ReportWire

Tag: electricity

  • Are New York electricity prices above the national average?

    [ad_1]

    Amid steep national price increases for certain consumer items, New York Republican state Sen. Tom O’Mara criticized the high cost of living in his state.

    In a column published in the Wellsville Sun on Jan. 20, O’Mara blamed Democrats in Albany for making New York “an increasingly expensive state in which to live, work, raise a family, or run a business.” 

    Republicans in the legislature, including O’Mara, have launched a “Save New York” campaign to tackle the cost of living, including electricity rates. 

    O’Mara is backing a bill that would return $2 billion to $3 billion in unspent money to taxpayers. The money would come from the New York State Energy and Research Development Authority, which is tasked with promoting energy efficiency, renewable energy and emissions reduction.

    In the column, O’Mara said such efforts are important because “New Yorkers pay 49% more than the national average for electricity.” 

    Federal data supports O’Mara’s statistic, though the percentage varies by the type of customer, and New York’s rates are lower than most New England states.

    How much higher are electricity costs in New York state?

    O’Mara — whose district includes portions of central New York state and the southern tier, including Corning and Elmira — responded to our inquiry with a post to an Empire Center for Public Policy article warning about the rising prices of electricity in New York. 

    According to the article, “In October 2025, the average residential electricity price in New York hit 26.95 cents per kilowatt-hour — about 50 percent higher than the U.S. average and among the top ten highest rates nationwide.”

    This aligns with slightly more recent data collected by the federal Energy Information Administration.

    In November 2025, the federal agency found, residential users in New York state paid average electricity prices of 26.49 cents per kilowatt hour in November 2025. The national rate that month was 17.78 cents per kilowatt hour, so New York state’s rate was exactly 49% higher than the national average.

    The premium paid by commercial users in New York state was similar to what residential users paid — 50% above the national average. 

    Two other categories of users — industrial and transportation — were closer to the national average, but still above it. Industrial users, which include major plants with a dedicated electricity supply, paid 6% more than the national average, while transportation users, such as rail, paid 15% more.

    New York compared favorably with some of its regional neighbors. 

    Among New England states, residential customers in Massachusetts paid 31.22 cents per kilowatt hour, Rhode Island residents paid 30.82, Maine residents paid 27.85, New Hampshire residents paid 27.37, and Connecticut residents paid 27.02 for residential.  The only New England state that was less expensive than New York was Vermont, where residential customers paid 24.17 cents per kilowatt hour.

    Two states in the mid-Atlantic region — New Jersey and Pennsylvania — had lower prices than New York, with 22.73 cents and 20.17 cents, respectively.

    Severin Borenstein, a University of California-Berkeley public policy and business administration professor, cautioned that the averages mask variations among people and locations.

    “New York has many different utilities and rates, so some people pay even more than that differential and others pay less,” Borenstein said.

    Our ruling

    O’Mara said, “New Yorkers pay 49% more than the national average for electricity.”

    Federal data from November 2025 shows that this is correct for residential and commercial users. Costs for industrial and transportation users were also above the national average, but not as dramatically.

    While O’Mara blamed New York’s Democrats for the high electricity prices, New York’s electricity costs are below those of most New England states, although they are higher than two mid-Atlantic states, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. 

    The statement is accurate but needs additional information, so we rate it Mostly True.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 11 tips for safer generator usage

    [ad_1]

    With the region in the grips of a major winter storm, the possibility of power outages looms large. Should the power go out, a generator can keep power flowing into homes or businesses.

    The Outdoor Power Equipment Institute (OPEI), an international trade association representing manufacturers and suppliers of outdoor power equipment, small engines, battery power systems, portable generators, utility and personal transport vehicles, and golf cars, reminds home and business owners to keep safety in mind when using generators.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“}@E 92G:?8 A@H6C H96? J@F ?665 :E 😀 7CFDEC2E:?8[ D@ 2 86?6C2E@C 42? AC@G:56 6>6C86?4J 324A@CE2?E E@ 7@==@H 2== >2?F724EFC6C’D :?DECF4E:@?D[ 2?5 ?6G6C A=246 2 86?6C2E@C 😕 J@FC 82C286 @C :?D:56 J@FC 9@>6 @C 3F:=5:?8] xE D9@F=5 36 2 D276 5:DE2?46 7C@> E96 DECF4EFC6 2?5 ?@E ?62C 2? 2:C :?E2<6]”k^Am

    kAm|@C6 E:AD :?4=F56ik^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`]k^DEC@?8m %2<6 DE@4< @7 J@FC 86?6C2E@C] |2<6 DFC6 6BF:A>6?E 😀 😕 8@@5 H@C<:?8 @C56C 367@C6 DE2CE:?8 2?5 FD:?8 :E] s@ E9:D 367@C6 2 DE@C> 9:ED]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8ma]k^DEC@?8m #6G:6H E96 5:C64E:@?D] u@==@H 2== >2?F724EFC6C’D :?DECF4E:@?D] #6G:6H E96 @H?6C’D >2?F2=D W=@@< >2?F2=D FA @?=:?6 :7 J@F 42??@E 7:?5 E96>X D@ 6BF:A>6?E 😀 @A6C2E65 D276=J]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mb]k^DEC@?8m x?DE2== 2 32EE6CJ@A6C2E65 42C3@? >@?@I:56 56E64E@C 😕 J@FC 9@>6] %9:D 2=2C> H:== D@F?5 :7 52?86C@FD =6G6=D @7 42C3@? >@?@I:56 6?E6C E96 3F:=5:?8]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mc]k^DEC@?8m w2G6 E96 C:89E 7F6= @? 92?5] &D6 E96 EJA6 @7 7F6= C64@>>6?565 3J E96 86?6C2E@C >2?F724EFC6C E@ AC@E64E E9:D :>A@CE2?E :?G6DE>6?E] xE 😀 :==682= E@ FD6 2?J 7F6= H:E9 >@C6 E92? `_T 6E92?@= 😕 @FE5@@C A@H6C 6BF:A>6?E] Wu@C >@C6 :?7@C>2E:@? @? AC@A6C 7F6=:?8 7@C @FE5@@C A@H6C 6BF:A>6?E G:D:E k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^HHH]@A6:]@C8^AC@8C2>D^6E92?@=H2C?:?8^QmHHH]@A6:]@C8^AC@8C2>D^6E92?@=H2C?:?8^k^2mX] xEUCDBF@jD 36DE E@ FD6 7C6D9 7F6=[ 3FE :7 J@F 2C6 FD:?8 7F6= E92E 92D 366? D:EE:?8 😕 2 82D 42? 7@C >@C6 E92? b_ 52JD[ 255 7F6= DE23:=:K6C E@ :E] $E@C6 82D @?=J 😕 2? 2AAC@G65 4@?E2:?6C 2?5 2H2J 7C@> 962E D@FC46D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8md]k^DEC@?8m t?DFC6 A@CE23=6 86?6C2E@CD 92G6 A=6?EJ @7 G6?E:=2E:@?] v6?6C2E@CD D9@F=5 ?6G6C 36 FD65 😕 2? 6?4=@D65 2C62 @C A=2465 :?D:56 2 9@>6[ 2 3F:=5:?8[ @C 2 82C286[ 6G6? :7 E96 H:?5@HD @C 5@@CD 2C6 @A6?] !=246 E96 86?6C2E@C @FED:56 2?5 2H2J 7C@> H:?5@HD[ 5@@CD[ 2?5 G6?ED E92E 4@F=5 2==@H 42C3@? >@?@I:56 E@ 5C:7E :?5@@CD]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8me]k^DEC@?8m z66A E96 86?6C2E@C 5CJ] s@ ?@E FD6 2 86?6C2E@C 😕 H6E 4@?5:E:@?D] r@G6C 2?5 G6?E 2 86?6C2E@C] |@56=DA64:7:4 E6?ED @C 86?6C2E@C 4@G6CD 42? 36 7@F?5 @?=:?6 7@C AFC492D6 2?5 2E 9@>6 46?E6CD 2?5 92C5H2C6 DE@C6D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mf]k^DEC@?8m ~?=J 255 7F6= E@ 2 4@@= 86?6C2E@C] q67@C6 C67F6=:?8[ EFC? E96 86?6C2E@C @77 2?5 =6E :E 4@@= 5@H?]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mg]k^DEC@?8m r92C86 2?5 FD6 32EE6CJA@H6C65 86?6C2E@CD^:?G6CE6CD AC@A6C=J] #6492C86 @?=J H:E9 E96 492C86C DA64:7:65 3J E96 >2?F724EFC6C] p 492C86C E92E 😀 DF:E23=6 7@C @?6 EJA6 @7 32EE6CJ A24< >2J ?@E 36 4@>A2E:3=6 H:E9 2?@E96C 32EE6CJ A24<] u@==@H 2== 492C8:?8 :?DECF4E:@?D 2?5 5@ ?@E 492C86 E96 32EE6CJ A24< @C 6BF:A>6?E @FED:56 E96 E6>A6C2EFC6 C2?86 DA64:7:65 😕 E96 :?DECF4E:@?D] r92C8:?8 :>AC@A6C=J @C 2E E6>A6C2EFC6D @FED:56 E96 DA64:7:65 C2?86 >2J 52>286 E96 32EE6CJ]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8mh]k^DEC@?8m !=F8 😕 D276=J] x7 J@F 5@?’E J6E 92G6 2 EC2?D76C DH:E49[ J@F 42? FD6 E96 @FE=6ED @? E96 86?6C2E@C] xE’D 36DE E@ A=F8 😕 2AA=:2?46D 5:C64E=J E@ E96 86?6C2E@C] x7 J@F >FDE FD6 2? 6IE6?D:@? 4@C5[ :E D9@F=5 36 962GJ5FEJ 2?5 56D:8?65 7@C @FE5@@C FD6] xE D9@F=5 36 C2E65 W:? H2EED @C 2>ADX 2E =62DE 6BF2= E@ E96 DF> @7 E96 4@??64E65 2AA=:2?46 =@25D] |2<6 DFC6 E96 4@C5 😀 7C66 @7 4FED[ 2?5 E96 A=F8 92D 2== E9C66 AC@?8D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m`_]k^DEC@?8m x?DE2== 2 EC2?D76C DH:E49] p EC2?D76C DH:E49 4@??64ED E96 86?6C2E@C E@ E96 4:C4F:E A2?6= 2?5 =6ED J@F A@H6C 92C5H:C65 2AA=:2?46D] |@DE EC2?D76C DH:E496D 2=D@ 96=A 2G@:5 @G6C=@25 3J 5:DA=2J:?8 H2EE286 FD286 =6G6=D]k^Am

    kAmkDEC@?8m“]k^DEC@?8m s@ ?@E FD6 E96 86?6C2E@C E@ “324<7665” A@H6C :?E@ J@FC 9@>6 6=64EC:42= DJDE6>] %CJ:?8 E@ A@H6C J@FC 9@>6’D 6=64EC:42= H:C:?8 3J “324<7665:?8” — H96C6 J@F A=F8 E96 86?6C2E@C :?E@ 2 H2== @FE=6E — 😀 52?86C@FD] *@F 4@F=5 9FCE FE:=:EJ H@C<6CD 2?5 ?6:893@CD D6CG65 3J E96 D2>6 EC2?D7@C>6C] q24<7665:?8 3JA2DD6D 3F:=E:? 4:C4F:E AC@E64E:@? 56G:46D[ D@ J@F 4@F=5 52>286 J@FC 6=64EC@?:4D @C DE2CE 2? 6=64EC:42= 7:C6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • EPA Rule Clarification Hits a Significant Source of Grok’s Electricity

    [ad_1]

    This past summer, activists at the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) announced they were going after Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, for what it claimed were “unpermitted gas turbines that threaten to make air pollution problems even worse,” in the Memphis area, where the xAI “Colossus” data centers are located. It appears the SELC has now prevailed, because the language of a general ruling from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding that type of turbine essentially confirms the activists’ assertion, undermining the Grok parent company’s legal rubric for using the equipment.

    In order to serve the computational needs of products like the Grok AI chatbot, Grokipedia, and the Grok image generator, xAI was generating off-grid power for its data center with gas-powered turbines and classifying them as “non-road engines”—temporary generators, ostensibly used for more transitory purposes. That temporary status, it was apparently hoped, would have made them exempt from air quality requirements. The newly updated EPA rules clarify that using such turbines, even temporarily, does not confer any such exemption from clean air rules.

    According to the Guardian, the placement of the initial “Colossus 1” turbines—which eventually came to number 35—benefited from a local loophole in environmental laws that says generators don’t require permits as long as they’re in place for 364 days or less. The Guardian’s reporting also notes that xAI now has locally permitted generators at the sites, but that the new EPA rules say the federal government is now in charge of such permitting, not the local authorities.

    In a statement published by the NAACP, SELC senior attorney Amanda Garcia said this decision “makes it clear that companies are not—and have never been—allowed to build and operate methane gas turbines without a permit and that there is no loophole that would allow corporations to set up unpermitted power plants,” adding that her organization expects “local health leaders to take swift action to ensure they are following federal law and to better protect neighbors from harmful air pollution.”

    This feels like a lifetime ago, but just under a year ago, during Elon Musk’s tenure at DOGE, Musk sought to slash EPA contracts with the stated aim of reducing government waste. The EPA’s administrator, Lee Zeldin, said at the time, “DOGE is making us better,” adding, “They come up with great recommendations, and we can make a decision to act on it.”

     

    xAI’s media contact email address sends a three-word auto-reply in response to all inquiries, including one from Gizmodo about what the turbine situation currently is for the relevant facilities in Tennessee. Gizmodo also asked xAI if the Colossus data centers are operating at reduced capacity while the permitting issues are being resolved. We will update if we receive a useful response. 

    [ad_2]

    Mike Pearl

    Source link

  • Trump administration calls on tech companies to pay energy bill for new AI power plants

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The Trump administration and a bipartisan group of governors called for reforms in the largest electric grid in the country to make sure the development of new artificial intelligence plants doesn’t drive up electric costs.  

    Federal and state officials signed onto a statement of principles that’s focused on the PJM Interconnection grid, which serves over 67 million people in 13 states in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest. The pact calls on technology companies to foot the bill for new power plants in PJM’s region, to address the surge of artificial intelligence data centers that the White House wants to see built. The administration says the National Energy Dominance Council reached an agreement with several states for over $15 billion in new power-generation projects. 

    The statement also calls on PJM to hold an emergency capacity auction for this power — and to protect residential customers from capacity price increases. 

    Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum signed onto the plan near the White House, at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building with Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin of Virginia and Democratic Govs. Wes Moore of Maryland and Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania.

    Wright said in a statement that President Trump had “asked governors across the Mid-Atlantic to come together and call upon PJM to allow America to build big reliable power plants again.” 

    He promised that the directives would “restore affordable and reliable electricity so American families thrive and America’s manufacturing industries once again boom.”

    PJM’s grid serves over 65 million people and operates in parts or all of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, Washington, D.C., Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, North Carolina, Delaware, Kentucky and Tennessee. Governors from every state signed onto the statement of principles. 

    The Board of Managers for PJM announced Friday it would take actions to address the additional load to the grid new AI data centers would bring. It says they’d have an “immediate initiation” to secure more power, and hold a “backstop generation procurement process to address short-term reliability needs.” 

    PJM’s announcement also says it expects the “data center community … to play a constructive role in addressing the reliability and affordability challenges associated with the scale and pace of the forecasted load additions in the PJM region.”

    Friday’s announcement also revealed a little bipartisanship between the Republican White House and potential 2028 presidential Democratic candidates Moore and Shapiro, who have both been calling for an increased power supply and lower energy prices. 

    “We cannot build a 21st-century economy on an energy market that blocks new supply,” Moore said in a statement. “This moment calls for urgency. Maryland families and businesses must be served by a reliable grid without shouldering the cost of sky-high energy bills.”

    Shapiro sued PJM in 2024 to stop price hikes, and said he’s been working with governors and federal energy officials for months to push PJM to make reforms. 

    “I’m glad the White House is following Pennsylvania’s lead and adopting the solutions we’ve been pushing for,” Shapiro said in a statement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Negative prices for electricity are getting more common in Europe and consumer costs have dipped—while Americans face rising energy bills | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Electricity supply is increasingly outpacing demand in Europe as renewable energy capacity grows, making negative prices a more frequent occurrence.

    In early 2020, Spain’s installed solar power capacity totaled nearly 9 gigawatts, according to data from Red Eléctrica. In early 2025, it had soared to 32 GW, helped by subsidies.

    With solar panels and wind turbines installed in more places—while energy storage capacity is still lagging—an especially sunny and windy day can generate more electricity than is needed, sending prices below zero.

    By September, the number of hours in Spain with negative electricity prices had already topped 500 for the year to date, more than double the full-year total for 2024. Similarly, France’s hours had topped 400 by then, also exceeding its 2024 tally, and Germany was on a trajectory to do so as well.

    Those rates are for the wholesale electricity market, meaning traders must pay someone to take the surplus energy instead of the other way around.

    That doesn’t mean households are also paid to consume electricity, because those rates are often set in advance. But negative prices can eventually be felt in markets with more dynamic pricing regimes.

    In fact, electricity prices for households in the European Union during the first half of the year were down 1.5% from the first half of 2024, according to data published in October. Excluding taxes Europeans paid, electricity prices fell more sharply and have been sliding since 2023, after spiking in 2021 and 2022.

    By contrast, rising electricity prices in the U.S. have become a growing source of voter discontent as utilities race to build more capacity to feed skyrocketing demand from AI data centers.

    The higher bills have fueled an overall affordability crisis that started with the post-pandemic inflation spike and was worsened by President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

    While the annual inflation rate has cooled sharply since peaking in 2022, consumers are still reeling from the aggregate price hikes over the last five years and are demanding lower prices, not just slower increases.

    The latest consumer price index data released earlier this month showed that electricity prices in November were up 6.9% year over year on an unadjusted basis.

    To be sure, negative electricity prices also happen occasionally in the U.S., including in Texas, which has a more deregulated grid and significant wind power capacity.

    But the Trump administration is cracking down on renewable energy, gutting subsidies for solar power and killing wind energy projects.

    And negative prices in Europe aren’t helping the energy industry there as they weigh on producers’ profits and valuations for solar plants.

    Countries are scrambling to boost battery storage. But in the short term, the challenging price environment has cooled development of new solar capacity, even where land, permits, and grid access have been secured.

    “The market is flooded with ready-to-build projects that developers want to sell since they’re no longer good enough in the current market,” a senior executive at an owner of Spanish solar plants told the Financial Times.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Ma

    Source link

  • How to save money on your energy bill as heating costs surge

    [ad_1]


    How to save money on your energy bill as heating costs surge – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    The cost of heating a home is going through the roof, but there are steps you can take to try to keep your energy bills down. Ash-har Quraishi has details.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Facing high home heating bills this winter? These tips can help you save money.

    [ad_1]

    Rising energy costs are adding to the affordability issues facing millions of U.S. consumers, with nonprofit group PowerLines recently estimating that more than 100 million Americans could see heftier bills this year because of rate hikes. 

    The average household is expected to pay an average of $995 on home heating this winter, a 9.2% increase from last year, according to the National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association (NEADA). Those who use electricity for heating were projected to see an even steeper jump of 12.2%, with the average bill swelling from $1,090 to $1,233, the group found.

    “Millions of households are being pushed deeper into utility debt and closer to shutoffs simply because they cannot afford to keep their homes warm,” Mark Wolfe, executive director of NEADA, said in a statement. 

    So what recourse do Americans have, knowing comfort comes at a cost? Here are some tips on how to save money on your utility bill:

    Get a home energy audit. An inspector can help you detect where cold air might be seeping into your house and recommend energy efficiency improvements. Audits are performed by certified home energy auditors, according to energystar.gov. Look to local government agencies or your utility company for home energy assessment tips.

    Tackle obvious leaks. Justin Castronova, a lead inspector at First Choice Inspectors in Illinois, told CBS News consumer correspondent Ash-har Quraishi that the best place to start is with doors and windows. Castronova recommends using caulk to seal gaps, maintaining weather stripping for doors and windows, and using spray foam around electrical outlets (make sure to turn off your power first).

    Invest in energy-efficient appliances. That can save you from $10 to $50 a month, depending on the size of the appliance and how many you have, Castronova said.

    Insulate your home. This will ensure the envelope of your home is fortified against the cold weather. Energy Star, an energy-efficiency program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, has a handy DIY guide on how to get started.

    Look into state, federal and nonprofit assistance programs. For example, the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program provides financial assistance to low-income households to weather-proof their homes and even deal with energy-related home repairs. The best way to find out what you qualify for is to call 211, which connects people with health and human services resources. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Georgia regulators approve 50% power capacity boost, betting that massive AI data center demand will eventually materialize | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Georgia’s only private electric utility plans to increase power capacity by 50% after state regulators on Friday agreed 5-0 that the plan is needed to meet projected demand from data centers.

    It would be one of the biggest build-outs in the U.S. to meet the insatiable electricity demand from developers of artificial intelligence. The construction cost would be $16.3 billion, but staff members say customers will pay $50 billion to $60 billion over coming decades, including interest costs and guaranteed profit for the monopoly utility.

    Georgia Power Co. and the Public Service Commission pledge large users will more than pay for their costs, and that spreading fixed costs over more customers, could help significantly cut residents’ power bills beginning in 2029.

    “Large energy users are paying more so families and small businesses can pay less, and that’s a great result for Georgians,” Georgia Power CEO Kim Greene said in a statement after the vote.

    But opponents say the five elected Republicans on the commission are greenlighting a risky bet by the utility to chase data center customers with existing ratepayers left holding the bag if demand doesn’t materialize.

    “The need for 10,000 megawatts of new capacity resources on the system in the next six years isn’t here,” said Bob Sherrier, a lawyer representing some opponents. “It just isn’t, and it may never be.”

    The approval came less than two months after voters rebuked GOP leadership, ousting two incumbent Republicans on the commission in favor of Democrats by overwhelming margins. Those two Democrats won in campaigns that centered on six Georgia Power rate increases commissioners have allowed in recent years, even though the company agreed to a three-year rate freeze in July.

    Peter Hubbard and Alicia Johnson — the Democrats who will take office Jan. 1 — opposed Friday’s vote. But current commissioners refused to delay.

    Electric bills have emerged as a potent political issue in Georgia and nationwide, with grassroots opposition to data centers partly based on fears that other customers will subsidize power demands of technology behemoths.

    Georgia Power is the largest unit of Atlanta-based Southern Co. It says it needs 10,000 megawatts of new capacity — enough to power 4 million Georgia homes — with 80% of that flowing to data centers. The company has 2.7 million customers today, including homes, businesses and industries.

    Whether the company’s projections of a huge increase in demand will pan out has been the central argument. Georgia Power and commission staff agreed Dec. 9 to allow the company to build or acquire all the desired capacity, despite staff earlier saying the company’s forecast included too much speculative construction.

    In return, the company agreed that after the current rate freeze ends in 2028, it would use revenue from new customers to place “downward pressure” on rates through 2031. That would amount to at least $8.50 a month, or $102 a year, for a typical residential customer. That customer currently pays more than $175 a month, including taxes.

    “So we’re taking advantage of the upsides from this additional revenue, but allow it to shift the downside and the risk over to the company. And I’m real proud of that,” Commission Chairman Jason Shaw said after the vote.

    But “downward pressure” doesn’t guarantee a rate decrease.

    “It doesn’t mean your bills are going down,” said Liz Coyle, executive director of consumer group Georgia Watch. “It means that maybe they’re not going up as fast.”

    Existing customers would pay for part of the construction program that doesn’t serve data centers. More importantly, opponents fear Georgia Power’s pledge of rate relief can’t be enforced, or won’t hold up over the 40-plus years needed to pay off new natural-gas fired power plants.

    In a Monday news conference, Hubbard likened it to a mortgage “to build a massive addition to your home for a new roommate, big tech.”

    “If in 10 years, the AI bubble bursts or the data centers move to a cheaper state, then the roommate moves out, but the mortgage doesn’t go away,” he said.

    Staff members say the commission must watch demand closely and that if data centers don’t use as much power as projected, Georgia Power must drop agreements to purchase wholesale power, close its least efficient generating plants and seek additional customers.

    Many opponents oppose any new generation fueled by natural gas, warning carbon emissions will worsen climate change. Some opponents were escorted out of the commission meeting by police after they began chanting “Nay! Nay! Nay! The people say nay!”

    “Increased natural gas output for the sake of these silicon billionaire kings seems like a lose-lose,” opponent Zak Norton told commissioners Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Amy, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • In his national address, President Trump claimed he’s bringing prices down. Here’s what the data shows.

    [ad_1]

    After nearly two months without new consumer price data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its latest report Thursday, providing a glimpse at energy costs, food prices and other everyday expenses.

    According to the consumer price index, inflation slowed in November, with prices rising 0.2% over the 0.3% observed in September. (BLS could not collect October data because of the government shutdown.)

    Still, inflation remains stubbornly high. Compared with a year ago, consumer costs are up about 2.7%.

    Thursday’s report came just a day after President Donald Trump delivered a prime-time address from the White House in which he largely discussed affordability concerns, from housing costs to grocery prices, saying the U.S. is “poised for an economic boom.”

    “The last administration and their allies in Congress looted our treasury for trillions of dollars, driving up prices and everything at levels never seen before. I am bringing those high prices down and bringing them down very fast.”

    In truth, of the 11 everyday costs tracked month to month by the consumer price index, only five have decreased since January.

    Here’s a closer look at the president’s claims and how prices are changing, or not, during his second term in office.

    To see the average U.S. price of a specific good, click on the drop-down arrow below and select the item you wish to view.

    Eggs

    In the wake of all-time highs set earlier this year, egg prices have collapsed in recent months.

    That downward trend continued in November, with the price dropping a whopping 63 cents from September and settling at $2.86 per dozen. It’s the first time since June 2024 that the average nationwide price for a dozen large Grade A eggs registered below the $3 mark.

    This steep drop-off in prices is a result of a declining number of bird flu cases in commercial and backyard flocks. In the first two months of 2025, tens of millions of birds were affected by highly pathogenic avian influenza across 39 states, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. With entire flocks culled to prevent the spread of the virus, the egg supply was strained, leading to shortages in stores and record costs for consumers.

    Following another spike in cases in the early fall, the number of new infections appears to be subsiding again, with less than 2 million U.S. birds affected in the past two months. More notably, zero outbreaks among egg-laying chickens have been reported in November and December.

    Consequently, costs are “falling rapidly” as highlighted by Trump in his prime-time address earlier this week.

    “The price of eggs is down 82% since March, and everything else is falling rapidly. And it’s not done yet, but boy are we making progress. Nobody can believe what’s going on.”

    While egg prices have dropped considerably from March’s record high of $6.23 per dozen, the difference of roughly $3.37 from March to November represents a 54% decrease — not the 82% cited by the president.

    In a statement given to the Tribune, a White House official clarified that he was referring to wholesale costs, not retail prices.

    Milk

    The cost of milk also saw a measurable decrease from the previous month, falling 13 cents.

    A gallon of fresh, fortified whole milk is now priced at $4.00 — that’s 2.5% less than it was in December 2024, before Trump took office.

    Bread

    The average price of white bread fell in November to $1.79 per pound, marking a three-year low for the pantry staple. Time for bread pudding, anyone?

    Bananas

    The cost of bananas fell slightly from September’s all-time highs, dropping just a fraction of a cent to $0.66 per pound in November.

    Recent price inflation is likely a byproduct of the president’s trade war, with tariffs imposed on the country’s top banana suppliers like Guatemala, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras and Mexico — all of which are currently subject to an import tax of at least 10%.

    But in mid-November, Trump took action to combat rising grocery costs, announcing that some agricultural products would be exempt from tariffs due to “current domestic demand for certain products” and “current domestic capacity to produce certain products.”

    Both fresh and dried bananas were among the listed exemptions, indicating that lower prices may be around the corner.

    Oranges

    No data on orange prices was available for November.

    However, in September, the cost of navel oranges was listed at $1.80 per pound, less than a cent shy of record highs and nearly 18% more than they were at the start of the Trump administration.

    Drastically low domestic orange production combined with steep tariffs on foreign growers have been helping to push costs skyward. But, as with bananas, oranges are now exempt from most reciprocal tariffs.

    Tomatoes

    As of November, the cost of field-grown tomatoes was $1.83 per pound. That price is 8 cents lower than the previous month of data and down roughly 12% since Trump took power.

    The change is somewhat abnormal given the growing season, as prices typically rise in the fall and peak in the early winter months, and could be attributable to the Trump administration’s recent course reversal on many of its tomato tariffs.

    Chicken

    The cost of fresh, whole chicken fell for a fourth consecutive month, to $2.04 per pound — its lowest price in a year.

    Rising feed costs and the effects of bird flu on the poultry supply chain have driven persistently higher prices, but with the number of cases dropping again, we could see lower prices in the new year.

    Still, the average cost is only about 2 cents less than it was when President Joe Biden left the White House.

    Ground beef

    Ground beef is getting more expensive.

    After shoppers saw some relief in September from climbing costs, the price of ground beef jumped another 18 cents.

    Rising costs can be attributed to a confluence of factors. The U.S. cattle inventory is the lowest it’s been in almost 75 years, and severe drought in parts of the country has further reduced the feed supply, per the USDA. Additionally, steep tariff rates on top beef importers also played a part in higher prices stateside, but as of Nov. 13 high-quality cuts, processed beef and live cattle are exempt from most countries’ levies.

    Still, since the change of administrations, ground beef costs have ballooned by 18% — translating to $1 per pound price increases at the grocery store.

    As of November, a pound of 100% ground beef chuck would set you back about $6.50.

    Electricity

    Electric costs have also been steadily rising.

    At approximately 19 cents per kilowatt-hour, the current price of electricity is a fraction of a cent off August’s high. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average American household uses 899 kWh every four weeks, translating to a monthly bill of about $170.

    Thankfully, the White House appears to be working to mitigate mounting costs. In his presidential address, Trump claimed that within the next 12 months his administration will have opened 1,600 new electrical generating plants.

    “Prices on electricity and everything else will fall dramatically,” Trump said.

    For many Americans, relief is needed. Since last December, the average price of electricity per kilowatt-hour has increased more than 7%.

    Gasoline

    Declining gas prices were another highlight of Trump’s Wednesday night remarks.

    The cost of gasoline has tumbled from the record-setting prices Americans saw three summers ago under Biden, and just last month, the price at the pump dropped more than 10 cents per gallon.

    “On day one I declared a national energy emergency,” Trump said. “Gasoline is now under $2.50 a gallon in much of the country. In some states, it by the way, just hit $1.99 a gallon.”

    According to the latest CPI data, the average nationwide cost for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline is $3.23. And though prices are noticeably lower than they were two to three years ago, that average remains higher than it was just a year ago and up nearly 3% during the Trump presidency.

    Prices in Chicago, meanwhile, are about the same month-over-month, costing an average of $3.29 per gallon, according to EIA data.

    Natural gas

    Bucking its previous downward trend, piped utility gas, or natural gas, is another expense that’s climbing. The nationwide cost jumped 3 cents in November, landing at $1.64 per therm.

    On average, Americans are paying close to 8% more to heat their homes, ovens and stovetops than when Biden left office. Year-over-year, that gap is even more drastic: a roughly 10% change or difference of 15 cents per therm.

    [ad_2]

    Claire Malon

    Source link

  • AP-NORC poll finds consumers pinched by prices this holiday season

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON, D.C.: As Americans head into the heart of the holiday shopping season, many say festive spending feels more stressful than joyful, weighed down by stubbornly high prices and economic unease, according to a new AP-NORC poll.

    Large majorities of U.S. adults report noticing higher-than-usual costs for groceries, electricity, and holiday gifts in recent months, the survey by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found. Many say they are dipping into savings, hunting more aggressively for bargains, or cutting back on discretionary spending.

    About half of Americans say it is more complicated than usual to afford the gifts they want to give, while similar numbers report delaying big purchases or reducing nonessential spending more than they typically would during the holidays.

    The findings present a challenge for President Donald Trump, who returned to the White House promising to bring prices down. Instead, inflation remains a persistent drag on public sentiment, much as it was during Democratic President Joe Biden’s term. The poll closely mirrors an AP-NORC survey from December 2022, when inflation was running much hotter, but consumer frustration looked strikingly similar.

    Trump’s tariffs have added to inflationary pressures and heightened concerns about economic stability, keeping prices at levels many Americans say remain difficult to manage. The president has rejected those concerns, insisting the economy is strong.

    “When will people understand what is happening?” Trump said last week on Truth Social. “When will Polls reflect the Greatness of America at this point, and how bad it was just one year ago?”

    Still, 68 percent of U.S. adults describe the economy as “poor,” unchanged from December 2024, just before Trump returned to office.

    White House officials plan to send Trump traveling around the country in hopes of boosting confidence ahead of next year’s midterm elections. But comments he made this week in Pennsylvania, suggesting Americans buy fewer dolls and pencils for children because of tariff-related price increases, contrasted sharply with what many respondents described in the poll, including some who supported him in 2024.

    Sergio Ruiz, 44, of Tucson, Arizona, said he is relying more on buy-now-pay-later programs to spread out the cost of gifts for his children. Though not deeply political, Ruiz voted for Trump last year and hopes interest rates fall to help his real estate business.

    “Prices are up. What can you do? You need to make more money,” Ruiz said.

    The poll found that roughly half of Americans are more focused than usual on finding the lowest price when they shop, while about four in ten say they are tapping into savings more than at other times.

    Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say they are cutting back or bargain-hunting, but many Republicans are adjusting as well. About four in ten Republicans say they are searching for low prices more than usual, and a similar share reports buying fewer nonessential items.

    Public attitudes toward holiday shopping look much like they did in 2022, when inflation surged to a four-decade high. Although inflation has since cooled to about three percent, it remains above the Federal Reserve’s two percent target, and the job market shows signs of slowing.

    The survey suggests it is the absolute level of prices — not just the pace of inflation — that continues to strain household budgets. Nearly nine in ten adults say grocery prices are higher than usual, while about two-thirds report higher electricity and holiday gift prices. About half say gas prices also feel elevated.

    Consumer spending has held up despite widespread pessimism, but Trump’s tariffs have changed how some people shop. Andrew Russell, a 33-year-old adjunct professor in Arlington Heights, Illinois, said he now avoids online purchases from abroad.

    “This year, I only bought things that I can pick up in person,” said Russell, who voted Democratic and worries that heavy investment in artificial intelligence could be forming a bubble that might hurt markets next year.

    Looking ahead, few Americans expect meaningful improvement. About four in ten say the economy will be worse next year, roughly three in ten expect little change, and only about two in ten think conditions will improve. Republicans are more optimistic than Democrats, but overall optimism has declined from last year.

    Millicent Simpson, 56, of Cleveland, Ohio, said she expects the economy to worsen for people like her who depend on Medicaid and food assistance programs.

    “He’s making it rough for us,” said Simpson, who voted Democratic. “He’s messing with the government assistance for everybody, young and old.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Americans are facing power shutoffs and mounting debt as energy costs surge

    [ad_1]

    Americans’ energy bills are piling up, forcing them deeper into debt and even triggering power shutoffs.

    As of June, nearly one in 20 households went into collections or fell in arrears on their utility bills, according to a new joint report from The Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, and advocacy group Protect Borrowers. The problem was even more pronounced in parts of the South and Appalachia, where one in 12 households was already in collections or on the verge of it.

    In the last three years, the average overdue balance on utility bills climbed from $597 to $789, a 32% jump, the report found. 

    More Americans are falling behind on their utility payments due to rising energy prices, alongside a jump in costs for other essentials, ranging from child care to housing.

    “When we see families unable to pay their utility bills, it raises alarm bells about a crisis of home heating and electricity, but it also raises alarm bells about people’s ability to deal with their cost of living across the board,” said Julie Margetta Morgan, president of The Century Foundation. 

    The average overdue utility balance in the U.S. has soared (Line chart)

    Residential electricity prices rose by 10.5% between January and August 2025, one of the fastest increases in a decade, government data analyzed by the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA), an educational and policy organization, shows. Natural gas is still the most popular way Americans heat their homes, although a growing share are using electricity.

    A combination of high interest rates, rising natural gas costs and an increase in demand from data centers has pushed up prices, according to NEADA.

    The issue will likely come into sharper focus this winter when millions of consumers face heating bills. NEADA predicts that Americans will see their energy bills rise nearly 8% this winter to an average of roughly $976 per month. 

    More Americans at risk of shutoffs

    When people fail to pay their energy bills on time, it can lead to electricity shutoffs, or when a utility turns off a household’s power until people pay the balance, along with a so-called reconnection fee.

    Most states have some sort of safeguard against utility shutoffs when the temperature dips below a certain level, but not all. States without cold-weather protection include Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee and Utah, according to the Energy Justice Lab, a joint project of Indiana University and the University of Pennsylvania.

    Despite these protections, Americans are becoming increasingly vulnerable to shutoffs, experts told CBS News.

    While no official national count of utility cutoffs exists, NEADA estimates that 3.5 million American households had their power cut off at some point in 2024 based on public data reported by utility companies. That number is expected to swell to 4 million this year, NEADA estimates.

    “Past due balances climbing, particularly for lower-income families, suggest that shutoffs are going to become much more prevalent,” the Century Foundation’s Margetta Morgan said. 

    Con Edison, a utility serving New York City and Westchester County in New York, has cut off almost 168,000 customers at some point this year, according to data NEADA shared with CBS News. That’s more than five times the number of shutoffs the utility reported last year. 

    Most Americans whose power is cut off have services restored within a few days, according to Mark Wolfe, NEADA’s executive director. Still, the shutoffs can create major disruptions to Americans’ day-to-day lives as they lose refrigeration, internet and lighting. Pipes can also freeze, and residents could get sick if their apartments get too cold, Wolfe added.

    Shutoffs tend to have a bigger impact on low-income households, given they are already stretched thin by everyday expenses, Wolfe said. Many turn to payday lenders, friends and family or state forgiveness plans to cover reconnection costs or overdue bills, he added.

    “When money is limited, people have to prioritize essentials like food and medicine, and utility bills become one of the few expenses they can postpone,” Wolfe told CBS News. “That flexibility gives them a small sense of control, but it also increases the risk of falling behind and facing shutoffs.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida approves electric bill rate hike: What we know

    [ad_1]

    Florida Power & Light (FPL), the largest electric utility in the United States, said it has approval from the regulator to increase customers’ base rates over the next four years, which critics say could cost consumers billions of dollars amid the country’s affordability crisis.

    Why It Matters

    FPL serves about 12 million people, making it an influential force in the industry and potentially setting a precedent for other companies.

    The increase comes after several years of high inflation, with the cost of living, notably groceries, remaining high for Americans and becoming a lightning rod for the administration of President Donald Trump, who campaigned last year on decreasing prices.

    The average cost of electricity per kilowatt-hour in the U.S. rose to 18.8 cents in September, compared with 17.8 cents in September 2024 and 13.7 cents in September 2020, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    What To Know

    The settlement is expected to lead to base-rate increases of $945 million in 2026 and $705 million in 2027. FPL also would collect additional amounts in 2028 and 2029 for solar-energy and battery-storage projects, CBS reported.

    According to FPL, starting January 1, 2026, the average residential electric bill for a customer using 1,000 kilowatt-hours will increase by $2.50 per month, a rise of about 2 percent, increasing bills from $134.14 to $136.64 in most areas of Florida. 

    The agreement, developed in collaboration with a broad coalition of customer groups, sets rates for 2026 through 2029, the utility said.

    FPL President and Chief Executive Armando Pimentel said the approval from the state Public Service Commission “is a win for our customers and a win for the entire state.”

    In seeking the increase, the utility had argued that higher rates were necessary to invest in “electric service infrastructure,” citing “far higher” than expected costs of components and labor.

    But the settlement drew opposition from the state Office of Public Counsel, which by law represents utility customers, and several consumer groups, per CBS.

    “I certainly think that this case will wind up in front of the Florida Supreme Court,” said attorney Bradley Marshall, who represents consumer groups Florida Rising, the League of United Latin American Citizens of Florida and the Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida, CBS also reported.

    This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A key vote that could decide if DC-area data centers jack up your power bill – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Ahead of an important vote, D.C.-area lawmakers are urging the operators of the electrical grid that powers the region to protect the power rates that customers pay.

    Ahead of an important vote, D.C.-area lawmakers are urging the operators of the electrical grid that powers the region to protect the power rates that customers pay.

    The lawmakers, including D.C. Council member Charles Allen, are calling on PJM Interconnection to adopt a plan called the Protecting Ratepayers Proposal. It’s a bipartisan proposal that, among other things, incentivizes data center owners to provide for their own power, cooling and other infrastructure resources, rather than relying solely on a utility grid.

    That’s known in the power business as “bringing its own capacity.”

    PJM is the electrical grid operator for Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia, among many other states.

    At a news conference Monday, Council member Allen said if the data center operators are allowed to connect to the grid without conditions, it will cost D.C. power customers a lot of money.

    “If nothing changes, residents of the District of Columbia could face increases of as much as $70 a month by 2028,” he said.

    Maryland State Sen. Katie Fry Hester, who co-chairs the National Conference of State Legislators’ energy and environment committee, said higher power bills are not the only issue customers face.

    “Whose power will be curtailed first when the blackouts, that PJM has told us are coming, arrive?” she asked.

    On Wednesday, the PJM Board of Directors will decide how to manage the connection of data centers to the regional grid.

    “PJM welcomes all proposals entered into the Critical Issue Fast-Path stakeholder process, which aims to preserve grid reliability for the 67 million people we serve while managing the integration of data centers and other large electricity users onto the system. The fact that we have received 12 different thoughtful proposals indicates the importance of this issue as well as the numerous opinions on how to solve it,” PJM told WTOP in an emailed statement.

    Hester characterized the PJM decision as unprecedented and is urging a thoughtful approach.

    “We welcome the economic opportunity that these data centers bring, but this growth has to be matched with responsibility,” she said.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As voters demand affordability, Stanford economist argues for ‘temporary, targeted price controls’ with supply-side reforms | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    Price controls are literally a textbook example of a policy that creates market inefficiency, but an economist sees some merit in them as voters delivered victories to Democrats who promised to hold the line on the cost of living.

    Zohran Mamdani, who vowed to freeze rent, won the race for New York mayor, and Mikie Sherrill, who proposed freezing electricity rates, was elected to be New Jersey’s next governor.

    Given the affordability crisis many Americans face, more Democrats will run on price controls too, wrote Stanford economist Neale Mahoney and former White House economic advisor Bharat Ramamurti in a New York Times op-ed on Sunday.

    “This may terrify many economists, who have long dismissed price controls as failed policy. But, like it or not, voters are demanding short-term price relief, and temporary price controls may be the only viable way to provide it,” they said.

    To combat rising costs, standard policy tools often take longer than voters will tolerate or don’t work. For example, tax incentives or deregulation can increase supply but can take years to make an impact on prices.

    In addition, subsidies and tax credits can offer some short-term relief but also eventually push up prices as demand increases faster than supply can catch up.

    Mahoney and Ramamurti also acknowledge that price controls obscure market signals that encourage producers to expand output and lower costs, pointing to President Richard Nixon’s efforts to cap gasoline prices in the 1970s.

    “Yet sharply rising rents and utility bills wreak havoc on family budgets. That’s why there is a case for temporary, targeted price controls that hold down costs, paired with supply-side reforms that encourage new production,” they added, noting that Mamdani and Sherrill have proposed similar ideas.

    For housing, that could mean rent caps on existing units, plus government investment in new housing as well as zoning and permitting reforms.

    To be sure, policies initially billed as temporary often last longer than intended as they inevitably create constituencies that lobby for them to continue.

    Policymakers can use sunset clauses or target price control narrowly to mitigate such risks, according to Mahoney and Ramamurti. But they also admit “we may need to accept some trade-off between immediate relief and weaker long-run investment.”

    “In a cost-of-living crisis, the question isn’t whether to intervene, but how to do so in a way that delivers relief today without creating new problems tomorrow,” they said.

    While the annual rate of consumer inflation has cooled sharply since hitting a high of 9% in 2022, prices are still going up and President Donald Trump’s tariffs are not helping. In fact, headline inflation has remained sticky and ticked higher since he launched his trade war.

    The off-year elections this month that delivered stunning losses to Republicans brought the issue of affordability front and center. 

    Trump has already rolled back some of his signature tariffs to help lower grocery prices, and “there are discussions” on extending Affordable Care Act subsidies as Republicans scramble to address soaring healthcare costs.

    That’s as voters are demanding that overall affordability improve and want to see prices decline, not just rise at a slower pace.

    “People are angry about the loss of affordability, and are inclined to blame incumbent governments for this,” Paul Donovan, chief economist at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note on Friday. “It is tempting to think of affordability as another version of the ‘cost of living crisis’—but affordability is subtly different, and may linger.”

    [ad_2]

    Jason Ma

    Source link

  • Future data centers are driving up forecasts for energy demand

    [ad_1]

    Future data centers are driving up forecasts for energy demand. States want proof they’ll get built

    David, I think you mentioned data centers in one of your answers. We, we’ve seen an explosion across the state. There was *** recent Marquette poll that showed 55% of Wisconsinites say the costs outweigh the benefits. 44% said the benefits outweigh the costs, and that was pretty evenly split along party lines. There’s really no. view on data centers yet maybe until you guys start talking about the little that that could that could potentially change. I’m curious though just your broad thoughts on data centers here in Wisconsin and what you see as as the state’s role in that. David, we’ll start with you. Well, our, our role is not to pick winners and losers but to make sure that this is. Fertile ground for for entrepreneurs and businesses to either stay or move right here to the state of Wisconsin. I, I do think that data centers play *** huge role and when you think about our, our traditional, uh, uh, uh, our traditional industries, right, manufacturing, you think about agriculture, you think about water technology and how we can actually fuse that. Uh, with the, uh, the next generation of technology we’re thinking about, you know, open data, AI and Fintech and things of that nature, uh, but we can do all these things while making sure that we not only protect our environment, uh, but we to protect people, we need to protect our, uh, our, our consumption as well and so I don’t think these things are necessarily mutually exclusive from one another. We can do all of these things at the exact same time, but I also think it’s important that. As we talk about, you know, companies who are, you know, $15 billion investment, how do we leverage that for community benefits across the entire state of Wisconsin? How does that help out our local units of government, our schools, our other local businesses, as well as those industries that I. That I previously mentioned and so I, I do think that there’s an opportunity for us to really become uh AI and *** data hub for not only for the entire country but for the entire globe and really sets us really apart and making sure that we can continue to invest in in businesses and companies here, Missy. What’s really interesting is that in the last 4 months or so I’ve visited *** number of different companies across Wisconsin that are really benefiting from the data center boom because they’re part of the supply chain we have companies like Wisconsin Aluminum Foundry that are providing um uh part of the skid that goes around the generator we’ve got companies like Train that are providing the HVAC systems for the data centers so it’s really *** whole supply chain that we’re. Seeing around the data centers and Wisconsin has an opportunity to continue to participate in that. I just recently heard that about 90% of the investment that we’re seeing in the country right now is coming out of AI and coming out of the building of those data centers, so we don’t wanna lose out on that, but I think we also, I think David was touching on this, we also need to recognize that our economy is incredibly diverse. We are not becoming *** data center economy in Wisconsin. And we have *** long way to go before that happens, but to have the opportunity to have some of these data centers land here in Wisconsin provide incredible, uh, property tax and revenue for the communities that are really determining how to how to pay their bills, how to build new schools, how to build new fire departments it’s an opportunity for those communities to access some of that investment and to benefit from it so it’s, you know, it is very important that when *** data center comes. Um, as we did at WEDC, we sit down with that company right away and we talk to them about their environmental needs, about where they’re, where they’re building and how to make that happen in *** way that has the least impact to the communities and the best benefit for Wisconsin and you know working directly with the companies and getting to know those companies acting with them as partners is critically important for these to be good investments and ultimately beneficial for Wisconsin. So this is near and dear to me in Washington County. I live on the east side of the county. I’m about 15 minutes away from the Newport, Washington project. Uh, I see an abundance of opportunity and an entire society that doesn’t quite know what it’s getting into at the moment. Um, I think being very, very strategic and smart about where these go, uh, is critically important and let me tell you *** few reasons why. Uh, the introduction of Microsoft in the last 5 to 10 years in Wisconsin, I think has been catalytic. Uh, UW Milwaukee is *** really good example of *** partnership that has been forged and is expanding as time goes on. Uh, having Oracle, uh, connected just down the road from my home is going to be humongous, and I think it’s gonna do *** lot for venture capital in the long term, um, but there’s other things, those things are wonderful, and we need to leverage them to the greatest extent possible. I think data centers and AI generally. Speaking are transformative to all of the globe, uh, but also to manufacturing in Wisconsin which is still, uh, the the harrowing call for all of our state, um, but one thing we need to be sensitive about, uh, and there’s several, but one in particular. And that is power, power distribution and power supply. We don’t have even remotely close to enough. The strategies that we’ve implemented over the last 10 to 15 years, uh, are *** joke and aren’t gonna work in the long haul at the rate and speed at which these data centers want to do their business and we want them to be successful. I’m *** giant advocate of doing data centers, but we’ve got to be smart about it and right now we don’t know enough to be smart about it, so I, I believe where this really provides opportunity for the state of Wisconsin. Is with power in the future and nuclear energy in particular. I grew up in middle school and high school in Kiwani. We’re 10 minutes from the Kiwani nuclear power plant. About half the people in my dad’s church had some connection to that power plant with family sustaining jobs, and it was an entire economy in and of itself and it powered *** massive part of Wisconsin that is now being decommissioned. Now we know all of the technology that has advanced in the last 10 years since the decision was made to decommission that plan, and there are leaps and bounds that we’ve made and we have to go yet in nuclear energy, not to mention UW Madison is one of the top universities in the world for nuclear engineering. We absolutely could have *** renaissance for Wisconsin to be the beacon of not just the Midwest but all of America in some ways the globe for nuclear energy which could completely propel us into *** new age of data centers if we do it smartly and wisely but don’t get, don’t get lost in, uh, being attracted to *** $15 billion project that’s really super exciting, especially for my friend Ted Nitski, the mayor of Port Washington. But there’s the devil’s in the details like all things, and we need to be very thoughtful and strategic. I think we need *** long term plan for how to do this and how to do it well. Folks have big feelings around AI data centers. I don’t know if people have been following Shirley Barons’ Instagram, but I’m glad that Missy mentioned the supply chains because there is *** lot of nuance to this, um, especially some of our middle of manufacturing and steel who have been hit with tariffs. these data centers are incredibly important to, um, uh, to their sales, but we’re hearing from communities who have. Large concerns around environmental impact as well as what’s going to happen to their utility bills, both water and electricity. But there’s been disinvestments, uh, especially in our rural communities, um, depopulation and the jobs that are going to come in, uh, do make *** big are, uh, are significant for smaller communities so I think that one of the big considerations here is that, uh, for the workers and jobs that are created from these AI data centers, let’s make sure that the. Housing that’s being built, uh, they’re gonna continue to the workers are going to stay in Wisconsin that we are mindful of the different, um, uh, that we have to uh make sure that the companies are being accountable, uh, held accountable and transparent, uh, when it comes to uh how those dollars are spent, um, and then again this, this goes back to quality of life for the communities. Are already there and the workers that may be coming they’re going to want to have investments in their community like good roads like uh and uh fully funding our public schools there uh and so there’s there’s nuance to this and *** lot of considerations uh but I think what is most important is is to center the workers and communities where uh who are gonna be most impacted by those data centers being built there. So I’m gonna reiterate some of the things that were were said earlier um I agree that this is something that could have an enormous impact on our economy could have an enormous impact um moving us forward with some of the technology businesses that we have here uh I do wanna talk *** little bit about um energy usage of the data centers because it has been brought up here before. And I think there’s an opportunity for us to do both if communities want to have those data centers there that fits their community, making sure that those energy costs are not borne by the taxpayer that we also ask some of these businesses to invest in renewable. Energies to invest to make sure that those increases are not um being borne by by the community itself and then if you look at some of the environmental effects with the water um that these data centers use making sure we have those discussions up front. And that if they’re going to be using what is an enormously valuable resource in the state of Wisconsin and not only for fishing and tourism and but it’s makes us one of the best places to live um that we cannot be having issues with our ecosystem because um water is being put back into our lakes or in. Our streams that is too warm to be able to sustain what we need as our ecosystem so those are nuanced conversations to be able to have um but it’s not ***, it’s not *** yes or no it’s not *** picking winner winners or losers we need to work with the community themselves and put some of those, um, um, discussions up front about energy usage and water usage. AI will and already is transforming every aspect of our society and of our economy. Um, and you know data centers are coming whether people like it or not, so I think the question for policy makers is, um, can we implement *** strategic plan, an approach that respects the values that I think all of us share of democracy and shared decision making that’s transparent, that’s accountable, um, of fair play, everybody paying their fair share. Um, and of protecting all of our resources whether that’s labor, whether that’s environmental water, um, and what we have seen is troubling to me which is the biggest and wealthiest and most powerful companies in the world. Some of the companies that have been at the forefront of breaking our democracy and frankly rigging our economy are coming into small communities and forcing their way without the normal procedures that I think any of us would expect. I think local communities deserve to have *** say in what happens to them, um, and I definitely think that ratepayers are being asked to foot an unknown bill for the when these data centers come in we don’t really know what the impact is gonna be, but we can certainly look around the country and see what it has been we’ve got an aging really out of date electrical grid and infrastructure, and we’re all connected so *** data center in Port Washington could definitely affect rate payers here in Madison. And we have an opportunity to um. Come up with *** strategy to use the time value of money. Getting *** data center online in *** year versus in 4 years will create tremendous wealth for the company that owns it. Let’s use that time value of money to make sure that these data centers are being located in places where the communities. Want them and welcome them and where it’s appropriate for them and that we are not gonna be on the hook. Let’s extract money to make sure that we can use that to modernize our electrical grid and pay for some of the critical infrastructure upgrades that we need in our energy infrastructure you know Wisconsin cannot meet the demand with just sustainable energy. We, we’ve got to figure out *** way to make sure that um all of us who are rate payers and have been paying extremely high utility bills that have gone. Crazy up over the last several years um do not face continually punishing costs because of data centers. If you were governor right now, would anyone up here would you have actively stepped in to try to stop any of the data center developments currently underway? I’m not sure um I’ll I’ll start. I don’t know that I would um actively stop *** data center that is that the community is welcoming and wants in their community, but I agree with Senator Royce that we have to make sure that we are having those conversations with the community and that. We have some of these conversations up front before the data data centers come in to talk about what they’re going to be investing in the state of Wisconsin so that we do not have these expenses borne by our taxpayers so having *** broader conversation is something that I think we we should be having right now. I would even add to that that we we also have to combat the misinformation and disinformation that is out there. I think there are also valid concerns that people have when they’re hearing about data centers moving into their community, but it’s also about what are we doing proactively to make sure, uh. That that this isn’t born that that rate pay the rate payers uh the cost isn’t increasing on them, right? How can we work with data centers to prepay for their energy, prepay for the equipment that is used to actually put in *** solid electrical grid so everybody can actually benefit from these things and. You know, and I know about the water consumption, but we also live in Wisconsin, right? And so every time we wanna cool some off, what we do, we open *** window, not saying every research what we would do with data centers and things of that nature, but there’s, it, it’s, there’s ***, this is *** nuanced conversation that we have to make sure that we’re actually getting out in front because these things can move really fast, making sure that the entire public understands what is actually coming into our communities. Anyone else I’m putting on the brakes? I guess I would just I would jump in to say that *** lot of these conversations are happening. The companies are at the table. The state of Wisconsin is at the table having these conversations and we’re making sure that we’re thinking through all the different steps there are um efforts being made by the companies to build sustainable energy and so by being at the table right at the beginning. You can have those conversations and I think Caledonia is *** great example of *** community that took *** hard look at this and then said we don’t wanna do this and Microsoft said OK we’re out no problem we’re gonna go find *** community that’s excited about this that’s exactly what we want to have happen we want the locals engaged we want the the state engaged we want the company engaged we want everybody at the table and I just would say that that that is happening. It needs to continue. We need to stay and we need to have leaders who are able to be at those conversations and have the the real in depth, as everyone has said, nuanced conversations, not to stop but to figure out how do we make this the best for the state and for the communities where these data centers are landing on the flip side real quick, would anyone have done any more as governor to entice these companies to come into Wisconsin? Uh, I just wanna put piggyback on what Missy said because I think she made *** really *** point that um the conversations are happening as I’ve discussed with our neighbors in Ozauki County in Port Washington about how that entire project progressed, um, all of the discussion that was just had at this. This on this stage has been happening behind the scenes I think the answer to your previous question is if and when I I feel as governor there’s *** moment in time where it’s gonna be *** real threat to the to the power grid and the people of Wisconsin I think that’s when we step in and say no.

    Future data centers are driving up forecasts for energy demand. States want proof they’ll get built

    Updated: 12:09 AM EST Nov 15, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    The forecasts are eye-popping: utilities saying they’ll need two or three times more electricity within a few years to power massive new data centers that are feeding a fast-growing AI economy.But the challenges — some say the impossibility — of building new power plants to meet that demand so quickly has set off alarm bells for lawmakers, policymakers and regulators who wonder if those utility forecasts can be trusted.Video above: Wisconsin governor candidates on data centersOne burning question is whether the forecasts are based on data center projects that may never get built — eliciting concern that regular ratepayers could be stuck with the bill to build unnecessary power plants and grid infrastructure at a cost of billions of dollars.The scrutiny comes as analysts warn of the risk of an artificial intelligence investment bubble that’s ballooned tech stock prices and could burst. Meanwhile, consumer advocates are finding that ratepayers in some areas — such as the mid-Atlantic electricity grid, which encompasses all or parts of 13 states stretching from New Jersey to Illinois, as well as Washington, D.C. — are already underwriting the cost to supply power to data centers, some of them built, some not.”There’s speculation in there,” said Joe Bowring, who heads Monitoring Analytics, the independent market watchdog in the mid-Atlantic grid territory. “Nobody really knows. Nobody has been looking carefully enough at the forecast to know what’s speculative, what’s double-counting, what’s real, what’s not.”There is no standard practice across grids or for utilities to vet such massive projects, and figuring out a solution has become a hot topic, utilities and grid operators say.Uncertainty around forecasts is typically traced to a couple of things.One concerns developers seeking a grid connection, but whose plans aren’t set in stone or lack the heft — clients, financing or otherwise — to bring the project to completion, industry and regulatory officials say.Another is data center developers submitting grid connection requests in various separate utility territories, PJM Interconnection, which operates the mid-Atlantic grid, and Texas lawmakers have found.Often, developers, for competitive reasons, won’t tell utilities if or where they’ve submitted other requests for electricity, PJM said. That means a single project could inflate the energy forecasts of multiple utilities.The effort to improve forecasts got a high-profile boost in September, when a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission member asked the nation’s grid operators for information on how they determine that a project is not only viable, but will use the electricity it says it needs.”Better data, better decision-making, better and faster decisions mean we can get all these projects, all this infrastructure built,” the commissioner, David Rosner, said in an interview.The Edison Electric Institute, a trade association of for-profit electric utilities, said it welcomed efforts to improve demand forecasting.The Data Center Coalition, which represents tech giants like Google and Meta and data center developers, has urged regulators to request more information from utilities on their forecasts and to develop a set of best practices to determine the commercial viability of a data center project. The coalition’s vice president of energy, Aaron Tinjum, said improving the accuracy and transparency of forecasts is a “fundamental first step of really meeting this moment” of energy growth.”Wherever we go, the question is, ‘Is the (energy) growth real? How can we be so sure?’” Tinjum said. “And we really view commercial readiness verification as one of those important kind of low-hanging opportunities for us to be adopting at this moment.”Igal Feibush, the CEO of Pennsylvania Data Center Partners, a data center developer, said utilities are in a “fire drill” as they try to vet a deluge of data center projects all seeking electricity. The vast majority, he said, will fall off because many project backers are new to the concept and don’t know what it takes to get a data center built.States also are trying to do more to find out what’s in utility forecasts and weed out speculative or duplicative projects.In Texas, which is attracting large data center projects, lawmakers still haunted by a blackout during a deadly 2021 winter storm were shocked when told in 2024 by the grid operator, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, that its peak demand could nearly double by 2030.They found that state utility regulators lacked the tools to determine whether that was realistic.Texas state Sen. Phil King told a hearing earlier this year that the grid operator, utility regulators and utilities weren’t sure if the power requests “are real or just speculative or somewhere in between.”Lawmakers passed legislation sponsored by King, now law, that requires data center developers to disclose whether they have requests for electricity elsewhere in Texas and to set standards for developers to show that they have a substantial financial commitment to a site.PPL Electric Utilities, which delivers power to 1.5 million customers across central and eastern Pennsylvania, projects that data centers will more than triple its peak electricity demand by 2030.Vincent Sorgi, president and CEO of PPL Corp., told analysts on an earnings call this month that the data center projects “are real, they are coming fast and furious” and that the “near-term risk of overbuilding generation simply does not exist.”The data center projects counted in the forecast are backed by contracts with financial commitments often reaching tens of millions of dollars, PPL said.Still, PPL’s projections helped spur a state lawmaker, Rep. Danilo Burgos, to introduce a bill to bolster the authority of state utility regulators to inspect how utilities assemble their energy demand forecasts.Ratepayers in Burgos’ Philadelphia district just absorbed an increase in their electricity bills — attributed by the utility, PECO, to the rising cost of wholesale electricity in the mid-Atlantic grid driven primarily by data center demand. That’s why ratepayers need more protection to ensure they are benefiting from the higher cost, Burgos said.”Once they make their buck, whatever company,” Burgos said, “you don’t see no empathy towards the ratepayers.”

    The forecasts are eye-popping: utilities saying they’ll need two or three times more electricity within a few years to power massive new data centers that are feeding a fast-growing AI economy.

    But the challenges — some say the impossibility — of building new power plants to meet that demand so quickly has set off alarm bells for lawmakers, policymakers and regulators who wonder if those utility forecasts can be trusted.

    Video above: Wisconsin governor candidates on data centers

    One burning question is whether the forecasts are based on data center projects that may never get built — eliciting concern that regular ratepayers could be stuck with the bill to build unnecessary power plants and grid infrastructure at a cost of billions of dollars.

    The scrutiny comes as analysts warn of the risk of an artificial intelligence investment bubble that’s ballooned tech stock prices and could burst.

    Meanwhile, consumer advocates are finding that ratepayers in some areas — such as the mid-Atlantic electricity grid, which encompasses all or parts of 13 states stretching from New Jersey to Illinois, as well as Washington, D.C. — are already underwriting the cost to supply power to data centers, some of them built, some not.

    “There’s speculation in there,” said Joe Bowring, who heads Monitoring Analytics, the independent market watchdog in the mid-Atlantic grid territory. “Nobody really knows. Nobody has been looking carefully enough at the forecast to know what’s speculative, what’s double-counting, what’s real, what’s not.”

    There is no standard practice across grids or for utilities to vet such massive projects, and figuring out a solution has become a hot topic, utilities and grid operators say.

    Uncertainty around forecasts is typically traced to a couple of things.

    This stretch of land between the Conodoguinet Creek and Country Club Road near Carlisle, Pennsylvania, is in the planning stages to become a $15 billion data center complex, Friday Nov. 14, 2025, in Carlisle, Pa.

    Marc Levy

    This stretch of land between the Conodoguinet Creek and Country Club Road near Carlisle, Pennsylvania, is in the planning stages to become a $15 billion data center complex, Friday Nov. 14, 2025, in Carlisle, Pa.

    One concerns developers seeking a grid connection, but whose plans aren’t set in stone or lack the heft — clients, financing or otherwise — to bring the project to completion, industry and regulatory officials say.

    Another is data center developers submitting grid connection requests in various separate utility territories, PJM Interconnection, which operates the mid-Atlantic grid, and Texas lawmakers have found.

    Often, developers, for competitive reasons, won’t tell utilities if or where they’ve submitted other requests for electricity, PJM said. That means a single project could inflate the energy forecasts of multiple utilities.

    The effort to improve forecasts got a high-profile boost in September, when a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission member asked the nation’s grid operators for information on how they determine that a project is not only viable, but will use the electricity it says it needs.

    “Better data, better decision-making, better and faster decisions mean we can get all these projects, all this infrastructure built,” the commissioner, David Rosner, said in an interview.

    The Edison Electric Institute, a trade association of for-profit electric utilities, said it welcomed efforts to improve demand forecasting.

    The Data Center Coalition, which represents tech giants like Google and Meta and data center developers, has urged regulators to request more information from utilities on their forecasts and to develop a set of best practices to determine the commercial viability of a data center project.

    The coalition’s vice president of energy, Aaron Tinjum, said improving the accuracy and transparency of forecasts is a “fundamental first step of really meeting this moment” of energy growth.

    “Wherever we go, the question is, ‘Is the (energy) growth real? How can we be so sure?’” Tinjum said. “And we really view commercial readiness verification as one of those important kind of low-hanging opportunities for us to be adopting at this moment.”

    Igal Feibush, the CEO of Pennsylvania Data Center Partners, a data center developer, said utilities are in a “fire drill” as they try to vet a deluge of data center projects all seeking electricity.

    The vast majority, he said, will fall off because many project backers are new to the concept and don’t know what it takes to get a data center built.

    States also are trying to do more to find out what’s in utility forecasts and weed out speculative or duplicative projects.

    In Texas, which is attracting large data center projects, lawmakers still haunted by a blackout during a deadly 2021 winter storm were shocked when told in 2024 by the grid operator, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, that its peak demand could nearly double by 2030.

    They found that state utility regulators lacked the tools to determine whether that was realistic.

    Texas state Sen. Phil King told a hearing earlier this year that the grid operator, utility regulators and utilities weren’t sure if the power requests “are real or just speculative or somewhere in between.”

    Lawmakers passed legislation sponsored by King, now law, that requires data center developers to disclose whether they have requests for electricity elsewhere in Texas and to set standards for developers to show that they have a substantial financial commitment to a site.

    PPL Electric Utilities, which delivers power to 1.5 million customers across central and eastern Pennsylvania, projects that data centers will more than triple its peak electricity demand by 2030.

    Vincent Sorgi, president and CEO of PPL Corp., told analysts on an earnings call this month that the data center projects “are real, they are coming fast and furious” and that the “near-term risk of overbuilding generation simply does not exist.”

    The data center projects counted in the forecast are backed by contracts with financial commitments often reaching tens of millions of dollars, PPL said.

    Still, PPL’s projections helped spur a state lawmaker, Rep. Danilo Burgos, to introduce a bill to bolster the authority of state utility regulators to inspect how utilities assemble their energy demand forecasts.

    Ratepayers in Burgos’ Philadelphia district just absorbed an increase in their electricity bills — attributed by the utility, PECO, to the rising cost of wholesale electricity in the mid-Atlantic grid driven primarily by data center demand.

    That’s why ratepayers need more protection to ensure they are benefiting from the higher cost, Burgos said.

    “Once they make their buck, whatever company,” Burgos said, “you don’t see no empathy towards the ratepayers.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Large wind turbine blade detaches in Massachusetts, falls in cranberry bog

    [ad_1]

    A large wind turbine blade detached and fell into a cranberry bog in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on Friday afternoon. Plymouth Fire Chief Neil Foley says they received a call from a concerned neighbor around 1:52 p.m. who noticed one of the three blades on the 300-foot-tall wind turbine was missing.Firefighters located the detached blade several hundred feet away from the base, resting in an open cranberry bog. Sister station WCVB’s Sky5 was over the scene of the broken blade, which is between 75 to 100 feet long. We did not see any additional detached blades in the area.There were no injuries, and there is no threat to the public.The maintenance company responsible for the wind turbine responded to the scene and said the turbine automatically entered a fail-safe mode, shutting down immediately after the blade detached.They’re still conducting inspections to determine the cause of the failure, according to fire officials.“We were fortunate that this turbine is located out in the middle of the cranberry bogs and not in a residential area,” said Chief Foley. “Thankfully, no one was hurt, and the turbine automatically shut itself down as designed. As we continue to investigate, MassDEP and Inspectional Services will now do their due diligence to ensure this incident is addressed appropriately and the impacted area is cleaned up safely.”The maintenance company has cordoned off the area and is arranging for contractors to clean up the scene.

    A large wind turbine blade detached and fell into a cranberry bog in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on Friday afternoon.

    Plymouth Fire Chief Neil Foley says they received a call from a concerned neighbor around 1:52 p.m. who noticed one of the three blades on the 300-foot-tall wind turbine was missing.

    Firefighters located the detached blade several hundred feet away from the base, resting in an open cranberry bog.

    Sister station WCVB’s Sky5 was over the scene of the broken blade, which is between 75 to 100 feet long. We did not see any additional detached blades in the area.

    There were no injuries, and there is no threat to the public.

    The maintenance company responsible for the wind turbine responded to the scene and said the turbine automatically entered a fail-safe mode, shutting down immediately after the blade detached.

    They’re still conducting inspections to determine the cause of the failure, according to fire officials.

    “We were fortunate that this turbine is located out in the middle of the cranberry bogs and not in a residential area,” said Chief Foley. “Thankfully, no one was hurt, and the turbine automatically shut itself down as designed. As we continue to investigate, MassDEP and Inspectional Services will now do their due diligence to ensure this incident is addressed appropriately and the impacted area is cleaned up safely.”

    The maintenance company has cordoned off the area and is arranging for contractors to clean up the scene.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The EV Battery Tech That’s Worth the Hype, According to Experts

    [ad_1]

    You’ve seen the headlines: This battery breakthrough is going to change the electric vehicle forever. And then … silence. You head to the local showroom, and the cars all kind of look and feel the same.

    WIRED got annoyed about this phenomenon. So we talked to battery technology experts about what’s really going on in electric vehicle batteries. Which technologies are here? Which will be, probably, but aren’t yet, so don’t hold your breath? What’s probably not coming anytime soon?

    “It’s easy to get excited about these things, because batteries are so complex,” says Pranav Jaswani, a technology analyst at IDTechEx, a market intelligence firm. “Many little things are going to have such a big effect.” That’s why so many companies, including automakers, their suppliers, and battery-makers, are experimenting with so many bit parts of the battery. Swap one electrical conductor material for another, and an electric vehicle battery’s range might increase by 50 miles. Rejigger how battery packs are put together, and an automaker might bring down manufacturing costs enough to give consumers a break on the sales lot.

    Still, experts say, it can take a long time to get even small tweaks into production cars—sometimes 10 years or more. “Obviously, we want to make sure that whatever we put in an EV works well and it passes safety standards,” says Evelina Stoikou, who leads the battery technology and supply chain team at BloombergNEF, a research firm. Ensuring that means scientists coming up with new ideas, and suppliers figuring out how to execute them; the automakers, in turn, rigorously test each iteration. All the while, everyone’s asking the most important question: Does this improvement make financial sense?

    So it’s only logical that not every breakthrough in the lab makes it to the road. Here are the ones that really count—and the ones that haven’t quite panned out, at least so far.

    It’s Really Happening

    The big deal battery breakthroughs all have something in common: They’re related to the lithium-ion battery. Other battery chemistries are out there—more on them later—but in the next decade, it’s going to be hard to catch up with the dominant battery form. “Lithium-ion is already very mature,” says Stoikou. Lots of players have invested big money in the technology, so “any new one is going to have to compete with the status quo.”

    Lithium Iron Phosphate

    Why it’s exciting: LFP batteries use iron and phosphate instead of pricier and harder-to-source nickel and cobalt, which are found in conventional lithium-ion batteries. They’re also more stable and slower to degrade after multiple charges. The upshot: LFP batteries can help bring down the cost of manufacturing an EV, an especially important data point while Western electrics struggle to compete, cost-wise, with conventional gas-powered cars. LFP batteries are already common in China, and they’re set to become more popular in European and American electric vehicles in the coming years.

    Why it’s hard: LFP is less energy dense than alternatives, meaning you can’t pack as much charge—or range—into each battery.

    More Nickel

    Why it’s exciting: The increased nickel content in lithium nickel manganese cobalt batteries ups the energy density, meaning more range in a battery pack without much more size or weight. Also, more nickel can mean less cobalt, a metal that’s both expensive and ethically dubious to obtain.

    Why it’s hard: Batteries with higher nickel content are potentially less stable, which means they carry a higher risk of cracking or thermal runaway—fires. This means battery-makers experimenting with different nickel content have to spend more time and energy on the careful design of their products. That extra fussiness means more expense. For this reason, expect to see more nickel use in batteries for higher-end EVs.

    Dry Electrode Process

    Why it’s exciting: Usually, battery electrodes are made by mixing materials into a solvent slurry, which then is applied to a metal current collector foil, dried, and pressed. The dry electrode process cuts down on the solvents by mixing the materials in dry powder form before application and lamination. Less solvent means fewer environmental and health and safety concerns. And getting rid of the drying process can save production time—and up efficiency—while reducing the physical footprint needed to manufacture batteries. This all can lead to cheaper manufacturing, “which should trickle down to make a cheaper car,” says Jaswani. Tesla has already incorporated a dry anode process into its battery-making. (The anode is the negative electrode that stores lithium ions while a battery is charging.) LG and Samsung SGI are also working on pilot production lines.

    Why it’s hard: Using dry powders can be more technically complicated.

    Cell-to-Pack

    Why it’s exciting: In your standard electric vehicle battery, individual battery cells get grouped into modules, which are then assembled into packs. Not so in cell-to-pack, which puts cells directly into a pack structure without the middle module step. This lets battery-makers fit more battery into the same space, and can lead to some 50 additional miles of range and higher top speeds, says Jaswani. It also brings down manufacturing costs, savings that can be passed down to the car buyer. Big-time automakers including Tesla and BYD, plus Chinese battery giant CATL, are already using the tech.

    Why it’s hard: Without modules, it can be harder to control thermal runaway and maintain the battery pack’s structure. Plus, cell-to-pack makes replacing a faulty battery cell much harder, which means smaller flaws can require opening or even replacing the entire pack.

    Silicon Anodes

    Why it’s exciting: Lithium-ion batteries have graphite anodes. Adding silicon to the mix, though, could have huge upsides: more energy storage (meaning longer driving ranges) and faster charging, potentially down to a blazing six to 10 minutes to top up. Tesla already mixes a bit of silicon into its graphite anodes, and other automakers—Mercedes-Benz, General Motors—say they’re getting close to mass production.

    Why it’s hard: Silicon alloyed with lithium expands and contracts as it goes through the charging and discharging cycle, which can cause mechanical stress and even fracturing. Over time, this can lead to more dramatic battery capacity losses. For now, you’re more likely to find silicon anodes in smaller batteries, like those in phones or even motorcycles.

    It’s Kind of Happening

    The battery tech in the more speculative bucket has undergone plenty of testing. But it’s still not quite at a place where most manufacturers are building production lines and putting it into cars.

    Sodium-Ion Batteries

    Why it’s exciting: Sodium—it’s everywhere! Compared to lithium, the element is cheaper and easier to find and process, which means tracking down the materials to build sodium-ion batteries could give automakers a supply chain break. The batteries also seem to perform better in extreme temperatures, and are more stable. Chinese battery-maker CATL says it will start mass production of the batteries next year and that the batteries could eventually cover 40 percent of the Chinese passenger-vehicle market.

    Why it’s hard: Sodium ions are heavier than their lithium counterparts, so they generally store less energy per battery pack. That could make them a better fit for battery storage than for vehicles. It’s also early days for this tech, which means fewer suppliers and fewer time-tested manufacturing processes.

    Solid State Batteries

    Why it’s exciting: Automakers have been promising for years that groundbreaking solid state batteries are right around the corner. That would be great, if true. This tech subs the liquid or gel electrolytes in a conventional li-ion battery for a solid electrolyte. These electrolytes should come in different chemistries, but they all have some big advantages: more energy density, faster charging, more durability, fewer safety risks (no liquid electrolyte means no leaks). Toyota says it will finally launch its first vehicles with solid state batteries in 2027 or 2028. BloombergNEF projects that by 2035, solid state batteries will account for 10 percent of EV and storage production.

    Why it’s hard: Some solid electrolytes have a hard time at low temperatures. The biggest issues, however, have to do with manufacturing. Putting together these new batteries requires new equipment. It’s really hard to build defect-free layers of electrolyte. And the industry hasn’t come to an agreement about which solid electrolyte to use, which makes it hard to create supply chains.

    Maybe It’ll Happen

    Good ideas don’t always make a ton of sense in the real world.

    Wireless Charging

    Why it’s exciting: Park your car, get out, and have it charge up while you wait—no plugs required. Wireless charging could be the peak of convenience, and some automakers insist it’s coming. Porsche, for example, is showing off a prototype, with plans to roll out the real thing next year.

    Why it’s hard: The issue, says Jaswani, is that the tech underlying the chargers we have right now works perfectly well and is much cheaper to install. He expects that eventually, wireless charging will show up in some restricted use cases—maybe in buses, for example, that could charge up throughout their routes if they stop on top of a charging pad. But this tech may never go truly mainstream, he says.

    [ad_2]

    Aarian Marshall

    Source link

  • Rising energy prices put AI and data centers in the crosshairs | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    As tech companies tout their plans for massive new data centers, consumers are increasingly worried the AI-driven gold rush will ultimately drive up the price they pay for electricity, according to a new survey.

    The report, commissioned by solar installer Sunrun, found that 80% of consumers are worried about the impact of data centers on their utility bills.

    Consumers’ concerns aren’t unfounded.

    Electricity demand in the United States held steady for over a decade, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Over the last five years, commercial users including data centers and industrial users began drinking more deeply from the grid, with annual growth rising 2.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, residential use only grew by 0.7% annually.

    Data centers today consume about 4% of the electricity generated in the United States, more than double their share in 2018. By 2028, consumption is forecasted to rise to 6.7% to 12%, according to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    Generation has managed to meet demand thanks to a surge in new capacity from solar, wind, and grid-scale battery storage. Big tech companies have been inking large deals for new utility-scale solar, in particular, attracted by the energy source’s low cost, modularity, and speed to power. Solar farms can start delivering power to data centers before they’re completed, and a new project typically takes around 18 months to complete. 

    The EIA expects renewables to dominate new generating capacity through at least the next year. The trend likely would have extended beyond 2026, but experts predict a Republican repeal of key parts of the Inflation Reduction Act will hamper the renewables’ growth.

    Techcrunch event

    San Francisco
    |
    October 13-15, 2026

    Meanwhile, natural gas, another source of energy favored by data center operators, hasn’t met the moment. Production has been rising, but most of the new supplies have gone toward feeding exports rather than the domestic market. Consumption by electricity generators rose by 20% between 2019 and 2024, while exporters consumed 140% more.

    New natural gas power plants won’t be ready in time, either, since they take around four years to complete, according to the International Energy Agency. A backlog of turbines used by gas-fired power plants has only compounded the problem. Manufacturers are quoting delivery dates up to seven years out, and newly announced production capacity is unlikely to change things.

    Slow natural gas buildouts coupled with kneecapped renewables have put data center developers in a bind.

    While AI and data centers aren’t entirely responsible for increasing electricity demand — industrial users have been nearly as thirsty — they’ve been leading the headlines.

    AI is likely to be the focus of consumers’ ire: More people are concerned about the technology than excited about it, according to a Pew survey. No surprise given that many employers have been wielding the tool as a way to cut headcount rather than improve augment employee productivity.

    Throw rising energy prices into the mix, and you can begin to see how a backlash might be brewing.

    [ad_2]

    Tim De Chant

    Source link