ReportWire

Tag: Energy and the environment

  • Lawmakers demand answers on offshore wind projects

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts’ two U.S. senators are demanding answers from the Trump administration about the “national security threats” it cited in the decision to scuttle several multibillion-dollar offshore wind projects.

    In a letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey demanded a sit-down meeting with the agencies to review “recently completed classified reports” behind the “national security risks” the Trump administration cited in its decision to halt construction of the offshore wind projects.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“pD >6>36CD @7 r@?8C6DD H9@ 2C6 23=6 E@ G:6H 4=2DD:7:65 :?7@C>2E:@? 3J E96 G:CEF6 @7 @FC A@D:E:@?D – 2?5 H9@ C6AC6D6?E 2 DE2E6 2?5 H@C<6CD 92C>65 3J E9:D 564:D:@? – H6 C6BF6DE 2446DD E@ E96D6 4=2DD:7:65 C6A@CED[” E96J HC@E6] “%96D6 AFCA@CE65 =62D6 A2FD6D H:== 92G6 E96 67764E @7 AFEE:?8 p>6C:42?D @FE @7 H@C<[ 56DE23:=:K:?8 @FC 6?6C8J 8C:5[ 2?5 42FD:?8 6=64EC:4:EJ AC:46D E@ D@2C 5FC:?8 E96 6IA6?D:G6 9@>6 962E:?8 D62D@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E 2??@F?465 |@?52J E92E :E 😀 92=E:?8 7656C2= =62D6D 7@C =2C86D42=6 @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED 4FCC6?E=J F?56C 4@?DECF4E:@?[ H9:49 :?4=F56D ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 `[ #6G@=FE:@? (:?5 @77 E96 |2DD249FD6EED 4@2DE[ r@2DE2= ‘:C8:?:2 ~77D9@C6 (:?5[ $F?C:D6 (:?5 2?5 E96 t>A:C6 (:?5 ` AC@;64E 😕 }6H *@C<]k^Am

    kAmx?E6C:@C $64C6E2CJ s@F8 qFC8F> 4:E65 F?DA64:7:65 ?2E:@?2= D64FC:EJ C:D:ED 7@C E96 AC@;64ED[ 3FE D2:5 E96 >@G6 😀 2:>65 2E “AC@E64E:?8” E96 p>6C:42? A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J ;@:?65 76==@H s6>@4C2E:4 8@G6C?@CD @7 }6H *@C<[ |2DD249FD6EED[ r@??64E:4FE 2?5 #9@56 xD=2?5 😕 :DDF:?8 2 DE2E6>6?E D2J:?8 E96 >@G6 H:== 4@DE E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D[ 5C:G6 FA E96 4@DE @7 6?6C8J 2?5 D6E324< E96 C68:@?’D 4=:>2E6 492?86 8@2=D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 2??@F?46>6?E J6DE6C52J A2FD:?8 @77D9@C6 H:?5 =62D6D 😀 :ED =2E6DE 68C68:@FD 2EE24< @? 4=62? 6?6C8J 2?5 :E =2?5D =:<6 2 =F>A @7 5:CEJ 4@2= 7@C E96 9@=:52J D62D@? 7@C p>6C:42? H@C<6CD[ 4@?DF>6CD[ 2?5 :?G6DE@CD[” E96J HC@E6] “!2FD:?8 24E:G6 =62D6D[ 6DA64:2==J 7@C 4@>A=6E65 2?5 ?62C=J 4@>A=6E65 AC@;64ED[ 567:6D =@8:4[ H:== 9FCE @FC 3:5 7@C 6?6C8J :?56A6?56?46[ H:== 5C:G6 FA 4@DED 7@C p>6C:42 C2E6A2J6CD[ 2?5 H:== >2<6 FD =@D6 E9@FD2?5D @7 8@@5A2J:?8 ;@3D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 8@G6C?@CD D2:5 E96 DE2E6D 2C6 “H@C<:?8 92C5 E@ 3F:=5 >@C6 6?6C8J E@ >66E C:D:?8 56>2?5 2?5 =@H6C 4@DED” 2?5 E96 H:?5 AC@;64ED F?56C 4@?DECF4E:@? 92G6 “4C62E65 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D 2?5 :?;64E65 3:==:@?D 😕 64@?@>:4 24E:G:EJ :?E@ @FC 4@>>F?:E:6D]”k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 32D6=6DD[ C64<=6DD 2?5 6CC2E:4 24E:@? 7C@> E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 x?E6C:@C H:== 2=D@ :?;64E 7FCE96C F?46CE2:?EJ :?E@ E96 >2C<6ED[ >2<:?8 :E 92C56C 7@C DE2E6D 2?5 AC:G2E6 4@>A2?:6D E@ D64FC6 7:?2?4:?8 7@C AF3=:4 H@C6 56DA:E6 92G:?8 8@?6 E9C@F89 2== E96 ?646DD2CJ =@42= 2?5 7656C2= 2AAC@G2= AC@46DD6D[” E96J HC@E6]k^Am

    kAm%96 x?E6C:@C s6A2CE>6?E’D 5:C64E:G6 4@>6D EH@ H66A @C56C E92E 92=E65 D6G6C2= @77D9@C6 H:?5 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2=@?8 E96 pE=2?E:4 r@2DE 7C@> |2:?6 E@ }6H y6CD6J]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 92D G@H65 E@ 6?5 7656C2= DFAA@CE 7@C @77D9@C6 H:?5 2?5 @E96C 4=62? 6?6C8J AC@;64ED 2D 96 7@4FD6D @? 3@@DE:?8 7@DD:= 7F6= AC@5F4E:@? 2D A2CE @7 3C@256C 677@CED E@ :>AC@G6 E96 ?2E:@?’D 6?6C8J :?56A6?56?46]k^Am

    kAmx? $6AE6>36C[ E96 AC6D:56?E 5:C64E65 E96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 %C2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 42?46= Sefh >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 5@K6? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED[ D2J:?8 E96 A=2?D “H6C6 ?@E 2=:8?65 H:E9 E96 8@2=D 2?5 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C 86EE:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D6E D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 6?G:C@?>6?E2= C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H:E9 2 8@2= @7 C6249:?8 “?6EK6C@” 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D C6=2E:G6 E@ `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_] %@ >66E E9@D6 8@2=D[ E96 DE2E6 A=2?D E@ 86?6C2E6 2E =62DE d[e__ >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5 A@H6C 3J a_af]k^Am

    kAm%96 ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 AC@;64E @77 |2CE92’D ‘:?6J2C5 😀 23@FE d_T 4@>A=6E6] %96 AC@;64E 42==D 7@C ea EFC3:?6D 42A23=6 @7 D6?5:?8 FA E@ c__ >682H2EED E@ E96 C68:@?2= 6=64EC:4 8C:5] |62H9:=6[ E96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 2?@E96C AC@;64E – $@FE9 r@2DE (:?5 – H@F=5 A@H6C @G6C ` >:==:@? 9@>6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 4C62E6 E9@FD2?5D @7 ;@3D]k^Am

    kAm(:?5 AC@G:56D 23@FE `_T @7 E96 6=64EC:4:EJ 86?6C2E65 😕 E96 &]$][ >2<:?8 :E E96 ?2E:@?’D =2C86DE D@FC46 @7 C6?6H23=6 6?6C8J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 7656C2= 52E2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Judge overturns Trump order blocking wind permits

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A federal judge gave the go-ahead for Massachusetts and other states to proceed with wind energy expansion by rejecting an executive order signed by President Donald Trump halting permits for clean energy projects.

    The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris on Monday sides with Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and 16 other Democrats who challenged Trump’s authority to enforce an order Jan. 20 that halted several offshore wind energy projects along the Atlantic Coast from Maine to New Jersey.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm$2C:D 564=2C65 %CF>A’D @C56C “:==682=” 😕 96C CF=:?8 2?5 D2:5 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E’D 564:D:@? E@ :?567:?:E6=J C67FD6 E@ 4@?D:56C 2AA=:42E:@?D 7@C @77D9@C6 2?5 @?D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED H2D “2C3:EC2CJ 2?5 42AC:4:@FD” 2?5 G:@=2E6D E96 7656C2= p5>:?:DEC2E:G6 !C@465FC6 p4E]k^Am

    kAm“%96 AC@@7 😀 😕 E96 AF55:?8i }@ A6C>:ED 92G6 366? :DDF65 D:?46 E96 (:?5 ~C56C H2D AC@>F=82E65[ 2?5 E96 286?4J 5676?52?ED 24:ED 2E =62DE F?E:= E96J 4@>A=6E6 E96 r@>AC696?D:G6 pDD6DD>6?E[ 7@C H9:49 E96C6 😀 ?@ E:>6=:?6[” $2C:D HC@E6 😕 E96 cfA286 CF=:?8] “%92E 24E:@? 😀 4@?EC2CJ E@ =2H]”k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 CF=:?8 AC@E64ED 9F?5C65D @7 >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 😕 :?G6DE>6?ED E96 DE2E6 >256 😕 @77D9@C6 H:?5 56G6=@A>6?E 2D :E AFCDF6D :ED 4=62? 6?6C8J 8@2=D]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 4C:E:42= G:4E@CJ 2=D@ AC6D6CG6D H6==A2J:?8 8C66? ;@3D 2?5 2446DD E@ C6=:23=6[ 277@C523=6 6?6C8J E92E H:== 96=A |2DD249FD6EED >66E @FC 4=62? 6?6C8J 2?5 4=:>2E6 8@2=D[” r2>A36== D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A[ H9@ @AA@D6D H:?5 2?5 D@=2C 6?6C8J[ 92D D@F89E E@ :?4C62D6 8@G6C?>6?E DFAA@CE 7@C 7@DD:= 7F6=D E@ >2I:>:K6 E96 ?2E:@?’D @FEAFE 2D E96 H@C=5’D E@A @:= 2?5 ?2EFC2= 82D AC@5F46C 2?5 E@ 7F=7:== E96 #6AF3=:42?’D 42>A2:8? AC@>:D6 E@ “5C:==[ 323J[ 5C:==” :7 6=64E65 E@ E96 AC6D:56?4J 7@C 2 D64@?5 E6C>]k^Am

    kAmx? $6AE6>36C[ %CF>A 5:C64E65 E96 &]$] s6A2CE>6?E @7 %C2?DA@CE2E:@? E@ 42?46= Sefh >:==:@? 😕 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 7@C 2 5@K6? :?7C2DECF4EFC6 AC@;64ED E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C AC@;64ED[ D2J:?8 E96 A=2?D “H6C6 ?@E 2=:8?65 H:E9 E96 8@2=D 2?5 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm%96 4FED :?4=F565 2 7656C2= 8C2?E 7@C E96 $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2= AC@;64E[ H9:49 8@E F?56CH2J =2DE DF>>6C 27E6C C646:G:?8 7F?5:?8 2?5 DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= A6C>:ED]k^Am

    kAm%96 Sb__ >:==:@? $2=6> ~77D9@C6 (:?5 %6C>:?2=[ 2 A2CE?6CD9:A 36EH66? rC@H=6J (:?5 $6CG:46D[ $2=6> 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED r=62? t?6C8J r6?E6C[ 42==D 7@C C656G6=@A:?8 2 ca24C6 D:E6 7@C>6C=J @44FA:65 3J 2 4@2= 2?5 @:=7:C65 A@H6C A=2?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 A=2?D 42== 7@C FD:?8 E96 D:E6 2D 2 DE28:?8 2C62 7@C 2DD6>3=:?8 2?5 EC2?DA@CE:?8 H:?5 EFC3:?6 4@>A@?6?ED E@ }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 2?5 @E96C @77D9@C6 H:?5 72C>D]k^Am

    kAmp (9:E6 w@FD6 DA@<6DA6CD@? 5676?565 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D A@=:4:6D @? AC@>@E:?8 7@DD:= 7F6=D[ D2J:?8 E96 AC6D:56?E’D y2?F2CJ @C56C “F?=62D965 p>6C:42’D 6?6C8J 5@>:?2?46]”k^Am

    kAm“&?56C y@6 q:56?’D vC66? }6H $42>[ @77D9@C6 H:?5 AC@;64ED H6C6 8:G6? F?72:C[ AC676C6?E:2= EC62E>6?E H9:=6 E96 C6DE @7 E96 6?6C8J :?5FDECJ H2D 9:?56C65 3J 3FC56?D@>6 C68F=2E:@?D[” (9:E6 w@FD6 DA@<6DH@>2? %2J=@C #@86CD D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 92D D6E D@>6 @7 E96 E@F896DE 6?G:C@?>6?E2= C68F=2E:@?D 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H:E9 2 8@2= @7 C6249:?8 “?6EK6C@” 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D C6=2E:G6 E@ `hh_ =6G6=D 3J a_d_] %@ >66E E9@D6 8@2=D[ E96 DE2E6 92D D6E 2 8@2= E@ 86?6C2E6 2E =62DE d[e__ >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5 A@H6C 3J a_af]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6 😀 H@C<:?8 H:E9 #9@56 xD=2?5 @? E9C66 AC@;64ED E@E2=:?8 a[efg >682H2EED @7 @77D9@C6 H:?5[ H9:49 :?4=F56D E96 }6H t?8=2?5 (:?5 a AC@;64E] (96? 4@>A=6E65[ E96 H:?5 EFC3:?6D H:== 36 42A23=6 @7 AC@G:5:?8 6?@F89 6=64EC:4:EJ E@ A@H6C >@C6 E92? `]c >:==:@? 9@>6D]k^Am

    kAmxE 😀 2=D@ A2CE @7 E96 !@H6C &A }6H t?8=2?5 :?:E:2E:G6 H:E9 r@??64E:4FE[ |2:?6[ }6H w2>AD9:C6[ #9@56 xD=2?5 2?5 ‘6C>@?E 2?5 D6G6C2= FE:=:E:6D — H9:49 42==D 7@C 6IA2?5:?8 :?E6C4@??64E:@? A@:?ED 7@C F?56CD62 423=6D E92E H:== 6G6?EF2==J 3C:?8 A@H6C 7C@> @77D9@C6 H:?5 EFC3:?6D E@ E96 C68:@?2= 8C:5]k^Am

    kAm|62?H9:=6[ E96 ‘:?6J2C5 (:?5 AC@;64E @77 |2CE92’D ‘:?6J2C5 😀 23@FE d_T 4@>A=6E6] %96 AC@;64E 42==D 7@C ea EFC3:?6D 42A23=6 @7 D6?5:?8 FA E@ c__ >682H2EED E@ E96 C68:@?2= 6=64EC:4 8C:5]k^Am

    kAm%H@ >2;@C @77D9@C6 H:?5 56G6=@A6CD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED – r@>>@?H62=E9 (:?5 2?5 $96== 2?5 ~462? (:?5D }@CE9 p>6C:42 – E6C>:?2E65 E96:C A@H6C AFC492D6 28C66>6?ED H:E9 E96 DE2E6’D FE:=:E:6D 😕 a_ab[ 4:E:?8 DFAA=J 492:? :DDF6D 2?5 @E96C 4@?46C?D E92E 92G6 >256 :E E@@ 5:77:4F=E E@ 7:?2?46 E96 AC@;64ED]k^Am

    kAm(:?5 AC@G:56D 23@FE `_T @7 E96 6=64EC:4:EJ 86?6C2E65 😕 E96 &]$][ >2<:?8 :E E96 ?2E:@?’D =2C86DE D@FC46 @7 C6?6H23=6 6?6C8J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 7656C2= 52E2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • AGs sue Trump EPA over solar energy program

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Attorney General Andrea Campbell has joined about two dozen other Democrats in suing the Trump administration over its decision to pull the plug on a $7 billion solar energy program for low-income households.

    The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, alleges that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency violated federal law and the Administrative Procedures Act when it terminated the Solar for All program, approved by Congress in 2023 as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 pvD 2C8F6 E96 >@G6 H2D 8@G6C?>6?E “@G6CC6249” 2?5 E92E E96 t!p =24@?6J AC6G:@FD=J 2AAC@G65 3J r@?8C6DD 7@C E96 D@=2C AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAm“!=2:?E:77D 92G6 366? 2?5 H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ 36 92C>65 3J 5676?52?ED’ 6I64FE:G6 @G6CC6249[” E96 pvD HC@E6 😕 E96 C646?E=J 7:=65 bhA286 =2HDF:E] “qJ 2C3:EC2C:=J E6C>:?2E:?8 2 AC@8C2> 😕 H9:49 A=2:?E:77D A2CE:4:A2E65 2?5 H9:49 H2D 6IA64E65 E@ 3C:?8 DF3DE2?E:2= 36?67:ED E@ A=2:?E:77D 2?5 E96:C C6D:56?ED[ 5676?52?ED 92G6 :==682==J 6=:>:?2E65 A=2:?E:77D’ 23:=:EJ E@ A2CE:4:A2E6 😕 2?5 36?67:E 7C@> E96 $up !C@8C2>]”k^Am

    kAm%96 pvD 2=D@ 7:=65 2 D6A2C2E6 =2HDF:E %9FCD52J 😕 E96 &]$] r@FCE @7 u656C2= r=2:>D E@ C64@G6C 52>286D 7@C t!p’D “F?=2H7F= 3C6249 @7 E96 8C2?E 28C66>6?ED” F?56C E96 D@=2C AC@8C2>]k^Am

    kAm%H@ H666?E2= 8C@FAD[ D@=2C 4@>A2?:6D 2?5 =23@C F?:@?D 7:=65 2 D:>:=2C =2HDF:E 😕 &]$] s:DEC:4E r@FCE 😕 #9@56 xD=2?5[ H9:49 2=D@ D662?6?E :?;F?4E:@? 3=@4<:?8 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D >@G6]k^Am

    kAmx? pF8FDE[ t!p p5>:?:DEC2E@C {66 +6=5:? 2??@F?465 E96 AC@8C2>’D 42?46==2E:@?[ 42==:?8 :E 2 “3@@?5@88=6” E92E’D “C:76 H:E9 8C:7E” 7C@> F?D4CFAF=@FD 4@>A2?:6D E2<:?8 4FED 7C@> E96 7656C2==J 7F?565 8C2?ED]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED H2D 2H2C565 S`de >:==:@? 7C@> E96 8C2?E AC@8C2>[ H9:49 DE2E6 @77:4:2=D D2J H@F=5 92G6 96=A65 4C62E6 8@@5A2J:?8 ;@3D[ =@H6C 6?6C8J 3:==D 7@C E6?D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 =@H:?4@>6 4@?DF>6CD 2?5 255 2? 255:E:@?2= `ad >682H2EED @7 D@=2C A@H6C E@ E96 DE2E6’D 4=62?6?6C8J >:I]k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?’D 2EE6>AE E@ “:==682==J 8FE” E96 AC@8C2> H:== “6=:>:?2E6 8@@5A2J:?8 ;@3D[ ?68=64E E96 52?86CD @7 4=:>2E6 492?86[ 2?5 C2:D6 4@DED 7@C =@H:?4@>6 C6D:56?ED]”k^Am

    kAm“pD |2DD249FD6EED 4@?E:?F6D E96 4C:E:42= EC2?D:E:@? E@ 4=62? 6?6C8J[ E96 $@=2C 7@C p== AC@8C2> 6?DFC6D E92E ?@ 4@>>F?:EJ 😀 =67E 369:?5 2?5 E92E 6G6CJ C6D:56?E 92D E96 @AA@CEF?:EJ E@ 36?67:E 7C@> 4=62?6C 2:C 2?5 >@C6 277@C523=6 FE:=:EJ 3:==D[” E96 s6>@4C2E D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm&?56C E96 AC@8C2>[ E96 DE2E6 :DDF65 8C2?ED E@ =6?5:?8 :?DE:EFE:@?D E92E 7F?5 D@=2C 2?5 32EE6CJ AC@;64ED[ 2D H6== 2D E@ :?DE2==6CD 2?5 AC@;64E 56G6=@A6CD H9@ 5@ E96 H@C<]k^Am

    kAm%96 q:56? 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 6DE:>2E65 E96 AC@8C2> H@F=5 AC@5F46 >@C6 E92? Sbd_ >:==:@? 😕 2??F2= D2G:?8D @? 6=64EC:4 3:==D 7@C =@H:?4@>6 9@FD69@=5D 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ[ H9:=6 4FEE:?8 8C66?9@FD6 82D 6>:DD:@?D 3J @G6C b_ >:==:@? >6EC:4 E@?D @7 42C3@? 5:@I:56 6BF:G2=6?E[ 6BF2= E@ E96 6>:DD:@?D @7 @G6C f >:==:@? EJA:42= A2DD6?86C G69:4=6D]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A AC@>:D65 E@ 6?5 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E’D DFAA@CE 7@C H:?5[ D@=2C 2?5 @E96C C6?6H23=6 6?6C8J D@FC46D E92E 96 4=2:>D 2C6 E@@ 4@DE=J 7@C 4@?DF>6CD]k^Am

    kAms6DA:E6 E96 AFD9324< 7C@> E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E[ s6>@4C2E:4 v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J 2?5 E@A 6?G:C@?>6?E2= @77:4:2=D 2C6 G@H:?8 E@ AC6DD @? H:E9 677@CED E@ 5:G6CD:7J E96 DE2E6’D 6?6C8J >:I H:E9 >@C6 D@=2C A@H6C FD:?8 E96 DE2E6’D ?6E >6E6C:?8 AC@8C2> 2?5 @E96C :?:E:2E:G6D]k^Am

    kAm~? %9FCD52J[ w62=6J 2?5 DE2E6 6?G:C@?>6?E2= @77:4:2=D C@==65 @FE 2? FA52E65 D@=2C :?46?E:G6 AC@8C2> – $@=2C |2DD249FD6EED #6?6H23=6 %2C86E b]_ – E96J 4=2:>65 H:== 3C:?8 >@C6 =@H4@DE 6?6C8J :?E@ E96 DE2E6 2?5 C65F46 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@DED 3J Sb__ >:==:@?]k^Am

    kAm“%@ 5C:G6 5@H? 4@DED[ H6 ?665 >@C6 – 2?5 D@=2C 😀 E96 72DE6DE[ 4962A6DE 6?6C8J H6 42? 3C:?8 :?E@ |2DD249FD6EED[” w62=6J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “|2DD249FD6EED 😀 @A6? 7@C D@=2C 3FD:?6DD]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Utility recommends natural gas plant despite objections

    Utility recommends natural gas plant despite objections

    [ad_1]

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The nation’s largest public utility on Friday recommended replacing an aging coal burning power plant with natural gas, ignoring calls for the Tennessee Valley Authority to speed its transition to renewable energy.

    TVA announced the completion of its environmental impact statement for replacing the Cumberland Fossil Plant near Cumberland City, Tennessee. The federally owned utility considered replacing the two coal-fired turbines there with solar panels but instead recommended a combined-cycle natural gas plant.

    Solar and battery storage would be more costly, requiring transmission upgrades that could take a decade to complete, according to a news release from TVA. The decision still needs the approval of TVA President and CEO Jeff Lyash, who has previously spoken in favor of natural gas.

    “Our focus is on ensuring that we provide affordable, reliable, resilient, and clean energy for generations to come,” Lyash said in the news release.

    TVA’s plan would idle one unit of the coal plant by the end of 2026 and the second by the end of 2028. The utility says a natural gas plant there could be built and operational by 2026, with construction beginning as early as summer 2023.

    The announcement drew backlash from groups that include the Center for Biological Diversity.

    “TVA’s plan to build a new gas plant and pipeline in the midst of climate catastrophe is reckless,” Gaby Sarri-Tobar, with the group’s energy justice program, said in a statement. “This is a slap in the face to the 10 million customers who rely on TVA and makes a mockery of the Biden administration’s clean energy pledges.”

    President Joe Biden has said he wants a carbon-pollution-free energy sector by 2035. TVA has set a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2035, compared with 2005 levels.

    Scientists, meanwhile, have warned that failing to meet Biden’s 2035 target will only lead to more intense and more frequent extreme weather events, as well as droughts, floods and wildfires. Teams of meteorologists across the world have predicted there is nearly a 50-50 chance that Earth will temporarily hit a global warming temperature threshold international agreements are trying to prevent within the next five years.

    The TVA board of directors last year delegated any decision on Cumberland’s replacement to Lyash. He has said TVA will not be able to meet the 100% reduction goal without technological advances in energy storage, carbon capture and small modular nuclear reactors. The utility has its own aspirational goal of net zero emissions by 2050.

    Those opposing the construction of a new gas plant have pointed out it will likely be around for decades, long past the 2035 decarbonization goal. They have also criticized TVA for not considering options that could decrease the demand for new electricity like improved energy efficiency and demand response — which helps customers change their usage patterns to flatten peak demand periods.

    U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, has emerged in legislative hearings as a key critic of TVA. He said the utility should not be moving forward on the Cumberland decision while Biden’s nominees for its board await Senate confirmation. Their installation would create a new board majority.

    “The Tennessee Valley Authority is showing yet again that it is willing to lock its customers into expensive and volatile fossil fuel generation, rather than take this opportunity to adopt reliable renewable energy,” Markey said in a statement Friday. “As the largest public power company in the country, the TVA has a responsibility to be a leader, not a laggard, in delivering clean, affordable power to its customers.”

    Meanwhile, a permit application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is still pending for a 32-mile (51-kilometer) natural gas pipeline branch to link to the proposed new Cumberland plant. Kinder Morgan Inc. said one of its subsidiaries filed the application in July. Pending regulatory approval, construction would begin in August 2024, with an expected September 2025 for the pipeline to be in service, the company said.

    TVA provides electricity to 10 million people in Tennessee and parts of the surrounding states of Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Coal-fired plant imploded in New Jersey for battery array

    Coal-fired plant imploded in New Jersey for battery array

    [ad_1]

    LOGAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. — A former coal-fired power plant in New Jersey was imploded Friday, and its owners announced plans for a new $1 billion venture on the site, where batteries will be deployed to store power from clean energy sources including wind and solar.

    The move came as New Jersey moves aggressively to adopt clean energy, including its push to be the East Coast leader in offshore wind energy.

    Starwood Energy demolished the former Logan Generating Plant, with the head of New Jersey’s Board of Public Utilities pushing a ceremonial button; the actual explosives used in bringing the structure down were triggered by a licensed demolition contractor.

    Logan is one of two former coal-fired power plants that the company decided in March to shutter and tear down under an agreement with the state and a local utility. The other is the former Chambers Cogeneration Plant in Carneys Point, which has yet to be dismantled.

    They were the last two coal-fired power plants operating in the state until they closed three months ago, and both will host battery storage projects, said Himanshu Saxena, CEO of Starwood, a Greenwich, Connecticut, private equity investment firm specializing in energy infrastructure projects.

    “This is the end of coal in this state,” Saxena said.

    The closures are part of the latest wave of coal-burning units to be retired as states try to fight climate change by requiring more carbon-free sources of electricity.

    “Wind doesn’t always blow; solar doesn’t always shine,” he said. “We need systems where you can store the energy. You have to build battery storage products.”

    The plant, on the banks of the Delaware River in the Philadelphia suburbs of southern New Jersey, began operating in 1994.

    Shortly before 11 a.m. Friday, an emergency siren sounded, indicating the imminent detonation of explosives placed strategically at the base of the plant’s smokestack and in a larger nearby building.

    A series of loud blasts rang out, and concussive waves of pressure radiated from the site as the structures began to crumble into a heap of smoke and dust.

    Saxena said he has a long history with power generation and environmental concerns.

    “I worked at a coal plant in India; there were no scrubbers,” he said, referring to emissions-control equipment. “You went in with a white shirt and came out with a black shirt.”

    Environmental and public interest groups including the Sierra Club pushed Atlantic City Electric to end an agreement that locked rate-payers into what the Sierra Club termed above-market electricity rates, and to end the operation of the two plants.

    “More utilities need to recognize the changing landscape and that they have a responsibility to reduce carbon pollution,” said Ramon Cruz, national president of the Sierra Club, adding he hopes the deal will be a model for other states and companies.

    Atlantic City Electric estimates that termination of the agreement will save ratepayers $30 million through 2024.

    ———

    Follow Wayne Parry on Twitter at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Coal-fired plant imploded in New Jersey for battery array

    Coal-fired plant imploded in New Jersey for battery array

    [ad_1]

    LOGAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. — A former coal-fired power plant in New Jersey was imploded Friday, and its owners announced plans for a new $1 billion venture on the site, where batteries will be deployed to store power from clean energy sources including wind and solar.

    The move came as New Jersey moves aggressively to adopt clean energy, including its push to be the East Coast leader in offshore wind energy.

    Starwood Energy demolished the former Logan Generating Plant, with the head of New Jersey’s Board of Public Utilities pushing a ceremonial button; the actual explosives used in bringing the structure down were triggered by a licensed demolition contractor.

    Logan is one of two former coal-fired power plants that the company decided in March to shutter and tear down under an agreement with the state and a local utility. The other is the former Chambers Cogeneration Plant in Carneys Point, which has yet to be dismantled.

    They were the last two coal-fired power plants operating in the state until they closed three months ago, and both will host battery storage projects, said Himanshu Saxena, CEO of Starwood, a Greenwich, Connecticut, private equity investment firm specializing in energy infrastructure projects.

    “This is the end of coal in this state,” Saxena said.

    The closures are part of the latest wave of coal-burning units to be retired as states try to fight climate change by requiring more carbon-free sources of electricity.

    “Wind doesn’t always blow; solar doesn’t always shine,” he said. “We need systems where you can store the energy. You have to build battery storage products.”

    The plant, on the banks of the Delaware River in the Philadelphia suburbs of southern New Jersey, began operating in 1994.

    Shortly before 11 a.m. Friday, an emergency siren sounded, indicating the imminent detonation of explosives placed strategically at the base of the plant’s smokestack and in a larger nearby building.

    A series of loud blasts rang out, and concussive waves of pressure radiated from the site as the structures began to crumble into a heap of smoke and dust.

    Saxena said he has a long history with power generation and environmental concerns.

    “I worked at a coal plant in India; there were no scrubbers,” he said, referring to emissions-control equipment. “You went in with a white shirt and came out with a black shirt.”

    Environmental and public interest groups including the Sierra Club pushed Atlantic City Electric to end an agreement that locked rate-payers into what the Sierra Club termed above-market electricity rates, and to end the operation of the two plants.

    “More utilities need to recognize the changing landscape and that they have a responsibility to reduce carbon pollution,” said Ramon Cruz, national president of the Sierra Club, adding he hopes the deal will be a model for other states and companies.

    Atlantic City Electric estimates that termination of the agreement will save ratepayers $30 million through 2024.

    ———

    Follow Wayne Parry on Twitter at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Coal-fired power plant in NJ to be imploded for clean power

    Coal-fired power plant in NJ to be imploded for clean power

    [ad_1]

    SWEDESBORO, N.J. — A former coal-fired power plant in New Jersey will be imploded Friday, and its owners are expected to announce plans for a new clean energy venture on the site.

    Starwood Energy will demolish the former Logan Generating Plant, with the head of New Jersey’s Board of Public Utilities pushing the button that triggers explosives used in bringing the structure down.

    Logan is one of two former coal-fired power plants that the company agreed in March to shut down. They were the last two coal-fired power plants operating in the state.

    Environmental and public interest groups including the Sierra Club pushed Atlantic City Electric to end an agreement that locked rate-payers into what the Sierra Club termed above-market electricity rates, and to end the operation of the plants.

    “The implosion will end a decades-long history of polluting air and worsening public health in the Swedesboro and surrounding Gloucester County communities,” the Sierra Club said in a statement.

    The utility estimates that termination of the agreement will save ratepayers $30 million through 2024.

    The other power plant shuttered under the agreement is the former Chambers Cogeneration Plant in Carneys Point.

    The move comes as New Jersey is moving aggressively to adopt clean energy, including its push to be the East Coast leader in offshore wind energy.

    ———

    Follow Wayne Parry on Twitter at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • In new role as G-20 chair, India set to focus on climate

    In new role as G-20 chair, India set to focus on climate

    [ad_1]

    BENGALURU, India — India officially takes up its role as chair of the Group of 20 leading economies for the coming year Thursday and it’s putting climate at the top of the group’s priorities.

    Programs to encourage sustainable living and money for countries to transition to clean energy and deal with the effects of a warming world are some of the key areas that India will focus on during its presidency, experts say. Some say India will also use its new position to boost its climate credentials and act as a bridge between the interests of industrialized nations and developing ones.

    The country has made considerable moves toward its climate goals in recent years but is currently one of the world’s top emitters of planet-warming gases.

    The G-20, made up of the world’s largest economies, has a rolling presidency with a different member state in charge of the group’s agenda and priorities each year. Experts believe India will use the “big stage” of the G-20 presidency to drive forward its climate and development plans.

    The country “will focus heavily on responding to the current and future challenges posed by climate change,” said Samir Saran, president of the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. The ORF will be anchoring the T-20 — a group of think tanks from the 20 member countries whose participants meet alongside the G-20.

    Saran said that India will work to ensure that money is flowing from rich industrialized nations to emerging economies to help them combat global warming, such as a promise of $100 billion a year for clean energy and adapting to climate change for poorer nations that has not yet been fulfilled and a recent pledge to vulnerable countries that there will be a fund for the loss and damage caused by extreme weather.

    He added that India will also use the presidency to push its flagship “Mission Life” program that encourages more sustainable lifestyles in the country, which is set to soon become most populous in the world.

    When outgoing chair Indonesia symbolically handed the presidency to India in Bali last month by passing the gavel, Prime Minister Narendra Modi took the opportunity to promote the program, saying it could make “a big contribution” by turning sustainable living into “a mass movement.”

    The impact of lifestyle “has not received as much attention in the global discourse as it should,” said RR Rashmi, a distinguished fellow at The Energy Research Institute in New Delhi. He added that the issue “may get some prominence” at the G-20 which would be a success for the Indian government, but critics say the focus on lifestyle changes must be backed by policy to have credibility.

    India has been beefing up its climate credentials, with its recent domestic targets to transition to renewable energy more ambitious than the goals it submitted to the U.N. as part of the Paris Agreement, which requires countries to show how they plan to limit warming to temperature targets set in 2015.

    Analysts say nations’ climate ambitions and actions — including India’s — are not in line with temperature targets.

    Many of India’s big industrialists are investing heavily in renewable energy domestically as well as globally, but the Indian government is also preparing to invest in coal-based power plants at the cost of $33 billion over the next four years.

    At the U.N. climate conference last month, India — currently the world’s third largest emitter of greenhouse gases — proposed a phaseout of all fossil fuels and repeatedly emphasized the need to revamp global climate finance. The country says it cannot reach its climate goals and reduce carbon dioxide emissions without significantly more finance from richer nations, a claim which those countries dispute.

    Navroz Dubash, author of several U.N. climate reports and professor at the Centre for Policy Research, said that a key question for many countries is how “emerging economies address development needs and do it in a low carbon pathway” with several in the global south, like India, pointing to a need for outside investment.

    As the chair of the G-20, India is a good position “to say what it will take for us to develop in ways that don’t lock up the remaining carbon budget,” Dubash added, referring to the amount of carbon dioxide the world can emit while still containing global warming within 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) compared with preindustrial levels.

    “Developing countries are making a convincing case that green industrial policies are actually quite dependent on having public money to throw at the problems,” said Dubash. Some experts say more than $2 trillion is needed each year by 2030 to help developing countries cut emissions and deal with the effects of a warming climate, with $1 trillion from domestic sources and the rest coming from external sources such as developed countries or multilateral development banks.

    “This public money can also be a way of getting in private money, which is what the U.S. has done in its Inflation Reduction Act,” Dubash added. The U.S.’s flagship climate package that passed earlier this year includes incentives for building out clean energy infrastructure.

    The G-20 will also be looking closely at alternative means to getting climate finance, experts say. The group could potentially take a leaf out of the Bridgetown initiative proposed by the prime minister of Barbados, Mia Mottley, which involves unlocking large sums of money from multilateral development banks and international financial institutions to help countries adapt to climate change and transition to cleaner energy.

    ORF’s Saran said that as G-20 chair India can help move forward the conversation on the initiative. Developing countries are often charged higher rates of interest when borrowing from global financial institutions. Rejigging global finance to make renewable energy more affordable in the developing world is key to curbing climate change, Saran said.

    The idea has recently gained traction amongst developed nations, with France’s Macron recently vocalizing his support.

    “A large share of emissions will come from the developing world in the future,” Saran said. “If we make it easier for them to shift to clean energy, then these emissions can be avoided.”

    ———

    Follow Sibi Arasu on Twitter at @sibi123

    ———

    Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gas driller pleads no contest to polluting town’s water

    Gas driller pleads no contest to polluting town’s water

    [ad_1]

    MONTROSE, Pa. — Pennsylvania’s most active gas driller pleaded no contest Tuesday to criminal charges, capping a landmark environmental case against a company that prosecutors say polluted a rural community’s drinking water 14 years ago and then tried to evade responsibility.

    Residents of the tiny crossroads of Dimock in northeastern Pennsylvania say they have gone more than a decade without a clean, reliable source of drinking water after their aquifer was ruined by Houston-based Coterra Energy Inc.

    Under a plea deal entered in Susquehanna County Court, Coterra agreed to pay $16.29 million to fund construction of a new public water system and pay the impacted residents’ water bills for the next 75 years.

    “After more than decade of denials, of shirking responsibility and accountability, Coterra pleaded to their crime, and the people of Dimock finally had their day in court,” Attorney General Josh Shapiro, the state’s incoming governor, said outside the courtroom. “Today is further proof that you don’t get to just walk away from the harm you do here in Pennsylvania.”

    The plea — the result of years of negotiations between Coterra and the attorney general’s office — represents a milestone in one of the most prominent pollution cases ever to emerge from the U.S. drilling and fracking boom. Dimock drew national notoriety after residents were filmed lighting their tap water on fire in the Emmy Award-winning 2010 documentary “Gasland.”

    Coterra’s corporate predecessor, Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., was charged in June 2020 with 15 criminal counts, most of them felonies, after a grand jury investigation found the company drilled faulty gas wells that leaked flammable methane into residential water supplies in Dimock and surrounding communities.

    The grand jury blasted what it called Cabot’s “long-term indifference to the damage it caused to the environment and citizens of Susquehanna County.”

    Cabot, which merged with Denver-based Cimarex Energy Co. to form Coterra, has long maintained the gas in residents’ water was naturally occurring.

    Coterra pleaded no contest to a misdemeanor charge of prohibition against discharge of industrial wastes under the state’s Clean Streams Law. The plea means Coterra does not admit guilt but agreed to accept criminal responsibility.

    “Coterra has worked closely with the Office of Attorney General to resolve historical matters and create a path forward for all parties,” company spokesperson George Stark said via email. He said Coterra ”strives to follow best practices, exceed industry standards, and to continue to be a valuable community partner.”

    Many residents have avoided using their well water since the aquifer was contaminated with methane and heavy metals, using bottled water, bulk water purchased commercially, and even water drawn from creeks and artesian wells instead.

    “These people had to find very creative ways to get water for their homes, water for their families, their kids, their critters, and it was not pretty,” Dimock resident Victoria Switzer said Tuesday. “It was just crazy, people trying to find water.”

    Switzer, whose house will be connected to the new water line, called it “wonderful news” — and a long time coming.

    Another resident, Scott Ely, said some of his neighbors had moved away or developed health problems as a result of Coterra’s practices, while his own children, now in college, had grown up “without a safe water source.”

    “There’s so much heartache,” he said.

    Residents were informed of the plea deal last week. A public utility, Pennsylvania American Water, plans to drill two wells — what it calls a “public groundwater system” — and build a treatment plant that will remove any contaminants from the water before piping it to about 20 homes in Dimock. The utility estimates that construction will take about three years, during which Coterra will be required to provide individual treatment systems and bottled water to impacted residents.

    The settlement comes near the end of Shapiro’s tenure as attorney general.

    On Tuesday, Shapiro, a Democrat who will be sworn in as governor in January, pledged more aggressive regulatory oversight of the industry.

    “We have to change our regulatory structure here in the commonwealth,” Shapiro said. “We have to make sure we are setting clear rules of the road and holding industry accountable. If the regulators fail to do that, then industry is not going to be constrained and they’re going to go ahead and put profits before people. And that’s where the danger comes in.”

    Shapiro demurred on the question of whether Coterra would be permitted to resume drilling in a 9-square-mile (23-square-kilometer) area of Dimock where it has long been banned. Shpairo said he would review the matter with his new environmental secretary after taking office as governor.

    The criminal case has not slowed Coterra’s business. It is the leading shale gas driller in the nation’s No. 2 natural gas-producing state.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UN climate boss settles for no cuts on emissions

    UN climate boss settles for no cuts on emissions

    [ad_1]

    SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt — Given an energy crisis in Europe and progress made in helping climate victims, the new climate chief for the United Nations said he’ll settle for a lack of new emissions-cutting action coming out of the now-concluded climate talks in Egypt.

    It could have been worse, UN Executive Secretary for Climate Simon Stiell said in a seaside interview with The Associated Press. The talks did achieve the historic creation of a fund for poor nations that are victims of climate disasters, he said.

    The progress made last year at the global climate meeting in Glasgow was maintained. “There was no backtracking. Which as a result, one could say, is highly unambitious. And I would actually agree,” a tired Stiell said hours after the Egyptian climate talks finished with one last around-the-clock push.

    “To say that … we have, stood still. Yeah, that’s not great,” Stiell said. But he still likes the overall outcome of the first set of climate talks he oversaw, in particular the long-sought compensation fund for nations that didn’t cause warming.

    Outside experts agree with Stiell that nothing was done on the central issue of reducing emissions that cause climate change and disasters like flooding in Pakistan.

    “In the shadow of the energy crisis, there were no major new climate protection commitments at the conference,” said climate scientist Niklas Hohne, founder of the NewClimate Institute in Germany. “Glasgow a year ago was a small but important step in the right direction, with many new national targets and new international initiatives. None of that happened this year.”

    That’s despite the fact that more than 90 nations repeatedly asked — many of them publicly — for the agreement to include a phase down of oil and gas use. The Glasgow agreement calls for a phase down of “unabated coal” — that is, coal burning where the carbon goes into the atmosphere rather than being captured somehow. Poor nations point out that they rely more on coal whereas oil and gas are used more in rich countries. These should also be required to phase down they said. In closing remarks at the talks, Stiell himself called for a phase down of oil and gas.

    But the Egyptian presidency never put the proposal, which came from India, in any of the decision documents. The country that hosts and runs the climate talks has the power to make that choice.

    Critics — including negotiators during the talks — blasted the Egyptian presidency and its agenda setting. Environmental groups repeatedly pointed out Egypt’s dependence on exports of natural gas, its role as operator of Suez Canal petroleum traffic and income from neighboring oil states. Oil and natural gas are both principal contributors to climate change.

    Next year’s climate talks will be held in the United Arab Emirates, a major oil power. Environmental advocates and outside experts fear that oil and gas phase down language won’t get a fair shake next year either.

    Asked about the wisdom of having fossil fuel exporting countries host and control climate talks, Stiell said: “They are part of the problem, but they are also part of the solution.” To try to manage this process without their involvement, would give “an incomplete picture,” he said.

    “The global economy is still based certainly on oil and gas. And that is the challenge,” Stiell said.

    Climate Analytics CEO Bill Hare, a climate scientist, called this a serious problem.

    “The massive presence of oil and gas interests at the COP undermines the integrity of the UN climate process and could be slowly eroding its legitimacy,” Hare said. “The suspected influence of petrol states and oil and gas lobbyists on the Egyptian presidency Is unhealthy to say the least.”

    Analyst Alex Scott of E3G said Egypt showed “a sense of willful ignorance” in not considering a document with a call for oil and gas phase down. The influence of petro states on the presidency happens out of site and “is the right question to ask,” she said.

    Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, the climate talks president, didn’t answer a shouted question Sunday about oil and gas phase down language.

    Stiell said countries have to keep coming back and putting pressure on each other to include language calling for a phase down on oil and gas. That worked for this year’s key accomplishment — the establishment of a fund for poor nations that are victims of climate disasters.

    But that also took more than 30 years.

    While critics bash Egypt and cite the influence of fossil fuel interests in the lack of action on reducing emissions, also known as mitigation, Stiell attributed the inaction to other things going on.

    He said there were complaints that last year’s climate talks were too mitigation oriented and this year’s talks restored balance.

    “You cannot do too much mitigation!” Hohne responded in an email. The global goal of limiting temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, “remains in intensive care as conditions deteriorate. The conference met the minimum requirements, but that is far from enough.”

    But getting the climate fund was a big and all-consuming accomplishment, Stiell said. Before he took the UN climate chief job this summer, he had been working on it as a cabinet minister for the small island nation of Grenada.

    “This is a 30-year discussion,” Stiell said. “I’ve been involved in that for ten years as a Grenadian minister, hearing just how ‘this can’t be done’ and how ‘this is impossible’.”

    Mohamed Adow of the environmental group Powershift Africa agreed. “COP27 was a surprise precisely because for once the needs of the vulnerable were actually listened to,” he said.

    As he looks back, Stiell said he still has great hope.

    “So progress: incremental, slight, insufficient. A lot more to be done,” Stiell said summing up climate change fighting efforts. “We’re still right there in the middle of crisis mode.”

    Follow AP’s climate and environment coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment

    ———

    Follow Seth Borenstein on Twitter at @borenbears

    ———

    Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UN climate boss settles for no cuts on emissions

    UN climate boss settles for no cuts on emissions

    [ad_1]

    SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt — Given an energy crisis in Europe and progress made in helping climate victims, the new climate chief for the United Nations said he’ll settle for a lack of new emissions-cutting action coming out of the now-concluded climate talks in Egypt.

    It could have been worse, UN Executive Secretary for Climate Simon Stiell said in a seaside interview with The Associated Press. The talks did achieve the historic creation of a fund for poor nations that are victims of climate disasters, he said.

    The progress made last year at the global climate meeting in Glasgow was maintained. “There was no backtracking. Which as a result, one could say, is highly unambitious. And I would actually agree,” a tired Stiell said hours after the Egyptian climate talks finished with one last around-the-clock push.

    “To say that … we have, stood still. Yeah, that’s not great,” Stiell said. But he still likes the overall outcome of the first set of climate talks he oversaw, in particular the long-sought compensation fund for nations that didn’t cause warming.

    Outside experts agree with Stiell that nothing was done on the central issue of reducing emissions that cause climate change and disasters like flooding in Pakistan.

    “In the shadow of the energy crisis, there were no major new climate protection commitments at the conference,” said climate scientist Niklas Hohne, founder of the NewClimate Institute in Germany. “Glasgow a year ago was a small but important step in the right direction, with many new national targets and new international initiatives. None of that happened this year.”

    That’s despite the fact that more than 90 nations repeatedly asked — many of them publicly — for the agreement to include a phase down of oil and gas use. The Glasgow agreement calls for a phase down of “unabated coal” — that is, coal burning where the carbon goes into the atmosphere rather than being captured somehow. Poor nations point out that they rely more on coal whereas oil and gas are used more in rich countries. These should also be required to phase down they said. In closing remarks at the talks, Stiell himself called for a phase down of oil and gas.

    But the Egyptian presidency never put the proposal, which came from India, in any of the decision documents. The country that hosts and runs the climate talks has the power to make that choice.

    Critics — including negotiators during the talks — blasted the Egyptian presidency and its agenda setting. Environmental groups repeatedly pointed out Egypt’s dependence on exports of natural gas, its role as operator of Suez Canal petroleum traffic and income from neighboring oil states. Oil and natural gas are both principal contributors to climate change.

    Next year’s climate talks will be held in the United Arab Emirates, a major oil power. Environmental advocates and outside experts fear that oil and gas phase down language won’t get a fair shake next year either.

    Asked about the wisdom of having fossil fuel exporting countries host and control climate talks, Stiell said: “They are part of the problem, but they are also part of the solution.” To try to manage this process without their involvement, would give “an incomplete picture,” he said.

    “The global economy is still based certainly on oil and gas. And that is the challenge,” Stiell said.

    Climate Analytics CEO Bill Hare, a climate scientist, called this a serious problem.

    “The massive presence of oil and gas interests at the COP undermines the integrity of the UN climate process and could be slowly eroding its legitimacy,” Hare said. “The suspected influence of petrol states and oil and gas lobbyists on the Egyptian presidency Is unhealthy to say the least.”

    Analyst Alex Scott of E3G said Egypt showed “a sense of willful ignorance” in not considering a document with a call for oil and gas phase down. The influence of petro states on the presidency happens out of site and “is the right question to ask,” she said.

    Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, the climate talks president, didn’t answer a shouted question Sunday about oil and gas phase down language.

    Stiell said countries have to keep coming back and putting pressure on each other to include language calling for a phase down on oil and gas. That worked for this year’s key accomplishment — the establishment of a fund for poor nations that are victims of climate disasters.

    But that also took more than 30 years.

    While critics bash Egypt and cite the influence of fossil fuel interests in the lack of action on reducing emissions, also known as mitigation, Stiell attributed the inaction to other things going on.

    He said there were complaints that last year’s climate talks were too mitigation oriented and this year’s talks restored balance.

    “You cannot do too much mitigation!” Hohne responded in an email. The global goal of limiting temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, “remains in intensive care as conditions deteriorate. The conference met the minimum requirements, but that is far from enough.”

    But getting the climate fund was a big and all-consuming accomplishment, Stiell said. Before he took the UN climate chief job this summer, he had been working on it as a cabinet minister for the small island nation of Grenada.

    “This is a 30-year discussion,” Stiell said. “I’ve been involved in that for ten years as a Grenadian minister, hearing just how ‘this can’t be done’ and how ‘this is impossible’.”

    Mohamed Adow of the environmental group Powershift Africa agreed. “COP27 was a surprise precisely because for once the needs of the vulnerable were actually listened to,” he said.

    As he looks back, Stiell said he still has great hope.

    “So progress: incremental, slight, insufficient. A lot more to be done,” Stiell said summing up climate change fighting efforts. “We’re still right there in the middle of crisis mode.”

    Follow AP’s climate and environment coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment

    ———

    Follow Seth Borenstein on Twitter at @borenbears

    ———

    Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Source link