ReportWire

Tag: e-mail

  • Safety net hospital fund shortfall widening

    Safety net hospital fund shortfall widening

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Lawmakers are seeking more support for the state’s safety net hospitals amid rising concerns about the fiscal health of a fund that helps cover medical costs for large numbers of uninsured and low-income patients.

    Hospitals and health insurers pay into the so-called safety net fund – a pool of money that helps fund care for hundreds of thousands of low-income residents who are uninsured or underinsured – with the state chipping in additional funding. But if the fund runs low, hospitals are on the hook for the shortfall.

    The fund is projected to have a shortfall of more than $220 million in the upcoming fiscal year, hospitals say, rising to the highest level in nearly two decades.

    Without additional funding, financially challenged hospitals will be forced to cover the deficit, leaving less money to provide medical care for low-income and uninsured patients, they say.

    An amendment to the Senate’s version of the $57.9 billion state budget filed by Sen. Barry Finegold, D-Andover, would require commercial health insurance companies to cover 50% of any revenue shortfalls in the safety net fund.

    “We need to do something to help our local hospitals,” Finegold said. “This is part of a long-term problem with funding for hospitals that serve the state’s most vulnerable residents. We need to fix it.”

    Many earmarks

    Finegold’s proposal is one of more than 1,000 amendments to the Senate’s budget, many of them local earmarks seeking to divert more state money to local governments, schools, cash-strapped community groups and nonprofits. Only a handful will likely make it into the Senate’s final spending package.

    The plan faces pushback from the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, which represents commercial insurers who would be impacted by the proposed changes to the hospital safety net program.

    Lora Pellegrini, the group’s president and CEO, said requiring insurers to cover the fund’s shortfalls would jeopardize negotiations between the state Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that seek to reduce assessments paid by medical insurance carriers.

    “This really came out of nowhere, and would be counterproductive to those efforts,” she said. “We have a committee process for a reason and that’s where these kinds of special interest issues should be vetted, not in the budget.”

    But the move is backed by the Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association, which says requiring insurers to cover the shortfall would help alleviate an “unmanageable financial burden” on the health care system “by broadening funding support for the program.”

    “The Health Safety Net is a vital component of Massachusetts’ healthcare infrastructure and its ability to cover the costs of care for low-income and uninsured patients,” Daniel McHale, MHP’s vice president for Healthcare Finance & Policy, said in a statement.

    “At this increasingly fragile time for the entire health care system, it is imperative that we take the steps needed to stabilize the safety net for the people and providers who rely on it each day.”

    Local hospitals affected

    The state’s safety net hospitals and community health centers – which include Lawrence Hospital, Salem Hospital, Holy Family Hospital in Methuen and Anna Jaques Hospital in Newburyport – serve a disproportionate percentage of low-income patients.

    Many are heavily dependent on Medicaid reimbursements, which are typically less than commercial insurance payouts.

    Nearly 30% of Lawrence General’s gross revenue is for care provided to Medicaid, or MassHealth, patients. The state average is 18%.

    Many community hospitals are collecting from low-paying government insurance programs, and getting below-average reimbursements from commercial insurers, advocates say.

    Lawmakers also swept money from the hospital safety net fund to help cover the costs of new Medicare savings programs that pay some or all of eligible senior citizen’s premiums and other health care costs, including prescriptions.

    Hospitals are also seeing increased demand from uninsured patients as hundreds of thousands of Medicaid recipients see their state-sponsored health care coverage dropped following the end of federal pandemic-related programs, which is driving up costs. Claims processing problems are another factor adding to hospital costs, they say.

    Those and other factors have widened the fund’s shortfall from $68 million in fiscal 2022 to more than $210 million in the previous fiscal year, according to the hospital association. Combined, the shortfall could reach $600 million for the three fiscal years, the association said.

    Biggest expense

    The House, which approved its $58.2 billion version of the state budget two weeks ago, proposed $17.3 million in state funding for the hospital safety net fund. The Senate, which begins debate on its version of the budget next week, has proposed a similar amount.

    In the current budget, the state allocated $91.4 million for the safety net fund.

    But the House budget didn’t include an amendment requiring insurers to help hospitals pay the shortfall. That means even if the Senate approves Finegold’s amendment, it would still need to be negotiated as part of the final budget before landing on Gov. Maura Healey’s desk for consideration.

    Health care coverage, in the meantime, is one of the state’s biggest expenses. Medicaid costs have doubled in the past decade and now account for nearly 40% of state spending.

    MassHealth serves more than 2 million people – roughly one-third of the state’s population – despite federal Medicaid redeterminations that have reduced its rolls over the past year.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Moulton looking to serve another term in Congress

    Moulton looking to serve another term in Congress

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton is seeking a sixth term in Congress, touting accomplishments in Washington that he says have roped in tens of millions of dollars in federal funding for his district, and pledging to work to bolster national security, and push for immigration reform and reproductive rights.

    Moulton filed paperwork with the Secretary of State’s Office on Thursday to run for reelection in the 6th Congressional race, which includes most of Essex County along with eight towns in Middlesex County. His campaign turned in more than 3,400 signatures from voters to qualify for the November ballot.

    If reelected to another two-year term, Moulton said he plans to work on protecting reproductive rights, push to modernize public transportation — including high speed rail, improve mental health care, and bolster national security amid increasing military threats from Russia and China.

    “We need a national China strategy,” said Moulton, who serves on a special House subcommittee on China. “We need to better manage competition, but most of all to succeed in deterrence. It’s critical that we succeed on deterrence.”

    Moulton, 45, said he also plans to focus on immigration reform, as Massachusetts wrestles with a surge of asylum seekers that have overwhelmed the state’s emergency shelter system and forced the state to allocate hundreds of millions of dollars amid a lack of funding from Congress and the Biden administration.

    “We need bipartisan immigration reform. Everyone knows the border is a mess,” Moulton said. “We need to do a lot more to discourage illegal immigration while encouraging people to come in through the proper pathways.”

    He touts his accomplishments in Congress, from pushing through legislation creating a new 988 nationwide suicide hotline to improving mental health care for active duty military service members and making ALS disability insurance “more comprehensive and accessible.”

    His reelection bid comes as a record number of congressional lawmakers have stepped down amid partisan bickering and redistricting changes in their home states. In the 118th Congress, at least 48 House members have departed or announced plans to leave Congress, about 11% of the lower chamber.

    Moulton, a former Marine captain, stresses his record of working with Republicans to get things approved by Congress, but says he won’t shy away from a fight.

    “Marines run toward the fight,” said Moulton, who served four combat tours of duty in Iraq. “There are problems and we’ve got to fix them. We have the best government in the world, but it needs a lot of work.”

    Moulton was first elected to Congress in 2014, after toppling nine-term incumbent Democratic Rep. John Tierney and beating Republican Richard Tisei with 55% of the vote in the general election. He has won reelection four times, sometimes with opposition.

    In the 2022 elections, he easily defeated Republican Bob May of Peabody and Mark Tashjian of Walpole, who was running as a Libertarian candidate.

    Moulton said he’s expecting a challenger in the Sept. 3 Democratic primary, but it isn’t clear how many candidates will jump into the congressional race.

    Nathaniel Mulcahy, a Rockport Democrat, pulled nomination papers to challenge Moulton, but hadn’t turned them in as of Thursday afternoon. The deadline to file paperwork to run is June 4, according to the Secretary of State’s Office.

    So far this election cycle, Moulton has raised close to $3.8 million, according to his campaign and Federal Election Commission filings. In the first quarter of 2024 alone, he raised $1.5 million, primarily for other Democratic candidates in congressional races.

    While the control of Congress will be up for grabs in the November elections, when voters will also choice a president, deep-blue Massachusetts isn’t of the competitive battleground states.

    All 11 members of the state’s current congressional delegation are Democrats, and the party has a 3 to 1 voter registration advantage over Republicans.

    The 6th Congressional District, which was once considered a competitive seat, hasn’t been held by a Republican in nearly three decades.

    Peter Torkildsen, who represented the 6th District from 1993 to 1997, lost the seat to Tierney in the November 1996 election by a razor-thin, 371-vote margin that took a month of recounts to finalize. He challenged Tierney two years later in what was described as a grudge match, but he failed to win back the seat.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Enrollment rising for Medicare savings programs

    Enrollment rising for Medicare savings programs

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The number of senior citizens enrolled in the state’s Medicare savings programs has increased since eligibility was expanded to help more beneficiaries pay for health care premiums and prescription drugs.

    There were 138,313 people enrolled in the state’s federally funded programs as of June, according to the latest data from the state Department of Public Health, which administers the programs.

    That includes 17,045 new seniors and disabled beneficiaries who enrolled in June under changes that expanded who qualifies for the programs.

    The state has several Medicare savings programs – Qualified Medicare Beneficiary, Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary and Qualifying Individual program – that pay some or all of beneficiaries’ premiums and other health care costs, including prescriptions. To qualify, residents must be at least 65 years old and approved for the federally funded program.

    Even more people are likely to qualify for the benefits under changes to the state’s new Medicare savings programs, which began March 1, with a replacement for MassHealth’s Senior Buy-In and Buy-In programs.

    Under new eligibility requirements, for a person on Medicare with less than $2,824 per month in income – or less than $3,833 for a couple – the program will pay for monthly Part B premiums, Part A and D co-pays and deductibles, as well as extra help with prescription costs, according to the administration of Gov. Maura Healey.

    Until now, eligibility was determined through an asset test that required individuals to have no more than $18,180 in assets, $27,260 for couples. Those assets included money in bank accounts and retirement funds, which advocates say often excluded people who would otherwise qualify based on annual income.

    “MassHealth is committed to ensuring that older adults on fixed budgets have access to affordable coverage,” Mike Levine, MassHealth’s assistant secretary, said in a recent statement. “Our work expanding eligibility for the Medicare Saving Program and simplifying the application process is critical to meeting this goal.”

    The Boston-based nonprofit group Healthcare for All says the new Medicare saving program will save seniors an average of $500 per month they would have otherwise spent on health care costs. The group says seniors are often having to choose between paying for food and housing or “essential” health care services.

    Massachusetts is wrestling with skyrocketing health care costs that advocates say are jeopardizing medical treatment for patients.

    A report in March by the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission’s Center for Health Information and Analysis found health care expenditures per capita increased by 5.8% from 2021 to 2022, well above the national rate of 4.1% and nearly double the 3.1% benchmark set by the commission, based on previous years’ growth.

    The center attributed the increases to a combination of high prescription drug expenses, “unprecedented” patient cost sharing, and other factors that are forcing consumers to dig deeper into their pockets to pay for health care services.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Lawmakers blast Iran for attack on Israel

    Lawmakers blast Iran for attack on Israel

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Members of the state’s all-Democrat congressional delegation are condemning Iran’s strike against Israel over the weekend and calling for stepped-up diplomacy to end the widening conflict.

    Iran launched a missiles and drone attack on Israel on Saturday in retaliation for the alleged Israeli strike on the Iranian embassy that took out two senior Iranian officers. Most of the drones and missiles were either shut down by Israeli, U.S. or British forces, or failed to hit their intended targets, authorities said.

    Rep. Seth Moulton, a Salem Democrat, blasted the attacks and said Iran’s actions risk sparking a “catastrophic” Middle Eastern war that could drag the U.S. and other Israeli allies into the conflict.

    “Iran’s evil regime murders its own people at home and innocents abroad, funding terrorist groups across the Middle East – from Hamas and Hezbollah to the Houthis and proxies in Iraq that have killed scores of U.S. troops,” he said in a statement.

    But Moulton, a Marine veteran, also urged Israel to show restraint in its response to the Iranian attacks and work toward a bilateral cease fire in the Gaza strip.

    “It is neither in America’s national security interests, nor in Israel’s, to escalate into a full regional war,” he said. “As Israel weighs its next steps, it is critical that it remains focused on finishing its operations in Gaza and achieving a cease-fire-for-hostages deal – not on starting a new war while still having no endgame for their first.”

    Rep. Lori Trahan, a Westford Democrat, issued a statement also condemning Iran’s attack and pledging to work to “support Israel’s ability to defend itself and its people, and bring an end to this conflict which threatens regional stability.”

    “This is a dangerous and unnecessary escalation, and it comes at a time when the world’s focus should be on stopping the bloodshed in Gaza, releasing the hostages still held by Hamas, surging humanitarian support to innocent Palestinians, and returning to the hard work of achieving peace,” Trahan said.

    Gov. Maura Healey posted on social media that “Massachusetts stands with the people of Israel and @POTUS in the face of this unprecedented attack by Iran.”

    The attack on Israel came more than six months after Hamas terrorists invaded the country on Oct. 7, after which the Israeli military began its bombardment of the Gaza Strip. Iran had signaled that it planned to respond militarily to the Israeli strike on its embassy.

    Republicans also criticized the strike, but pointed blame at President Joe Biden’s administration for its “appeasement” policy towards Iranian government.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson said Israel is facing a “vicious” attack and the U.S. “must stand” by its ally. The Louisiana Republican accused the Biden administration of “undermining” Israel with conflicting policies about U.S. support.

    “As Israel faces this vicious attack from Iran, America must show our full resolve to stand with our critical ally,” Johnson’s office said on social media. “The world must be assured: Israel is not alone.”

    House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said the lower chamber will reconvene this week to consider legislation supporting Israel and to hold “Iran and its terrorist proxies accountable.”

    “The House of Representatives stands strongly with Israel, and there must be consequences for this unprovoked attack,” he posted on social media.

    But Moulton and other Democratic lawmakers pushed back on claims that the Biden administration contributed to the attacks.

    “It shouldn’t be hard for the Republican Party to support democracies like Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan rather than catering to Russia, China, and insurrection-backing extremists in their own ranks,” he said.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Student loan providers make millions of billing errors

    Student loan providers make millions of billing errors

    [ad_1]

    Private companies overseeing the federal government’s college loan programs made “millions” of errors implementing new repayment plans, costing student borrowers time and money, according to a new congressional report.

    The report, released by Massachusetts Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey, along with two other Democratic lawmakers, said the major loan servicers under contract with the U.S. Department of Education made more than 3.9 million “billing-related errors” once repayment of federal student loans resumed last fall.

    “The four student loan servicers that were under contract with ED at the end of the payment pause had ample time, clear contractual requirements, and sufficient funding from the federal government,” the report states. “Yet, they still made a series of mistakes that harmed millions of borrowers when payments restarted.”

    The report is based on data from the U.S. Education Department and federal audits that detailed delayed billing statements, “miscalculations” for borrowers converting to the new SAVE income-driven repayment plan, and payment miscalculations on borrowers’ income, family size or marital status.

    The loan servicing companies – EdFinancial Services, Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missouri, Maximus Education and Nelnet Diversified Solutions – responded to the allegations in a series of letters to the lawmakers that detail how they were challenged once loan repayments resumed.

    In a January letter, MOHELA said it has struggled to adjust to “evolving” loan servicing requirements from the U.S. Department of Education’s office of Federal Student Aid when millions of borrowers resumed repayments after a multiyear pause. A lack of federal funding compounded the efforts, the company said.

    “FSA has allocated only limited funding for servicing during the unprecedented event and throughout the ‘on-ramp’ period, funding which pales in comparison to the enormity of work associated with assisting millions of borrowers in a condensed time frame,” the company wrote.

    Nelnet blamed the federal government, in part, for the bungled resumption of student loan repayments and said it could “have avoided foreseeable borrower impacts and created a better customer experience.”

    “Unfortunately, borrowers were instead met with confusing and conflicting announcements of program changes, were told no payments were required, that interest would not accrue, indefinitely, and were promised their loans would be discharged,” Jeffrey Noordhoek, NelNet’s CEO, wrote to Warren.

    It’s not clear if the congressional report will lead to sanctions against the loan servicers. Last year, the Education Department released guidelines outlining steps it could take to punish servicers who fail to fulfill their contractual obligations, including withholding pay and transferring borrowers to other loan servicers.

    But the lawmakers said in the report that more should be done to help borrowers impacted by the errors, and called on the Biden administration to provide debt relief for those who were overbilled on loan repayments.

    “To remedy servicers’ historic failures and protect borrowers from future harms, there must be a path for debt relief for borrowers harmed by their servicers,” they wrote.

    Federal student loan servicing companies have been under intense scrutiny from Congress, which has held oversight hearings grilling education officials on efforts to reduce student debt. More than 43 million borrowers in the United States are carrying an estimated $1.6 trillion in student loan debt, according to federal data.

    Overall, the lawmakers said loan servicing companies have a “decades-long pattern of failures” and said the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated a lack of accountability in the system that “allowed abuses to go unchecked and caused harm for borrowers crushed by student loan debt.”

    “These failures have resulted in borrowers being unable to properly manage their loans and take advantage of long standing student debt relief programs,” they wrote.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • House seeks more money for MBTA upgrades

    House seeks more money for MBTA upgrades

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — House Democrats are seeking hundreds of millions of dollars more for MBTA upgrades and workforce needs as part of their annual spending plan.

    The House’s version of the budget unveiled Wednesday calls for spending what legislative leaders described as a “record” $555 million for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority in the next fiscal year and an additional $184 million for regional transit systems that operate across the state.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano said the “historic” level of spending “will allow the new leadership at the T to meet the immense challenges that they face head on.”

    “Given the workforce recruitment and training challenges that have plagued the MBTA, I am particularly proud of the House’s proposal to establish an MBTA Academy that would help to bolster their workforce development efforts,” the Quincy Democrat said in a statement.

    House leaders said the spending plan for the fiscal year that begins July 1 would be funded in part by revenue from the state’s new “millionaire’s tax,” a voter-approved law that set a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million.

    “Having a well-run transit system is critical to the success of the commonwealth,” House Committee on Ways and Means Chair Aaron Michlewitz, D-Boston, said in a statement. “This record amount of funding shows the House’s commitment to improving our transportation infrastructure in every area of the commonwealth.”

    The House plan earmarks $314 million for direct operating costs at the MBTA, $184 million for the state’s 15 regional transit authorities, and $75 million for MBTA capital investments.

    The plan also calls for spending $40 million to create an MBTA academy to oversee recruiting and training efforts, and create a pipeline for skilled workers.

    An additional $20 million would be set aside for reduced fares for riders with low incomes, which was recently approved by the MBTA’s board of directors.

    The low-income fare program is expected to cost $60 million a year and Gov. Maura Healey has proposed $45 million in funding from the “millionaire’s tax” in her fiscal 2025 budget proposal. Members of an advisory board that recommended approval of the plan also cautioned that the state does not have a dedicated source of funding.

    The move to pump more taxpayer money into the state’s beleaguered public transit system comes as the MBTA wrestles with projected budget deficits driven by a mountain of debt, some dating back to the Big Dig project.

    T officials estimate the transit agency’s operating deficit for the next fiscal year is $182 million, which is projected to grow to $859 million by 2029.

    Meanwhile, the MBTA said it would need about $24.5 billion to bring the system into a state of “good repair” by replacing tracks, facilities, power equipment, trains and other infrastructure.

    Healey attributes the deficit to a lack of investment in the system over decades and said she wants to make “transformative investments” to improve service and reliability. She touted $250 million in MBTA funding in her $56.1 billion budget proposal unveiled in January.

    Lawmakers are expected to file hundreds of proposed amendments to the House’s spending package, the fate of which will be debated in closed-door leadership negotiations.

    The budget would also need to be approved by the state Senate before heading to Healey’s desk for review.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Russia divestment promises largely unfulfilled

    Russia divestment promises largely unfulfilled

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Nearly two years after Massachusetts moved to strip the state’s retirement fund of Russian-tied stocks and other holdings in response to its war in Ukraine, that pledge remains largely unfulfilled.

    Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, state lawmakers approved a $1.6 billion bipartisan supplemental spending bill that called for divesting the state’s pension fund of an estimated $140 million in investments tied to the country. Then-Gov. Charlie Baker signed the bill, as well as an executive order directing executive branch agencies to conduct a review of state contracts to determine if there are any ties to Russian businesses that could be severed.

    Baker’s directive also called on independent agencies, public colleges and universities, and other constitutional offices to adopt similar policies.

    At the time, state leaders touted the move to pull out those investments was a small, but meaningful, way of expressing outrage over the unprovoked war, and showing solidarity with the Ukrainian people’s fight against Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    But nearly two years after the much publicized move, little has changed. The state’s pension fund still has an estimated $140 million in investments tied to Russia, according to Treasurer Deb Goldberg, whose office oversees the retirement system.

    In a recent report to House and Senate clerks, the Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management said the pension fund still has millions of shares tied to Russian entities in its investment portfolio.

    “With markets at PRIM’s investment managers’ disposal being suspended from trading in the Russian securities and markets, our investment managers have been unable to liquidate out of the majority of positions,” PRIM’s executive director and chief investment officer Michael G. Trotsky wrote in the report. “They continue to monitor the situation.”

    The data shows retirement fund managers have been able to divest more than 1 million shares in Russian investments since July 2022, including shares in Sberbank PJSC, Russia’s largest bank, and retail giant Magnit.

    State pension officials said the remaining shares tied to restricted Russian assets are essentially worthless as of Dec. 31, with a market value of zero.

    The PRIM reports also said investment managers with indirect holdings of restricted securities “have not removed restricted companies from their funds nor have these managers created similar actively managed funds which exclude these restricted securities.”

    But Massachusetts isn’t alone. Other states that took steps in 2022 to have their public employee pension funds divest their holdings from Russian stocks or cease any new investments into those entities have also made little progress to fulfill those pledges, according to pension fund groups.

    Pension fund experts say the global reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine two years ago cut off much of its economy from the rest of the world.

    But that has made it nearly impossible to move ahead with pledges of divestment by state retirement systems, university endowments and other public-sector holdings — as well as private investments like those in 401(k) accounts.

    Alex Brown, research manager at the National Association of State Retirement Administrators, said while many pension funds want to get out of Russian investments, it’s just not realistic to sell in the current environment.

    “The point wasn’t to engage in a fire sale of these assets, but rather to systematically identify opportunities to sell their Russian holdings in the most prudent manner,” he said. “It has to be a practical time to sell, but you also want to do it prudently.”

    Brown noted that collectively Russian investments account for only a “tiny fraction” of the more than $5 trillion value of state and local retirement funds. Much of the money was invested in Russian government bonds, oil and coal companies as part of emerging-markets index funds, experts say.

    Political observers also note that many investments in Russia purchased before the war are now almost worthless or substantially depreciated in value. That’s raised questions about whether divesting those funds is even necessary.

    Meanwhile, the Kremlin has also rewritten rules governing foreign ownership of Russian company shares in response to U.S. sanctions, which analysts say has triggered confusion among investors and increased their risks of heavy losses from holdings now stranded in the country.

    The Biden administration imposed a fresh slate of sanctions on more than 500 targets on Friday — the largest to date — in response to the death of opposition figure Alexey Navalny and on the eve of Russia’s two-year war in Ukraine.

    The United States and its allies have imposed sanctions on thousands of Russian targets in the past two years.

    “Two years ago, he tried to wipe Ukraine off the map,” Biden said in a statement. “If Putin does not pay the price for his death and destruction, he will keep going.”

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Lawmakers seek to lift fishing gear removal ban

    Lawmakers seek to lift fishing gear removal ban

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A new bipartisan proposal calls for lifting a statewide ban on removing abandoned fishing lines to help protect critically endangered North Atlantic right whales.

    The legislation, filed by Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr, R-Gloucester, would authorize the state Division of Marine Fisheries – with the approval of the Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission and the Department of Fish and Game – to set regulations allowing for the removal of fishing gear from state waters.

    Under current law, commercial fishing gear is considered private property and cannot be removed when it becomes dislodged and sinks to the ocean floor or washes up on shore. Backers of the plan say abandoned fishing gear poses a threat to the marine environment and ecosystems.

    “It ‘ghost fishes,’ increasing mortality without any harvest benefit, it presents a major risk for entanglement for right whales and other species, it clutters and pollutes the ocean floor, and it presents ongoing problems for coastal communities that have to deal with this form of pollution when it washes ashore and must be collected and disposed of before it does further damage,” Tarr said in a statement.

    The rare bipartisan measure is co-sponsored by more than a dozen lawmakers spanning the North Shore, South Shore, Cape Cod and the islands, including state Sen. Joan Lovely, D-Salem, and Rep. Ann-Margaret Ferrante, D-Gloucester, and House Minority Leader Brad Jones, R-North Reading.

    It’s also backed by the Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association, which lauded the fact that the bill would allow abandoned gear to be collected during community beach cleanups.

    “The commercial lobster industry also helps with many of these cleanup efforts to maintain clean beaches for everyone to enjoy,” said Beth Casoni, the association’s executive director. “We look forward to seeing this bill through to the end.”

    The bill also includes protections for fishermen, including a provision that clarifies it is unlawful to “take, use, destroy, injure or molest” traps, lines and other gear “without the consent of the owner.”

    Lawmakers say the proposal seeks to strike a balance between the protection of right whales while recognizing the impact of government-ordered fishing ground closures and other restrictions on the state’s commercial lobster fishery.

    Driven to the brink of extinction in the 20th century by whalers, North Atlantic right whales are more recently at risk from ship collisions and entanglement in fishing gear.

    Scientists say the population of North Atlantic right whales has dwindled to about 360. The species has also been hindered by poor reproduction and several years of high mortality, research has shown.

    Environmental activists want to ban commercial fishing nets and gear in state waters to prevent entanglements of whales and turtles. They’ve also called for federal regulators to expand no-fishing zones and mandate the use of so-called “ropeless” fishing gear to reduce the risk of entanglements.

    Federal regulators are considering new regulations requiring modifications in fishing gear to help reduce whale fatalities, but those rules have been put on hold for two years following recent court challenges.

    Massachusetts lobstermen argue that they’re doing more than enough to protect the whales by following conservation measures, including a months-long fishing closure during the winter and early spring and the use of new technology.

    They also argue that line entanglements are rare and say additional regulations would mean more financial pressures for an industry that is already struggling amid stringent regulations and closures of fishing areas.

    Last week, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced the death of a right whale off Martha’s Vineyard from a fishing line entanglement.

    The federal agency said the fishing gear, which had become deeply embedded in the whale’s tail, was traced back to Maine’s commercial lobster industry.

    Meanwhile, authorities discovered another dead right whale carcass floating off the coast of Georgia this week.

    The deaths have rekindled demands from environmental groups to impose new restrictions on fishing gear and commercial vessels to protect the critically endangered species.

    “The death of two juvenile North Atlantic whales within three weeks of each other is heartbreaking and preventable,” Kathleen Collins, senior marine campaign manager for the International Fund for Animal Welfare, said in a statement Thursday. “The right whale graveyard off our eastern seaboard continues to grow and inaction from the administration is digging the graves.”

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link