ReportWire

Tag: editor: awise

  • I Regularly Run Ultramarathons. Here’s What I Eat During Taper Week.

    [ad_1]

    Published November 28, 2025 03:30AM

    When I’m deep in ultramarathon training, I crave two things: carbs and comfort. And nothing delivers both like a big bowl of spicy Italian sausage vodka pasta with creamy sauce and a handful of green peas for good measure.

    But let’s get this straight before any running purists come for me: this is not a pre-race meal nor the meal you eat the night before your ultra. All of that fat, spice, veggies, and cream would revolt on race day, when bathroom stops are scarce—and toilet paper is even scarcer.

    Rather, I save this meal for taper week, the magical few days when I cut my mileage, slow the intensity, and let my body recover. Me, impatient as ever, learning that sometimes the best things come to those who… wait. Or rest. Or eat pasta. Taper week is all about slowing down to let your body catch up to your ambitions.

    Sometimes we roll out our own pasta at home, but store-bought works perfectly fine, too. We’re still learning the art of getting the noodles thin enough. Right now, they come out thick, rustic, and stubborn, as you’ll see in the video. A pasta maker is on our wishlist for Christmas, but until then, it’s all part of the experience.

    How to Fuel Taper Week

    1. Don’t Try Anything New During Taper Week.

    Your stomach is actually training, too. Stick with meals your body already knows and loves. Familiar food equals happy digestion, and one less thing to stress about before the big day.

    2. Go Heavy on Carbs a Few Days Before the Event.

    That’s your body’s time to top off the tank. I usually start increasing carbs three to four days out from race day. The key is balance: comfortably full, not stuffed. (Maybe then there’s room for ice cream!)

    3. Ease Up on Veggies and Protein (Just a Bit).

    I’ve learned that fiber can slow digestion, and heavy protein takes longer to break down. I love my greens, but I go lighter the week of a race. My body thanks me later.

    4. Double Your Meal for Leftovers.

    Future you will be grateful. Less time cooking and cleaning, more time stretching, walking, or doing absolutely nothing productive. That’s taper life.

    5. Hydrate Like It’s Your Full-Time Job.

    When it comes to staying hydrated, you don’t need a fancy strategy, just consistency. Water, electrolytes, repeat. It’s one of the simplest but most underrated parts of taper week prep.


    There’s something about cooking (or being cooked for) during taper week that feels grounding. Maybe the secret to a strong race isn’t at the starting line at all. It starts in the kitchen, where you listen to your body, feed it what it loves, and savor the calm before the storm. Sometimes the noodles are a little thick, or the sauce is a little too spicy, and yet, somehow, everything feels exactly right.

    [ad_2]

    awise

    Source link

  • The Newest Endurance Supplement Is a Broccoli Shot. But Does It Work?

    [ad_1]

    Published October 29, 2025 02:45PM

    Andreas Almgren, who streaked to a new European half-marathon record of 58:41 earlier this month, swears by it. So does Cole Hocker: “Yeah, I ripped a shot before the 5K,” he said after taking gold in that event at the track and field world championships in Tokyo in September. Mads Pederson, former world cycling champion, credits it with spurring him to his best-ever 90-minute ride.

    “It” is a supplement called Nomio, a concentrated shot extracted from broccoli sprouts that has emerged as the hottest new performance-enhancer among elite endurance athletes (as Velo’s Jim Cotton recently reported). The tagline printed on the box and splashed across the company’s website is that it’s “a natural compound that reduces lactate buildup during intense physical activity.” The promise to lower lactate is reminiscent of claims about baking soda, which has swept through endurance sport over the past few years. That’s what is drawing athletes in—but the actual science behind Nomio, preliminary though it remains, suggests a more complicated and perhaps more interesting picture.

    Nomio as a Lactate Fighter

    The active ingredient in Nomio is isothiocyanates, or ITCs, which are found in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, kale, and cabbage. The product was developed by scientists at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute and the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences—by some of the same scientists who did pioneering research into the endurance-boosting abilities of the nitrates found in foods such as beets. Beet juice has turned out to be one of the very few purported sports supplements backed by robust evidence, one of just five that the International Olympic Committee gives a thumbs-up to. That parallel is encouraging: maybe another vegetable extract is ready to join the list.

    The claims on the Nomio website are all over the map. Not only will it reduce lactate, it will also lower oxidative stress and inflammation, enhance training response to create more mitochondria, and accelerate post-exercise recovery. Oh, and it will also make your legs feel lighter. That sounds suspiciously like a magical pill that makes all your wishes come true—a bargain at $28 for four doses.

    The “Science” tab on Nomio’s website offers three references for these claims:

    The first is a 2023 study led by Filip Larsen, one of Nomio’s co-founders, in which volunteers took a shot of Nomio (or a placebo) twice a day for a week while completing intense interval workouts on an exercise bike every day. The supplement reduced oxidative stress and lowered lactate levels during exercise, improved regulation of blood glucose, and extended time to exhaustion by about 12 percent in a VO2 max test (though it didn’t actually change VO2 max).

    The second study hasn’t yet been published, but is available as a preprint while it undergoes peer review. It’s also from Larsen’s group, led by Michaela Sundqvist. This time it’s a one-shot test: take a broccoli shot, then three hours later do some exercise. Once again, lactate levels were lower at a given speed or power output compared to with a placebo.

    The third study is a little more arcane. It involved stimulating individual muscle fibers in a test tube to simulate exercise. In the presence of ITCs, there was a dramatic increase in training response leading to lower oxidative stress and the creation of more mitochondria, the cellular “powerhouses” that are key to aerobic exercise. This was an independent study by David Hood, a prominent muscle physiologist at York University. And it really was independent; when I contacted Hood, he’d never heard of Nomio. But he confirmed the study’s findings: “The results were dramatic for us,” he said. His group is now running a training study in live mice with and without ITCs, with results expected in January.

    These studies are certainly suggestive, but two things are missing, from my perspective. One is direct evidence that ITCs enhance performance. Nobody wins a medal for best mitochondria or lowest lactate levels; all we really care about is whether the supplement makes athletes faster. The other is a coherent explanation of why we should expect ITCs to make athletes faster. I’ll come back to the question of evidence below, but let’s start with the why.

    Nomio’s Other Origin Story

    When I got in touch with Larsen (whose research I’ve written about previously), he explained the evolution of his thinking about ITCs in a way that made more sense to me. It’s not about lactate, or at least it wasn’t initially.

    In Larsen’s telling, the starting point was a 2021 study on overtraining. They had volunteers progressively ramp up their training over the course of three weeks, with the final week pushing them into overtraining. At that point, their mitochondria were no longer working as well, their blood sugar control was compromised, and they were slower. “This aligns well with how athletes typically feel when they train harder than they can adapt: muscles feel heavy and unresponsive, and they don’t recover between sessions as they should,” Larsen says. The culprit appeared to be a signaling pathway called Nrf2, which is a key regulator of the body’s antioxidant defenses and (as David Hood and others have shown) how it responds to training.

    With those results in mind, Larsen and his team wondered whether boosting Nrf2 might counteract the effects of overtraining. There was already a robust literature showing that ITCs boost Nrf2. “Based on that,” Larsen says, “we simply asked: ‘What happens if we give people ITC (from broccoli sprouts) while they train really hard?’”

    That question is what led to the 2023 study mentioned above. As hypothesized, ITCs seemed to protect people from oxidative stress during heavy training. But the other benefits—better blood sugar control, and especially lower lactate during exercise—were surprising. That’s what prompted the second study, where even a single dose of ITCs—as much as you’d get from about six pounds of raw broccoli, packed into a shot glass-sized container—lowered lactate during exercise.

    Larsen and his colleagues still aren’t sure why ITCs lower lactate; there are a few possible biochemical explanations, but none has been proven yet. The effects are most apparent when lactate concentrations are in an intermediate range between about 3 and 8 millimolar, which corresponds to moderately hard but not all-out paces of the type you’d see in efforts lasting between about ten minutes and a few hours. (In contrast, the biggest benefits of baking soda are thought to accrue in shorter, more intense efforts between about one and ten minutes.)

    Before these lactate findings popped up, though, the original reason for trying ITCs was to fight the oxidative stress caused by hard training. This raises a dilemma, because there’s a well-established body of evidence suggesting that taking high doses of antioxidant supplements can actually blunt the benefits of training. The basic idea is that oxidative stress is a signal that tells your body to adapt and get stronger, so suppressing that signal by taking antioxidants results in less training adaptation.

    That’s a genuine concern, Larsen says. But in this case, ITCs aren’t really antioxidants. In fact, they’re mild pro-oxidants, just like exercise itself. In both cases, generating a small amount of oxidative stress causes the body’s own antioxidant defenses, controlled by Nrf2, to kick into higher gear. So instead of eliminating training’s adaptive signal with an antioxidant, Nomio is trying to amplify that signal. Still, Larsen says, that means it’s really only useful if you’re training reasonably hard. “We also recommend that athletes only take it before hard sessions or during tougher training blocks,” Larsen says, “not before easy sessions or on rest days.”

    More specifically, the company’s recommended usage plan has two components. For the acute benefits, take one shot three hours before a race or hard workout. For the chronic adaptive benefits, take one shot daily during hard training blocks, three hours before your main workout, then take a second shot before bed on hard workout days, and no shots on rest or easy days. Given the body’s finely tuned antioxidant balance, Larsen says, “I don’t think ITC intake is useful for healthy people who don’t train.”

    But Does It Actually Work?

    Here’s where things get sticky. In the scientific papers published so far, all we have is that subjects lasted a little longer in a VO2 max test, which isn’t really comparable to a race. Emil Sjölander, one of Nomio’s co-founders, connected me with a few scientists who have done or are doing performance testing either in academia or professional cycling, but none were willing to publicly share the results of their testing.

    When I reached out to others who work with professional endurance athletes, the responses were mixed. Everyone had heard of it, and most were at least intrigued. “Their work thus far looks well-done and credible… just not a lot of it yet,” said Trent Stellingwerff, the chief performance officer at the Canadian Sports Institute Pacific, who hasn’t yet worked with any athletes using Nomio. The most skeptical person I spoke to (who asked not to be named) said the data so far seemed “weak and unconvincing,” but they are nonetheless planning a study of Nomio’s effects this fall—which is an expression of interest, if nothing else.

    The list of athletes using it, both with and without the company’s cooperation, is long and growing. Among the unpaid names Sjölander mentioned: Conner Mantz, Clayton Young, Sarah Hall, and Graham Blanks. I asked Young about his experiences, and he admitted sharing my initial confusion about what the product’s main goal is. “After reading the research papers, it seemed like much of the science targeted changes in mitochondria,” he wrote in an email. “I was then surprised to see that it was marketed more towards reducing lactic acid levels. Almost as if they wanted to simplify the marketing and label it more as a bi-carb [i.e. baking soda] alternative.”

    Still, based on the positive experiences of some of his friends and training partners, Young gave it a shot in the lead-up to the World Championships marathon in Tokyo last month, where he placed ninth despite a hard fall early in the race. “My Tokyo build was one of the best I’ve ever had, if not the best,” he wrote. “My workouts, especially my speed workouts on the track, seem to be better than ever. That being said, there are so many factors that go into training, and it’s hard to say that it all came from Nomio.”

    Elite cycling tends to be more data-driven than marathoning, and the most detailed feedback I got on Nomio was from a coach working with a UCI World Tour team, who I agreed not to name. To this coach, the promise of lower lactate was not what interested him. “Biomarkers are one thing, but to know if something really works, it’s hard to get much out of lactate testing,” he said.

    Instead, the coach was interested in how the team performed in real-world field trials, which included a mix of moderate and all-out intervals. They didn’t notice an obvious decrease in lactate levels, but most of the riders reported “a feeling that it worked,” and many notched objectively high power outputs compared to their usual training. Proof? Not really. But the team isn’t waiting for further evidence. “If we wait, somebody else will try to use the advantage,” the coach says. “So in our world, you have to be able to work even when you don’t have clear answers.”

    It’s hard to say anything more definitive than that for now. The anecdotal evidence is intriguing, but who among us can really say for sure why we’ve had a particularly good or bad day? “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool,” as Richard Feynman once said. That’s why we do studies with placebos and control groups and so on. There’s enough interest in Nomio that those studies will come—or, if they don’t, that their absence will become increasingly glaring. Until then… broccoli season continues.


    For more Sweat Science, join me on Threads and Facebook, sign up for the email newsletter, and check out my new book The Explorer’s Gene: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map.

    [ad_2]

    awise

    Source link

  • The Surprising Limits of Human Endurance

    [ad_1]

    Published October 20, 2025 01:37PM

    Back in 2019, scientists proposed a new theory of endurance. For efforts lasting more than about a day, they suggested, the ultimate limit is dictated by how much food you’re able to digest. Your heart and mind and muscles can adapt to do amazing things, but they all need fuel. The most calories you can digest seems to be about 2.5 times your resting metabolism—so that’s what limits how much physical activity you can do day after day over weeks, months, or years.

    This idea of a “metabolic ceiling” sparked lots of discussion, but it also left some open questions. Does it really apply to top-level endurance athletes—like, say, Kilian Jornet, who just finished climbing 72 1,400-foot summits and cycling 2,500 miles in just 31 days while quaffing olive oil for calories? A newly published study in Current Biology sets out to answer some of these questions, measuring calorie data from 14 world-class ultrarunners and triathletes and analyzing the training logs of notable athletes like Jornet. Here’s what they found.

    What They Did

    The study was led by Andrew Best of the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts and Herman Pontzer of Duke University, the latter of whom was one of the key authors of the original 2019 paper. The key data in the paper comes from 14 ultra-endurance athletes who drank special isotope-labeled water that enabled the scientists to calculate exactly how many calories they were burning at different times. They collected this data during events like a six-day ultramarathon, a 24-hour record attempt, and Joe McConaughy’s 13-day FKT on the Arizona Trail. They also collected calorie data during one or more training weeks, for reasons we’ll get into below.

    The calorie data from races blew through the theorical limit of 2.5 times resting metabolism. That’s because you can afford to go into calorie debt for short periods of time, meaning that you’re burning stored fat (and sometimes muscle) and losing weight. “Joe lost tons of weight running the Arizona Trail,” Best told me. But that can’t continue indefinitely. If you’re burning 9,000 calories a day (as Jornet estimates he was during his most recent challenge) but only consuming 7,000 calories a day, you might be able to keep doing that for a month or two, but you’ll eventually hit a wall.

    That’s why Best also measured calories during training weeks. By taking at least two measurements for each runner, one during a competition or hard training week and the other during a relatively easy training week, he created a personalized formula for each runner to estimate how many calories they burn as a function of how much they’re running. Then he applied this formula to a year’s worth of training data to see how many calories they could burn over a 12-month period rather than just during a week or two of competition. That’s where the 2.5 resting metabolism limit shows up again.

    Here’s a graph showing “metabolic scope” (which is how many calories per day you’re burning expressed as a multiple of resting metabolism) for different durations:

    The longer the duration, the lower the daily calorie burn you’re able to sustain. (Photo: Current Biology)

    The dark blue circles on the left side of the graph show the direct measurements of calorie burn during training and racing. There are values as high as seven times resting metabolism, which corresponds to a one-day record attempt on a 90-mile trail.

    The light blue circles are calculated from the athletes’ training logs based on training periods of various lengths. For example, at the six-week mark (42 days), you can see a range of light blue circles between about 2.5 and 4. The circle at 4 corresponds to a runner who ran an astounding 1,989 miles over a six-week period, which is 332 miles per week. But that was during a 46-day FKT attempt on the Appalachian Trail, so clearly not a level the subject could sustain for an entire year.

    As you extend to longer durations like 30 or 52 weeks, you can see that the light blue circles all cluster around 2.5. Some are a little higher, others a little lower, but none of these elite ultra athletes are sustaining values that are significantly higher than the proposed limit.

    What about true super-elites like Kilian Jornet and triathlon star Kristian Blummenfelt? Based on their publicly available training data, along with the training hours-to-calories formula that the new study generated, Best estimates that Blummenfelt averages about 2.8 to 2.9 times his resting metabolism over the course of an entire year, while Jornet hits 2.75. So the best of the best may edge slightly above the usual limit of 2.5, but not by much.

    What It Means

    There are two interesting features in the graph I included above. The first and most important is the flat line on the right side of the graph, which corresponds to the proposed asymptote of 2.5 based on the limits of digestion. The new results bolster my confidence that this really is a consistent phenomenon. If Jornet isn’t breaking it (by much), I don’t know who is. So I was surprised, when I checked in with Herman Pontzer, to find that he’s less confident than he was in 2019 that this is an ironclad rule.

    One of his reasons is that more data has emerged from elite cyclists at Grand Tours where they seem to be burning enormous numbers of calories without losing weight—which implies that they’re absorbing a comparable number of calories. A study of seven cyclists in the Giro d’Italia, for example, found that they burned more than four times their resting metabolism over the course of 24 days without losing weight. It may be that sports scientists’ quest to produce ever-more digestible carbohydrates is enabling cyclists to push back the limits of digestibility.

    The other interesting feature in the graph is the shape of the curve on the left. You see a similar curve when you plot your speed in shorter distance (i.e. a few hours or less) races against the time elapsed, as I did for my own track times here. In that situation, the asymptote corresponds to a quantity called critical speed, which represents your long-term sustainable pace. The shape of the curve is dictated by another parameter sometimes referred to as anaerobic capacity, which you can think of (very loosely) as the amount of energy you’re able to “borrow” when running faster than critical speed before you hit a wall. Milers and other middle-distance runners tend to have a very high anaerobic capacity.

    Something has to dictate the shape of Pontzer’s multi-day energy curve, and at this point he’s not sure what that something is. Intuitively, you can think of it as analogous to anaerobic capacity: you can “borrow” a lot of calories for a short period of time, putting you way above the 2.5 line; or you can borrow a lesser amount over an extended period of time. If you want to keep going for, say, six months, you can’t really borrow anything: calories out has to be balanced by calories in.

    But what determines the shape of that curve? If you’re carrying a lot of body fat, does that enable you to borrow more for longer? Or, more likely, if you’ve trained your metabolism to burn fat more rapidly, does that raise the curve? Does the precise shape of the curve depend on the mix of fat and carbohydrate that you burn at different exercise intensities? Or are there other non-metabolic factors that come into play, like muscle recovery or mental fatigue? The physiology of multi-day endurance challenges is still a relatively young scientific field—which means there should be lots of more insights, and lots more fun, still to come.


    For more Sweat Science, join me on Threads and Facebook, sign up for the email newsletter, and check out my new book The Explorer’s Gene: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map.

    [ad_2]

    awise

    Source link

  • Birthday Cake, PB&J, and Spam Musubi: How Outside Editors Fuel Their Ultras

    Birthday Cake, PB&J, and Spam Musubi: How Outside Editors Fuel Their Ultras

    [ad_1]

    </div></div>”],”filter”:{“nextExceptions”:”img, blockquote, div”,”nextContainsExceptions”:”img, blockquote, a.btn, a.o-button”},”renderIntial”:true,”wordCount”:350}”>

    The Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc (UTMB) World Series Finals kick off on August 26 and run through September 1. The annual finale is made up of three races: the Ultra Trail du Mont Blanc Orsières-Champex-Chamonix (50K), the Ultra Trail du Mont Blanc Courmayeur-Champex-Chamonix (100K), and the classic UTMB (100M), across France, Italy, and Switzerland.

    Sure, crowds come for the world-class athletes and spectacular views of the Alps, but, some might argue, another big draw is the food—and even the race participants get a taste on the course. Much of the fuel at aid stations are sourced from nearby communities, who bring their best. Think: locally made croissants, bread, cheese, and prosciutto.

    But for those of us who haven’t had the pleasure of running by tents filled with freshly baked French baguettes on our long runs, here’s the weird, the specific, and the sometimes gross on how we fuel our adventures.

    The Food Outside Editors Eat for Ultramarathons

    Birthday Cake

    On a 13-hour, nearly 10,000-vertical foot ridge scramble/romp through the high peaks in New Mexico a few years ago, I fueled with the food of the gods: birthday cake in a bag. I had somehow scammed my way into having three cakes at my birthday dinner a few nights prior and figured the calorie-to-weight ratio of buttercream frosting couldn’t be far off from Gu. So I cut a generous piece of birthday cake, put it in a Ziploc, and stashed it in my pack. By the time I went to eat it, it had lost all structure and I could easily squeeze it directly into my mouth from a hole I cut in the bottom corner of the bag.

    —Abigail Barronian, senior editor, Outside

    Raisin Scones

    The last time I ran 100 miles, it was a self-supported multi-day journey through the English countryside. The bad news: no aid stations. The good news: pubs and cafes at far greater frequency. I was able to refill my vest with raisin scones and coffee every ten miles. By itself, a scone is pretty dry. But combined with a mouthful of coffee (or even water), it becomes an easy-to-digest, carby snack that’s just the right amount of sweet. Plus, it’s perfectly sized to fit in a chest pocket.

    —Corey Buhay, interim managing editor, Backpacker

    Real Food

    I have been blessed with a rock-solid stomach and have never had gastrointestinal issues during any run or race. That gives me the freedom to consume just about anything, but I notably veer away from energy gels and opt for real food—either the breakfast burritos or ramen noodles available at aid stations or peanut butter tortilla wraps (sometimes with Nutella) and Pay Day candy bars (because they don’t melt and have a good blend of calories, carbs, fat and protein). I have also been known to drink pickle juice straight from the jar for the sodium content. I love the taste!

    —Brian Metzler, editor-in-chief, RUN

    Trader Joe’s Many Things Snack Mix

    I’m all about having a variety of guilty pleasure snacks on hand during an ultra! My favorite is a specific mix from Trader Joe’s called Many Things Snack Mix, with honey-roasted peanuts, sweet and spicy Chex-like cereal squares, pretzel sticks, and bread chips. It’s basically Chex mix. I put it in a Ziploc bag and relish being able to eat it without guilt during my run (because when I eat it at home, it’s never really fulfilling any kind of nutritional need and I always eat too much of it!).

    I’ll also pack a Ziploc bag with gummy bears, and then another one with half of a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Peanuts and peanut butter go down easy for me while also providing a bit of a “stick to your ribs” satiety, while the gummy bears have a fun texture and come with a sugar rush. A PB&J sandwich kind of combines both sides of that, and then the Chex mix—as long as it has some spicy pieces—wakes up my taste buds.

    —Svati Narula, contributing editor, Outside

    PB&J

    My go-to is a good old-fashioned peanut butter and jelly sandwich. It’s simple, reliable, easy on my belly (maybe I’m just used to it), and gives me the perfect balance of carbs and protein—plus, all the nostalgia of my childhood days. I love it so much.

    —Mary Mckeon, director of audience development, Outside Inc.

    Spam Musubi

    My go-to rolls are the perfect combination of salty and sweet and are packed with carbs and protein. Plus, as a runner who’s prone to an upset stomach after the ten-mile point, they’re bland enough that they tend to stay put when other snacks come right back up. Best of all: Spam musubi’s a hand-held roll that travels well and is just as tasty at room temperature after a couple of hours in my pack.

    —Abigail Wise, contributing editor, Outside

    Good Vibes

    I prefer to subsist on basically nothing but good vibes and enthusiasm for about three or four hours before inevitably crashing and burning due to a lack of fueling.

    —Matt Skenazy, features editor, Outside

    [ad_2]

    awise

    Source link