ReportWire

Tag: dreamers

  • Orlando Dreamers make Orlando pitch at MLB Winter Meetings

    [ad_1]

    The Orlando Dreamers group, which has spent years pushing for MLB expansion or relocation to the region, is using the high-profile gathering to continue its pitch.The meetings, which conclude Thursday, bring together team executives, owners and league officials from across baseball.The group shared on social media that its representatives were on site this week, including Hall of Famer Barry Larkin, who serves as a partner and ambassador for the Dreamers.“Since they were in our backyard, we thought it would be a good idea to get our information out there,” Larkin told WESH 2 News.Larkin said he spent the past several days meeting with team owners, fans and MLB executives, stressing that Orlando is prepared should the league decide to expand or relocate a franchise. He added that many around baseball are noting how seriously Orlando is positioning itself.“I wasn’t really surprised by how many people didn’t realize Orlando was a true player in all of this,” he said. “It’ll be interesting now to see what cities are a potential for expansion or relocation.”Larkin said the group’s financing model could also set Orlando apart.“Another thing about this that’s very unique is that there’s financing in place, where an ownership group will not be encumbered with providing financing for a stadium,” he said.Earlier this year, the Dreamers attempted to pursue ownership of the Tampa Bay Rays before the franchise was sold to a Jacksonville-based group. Larkin said the Dreamers have continued to make progress behind the scenes as they wait for the right opportunity.“There’s only so many things that we can control,” he said. “And what we can control, I think we’ve done a pretty good job of pushing that forward.”Dreamers co-founder Kim Schnorf said conversations at the winter meetings reinforced the group’s belief that it’s now a matter of when — not if — the league is ready to move forward with expansion.For now, the group says it will continue its push as MLB weighs its next steps.

    ORLANDO, Fla. —

    The Orlando Dreamers group, which has spent years pushing for MLB expansion or relocation to the region, is using the high-profile gathering to continue its pitch.

    The meetings, which conclude Thursday, bring together team executives, owners and league officials from across baseball.

    The group shared on social media that its representatives were on site this week, including Hall of Famer Barry Larkin, who serves as a partner and ambassador for the Dreamers.

    “Since they were in our backyard, we thought it would be a good idea to get our information out there,” Larkin told WESH 2 News.

    Larkin said he spent the past several days meeting with team owners, fans and MLB executives, stressing that Orlando is prepared should the league decide to expand or relocate a franchise. He added that many around baseball are noting how seriously Orlando is positioning itself.

    “I wasn’t really surprised by how many people didn’t realize Orlando was a true player in all of this,” he said. “It’ll be interesting now to see what cities are a potential for expansion or relocation.”

    Larkin said the group’s financing model could also set Orlando apart.

    “Another thing about this that’s very unique is that there’s financing in place, where an ownership group will not be encumbered with providing financing for a stadium,” he said.

    Earlier this year, the Dreamers attempted to pursue ownership of the Tampa Bay Rays before the franchise was sold to a Jacksonville-based group. Larkin said the Dreamers have continued to make progress behind the scenes as they wait for the right opportunity.

    “There’s only so many things that we can control,” he said. “And what we can control, I think we’ve done a pretty good job of pushing that forward.”

    Dreamers co-founder Kim Schnorf said conversations at the winter meetings reinforced the group’s belief that it’s now a matter of when — not if — the league is ready to move forward with expansion.

    For now, the group says it will continue its push as MLB weighs its next steps.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DACA changes could leave tens of thousands of Texans ineligible to work

    [ad_1]

    The dome of the Texas Capitol in Austin peaks over tree tops on Aug. 28, 2025.

    The dome of the Texas Capitol in Austin on Aug. 28, 2025. A court ruling stemming from a lawsuit brought forth by Texas will make it illegal for DACA recipients to work in the state.


    Eleanor Dearman

    edearman@star-telegram.com

    An impending federal ruling is expected to strip Texas DACA recipients of their work authorizations, impacting tens of thousands of people in the state.

    In 2021, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen of the Southern District of Texas ruled that DACA violated the Administrative Procedure Act, but his ruling did not end the program. It only paused the approval of new applications. Now, he’s considering a new proposal put forth by U.S. attorneys for application approval to resume.

    However, in March, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate that stated the deportation protections afforded by DACA could be severed from the employment benefits granted under the program in Texas.

    As a result of this mandate, Hanen is expected to limit DACA’s scope within the state. It would mean DACA recipients wouldn’t be deported, but they couldn’t legally hold a job in Texas.

    This goes back to a federal lawsuit filed in 2018 in which Texas, along with other states, argued that employment authorizations adversely impacted the economic and labor interests of native-born residents. To date, Texas has been the only state to demonstrate damages resulting from DACA in court.

    According to the latest figures, there are more than 90,000 DACA recipients in Texas.

    DACA — Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals — is a humanitarian program that gives legal protection and other benefits, including the authorization to work, to people who immigrated to the U.S. as children.

    A DACA recipient in Fort Worth who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of being targeted by immigration officials said her life has been upended as she awaits the ruling on employment authorizations.

    “It’s scary,” she said. “We aren’t being treated as humans. It’s like people lost their humanity card.”

    The woman told the Star-Telegram she came to the U.S. from Mexico with her parents when she was 2. She graduated from high school in 2015, has a job, is raising a son and has never known another home outside this country.

    Now, she fears she’ll have to leave for another state, disrupting her son’s life and education in the process. She doesn’t want to do that, but if she’s unable to work in Texas, she sees no other option.

    For her, the most disappointing part is that she believes she’s being punished despite being a tax-paying, law-abiding and contributing member of the community.

    “People like to use the word ‘illegal’ when talking about DACA recipients,” she said. “No, we’re here legally. We’re following the rules. It’s frustrating when they’re comparing us with people who commit crimes and choose to cross (unlawfully). You realize I was a kid, I was 2, right? I had no knowledge of it. I was innocent.”

    Who qualifies for DACA?

    To qualify for DACA protection, an individual must have arrived in the U.S. when they were under 16 and must have continuously resided in the country, along with meeting other age and residency guidelines.

    Additionally, DACA applicants were required to be in school or to have graduated, or to have served in the military, and they could not have been convicted of a felony, a serious misdemeanor or multiple misdemeanors while in the U.S.

    DACA recipients must file for renewal every two years. Currently, there is no path to permanent U.S. citizenship through DACA.

    DACA was established by a Department of Homeland Security memorandum in 2012. The Trump administration tried unsuccessfully to rescind DACA in 2017. In 2022, the Biden administration solidified the program with what is called the “Final Rule,” which included a provision allowing the employment authorization portion to be severed from the rest of the rules governing DACA.

    After ruling against DACA in 2021, Hanen in 2023 maintained that the Final Rule did not significantly differ from the original 2012 memorandum and was therefore unlawful.

    The National Immigration Law Center has a timeline of DACA litigation on its website.

    How would the new ruling impact DACA recipients and first-time applicants?

    If Hanen agrees with the federal government’s latest proposal, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services could begin processing new DACA applications. But the appeals court mandate would mean first-time DACA applicants in Texas would not have the right to work, and existing DACA recipients who are working could lose their ability to do so.

    In other states, there would be no change to the program, and DACA recipients would still be granted employment authorization documents.

    Texas was one of 10 states that sued the federal government in 2018 to end DACA. In January 2025, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that portions of the DACA were unlawful and that Texas had demonstrated damages.

    Texas’ argument was that DACA cost the state and local communities more than $750 million each year for education and other services. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay, and the case returned to Hanen’s court for further consideration, though proceedings have been paused due to the federal government shutdown, as reported by the Texas Tribune.

    Now, Texas DACA recipients are anxiously waiting to see what happens next and planning for an uncertain future should work authorizations be revoked.

    The source who spoke with the Star-Telegram said she and other DACA recipients do not qualify for state or federal benefits, and she’s unsure why people believe they’re a burden on state resources. She said it’s quite the opposite — that DACA recipients are an integral part of the communities in which they live, contributing to the economy and performing vital functions, like teaching in Texas schools.

    A 2022 article published by the National Education Association said there were approximately 15,000 educators nationwide who were DACA recipients.

    “Having DACA is a blessing,” she told the Star-Telegram. “The only difference between me and someone else is just a piece of paper and where I was born.”

    Matt Adams

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Matt Adams is a news reporter covering Fort Worth, Tarrant County and surrounding areas. He previously wrote about aviation and travel and enjoys a good weekend road trip. Matt joined the Star-Telegram in January 2025.

    [ad_2]

    Matthew Adams

    Source link

  • President Biden to announce relief for some undocumented spouses of US citizens, ‘Dreamers’

    President Biden to announce relief for some undocumented spouses of US citizens, ‘Dreamers’

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden will announce on Tuesday two new executive actions that could provide relief to thousands of undocumented immigrants who have been in the country for several years.

    The first action aims to streamline the process through which undocumented spouses and undocumented children of U.S. citizens apply for lawful permanent residence.

    The policy will allow noncitizen spouses married to U.S. citizens to apply to live and work in the United States legally without having to leave the country. Noncitizen children of applicants would also be eligible for protection.

    Under current laws, some undocumented migrants must first leave the U.S. and apply for legal residency from their home countries when they marry a citizen. In some cases, those migrants are barred from returning to the U.S. for up to 10 years.

    To be eligible for the program, noncitizen spouses must have been in the U.S. for at least 10 years as of June 17, 2024, without having been previously legally admitted into the country, or paroled into the country. They also must have been legally married to a U.S. citizen as of the same date and must also be deemed not to pose a threat to public safety or national security. If found eligible, the spouses would be given three years to apply for legal permanent residence.

    The Department of Homeland Security estimates that up to half a million spouses could be eligible for the program, and approximately 50,000 children of these spouses would also be protected.

    “President Biden is taking an incredibly important action by helping the spouses of U.S. citizens get a path to citizenship. This balanced approach, combined with Biden’s border security actions, is much more popular than Trump’s mass deportation plan,” Kerri Talbot, Executive Director of The Immigration Hub, told ABC News in a statement.

    The president is also expected to announce a new action that will allow some undocumented immigrants, including some DACA recipients and so-called “Dreamers,” to obtain employment-based nonimmigrant visas quicker, senior administration officials said.

    To be eligible, applicants must have graduated from an accredited higher education institution in the United States and have a high-skilled job offer from a U.S. employer in their field of study.

    Tuesday’s announcement comes just two weeks after President Biden implemented an executive action that restricts the number of migrants who can seek asylum in between ports of entry when migrant encounters at the border reach more than a daily rate of 2,500 for a week straight.

    Some members of his own party denounced the asylum cap. The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit to challenge the order last week.

    Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, told ABC News in an interview that caucus members had met with the President at the White House in May and called for the protections announced today.

    “I think it’s a happy day for many immigrant families across America. I think there’s going to be people crying tears of joy paired with some sighs of relief. This is a significant executive action by President Biden and the Hispanic Caucus has been for months encouraging and advocating for the President and administration to provide these protections,” the congresswoman said.

    Copyright © 2024 ABC News Internet Ventures.

    [ad_2]

    ABCNews

    Source link

  • ‘Dreamers’ have faced barriers to a better life

    ‘Dreamers’ have faced barriers to a better life

    [ad_1]

    On December 4, news broke that immigration negotiations between six bipartisan senators had fallen apart. These talks revolved around Republicans pushing changes to asylum in return for aid for Israel and Ukraine. It’s a common event in immigration policy—many small groups of Senators have tried and failed to find a consensus. But it’s unfortunate because smart immigration reform has the potential to improve the lives of both Americans and those arriving at our shores.

    States have recently been taking matters into their own hands, some with efforts to keep immigrants out (as in Texas’s border barriers) and others with efforts to better integrate immigrants (like in-state college tuition and language training support). Neither approach, however, has had much success. Our new study (joint with Susan Averett and Grace Condon) shows that integrating undocumented immigrants is more complex than what states can do alone. A real solution for “Dreamers” and the undocumented immigrants in the country will require Congress to open the nation’s golden door to them.

    Young undocumented immigrants in the U.S. who arrived with their parents before age 16 can be thought of as “Dreamers.” According to the Migration Policy Institute, there are over 3 million. The migration decision was not theirs. Their status puts them in a sort of limbo—they have spent most of their lives in the U.S. but do not have the authorization of the federal government to work legally, receive government benefits, or, in many states, access in-state low-cost tuition for higher education. This sort of twilight status is a problem for immigrants and our entire country. It is in the nation’s best interest to promote education among undocumented youth because they are here to stay. As you might expect, more educated people are less likely to draw on public assistance and more likely to enter high-paying occupations. 

    Undocumented immigrants make extensive contributions to the country even when lacking legal status. For example, they contribute $11.6 billion in state and local taxes each year through sales, property, and personal income taxes. Undocumented immigrants have a net positive effect on U.S. federal welfare programs—they put more money in than they take out.

    The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996 prohibited access to in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants at the federal level. Since then, more than half of U.S. states have granted in-state tuition to undocumented youth who have graduated from high school and have spent, on average, three years in their state. 

    Only 5 percent to 10 percent of undocumented high school graduates pursue higher education, compared to the national average of 62.5 percent. Despite the generosity of these states, our new research finds that in-state tuition alone doesn’t uniformly boost enrollment and completion rates for college degrees. For those who are undocumented and can’t legally work, it could be that they simply don’t see a reason to invest in schooling. Even if they finish their degree, they can’t take it to employers as proof of their skills and knowledge as companies cannot legally employ them.

    There are some differences based on gender. Our results suggest that access to in-state tuition rates does not increase enrollment among women but allows them to stay in school and complete their degrees. Men, on the other hand, are incentivized to take a college class at a lower cost but the impact is short-lived as they are not more likely to graduate.

    Meanwhile, we also evaluate the role of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA), a federal directive that was announced in 2012 and has given access to legal employment and deferral of deportation to over a half-million young adults. In our study, we find that DACA does not encourage eligible youth to invest in higher education, possibly since the policy alone did not lower tuition costs. While DACA eligibility does not impact enrollment rates, we show that overall it is positively associated with graduation which may result in higher returns in the formal labor market. We confirm that DACA incentivizes youth to work more, as expected, and results in lower rates of self-employment, as this group of undocumented youth likely has access to the formal labor market. However, DACA recipients must reapply every two years to stay in the country. Their limbo got more uncertain when, in September, a Texas court ruled the program unconstitutional and they are now waiting on an appeal in federal courts. 

    The fundamental story is simple: The lack of access to legal employment reduces the power of in-state tuition access to motivate students to attend and complete post-secondary schooling. This becomes a problem when you zoom out and think about the families and children of undocumented immigrants. The children of undocumented people in the U.S. are, by birthright, U.S. citizens. Today’s failure to educate and lift their parents dims their prospects. These children are likely to be more secure if their parents hold better jobs and are more productive. In addition, more educated households are less likely to depend on public assistance.

    The patchwork opportunities for undocumented youth will continue to limit their potential returns to education, dampen U.S. productivity, and negatively impact public fiscal coffers. So what to do? With approximately 3 million undocumented youth who grew up in the U.S., there is tremendous potential for them to contribute to the formal labor market and enhance economic growth. They are already here and ready to contribute, the benefits are there to be captured. It is a low-hanging fruit and a win-win for the undocumented youth and the U.S. economy. A comprehensive plan would involve both in-state tuition and access to legal employment along with the path to permanent residency.

    [ad_2]

    Eva Dziadula

    Source link

  • OPINION: Left out: Dreamers miss too may education opportunities that could change their lives – The Hechinger Report

    OPINION: Left out: Dreamers miss too may education opportunities that could change their lives – The Hechinger Report

    [ad_1]

    As tuition and related fees skyrocket, finding ways to keep a college degree within reach for anyone willing to work toward one is imperative. Offering every high school student access to college-level courses while in high school is one critical way to do so.

    Students who are able to take college-level courses, through Advanced Placement or dual enrollment, can get a head start on college — entering with credits in hand that reduce their tuition costs and shorten their path to a degree.

    The courses can also provide a confidence boost to young adults uncertain whether college is for them.

    Data and research show that access to college coursework while in high school increases college enrollment, success and graduation rates and has a positive impact on academic performance.

    Yet undocumented students, often called Dreamers, are too often excluded from such coursework, particularly dual enrollment.

    Related:  High schoolers can take dual-enrollment courses for college credit. Many undocumented students cannot

    This lack of access to dual enrollment is just one of the persistent barriers that immigrant students encounter in their pursuit of higher education and career success.

    In some instances, state tuition and financial aid policies explicitly exclude undocumented students; in others, length of residency requirements exclude recent immigrants, recent reporting by The Hechinger Report revealed.

    Undocumented students are eligible for admissions and aid in a growing number of states, including 24 that offer in-state tuition and 18 that provide state aid to undocumented students. Yet too many other states limit undocumented students’ access to in-state tuition or even enrollment in public institutions.

    Advocating for policy change is essential. Too often, though, that advocacy for the future overshadows immediate opportunities to expand Dreamers’ college access despite state and local policies.

    It is just as important to elevate the visibility of these opportunities so that today’s learners can strengthen their own futures and the futures of their communities and the workforce.

    Related: OPINION: Despite public skepticism, higher education can still change lives for generations to come

    The philanthropy Modern States Education Alliance, whose mission is to make college accessible and affordable for all, has for several years worked with TheDream.US, the nation’s largest college and career success program for undocumented immigrant youth, to ensure that undocumented students are not left out of free precollege opportunities.

    Modern States offers a library of 32 online courses is designed to teach learners what they need to know to pass the College Level Examination Program (CLEP) exams. Nearly 3,000 colleges and universities accept passing scores on CLEP exams for college credit, in much the same way they accept passing grades in Advanced Placement and dual-enrollment courses. Modern States explicitly serves all people, including Dreamers, with some 500,000 registered users.

    The organization has made 150,000 CLEP exams free for learners so far — with every 10 exams passed equivalent to one free year of college.

    Too often, advocacy for the future overshadows immediate opportunities to expand Dreamers’ college access.

    Through partnership with TheDream.US, Modern States has already provided multiple years’ worth of free college for Dreamers.

    This approach complements the core scholarship program at TheDream.US, which provides exceptional opportunities to participating students but has nowhere near enough resources to support the college aspirations of all undocumented high schoolers.

    Our work is an example of the type of multifaceted strategy that we as a nation require to address the needs of an increasingly large and integral group of students in our higher education system.

    Immigrant-origin students, inclusive of Dreamers, comprised 31 percent of college students in 2021, a significant rise from 20 percent in 2000, a recent report based on data from the Migration Policy Institute found.

    As the population of immigrant-origin students in college grows, maintaining barriers to their success is increasingly damaging to individuals and our nation. Let’s commit to removing those barriers and creating opportunity for all learners.

    And in the meantime, let’s not forget the ways we can support young people now, so that today’s learners do not miss their shot at the life they want to live.

    Chris Aviles is the senior program manager, Partner College and Scholar Supports, for TheDream.US. Jefferson Pestronk serves as executive director of Modern States Education Alliance. The organizations have partnered since 2018 to support Dreamers in their quest for an affordable and equitable education.

    This story about Dreamers and college was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for Hechinger’s newsletter.

    The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. But that doesn’t mean it’s free to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the country. We tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

    Join us today.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Aviles and Jefferson Pestronk

    Source link

  • Arizona Voters Approve In-State College Tuition For Non-Citizen Students

    Arizona Voters Approve In-State College Tuition For Non-Citizen Students

    [ad_1]

    PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona voters have approved an initiative to extend cheaper in-state college tuition to some non-citizen students, cheering supporters who hope the measure’s passage Monday will help spark momentum for wider immigration reform in Congress.

    The Associated Press called the race for Proposition 308 after the latest round of vote releases gave it a big enough lead that the AP determined it could not lose. Arizona joins at least 18 other states, including California and Virginia, that offer in-state tuition to all students who otherwise qualify regardless of immigration status.

    “This shows there is bipartisan broad consensus about immigration solutions,” Rebecca Shi, executive director of the national American Business Immigration Coalition Action, said earlier in the day, anticipating the proposition’s success.

    The measure was referred to the ballot by Arizona’s Legislature and repeals some parts of an earlier initiative that banned in-state tuition for non-citizens. It will allow all students regardless of immigration status to pay in-state college rates as long as they attended Arizona high schools for two years and graduated.

    Advocates say tens of thousands of future non-citizen students who have been in Arizona for years could potentially benefit from the proposition in a state where an estimated 275,000 migrants are living without authorization.

    The measure will allow qualifying non-citizen students to pay the current in-state undergraduate tuition of $10,978 per academic year at Arizona’s state universities. Those universities do not have a specific rate for non-citizens brought to the U.S. as children, but officials say more than 300 students are currently paying a non-resident rate for Arizona high school graduates that is 150% of in-state costs.

    Community college students will also benefit.

    The vote is a turnaround from 2006, when Arizona voters rode a widespread wave of anti-immigrant sentiment to bar students who entered the U.S. without authorization from getting in-state tuition and other financial benefits, even if they lived here most of their lives.

    A sign in front of some cacti marks one of the entrances to the University of Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona. (Photo by Epics/Getty Images)

    Subsequent years saw other anti-immigrant measures.

    The Arizona legislature in 2010 passed the so-called “show me your papers” law that allowed law enforcement officers to to check the immigration status of residents during routine stops. Denounced by activists as racial profiling, the law was partially struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court two years later.

    Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who immigration advocates accused of racial profiling, was later elected out of office and found guilty of misdemeanor contempt of court for ignoring a 2011 court order to stop the patrols. Then-President Donald Trump in 2017 issued a presidential pardon for that conviction.

    Although concerns about security along the U.S.-Mexico border remain high in Arizona, advocates say that attitudes have changed somewhat concerning young people brought to the U.S. by their families when they were small children.

    Supporters said they now hope approval of the measure will encourage Congress to consider wider immigration reform.

    “I’m proud of Arizona and how far we have come,” said Bob Worsely, a retired Republican state legislator and co-chair of the coalition that backed passage of Proposition 308.

    Volunteers in recent months knocked on millions of doors and sent out millions of text messages to assure the measure’s passage.

    Hazel Villatoro, who attended schools in Arizona her whole life after her parents brought her to the United States from Mexico when she was 1, said Proposition 308 will change her future.

    “I will now be able to achieve my dream of becoming an anesthesiologist,” said Villatoro. “I want to thank the voters of Arizona for doing the right thing.”

    Many Arizona business owners say it makes sense to make sure the brightest young people remain and seek jobs in the state, whatever their immigration status, especially with worker shortages in some sectors.

    “Proposition 308 is not only the right thing, but also the smart thing,” said John Graham, president of Sunbelt Holdings, an Arizona real estate management, investment and development firm, and board chairman of the Arizona State University Foundation.

    On other ballot initiatives, Arizona voters rejected one of the three referendums placed on the ballot by Republican state lawmakers that would limit the citizen’s initiative process. The defeated measure would have allowed the Legislature to make changes to voter-approved laws if one part of it was declared to be illegal.

    Two others referendums changing the initiative process were called by the AP Monday night. One changes the threshold for tax increases in initiatives to a 60% vote, while the other limits them to a single subject.

    Groups that back citizen initiatives say the changes will limit comprehensive measures. The Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry pushed for the limits after a series of initiatives passed, including a minimum wage increase and a tax on the wealthy to fund education that was overturned by the state Supreme Court.

    Arizona voters also approved a referendum creating a lieutenant governor office, but voted down a statewide sales tax increase for fire districts.

    Associated Press writer Bob Christie contributed to this report from Phoenix.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • $2 Million in Scholarships for DREAMers Announced on Going Merry

    $2 Million in Scholarships for DREAMers Announced on Going Merry

    [ad_1]

    Going Merry has partnered with Golden Door Scholars to provide access to $2 million in scholarships for DACA students nationwide

    Press Release
    –


    updated: Oct 18, 2018


    SAN FRANCISCO, October 18, 2018 (Newswire.com)
    –
     Going Merry, a platform which helps students apply to all of their scholarships from one place, has announced $2 million in scholarships for DREAMers across the nation. The Golden Door Scholarships, provided by the Golden Door Scholars organization, will be awarded to 50 students and worth up to $40,000 each. The deadline for applications is Oct. 25, 2018. Students can apply for the Golden Door Scholarships online through Going Merry.

    Every year, 65,000 undocumented students graduate from high school, according to the Center for American Progress. Unfortunately, this is where education ends for many of them due to a lack of information on opportunities available to DACA students.

    Our mission is to give every student equal access to life-changing education, and that includes DREAMers.

    Charlie Maynard, CEO, Going Merry

    “Our mission is to give every student equal access to life-changing education, and that includes DREAMers,” said Charlie Maynard, CEO of Going Merry. “Partnering with an organization like Golden Door Scholars allows Going Merry to play an important role in providing hope to over one million undocumented students in America.”

    Scholarship recipients will receive funding to support tuition, room and board for a four-year degree at Golden Door partner schools and schools offering in-state tuition to students with DACA status. Scholarships will also be awarded on a case-by-case basis to students who have applied to or are interested in other colleges. Golden Door will match scholarship recipients to partner and other colleges based on student preference and school admission slot availability.

    About Going Merry: Going Merry gives every student one place from which they can apply to all of their scholarships. We are a company founded by Stanford graduates who all relied on financial aid to pay for college. We make it easy for students to find and apply for scholarships and simple for scholarship providers to create and manage them. We come together from different backgrounds and skill sets but share the same mission: to give every student truly equal access to life-changing education.

    Media Contact:

    Chris Karnes
    215-407-4739
    ckarnes@goingmerry.com

    Source: Going Merry

    [ad_2]

    Source link