ReportWire

Tag: Economy

  • Federal Reserve cuts key rate, sees healthier economy next year

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve reduced its key interest rate by a quarter-point for the third time in a row Wednesday but signaled that it may leave rates unchanged in the coming months.

    The cut decreased the Fed’s rate to about 3.6%, the lowest it has been in nearly three years. Lower rates from the Fed can bring down borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards over time, though market forces can also affect those rates.

    Chair Jerome Powell suggested at a news conference that after six rate cuts in the past two years, the central bank can step back and see how hiring and inflation develop. In a set of quarterly economic projections, Fed officials signaled they expect to lower rates just once next year.

    Fed officials “will carefully evaluate the incoming data,” Powell said, adding that the Fed is “well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves.”

    The chair also said that the Fed’s key rate was close to a level that neither restricts nor stimulates the economy, a significant shift from earlier this year, when he described the rate as high enough to slow the economy and quell inflation. With rates closer to a more neutral level, the bar for further rate cuts is likely higher that it was this fall.

    “We believe the labor market will have to noticeably weaken to warrant another rate cut soon,” Ryan Sweet, global chief economist at Oxford Economics, said.

    Three Fed officials dissented from the move, the most dissents in six years and a sign of deep divisions on a committee that traditionally works by consensus. Two officials voted to keep the Fed’s rate unchanged: Jeffrey Schmid, president of the Kansas City Fed, and Austan Goolsbee, president of the Chicago Fed. Stephen Miran, whom Trump appointed in September, voted for a half point cut.

    December’s meeting could usher in a more contentious period for the Fed. Officials are split between those who support reducing rates to bolster hiring and those who’d prefer to keep rates unchanged because inflation remains above the central bank’s 2% target. Unless inflation shows clear signs of coming fully under control, or unemployment worsens, those divisions will likely remain.

    “What you see is some people feel we should stop here and we’re in the right place and should wait, and some people think we should cut more next year,” Powell said.

    A stark sign of the Fed’s divisions was the wide range of cuts that the 19 members of the Fed’s rate-setting committee penciled in for 2026. Seven projected no cuts next year, while eight forecast that the central bank would implement two or more reductions. Four supported just one. Only 12 out of 19 members vote on rate decisions.

    President Donald Trump on Wednesday criticized the cut as too small, and said he would have preferred “at least double.” Trump could name a new Fed chair as soon as later this month to replace Powell when his term ends in May. Trump’s new chair is likely to push for sharper rate cuts than many officials will support.

    Stocks jumped in response to the Fed’s move, in part because some Wall Street investors expected Powell to be more forceful in shutting down the possibility of future cuts. The broad S&P 500 stock index rose 0.7% and closed near an all-time high reached in October.

    Powell was also optimistic about the economy’s growth next year, and said that consumer spending remains resilient while companies are still investing in artificial intelligence infrastructure. He also suggested growing worker efficiency could contribute to faster growth without more inflation.

    Still, Powell said the committee reduced borrowing costs out of concern that the job market is even weaker than it appears. While government data shows that the economy has added just 40,000 jobs a month since April, Powell said that figure could be revised lower by as much as 60,000, which would mean employers have actually been shedding an average of 20,000 jobs a month since the spring.

    “It’s a labor market that seems to have significant downside risks,” Powell told reporters. “People care about that. That’s their jobs.”

    The Fed met against the backdrop of elevated inflation that has frustrated many Americans, with prices higher for groceries, rents, and utilities. Consumer prices have jumped 25% in the five years since COVID.

    “We hear loud and clear how people are experiencing really high costs,” Powell said Wednesday. “A lot of that isn’t the current rate of inflation, a lot of that is e mbedded high costs due to higher inflations in 2022-2023.”

    Powell said inflation could move higher early next year, as more companies pass tariff costs to consumers as they reset prices to start the year. Inflation should decline after that, he added, but it’s not guaranteed.

    “We just came off an experience where inflation turned out to be much more persistent than anyone expected,” he said, referring to the spike in 2022. “Is that going to happen now? That’s the risk.”

    The Fed’s policy meeting took place as the Trump administration moves toward picking a new Fed chair to replace Powell when his term finishes in May. Trump’s nominee is likely to push for sharper rate cuts than many officials may support.

    Trump has hinted that he will likely pick Kevin Hassett, his top economic adviser. But on Wednesday, Trump said he would meet with Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor who has also been on the short list to replace Powell.

    Trump added that he wants someone who will lower interest rates. “Our rates should be the lowest rates in the world,” he said.

    A government report last week showed that overall and core prices rose 2.8% in September from a year earlier, according to the Fed’s preferred measure. That is far below the spikes in inflation three years ago but still painful for many households after the big run-up since 2020.

    Adding to the Fed’s challenges, job gains have slowed sharply this year and the unemployment rate has risen for three straight months to 4.4%. While that is still a low rate historically, it is the highest in four years. Layoffs are also muted, so far, as part of what many economists call a “low hire, low fire” job market.

    The Fed typically keeps its key rate elevated to combat inflation, while it often reduces borrowing costs when unemployment worsens to spur more spending and hiring.

    Powell will preside over only three more Fed meetings before he steps down. On Wednesday, he was asked about his legacy.

    “I really want to turn this job over to whoever replaces me with the economy in really good shape,” he said. “I want inflation to be under control, coming back down to 2%, and I want the labor market to be strong.”

    ___

    Associated Press Writers Collin Binkley and Alex Veiga in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In Finds Women Are Leaning Out in the Workplace

    Sandberg argues that standardized processes are essential to closing the widening ambition gap. John Lamparski/Getty Images

    Twelve years after Sheryl Sandberg’s best-seller Lean In sparked a workplace movement urging women to push for advancement, many are now leaning out. A new survey by LeanIn.org, the nonprofit Sandberg founded alongside the book’s release in 2013, conducted with McKinsey & Company shows a notable drop in women’s ambition.

    LeanIn.org’s annual “Women in the Workplace” report, released Tuesday (Dec. 9) and based on data from 124 companies in the U.S. and Canada, finds for the first time that women are less likely than men to say they want a promotion. In 2025, 80 percent of women sought a promotion compared to 86 percent of men. In prior years, ambition levels were aligned. Last year, for example, both were at 70 percent.

    We do see that ambition gap, but only when women don’t get the opportunities and support they need,” Sandberg said in an interview with Bloomberg on Tuesday. 

    She said the gap stems from persistent barriers at every career stage. Two in 10 companies now say women’s advancement is a low or nonexistent priority—a figure that rises to three in 10 for women of color. About half of the companies that previously contributed to the report also no longer prioritize advancing women, Sandberg said.

    Day-to-day, these barriers are reflected in how ambition is perceived and rewarded. Women are 30 percent more likely than men to be labeled “aggressive” when they ask for raises or promotions, and men in senior roles are 70 percent more likely than their female peers to be selected for leadership training.

    Sandberg argues the solution is straightforward: “Standardize your processes. Establish criteria in advance that everyone agrees to that are universally applied.”

    The report also notes the impact of post-COVID return-to-office mandates. A quarter of surveyed companies now offer fewer remote and hybrid options—policies that disproportionately affect women, who make up about two-thirds of U.S. caregivers. Women who work mostly remotely face stigma for using flexibility benefits, whereas men generally do not.

    Gender diversity programs are also shrinking. Nearly one-sixth of companies have reduced formal leadership sponsorships and scaled back programs designed for women. These cuts come amid the Trump administration’s rollback of DEI efforts and the rise of natalist policies that encourage women to have more children.

    As rhetoric promoting stay-at-home motherhood gains traction, Sandberg said the data doesn’t support the idea that staying home is inherently better for families. These expectations, she added, “were never really gone.” Even now, she said, “Do I really think we ever fully encouraged leadership in…women as much as men?” The answer is no.

    “If you can afford to be a full-time spouse and a full-time parent as a man or a woman and you want to do that, I think that can be deeply fulfilling work,” said Sandberg. “Most women don’t have that option.”

    Ultimately, Sandberg said expanding leadership opportunities for women is an economic imperative. “It’s a question of economic productivity,” she said. “Do we want to get the best out of our workforce?”

    Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In Finds Women Are Leaning Out in the Workplace

    Rachel Curry

    Source link

  • Fact-check: Donald Trump’s PA speech on the economy

    For the first time in months, President Donald Trump held a campaign-style rally, traveling to a Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, casino to talk about the economy amid growing consumer concerns about affordability that Trump has tried to paint as a hoax and a Democratic issue.

    In his roughly 100-minute speech, he talked about his love of the word “tariff” and zeroed in on the “fake news” reporters covering the event. At times, supporters chanted “four more years,” although experts have told PolitiFact another Trump candidacy would violate the 22nd Amendment’s clear intent. 

    Trump’s Dec. 9 comments touched on other high-profile recent topics. As Minnesota is in the news for a fraud scandal involving Somalis, he attacked Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., who is Somali, saying she “does nothing but bitch. She’s always complaining.” The crowd responded, “Send her back.” Omar is a U.S. citizen, as are the majority of Somalis in Minnesota.

    And amid his recent focus on former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen, Trump mused about whether Federal Reserve Board members appointed by his predecessor were serving illegally. There’s no way to nullify presidential actions signed by autopens, legal experts say.

    Trump also repeated his Pants on Fire claim that every strike on a “narcoterrorist” boat in the Caribbean saves 25,000 American lives.

    We fact-checked several of Trump’s statements about the economy.

    Trump: The U.S. is “right around $18 trillion” in promises of new investment. “We could hit $20 trillion in the first year” of my presidency.

    False.

    Trump has said that since he took office in January, the U.S. has attracted between $18 trillion and $22 trillion in new investment. But the White House website documents a smaller number — $9.6 trillion — and the investments listed on the website include aspirational, multi-year goals that may not come to fruition and future purchases or sales of products, rather than only capital investments. 

    In Pennsylvania, Trump also said, “I went to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and (the United Arab Emirates). I brought back $4 trillion.” These commitments are among the highest-dollar commitments on the White House list, but the list cites $3.2 trillion, lower than what Trump said,  and that number still requires a major caveat. The Qatar and the UAE commitments are multiple times larger than their countries’ annual gross domestic product, which calls the pledges’ feasibility into question.

    Trump: “It was just reported that four states had $1.99 a gallon” for gasoline.

    This cherry-picks a small number of gas stations in three states.

    The current national average gasoline price is $3.07 per gallon, according to the federal government’s Energy Information Administration. The American Automobile Association said the states with the lowest average statewide gasoline prices are Oklahoma at $2.38, Texas at $2.49, Arkansas at $2.52 and Colorado at $2.53.

    According to Patrick De Haan of the gasoline price comparison site Gas Buddy, Oklahoma, Colorado and Texas have a few dozen stations with prices below $1.99 a gallon. These are a fraction of all U.S. stations, which number well over 100,000. 

    Trump: “Our prices are coming down tremendously from the highest prices in the history of our country.”

    This is misleading. 

    Overall inflation on Trump’s watch is right where it started. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ consumer price index, year-over-year inflation in January 2025, when he took office, was 3%, and in the most recent month available, September, it was also 3%. (The government shutdown delayed more recent inflation data.)

    When using the inflation rate minus food and energy, the rate has declined modestly.  This rate was 3% year over year in September, lower than the 3.3% rate in January 2025. Economists sometimes prefer this measurement because it smooths out the price volatility in the food and energy sectors.

    Trump’s statement about the highest prices in U.S. history is inaccurate in two ways.

    The highest year-over-year inflation rate under Biden was around 9% in summer 2022. That was the highest in about 40 years, but the record-high U.S. inflation rates were recorded in the 1970s and early 1980s, when the inflation rate often hovered between 12% and 15%. 

    In addition, Trump ignores that during the final two-plus years of Biden’s tenure, inflation fell significantly. By Biden’s final full month in office, December 2024, the year over year inflation rate was 2.9%, meaning it fell by about two-thirds from its Biden-era peak and was slightly lower than the most recent rate recorded under Trump.

    Trump: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act in 2025 enacted the “biggest tax cuts ever.”

    This is Mostly False.

    We examined the tax revenue decreases from major laws passed since 1980. (Most tax laws prior to 1980 either raised taxes or cut them modestly.) We looked at tax cuts as a percentage of gross domestic product, which evens out differences over time. 

    President Ronald Reagan signed the 1981 law with the biggest tax savings. That law cut taxes by 3.5% of the nation’s cumulative five-year GDP.

    A 2012 bill passed by the Republican Congress and signed by President Barack Obama ranked second. That bill, which cut taxes by 1.7% of GDP, extended the tax cuts passed in 2003 under President George W. Bush.

    Based on initial projections, Trump’s 2025 law ranks third at 1.4% of GDP. Trump’s 2017 law ranks fourth at 1%, tied with a 2010 law Obama signed that extended Bush’s 2001 tax cuts. 

    However, the bottom-line impact on Americans’ tax liabilities beginning in 2026 might not be dramatic as these rankings suggest, because the 2025 bill extended the cuts from Trump’s 2017 bill, which would have expired otherwise. So people are already paying the lower tax rates and won’t necessarily see additional tax cuts. 

    The 2025 law adds some new tax breaks, such as for income from tips and overtime and for Americans 65 and older.

    If considering only the new tax cuts and not the renewal of the 2017 tax cuts, then Trump’s 2025 law would tie for sixth biggest cut ever at 0.5% of GDP.

    Trump: The Big Beautiful BIll Act included a provision for “no tax on Social Security for our great seniors.”

    This is Mostly False.

    Because of a procedural quirk, Republican lawmakers were unable to include a complete elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits when crafting the legislation. Instead, the House and Senate agreed to workarounds that produced significant, but not full, overlap between people who would benefit from the tax break and people who receive Social Security payments. 

    A representative from the Joint Committee on Taxation, the bipartisan body of Congress that analyzes proposed tax legislation, estimated that 24 million Americans could still pay some amount of tax on their Social Security benefits.

    Trump: Under Biden, “migrant workers and illegal aliens got 100%” of new jobs, “but since I took office, 100% of all net job creation has gone to American citizens.”

    This needs context

    The number of native-born Americans working since he took office in January has risen by 2.58 million, a 2% increase. During that same period, the number of foreign-born workers has decreased by 1 million, a 3.1% decline. (A caveat: The data for these two statistics tends to be what economists call “noisy,” because unlike other employment statistics, these metrics are not seasonally adjusted.)

    The problem with Trump’s statement is attributing the foreign-born employment data only to “migrant workers and illegal aliens.” There is no statistical category for “migrant” or “illegal alien” employment. The available statistics for “foreign born” includes large numbers of naturalized U.S. citizens, permanent residents and other immigrants legally in the U.S.

    Source link

  • Making the most of Small Business Saturday


    Making the most of Small Business Saturday – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    Black Friday may be over, but the great deals are continuing on Small Business Saturday. “CBS Saturday Morning” explores how you can save money while supporting small brands.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Venezuelans Worried About Economic Turmoil Shun Black Friday Deals

    CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — Window displays advertising 30% discounts and shoes for $20 were not enough to draw throngs of bargain hunters this Black Friday to a popular mall in Venezuela’s capital. Even the newly opened H&M store was virtually empty in the morning.

    The country’s suffocating economy, Venezuelans said, not the threats of U.S. military action, is to blame for Friday’s stark contrast to other post-pandemic years when enthusiastic shoppers formed lines outside stores. Years of experiences riding the twists and turns of their country’s complex crisis have taught them to focus on their immediate individual needs, like buying food or medicines, and not the collective long term, like a possible military strike.

    “The country’s economy is based on day-to-day survival. What do I do to survive today and live tomorrow?” physician Luisa Torrealba said outside an appliance store. “We don’t have the luxury of stopping because there’s going to be a war, because there’s a psychological war going on, because the government says one thing or the United States says another.”

    A day earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump increased pressure on his Venezuelan counterpart, Nicolás Maduro, by suggesting during a Thanksgiving address to troops that the military could “very soon” begin hitting alleged drug-trafficking targets within the South American country. So far, a monthslong U.S. military operation has killed 80 people in strikes against vessels in international waters in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

    Since returning to office, Trump has increased the pressure on Maduro and his allies, including by doubling to $50 million the reward for information that leads to his arrest on narcoterrorism charges. Maduro, who denies the accusations, and his allies have repeatedly said that the U.S. military operation is designed to force a government change in Venezuela.

    But while White House evaluates if and when to strike on Venezuelan soil, the country’s economy continues to suffer and millions of Venezuelans struggle to buy food.

    Families these days need more than $500 to buy the basics for a month. Yet, Venezuela’s monthly minimum wage of 130 bolivars, or $0.52, has not increased since 2022, putting it well below the United Nations’ measure of extreme poverty of $2.15 a day.

    Many public sector workers survive on roughly $160 per month, while the average private sector employee earned about $237, according to the independent Venezuelan Observatory of Finances.

    On Friday, Marian García expected to see a crowd outside a shoe store at the mall in Caracas where she wanted to buy a pair of boots. But she found herself being the first in line.

    The store’s windows promised shoes for $20, an unbeatable deal for García, who had set her eyes on boots that regularly range from $60 to $80, or more than 10% of the monthly combined income with her partner.

    “It’s difficult to indulge in luxuries,” García, 26, said. “Due to the current economic situation, people are cutting back and only spending on the essentials, such as food.”

    Yarbelis Revilla, who works three jobs and considers herself a master bargain hunter, also looked around the mall for deals on shoes. She checked out offers at different stores but in the end felt that many of this year’s Black Friday discounts did not feel like a steal.

    Amid the country’s conditions, Revilla explained that looking for shoes may seem like “vanity,” but she works hard to meet her needs and does not dwell on the future.

    “I am a Christian, and the Bible says, ‘Do not worry. Do not make plans for the future because you won’t really know what’s coming,’” she said.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Black Friday shoppers spend more time looking for deals but less money amid economic angst

    Black Friday shoppers flocked to stores, hoping to get more bags for their buck as they grapple with inflation, tariffs and anxiety about the health of the economy.

    Citadel Outlets in Commerce was mobbed Friday morning with long waits for parking and winding lines in front of stores as consumers tried to grab good deals. Camila Romero and her 13-year-old daughter spent hours in line trying to get the best possible deals on Ugg and Coach items on their wish lists.

    “You come to the Citadel because it’s outlets. And it’s discounts on top of that,” she said. “So even when you’re broke, you don’t feel it.”

    Shoppers across Los Angeles plan to spend less this holiday season, data show. While retailers tease their biggest deals and prepare for what they hope is robust demand, a Deloitte survey found that Angelenos plan to spend 14% less over the holidays compared with last year.

    Nationally, shoppers are expected to spend 10% less than last year.

    Consumers are pulling back on spending in response to economic uncertainty and rising prices, said Rebecca Lohrey, a partner at Deloitte with expertise in retail and e-commerce.

    “There is at least a perception of higher prices and higher costs of goods,” Lohrey said. “That is a concern for consumers across the board, and is one of the reasons they’re tightening their wallets a little bit.”

    The survey found that 62% of Angelenos expect the economy to weaken in the year ahead, up from 34% in 2024. Around the same percentage of respondents said they are concerned about a potential recession in the next six months.

    Across income groups, consumers are making cost-cutting trade-offs and putting more emphasis on finding the best deal, the data showed. More than half of Los Angeles respondents said they would switch brands if their first choice was too expensive.

    “It tends to be the lower income brackets or the middle income brackets that are the most likely to trade down,” said Collin Colburn, vice president of commerce and retail media at the Interactive Advertising Bureau. “This year, actually, everyone is trading down.”

    Camryn Smith and her daughter showed up to snoop around for the deals at the Americana at Brand in Glendale early Friday morning. The discounts help knock off some of the effect of inflation, she said.

    “The prices are higher and they just bring them down to what they normally would be,” Smith said. “It’s crazy.”

    Consumers are fatigued from continuous inflation and instability brought on by the Trump administration. More shoppers are regifting or considering giving homemade gifts, the Deloitte survey found.

    “We’ve been in an environment where prices continue to rise for a host of reasons, inflation being one, tariffs being another,” Colburn said. “I think when that happens year on year, it really drags on the consumer.”

    This means more shoppers are looking for ways to save on purchases — and presents — they cannot put off.

    The National Retail Federation predicts that a record number of Americans will shop the sales over Thanksgiving weekend. Retail sales in November and December are expected to grow between 3.7% and 4.2% compared with last year, the federation said.

    Cautious consumers are more eager than ever to find a hot deal, said NRF chief economist Mark Mathews.

    “People are changing the way that they spend,” he said. “They’re focusing more on stretching their dollar and getting value for the dollar.”

    Even shoppers spending more than usual may be doing it out of concern, economists say. Consumers who anticipate inflation sometimes spend now out of fear that prices will rise later.

    Brooklyn Farmer braved the crowds at Citadel to shop and try to save amid inflation.

    “People are struggling right now, but the holidays are still important to them,” he said. “The thinking is if there’s going to be discounts like this, I might as well go while I can, instead of spending more later.”

    Of those surveyed by Deloitte in Los Angeles, 43% said they planned to spend most of their holiday budget at big-box retailers and 32% said they would spend the most at digital-first retailers.

    Shoppers are also using new tools to help them find products and deals, including artificial intelligence. Data collected by the Interactive Advertising Bureau found that AI now ranks as the second-most influential shopping source, ahead of retailers’ websites and apps and behind only search engines.

    Nearly 90% of shoppers nationally said AI helps them find products they wouldn’t have found otherwise, according to the IAB data.

    Mattel, the El Segundo-based toy company, is offering up to 50% off at Target on Hot Wheels, Barbie dolls and Disney Princess toys, said company spokesperson Kelly Powers.

    “Mattel is working closely with retailers across the country on Black Friday deals,” Powers said.

    In May, Mattel said it was considering raising its prices to offset the effect of President Trump’s tariffs on China..

    On the October earnings call, however, the company said the full effect of tariffs won’t be seen until the fourth quarter.

    Discount retailers that depend heavily on foot traffic have given conflicting signals about their business.

    Walmart recently raised its sales forecast for the year after reporting a 6% year-over-year increase in revenue in the third quarter.

    Target, in contrast, missed analyst expectations and reported a 1.5% decline in sales in the third quarter. On a call with analysts earlier this month, Target Chief Executive Brian Cornell said the company “has not been performing up to its potential.”

    Of course, for many shoppers on Friday, the pilgrimage to splurge at the local mall was about more than saving.

    Ericka Pentasuglia brought her daughter to the Americana the Brand at around 3 a.m. to be the first in line for a pop-up store selling Billie Eilish perfume. She thought it was important for her to pass down the tradition of Black Friday shopping.

    “I do feel like it is dying a little bit,” Pentasuglia said. “The best thing is that you don’t lose a tradition, it continues to your children.”

    Caroline Petrow-Cohen, Christopher Buchanan, Gavin J. Quinton

    Source link

  • Research Reports & Trade Ideas – Yahoo Finance

    Technical Assessment: Bullish in the Intermediate-Term

    Source link

  • Data centers aren’t new, but seem to pop up everywhere

    While it may seem like a new buzzword generating debate across the nation, data centers are nothing new.

    The large facilities, some of which can house millions of servers, have been around for decades. Construction is booming across the country, largely due to the growth of artificial intelligence.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]52E246?E6C>2A]4@>^FD2Q E2C86ElQ03=2?@C6 E92? `_[___ 52E2 46?E6CD =:DE65 @? E96 H@C=5H:56 >2A[ c[`gh 2C6 😕 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D] %96 E9C66 DE2E6D =625:?8 E96 :?5FDECJ 2C6 ‘:C8:?:2 H:E9 eee 46?E6CD[ %6I2D H:E9 c_h 2?5 r2=:7@C?:2 H:E9 ba`]k^Am

    kAm(2?852 +F@[ 2 !6?? $E2E6 &?:G6CD:EJ AC@76DD@C 😕 E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 pC49:E64EFC2= t?8:?66C:?8[ D2:5 :?5:G:5F2= 4@?DF>6C 923:ED 2C6 4C62E:?8 E96 8C@H:?8 ?665 7@C 52E2 46?E6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(96? H6 H2E49 }6E7=:I[ 2== E96 G:56@D 2C6 24EF2==J DE@C65 😕 E96 52E2 46?E6C 2?5 56=:G6C65 E@ E96 4FDE@>6C] (96? H6 AFC492D6 @? p>2K@?[ H6 2=D@ FD6 52E2 46?E6CD 3642FD6 E96J 92G6 E96 52E2 7@C FD 7@C @FC @?=:?6 AFC492D:?8 6IA6C:6?46[” +F@ D2:5] “$@ 52E2 46?E6CD 2C6 6G6CJH96C6[ J@F @56C? D@4:6EJ] (6 ?665 52E2 46?E6CD E@ <66A @FC D@4:6EJ 7F?4E:@?:?8]”k^Am

    kAmp=E9@F89 +F@ 6DE:>2E65 E92E 52E2 46?E6CD 92G6 366? 2C@F?5 7@C c_ E@ d_ J62CD[ E96J ?@H D66> E@ 36 A@AA:?8 FA 6G6CJH96C6]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D C62==J 4@>6D 7C@> E96 C646?E 2AA=:42E:@? @7 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46] %@ 5@ E92E[ J@F ?665 2 9F86 2>@F?E @7 52E2 E@ EC2:? E96 px >@56=[” +F@ D2:5] “$@[ 7@C E92E[ J@F ?665 E9@FD2?5D @C >:==:@?D @7 4@>AFE6CD] %92E’D H9J A6@A=6 2C6 3F:=5:?8 >@C6 52E2 46?E6CD E@ 6?23=6 E96 EC2:?:?8 @7 px]”k^Am

    kAmpD 56G6=@A6CD 564:56 H96C6 E@ 3F:=5 52E2 46?E6CD[ E96J 2C6 =:<6=J E9:?<:?8 23@FE 6?6C8J DFAA=J 2?5 H2E6C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ +F@]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 724:=:E:6D C6BF:C6 2 =@E @7 6=64EC:4:EJ]k^Am

    kAm%96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]:62]@C8^C6A@CED^6?6C8J2?52:^6?6C8J56>2?57C@>2:Q E2C86ElQ03=2?2E6Dk^2m 52E2 46?E6C 6?6C8J 4@?DF>AE:@?[ 244@F?E:?8 7@C D6CG6CD[ DE@C286 DJDE6>D[ ?6EH@C<:?8 6BF:A>6?E[ 4@@=:?8 2?5 6?G:C@?>6?E2= 4@?EC@=[ F?:?E6CCFAE:3=6 A@H6C DFAA=J 2?5 255:E:@?2= :?7C2DECF4EFC6[ DF49 2D =:89E:?8 2?5 @77:46 6BF:A>6?E[ 2>@?8 @E96C E9:?8D]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4J 6DE:>2E65 52E2 46?E6CD H@C=5H:56 4@?DF>65 2C@F?5 c`d E6C2H2EE9@FCD =2DE J62C[ 23@FE `]dT @7 8=@32= 4@?DF>AE:@?]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4J’D “q2D6 r2D6” AC@;64ED 52E2 46?E6CD’ 8=@32= 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@?DF>AE:@? H:== 5@F3=6 3J a_b_]k^Am

    kAmp44@C5:?8 E@ E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]6:2]8@G^E@52J:?6?6C8J^56E2:=]A9An:5ledaecQ E2C86ElQ03=2?2E:@? p5>:?:DEC2E:@?k^2m[ 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@?DF>AE:@? 😕 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D C624965 2? 2==E:>6 9:89 😕 a_ac 7@==@H:?8 2 C2E96C DE625J 56>2?5 7C@> E96 >:5a___D E9C@F89 E96 62C=J a_a_D]k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>6C4:2= D64E@C[ H9:49 :?4=F56D 52E2 46?E6CD[ 😀 2 5C:G:?8 7@C46 😕 E96 C646?E :?4C62D6 😕 6?6C8J 4@?DF>AE:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@?]k^Am

    kAms2E2 46?E6CD 😕 E96 &?:E65 $E2E6D FD65 23@FE `gb E6CC2H2EE9@FCD @7 6=64EC:4:EJ =2DE J62C[ 23@FE cT @7 E96 4@F?ECJ’D E@E2= 4@?DF>AE:@?[ E96 x?E6C?2E:@?2= t?6C8J p86?4J 6DE:>2E6D]k^Am

    kAm{2DE J62C[ >@C6 E92? c_T @7 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]:62]@C8^C6A@CED^6?6C8J2?52:^6?6C8JDFAA=J7@C2:Q E2C86ElQ03=2?6 7C@> ?2EFC2= 82D] #6?6H23=6D DF49 2D D@=2C 2?5 H:?5 >256 FA acT @7 E96 A@H6C[ ?F4=62C a_T 2?5 4@2= `dT[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 286?4J]k^Am

    kAm%96 286?4J AC@;64ED E92E 6=64EC:4:EJ 4@?DF>AE:@? 3J &]$] 52E2 46?E6CD H:== 8C@H 3J `bbT 3J a_b_]k^Am

    kAm+F@ 6IA=2:?65 E92E !6??DJ=G2?:2 😀 😕 2 F?:BF6 A@D:E:@? 😕 E6C>D @7 6=64EC:4:EJ DFAA=J 2?5 AC@I:>:EJ E@ =2C86 >2C<6ED] xE 2=D@ 92D 2446DD E@ H2E6C]k^Am

    kAmx? yF?6[ p>2K@? 2??@F?465 A=2?D E@ :?G6DE Sa_ 3:==:@? 😕 !6??DJ=G2?:2 E@ 3F:=5 >F=E:A=6 42>AFD6D 7@4FD65 @? 9:89E649 4=@F5 4@>AFE:?8 2?5 2CE:7:4:2= :?E6==:86?46 :??@G2E:@?] %96 A=2?E 😕 {FK6C?6 r@F?EJ 😀 ?62C E96 $FDBF692??2 #:G6C 2?5 E96 $FDBF692??2 $E62> t=64EC:4 $E2E:@?[ 2 ?F4=62C A@H6C A=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“x E9:?< H6 92G6 2 C62==J DEC@?8 FE:=:EJ DFAA=J 96C6[ H9:49 92D A@H6C] %96?[ H6’C6 4=@D6 E@ E9@D6 3:8 4:E:6D H:E9 2 =@E @7 56>2?5[” +F@ D2:5] “x E9:?< E92E F?:BF6=J A@D:E:@?D FD 7@C E96 =@42E:@? @7 ?6H 52E2 46?E6CD]”k^Am

    kAm%96 724:=:E:6D 2=D@ C6BF:C6 D:8?:7:42?E 2>@F?ED @7 H2E6C 7@C 4@@=:?8 AFCA@D6D]k^Am

    kAmy@9? +236CD @7 4@>AFE6CD E92E 42? AFE @77 2 =@E @7 962E]k^Am

    kAm“%9:?< 23@FE 9@H H2C> 2 =2AE@A 42? 86E D:EE:?8 @? J@FC 4@F49 4FD9:@? @C =2A H96? 5@:?8 H@C< 2E 9@>6[” +2F49 >@C6 :?E6?D6]”k^Am

    kAm{2C86 52E2 46?E6CD 42? 4@?DF>6 FA E@ 7:G6 >:==:@? 82==@?D @7 H2E6C 52:=J[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 t?G:C@?>6?E2= 2?5 t?6C8J $EF5J x?DE:EFE6] %9:D 2>@F?E 😀 6BF:G2=6?E E@ E96 52:=J H2E6C 4@?DF>AE:@? 😕 2 E@H? @7 `_[___ E@ d_[___ A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE g_T @7 E96 H2E6C FD65 E@ 4@@= D6CG6CD 6G2A@C2E6D] %96 C6DE 9625D E@ =@42= H2DE6H2E6C 724:=:E:6D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 :?DE:EFE6]k^Am

    kAmpD E649?@=@8J 4@?DE2?E=J 6G@=G6D[ E96C6 2C6 2=H2JD ?6H H2JD E@ 4@@= E9:?8D] +2 E96 $FDBF692??2 #:G6C q2D:? r@>>:DD:@?]k^Am

    kAm“tG2A@C2E:G6 4@@=:?8 C6BF:C6D =@ED @7 H2E6C E92E 23D@C3D E96 962E 2?5 E96? 6G2A@C2E6D @77[” 96 D2:5] “%96D6 DJDE6>D 42? FD6 H2E6C 😕 E96 2>@F?ED @7 >:==:@?D @7 82==@?D A6C 52J E@ E6?D @7 >:==:@?D @7 82==@?D A6C 52J[ 56A6?5:?8 @? E96 D:K6 2?5 D4@A6 @7 E96 9JA6CD42=6 F?:E]”k^Am

    By Anna Wiest | awiest@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • US retailers are about to see if Black Friday benefits from a holiday halo effect

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Black Friday bargains no longer tempt people to leave Thanksgiving tables for midnight mall runs. Brawls in store aisles over toys and TVs with limited-time discounts are spectacles of holidays past. Online shopping and retailers launching discounts weeks before the turkey feast subdued that kind of fervor.

    But the sales event still has enough enthusiasts to make the day after Thanksgiving the one when U.S. stores get the most shoppers coming in the door. For that reason, Black Friday still rules as the unofficial start of the holiday shopping season.

    This year’s kickoff comes as consumer confidence in the U.S. economy fell this month in the aftermath of the federal government shutdown, weak hiring and stubborn inflation, according to a report The Conference Board issued Tuesday.

    Many retail executives have reported customers becoming more discerning and increasingly focused on deals while at the same time remaining willing to splash out for important occasions like the start of the school year and the winter holidays, creating a halo effect.

    “Consumers have been saying the economy is terrible while continuing to spend for years now, so the outlook is probably better than they are telling us,” Bill Adams, the chief economist at Comerica Bank, said this week of shoppers’ moods heading into Black Friday. “But business surveys also report consumers are being more sensitive to prices and selective in spending.”

    While planning for the holidays in the spring and summer, retail companies were wrestling with the volatility of President Donald Trump ’s wide-ranging tariffs on imported goods. Many accelerated shipments of some merchandise before the tariffs took effect or decided to absorb some of the import tax costs instead of raising prices for customers.

    Market research firm Circana said that 40% of all general merchandise sold in September saw a price increase of at least 5% compared with the first four months of the year.

    Toys, baby products, housewares, and team sports equipment were among the hardest hit categories. For example, 83% of toys sold in September saw an increase of at least 5%, Circana said. Industry group The Toy Association says nearly 80% of the toys sold in the U.S. are made in China, a country the Trump administration hit with especially high tariffs at various points this year.

    Still, analysts and mall executives cited solid momentum heading into Black Friday week. At the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota, foot traffic in recent weeks surpassed the numbers from pre-pandemic 2019, said Jill Renslow, the mall’s chief business development and marketing officer.

    “We’re seeing a very positive start to the holiday season,” Renslow said. “The last few Saturdays in November have been very strong.”

    The growth in online sales also has been robust so far. From Nov. 1 to Nov. 23, consumers spent $79.7 billion, according to web tracking and analysis platform Adobe Analytics. That represented a gain of 7.5% from a year earlier and was bigger than Adobe’s 5.3% growth forecast for the season.

    Mastercard SpendingPulse, which tracks spending across all payment methods, predicted a 3.6% increase in holiday sales from Nov. 1 through Dec. 24. That compares with a 4.1% increase last year.

    “Clearly, there’s uncertainty,” Mastercard Chief Economist Michelle Meyer said. “Clearly, consumers feel on edge. But at the moment, it doesn’t seem like it’s changing how they are showing up for this season.”

    According to Adobe Analytics, Thanksgiving Day was the best time to shop online to get the deepest discount on sporting goods. But Black Friday will be the best time to buy TVs, toys and appliances online.

    Cyber Monday, however, should be the best time to buy apparel and computers. Apparel discounts peaked at 12.2% off the suggested manufacturer’s price between Nov. 1 and Nov. 23 but are expected to hit 25% off on Cyber Monday, Adobe said.

    Source link

  • US retailers are about to see if Black Friday benefits from a holiday halo effect

    NEW YORK — NEW YORK (AP) — Black Friday bargains no longer tempt people to leave Thanksgiving tables for midnight mall runs. Brawls in store aisles over toys and TVs with limited-time discounts are spectacles of holidays past. Online shopping and retailers launching discounts weeks before the turkey feast subdued that kind of fervor.

    But the sales event still has enough enthusiasts to make the day after Thanksgiving the one when U.S. stores get the most shoppers coming in the door. For that reason, Black Friday still rules as the unofficial start of the holiday shopping season.

    This year’s kickoff comes as consumer confidence in the U.S. economy fell this month in the aftermath of the federal government shutdown, weak hiring and stubborn inflation, according to a report The Conference Board issued Tuesday.

    Many retail executives have reported customers becoming more discerning and increasingly focused on deals while at the same time remaining willing to splash out for important occasions like the start of the school year and the winter holidays, creating a halo effect.

    “Consumers have been saying the economy is terrible while continuing to spend for years now, so the outlook is probably better than they are telling us,” Bill Adams, the chief economist at Comerica Bank, said this week of shoppers’ moods heading into Black Friday. “But business surveys also report consumers are being more sensitive to prices and selective in spending.”

    While planning for the holidays in the spring and summer, retail companies were wrestling with the volatility of President Donald Trump ’s wide-ranging tariffs on imported goods. Many accelerated shipments of some merchandise before the tariffs took effect or decided to absorb some of the import tax costs instead of raising prices for customers.

    Market research firm Circana said that 40% of all general merchandise sold in September saw a price increase of at least 5% compared with the first four months of the year.

    Toys, baby products, housewares, and team sports equipment were among the hardest hit categories. For example, 83% of toys sold in September saw an increase of at least 5%, Circana said. Industry group The Toy Association says nearly 80% of the toys sold in the U.S. are made in China, a country the Trump administration hit with especially high tariffs at various points this year.

    Still, analysts and mall executives cited solid momentum heading into Black Friday week. At the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota, foot traffic in recent weeks surpassed the numbers from pre-pandemic 2019, said Jill Renslow, the mall’s chief business development and marketing officer.

    “We’re seeing a very positive start to the holiday season,” Renslow said. “The last few Saturdays in November have been very strong.”

    The growth in online sales also has been robust so far. From Nov. 1 to Nov. 23, consumers spent $79.7 billion, according to web tracking and analysis platform Adobe Analytics. That represented a gain of 7.5% from a year earlier and was bigger than Adobe’s 5.3% growth forecast for the season.

    Mastercard SpendingPulse, which tracks spending across all payment methods, predicted a 3.6% increase in holiday sales from Nov. 1 through Dec. 24. That compares with a 4.1% increase last year.

    “Clearly, there’s uncertainty,” Mastercard Chief Economist Michelle Meyer said. “Clearly, consumers feel on edge. But at the moment, it doesn’t seem like it’s changing how they are showing up for this season.”

    According to Adobe Analytics, Thanksgiving Day was the best time to shop online to get the deepest discount on sporting goods. But Black Friday will be the best time to buy TVs, toys and appliances online.

    Cyber Monday, however, should be the best time to buy apparel and computers. Apparel discounts peaked at 12.2% off the suggested manufacturer’s price between Nov. 1 and Nov. 23 but are expected to hit 25% off on Cyber Monday, Adobe said.

    Source link

  • Cook County in Illinois establishes permanent guaranteed income program

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The second-largest county in the United States has established a permanent guaranteed basic income program after the success of a previous pilot version.

    The Cook County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved $7.5 million for a permanent guaranteed basic income program last week. Chicago, the largest city in the Midwest and third-largest in the country, is the county seat for Cook County.

    Cook County made headlines as it established the guaranteed basic income program after many local governments across the country launched pilot versions. 

    The Cook County Board of Commissioners approved $7.5 million for a permanent guaranteed basic income program last week. (Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

    CHICAGO HOMEOWNERS DEMAND ANSWERS AS PROPERTY TAX BILLS RISE: ‘DIVESTMENT IN THIS COMMUNITY’

    Guaranteed basic income programs have become a trend across the U.S. in recent years with more than 100 pilots launched since 2018. Mayors for Guaranteed Income grew into a coalition of 150 mayors pushing pilot programs, offering low-income participants up to $1,000 a month with no strings attached. The group has pushed pilot programs that have been adopted by municipalities across the country

    The Cook County program was launched in 2022 with the aid of federal COVID-19 relief funds.

    Once the largest publicly funded program in the nation receiving $42 million in federal funding from the American Rescue Plan Act, the Cook County Promise Guaranteed Income Pilot provided monthly payments of $500 to 3,250 households for two years, with no strings attached.

    Economic Security Illinois Director Sarah Saheb described Cook County’s guaranteed basic income pilot as a “historic success” and said that when the federal government was “stepping back from its responsibilities to working families, Cook County is leading the way to ensure people can afford basic necessities.”

    The commissioners told Fox News Digital that the decision to extend the program into permanence was based on findings from a survey on the county’s pilot program.

    ILLINOIS LAWMAKERS PASS BILL BANNING ICE IMMIGRATION ARRESTS NEAR COURTHOUSES

    Close up of hands holding cash

    Guaranteed basic income programs have become a trend across the U.S. in recent years with more than 100 GBI pilots launched since 2018. (iStock)

    The findings released by the commission in April showed that three-quarters of participants reported feeling more financially secure and 94% of participants used the funds to address financial emergencies during challenging times. Majorities also reported the program improved their mental health and lowered their stress levels.

    The commission learned from the survey that participants mainly used the funds for essential needs such as food, rent, utilities, and transportation.

    Illinois Policy Institute (IPI), a think tank that tracks public policy decisions in the state, told Fox News Digital that “Cook County is making its guaranteed income pilot permanent and committing millions to a failed strategy already shown to leave people with less work experience and lower earnings.”

    POLICE SAY THEY’RE ‘TIRED’ OF DEM CITIES SPENDING BILLIONS ON ILLEGAL ALIENS OVER COPS: LAW ENFORCEMENT GROUP

    “That should alarm anyone who wants real, long-term progress for low-income residents. A recent pilot program in northern Illinois, including Cook County, decreased workforce participation and lower individual income (before transfers),” said Josh Bandoch, head of policy for the IPI.

    Democrats in the Illinois legislature are trying to advance an "Illinois Guaranteed Income Fund" through the Department of Human Services. 

    Democrats in the Illinois legislature are trying to advance an “Illinois Guaranteed Income Fund” through the Department of Human Services.  (iStock)

    In response to IPI, the commission told Fox News Digital that “outcomes and impacts vary depending heavily on program design: amount of cash, frequency/duration of payments, eligibility criteria (income-based, place-based, etc.), and local cost of living.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Cook County is partnering closely with the Inclusive Economy Lab at the University of Chicago to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the Promise Pilot. We will then design our next program in a thoughtful way that considers short- and long-term outcomes,” the commission said.

    Source link

  • Kim Jong Un says mega farm project chiefly about cultivating patriotic youth | NK News

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspected the construction of a mega greenhouse farm on the border with China for the sixth time on Wednesday, where he said a chief purpose of the project has been cultivating loyalty to his leadership among the young citizens he sent to build it.

    According to the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Thursday, the Sinuiju Combined Greenhouse Farm is now “nearing completion,” nine months after “day-and-night” construction started on islands in the Yalu River (Amnok River) that suffered severe flooding last year.

    Source link

  • Shifting Thanksgiving traditions reflect broader political, economic and cultural divides

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Thanksgiving is often cast as a holiday of unity, but it has also become a microcosm of the country’s fractures.

    What winds up being served for Thanksgiving dinner, who shows up — or doesn’t — and whether politics gets mentioned, can reflect broader shifts in ideology and culture. Simultaneously, Thanksgiving is still intended to bridge divides and emphasize the magnificence of the great American experiment launched centuries ago. 

    One example of this is the food Americans choose to eat on Thanksgiving and how they make it. 

    6 CLASSIC THANKSGIVING SIDE DISHES THAT HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM AMERICAN TABLES

    Take-out and dine-in options have become more widely adopted in contemporary Thanksgiving celebrations, with research from restaurant software company Popmenu finding a 42% increase from 2024 in the number of folks who plan to order from, or dine-in at a restaurant on Thanksgiving. Costs were a primary reason for the shift, along with wanting to spend more time with family and not worry about cooking. 

    President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump pardon the national Thanksgiving turkey Gobble in the Rose Garden of the White House, Nov. 25, 2025.  (Evan Vucci/The Associated Press )

    The length of time spent at the dinner table can also be quite telling. 

    In 2018, university researchers analyzed smartphone location data pings and determined that “politically diverse” Thanksgiving dinners tended to be significantly shorter than those dinners involving a family of entirely like-minded individuals. The study, conducted in 2018, showed the average dinner was 30 minutes to 50 minutes shorter at tables full of politically diverse folks, while a study measuring the same thing in 2020 found politically diverse dinners to be about 24 minutes shorter on average.

    Meanwhile, other Thanksgiving survey data from 2025, published by YouGov, found that 19% of Democrats expect to have political arguments at the dinner table, compared to 9% of Republicans.

    GUY FIERI INSISTS THANKSGIVING IS ‘ONE OF THE MORE AFFORDABLE HOLIDAYS’ FOR FAMILIES TO COOK ON A BUDGET   

    President Bush holding a turkey in Iraq

    President George W. Bush traveled to Iraq in 2003 to meet with troops without the public’s knowledge.  (Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images)

    It is hard to say overall whether Thanksgiving diners have gotten longer, or shorter, but according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, people typically spend around 128 minutes on meal preparation and cleanup, 89 minutes on eating and drinking, and about 148 minutes socializing, according to a long-term analysis conducted between 2003 and 2015.

    According to the National Turkey Federation, 94% of Americans plan to celebrate Thanksgiving. 

    The group added that 87% of those who celebrate say turkey is part of their holiday tradition, with 74% planning to serve an entire bird.

    An archival photograph of President Gerald R. Ford carving a turkey at Camp David in November 1976.

    An archival photograph of President Gerald R. Ford carving a turkey at Camp David Nov. 25, 1976. (Gerald R. Ford Library/The National Archives)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP  

    However, simultaneously, other findings from turkey producer Jennie-O indicated that there is a growing openness for less traditional Thanksgiving meal options, which the group said shows a “blend of old and new is redefining what Thanksgiving dinner looks like across America.” 

    The turkey product brand noted that 55% of Americans were “open to trying Thanksgiving recipes from different cultures,” particularly via side dishes.

    Even the changing treatment of the turkeys used for the presidential pardon has shifted slightly over the years as well. 

    In the early-2000s, turkeys that were presented were sometimes unnamed, or treated more anonymously, but more recently it has become standard to dub the turkeys with names and humanize them a bit. That trend also mirrors a shift toward better care for the pardoned turkeys over the years. 

    Source link

  • Weakening incomes add new strain to households already hit by high prices

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    For months, Americans have voiced frustration over the stubbornly high cost of living.

    But economists say a more troubling shift is emerging: consumers are increasingly reporting that their incomes aren’t keeping up with the financial pressures they face.

    AS THE HOLIDAYS APPROACH, THANKSGIVING BECOMES TRUMP’S ECONOMIC TEST

    Joanne Hsu, director and chief economist of the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers, says the change is showing up more clearly in recent readings.

    “Consumers have been expressing frustration from high prices consistently for the past several years; what makes this season different is that consumers are also increasingly mentioning weakening incomes as well,” Hsu told Fox News Digital.

    “This year, they are reporting pressures on their pocketbooks from multiple sources,” she added.

    Consumers are increasingly reporting that their incomes aren’t keeping up with the financial pressures they face. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    That sense of mounting pressure is backed up by recent analysis. 

    According to the Bank of America Institute, inflation has risen faster than middle- and lower-income households’ after-tax wages since January 2025.

    As a result, nearly one in four U.S. households is now living paycheck to paycheck, a number that has grown during the past year.

    NEARLY 1 IN 4 AMERICAN HOUSEHOLDS LIVING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK, REPORT REVEALS

    What that means is that the erosion of purchasing power is pushing more Americans to the edge of their budgets, making it harder to keep up, let alone get ahead.

    Hand reaching out across table to pay for meal outdoors with a credit card - contactless payment

    Americans say that it is hard to keep up financially, let alone, get ahead. (iStock)

    That growing strain presents a political challenge for President Donald Trump, who returned to the White House on promises of greater affordability. He is now confronting voter doubts about whether he can deliver.

    A Fox News national survey shows 76% of voters now rate the economy negatively, up sharply from 67% in July and 70% at the end of former President Joe Biden‘s term.

    Trump’s economic approval has also slipped to a new low, and his overall job approval has climbed to record levels of disapproval, even among voters who have historically backed him.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    US President Donald Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting

    President Donald Trump is grappling with affordability issues that plagued former President Joe Biden’s administration. (Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    For now, the daily reality for many Americans remains the same: prices feel too high, paychecks feel too thin and confidence in the future is fragile. 

    How quickly that changes and whether voters give Trump credit for it may determine the tone of the country’s economic and political debate in the months ahead.

    Source link

  • California consumer confidence plunges to 5-year low

    California consumer confidence has plummeted to levels not seen since the pandemic’s economic upheaval.

    My trusty spreadsheet’s review of the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index for California found that shopper psyche plunged 16% in November from October. This pushed the measure down to a level last seen in December 2020. Much of the index’s polling for this report took place before the 43-day shutdown ended on Nov. 12.

    This Golden State optimism tally is now 25% below its average since 2007. Plus, it hit its lowest November reading since 2012, and is not the consumer buoyancy merchants would like to see during the holiday shopping rush.

    Consumers juggle numerous challenges. The federal government shutdown, no matter who you blame, rattled nerves. Perhaps its resolution will revive sinking financial sentiments.

    Still, the job market appears wobbly. Immigration crackdowns are unnerving a part of the population. Plus, the state government budget has another huge shortfall.

    And while budget-busting inflation has decreased from its recent peak, it’s worrisome that it’s still not resolved for most shoppers’ satisfaction. The key price watchdog, the Federal Reserve, also seems more anxious about the employment picture.

    Slumping slices

    The California index tracks two slices of shopper sentiment, neither of which reveals much economic enthusiasm.

    Its “present situation” index – measuring current conditions – dropped 11% in November to a low last seen in mid-pandemic March 2021. It’s also 10% below average.

    The “expectations” index – gauging consumers’ financial outlook – was off 22% in November to its lowest level since October 2011. It’s now 37% below average.

    Nationally nervous

    U.S. consumers were spooked, too, but not as much as the Golden State.

    The overall national confidence index was off 7% in a month to a seven-month low and is 3% below its 19-year average. This was the weakest November confidence since 2013.

    The nationwide view of current conditions fell 3% in a month to its lowest since September 2024. But this yardstick remains 20% above average.

    The future is murky, nationally, too. The expectations index was off 12% to a seven-month low and sits 24% below average.

    Stately unease

    Five of the seven other big states tracked by the Conference Board saw optimism drop – but no political pattern emerges.

    Michigan: Down 22% in a month to the lowest level since June 2014 and 9% below average.

    Florida: Down 15% in a month to the lowest since April 2025, but 8% above average.

    Ohio: Down 10% in a month to the lowest since October 2016 and 7% below average.

    Illinois: Down 8% in a month to the lowest since October 2020 and 6% below average.

    Pennsylvania: Down 8% in a month to the lowest since September 2024 and 4% below average.

    And the two gainers couldn’t be more different, politically speaking. For example, New York City just elected a democratic socialist as its next mayor. Texas leans conservative.

    New York: Up 13% in a month and to 29% above average.

    Texas: Up 9% in a month and to 2% below average.

    Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

    Jonathan Lansner

    Source link

  • Californians sharply divided along partisan lines about immigration raids, poll finds

    California voters are sharply divided along partisan lines over the Trump administration’s immigration raids this year in Los Angeles and across the nation, according to a new poll.

    Just over half of the state’s registered voters oppose federal efforts to reduce undocumented immigration, and 61% are against deporting everyone in the nation who doesn’t have legal status, according to a recent poll by UC Berkeley’s Possibility Lab released to The Times on Wednesday.

    But there is an acute difference in opinions based on political leanings.

    Nearly 80% of Democrats oppose reducing the number of people entering the United States illegally, and 90% are against deporting everyone in the country who is undocumented, according to the poll. Among Republicans, 5% are against reducing the entries and 10% don’t believe all undocumented immigrants should be forced to leave.

    “The big thing that we find, not surprisingly, is that Democrats and Republicans look really different,” said political scientist Amy Lerman, director of UC Berkeley’s Possibility Lab, who studies race, public opinion and political behavior. “On these perspectives, they fall pretty clearly along party lines. While there’s some variation within the parties by things like age and race, really, the big divide is between Democrats and Republicans.”

    While there were some differences based on gender, age, income, geography and race, the results largely mirrored the partisan divide in the state, Lerman said.

    One remarkable finding was that nearly a quarter of survey respondents personally knew or were acquainted with someone in their family or friend groups directly affected by the deportation efforts, Lerman said.

    “That’s a really substantial proportion,” she said. “Similarly, the extent to which we see people reporting that people in their communities are concerned enough about deportation efforts that they’re not sending their kids to school, not shopping in local stores, not going to work,” not seeking medical care or attending church services.

    The poll surveyed a sample of the state’s registered voters and did not include the sentiments of the most affected communities — unregistered voters or those who are ineligible to cast ballots because they are not citizens.

    A little more than 23 million of California’s 39.5 million residents were registered to vote as of late October, according to the secretary of state’s office.

    “So if we think about the California population generally, this is a really significant underestimate of the effects, even though we’re seeing really substantial effects on communities,” she said.

    Earlier this year, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement launched a series of raids in Los Angeles and surrounding communities that spiked in June, creating both fear and outrage in Latino communities. Despite opposition from Gov. Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other elected Democrats, the Trump administration also deployed the National Guard to the streets of the nation’s second-largest city to, federal officials said, protect federal immigration officials.

    The months since have been chaotic, with masked, armed agents randomly pulling people — most of whom are Latino — off the streets and out of their workplaces and sending many to detention facilities, where some have died. Some deportees were flown to an El Salvador prison. Multiple lawsuits have been filed by state officials and civil rights groups.

    In one notable local case, a federal district judge issued a ruling temporarily blocking federal agents from using racial profiling to carry out indiscriminate immigration arrests in the Los Angeles area. The Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal and lifted that order, while the case moves forward.

    More than 7,100 undocumented immigrants have been arrested in the Los Angeles area by federal authorities since June 6, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

    On Monday, Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach), Bass and other elected officials hosted a congressional hearing on the impact of immigration raids that have taken place across the country. Garcia, the top Democrat on the House’s oversight committee, also announced the creation of a tracker to document misconduct and abuse during ICE raids.

    While Republican voters largely aligned with Trump’s actions on deportations, 16% said that they believed that the deportations will worsen the state’s economy.

    Lerman said the university planned to study whether these numbers changed as the impacts on the economy are felt more greatly.

    “If it continues to affect people, particularly, as we see really high rates of effects on the workforce, so construction, agriculture, all of the places where we’re as an economy really reliant [on immigrant labor], I can imagine some of these starting to shift even among Republicans,” she said.

    Among Latinos, whose support of Trump grew in the 2024 election, there are multiple indications of growing dissatisfaction with the president, according to separate national polls.

    Nearly eight in 10 Latinos said Trump’s policies have harmed their community, compared to 69% in 2019 during his first term, according to a national poll of adults in the United States released by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center on Monday. About 71% said the administration’s deportation efforts had gone too far, an increase from 56% in March. And it was the first time in the two decades that Pew has conducted its survey of Latino voters that the number of Latinos who said their standing in the United States had worsened increased, with more than two-thirds expressing the sentiment.

    Another poll released earlier this month by Somos Votantes, a liberal group that urges Latino voters to support Democratic candidates, found that one-third of Latino voters who previously supported Trump rue their decision, according to a national poll.

    Small business owner Brian Gavidia is among the Latino voters who supported Trump in November because of financial struggles.

    “I was tired of struggling, I was tired of seeing my friends closing businesses,” the 30-year-old said. “When [President] Biden ran again I’m like, ‘I’m not going to vote for the same four years we just had’ … I was sad and I was heartbroken that our economy was failing and that’s the reason why I went that way.”

    The East L.A. native, the son of immigrants from Colombia and El Salvador, said he wasn’t concerned about Trump’s immigration policies because the president promised to deport the “worst of the worst.”

    He grew disgusted watching the raids that unfolded in Los Angeles earlier this year.

    “They’re taking fruit vendors, day laborers, that’s the worst of the worst to you?” he remembered thinking.

    Over a lunch of asada tortas and horchata in East L.A., Gavidia recounted being detained by Border Patrol agents in June while working at a Montebello tow yard. Agents shoved him against a metal gate, demanding to know what hospital he was born at after he said he was an American citizen, according to video of the incident.

    After reviewing his ID, the agents eventually let Gavidia go. The Department of Homeland Security later claimed that Gavidia was detained for investigation for interference and released after being confirmed to be a U.S. citizen with no outstanding warrants. He is now a plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by the ACLU and immigrant advocacy groups alleging racial profiling during immigration raids.

    “At that moment, I was the criminal, at that moment I was the worst of the worst, which is crazy because I went to go see who they were getting — the worst of the worst like they said they were going to get,” Gavidia said. “But turns out when I got there, I was the worst of the worst.”

    Seema Mehta, Brittny Mejia

    Source link