ReportWire

Tag: Elizabeth Warren

  • Katie Porter holds ‘F— TRUMP’ sign at California Democratic convention

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, one of the Democratic candidates eyeing the Golden State governorship, held up a message that read “F— TRUMP” during the California Democratic Party’s 2026 state convention on Saturday.

    “Yeah, that’s right, f— Trump,” she declared.

    “Together, we’re gonna kick Trump’s a– in November. I’ll stand up to Trump and his cronies just like I did in Congress, with or without my whiteboard,” she said.

    ILLINOIS LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SEEKING US SENATE SEAT RELEASES VIDEO OF PEOPLE SAYING ‘F— TRUMP’

    Former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter addresses the crowd at the General Session during the California Democratic Party State Convention at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, Calif., on Saturday, Feb. 21, 2026. (Christina House/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

    “But this election for governor is about more than defeating Trump. We know what Trump is willing to do. He’s willing to kill people in the streets, to rip away healthcare, and to ruthlessly attack our democracy. But this governor’s race asks us, what are we willing to do, what is California willing to do for our democracy?” she said.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and the Republican National Committee for comment on Monday.

    UNEARTHED FEC RECORDS EXPOSE KATIE PORTER’S HYPOCRISY AFTER SHE FUMES AT ‘NEW BILLIONAIRE’ JOINING RACE

    Former Rep. Katie Porter

    California gubernatorial candidate Katie Porter delivers remarks during the California Democratic Party convention at Moscone Center in San Francisco on Saturday, Feb. 21, 2026. (Yalonda M. James/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

    Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has endorsed Porter for governor.

    “Senator Elizabeth Warren knows what it means to fight for working families. Together, we’ve held the powerful accountable, put people before billionaires, and worked hard to lower costs for Americans. Grateful to my friend @ewarren for her endorsement in this race,” Porter wrote in a post on X.

    LIBERAL MEDIA DARLING IN THE HOT SEAT AFTER EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW GOES VIRAL

    Rep. Katie Porter and Sen. Elizabeth Warren in 2023

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks with Representative Katie Porter before Israeli President Isaac Herzog addresses a Joint Meeting of Congress in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, D.C., on July 19, 2023. ( SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “From the moment @katieporterca set foot in my consumer law class, I knew that she would be a warrior for working families. Katie will champion the kind of bold, progressive vision that California workers and families deserve, and I’m proud to endorse her for California Governor,” Warren said in a post on X.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elizabeth Warren says Trump called her after speech criticizing his record on costs

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said that President Donald Trump called her on Monday following a speech in which she sharply criticized his record on costs and governance. 

    “This morning, I gave a speech noting how Donald Trump is driving up costs for families, sowing terror and chaos in our communities, and abusing his power to prosecute anyone who criticizes him. I also laid out an argument for how Democrats should fight back and win,” Warren said in her statement.

    The left-wing lawmaker delivered a speech at a National Press Club event on Monday and then offered further remarks while responding to questions after the speech. 

    DEMOCRATS ‘DOOMED TO FAIL’ WITHOUT POPULIST ECONOMIC MESSAGE, WARREN WARNS

    Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., holds a discussion at the National Press Building on Jan. 12, 2026 in Washington, D.C.  (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    “In my remarks, I made it clear that despite promising to lower costs On Day One, Trump has done nothing but raise costs for families,” she said in the statement

    She said Trump called her after her remarks at the event on Monday.

    “I told him that Congress can pass legislation to cap credit card rates if he will actually fight for it. I also urged him to get House Republicans to pass the bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act,” that “would build more housing and lower costs,” she said in the statement.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on Tuesday.

    “President Trump and Sen. Warren had a productive call about credit card interest rates and housing affordability for the American people,” a White House official noted.

    MAMDANI ADVISER, WARREN IN THE HOT SEAT AS COLLAPSE OF ROOMBA MAKER SHIFTS DATA TO CHINA

    In a post on Truth Social last week, President Trump called for capping credit card interest rates at 10% for one year.

    “Effective January 20, 2026, I, as President of the United States, am calling for a one year cap on Credit Card Interest Rates of 10%. Coincidentally, the January 20th date will coincide with the one year anniversary of the historic and very successful Trump Administration,” he declared in the post.

    ELIZABETH WARREN CALLS ON DEMOCRATS TO REJECT BILLIONAIRE DONORS AHEAD OF 2026 AND 2028 ELECTIONS

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    During comments at the National Press Club event, Warren said the president has a “credibility problem,” saying he has not done “one damn thing to actually lower the cost of housing for the American people.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren says Congress could work with Trump to cap credit card rates

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Sen. Elizabeth Warren and President Trump don’t agree on much, but Warren suggests they might be able to work together on capping credit card interest rates and potentially addressing other cost-of-living issues. 

    Mr. Trump has expressed a desire to cap credit card rates, something that Warren, a progressive Democrat from Massachusetts, has long supported. Late Friday, Mr. Trump proposed capping rates at 10% for one year. After Warren delivered a speech Monday morning criticizing Mr. Trump’s record on affordability issues and saying he should pick up the phone to do something about capping credit card interest, Warren said the president called her. 

    “After my speech, the president called me, and I delivered this same message on affordability to him directly,” Warren said in a statement. “I told him that Congress can pass legislation to cap credit card rates if he will actually fight for it.”

    Speaking to CBS News Monday afternoon, Warren noted that she has long supported such a plan.

    “I had said at the time when he announced this a year ago, I said, great — I had been proposing that for years. Let’s do it! And what’s Donald Trump done since then? Nothing,” she said.

    Warren said she and the president also discussed housing costs.

    “While I had a chance to talk to him, I raised the question of how we reduce housing costs. We’ve got a bill that has passed the Senate unanimously to expand the supply of housing, but Republicans over in the House have hung it up. And Donald Trump has not lifted a finger to get that bill passed on through,” she said.

    The president hasn’t shared his side of the phone call. 

    Capping credit card interest rates would be a tall order for a Republican-controlled Congress, though a handful of congressional Republicans have backed the idea, including Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley and Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna.

    Banks and other credit card issuers are strongly opposed to the idea, arguing a limit on interest rates could force banks to cut off access for millions of people, especially higher-risk borrowers. A coalition of industry groups, including the American Bankers Association, said Friday that a 10% cap “would reduce credit availability and be devastating for millions of American families and small business owners.”

    Bank stocks dipped after Mr. Trump proposed the rate cap over the weekend. 

    Warren and Mr. Trump have long been vocal in their criticism of each other. On the campaign trail in 2016 and since, he sometimes referred to her as “Pocahontas” after Warren claimed to have some Cherokee Nation heritage. 

    Warren also criticized the Justice Department’s investigation into the Federal Reserve and its chairman, Jerome Powell, over renovations to the Fed’s headquarters building. Watch her full interview in the video on this page.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bessent calls for overhaul of regulator tasked with spotting systemic financial risks

    [ad_1]

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wants to overhaul a federal regulatory group, launched following the 2008 housing bust, that is tasked with safeguarding the U.S. financial system.

    The 15-member panel, known as the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), was established by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act to help spot and defuse systemic financial risks.

    The council is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and includes the leaders from other financial regulatory agencies, such as the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the head of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    In a letter released Thursday, Bessent called for looser FSOC regulations, saying that “too often in the past, efforts to safeguard the financial system have resulted in burdensome and often duplicative regulations.”

    “Our administration is changing that approach,” Bessent added.

    The Treasury Department and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.

    Proponents of strong financial regulation criticized the push to revamp the FSOC.

    “What you’re removing is the smoke alarm for the entire financial system,” said Oscar Valdés Viera, private equity and capital markets policy analyst at Americans for Financial Reform, a coalition consisting of over 250 national and local groups.

    Bessent’s proposal would remove vital safeguards just as financial risks are mounting, such as a potential bubble in AI stocks, Valdés Viera added.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, also attacked the decision to loosen financial regulations.

    “Going down this path just as cracks are emerging in the financial system and yellow lights are flashing across our economy is especially reckless,” she said in a statement, citing the recent bankruptcies of subprime auto lender Tricolor Holdings, auto parts company First Brands and home remodeling platform Renovo Home Partners.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump nominates new CFPB director, but White House says agency is still closing

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — President Trump nominated Stuart Levenbach as the next director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Wednesday, using a legal maneuver to keep his budget director Russell Vought as acting director of the bureau while the Trump administration continues on its plan to shut down the consumer financial protection agency.

    Levenbach is currently an associate director inside the Office of Management and Budget, handling issues related to natural resources, energy, science and water issues. Levenbach’s resume shows significant experience dealing with science and natural resources issues, acting as chief of staff of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during Trump’s first term.

    Levenbach’s nomination is not meant to go through to confirmation, an administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters. Under the Vacancies Act, Vought can only act as acting director for 210 days, but now that Trump has nominated someone to the position, that clock has been suspended until the Senate approves or denies Levenbach’s confirmation as director. Vought is Levenbach’s boss.

    The CFPB has been nonfunctional much of the year. Many of its employees have been ordered not to work, and the only major work the bureau is doing is unwinding the regulations and rules it put into place during Trump’s first term and during the Biden administration.

    While in the acting director role, Vought has signaled that he wishes to dismantle, or vastly diminish, the bureau.

    The latest blow to the bureau’s future came earlier this month, when the White House said it does not plan to withdraw any funds from the Federal Reserve, which is where the bureau gets its funding, to fund the bureau past Dec. 31.

    The White House and the Justice Department are using a legal interpretation of the law that created the bureau, the Dodd-Frank Act, that the Fed must be profitable in order to fund the CFPB’s operations. Since roughly 2022, the Fed has been cash-flow negative since it owns bonds from the COVID-19 pandemic that pay very low interest but must pay out higher interest to the banks that deposit reserves with it. This means, on paper, the Fed is not earning a profit at the moment and therefore has no money to allot to the CFPB.

    Several judges have rejected this argument when it was brought up by companies, but it’s never been the position of the government until this year that the CFPB requires the Fed to be profitable to provided the CFPB with operating funds.

    “Donald Trump’s sending the Senate a new nominee to lead the CFPB looks like nothing more than a front for Russ Vought to stay on as Acting Director indefinitely as he tries to illegally close down the agency,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, in a statement.

    The bureau was created after the 2008 financial crisis as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, a law passed to overhaul the financial system and require banks to hold more capital to avoid another financial crisis. The CFPB was created to be a independent advocate for consumers to help them avoid bad actors in the financial system.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Larry Summers takes leave from teaching at Harvard after release of Epstein emails

    [ad_1]

    Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers abruptly went on leave Wednesday from teaching at Harvard University, where he once served as president, over recently released emails showing he maintained a friendly relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Summers’ spokesperson said.

    Summers had canceled his public commitments amid the fallout of the emails being made public and earlier Wednesday severed ties with OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT. Harvard had reopened an investigation into connections between him and Epstein, but Summers had said he would continue teaching economics classes at the school.

    That changed Wednesday evening with the news that he will step away from teaching classes as well as his position as director of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government with the Harvard Kennedy School.

    “Mr. Summers has decided it’s in the best interest of the Center for him to go on leave from his role as Director as Harvard undertakes its review,” Summers spokesperson Steven Goldberg said, adding that his co-teachers would finish the classes.

    Summers has not been scheduled to teach next semester, according to Goldberg.

    A Harvard spokesperson confirmed to The Associated Press that Summers had let the university know about his decision. Summers decision to go on leave was first reported by The Harvard Crimson.

    Harvard did not mention Summers by name in its decision to restart an investigation, but the move follows the release of emails showing that he was friendly with Epstein long after the financier pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from an underage girl in 2008.

    By Wednesday, the once highly regarded economics expert had been facing increased scrutiny over choosing to stay in the teaching role. Some students even filmed his appearance in shock as he appeared before a class of undergraduates on Tuesday while stressing he thought it was important to continue teaching.

    Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, said in a social media post on Wednesday night that Summers “cozied up to the rich and powerful — including a convicted sex offender. He cannot be trusted in positions of influence.”

    Messages appear to seek advice about romantic relationship

    The emails include messages in which Summers appeared to be getting advice from Epstein about pursuing a romantic relationship with someone who viewed him as an “economic mentor.”

    “im a pretty good wing man , no?” Epstein wrote on Nov. 30, 2018.

    The next day, Summers told Epstein he had texted the woman, telling her he “had something brief to say to her.”

    “Am I thanking her or being sorry re my being married. I think the former,” he wrote.

    Summers’ wife, Elisa New, also emailed Epstein multiple times, including a 2015 message in which she thanked him for arranging financial support for a poetry project she directs. The gift he arranged “changed everything for me,” she wrote.

    “It really means a lot to me, all financial help aside, Jeffrey, that you are rooting for me and thinking about me,” she wrote.

    New, an English professor emerita at Harvard, did not respond to an email seeking comment Wednesday.

    An earlier review completed in 2020 found that Epstein visited Harvard’s campus more than 40 times after his 2008 sex-crimes conviction and was given his own office and unfettered access to a research center he helped establish. The professor who provided the office was later barred from starting new research or advising students for at least two years.

    Summers appears before Harvard class

    On Tuesday, Summers appeared before his class at Harvard, where he teaches “The Political Economy of Globalization” to undergraduates with Robert Lawrence, a professor with the Harvard Kennedy School.

    “Some of you will have seen my statement of regret expressing my shame with respect to what I did in communication with Mr. Epstein and that I’ve said that I’m going to step back from public activities for a while. But I think it’s very important to fulfill my teaching obligations,” he said.

    Summers’ remarks were captured on video by several students, but no one appeared to publicly respond to his comments.

    Epstein, who authorities said died by suicide in 2019, was a convicted sex offender infamous for his connections to wealthy and powerful people, making him a fixture of outrage and conspiracy theories about wrongdoing among American elites.

    Summers served as treasury secretary from 1999 to 2001 under President Bill Clinton. He was Harvard’s president for five years from 2001 to 2006. When asked about the emails last week, Summers issued a statement saying he has “great regrets in my life” and that his association with Epstein was a “major error in judgement.”

    Other organizations that confirmed the end of their affiliations with Summers included the Center for American Progress, the Center for Global Development and the Budget Lab at Yale University. Bloomberg TV said Summers’ withdrawal from public commitments included his role as a paid contributor, and the New York Times said it will not renew his contract as a contributing opinion writer.

    ___

    This story has been corrected to show that Summers is a former treasury secretary, not treasurer; to show that Summers’ statement about stepping back from public commitments was issued late Monday, not Tuesday; and to show that the school is known as the Harvard Kennedy School, not Kennedy Harvard School.

    ___

    Associated Press journalist Hallie Golden contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elizabeth Warren Calls For Harvard To Cut Ties With A Key Figure After Epstein Revelations

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is calling for Harvard to cut ties with the school’s former president and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, after the extent of Summers’ friendship with Jeffrey Epstein was laid bare in a document dump from Epstein’s estate last week.

    Summers’ messages appeared regularly in Epstein’s inbox, even after the billionaire financier pleaded guilty to soliciting sex from underage girls in Florida in 2008.

    In several emails reviewed by The Harvard Crimson, Summers and Epstein discussed the possibility of the billionaire making financial contributions to the school, with a specific emphasis on a digital poetry initiative spearheaded by Summers’ wife.

    In dozens of others, Summers delves into his personal life, both soliciting and offering relationship advice.

    In another email, dated October 2017, Summers appeared to sympathize with Epstein, bemoaning an “American elite” that ostracizes someone who “hit on a few women” a decade ago, while offering a path to redemption for other seemingly worse misdeeds.

    “For decades, Larry Summers has demonstrated his attraction to serving the wealthy and well-connected, but his willingness to cozy up to a convicted sex offender demonstrates monumentally bad judgment,” Warren told CNN in a statement.

    “If he had so little ability to distance himself from Jeffrey Epstein even after all that was publicly known about Epstein’s sex offenses involving underage girls,” she continued, “then Summers cannot be trusted to advise our nation’s politicians, policymakers, and institutions — or teach a generation of students at Harvard or anywhere else.”

    Epstein donated around $9.1 million to the school between 1998 and 2008, overlapping with Summers’ tenure as president of the university from 2001 to 2006.

    Summers has previously said he “regrets” his relationship with Epstein.

    “I have great regrets in my life,” he wrote, in a statement relayed by The Crimson. “As I have said before, my association with Jeffrey Epstein was a major error of judgement.”

    Join Our MissionSupportIndependent News

    Your SupportFuelsOur Mission

    Your SupportFuelsOur Mission

    We believe our mission of independent journalism has never been more important. We face increasing pressure from politicians and billionaire media owners that is irrevocably impacting our industry. Yet HuffPost has never been more committed

    We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.

    Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.

    We remain committed to providing you with the unflinching, fact-based journalism everyone deserves.

    Thank you again for your support along the way. We’re truly grateful for readers like you! Your initial support helped get us here and bolstered our newsroom, which kept us strong during uncertain times. Now as we continue, we need your help more than ever. We hope you will join us once again.

    “Our Around-The-Clock Journalism Holds Power To Account And Informs Millions Of Readers Around The Globe, Helping Them Understand The World And Live Better Lives”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump jokingly asked Rolex executives if tariffs prompted US Open invite, CEO says

    [ad_1]

    Donald Trump asked Rolex executives if he would have been invited to watch this month’s US Open final from the luxury watchmaker’s VIP box had he imposed steep tariffs on Swiss exports weeks earlier.

    The US president’s remarks were made “in jest”, stressed Jean-Frederic Dufour, the Rolex CEO, in a letter to Elizabeth Warren, the US senator who had raised questions about the decision to invite Trump – including whether the conglomerate was seeking to “curry favor” with the administration.

    Related: Rolex faces questions over Trump US Open invitation amid tariffs pain

    Warren, a Democrat for Massachusetts, said: “Corruption is not a laughing matter.”

    Trump’s 39% tariff on Swiss exports to the US – significantly higher than his 15% rate on the European Union, or 10% on the UK – threatens to pile pressure on Rolex, one of the world’s leading watch manufacturers.

    Dufour claimed that the invite to Trump, and other senior figures in his administration, was part of a broader focus on “the values of sport, sportsmanship and international friendship”, rather than any “capitulation” to the US president. “Rolex is not, nor has it ever been, engaged in any negotiation with the US government regarding tariffs,” he wrote.

    But Dufour described how Trump brought up the tariffs he had imposed on Switzerland, and Swiss exporters like Rolex, weeks earlier.

    “President Trump, never one to miss a rhetorical opportunity, did ask in jest whether he would have been invited had it not been for the tariffs – a moment that brought a round of laughter all around and, as you can imagine, a swift return of attention to the unfolding excitement on court,” Dufour wrote.

    “No substantive discussion” took place “regarding tariffs, trade policy, or any other official matter” during the US Open final, or since, he claimed.

    Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, using Trump’s favored jibe about Warren, said: “Pocahontas should find a better use of her time than conjuring up asinine conspiracy theories.”

    “While families are getting crushed by Trump’s chaotic tariffs, Donald Trump and his rich friends are laughing about tariffs in a fancy box sponsored by a luxury watch brand,” said Warren. “How much more out of touch can Trump be?”

    Trump was gifted “a golf sweater and a sports gilet” as “a token of appreciation for attending the event”, said Dufour.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Social Security pushes back on Warren, touts transparency and service under Trump

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The Social Security Administration is pushing back against Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., after she accused the agency of removing key data and covering up dysfunction.

    In a Sept. 16, 2025 letter and data report shared exclusively with Fox News Digital, SSA Commissioner Frank J. Bisignano claimed Warren’s analysis was inaccurate. 

    He said the agency is more transparent and performing better under the Trump administration than it did under the prior administration. The documents reflect SSA’s position and have not been independently verified.

    SSA currently reports nearly three times the number of data elements on the performance webpage under the Trump Administration (30) than it did under the Biden Administration (11),” Bisignano wrote.

    EXCLUSIVE: MEDICAID DIRECTS STATES TO CRACK DOWN ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT ENROLLEES WITH MONTHLY CHECKS

    President Donald Trump poses with Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano in the Oval Office as Trump displays a signed proclamation. (Courtesy of the Social Security Administration)

    “These facts conclusively demonstrate that you are wrong in alleging a lack of transparency.”

    He also pushed back on Warren’s charge of a cover-up, saying SSA has made improvements in customer service, including “shorter wait times on the phones and in offices, as well as reduced backlogs.” Bisignano said 81 percent of performance measures are better than before, with the rest about the same.

    According to SSA’s data, average phone wait times dropped from 29 minutes in 2024 to 16 minutes in 2025, with August down to just 9 minutes.

    SOCIAL SECURITY STRONGER UNDER TRUMP, CRITICS PUSHING ‘FALSE’ NARRATIVE, COMMISSIONER SAYS

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren

    Senator Warren penned a letter earlier this month claiming the Social Security Administration had become less transparent under President Trump’s leadership. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    Pending disability determinations fell from nearly 1.2 million in August 2024 to about 907,000 a year later. Disability claim processing sped up from 231 days to 217 days. SSA reports retirement and survivor claims were processed on time 87% of the time in August 2025.

    Bisignano wrote that the agency’s goal is to become a “digital-first” operation that runs efficiently and serves people whether they call, visit an office or use the website. He said constant monitoring of key performance indicators is part of that effort.

    Social Security building

    Wait times are down according to a September report exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital from the Social Security Administration. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh, File)

    He also urged Warren to work with SSA instead of spreading what he called “fearmongering and reckless lies that Social Security is going away.”

    “The time has come to stop weaponizing Social Security,” he wrote. “The American people do not want a Social Security War Room. They want their leaders to protect and preserve Social Security, just as President Trump has promised.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    The office of Senator Elizabeth Warren did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • From Bernie Sanders to Theo Von: These Democratic Kingmakers Will Anoint the Next Obama

    [ad_1]

    In some particularly tortured living rooms across America, people are playing a parlor game called Who Is the Next Democratic Leader? Its central premise is that someone will save Democrats specifically and democracy more generally. Maybe that’s true, maybe another Obama will spring from the head of Zeus fully formed and serving in the Senate, or maybe it will be a big messy primary à la 2016 or 2020.

    But before asking who the next leader of the party is or will be, it helps to ask who are today’s Democratic kingmakers who can anoint an upstart with legitimacy, who can help shepherd a chaotic Democratic Party apparatus behind a rising star. Some of the faces are familiar, some are newcomers wielding tremendous power.

    When I asked Dan Pfeiffer, my favorite of the Pod Save America guys, he essentially rejected the premise of my question. “Given how most Democrats feel about the party these days, endorsements from establishment leaders are likely to be net negatives, and people will be clamoring for the support of party outsiders.”

    I heard something similar from Bradley Tusk, a venture capitalist who previously served as a deputy governor of Illinois and as a campaign manager for Mike Bloomberg’s 2009 mayoral campaign. “I feel like that world doesn’t exist anymore. Party machines are mainly dead,” Tusk wrote to me. “Endorsements typically don’t matter much because people have so little faith in institutions. The candidate with the most money doesn’t necessarily win so having rich donors isn’t enough. I think now it’s a cult of personality rather than being blessed by a kingmaker.”

    These responses capture the wider frustration with the Democratic Party, but I don’t necessarily agree that this sentiment negates the influence that powerful figures could potentially wield.

    I got much more fulsome responses when I granted sources anonymity. “I think Nancy Pelosi still plays a big role,” one young congressional staffer told me. “Mike Bloomberg and Bill and Melinda Gates. Donors: George Soros, Laurene Powell Jobs, and Future Forward PAC. Rachel Maddow.” She added that Obama is still very much a kingmaker in the party, and that his endorsement was helpful to Kamala Harris’s campaign. Similarly, a famous writer told me that “despite being old and tired, you gotta say that [Chuck] Schumer and [Hakeem] Jeffries are still kingmakers—helps to have their support.”

    It also seems inevitable that the next Obama will almost certainly need the support of a broad podcast coalition. In the 2024 election, Kamala Harris’s campaign didn’t end up doing Joe Rogan’s show. “There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn’t want her to be on it, and how there would be a backlash,” campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri said, according to the reporting by the Financial Times. But next time, the young congressional staffer told me, things will be different. “In an upcoming election, a Joe Rogan endorsement could mean almost as much as an Obama endorsement.”

    [ad_2]

    Molly Jong-Fast

    Source link

  • Fed nominee Miran queried by Senator Warren about discrepancy in ethics filings

    [ad_1]

    (Reuters) -U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren raised fresh questions about President Donald Trump‘s pick to fill an open seat at the Federal Reserve, demanding on Tuesday that Stephen Miran explain a discrepancy in filings to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics disclosing income that his spouse received.

    Warren demanded answers in a letter issued less than 24 hours before the Republican-majority Senate banking committee’s scheduled vote, at 10 a.m. EDT on Wednesday, to advance Miran’s nomination for consideration by the full Senate.

    Warren, the banking panel’s top Democrat, opposes Miran’s confirmation. She and other members of her party say that his decision not to resign as White House economic advisor compromises his ability to make decisions on monetary policy that are independent of the president, who has made no secret of his desire for lower interest rates.

    In a February 2025 OGE filing when he was nominated for his current job as chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, Miran reported $1.4 million in income attributed to his spouse from a for-profit university called East Coast Polytechnic Institute.

    However, seven months later he reported spousal income of $457,954 from ECPI. That was included in his latest OGE filing, dated September 3, 2025.

    “Particularly given the history of reputational quality issues, underhanded operations, and opaque funding structures associated with for-profit universities, the nature of your spouse’s — and by extension your — relationship with ECPI deserves full clarity,” Warren wrote in the letter, a copy of which was seen by Reuters.

    “Further, the discrepancy raises questions about the reason for the change and the accuracy of the disclosures in your OGE forms.”

    The White House and ECPI president had no immediate comment.

    In a letter following up on Miran’s confirmation hearing last week, Warren had asked Miran about his and his spouse’s relationship with the university, and several other assets reported on his disclosure form as real estate assets that “support ECPI.”

    Miran, in his response dated September 7, said he had “provided all required financial information” to the ethics office and had entered into an ethics agreement “that describes the steps that I will take to avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest in the event that I am confirmed for the position of Governor of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.”

    (Reporting by Ann Saphir, Michael S. Derby, Andrea Shalal; Editing by Richard Chang)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Federal Reserve unveils toned-down banking regulations in victory for Wall Street

    Federal Reserve unveils toned-down banking regulations in victory for Wall Street

    [ad_1]

    A top Federal Reserve official on Tuesday unveiled changes to a proposed set of U.S. banking regulations that roughly cuts in half the extra capital that the largest institutions will be forced to hold.

    Introduced in July 2023, the regulatory overhaul known as the Basel Endgame would have boosted capital requirements for the world’s largest banks by roughly 19%.

    Instead, officials at the Fed, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have agreed to resubmit the massive proposal with a more modest 9% increase to big bank capital, according to prepared remarks from Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr.

    The change comes after banks, business groups, lawmakers and others weighed in on the possible impact of the original proposal, Barr told an audience at the Brookings Institution.

    “This process has led us to conclude that broad and material changes to the proposals are warranted,” Barr said in the remarks. “There are benefits and costs to increasing capital requirements. The changes we intend to make will bring these two important objectives into better balance.”

    The original proposal, a long-in-the-works response to the 2008 global financial crisis, sought to boost safety and tighten oversight of risky activities including lending and trading. But by raising the capital that banks are required to hold as a cushion against losses, the plan could’ve also made loans more expensive or harder to obtain, pushing more activity to nonbank providers, according to trade organizations.

    The earlier version brought howls of protest from industry executives including JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who helped lead the industry’s efforts to push back against the demands. Now, it looks like those efforts have paid off.

    But big banks aren’t the only ones to benefit. Regional banks with between $100 billion and $250 billion in assets are excluded from the latest proposal, except for a requirement that they recognize unrealized gains and losses on securities in their regulatory capital.

    That part will likely boost capital requirements by 3% to 4% over time, Barr said. It’s an apparent response to the failures last year of midsized banks caused by deposit runs tied to unrealized losses on bonds and loans amid sharply higher interest rates.

    Mortgages, retail loans

    Key parts of the proposal that apply to big banks bring several measures of risk more in line with international standards, while the original draft was more onerous for things such as mortgages and retail loans, Barr said.

    It also cuts the risk weighting for tax credit equity funding structures, often used to finance green energy projects; tempers a surcharge proposed for firms with a history of operational failures; and recognizes the relatively lower-risk nature of investment management operations.

    Barr said he will push to resubmit the proposed Basel Endgame regulations, as well as a separate set of capital surcharge rules for the biggest global institutions, which starts anew a public review process that has already taken longer than a year.

    That means it won’t be finalized until well after the November election, which creates the risk that if Republican candidate Donald Trump wins, the rules could be further weakened or never implemented, a situation that some regulators and lawmakers hoped to avoid.

    It’s unclear if the changes appease the industry and their constituents; banks and their trade groups have threatened to litigate to prevent the original draft’s implementation.

    “The journey to improve capital requirements since the Global Financial Crisis has been a long one, and Basel III Endgame is an important element of this effort,” Barr said. “The broad and material changes to both proposals that I’ve outlined today would better balance the benefits and costs of capital.”

    Reaction to Barr’s proposal was swift and predictable; Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., called it a gift to Wall Street.

    “The revised bank capital standards are a Wall Street giveaway, increasing the risk of a future financial crisis and keeping taxpayers on the hook for bailouts,” Warren said in an emailed statement. “After years of needless delay, rather than bolster the security of the financial system, the Fed caved to the lobbying of big bank executives.”

    The American Bankers Association, a trade group, said it welcomed Barr’s announcement but stopped short of giving its approval to the latest version of the regulation.

    “We will carefully review this new proposal with our members, recognizing that America’s banks are already well-capitalized and … any increase in capital requirements will still carry a cost for the economy and must be appropriately tailored,” said ABA President Rob Nichols.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Warren warns Powell against weakening banking regulations: ‘Do your job’

    Sen. Warren warns Powell against weakening banking regulations: ‘Do your job’

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is accusing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell of doing the financial industry’s bidding by considering changes to a sweeping set of regulations aimed at boosting the capital cushion that large American banks would be required to hold.

    In a June 17 letter first obtained by CNBC, Warren asked Powell for a response to reports that “you are advocating for slashing in half” the increase in capital required under the proposals, known as the Basel III Endgame.

    “I am disappointed by press reports indicating that you are personally intervening—after numerous meetings with big bank CEOs—to delay and water down the Basel III capital rules,” said Warren.

    Last year, three U.S. banking regulators including the Federal Reserve unveiled the proposed rules, a long-expected regime shift around bank capital and risky activities such as trading and lending. The regulations incorporate new international standards created as a response to the 2008 global financial crisis.

    “These rules are critical and long overdue, particularly in the wake of the Silicon Valley and Signature Bank failures, and as risks from the weak commercial real estate market and other economic threats ripple through the banking system,” Warren said.

    Bank CEOs and their lobbying groups have said the increases are unnecessarily aggressive and would force the industry to curtail lending.

    In March, Powell told lawmakers that he expected “broad and material changes” to the proposal in the wake of the industry’s campaign against the rules. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon coordinated efforts to weaken the rules, urging CEOs to appeal directly to Powell, The Wall Street Journal reported last month.

    “It now appears that you are directly doing the bank industry’s bidding, rewarding them for their extensive personal lobbying of you,” Warren said in her letter. “Taking orders from the industry that caused the 2008 economic meltdown would sacrifice the financial security of middle-class and working families to line the pockets of wealthy investors and CEOs.”

    She further criticized Powell, saying “regulatory rollbacks” under the Fed chair allowed the regional banking crisis of 2023 to happen and “enriched Jamie Dimon and his Wall Street cronies.”

    Warren urged Powell to allow a Federal Reserve Board vote on the original, tougher Basel proposal by the end of this month. The window to finalize and approve the rules ahead of U.S. elections in November is closing, and analysts have said that the proposal could be delayed or killed if Donald Trump is reelected president.

    “Instead of doing Mr. Dimon’s bidding, you should do your job and allow the Board to convene for a vote on a 16% capital increase by June 30th, as global regulators determined was necessary to prevent another financial crisis,” Warren said.

    When asked for a response to Warren’s letter, a Fed spokesperson had this statement on Tuesday morning: “We have received the letter and plan to respond.”

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warren, Markey keep pressure on Steward as suitors emerge

    Warren, Markey keep pressure on Steward as suitors emerge

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Southcoast Health announced Friday it is considering buying a Fall River hospital owned by financially floundering Steward Health Care, with the goal of preserving care for patients and preventing the facility from potentially closing.

    Southcoast Health CEO David McCready said his organization has a “strong interest” in acquiring St. Anne’s Hospital.

    “St. Anne’s patients and employees are part of our community; they are our family members, friends and neighbors,” McCready said in a community message Friday, which was posted on the not-for-profit health care system’s website. He said his company’s message to Steward is: “The best option for St. Anne’s Hospital, its patients, its employees, and our community, is for St. Anne’s to join the Southcoast Health family.”

    And in a separate letter concerning Steward, U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey on Friday demanded that CEO Ralph de la Torre explain “years of mismanagement, private equity schemes, and executive profiteering” at the for-profit company he leads.

    The senators wrote that Steward has hundreds of millions of dollars in debt, “raising questions about unpaid vendors, patient care, and job losses for front-line health care workers, while creating ongoing uncertainty about whether hospitals will close, and if not, how they will be restructured.”

    “You are attempting to make a last-minute deal for your remaining assets that would let you walk away, while leaving Governor Healey and the Executive Office of Health and Human Services to scramble for a solution to preserve care,” the senators wrote to Steward’s CEO.

    Southcoast Health operates three hospitals in Massachusetts, including Charlton Memorial Hospital in Fall River, St. Luke’s Hospital in New Bedford and Tobey Hospital in Wareham. The system’s next step is to conduct “thorough due diligence” to determine whether any type of acquisition with Steward is feasible, McCready wrote.

    A Steward spokesperson, asked if the company was also interested in the transaction, did not directly address a deal for St. Anne’s Hospital.

    “Steward Health Care is working with state officials and others to transition ownership of the Massachusetts hospitals in a way that everyone agrees is best for patients, our employees, and the Commonwealth,” the spokesperson said in a statement to the News Service. “We are committed to continuity of care in our communities, and we appreciate the strong level of interest we have received from numerous qualified health systems that could facilitate a smooth transition.”

    McCready wrote he was alarmed by news that Steward — a for-profit system that’s faced increasing scrutiny over its severe financial distress and incomplete financial reporting to state regulators — plans to sell off its nine Massachusetts hospitals. Gov. Maura Healey’s office last month said it’s time for Steward to leave the Massachusetts health care market.

    “As you can imagine, this will be a complex transaction involving multiple parties – with the potential to be truly devastating for these hospitals’ patients and employees if there is an interruption of service,” McCready said. “In the worst case, if Steward and their partners fail to find a buyer, or enough buyers, they may have to close one or more of their hospitals.”

    McCready argued Southcoast Health is best suited to take over St. Anne’s Hospital, compared to national health systems that have “much less at stake when it comes to public health and community outreach in the areas where they operate.”

    “Ultimately, our goal is to further provide our region with patient-centered, community-based healthcare, and to offer employment opportunities to talented caregivers and healthcare workers currently serving Steward’s patients,” he said.

    In their letter to de la Torre, Warren and Markey said they want answers by March 21 outlining the compensation of top Steward executives, and the financial arrangement between Steward and Medical Properties Trust, which is essentially the landlord for Steward hospitals. Their lengthy list of questions also probes Steward’s plan to repay its debt and exit Massachusetts, and past transactions with private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management.

    The senators demanded that Steward provide audited financial statements for fiscal years ending Dec. 31 of 2022 and 2023.

    “Steward’s Massachusetts hospitals are in deep financial distress and appear to be in danger of closure because of years of mismanagement, private equity schemes, and executive profiteering. You have run this hospital system for 14 years, and reportedly have had access to two private jets while owning two luxury yachts,” the letter states.

    MPT is working with Steward and its advisors to strengthen the company’s liquidity, MPT CEO Edward Aldag said in a fourth quarter earnings call on Feb. 21. Aldag said MPT is trying to “significantly” reduce its exposure to Steward and accelerate the collection of unpaid rent.

    “This plan contemplates a wide range of strategic transactions, including transitioning certain hospitals to new tenants and selling its managed care business,” Aldag said. “While it will take some time for Steward to execute these steps, we are encouraged by the early progress.”

    MPT has provided Steward with $60 million in bridge loan funding, and Aldag said more money could be provided if Steward achieves “significant” rent payment milestones.

    Aldag said Steward’s cash collections problems have worsened since the fall and are exacerbated by its backlog of vendor payments. That’s impaired Steward’s ability “to perform higher-margin surgeries that are a key driver of cash flow,” Aldag said.

    [ad_2]

    Alison Kuznitz

    Source link

  • Here’s why Capital One is buying Discover in the biggest proposed merger of 2024

    Here’s why Capital One is buying Discover in the biggest proposed merger of 2024

    [ad_1]

    Capital One CEO and Chairman, Richard Fairbank.

    Marvin Joseph| The Washington Post | Getty Images

    Capital One’s recently announced $35.3 billion acquisition of Discover Financial isn’t just about getting bigger — gaining “scale” in Wall Street-speak — it’s a bid to protect itself against a rising tide of fintech and regulatory threats.

    It’s a chess move by one of the savviest long-term thinkers in American finance, Capital One CEO Richard Fairbank. As a co-founder of a top 10 U.S. bank by assets, his tenure is a rarity in a banking world dominated by institutions like JPMorgan Chase that trace their origins to shortly after the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

    Fairbank, who became a billionaire by building Capital One into a credit card giant since its 1994 IPO, is betting that buying rival card company Discover will better position the company for global payments’ murky future. The industry is a dynamic web where players of all stripes — from traditional banks to fintech players and tech giants — are all seeking to stake out a corner in a market worth trillions of dollars by eating into incumbents’ share amid the rapid growth of e-commerce and digital payments.

    “This deal gives the company a stronger hand to battle other banks, fintechs and big tech companies,” said Sanjay Sakhrani, the veteran KBW retail finance analyst. “The more that they can separate themselves from the pack, the more they can future-proof themselves.”

    The deal, if approved, enables Capital One to leapfrog JPMorgan as the biggest credit card company by loans, and solidifies its position as the third largest by purchase volume. It also adds heft to Capital One’s banking operations with $109 billion in total deposits from Discover’s digital bank and helps the combined entity shave $1.5 billion in expenses by 2027.

    ‘Holy Grail’

    Capital One and Discover credit cards arranged in Germantown, New York, US, on Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2024. 

    Angus Mordant | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    “That network is a very, very rare asset,” Fairbank said. “We have always had a belief that the Holy Grail is to be able to be an issuer with one’s own network so that one can deal directly with merchants.”

    From the time of Capital One’s founding in the late 1980s, Fairbank said, he envisioned creating a global digital payments tech company by owning the payment rails and dealing directly with merchants. In the decades since, Capital One has been ahead of stodgier banks, gaining a reputation in tech circles for being forward-thinking and for its early adoption of cloud computing and agile software development.

    But its growth has relied on Visa and Mastercard, which accounted for the vast majority of payment volumes last year, processing nearly $10 trillion in the U.S. between them.

    Capital One intends to boost the Discover network, which carried $550 billion in transactions last year, by quickly switching all of its debit volume there, as well as a growing share of its credit card flows over time.

    By 2027, the bank expects to add at least $175 billion in payments and 25 million of its cardholders onto the Discover network.

    Owning the toll road

    The true potential of the Discover deal, though, is what it allows Capital One to do in the future if it owns the toll road, according to analysts.

    By creating an end-to-end ecosystem that is more of a closed loop between shoppers and merchants, it could fend off competition from rapidly mutating fintech players like Block and PayPal, as well as buy now, pay later firms like Affirm and Klarna, who have made inroads with both businesses and consumers.

    Capital One aims to deepen relationships with merchants by showing them how to boost sales, helping them prevent fraud and providing data insights, Fairbank said Tuesday, all of which makes them harder to dislodge. It can use some of the network fees to create new loyalty plans, like debit rewards programs, or underwrite merchant incentives or experiences, according to analysts.

    “Owning a network allows us to deal more directly with merchants rather than a network intermediary,” Fairbank told analysts. “We create more value for merchants, small businesses and consumers and capture the additional economics from vertical integration.”

    It’s a capability that technology or fintech companies probably covet. The Discover network alone would be worth up to $6 billion if sold to Alphabet, Apple or Fiserv, Sakhrani wrote Tuesday in a research note.

    Will regulators approve?

    The Capital One-Discover combination could fortify the company against another potential threat — from Washington.

    Proposed legislation from Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., aims to cap the fees charged by Visa and Mastercard, potentially blowing up the economics of credit card rewards programs. If that proposal becomes law, the competitive position of Discover’s network, which is exempt from the limitations, suddenly improves, according to Brian Graham, co-founder of advisory firm Klaros Group. That mirrors what an earlier law known as the Durbin amendment did for debit cards.

    Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) speaks during a US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing regarding Supreme Court ethics reform, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on May 2, 2023.

    Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

    “There are a bunch of things aimed, in one way or another, at the card networks and that ecosystem,” Graham said. “Those pressures might be one of the things that creates an opportunity for Capital One in the future if they have control over this network.”

    The biggest question for Capital One, its customers and investors is whether the merger will ultimately be approved by regulators. While Fairbank said he expects the deal to be closed in late 2024 or early 2025, industry experts said it was impossible to know whether it will be blocked by regulators, like a string of high-profile takeovers among banks, airlines and tech companies.

    On Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts urged regulators to swiftly block the deal, calling it “dangerous.” Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said he would be watching the deal to “ensure that this merger doesn’t enrich shareholders and executives at the expense of consumers and small businesses.”

    The Discover deal’s survival may hinge on whether it’s seen as boosting an also-ran payments network, or allowing an already-dominant card lender to level up in size — another reason Fairbank may have played up the importance of the network.

    “Which thing you are more concerned about will define whether you think this is a good deal or a bad deal from a public policy point of view,” Graham said.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Big banks have drastically cut overdraft fees, but customers still paid $2.2 billion last year

    Big banks have drastically cut overdraft fees, but customers still paid $2.2 billion last year

    [ad_1]

    Pedestrians pass a JPMorgan Chase bank branch in New York.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The three biggest American retail banks collected 25% less overdraft revenue last year as the companies, under pressure from regulators to cap the fees, created new ways for customers to avoid the penalties.

    JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America reported a combined $2.2 billion in overdraft fees in 2023, roughly $700 million less than in the previous year, according to regulatory filings.

    Overdraft fees are triggered when a customer attempts to spend more than the balance in their checking accounts. At around $35 per transaction at many banks, the fees have been a lucrative line item for the industry, generating $280 billion in revenue since 2000, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

    The industry is girding itself for a battle over overdraft fees after the CFPB in January unveiled a proposal to limit charges to as little as $3 per transaction. Banks say overdraft services are a lifeline that helps users avoid worse options such as payday loans, while critics including President Joe Biden say the fees exploit struggling Americans.

    The practice has brought unwelcome attention to big banks. During a 2021 hearing, Sen. Elizabeth Warren needled JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon on the fees. Dimon at the time refused her call to refund $1.5 billion to customers.

    But even before recent efforts by regulators, banks’ haul from overdraft has been on the decline. Pandemic stimulus money helped Americans trigger fewer of the fees starting in 2020, and then firms including Capital One, Citigroup and Ally voluntarily ended the practice.

    Those who kept the fees, including JPMorgan, limited the types of transactions that trigger penalties, got rid of fees for bounced checks and introduced one-day grace periods and $50 cushions to reduce their frequency.

    Bank of America cut the fees to $10 from $35 in 2022.

    “Whether folks eliminated some fees or dramatically reduced the cost of others, there’s been very significant shifts here,” said Jennifer Tescher, CEO of nonprofit group Financial Health Network. “Banks aren’t just getting rid of overdraft, they’re trying to find more customer-friendly ways of meeting their liquidity needs while making sure they aren’t overextended.”

    Steady decline

    Industrywide overdraft revenue totaled $7.7 billion in 2022, 35% below the 2019 level, according to a May CFPB report that included all U.S. banks with at least $1 billion in assets.

    Recent regulatory filings show that the steady decline continued last year, though JPMorgan and Wells Fargo remain by far the largest players in overdraft.

    JPMorgan had $1.1 billion in overdraft revenue last year, about 12% lower than in 2022. Wells Fargo saw a 27% decline to $937 million. Bank of America posted a 64% decline to $140 million.

    More than 70% of overdraft transactions no longer incur fees, and customers can choose accounts that don’t allow the penalties, a JPMorgan spokesman told CNBC.

    “Our customers continue to tell us they want and need access to overdraft protection, which helps them when they are temporarily short on money,” the JPMorgan spokesman said.

    Wells Fargo declined to comment. A Bank of America spokesman noted that after the company voluntarily changed its overdraft policies in 2022, revenue from the practice fell more than 90%, and they now collect less than smaller banks.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats urge Biden administration to deschedule marijuana – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    Democrats urge Biden administration to deschedule marijuana – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news

    [ad_1]





    Democrats urge Biden administration to deschedule marijuana – Cannabis Business Executive – Cannabis and Marijuana industry news





























    skip to Main Content

    [ad_2]

    AggregatedNews

    Source link

  • CEO Trashes Crypto – Again – And Warns Of Ban: Here's Why

    CEO Trashes Crypto – Again – And Warns Of Ban: Here's Why

    [ad_1]

    In a fiery declaration that reverberated through the financial landscape, JPMorgan Chase’s formidable CEO, Jamie Dimon, once again launched a verbal assault on crypto.

    Dimon, well-known for speaking his mind, straightforwardly called for a complete ban on digital currencies, linking them to criminal activities without holding back.

    The CEO didn’t mince words at a Senate hearing alongside seven other big bank bosses:

    “If I was the government, I’d close it down.”

    In response to a question from Senator Elizabeth Warren, he stated that he was adamantly against all forms of crypto, including bitcoin.

    Dimon expressed worries that terrorists, drug dealers, and rogue states would use them as a means of finance and declared he would shut it down if he were in charge.

    Even though Dimon’s bank is deeply engaged in blockchain—the technology that powers the $1.6 trillion cryptocurrency industry—his comments are the most recent assault against the industry.

    Dimon Bashes Crypto

    In earlier remarks, Dimon referred to bitcoin as “a hyped-up scam,” a term he subsequently withdrew. In addition, he had compared it to a “pet rock.”

    In spite of his subsequent admissions of remorse, he continued to use the term “decentralized Ponzi scheme” to describe bitcoin and other digital currencies following his previous tirades.

    Dimon and other banking leaders, including Brian Moynihan of Bank of America Corp., have asserted that their institutions have measures to stop terrorists and other criminals from utilizing them.

    In contrast, Warren advocated for the extension of anti-money-laundering regulations that banks presently enforce to digital assets, specifically the cryptocurrency market. Every single CEO expressed agreement.

    As of today, the market cap of cryptocurrencies stood at $1.55 trillion. Chart: TradingView.com

    According to sources, JPMorgan completed its first blockchain-based collateral resolution as recently as October in a deal with BlackRock and Barclays.

    With its JPM Coin, a proprietary stablecoin that enables users to execute blockchain-based payments, JPMorgan was a pioneer in this space.

    JPMorgan said in the next two years, the token may handle up to $10 billion in daily transactions, up from its current level of about $1 billion.

    The price of bitcoin, the biggest cryptocurrency in the world in terms of market valuation, has increased by more than 150% this year to about $44,000-plus, according to market tracker CoinMarketCap, despite calls for a government clampdown.

    Cryptocurrency Critique Unites Senator With Bankers

    Warren took advantage of the session to criticize the cryptocurrency sector by collaborating with Republicans and prominent bankers.

    Naturally, Dimon does not have the power of a government and cannot independently initiate the ban of cryptocurrencies.

    Being the leader of a private financial company, he may only make suggestions and voice opinions; he cannot implement significant policy changes.

    Nevertheless, it demonstrated an unusual convergence of interests between the crypto industry and the senator from Massachusetts, a long-time enemy of banks, who claimed that cryptocurrency was supporting illegal transactions.

    The price of bitcoin, the biggest and most popular cryptocurrency in the world, has increased by more than 150% this year and crossed the $44,000 barrier on Wednesday, according to the most recent market data, despite calls for a government shut down.

    Featured image from Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    [ad_2]

    Christian Encila

    Source link

  • Jamie Dimon on the cryptocurrency industry: “I’d close it down”

    Jamie Dimon on the cryptocurrency industry: “I’d close it down”

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told lawmakers on Wednesday that he would pull the plug on the cryptocurrency industry if he had the power. 

    “I’ve always been deeply opposed to crypto, bitcoin, etcetera,” he said in response to a question from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D.-Mass., about the use of cryptocurrencies by terrorists, drug traffickers and rogue nations to finance their activities. “If I was the governments, I’d close it down.”

    Dimon, regarded by many as America’s most prominent banker, said bad actors use digital currencies to launder money and dodge taxes, noting that cryptocurrency remains largely unregulated and hard to trace. He has long criticized the emerging crypto sector, once calling it a “fraud” and likening it to historical financial manias.

    Warren said the nation’s banking laws need to be updated, but that lobbyists for the crypto industry are working to block legislation to tighten rules on digital currencies, including compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act. 

    Dimon’s comments follow a tumultuous year for the crypto industry, including the November conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of bankrupt exchange FTC on multiple counts of fraud, and a $4.3 billion settlement with another major exchange, Binance, for its violation of anti-money laundering and U.S. government sanctions.

    Dimon and other leading bank CEOs, who were on Capitol Hill Wednesday for a Senate hearing on regulating Wall Street, testified that their institutions have controls in place to detect and halt illicit crypto transactions.

    Warren, a noted critic of Wall Street, urged the assembled financial executives to support the “Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2023,” a bill that would extend and toughen banking laws to prevent the use of crypto for money laundering, ransomware attacks, financial fraud and other illegal activities. 

    Despite calls for a government crackdown, the price of the world’s most important cryptocurrency — bitcoin — has surged more than 150% this year to nearly $44,000, according to price tracker CoinDesk

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Circle denies allegations of illicit financial activities

    Circle denies allegations of illicit financial activities

    [ad_1]

    Circle has publicly refuted allegations of improper banking relationships and financing of illicit activities in a detailed response to concerns raised by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown.

    The Nov. 30 letter, crafted by Circle’s Chief Strategy Officer Dante Disparte, responds to claims from the Campaign for Accountability, which accused Circle of facilitating illicit financial activities, including banking Justin Sun and financing Hamas.

    The Campaign for Accountability, led by Michelle Kuppersmith, based its allegations on studies and reports, suggesting ties between Circle and Sun. However, Circle’s response is clear: they have no current accounts with Sun or his entities, including the TRON Foundation or Huobi Global.

    They also noted that the U.S. government has not designated Sun or his companies as ‘specially designated nationals’, although Circle terminated their accounts in February 2023.

    This controversy emerges amidst broader concerns about the role of cryptocurrencies in illegal finance. Senators Warren and Brown have been vocal in urging the Biden Administration to address this issue, particularly in the context of crypto-financed terrorism.

    Their concerns were partly based on a Wall Street Journal report suggesting that Hamas used crypto to fund attacks on Israel, a claim later disputed by Elliptic, the data source for the report.

    Circle’s stance is firm yet open for dialogue, extending an offer to discuss these matters with the two Senators.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Bralon Hill

    Source link