ReportWire

Tag: Electric

  • Waymo’s cheaper robotaxi tech could help expand rides fast

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    If you live in cities like San Francisco, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Austin or Atlanta, you may have already seen or even taken a ride in a driverless Waymo operating without a human behind the wheel. In newer markets like Miami, service is rolling out, while other cities, including Dallas, Houston, San Antonio and Orlando, are part of Waymo’s expansion plans.

    For everyone else, not so much. At least not yet. For most of us, that still feels like something happening somewhere else, not something that pulls up when you request a ride.

    However, that could start to change very soon. Waymo just unveiled its sixth-generation Waymo Driver hardware, and the headline is simple: it costs less and fits into more vehicles. That combination could help driverless rides reach a lot more cities, faster than you and I might expect.

    THE ROBOTAXI PRICE WAR HAS STARTED. HERE’S EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW.

    Waymo’s new sixth-generation hardware will first roll out in the Zeekr-built Ojai minivan before expanding to more vehicles and cities. (Waymo)

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter     

    Why Waymo’s cheaper robotaxi hardware changes the game

    Until recently, if you spotted a Waymo on the road, it was usually a Jaguar I-Pace. Nice car. Not exactly built for a massive robotaxi rollout. The sixth-generation system changes that. The first vehicle to carry the new hardware is the Zeekr-built Ojai electric minivan. Zeekr is owned by Geely. Waymo employees in Los Angeles and San Francisco will begin fully autonomous rides in it soon, with public access expected to follow. In these new deployments, Waymo says the vehicles will operate without safety drivers behind the wheel. After that, the hardware will also power versions of the Hyundai Ioniq 5.

    Here is where this really matters. When Waymo can install the same system across multiple vehicle types and produce it at a lower cost, expansion becomes much easier. The company says it plans to move into 20 additional cities this year and is ramping up its Metro Phoenix facility to build tens of thousands of Driver kits annually.

    Waymo says it has shifted more processing power into its own custom silicon chips, allowing it to use fewer cameras while improving performance and reducing overall system cost. More vehicles and lower costs mean one thing: a better chance that driverless rides show up in your city sooner rather than later.

    How the Waymo Driver actually sees the road

    If you have never been in a robotaxi, this is the part you are probably wondering about. The sixth-generation Waymo Driver uses 16 high-resolution 17 megapixel cameras, short-range lidar, radar and external audio receivers. Waymo says the updated cameras offer improved dynamic range compared to the previous 29-camera setup. That helps the vehicle perform better at night and in bright glare.

    Short-range lidar delivers centimeter-level accuracy to detect pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users. Radar adds another layer of awareness. Waymo says its upgraded imaging radar can track distance, speed and object size even in rain or snow, giving the system more time to react. External audio receivers can detect sirens or trains by sound.

    Unlike Tesla, which has emphasized camera-based systems, Waymo relies on multiple overlapping technologies. If one sensor struggles, another can support it. There is also a cleaning system for key sensors. Snow, dirt, or road spray should not easily block visibility.

    Waymo says this version is designed to operate in more extreme weather, including heavy winter conditions, which could open the door to colder U.S. cities that were previously harder to support.

    Waymo’s new sixth-generation interior

    The Waymo Driver blends high-resolution cameras, lidar and radar to create a 360-degree view of the road, even at night or in bad weather. (Waymo)

    Why you probably haven’t seen a Waymo robotaxi yet

    Right now, Waymo has about 1,500 vehicles on the road. That sounds like a lot until you compare it to the millions of cars in the U.S. The company wants to grow that number to around 3,500 this year and eventually into the tens of thousands. Still, service is limited to certain parts of certain cities. If you do not live in one of those areas, you are simply not going to see one.

    That is why this new hardware matters. When the system costs less and fits into more vehicles, Waymo can put more cars on the road in more places. This is not about adding flashy features or cool upgrades. It is about getting from a small footprint to something that feels normal in everyday life.

    What about safety and past incidents?

    Whenever driverless cars expand, safety questions come right with them. Waymo says its system is built with multiple layers of redundancy. The sixth-generation Driver combines cameras, lidar, radar and audio detection so the vehicle is not relying on a single sensor. That layered setup is designed to reduce risk if one system has trouble. The company says this latest system builds on nearly 200 million fully autonomous miles driven across more than 10 major cities, including dense urban cores and freeways.

    Even so, incidents have happened. Earlier this year, a Waymo vehicle was involved in an accident that injured a child, which raised fresh concerns about how autonomous vehicles respond in complex real-world situations. Regulators continue to monitor autonomous vehicle performance closely, especially in states like California, where reporting requirements are strict.

    WAYMO UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AFTER CHILD STRUCK

    Waymo has also released data suggesting its vehicles experience fewer injury-causing crashes per mile compared to human drivers in similar areas. Supporters argue that reducing human error could improve road safety over time. Critics say expanding too quickly could introduce new risks.

    Both things can be true. The technology is advancing, but public trust will depend on transparency, accountability and long-term safety performance.

    What this means to you

    If Waymo expands into your city, you may soon open a rideshare app and see a new option. No driver. No conversation. Just a vehicle that navigates using software and sensors.

    More vehicles could mean shorter wait times in busy areas. Increased competition may also affect pricing in the rideshare market. At the same time, comfort levels vary. Many riders may hesitate before stepping into a car with an empty front seat. This shift is about more than technology. It changes how people commute, travel and move around urban areas.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Waymo’s new sixth-generation interior

    With lower costs and broader vehicle compatibility, Waymo hopes to put many more driverless cars on real city streets soon. (Waymo)

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com       

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    Waymo’s sixth-generation Driver is really about one thing: getting more driverless cars on the road, in more cities, at a lower cost. When the hardware becomes cheaper and easier to install in different vehicles, expansion gets easier. That does not automatically mean everyone will be comfortable hopping in. For many people, sitting in a car with no driver might still feel a bit scary. The technology is moving forward whether we are ready or not. The bigger question is simple: will we feel confident enough to get in?

    If you had to choose today, would you book the driverless ride or wait for a human behind the wheel? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter 

    Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Power restored to thousands in Denver area after Sunday outages

    [ad_1]

    UPDATE: Widespread power outages caused by failed Xcel Energy transformer

    More than 185,000 customers were left in the dark on Sunday as widespread power outages hit the Denver area, according to energy utility officials.

    During the peak of Sunday’s outages, roughly 44,000 Core Electric Cooperative customers and 145,000 Xcel Energy customers were without power, according to the two utilities.

    The widespread power outages also caused disruptions at Denver International Airport and law enforcement agencies across the southeast metro area.

    As of 5:15 p.m. Sunday, all but a handful of Core Electric‘s power outages had been resolved, according to the utility’s outage map. Just 30 minutes earlier, reported outages included:

    • 23,416 customers in Arapahoe County,
    • 20,242 customers in Douglas County,
    • 692 customers in Elbert County,
    • And 1 customer in Adams County.

    The cause of the outages remained under investigation Sunday evening, Core Electric spokesperson Amber King said.

    Xcel Energy spokesperson Michelle Aguayo confirmed in an email to The Denver Post that “a large outage” also impacted as many as 145,000 of that utility’s customers in the southeast metro area.

    As of 5:47 p.m. Sunday, power had been restored to all Xcel Energy customers, Aguayo said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Analyzing Plains All American Pipeline (PAA) and The Competition

    [ad_1]

    Plains All American Pipeline (NASDAQ:PAAGet Free Report) is one of 16 publicly-traded companies in the “Pipelines, Except Natural Gas” industry, but how does it compare to its peers? We will compare Plains All American Pipeline to similar companies based on the strength of its dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

    Dividends

    Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 125.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. As a group, “Pipelines, Except Natural Gas” companies pay a dividend yield of 7.7% and pay out 112.0% of their earnings in the form of a dividend.

    Risk and Volatility

    Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline’s peers have a beta of 0.95, meaning that their average stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

    Institutional & Insider Ownership

    41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of shares of all “Pipelines, Except Natural Gas” companies are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of shares of all “Pipelines, Except Natural Gas” companies are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

    Profitability

    This table compares Plains All American Pipeline and its peers’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

    Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
    Plains All American Pipeline 2.42% 11.04% 4.41%
    Plains All American Pipeline Competitors 32.45% 36.20% 10.59%

    Valuation and Earnings

    This table compares Plains All American Pipeline and its peers gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

    Gross Revenue Net Income Price/Earnings Ratio
    Plains All American Pipeline $50.07 billion $772.00 million 14.64
    Plains All American Pipeline Competitors $10.13 billion $374.42 million 15.95

    Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than its peers. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than its peers, indicating that it is currently more affordable than other companies in its industry.

    Analyst Ratings

    This is a summary of recent recommendations for Plains All American Pipeline and its peers, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

    Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
    Plains All American Pipeline 0 0 1 0 3.00
    Plains All American Pipeline Competitors 143 1396 1358 169 2.51

    As a group, “Pipelines, Except Natural Gas” companies have a potential upside of 8.66%. Given Plains All American Pipeline’s peers higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Plains All American Pipeline has less favorable growth aspects than its peers.

    Summary

    Plains All American Pipeline peers beat Plains All American Pipeline on 10 of the 15 factors compared.

    Plains All American Pipeline Company Profile

    (Get Free Report)

    Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., through its subsidiaries, engages in the pipeline transportation, terminalling, storage, and gathering of crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) in the United States and Canada. The company operates in two segments, Crude Oil and NGL. The Crude Oil segment offers gathering and transporting crude oil through pipelines, gathering systems, trucks, and at times on barges or railcars. This segment provides terminalling, storage, and other facilities-related services, as well as merchant activities. As of December 31, 2021, this segment owned and leased 18,300 miles of active crude oil transportation pipelines and gathering systems, as well as an additional 110 miles of pipelines that supports crude oil storage and terminalling facilities; 74 million barrels of commercial crude oil storage capacity; 38 million barrels of active, above-ground tank capacity; four marine facilities; a condensate processing facility; seven crude oil rail terminals and 2,100 crude oil railcars; and 640 trucks and 1,275 trailers. The Natural Gas Liquids segment engages in the natural gas processing, NGL fractionation, storage, transportation, and terminalling activities. As of December 31, 2021, this segment owned and operated four natural gas processing plants; nine fractionation plants; 28 million barrels of NGL storage capacity; approximately 1,620 miles of active NGL transportation pipelines, as well as an additional 55 miles of pipeline that supports NGL storage facilities; 16 NGL rail terminals and approximately 3,900 NGL rail cars; and approximately 220 trailers. The company was founded in 1981 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.



    Receive News & Ratings for Plains All American Pipeline Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Plains All American Pipeline and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    [ad_2]

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Xcel Energy seeks $355.5M revenue hike, increasing residential bills nearly 10% on average

    [ad_1]

    Xcel Energy, Colorado’s largest electric utility, has asked state regulators for an increase of $355.5 million to its rate base, which would boost the average residential electric bill by nearly 10% per month.

    Xcel filed the proposal Friday with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, which will take testimony from the company and various intervening parties and hold a public hearing. If approved, the increase would take effect in September 2026.

    Xcel Energy-Colorado President Robert Kenney said the utility’s last increase to the rate base was in 2022. The average residential bill rose by 3.2%, according to an Xcel statement after an agreement was reached with all the parties

    The rate base is a utility’s investments to provide services and on which it’s allowed to earn a regulated rate of return.

    “This rate case is to recover costs associated with investments that we’ve made over the last three years,” Kenney said.

    The Utility Consumer Advocate, or UCA, which represents the public before state regulators, said the proposed increase is “too big of an increase.”

    “It’s an especially large increase given the context of the economic times,” said Joseph Pereira, UCA deputy director.

    The increase is largely related to Xcel’s expanded capital spending on distribution, transmission and generation, Pereira said.

    “It’s unclear to parties in the UCA that the company is prioritizing investments that are the biggest bang for the buck, that increase reliability and that adopt an intelligent approach to how they’re using the grid,” Pereira said. “It still appears that the company is using a crude blanket approach to replacing and investing in new infrastructure.”

    Kenney said Xcel has invested in safety, reliability, making the system more resilient, electrifying transportation and buildings, meeting increased demands from growth and taking steps to significantly reduce carbon emissions.

    Xcel has said it has reduced carbon emissions by 57%. The state’s target is to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 80% from 2005 levels by 2030.

    Xcel is upgrading its electric grid with a $1.7 billion transmission project. The Colorado Power Pathway includes transmission lines, power substations and other equipment stretching over 12 counties, mostly in eastern Colorado.

    “We’ve added a tremendous amount of renewable energy over the last several years,” Kenney said. “And we’ve done all of this while keeping bills as low as possible.”

    Xcel has faced criticism from the Office of the Utility Consumer Advocate, or UCA, which represents the public before state regulators, and customers over the past few years for what the UCA has called “a pancaking of rate increases.”

    The criticism of Xcel and other regulated utilities heated up in 2023 after a cold winter and high natural gas prices sent costs soaring statewide. A legislative committee held hearings and approved a bill intended to protect customers against future price shocks and level what some see as a playing field tilted in the utilities’ favor.

    [ad_2]

    Judith Kohler

    Source link

  • EVs beat gas after two years, study finds

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Electric vehicles are proving their worth when it comes to long-term emissions. While building an EV creates more pollution upfront because battery production demands more energy, the balance changes fast once the car is on the road. After about two years of normal driving, an electric car overtakes a gas-powered one in total CO2 savings and keeps widening the gap over time.

    A peer-reviewed study published in PLOS Climate supports this finding. Researchers Pankaj Sadavarte, Drew Shindell, and Daniel Loughlin conducted the analysis titled, “Comparing the climate and air pollution footprints of Lithium-ion BEVs and ICEs in the U.S. incorporating systemic energy system responses.” Their work examined how manufacturing, fuel production and vehicle operation affect both climate and air quality over a vehicle’s lifetime.

    POWER ON THE MOVE: IS PILOT PROGRAM THE FUTURE OF EV CHARGING?

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    New research from PLOS Climate shows electric cars surpass gas vehicles in total CO2 savings after just two years on the road. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    How the study shows EVs overtake gas cars in emissions

    Using the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), the study simulated how U.S. transportation and energy systems interact through 2050 under different rates of EV adoption. The results show that while manufacturing EVs releases about 30% more CO2 than producing gas cars, that gap closes quickly once you drive. By the end of year two, EVs emit less carbon overall, and the advantage widens over time as the power grid shifts toward cleaner energy sources.

    Each additional kilowatt-hour of battery capacity is projected to eliminate roughly 485 pounds of CO2 by 2030 and about 280 pounds by 2050. That reflects continued progress in electricity generation and efficiency gains across the EV industry. Over an estimated 18-year lifespan, gas-powered vehicles produce two to three and a half times more pollution-related damage than electric ones. Those damages include the social and economic costs of climate change and health issues linked to air pollution.

    An electric car charges up.

    While building EV batteries creates more emissions upfront, cleaner power grids and zero tailpipe output help electric vehicles pull ahead over time. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    How the GCAM model works

    The GCAM model links global energy use, economic activity, and emissions across multiple sectors. In this analysis, researchers measured not only tailpipe emissions but also the upstream effects from mining, refining, and fuel processing. They also factored in how growing EV adoption changes the energy mix. As electricity demand rises, cleaner energy sources like wind, solar and nuclear expand their share, while coal steadily declines.

    By 2050, electricity generation from gas, wind and solar grows while coal falls below 6% of the total mix. This cleaner grid makes charging electric cars progressively less carbon-intensive, strengthening the case for a large-scale EV transition.

    The digital dashboard of an electric vehicle

    The study found lifetime health and climate damages from gas cars can be up to 3.5 times higher than from EVs, underscoring the long-term benefits of going electric. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    How EVs impact you and the environment

    If you keep a car for more than two years, switching to an EV can meaningfully reduce your carbon footprint. The study found that EVs start paying back their manufacturing emissions faster in regions with renewable-heavy grids. In states still dependent on coal, the break-even point arrives later but still occurs well before a car’s third birthday. The cleaner your local power mix, the faster your EV moves into net-positive territory.

    INHALERS PRODUCE CARBON EMISSIONS EQUAL TO 530,000 CARS ON ROAD ANNUALLY, STUDY FINDS

    The findings also highlight public health benefits. Gas vehicles emit more nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide, both of which contribute to respiratory illnesses and smog. As EVs replace traditional engines, these pollutants drop, improving air quality and reducing healthcare costs.

    Context and limitations

    The authors acknowledge that their analysis does not include emissions from recycling or disposing of vehicle parts at the end of life. Nor does it count emissions from building charging networks or new power infrastructure. Despite those exclusions, the study provides one of the most comprehensive long-term looks at how EV adoption affects both the economy and the environment.

    Because the study uses projections through 2050, results depend on future technology and energy trends. Even so, the consistent pattern across all scenarios is that EVs deliver large reductions in CO2 and air pollutants once on the road.

    What this means for you

    If you drive often and plan to own your car for several years, the data shows an EV can save both emissions and money over time. Charging on a renewable or low-carbon plan speeds the payoff even more. Choosing a vehicle that matches your driving needs helps minimize unnecessary battery production and further reduces your footprint.

    For communities, broader EV adoption means cleaner local air, fewer health-related costs and lower long-term damage from climate change.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    This PLOS Climate study reinforces that after the first two years, EVs deliver real and lasting climate benefits. As the U.S. grid shifts toward cleaner energy, its impact grows even stronger. The authors note that the analysis does not include emissions from recycling or charging infrastructure, yet it remains one of the most thorough long-term views of EV adoption and its effects on the economy and environment.

    Would a cleaner grid in your state make you more likely to trade in your gas car for an EV? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Power on the move: Is pilot program the future of EV charging?

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Driving an electric vehicle could soon mean charging as you go. A new wireless charging pilot in France is showing how coils built into the road can transfer more than 300 kilowatts of power to moving EVs. This breakthrough could make long trips possible without stopping at a charging station.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter. 

    RESEARCHERS CREATE REVOLUTIONARY AI FABRIC THAT PREDICTS ROAD DAMAGE BEFORE IT HAPPENS

    The road that powers your vehicle

    The technology comes from Electreon Wireless, working with Vinci Construction, Gustave Eiffel University and Hutchinson. Together, they’ve installed about a one-mile stretch of road near Paris that can transfer energy to EVs in motion.

    So far, the system has powered a truck, van, car and bus — all equipped with special pickup coils. Early tests show the system can deliver peak power over 300 kW and more than 200 kW under steady conditions. That’s strong enough to keep large cargo trucks rolling for miles without a pit stop.

    New wireless road tech in France powers EVs while they drive, offering more than 300 kilowatts of charging. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    Charging ahead: Why it matters

    If widely adopted, dynamic wireless charging could change how America powers transportation. Heavy-duty trucks could use smaller, cheaper batteries. Delivery vehicles and buses could stay on the road longer with less downtime.

    For drivers, it could mean never having to worry about range anxiety again. Instead of hunting for the nearest charger, the highway itself could be your power source.

    WOULD YOU BUY THE WORLD’S FIRST PERSONAL ROBOCAR?

    Coils built into the road charge the EV.

    Electreon’s one-mile test track near Paris charges moving EVs through coils built into the road. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    The roadblocks ahead

    The big questions now are about cost and control. Who pays to install these power roads? How much will it cost to use them? Public-private partnerships may hold the key, but until those details are ironed out, large-scale rollout remains a challenge.

    Still, with global momentum building, it’s only a matter of time before dynamic wireless charging becomes part of everyday driving.

    What this means for you

    This innovation is not limited to Europe. In Detroit, Michigan, a public road on 14th Street already uses embedded charging coils that can send power to EVs as they move. In Indiana, Purdue University and the Indiana Department of Transportation are building a quarter-mile highway section designed to charge electric vehicles, including heavy trucks, while they travel.

    For drivers, this technology could make owning an EV easier and more practical. Your vehicle could recharge during normal trips without the need to stop, plug in or wait. That level of convenience could help expand EV adoption across the United States, lowering emissions and fuel costs for millions.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com

    THE ROAD TO PROSPERITY WILL BE PAVED BY AUTONOMOUS TRUCKING

    Electric trucks and buses could save time on charging.

    The innovation could transform U.S. roads, cutting downtime for electric trucks and buses. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    Wireless charging roads are moving from concept to construction and showing real promise for a new era of electric travel. The idea that vehicles could charge while driving has the potential to transform how we move goods, commute and use energy. There are still big questions about who will fund widespread installation and how well the system will perform under real traffic and weather conditions. The technology is advancing fast, but scaling it will take time, collaboration and investment. If these challenges can be overcome, dynamic wireless charging could redefine the way we think about mobility and sustainability.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Do you think this is really a viable way to power the future of transportation? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla revives ‘Mad Max’ mode in Full Self-Driving

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Tesla is making headlines again with the return of its Mad Max mode in Full Self-Driving (Supervised). This feature, designed to make the car drive more aggressively, has arrived just as the automaker faces new scrutiny from regulators and ongoing lawsuits from customers. 

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CyberGuy.com newsletter.

    Mad Max Mode returns in Tesla’s latest FSD update

    Tesla recently launched its FSD v14.1.2 update. The update follows last year’s major FSD v14 release, which introduced “Sloth Mode” for slower, more cautious driving. The latest update moves to the opposite end of the spectrum with Mad Max mode.

    According to Tesla’s release notes, this profile allows higher speeds and more frequent lane changes than Hurry mode. The update has sparked mixed reactions. Some Tesla fans praise it for making driving feel more natural. Critics argue that it invites risky behavior at a time when regulators like the NHTSA and California DMV are already investigating Tesla’s advanced driver-assist systems.

    TESLA’S SELF-DRIVING CARS UNDER FIRE AGAIN

    A new Mad Max speed profile is now included in Tesla’s Full Self-Driving interface. (Tesla)

    History of Tesla’s Mad Max mode since 2018

    The Mad Max setting isn’t new. Tesla first introduced it in 2018 for the original Autopilot system. At the time, Elon Musk described it as ideal for handling aggressive city traffic. The name, borrowed from the post-apocalyptic movie series, immediately drew attention for its bold tone.

    Now, the feature is back in Tesla’s latest FSD version. Within hours of release, drivers reported seeing cars equipped with Mad Max mode rolling stop signs and driving over the speed limit. These early reports highlight how the mode may behave more assertively than before.

    Why Tesla brought back its Mad Max mode

    Bringing back Mad Max mode may serve several purposes for Tesla. It helps demonstrate the company’s continuous development of FSD software while appealing to drivers who prefer faster, more decisive movement in traffic. It also acts as a signal that Tesla is still chasing the goal of Level 4 autonomy, even though its system remains classified as Level 2, requiring constant driver supervision.

    Elon Musk sitting with hands together

    Tesla owners can access Mad Max mode through the car’s settings under Speed Profiles.  (Chesnot/Getty Images)

    For Tesla, this feature shows confidence in its progress. For observers, it raises concerns about timing. With multiple investigations and lawsuits in progress, many expected Tesla to focus on safety rather than on more aggressive driving profiles.

    What this means for you

    If you own a Tesla with Full Self-Driving (Supervised), you can access Mad Max mode through the car’s settings under Speed Profiles. This mode provides a more assertive driving experience that includes quicker acceleration, more lane changes, and less hesitation.

    However, remember that Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system still requires active driver attention. You must keep your hands on the wheel and remain ready to take control at any moment. While the name suggests thrill and speed, safety and awareness should remain your top priority.

    Tesla Model Y on California highway

    Tesla’s speed-profile menu includes the toggle options of Chill, Standard, Hurry, and Mad Max profiles to customize how aggressively their car responds in traffic.  (REUTERS/Mike Blake)

    If you share the road with Teslas, it’s smart to stay alert. Vehicles using Mad Max mode may accelerate or change lanes more quickly than expected. Giving Teslas a little extra space can help reduce surprises and keep everyone safer on the road.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: CyberGuy.com.

    WOULD YOU BUY THE WORLD’S FIRST PERSONAL ROBOCAR?

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    Tesla’s decision to reintroduce Mad Max mode is both strategic and provocative. It revives a feature from its early Autopilot days while reigniting debate over the balance between innovation and responsibility. The mode’s return reminds everyone that Tesla continues to test the limits of driver-assist technology and public tolerance for it.

    Will Tesla’s revived Mad Max mode mark a bold step toward autonomy or a dangerous gamble in the race for self-driving dominance? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CyberGuy.com newsletter.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Would you buy the world’s first personal robocar?

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Silicon Valley startup Tensor is taking a bold step into the future of driving. Unlike rivals chasing robotaxi fleets, Tensor wants consumers to own the first true self-driving car. The company calls it the world’s first personal robocar.

    This luxury EV promises Level 4 autonomy, meaning you can ride with your eyes off the road while the steering wheel folds away into the dash. In its place, a wide screen transforms the driver’s seat into a lounge or mobile office.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    WILL AUTONOMOUS TRUCKS REPLACE DRIVERS BY 2027?

    Tensor aims to have its autonomous vehicles, a prototype of which is seen in this undated photo, available for purchase by 2026. (Tensor )

    Tensor robocar loaded with sensors and AI power

    Tensor built this machine from the ground up. It is covered in technology: 37 cameras, five custom lidars, 11 radars, plus microphones, ultrasonics and water detectors. Each sensor includes cleaning systems to keep its view clear in any condition.

    The car runs on Tensor’s own Foundation Model, a transformer-based AI designed to mimic human driving decisions. Unlike many competitors, the system works without constant cloud support. That means better privacy and no dependency on remote servers.

    LUCID JOINS TESLA AND GM WITH HANDS-FREE HIGHWAY DRIVING

    Tensor aiming for full self-driving vehicle

    Unlike rivals chasing robotaxi fleets, Tensor wants consumers to own the first true self-driving car. (Tensor)

    How Tensor’s robocar differs from robotaxis

    Most autonomous startups, including Tensor’s earlier brand AutoX, started with robotaxi fleets. Those are easier to control since they operate in one city and return to a depot every night.

    Tensor is taking a tougher path with consumer cars. That means the robocar must adapt to highways, urban roads and real-world conditions without a safety net. While it won’t travel on every road from day one, owners can take control whenever needed.

    VOLKSWAGEN’S ICONIC CUTE VAN DRIVES ITSELF WITH 360-DEGREE VISION

    The steering wheel in a Tensor vehicle

    Tensor’s robocars must adapt to more real-world conditions without a safety net. (Tensor)

    Tensor’s robocar is designed for safety and luxury driving

    Tensor promises full redundancy with steering, braking and computing. If one system fails, backups take over instantly. The interior design adds another layer of appeal. With retractable pedals and foldable steering, the cabin feels more like a living space than a driver’s seat.

    The company partnered with VinFast, the Vietnamese automaker, to manufacture the vehicle. Pricing remains under wraps, but executives admit it will exceed luxury electric vehicles like the Lucid Air.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    A video screen in a Tensor robocar

    Tensor says that its self-driving cars will be comparable to other luxury vehicles on the market. (Tensor)

    What this means for you

    Tensor’s approach signals a turning point. Instead of waiting for ride-hailing services to roll out self-driving fleets, consumers may soon buy autonomy outright. If successful, this could reshape not just commuting, but how we think about owning cars at all.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right — and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    Tensor has history on its side. Its AutoX roots gave it years of testing, including permits for driverless operation in California since 2020. Now rebranded, it’s racing to sell the first consumer-ready robocar by 2026. The gamble is big. Luxury buyers may welcome the futuristic design and privacy protections, but mass adoption will depend on trust, safety and real-world performance.

    Would you hand control of your daily drive to a car that promises to drive itself? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mary Kay’s iconic pink Cadillac shifts to fully electric

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Nearly 60 years ago, Mary Kay Ash was turned away by a car salesman who refused to sell her a car without a man’s signature. That moment became the catalyst for a legacy, one powered by determination, lipstick, and eventually, horsepower. 

    Now, the iconic Mary Kay pink Cadillac is entering a bold new chapter: electric mobility. Mary Kay is offering its top-performing sales reps a fully electric Cadillac Optiq wrapped in a custom “pink pearl” finish. It’s the first time the company’s legendary incentive vehicle is going fully electric, and it’s turning heads while staying true to its roots.

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    A fully electric Cadillac Optiq wrapped in a custom “pink pearl” finish is parked in front of Mary Kay. (Mary Kay)

    A statement in pink (and green)

    In a press release, CEO Ryan Rogers, grandson of founder Mary Kay Ash, called the move a tribute to the company’s past and a leap into the future:

    “With the introduction of the all-electric OPTIQ, we’re honoring that iconic legacy while driving into a transformative future-one grounded in our commitment to sustainability and dedication to inspiring and celebrating the achievements of our independent sales force for generations to come.”

    THIS EV HAS A FACE, AND IT TALKS BACK WITH AI

    It’s not just a change in drivetrain. It’s a shift in mindset and a signal that luxury, reward, and eco-consciousness can coexist without compromise.

    The Mary Kay electric Cadillac Optiq

    The Cadillac Optiq grille and logo are seen up close. (Mary Kay)

    Why the pink Cadillac still matters

    Mary Kay pink Cadillacs are more than just a flashy ride. They represent achievement, empowerment, and recognition. Only the top 1% of the company’s sales force qualify. Even then, it’s not handed out lightly; recipients can choose a $900 monthly bonus instead. But 90% take the car. What makes these cars even more exclusive is that they’re leased for just two years. When the lease ends, they’re returned and repainted to the original factory color. That makes a true pink Cadillac a rare sight outside of Mary Kay circles. And yes, they’re beautiful. That pink pearl paint is exclusive, and few people outside the company ever get to drive one.

    VOLKSWAGEN’S ICONIC CUTE VAN DRIVES ITSELF WITH 360-DEGREE VISION

    The Mary Kay electric Cadillac Optiq

    The fully electric Cadillac Optiq wrapped in a custom “pink pearl” finish drives down a road. (Mary Kay)

    What this means for you

    Whether or not you’re building an empire through lipstick sales, this shift tells a bigger story. The auto industry is changing. EVs are no longer just for tech-savvy early adopters or Silicon Valley commuters. Now, they’re reaching industries built on tradition and glamour. The Mary Kay electric Cadillac shows how companies can preserve their legacy while embracing innovation. If you’re considering switching to an electric vehicle, this proves that style and sustainability don’t have to be at odds.

    Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

    Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right – and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

    Kurt’s key takeaways

    This move isn’t just a flex. It’s a smart pivot that aligns Mary Kay with modern values while still honoring its founder’s bold spirit. And frankly, it’s refreshing to see a legacy brand walk the talk when it comes to sustainability and do it in such an eye-catching shade of pink.

    How do you see the integration of electric vehicles by legacy brands like Mary Kay impacting attitudes towards sustainability in industries rooted in tradition? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
    Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

    Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    In 1900, 40% of cars in America were steam-powered, 38% electric, and 22% gasoline, reflecting a…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • samsung oven fire

    samsung oven fire

    [ad_1]

    samsung oven fire. Didn't know where else to post about this but Our samsung electric range caught on fire near the knob control panel on the back last night. A

    Didn’t know where else to post about this but
    Our samsung electric range caught on fire near the knob control panel on the back last night.
    Almost burned our entire house down.
    I had to spray water on it and shut off the breaker so i could pull it out and unplug it.
    House was FILLED with toxic smoke.
    I have looked it up and apparently a lot of other people with the same model number have had the EXACT same issue with that control panel catching fire.
    I have never thought about being in a class action lawsuit but I’m pretty sure if this is a for real defect on this range then it could potentially take houses and lives.
    IDK honestly it’s been a rough 12 hours since then. My eyes and throat burn and we’ve been on the phone with insurance/samsung for hours.
    If any one here has experience with class action lawsuits or just lawsuits in general feel free to drop a comment or PM me some info because we almost died and lost our home and I want SAMSUNG to ******* pay.
    (S/N NE59J7630 in case anyone has this oven do not leave it alone)
    I would love to take those ******* to court. (I am located in Oklahoma in case state matters for lawyer stuff)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Opinion: Here’s why pursuing net-zero buildings — even in Aspen — isn’t practical or necessary

    Opinion: Here’s why pursuing net-zero buildings — even in Aspen — isn’t practical or necessary

    [ad_1]

    The company I work for recently built a new ticket office at the base of Buttermilk Mountain in Aspen, Colorado. Environmentally, we killed it: argon-gas-filled windows, super-thick insulation and comprehensive air sealing, 100% electrification using heat pumps instead of gas boilers. All within budget.

    Yet one of the first comments we received was from a famous energy guru: “Nice building. But why do you have a heating system at all?” Or more simply put: “Why didn’t you build a perfect building, instead of just a really good one?”

    Solving climate change could depend on how we answer that question. My answer: Society needs the Prius of buildings, not the Tesla X.

    The green building movement didn’t originate only from a desire to protect the environment. It often had elements of the bizarre ego gratification that trumped practicality.

    Recall “Earthships” that used old tires and aluminum cans in the walls. Geodesic domes were interesting looking but produced inordinate waste to build. They also leaked. Rudolf Steiner’s weirdly wonderful Goetheanum was an all-concrete structure designed to unite “what is spiritual in the human being to what is spiritual in the universe.”

    Early practitioners such as Steiner, Buckminster Fuller, and Bill McDonough, among others, were often building monuments, whose ultimate goal became the concept of “net zero.” Net zero was a building that released no carbon dioxide emissions at all.

    Designers achieved that goal by constructing well-sealed, heavily insulated, properly oriented, and controlled buildings–but then they did something wasteful. They added solar panels to make up for carbon dioxide emissions from heating with natural gas. The approach zeroed out emissions, but at extraordinary cost that came in the form of added labor, expense and lost opportunity.

    While net zero wasn’t a good idea even when most buildings were heated with natural gas, the rapid decarbonization of utility grids — happening almost everywhere — and advances in electrification make the idea downright pointless.

    Instead, all you need to build an eventual net zero building is to go all-electric. It won’t be net zero today, but it will be net zero when the grid reaches 100% carbon-free power. So, all that really matters is that building codes require 100% electrification.

    Yet many communities remain focused on that sexy goal of net zero, and therefore include requirements for solar panels, or “solar ready” wiring. Even apart from the issue of cost, many utilities don’t need rooftop solar because they increasingly have access to huge solar arrays, giving them more electricity than they need in peak times.

    What utilities really need is energy storage and smart management.

    That means home batteries and grid integration that allows utilities to “talk” to buildings and turn off appliances during peak times. The problem is that environmentalists haven’t evolved: Just like we can’t retire our tie-dyes, we think “green” means rooftop solar panels.

    My company’s Buttermilk building passes the only test that matters: “If everyone built this kind of structure, would it solve the built environment’s portion of the climate problem?” The answer for our building is “yes.”

    Still, aspirational monuments matter. We need the Lincoln Memorial, the Empire State Building. But if we’re going to solve climate change in buildings, which is about a third of the total problem, new structures will have to reconceive what we consider efficient and beautiful. And it doesn’t have to break the bank.

    Electrification, for example, is getting cheaper every year. Years ago, I served on an environmental board for the town of Carbondale in western Colorado. The overwhelming interest there was ending dandelion spraying in the town park. But at one point, we worked on a building.

    After a long conversation about the technical tricks and feats we could pull off, a Rudolf Steiner disciple named Farmer Jack Reed said: “We should also plant bulbs in the fall so colorful flowers blossom in the spring.” “Why?” I asked, stuck in my own technocratic hole. He said: “Because flowers are beautiful and they make people happy.”

    So, too, are realistic solutions as we adapt to climate change.

    Auden Schendler is a contributor to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. He is senior vice president of sustainability at Aspen One. His book, Terrible Beauty: Reckoning with Climate Complicity and Rediscovering our Soul, comes out in November.

    Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.

    To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

    Originally Published:

    [ad_2]

    Auden Schendler

    Source link

  • Texans Face Higher Electric Bills, More Utility Debt Studies Find

    Texans Face Higher Electric Bills, More Utility Debt Studies Find

    [ad_1]

    Everything is bigger in Texas, so they say, and right now, that’s probably translating to your electric bill.  “My bill went up like crazy,” Michelle from Oak Cliff emailed the Observer last week…

    [ad_2]

    Emma Ruby

    Source link

  • The Best Electric Kick Scooters

    The Best Electric Kick Scooters

    [ad_1]

    I’ve tested a ton of scooters. Not all of them deserve a spot above, but some are still worth considering. These are a few other good scooters I like, just not as much as the ones above.

    MiniMotors USA Dualtron Mini Special for $1,399: The instructions to assemble this scooter are vague, and a few steps aren’t even mentioned in the instruction booklet. (I found the handlebar grip hard to put on—rubbing alcohol is your friend.) This is also the first time I tried the MiniMotors Dualtron app, and honestly, it’s not beginner-friendly. None of the terms and functions are well explained. It’s not a scooter I’d suggest for newcomers, but once you get everything up and running, the riding experience is quite nice. It has a top speed of 35 mph, and while the company claims a 40-mile range, you can expect closer to 25 to 30 miles. It’ll handle slopes just fine, but I do find it weird that despite being fairly hefty (59 pounds), it has a max load capacity of 200 pounds.

    Segway P100S for $1,500: This Segway (8/10, WIRED Recommends) is 73 pounds but has a max speed of 24 mph, so it’s a little less intense than the Apollo or Dualtron Mini Special. At that speed, I was able to get 16 miles in with 35 percent left in the tank. If you limit the speed to 20 via the app, you should easily be able to get close to 20 or 25 miles. I just hate the loud turn signal.

    Fluidfreeride Fluid Mosquito for $849: If the lightweight Unagi Model One Voyager doesn’t interest you but you still want an ultra-lightweight scooter, then check out the Fluid Mosquito (7/10, WIRED Recommends). At just 29 pounds, it’s one of the lightest scooters in this guide and has a comfy, built-in grab handle for easy toting. It’s fast to fold and is powerful, with a top speed of 24 mph. But shaving down the weight on this nimble scooter does have drawbacks. The suspension is just OK—you’ll feel most of those bumps—and the wheels are narrow. The braking system works fine, but you might encounter some skidding if you make a sudden stop, and the range is lackluster (around 9 miles in my testing, going over the Brooklyn Bridge). There’s also no easy way to change speed modes on the fly; you set it before you ride.

    Niu KQi Air for $1,399: I was so excited to test this scooter, but my experience with it over several months is mixed. I still like it, but a few quirks hold it back from being a top pick. The KQi Air has a carbon fiber frame, allowing it to be a mere 26 pounds with a 20-mph top speed. That makes it the lightest scooter I have ever tested. It’s easy to fold and has turn signals, a slick app, and reliable regenerative braking. The range is a bit lackluster—I usually got just under 10 miles on a single charge, but it’s so lightweight that when it died on my way home once, I strapped it to a Citi Bike’s front basket and cycled home (don’t do this!). The ride quality is great, but I had issues with it refusing to connect to my phone until I disconnected the internal power cable in the stem. There’s a theft protection that sounds an alarm and slows down the scooter if someone tries to roll it away, but bizarrely, while you can permanently turn off the alarm, the only way to stop it from braking as you roll it is to turn the scooter on. My initial model also stopped working completely and wouldn’t turn on, so Niu had to send me a second model. Oh, and sometimes, during rides, the scooter slows down and doesn’t hit its top speed until a few minutes later. I suspect there’s some thermal issue causing this. Overall, there’s a lot of promise, but it’s just annoying.

    TurboAnt M10 Lite for $290: This is a perfectly fine budget scooter best for folks under 200 pounds. (I wasn’t able to hit its top speed of 16 mph.) The assembly requires a few extra steps (more things to screw in, like the rear mudguard). I was only able to get around 8 miles riding it, but I like that the folding system is quick, the display is bright, and it’s pretty light at 31 pounds. Just don’t take it up any steep hills.

    Gotrax Apex for $350: The Apex is 32 pounds and easy to fold up. It has an integrated bell and a digital display that shows your speed and battery life, and it can go up to 15 mph. The Apex is reliable—I’ve gone to coffee shops, remote video shoots with a backpack full of camera gear, and the grocery store—though it’s not the smoothest ride. The 250-watt motor struggles with any slight incline, and slopes drain the battery fast. The battery usually doled out around 9 miles for me. I’m also tall, and I had to constantly outstretch my arms to reach the handlebars. You’ll want to tighten the rear disc brake; it works fine, but I wouldn’t have minded more stopping power.

    Gotrax GX2 for $1,499: The GX2 is akin to the Apollo Phantom and Segway P100S in that it’s 76 pounds and packs a lot of power and range. This gunmetal scooter looks a bit like a Transformer and can hit a max speed of 35 mph via the dual 800-watt motors, but I usually rode it at 20 mph. It took me to midtown and back to Brooklyn (a total of 18.4 miles) with some juice left over. I hate carrying it up and down the stairs, because the stem is super thick, making it difficult to grasp. When you’re waiting at a light, the GX2 also switches to Parking mode after a few seconds, so you constantly have to remember to press the mode button to switch it to the driving gear. It’s super annoying, and Gotrax says there’s no way to disable it. I am a little concerned about build quality—the motor makes a noise as if something is brushing against it, and this sound disappears if I lightly press the left brake lever while riding. The latch to keep the stem upright comes down too easily, despite a sliding lock mechanism to keep it in place; Gotrax says it might just be that it’s installed too tightly. If you see any of these issues, I recommend reaching out to Gotrax and going to a local scooter shop to have them take a look.

    Navee S65 for $1,099: Navee is a relatively new brand growing its presence in the US, and I had a great time using the S65 (7/10, WIRED Recommends). I was able to regularly complete 16-mile round trips at 20 mph, but that pretty much depleted the battery. It has great acceleration, thanks to its geared hub motor, and it climbs slopes with ease, but this also makes it very loud. The motor’s sound disappears if you’re in a noisy city like New York, but it can make you self-conscious on quiet streets. It’s 53 pounds, so it’s heavier than our top pick despite a similar range, and its customer service is up in the air since it’s so new. Still, I had fun riding it.

    Evolv Terra for $1,231: I enjoyed my time with the Evolv Terra (7/10, WIRED Recommends). It’s 53 pounds and thanks to the thin stem, not too annoying to carry. It’s powerful, with the potential to go as fast as 31 miles per hour when you engage both 600-watt motors (check your local speed laws first!). Otherwise, you can cruise along at 20 mph as I did on the second gear speed setting (there are three in total) with the single motor. Range is pretty average, with around two bars left on the meter after 15 miles, so it can potentially last more than 20 miles, especially if you’re conservative with its speeds. The suspension is OK but the solid tires on rougher roads can feel quite bumpy. The fenders also seemed pretty useless to me as, after a wet ride post-rain, my back was covered in specks of dirt kicked up from the rear tire. The stem’s angle was also a little too close to my body, and the lack of a thumb throttle meant my wrist hurt after long rides. You can tweak the angle of the throttle and brakes to improve this though.

    Radio Flyer S533 for $599: Honestly, I’m surprised at how well this scooter did in my tests. The folding mechanism is just a latch and a sleeve you pull down to keep the latch from coming undone while you ride. It’s super easy to fold and unfold, and lightweight at 30 pounds. It’s not a commuter scooter by any means—my range hovered under 8 miles on a single charge—and despite exceeding its 220-pound load capacity, I averaged around 14 mph of its 16 mph top speed. It’s a nice little scooter for going to the post office, grocery store, or Cinnabon when my wife asks for a cinnamon roll. However, its price doesn’t match its power and performance; it should be cheaper. It’s also worth noting that the first model the company sent me didn’t turn on and the second model had a deflated front tire. Inflating it was a quick affair and I haven’t had problems since.

    Apollo Air Pro (2022) for $899: I have not tested the new 2024 model, but the Apollo Air Pro (2022) was a perfectly fine scooter (6/10, WIRED Review); I just don’t think it’s worth the high price. It goes up to 21 mph, and I was able to ride it for about 13 to 15 miles before it died. You get all the accouterments, like a front light and bell, and there’s app connectivity to tweak settings to your liking. However, the app is required to unlock the Air Pro’s true speed—otherwise, you’re restricted to 12 mph. I’m more miffed at the folding mechanism, which is more work than it should be. It also doesn’t accelerate too fast and, despite its 39-pound weight, is uncomfortable to carry due to its thick stem.

    [ad_2]

    Julian Chokkattu

    Source link

  • Colorado lawmakers’ latest police oversight bill would protect whistleblowers from retaliation

    Colorado lawmakers’ latest police oversight bill would protect whistleblowers from retaliation

    [ad_1]

    Former Edgewater police officer McKinzie Rees hopes to serve and protect again, but first she must get her name removed from a so-called “bad cops list” maintained by the Colorado Attorney General’s Office. It landed there, she said, as retaliation after she reported sexual assaults by a supervising sergeant.

    That sergeant went on to work for another police department until this year, when he pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and misconduct and was sentenced, more than four years after the assaults and retaliation against Rees.

    She testified to the state’s House Judiciary Committee this week that, even after her attacker was exposed, her complaint about still being listed as a problem police officer “is falling on deaf ears every time.”

    Rees’ testimony, echoed by other frontline police officers from Colorado Springs and Denver about retaliation they faced after reporting misconduct, is driving state lawmakers’ latest effort at police oversight. Fresh legislation would require investigations of all alleged misconduct and increase protection for whistleblowers.

    But the bill, titled “Law Enforcement Misconduct,” faces resistance from police chiefs, sheriffs, district attorneys and the Fraternal Order of Police who contend it would complicate police work and lead to unnecessary prosecutions.

    While state leaders “are committed to addressing police misconduct,” the requirement that all allegations must be investigated could create “a caustic culture” within police agencies, said Colorado Department of Public Safety executive director Stan Hilkey in testimony to lawmakers during a hearing Tuesday.

    “This bill is harmful to the mission of public safety,” Hilkey said, raising concerns it would lead to police “watching each other … instead of going out and responding to and preventing crime.”

    The legislation, House Bill 1460, won approval on a 6-5 vote in the House Judiciary Committee. It would require investigations of all alleged misconduct by police, correctional officers and others who enforce the law in Colorado. Officers who report misconduct would gain the ability to file lawsuits if complaints aren’t investigated or they face retaliation.

    Key elements under discussion include a provision bolstering the attorney general’s power to add and remove names from the Police Officer Standards and Training database, which bars future employment, and to compel police agencies to provide information for managing that list.

    Other provisions would require longer retention of police records and prohibit government agencies from charging fees for making unedited police body-worn camera videos available for public scrutiny.

    Investigating all alleged misconduct is projected to cost millions of dollars as state agencies face increased workloads, requiring more employees in some agencies, and increased litigation and liability expenses.

    Lawmakers sponsoring the bill have agreed to remove a provision that would have established a new misdemeanor crime for officers who fail to report misconduct by their peers.

    But the increased protection for whistleblowers is essential, said Rep. Leslie Herod, a Denver Democrat, in an interview.

    “People need those protections now. This would ensure good officers can be good officers and bad officers who cover up for bad officers no longer can be on the force,” said Herod, who introduced the legislation on April 17.

    Most police officers “do great work,” sponsor says

    The bill would build on police accountability laws passed following the 2020 Minneapolis police murder of George Floyd, which sparked street protests, Herod said.

    “We still have more work to do. There’s no one-shot bill that will fix police accountability in the state,” she said.

    “The majority of police officers in Colorado do great work. We need to make sure we have protections in place when that doesn’t happen. This is just as important as any other issue we are debating in Colorado.”

    The late-in-the-session legislation would affect the 246 police agencies and 12,000 sworn officers around Colorado. It began when Rees and other police whistleblowers who had faced retaliation approached lawmakers.

    For Rees, 30, who now supports herself by pet-sitting, the feeling of still being punished — and prevented from continuing a career she worked toward since childhood — “is horrible,” said in an interview.

    “There should always be checks and balances,” she said. “It is exhausting trying to figure this out. You just get this runaround. There’s no way out.”

    Rees told lawmakers that she reported two sexual assaults in 2019 by the sergeant to colleagues, seeking protection under internal agency protocols and as a whistleblower under existing state laws.

    “Instead, I got served the ultimate sentence of no protection,” she said.

    This year, after his dismissal from the Black Hawk Police Department, former Edgewater police Sgt. Nathan Geerdes, who was indicted by a grand jury in 2022 on four counts of unlawful sexual contact and one count of witness retaliation, pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact, first-degree official misconduct and forgery as part of a plea deal. He was sentenced in Jefferson County District Court to four years of probation.

    Edgewater police officer Ed McCallin also testified, describing the retaliation he faced after he became aware “that a senior officer had sexually assaulted a junior officer” — referring to Rees — and then “weaponized” the state’s database against her.

    “I was asked to cover that up by my police chief,” he said. “I was threatened with internal investigations twice” and “had to meet with a city council member to save my job for doing the right thing.”

    When he went to the Fraternal Order of Police for guidance in the case, McCallin said, a contract attorney advised him “to look the other way.”

    “We just need more time,” sheriff says

    Colorado law enforcement group leaders and police advocates said their main concern was that they weren’t consulted by sponsors of this legislation.

    “We just need more time to dive into this,” Arapahoe County Sheriff Tyler Brown, representing the County Sheriffs of Colorado, told lawmakers.

    Herod acknowledged “miscalculation” in not consulting with law enforcement brass in advance.

    She and co-sponsor Rep. Jennifer Bacon, a Denver Democrat serving as vice chair of the House Judiciary Committee, said they lined up meetings this week to hash out language and amendments before the bill advances.

    Rep. Mike Weissman, who chairs the committee, agreed that support from law enforcement leaders would be crucial but added that he understood the “guardedness” of the bill sponsors, “given how these issues can go in this building.”

    District attorneys from Jefferson and El Paso counties objected to the proposed requirement that every misconduct claim must be investigated, saying it would create conflicts in carrying out their professional duties.

    Several lawmakers raised concerns about language in the bill, such as “unlawful behavior.” Rep. Matt Soper, a Delta Republican, said a police officer who was sexually assaulted and chose not to report the crime “could become caught up in the system” for failing to report misconduct. Or police who might have to make an illegal U-turn while chasing a suspect, hypothetically, would have to be investigated, he said.

    But the lawmakers broadly supported the efforts aimed at making sure the Attorney General’s Office manages the database of police transgressors properly.

    The committee’s bill supporters said the compelling testimony from the Edgewater officers and other whistleblowers persuaded them that there’s an undeniable problem to address.

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Finley

    Source link

  • Electric Vehicle Startup, RINDEV, Now Open for Public Investment

    Electric Vehicle Startup, RINDEV, Now Open for Public Investment

    [ad_1]

    Press Release


    Apr 19, 2022

    Electric powersports company, RINDEV, has announced the launch of its first equity crowdfunding campaign.

    RINDEV, a Colorado-based company, is engineering a technology platform to electrify the powersports industry. The company was founded by recreational motorsport enthusiasts who have targeted their vehicle’s design to meet the needs and exceed the desires of its customer base. Now, they are offering fellow enthusiasts the opportunity to be a part of this revolutionary shift. The campaign has launched with investments now open to the public at www.wefunder.com/RINDEV.

    Their first product will be an electric side by side, the Unity. Unity is an all-electric, long-range, high-performance side by side designed to address environmental and performance issues commonly seen in the off-road market. 

    “We are focused on providing a vehicle that has a place in today’s evolving landscape, one that is designed around our customers. We feel that it is time for a major shift in the market, and we are not just talking about how the vehicles get their power.” – Ari Kronish, Founder & CEO

    Lead investor, William Mcleish, is a passionate enthusiast and avid participant in the sport of off-roading. For over 50 years, Mcleish has been a participant in the on-road and off-road motorsport community, witnessing the evolution of the industry, and he is particularly excited about what RINDEV is bringing to the table.

    “By bringing a high-quality electric vehicle to the off-road market, RINDEV stands on the threshold of changing the public perception of off-road vehicles. The noisy, oil-belching vehicles of the past will be replaced by sleek, quiet, eco-friendly machines worthy of access to any trail system the world over. For the off-road industry, this is a game-changing moment.” – William Mcleish, Lead Investor

    RINDEV entered the public eye at the end of 2021 with the launch of its website and the announcement of taking preorder reservations. Since that time, the company has secured millions of dollars’ worth of preorders and has established partnerships with industry leaders and innovators within the recreational market.

    RINDEV Highlights

    RINDEV is designing electric recreational vehicles with a modern design, exceptional performance, and unmatched durability. The RINDEV side by side is the answer to accelerating the recreational market’s shift to electric. For more information, visit www.rindev.com & www.wefunder.com/rindev.

    RINDEV Contact

    Whitney Johnson
    hello@rindev.com

    Source: RINDEV

    [ad_2]

    Source link