ReportWire

Tag: emergency declaration

  • Governor Kotek Extends Oregon Homelessness Emergency – KXL

    [ad_1]

    SALEM, OR – Gov. Tina Kotek on Tuesday extended Oregon’s state of emergency on unsheltered homelessness, sharpening the state’s focus on mental health and addiction as ongoing threats to public health, safety and economic stability.

    The emergency, first declared in January 2023, will now remain in effect through Jan. 10, 2027, unless modified or terminated earlier. Kotek said the extension reflects both progress made and the continued urgency of addressing homelessness alongside behavioral health needs.

    “We have helped thousands of people move from the streets into shelter, from shelter into homes, and prevented thousands more from experiencing homelessness in the first place,” Kotek said in a statement. “But we must maintain the momentum and strengthen our focus on the intersection of homelessness, mental health, and addiction.”

    Kotek said her administration’s work to expand treatment beds and strengthen the behavioral health workforce will support the renewed effort. “Working together, we can continue to reduce rates of unsheltered homelessness,” she said.

    Progress since 2023

    The governor initially declared a homelessness emergency on January 10, 2023, in regions that saw increases of 50% or more in unsheltered homelessness between 2017 and 2022. The order has been extended several times, most recently through Executive Order 25-01 issued January 7, 2025.

    According to the Governor Kotek’s office, from January 2023 through September 2025, emergency actions resulted in 6,286 new and maintained shelter beds statewide. During that period, 5,539 Oregonians experiencing unsheltered homelessness were rehoused, and nearly 26,000 households received assistance to prevent homelessness.

    State officials say those gains, while significant, have not resolved the underlying challenges faced by many people living without shelter. A large share of people experiencing chronic homelessness also live with serious mental illness, substance use disorders, traumatic brain injuries or other behavioral health conditions. These co-occurring issues often lead to repeated interactions with emergency rooms, psychiatric facilities, jails and crisis systems.

    “Through daily work serving people experiencing homelessness, we see every day how closely homelessness is tied to untreated mental health and addiction,” said Scott Kerman, former executive director of Blanchet House. “Housing saves lives, and stability and success occur when people also have access to treatment, care, and ongoing support.”

    New goals and investments

    Under the extended order, the state of emergency continues to apply to the Metro region continuums of care, Central Oregon, Lane County, Jackson County, Marion and Polk counties, Linn County, Clatsop County and Malheur County.

    The Oregon Department of Emergency Management will continue coordinating the emergency response, while Oregon Housing and Community Services and the Oregon Health Authority will focus on longer-term solutions.

    New goals outlined in the order include rehousing an additional 1,400 households, preventing homelessness for more than 8,000 households and investing $20 million during the 2025–27 biennium to support intensive permanent supportive housing. The order also calls for expanded behavioral health capacity and improved coordination between housing and health care systems.

    In addition, Kotek’s action releases $19 million in previously allocated funds to expand community capacity for people connected with the justice system who are unable to aid and assist in their own defense. Those funds will support 36 transitional housing beds in Clackamas County and 72 additional beds, including secure and nonresidential treatment facilities.

    Andrea Bell, executive director of Oregon Housing and Community Services, said the state remains committed to long-term solutions. “Every Oregonian deserves to live a dignified life—one where they have the freedom and security of knowing they can afford to have a place to call home,” Bell said. “Through local and state partnerships, we remain vigorously committed to materially making everyday life better.”

    The emergency order takes effect immediately. Kotek said she will reassess it every two months to ensure it reflects current conditions and progress.

    [ad_2]

    Tim Lantz

    Source link

  • United flight’s cockpit window may have been struck by weather balloon, company says

    [ad_1]

    Brand new research from WalletHub identifies the best airlines. The report compares the nine largest US airlines, plus two regional carriers based on safety, affordability, and delays in 2024. For overall best airline, Delta Airlines came in 3rd on the list but was considered the most reliable airline. SkyWest Airlines came in 2nd. That’s *** regional carrier serving Delta, American, United, and Alaska for shorter flights. Spirit Airlines came in first, scoring the highest for. Affordability and safety. March and April have seen an uptick in air travel, meaning security checkpoints will be busy. TSA data shows more than 17 million travelers passed through security checkpoints last week, an average of 2.5 million travelers *** day. To help plan your trip, the MyTSA app shows your average security wait times based on the time and day you plan to travel. For day of updates, you can track the status of your flight by downloading the app for your airline or using an app like Flighty. And remember, TSA will begin enforcing real ID on May 7th. So if you don’t have *** real ID yet or an acceptable alternative like *** passport, expect to run into problems at the airport. And even if you do have one, it’s *** good idea to get to the airport *** little early just in case of delays. Reporting in Washington, I’m Amy Lou.

    A mysterious object that cracked a windshield on a United Airlines flight, injuring a pilot and forcing an emergency landing, may have been a weather balloon.WindBorne, a California start-up focused on advanced weather forecasting and atmospheric data collection, said in a statement Monday it believes one of its balloons likely hit the plane.United Flight 1093, a Boeing 737 traveling from Denver to Los Angeles, landed safely in Utah Thursday with 134 passengers and six crew members onboard, according to the airline.Air traffic control audio from LiveATC.net showed the pilots remained calm and declared an emergency as they diverted to land at Salt Lake City.The first officer in the cockpit was treated for minor injuries upon the plane’s landing, the Salt Lake City Fire Department said.Windborne said it is cooperating with the NTSB and FAA on their investigation.“We immediately rolled out changes to minimize time spent between 30,000 and 40,000 feet,” the company said. “These changes are already live with immediate effect. Additionally, we are further accelerating our plans to use live flight data to autonomously avoid planes, even if the planes are at a non-standard altitude. We are also actively working on new hardware designs to further reduce impact force magnitude and concentration.”The plane later flew to Rockford, Illinois, where United Airlines performs maintenance on its 737s, according to the flight tracking site FlightAware.

    A mysterious object that cracked a windshield on a United Airlines flight, injuring a pilot and forcing an emergency landing, may have been a weather balloon.

    WindBorne, a California start-up focused on advanced weather forecasting and atmospheric data collection, said in a statement Monday it believes one of its balloons likely hit the plane.

    United Flight 1093, a Boeing 737 traveling from Denver to Los Angeles, landed safely in Utah Thursday with 134 passengers and six crew members onboard, according to the airline.

    Air traffic control audio from LiveATC.net showed the pilots remained calm and declared an emergency as they diverted to land at Salt Lake City.

    The first officer in the cockpit was treated for minor injuries upon the plane’s landing, the Salt Lake City Fire Department said.

    Windborne said it is cooperating with the NTSB and FAA on their investigation.

    “We immediately rolled out changes to minimize time spent between 30,000 and 40,000 feet,” the company said. “These changes are already live with immediate effect. Additionally, we are further accelerating our plans to use live flight data to autonomously avoid planes, even if the planes are at a non-standard altitude. We are also actively working on new hardware designs to further reduce impact force magnitude and concentration.”

    The plane later flew to Rockford, Illinois, where United Airlines performs maintenance on its 737s, according to the flight tracking site FlightAware.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pittsburgh Mayor Gainey declares Disaster Emergency following Squirrel Hill apartment building fire

    [ad_1]

    Mayor Ed Gainey has declared a local Disaster Emergency in Pittsburgh following the devastating fire at the Jefferson Apartments in Squirrel Hill.

    The fire started at approximately 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday and resulted in the total loss of the building, which now requires demolition.

    PHOTOS: Massive fire at Squirrel Hill apartment building

    Dozens of residents have been permanently displaced, suffering severe personal and property losses.

    “This is a heartbreaking moment for our community,” said Mayor Ed Gainey. “The Jefferson Apartments were home to so many of our neighbors — families, seniors, students, and individuals who have now lost everything.”

    Previous coverage: Business owners, tenants wait on demolition of apartment building destroyed by fire in Squirrel Hill

    Mayor Gainey expressed gratitude to the Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire, stating, “I want to thank the brave members of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire, whose quick action and courage prevented what could have been a tragic loss of life.”

    The emergency declaration, issued under the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Services Code and City Code, allows for an immediate and coordinated response to support the victims and stabilize the neighborhood.

    Previous coverage: Families who lost everything in apartment fire being helped by the Sally and Howard Levin Clubhouse

    Many affected residents do not have rental insurance, the city said, compounding the hardship they face.

    The declaration enables the activation of emergency management plans and expedites recovery operations and aid distribution.

    Displaced residents who meet program qualifications can seek state and federal assistance for losses incurred in the fire.

    The disaster emergency declaration is effective immediately and will remain in place for up to seven days, subject to extension with approval from the Pittsburgh City Council.

    Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.

    Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • After San Clemente landslide halted train service, agency will tap emergency funds

    After San Clemente landslide halted train service, agency will tap emergency funds

    [ad_1]

    The Orange County Transportation Authority is getting emergency aid to repair train tracks in San Clemente after a landslide that halted service indefinitely between Orange and San Diego counties.

    On Thursday, Caltrans issued an emergency declaration as a result of the recent landslide. Passenger train service was stopped between the Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo and Oceanside stations, which are used by Metrolink and Amtrak passengers.

    “The hillside still is moving, which is why passenger rail service hasn’t resumed,” said Scott Johnson, director of communications for Metrolink. He said, however, measures were taken to brace the hillside above the tracks before Thursday’s storm set in.

    The emergency declaration allows the OCTA, which owns that section of the rail line, to access up to $10 million in immediate emergency repair funding.

    On Jan. 24, track personnel observed debris and dirt falling onto the track, prompting the closure, Johnson told The Times on Thursday.

    Ahead of this week’s storm, “there was a significant amount of excavation and grading that took place,” Johnson said, “along with efforts to restore an extensive culvert system.”

    Workers placed tubes, pipes, ballast and rock as well as tarping to brace for the rain.

    Teams were “out there throughout the day Wednesday,” he said. “They do continue to see movement, but no significant debris has fallen onto the track.”

    Some freight trains are still allowed to use the track between the hours of 9 p.m. and 3 a.m. but at drastically reduced speeds, he said.

    Despite the emergency declaration and impending funding, there is still no timeline as to when passenger rail service will resume.

    This isn’t the first time in recent years that the tracks have been closed due to a landslide. A similar incident occurred in April.

    [ad_2]

    Karen Garcia

    Source link

  • Spending Recklessly in Good Times Is a Recipe for Disaster in Bad Times

    Spending Recklessly in Good Times Is a Recipe for Disaster in Bad Times

    [ad_1]

    Some policy experts who, over the last few decades, saw little need for serious fiscal austerity because the government could borrow at low interest rates are now changing their tune. Their argument is that with rates now rising and the government’s interest payments set to become extremely expensive, it’s time to adjust. While I suppose that’s progress, they fail to see that the past calls for austerity were attempts to avoid precisely what’s happening today.

    Indeed, the need for fiscal responsibility was never based on an inability to afford extra debt back then. It was because the moment was destined to arrive when adjustments became necessary, and rising indebtedness ensured that these changes would become more painful.

    Let me explain. Consider two well-respected economists and former high-ranking government officials, Lawrence Summers and Jason Furman, who previously suggested that in the aftermath of the Great Recession, concerns expressed by “deficit fundamentalists” (like me) were excessive, and that some of the efforts we championed to reduce the debt were unnecessary.

    Despite the growing national debt, interest rates remained historically low, meaning the cost of servicing it was not particularly burdensome. This, they argued, made calls to control the debt out of touch. Better yet, those low rates were said to present an opportunity to “invest” in productive projects like infrastructure and education. This spending, in turn, would fuel productivity and raise economic growth, helping offset the future cost of the debt.

    Now, unlike some who subscribe to similar ideas, Summers and Furman aren’t extremists. They acknowledged that debt cannot accumulate indefinitely. But they mocked calls for austerity measures back in the 2010s as premature, while encouraging government investments paid for with debt accumulation.

    Undoubtedly, interest rates were low. As Summers and Furman highlighted in a 2019 paper, “in 2000, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast that by 2010, the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio would be six percent. The same ten-year forecast in 2018 put the figure for 2028 at 105 percent. Real interest rates on ten-year government bonds, meanwhile, fell from 4.3 percent in 2000 to an average of 0.8 percent last year.”

    This thinking has problems. First, it assumes government officials have the right incentives and knowledge—in addition to a comparative advantage over the profit-driven private sector—to “invest” productively. Not all government spending qualifies as productive investment, especially when most comes in the form of transferring wealth from one group to another and the rest is driven largely by interest group politics rather than by sound cost benefit analysis.

    Second, 10-year projections are really unreliable. Later, in 2008, CBO projected that in 2018, public debt would be 22.6 percent of GDP. It turned out to be 78 percent. Then, in 2018, CBO projected that in 2028, debt would be 96 percent of GDP. It’s now projected to be 108 percent. Meanwhile, CBO projections for interest rates since the Great Recession have been higher than what they wound up being. Starting last year, that flipped, and actual rates are much higher than the projection. That gap between projected rates and actual rates is likely to continue. It could expand.

    Overestimating interest rates means the federal government pays less than projected. Yay. An underestimation, however, means higher interest payments, more borrowing, and more debt than expected. Add to this misfortune an underestimation of debt levels and you quickly see a lot of red ink.

    That’s why betting on low interest rates to argue that we should not worry about a growing debt burden is risky. Interest rates are influenced by a variety of factors and can rise fast. In fact, back in 2021, many continued to wrongfully argue that rates would not go up. Is it crazy, then, to believe we would be in a better position to face the rate hikes today if the government had better controlled its debt over the last 10 or 20 years?

    Finally, anyone looking at CBO budget forecasts could always see that the disconnect between government spending and revenue was growing. Even assuming no significant rises in interest rates, as well as no emergencies requiring more borrowing and no new congressional or presidential spending programs—all things that have come to pass—official debt projections never looked good. Why add more debt to that?

    In the end, the risks associated with high levels of debt were never about what we could afford while rates were low. It was always about understanding that when change inevitably comes, we can better address the challenge if we are not in over our heads.

    COPYRIGHT 2023 CREATORS.COM.

    [ad_2]

    Veronique de Rugy

    Source link

  • The COVID Emergency Is Ending. Is Vaccine Outreach Over Too?

    The COVID Emergency Is Ending. Is Vaccine Outreach Over Too?

    [ad_1]

    Stephen B. Thomas, the director of the Center for Health Equity at the University of Maryland, considers himself an eternal optimist. When he reflects on the devastating pandemic that has been raging for the past three years, he chooses to focus less on what the world has lost and more on what it has gained: potent antiviral drugs, powerful vaccines, and, most important, unprecedented collaborations among clinicians, academics, and community leaders that helped get those lifesaving resources to many of the people who needed them most. But when Thomas, whose efforts during the pandemic helped transform more than 1,000 Black barbershops and salons into COVID-vaccine clinics, looks ahead to the next few months, he worries that momentum will start to fizzle out—or, even worse, that it will go into reverse.

    This week, the Biden administration announced that it would allow the public-health-emergency declaration over COVID-19 to expire in May—a transition that’s expected to put shots, treatments, tests, and other types of care more out of reach of millions of Americans, especially those who are uninsured. The move has been a long time coming, but for community leaders such as Thomas, whose vaccine-outreach project, Shots at the Shop, has depended on emergency funds and White House support, the transition could mean the imperilment of a local infrastructure that he and his colleagues have been building for years. It shouldn’t have been inevitable, he told me, that community vaccination efforts would end up on the chopping block. “A silver lining of the pandemic was the realization that hyperlocal strategies work,” he said. “Now we’re seeing the erosion of that.”

    I called Thomas this week to discuss how the emergency declaration allowed his team to mobilize resources for outreach efforts—and what may happen in the coming months as the nation attempts to pivot back to normalcy.

    Our conversation has been edited for clarity and length.

    Katherine J. Wu: Tell me about the genesis of Shots at the Shop.

    Stephen B. Thomas: We started our work with barbershops and beauty salons in 2014. It’s called HAIR: Health Advocates In-Reach and Research. Our focus was on colorectal-cancer screening. We brought medical professionals—gastroenterologists and others—into the shop, recognizing that Black people in particular were dying from colon cancer at rates that were just unacceptable but were potentially preventable with early diagnosis and appropriate screening.

    Now, if I can talk to you about colonoscopy, I could probably talk to you about anything. In 2019, we held a national health conference for barbers and stylists. They all came from around the country to talk about different areas of health and chronic disease: prostate cancer, breast cancer, others. We brought them all together to talk about how we can address health disparities and get more agency and visibility to this new frontline workforce.

    When the pandemic hit, all the plans that came out of the national conference were on hold. But we continued our efforts in the barbershops. We started a Zoom town hall. And we started seeing misinformation and disinformation about the pandemic being disseminated in our shops, and there were no countermeasures.

    We got picked up on the national media, and then we got the endorsement of the White House. And that’s when we launched Shots at the Shop. We had 1,000 shops signed up in I’d say less than 90 days.

    Wu: Why do you think Shots at the Shop was so successful? What was the network doing differently from other vaccine-outreach efforts that spoke directly to Black and brown communities?

    Thomas: If you came to any of our clinics, it didn’t feel like you were coming into a clinic or a hospital. It felt like you were coming to a family reunion. We had a DJ spinning music. We had catered food. We had a festive environment. Some people showed up hesitant, and some of them left hesitant but fascinated. We didn’t have to change their worldview. But we treated them with dignity and respect. We weren’t telling them they’re stupid and don’t understand science.

    And the model worked. It worked so well that even the health professionals were extremely pleased, because now all they had to do was show up with the vaccine, and the arms were ready for needles.

    The barbers and stylists saw themselves as doing health-related things anyway. They had always seen themselves as doing more than just cutting hair. No self-respecting Black barber is going to say, “We’ll get you in and out in 10 minutes.” It doesn’t matter how much hair you have: You’re gonna be in there for half a day.

    Wu: How big of a difference do you think your network’s outreach efforts made in narrowing the racial gaps in COVID vaccination?

    Thomas: Attribution is always difficult, and success has many mothers. So I will say this to you: I have no doubt that we made a huge difference. With a disease like COVID, you can’t afford to have any pocket unprotected, and we were vaccinating people who would otherwise have never been vaccinated. We were dealing with people at the “hell no” wall.

    We were also vaccinating people who were homeless. They were treated with dignity and respect. At some of our shops, we did a coat drive and a shoe drive. And we had dentists providing us with oral-health supplies: toothbrush, floss, paste, and other things. It made a huge difference. When you meet people where they are, you’ve got to meet all their needs.

    Wu: How big of a difference did the emergency declaration, and the freeing-up of resources, tools, and funds, make for your team’s outreach efforts?

    Thomas: Even with all the work I’ve been doing in the barber shop since 2014, the pandemic got us our first grant from the state. Money flowed. We had resources to go beyond the typical mechanisms. I was able to secure thousands of KN95 masks and distribute them to shops. Same thing with rapid tests. We even sent them Corsi-Rosenthal boxes, a DIY filtration system to clean up indoor air.

    Without the emergency declaration, we would still be in the desert screaming for help. The emergency declaration made it possible to get resources through nontraditional channels, and we were doing things that the other systems—the hospital system, the local health department—couldn’t do. We extended their reach to populations that have historically been underserved and distrustful.

    Wu: The public-health-emergency declaration hasn’t yet expired. What signs of trouble are you seeing right now?

    Thomas: The bridge between the barbershops and the clinical side has been shut down in almost all places, including here in Maryland. I go to the shop and they say to me, “Dr. T, when are we going to have the boosters here?” Then I call my clinical partners, who deliver the shots. Some won’t even answer my phone calls. And when they do, they say, “Oh, we don’t do pop-ups anymore. We don’t do community-outreach clinics anymore, because the grant money’s gone. The staff we hired during the pandemic, they use the pandemic funding—they’re gone.” But people are here; they want the booster. And my clinical partners say, “Send them down to a pharmacy.” Nobody wants to go to a pharmacy.

    You can’t see me, so you can’t see the smoke still coming out of my ears. But it hurts. We got them to trust. If you abandon the community now, it will simply reinforce the idea that they don’t matter.

    Wu: What is the response to this from the communities you’re talking to?

    Thomas: It’s “I told you so, they didn’t care about us. I told you, they would leave us with all these other underlying conditions.” You know, it shouldn’t take a pandemic to build trust. But if we lose it now, it will be very, very difficult to build back.

    We built a bridge. It worked. Why would you dismantle it? Because that’s exactly what’s happening right now. The very infrastructure we created to close the racial gaps in vaccine acceptance is being dismantled. It’s totally unacceptable.

    Wu: The emergency declaration was always going to end at some point. Did it have to play out like this?

    Thomas: I don’t think so. If you talk to the hospital administrators, they’ll tell you the emergency declaration and the money allowed them to add outreach. And when the money went away, they went back to business as usual. Even though the outreach proved you could actually do a better job. And the misinformation and the disinformation campaign hasn’t stopped. Why would you go back to what doesn’t work?

    Wu: What is your team planning for the short and long term, with limited resources?

    Thomas: As long as Shots at the Shop can connect clinical partners to access vaccines, we will definitely keep that going.

    Nobody wants to go back to normal. So many of our barbers and stylists feel like they’re on their own. I’m doing my best to supply them with KN95 masks and rapid tests. We have kept the conversation going on our every-other-week Zoom town hall. We just launched a podcast. We put out some of our stories in the form of a graphic novel, The Barbershop Storybook. And we’re trying to launch a national association for barbers and stylists, called Barbers and Stylists United for Health.

    The pandemic resulted in a mobilization of innovation, a recognition of the intelligence at the community level, the recognition that you need to culturally tailor your strategy. We need to keep those relationships intact. Because this is not the last time we’re going to see a pandemic even in our lifetime. I’m doing my best to knock on doors to continue to put our proposals out there. Hopefully, people will realize that reaching Black and Hispanic communities is worth sustaining.

    [ad_2]

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link