ReportWire

Tag: Elections

  • Trump Leaves Military Action Against Venezuela on the Table but Floats Possible Talks

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Monday did not rule out military action against Venezuela despite bringing up a potential diplomatic opening with leader Nicolás Maduro, who has insisted that a U.S. military buildup and strikes on alleged drug boats near his South American country are designed to push him out of office.

    “I don’t rule out that. I don’t rule out anything,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office a day after he first floated the possibility of having “discussions” with Maduro. Trump, however, sidestepped questions about whether Maduro could say anything to him that would lead to the U.S. backing off its military show of force.

    “He’s done tremendous damage to our country,” said Trump, tying Maduro to drugs and migrants coming into the U.S. from Venezuela. “He has not been good to the United States, so we’ll see what happens.”

    The comments deepened the uncertainty about the Trump administration’s next steps toward Maduro’s government. The U.S. has ratcheted up the pressure in recent days, saying it was expecting to designate as a terrorist organization a cartel it says is led by Maduro and other high-level Venezuelan government officials.


    ‘Can turn policy on a dime’

    The administration says its actions are a counterdrug operation meant to stop narcotics from flowing to American cities, but some analysts, Venezuelans and the country’s political opposition see them as an escalating pressure tactic against Maduro.

    The Trump administration has shown it “can turn policy on a dime,” said Geoff Ramsey, an expert on U.S. policy toward Venezuela who is a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. He pointed to the diplomatic talks the administration held with Iran “right up until the point” that the U.S. military targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities in June.

    But, Ramsey added, the timing of Trump’s remarks — after Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s announcement of the impending terrorist designation of the Cartel de los Soles — underscores that the administration does not want to repeat failed attempts at dialogue.

    “They really want to negotiate from a place of strength, and I think the White House is laying out an ultimatum for Maduro,” Ramsey said. “Either he engages in credible talks about a transition, or the U.S. will have no choice but to escalate.”

    Among the concessions the U.S. made to Maduro during negotiations was approval for oil giant Chevron Corp. to resume pumping and exporting Venezuelan oil. The corporation’s activities in the South American country resulted in a financial lifeline for Maduro’s government.

    Neither Maduro nor his chief negotiator, National Assembly president Jorge Rodriguez, commented Monday on Trump’s remarks. A spokesperson for Venezuelan opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado told reporters Monday that she would not comment on Trump’s remarks.


    Trump also talks about Mexico

    Trump didn’t even rule out possible military action against close allies in the region.

    “Would I want strikes in Mexico to stop drugs? OK with me, whatever we have to do to stop drugs,” Trump said, adding that he’s “not happy with Mexico.”

    Trump said the U.S. government has drug corridors from Mexico “under major surveillance” and said he would also like to target Colombia’s “cocaine factories.”

    “Would I knock out those factories? I would be proud to do it personally. I didn’t say I’m doing it — but I would be proud to do it,” he said.


    Skepticism and hope in Venezuela about possible talks

    Trump’s goal on Venezuela remains unclear, but above all, Ramsey said, the president “is looking for a win.”

    “And he may be flexible on exactly what that looks like,” Ramsey said. “I could envision the U.S. pushing for greater control over Venezuela’s natural resources, including oil, as well as greater cooperation with the president’s migration and security goals.”

    In Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, people responded with skepticism and hope to the possibility of a new dialogue between the U.S. and Maduro, whose government has fueled rumors of a ground invasion despite the Trump administration giving little clear indication of such a plan.

    “If (the dialogue) actually happens, I hope the government will actually follow through this time,” shopkeeper Gustavo García, 38, said as he left church. “We have to be serious. They’ve gotten us used to them talking, but they don’t honor the agreements. You don’t mess with Trump.”

    Stay-at-home mother Mery Martínez, 41, said, “Talking is always better.”

    “Anything that helps prevent a tragedy is good,” Martínez said. “Venezuelans don’t deserve this. A war benefits no one.”

    Garcia Cano reported from Caracas, Venezuela. Associated Press writer Jorge Rueda in Caracas contributed to this report.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • U.K. Follows Europe and U.S. in Crackdown on Asylum Seekers

    [ad_1]

    LONDON—The U.K. government on Monday announced an overhaul of its immigration policy to deter asylum seekers from arriving on British shores, the latest European nation to tighten rules in response to growing dissatisfaction from voters at levels of illegal immigration.

    The Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a suite of policies including changing laws to make it easier to expel migrants, quadrupling the length of time they have to wait to become permanent residents to 20 years and regularly reviewing whether their home countries have become safer and can take them back.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Max Colchester

    Source link

  • New analysis shows more US consumers are falling behind on their utility bills

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — More people are falling behind on paying their bills to keep on the lights and heat their homes, according to a new analysis of consumer data — a warning sign for the U.S. economy and another political headache for President Donald Trump.

    Past due balances to utility companies jumped 9.7% annually to $789 between the April-June periods of 2024 and 2025, said The Century Foundation, a liberal think tank. The increase has overlapped with a 12% jump in monthly energy bills during the same period.

    Consumers usually prioritize their utility bills along with their mortgages and auto debt, said Julie Margetta Morgan, the foundation’s president. The increase in both energy costs and delinquencies may suggest that consumers are falling behind on other bills, too.

    “There’s a lot of information out there about rising utility costs, but here we can actually look at what that impact has been on families in terms of how they’re falling behind,” Margetta Morgan said.

    Troubles paying electricity and natural gas bills reflect something of an economic quandary for Trump, who is promoting the buildout of the artificial intelligence industry as a key part of an economic boom he has promised for America. But AI data centers are known for their massive use of electricity, and threaten to further increase utility bills for everyday Americans.

    These troubles also come as Trump faces political pressure from voters fed up with the high cost of living.

    Ever since Republicans saw their fortunes sag in off-year elections this month and affordability was identified as the top issue, Trump has been trying to convince the public that prices are falling. Fast-rising electricity bills could be an issue in some congressional battlegrounds in next year’s midterm elections.

    Trump has put a particular emphasis on prices at the pump. Gasoline accounts for about 3% of the consumer price index, slightly less than the share belonging to electricity and natural gas bills — meaning that possible savings on gasoline could be more than offset by higher utility bills.

    The president maintains that any troubling data on inflation is false and that Democrats are simply trying to hurt his administration’s reputation.

    “In fact, costs under the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION are tumbling down, helped greatly by gasoline and ENERGY,” Trump posted on social media Friday. “Affordability is a lie when used by the Dems,”

    Nearly 6 million households have utility debt “so severe” that it will soon be reported to collection agencies, according to the foundation’s analysis, drawn from the University of California Consumer Credit Panel.

    During Trump’s first six months in office, there was a 3.8% increase in households with severely overdue utility bills.

    “Voters are frustrated and families are hurting because these tech giants are cutting backroom deals with politicians, and it’s causing their power bills to go up,” said Mike Pierce, executive director of the advocacy group Protect Borrowers, which contributed to the analysis. “If the Trump administration doesn’t want to do its job and protect families and make life more affordable, I guess that’s its choice.”

    Both Margetta Morgan and Pierce previously worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a government agency formed in part to track trends in household borrowing to prevent potential abuses. The Trump administration has essentially shut down the bureau.

    The administration has so far said it has no responsibility for any increases in electricity prices, since those are often regulated by state utility boards. The White House maintains that utility costs are higher in Democratic states that rely on renewable forms of energy.

    “Electricity prices are a state problem,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told ABC News this month. “There are things that the federal government can control. Local electricity prices are not one of them.”

    The Century Foundation analysis counters that the Trump administration is contributing to higher utility costs “by impeding renewable energy generation” including solar and wind power.

    While the new analysis is a warning sign, other economic analyses on consumers suggest their finances are stable despite some emerging pressures.

    The New York Federal Reserve has said delinquency rates of 90 days or more for mortgages, auto loans and student debt have each increased over the past 12 months, though it said mortgage delinquencies are “relatively low.” An analysis of debit and credit card spending by the Bank of America Institute showed that consumers’ “overall financial health looks sound.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Indiana officials, experts share mixed feelings about end to government shutdown

    [ad_1]

    The end of the longest government shutdown in U.S. history exposed partisan divides in Washington and left Democrats hoping, again, that Republicans will keep their word of addressing expiring healthcare subsidies in the coming months, political science experts said.

    President Donald Trump signed a government funding bill Wednesday night, ending a record 43-day shutdown that caused financial stress for federal workers who went without paychecks, stranded scores of travelers at airports, and generated long lines at some food banks as Trump officials cut off SNAP benefits.

    Noe Luna, a student in the East Chicago Central job skills program, packs juice into boxes to be distributed by the Food Bank of Northwest Indiana on Thursday, Oct. 23, 2025. (Kyle Telechan/for the Post-Tribune)

    The House passed the measure on a mostly party-line vote of 222-209 on Wednesday afternoon, while the Senate had already passed the measure on Monday.

    U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, said in a statement he voted against the continuing resolution because while the bill will ensure that emergency food assistance will be funded, “it is wrong to do so at the expense of affordable health care benefits.”

    “I have spent my career as a public official working on behalf of individuals and families facing economic hardship, often through no fault of their own, who have been in need of access to food, housing, and health care. Too many times have I witnessed the difficult choice that families often make between choosing between a meal or health care services,” Mrvan said.

    “I remain deeply disappointed that the Republican Majority refused to extend the health care tax credits as part of this negotiation that so many small business owners and working families rely on, even as they allow the Trump Administration to direct $40 billion in federal funds to support Argentina’s economy,” Mrvan said.

    Mrvan said he also didn’t support the continuing resolution because it doesn’t fund the Toxic Exposures Fund, which supports veterans.

    “As we move forward, the fight for access to affordable health care continues, and I remain committed to working with my colleagues to find a bipartisan agreement that restores the health care tax credits as soon as possible,” Mrvan said.

    Senator Todd Young said in a statement that he voted in favor of the continuing resolution because it will reopen the government through Jan. 30, 2026 and include full-year appropriations for military construction, veterans affairs, agriculture and the legislative branch.

    Young noted that he voted 15 times to reopen the government, but Democrats voted 14 times to against the effort.

    “I am frustrated that the shutdown dragged on as long as it did and negatively affected our country in so many ways. I am grateful for all the dedicated federal workers, such as our service members and air traffic controllers, who continued to work throughout the shutdown,” Young said.

    Senator Jim Banks blamed the Democrats for “holding American hostage” by continuing the shutdown.

    The shutdown magnified partisan divisions in Washington as Trump took unprecedented unilateral actions — including canceling projects and trying to fire federal workers — to pressure Democrats into relenting on their demands.

    Democrats wanted to extend an enhanced tax credit expiring at the end of the year that lowers the cost of health coverage obtained through Affordable Care Act marketplaces. They refused to go along with a short-term spending bill that did not include that priority. But Republicans said that was a separate fight to be held at another time.

    The compromise funds three annual spending bills and extends the rest of government funding through Jan. 30. Republicans promised to hold a vote by mid-December to extend the health care subsidies, but there is no guarantee of success.

    The bill includes a reversal of the Trump administration policy of firing of federal workers since the shutdown began. It also protects federal workers against further layoffs through January and guarantees they are paid once the shutdown is over.

    A bill for the Agriculture Department, which funds the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, means people who rely on key food assistance programs will see those benefits funded without threat of interruption through the rest of the budget year.

    Food Bank of Northwest Indiana CEO Victor Garcia said the organization is pleased the government shutdown has ended, but it’s unclear how soon SNAP benefits will be distributed.

    “There is still some uncertainty in how and when SNAP benefits will be distributed to our neighbors in Northwest Indiana. The Food Bank will continue to provide additional nutrition support as we navigate the fallout of the shutdown together,” Garcia said.

    It’s unclear whether the parties will find any common ground on health care before a potential December vote in the Senate. House Speaker Mike Johnson has said he will not commit to bringing it up in his chamber. Without the enhanced tax credit, premiums on average will more than double for millions of Americans.

    Some Republicans have said they are open to extending the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits, but they also want new limits on who can receive the subsidies.

    Aaron Dusso, associate professor of political science at Indiana University Indianapolis, said he was surprised the shutdown ended when it did, but he thought it was likely because of the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday.

    Eight Democratic Senators voted to end the shutdown with the promise from Republican Senate leadership of holding a vote on healthcare subsidies in December, Dusso said. But, earlier this year, a shutdown was avoided when Republicans told Democrats that they would discuss healthcare subsidies outside of the Trump administration’s tax bill, and that never happened, he said.

    “The classic cartoon is Lucy holding that football and Charlie Brown believing he’s going to finally be able to kick that football. We’ll see if that actually happens,” Dusso said.

    With the government reopening, funding for programs like SNAP should move fairly quickly because the apparatus for funding is already there, Dusso said. But departments that rely on people, like air traffic controllers, could take a little longer to start back up as people return to work, he said.

    It’s likely that the government shutdown won’t be top of mind for voters in 2026 as many more things will occur at the federal level between now and then, Dusso said.

    “I don’t think there’s going to be much, as far as outside of Washington, much memory of it. Inside Washington, some of the memories are going to come down to internal to the Democratic Party. There will certainly be hurt feelings and distrust,” Dusso said.

    The Associated Press contributed. 

    akukulka@post-trib.com

    [ad_2]

    Alexandra Kukulka

    Source link

  • Leading Senate Democrat tells Fox News ‘it’s time … for new leadership,’ as Schumer faces growing pressure

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Amid a rising tide of calls from House Democrats and others in the party to remove Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., from his longtime post as Senate Democratic leader, a top Democratic senator says it’s time for “new leadership” in the party. 

    Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, speaking one-on-one with Fox News Digital during a stop in New Hampshire, said it’s also a moment for a younger generation of Democratic leaders to “step up the stage.”

    Booker was interviewed on Friday, four days after seven Senate Democrats and independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with the party, bucked Senate Democratic leaders and voted with the majority Republicans to end the longest federal government shutdown in history.

    Plenty of progressives and center-left Democrats have pilloried the deal to end the shutdown, which didn’t include the Democrats’ top priority: an agreement to extend expiring subsidies that make health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act, known as the ACA or Obamacare, more affordable to millions of Americans.

    DEMOCRATIC SENATOR CALLS FOR ‘MORE EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP’ AS SCHUMER FACES MOUNTING PRESSURE

    Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., is seen after a news conference in the U.S. Capitol on the government shutdown on Wednesday, November 5, 2025. (Tom Williams/Getty)

    And even though he opposed the agreement, Schumer, the top Democrat in the chamber, has faced calls from an increasing number of party members to step down due to his inability to keep Senate Democrats unified.

    But to date, no Senate Democrat has joined those calls for Schumer to step down.

    After the final congressional vote to end the shutdown, Booker wrote that “the Democratic Party needs change. It needs a new generation of leaders to stand up to Trump.”

    SCHUMER FACES FURY FROM THE LEFT OVER DEAL TO END SHUTDOWN

    Asked if those comments were directed at Schumer, Booker said, “I’m pointing these comments at anybody who will listen to me.”

    “Chuck Schumer’s generation, Nancy Pelosi’s generation, John Lewis’s generation. They have so much to be proud of. It is time, though, for new leadership. The other generations, X, millennials, Z, — it’s time for us to step up. The stage is waiting for us to lead, not just the party, but the nation right now.”

    Cory Booker Fox Digital interview

    Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey is interviewed by Fox News Digital at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics, in Manchester, N.H. on Nov. 14, 2025 (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    Booker was interviewed ahead of an event at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics. New Hampshire’s two senators — Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan — were among the Democrats who supported the deal with Republicans.

    Shaheen, who previously supported a bill to extend the ACA subsidies, on Monday defended breaking with her party to support the deal.

    “We’re making sure that the people of America can get the food benefits that they need, that air traffic controllers can get paid, that federal workers are able to come back, the ones who were let go, that they get paid, that contractors get paid, that aviation moves forward,” Shaheen said in a “Fox and Friends” interview.

    SHUTDOWN SHOWDOWN: DEMOCRATIC SENATOR STANDS FIRM AFTER DEFYING PARTY

    Asked about the Democratic senators who bucked the party, Booker, who played Division One football at Stanford University, called for party unity.

    “I played football, and that play is behind me. Now I want everybody back in the huddle, tighten your chin straps, because we’ve got to fight forward and the end zone, for me, is very simple. It is lowering people’s healthcare costs, lowering people’s grocery costs, lowering people’s energy costs, and getting an America that works for everybody, not just the wealthiest of the wealthy,” Booker said.

    And Booker, who broke a Senate record with a 25-hour speech earlier this year as he took aim at President Donald Trump‘s second-term agenda, said: “I’m a big believer, if you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.”

    Sen. Cory Booker in New Hampshire

    Democratic Sen. Cory Booker headlines an event at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics, in Manchester, N.H. on Nov. 14, 2025. (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    But he also lamented the increased animosity between Democrats and Republicans, saying that “the partisanship, as you know, bothers me, because it’s turned to tribalism.”

    As he unsuccessfully ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, Booker spent plenty of time and made lots of friends in New Hampshire, which has held the first-in-the-nation presidential primary for over a century.

    Booker, who is up for re-election next year in blue-leaning New Jersey, is seen by political pundits as a possible contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, which is expected to be a crowded and competitive race.

    “Of course, I’m thinking about it. Haven’t ruled it out. But I’m up on the ballot in New Jersey in ’26 and that is my focus,” Booker said.

    After his Fox News interview, Booker headlined the latest “Stand Up New Hampshire Town Hall.” The speaking series, organized by top New Hampshire Democratic elected officials and party leaders, is seen as an early cattle call for potential White House contenders.

    And later in the day, he gave the keynote address at a major fundraising gala for the New Hampshire Democratic Party.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Booker called next year’s elections, when the Democrats will try to win back majorities in the House and Senate, “vitally important.”

    “Don’t talk to me about ’28 until you show me where you stand and who you stand for in ’26. I stand for New Jersey. I stand for America and an America that works for everybody,” Booker emphasized.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about the 2020 Georgia election case and its new prosecutor

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — The fate of the Georgia election interference case against President Donald Trump and others is now in the hands of a new prosecutor who has to decide how he is going to move forward with the sprawling indictment.

    After courts removed Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis over an “appearance of impropriety” created by a romantic relationship with the special prosecutor she had chosen to lead the case, it was up to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council to someone to take over. Council Executive Director Pete Skandalakis said Friday that he would handle the case himself after he was unable to find anyone else willing to do it.

    The indictment against Trump and 18 others was returned by a grand jury in August 2023 and uses the state’s anti-racketeering law to allege a wide-ranging conspiracy to illegally overturn Trump’s narrow loss to Democrat Joe Biden in Georgia.

    Here are some things to know about Skandalakis and what might come next for this prosecution.

    When a prosecutor recuses or is removed from a case in Georgia, the executive director of the nonpartisan Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council steps in to appoint a substitute prosecutor. Skandalakis, who has led the agency since January 2018, said in an e-mailed statement that he contacted several prosecutors about taking over the election interference case and they all declined.

    The judge overseeing the case had said that if a new prosecutor wasn’t appointed by Friday, he would dismiss the case. Skandalakis said that while he could easily have let the judge’s deadline pass without appointing anyone and allowed the case to be dismissed, he “did not believe that to be the right course of action.”

    He acknowledged that he had not had a chance to fully review the case, having only recently received from Willis’ office 101 boxes of documents and an eight-terabyte hard drive with the full investigative file. Appointing himself to the case, he said, “will allow me to complete a comprehensive review and make an informed decision regarding how best to proceed.”

    Prior to his time at the council, Skandalakis spent about 25 years as the elected Republican district attorney for the Coweta Judicial Circuit, southwest of Atlanta. But former Gwinnett County District Attorney Danny Porter, who has known Skandalakis for more than 40 years, said they shared a philosophy that the district attorney’s office should be nonpartisan.

    “I wouldn’t put too much weight on the fact that he ran as a Republican,” Porter said. “I feel certain that he’s going to do what he said he’s going to do and give it a fair and transparent review and come to conclusions based on the law and the facts.”

    Skandalakis is no stranger to sensitive high-profile cases. He took on the investigation into the June 2020 shooting death of Rayshard Brooks, a Black man, by a white police officer after Willis recused her office from the case. He ultimately decided that the two officers involved had acted reasonably, and he declined to pursue charges.

    Skandalakis will continue to review the case file to decide how he wants to proceed. The judge has set a Dec. 1 status hearing and said the prosecution should be prepared to say at that time whether it intends to seek a new indictment in the case.

    Skandalakis has declined to comment beyond the statement he released Friday. But Porter, who has served as a substitute prosecutor, said the first step is generally to get the case filed, which Skandalakis has done. Then, Porter said, it is not improper to have a discussion with the removed prosecutor about their summary of the case, but that should be the last contact between the two prosecution teams about the case.

    Then the substitute prosecutor would start from scratch, figuring out how the case is organized, determining the budget and resources needed to handle it and figuring out how to handle it.

    The size of this case makes all that a “nearly impossible task for one person to do,” Porter said. While Skandalakis has a “great staff” with some really talented prosecutors, they all have other cases on their plates.

    The Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council has a tight budget, and the state legislature is dominated by Republicans, many loyal to Trump, who are unlikely to grant any special appropriations for this prosecution. But Skandalakis could look for money elsewhere to hire contract attorneys and cover other expenses, Porter said.

    Then Skandalakis will have to decide whether he wants to continue on the course that Willis had charted, pursue only some of the charges or dismiss the case.

    “I think the case as it’s indicted is completely untryable,” Porter said, adding that he would try to slim it down, either by seeking a new indictment or asking the judge to sever some counts to break it down into smaller cases, Porter said.

    The indictment includes charges related to a Jan. 2, 2021, phone call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger during which Trump urged the state’s top elections official to help him “find” the votes he needed to win. Other charges have to do with a getting a slate of Republican electors to falsely declare that Trump won the state, allegations of harassment of a Georgia election worker and a breach of election equipment in a rural south Georgia county.

    Four of the 19 people charged pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors in the months following their indictment. Trump and the other 14 people charged have all pleaded not guilty. It seems unlikely that any action against Trump could proceed while he is in office, but the others do not have that shield.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DHS shores up case against mayor accused of voting illegally 3 times

    [ad_1]

    A new report from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) provided documents to bolster the case against a city mayor from Kansas accused of committing voter fraud while residing in the U.S. as a green card immigrant.

    Newsweek reached out to the Coldwater mayor’s office via email on Friday evening outside normal business hours for comment.

    Why It Matters

    Voter fraud has remained an issue of significant focus after President Donald Trump and his allies claimed widespread fraud in the 2020 presidential election, alleging that such issues were the cause of his defeat. However, dozens of cases brought against various states and entities to prove that such fraud had occurred resulted in virtually no convictions, with a group of eight prominent Republican judges and lawyers issuing a report in 2022 to say that the “unequivocal” conclusion they reached was that the election lost by Trump to former President Joe Biden was not “stolen.”

    What To Know

    DHS on Thursday showed documents related to the charges brought against Jose “Joe” Ceballos-Armendariz, 54, who won reelection as mayor of Coldwater this month.

    Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach on November 5 announced he had filed charges against Ceballos, with three counts of voting without being qualified and three counts of election perjury.

    Ceballos is a citizen of Mexico who has been living in the United States for decades, first obtaining a green card in 1990, according to DHS. He had applied for U.S. citizenship in February.

    However, during the intervening years, he attested on forms, which DHS posted along with its statement, that showed Ceballos asserting that he is a U.S. citizen. When he submitted his application for citizenship, he said that he has never claimed to be a U.S. citizen, but also admitted to registering to vote or having voted in elections in the U.S. DHS also noted that Ceballos was convicted of battery in 1995.

    Kansas news outlet KAKE reported this week that the city of Coldwater had called a special meeting after Ceballos’ reelection to discuss the charges, with a decision on further steps still pending.

    During his time as attorney general, Kobach has pushed for proof-of-citizenship requirements to vote in elections, but the law was struck down in 2018.

    What People Are Saying

    Coldwater City Council President Britt Lenertz, to KAKE: “At this time, our focus remains on ensuring that city operations continue to run smoothly and that the needs of our community are met. While the recent allegations involving the mayor are understandably concerning, we will allow the proper legal process to take its course before making any further comments. It’s important that we respect both due process and the integrity of our local government.”

    DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, in a statement Thursday: “This alien committed a felony by voting in American elections. If convicted, he will be placed in removal proceedings. President Trump and [Homeland Security] Secretary [Kristi] Noem gave states access to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program to ensure only Americans vote in American elections. The SAVE program is a critical tool for state and local governments to safeguard the integrity of elections across the country. Our elections belong to American citizens, not foreign citizens.”

    Kobach, in a statement earlier this month: “In Kansas, it is against the law to vote if you are not a U.S. citizen. We allege that Mr. Ceballos did it multiple times,” adding, “Voting by noncitizens, including both legal and illegal aliens, is a very real problem. It happens. Every time a noncitizen votes, it effectively cancels out a U.S. citizen’s vote.”

    What’s Next

    Lenertz told the Kansas Reflector that the Coldwater City Council is seeking guidance on the matter and is uncertain about potential consequences if Ceballos is deemed ineligible to maintain his mayoral seat. Amid the tumult, she added, council members are committed to keeping city operations efficient, according to the news outlet. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats mocked for ‘out of touch’ comments dismissing no tax on tips: ‘Peak elitism’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Nevada Democratic representatives Dina Titus, Susie Lee and Steven Horsford are being mocked as “out of touch” for keeping silent after a national Democratic Party spokesperson dismissed no tax on tips as mere “crumbs.”

    In a Politico article about the importance of the no tax on tips policy in congressional races in Nevada, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Lindsay Reilly appeared to dismiss the policy, saying, “D.C. Republicans are giving temporary crumbs to working families.”

    Reilly added, “Meanwhile, millions of families are at risk of losing their health care, hundreds of hospitals could close, and countless Americans could lose their jobs — all to pay for permanent tax cuts for billionaires.”

    The no-tax-on-tips provision in the big, beautiful bill establishes an income tax deduction of up to $25,000 on qualified tipped income through 2028.

    WATCH: DEM LAWMAKERS ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN WHY STOCK MARKET IS BOOMING DESPITE TRUMP TARIFFS

    Left to right: Nevada Democratic Reps. Susie Lee, Steven Horsford and Dina Titus (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images); Mandel NGAN / AFP; Rep. Susie Lee official House of Representatives official website)

    With Nevada being the state with the highest share of tipped workers in the country, these comments ignited a firestorm of criticisms from Republican voices online.

    “Marvel at just how out of touch Democrats are with reality. The DCCC thinks no taxes on tips is ‘crumbs,’” wrote conservative commentator Steve Guest.

    “What makes this so bad, is that this is ACTUALLY what the Democrat party thinks,” wrote White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson.

    National Republican Senatorial Committee advisor Nathan Brand added, “Nancy Pelosi peddled this same elitist ‘crumbs’ message in 2017 after Trump and Republicans cut taxes for nearly all working families.”

    The Republican Congressional Leadership Fund challenged Titus, Lee and Horsford, saying, “Will you denounce the @dccc’s statement that cutting taxes on tips amounts to ‘crumbs?’ Many of your constituents rely on tips to support their families.”

    National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Christian Gonzalez wrote, “The @dccc sneering that No Tax on Tips is ‘crumbs’ is peak Democrat elitism.”

    KAMALA HARRIS-ENDORSED CANDIDATE IN HOT SEAT FOR MILLION-DOLLAR DC HOME HUNDREDS OF MILES OUTSIDE DISTRICT

    Nancy Pelosi speaks in New York City

    Nancy Pelosi speaks onstage during the 2025 Concordia Annual Summit at Sheraton New York Times Square on Sept. 23, 2025 in New York City.  (Riccardo Savi/Getty Images for Concordia Annual Summit)

    Though all three Democrats have advocated for the no tax on tips policy, they voted against the big, beautiful bill in which the policy was included.

    Gonzalez said that the Nevada Democrats’ “voting record says it all” and that “Out of touch Democrats Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Steven Horsford are too scared of their radical, latte-sipping bosses in D.C. to stand with the workers who keep Nevada running.”

    “Only a party run by latte-liberals who refuse to go into the office thinks hard-earned tip money is pocket lint,” he said.

    The NRCC itself also asked: “Will Titus, Lee, and Horsford stand with workers?”

    “National Democrats just mocked Nevada’s servers, bartenders, cooks, housekeepers, dealers, and hospitality workers, sneering that their right to keep their own hard-earned tip money amounts to nothing more than ‘crumbs,’” the NRCC said in a statement.

    “This is the shameless party of Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Steven Horsford. They can’t hide from their vote AGAINST No Tax on Tips for hardworking Nevadans. If Titus, Lee, and Horsford actually stood with workers, they’d condemn these comments and stand up for workers keeping more of their hard-earned money,” the NRCC went on.

    ‘SQUAD’ DEM SPENDS EYE-POPPING AMOUNT ON LUXURY LIMO SERVICES IN ONE YEAR

    Susie Lee

    Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., walks down the House steps at the Capitol after the last votes of the week on Friday, April 1, 2022.  (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    After its passage, Lee wrote in the Las Vegas Sun that she “rushed back to Washington to vote against the One Big Beautiful Bill,” calling it “one of the least popular pieces of legislation in modern American history, giving massive, permanent tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans and temporary crumbs for working families in Southern Nevada.”

    In August, the three sent a letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent “to ensure the successful implementation” of the no-tax-on-tips policy. In a statement, Lee’s office said the letter highlighted that “the version of ‘No Tax on Tips’ passed by Republicans in Washington does not fully meet the needs of Nevadans.”

    In a statement to Fox News Digital, Lee said, “I believe that no one should lose out on tips they earned. That’s why I support the TIPS Act to PERMANENTLY end taxes on tips.”

    She said that earlier this year, she “called on Speaker [Mike] Johnson to bring the permanent fix ‘No Tax on Tips Act’ — which unanimously passed the Senate — to the House floor for a vote.”

    PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS TURN ON PARTY LEADERSHIP AFTER GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENDS WITHOUT HEALTHCARE GUARANTEES

    A man's hand holds five $1 bills to give to a waitress holding a carrying tray at a restaurant.

    The no-tax-on-tips provision in the big, beautiful bill establishes an income tax deduction of up to $25,000 on qualified tipped income through 2028. (iStock)

    “Instead, Republican leaders held it hostage so they could provide cover for themselves as they voted to pass the largest transfer of wealth in American history,” she said, adding, “The Republican ‘no tax on tips’ provision is a raw deal for tipped earners — it’s temporary, capped, and so much smaller than the tax breaks the wealthiest Americans got out of the Big Bulls**t Bill.”

    “Let me be clear — our service workers can’t benefit from no tax on tips if they aren’t receiving tips thanks to our tourism slump or if they’ve lost their jobs,” she said.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    DCCC spokeswoman Lindsay Reilly also responded to the backlash, telling Fox News Digital “it’s sad that the out-of-touch operatives at the NRCC are having a meltdown when confronted with the facts.”

    “Everyone knows the Big, Ugly Bill is a massive tax giveaway for the wealthiest few that sticks working families with the bill. That is fact, and it’s why everyone hates it,” she said, adding, “Voters can see through Republicans’ cheap spin and people know their bill fails to deliver meaningful relief to everyday Americans, while the billionaires cash out.”

    In response to the knock on her 2017 “crumbs” comment, Pelosi’s office shared a statement from 2018, which accused President Donald Trump’s first-term tax breaks of being a scam and “a monumental theft from the middle class to enrich the wealthiest 1 percent.”

    Fox News Digital also reached out to Titus and Horsford, but did not immediately receive a response.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont Announces Run for Third Term, Touts Record but Says There’s More to Do

    [ad_1]

    HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont formally launched his bid for a third term Friday, highlighting his record but saying more work is needed to improve health care access, housing availability and energy affordability.

    “We’ve come a long way but the job’s not done,” the wealthy 71-year-old Democrat and former cable entrepreneur says in an upbeat, fast-paced campaign video released online. He spent the day making appearances throughout the state with Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz, who is seeking a third term as well.

    Lamont’s announcement comes on the heels of successful municipal elections for Democrats in Connecticut.

    With a reputation as a fiscal moderate, Lamont is facing a primary from progressive Democratic Rep. Josh Elliott of Hamden, who has criticized the governor for being too centrist and not supporting higher taxes on the wealthy.

    Greenwich state Sen. Ryan Fazio is officially seeking the Republican nomination for governor while former Republican Mayor Erin Stewart of New Britain has said she’s considering a run.

    Lamont on Friday credited his administration with making major positive changes for the state, saying Connecticut “was in a world of hurt, lurching from deficit to deficit” when he first took office in 2019.

    “I said, ‘We’re turning around the moving vans. I want you to believe in the state of Connecticut again,’” he says in the video. Since then, he said, state investments have been made in cities and public education. There are more new jobs and income tax rates were cut.

    While criticized from some on the left for not being more combative with Republican President Donald Trump, Lamont pledged in his ad to “fight for Connecticut values,” a term he often uses.

    “He excludes some people. Some people don’t feel like they belong in Trump America,” Lamont said. “They belong in Connecticut.”

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Inside the Multimillion-Dollar Plan to Make Mobile Voting Happen

    [ad_1]

    Joe Kiniry, a security expert specializing in elections, was attending an annual conference on voting technology in Washington, DC, when a woman approached him with an unusual offer. She said she represented a wealthy client interested in funding voting systems that would encourage bigger turnouts. Did he have any ideas? “I told her you should stay away from internet voting, because it’s really, really hard,” he says.

    Later he learned who had sent her. It was Bradley Tusk, a New York City political consultant and fixer for companies like Uber fending off regulation. He’d made a fortune doing that (early Uber stock helped a lot), and he was eager to spend a good chunk of it pursuing online voting technology. Tusk convinced Kiniry to work with him. At the very least, Kiniry thought, it would be a valuable research project.

    Today Tusk is showing off the fruits of that collaboration. His Mobile Voting Foundation is releasing VoteSecure, a cryptography-based protocol that seeks to help people securely cast their votes on iPhones and Androids. The protocol is open source and available on GitHub for anyone to test, improve upon, and build out. Two election technology vendors have already committed to using it—perhaps as early as 2026. Tusk claims that mobile voting will save our democracy. But getting it accepted by legislators and the public will be the really, really hard part.

    Primary Numbers

    Tusk has been obsessed with mobile voting for a while. Around 2017, he began taking serious action, funding small elections that used existing technology to allow deployed military or disabled people to vote. He estimates he’s dropped $20 million so far and plans to keep shoveling cash into the effort. When I ask why, he explains that working with the government has given him a panoramic view of its failures. Tusk believes there is a single pressure point that could fix a number of mismatches between what the public deserves and what they get: more people using the ballot box. “We get lousy, or corrupt, government because so few people vote, especially in off-year elections and primaries, where the turnout is dismal,” he says. “If primary turnout is 37 percent instead of 9 percent, the underlying political incentives for an elected official to change—it pushes them to the middle, and they’re not rewarded for screaming and pointing fingers.”

    To Tusk, mobile voting is a no-brainer: We already do banking, commerce, and private messages on our phones, so why not cast a ballot? “If I don’t do it, who is going to do it?” he asks. Furthermore, he says, “if it doesn’t happen, I don’t think we’re one country in 20 years, because if you are unable to solve any single problem that matters to people, eventually they decide not to keep going.”

    Tusk had Kiniry evaluate existing online voting platforms—including some that Tusk himself had paid for. “Joe is considered the absolute expert on electronic voting,” says Tusk. So when Kiniry deemed those systems insufficient, Tusk decided that the best way forward was to start from scratch. He hired Kiniry’s company, Free & Fair, to develop VoteSecure. It’s not a turnkey solution but a backend part of a system that will require a user interface and other pieces to be operable. The protocol includes a means for voters to check the accuracy of their ballots and verify that their vote has been received by the election board and transferred to a paper ballot.

    Tusk says his next step is to “run legislation” in a few cities to allow mobile voting. “Start small—city council, school board, maybe mayor,” he says. “Prove the thesis. The odds of Vladimir Putin hacking the Queensborough election seems pretty remote to me.” (Next spring some local election elections in Alaska will offer the option of mobile-phone voting with software developed by Tusk’s foundation.) Kiniry agrees it’s way too soon to use mobile voting in national elections, but Tusk is betting that eventually the systems become familiar, to the point where people trust them much more than traditional paper ballots. “Once the genie’s out of the bottle, they can’t put it back, right?” he says. “That’s been true for every tech I’ve worked on.” But first the genie has to get out of the bottle. That’s no cinch.

    Crypto Foes

    The loudest objections against mobile or internet voting come from cryptographers and security experts, who believe that the safety risks are insurmountable. Take two people who were at the 2017 conference with Kiniry. Ron Rivest is the legendary “R” in the RSA protocol that protects the internet, a winner of the coveted Turing Award, and a former professor at MIT. His view: Mobile voting is far from ready for prime time. “What you can do with mobile phones is interesting, but we’re not there yet, and I haven’t seen anything to make me think otherwise,” he says, “Tusk is driven by trying to make this stuff happen in the real world, which is not the right way to do it. They need to go through the process of writing a peer-reviewed paper. Putting up code doesn’t cut it.”

    Computer scientist and voting expert David Jefferson is also unimpressed. Though he acknowledges that Kiniry is one of the country’s top voting system experts, he sees Tusk’s effort as doomed. “I’m willing to concede rock-solid cryptography, but it does not weaken the argument about how insecure online voting systems are in general. Open source and perfect cryptography do not address the most serious vulnerabilities.”

    [ad_2]

    Steven Levy

    Source link

  • Central African Republic Leader Cleared for Third Term in Key Vote Followed Closely by Russia

    [ad_1]

    BANGUI, Central African Republic (AP) — The top court in the Central African Republic on Friday cleared President Faustin Archange Touadera to run in December’s election, a contest that will unfold amid a deepening security crisis and the leader’s growing reliance on Russia for protection.

    The Central African Republic’s constitutional court approved Touadera’s candidacy alongside prominent opposition leader Anicet Georges Dologuélé and five other candidates for the Dec. 28 vote.

    Touadera, who has led the country since 2016 and was reelected in 2021, is one of Russia’s closest allies in Africa. Central African Republic is one of the first countries in which the Russian mercenary group Wagner established operations with the pledge of fighting rebel groups and restoring peace.

    But disagreements around the nature of Russia’s military presence in the country have cast a shadow over the Central African Republic’s relations with Moscow.

    In August, state and military officials told The Associated Press that Russia has called on the country to replace the private Wagner mercenary group with Moscow’s state-run Africa Corps and requested payment for further security services.

    The Central African Republic’s government has been reluctant to agree to Russia’s demands, because it sees Wagner as more effective and they prefer to pay for services with minerals, not in cash.

    For years, Wagner has been protecting Touadera and his government, and helped him win a 2023 constitutional referendum that could extend his power indefinitely. In exchange, they’ve enjoyed access to the country’s rich minerals, including gold.

    The Central African Republic has been in conflict since 2013, when predominantly Muslim rebels seized power and forced the president from office. A 2019 peace deal was signed, but six of the 14 armed groups involved in the deal withdrew from it. Wagner is credited for helping prevent the rebels from retaking the capital in 2021.

    The validation of Touadera’s candidacy came on the same day as the U.N. Security Council extended its peacekeeping mission in the Central African Republic for a year.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Different Needs but Similar Fears Arise in Communities on Both Ends of Missouri’s Redistricting

    [ad_1]

    The 18th and Vine community is known for a museum telling the story of segregated professional baseball in the decades before Jackie Robinson broke Major League Baseball’s color barrier. Its leaders are talking about expanding the city’s streetcar line to lure more visitors to its cultural and historical attractions.

    About 100 miles (161 kilometers) east, Boonville leaders want federal help restoring an old railroad bridge to give cyclists a more direct route on a popular cross-state bike trail near the mostly white farming community.

    The two areas are thrust together under a new map Missouri Republicans passed in September in response to President Donald Trump’s push to give the GOP another winnable seat ahead of next year’s elections. Texas answered Trump’s call first, tilting five seats toward Republicans, but lawmakers in both major political parties are fighting a mid-decade, state-by-state battle to squeeze extra territory out of states they control. In California, voters approved a new House map to boost Democrats.

    Missouri Republicans targeted Democratic U.S. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, shaving off portions of his Kansas City district and stretching it into Republican-heavy rural areas.

    Congressional districts often mix rural and urban areas, but redoing boundaries can alter priorities and change which federal projects representatives pursue and how they pursue things like health care, housing and education funding. When Congress debates a farm bill, is protecting food assistance benefits more important than preserving crop insurance? It often depends on who’s being represented.

    That might explain why Robert Sylvan, an 81-year-old Kansas City resident who attends Cleaver’s church, worries “the whole set of dynamics that impact us” could be upended.


    Voters fear being forgotten

    Even with U.S. politics deeply polarized, there’s bipartisan agreement on Sylvan’s point.

    Republican state Rep. Tim Taylor, who represents the Boonville area in the Legislature, said farmers Cleaver previously represented didn’t feel he understood them or came around much.

    “Where he lives, things are different than they are here,” said Taylor, who voted for the redistricting plan despite misgivings about it.

    It’s unclear how any Republican challenging Cleaver in the redrawn district would balance the needs of the two communities. So far, no likely contender is from Kansas City.

    Some Kansas City residents don’t expect people around 18th and Vine to get much attention if Cleaver loses. Cleaver was raised in public housing in Texas and preached about social justice as a Methodist pastor in a predominantly African American congregation.

    “Naturally, 18th and Vine is kind of his baby,” said Bob Kendrick, president of the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum. “I don’t want it to be forgotten.”

    Fewer than 11% of Boonville’s residents are Black, while more than 64% are in 18th and Vine. The new Missouri map could have the state going from having people of color hold two of its eight House seats to one. Non-Hispanic white people are 62% of Missouri’s population but would hold 88% of its seats.

    “We could potentially have folk representing us who have no interaction and have never had any interaction with people of color and have no idea of what goes on in the urban context,” said Cleaver’s son, Emanuel Cleaver III.

    The areas often see common needs differently. Is the pressing problem with health care cuts that they cause rural hospitals to struggle or that millions of Americans don’t have insurance? An 18th and Vine resident is nearly twice as likely as a Boonville resident to have no health insurance. Boonville has been without a hospital since 2020.

    Other differences: Buses stop every 15 minutes in 18th and Vine but must be prescheduled in Boonville. Kansas City leaders want more gun laws to combat violence while Republicans like Taylor have fought to expand gun rights. Trump won 67% of Boonville’s vote, compared with 14% of 18th and Vine’s.

    The Kansas City neighborhood, celebrated for barbecue and jazz joints, hosted a 1920 meeting that founded the Negro National League, where Robinson got his start. Later, the area fell into disrepair.

    Cleaver helped change that, seeking taxpayer dollars for 18th and Vine since 1989, first as a city councilman and then mayor before his two decades in Congress. The city’s spending has exceeded $100 million, helped by federal grants. Most recently, Cleaver helped obtain $15.5 million in federal money to renovate the nation’s oldest Black-owned housing cooperative, which he called “one of the citadels for the African American community.”

    That project followed Cleaver’s efforts to bring money to neighborhoods on the historically Black side of Troost Avenue, long known as the city’s unofficial racial dividing line. It’s now one of his new district’s borders, which he finds outrageous.

    “I feel more skeptical about the society’s direction than I did when I was a kid growing up in public housing,” Cleaver lamented during an interview at the church his son now leads.

    Now, 18th and Vine also is home to all-night jazz jam sessions, a dance company, an arts center and an MLB Urban Youth Academy. Kendrick’s museum hopes to raise $35 million to triple exhibit space.

    If there’s unease among locals, it’s that they might be priced out as taxpayer money helps transform the area. The city is working on a pedestrian plaza and a parking garage. Local officials are studying a streetcar line extension. There’s no cost estimate yet, but the latest streetcar extension got $174 million in federal funds.

    Carmaletta Williams, executive director of the Black Archives of Mid-America in Kansas City, an area museum, wonders about a new representative: “Will they see the value in what’s going on?”


    A bike trail lures tourists to Boonville

    Boonville is surrounded by row crops and cattle ranches. One local school district graduates fewer than 10 students a year.

    Yet it lures tourists with the Katy Trail. At 240 miles (386 kilometers), it’s the longest trail built on former rail lines in the U.S., and work on it began at nearly the same time as the rebuilding in 18th and Vine.

    Taylor said after the trail’s first section opened in 1990 it was instrumental in reviving a town that was “pretty much dying” when he was a teenager in the 1980s. His wife runs Taylor’s Bake Shop & Espresso downtown.

    Heading into Boonville, bikers detour off the railroad’s original path, crossing the Missouri River on a highway bridge that includes a designated bike path. The path leads them away from a 1932 railroad bridge, which trail riders would love to see refurbished. The city applied unsuccessfully last year for a $236,000 federal planning grant.

    “The Katy Bridge is like the Eiffel Tower of Missouri if it would only be fixed,” said Annie Harmon, who runs a store in downtown Boonville called Celestial Body that sells essential oils, herbs, tie-dyed clothing and crystals.

    Missouri has received $30 million in federal funds over the years for the Katy Trail and a related trail-building effort that cycling enthusiasts hope will loop almost 450 miles (724 kilometers), said Brandi Horton, a spokeswoman for the Rails to Trails Conservancy, a Washington-based nonprofit.

    “You can’t do trail development at this scale,” Horton said, “without the dollars and the investment that the federal government can uniquely provide.”

    Hanna reported from Topeka, Kan.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Oct. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Welch prepares for new role as Amesbury’s District 4 councilor

    [ad_1]

    AMESBURY — District 4 City Councilor-elect Maryann Welch is no stranger to serving the city.

    While Welch is new to the council, it is not her first time serving as a local elected official.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmu@C E96 A2DE D:I J62CD[ D96 92D D6CG65 @? E96 4:EJ’D $49@@= r@>>:EE66] u@C E96 =2DE EH@ J62CD[ (6=49 92D D6CG65 2D G:46 492:C @7 E96 4@>>:EE66 2?5 492:C @7 E96 u:?2?46 U2>Aj u24:=:E:6D DF34@>>:EE66]k^Am

    kAm$96 😀 2=D@ 2 7@C>6C 6=6>6?E2CJ D49@@= E62496C 2?5 D6CG65 2D 5:C64E@C @7 E96 |2DD249FD6EED u2>:=J {6256CD9:A !C@8C2> 7@C E96 A2DE 7:G6 J62CD]k^Am

    kAm(6=49 H:== C6A=246 r:EJ r@F?4:=@C }:4< (966=6C[ H9@ 5:5 ?@E D66< C66=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAm(6=49 D2:5 (966=6C 2AAC@24965 96C 27E6C 96 564:565 ?@E E@ D66< C66=64E:@? 2?5 2D<65 :7 D96 H@F=5 4@?D:56C CF??:?8 E@ 7:== E96 D62E]k^Am

    kAm“x 92G6 366? G6CJ G@42= 😕 E96 =2DE D6G6C2= J62CD 😕 DFAA@CE:?8 @FC 4:EJ[” (6=49 D2:5] “p?5 96 E9@F89E E9:D >:89E 36 2 8C62E EC2?D:E:@? 7@C >6 2?5 x 28C665]”k^Am

    kAm(6=49 C2? F?@AA@D65 2?5 C646:G65 cdc G@E6D 😕 E96 }@G] c 6=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAm}@H[ 2D D96 AC6A2C6D E@ E2<6 E96 s:DEC:4E c 4@F?4:= D62E[ (6=49 D2:5 D96 H:== 4@?E:?F6 (966=6C’D H@C< 25G@42E:?8 7@C E96 D49@@=D]k^Am

    kAm“x E9:?< E92E =@D:?8 }:4< (966=6C[ H9@ 2=D@ 925 2 324<8C@F?5 @? E96 $49@@= r@>>:EE66[ :E’D 8@:?8 E@ 36 3:8 D9@6D E@ 7:== 7@C >6[” (6=49 D2:5] “qFE x E9:?< =@D:?8 9:> 2D 2? 25G@42E6 😀 2 56EC:>6?E E@ E96 4:EJ] $@ x 9@A6 x’> 8@:?8 E@ 5@ 9:> ;FDE:46 2?5 25G@42E6 DEC@?8=J 7@C E96 D49@@=D >@G:?8 7@CH2C5]”k^Am

    kAm(6=49’D 6=64E:@? E@ E96 4@F?4:= 4@:?4:56D H:E9 E96 C646?E 72:=FC6 @7 E96 Se >:==:@? 3F586E @G6CC:56 BF6DE:@? @? E96 32==@E]k^Am

    kAm(6=49 D2:5 D96 😀 AC6A2C65 E@ D66< D@=FE:@?D E@ 7:?2?4:2= AC@3=6>D @?46 D96 E2<6D @77:46]k^Am

    kAm“x’> 567:?:E6=J 4@>>:EE65 E@ 7:?5:?8 4C62E:G6 2?5 AC24E:42= D@=FE:@?D E@ 7:?2?4:2= 492==6?86D H:E9@FE C6=J:?8 @? E96 @G6CC:56[” D96 D2:5] “x’G6 925 6IA6C:6?46 H:E9 7:?2?46 @? E96 $49@@= r@>>:EE66 D:56 2?5 x E9:?< H6 H:== 36 7@4FD:?8 😕 E96 ?6IE EH@ J62CD @? C6DA@?D:3=6 3F586E:?8 2?5 9@H E@ DFAA@CE @FC 4@>>F?:EJ]k^Am

    kAm“p?5 >2<6 DFC6 E92E @FC D49@@=D[ ?6:893@C9@@5D 2?5 4:EJ D6CG:46D 😕 @FC 4@>>F?:EJ 766= DFAA@CE65 2?5 AC@F5 E@ 4@?E:?F6 E@ =:G6 96C6[” (6=49 25565]k^Am

    kAm(6=49 D2:5 2D D96 =@@6D3FCJ !F3=:4 $49@@=D 2?5 E96 r:EJ r@F?4:=]k^Am

    kAm“x’> C62==J =@@<:?8 7@CH2C5 E@ =62C?:?8 >@C6 23@FE 9@H E96 4:EJ 8@G6C?2?46 2E E96 r:EJ r@F?4:= =6G6= H@CA2C65 E@ E96 $49@@= r@>>:EE66[” D96 D2:5] “p?5[ 9@A67F==J[ 36 23=6 E@ 4@??64E E96 D49@@=D 2?5 E96 r:EJ r@F?4:= >@C6]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Caitlin Dee | cdee@newburyportnews.com

    Source link

  • Former Democratic congressman launches comeback bid in new Salt Lake City district

    [ad_1]

    SALT LAKE CITY — The most recent Democrat to represent Utah in Congress announced Thursday his bid to return to Washington after a judge adopted a new congressional map creating a heavily Democratic-leaning district in the state.

    Former U.S. Rep. Ben McAdams will run in a new district centered on Salt Lake County, Utah’s population center and an island of Democratic support in an otherwise red state. He was once the county’s mayor, then its state senator, and represented much of the area within his previous congressional district from 2019 to 2021.

    The new district is the result of a legal battle in which a judge struck down the map adopted after the 2020 census because the Republican-led Legislature had bypassed standards established by voters to ensure districts don’t deliberately favor a party, a practice known as gerrymandering. Late Monday, Judge Dianna Gibson again rejected a revised map drawn by lawmakers and adopted one from voting rights groups who were plaintiffs in the case.

    With the ruling, Democrats are all but certain to flip a seat in Utah, where Republicans currently hold all four U.S. House districts.

    Nationally, Democrats need to net three House seats next year to wrest control of the chamber from the GOP and impede President Donald Trump’s agenda. Several Republican-led states have responded to calls from Trump to add winnable seats for the party through mid-decade redistricting. But Democrats have been fighting back to try to offset GOP gains.

    McAdams, a moderate Democrat, could face a full slate of candidates to his political left who see an opportunity for Utah to send a more progressive politician to Capitol Hill. While in Congress, he was a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, a group of centrist Democrats viewed widely as the party’s most conservative House members.

    State Sen. Kathleen Riebe also launched a bid for the seat this week. In her announcement, the former teacher pledged to be a strong voice for Democrats in Congress and an advocate for working families. She served on the Utah Board of Education from 2017 to 2018 and has been in the state Senate since 2019.

    Competition is good for democracy, McAdams told The Associated Press in an interview Thursday. But he argued his experience and deep connections in the community make him the right person to represent the Salt Lake City area.

    McAdams said he thinks Washington under Trump is broken and needs leaders who have shown they can stand up to the Republican president. He went on to criticize Trump for sending troops into cities, splitting apart immigrant families and prosecuting his political opponents.

    “I think people know me. I am somebody who brings people together to get stuff done, but I’m also somebody who stands for what I believe in, and I’m not afraid to stand alone if that’s what’s required,” McAdams said, noting he voted to impeach Trump in 2019 despite knowing it could cost him reelection.

    The following year, McAdams lost his reelection bid to former NFL player Burgess Owens, a Republican, by less than a percentage point. Owens was reelected in 2022, after the district was reconfigured to include more rural areas, and again in 2024.

    During his 2018 campaign, McAdams described having anti-abortion views. He said he had deep personal beliefs about the sanctity of life but that decisions about terminating a pregnancy should be made by a woman in consultation with her doctors, family and faith counselors.

    The former congressman said Thursday that the reality across the country has since changed dramatically, with the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.

    “We’re seeing women denied access to health care all across the country, even leading to preventable deaths in several tragic cases,” McAdams said. “Because of that, I would vote to restore a woman’s right to choose and vote to codify Roe.”

    He and Riebe are running in the new 1st Congressional District for the seat held by Republican Blake Moore. District lines and numbering changed significantly under the new map, meaning Moore’s northern Utah district is geographically very different from the new 1st District.

    Matt Lusty, a spokesperson for Moore’s campaign, said the congressman will run again for one of Utah’s four seats.

    Democratic state Sen. Nate Blouin told the AP on Thursday that he, too, is “leaning strongly towards” running in the new 1st District. Blouin said voters in Salt Lake County deserve a progressive voice and have “a generational opportunity to rewrite Utah’s narrative.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer Mead Gruver contributed from Fort Collins, Colorado.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Best of Detroit 2025

    [ad_1]

    Our poll has officially crossed the finish line — and Detroit, you sure burned rubber!

    After weeks of honking, hyping, and high-octane competition, the results of the Metro Times Best of Detroit are in. You nominated your favorite taco slingers, dive-bar legends, tattoo wizards, vinyl pushers, and much more — and now it’s time to crown the true kings and queens of the Motor City.

    The votes have been tallied and the champions are in the winners’ circle. Here’s the best of Detroit, according to you.

    [ad_2]

    Layla McMurtrie

    Source link

  • DOJ joins lawsuit against Newsom over ‘racial gerrymander’ of California map

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The Department of Justice intervened Thursday in a lawsuit against Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom that is challenging California’s efforts to redraw the state’s congressional map in time for the next election.

    DOJ Civil Rights Division lawyers argued in a complaint that race was “used as a proxy” in California to justify creating districts favorable to Democrats, a move that served to offset the redistricting showdown in Texas that resulted in more Republican-leaning districts.

    “In the press, California’s legislators and governor sold a plan to promote the interests of Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections,” the DOJ lawyers wrote. “But amongst themselves and on the debate floor, the focus was not partisanship, but race.”

    CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS SUE TO STOP NEWSOM, DEMOCRATS FROM PUSHING REDISTRICTING PLAN

    Attorney General Pam Bondi (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    They added the Constitution “does not tolerate this racial gerrymander” and cited several remarks from lawmakers and others involved in the process about how they prioritized creating a Latino-majority district to counter Texas’ perceived attempt to “silence the voices of Latino voters.”

    The federal government has authority to enforce the Voting Rights Act, which has a provision designed to make sure voters are not disenfranchised based on their race. But the law’s language has long been a point of controversy and is now under review by the Supreme Court in a separate redistricting case about Louisiana’s map.

    California’s ballot measure, called Proposition 50, passed on Election Day, and clears the way for the state legislature to redraw districts that could flip five Republican seats. Newsom said in celebratory remarks after the measure’s passage that it was California’s answer to Trump “trying to rig the midterm elections before one single vote is even cast.”

    ‘DERANGED OBSESSION’: NEWSOM HIT WITH LAWSUIT OVER ‘RETALIATORY’ CALIFORNIA REDISTRICTING PUSH

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom with two American flags in the background.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom looks on during a bill signing event related to redrawing the state’s congressional maps on Aug. 21, 2025 in Sacramento, California. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

    Advocates for no on 50 in California

    Opponents of California Proposition 50, also known as the Election Rigging Response Act, a California ballot measure that would redraw congressional maps to benefit Democrats, rally in Westminster, Calif., on Sept. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)

    “One thing he never counted on, though, was the state of California,” Newsom said. “Instead of agonizing over the state of our nation. We organized in an unprecedented way, in a 90-day sprint.”

    California Assembly member David Tangipa, a Republican, responded by suing, and the DOJ joined in that lawsuit Thursday.

    A spokesperson for Newsom told Fox News Digital: “These losers lost at the ballot box and soon they will also lose in court.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    The legal battle comes as redistricting fights have intensified in the lead-up to the 2026 midterm elections. In addition to Texas and California, Louisiana’s fight before the Supreme Court could affect its map by the next election, depending on when the high court rules. In Utah, Republicans were just dealt a blow by a state judge who approved a new map that will tip one of the state’s four districts in favor of Democrats.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California’s Prop 50 shakes up nation’s redistricting arms race

    [ad_1]

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Evan Cragin, president of the Sacramento County Young Democrats, said he was initially hesitant to support his party’s mid-decade push to redraw California’s congressional map to favor Democrats.






    Evan Cragin, president of the Sacramento County Young Democrats




    The state in 2008 voted to create an independent redistricting commission in an effort to end gerrymandering. In August, Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed Prop 50, a ballot measure that would temporarily override the commission and implement a redrawn map favoring Democrats.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm(96? E96 >62DFC6 92?5:=J A2DD65 5FC:?8 =2DE H66<’D 6=64E:@?[ rC28:?’D :?:E:2= 766=:?8 @7 368CF58:?8 2446AE2?46 925 492?865 E@ 2 7:6CJ 32EE=6 4CJ]k^Am

    kAm“(6 7:?2==J 766= =:<6 E96 7:89E 😀 @? E@ 4@>32E %CF>A 2D 5:C64E=J 2D H6 A@DD:3=J 42?[” rC28:? D2:5]k^Am

    kAm!C@A d_ 42>6 27E6C %6I2D #6AF3=:42?D[ 2E E96 C6BF6DE @7 !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A[ 28C665 E@ C65C2H E96:C DE2E6’D 4@?8C6DD:@?2= >2A 5FC:?8 2 DA64:2= D6DD:@? 😕 pF8FDE E92E 2:>D E@ 7=:A 7:G6 D62ED 7C@> 3=F6 E@ C65] %96 8@2= 😀 E@ 8:G6 #6AF3=:42?D 2? 25G2?E286 😕 ?6IE J62C’D >:5E6C> 6=64E:@?D E@ >2:?E2:? E96:C D=:> >2;@C:EJ 😕 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D]k^Am

    kAmp H:? 3J s6>@4C2ED H@F=5 AC6D6?E E96 7:CDE C62= 492==6?86 E@ %CF>A’D D64@?5E6C> p>6C:427:CDE 286?52[ H9:49 92D D@ 72C >@G65 7@CH2C5 H:E9 =:EE=6 AFD9324< 7C@> #6AF3=:42? =2H>2<6CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H >2A 😕 %6I2D E@F4965 @77 2? F?AC64656?E65 >:5E6C> C65:DEC:4E:?8 2C>D C246 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ E92E 92D =65 E@ `b DE2E6D 6:E96C 2AAC@G:?8 @C 4@?D:56C:?8 A2CE:D2? 4@?8C6DD:@?2= >2AD]k^Am

    kAm|:DD@FC:[ ~9:@ 2?5 }@CE9 r2C@=:?2 92G6 2== :>A=6>6?E65 C65C2H? 5:DEC:4ED E92E 😕 E@E2= 4@F=5 96=A #6AF3=:42?D A:4< FA 7@FC D62ED] #65 DE2E6D =:<6 x?5:2?2[ z2?D2D[ u=@C:52 2?5 {@F:D:2?2 2C6 2=D@ 4@?D:56C:?8 ?6H >2AD]k^Am

    kAmr2=:7@C?:2 =2DE H66< 3642>6 E96 7:CDE s6>@4C2E:4=65 DE2E6 E@ 2AAC@G6 2 86CCJ>2?56C65 >:5E6C> >2A E92E 2:>D E@ 255 7:G6 3=F6 D62ED E@ E96 w@FD6] ‘:C8:?:2 2?5 |2CJ=2?5[ H96C6 s6>@4C2ED 9@=5 >2;@C:E:6D 2E E96 DE2E69@FD6[ 4@F=5 2=D@ D@@? 7@==@H DF:E]k^Am

    kAm$E2E6D 2C6 C6BF:C65 E@ C65C2H 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 5:DEC:4ED 6G6CJ `_ J62CD 7@==@H:?8 E96 &]$] r6?DFD] p=E9@F89 D@>6 DE2E6D 2==@H C65:DEC:4E:?8 36EH66? 46?DFD6D[ >:5E6C> C65:DEC:4E:?8 C2C6=J 92AA6?D]k^Am

    kAm$E:==[ C65C2H:?8 86CCJ>2?56C65 5:DEC:4ED 367@C6 2 >:5E6C> :D?’E :==682=] %96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE 😕 2 a_`h 42D6 CF=65 E92E 7656C2= ;F586D 92G6 ?@ 2FE9@C:EJ E@ 564:56 H96E96C A2CE:D2? 86CCJ>2?56C:?8 8@6D E@@ 72C]k^Am

    kAm#6AF3=:42?D 2C8F6 E92E >2<6D E96 4FCC6?E 677@CE 2 =682= 2?5 =68:E:>2E6 E24E:4 E@ >2:?E2:? 4@?EC@= @7 E96 w@FD6] s6>@4C2ED D2J :E’D 4962E:?8 2?5 5:>:?:D96D G@E6CD’ G@:46D 2E E96 32==@E 3@I]k^Am







    Deene Souza, Tulare County GOP

    Deene Souza, director of grassroot efforts with the Tulare County Republican Party.




    kAmqFE s66?6 $@FK2[ 8C2DDC@@ED 5:C64E@C @7 r2=:7@C?:2’D %F=2C6 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ[ D2:5 s6>@4C2ED 92G6 ?@H D:=6?465 96C G@E6 27E6C E96 2AAC@G2= @7 !C@A d_]k^Am

    kAm“(6 92G6 ?@ G@:46 2?J>@C6[” D96 D2:5] “xE’D ;FDE C62==J 5:D2AA@:?E:?8 E@ D66 A6@A=6 E92E 4=2:> E96J’C6 56>@4C2E:4 G@E6 7@C D@>6E9:?8 E92E’D D@ F?56>@4C2E:4]”k^Am

    kAmrC28:?[ H:E9 E96 $24C2>6?E@ r@F?EJ *@F?8 s6>@4C2ED[ D2:5 86CCJ>2?56C:?8 😀 HC@?8 2?5 96 5@6D?’E DFAA@CE :E[ 3FE :E’D 364@>6 2 ?646DD2CJ 6G:= 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 E@ 4@>32E %CF>A’D A@H6C 8C23 😕 E96 w@FD6]k^Am

    kAm&?=6DD E96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE @C 7656C2= =2H>2<6CD 2AAC@G6 2 ?2E:@?2= 32? @? E96 86CCJ>2?56C:?8[ s6>@4C2ED 92G6 E@ “7:89E 7:C6 H:E9 7:C6[” 96 2C8F65]k^Am

    kAm“x 5@?’E E9:?< H6 D9@F=5 36 92AAJ E92E H6’C6 86CCJ>2?56C:?8[” rC28:? D2:5] “xE’D ?@E E96 :562= D46?2C:@] qFE %6I2D DE2CE65 E9:D[ 2?5 H6’C6 DFC6 2D 96== 8@:?8 E@ 7:?:D9 :E]”k^Am

    k9bm‘%62CD 2A2CE 2 C6AF3=:4’k^9bm

    kAm!C@A d_ 😀 DFC6 E@ 492?86 E96 A@=:E:42= 42=4F=FD 7C@> 3@E9 A2CE:6D @? >:5564256 C65:DEC:4E:?8]k^Am







    Erik Nisbet

    Erik Nisbet, director of Northwestern University’s Center for Communication and Public Policy




    kAmtC:< }:D36E[ 5:C64E@C @7 }@CE9H6DE6C? &?:G6CD:EJ’D r6?E6C 7@C r@>>F?:42E:@? 2?5 !F3=:4 !@=:4J[ D2:5 r2=:7@C?:2 2?5 %6I2D >2C<65 E96 =2C86DE 4@?8C6DD:@?2=D62E 82:?D 6:E96C A2CEJ 4@F=5 82C?6C 7C@> C65:DEC:4E:?8]k^Am

    kAm#65C2H? >2AD 😕 @E96C DE2E6D DF49 2D x==:?@:D 2?5 z2?D2D 7246 >2;@C 9FC5=6D E@ 82:? 2AAC@G2= 2?5 H@F=5 A:4< FA @?=J @?6 D62E 7@C 6:E96C A2CEJ] %92E 4@F=5 =625 =2H>2<6CD E@ 232?5@? 677@CED E96C6[ }:D36E DA64F=2E65]k^Am

    kAm“!6@A=6 5@?’E H2?E E@ DA6?5 E96 A@=:E:42= 42A:E2=[” 96 D2:5] “x 5@?’E @H 9@H >F49 H:==:?8?6DD #6AF3=:42?D @C s6>@4C2ED 92G6 E@ 8@ E9C@F89 E96 32EE=6D ?66565 E@ 6<6 @FE 2 D62E DE2E6 3J DE2E6]”k^Am

    kAmqFE r925 z:?D6==2[ 2 A@=:E:42= D4:6?E:DE 2?5 5:C64E@C @7 q2== $E2E6 &?:G6CD:EJ’D q@H6? r6?E6C 7@C !F3=:4 p772:CD[ D2:5 %CF>A 😀 =:<6=J E@ FD6 !C@A d_ E@ 7F6= 9:D AC6DDFC6 42>A2:8? @? #6AF3=:42? DE2E6D E@ C65C2H E96:C >2AD 😕 72G@C @7 v~! 42?5:52E6D]k^Am







    Chad Kinsella

    Chad Kinsella




    kAm%92E 4@F=5 36 6DA64:2==J ECF6 😕 x?5:2?2[ H96C6 E96 AC6D:56?E 92D C6=6?E=6DD=J AC6DD65 #6AF3=:42? =2H>2<6CD E@ 24BF:6D46 E@ 9:D C6BF6DE] ‘:46 !C6D:56?E y]s] ‘2?46 92D EH:46 G:D:E65 E96 DE2E6[ 2?5 %CF>A DA@<6 5:C64E=J E@ $6?2E6 #6AF3=:42?D =2DE >@?E9 5FC:?8 2 A9@?6 42==]k^Am

    kAm$E2E6 D6?2E6 =6256CD9:A 92D D2:5 E96J 5@?’E 92G6 E96 G@E6D E@ A2DD 2 ?6H >2A[ 3FE H:== ?@H 36 7@C465 E@ 4@?D:56C :E 27E6C v@G] |:<6 qC2F? 42==65 2 DA64:2= D6DD:@?]k^Am

    kAm“x E9:?< E96 ?2E:@?2= @77:46D 2?5 E96 AC6D:56?E 2C6 8@:?8 E@ C2>A FA AC6DDFC6 @? qC2F? 2?5 E96 DE2E6 =68:D=2EFC6 E@ 86E D@>6E9:?8 5@?6[ 3642FD6 ?@H E96J 92G6 E@ 244@F?E 7@C 7:G6 @C >@C6 D62ED =@DE E@ r2=:7@C?:2[” z:?D6==2 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm!@=:E:42= E2>A6C:?8 H:E9 G@E:?8 >2AD :D?’E F?:BF6 E@ 6:E96C >2;@C A2CEJ] q@E9 3=F6 2?5 C65 DE2E6D H96C6 @?6 A2CEJ 4@?EC@=D E96 =68:D=2EFC6 2?5 8@G6C?@C’D D62E 92G6 9:DE@C:42==J 86CCJ>2?56C65 >2AD 😕 72G@C @7 E96:C A2CEJ]k^Am

    kAmqFE 677@CED E@ 5C2H A2CE:D2? >2AD 92G6 :?E6?D:7:65 😕 C646?E 564256D[ 4@?EC:3FE:?8 E@ E96 566A A@=:E:42= A@=2C:K2E:@? E92E E@52J 567:?6D p>6C:42? A@=:E:4D[ 6IA=2:?65 }:D36E]k^Am

    kAm%96 4FCC6?E >:5564256 C65:DEC:4E:?8 C246 >2C@4C24J 2?5 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D[ 96 2C8F65]k^Am

    kAm“x E9:?< E9:D E:E 7@C E2E 😀 92G:?8 2 C:AA=6 67764E E92E 😀 52>28:?8[” }:D36E D2:5] “xE 2== ;FDE E62CD 2A2CE 2 C6AF3=:4]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    Carson Gerber CNHI State Reporter

    Source link

  • Chris Matthews blames Democratic Party ‘snobbery and attitude’ for losing working class voters to Trump

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews pointed to the Democrats’ “snobbery and attitude” as a reason why working people voted for President Donald Trump during an interview Wednesday.

    MSNBC host Katy Tur asked Matthews about how the Democratic Party should bridge the divide between the working class and the college-educated voters.

    “I don’t know the whole answer. [Pennsylvania Gov.] Josh Shapiro said, ‘All right, we’re going to stop this a little bit. We’re going to get rid of the law that you have to be some college graduate to get a job in the state government.’ Pennsylvania doesn’t have that law anymore,” Matthews said.

    “It isn’t just for college grads. And I think there’s a lot to that. The town vs. gown has gotten to be political. The people that didn’t get to college are voting for Trump. Why? Because the snobbery and attitude,” he said.

    Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews speaks during the Democratic presidential primary debate Feb. 19, 2020, in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

    CHRIS MATTHEWS SAYS DEMOCRATS ‘FALLING INTO A TRAP OF DEFENDING WHAT’S INDEFENSIBLE’ ON CRIME

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro issued an executive order in 2023 after taking office to establish that 92% of state government jobs would no longer require a college degree, according to CBS News

    Matthews has been critical of the Democratic Party amid President Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory, calling on lawmakers to focus on the economy.

    While discussing the Democratic Party’s low popularity on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in August, Matthews pointed in part to the Biden administration’s poor handling of illegal immigration as a reason, saying, “The polling will tell you, the open border — what seemed like an open border for four years.

    “Today, the border has been closed since January and not a peep out of any Hispanic leader. Nobody has complained because they know that surge at the border was killing the Democrats,” he said.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

    Identifying another possible factor in Democrats’ sinking approval, Matthews back in August cited how transgender policies impacted the 2024 presidential election.

    “On the issue of trans people playing women’s sports, that ad ran in every sports event, starting with the World Series. It never stopped. It showed up around the third quarter, and everybody’s like, ‘What’s that? That’s insane.’”

    CNN HOST SAYS SHE STUDIES ‘CONSPIRACY THEORIES’ TO EFFECTIVELY TALK WITH CONSERVATIVES

    The ex-MSNBC host said issues such as transgender participation in sports were 80/20 issues before calling for a renewed focus on the economy.

    New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill speaks during an election night party

    Then-New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill speaks during an election night party in East Brunswick, N.J., Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. She ultimately won her race and was elected governor.  (Matt Rourke/AP Photo)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Democrats won elections in New Jersey, New York, and Virginia that largely focused on economic anxiety and affordability issues. 

    New Jersey Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill defeated Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli in the New Jersey governor’s race, while former Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger defeated Republican challenger Winsome Earle-Sears in the Virginia gubernatorial race. In the Empire State, democratic socialist New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani claimed victory over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an Independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa. 

    Matthews previously hosted “Hardball” on MSNBC and resigned from the network in 2020 after facing backlash over multiple controversies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump is ramping up a new effort to convince a skeptical public he can fix affordability worries

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is adjusting his messaging strategy to win over voters who are worried about the cost of living with plans to emphasize new tax breaks and show progress on fighting inflation.

    The messaging is centered around affordability, and the push comes after inflation emerged as a major vulnerability for Trump and Republicans in Tuesday’s elections, in which voters overwhelmingly said the economy was their biggest concern.

    Democrats took advantage of concerns about affordability to run up huge margins in the New Jersey and Virginia governor races, flipping what had been a strength for Trump in the 2024 presidential election into a vulnerability going into next year’s midterm elections.

    White House officials and others familiar with their thinking requested anonymity to speak for this article in order to not get ahead of the president’s actions. They stressed that affordability has always been a priority for Trump, but the president plans to talk about it more, as he did Thursday when he announced that Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk would reduce the price of their anti-obesity drugs.

    “We are the ones that have done a great job on affordability, not the Democrats,” Trump said at an event in the Oval Office to announce the deal. “We just lost an election, they said, based on affordability. It’s a con job by the Democrats.”

    The White House is keeping up a steady drumbeat of posts on social media about prices and deals for Thanksgiving dinner staples at retailers such as Walmart, Lidl, Aldi and Target.

    “I don’t want to hear about the affordability, because right now, we’re much less,” Trump told reporters Thursday, arguing that things are much better for Americans with his party in charge.

    “The only problem is the Republicans don’t talk about it,” he said.

    The outlook for inflation is unclear

    As of now, the inflation outlook has worsened under Trump. Consumer prices in September increased at an annual rate of 3%, up from 2.3% in April, when the president first began to roll out substantial tariff hikes that suddenly burdened the economy with uncertainty. The AP Voter Poll showed the economy was the leading issue in Tuesday’s elections in New Jersey, Virginia, New York City and California.

    Grocery prices continue to climb, and recently, electricity bills have emerged as a new worry. At the same time, the pace of job gains has slowed, plunging 23% from the pace a year ago.

    The White House maintains a list of talking points about the economy, noting that the stock market has hit record highs multiple times and that the president is attracting foreign investment. Trump has emphasized that gasoline prices are coming down, and maintained that gasoline is averaging $2 a gallon, but AAA reported Thursday that the national average was $3.08, about two cents lower than a year ago.

    “Americans are paying less for essentials like gas and eggs, and today the Administration inked yet another drug pricing deal to deliver unprecedented health care savings for everyday Americans,” said White House spokesman Kush Desai.

    Trump gets briefed about the economy by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other officials at least once a week and there are often daily discussions on tariffs, a senior White House official said, noting Trump is expected to do more domestic travel next year to make his case that he’s fixing affordability.

    But critics say it will be hard for Trump to turn around public perceptions on affordability.

    “He’s in real trouble and I think it’s bigger than just cost of living,” said Lindsay Owens, executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal economic advocacy group.

    Owens noted that Trump has “lost his strength” as voters are increasingly doubtful about Trump’s economic leadership compared to Democrats, adding that the president doesn’t have the time to turn around public perceptions of him as he continues to pursue broad tariffs.

    New hype about income tax cuts ahead of April

    There will be new policies rolled out on affordability, a person familiar with the White House thinking said, declining to comment on what those would be. Trump on Thursday indicated there will be more deals coming on drug prices. Two other White House officials said messaging would change — but not policy.

    A big part of the administration’s response on affordability will be educating people ahead of tax season about the role of Trump’s income tax cuts in any refunds they receive in April, the person familiar with planning said. Those cuts were part of the sprawling bill Republicans muscled through Congress in July.

    This individual stressed that the key challenge is bringing prices down while simultaneously having wages increase, so that people can feel and see any progress.

    There’s also a bet that the economy will be in a healthier place in six months. With Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s term ending in May, the White House anticipates the start of consistent cuts to the Fed’s benchmark interest rate. They expect inflation rates to cool and declines in the federal budget deficit to boost sentiment in the financial markets.

    But the U.S. economy seldom cooperates with a president’s intentions, a lesson learned most recently by Trump’s predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, who saw his popularity slump after inflation spiked to a four-decade high in June 2022.

    The Trump administration maintains it’s simply working through an inflation challenge inherited from Biden, but new economic research indicates Trump has created his own inflation challenge through tariffs.

    Since April, Harvard University economist Alberto Cavallo and his colleagues, Northwestern University’s Paola Llamas and Universidad de San Andres’ Franco Vazquez, have been tracking the impact of the import taxes on consumer prices.

    In an October paper, the economists found that the inflation rate would have been drastically lower at 2.2%, had it not been for Trump’s tariffs.

    The administration maintains that tariffs have not contributed to inflation. They plan to make the case that the import taxes are helping the economy and dismiss criticisms of the import taxes as contributing to inflation as Democratic talking points.

    The fate of Trump’s country-by-country tariffs is currently being decided by the Supreme Court, where justices at a Wednesday hearing seemed dubious over the administration’s claims that tariffs were essentially regulations and could be levied by a president without congressional approval. Trump has maintained at times that foreign countries pay the tariffs and not U.S. citizens, a claim he backed away from slightly Thursday.

    “They might be paying something,” he said. “But when you take the overall impact, the Americans are gaining tremendously.”

    _____

    Associated Press writers Will Weissert and Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats are hopeful again. But unresolved questions remain about party’s path forward

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — For a day, at least, beleaguered Democrats are hopeful again. But just beneath the party’s relief at securing its first big electoral wins since last November’s drubbing lay unresolved questions about its direction heading into next year’s midterm elections.

    The Election Day romp of Republicans stretched from deep-blue New York and California to swing states Georgia, Pennsylvania and Virginia. There were signs that key voting groups, including young people, Black voters and Hispanics who shifted toward President Donald Trump’s Republican Party just a year ago, may be shifting back. And Democratic leaders across the political spectrum coalesced behind a simple message focused on Trump’s failure to address rising costs and everyday kitchen table issues.

    The dominant performance sparked a new round of debate among the party’s establishment-minded pragmatists and fiery progressives over which approach led to Tuesday’s victories, and which path to take into the high-stakes 2026 midterm elections and beyond. The lessons Democrats learn from the victories will help determine the party’s leading message and messengers next year — when elections will decide the balance of power in Congress for the second half of Trump’s term — and potentially in the 2028 presidential race, which has already entered its earliest stages.

    “Of course, there’s a division within the Democratic Party. There’s no secret,” Sen. Bernie Sanders told reporters at a Capitol Hill press conference about the election results.

    Sanders and his chief political strategist pointed to the success of New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, as a model for Democrats across the country. But Rep. Suzan Del Bene, who leads the House Democrats’ midterm campaign strategy, avoided saying Mamdani’s name when asked about his success.

    Del Bene instead cheered the moderate approach adopted by Democrats Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill in successful races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey as a more viable track for candidates outside of a Democratic stronghold like New York City.

    “New York is bright blue … and the path to the majority in the House is going to be through purple districts,” she told The Associated Press. “The people of Arizona, Iowa and Nebraska aren’t focused on the mayor of New York.”

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a likely Democratic presidential prospect who campaigned alongside Democrats in several states leading up to Tuesday’s elections, noted the candidates hit on a common issue that resonated with voters, regardless of location.

    “All of these candidates who won in these different states were focused on peoples’ everyday needs,” Shapiro said. “And you saw voters in every one of those states and cities showing up to send a clear message to Donald Trump that they’re rejecting his chaos.”

    Intraparty criticism

    Amid Democrats’ celebratory phone calls and news conferences, members of the party’s different wings had some sharp critiques for each other.

    While Shapiro cheered the party’s success during a Wednesday interview, he also acknowledged concerns about Mamdani in New York.

    Shapiro, one of the nation’s most prominent Jewish elected leaders, said he’s not comfortable with some of Mamdani’s comments on Israel. The New York mayor-elect, a Muslim, has described Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks as “genocide” against the Palestinian people and has been slow to condemn rhetoric linked to anti-Semitism.

    “I’ve expressed that to him personally. We’ve had good private communications,” Shapiro said of his concerns. “And I hope, as he did last night in his victory speech, that he’ll be a mayor that protects all New Yorkers and tries to bring people together.”

    Meanwhile, Sanders’ political strategist, Faiz Shakir, warned Democrats against embracing “cookie cutter campaigns that say nothing and do nothing” — a reference to centrist Democrats Spanberger and Sherrill.

    Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat who defeated democratic socialist Omar Fateh to win a third term, said at a news conference Wednesday that “we have to love our city more than our ideology.”

    “We need to be doing everything possible to push back on authoritarianism and what Donald Trump is doing,” Frey said. “And at the same time, the opposite of Donald Trump extremism is not the opposite extreme.”

    Democrats win everywhere

    Despite potential cracks in the Democratic coalition, it’s hard to understate the extent of the party’s electoral success.

    In Georgia, two Democrats cruised to wins over Republican incumbents in elections to the state Public Service Commission, delivering the largest statewide margins of victory by Democrats in more than 20 years.

    In Pennsylvania, Democrats swept not only three state Supreme Court races, but every county seat in presidential swing counties like Bucks and Erie Counties, including sheriffs. Bucks County elected its first Democratic district attorney as Democrats there also won key school board races and county judgeships.

    Maine voters defeated a Republican-backed measure that would have mandated showing an ID at the polls. Colorado approved raising taxes on people earning more than $300,000 annually to fund school meal programs and food assistance for low-income state residents. And California voters overwhelmingly backed a charge led by Gov. Gavin Newsom to redraw its congressional map to give Democrats as many as five more House seats in upcoming elections.

    Key groups coming back to Democrats

    Trump made inroads with Black and Hispanic voters in 2024. But this week, Democrats scored strong performances with non-white voters in New Jersey and Virginia that offered promise.

    About 7 in 10 voters in New Jersey were white, according to the AP Voter Poll. And Sherrill won about half that group. But she made up for her relative weakness with whites with a strong showing among Black, Hispanic and Asian voters.

    The vast majority — about 9 in 10 — of Black voters supported Sherrill, as did about 8 in 10 Asian voters.

    Hispanic voters in New Jersey were more divided, but about two-thirds supported Sherrill; only about 3 in 10 voted for the Republican nominee, Jack Ciattarelli.

    The pattern was similar in Virginia, where Spanberger performed well among Black voters, Hispanic voters and Asian voters, even though she didn’t win a majority of white voters.

    Democrats will soon face a choice

    The debate over the party’s future is already starting to play out in key midterm elections where Democrats have just begun intra-party primary contests.

    The choice is stark in Maine’s high-stakes Senate race, where Democrats will pick from a field that features establishment favorite, Gov. Jan Mills, and Sanders-endorsed populist Graham Platner. A similar dynamic could play out in key contests across Massachusetts, New York, Texas and Michigan.

    Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who is aligned with the progressive wing of the party, said the people he speaks to are demanding bold action to address their economic concerns.

    “Folks are so frustrated by how hard its become to afford a dignified life here in Michigan and across the country,” he said.

    “I’m sure the corporate donors don’t want us to push too hard,” El-Sayed continued. “My worry is the very same people who told us we were just fine in 2024 will miss the mandate.”

    ___

    Associated Press reporter Mike Catalini in Newark and Joey Cappelletti in Washington contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link