ReportWire

Tag: employment

  • Employers added 119,000 jobs in September, blowing past expectations

    [ad_1]

    Employers across the U.S. added 119,000 jobs in September, marking a pickup after previous employment data had shown a slowdown in hiring. The report marks the first official job tally since the government shutdown ended last week, ending a six-week blackout on labor data.

    The numbers

    Economists had forecast payroll gains of 50,000 jobs in September, according to a poll by FactSet. 

    The job market has been losing momentum for much of this year, with previous employment reports indicating a slowdown in hiring. At the same time, employers have been announcing layoffs in recent months, leading to the worst October for job reductions in 22 years, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    Delayed employment reports

    The September jobs report, originally slated for Oct. 3, was pushed back by the government shutdown that ended on Nov. 12. The delay means it offers a belated snapshot of the labor market just before federal funding lapsed on Oct. 1.

    On Tuesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said it won’t publish the full October employment report, which was originally slated for release on Nov. 7. Instead, the agency will fold select October data into the November report, which is set for release on Dec. 16.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Labor Department Won’t Release Full October Jobs Report, A Casualty Of The 43 Day Federal Shutdown – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Labor Department said Wednesday that it will not be releasing a full jobs report for October because the 43-day federal government shutdown meant it couldn’t calculate the unemployment rate and some other key numbers.

    Instead, it will release some of the October jobs data — most importantly the number of jobs that employers created last month — along with the full November jobs report, now due a couple of weeks late on Dec. 16.

    The department’s “employment situation” report usually comes out the first Friday of the month.

    But the government shutdown disrupted data collection and delayed the release of the reports. For example, the September jobs report, now coming out Thursday, was originally due Oct. 3.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Layoff notices surged in October across much of U.S., Federal Reserve report says

    [ad_1]


    Impending layoff notices across much of the U.S. surged in October, highlighting signs of stress in the job market.

    Data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland shows that 39,006 Americans last month in 21 states received a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, or WARN, notice informing them of an upcoming layoff. U.S. labor law requires employers to provide these written warnings 60 days ahead of plant closings or mass layoffs.

    It represents one of the highest numbers of WARN notices since Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland researchers started tracking the data in January 2006, although the tally remains below the spikes recorded during the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic. 

    Layoff notices across the 21 states tracked by the Cleveland Fed reached a peak of more than 550,000 in March 2020. 

    “>

    Major companies including Target, Amazon and UPS have announced rounds of job cuts in recent weeks, with some economists noting that the labor market appears to be weakening. The record-long government shutdown has also delayed two months’ worth of federal jobs data, creating a blind spot in assessing U.S. employment conditions.

    Despite the lack of official government data, some other measures point to a cooling U.S. labor market. For example, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas recently said that layoffs last month soared to their highest October level in 22 years, while ADP data released Tuesday shows U.S. companies shed an average of 2,500 jobs per week in the four weeks ending Nov. 1.

    Some experts warn that the latest layoffs may be only an early sign of broader cutbacks yet to come. Pantheon Macroeconomics economists Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen said in a Monday email that they expect layoffs to pick up next year amid wider AI adoption, while noting that the technology has had a “net positive impact” on the labor market so far this year.

    The delayed September employment report, which will be released Thursday, will provide another barometer on the health of the U.S. labor market. Economists polled by financial data provider FactSet predict payroll gains of 50,000.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The economy survived the government shutdown — but all is not well

    [ad_1]

    The economy survived the government shutdown but all is not well

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Holiday job postings rise, but competition remains fierce – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    “After two down years, we’ve seen the seasonal hiring appetite actually come in a bit stronger than last year,” said Indeed Canada’s senior economist Brendon Bernard, who also authored the report.

    Bernard said demand for seasonal workers generally mimics the broader state of the economy. The last two holidays were overshadowed by high interest rates and inflation, which tempered businesses’ hiring appetite as households reined in spending. This year, however, consumer spending seems to be stabilizing as many retailers report “a fairly solid year,” Bernard said.

    Sandra Lavoy, metro market director with Robert Half, agrees that the holiday job market is looking a bit healthier this year. Lavoy said this comes after several industries—such as service and retail—have been running their businesses with lean staffing. But with the holiday season around the corner, it’s harder to maintain those levels. “When you look at seasonal work, it’s about two months, maybe, three months,” she said. “You have no choice because the business does increase significantly.” 

    Temporary holiday work in high demand

    But landing a holiday job is not as easy as it was a few years ago. The report shows more Canadians are searching for work. The October labour market report from Statistics Canada shows the unemployment rate remains elevated at 6.9%, despite a couple months of surprising job gains. 

    Indeed Canada tracks holiday-related job postings on its website, parsing through listings for mentions of words such as Christmas, Xmas, Santa, holiday, and other related terms. It also tracks job seeker searches for these terms. The report says the share of job seeker searches on Indeed containing seasonal job-related terms has increased. In early November, about three out of every 1,000 Canadian job searches included a holiday-related term, up slightly from a year earlier, and meaningfully higher from November 2023 and 2022, at 2.5 and 2.2, respectively.

    “Stronger interest in seasonal work isn’t a great sign for the health of the overall labour market,” the report said, adding that it could indicate some are considering seasonal work to make ends meet. That has likely made it more difficult to land a temporary job when compared to previous years, Bernard said.  “That might cause folks, who would in other times prefer to work a more stable permanent job, needing to look for temporary work just for now,” he said.

    Seasonal hiring slower than summer months

    The weak labour market created a competitive environment for seasonal jobs in the summer, but Bernard said it’s hard to gauge whether the holiday hiring season will also be that fierce. While there are some similarities in economic conditions, the labour demand and types of hiring are starkly different for the summer season, Bernard said. “There’s a lot more hiring that happens in the summer than around the holidays, just because there’s so much more work that gets done over the summer months,” he said.

    Unlike this winter season, where postings are slightly higher, Indeed Canada’s summer hiring report showed summer job postings had dropped 22% in May year-over-year. “We did see a bit of a change in direction (this winter), which is good to see, even if it’s not going to be a roaring market,” Bernard said.

    Article Continues Below Advertisement


    Get free MoneySense financial tips, news & advice in your inbox.

    Read more news:



    About The Canadian Press


    About The Canadian Press

    The Canadian Press is Canada’s trusted news source and leader in providing real-time stories. We give Canadians an authentic, unbiased source, driven by truth, accuracy and timeliness.

    [ad_2]

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • Amid Government Shutdown ‘Fog’, Employers Are Scrutinizing Private Data for Economic Clues

    [ad_1]

    One of several effects of the longest government shutdown in history that’s clouding our economic outlook is the shuttering of the agencies that provide economic and employment data. With that flow of information closed since September, private sector observers have stepped up with their own statistics to offer business leaders a better idea of where things are headed. But no end in sight for the federal work stoppage, the job figures released this week by a variety of companies may actually create more confusion than clarity.

    This week the government shutdown entered its second month, leaving legions of federal workers unpaid, disrupting services from air traffic control to food stamp distribution. It also continued preventing the Bureau of Labor Statistics from producing its regular monthly jobs reports. The agency’s last official data in September showed companies had pinched off recruitment to almost nothing beyond replacing departing workers. That cautious staffing strategy by businesses that have hesitated to hire since spring amid economic uncertainty meant a monthly average of only 26,750 positions were created between May through August, when just 22,000 openings were filled.

    Since that time, companies have had to rely on statistics and analyses from private sector actors as they try to figure out how the labor market and broader economy are performing. A new wave of data released this week may leave some business leaders more cross-eyed than clearsighted.

    On the positive side, payroll services company ADP said that its customers’ data indicated U.S. businesses increased headcounts by 42,000 in October. That number was a decided improvement over the 34,000 net job losses ADP reported in September, after a decrease of 3,000 in August.

    But it’s still a fraction of the average 180,000 hires per month in 2024, and even less than the 64,500 monthly average between January and May. Moreover, relatively robust hiring in the healthcare, transport, and utility sectors compensated for anemic recruitment otherwise.

    “Private employers added jobs in October for the first time since July, but hiring was modest relative to what we reported earlier this year,” said ADP chief economist Nela Richardson, announcing the latest monthly estimate.

    And that was the good news.

    Rival payroll services and staff management company Gusto released its October employment data for small businesses, when 5,900 jobs were lost. Worse still, that extended the decline in recruitment since a recent peak of 57,400 new hires in July, which decreased to around 19,000 in September before dipping into the red last month.

    “This marks a continuation of the broader hiring slowdown we’ve observed since the post-pandemic hiring surge of 2021, when small businesses were adding an average of 170,000 net new jobs each month,” the October 2025 Gusto Small Business Jobs Report said. “Notably, the overall pace of both hiring and terminations has slowed dramatically over the past two years — the so-called ‘Great Freeze’. Hiring for small businesses peaked at nearly 3.4 million per month in January 2022, and have since fallen by 37 percent since then.”

    Homebase, another competitor in payroll and workforce management services, used different statistics to paint the same picture of a weakening labor market.

    Its recently released “Main Street Health Report” found that what it terms “workforce participation” at the over 100,000 small businesses it studied had decreased by 2.9 percent in October — a slight improvement over the 3.5 percent headcount decline in September. That came as hiring slipped 5 percent compared to October 2024, with business activity sluggish or dropping in all sectors apart from hospitality.

    So, what should business leaders make from those different, yet largely overlapping views of company headcounts remaining flat or shrinking slightly in October?

    According to Appcast chief economist Andrew Flowers, amid the “fog” created by the absence of reliable government data during the shutdown, the best thing businesses owners can do is use the available “headlights” of private sector statistics to carefully steer themselves down the road. That may be unnerving, he said, but less dangerous than pessimists might think.

    “What data we do have in hand suggests a continual labor market slowdown, but not the bottom falling out,” Flowers said in emailed comments to Inc.

    But he also pointed to recent mass layoffs announced by Amazon, Target, UPS, IBM, and other corporations. Following those big cuts, there may be a risk that business leaders deprived of official economic and employment data could defensively replicate the headcount cutting example of bigger companies.

    “This happened in early 2023, mind you — when bad vibes about jobs were disproportionate to the underlying data,” Flowers said. “This time around we don’t have the data to guide us. (But) underlying consumer spending and business investment has been surprisingly resilient. Real-time GDP tracking estimates show Q3 to be quite strong.”

    Meaning employers, staff, and job seekers alike would be wise to buckle up and hope for the best as they make their way through the fog.

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Crumley

    Source link

  • Layoffs soared in October to their highest for the month in 22 years, report says

    [ad_1]

    Layoffs across the U.S. soared last month to more than 153,000, marking the worst October for job reductions in 22 years, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    Employers have announced early 1.1 million job cuts this year, the most through October since 2020, when pandemic shutdowns sent unemployment soaring.

    The labor market has shifted from a “no hire, no fire” environment — when employees enjoyed job security despite slower hiring — to one where companies are cutting costs and reducing staff as they lean on AI to replace human workers.

    “October’s pace of job cutting was much higher than average for the month,” Andy Challenger, a workplace expert and chief revenue officer for Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said in a statement. 

    He added, “Some industries are correcting after the hiring boom of the pandemic, but this comes as AI adoption, softening consumer and corporate spending, and rising costs drive belt-tightening and hiring freezes.”

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cited concerns about slower hiring in announcing interest rate cuts in September and October. 

    The Department of Labor’s monthly employment report has been on hold since the government shutdown began on Oct. 1, which delayed September’s labor market data and is likely to postpone October’s report. 

    Other measures, including data this week from payroll processor ADP that showed muted hiring by private employers, point to a job market that has cooled sharply from earlier this year. 

    “Those laid off now are finding it harder to quickly secure new roles, which could further loosen the labor market,” Challenger added. 

    The National Association for Business Economics forecast last month that the nation’s unemployment rate, which was 4.3 % as of August, will rise to 4.5% in 2026

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Corporate profits are soaring even as layoffs mount. Economists call it a

    [ad_1]

    As U.S. corporate profits rise and the stock market hits new highs, investors are reaping the rewards. Yet beneath the surge, companies have cut nearly 1 million jobs this year — the most since 2020, when the pandemic slammed the economy. 

    The disconnect between soaring company earnings and mounting layoffs amounts to what Chen Zhao, chief global strategist at investment research firm Alpine Macro, calls a “jobless boom.” Typically, layoffs accelerate when companies are struggling with declining profitability and need to pare costs.

    “We’ve never seen anything like that”

    “This is something that is completely different from a historical playbook,” Zhao told CBS News. “It’s kind of odd to see Amazon laying off 30,000 people even though the profit is doing really, really well.”

    At the heart of the issue, Zhao said, is the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence, which is boosting business productivity across multiple industries and the economy at large, while also suppressing demand for workers. Although that trend has initially taken root in the technology sector, it is spreading to other industries as businesses adopt AI as a way to boost productivity and lower costs, he noted. 

    “You have a labor demand that basically has come down to probably 0% in terms of growth, maybe even a mild contraction, even though the economy is doing fine — profits are doing great,” he said. “We’ve never seen anything like that.”

    For much of 2025, the job market was described by economists as “no hire, no fire,” meaning an environment where workers could count on job security even as hiring around the U.S. cooled. But conditions have changed, and the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate in both September and October, citing increasing risks to employment growth and with Fed Chair Jerome Powell noting that policymakers are closely watching layoff announcements by big employers. 

    The Department of Labor’s monthly employment report has been on hold since the government shutdown began on Oct. 1, which delayed September’s labor market data and is likely to also postpone October’s report. Still, economists are turning to other employment measures to assess the health of the labor market, such as data from payroll processor ADP.

    By those metrics, job growth looks muted. ADP, which only tracks private-sector hiring, said Wednesday that private employers added 42,000 workers in October, a modest rebound after two months of subpar hiring. 

    “Employment is stagnating in the fall, according to data available during the shutdown,” Bill Adams, chief economist for Comerica Bank, said in an email. “While private employment grew in October, overall employment was likely about flat in the month after accounting for federal layoffs, which aren’t measured by ADP.”

    Why unemployment isn’t spiking

    The nation’s unemployment rate has remained relatively low despite the shifting tides of slower hiring and more layoffs, experts have noted. The jobless rate stood at 4.3% in August, according to the most recent data available. 

    Unemployment has remained in check because the nation’s labor pool is shrinking due to the retiring baby boom generation and lower immigration stemming from the Trump administration’s tighter policies, Zhao said.

    “You basically have a labor demand that is going nowhere, and labor supply going nowhere, too,” he said. “So that creates a very odd equilibrium.”

    Not everyone thinks AI is driving the recent bout of layoffs. Instead, the job cuts are more likely due to businesses recalibrating their needs after the pandemic, when many employers expanded and may have overhired, said Art Pappas, the CEO of Bullhorn, a software company that works with recruitment and temporary agencies. 

    Companies feel more emboldened to cut workers now because it’s easier to find new talent than during the pandemic, when the labor market was tighter, he said. Pappas also believes businesses that point to AI as a reason for layoffs are using it more as a buzzword.

    “These companies announce layoffs and their stock goes up — it’s a perverse incentive to announce layoffs,” he noted. 

    But the change in the labor market is very real, with companies cutting back on hiring for entry-level jobs, Pappas said.

    “People point to AI, and say, ‘That’s because AI is replacing entry-level jobs,’” he said. “I say, ‘No, that’s a sign companies aren’t hiring, because companies do most of the hiring at the entry level’.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This Week in Economics: Tariffs, SNAP Fears and Holiday Spending

    [ad_1]

    Well, well, if it isn’t another Friday come upon us. And Halloween, no less. Fret not: We only have treats for you here.

    Here’s what we covered at Decision Points this week:

    Monday: Tariffs

    “It was a familiar pattern for Trump,” Tim wrote. “The threat of a sharp increase in tariffs is consistent with his style of striking first publicly, then letting negotiations go on behind the scenes as he waits for the opportunity to announce a deal that he asserts only he could have made.”

    As is the case with every “deal” Trump announces, we’ll have to watch whether China confirms the terms of the arrangement and then monitor implementation.

    Tuesday: Shutdown

    On Tuesday, I wrote about how the partial government shutdown risks affecting some of the most vulnerable Americans – those on food stamps, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (known as WIC) and those in the preschool Head Start program.

    All told, we’re talking about millions of Americans who depend on federally funded and state-administered programs. Some states have scrounged up the money to keep providing those services – temporarily, anyway.

    The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, aka food stamps, is the country’s largest nutrition assistance program. It costs about $100 billion per year, and benefits average $187.20 per participant per month.

    Wednesday: Christmas Shoppers

    On Wednesday, I looked at a new Gallup survey that asked Americans how much they planned to spend on gifts this holiday season. It’s a decent stand-in for people’s views about the health of the economy.

    And in this instance, the data highlighted the “K-shaped economy,” in which those at the top fare better and better over time, while those at the bottom see their situation deteriorate.

    “Americans in households earning less than $50,000 expect to spend $651 on holiday gifts, down from $776 last year,” I wrote. “Americans in households earning $100,000 or more forecast they’ll spend $1,479, up from $1,403 in 2024. As for middle-income Americans, they project spending $847, down a bit from last year’s $902.”

    Thursday: Layoffs Galore

    On Thursday, I took stock of the wave of layoff announcements over the past few weeks. Tens of thousands of workers are, or will be, out of a job right as we enter the winter holiday season.

    And corporations are pouring on the corporate-speak pretty thick. They’re “removing layers” or “re-grounding” or “evolving.”

    Paramount, Amazon, UPS, Target, Nestlé, Procter & Gamble and GM are each parting ways with chunks of their workforces. The reasons are varied, from a slowdown in electric vehicle demand, to the rise of AI, to the pain from President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

    My thoughts: “As someone pushed out of two jobs in the last five years, I can tell you that corp’ talk about flexibility or de-layering or being “nimble” just adds insult to injury. You’re cutting costs? I get that. Please don’t dress it up like a family pet for Halloween.”

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    [ad_2]

    Olivier Knox

    Source link

  • Small Businesses Aren’t Seeing the Same AI Gains as Big Corporations. Here’s Why

    [ad_1]

    Companies of all sizes and sectors are moving swiftly to boost productivity by integrating artificial intelligence applications to automate tasks previously performed by employees. But recent reports clash significantly in calculating AI’s effects on humans, while also diverging on whether larger corporations seem to benefit from AI more than smaller businesses.

    In the end, the difference in those analyses appears to be opinions about how fast and far AI should go in replacing humans in a given workplace, and how beneficial machines taking over from employees is to the results sought in using the tech.

    The first of those inquiries came from Wells Fargo chief equity strategist Ohsung Kwon, who compared changes in revenue generated per each worker on the staffs of big S&P 500 firms. He then made the same calculation for companies on the small-cap Russell 2000 index.

    Using the 2022 release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT AI bot as the starting point, Kwon’s team determined that the increased scaling abilities of larger corporations allowed them to benefit from the tech’s automating capabilities to boost the output—and with it, revenue—of workers they employed. During the same period, by contrast, it found productivity in the modest-size businesses fell.

    While productivity for the S&P 500 has soared 5.5 [percent] since ChatGPT, it’s down 12.3 [percent] for the Russell 2000,” Kwon wrote in a recent note to clients that was featured in a CNBC report on the differing results of AI adoption in business. “We see other examples of diverging trends in consumer, industrial, and financial markets.”

    But much like today’s big news that Amazon is laying off 14,000 corporate employees as it expands its use of AI across the business, Kwon’s measurement of productivity gains appears to depend mainly on human workers losing their jobs to the tech. Even if overall output remains the same or even dips following tech-driven head count reductions, the lower number of total workers—and payroll savings added back into the bottom line—mechanically boosts per employee claims of revenue generated.

    In addition to Amazon, the CNBC report lists big companies—including Meta, UPS, Starbucks, Oracle, Microsoft, and Google—that have announced big staff cuts this year. Those were undertaken to streamline their structures, but primarily to make way for use of AI to automate many of the tasks eliminated that employees previously performed.

    That willingness of big companies to sacrifice employees, cut labor costs, and boost revenue by scaling their use of AI appears to explain why they’ve benefited more from the tech than small-business owners under Kwon’s analysis. After all, even entrepreneurs responsive to investor demands for increasing returns tend to be more hesitant about laying off people they’re often working in close contact with than corporate managers.

    Any aversion to company founders cutting staff as an integral part of AI adoption may well also explain another of Kwon’s findings. While the S&P 500 rose 74 percent since use of AI took off in 2022, the Russell 2000 increased by just 39 percent—probably reflecting investor views about where the biggest, fastest potential boosts to share prices are.

    Still, none of that means smaller companies are holding back on introducing the tech to their workplaces or missing out on the productivity gains it can offer.

    A recent survey of small-business owners in the U.S., Australia, Canada, and the U.K. by Intuit QuickBooks Small Business Insights found nearly 70 percent of respondents used AI on a daily basis, with 75 percent reporting increased productivity as a result. Around 15 percent of participants said adoption of the tech had allowed them to create jobs, with only 5 percent saying they’d cut head counts instead.

    Results of a recent study by business consultancy Deloitte also measured successful adoption of AI in ways other than merely reducing head counts and costs. Its Humans x Machines report argues that both big corporations and small businesses that focus primarily on the tech rather than the employees who use it end up with disappointing results.

    Its survey found that nearly 60 percent of responding companies that deployed AI first and asked workplace questions about its use and effectiveness later are 1.6 times more likely to report lower return on their investment than other businesses.

    Companies with the best outcomes, the report said, are organizations that allowed human relations and other managers to work with staff to identify the most useful kinds of AI applications, train workers to adopt them, and then encourage continued deployment of those tools across the business. The report concluded that the tech will never meet its effectiveness potential unless business leaders prepare employees to enable that beforehand.

    “[M]ost organizations are investing heavily in AI, but not enough in the work design needed to unlock its value,” said Deloitte U.S. human capital head of research and chief futurist David Mallon in comments about the study. “This shouldn’t be an ‘either/or’ approach—it should be a ‘both/and’ strategy to maximize value. Organizations that take a technology-first approach struggle to scale, while those that intentionally design roles, workflows, and decision-making to integrate humans and machines are more likely to exceed their ROI expectations.”

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Crumley

    Source link

  • It’s Not You, It’s ‘Removing Layers’: Wave of Corporate Layoffs (And Lingo) Hits Workers

    [ad_1]

    In other words, you’re out of a job. Like tens of thousands of other corporate-speak victims.

    The causes vary widely: turbulent markets, President Donald Trump’s tariffs on pretty much every U.S. trading partner, the rise of artificial intelligence, etc. But the result is the same: Significant job reductions at many large corporate employers.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    Here are some of the cuts announced in the last few weeks:

    Amazon said this week it was cutting approximately 14,000 jobs. That’s roughly 4% of its total workforce. The retail giant blamed AI, in part, describing that tech as “the most transformative technology we’ve seen since the Internet.”

    “We’re convinced that we need to be organized more leanly, with fewer layers and more ownership, to move as quickly as possible for our customers and business,” the company said.

    Target announced last week it’s cutting 1,800 corporate jobs. That may not seem like much, but it’s the most significant reduction the retailer has announced in a decade.

    Nestlé, the maker of Nescafé, KitKats, pet foods and many other well-known consumer brands, plans 16,000 job cuts over the next two years.

    GM says slowing demand for electric vehicles is partly to blame for the automaking giant laying off about 1,700 workers in Michigan and Ohio manufacturing sites.

    Corp-speak vs. Real Life

    None of this is to say that corporate flexibility is a bad thing. A major feature of capitalism is that firms hire when they need workers and lay off when they aren’t doing well. Such is life.

    But as someone pushed out of two jobs in the last five years, I can tell you that corp’ talk about flexibility or de-layering or being “nimble” just adds insult to injury. You’re cutting costs? I get that. Please don’t dress it up like a family pet for Halloween.

    [ad_2]

    Olivier Knox

    Source link

  • “No hire, no fire” job market may no longer be a thing as big companies announce mass layoffs

    [ad_1]

    For most of 2025, the job market was described by economists as “no hire, no fire” — a stretch of time when job seekers faced slim prospects, but workers could count on job security. But that fragile balance may now be shifting, labor experts warn, as mass layoffs at companies like Amazon and UPS signal a possible turning point for the labor market.

    Amazon on Tuesday announced 14,000 job cuts, citing a shift toward artificial intelligence, while UPS on the same day said it has reduced its workforce by 48,000 from a year earlier.

    Target on Tuesday also notified a state employment agency in Minnesota, where the retailer is based, that it plans to lay off more than 800 workers in January as part of a broader corporate restructuring, CBS News Minnesota reported. The retailer announced last week that it would cut 1,800 corporate positions as the chain trims its global workforce by about 8%.

    The mass layoffs come as the Federal Reserve scrutinizes the labor market for signs of weakness, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell last month citing concerns about slower hiring when announcing the central bank’s first rate cut of 2025. The announcements from Amazon and UPS could signal that the Fed has good reason to be worried, experts said. 

    “No question that this is a shift, and it does seem to me it signals that ‘no hire, no fire’ is a thing of the past,” John Challenger, CEO of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, told CBS News. 

    “These are major layoffs, the kind of which we only see in periods of real change in the economy,” he added.

    Layoffs picking up

    Even before Tuesday’s job cuts, layoffs had been trending higher, according to data from Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Employers across the U.S. cut nearly 950,000 jobs this year through September, the largest number of layoffs since 2020, its most recent data shows.

    Official federal reports on the state of the labor market have been suspended due to the government shutdown, which means the Fed will make its next interest rate decision tomorrow, Oct. 29, without information about hiring in September. 

    August’s jobs report, however, provides a snapshot of a weakening labor market, with employers adding an anemic 22,000 new positions that month — far fewer than the 80,000 expected by economists. On Oct. 1, the ADP National Employment Report, a measure of private employment in the U.S., said payrolls at private employers declined by 32,000 jobs in September.

    At the same time, recent reports suggest layoffs have accelerated in October, Grace Zwemmer, associate economist with Oxford Economics, said in a report Wednesday. State-level data also shows jobless claims by federal employees topped 10,000 in the week ended Oct. 18, a sign the stalemate in Congress is taking a toll, the investment advisory firm said in a separate research note.

    To be sure, the unemployment rate is still relatively low, inching up to 4.3% in August from 4.2% in July. The latest layoffs aren’t likely to dramatically move the needle on the jobless rate, experts say.

    “When we look at the scale of the announcements vis-à-vis the broader economy and the data we have from unemployment claims, we don’t see them yet at a scale where the unemployment rate is going to shoot up,” said Andy Stettner, director of economy and jobs at the left-leaning Century Foundation. 

    But, he added, “These larger corporate downsizings are happening at a time when there aren’t many job openings.”

    That means some workers who lose their jobs may struggle to find new employment, experts say. As a result, the ranks of long-term unemployed people, or those who have been searching for work for more than six months, are predicted to rise even higher from its August figure of almost 2 million, its highest level since 2022.

    What’s impacting the labor market?

    Employers are cutting jobs due to several factors, experts say, ranging from artificial intelligence to uncertainty in the economy. Earlier this year, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said the e-commerce giant’s investment in AI tools would allow the company to trim its human workforce as the business becomes more efficient.

    “Amazon really pointed to robotics, AI and new technology — and being on the cutting edge of that technology — for shifting jobs,” Challenger said. 

    About one-quarter of tech workers said they had experienced layoffs or role eliminations due to AI adoption during the past two years, according to a new study from career site Indeed.

    Other companies are holding off on hiring or cutting roles due to other factors. UPS cited the impact of the Trump administration’s tariffs, as well as shipping declines from Amazon, its biggest customer, on its business. Amazon has been building its own delivery infrastructure, leading it to cut back on its use of UPS.

    On Monday, children’s clothing brand Carter’s said it is cutting 300 jobs, or 15% of its workforce, and closing 150 stores over the next three years due to higher costs from tariffs, which are import duties paid by U.S. companies to the federal government. 

    The Trump administration has said that its tariffs would help protect U.S. manufacturing and return factory production stateside as businesses restore their operations. 

    In the meantime, Americans are growing more pessimistic about the job market, according to CBS News polling. About 52% of Americans describe the labor market as “bad,” up seven percentage points from April, the poll found.

    “We are moving more into a time where job security might be more precarious,” Challenger said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Push to close the AI skills gap among young workers

    [ad_1]

    A new generation is graduating into a job market turned upside down, where artificial intelligence and not humans are taking some entry-level jobs. A $25 million global initiative aims to rewrite the future of work. Ed Skyler, head of enterprise services and public affairs at Citi, joins to discuss.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A judge told Gov. Jared Polis not to comply with an ICE subpoena. Polis’ attorneys say he still wants to.

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Jared Polis is still trying to find a way to comply with a federal immigration subpoena, four months after a Denver judge ruled that doing so would violate Colorado law.

    In repeated court filings, including one submitted Friday, Polis’ private attorneys have said they intend to turn over records on 10 businesses that employed several sponsors of unaccompanied children to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    They’ve asked a Denver judge, who previously prohibited some state employees from complying with ICE’s subpoena, to dismiss the case and clear the way for them to turn over a more limited batch of records.

    The recent filings represent the second attempt by Polis to comply with the April immigration enforcement subpoena. The governor’s first attempt was blocked by District Court Judge A. Bruce Jones in June, after Jones sided with a senior state employee who’d sued Polis earlier that month to stop the state from fulfilling the subpoena.

    The employee, Scott Moss, argued that providing the requested records would violate state laws that limit what information can be shared with federal immigration authorities.

    But though Jones preliminarily sided with Moss, his ruling is complicated. He prohibited Polis from directing a specific division of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment to comply with the subpoena. But he said he couldn’t prevent Polis from directing others to comply with the subpoena, even though Jones said doing so would still likely violate the law.

    The records that Polis now says he intends to turn over to ICE are in the custody of another labor department division not covered in Jones’ order.

    In an email Tuesday, Polis spokeswoman Shelby Wieman declined to comment on the case or why Polis is still seeking to provide records to ICE. She pointed to the administration’s recent legal filings.

    The administration has previously said it wanted to support ICE’s efforts to check on unaccompanied minors without legal status, though the governor’s office has not provided any evidence that it has sought assurances that ICE wasn’t seeking the information purely for immigration enforcement efforts.

    David Seligman, whose law firm has supported the case, criticized the governor’s decision to seek the lawsuit’s dismissal while indicating his intention to turn over records to ICE. While ICE wrote that it wanted detailed employment records so it could check on the well-being of unaccompanied children, Seligman and Moss, the employee who brought the lawsuit, have argued that the agency only wants the information so it can arrest and deport the children’s sponsors.

    “It is absolutely absurd that this governor would be going out of his way to comply with and cooperate with ICE in light of everything that we’re seeing right now,” Seligman said.

    Moss has since left the department, and Polis’ lawyers now argue that no one associated with the case has a legal standing to challenge compliance with the subpoena. They’ve also argued that they can turn over the records because the employers’ addresses and contact information can be found online.

    The records are only part of the broader swath of personal details that ICE initially requested, and they cover only six of the 35 sponsors for which ICE first sought records. The sponsors are typically family members of children without legal status, who care for the minors while their immigration cases proceed.

    The administration has similarly told ICE officials that it intends to comply with part of the subpoena once the lawsuit is concluded. In a July 11 email, Joe Barela, the head of the Department of Labor and Employment, wrote to a special agent in ICE’s investigative branch that the agency planned to “provide your office with the names and contact information for those 10 employers.”

    The labor department has already complied with three ICE subpoenas this year, including in one “erroneous” case that apparently ran afoul of state law.

    Jones must now rule on whether to dismiss the lawsuit or let it proceed. Between June and early September, Recht Kornfeld, the private law firm Polis hired to represent him in the lawsuit, has billed the state for more than $104,000, according to records obtained by The Denver Post through a public records request.

    The Colorado Attorney General’s Office has said it was unable to represent Polis because of legal advice it provided to the governor related to complying with the subpoena. The office has declined to characterize the nature of that advice.

    The subpoena was sent to the state labor department in April as part of what ICE described as essentially a welfare check of unaccompanied minors in the state. The subpoena sought employment and personal records for the children’s sponsors.

    Initially, administration officials decided not to comply with the subpoena because of the state’s laws limiting such contact. But Polis abruptly changed course and decided to turn over the records, prompting Moss to sue.

    [ad_2]

    Seth Klamann

    Source link

  • 60% of workers are unhappy with key aspects of their job, survey finds

    [ad_1]

    Six in 10 U.S. workers say their jobs fall short of the standards for a “quality” position — one that offers basics such as fair pay, a steady schedule and career growth — according to research from advocacy group Jobs for the Future.

    Although government labor statistics track how many Americans are employed and how much they earn, the official data doesn’t offer a full picture of the state of the job market, researchers behind Jobs for the Future’s new study said.

    “We recognize that not only has the way we measure the economy not kept up with way work and the economy is changing, but it has never been sufficient in terms of letting us understand what’s going on under hood of economy and across the workforce, which is the engine of economic prosperity in the U.S.,” said Molly Blankenship, a director in solutions design and delivery at Jobs for the Future, which lobbies for policies aimed at spurring innovation,

    The group surveyed workers across industries and different types of jobs, in partnership with Gallup, the Families & Workers Fund and the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    “We suspected when we started this work that the majority of Americans were not in jobs that were helping them,” Blankenship added. “This data confirms what we suspected, which is that the majority of American workers are not in quality jobs.”

    What makes for a good job?

    A quality job is defined by five main criteria, according to Jobs for the Future:

    • Financial well-being, such as fair pay and stable employment
    • Workplace culture and safety, meaning the worker is free from discrimination or harassment
    • Growth and development opportunities, allowing employees to develop skills and advance their career
    • Agency and voice, or the ability to influence decisions that impact one’s job
    • Work structure and agency, including a predictable schedule and manageable workload

    By those measures, only 40% of the more than 18,000 workers surveyed by the group said they are employed in quality jobs, while the remaining 60% said their jobs fall short of those standards. For example, 62% of employees said they have unpredictable work schedules, while about one-third said they are struggling financially, according to the survey. 

    Only 27% of those surveyed by Jobs for the Futures said their jobs pay enough for them to feel financially comfortable; nearly 3 in 10 described themselves as “just getting by” or “finding it difficult to get by.”

    Beyond fair pay, workers also want to feel safe and respected in their jobs, while opportunities for growth are also valued, the study noted. One in four employees say they have no opportunities for promotion or advancement at work, the survey found. 

    Another issue affecting how employees perceive their jobs is how employers use new technologies, such as artificial intelligence. 

    “There is tremendous concern over technology, how it’s being adopted and how it will impact people’s jobs in the future,” Susan Houseman, a senior economist at the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research and a contributor to the the report, told CBS News. “The research indicates that they lack input on these issues.” 

    The degree of autonomy employees have in their jobs also shapes their daily routine and can affect their overall work-life balance, Jobs for the Future found. More than six in 10 employees said they lack control over their schedules, while more than half of workers said they often or sometimes work more than scheduled.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Reporter’s Notebook: What is work for?

    [ad_1]



    Reporter’s Notebook: What is work for? – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    What is the purpose of work? It depends on who you ask. “CBS Evening News” co-anchor John Dickerson explains.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • New Data Says Women and Black Employees Are the Biggest Losers Under RTO and Trump Policies

    [ad_1]

    Ongoing workplace and political policy trends are disrupting, or even eliminating millions of U.S. jobs. But recent data suggests those changes penalize two historically disadvantaged groups of people more severely: women and Black workers. The mix of private and public policies is again widening the gender wage gap and driving unemployment rates for Black workers at a higher rate than the national average.

    The trend among employers to tighten return to office (RTO) mandates by requiring increased or full-week in-person workplace timepresence is a major factor in this disruption, which hits women especially hard. Other reasons for this distorted effect include the Trump administration’s mass layoffs of federal employees, and its accompanying drive to eradicate diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) practices by government agencies, contractors they work with, and even private sector businesses.

    Those pressures have coincided with — or perhaps directly caused — a widening of the gender pay gap that had been narrowing since the 1960s, and a sharp increase in unemployment among Black Americans.

    Return to office, return to pay inequality?

    “Are RTO mandates reversing decades of progress on gender pay equity?” asked a recent post by Flex Index, which tracks changes in remote work rules at 9,000 companies. “The timing is striking: the wage gap has widened two years running; women now earn 81 cents on the dollar, down from 84 cents in 2022, the lowest since 2016.”

    That broadening of gender pay disparity came as Fortune 100 companies requiring full week in-office presence rose from 16 percent to 29 percent in the past two years, according to Flex Index. It also cited a recent Baylor University study of 3 million employees that found “women are nearly three times as likely to quit when RTO mandates hit.”

    But leaving a job over lost flexibile work arrangements — usually a response from working mothers who can’t find or afford childcare for the additional hours they’d be spending away from home — isn’t the only way tightening RTO rules appear to be setting women back.

    The Baylor study found that 46 percent of women employees ordered to spend more time in the office had negotiated taking on lower-level positions that allowed them to maintain their flexible working arrangements. Just over 40 percent more opted lateral job transfers with the same goal.

    Those moves often involved women employees accepting pay cuts, with one executive participating telling Baylor researchers she took a $30,000 a year pay cut to avoid going to the office five days a week.

    Those responses to tighter RTO mandates have coincided with the median income of U.S. men rising by 3.7 percent from 2023 to 2024, according to a recent Washington Post report. During the same period, that pay metric remained mostly unchanged for women. The paper also cited data for the first six months of 2025 showing women aged 25 to 44 who have young children dropped by 3 percent as a proportion of the total workforce.

    “These results suggest that the cause for leaving a firm after RTO are not the usual reasons for promotion or mobility,” a summary of the Baylor study said. “Instead, they highlight that employees are willing to sacrifice career advancement for remote work options.”

    Anti-DEI efforts hit Black workers twice as hard

    Many employees taking pay cuts or quitting in the face of new RTO restrictions are Black women, who also facing increasing employment challenges arising from shifting political policies.

    The current trend of most companies to limit hiring only to replacing departing workers has hit Black employees harder than most, and may well make bouncing back even harder. In a recent New York Times article, the unemployment rate among Black Americans has risen from 6 percent to 7.5 percent in the last four months, while the rate among white workers dipped slightly to 3.7 percent.

    The jobless increase among Black workers has come as the Trump administration slashed over 250,000 positions from the federal workforce, whose composition has more closely reflected the racial makeup of U.S. society than private companies — especially in entry-level positions. The Pew Research Center said 48.3 million people self-identified as Black in 2023. That’s about 14.4% of the U.S. population. Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2022 said Black employees made up about 12 percent of the national workforce, and noted that 18 percent of Black and Hispanic men worked in lower-paying service occupations, compared with 12 percent of White men.

    Meantime, companies working as federal contractors quickly and meticulously applied new White House bans on DEI policies in order to avoid losing government business. For decades, those same employers carefully complied with federally imposed equal opportunity requirements, including in their recruitment and hiring Black applicants and other minority job candidates.

    But with those policies now banned and drawing retribution from the White House when they are applied, those same companies may no longer be as available an option for the rising number of unemployed Black people looking for work. Meaning that as the wider labor market grinds to a near stop, Black job applicants may be facing an even tougher road back to employment than other candidates for the foreseeable future.

    “I think the speed at which things have changed, in such a dramatic fashion, is out of the ordinary,” Valerie Wilson, director of the race, ethnicity and the economy program at the Economic Policy Institute, told the Times. “There’s been such a rapid shift in policy, rather than something cyclical or structural about the economy.”

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Crumley

    Source link

  • The Nordic approach to business builds empowerment, team spirit and engagement. But can you copy it?  | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Nordic countries are known for being happy, with high incomes, robust welfare support and easy access to nature. Finland, Denmark, Iceland and Sweden are in fact the world’s four happiest countries according to the latest UN-sponsored World Happiness Report, with Norway coming in 7th.  

    It turns out, many people are happy at work there too. Nordic-headquartered businesses occupy ten spaces on Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For – Europe list, despite their countries constituting under 4% of the continent’s population.  

    Denmark and Norway each have three of the top 100—Novo Nordisk, Beierholm and JYSK for the former; Sector Alarm, Norgehus and Reitan Retail for the latter—while Sweden has four: Svea, Tre, Bengt Dahlgren and Sparbanken. 

    Is there something in the region’s glacial waters that firms in other parts of the world can learn from?  

    Erkko Autio, professor and chair in technology venturing and entrepreneurship at Imperial College Business School, points to four distinguishing features. “Nordic businesses are much less hierarchical. That’s one thing. The second is that these are high-trust cultures that give employees a high level of autonomy. Work life balance is the third factor. Finally, there’s an emphasis on collaboration and consensus rather than dictation,” he explains.  

    Anna Nivala, CEO of the Gothenburg branch of Swedish civil engineering consultancy Bengt Dahlgren, says that Swedes joke that “[we’re] the only country where the coworkers make decisions and then the CEO has to adjust. Democracy in that sense is very important, but it makes for a solid ground for psychological safety when you can say to anyone what’s on your mind.” 

    The Nordic model in practice 

    The four pillars of happy, Nordic companies that Autio highlights—autonomy, low power distance, work-life balance and collaboration—come as a package.  

    “Nordic businesses are much less hierarchical.”Erkko Autio, professor and chair in technology venturing and entrepreneurship at Imperial College Business School

    A commitment to work-life balance, for example, is critical for empowerment, says Nivala. “When Bengt Dahlgren founded the company 74 years ago, he had a slogan that a hungry engineer was not a good engineer, and he used to treat his employees to blueberry pies and invite them to his house,” she says.  

    Today, there are “a lot of small things all of the time that happen to make you feel that your personal life also matters,” including regular fika—coffee and cake breaks where teams get to know each other without talking about work—subsidized company ski trips, and lectures about mindfulness or preventing calendar creep.  

    This level of caring and personal openness—owning mistakes is part of being present as a whole person—filters into the business culture. “Sharing with each other that you’re going through a divorce or having difficulties with this or that makes you trust each other more,” Nivala explains.  

    It’s a familiar story in the Nordics. Danish pharma firm Novo Nordisk, which also makes the top 100, is similarly known for a culture where employees call the CEO by their first name, and don’t feel pressure to stay at work late. 

    Not for everyone  

    These principles—however virtuous—do come with risks. Autio points to Nokia, Finland’s one-time giant mobile maker, as an example of the pros and cons of the Nordic approach. 

    Nokia started out in forestry and heavy industries before pivoting to electronics in the 1960s and 1970s, later rising to dominate the global mobile phone market in the 1990s and early 2000s. At the time, it credited this position to its flat hierarchy, pushing decision-making closer to customers.  

    “Sharing with each other that you’re going through a divorce or having difficulties with this or that makes you trust each other more.”

    Anna Nivala, CEO of the Gothenburg branch of Bengt Dahlgren

    But when the iPhone ushered in the smartphone era, the company couldn’t make the transition a second time and eventually exited the market; it now specializes in telecommunications equipment.  

    The much-dissected failure partly came from strategic errors, but Autio also blames the company’s system of middle management committees: “The committees were empowered to decide which approaches to move ahead with. They ended up in a situation where the middle managers kept voting down each other’s initiatives, and that reduced Nokia’s capability to respond to industry change.” 

    That isn’t to say that consensus culture prevents innovation or agility—Autio offers Sweden’s vibrant start-up sector as evidence to the contrary. Nivala also says that once consensus is secured, things tend to move faster because everyone is aligned.  

    Getting the balance right does take skilful execution. Perhaps the most important—and apt—lesson from the Nordic companies on this year’s Best Companies to Work For – Europe list is that leaders cannot impose a collaborative culture from the top down.  

    “Often you can think it’s the leader’s responsibility, but you need to talk to every coworker about creating this kind of environment,” says Nivala. “It’s not just what is the boss going to do, it’s how are you going to contribute? And what do you need to contribute?” 

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Adam Gale

    Source link

  • Missing Data Leaves Economy ‘Flying Blind’

    [ad_1]

    It’s a ritual that economists, investors and businesses eagerly anticipate the first Friday of each month – checking to see how many people joined or left the labor market.

    But last Friday morning, they instead found this simple announcement on the Bureau of Labor Statistics page: “This website is currently not being updated due to the suspension of federal government services.”

    The BLS report is considered the gold standard of labor data, and its omission or delay comes at a crucial time for the economy. In recent months, the data has been confirming a sharp slowdown in the job market, with only 22,000 new jobs created in August and an expectation of another 50,000 or so added in September.

    The data is key to whether the Federal Reserve will continue its policy of lowering interest rates, which started last month with a quarter-point cut in the central bank’s overnight lending rate. That rate is a catalyst for a broad range of interest rates that determine how much interest you pay on a car loan or a mortgage.

    Markets are keyed in on the idea of the Fed lowering rates twice more this year, which would be more oxygen for stocks that are already trading at all-time highs.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    Decision-Makers ‘Flying Blind’

    There are labor data alternatives from the private sector, but nothing has quite the gravitas of the BLS, which has been issuing reports on the health of the job market since 1915. And the alternatives have been sending mixed signals of late.

    • Private payroll firm ADP, which issues a monthly report drawn from surveying its millions of customers, published a surprise September report last week showing a loss of 32,000 jobs. (ADP does not include government jobs.) 
    • Revilio Labs, a financial technology company, estimated September job growth of 60,000. 
    • Online hiring firm Indeed issued its read of the job market Friday, showing a 2.5% drop in job postings from August.

    BLS data is also used to compile the monthly consumer price index, a key measure of inflation. The September CPI release is set for Oct. 15, but it may also be delayed if the government shutdown goes beyond this week.

    The Fed is facing the tricky balance of propping up the job market while avoiding any increase in inflation. It now may be tasked with deciding a next move without trusted labor or inflation data when it meets Oct. 28.

    “The Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury, financial markets, businesses and households will be flying blind,” says Erica Groshen, who was the BLS commissioner the last time the labor report was withheld during a government shutdown in 2013. “They will be less certain of current conditions at what could be the beginning of a recession – precisely when their decisions are most consequential.”

    BLS Under Fire

    The delayed report is not the only issue facing the BLS. After the economy added 73,000 jobs in July, a weaker-than-expected performance, and common seasonal revisions lowered the number for the prior two months, President Donald Trump fired BLS chief Erika McEntarfer. He then nominated a conservative economist with little of the experience normally found in such nominees, which prompted widespread criticism and led to Trump pulling the nomination.

    At the same time, staffing at the BLS has been sharply reduced, and response rates to its surveys – still done by phone for the labor data and by manual surveys at stores for the CPI – have been on a downward trend.

    The actual data for the September jobs report has been collected and processed, a fact that prompted Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren to call on the Office of Management and Budget to release it.

    “The economy could be at an inflection point,” Warren wrote to OMB Director Russell Vought. “Withholding this data would undermine the Fed’s ability to make informed decisions that affect every American household through interest rates, the job market, and price stability.”

    [ad_2]

    Tim Smart

    Source link

  • Report: Slips in employer optimism tied to Trump tariffs

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The state’s economy may be on solid footing but employers are becoming increasingly pessimistic about the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on their bottom lines, according to a new report.

    The latest Business Confidence Index, which is compiled by the pro-business group Associated Industries of Massachusetts, shows overall enthusiasm among employers “grew darker” after slipping 1.4 points to 47.5 on a 100-point scale in September.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%92E’D E96 D6G6?E9 4@?D64FE:G6 >@?E9 E96 :?56I 76== 36=@H E96 d_A@:?E >2C< 4@?D:56C65 A6DD:>:DE:4 E6CC:E@CJ 2>@?8 6>A=@J6CD[ E96 8C@FA D2:5] xE 2EEC:3FE65 H62<6?:?8 4@?7:56?46 E@ 6>A=@J6C F?46CE2:?EJ 23@FE 2 9@DE @7 7656C2= A@=:4J :?:E:2E:G6D F?56C E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 :>A24E @7 E96 AC6D:56?E’D 8=@32= E2C:77D]k^Am

    kAm$2C2 y@9?D@?[ 492:CH@>2? @7 px|’D q@2C5 @7 t4@?@>:4 p5G:D@CD[ D2:5 H9:=6 E96 DE2E6’D ;@3 >2C<6E C6>2:?D DE23=6 2?5 :ED 8C@DD 5@>6DE:4 AC@5F4E 8C6H 3J b]gT 😕 E96 D64@?5 BF2CE6C[ E96 “>@>6?EF> 😀 4@@=:?8” 2>@?8 >2?J 3FD:?6DD6D]k^Am

    kAm“t>A=@J6CD 2C6 ?2G:82E:?8 E96 4C@DD4FCC6?ED @7 2? 64@?@>J E92E 92D D66? C@3FDE 8C@HE9 C646?E=J 3FE 😀 GF=?6C23=6 E@ D92CA :?4C62D6D 😕 E2C:77D[ A6CD:DE6?E :?7=2E:@?[ 2?5 6I46DD:G6 7656C2= 3F586E 567:4:ED[” y@9?D@? D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 C6A@CE[ H9:49 DFCG6J65 `c_ |2DD249FD6EED 6>A=@J6CD[ BF@E65 F??2>65 6>A=@J6CD 56D4C:3:?8 E96:C 492==6?86D @7 ECJ:?8 E@ DE2J 29625 @7 56G6=@A>6?ED 😕 E96 (9:E6 w@FD6’D EC256 A@=:4J[ H:E9 E96 A@E6?E:2= 4@DE @7 E96 E2C:77D 7=F4EF2E:?8]k^Am

    kAm“&?E:= H6 @H 9@H E96 E2C:77D 2C6 8@:?8 E@ 36 2AA=:65[ 2?5 E96 2>@F?E[ @FC 4FDE@>6CD 92G6 =2C86=J DE@AA65 3FJ:?8[” @?6 >2?F724EFC6C E@=5 E96 8C@FA]k^Am

    kAmp?@E96C >2?F724EFC6C D2:5 E96J AFC492D65 2 A:646 @7 6BF:A>6?E E92E H2D “6DD6?E:2=” E@ E96:C 3FD:?6DD @A6C2E:@? 3FE :E 42>6 H:E9 2 Sh[cbg E2C:77 4@DE]k^Am

    kAm“%2C:77D 2C6 2?E:3FD:?6DD 2?5 2C6 2 5:C64E E2I @? D>2== 3FD:?6DD6D 2=C625J @A6C2E:?8 😕 2 4@>A6E:E:G6 2?5 492==6?8:?8 64@?@>J[” E96 6>A=@J6C E@=5 E96 3FD:?6DD 8C@FA]k^Am

    kAmx? pAC:=[ %CF>A 564=2C65 2 “?2E:@?2= 6>6C86?4J” 2?5 D2:5 E96 “{:36C2E:@? s2J” E2C:77D 2C6 ?66565 E@ 6C2D6 2 EC256 567:4:E 36EH66? E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D 2?5 @E96C 4@F?EC:6D]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A’D @C56C @? “C64:AC@42=” E2C:77D 7@C 6IA@CED 7C@> eh EC25:?8 A2CE?6CD =:DE:?8 9:896C :>A@CE 5FEJ C2E6D @7 `_T E@ c`T E@@< 67764E pF8] f[ C2:D:?8 E96 2G6C286 &]$] :>A@CE 5FEJ E@ :ED 9:896DE 😕 2 46?EFCJ] |2DD249FD6EED 3FD:?6DD6D 6IA@CE 23@FE Sff 3:==:@? H@CE9 @7 8@@5D 6249 J62C E@ >@C6 E92? a`_ >2C<6ED H@C=5H:56[ 244@C5:?8 E@ px|]k^Am

    kAm$@ 72C[ E96 E2C:77D 92G6 DFCG:G65 =682= 492==6?86D] qFE E96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE 😀 6IA64E65 E@ 564:56 :7 %CF>A 92D E96 2FE9@C:EJ F?56C E96 x?E6C?2E:@?2= t>6C86?4J t4@?@>:4 !@H6CD p4E E@ :>A@D6 E2C:77D[ 4C62E:?8 7FCE96C F?46CE2:?EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? A@:?ED E@ 52E2 D9@H:?8 56DA:E6 E96 :>A24E @7 E2C:77D @? 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 4@?DF>6CD E96 64@?@>J 😀 8C@H:?8 2E ?62C=J 2 cT C2E6[ F?6>A=@J>6?E C6>2:?D 9:DE@C:42==J =@H[ :?7=2E:@?’D DE:== F?56C bT 2?5 E2C:77D 2C6 AC@;64E65 E@ 86?6C2E6 >@C6 E92? Sc__ 3:==:@? 2 J62C 😕 C6G6?F6]k^Am

    kAmpx| !C6D:56?E 2?5 rt~ qC@@<6 %9@>D@? D2:5 |2DD249FD6EED 6>A=@J6CD “4@?E:?F6 E@ AFD9 7@CH2C5” 56DA:E6 2 DH:C= @7 A@=:E:42=[ 64@?@>:4 2?5 E649?@=@8:42= F?46CE2:?EJ]k^Am

    kAm“t>A=@J6CD 2C6 4@?46C?65 23@FE :?E6C?2E:@?2= EC256[ E96 6>6C86?46 @7 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 2?5 E96 4@DE @7 5@:?8 3FD:?6DD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED[ 3FE[ 2E E96 D2>6 E:>6[ E96 u65 ;FDE =@H6C65 :?E6C6DE C2E6D[ F?6>A=@J>6?E 92D 366? DE625J[ 2?5 E96 7:?2?4:2= >2C<6ED 92G6 DFC865[” %9@>D@? D2:5]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link