ReportWire

Tag: Drought

  • Citizen scientist measured Colorado snowfall for 50 years. Two new hips help him keep going.

    Citizen scientist measured Colorado snowfall for 50 years. Two new hips help him keep going.

    [ad_1]

    GOTHIC — Four miles from the nearest plowed road high in Colorado’s Rocky Mountains, a 73-year-old man with a billowing gray beard and two replaced hips trudged through his front yard to measure fresh snow that fell during one mid-March day.

    Billy Barr first began recording snow and weather data more than 50 years ago as a freshly minted Rutgers University environmental science graduate in Gothic, near part of the Colorado River’s headwaters.

    Bored and looking to keep busy, he had rigged rudimentary equipment and each day had jotted the inches of fresh snow, just as he had logged gas station brands as a child on family road trips.

    Unpaid but driven by compulsive curiosity and a preference for spending more than half the year on skis rather than on foot, Barr stayed here and kept measuring snowfall day after day, winter after winter.

    His faithful measurements revealed something he never expected long ago: snow is arriving later and disappearing earlier as the world warms. That’s a concerning sign for millions of people in the drought-stricken Southwest who rely on mountain snowpack to slowly melt throughout spring and summer to provide a steady stream of water for cities, agriculture and ecosystems.

    “Snow is a physical form of a water reservoir, and if there’s not enough of it, it’s gone,” Barr said.

    So-called “citizen scientists” have long played roles in making observations about plants and counting wildlife to help researchers better understand the environment.

    Barr is modest about his own contributions, although the once-handwritten snow data published on his website has informed numerous scientific papers and helped calibrate aerial snow sensing tools. And with each passing year, his data continues to grow.

    “Anybody could do it,” said the self-deprecating bachelor with a softened Jersey accent. “Being socially inept made me so I could do it for 50 years, but anyone can sit there and watch something like that.”

    Two winters ago, Barr’s legs started buckling with frustrating frequency as he’d ski mellow loops through spruce trees looking for animal tracks — another data point he collects. He feared it might be his last year in Gothic, a former mining town turned into a research facility owned by the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, where he worked full time for decades and is now a part-time accountant.

    “I was running out of time to live here,” he said. “That’s why I went through the hip replacements to prolong it.”

    Two hip replacement surgeries provided an extended lease on high-altitude living. Barr cross-country skied more this past December than he did the entire previous winter.

    “Unless something else goes wrong, which it will, but unless it’s severe, I think I can last out here a while longer,” he said.

    A lot could go wrong. As Barr sat on a bench beside at the research lab on an unseasonably warm March day, a heavy slab of snow slid off the roof and launched the bench forward, nearly causing him to fall.

    Not all risks are avoidable, but some are. If the ski track is too icy, he’ll walk parallel in untracked snow to get better footing. He grows produce in a greenhouse attached to his home, and most of his non-perishable goods — stocked the previous autumn — are organic. He wears a mask when he’s around others indoors.

    “I can’t get a respiratory disease at this altitude,” he said.

    For Barr, longevity means more time for the quiet mountain lifestyle he enjoys from his rustic two-room house heated by passive solar and a wood stove. He uses a composting toilet and relies on solar panels to heat water, do laundry and enable his nightly movie viewing.

    When he eventually retires from the mountains, Barr hopes to continue most of his long-running weather collection remotely.

    He has been testing remote tools for five years, trying to calibrate them to his dated but reliable techniques. He figures it will take a few more years of testing before he’ll trust the new tools and, even then, fears equipment failure.

    For now, he measures snow in his tried and true way:

    Around 4 p.m., he hikes uphill from his home to a flat, square board painted white, and sticks a metal ruler into accumulated snow to measure its depth. Next he pushes a clear canister upside down into the snow, uses a sheet of metal to scrape off the rest of the snow, then slides the sheet under the canister to help flip it over. He weighs the snow, subtracting the canister’s weight, which lets him calculate the water content.

    So far, manual measuring remains the best method, scientists say. Automated snow measurements introduce a degree of uncertainty such as how wind spreads snow unevenly across the landscape, explained Ben Pritchett, senior forecaster at the Colorado Avalanche Information Center.

    “Nothing replaces observing snow in person to understand how it’s changing,” Pritchett said.

    But Barr’s data collection has always been unpaid volunteer work — and that complicates any succession plan when he eventually leaves his home in Gothic.

    “If environmental science were funded like the way we fund cancer research or other efforts, we would absolutely continue that research and data collection,” said Ian Billick, executive director for the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory. “It would be super valuable.”

    The lab has winter caretakers who could ski the half mile (.8 kilometer) to Barr’s home to manually measure new snow at the same site with his same method, but someone would still need to foot the bill for their time.

    Barr is well aware that his humble weather station is just a snapshot of the Colorado River basin, and that satellites, lasers and computer models can now calculate how much snow falls basin-wide and predict resulting runoff. Yet local scientists say some of those models wouldn’t be as precise without his work.

    Ian Breckheimer, an ecologist with the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, measures snow from space using satellites. Given the distance, Breckheimer needed on-the-ground data to calibrate his model.

    “Billy’s data provides that ground truth,” Breckheimer said. “We know that his data is right. So that means that we can compare all the things that we think we can see to the things that we know are right.”

    [ad_2]

    Brittany Peterson

    Source link

  • Opinion: California has to conserve water. Why is Sacramento dragging its heels?

    Opinion: California has to conserve water. Why is Sacramento dragging its heels?

    [ad_1]

    On the heels of two wet winters, it’s easy to forget how close some parts of California came to running out of water a few short years ago. But this climate amnesia will not help us prepare for the next inevitable drought. Since before the state’s founding, the boom-and-bust of drought and flood have shaped our landscapes. In this era of climate change, weather extremes are becoming more common and more severe.

    The robust water supply of the 20th century is no longer reliable. California recently agreed to cut water imports from the Colorado River by 10% not out of altruism, but because we must. The Department of Water Resources projects that the Sierra snowpack — a major source of water for farms and cities — could be reduced by as much as 65% by the end of the century. More immediately, California’s water supply is projected to decrease by 10% as early as 2040. Now is the time to prepare for a drier, less predictable future.

    That’s why we spent nearly two years crafting legislation designed to do just that. We developed and shepherded the passage of two water conservation bills, Senate Bill 606 and Assembly Bill 1668, back in 2018. That legislation established a framework for creating long-term water-use efficiency standards for urban water suppliers that would govern indoor use, allowable water loss and outdoor use. The State Water Resources Control Board was charged with crafting the standards, working with the Department of Water Resources, businesses, environmental advocates and water utilities.

    The process has required compromise all around. The standards for indoor use and allowable water loss were hammered out by 2023, but there has been a delay in finalizing the outdoor-use efficiency standards.

    In large part because of that delay, the water board is about to trample the hard-won work that’s been done so far by allowing water utilities until 2035 or later to implement meaningful reductions. Under the current proposal, according to the board’s “provisional data,” 72% of Californians won’t have to save any additional water for another 10 years. But climate change isn’t waiting another decade to deepen its impacts. We need to stretch every drop from years when we get enough snow, as in this year, to carry us through the hot, dry periods to come.

    SB 606 and AB 1668 and the standards that are being set won’t tell Californians how many times a week to shower or when they can water their yards. The framework creates “water budgets” for water suppliers — customized bottom lines based on population, water use in the service area, climate and the like — that the utilities and their customers can meet in ways that best fit their individual situations.

    The goal of the budgets is to keep faucets flowing and water bills in check by pushing the utilities to invest in efficiency. That means replacing aging infrastructure to reduce wasteful leaks. It means incentivizing users to replace their lawns with California-friendly plants and to update their washing machines, toilets and faucets — all of which utilities can promote through rebates or even by doing the work themselves for households that can’t afford to pay upfront and wait for reimbursement.

    Because the water board’s latest plan for implementing efficiency standards has such an extended timeline, water will inevitably become even more expensive, including for low-income households and communities. While it is true that investing in efficiency costs money, it is the least expensive and fastest way to get our demand for water into balance with increasingly limited supplies. It can give us all more flexibility, so we’re not facing mandatory cutbacks or situations where households worry they can’t afford water for basic needs.

    Dollars not invested in improved efficiency will not be saved; they will instead have to be spent on more expensive options to achieve water sustainability, such as wastewater recycling and desalination plants. These are important tools essential to improving our water security, but they take time to build. Whether a water utility is promoting efficiency or recycling wastewater into drinking water, those costs ultimately get passed on to customers. Viewed in this full context, prioritizing investments in efficiency is raging commonsense.

    It is essential for state leaders to create durable and responsible policy rooted in today’s climate reality. Our water supply is under intense pressure.

    It’s not too late to turn this ship around. We can end the delay in implementing our conservation legislation by reverting to earlier proposed standards for outdoor water use in urban areas and finally holding utilities to appropriate water budgets.

    The state water board must do what is right for our communities, our environment and our future: Make efficiency the top priority. Don’t leave Californians waiting decades longer to make conservation a way of life.

    Robert Hertzberg is a former speaker of the Assembly and former majority leader of the state Senate. Assembly member Laura Friedman (D-Glendale) is running to replace Adam Schiff in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    [ad_2]

    Robert Hertzberg and Laura Friedman

    Source link

  • Eye on America: Small business tries four-day work week

    Eye on America: Small business tries four-day work week

    [ad_1]

    Eye on America: Small business tries four-day work week – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In Louisiana, we learn how a devastating drought has greatly diminished the area’s crawfish supply. Then in Ohio, we tour a small business that’s seeing promising results from a four-day work week model. Watch these stories and more on Eye on America with host Michelle Miller.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • One of the world’s most populated cities is nearly out of water as many go “days if not weeks” without it

    One of the world’s most populated cities is nearly out of water as many go “days if not weeks” without it

    [ad_1]

    Mexico City is home to nearly 22 million people. But for months, the sprawling city has been suffering from diminishing water supplies — and now, one of the world’s most populated cities is on the verge of a “day zero” where it will no longer have enough water to provide residents.  

    Citing the Water Basin Organization of the Valley of Mexico, local outlet La Razón de México reported last week that officials fear this “day zero” — when the Cutzamala System will no longer have enough water for residents — could come on June 26 and last until September. Locals are already struggling to have enough water, with many going “days, if not weeks, without running water in their houses,” CBS News contributor Enrique Acevedo said. 

    “There’s been water scarcity, water management, in the city that we haven’t seen in at least a decade,” he said. “Gyms here in Mexico City and other public parks had to start limiting the number of guests they have taking showers and using their facilities because a lot of people were taking advantage of their memberships to use water at those facilities.” 

    Local resident Juan Ortega told Reuters in January that among the rules implemented to try and conserve water is “cars are no longer washed.” 

    “The garden, the grass, is never watered, only the plants so that they don’t die,” he said. “We are going to start reusing water from washing machines for watering.” 

    One of The World's Most Populated Cities On The Edge of Water Scarcity
    A woman fills a bucket with bottled water at an apartment unit in the Las Peñas neighborhood in Iztapalapa on February 27, 2024 in Mexico City, Mexico.

    TOYA SARNO JORDAN / Getty Images


    Arturo Gracia, who runs a coffee shop in the area, said that his business has to pay for a water truck to supply water to toilets and other essentials. 

    “It’s affecting us a lot,” he said. “And I don’t think it’s just us. This is happening in several neighborhoods.” 

    These issues have been exacerbated as Mexico City battled high temperatures last week. Mexico City’s water system SACMEX said on Feb. 27 that temperatures were recorded as high as nearly 85 degrees Fahrenheit. This week, temperatures are expected to reach nearly 90 degrees Fahrenheit with minimal cloud coverage, according to The Weather Channel

    It’s an “unprecedented situation,” Rafael Carmona, director of SACMEX, told Reuters, with a lack of rain being a major factor. Rainfall in the region has decreased over the past four to five years, he said, leading to low storage in local dams. A lack of overall water in the supply systems, combined with the high population, created “something that we had not experienced during this administration, nor in previous administrations,” he said. 

    Most of Mexico is experiencing some form of drought, with many areas experiencing the highest levels of “extreme” and “exceptional,” according to the country’s drought monitor. In October, 75% of the country was experiencing drought, the Associated Press reported, while the country’s rainy season doesn’t start until around May. 

    One of The World's Most Populated Cities On The Edge of Water Scarcity
    Women wash clothes on the dry banks of the Villa Victoria dam, which is at 30.5 percent of its capacity on February 28, 2024 in Villa Victoria, Mexico. 

    / Getty Images


    On top of the drought, Acevedo said that “poor water management” has also been a major contributor to the problem. 

    “We’ve had a lot of underwater leaks. … Some figures say up to 40% of the water that’s been wasted in the city comes from underground leaks. There’s also some residential leaks,” he said. 

    Several leaks were reported by SACMEX at the beginning of February, which the supplier said it was working to correct. Many of those leaks were “caused by variations in the pressures of the hydraulic network,” SACMEX said. 

    Not everyone, however, believes “day zero” will come so soon. Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said the government will be able to increase the water supply enough to avoid such an event this year, La Razón de México reported. Other researchers believe it’s something that could happen in the years ahead. 

    “It’s not that we have a day zero coming up,” Acevedo said, “but certainly we haven’t seen things be as bad as they are right now in a while.”  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The innovative ways California is improving its underground water storage

    The innovative ways California is improving its underground water storage

    [ad_1]

    As of mid-February, the Sacramento area has now received more than a foot of rain in the current water season. 

    The rain and snowfall from this winter’s storms have been swelling rivers, adding to the Sierra Nevada snowpack and hopefully replenishing reservoirs. 

    Water experts say if we don’t change the way we store and use the water we will be in trouble in the future, likely facing higher water bills and laws that seriously restrict water use. 

    There could be another way, however, if we look beneath our feet. 

    When massive storms bring lots of water to California, bodies of water like Folsom Lake have to release water to make room for more water.   

    All that water that is released heads out to sea unused. A lot of storm runoff also goes unused.   

    But what if there was a way to capture a good chunk of that unused water and store it for a drought that we know is possible? 

    That is exactly what state officials are trying to do by putting excess water underground.  

    For decades hydrogeologist Tim Godwin has been studying groundwater.  

    “This is fundamentally changing the way we look at how we manage water in the state,” Godwin said.   

    He says the state’s Dept. of Water Resources is now looking at the whole water picture. 

    “Notice I am not distinguishing groundwater from surface water… it is one resource, and they are connected, and now we are starting to manage the basins, the bottom of our system,” he said.  

    So how much water can be stored underground? 

    Imagine a standard bucket. That bucket can represent all the water in California’s lakes and rivers in one year, about 40 to 50 million acre-feet of water. 

    Four standard garbage bins —the ones that you set out on the curb every week— represent the capacity of how much water can be stored underground. 

    Even though the aquifers are not empty, they can still take two to four times the amount of water California gets in a normal year.  

    Scientists have found two main ways to get all of that water underground. 

    Roseville has been implementing one of the ways for almost two decades through the use of a reversible water pump.   

    “Roseville was key in sort of pioneering the process really from the start,” Sean Bigley with Environmental Utilities of Roseville said.  

    The massive pumps can withdraw groundwater, but when we aren’t in a drought, these pumps can put large amounts of treated water back into the ground. 

    “This past year we were able to recharge about 2000-acre feet of water.  That is 6-thousand households worth of water (in an entire year),” Bigley said.  

    It’s hard to visualize where all the water goes underground.  

    They send water hundreds of feet down, saturating layers of rock, dirt, sand and silt, replenishing the aquifers that have been slowly shrinking over decades of use. 

    The other way to get a lot of water underground fast is with groundwater basins. These big areas of land can be flooded with storm runoff, water we couldn’t otherwise capture. 

    Dr. Graham Fogg, professor emeritus of hydrogeology at UC Davis, said, “If you look across this landscape, I mean it looks all the same, so people think, ‘Oh, the aquifer is uniform.’  Well, it’s not uniform.” 

    “It’s kind of like a complex architecture underground. Where water moves quickly and where we can recharge relatively rapidly is sand and gravel,” Dr. Fogg added.  

    To find where the best, most porous soil is, the DWR uses a high-tech electromagnetic device carried high above the ground by a helicopter traveling up and down the state. 

    Think of it like a giant X-ray or MRI that looks deep into the ground, around 1,000 feet, to map where the most porous areas are located. 

    Whether it is with big basins or reversible pumps, these tools will become more important as our climate is changing and storms have the potential to get stronger. 

    “Our surface water storage can fill quickly as we saw last year, (but) then what?” Godwin said. “This is the ‘then what?’”  

    This way of thinking about groundwater storage is so different from what was applied in previous decades. It takes years to get the different water agencies and thousands of landowners on board. 

    However, cities like Roseville, as well as the state’s water administrators and countless owners, are catching on and making those changes to save California’s water future. 

    [ad_2]

    Richard Sharp

    Source link

  • Crawfish shortage impacts Louisiana’s economy

    Crawfish shortage impacts Louisiana’s economy

    [ad_1]

    Crawfish shortage impacts Louisiana’s economy – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Crawfish are a Southern delicacy that are always in high demand – but this year, they’re in short supply. The crustaceans are hard to find right now due to a devastating drought in the region, and that’s hurting a lot of wallets in Louisiana. Janet Shamlian reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Explainer: What is an atmospheric river and how does it affect drought in California?

    Explainer: What is an atmospheric river and how does it affect drought in California?

    [ad_1]

    Atmospheric rivers get talked about a lot during winter in California — and for good reason.

    The invisible rivers in the sky play a significant role in how much rain the state receives and can contribute to some of California’s wettest winters on record.

    But what exactly are they?

    What is an atmospheric river?

    Atmospheric rivers are long, powerful portions of the atmosphere that carry lots of water from the tropical regions near the Earth’s equator towards the poles.

    They’re invisible to the naked eye — the water is moved over the ocean in the form of water vapor, not a “river” in the way we think of them on land. They tend to move through the atmosphere in streams between 250 and 375 miles wide.

    That’s about the distance between LA and San Francisco.

    That stretch moves an astonishing amount of water. Just one atmospheric river can move an average of 10.5 trillion gallons of water per day.

    The strongest atmospheric rivers can move anywhere between seven and 25 times as much water as the flow of the Mississippi River, which is the second longest river in North America and has a watershed that reaches 32 states, according to the national park service.

    According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, atmospheric rivers “are a primary feature in the entire global water supply and flood risks, particularly in the western U.S.”

    How do atmospheric rivers form?

    A view of the Earth using a water vapor satellite shows that moisture in the atmosphere is concentrated over the equator.

    Temperatures at the equator tend to run hotter, and just like in grade-school science lessons, hotter temperatures cause water to evaporate into the atmosphere. Warmer air can also hold more water vapor.

    The circulation of the atmosphere will pull streams of moisture away from the equator forming “atmospheric rivers.” These “rivers” of moisture can be pushed towards land by weather systems.

    Atmospheric rivers play a major role in California’s rain season. 25-50% of our state’s annual precipitation is produced by atmospheric rivers. Rain and snow amounts can vary widely depending on the exact location, timing and moisture content.

    Why are storms fueled by atmospheric rivers so powerful?

    Atmospheric rivers form and move fairly close to the surface of Earth at below 10,000 feet.

    In contrast, planes spend most of their time travelling at altitudes of 30,000 feet or higher.

    This means that, once atmospheric rivers reach land, especially the coastal mountains in California, they move up in altitude from their starting point as they travel.

    As the water vapor that makes up the rivers moves up, it cools with the temperature of the atmosphere, turning into water droplets and — eventually — lots and lots of precipitation.

    What does this have to do with California’s drought?

    Atmospheric rivers come in all shapes and sizes around the globe, and while some tend to point in a mostly consistent direction — there’s one that, according to NOAA, generally comes in from Hawaii and moves towards the West Coast of the U.S. — they do get moved around with the winds like other weather phenomena.

    This upcoming weekend, for example, will start with an atmospheric river pointed at northern and central California. Scattered clouds will make their way into the SoCal area while other parts see up to 7 inches of rain.

    But as the atmospheric river moves south, the storm will bring more and more rain to our area. That’s if they move as predicted, which can be difficult.

    “Now the one note with atmospheric rivers is, because they’re kind of narrow, and they’re very dependent on the moisture coming in off the Pacific, any slight shift in position or timing could have a big impact on how much rainfall we’re looking at,” Biggar said.

    And when the drought conditions are so severe, that change in impact gets noticed.

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Lloyd and Maggie More

    Source link

  • Proposal for new water district sparks fear of Northern California 'water grab'

    Proposal for new water district sparks fear of Northern California 'water grab'

    [ad_1]

    As California grapples with worsening cycles of drought, a proposal to create a new water district in Butte County has sparked fears of a profit-driven water grab by large-scale farmers and outside interests.

    In the walnut and almond orchards along State Route 99 near Chico, agricultural landowners have led a years-long campaign to form the Tuscan Water District — an entity they say is vital for the future of farming in this part of Northern California. They say having the district will enable them to bring in water and build infrastructure to recharge the groundwater aquifer.

    Yet some residents argue the district would open the door to water profiteering, claiming the plan would connect local supplies to California water markets, and allow the state to demand transfers during drought emergencies.

    Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

    The proposal, which will be decided Tuesday via mail-in balloting, has generated debate about the use of partially depleted aquifers to store imported water. Although major water suppliers in other parts of the state, such as the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, have invested in efforts to bank water underground for times of drought, the concept has met with deep suspicion in Butte County.

    “You put in the infrastructure, you start taking over the groundwater basin for private profit, and it changes everything,” said Barbara Vlamis, executive director of AquAlliance, an organization focused on protecting water resources in the Sacramento Valley. “It becomes this economic engine for these people that want to take over ownership.”

    Supporters deny the charges of seeking to sell or export water. They say the district is necessary to address the local groundwater deficit and achieve sustainability in the coming years, as required under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, or SGMA.

    “This is the most important development in local agriculture in a hundred years,” said Richard McGowan, a farmer who is one of the campaign’s leaders.

    Local nut and fruit orchards depend entirely on groundwater, which because of overuse is projected to require reductions in pumping to meet state-mandated sustainability goals.

    McGowan said the district, once formed, could plan projects to transport water to the area and use that water instead of pumping from wells, or use it to recharge the groundwater basin. Another benefit of forming the agency, he said, would be the ability to apply for government grants to fund infrastructure projects.

    “We’re going to have to become sustainable,” McGowan said. “This gives us a great opportunity to work together to preserve this water resource we have. And now water has become such a hot topic, and the state has now become involved with it, that it almost dictates that we do something like this.”

    Those who are fighting the district say it’s unnecessary. Vlamis argued the area’s current overuse of groundwater, which is not as severe as other parts of the Central Valley, could easily be addressed through conservation, estimating that if growers would save about 5%, that would be enough.

    She and others argue that if infrastructure is built to bring in water for groundwater recharge, the imported water that’s stored in the aquifer would become a privately owned asset, effectively creating a water bank. They say the groundwater basin could then be drawn down and filled with banked water, which could be sold and shipped elsewhere for profit.

    Such water banks have been established by various entities elsewhere in the state, such as the southern San Joaquin Valley.

    Vlamis said banking water would require a drawdown of the aquifer to create storage space, which would diminish the flow of streams, threaten groundwater-dependent trees and put shallow domestic wells at risk of running dry.

    “I think it is a damaging effort that could potentially destroy this region as we know it,” Vlamis said.

    A pump draws groundwater to irrigate a nut orchard near Nord in Butte County.

    A pump draws groundwater to irrigate a nut orchard near Nord in Butte County.

    (Jeffrey Obser)

    Opponents formed a political action committee called Groundwater for Butte, which has warned that establishing the district is a “water grab by Big Ag and the state.”

    “When they begin to pump water into the ground, from surface water that is already owned by private parties, those companies or those interests will own the water in the ground under my house,” said Jeffrey Obser, executive director of Groundwater for Butte. “That public status of the water will slowly be erased.”

    Supporters of the Tuscan Water District called such claims unfounded, saying they do not intend to transfer any water out of the area — and that measures are in place to prevent that from happening.

    They pointed out that the resolution outlining the district’s authority specifically states that it will not “have the powers to export, transfer, or move water” outside the local Vina and Butte subbasins, and that the district will not transfer any imported water outside its boundaries.

    “That’s an important restriction,” said Tovey Giezentanner, a consultant and spokesperson for the Tuscan Water District. “It was formed without the power to export water out of the county.”

    Another of the conditions adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission says the district must submit proposed projects, such as those focusing on aquifer recharge, to the local groundwater agency to ensure consistency with the area’s state-required groundwater sustainability plan.

    Those conditions “will ensure that the water stays local,” Giezentanner said.

    Supporters note that Butte County also has since the 1990s had an ordinance that requires a county review process for any transfers of local groundwater outside the county, or for so-called groundwater substitution transfers, in which a property owner would sell surface water that would otherwise be used locally and, as a substitute, would pump groundwater.

    McGowan touted those measures, saying the effort to create the agency “is not about shipping water out of the county.”

    But Vlamis said the district’s bylaws could easily be changed to allow for water to be moved out of the area, and the county ordinance simply outlines a procedure that would have to be followed.

    “Even if that’s not their intention, to transfer water out of here, all it takes is an emergency proclamation by the governor, and all local ordinances and everything are thrown out,” Vlamis said. “You may have honorable intentions, but once the state wants more water, and you’ve put in the infrastructure to facilitate this, all bets are off.”

    The water district’s proposed 102,000-acre territory covers a portion of the Tuscan Aquifer around Chico. It would overlap with part of the local Vina Groundwater Sustainability Agency’s territory.

    State regulators have endorsed the area’s groundwater management plans, but Vlamis’ group AquAlliance is suing to challenge the Vina plan, as well as two other local plans. The group cites various failures in the plans, saying they would allow for substantial declines in groundwater levels, threatening wells and streams.

    Vlamis said she’s convinced there is a longstanding interest among state and federal water officials to “integrate” the county’s groundwater into the state’s supplies, allowing for water to be transferred out of the area.

    The state Department of Water Resources denied that.

    Landowners have been casting ballots in the mail-election election. The balloting is weighted based on assessed land value, so the largest landowners, some of which farm thousands of acres, will have the biggest influence in the result. Critics have objected to this type of vote, saying they believe a one-vote-per-person system would be fairer.

    Richard Harriman, a lawyer in Chico, called the effort to form the district a “Trojan Horse,” saying out-of-county landowners are seeking control of the area’s water “for purposes that are not for the public interest in Butte County.”

    “It is absolute folly to think that the water is going to stay in Butte County, in that water bank, once the price of water is higher than the economic value of that water to agriculture. It will be gone. The water will follow the money,” Harriman said.

    Farmer Ernie Washington said in a letter to the Chico Enterprise-Record that he initially was concerned about the potential to export water from the county.

    “Conspiracy theories abound in the water world and I’m not naive enough to think that there aren’t plenty of outside interests with designs on our groundwater,” Washington wrote.

    But he added that he’s satisfied measures are in place to address that “as well as it can be,” and believes the intent of those seeking to form the district is to “preserve our groundwater resource,” as well as farmers’ livelihood and way of life.

    [ad_2]

    Ian James

    Source link

  • A Pond In Hawaii Turned Barbie Pink. Here’s What Scientists Think That Means.

    A Pond In Hawaii Turned Barbie Pink. Here’s What Scientists Think That Means.

    [ad_1]

    HONOLULU (AP) — A pond in Hawaii has turned so bubble-gum pink it could be from the set of “Barbie,” but the bizarre phenomenon is no cause for a dance party. Drought may be to blame for the strange hue, scientists say, and they’re warning against entering the water or drinking it.

    Staff at the Kealia Pond National Wildlife Refuge on Maui have been monitoring the pink water since Oct. 30.

    “I just got a report from somebody that was walking on the beach, and they called me up like, ‘There’s something weird going on over here,’” said Bret Wolfe, the refuge manager.

    Wolfe was concerned the bright pink could be a sign of an algae bloom, but lab tests found toxic algae was not causing the color. Instead an organism called halobacteria might be the culprit.

    Halobacteria are a type of archaea or single-celled organism that thrive in bodies of water with high levels of salt. The salinity inside the Kealia Pond outlet area is currently greater than 70 parts per thousand, which is twice the salinity of seawater. Wolfe said the lab will need to conduct a DNA analysis to definitively identify the organism.

    Maui’s drought is likely contributing to the situation. Normally Waikapu Stream feeds into Kealia Pond and raises water levels there, but Wolfe said that hasn’t happened in a long time.

    When it rains, the stream will flow into Kealia’s main pond and then into the outlet area that’s now pink. This will reduce the salinity and potentially change the water’s color.

    “That might be what makes it go away,” Wolfe said.

    Shad Hanohano, from left, Leilani Fagner and their daughter Meleana Hanohano view the pink water at the Kealia Pond National Wildlife Refuge in Kihei, Hawaii on Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023. Officials in Hawaii are investigating why the pond turned pink, but there are some indications that drought may be to blame. (Matthew Thayer/The Maui News via AP)

    No one at the refuge has seen the pond this color before — not even volunteers who have been around it for 70 years. The pond has been through periods of drought and high salinity before, though, and Wolfe isn’t sure why the color has changed now.

    Curious visitors have flocked to the park after photos of the pink pond appeared on social media.

    “We prefer that they come to hear about our our mission conserving native and endangered waterbirds and our wetland restorations. But no, they’re here to see the pink water,” Wolfe joked.

    He understands everyone’s fascination.

    “If that’s what gets them there, it’s OK,” he said. “It is neat.”

    Severino Urubio of Hilo, Hawaii snaps photos of Kealia Pond's pink water at Kealia Pond National Wildlife Refuge in Kihei, Hawaii on Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023. Officials in Hawaii are investigating why the pond turned pink, but there are some indications that drought may be to blame. (Matthew Thayer/The Maui News via AP)
    Severino Urubio of Hilo, Hawaii snaps photos of Kealia Pond’s pink water at Kealia Pond National Wildlife Refuge in Kihei, Hawaii on Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023. Officials in Hawaii are investigating why the pond turned pink, but there are some indications that drought may be to blame. (Matthew Thayer/The Maui News via AP)

    The wildlife refuge is a wetland that provides nesting, feeding and resting habitat to the endangered Hawaiian stilt, known as aeo, and the Hawaiian coot or alae keokeo. It also hosts migratory birds during the winter.

    The water doesn’t appear to be harming the birds, Wolfe said.

    As a wildlife refuge, people aren’t supposed to wade into the pond or let their pets in the water regardless of its color. But officials are taking an extra precaution to warn people not to enter the water or eat any fish caught there because the source of the color has yet to be identified.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sweltering summer heat took toll on many U.S. farms

    Sweltering summer heat took toll on many U.S. farms

    [ad_1]

    Sweltering summer heat took toll on U.S. farmers


    Sweltering summer heat took toll on U.S. farmers

    01:46

    Extension, Louisiana — Van Hensarling grows peanuts and cotton. But this Mississippi farmer’s harvesting a disaster.   

    “It probably took two-thirds of the cotton crop, and probably half of the peanut crop,” Hensarling told CBS News. “I’ve been farming for over 40 years, and I’ve never seen anything like this.” 

    His losses alone amount to about $1.2 million.  A combination of too much heat and too little rain.

    This summer’s same one-two punch knocked down Jack Dailey’s soybean harvest in neighboring Louisiana. He calls soybeans, “poverty peas.”

    “Everything hurts on a farm if you’re not getting everything, all the potential out of your crop,” Dailey said.

    Over the summer here in Franklin Parish, 27 days of triple-digit heat baked crops. Making matters worse, between mid-July and the end of August there was no rain for nearly six weeks, not a drop.

    Another issue for the soybean fields is it never really cooled down at night during this scorcher of a summer, further stressing these beans, which further stressed the farmers.   

    Summer extremes hit farms all across the U.S. from California, north to Minnesota, and east to Mississippi.    

    The impact hurt both farmers like Dailey and U.S. consumers. He was relatively lucky, losing about 15% of his soybean crop.

    “And so it looks like we’re going to get our crop out, which is huge,” Dailey said.

     It’s what always seeds a farmer’s outlook: optimism.    

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Amazon River Records Lowest Water Level In Over A Century

    Amazon River Records Lowest Water Level In Over A Century

    [ad_1]

    The water level at a major river port in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest has hit its lowest point in at least 121 years, as a historic drought upends the lives of hundreds of thousands of people and damages the jungle ecosystem. What do you think?

    “I’m glad I bought that CD of relaxing Amazon river sounds when I did.”

    Debra Martin, Escalator Operator

    “‘Amazon Valley’ has a nice ring to it.”

    Kirk Andrada, Satchel Designer

    “If we keep using the term historic to describe all these disasters then the word will lose all meaning.”

    Bailey Clark, Systems Analyst

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Saltwater threatens New Orleans’ drinking water

    Saltwater threatens New Orleans’ drinking water

    [ad_1]

    Saltwater threatens New Orleans’ drinking water – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Drought conditions brought the Mississippi River to unusually low levels. As a result, New Orleans’ drinking water could become contaminated by saltwater from the Gulf of Mexico. Omar Villafranca has the story.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ohio’s droughts are worse than often recognized, study finds

    Ohio’s droughts are worse than often recognized, study finds

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — COLUMBUS, Ohio – A new type of analysis suggests that droughts in Ohio were more severe from 2000 to 2019 than standard measurements have suggested.

    Researchers at The Ohio State University developed impacts-based thresholds for drought in Ohio, looking specifically at how corn yield and streamflow were affected by various drought indicators, such as notable changes in soil moisture, crops, and even livestock losses in the state.

    The results suggest this impacts-based approach could give Ohio farmers earlier and more accurate notice when drought conditions are approaching, said Steven Quiring, co-author of the study and a professor of geography at Ohio State.

    “We want to better understand what steps should be taken so that Ohio can better prepare for and also monitor the onset of drought conditions because a lot of the best ways to respond to drought is taking action early,” said Quiring. Moreover, with a more precise early warning system, agriculture producers might be able to save time and money by implementing water restrictions, or by switching to different or more drought-resistant crops. 

    The study was published in the Journal of Hydrometeorology. 

    The Ohio State researchers compared how their method performed at predicting droughts with data from the U.S Drought Monitor (USDM)

    The problem with the USDM is that it uses fixed drought thresholds, or guidelines that use the same parameters to measure changes in all seasons and climate regions of the country. Unfortunately, this one-size-fits-all approach can cause monitoring plans to inaccurately gauge local weather conditions and how they impact those in certain communities, Quiring said.

    By analyzing data from four drought indices commonly used in previous studies to monitor drought intensity across the United States, researchers were able to show that fixed thresholds tend to indicate milder drought conditions in Ohio than are indicated by the impacts-based thresholds identified in their study. 

    It’s why Quiring and his team want to use the impacts-based method to revamp those thresholds to better reflect drought conditions in Ohio, a move that starts by updating The Ohio Emergency Management Agency’s state drought plan. 

    To accomplish their goal, the researchers investigated how data from the four indices impacted streamflow, or how much water discharges over a designated point in a fixed period of time, and Ohio’s total corn yield, mainly because the crop covers an extensive area within the state, and nearly every county grows it. 

    Identifying agricultural drought thresholds that are specific to Ohio is important, said Quiring. Because the impacts of drought can vary from region to region, using the same drought thresholds in California as in Ohio is absurd, he said. Additionally, the types of drought that occur can differ. Ohio, for example, in particular is prone to “flash droughts” — shortages caused by warm weather that can happen quickly over a few days or weeks. 

    “These rapid-onset droughts can be particularly challenging for the agricultural community because they arrive quickly and conditions can rapidly go from normal to drier than normal,” said Quiring. “All of a sudden soil moisture is depleted, the crops are stressed and yield losses and impacts on the ecosystem occur.”  

    The last time severe drought caused major losses in the United States was in 2012 when a record-breaking heat wave resulted in $34.2 billion in economic losses, 123 direct deaths and a 26% decrease in total corn crop yield across the country. 

    As large areas of the country dried out, Ohio’s corn yield dropped from about 160 bushels per acre to 120 bushels per acre within a year. While such considerable losses have not happened since, according to the State Climate Office of Ohio, some areas of the state have experienced abnormally dry drought conditions this year.  

    What’s more, the researchers’ impacts-based method of drought monitoring also takes into account how climate change can worsen flash drought events.

    “One of the impacts that we found to be counterintuitive in Ohio is that with climate change, we do expect more rainfall overall, but we also expect to see more droughts because there are longer periods of time where no rain occurs,” said Quiring. 

    The results of this study suggest that following guidelines that aren’t specific to a region’s issues can end up either systematically underestimating the impacts of severe drought conditions in some locations or overestimating them in others, Quiring said. 

    While it’ll be some time before Quiring’s team can get their research incorporated into the next edition of the state drought plan, the study emphasizes that its methods could easily be applied to other regions beyond Ohio where long-term streamflow and crop yield data are readily available. Optimistically, it could help to improve drought monitoring worldwide and provide useful information to future agriculture producers and decision-makers, said Quiring. 

    “This work is actually timely because it will provide a basis for decision-making in Ohio, rather than using research that’s been done in other parts of the country,” said Quiring. “Hopefully we can give better guidance to those who are making decisions on the ground.”

    This study was supported by the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS). Co-authors were Ning Zhang and Zhiying Li, who were both at Ohio State when the study was conducted. Zhang is now at the University of California, Davis and Li is at Indiana University. 

    #

    [ad_2]

    Ohio State University

    Source link

  • U.S. sets record for billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in 2023

    U.S. sets record for billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in 2023

    [ad_1]

    With months to go before 2023 wraps up, the U.S. has set a new record for the number of weather disasters in a year that cost $1 billion or more.

    There have been 23 climate catastrophes and weather events costing at least $1 billion as of the end of August, breaking the record of 22 set in 2020, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced Monday. This year’s disasters have so far cost more than $57.6 billion and killed 253 people. 

    And the number could climb higher. NOAA is still totaling the cost of Tropical Storm Hilary, which wreaked havoc across California last month, and a drought in the South and Midwest. There’s also an “above normal” forecast for this year’s hurricane season, which will continue through the end of November. 

    Some of the latest costly disasters include the firestorm in Hawaii, Hurricane Idalia and hail storms in Minnesota. 

    Last year, there were 18 climate extremes that caused at least $1 billion in damage each, totaling more than $165 billion.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator Deanne Criswell warned in August that the organization’s disaster fund could dry up within weeks and delay the federal response to natural disasters. President Biden asked Congress last month for $12 billion to replenish the disaster fund, but Criswell said on “Face the Nation” that $12 billion in extra funds may not be enough. 

    This year’s costliest weather event, adjusted for inflation, was in early March across parts of southern and eastern U.S. states, when severe storms, high winds and tornados caused an estimated $6.1 billion in damage as homes, vehicles, businesses and infrastructure were destroyed, according to NOAA. The recent wildfires on Maui, which decimated the town of Lahaina, caused around $5.5 billion in damage. California flooding, which lasted for months, caused an estimated $4.6 billion in damage.

    u-s-2023-billion-dollar-weather-disasters.jpg
    The U.S. this year saw 23 weather disasters that cost $1 billion or more as of August 2023.

    NOAA


    The number and cost of disasters have increased over time, NOAA said. The increase has happened because of a combination of factors, including climate change, where and how we build, and the value of structures at risk of possible loss. 

    “Vulnerability is especially high where building codes are insufficient for reducing damage from extreme events,” NOAA says. “Climate change is also playing a role in the increasing frequency of some types of extreme weather that lead to billion-dollar disasters— most notably the rise in vulnerability to drought, lengthening wildfire seasons in the Western states, and the potential for extremely heavy rainfall becoming more common in the eastern states.”

    Between 1980 to 2023, 61 tropical cyclones, 185 severe storms, 22 wildfires, 42 flooding events, 22 winter storms, 30 droughts and 9 freezes costing $1 billion or more impacted the U.S, according to NOAA. The total cost of those 371 events exceeds $2.615 trillion. There were an average of 18 events a year costing a billion dollars or more between 2018 and 2022.

    The costliest year for weather disasters was 2017, with around $383.7 billion in damages, according to NOAA. The U.S. was rocked that year by hurricanes Harvey, Maria and Irma, totaling about $328.6 billion in damage. Western wildfires also cost around $22.5 billion.

    NOAA began tracking billion-dollar disasters in 1980. In the years since, every state in the country has been impacted by at least one such weather event. Texas has been hit particularly hard— more than 100 billion-dollar weather events have affected at least part of the state. The Central, South and Southeast regions usually experience billion-dollar disasters at a higher frequency than other parts of the U.S.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Drought causing backups in Panama Canal

    Drought causing backups in Panama Canal

    [ad_1]

    Drought causing backups in Panama Canal – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Ongoing drought conditions and low water levels are leading to a crisis in the Panama Canal, which is a key channel for global trade. Ben Tracy reports on the growing problem.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Drought hampering Panama Canal could have major economic repercussions

    Drought hampering Panama Canal could have major economic repercussions

    [ad_1]

    Drought hampering Panama Canal could have major economic repercussions – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A major drought is drying up the waterways that feed into the Panama Canal, and subsequently limiting the number of cargo ships that can be allowed through each day. Some ships are also being forced to carry less cargo to get through. Ben Tracy has the story.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Drought affecting Panama Canal threatens 40% of global cargo ship traffic

    Drought affecting Panama Canal threatens 40% of global cargo ship traffic

    [ad_1]

    Drought affecting Panama Canal threatens 40% of global cargo ship traffic – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Every ship that transits the Panama Canal uses tens of millions of gallons of fresh water to pass through. A historic drought in Panama is limiting the number of ships allowed to pass and the amount of cargo they can carry. CBS News’ Ben Tracy reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Arizona reexamining deals to lease land to Saudi-owned farms

    Arizona reexamining deals to lease land to Saudi-owned farms

    [ad_1]

    With the Southwest in the middle of a decadeslong megadrought, states like Arizona are facing the biggest water crisis in a generation. And there is growing outrage over scarce water being used by foreign-owned mega farms.

    Arizona cattle rancher Brad Mead says his well has run dry because of his neighbor’s farm down the road.

    It’s run by Fondomonte, owned by one of the largest dairy companies in Saudi Arabia. It grows alfalfa in the U.S. to feed cattle back in the Middle East. The crop is illegal to grow in Saudi Arabia because it uses too much water.

    Mead told CBS News when he looks out on the field of alfalfa, “I see money leaving America. I see water getting depleted.”

    Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, said Fondomonte bought vast tracts of land in the western part of the state. There are no regulations on how much water can be pumped up out of the ground in that area, so the state doesn’t monitor it. 

    Fondomonte also leases thousands of acres from the state, thanks to deals approved by state officials who are no longer in office. The company pays nothing for the water itself.

    “We cannot afford to give our water away frankly to anyone, let alone the Saudis,” Mayes said, noting that they are using “millions upon millions of gallons of precious groundwater.”

    Mayes said Arizona’s cities, including Phoenix, will need that water as they face potentially drastic cuts from the drought-ravaged Colorado River

    Fondomonte, which declined CBS News’ request for an interview, is not doing anything illegal. However, since CBS News first began covering its use of Arizona groundwater, the state has revoked approval for two additional wells and is considering canceling some of the company’s leases on state-owned land when they expire next year.

    “It is a scandal that the state of Arizona allowed this to happen, and it needs to come to an end,” Mayes said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Not enough water to go around: Colorado River Basin, ravaged by drought, plans for a drier future

    Not enough water to go around: Colorado River Basin, ravaged by drought, plans for a drier future

    [ad_1]

    Not enough water to go around: Colorado River Basin, ravaged by drought, plans for a drier future – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Seven states and 30 Native American tribes lying in the Colorado River Basin prepare to make hard choices as water levels plummet due to a 23-year drought. Bill Whitaker reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Arizona to halt some new home construction due to water supply issues

    Arizona to halt some new home construction due to water supply issues

    [ad_1]

    Phoenix, Arizona — The population of Arizona’s Maricopa County — which includes the Phoenix metropolitan area — skyrocketed by 15% in the last decade. But now, the county could see a troubling flatline.

    New construction that relies on groundwater will stop in some parts of the state after a report from the Arizona Department of Water Resources released earlier this month revealed Arizona’s booming population will outgrow its drought-stricken water supply if action isn’t taken.

    Specifically, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs announced earlier this month that the state will put the brakes on new home construction in the area surrounding Phoenix, but not within the city of Phoenix itself. 

    “This pause will not affect growth within any of our major cities,” Hobbs said in a news conference following the report’s release. 

    The new state plan will immediately impact the surrounding suburbs of Phoenix, which includes towns like Queen Creek. While projects permitted before the announcement will not be impacted, 9,000 undeveloped properties without a secure water supply will remain vacant. 

    “It’s been an issue that we’ve been dealing with in Arizona from the very beginning,” carpenter Rick Collins told CBS News of the water supply. “It’s how it works here. If we don’t have water, we can’t build these communities.”

    In Maricopa County alone, an estimated two billion gallons of water are used daily, according to numbers from the U.S. Geological Survey. That’s nearly twice as much use as New York City, which has about double Maricopa County’s population of approximately 4.5 million people.

    “Of course we have concern, our council has been looking forward into the future knowing that this day was going to come,” said Paul Gardner, wastewater director for Queen Creek.

    Gardner doesn’t see the region as in decline, but instead as “a community that is evolving.”

    That evolution means relying more on reclaimed wastewater projects and spending tens of millions of dollars to buy water from the Colorado River.
     
    However, climate change and growing demand across the West are also shrinking the Colorado River, which means the river as a water source could be cut off down the road. Last month, California, Arizona and Nevada reached a tentative agreement that would significantly cut their water use from the river over the next three years.

    Meanwhile, Kathryn Sorensen, director of research at the Kyle Center for Water Policy, said Arizona’s own plan to limit construction ensures there is enough water for all, as Arizona adapts to a world with less of it.

    “It is a proactive plan,” Sorensen said. “It is not reactive.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link