will begin after the high winds and fire danger subside, according to the website.

    The timeline for restoration can range from several hours to several days, depending on the area, utility officials said. Crews need to patrol the entire line to ensure it’s safe before it can be re-energized.

    Even if Xcel does not proactively shut off power, the utility still expects to implement what it calls “enhanced powerline safety settings” on Wednesday.

    [ad_2]

    Lauren Penington

    Source link

  • Cullen Capital Management LLC Boosts Holdings in EOG Resources, Inc. $EOG

    [ad_1]

    Cullen Capital Management LLC increased its holdings in EOG Resources, Inc. (NYSE:EOGFree Report) by 4.7% in the second quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 576,470 shares of the energy exploration company’s stock after purchasing an additional 25,753 shares during the period. Cullen Capital Management LLC’s holdings in EOG Resources were worth $68,952,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

    Several other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently made changes to their positions in EOG. Caitong International Asset Management Co. Ltd boosted its position in EOG Resources by 10,950.0% during the second quarter. Caitong International Asset Management Co. Ltd now owns 221 shares of the energy exploration company’s stock valued at $26,000 after buying an additional 219 shares during the period. Saudi Central Bank bought a new stake in shares of EOG Resources in the 1st quarter valued at about $28,000. Raleigh Capital Management Inc. purchased a new stake in EOG Resources during the 2nd quarter valued at about $29,000. ORG Partners LLC grew its position in EOG Resources by 45.1% during the 2nd quarter. ORG Partners LLC now owns 283 shares of the energy exploration company’s stock worth $34,000 after acquiring an additional 88 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Keener Financial Planning LLC bought a new position in EOG Resources during the 2nd quarter worth approximately $35,000. Institutional investors own 89.91% of the company’s stock.

    Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades

    Several analysts have weighed in on the company. Melius Research assumed coverage on EOG Resources in a research report on Wednesday, August 20th. They issued a “buy” rating and a $173.00 price objective for the company. Siebert Williams Shank decreased their target price on shares of EOG Resources from $155.00 to $145.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research note on Monday, October 13th. Melius initiated coverage on shares of EOG Resources in a report on Wednesday, August 20th. They set a “buy” rating and a $173.00 price target for the company. KeyCorp dropped their price target on shares of EOG Resources from $140.00 to $138.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research report on Wednesday, September 3rd. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company decreased their price objective on shares of EOG Resources from $127.00 to $126.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a research report on Tuesday, November 11th. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, eleven have given a Buy rating and seventeen have given a Hold rating to the company’s stock. According to MarketBeat, EOG Resources has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $139.43.

    Read Our Latest Report on EOG Resources

    EOG Resources Stock Performance

    Shares of EOG stock opened at $108.01 on Monday. The firm has a market capitalization of $58.61 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 10.76, a PEG ratio of 8.17 and a beta of 0.49. The stock has a fifty day moving average of $108.00 and a 200 day moving average of $115.05. EOG Resources, Inc. has a 52 week low of $102.52 and a 52 week high of $138.18. The company has a quick ratio of 1.43, a current ratio of 1.62 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.25.

    EOG Resources (NYSE:EOGGet Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, November 6th. The energy exploration company reported $2.71 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.42 by $0.29. The business had revenue of $5.85 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $5.48 billion. EOG Resources had a net margin of 24.49% and a return on equity of 19.80%. The company’s quarterly revenue was down 2.0% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period in the previous year, the firm earned $2.89 EPS. As a group, research analysts expect that EOG Resources, Inc. will post 11.47 earnings per share for the current year.

    EOG Resources Dividend Announcement

    The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, January 30th. Shareholders of record on Friday, January 16th will be given a dividend of $1.02 per share. This represents a $4.08 annualized dividend and a yield of 3.8%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Friday, January 16th. EOG Resources’s payout ratio is presently 40.64%.

    EOG Resources Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    EOG Resources, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas primarily in producing basins in the United States, the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and internationally. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company.

    Further Reading

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding EOG? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for EOG Resources, Inc. (NYSE:EOGFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG)



    Receive News & Ratings for EOG Resources Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for EOG Resources and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Judge overturns Trump order blocking wind permits

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A federal judge gave the go-ahead for Massachusetts and other states to proceed with wind energy expansion by rejecting an executive order signed by President Donald Trump halting permits for clean energy projects.

    The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris on Monday sides with Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and 16 other Democrats who challenged Trump’s authority to enforce an order Jan. 20 that halted several offshore wind energy projects along the Atlantic Coast from Maine to New Jersey.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm$2C:D 564=2C65 %CF>A’D @C56C “:==682=” 😕 96C CF=:?8 2?5 D2:5 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E’D 564:D:@? E@ :?567:?:E6=J C67FD6 E@ 4@?D:56C 2AA=:42E:@?D 7@C @77D9@C6 2?5 @?D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED H2D “2C3:EC2CJ 2?5 42AC:4:@FD” 2?5 G:@=2E6D E96 7656C2= p5>:?:DEC2E:G6 !C@465FC6 p4E]k^Am

    kAm“%96 AC@@7 😀 😕 E96 AF55:?8i }@ A6C>:ED 92G6 366? :DDF65 D:?46 E96 (:?5 ~C56C H2D AC@>F=82E65[ 2?5 E96 286?4J 5676?52?ED 24:ED 2E =62DE F?E:= E96J 4@>A=6E6 E96 r@>AC696?D:G6 pDD6DD>6?E[ 7@C H9:49 E96C6 😀 ?@ E:>6=:?6[” $2C:D HC@E6 😕 E96 cfA286 CF=:?8] “%92E 24E:@? 😀 4@?EC2CJ E@ =2H]”k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 CF=:?8 AC@E64ED 9F?5C65D @7 >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 😕 :?G6DE>6?ED E96 DE2E6 >256 😕 @77D9@C6 H:?5 56G6=@A>6?E 2D :E AFCDF6D :ED 4=62? 6?6C8J 8@2=D]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 4C:E:42= G:4E@CJ 2=D@ AC6D6CG6D H6==A2J:?8 8C66? ;@3D 2?5 2446DD E@ C6=:23=6[ 277@C523=6 6?6C8J E92E H:== 96=A |2DD249FD6EED >66E @FC 4=62? 6?6C8J 2?5 4=:>2E6 8@2=D[” r2>A36== D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A[ H9@ @AA@D6D H:?5 2?5 D@=2C 6?6C8J[ 92D D@F89E E@ :?4C62D6 8@G6C?>6?E DFAA@CE 7@C 7@DD:= 7F6=D E@ >2I:>:K6 E96 ?2E:@?’D @FEAFE 2D E96 H@C=5’D E@A @:= 2?5 ?2EFC2= 82D AC@5F46C 2?5 E@ 7F=7:== E96 #6AF3=:42?’D 42>A2:8? AC@>:D6 E@ “5C:==[ 323J[ 5C:==” :7 6=64E65 E@ E96 AC6D:56?4J 7@C 2 D64@?5 E6C>]k^Am

    kAmx? $6AE6>36C[ %CF>A 5:C64E65 E96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 %C2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 42?46= Sefh >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 5@K6? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED[ D2J:?8 E96 A=2?D “H6C6 ?@E 2=:8?65 H:E9 E96 8@2=D 2?5 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C C646:G:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm%96 Sb__ >:==:@? $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2=[ 2 A2CE?6CD9:A 36EH66? rC@H=6J (:?5 $6CG:46D[ $2=6> 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED r=62? t?6C8J r6?E6C[ 42==D 7@C C656G6=@A:?8 2 ca24C6 D:E6 7@C>6C=J @44FA:65 3J 2 4@2= 2?5 @:=7:C65 A@H6C A=2?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 A=2?D 42== 7@C FD:?8 E96 D:E6 2D 2 DE28:?8 2C62 7@C 2DD6>3=:?8 2?5 EC2?DA@CE:?8 H:?5 EFC3:?6 4@>A@?6?ED E@ }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C @77D9@C6 H:?5 72C>D]k^Am

    kAmp (9:E6 w@FD6 DA@<6DA6CD@? 5676?565 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D A@=:4:6D @? AC@>@E:?8 7@DD:= 7F6=D[ D2J:?8 E96 AC6D:56?E’D y2?F2CJ @C56C “F?=62D965 p>6C:42’D 6?6C8J 5@>:?2?46]”k^Am

    kAm“&?56C y@6 q:56?’D vC66? }6H $42>[ @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED H6C6 8:G6? F?72:C[ AC676C6?E:2= EC62E>6?E H9:=6 E96 C6DE @7 E96 6?6C8J :?5FDECJ H2D 9:?56C65 3J 3FC56?D@>6 C68F=2E:@?D[” (9:E6 w@FD6 DA@<6DH@>2? %2J=@C #@86CD D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D6E D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 6?G:C@?>6?E2= C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H:E9 2 8@2= @7 C6249:?8 “?6EK6C@” 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D C6=2E:G6 E@ `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_] %@ >66E E9@D6 8@2=D[ E96 DE2E6 92D D6E 2 8@2= E@ 86?6C2E6 2E =62DE d[e__ >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5 A@H6C 3J a_af]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6 😀 H@C<:?8 H:E9 #9@56 xD=2?5 @? E9C66 AC@;64ED E@E2=:?8 a[efg >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5[ H9:49 :?4=F56D E96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 a AC@;64E] (96? 4@>A=6E65[ E96 H:?5 EFC3:?6D H:== 36 42A23=6 @7 AC@G:5:?8 6?@F89 6=64EC:4:EJ E@ A@H6C >@C6 E92? `]c >:==:@? 9@>6D]k^Am

    kAmxE 😀 2=D@ A2CE @7 E96 !@H6C &A }6H t?8=2?5 :?:E:2E:G6 H:E9 r@??64E:4FE[ |2:?6[ }6H w2>AD9:C6[ #9@56 xD=2?5 2?5 ‘6C>@?E 2?5 D6G6C2= FE:=:E:6D — H9:49 42==D 7@C 6IA2?5:?8 :?E6C4@??64E:@? A@:?ED 7@C F?56CD62 423=6D E92E H:== 6G6?EF2==J 3C:?8 A@H6C 7C@> @77D9@C6 H:?5 EFC3:?6D E@ E96 C68:@?2= 8C:5]k^Am

    kAm|62?H9:=6[ E96 ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 AC@;64E @77 |2CE92’D ‘:?6J2C5 😀 23@FE d_T 4@>A=6E6] %96 AC@;64E 42==D 7@C ea EFC3:?6D 42A23=6 @7 D6?5:?8 FA E@ c__ >682H2EED E@ E96 C68:@?2= 6=64EC:4 8C:5]k^Am

    kAm%H@ >2;@C @77D9@C6 H:?5 56G6=@A6CD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED – r@>>@?H62=E9 (:?5 2?5 $96== 2?5 ~462? (:?5D }@CE9 p>6C:42 – E6C>:?2E65 E96:C A@H6C AFC492D6 28C66>6?ED H:E9 E96 DE2E6’D FE:=:E:6D 😕 a_ab[ 4:E:?8 DFAA=J 492:? :DDF6D 2?5 @E96C 4@?46C?D E92E 92G6 >256 :E E@@ 5:77:4F=E E@ 7:?2?46 E96 AC@;64ED]k^Am

    kAm(:?5 AC@G:56D 23@FE `_T @7 E96 6=64EC:4:EJ 86?6C2E65 😕 E96 &]$][ >2<:?8 :E E96 ?2E:@?’D =2C86DE D@FC46 @7 C6?6H23=6 6?6C8J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 7656C2= 52E2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Going Nuclear Without Blowing Up

    [ad_1]

    Adolfo Saracho, a senior diplomat and arms expert, soon created the Department for Nuclear Affairs and Disarmament in the Argentinean Foreign Ministry. “Saracho was a kind of Pied Piper, who was surrounded by young, smart, passionate kids he mentored,” Poneman, a nuclear-security expert who was in Buenos Aires at the time, recalled. Grossi was “a wet-behind-the-ears, newly minted diplomat” in Saracho’s orbit, Poneman said. “Rafa always had a kind of vision, even for a kid at that point, in his tender years, with a lively intellect, already charismatic, and with genuine gravitas. He stood out.”

    Grossi has now spent four decades on the issues outlined in Eisenhower’s speech. In 2023, he addressed the U.N. General Assembly from the same dais where Eisenhower had spoken. “Atoms for Peace is more relevant than ever,” he said. “Every day on every continent, the I.A.E.A. supports nations in overcoming challenges like disease, poverty, hunger, pollution, and climate change by seizing opportunities to improve health care, agriculture, and energy systems through the power of nuclear science and technology.”

    This year, Grossi persuaded the World Bank to end its decades-long ban on funding nuclear-energy projects; the agreement was signed in June, opening the way for the bank to support initiatives in developing countries. Grossi also created the Rays of Hope program, to expand global access to cancer detection and care. As a medical treatment, radiation had saved millions of lives “by turning cancers that were death sentences into curable diseases,” he said, in a speech in Ethiopia launching the initiative. “But these lifesaving advances have passed half the world by.”

    Still, Grossi has generated more headlines in his role as the watchdog checking for cheaters—as Argentina once was. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, or N.P.T., which went into effect in 1970, authorizes Grossi’s agency to monitor the nuclear facilities in all countries that have signed it; the I.A.E.A. can deploy cameras, conduct on-site inspections, and investigate suspicious activity. (The treaty currently has a hundred and ninety-one signatories.)

    Iran was one of the original signatories. It is now the I.A.E.A.’s crisis case. A year ago, Grossi visited Fordo, the most advanced nuclear facility in the country. It was “very unassuming,” he told me. “Think about it as an underground parking garage. The difference is, instead of cars, it had labs and centrifuge halls and research-and-development places. It is a major piece of architecture.” Trucks could transport personnel and equipment into the complex; Grossi’s team opted to walk down a circular ramp almost three hundred feet underground. The facility is at the edge of the Alborz Mountains, a range considered in ancient times to be the home of mythical gods and an entrance to the afterlife. In the twenty-first century, it has hidden the centerpiece of Iran’s contentious nuclear program.

    In June, the I.A.E.A. board of governors declared for the first time in two decades that Iran had violated the safeguard provisions outlined in the N.P.T. It cited the Islamic Republic for “many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019” on nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran. I.A.E.A. declarations are based on reports prepared by Grossi. “That report did not say anything that we had not said before,” Grossi told me. “Of course, it was stern and serious about Iran’s lack of answers and coöperation on many fronts. At the same time, I said in black-and-white that there was no systematic nuclear-weapons program in Iran.” (The board includes representatives from the first five nuclear powers and thirty other rotating members. Nineteen countries supported the Iran resolution, eleven abstained, two declined to vote, and three—China, Russia, and Burkina Faso—opposed it.)

    Shortly after the I.A.E.A. resolution, Israel bombed military, nuclear, and political headquarters across Iran, including Fordo’s surface facilities and access roads. U.S. B-2 stealth warplanes later dropped a dozen bunker-busting bombs, each weighing thirty thousand pounds, directly into Fordo. Ali Larijani, the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, blamed Grossi personally for what would later be dubbed the Twelve-Day War; he vowed that Iran would “settle” with the I.A.E.A. director-general after it ended. Kayhan, a hard-line newspaper considered the mouthpiece of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, called Grossi, who is Catholic, a Mossad agent. It warned that he would be tried and executed if he returned to Iran. There have since been more graphic threats.

    [ad_2]

    Robin Wright

    Source link

  • Indexing the atom: How to capture the nuclear comeback | Insights | Bloomberg Professional Services

    [ad_1]

    Investing in the nuclear revival: Why an index approach works 

    For market participants, gaining targeted exposure to the nuclear theme can be complex. The ecosystem includes miners, reactor designers, manufacturers, engineers, and utilities, each with distinct economics and policy drivers. No single company captures the full opportunity, and risks vary sharply across the chain.

    An index approach provides a structured way to gain exposure while improving diversification. Legacy strategies often focus on uranium miners or utilities, leaving market participants under-exposed to the manufacturers and technology firms driving today’s nuclear innovation. 

    The Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index (BNUKE) takes a holistic view, tracking companies globally with exposure to the nuclear ecosystem. Bloomberg Intelligence uses a rules-based process to identify firms based on near-term revenue alignment with nuclear products and services. Securities are eligible if they fall into predefined “Gold-tier” categories such as uranium, equipment and power control (EPC), or power generation. 

    This approach aims to reflect on how the market is evolving. Growth in the industry is increasingly driven by engineering innovation, modular reactor deployment, and infrastructure investment rather than by utilities alone. By allocating across the full spectrum, an index can capture gains from both established industry leaders and emerging disruptors behind next-generation reactors. 

    Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index by Sub Industry - BICS Level 4

    Policy support, supply-chain shifts, and rising electricity demand are lifting multiple parts of the ecosystem at once. Instead of trying to pick a single winner in a specialized industry, an index strategy offers exposure to the collective momentum of companies contributing to the next wave of reliable nuclear power. In a world where energy reliability and decarbonization are inseparable, a diversified nuclear index provides a practical way to participate in the sector’s re-emergence. 

    The nuclear value chain in action 

    The path from uranium to usable electricity is long and intricate. The nuclear ecosystem spans miners, engineers, manufacturers, and utilities. Understanding this progression can help explain where investment opportunities arise and why the nuclear theme is broader than many market participants realize. 

    Nuclear Power Value Chain

    Uranium Mining & Production 

    The journey begins underground. Companies such as BHP Group (+21% YTD through October) and Uranium Energy Corp (+126% YTD through October) extract and process uranium ore, the essential fuel for reactors. Cameco (+99% YTD through October), one of the world’s largest uranium producers, operates across the mining and conversion cycle, supplying feedstock to fuel fabricators worldwide. Their fortunes rise and fall with uranium prices, making them the starting point of nuclear economic chain. Note: source for the data in this section is Bloomberg L.P. between 12/31/2024-10/31/2025.

    Enrichment & Fuel Fabrication

    Once mined, uranium must be enriched to create reactor-ready fuel. Centrus Energy (+451% YTD through October) plays a key role here, developing advanced enrichment technologies that will power next-generation small modular reactors. This step ensures a steady, secure fuel supply for both existing and future systems. 

    Reactor Design & Technology

    At the heart of innovation are the firms designing the reactors themselves. GE Vernova (+78% YTD through October), is advancing the small modular reactor design aimed at making nuclear deployment faster and more economical. Rolls-Royce Holdings (+117% YTD through October) is developing its own SMR program, applying aerospace-grade engineering to create compact, modular power plants. 

    Equipment Manufacturing & Engineering

    Translating design into hardware requires precision manufacturing. Doosan Enerbility (+422% YTD through October) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (+115% YTD through October1) produce reactor vessels, turbines, and control systems that form the backbone of plant construction. BWX Technologies (+93% YTD through October1), with decades of experience in reactor modules and nuclear propulsion, adds fabrication expertise that extends from defense to civil applications. These companies are an integral part of the nuclear buildout.

    Construction, Integration & Services

    Building and maintaining a nuclear facility demands deep technical integration. Huntington Ingalls Industries (+73% YTD through October), best known for naval shipbuilding, has expanded its nuclear expertise into environmental services and Department of Energy projects, including site remediation and decommissioning. Its work demonstrates how technical knowledge in one nuclear domain can be applied across the energy landscape.

    Operation & Utilities

    The chain ends with the utilities that deliver reliable power to homes and industries. Entergy Corporation (+29% YTD through October) operates several U.S. nuclear plants that provide carbon-free baseload electricity across southern states. In Japan, Kansai Electric Power Company (+44% YTD through October) is among the utilities restarting the nation’s nuclear fleet, underscoring the importance of nuclear power to energy security and grid stability. 

    Looking ahead 

    After years of dormancy, nuclear power is emerging as the quiet backbone of the digital economy, providing the reliable, carbon-free electricity that modern infrastructure demands. Yet the opportunity extends well into the coming decades. From uranium miners to modular-reactor engineers, the sector is being rebuilt by global companies, modernizing one of the world’s most complex energy systems. 

    The Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index (BNUKE) captures this transformation by tracking the performance of firms across the entire value chain, including those designing, manufacturing, and operating the reactors of tomorrow. For market participants, it offers a diversified way to participate in nuclear’s resurgence. If nuclear energy is to power the next industrial age, BNUKE can serve as a benchmark for how that revival unfolds, measured not only in megawatts but in the innovation driving them. 

    To learn more about Bloomberg Indices, click here.  

    First Trust has licensed the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index for their ETF, ticker RCTR.  

    Disclaimer

    The data and other information included in this publication is for illustrative purposes only, available “as is”, non-binding and constitutes the provision of factual information, rather than financial product advice.  BLOOMBERG and BLOOMBERG INDICES (the “Indices”) are trademarks or service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. (“BFLP”). BFLP and its affiliates, including BISL, the administrator of the Indices, or their licensors own all proprietary rights in the Indices. Bloomberg L.P. (“BLP”) or one of its subsidiaries provides BFLP, BISL and its subsidiaries with global marketing and operational support and service. Certain features, functions, products and services are available only to sophisticated investors and only where permitted. Bloomberg (as defined below) does not approve or endorse these materials or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, nor does Bloomberg make any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom, and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, Bloomberg shall not have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith. Nothing in the Services or Indices shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments by Bloomberg, or as investment advice or investment recommendations (i.e., recommendations as to whether or not to “buy”, “sell”, “hold”, or to enter or not to enter into any other transaction involving any specific interest or interests) by Bloomberg. Information available via the Index should not be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. All information provided by the Index or in this publication is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons. Absence of any trademark or service mark from this list does not waive Bloomberg’s intellectual property rights in that name, mark or logo.  For the purposes of this publication, Bloomberg includes BLP, BFLP, BISL and/or their affiliates.   

    BISL is registered in England and Wales under registered number 08934023 and has its registered office at 3 Queen Victoria Street, London, England, EC4N 4TQ. BISL is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a benchmark administrator.   © 2025 Bloomberg. All rights reserved.  

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg

    Source link

  • The country’s largest all-electric hospital is about to open in Orange County

    [ad_1]

    A new hospital at UC Irvine opens Wednesday and it will be all-electric — only the second such medical center, and the largest, in the country so far.

    People live through some of the toughest moments of their lives in hospitals, so they need to be as comfortable as possible. Hospitals traditionally connect with natural gas lines several times bigger than those connected to residential homes, to ensure that rooms are always warm or cool enough and have sufficient hot water.

    But burning that natural gas is one of the main ways that buildings cause climate change. The way we build and operate buildings is responsible for more than one-third of global greenhouse gases.

    UCI Health–Irvine will include 144 beds and will be entirely electric.

    The difference is manifest in the hospital’s new kitchen.

    Yes, said principal project manager Jess Langerud on a recent tour, people are permitted to eat fried food in a hospital. Here, the fryer is electric. “After all, you still have to have your crunchy fries, right?”

    He moved over to an appliance that looked like a stove but with metal zigzagging across the top instead of the usual burners. “I can still put your sear marks on your steak or burger with an infrared grill that’s fully electric,” said Langerud. “It’ll look like it came off your flame-broiled grill.”

    The kitchen, though, is relatively minor. One of the real heavy hitters when it comes to energy use in any new building, and especially in hospitals, are the water heaters. At UCI Health–Irvine, that means a row of 100-gallon water heaters 20 feet long.

    1

    2

    Art work lines the hallways shown with the nurses station in the foreground at UCI Health - Irvine hospital building

    1. Four electric water heaters service the hospital building. It’s a 144-bed facility, with no natural gas or fuel. (Gary Coronado/For The Times) 2. Art lines the hallways near the nurses’ station. (Gary Coronado/For The Times)

    “This is an immense electrical load we’re looking at right here,” said Joe Brothman, director of general services at UCI Health.

    The other heaviest use of energy in the complex is keeping rooms warm in winter and cool in summer. For that, UCI Health is employing rows of humming heat pumps installed on the rooftop.

    “The largest array, I think, this side of the Mississippi,” Brothman said.

    A floor below, indoors, racks of centrifugal chillers that control the refrigerant make him smile.

    “I love the way they sound,” Brothman said. “It sounds like a Ferrari sometimes, like an electric Ferrari.”

    While most of the complex is nonpolluting, there is one place where dirty energy is still in use: the diesel generators that are used for backup power. That’s due in part to the fact that plans for the complex were drawn up six years ago. Solar panels plus batteries have become much more common for backup power since then.

    The Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ambulatory Care building

    The Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ambulatory Care building, left, with the San Joaquin Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary, right, next to the UCI Health–Irvine hospital.

    Blackouts are bad for everyone, but they are unacceptable for hospitals. If an emergency facility loses power, people die.

    So four 3-megawatt diesel generators sit on the roof of the facility’s central utility plant. Underground tanks hold 70,000 gallons of diesel fuel to supply them. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Fire Protection Assn. have codes that require testing the generators once a month at 30% power for half an hour, Brothman said.

    The emissions from burning that diesel are real, he conceded. But “it’s not something that you want to mess around with.”

    Normally a central utility plant for a large facility like this would be “very noisy. It’s grimy. Usually there’s hazardous chemicals,” said Brothman, who has managed physical plants for many years. “Here there’s no combustion. No carbon monoxide.”

    Tony Dover, energy management and sustainability officer at UCI Health, said the building project team is currently applying for LEED Platinum certification, the highest level the U.S. Green Building Council awards for environmentally sustainable architecture.

    Most of the energy and pollution savings at the hospital come from the way the building is run. But that tells only part of the story. The way the building was constructed in the first place is also a major consideration for climate change. Concrete is particularly damaging for the climate because of the way cement is made. Dover said lower-carbon concrete was used throughout the project.

    A tunnel from the UCI Health–Irvine hospital building leading to the Central Utility Plant

    Jess Langerud, principal project manager for the hospital, stands inside a tunnel leading from the hospital to the central utility plant.

    Alexi Miller, a mechanical engineer and director of building innovation at the New Buildings Institute, a nonprofit that gives technical advice on climate and buildings, said the new UCI hospital is a milestone and he hopes to see more like it.

    There are things Miller thinks could have been done differently. He’s not so much worried about using diesel generators for backup power, but he did suggest that a solar-plus-storage system might have been better than what UCI ended up with. Such systems, he said, “refuel themselves.” They would be “getting their fuel from the sun rather than from a tanker truck.”

    One area Miller believes UCI could have done better: the hot water heaters, which, despite being new, utilize an older and relatively inefficient technology called “resistance heat,” instead of heat-pump hot water heaters, which are now used regularly in commercial projects.

    “It’s a little surprising,” he said. “Had they chosen to go with heat-pump hot water heaters, they could have powered it roughly three times as long, because it would be three to four times as efficient.”

    But overall, “I think we should applaud what they’ve achieved in the construction of this building,” Miller said.

    There are other all-electric hospitals on the way: In 2026, UCLA Health plans to open a 119-bed neuropsychiatric hospital that does not use fossil fuels. And an all-electric Kaiser Permanente hospital is set to open in San Jose in 2029.

    [ad_2]

    Ingrid Lobet

    Source link

  • Data centers aren’t new, but seem to pop up everywhere

    [ad_1]

    While it may seem like a new buzzword generating debate across the nation, data centers are nothing new.

    The large facilities, some of which can house millions of servers, have been around for decades. Construction is booming across the country, largely due to the growth of artificial intelligence.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]52E246?E6C>2A]4@>^FD2Q E2C86ElQ03=2?@C6 E92? `_[___ 52E2 46?E6CD =:DE65 @? E96 H@C=5H:56 >2A[ c[`gh 2C6 😕 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D] %96 E9C66 DE2E6D =625:?8 E96 :?5FDECJ 2C6 ‘:C8:?:2 H:E9 eee 46?E6CD[ %6I2D H:E9 c_h 2?5 r2=:7@C?:2 H:E9 ba`]k^Am

    kAm(2?852 +F@[ 2 !6?? $E2E6 &?:G6CD:EJ AC@76DD@C 😕 E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 pC49:E64EFC2= t?8:?66C:?8[ D2:5 :?5:G:5F2= 4@?DF>6C 923:ED 2C6 4C62E:?8 E96 8C@H:?8 ?665 7@C 52E2 46?E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(96? H6 H2E49 }6E7=:I[ 2== E96 G:56@D 2C6 24EF2==J DE@C65 😕 E96 52E2 46?E6C 2?5 56=:G6C65 E@ E96 4FDE@>6C] (96? H6 AFC492D6 @? p>2K@?[ H6 2=D@ FD6 52E2 46?E6CD 3642FD6 E96J 92G6 E96 52E2 7@C FD 7@C @FC @?=:?6 AFC492D:?8 6IA6C:6?46[” +F@ D2:5] “$@ 52E2 46?E6CD 2C6 6G6CJH96C6[ J@F @56C? D@4:6EJ] (6 ?665 52E2 46?E6CD E@ <66A @FC D@4:6EJ 7F?4E:@?:?8]”k^Am

    kAmp=E9@F89 +F@ 6DE:>2E65 E92E 52E2 46?E6CD 92G6 366? 2C@F?5 7@C c_ E@ d_ J62CD[ E96J ?@H D66> E@ 36 A@AA:?8 FA 6G6CJH96C6]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D C62==J 4@>6D 7C@> E96 C646?E 2AA=:42E:@? @7 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46] %@ 5@ E92E[ J@F ?665 2 9F86 2>@F?E @7 52E2 E@ EC2:? E96 px >@56=[” +F@ D2:5] “$@[ 7@C E92E[ J@F ?665 E9@FD2?5D @C >:==:@?D @7 4@>AFE6CD] %92E’D H9J A6@A=6 2C6 3F:=5:?8 >@C6 52E2 46?E6CD E@ 6?23=6 E96 EC2:?:?8 @7 px]”k^Am

    kAmpD 56G6=@A6CD 564:56 H96C6 E@ 3F:=5 52E2 46?E6CD[ E96J 2C6 =:<6=J E9:?<:?8 23@FE 6?6C8J DFAA=J 2?5 H2E6C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ +F@]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 724:=:E:6D C6BF:C6 2 =@E @7 6=64EC:4:EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]:62]@C8^C6A@CED^6?6C8J2?52:^6?6C8J56>2?57C@>2:Q E2C86ElQ03=2?2E6Dk^2m 52E2 46?E6C 6?6C8J 4@?DF>AE:@?[ 244@F?E:?8 7@C D6CG6CD[ DE@C286 DJDE6>D[ ?6EH@C<:?8 6BF:A>6?E[ 4@@=:?8 2?5 6?G:C@?>6?E2= 4@?EC@=[ F?:?E6CCFAE:3=6 A@H6C DFAA=J 2?5 255:E:@?2= :?7C2DECF4EFC6[ DF49 2D =:89E:?8 2?5 @77:46 6BF:A>6?E[ 2>@?8 @E96C E9:?8D]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4J 6DE:>2E65 52E2 46?E6CD H@C=5H:56 4@?DF>65 2C@F?5 c`d E6C2H2EE9@FCD =2DE J62C[ 23@FE `]dT @7 8=@32= 4@?DF>AE:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4J’D “q2D6 r2D6” AC@;64ED 52E2 46?E6CD’ 8=@32= 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@?DF>AE:@? H:== 5@F3=6 3J a_b_]k^Am

    kAmp44@C5:?8 E@ E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]6:2]8@G^E@52J:?6?6C8J^56E2:=]A9An:5ledaecQ E2C86ElQ03=2?2E:@? p5>:?:DEC2E:@?k^2m[ 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@?DF>AE:@? 😕 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D C624965 2? 2==E:>6 9:89 😕 a_ac 7@==@H:?8 2 C2E96C DE625J 56>2?5 7C@> E96 >:5a___D E9C@F89 E96 62C=J a_a_D]k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>6C4:2= D64E@C[ H9:49 :?4=F56D 52E2 46?E6CD[ 😀 2 5C:G:?8 7@C46 😕 E96 C646?E :?4C62D6 😕 6?6C8J 4@?DF>AE:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]k^Am

    kAms2E2 46?E6CD 😕 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D FD65 23@FE `gb E6CC2H2EE9@FCD @7 6=64EC:4:EJ =2DE J62C[ 23@FE cT @7 E96 4@F?ECJ’D E@E2= 4@?DF>AE:@?[ E96 x?E6C?2E:@?2= t?6C8J p86?4J 6DE:>2E6D]k^Am

    kAm{2DE J62C[ >@C6 E92? c_T @7 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]:62]@C8^C6A@CED^6?6C8J2?52:^6?6C8JDFAA=J7@C2:Q E2C86ElQ03=2?6 7C@> ?2EFC2= 82D] #6?6H23=6D DF49 2D D@=2C 2?5 H:?5 >256 FA acT @7 E96 A@H6C[ ?F4=62C a_T 2?5 4@2= `dT[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 286?4J]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4J AC@;64ED E92E 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@?DF>AE:@? 3J &]$] 52E2 46?E6CD H:== 8C@H 3J `bbT 3J a_b_]k^Am

    kAm+F@ 6IA=2:?65 E92E !6??DJ=G2?:2 😀 😕 2 F?:BF6 A@D:E:@? 😕 E6C>D @7 6=64EC:4:EJ DFAA=J 2?5 AC@I:>:EJ E@ =2C86 >2C<6ED] xE 2=D@ 92D 2446DD E@ H2E6C]k^Am

    kAmx? yF?6[ p>2K@? 2??@F?465 A=2?D E@ :?G6DE Sa_ 3:==:@? 😕 !6??DJ=G2?:2 E@ 3F:=5 >F=E:A=6 42>AFD6D 7@4FD65 @? 9:89E649 4=@F5 4@>AFE:?8 2?5 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 :??@G2E:@?] %96 A=2?E 😕 {FK6C?6 r@F?EJ 😀 ?62C E96 $FDBF692??2 #:G6C 2?5 E96 $FDBF692??2 $E62> t=64EC:4 $E2E:@?[ 2 ?F4=62C A@H6C A=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“x E9:?< H6 92G6 2 C62==J DEC@?8 FE:=:EJ DFAA=J 96C6[ H9:49 92D A@H6C] %96?[ H6’C6 4=@D6 E@ E9@D6 3:8 4:E:6D H:E9 2 =@E @7 56>2?5[” +F@ D2:5] “x E9:?< E92E F?:BF6=J A@D:E:@?D FD 7@C E96 =@42E:@? @7 ?6H 52E2 46?E6CD]”k^Am

    kAm%96 724:=:E:6D 2=D@ C6BF:C6 D:8?:7:42?E 2>@F?ED @7 H2E6C 7@C 4@@=:?8 AFCA@D6D]k^Am

    kAmy@9? +236CD @7 4@>AFE6CD E92E 42? AFE @77 2 =@E @7 962E]k^Am

    kAm“%9:?< 23@FE 9@H H2C> 2 =2AE@A 42? 86E D:EE:?8 @? J@FC 4@F49 4FD9:@? @C =2A H96? 5@:?8 H@C< 2E 9@>6[” +2F49 >@C6 :?E6?D6]”k^Am

    kAm{2C86 52E2 46?E6CD 42? 4@?DF>6 FA E@ 7:G6 >:==:@? 82==@?D @7 H2E6C 52:=J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 t?G:C@?>6?E2= 2?5 t?6C8J $EF5J x?DE:EFE6] %9:D 2>@F?E 😀 6BF:G2=6?E E@ E96 52:=J H2E6C 4@?DF>AE:@? 😕 2 E@H? @7 `_[___ E@ d_[___ A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE g_T @7 E96 H2E6C FD65 E@ 4@@= D6CG6CD 6G2A@C2E6D] %96 C6DE 9625D E@ =@42= H2DE6H2E6C 724:=:E:6D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 :?DE:EFE6]k^Am

    kAmpD E649?@=@8J 4@?DE2?E=J 6G@=G6D[ E96C6 2C6 2=H2JD ?6H H2JD E@ 4@@= E9:?8D] +2 E96 $FDBF692??2 #:G6C q2D:? r@>>:DD:@?]k^Am

    kAm“tG2A@C2E:G6 4@@=:?8 C6BF:C6D =@ED @7 H2E6C E92E 23D@C3D E96 962E 2?5 E96? 6G2A@C2E6D @77[” 96 D2:5] “%96D6 DJDE6>D 42? FD6 H2E6C 😕 E96 2>@F?ED @7 >:==:@?D @7 82==@?D A6C 52J E@ E6?D @7 >:==:@?D @7 82==@?D A6C 52J[ 56A6?5:?8 @? E96 D:K6 2?5 D4@A6 @7 E96 9JA6CD42=6 F?:E]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Anna Wiest | awiest@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • House Number Numerology: How To Find Yours + What It Means

    [ad_1]

    However, if you want action, variety, exploration, freedom, and a bit of risk, you might just thrive here. But be warned, Kaerhart cautions, “Sometimes the 5 can be a bit of a hedonist, so make sure you find balance within your life instead of going to extremes.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Trump Administration’s Data Center Push Could Open the Door for New Forever Chemicals

    [ad_1]

    In response to questions on its two-phase cooling products from WIRED, including whether or not the company planned to submit chemicals for fast-tracked consideration under the administration’s new data center exemption, Chemours spokesperson Cassie Olszewski said the company is “in the process of commercializing our two-phase immersion cooling fluid, which will require relevant regulatory approvals.”

    “Our work in this area has been focused on developing more sustainable and efficient cooling solutions that would allow data centers to consume less energy, water, and footprint while effectively managing the increasing amount of heat generated by the next generation of chips with higher processing power,” Olszewski said.

    These chips could also be a significant source of new chemicals. Both Schweer and Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz, a lawyer at environmental nonprofit Earthjustice, say that the semiconductor industry, which produces the chips that provide the computing power in data centers, stands to gain significantly from the expedited review process. The semiconductor manufacturing process uses forever chemicals at multiple different points of production, including in the crucial photolithography process, which uses light to transfer patterns to the surface of silicon wafers.

    Schweer says that in his last few years working at the EPA, this industry submitted a large number of applications for new chemicals. Kalmuss-Katz says that semiconductor manufacturers “are a main driver of new chemicals.”

    “The administration has this kind of AI-at-all-costs mindset, where you’re rushing to build more and more data centers and chip fabs without any meaningful plan for dealing with their climate impacts, their natural resource impacts, and the toxic substances that are being used and released from these new facilities,” he says.

    Lobbying documents show that the semiconductor industry has been asking for changes this year to the EPA’s new-chemicals program. In March, Nancy Beck, a former policy director for an industry lobbyist group who now leads the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, the office that oversees new chemical reviews, met with representatives from SEMI, a global advocacy organization for the industry. The meeting was initially organized to discuss the “EPA’s approach to regulations on PFAS and other chemicals that are essential to semiconductor manufacturing,” according to emails obtained by WIRED via a Freedom of Information Act request. Emails show that Beck suggested during the meeting that the lobbying group follow up with a public comment in support of changes to the new chemicals program, which the group sent over the next month in a letter. (“The Trump EPA encourages stakeholders to submit and document their comments on proposed rules so that we get a diverse array of perspectives,” says Hirsch, the EPA spokesperson.)

    [ad_2]

    Molly Taft

    Source link

  • Why Iceland Is Becoming a Model for Renewable-Powered High-Performance Computing

    [ad_1]

    With abundant renewable energy, efficient cooling and community-first development, Iceland shows how data centers can grow without compromising the planet. Unsplash+

    As the demand for A.I.-ready digital infrastructure skyrockets, data center development has become an urgent and necessary foundation for a wide spectrum of high-performance computing technologies—and for the businesses that are increasingly dependent on them. Unsurprisingly, data center construction has surged globally. Yet as growth accelerates, teh roadblocks to building at the required pace and scale have become far more pronounced. 

    Arguably, the most critical factor in data center development today is access to power. Alex de Vries-Gao, the founder of tech sustainability website Digiconomist, estimates that by the end of 2025, energy consumption by A.I. systems could reach 23 gigawatts—twice the total energy consumption of the Netherlands.

    This poses two intertwined challenges. First, many countries simply lack sufficient power or a modern grid capable of supporting these demands. Much of the U.S. and U.K. national grid infrastructure was built between 1950 and 1970 and designed around large coal-fired plants—a post-war regeneration system now decades overdue for modernization. As coal availability waned, nuclear and renewable sources such as wind and solar began to fill the gap. Yet, these types of energy systems take time to develop and rely heavily on robust, upgraded power networks. The sudden increase in power demand resulting from the proliferation of data centers has highlighted the crucial need for investment in power infrastructure globally.

    Second, the demand for such vast power has sharpened scrutiny on the carbon footprint of data centers. As a result, data-intensive businesses are increasingly looking for data center partners that have proven sustainability credentials and can help decarbonize their IT workloads. That often means looking further afield than your local neighborhood data center provider to find a partnership that is environmentally and financially beneficial and sustainable long-term. At atNorth, we are seeing unprecedented demand for environmentally responsible A.I. infrastructure at speed and scale. Power bottlenecks caused by power availability simply cannot be allowed to become a limiting factor to growth.

    The Icelandic example

    Data centers located in cooler climates such as the Nordics can leverage highly energy-efficient cooling systems that significantly reduce the energy required to power and cool the hardware they host. The region also benefits from abundant renewable energy and relatively young, resilient power and internet networks. 

    Iceland, in particular, is a global leader in clean energy: 71 percent of its energy is generated by hydropower, and 29 percent from geothermal energy. Icelandic data centers can combine renewable energy with its naturally cool ambient temperatures to achieve exceptional energy efficiency. While global average Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE)—the metric of data center energy efficiency where the ideal value is 1.0 (representing 100 percent efficiency)—hovers around 1.48, Icelandic facilities average between 1.1 and 1.2, enabling customers to significantly decarbonize their IT workloads. For example, BNP Paribas lowered its total cost of ownership, cut energy use by 50 percent and reduced CO₂ output by 85 percent by relocating a portion of its IT infrastructure to one of atNorth’s Icelandic facilities.

    Temperatures in Iceland typically range from 30°F (-1 °C) in winter to 52°F (11 °C) in summer, enabling free-air cooling of some IT workloads. As compute density increases to accommodate A.I. and other high-performance applications, more advanced cooling technologies—such as Direct Liquid Cooling (DLC) or Direct to Chip Cooling—that allow water (or coolants) to reduce the temperature of the computer equipment more efficiently due to superior heat dissipation have become essential. These solutions are widely available in Iceland and across the Nordic countries, which are well known for their environmentally friendly ethos and circular economy principles.

    Moreover, Iceland’s political and economic stability offers another key advantage as geopolitical uncertainty grows across regions. Businesses are now more sensitive to the physical location of their data and the legal frameworks that govern it. As a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), Iceland has adopted the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and reinforced it with national legislation, resulting in robust safeguards for data privacy and security.

    Going beyond carbon reduction

    These factors have driven a surge in Nordic data center development in recent years, positioning the region at the forefront of the industry. While much of the world works to upgrade legacy power networks in order to start building data centers, the Nordic countries are addressing newer challenges associated with more mature data center development. Certainly, at atNorth, we have seen growing demand for a more holistic approach to sustainability and responsible operations. It is not enough to mitigate environmental impact; data center operators must deliver tangible benefits to the local communities in which we operate to support long-term sustainability and economic growth.

    Using the most sustainable materials possible is one factor that can showcase an honest commitment to care for the natural environment. atNorth’s ICE03 data center was constructed using Glulam, a sustainable laminated wood product with lower environmental impact and superior fire resistance compared to steel. Similarly, the site was insulated using sustainable Icelandic rockwool, produced from natural volcanic basalt and known for its durability, fire resistance and low ecological footprint.  

    The process of heat reuse—the recycling of waste heat from the data center cooling systems for use in the local community—is a practice that is common in the Nordic countries and growing in popularity across northern Europe. This is a fundamental part of sustainable data center design, and even in countries like Iceland, where naturally heated geothermal water is abundant, opportunities for further improvement remain. At ICE03, for example, atNorth partnered with the municipality of Akureyri to channel waste heat into a new community-run greenhouse, which will provide a space for schoolchildren to explore ecological farming practices and sustainable food production. These initiatives reduce carbon emissions for both the data center and the receiving organization while addressing specific local needs, such as fresh vegetable production in a country that imports 80 percent of its fresh produce.

    Community engagement is also becoming pivotal to the data center development process as competition over suitable land intensifies. Just as the concept of a “trusted brand” has proven fundamental in the consumer retail market—with some research suggesting that 81 percent of consumers need to trust a brand before considering a purchase—the same principle extends to regional decision-making that directly affects the lives of local people. Therefore, operators that can demonstrate a genuine commitment to good corporate citizenship will undoubtedly find more success.

    To ensure authentic integration with local communities, local hiring is essential. Over 90 percent of the workforce involved in developing atNorth’s ICE03 site came from nearby communities. The company also supports local education, charities and community projects through volunteer support and financial donations—sponsoring a local run in Akureyri, funding Reykjanesbær’s light festival and donating advanced mechatronics equipment to Akureyri University to support training for data center-related careers. 

    Building for the A.I. era—responsibly 

    As digitalization intensifies, so will the demand for high-performance data center capacity. Yet such rapid expansion carries risks that could seriously undermine long-term sustainability. The boom-and-reckoning pattern seen in industries like palm oil—where explosive growth preceded significant deforestation—serves as a warning. 

    The data center industry must learn from history and chart a new path in which digital infrastructure can be technologically advanced, environmentally responsible and locally beneficial. In short: data centers must be developed to meet A.I.-era performance demands while driving responsible growth and long-term value for clients, communities and our planet.

    Why Iceland Is Becoming a Model for Renewable-Powered High-Performance Computing

    [ad_2]

    Erling Freyr Guðmundsson

    Source link

  • Trump launches ‘Genesis Mission’ to supercharge US scientific AI innovation

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday aimed at bolstering U.S. artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives as it unveiled its new “Genesis Mission” to accelerate AI use for scientific purposes. 

    The “Genesis Mission” will direct the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and their national labs to work with private companies to share federal data sets, advanced supercomputing capabilities, and scientific facilities. 

    TRUMP, MCCORMICK TO UNVEIL $90B ENERGY AND INNOVATION INVESTMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA

    “The private sector has launched artificial intelligence at huge scale, but with a little bit different focus – on language, on business, on processes, on consumer services,” Secretary of Energy Chris Wright told reporters Monday. “What we’re doing here is just pivoting those efforts to focus on scientific discovery, engineering advancements. And to do that, you need the data sets that are contained across our national labs.” 

    Vice President JD Vance, left, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, right, in Greenland while honoring the 55th anniversary of Earth Day 2025.  (Reuters)

    Additionally, the executive order instructs the Department of Energy and national labs to create an integrated platform aimed at expediting scientific discovery, in an attempt to connect AI capability with scientists, engineers, technical staff, and the labs’ scientific instruments, according to a White House official.

    AI LAWNMOWERS CUT GRASS — AND POTENTIALLY COSTS — IN NATIONAL MALL TEST RUN 

    Trump hinted an effort like this was in the works during the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum Wednesday in Washington, where he said the U.S. would work “to build the largest, most powerful, most innovative AI ecosystem in the world.”

    US President Donald Trump during the US-Saudi Investment Forum at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC.

    US President Donald Trump during the US-Saudi Investment Forum at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2025.  (Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The effort comes after Trump issued an AI policy document called “Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan” in July. The document laid out a framework focused on accelerating AI innovation, ensuring the U.S. is the leader in international AI diplomacy and security, and using the private sector to help build up and operate AI infrastructure. 

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVES DEMAND FOR ELECTRIC GRID UPDATE

    Meanwhile, the Trump administration is also currently considering other executive orders pertaining to AI, and more executive orders could be on the horizon. 

    For example, Fox News Digital previously reported that the White House was gearing up an executive order instructing the Justice Department to sue states that adopt their own laws regulating AI

    Justice Department logo and Pam Bondi

    The Trump administration is prepping an executive order that would instruct the Justice Department to sue states that adopt their own laws that would regulate AI.  (Samuel Corum/Bloomberg via Getty Images, left, and MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images, right.)

    Trump appeared to address the initiative at the U.S-Saudi Investment Forum as well, claiming that a series of AI regulations imposed at the state level would prove a “disaster.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

    “And we are going to work it so that you’ll have a one approval process to not have to go through 50 states,” Trump said. 

    Fox News’ Amanda Macias and Dennis Collins contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Xcel Energy seeks $355.5M revenue hike, increasing residential bills nearly 10% on average

    [ad_1]

    Xcel Energy, Colorado’s largest electric utility, has asked state regulators for an increase of $355.5 million to its rate base, which would boost the average residential electric bill by nearly 10% per month.

    Xcel filed the proposal Friday with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, which will take testimony from the company and various intervening parties and hold a public hearing. If approved, the increase would take effect in September 2026.

    Xcel Energy-Colorado President Robert Kenney said the utility’s last increase to the rate base was in 2022. The average residential bill rose by 3.2%, according to an Xcel statement after an agreement was reached with all the parties

    The rate base is a utility’s investments to provide services and on which it’s allowed to earn a regulated rate of return.

    “This rate case is to recover costs associated with investments that we’ve made over the last three years,” Kenney said.

    The Utility Consumer Advocate, or UCA, which represents the public before state regulators, said the proposed increase is “too big of an increase.”

    “It’s an especially large increase given the context of the economic times,” said Joseph Pereira, UCA deputy director.

    The increase is largely related to Xcel’s expanded capital spending on distribution, transmission and generation, Pereira said.

    “It’s unclear to parties in the UCA that the company is prioritizing investments that are the biggest bang for the buck, that increase reliability and that adopt an intelligent approach to how they’re using the grid,” Pereira said. “It still appears that the company is using a crude blanket approach to replacing and investing in new infrastructure.”

    Kenney said Xcel has invested in safety, reliability, making the system more resilient, electrifying transportation and buildings, meeting increased demands from growth and taking steps to significantly reduce carbon emissions.

    Xcel has said it has reduced carbon emissions by 57%. The state’s target is to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 80% from 2005 levels by 2030.

    Xcel is upgrading its electric grid with a $1.7 billion transmission project. The Colorado Power Pathway includes transmission lines, power substations and other equipment stretching over 12 counties, mostly in eastern Colorado.

    “We’ve added a tremendous amount of renewable energy over the last several years,” Kenney said. “And we’ve done all of this while keeping bills as low as possible.”

    Xcel has faced criticism from the Office of the Utility Consumer Advocate, or UCA, which represents the public before state regulators, and customers over the past few years for what the UCA has called “a pancaking of rate increases.”

    The criticism of Xcel and other regulated utilities heated up in 2023 after a cold winter and high natural gas prices sent costs soaring statewide. A legislative committee held hearings and approved a bill intended to protect customers against future price shocks and level what some see as a playing field tilted in the utilities’ favor.

    [ad_2]

    Judith Kohler

    Source link