ReportWire

Tag: Elections

  • Trump’s State of the Union seeks to calm economic jitters

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump declared during the State of the Union on Tuesday that “we’re winning so much,” saying he sparked a jobs and manufacturing boom at home while imposing a new world order abroad — hoping that offering a long list of his accomplishments can counter approval ratings that have been falling.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%CF>A EC:65 62C=J @? E@ 2AA62= E@ 3:A2CE:D2? A2EC:@E:4 D6?E:>6?ED[ 5C2>2E:42==J :?G:E:?8 E96 ~=J>A:4 8@=5>652=H:??:?8 &]$] >6?’D 9@4<6J E62> :?E@ E96 w@FD6 492>36C E@ 2AA=2FD6] %96 E62> 42>6 E@ E96 r2A:E@= 27E6C 2? 27E6C?@@? G:D:E E@ E96 (9:E6 w@FD6]k^Am

    kAm“~FC 4@F?ECJ 😀 H:??:?8 282:?] x? 724E[ H6’C6 H:??:?8 D@ >F49 E92E H6 C62==J 5@?’E 6[ V!=62D6[ A=62D6[ A=62D6[ |:DE6C !C6D:56?E[ H6’C6 H:??:?8 E@@ >F49] (6 42?’E E2<6 :E 2?J>@C6[VQ %CF>A D2:5 367@C6 :?EC@5F4:?8 E96 E62>] “V(6’C6 ?@E FD65 E@ H:??:?8 😕 @FC 4@F?ECJ F?E:= J@F 42>6 2=@?8]V”k^Am

    kAm%96 9@4<6J A=2J6CD[ H62C:?8 E96:C >652=D 2?5 DH62E6CD E92E D2:5 “&$p” 😕 =2C86 =6EE6CD[ 5C6H 2 3:A2CE:D2? DE2?5:?8 @G2E:@?] %CF>A A@:?E65 E@ E96 s6>@4C2E:4 D:56 @7 E96 492>36C 2?5 BF:AA65[ “%92E’D E96 7:CDE E:>6 x 6G6C x’G6 6G6C D66? E96> 86E FA]”k^Am

    kAmx? 2?@E96C >2567@C%’ >@>6?E[ %CF>A 2??@F?465 96 H@F=5 36 2H2C5:?8 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^5@?2=5ECF>A2AE@A?6HDE2=<C25:@A@=:E:4D6?E6CE2:?>6?E5fh2f6625eg5e2b_c5bg3eed6e7gh4a2Qm!C6D:56?E:2= |652= @7 uC665@>k^2m[ p>6C:42’D 9:896DE 4:G:=:2? 9@?@C[ E@ E96 9@4<6J E62>’D 8@2=E6?56C[ r@??@C w6==63FJ4<] %CF>A >256 2 D:>:=2C DFCAC:D6 2??@F?46>6?E 😕 a_a_[ 36DE@H:?8 E96 2H2C5 @? 4@?D6CG2E:G6 C25:@ 9@DE #FD9 {:>32F89 5FC:?8 E96 DA6649]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 492>A:@?65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:462CC6DEDH2CC2?ED>:??62A@=:DECF>A__5_23_bbg6gabc`75h`3`e_fdg263a5Qm9:D :>>:8C2E:@? 4C24<5@H?Dk^2m 2?5 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^6=@?>FD<5@865@?2=5ECF>Adf6_dhd`2_`77h6eb3b2234ab574a633QmD=2D9:?8 @7 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?Ek^2m[ 2D H6== 2D 9:D AFD9 E@ AC6D6CG6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AE2C:77D64@?@>J=:36C2E:@?52J5bcdg52aad4`757256hf65chc3ab6gegQmH:56DAC625 E2C:77Dk^2m E92E E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^DFAC6>64@FCEE2C:77DECF>A_cgd7452b_2fb`_d_“ab6chb`532b7hQm$FAC6>6 r@FCE ;FDE DECF4< 5@H?k^2m] pD 96 92D 😕 E96 A2DE[ 96 564C:65 DE2E6D =2C86=J CF? 3J s6>@4C2ED[ D:?8=:?8 @FE |:??6D@E2]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC6D:56?E 2=D@ 2??@F?465 E92E E649 4@>A2?:6D :?G@=G65 😕 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 2C6 28C66:?8 E@ A2J 9:896C 6=64EC:4:EJ C2E6D 😕 2C62D H96C6 E96:C 52E2 46?E6CD 2C6 =@42E65] s2E2 46?E6CD E6?5 E@ FD6 =2C86 G@=F>6D @7 6=64EC:4:EJ[ A@E6?E:2==J :?4C62D:?8 E96 4@DE @7 A@H6C E@ @E96C 4@?DF>6CD 😕 E96 2C62]k^Am

    kAmw6 5C6H 2AA=2FD6 @?=J 7C@> s6>@4C2ED H9:=6 56D4C:3:?8 E96 $FAC6>6 r@FCE’D CF=:?8 =2DE H66< DEC:<:?8 5@H? >2?J @7 9:D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AE2C:77DDFAC6>64@FCEH92ED?6IE3g3e5d5cc633bec_2gg7fa_afdc43be`QmD:8?2EFC6 E2C:77 A@=:4:6Dk^2m] %96 AC6D:56?E 42==65 :E “2? F?7@CEF?2E6 CF=:?8” 2?5 D2:5 “6G6CJE9:?8 H2D H@C<:?8 H6==” 367@C6 E96 4@FCE’D 564:D:@?]k^Am

    kAmqFE %CF>A D2:5 96 H@F=5 A=@H 29625[ FD:?8 “2=E6C?2E:G6” =2HD E@ :>A@D6 E96 E2I6D @? :>A@CED 2?5 E6==:?8 =2H>2<6CD[ “r@?8C6DD:@?2= 24E:@? H:== ?@E 36 ?646DD2CJ]”k^Am

    kAmw6 2=D@ >256 2 3@=5 AC65:4E:@?[ DF886DE:?8 E92E D@>6 52J E2C:77D H@F=5 “DF3DE2?E:2==J C6A=246” E96 >@56C? :?4@>6 E2I DJDE6>] w6 4=2:>65 E96 E2C:77D 2C6 A2:5 3J 7@C6:8? 4@F?EC:6D 56DA:E6 6G:56?46 E92E E96 4@DED 2C6 3@C?6 3J p>6C:42? 4@?DF>6CD 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D]k^Am

    kAm“xEVD D2G:?8 @FC 4@F?ECJ[” %CF>A D2:5 @7 E2C:77D[ 255:?8 E92E E96J H6C6 “A6246 AC@E64E:?8]Qk^Am

    kAm%96 $FAC6>6 r@FCE ;FDE:46D 😕 2EE6?52?46 H6C6 E96 D2>6 H9@ 42>6 E@ %CF>A’D 255C6DD E@ 2 ;@:?E D6DD:@? @7 r@?8C6DD 😕 |2C49i r9:67 yFDE:46 y@9? #@36CED[ 2D H6== 2D yFDE:46D qC6EE z2G2?2F89[ p>J r@?6J q2CC6EE 2?5 t=6?2 z282?] %CF>A 8C66E65 E96 ;FDE:46D 2?5 6G6? D9@@< 92?5D H:E9 r@?6J q2CC6EE[ 27E6C AC6G:@FD=J D=2>>:?8 96C 7@C D:5:?8 H:E9 E96 >2;@C:EJ 282:?DE %CF>AVD E2C:77D — 56DA:E6 9:> 2AA@:?E:?8 96C E@ E96 9:89 4@FCE 😕 9:D 7:CDE E6C>]k^Am

    kAms6>@4C2ED 2=D@ DE@@5 7@C %CF>A G@H:?8 E@ 4C24<5@H? @? :?D:56C EC25:?8 3J =2H>2<6CD[ AC@>AE:?8 %CF>A E@ @776C[ “x’> G6CJ :>AC6DD65]”k^Am

    kAm}@E 6G6CJ3@5J 2AA=2F565[ E9@F89] #6A] |2C< %2<2?@[ 2 r2=:7@C?:2 s6>@4C2E J6==65[ “w@H 23@FE J@F 7:CDEP” #6A] #2D9:52 %=2:3[ 2 |:49:82? s6>@4C2E[ 42==65 @FE[ “*@F’C6 E96 >@DE 4@CCFAE AC6D:56?EP”k^Am

    kAm(96? D@>6 964<=:?8 4@?E:?F65[ %CF>A AC@4=2:>65[ “*@F D9@F=5 36 2D92>65 @7 J@FCD6=G6D]Q {2E6C 96 A@:?E65 2E s6>@4C2ED 2?5 AC@4=2:>65[ “%96D6 A6@A=6 2C6 4C2KJ[Q 255:?8[ “s6>@4C2ED 2C6 56DEC@J:?8 @FC 4@F?ECJ]”k^Am

    kAms6>@4C2E:4 #6A] p= vC66? H2D 6D4@CE65 7C@> E96 492>36C 27E6C 96 F?7FC=65 2 D:8? @7 AC@E6DE E92E C625 “q=24< !6@A=6 pC6?’E pA6DP” %96 D:8? 2AA62C65 E@ 36 2 C676C6?46 E@ 2 C24:DE G:56@ E96 AC6D:56?E A@DE65 E92E 56A:4E65 7@C>6C !C6D:56?E q2C24< ~32>2 2?5 u:CDE {25J |:496==6 ~32>2 56A:4E65 2D AC:>2E6D 😕 2 ;F?8=6] vC66? H2D 2=D@ C6>@G65 5FC:?8 %CF>AVD 255C6DD E@ 2 ;@:?E D6DD:@? @7 r@?8C6DD =2DE J62C]k^Am

    kAmq67@C6 96 3682? DA62<:?8[ $6?2E6 s6>@4C2ED 3=@4<65 2 3:== E@ C6DE@C6 7F?5:?8 E@ E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 w@>6=2?5 $64FC:EJ[ AC6DD:?8 7@C ?6H =:>:ED @? :>>:8C2E:@? 6?7@C46>6?E E92E #6AF3=:42?D 92G6 @AA@D65]k^Am

    kAmx? C6DA@?D6[ %CF>A :?G:E65 =2H>2<6CD 7C@> 3@E9 A2CE:6D E@ “AC@E64E p>6C:42? 4:E:K6?D[ ?@E :==682= 2=:6?D” 2?5 492>A:@?65 AC@A@D2=D E@ =:>:E >2:=:? 32==@ED 2?5 E:89E6? G@E6C :56?E:7:42E:@? CF=6D]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 56G@E65 C6=2E:G6=J =:EE=6 E:>6 😕 9:D DA6649 E@ 677@CED E@ 3C:?8 5@H? E96 4@DE @7 =:G:?8 — 56DA:E6 A@==:?8 D9@H:?8 E92E 9:D 92?5=:?8 @7 E96 64@?@>J 2?5 <:E496? E23=6 :DDF6D 92D D=:AA65] x?5665[ 4@?46C?D 23@FE E96 9:89 4@DED @7 =:G:?8 96=A65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^G:C8:?:2?6H;6CD6JECF>A6=64E:@?56>@4C2EC6AF3=:42?725`_hghb475c36d3ch2d33`3_`bg5g5QmAC@A6= s6>@4C2E:4 H:?D 2C@F?5 E96 4@F?ECJ @? t=64E:@? s2J 😕 }@G6>36Ck^2m]k^Am

    kAm~? %F6D52J[ 96 3=2>65 9:D AC65646DD@C[ 7@C>6C !C6D:56?E y@6 q:56?[ 2=@?8 H:E9 s6>@4C2E:4 =2H>2<6CD 😕 E96 492>36C[ D2J:?8 E96J H6C6 C6DA@?D:3=6 7@C C:D:?8 AC:46D 2?5 962=E9 42C6 4@DED[ EH@ :DDF6D 9:D A@=:E:42= @AA@?6?ED 92G6 C6A62E65=J C2:D65 282:?DE 9:>]k^Am

    kAm“*@F 42FD65 E92E AC@3=6>[” %CF>A D2:5 @7 277@C523:=:EJ 4@?46C?D] w6 25565 2 >@>6?E =2E6C[ “%96J 6?ED H6C6 2 5:CEJ[ C@EE6? =:6]”k^Am

    kAmpD 😀 EJA:42=[ %CF>A 2=D@ 925 D@>6 ?@E23=6 @77D4C:AE >@>6?ED] #676C6?4:?8 AC6D4C:AE:@? 5CF8 AC:46D[ %CF>A D2:5[ “$@ 😕 >J 7:CDE J62C @7 E96 D64@?5 E6C> — D9@F=5 36 >J E9:C5 E6C> — 3FE DEC2?86 E9:?8D 92AA6?[” AC@>AE:?8 2E =62DE @?6 492?E 😕 E96 492>36C @7 “u@FC >@C6 J62CDP”k^Am

    kAm%CF>A 5:5 ?@E @776C 56E2:=D 23@FE 9@H 96 H@F=5 AFE E96 AC@8C2> 😕 A=246 2?5 5:5 ?@E :?5:42E6 :7 96 H@F=5 2D< r@?8C6DD E@ A2DD E96 AC@8C2> 2?5 7F?5 :E]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC6D:56?E 3@2DE65 @7 92G:?8 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^:?7=2E:@?ECF>A64@?@>JAC:46D5cgh472c3cg6baaba7`begb_bbb5`53_QmE2>65 :?7=2E:@?k^2m 2?5 D2:5 96 92D E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A64@?@>J:?7=2E:@?E2C:77D85A724E4964<74c`d6gfhd`h7`c62da`h7__2hfhhc7cQm64@?@>J 9F>>:?8[k^2m 8:G6? E92E E96 s@H y@?6D x?5FDEC:2= pG6C286 C646?E=J k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^DE@42C<6EDECF>A8@=5E649`hh5c5ed3fdhe5f4bc7b2d5h2ff4abaeQm6I466565 d_[___ A@:?EDk^2m 7@C E96 7:CDE E:>6]k^Am

    kAm$F49 82:?D 5@?VE 766= E2?8:3=6 E@ E9@D6 H:E9@FE DE@4< A@CE7@=:@D[ 9@H6G6C] %96C6 2=D@ 2C6 A6CD:DE6?E 762CD E92E E2C:77D DE@<65 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AE2C:77D9@FD69@=54@DED:?7=2E:@?bhg6_427hdbe56e4eb7_5“he4dc7cdbQm9:896C AC:46Dk^2m[ H9:49 4@F=5 6G6?EF2==J 9FCE E96 64@?@>J 2?5 ;@3 4C62E:@?] k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^85A64@?@>J4@?DF>6CD9FE5@H?:>>:8C2E:@?_6d4242fgb3hb627aab`che6b6_7dc7bQmt4@?@>:4 8C@HE9 D=@H65k^2m 😕 E96 =2DE E9C66 >@?E9D @7 =2DE J62C]k^Am

    kAmxE 😀 A@E6?E:2==J A@=:E:42==J A6C:=@FD 29625 @7 }@G6>36C 6=64E:@?D E92E 4@F=5 56=:G6C 4@?8C6DD:@?2= H:?D E@ s6>@4C2ED[ ;FDE 2D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^dghfb_5c3egbc2_53_3dgg7adbde7bb2Qma_`g’D 3=F6 H2G6k^2m 4C62E65 2 DEC@?8 4964< E@ 9:D 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 5FC:?8 9:D 7:CDE E6C>]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A DA6?E C6=2E:G6=J =:EE=6 E:>6 @? 7@C6:8? A@=:4J[ 56DA:E6 9:D 255C6DD 4@>:?8 2D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>A:C2?2:C4C27E42CC:6C>:=:E2CJg53b723`_cfehch2452g3hfb36c`ea_cQmEH@ &]$] 2:C4C27E 42CC:6CD 92G6 366? 5:DA2E4965 E@ E96 |:55=6 t2DEk^2m 2>:5 E6?D:@?D H:E9 xC2?]k^Am

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    By WILL WEISSERT and MICHELLE L. PRICE – Associated Press

    Source link

  • Bipartisan commission gets to work on upgrading 28-year-old NC elections systems

    [ad_1]

    North Carolina’s election technology is long overdue for an upgrade, state officials say, and now a bipartisan commission is poised to meet for the first time Tuesday to dive into the nitty-gritty of modernizing the systems. 

    In the end, officials say, election results should come faster, voter data should be better maintained, and the systems that organize votes should be more secure.

    North Carolina’s Statewide Elections Information Management System (SEIMS) dates to 1998. It has evolved into a tangle of technology, consisting of modern, web-based applications and legacy systems that are written in unsupported programming languages that pose security risks, and are difficult to manage and update. The current systems are “on the verge of malfunctioning due to various updates to operating and other system resources,” the state said in describing the upgrade to potential contractors.

    Lawmakers passed a spending package last year that included $15 million for the State Board of Elections to use for upgrades to the system, including improvements to campaign finance software. 

    State Auditor Dave Boliek, a Republican whose office oversees state election administration, created the bipartisan commission to help oversee the modernization effort, and to build faith among voters who might be skeptical of the process. The Modernization of Election Data Systems commission is made up of 22 members: professional election staffers, political appointees and academics, who are tasked with helping fix the technology that supports North Carolina’s elections.

    Election technology has come under scrutiny from some voters in recent years, fueled in part by President Donald Trump’s disproven claims about voter fraud during the 2020 election. In 2024, nearly one in every three North Carolina voters had little to no faith in the accuracy of election results, according to a WRAL News poll. Mistrust was highest among Trump supporters, even though audits of past election results haven’t found widespread voter fraud.

    A recent North Carolina lawsuit — brought by Republican Jefferson Griffin, who challenged a 2024 race for a state Supreme Court seat — put a brighter spotlight on election data management, though. Griffin challenged the validity of thousands of voters, saying they had errant or incorrect information on file with the state. Griffin lost that challenge and the race, but his effort prompted the state to seek to verify the identity of thousands of North Carolina voters.

    The tech upgrade also comes as Democrats question whether elections can be administered impartially following the transfer of election control from the Democratic governor’s office to the Republican state auditor — a move enabled by the Republican-led state legislature.

    Phase one of the modernization effort — including requesting proposals from vendors and creating the commission — is complete. The second phase will take several years. Boliek plans incremental modernization of the current system to keep it operational. 

    In the meantime, Boliek says the current system is in good shape to produce accurate results and a fair election.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Never Trump Republicans Are Still Issuing Dire Warnings. Is Anyone Listening?

    [ad_1]

    NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. (AP) — Over and over, the Republicans and former Republicans who gathered just outside Washington this weekend warned that President Donald Trump and his allies in Congress are tearing at the very fabric of American democracy.

    A former congressman described the president’s party as an “authoritarian-embracing cult.” A prominent conservative writer said Trumpism is an “existential threat.” And a retired Army general, his voice shaking with emotion, cited post-Nazi Germany as a roadmap for the nation’s post-Trump recovery.

    It’s unclear how many people are listening.

    The main convention hall at the sixth annual Principles First summit on Saturday and Sunday was half empty. About 750 chairs were set up in a room that could have fit thousands, and many were unfilled. Not a single current Republican elected official participated in the two-day program.

    This is what remains of the Grand Old Party’s Never Trump movement, a coalition of Republicans, former Republicans and independents who banded together as Trump consolidated power. They largely remain political exiles — not quite at home among Democrats yet disgusted by how the president has abandoned Republicans’ longstanding commitments to free trade and limited government.

    John McDowell, 69, who was a lifelong Republican before Trump’s emergence, acknowledged that the diminished group had virtually “zero” political clout within his former party.

    “It’s just a fact. We’re losing good people,” said McDowell, a former Capitol Hill staffer and county Republican official from San Carlos, California. “The party is becoming more and more MAGA-fied.”

    White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson dismissed all the criticism from what she called “a bunch of deranged has-been politicians.”

    “The only people who will pay attention to this event are the journalists who are forced to cover it,” she said.

    Virtually everyone who gathered at the hotel in National Harbor, Maryland, said they are rooting for Democratic victories in this fall’s midterm elections. One of the only Democrats there was Conor Lamb, a former congressman from Pennsylvania who lost his party’s primary to John Fetterman four years ago.

    Despite dire concerns, there was a slight sense of optimism among the half-empty convention hall and quiet hotel hallways.

    Several people cheered last week’s Supreme Court decision to strike down Trump’s tariffs, the economic tool he has wielded without congressional approval in his attempt to force friends and foes around the globe to bend to his will. Trump insisted he would implement a new round of tariffs despite the ruling.

    Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a former Trump adviser, highlighted recent AP-NORC polling showing that 1 in 4 Republicans nationwide do not approve of Trump’s job performance.

    “It’s like any show that’s on TV for a long time — the ratings start to go down. And the ratings are going down,” Christie said. “I am willing to bet you that by next February, this room is going to be twice the size of what it is now. After the midterms, you watch.”

    Ex-MAGA diehard Rich Logis, wearing a red “I left MAGA hat,” hopes to see “an electoral revolt against MAGA” in the midterms.

    “I think there’s a shift in our country right now,” he said. “It happens slowly.”

    Logis was promoting support groups for friends and family of Trump loyalists at a table outside the convention hall. Nearby, someone was selling books about how to escape cults.

    At the podium, former Republican Rep. Joe Walsh implored Trump’s critics not to downplay the seriousness of the threat the president poses to the nation.

    “He’s everything our founders feared. Say it. Believe it,” Walsh said. He said his former party is “an authoritarian-embracing cult” and “a threat to everything I love.”

    Retired Gen. Mark Hertling, who once commanded the U.S. Army’s European forces, said he’s “haunted” by allies who ask him “whether American institutions ever can be trusted again.”

    “Our nation’s institutions have been shaken. Our alliances have been strained. Our credibility has been damaged. And our nation’s values have been cast aside,” Hertling said. He suggested the U.S. should look to the reconstruction of Germany after the defeat of Nazism if it hoped to to restore the damage caused by Trump and his allies.

    The nation’s recovery, he said as his voiced cracked, would be something people have to earn over many years.

    Bill Kristol, who worked in previous Republican administrations and helped found the Weekly Standard magazine, described Trump and his Republican supporters in Congress as “an existential threat” to the nation. But he was also optimistic about the upcoming midterm elections.

    Kristol said Democrats are “almost certain to win the House,” “could possibly win the Senate,” and have “a good chance to win the presidency” in 2028.

    Brittany Martinez, executive director of the host organization Principles First, also tried to cast an optimistic tone, even after describing the many reasons why she couldn’t bear to continue her career as a Republican staffer on Capitol Hill.

    “I hope that Republicans continue to wake up,” she said. “I do think that those folks exist. And I hope that they exist in greater numbers.”

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • A policy wonk who wants Nancy Pelosi’s House seat is unafraid of a fight

    [ad_1]

    SAN FRANCISCO — The California state lawmaker favored to succeed Nancy Pelosi in the U.S. House has already been thrust into the national spotlight as the force behind headline-grabbing policies like a ban on masks for federal agents and protections for transgender youth.

    Now Scott Wiener is expected to win the California Democratic Party’s endorsement on Sunday, giving his candidacy an extra boost in a competitive primary. Once in Washington, he could swiftly become a fresh symbol of San Francisco politics, derided by conservatives as an example of extreme liberalism while occasionally clashing with progressives.

    Wiener has practice with that balancing act after 15 years in city and state politics.

    “Sen. Wiener only does the tough bills,” longtime Sacramento lobbyist Chris Micheli said. “He never shies away from a significant political battle.”

    Wiener’s challenge of navigating modern Democratic politics was on display in January, when he changed his language on the war in Gaza. Days after declining to align with his progressive opponents in describing Israel’s actions as genocide, he said he agreed with that term. The shift angered some Jewish groups and led Wiener to step down as co-chair of the state Legislative Jewish Caucus.

    “For a period of time I chose not to use the word ‘genocide’ because it is so sensitive within the Jewish community,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press. “But ultimately I decided I had been effectively saying ‘genocide’ for quite some time.”

    Wiener, known for his calm demeanor, is often at the center of California’s most divisive issues, from housing to drug use. His backers and critics alike describe him as someone who advocates relentlessly for his bills.

    “If you’re willing to risk people being mad at you, you can get things done and make people’s lives better,” Wiener said.

    He wrote laws requiring large companies to disclose their direct and indirect climate emissions and ramp up apartment construction near public transit stops.

    But he doesn’t always win.

    Wiener authored a first-in-the-nation law banning local and federal law enforcement agents from wearing face coverings after a wave of immigration raids across Southern California last summer. A judge blocked it from taking effect this month — a rare loss in the state’s legal battles with the Trump administration that had Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office blaming Wiener.

    He also failed to pass high-profile bills to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms and hold oil and gas companies liable for damage from climate-caused natural disasters.

    His critics come from both parties.

    Republicans have blasted many of his policies aimed at defending LGBTQ+ people, sometimes calling Wiener, who is gay, offensive names.

    Aaron Peskin, a former San Francisco supervisor and outspoken progressive, said a law Wiener wrote inadvertently stifled local housing and affordability efforts.

    “It was screwing my government’s ability to deliver goods and services to the people that we represent,” he said.

    Wiener said he supports Israel’s right to defend itself but grew horrified by the scale of its attacks on Gaza and blocking of humanitarian aid. More than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed since the war began in late 2023, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. He had harshly criticized Israel’s actions but avoided using the word “ genocide.”

    At a candidate forum in January, he refused to say “yes” or “no” after the Democratic hopefuls were asked whether Israel was committing genocide, which angered pro-Palestinian advocates. His opponents, San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan and former tech executive Saikat Chakrabarti, said “yes.”

    Days later he released a video saying Israel had committed genocide, triggering backlash from Jewish and pro-Israel groups who said his words lacked “moral clarity.”

    It was a representation of the difficult political terrain many Democrats are navigating as polls show views have shifted on Israel. American sympathy for Israel dropped to an all-time low in 2025, particularly among Democrats and independents, while sympathy for Palestinians has risen.

    “Do I think he wins or loses based on this issue? Not necessarily, but it could become a problem for him,” San Francisco Bay Area political consultant Jim Ross said, adding that some voters might fear he will equivocate on issues important to them.

    Just two Jewish members of Congress — Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders and Democratic Rep. Becca Balint, both of Vermont — have publicly used the word “genocide” to describe Israel’s actions. Only a small percentage of congressional Democrats have used the term, according to the Jewish Democratic Council of America.

    Wiener grew up in New Jersey in a family that was Conservative Jewish, a sect of Judaism that is moderately traditional, and his only friends until high school were from his synagogue, he said. He later joined a Jewish fraternity at Duke University and was surprised by how supportive his brothers were when he told them he was gay.

    “A lot of Jews just intuitively understand what it means to be part of a marginalized community,” he said.

    Pelosi, a former House speaker, has not made an endorsement in the race.

    If elected, Wiener said, he will work to bring down San Francisco’s notoriously high cost of living. His opponents are running on a similar promise and say he has failed to prioritize affordable housing.

    Chan and Chakrabarti, a former aide to U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., say they are fresher faces better positioned to bring sweeping change after Pelosi. Wiener, they say, is a moderate with establishment ties. Chan has been elected twice by voters in the city’s Richmond District, while Chakrabarti has never been on the ballot.

    Ross, the political consultant, said it’s impossible to compare anyone to Pelosi given the sheer size of her political influence. But like her, Wiener has proved to be a strong networker who can raise money and pass ambitious bills.

    “They’re both about the politics of what they can get done,” Ross said.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Janie Har contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Policy Wonk Who Wants Nancy Pelosi’s House Seat Is Unafraid of a Fight

    [ad_1]

    Now Scott Wiener is expected to win the California Democratic Party’s endorsement on Sunday, giving his candidacy an extra boost in a competitive primary. Once in Washington, he could swiftly become a fresh symbol of San Francisco politics, derided by conservatives as an example of extreme liberalism while occasionally clashing with progressives.

    Wiener has practice with that balancing act after 15 years in city and state politics.

    “Sen. Wiener only does the tough bills,” longtime Sacramento lobbyist Chris Micheli said. “He never shies away from a significant political battle.”

    Wiener’s challenge of navigating modern Democratic politics was on display in January, when he changed his language on the war in Gaza. Days after declining to align with his progressive opponents in describing Israel’s actions as genocide, he said he agreed with that term. The shift angered some Jewish groups and led Wiener to step down as co-chair of the state Legislative Jewish Caucus.

    “For a period of time I chose not to use the word ‘genocide’ because it is so sensitive within the Jewish community,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press. “But ultimately I decided I had been effectively saying ‘genocide’ for quite some time.”


    Leading high-profile legislation

    Wiener, known for his calm demeanor, is often at the center of California’s most divisive issues, from housing to drug use. His backers and critics alike describe him as someone who advocates relentlessly for his bills.

    “If you’re willing to risk people being mad at you, you can get things done and make people’s lives better,” Wiener said.

    But he doesn’t always win.

    Wiener authored a first-in-the-nation law banning local and federal law enforcement agents from wearing face coverings after a wave of immigration raids across Southern California last summer. A judge blocked it from taking effect this month — a rare loss in the state’s legal battles with the Trump administration that had Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office blaming Wiener.

    His critics come from both parties.

    Republicans have blasted many of his policies aimed at defending LGBTQ+ people, sometimes calling Wiener, who is gay, offensive names.

    Aaron Peskin, a former San Francisco supervisor and outspoken progressive, said a law Wiener wrote inadvertently stifled local housing and affordability efforts.

    “It was screwing my government’s ability to deliver goods and services to the people that we represent,” he said.


    Shifting language on Israel

    Wiener said he supports Israel’s right to defend itself but grew horrified by the scale of its attacks on Gaza and blocking of humanitarian aid. More than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed since the war began in late 2023, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. He had harshly criticized Israel’s actions but avoided using the word “ genocide.”

    At a candidate forum in January, he refused to say “yes” or “no” after the Democratic hopefuls were asked whether Israel was committing genocide, which angered pro-Palestinian advocates. His opponents, San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan and former tech executive Saikat Chakrabarti, said “yes.”

    Days later he released a video saying Israel had committed genocide, triggering backlash from Jewish and pro-Israel groups who said his words lacked “moral clarity.”

    It was a representation of the difficult political terrain many Democrats are navigating as polls show views have shifted on Israel. American sympathy for Israel dropped to an all-time low in 2025, particularly among Democrats and independents, while sympathy for Palestinians has risen.

    “Do I think he wins or loses based on this issue? Not necessarily, but it could become a problem for him,” San Francisco Bay Area political consultant Jim Ross said, adding that some voters might fear he will equivocate on issues important to them.

    Just two Jewish members of Congress — Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders and Democratic Rep. Becca Balint, both of Vermont — have publicly used the word “genocide” to describe Israel’s actions. Only a small percentage of congressional Democrats have used the term, according to the Jewish Democratic Council of America.

    Wiener grew up in New Jersey in a family that was Conservative Jewish, a sect of Judaism that is moderately traditional, and his only friends until high school were from his synagogue, he said. He later joined a Jewish fraternity at Duke University and was surprised by how supportive his brothers were when he told them he was gay.

    “A lot of Jews just intuitively understand what it means to be part of a marginalized community,” he said.


    Competing for Pelosi’s seat

    Pelosi, a former House speaker, has not made an endorsement in the race.

    If elected, Wiener said, he will work to bring down San Francisco’s notoriously high cost of living. His opponents are running on a similar promise and say he has failed to prioritize affordable housing.

    Chan and Chakrabarti, a former aide to U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., say they are fresher faces better positioned to bring sweeping change after Pelosi. Wiener, they say, is a moderate with establishment ties. Chan has been elected twice by voters in the city’s Richmond District, while Chakrabarti has never been on the ballot.

    Ross, the political consultant, said it’s impossible to compare anyone to Pelosi given the sheer size of her political influence. But like her, Wiener has proved to be a strong networker who can raise money and pass ambitious bills.

    “They’re both about the politics of what they can get done,” Ross said.

    Associated Press writer Janie Har contributed.

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Salisbury Democrats to hold caucus

    [ad_1]

    SALISBURY — The Salisbury Democratic Town Committee will hold a caucus Feb. 28 at the Hilton Senior Center, 43 Lafayette Road, to elect delegates to attend as voting members of the Democratic State Convention.

    The snow date is March 7. Caucus registration takes place between 9:30 and 10 a.m. The caucus begins at 10 a.m. All are welcome to observe the proceedings.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmp== C68:DE6C65 s6>@4C2ED =:G:?8 😕 $2=:D3FCJ 2C6 6=:8:3=6 E@ CF? 2D 2 56=682E6] $2=:D3FCJ H:== 6=64E 7@FC 56=682E6D 2?5 7@FC 2=E6C?2E6D 2E E96 42F4FD]k^Am

    kAmt=64E65 56=682E6D H:== 36 23=6 E@ 2EE6?5 E96 4@?G6?E:@? 😕 (@C46DE6C @? |2J ahb_] r@?G6?E:@? A2CE:4:A2?ED H:== 962C 7C@> s6>@4C2E:4 DE2E6 =6256CD 2?5 42? G@E6 @? H9:49 &]$] $6?2E6 42?5:52E6 E96J DFAA@CE]k^Am

    kAm%96 E9C66 564=2C65 s6>@4C2E:4 42?5:52E6D 2C6 :?4F>36?E $6?] t5 |2C<6J 2?5 492==6?86CD $6E9 |@F=E@? 2?5 p=6I #:<=66?] t249 42?5:52E6 H:== ?665 E@ 62C? E96 DFAA@CE @7 `dT @7 4@?G6?E:@? 56=682E6D]k^Am

    kAm!6@A=6 286D `e E@ bd[ E9@D6 H:E9 5:D23:=:E:6D[ A6@A=6 @7 4@=@C[ G6E6C2?D 2?5 >6>36CD @7 E96 {vq%”Z 4@>>F?:EJ ?@E 6=64E65 2D 56=682E6D @C 2=E6C?2E6D 5FC:?8 E96 42F4FD 42? 364@>6 2? 255@? 56=682E6 6:E96C 2E E96 42F4FD @C 27E6C]k^Am

    kAmu@C >@C6 23@FE E96 42F4FD[ 4@?E24E s6C6< s6!6EC:==@[ 492:C @7 E96 s6>@4C2E:4 %@H? r@>>:EE66[ 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i56C6<5_d`go8>2:=]4@>Qm56C6<5_d`go8>2:=]4@>k^2m @C |2C< (9:E>@C6[ $2=:D3FCJ 42F4FD 4@@C5:?2E@C[ 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@iH9:E>@C6]>2C<`o8>2:=]4@>QmH9:E>@C6]>2C<`o8>2:=]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newsom become adversaries over push to tax California billionaires

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — As national Democrats search for a unifying theme ahead of the fall’s midterm elections, a California proposal to levy a hefty tax on billionaires is turning some of the party’s leading figures into adversaries just when Democrats can least afford division from within.

    Bernie Sanders will be in Los Angeles campaigning Wednesday for the tax proposal that has the Silicon Valley in an uproar, with tech titans are threatening to leave the state. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is among its outspoken opponents, warning that it could leave government finances in crisis and put the state at a competitive disadvantage nationally.

    Sanders is planning a late afternoon rally near downtown, and in the past he has turned out overflow crowds in the heavily Democratic city. The Vermont senator, a democratic socialist, is popular in California — he won the 2020 Democratic presidential primary in the state in a runaway. He’s been railing for decades against what he characterizes as wealthy elites and the growing gap between rich and poor.

    A large health care union is attempting to place a proposal before voters in November that would impose a one-time 5% tax on the assets of billionaires — including stocks, art, businesses, collectibles and intellectual property — to backfill federal funding cuts to health services for lower-income people that were signed by President Donald Trump last year.

    Sanders wrote on the social platform X that he strongly supports the tax “at a time of unprecedented and growing wealth and income inequality.”

    “Our nation will not thrive when so few own so much,” Sanders wrote.

    Debate on the proposal is unfolding at a time when voters in both parties express unease with economic conditions and what the future will bring in a politically divided nation. Distrust of government — and its ability to get things done — is widespread.

    The proposal has created a rift between Newsom and prominent members of his party’s progressive wing, including Sanders, who has said the tax should be a template for other states.

    “The issues that are really going to be motivating Democrats this year, affordability and the cost of health care and cuts to schools, none of these would be fixed by this proposal. If fact, they would be made worse,” said Brian Brokaw, a longtime Newsom adviser who is leading a political committee opposing the tax.

    Midterm elections typically punish the party in control of the White House, and Democrats are hoping to gain enough U.S. House seats to overturn the chamber’s slim Republican majority. In California, rejiggered House districts approved by voters last year are expected to help the party pick up as many as five additional seats, which would leave Republicans in control of just a handful of districts.

    “It is always better for a party to have the political debate focused on issues where you are united and the other party is divided,” said Eric Schickler, a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley. “Having an issue like this where Newsom and Sanders — among others — are on different sides is not ideal.”

    With the idea of taxing billionaires popular among many voters “this can be a good way for Democratic candidates to rally that side and break through from the pack,” Schickler added in an email.

    It’s already trickled into the race for governor and contests down the ballot. Republicans Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton, both candidates for governor, have warned the tax would erase jobs. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, a Democratic candidate for governor, has said inequality starts at the federal level, where the tax code is riddled with loopholes.

    Coinciding with the Sanders visit and an upcoming state Democratic convention this weekend, opponents are sending out targeted emails and social media ads intended to sway party insiders.

    It’s not clear if the proposal will make the ballot — supporters must gather more than 870,000 petition signatures to place it before voters.

    The nascent contest already has drawn out a tangle of competing interests, with millions of dollars flowing into political committees.

    Newsom has long opposed state-level wealth taxes, believing such levies would be disadvantageous for the world’s fourth-largest economy. At a time when California is strapped for cash and he is considering a 2028 presidential run, he is trying to block the proposal before it reaches the ballot.

    Analysts say an exodus of billionaires could mean a loss of hundreds of millions of tax dollars for the nation’s most populous state. But supporters say the funding is needed to offset federal cuts that could leave many Californians without vital services.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fact-checking Kristi Noem on DHS role in elections

    [ad_1]

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made comments that could lead people to misinterpret her agency’s role in elections as she lobbied for legislation that would require photo ID to vote and documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration.

    “Although the Constitution gives states the primary responsibility for running their elections, Congress also gives authorities and duties to the federal government,” Noem said Feb. 13 at a press conference. “Now, as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, those authorities lie within my department. And the responsibility lies with me.” 

    Her comments came two days after House Republicans passed the SAVE America Act, legislation backed by President Donald Trump.

    Noem then described what she said is her role in elections:

    “I have the responsibility of not just pointing out different vulnerabilities that we may see in our election systems, but also with making sure that we’re putting forward mitigation measures that can be enacted at the state and local level to make sure that our elections are run correctly, that the votes are counted and tabulated and that the people that were elected were put into those positions.” 

    A phrase she later used about making sure “we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders” drew alarm from Democrats.

    After CNN’s Jake Tapper questioned her remarks about the “right people” voting, Noem responded on X: “We must build election infrastructure that makes it easy and secure for eligible American citizens to vote — while preventing noncitizens, including illegal aliens, from casting ballots. The choice of who to vote for is obviously up to the voters themselves.”

    States administer elections while Homeland Security plays a very limited part. We contacted Noem’s agency for evidence to support her statements and received no response.

    Homeland Security agency assists in protecting elections, but doesn’t operate them

    In 2018, Trump signed a law creating the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency within the Department of Homeland Security to protect critical infrastructure including elections from physical and cyber threats. The agency says such infrastructure is considered so vital that if incapacitated or destroyed it would harm security, national public health or safety.

    The agency works with state and local governments, election officials, federal partners and private sector partners to manage risks to voting sites, databases and equipment. 

    CISA provides these partners with quick security alerts, training, and physical and cybersecurity assessments of election facilities.

    Wendy Weiser, a lawyer at the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, pushed back on Noem’s remarks in an X post, saying Homeland Security is not in charge of elections.

    “There is no law that ‘delegates’ power over elections to DHS. None,” Weiser wrote. “There are laws that give DHS duties with respect to America’s ‘critical infrastructure,’ but they do not put DHS in charge of that infrastructure, and especially not elections.” 

    The agency offers risk assessments, advice and support, Weiser wrote, “but only on a voluntary basis.”

    The statute that created CISA says the agency “upon request, provide(s) analyses, expertise, and other technical assistance to critical infrastructure owners and operators” and when appropriate, shares it with other agencies.

    Because of CISA security training, Rhode Island election workers knew how to respond in September 2024 when an envelope containing white powder with the return address “U.S. Traitor Elimination Army” arrived at the state’s Board of Elections. CISA had already distributed physical security and cybersecurity checklists with tips about how to address such a threat. 

    Which agencies oversee vote counting and tabulation?

    Local governments tabulate votes.

    Noem correctly acknowledged that “the Constitution gives states the primary responsibility for running their elections.” The Constitution delegates to states the authority to set “the times, places and manner” of holding congressional elections, while Congress can pass election laws. 

    Congress has passed only a few statutes relating to state election administration, such as the National Voter Registration Act, which sets certain voter registration requirements such as compelling government offices to offer opportunities for people to register to vote.

    But “none confer oversight authority over state election administration” to Homeland Security, said Rebecca Green, a William and Mary Law School professor.

    CISA “has no independent authority or oversight role in how states run their elections,” Green said.

    Other federal agencies have limited tasks in elections. The Justice Department can file lawsuits alleging violations of federal laws while the Election Assistance Commission tests and certifies election equipment.

    RELATED: Does the US have stricter ID rules for buying beer than voting?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Subpoenas Issued in Inquiry on Response to 2016 Russian Election Interference, AP Sources Say

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department has issued new subpoenas in a Florida-based investigation into perceived adversaries of President Donald Trump and the U.S. government response to Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

    An initial wave of subpoenas in November asked recipients for documents related to the preparation of a U.S. intelligence community assessment that detailed a sweeping, multi-prong effort by Moscow to help Trump defeat Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

    Though the first subpoenas requested documents from the months surrounding the January 2017 publication of the Obama administration intelligence assessment, the latest subpoenas seek any records from the years since then, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press to discuss a non-public demand from investigators.

    The Justice Department declined to comment Tuesday.

    The subpoenas reflect continued investigative activity in one of several criminal inquiries the Justice Department has undertaken into Trump’s political opponents. An array of former intelligence and law enforcement officials have received subpoenas in the investigation. Lawyers for former CIA Director John Brennan, who helped oversee the drafting of the assessment and who has been called “crooked as hell” by Trump, have said they have been informed he is a target but have not been told of any “legally justifiable basis for undertaking this investigation.”

    The intelligence community assessment, published in the final days of the Obama administration, found that Russia had developed a “clear preference” for Trump in the 2016 election and that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an influence campaign with goals of undermining confidence in American democracy and harming Clinton’s chance for victory.

    That conclusion, and a related investigation into whether the 2016 Trump campaign colluded with Russia to sway the outcome of the election, have long been among the Republican president’s chief grievances and he has vowed retribution against the government officials involved in the inquiries. Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted by the Trump administration Justice Department last year on false statement and obstruction charges, but the case was later dismissed.

    Multiple government reports, including bipartisan congressional reviews and a criminal investigation by former special counsel Robert Mueller, have found that Russia interfered in Trump’s favor through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails as well as a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying American public opinion. Mueller’s report found that the Trump campaign actively welcomed the Russian help, but it did not establish that Russian operatives and Trump or his associates conspired to tip the election in his favor.

    The Trump administration has freshly scrutinized the intelligence community assessment in part because a classified version of it incorporated in its annex a summary of the “Steele dossier,” a compilation of Democratic-funded opposition research that was assembled by former British spy Christopher Steele and was later turned over to the FBI. That research into Trump’s potential links to Russia included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip, and Trump has long held up its weaknesses in an effort to discredit the entire Russia investigation.

    A declassified CIA tradecraft review ordered by current Director John Ratcliffe and released last July faults Brennan’s oversight of the assessment.

    The review does not challenge the conclusion of Russian election interference but chides Brennan for the fact that the classified version referenced the Steele dossier.

    Brennan testified to Congress, and also wrote in his memoir, that he was opposed to citing the dossier in the intelligence assessment since neither its substance nor sources had been validated, and he has said the dossier did not inform the judgments of the assessment. He maintains the FBI pushed for its inclusion.

    The new CIA review seeks to cast Brennan’s views in a different light, asserting that he “showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness” and brushed aside concerns over the dossier because he believed it conformed “with existing theories.” It quotes him, without context, as having stated in writing that “my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.”

    In a letter last December addressed to the chief judge of the Southern District of Florida, where the investigation is based, Brennan’s lawyers challenged the underpinnings of the investigation, questioning what basis prosecutors had for opening the inquiry in Florida and saying they had received no clarity from prosecutors about what potential crimes were even being investigated.

    “While it is mystifying how the prosecutors could possibly believe there is any legally justifiable basis for undertaking this investigation, they have done nothing to explain that mystery,” the lawyers said.

    Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report.

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • ‘ShamWow Guy’ reveals what is motivating him to run for Congress: ‘This woke mess won’t clean itself’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    EXCLUSIVE: Vince Offer Shlomi, more commonly known to the masses as the “ShamWow Guy,” is running for Congress in Texas as an anti-establishment Republican vowing to “clean the swamp.”

    If elected, Shlomi, who is beloved for his high-energy late-night ShamWow and “Slap Chop” commercials, has said he will “destroy wokeism,” quipping on his campaign website, “This woke mess won’t clean itself.”

    In a recent ad, Shlomi, 61, knocked 84-year-old incumbent Republican Rep. John Carter’s cognitive ability as “worse than Biden,” saying, “vote for me, a guy who’s not half dead.”

    Despite President Donald Trump endorsing Carter for re-election, Shlomi believes he would be a better ally in Congress for the president. He suggested Carter is no longer up for the job, likening his continued presence in the House of Representatives to a form of elder abuse.

    “He’s not a fighter,” said Shlomi, adding, “It’s not that he’s old, but his capacity is lacking and Trump doesn’t know that.”

    TEXAS DEMOCRAT BLASTED FOR TELLING LATINO, BLACK, ASIAN PEOPLE TO UNITE AGAINST ‘OPPRESSOR,’ ‘TAKE OVER’ US

    Left: Rep. John Carter, R-Texas. Right: Media personality and Republican congressional candidate Vince Shlomi “ShamWow.” (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Vince Shlomi Campaign)

    After years in the media world, Shlomi said he decided to break into politics after “seeing the decline of the civilization.”

    “I’m seeing people not standing up to things. Not thinking about God … kind of afraid, they’re kind of intimidated, walking on eggshells,” he explained. “I feel that we need to fight a little bit stronger on just the commonsense American value ideas.”

    “I want to bring wholesomeness back to America,” he said.

    He also framed his candidacy as standing up to the GOP establishment, something he believes has already put a target on his back.

    He believes that “someone” in the GOP deleted his nickname from the ballot to reduce his name recognition. Candidates using nicknames on the ballot is very common but nicknames tied to brand names or products are rarer.

    CONSERVATIVE FIREBRAND VOWS TO PURGE ‘RINOS’ IN BATTLE TO REPLACE RETIRING VERN BUCHANAN IN OPEN FLORIDA SEAT

    Vince Shlomi in a ShamWow commercial

    Vince Offer Shlomi is best known for his high-energy television commercials marketing the “ShamWow.” (Vince Shlomi Campaign)

    “I think they’re trying to hoodwink the voters from not knowing who I am,” said Shlomi, adding, “Honestly, it’s a swampy move, and that’s one of the things I’ll be working on when I get to Congress.”

    Though describing his election effort as an “uphill battle,” Shlomi said he believes it is part of a “higher purpose.”

    “The bottom line is I want to help clean the swamp,” he said. “I’ve just seen the world, I’m looking at athletes, and they’re not standing up for kids, or standing up for girls, and they just go with whatever pays the most money. So, I just thought, you know what? I’m not a brave person, but I just can’t let this happen.”

    TURNING POINT ISSUES MAJOR ENDORSEMENT IN CRITICAL SENATE RACE AS TRUMP HINTS AT WEIGHING IN

    A split of the U.S. Capitol building and Vince Shlomi "ShamWow"

    Television commercial star Vince Shlomi, also known as “ShamWow,” is running for U.S. Congress in Texas. (Jason Reed/REUTERS; Vince Shlomi Campaign)

    Regarding Shlomi’s ballot name, Abraham George, chairman of the Republican Party of Texas, told Fox News Digital that “the National Republican Congressional Committee challenged Mr. Shlomi’s ballot nickname – ‘ShamWow’” and “after considering the law, including Texas Election Code section 52.031, the Republican Party of Texas determined that this challenge was well taken and Mr. Shlomi’s ballot nickname was eliminated. Nicknames that indicate an economic affiliation are impermissible by law.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Carter’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rubio Meets Orbán in Budapest as US and Hungary Are to Sign a Civilian Nuclear Pact

    [ad_1]

    BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in the Hungarian capital on Monday for meetings with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his government during which they plan to sign a civilian-nuclear cooperation agreement heralded by U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Trump has been outspoken in his support for the nationalist Orbán in the Hungarian leader’s bid for reelection in two months. Orbán and his Fidesz party are facing their most serious challenge in the April 12 vote since the right-wing populist retook power in 2010.

    Led by Euroskeptic populists who oppose support for Ukraine and vocally back Trump, Slovakia and Hungary represent friendly territory for Rubio as he pushes to shore up energy agreements with both Central European countries.

    Widely considered Russian President Vladimir Putin’s most reliable advocate in the European Union, Orbán has maintained warm relations with the Kremlin despite its war against Ukraine while currying favor with Trump and his MAGA — short for the 2016 Trump campaign slogan “Make America Great Again” — movement.

    Many in MAGA and the broader conservative world view Hungary as a shining example of successful conservative nationalism, despite the erosion of its democratic institutions and its status as one of the EU’s poorest countries.

    In a post on his Truth Social site earlier this month, Trump endorsed Orbán for the coming elections and called him a “truly strong and powerful Leader” and “a true friend, fighter, and WINNER.”

    Trump has praised Orbán’s firm opposition to immigration, exemplified by a fence his government erected on Hungary’s southern border in 2015 as hundreds of thousands of refugees fled Syria and other countries in the Middle East and Africa.

    Other U.S. conservatives admire Orbán’s hostility to LGBTQ+ rights. His government last year banned the popular Budapest Pride celebration and allowed facial recognition technology to be used to identify anyone participating despite the ban. It has also effectively banned same-sex adoption and same-sex marriage, and disallowed transgender individuals from changing their sex in official documents.

    Orbán has remained firmly committed to purchasing Russian energy despite efforts by the EU to wean off such supplies, and received an exemption from U.S. sanctions on Russian energy after a November meeting in the White House with Trump.

    Apparently trusting that his political and personal affinity with the U.S. leader could pay even greater dividends, Orbán and his government have sought to woo Trump to Hungary before the pivotal April 12 elections — hoping such a high-profile visit and endorsement would push Orbán, who is trailing in most polls, over the finish line.

    Budapest has hosted several annual iterations of the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC, and another was hastily rescheduled this year to fall in March, just before Hungary’s elections.

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Feb. 2026

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Dolton Trustee Kiana Belcher challenges appointee Kisha McCaskill for 5th District Cook County Board seat

    [ad_1]

    Dolton Trustee Kiana Belcher is running for the 5th District Cook County Board seat against Harvey Park District Executive Director Kisha McCaskill, who was appointed to the position last year, in the March 17 Democratic primary.

    The seat was previously held by Monica Gordon, who was elected in 2022. It represents parts of the South Side and large sections of the south and southwest suburbs and includes portions of Bloom, Bremen, Calumet, Lake, Rich, Thornton and Worth townships.

    Gordon resigned in 2024 after being elected as Cook County clerk in a special election, and McCaskill was appointed to fill her seat in January 2025.

    “Right now, that means that it’s two people on the ballot that have never been on the ballot for that seat,” Belcher said. “So we’re gonna let the residents decide.”

    Kiana Belcher

    Belcher was elected a Dolton trustee in 2021. She was reelected in 2025 as part of now-Mayor Jason House’s Clean House slate in opposition to former Mayor Tiffany Henyard.

    “I think I may have a little bit more visibility because of the whole Dolton saga,” Belcher said. “People have seen that I don’t mind going against the grain, I don’t mind standing up for my residents, and I’ll do the same thing at the county level.”

    Belcher said she wanted to be an advocate for the communities of the south suburbs and make sure they get their fair share of county resources.

    “For a very long time the Southland has been underserved. And when I say underserved, most of the times, when knocking on doors, people don’t even know what the commissioner does,” Belcher said.

    Proper allocation of county resources is especially important now, with federal funds being cut, Belcher said.

    “The county has a $10 billion budget,” Belcher said. “We need to make sure that in the Southland, that someone is advocating for us, making sure to say like, hey, with all these water main breaks, safer water is very important, and most of our infrastructure is 80 years old.”

    Dolton Trustee Kiana Belcher speaks during a Village Board meeting Nov. 6, 2024. (Vincent D. Johnson / for the Daily Southtown)

    If elected, her first priority would be learning how to work collaboratively with the other 16 commissioners.

    “Getting acclimated would be first, because you can’t go in there and say, ‘Oh, you’re going to do this,’ or ‘Oh, let’s work on this’ without being acclimated to what’s actually going on,” Belcher said.

    Both Belcher and McCaskill mentioned high property taxes as a priority.

    Like McCaskill, Belcher was one of the five candidates who applied to fill the county commissioner seat following Gordon’s resignation. She said she felt she could benefit more people by working on the county level. Each Cook County district represents about 300,000 residents.

    “As a trustee, at the Dolton level, it’s good to be a representation of your community,” Belcher said. “But at the county level, you have a substantial amount more people that would be able to benefit as long as they have an advocate there to make sure that they have someone to speak up for them.”

    Kisha McCaskill

    McCaskill has been executive director of the Harvey Park District since 2015. She said her desire to serve on the county board came from her experience as a lifelong Harvey resident.

    “Just seeing the lack of care, just the lack of resources and lack of opportunity brought to my specific city and across the Southland,” McCaskill said. “That was what catapulted me to want to do it.”

    McCaskill said her priorities are addressing high property taxes and housing instability in the Southland.

    “We have a situation called the grey wave, where we’re seeing more and more seniors that are basically not able to live in their own homes,” McCaskill said.

    She said she’s proud of her work in the year she’s spent on the board.

    “I enjoy what I do because I’ve been able to be very effective,” McCaskill said. “Along with my fellow commissioners, of course, we’ve passed over 300 pieces of legislation, or resolutions, specifically for health care, affordable housing, infrastructure, economic development, and most importantly funding, specifically for small organizations and community-based organizations.”

    Kisha McCaskill speaks to Cook County Board members after being sworn in Jan. 16, 2025, as commissioner in the 5th District. (STH Media)

    STH Media

    Kisha McCaskill speaks to Cook County Board members after being sworn in Jan. 16, 2025, as commissioner in the 5th District. (STH Media)

    When she was appointed, McCaskill said her priorities included expanding vaccine access in the south suburbs and securing a Level I trauma center for the region, which represents the highest state-certified level of trauma care.

    She said in the year since, she’s worked to expand health care services offered by clinics in Ford Heights, Robbins and Blue Island.

    “Some of the things that are being done over at Blue Island (Health Center) for example, we’ve expanded our material services,” McCaskill said. “With Ford Heights, we’ve actually expanded immunization care, where we have outdoor events and more outreach into the churches and the community.”

    Securing a Level I trauma center has been more difficult, she said. Improving trauma care in the south suburbs was also a goal of Gordon, her predecessor.

    “We really don’t have the dynamics for that right now,” McCaskill said. “But the conversations are still taking place, so I’m still optimistic about it.”

    McCaskill said she tries to think about benefiting neighboring districts and the region as a whole, not just the 5th District.

    “When we look at economic development, our development has to be something that’s more regional,” McCaskill said. “That’s what people need to see, that it’s not just about a few being taken care of, but it’s about all of us having the opportunity.”

    elewis@chicagotribune.com

    [ad_2]

    Evy Lewis

    Source link

  • Fetterman slams Democrats’ ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ voter ID rhetoric as party unity fractures

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., is continuing his streak of breaking with his party — this time on voter ID legislation gaining momentum in the Senate.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Democrats have near-unanimously rejected the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, election integrity legislation that made its way through the House earlier this week.

    Schumer has dubbed the legislation “Jim Crow 2.0,” arguing it would suppress voters rather than encourage more secure elections.

    COLLINS BOOSTS REPUBLICAN VOTER ID EFFORT, BUT WON’T SCRAP FILIBUSTER

     Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., speaks to a reporter as he arrives in the U.S. Capitol for a vote on Wednesday, December 3, 2025. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    But Fetterman, who has repeatedly rejected his party’s messaging and positions, pushed back on Schumer’s framing of the bill.

    “I would never refer to the SAVE Act as like Jim Crow 2.0 or some kind of mass conspiracy,” Fetterman told Fox News’ Kayleigh McEnany on “Saturday in America.”

    “But that’s part of the debate that we were having here in the Senate right now,” he continued. “And I don’t call people names or imply that it’s something gross about the terrible history of Jim Crow.”

    The bill would require voters to present photo identification before casting ballots, require proof of citizenship in person when registering to vote and mandate states remove non-citizens from voter rolls.

    MURKOWSKI BREAKS WITH GOP ON VOTER ID, SAYS PUSH ‘IS NOT HOW WE BUILD TRUST’

    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, in the Senate subway

    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, announced her support for the SAVE America Act, but won’t go as far as to nuke the Senate filibuster.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    Momentum is building among Republicans. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, became the 50th member of the conference to back the legislation. But Senate Democrats have all but guaranteed its demise in the upper chamber, via the filibuster.

    Fetterman would not say whether he supports the bill outright. However, he noted that “84% of Americans have no problem with presenting IDs to vote.”

    “So it’s not like a radical idea,” Fetterman said. “It’s not something — and there already are many states that show basic IDs. So that’s where we are in the Senate.”

    HARDLINE CONSERVATIVES DOUBLE DOWN TO SAVE THE SAVE ACT

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Democrats are ready to buck the SAVE Act.  (Kevin Dietsch/Getty)

    Even if Fetterman were to support the bill on the floor, it is unlikely to pass without more significant procedural changes.

    There are currently not enough votes to overcome the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster threshold.

    Fetterman is also not keen on eliminating the filibuster — a position shared by most Senate Republicans.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    He noted that Senate Democrats once favored scrapping the filibuster but now want to preserve it while in the minority in a Republican-controlled government.

    “I campaigned on it, too,” Fetterman said. “I mean we were very wrong about that to nuke the filibuster. And we should really humble ourselves and remind people that we wanted to eliminate it — and now we love it.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Beacon Hill targets AI in political advertising

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Doctored photos and video footage coupled with ads twisting candidates’ words have been used for decades in political campaigns, but the rise of artificial intelligence has elevated such deceptive tactics to a new level.

    That has prompted a bipartisan push on Beacon Hill for restrictions on the misuse of the technology to sway voters and bash political opponents.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmp A2:C @7 3:==D E92E 4=62C65 E96 s6>@4C2E:44@?EC@==65 w@FD6 (2JD 2?5 |62?D r@>>:EE66 @? %F6D52J H:E9 2 72G@C23=6 G@E6 H@F=5 C6BF:C6 42>A2:8?D E@ 5:D4=@D6 E96 FD6 @7 px 😕 A@=:E:42= 25G6CE:D6>6?ED 2?5 32? “5646AE:G6” 4@>>F?:42E:@?D 😕 42>A2:8? 25D h_ 52JD 367@C6 2? 6=64E:@?]k^Am

    kAmx? 2 ;@:?E DE2E6>6?E[ w@FD6 $A62<6C #@? |2C:2?@[ s”F:?4J[ 2?5 w@FD6 (2JD 2?5 |62?D r92:C>2? p2C@? |:49=6H:EK[ sq@DE@?[ D2:5 w@FD6 s6>@4C2ED A=2? E@ AFE 3@E9 3:==D FA 7@C 5632E6 2?5 2 G@E6 2E 2 7@C>2= D6DD:@? (65?6D52J]k^Am

    kAm“pD 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 4@?E:?F6D E@ C6D92A6 @FC 64@?@>J 2?5 >2?J 2DA64ED @7 @FC 52:=J =:G6D[ =2H>2<6CD 92G6 2 C6DA@?D:3:=:EJ E@ 6?DFC6 E92E px 5@6D ?@E 7FCE96C E96 DAC625 @7 >:D:?7@C>2E:@? 😕 @FC A@=:E:4D[” E96J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“w@FD6 =6256CD9:A 4@?E:?F6D E@ 92G6 AC@5F4E:G6 4@?G6CD2E:@?D H:E9 E96 >6>36CD9:A @? E9:D :DDF6[ 2?5 H6 =@@< 7@CH2C5 E@ A2DD:?8 E9:D :>A@CE2?E =68:D=2E:@? @? (65?6D52J]”k^Am

    kAm~?6 3:==[ 7:=65 3J #6A] %C:4:2 u2C=6Jq@FG:6C[ s!:EED7:6=5[ H@F=5 AC@9:3:E 2?J@?6 CF??:?8 7@C 6=64E65 @77:46 7C@> 5:DEC:3FE:?8 5646AE:G6 @C 7C2F5F=6?E “DJ?E96E:4” 25D H:E9:? h_ 52JD @7 2? 6=64E:@? 😕 H9:49 E96 42?5:52E6 @C E96:C A@=:E:42= A2CEJ H:== 2AA62C @? DE2E6 @C =@42= 32==@ED] ‘:@=2E@CD H@F=5 7246 7:?6D @7 FA E@ S`[___ F?56C E96 AC@A@D2=]k^Am

    kAmp?@E96C 3:==[ 7:=65 3J w@FD6 |:?@C:EJ {6256C qC25 y@?6D[ #}@CE9 #625:?8[ H@F=5 C6BF:C6 A@=:E:42= 42>A2:8?D E@ 5:D4=@D6 E96 FD6 @7 2?J px E649?@=@8J E@ 86?6C2E6 %'[ 5:8:E2= @C AC:?E 25D E2C86E:?8 E96:C @AA@?6?ED]k^Am

    kAm!@=:E:42= @3D6CG6CD 2?E:4:A2E6 2? @?D=2F89E @7 D@A9:DE:42E65 px86?6C2E65 G:56@ @C 2F5:@ 4=:AD 😕 AC6D:56?E:2= 25D 7@C E6=6G:D:@? 2?5 D@4:2= >65:2 D:E6D 29625 @7 E96 A:G@E2= }@G6>36C >:5E6C> 6=64E:@? H96? 4@?EC@= @7 r@?8C6DD H:== 36 FA 7@C 8C23D]k^Am

    kAmp a_ac C6A@CE :DDF65 3J E96 r@?8C6DD:@?2= #6D62C49 $6CG:46[ 2 AF3=:4 A@=:4J C6D62C49 2C> @7 r@?8C6DD[ H2C?65 E92E 566A72<6D 4@F=5 2=D@ 36 86?6C2E65 3J C@8F6 4@F?EC:6D @C 7@C6:8? 25G6CD2C:6D E@ >655=6 😕 E96 FA4@>:?8 AC6D:56?E:2= 6=64E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“$E2E6 25G6CD2C:6D @C A@=:E:42==J >@E:G2E65 :?5:G:5F2=D 4@F=5 C6=62D6 72=D:7:65 G:56@D @7 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D @C @E96C AF3=:4 7:8FC6D >2<:?8 :?46?5:2CJ 4@>>6?ED @C 3692G:?8 :?2AAC@AC:2E6=J[” E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD HC@E6] “s@:?8 D@ 4@F=5[ 😕 EFC?[ 6C@56 AF3=:4 ECFDE[ ?682E:G6=J 27764E AF3=:4 5:D4@FCD6[ @C 6G6? DH2J 2? 6=64E:@?]”k^Am

    kAmx? a_ac[ E96 u656C2= t=64E:@? r@>>:DD:@? G@E65 E@ 368:? E96 AC@46DD @7 C68F=2E:?8 px86?6C2E65 566A72<6D 😕 A@=:E:42= 25D 29625 @7 E96 a_ac 6=64E:@?] %96 A2?6= 96=5 2 e_52J AF3=:4 962C:?8 AC@46DD[ 3FE 92D J6E E@ E2<6 24E:@? @? 2?J ?6H C68F=2E:@?D] p =24< @7 utr 4@>>:DD:@?6CD >62?D E96 A2?6= 5@6D ?@E 92G6 2 BF@CF> E@ >66E @C G@E6 @? D2?4E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmp 8C@FA @7 4@?8C6DD:@?2= =2H>2<6CD[ :?4=F5:?8 |2DD249FD6EED #6AD] $6E9 |@F=E@? 2?5 y:> |4v@G6C?[ HC@E6 E@ E96 utr 😕 yF=J a_ac[ FC8:?8 E96 286?4J E@ 24E @? 2 A6E:E:@? 7C@> 8@@5 8@G6C?>6?E 8C@FAD E@ D6E C6DEC:4E:@?D @? 566A 72<6 A@=:E:42= 25G6CE:D:?8]k^Am

    kAm“”F:4<=J 6G@=G:?8 px E649?@=@8J >2<6D :E :?4C62D:?8=J 5:77:4F=E 7@C G@E6CD E@ 244FC2E6=J :56?E:7J 7C2F5F=6?E G:56@ 2?5 2F5:@ >2E6C:2=[ H9:49 😀 :?4C62D:?8=J EC@F3=:?8 😕 E96 4@?E6IE @7 42>A2:8? 25G6CE:D6>6?ED[” E96J HC@E6]k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • State board investigating allegations of misconduct by voter registration-drive workers

    [ad_1]

    The North Carolina State Board of Elections is  investigating allegations of misconduct by voter registration-drive workers. 

    The board said Friday that it received complaints alleging that workers have been impersonating state or county elections officials in Brunswick, Buncombe, Chowan, Haywood, Nash, Scotland, and Wake counties.

    The board said it received complaints of people falsely telling voters that they must re-register to vote to cast a ballot in future elections. Under the law, however, voters who are already registered are not required to re-register unless they have moved to a new county. Voters who move to a new address in the same county or wish to change their name or party affiliation should submit a new voter registration application to update their voter record, elections officials said. 

    Elections officials also received complaints of people going door-to-door, falsely identifying themselves as county or state election workers. Government election workers do not go door-to-door for any reason, the board said. 

    The board is also investigating allegations of voter registration applications turned into county boards of elections with missing or inaccurate voter information, such as a wrong birthdate or a voter identification number different that doesn’t match what’s on file with state elections officials. It is a felony to falsify a voter registration form, officials said. 

    “When workers involved in voter drives falsify or alter information on registration forms, it can cause problems for innocent voters at the polls,” Sam Hayes, the director of the state elections board, said in a statement. “This is unacceptable and hurts voter confidence.”

    The board regularly investigates allegations of fraud or misconduct. In October 2022, the state board investigated complaints from voters who said they were confused by mailers that included inaccurate information about whether they voted in the 2018 or 2020 elections.

    Tips for Voters

    The state board on Friday provided tips and reminders for voters as the March 3 primary election nears: 

    • All voters can check their registration status on the state board’s website to double check if they are registered or see if they need to re-register
    • Voters registering to vote at a registration drive don’t have to return the form to the worker at the drive. Voters can deliver the form in person or by mail to their county board of elections.
    • County and state elections officials do not go door-to-door. The board asked voters to report instances of home visits by people identifying themselves as election officials.
    • Voters can always ask voter registration workers for their information to verify their identities to make sure they are actually working for election officials.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump boasts of over $1.5B in political funds, which could rock the midterms

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has bragged about building a political war chest exceeding $1.5 billion — a staggering sum that he can wield at his whim to shape November’s midterms and the 2028 race to succeed him.

    Trump’s stockpile — which dwarfs any amounts raised by his predecessors in their second terms — is not easy to precisely calculate given that much of it is being collected by groups that aren’t required to file regular financial disclosures.

    Current and former staffers, as well as others in Trump’s orbit, wouldn’t say exactly where his political bank account stands six months after the president announced on social media that he’d raised, just since Election Day 2024, “in various forms and political entities, in excess of 1.5 Billion Dollars.”

    But what is not in question is that it represents a mountain of cash that could reshape Republican politics for years to come — if he chooses. He’s been reluctant to spend money on other people’s races in the past, and he’s even found ways to funnel some cash to his own businesses.

    The $1.5 billion Trump claimed is roughly equal to what he and outside groups spent on his successful 2024 reelection bid, according to OpenSecrets, a nonpartisan group that tracks political spending.

    By comparison, Democratic President Joe Biden’s various super PACs, political groups and nonprofits, as well as the Democratic National Committee, raised roughly $97 million during his first year in office, according to public disclosures. That’s only about 7% of Trump’s total, and Biden was gearing up for a reelection run Trump isn’t allowed to make.

    “I think a lot of people are asking, ‘What is it all for?’” said Saurav Ghosh, federal campaign finance reform director at the Washington nonprofit Campaign Legal Center.

    People close to Trump say the main benefit of all that cash is unmatched influence heading into November. They insist Trump is eager to help Republicans so his political agenda isn’t stymied, like when Democratic victories derailed his first-term agenda after 2018’s midterms. His stockpile has helped the GOP build a sizable cash advantage over Democrats ahead of November, at least so far.

    “One of the main reasons a lame-duck president might want to amass this much money is to maintain political relevance,” said Daniel Weiner, a former Federal Election Commission attorney and current director of the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. “Certainly he’s been far more aggressive about this than any of his predecessors.”

    Trump on Wednesday vowed political consequences for Republicans opposing his tariff policies, and could spend big to hurt them in GOP primaries. Chief among his targets is Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who opposed Trump’s tax and spend package and defied the White House in helping force the release of federal files on Jeffrey Epstein.

    Trump has also endorsed a primary opponent of Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., after he voted to convict Trump during his 2021 impeachment trial over the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol. Still, the extent to which Trump will open his pocketbook in congressional races remains to be seen.

    “What I’m a little surprised about is that Trump has not leveraged — at least overtly — the money he controls going into that election on his congressional agenda,” said Jason Roe, a Republican strategist in Michigan.

    Indeed, Trump has a history of not spending big on races where he isn’t running. In 2018, Trump’s America First Action super PAC spent less than $30 million — a pittance given that super PACs spent about $820 million that cycle, according to OpenSecrets.

    He doesn’t always follow through on his threats, either. Despite pledging to travel to Alaska to help defeat Republican Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski in 2022, a Trump-affiliated PAC instead gave $1.5 million to a group opposing her. Murkowski was reelected anyway.

    The president also has made no major moves so far to oppose state lawmakers in Indiana who refused to back new congressional maps championed by the White House.

    Trump’s campaign bank account also would let him play a decisive role in the next presidential race. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are the early favorites, with Trump suggesting pairing them on a GOP ticket he says would be formidable.

    Much of Trump’s political cash comes from the MAGA Inc. super PAC, which raised $100-plus million in the last six months of 2025 and entered this year with more than $300 million. The Republican National Committee reported raising $172 million last year.

    There’s also a constellation of pro-Trump nonprofits, including Securing American Greatness, which are only required to release limited information about their finances. Donations to one Trump entity can be moved through the various nonprofits and super PACs, making it difficult to track what’s spent where.

    “Because there are virtually no restrictions on what super PAC money can be used for, it essentially can be operated as a slush fund at the disposal of whoever controls it,” Weiner said.

    There are many ways Trump has used political funds to enrich his businesses in the past, including billing his campaign for the use of his own airplane. He could also stage political events at his properties in Florida or New Jersey, or his golf club outside Washington.

    At least $26 million has been spent by conservative groups and Republican committees at Trump properties since 2015 — and the actual figure is likely higher since some groups don’t have to offer detailed spending figures.

    Though federal rules govern the ways political donations can be spent, they can also be skirted. In 2020, Trump’s campaign paid tens of millions of dollars to limited liability companies controlled by aides, a move that satisfied federal disclosure rules, but masked the ultimate recipient of the money. In 2024, his political operation clawed back millions of dollars in donations it made to a super PAC supporting Trump’s run and used the money to instead pay legal bills that mounted after his indictments in four federal criminal cases while also facing civil trials.

    “As with so many things Donald Trump, he is sometimes pushing the envelope on what’s permitted, sometimes blowing right through what are pretty clear legal limits,” said Ghosh, of the Campaign Legal Center.

    Trump’s fundraising efforts are tireless. The day after his 2024 election win, he ordered staff to begin fundraising anew, and he’s since attended frequent fundraisers. His allies send out emails seeking donations constantly, often multiple times daily.

    “I’m sitting here. Alone. In the war room. Fighting for you,” Trump wrote in one such message last month. In another, a Trump-affiliated group tried to spur on donors to give by asking, “Does ICE need to come and track you down?”

    During his first presidential run, Trump relied heavily on small donations. But much of his operation now relies on large checks from uber-wealthy donors and well-connected businesses.

    Greg Brockman, co-founder of OpenAI, and his wife, Anna, donated $25 million to MAGA Inc. last year, as Trump talked constantly about helping ensure U.S. companies dominate the artificial intelligence field globally.

    Other big donations came from crypto interests that have had federal investigations dropped and big tobacco companies hoping to ease regulations.

    The parents of Howard Brodie, Trump’s ambassador to Finland, donated $500,000 to MAGA Inc., while Isabela Herrera gave $3.5 million before her father, Venezuelan banker Julio Herrera Velutini, was pardoned by Trump on bribery charges.

    “Each of these wealthy individuals. corporations, they are ponying up for a purpose,” Ghosh said. “What we’re seeing with Trump’s administration is just an unprecedented level of pay-to-play.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As electricity costs rise, everyone wants data centers to pick up their tab. But how?

    [ad_1]

    HARRISBURG, Pa. — As outrage spreads over energy-hungry data centers, politicians from President Donald Trump to local lawmakers have found rare bipartisan agreement over insisting that tech companies — and not regular people — must foot the bill for the exorbitant amount of electricity required for artificial intelligence.

    But that might be where the agreement ends.

    The price of powering data centers has become deeply intertwined with concerns over the cost of living, a dominant issue in the upcoming midterm elections that will determine control of Congress and governors’ offices.

    Some efforts to address the challenge may be coming too late, with energy costs on the rise. And even though tech giants are pledging to pay their “fair share,” there’s little consensus on what that means.

    “‘Fair share’ is a pretty squishy term, and so it’s something that the industry likes to say because ‘fair’ can mean different things to different people,” said Ari Peskoe, who directs the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard University.

    It’s a shift from last year, when states worked to woo massive data center projects and Trump directed his administration to do everything it could to get them electricity. Now there’s a backlash as towns fight data center projects and some utilities’ electricity bills have risen quickly.

    Anger over the issue has already had electoral consequences, with Democrats ousting two Republicans from Georgia’s utility regulatory commission in November.

    “Voters are already connecting the experience of these facilities with their electricity costs and they’re going to increasingly want to know how government is going to navigate that,” said Christopher Borick, a pollster and director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion.

    Data centers are sprouting across the U.S., as tech giants scramble to meet worldwide demand for chatbots and other generative AI products that require large amounts of computing power to train and operate.

    The buildings look like giant warehouses, some dwarfing the footprints of factories and stadiums. Some need more power than a small city, more than any utility has ever supplied to a single user, setting off a race to build more power plants.

    The demand for electricity can have a ripple effect that raises prices for everyone else. For example, if utilities build more power plants or transmission lines to serve them, the cost can be spread across all ratepayers.

    Concerns have dovetailed with broader questions about the cost of living, as well as fears about the powerful influence of tech companies and the impact of artificial intelligence.

    Trump continues to embrace artificial intelligence as a top economic and national security priority, although he seemed to acknowledge the backlash last month by posting on social media that data centers “must ‘pay their own way.’”

    At other times, he has brushed concerns aside, declaring that tech giants are building their own power plants, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright contends that data centers don’t inflate electricity bills — disputing what consumer advocates and independent analysts say.

    Some states and utilities have started to identify ways to get data centers to pay for their costs.

    They’ve required tech companies to buy electricity in long-term contracts, pay for the power plants and transmission upgrades they need and make big down payments in case they go belly-up or decide later they don’t need as much electricity.

    But it might be more complicated than that. Those rules can’t fix the short-term problem of ravenous demand for electricity that is outpacing the speed of power plant construction, analysts say.

    “What do you do when Big Tech, because of the very profitable nature of these data centers, can simply outbid grandma for power in the short run?” Abe Silverman, a former utility regulatory lawyer and an energy researcher at Johns Hopkins University. “That is, I think, going to be the real challenge.”

    Some consumer advocates say tech companies’ fair share should also include the rising cost of electricity, grid equipment or natural gas that’s driven by their demand.

    In Oregon, which passed a law to protect smaller ratepayers from data centers’ power costs, a consumer advocacy group is jousting with the state’s largest utility, Portland General Electric, over its plan on how to do that.

    Meanwhile, consumer advocates in various states — including Indiana, Georgia and Missouri — are warning that utilities could foist the cost of data center-driven buildouts onto regular ratepayers there.

    Utilities have pledged to ensure electric rates are fair. But in some places it may be too late.

    For instance, in the mid-Atlantic grid territory from New Jersey to Illinois, consumer advocates and analysts have pegged billions of dollars in rate increases hitting the bills of regular Americans on data center demand.

    Legislation, meanwhile, is flooding into Congress and statehouses to regulate data centers.

    Democrats’ bills in Congress await Republican cosponsors, while lawmakers in a number of states are floating moratoriums on new data centers, drafting rules for regulators to shield regular ratepayers and targeting data center tax breaks and utility profits.

    Governors — including some who worked to recruit data centers to their states — are increasingly talking tough.

    Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat running for reelection this year, wants to impose a penny-a-gallon water fee on data centers and get rid of the sales tax exemption there that most states offer data centers. She called it a $38 million “corporate handout.”

    “It’s time we make the booming data center industry work for the people of our state, rather than the other way around,” she said in her state-of-the-state address.

    Energy costs are projected to keep rising in 2026.

    Republicans in Washington are pointing the finger at liberal state energy policies that favor renewable energy, suggesting they have driven up transmission costs and frayed supply by blocking fossil fuels.

    “Americans are not paying higher prices because of data centers. There’s a perception there, and I get the perception, but it’s not actually true,” said Wright, Trump’s energy secretary, at a news conference earlier this month.

    The struggle to assign blame was on display last week at a four-hour U.S. House subcommittee hearing with members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

    Republicans encouraged FERC members to speed up natural gas pipeline construction while Democrats defended renewable energy and urged FERC to limit utility profits and protect residential ratepayers from data center costs.

    FERC’s chair, Laura Swett, told Rep. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio, that she believes data center operators are willing to cover their costs and understand that it’s important to have community support.

    “That’s not been our experience,” Landsman responded, saying projects in his district are getting tax breaks, sidestepping community opposition and costing people money. “Ultimately, I think we have to get to a place where they pay everything.”

    ___

    Follow Marc Levy on X at: https://x.com/timelywriter

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • In North Carolina, a tight primary could upend the balance of conservative power

    [ad_1]

    ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, N.C. — Phil Berger entered the small auditorium at Rockingham Community College and prepared to defend his record to a crowd of MAGA-hat-wearing constituents, with just weeks to go before the primary for his North Carolina Senate seat.

    On paper, his odds looked good. He had represented these voters for more than two decades in the state Senate and had led the chamber ever since Republicans took over in 2011. He had built a political machine that in many ways now runs the state. And his clamp on policy decisions, as well as his network of lobbyists and wealthy donors, had turned him into North Carolina’s most powerful politician, making his seat virtually untouchable.

    But at the conservative candidates forum at the college in Wentworth, North Carolina, last week, there was a popular sheriff in town eager to take down Berger, representing the first time in years that the Senate leader’s reign has been threatened.

    “Too many times we elect officials that forget who their bosses are, and whom they serve,” the sheriff, Sam Page of Rockingham County, North Carolina, told the crowd, flashing his trademark cowboy hat, gray mustache and thick glasses. Several nodded in approval.

    To much of North Carolina, the most talked-about race so far this year has not been the high-profile contest for U.S. Senate nor one of the few potentially competitive races in congressional districts across the swing state. Instead, all eyes have zeroed in on a surprisingly tight Republican primary on March 3 for state Senate District 26, a rural stretch of land in the north, that could upend the balance of conservative power in North Carolina.

    “North Carolina hasn’t seen a primary race like this in decades, and probably hasn’t ever seen one like this where the stakes could not be higher,” said Andrew Dunn, a GOP strategist and the publisher of Longleaf Politics, a conservative newsletter. “If Sen. Berger loses, that creates a gigantic power vacuum in North Carolina politics, and it’s unclear who would fill that.”

    President Donald Trump endorsed Berger last year shortly after the Senate leader spearheaded the approval of a new congressional map that is likely to give Republicans an extra U.S. House seat this year. Berger has denied accusations that he pushed for redistricting to secure Trump’s approval.

    But even the endorsement has underscored the peculiarities of the race and has mirrored the ways some voters feel about both candidates. Trump has also been friendly with Page, whom he has described as “right out of central casting.” In December, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he wanted Page “to come work for us in Washington, D.C., rather than further considering a run against Phil — Both are such outstanding people!”

    For many in rural Rockingham County, Page — who has served the county for almost three decades — has been a near-constant affable figure steeped in Trump world. He texts with Tom Homan, the White House border czar, and jokes that the way to fix U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s image is to add “National” to its name so the acronym spells “NICE.”

    The sheriff, whose phone wallpaper is a photo of him smiling next to the president, said in an interview that he had been watching a comedy channel on TV when Trump called to tell him that he wanted to endorse Berger but that “I want to endorse you, too.”

    Page told the president that he appreciated the job offer, but he was “committed to the people” of Rockingham and Guilford counties. There, billboards, TV commercials and flyers advertise Trump’s adoration for Berger and portray the sheriff as “shady,” calling him Sombrero Sam and saying he is weak on immigration.

    The sheriff said those ads were a farce.

    “If you see me toting a shotgun over my shoulder, if you see me riding a horse, or if you see me standing with Donald Trump, it’s not AI — it’s real,” he said. “I am who I am.”

    Some of Berger’s allies privately acknowledge that despite all those flyers and hours of ads, the longtime sheriff still has him on the ropes. It has become a campaign for political survival, one that is testing the antiestablishment restlessness coursing through voters of all stripes.

    “The way I’ve described it is, I’ve had the opportunity to exercise political muscles that I haven’t had to exercise in a while,” Berger said in an interview, clenching his fists as if he were flexing. “And it feels good.”

    Two Very Different Candidates

    In both personality and campaign style, the sheriff and the senator are worlds apart. Page, typically wearing some kind of vest and boots, is extroverted. Berger, rarely seen without a suit, appears more reserved, working his power behind the scenes.

    Since at least 2012, Page has been hawkish on immigration, even visiting the border. Berger has mainly prioritized fiscal policy and building up the private sector, which his supporters say has contributed to North Carolina’s being named by CNBC as the best state for business for three of the last four years.

    Page says his favorite campaign strategy is visiting Walmart and Sam’s Club stores to shake hands. His vehicle is outfitted with campaign stickers. Berger’s campaign and organizations supporting him have flooded TV airwaves and are likely to spend millions of dollars doing so through the end of his primary campaign, according to two people familiar with his operation who were not authorized to speak publicly.

    Berger declined to specify how much his campaign would spend or what his internal polls showed, but he noted that his team would invest “probably more than we need to” in order to win. In the past, campaigns in tough state Senate primaries have spent anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Such high spending may cost Republican state senators who are facing tight races in November and need the money in order to maintain a supermajority in the chamber. There are questions whether Berger, a prolific fundraiser, will have sufficient money left over for his caucus.

    Some polls show that Berger will almost surely lose in Rockingham County, which accounts for about 40% of votes in the district; the other 60% lie in parts of Guilford County.

    His poor showing in Rockingham is partly because of what happened in 2023, when the Senate leader tried to rush through legislation that would have brought a casino to the county. The community, deeply conservative and Christian, angrily pushed back on the proposal, prompting Berger to abandon the measure. But many voters have not forgotten.

    (BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM.)

    Also entangled in the race is the fact that North Carolina remains the only state in the country without an approved budget. As the Republican-controlled chambers remain in a stalemate, mainly over tax disagreements, Berger’s fate next month could steer the way negotiations go.

    (END OPTIONAL TRIM.)

    On a recent afternoon at the Farmer’s Table, a restaurant in Rockingham County, Page waved at customers and talked about the Reidsville High School Rams’ state football championship. Several brought up Berger.

    “He’s like a chameleon,” Page said of his opponent’s transformation into a pro-Trump politician, taking a bite from his plate of hush puppies.

    “I don’t think we need him anymore,” said Yancy King, a 66-year-old former emergency management worker, arguing that Berger cared more about his personal interests than about his constituents.

    “I know it,” the sheriff said.

    The county of about 93,000 is not entirely against Berger. Some residents, like Wayne Hamilton, 55, said there were tangible benefits from the fact that the most powerful person in the state was a local. He cited the recruitment of a pet food manufacturing facility as an example.

    “It’s about what he brings to the table for our county,” Hamilton said.

    Several voters in Guilford County said they were sick of Berger’s ads, saying the volume felt worse than a presidential election year, which is saying a lot for swing state residents. Others said the Trump endorsement was all the guidance they needed.

    That connection has deeply mattered to Berger, who last year shepherded an immigration bill and a sweeping crime bill through the legislature. Asked what he made of the assertion that Page was more like Trump, Berger said there was “an old story here in Rockingham County that the most dangerous place to be is between Sam Page and a camera.”

    “If that’s what you mean by being more Trumpy, then that’s him,” he added.

    (STORY CAN END HERE. OPTIONAL MATERIAL FOLLOWS.)

    At the forum at Rockingham Community College last week, the men were cordial, shaking hands as they took the stage.

    In a rapid-fire, punctual tone, Berger listed off his accomplishments.

    “I am the most effective conservative candidate in this race — the most effective conservative leader for legislative Republicans,” Berger said, adding, “I’ve fought every conservative battle there is and come out on top.”

    Then came closing statements. The sheriff stood up and delivered a message about working for “we the people.”

    Berger remained seated as he spoke his closing thoughts. All night, candidates in other primary races had stopped talking as soon as the moderator banged his gavel.

    Berger paused briefly when he was interrupted by a thud at the podium. But then he continued.

    “I’m the leader of Republicans in the Senate,” he said. “I ask for your vote.”

    This article originally appeared in The New York Times.



    Signs for Phil Berger, the State Senate majority leader, and his opponent, Sam Page, outside Rockingham Community College in Wentworth, N.C. on Feb. 5, 2026. (Cornell Watson/The New York Times)
    CORNELL WATSON




    Phil Berger, right, the State Senate majority leader, at a forum for Republican candidates with his opponent, Sam Page, center, at Rockingham Community College in Wentworth, N.C. on Feb. 5, 2026. Phil Berger has led the State Senate for years with an iron grip. But in a March election, he faces a popular, horse-riding sheriff who could topple his reign. (Cornell Watson/The New York Times)

    CORNELL WATSON




    Sheriff Sam Page in Reidsville, N.C. on Feb. 6, 2026. Phil Berger has led the State Senate for years with an iron grip. But in a March election, he faces a popular, horse-riding sheriff who could topple his reign. (Cornell Watson/The New York Times)

    CORNELL WATSON




    Phil Berger, left, the State Senate majority leader, at Rockingham Community College Wentworth, N.C. on Feb. 5, 2026. Sam Page, right, in Reidsville, N.C., on Feb. 6, 2026. Phil Berger has led the State Senate for years with an iron grip. But in a March election, he faces a popular, horse-riding sheriff who could topple his reign.(Cornell Watson/The New York Times)

    CORNELL WATSON

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hardline conservatives double down to save the SAVE Act

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Senate Republicans face long odds in advancing voter ID legislation, but they’re not backing down.

    Huddled behind closed doors on Tuesday, GOP lawmakers attempted to chart a path forward on the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, a revamped version of election integrity legislation that has long gathered dust in Congress.

    A trio of hardliner conservatives — Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rick Scott of Florida — have championed the legislation and demanded that it be considered in the upper chamber.

    MURKOWSKI BREAKS WITH GOP ON VOTER ID, SAYS PUSH ‘IS NOT HOW WE BUILD TRUST’

    Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, is leading the push in the Senate to pass voter ID legislation, and pitching multiple paths that Republicans could take to do it.  (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    Lee gave what lawmakers who attended the meeting described as an impassioned plea to move ahead with the bill, which would require voters to show identification, mandate in-person proof of citizenship when registering and direct states to remove non-citizens from voter rolls.

    “Nothing in the Senate’s an easy move,” Lee said after the meeting. “This one’s certainly not. But if we want to do this, this is how we have to go about it.”

    Indeed, Senate Democrats won’t support the legislation. That means the 60-vote filibuster threshold is, for now, an impossible barrier to breach.

    REPUBLICANS, TRUMP RUN INTO SENATE ROADBLOCK ON VOTER ID BILL

    Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., speaks during a press conference.

    Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., wants Republicans to keep pressing voter ID legislation, and noted how prevalent showing ID is in everyday life.  (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., told Fox News Digital that Republicans would continue to press the voter ID issue as common sense, given how prevalent identification is across several aspects of daily life.

    “To get on an airplane you need a photo ID. You want to buy a beer at a football game? You need a photo ID. Go to the library, you need a photo ID for just about everything,” Barrasso said. “And now you see Democrats are demanding photo IDs to go to any meetings that they have, and we just saw that in Georgia.”

    But Democratic resistance and moderate GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s rejection of the legislation leave two options, which Lee and others pitched to their colleagues — nuke the filibuster or turn to the standing, or talking, filibuster.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., immediately threw cold water on the former.

    SCHUMER NUKES GOP PUSH FOR ‘JIM CROW-ERA’ VOTER ID LAWS IN TRUMP-BACKED SHUTDOWN PACKAGE

    Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla.

    Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said that all options were on the table to pass voter ID legislation, including turning to the original version of the filibuster.  (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    “It’s not just me not being willing to do it. There aren’t anywhere close to the votes — not even close — to nuking the filibuster,” Thune said. “And so that idea is something, although it continues to be put out there, is something that doesn’t have a future.”

    “So is there another way of getting there? We’ll see,” he continued.

    In lieu of nuking the filibuster, which Trump has asked Senate Republicans to do throughout his second term, the GOP is considering turning to the standing filibuster, which existed before the modern 60-vote threshold.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The modern filibuster is less strenuous than the standing filibuster, which requires lawmakers to debate on the floor. That route could paralyze the upper chamber for hundreds of hours.

    Scott told Fox News Digital that during the meeting his colleagues were “starting to understand” the standing filibuster, but noted that not everyone was on board yet.

    “I think we ought to look at all of our options to get it passed, whether it’s the talking filibuster or whatever it is, to make sure elections are secure,” Scott said. “So I’m not going to give up.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tokyo benchmark Nikkei 225 jumps after PM Takaichi’s ruling party wins a super majority in election

    [ad_1]

    BANGKOK — Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 share index jumped 4.7% on Monday after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s governing party secured a two-thirds supermajority in a parliamentary election.

    Takaichi is expected to pursue market-friendly policies. She told public broadcaster NHK later that she is ready to pursue policies to make Japan strong and prosperous.

    Markets across Asia also advanced, with South Korea’s Kospi surging 4.3% and other benchmarks gaining more than 1%.

    The gains came after the U.S. stock market roared back on Friday as technology stocks recovered much of their losses from earlier in the week and bitcoin halted its plunge.

    The S&P 500 rallied 2% for its best day since May. The Dow Jones Industrial Average soared 1,206 points, or 2.5%, and topped the 50,000 level for the first time, while the Nasdaq composite leaped 2.2%.

    The combination of a rebound in tech shares, Wall Street’s rally and other upbeat news lifted shares across Asia.

    NHK, citing results of vote counts, said Takaichi’s Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP, alone secured 316 seats by early Monday, comfortably surpassing a 261-seat absolute majority in the 465-member lower house, the more powerful of Japan’s two-chamber parliament. That marks a record since the party’s foundation in 1955 and surpasses the previous record of 300 seats won in 1986 by late Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone.

    Takaichi’s first major task when the lower house reconvenes in mid-February is to work on a budget bill, delayed by the election, to fund economic measures that address rising costs and sluggish wages.

    By late morning, the Nikkei 225 was up 4.7% at 56,788.85, having topped 57,000 earlier in the session to set a new record. The Kospi gained 4.3% to 5,308.84.

    Elsewhere in Asia, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index climbed 1.5% to 26,963.25 and the Shanghai Composite index rose 1% to 4,106.54. Taiwan’s Taiex gained 2.4%.

    In Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 surged 1.9% to 8,876.50.

    On Friday, computer chip companies helped drive the widespread rally, and Nvidia jumped 7.8% to trim its loss for the week, which came into the day at just over 10%. Broadcom climbed 7.1% and erased its drop for the week.

    But even with Friday’s surge, the S&P 500 still fell to its third losing week in the last four. Apart from worries about spending by Big Tech companies, which are Wall Street’s most influential stocks, concerns about AI potentially stealing customers from software companies also hurt the market. Software stocks got hit particularly hard after AI firm Anthropic released free tools to automate things like legal services.

    Bitcoin, meanwhile, steadied following a weekslong plunge that had sent it more than halfway below its record price set in October. It climbed back above $70,000 after briefly dropping close to $60,000 late Thursday.

    Prices in the metals market also calmed a bit following their own wild swings. Gold rose 1.8% to settle at $4,979.80 per ounce, while silver added 0.2%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link