ReportWire

Tag: Drake

  • ‘Say, Drake,’ Schemes That Todd Set Up & ‘SINNERS’: Funniest, Wildest & Messiest BOSSIP Headlines Of 2025

    [ad_1]

    Source: Bob Kupbens/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

    2025 was another hilariously messy mishmash of mayhem that peaked with Kendrick giving Drake one final WOP WOP WOPPING during his legendary performance at the Super Bowl.

    In one of the buzziest Super Bowl shows ever, the Compton rapper diabolically demolished what’s left of Drake during his world-stopping performance at Super Bowl LIX.

    As expected, Kendrick gave the people what they wanted and performed his Grammy-winning Drake diss ‘Not Like Us‘ that shattered the whole entire internet.

    At one point, he went full villain in a now-legendary Super Bowl moment, rapping “say Drake…I heard you like ’em young” while smiling deviously into the camera.

     Overall, 2025 was a delicious mess fest that also gave us Diddy’s reckoning courtesy of his arch nemesis 50 Cent, Drake collecting one L after another after multiple failed lawsuits, Cardi gallivanting around with her baller boo thang Stefon Diggs, yappin’ Young Thug going viral for his now-infamous leaked chatty patty sessions in jail, and much more.

    Back in September 2025, social media spiraled into chaos over countless jail calls where the “Lifestyle” rapper vented about various hot topics like his relationship with ex-BFF Gunna, his very unpopular view on serving life in prison (“If we go to life for prison, whoopty doo!”), and more in unintentionally hilarious soundbites currently making their rounds across the internet.

    In the viral episode, Thug can be seen venting about various hot topics like his relationship with ex-BFF Gunna, his very unpopular view on serving life in prison (“If we go to life for prison, whoopty doo!”), and more in unintentionally hilarious soundbites currently making their rounds across the internet.

    Check out the full episode below:

    This comes after the ‘Money On Money’ rapper lashed out at everyone from Drake to Kendrick Lamar to Andre 3000, former BFF Gunna, and GloRilla, who was allegedly called “ugly” and disrespected for her looks during a messy conversation with his boo thang, Mariah the Scientist.

    Oh baby, it was quite the (hilarious) saga that will certainly be remembered after 2025 and beyond.

    What was your fave BOSSIP headline of 2025? Tell us down below and enjoy ALL of the BEST BOSSIP headlines of the year on the flip.

    [ad_2] Alex Ford
    Source link

  • Drake Accused of Manipulating Streaming Play Counts With Bots in New Lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Drake’s relationship with the online “social casino” Stake.us is facing fresh legal scrutiny. The rapper has been named in a federal lawsuit that claims he helped promote an illegal real-money online casino and used it to quietly move money tied to a scheme aimed at artificially boosting music streaming numbers.

    Plaintiffs LaShawnna Ridley and Tiffany Hines filed a class action lawsuit last week in a federal court in Virginia against Stake.us’s parent company, Sweepsteaks Limited, as well as Drake, online streamer Adin Ross, and George Nguyen, an alleged facilitator of the botting scheme.

    The lawsuit claims the defendants misrepresented Stake while being paid to promote it, inflicting “harm on consumers across the Commonwealth who have lost real money chasing gambling wins on the Stake platform.”

    It also accuses Drake, Ross, and Nguyen of transferring “money between and among themselves, using Stake’s ‘Tipping’ program.”

    The plaintiffs allege the conduct violates the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and Virginia consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs are asking for at least $5 million, along with refunds for users, the return of profits they say were improperly earned, court orders to stop the alleged conduct, and additional damages under federal law.

    “Stake.us preys on consumers in Virginia and nationwide who are lured into real money gambling, exposing consumers to substantial risks of gambling addictions and jeopardizing their and their families’ financial well-being,” the lawsuit claims.

    A major crux of the case centers on how Stake.us operates. The company describes itself as a social casino where users can buy what it calls “Gold Coins” to play digital casino games like slots and poker. Those coins cannot be redeemed for cash, but users also receive “Stake Cash” through bundled purchases of Gold Coins, daily login bonuses, and promotions.

    Once users meet certain conditions, like wagering their Stake Cash several times, it can be redeemed for real money. The lawsuit argues this structure makes Stake.us indistinguishable from real-money online gambling, which is illegal in Virginia and many other states.

    The complaint also alleges Drake and Ross were paid by Stake to promote the site and participated in livestreams showing them gambling with large sums of money provided by the company itself.

    “In other words, though Drake and Ross purported to be gambling with their own Stake Cash, it was in fact provided to them by the house,” the lawsuit reads.

    Drake signed an endorsement deal with Stake in 2022 that was reportedly worth $100 million per year. Drake later publicly complained about issues withdrawing money from the platform, though an Instagram post from October indicated that the beef may have since been squashed.

    Beyond the gambling allegations, the lawsuit further claims Drake, Ross, and Nguyen transferred proceeds among themselves via Stake’s tipping feature and used that money to fund bots that artificially boosted Drake’s music streaming numbers on platforms like Spotify.

    This is not the first lawsuit challenging Drake’s relationship with Stake.us. A separate complaint filed in October in Missouri also names Drake and Ross as defendants and similarly accuses them of misrepresenting Stake.us’s alleged gambling operations.

    Stake.us and representatives for Drake did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s requests for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Bruce Gil

    Source link

  • Drake and Adin Ross Face Legal Action over Alleged Illegal Gambling Promotion

    [ad_1]

    A new legal dispute in the USA has placed two of the internet’s most recognizable figures at the center of a heated debate over influencer-driven gambling promotion. Music superstar Drake and popular streamer Adin Ross are named in a newly filed class-action lawsuit that accuses them of helping direct consumers toward real-money gambling through the sweepstakes-style casino platform Stake.us.

    The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Virginia by two state residents, alleges that the influencers leveraged their online presence to promote Stake.us in ways that far exceeded casual endorsement. The lawsuit contends that Drake and Ross, along with an associate based in Australia, collaborated with the platform to draw users into wagering with real financial consequences.

    This dispute revolves around Stake.us’s dual-currency system. Players can purchase virtual “Gold Coins” for games marketed as recreational. However, each transaction also includes “Stake Cash,” a second digital token that can be wagered and later exchanged for real money. Plaintiffs argue that this structure disguises gambling as sweepstakes, allowing the platform to operate in states where online casinos are otherwise prohibited.

    According to the lawsuit, Drake and Ross repeatedly showcased Stake.us during livestreams and social media posts, featuring high-stakes betting, giveaways, and dramatic wins that encouraged viewers to sign up and play. Plaintiffs claim that these advertisements created a false perception of reduced risk, while downplaying the potential for financial loss and addiction.

    Sweepstakes Remain Highly Controversial in the USA

    This newest case stands out due to its scope. Beyond consumer protection claims, the lawsuit alleges racketeering activity under the federal RICO statute. The complaint argues that Stake’s internal tipping feature served as an informal money-transfer mechanism, allowing funds to move between accounts without traditional financial oversight. Those funds were allegedly routed into broader schemes unrelated to gambling, including online promotion campaigns.

    Drake, in particular, faces accusations of using proceeds linked to Stake activity to bankroll artificial streaming operations, including bot-driven plays and coordinated social media amplification, to boost his music across major platforms. Ross is described as a key promotional partner. His livestreams regularly featured Stake-branded content, reinforcing the platform’s visibility among younger audiences who could transition from watching to wagering.

    The lawsuit seeks to represent Virginia residents who lost money on Stake.us in the last three years. It requests the court to award damages, impose penalties under consumer protection laws, and halt what it describes as ongoing unlawful activity. Similar lawsuits against Stake have previously emerged in other states, reflecting growing concern among regulators and lawmakers about sweepstakes casinos and influencer marketing. 

    [ad_2]

    Deyan Dimitrov

    Source link

  • The Belcalis Vs. Barbie Brawl & The Other Craziest Celebrity Beefs Of 2025

    [ad_1]

    Source: Kevin Mazur

    2025 was a wild year for celebrity beefs, with stars trading insults online over everything from personal grudges to professional rivalries. Some clashes turned especially messy, with dirty blows that kept fans glued to their screens for hours, days, and even months. From Cardi B and Nicki Minaj hurling vicious insults online to Drake and Kendrick Lamar going head-to-head in diss tracks, here’s a look at some of the most heated and talked-about beefs of the year.

    Cardi B vs. Nicki Minaj

    In September, one of the most notorious rivalries in hip-hop flared up again, when Cardi B and Nicki Minaj traded severe insults online. The clash began after Minaj appeared to mock the sales of Cardi’s new album, Am I The Drama? Minaj took to X, with a since-deleted post that read, $4.99, poking fun at what seemed to be a reference to the promotional iTunes price of Cardi’s project.

    That led to a series of firing posts: Minaj mocked Cardi’s pregnant belly and accused her of “fallin off the charts,” while Cardi fired back with cutting remarks about Minaj’s family and alleged cocaine use, even referencing Minaj’s brother’s 2017 criminal conviction. As previously reported, Jelani Maraj was convicted of predatory assault against an 11-year-old girl and was found guilty in 2017. He was sentenced to 25 years to life in 2020.

    Sadly, the social media spat reached a new low when the rappers dragged each other’s children into the mix, drawing widespread criticism. The feud quickly escalated into deeply personal territory, prompting other artists, including 50 Cent, to publicly warn that the situation was “not gonna end well” if it continued to spiral online. Thankfully, the beef quickly dissipated.

    50 Cent vs. Diddy

    50-Cent-Diddy-craziest-celebrity-beefs-of-2025
    Source: John Lamparski/ Shareif Ziyadat

    Unlike many flash-in-the-pan celebrity beefs, 50 Cent and Sean “Diddy” Combs (P. Diddy) have maintained tension for nearly two decades. The feud traces back to the mid-2000s, when 50 Cent released a diss track called “The Bomb,” accusing Combs of involvement in the Notorious B.I.G. ‘s 1997 murder, a claim the latter has always denied, according to PEOPLE. Over the years, the animosity has persisted, driven by industry rivalries, competition over endorsements (such as vodka brands), and public comments. 

    The rivalry surged to new heights in 2023, when 50 Cent started weighing in on Combs’ legal troubles, following a series of controversies. The drama first intensified in November 2023 when Combs’ ex-girlfriend, singer Cassie Ventura, accused him of rape and sexual assault. He denied the claims, and the lawsuit was settled the very next day. At the time, 50 Cent joked about Combs losing some of his business partnerships, posting on X that he would be willing to step in.

    A few months later, Combs faced more upheaval when authorities raided his Los Angeles and Miami homes through HSI investigations. 50 Cent again shared his thoughts on X, suggesting he believed the allegations against Combs were legitimate.

    “Now it’s not Diddy do it, it’s Diddy done,” he wrote. “They don’t come like that unless they got a case.”

    In 2025, the rivalry gained fresh attention with the release of the Netflix documentary Sean Combs: The Reckoning, executive-produced by 50 Cent. The series highlights sexual misconduct allegations and the legal troubles surrounding Combs, including his criminal conviction and prison sentence, and some interpreted 50 Cent’s involvement as an extension of their long-standing beef rather than a neutral project. 

    Even in isolation from official beef moments, fans and commentators treat the documentary and 50 Cent’s relentless public commentary as proof the feud hasn’t cooled. 

    Remy Ma vs. Papoose & Claressa Shields

    Claressa-Shields-Papoose-Remy-Ma-craziest-celebrity-beefs-of-2025
    Source: Scott Legato/Getty Images for The Fire Inside/ Terence Rushin / Getty

    In 2024, the Remy Ma and Papoose cheating scandal reached a peak when professional boxer Claressa Shields called out Remy Ma after the rapper accused her of having an affair with Papoose. But the drama escalated in May 2025 when Remy publicly criticized her estranged husband for allegedly delaying their divorce.

    On Thursday, May 22, 2025, Remy went live on Instagram to address comments Shields made on The Breakfast Club, saying she had no “ill-will” toward the situation. The boxer said that while Papoose’s divorce had to be “taken care of,” she and the rapper were madly in love despite Remy’s “chaos.”

    During an Instagram Live session, Remy insisted that she had already moved on from the drama and had requested that Papoose file for divorce. She even offered to pay for it if necessary. She added, “Everything is signed and ready to go,” putting the delay on her ex, and hinted that if Shields wanted to shell out cash for the split to be official, it would be “great.”

    Papoose quickly responded on Instagram, sharing a screenshot of an email confirming that he had filed for divorce in New Jersey.

    “This was so easy to file for divorce. Why hasn’t she done it? #pumpfaking,” he wrote. “The only reason I haven’t filed previously is for the sake of my daughter. She has to go to school. When two individuals behave like civilized adults, you can get a divorce peacefully/privately. And that was my intentions. But when a person wants to be bitter, & clout chase. It turns into a circus. Which can lead to an embarrassment for my child.”

    He went on to call Remy a liar and claimed she had been trying to get back together with him. Remy Ma fired back on IG Live, calling her ex a liar for suggesting she wanted to rekindle their relationship. She also accused him of failing in his fatherly duties.

    “Sidebar: and you haven’t taken my daughter to or from school since last year. But that’s allegedly why u got a place so close to my crib lol Double Sidebar: Like I always tell you…If u miss me, just say that, no need to start an unnecessary fight.”

    Regarding the divorce filing, the rapper claimed that Papoose waited until she publicly called him out before filing. 

    “Did y’all see the date on that divorce filing? He filed that today. He filed that today. Who gave you the money? They gave you the money? You should thank me. Look at me doing you favors again…I got y’all lit.”

    The drama continued to intensify that month, with Remy claiming Papoose blocked her on social media and threatened to put his son on her IG Live to prove he wasn’t an active father. After a day of drama, Papoose claimed he had written the majority of Remy Ma’s raps. 

    The feud may now be cooling down, as Papoose and Shields recently appeared on The Breakfast Club, saying they wanted to move on from the controversy.

    Tamar Braxton vs. Funky Dineva

    Tamar Braxton x Funky Dineva
    Source: Arturo Holmes/Paras Griffin

    In August 2025, Tamar Braxton and Funky Dineva had a very public fallout following a night that almost turned scandalous and fatal. The controversy began on Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025, when Tamar teased her new Heartbreak Retrograde EP, starring a married Mendeecees Harris, just a week after claiming she “almost died” and was “found in a pool of blood,” without giving full details.

    In the promo, the 48-year-old singer was seen snuggling up with Harris, and planting a kiss on the reality TV star, though she clarified in captions that he was only a “FRIEND.” Still, the internet erupted with speculation about a possible romance. Rumors were fueled by sightings of Tamar and Mendeeces together at V12 Lounge, allegedly hours before her accident. The photos also captured Dineva partying with the singer that same night, but what started as speculation quickly turned into controversy. 

    Some internet sleuths accused Dinvea of having something to do with Tamar’s incident, which sent the YouTuber into a heated rampage. In a now-deleted YouTube livestream, Dineva referred to Tamar as “the lady” and claimed he had no knowledge of what happened after leaving the club.

    On Aug. 27, Dineva addressed the situation on social media, expressing hurt over Tamar’s silence over the allegations. He also called her accident “a PR stunt,” claiming he was used as “collateral damage” to promote the singer’s new album.

    He continued:

    “@Tamarbraxton you ain’t even gone try to clear any of this up and tell these people I didn’t do anything to you…. I was accused of NOT BEING A FRIEND TO YOU. When at the end of the day, it was YOU NOT BEING A FRIEND TO ME!! I didn’t deserve any of this, and I’m deeply hurt!”

    Tamar eventually responded, stating she didn’t want to fight with the social media star. 

    “No matter what he says, I love @MsFunkyDineva anyway. Had I known what was going on while I was in the hospital trying to recover, I would have said something. It’s terrible that what ever I DIDN’T say turned into all this. I just want PEACE.”

    She clarified on Instagram that she did not fake her accident. 

    “I wish it was a lie. Or a ‘PR’ stunt. I’m devastated that ANYONE would suggest that. Please enjoy my EP. I worked very hard, and I spent my OWN money for my Tamartian friends to enjoy.”

    A day later, on Aug. 28, Tamar shared a joint video explaining her injuries with Dr. Amira Ogunleye, which included “multiple dental fractures, a nasal fracture, and even a tooth completely knocked out of the socket.” Despite this, Dineva continued to criticize her online.

    Funky followed up by accusing Tamar of having an affair with Mendeecees, something she strongly denied.

    Tamar Braxton "Heartbreak Retrograde" Album Release Party
    Source: Prince Williams / Getty

    Kendrick Lamar vs. Drake

    Drake and Kendrick Lamar
    Source: Prince Williams / Paras Griffin

    The Kendrick Lamar and Drake beef simmered long before 2025, but dominated headlines this year. According to USA Today, tension began with subliminal messages in tracks dating back to 2013, including Lamar’s “Control,” which aimed at Drake.

    But the beef really boiled up after the release of Drake and J. Cole’s 2023 track “First Person Shooter.” On the infamous track, J.Cole called himself and the two rivals the “big three” of rap, but that title didn’t sit well with Lamar. The Cali-bred hip-hop artist responded in Future and Metro Boomin’s March release “Like That” rapping: “forget ‘the big three … it’s just big me” and apparently referencing Drake: “It’s time for him to prove that he’s a problem.”

    This led to Lamar’s 2024 diss track “Not Like Us,” which carried into 2025 with a ton of success and sizzling drama. The track won five Grammys in February 2025, and Lamar performed it at the Super Bowl, showcasing his trolling skills, alongside Drake’s ex Serena Williams, no less.

    Drake wasn’t silent, however. The Super Bowl performance came after Drizzy filed a defamation lawsuit in NYC against Universal Music Group over the fiery diss, claiming the lyrics and music video falsely portrayed him as a pedophile, damaging his reputation. TMZ reported that Drake alleged UMG promoted the track to devalue his brand. The case was dismissed in October 2025, though Drake filed a motion to appeal that same month.

    Nicki Minaj vs. SZA

    Nicki Minaj and SZA
    Source: Christopher Polk

    Nicki Minaj also took aim at SZA in 2025. In July, the Grammy-nominated rapper publicly accused SZA’s manager, TDE’s Terrence “Punch” Henderson, of bullying her.

    It all began on July 15, when Nicki called out Henderson, claiming he was “bullying” her on “Twitter for no reason.” The origin of the allegations was unclear, though Punch had tweeted about “Broken Barbies” earlier that morning. While the tweet referred to Lyric Michelle’s new song from his “Room Full Of Mirrors” group and had nothing to do with Nicki, she appeared to take it personally.

    Shortly after Nicki’s rant, SZA responded on X with a cryptic message: “Mercury retrograde…don’t take the bait lol silly goose.” Though she didn’t mention anyone specifically, Nicki immediately accused her of subtweeting and went on the offensive:

    “Go draw your freckles back on bookie,” she tweeted. “Bh looking & sounding like she got stung by a fing bee. dot dot dot Draws on my fake freckles.”

    Nicki also criticized SZA’s achievements, targeting her record-breaking 2022 albumSOS, which went 9X platinum in under 3 years. The album made SZA the only Black artist to spend over 80 weeks in the Billboard 200’s Top 10, surpassing Michael Jackson’s record, as previously reported. 

    “B***h put out a whole new album as a deluxe to an already existing album that was out for like a year or 2, so the original album could break records,” Nicki said. “Like what in the insecure lack of morals & integrity you doing? I thought she was like a real artist? Girl bye.”

    The two traded a few more barbs before the feud appeared to simmer down.

    Eventually, SZA responded to one of Nicki’s tweets, calling her a “fake girl’s girl” and highlighting her alleged superiority. The TDE singer presented evidence that Minaj had requested features from her twice and even rapped lyrics SZA had written:

    “Nicki … You absolutely know my music and what I contribute cause you’ve asked for features twice to no response,” she tweeted. “In addition to rapping my lyrics on feeling myself ‘Cooking up the bass looking like a kilo’? Lol ur having a moment … I’m not sure why, but be blessed.”

    SZA also shared a screenshot of alleged messages between a team member and Nicki asking, “Is SZA recording right now? Got this hook, I think she would be dope on.” From there, the online beef largely dissipated.

    In a November GQ interview, SZA addressed the situation, explaining there was “no backstory” and that she didn’t even know Nicki personally.

    “I don’t know her,” SZA began. “We have no connection to each other. There’s no backstory. Like, there was no through-line narrative. It was just like, ‘Roc Nation…I don’t know where it came from. That’s not even my place to correct a narrative that I don’t got s**t to do with. It was a little strange. It was very like, ‘Why?’ But also, you know, ‘I guess.’ ”

    What do you think of these wild celebrity feuds of 2025? Tell us your thoughts in the comments section.

    RELATED: Relationship Recap: 2025 Celebrity Weddings, Engagements & Entanglements

    [ad_2]

    Shannon Dawson

    Source link

  • AI song generator Udio offers brief window for downloads after Universal settlement upsets users

    [ad_1]

    Artificial intelligence song generation platform Udio said it would give its frustrated users 48 hours starting Monday to download their songs before the company shifts to a new business model to comply with a legal settlement.

    The short reprieve comes after Udio on Wednesday said it had settled copyright infringement claims brought by Universal Music, a label with artists including Taylor Swift, Olivia Rodrigo, Drake and Kendrick Lamar.

    AI companies are now fighting so many copyright lawsuits that a tech industry lobby group, the Chamber of Progress, last week called on President Donald Trump to sign an executive order directing federal attorneys “to intervene in legal cases” to defend the industry’s practice of building generative AI tools by feeding them on copyrighted works.

    Citing more than 50 pending federal cases, the group asked for help stopping court fights leading to “potentially company-killing penalties” that threaten AI innovation. But artists have warned that AI tools built on their works also threaten their livelihoods.

    In the biggest settlement so far, AI company Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion — or $3,000 per book — to settle claims from authors who alleged the company illegally pirated nearly half a million of their works to train its chatbot.

    Udio and Universal didn’t disclose the financial terms of their new music licensing agreements. They also said they will team up on a new streaming platform.

    As part of the agreement, Udio immediately stopped allowing people to download songs they’ve created, which sparked a backlash and apparent exodus among paying users.

    “We know the pain it causes to you,” Udio later said in a post on Reddit’s Udio forum, where users were venting about feeling betrayed by the platform’s surprise move and complained that it limited what they could do with their music.

    Udio said it still must stop downloads as it transitions to a new streaming platform next year. But over the weekend, it said it will give people 48 hours starting at 11 a.m. Eastern time Monday to keep their “past creations.”

    “Udio is a small company operating in an incredibly complex and evolving space, and we believe that partnering directly with artists and songwriters is the way forward,” said Udio’s post.

    The settlement deal was the music industry’s first since Universal, along with Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Records, sued Udio and another AI song generator, Suno, last year over copyright infringement.

    Udio and Suno pioneered AI song generation technology, which can spit out new songs based on prompts typed into a chatbot-style text box. Users, who don’t need musical talent, can merely request a tune in the style of, for example, classic rock, 1980s synth-pop or West Coast rap.

    Record labels have accused the platforms of exploiting the recorded works of artists without compensating them.

    In its lawsuit filed against Udio last year, Universal sought to show how specific AI-generated songs made on Udio closely resembled Universal-owned classics like Frank Sinatra’s “My Way,” The Temptations’ “My Girl,” ABBA’s “Dancing Queen” and holiday favorites like “Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree” and “Jingle Bell Rock.”

    A musician-led group, the Artist Rights Alliance, said Friday that the Universal-Udio settlement represents a positive step in creating a “legitimate AI marketplace” but raised questions about whether independent artists, session musicians and songwriters will be sufficiently protected from AI practices that present an “existential threat” to their careers.

    “Licensing is the only version of AI’s future that doesn’t result in the mass destruction of art and culture,” the group said. “But this promise must be available to all music creators, not just to major corporate copyright holders.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Universal Music and AI song tool Udio settle lawsuit and partner on new platform, sparking backlash

    [ad_1]

    LONDON (AP) — Universal Music Group and AI song generation platform Udio have settled a copyright infringement lawsuit and agreed to team up on new music creation and streaming platform, the two companies said in a joint announcement.

    Universal and Udio said Wednesday that they reached a “compensatory legal settlement” as well as new licensing agreements for recorded music and publishing that will “provide further revenue opportunities” for the record label’s artists and songwriters.

    As part of the deal, Udio immediately stopped allowing people to download songs they’ve created, which sparked a backlash and apparent exodus among paying users.

    The deal is the first since Universal, along with Sony Music Entertainment and Warner Records, sued Udio and another AI song generator, Suno, last year over copyright infringement.

    “These new agreements with Udio demonstrate our commitment to do what’s right by our artists and songwriters, whether that means embracing new technologies, developing new business models, diversifying revenue streams or beyond,” Universal CEO Lucian Grainge said.

    Financial terms of the settlement weren’t disclosed.

    Universal announced another AI deal on Thursday, saying it was teaming up with Stability AI to develop “next-generation professional music creation tools.”

    Udio and Suno pioneered AI song generation technology, which can spit out new songs based on prompts typed into a chatbot-style text box. Users, who don’t need musical talent, can merely request a tune in the style of, for example, classic rock, 1980s synth-pop or West Coast rap.

    Udio and Universal, which counts Taylor Swift, Olivia Rodrigo, Drake, and Kendrick Lamar among its artists, said the new AI subscription service will debut next year.

    Udio CEO Andrew Sanchez said in a blog post that people will be able to use it to remix their favorite songs or mashup different tunes or song styles. Artists will be able to give permission for how their music can be used, he said.

    However, “downloads from the platform will be unavailable,” he said.

    AI songs made on Udio will be “controlled within a walled garden” as part of the transition to the new service, the two companies said in their joint announcement.

    The move angered Udio’s users, according to posts on Reddit’s Udio forum, where they vented about feeling betrayed by the platform’s surprise move and complained that it limited what they could do with their music.

    One user accused Universal of taking away “our democratic download freedoms.” Another said “Udio can never be trusted again.”

    Many vowed to cancel their subscriptions for Udio, which has a free level as well as premium plans that come with more features.

    The deal shows how the rise of AI song generation tools like Udio has disrupted the $20 billion music streaming industry. Record labels accuse the platforms of exploiting the recorded works of artists without compensating them.

    The tools have fueled debate over AI’s role in music while raising fears about “AI slop” — automatically generated, low quality mass produced content — highlighted by the rise of fictitious bands passing for real artists.

    In its lawsuit filed against Udio last year, Universal alleged that specific AI-generated songs made on Udio closely resembled Universal-owned classics like Frank Sinatra’s “My Way,” The Temptations’ “My Girl” and holiday favorites like “Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree” and “Jingle Bell Rock.”

    In the “My Girl” example, a written prompt on Udio that asked for “my tempting 1964 girl smokey sing hitsville soul pop” generated a song with a “very similar melody, the same chords, and very similar backing vocals” as the hit song co-written by Smokey Robinson and recorded by The Temptations in 1964, according to the lawsuit. A link to the AI-generated song on Udio now says “Track not found.”

    ___

    AP Technology Writer Matt O’Brien in Providence, Rhode Island contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Far From Finished: Lawbrey Files Notice of Appeal In Kendrick Lamar ‘Not Like Us’ Defamation Case

    [ad_1]

    Drake isn’t backing down from his defamation claims against Universal Music Group.

    Source: Prince Williams / Getty

    The Canadian rapper has filed a notice of appeal in his case against UMG and their promotion of Kendrick Lamar‘s highly lauded diss track, “Not Like Us.”

    Representatives for Drake filed the appeal on Wednesday morning, writing that the rapper was providing notice of appeal to the District Court’s opinion and order from earlier this month, per Variety. As for his legal team’s arguments over the basis of the appeal, those are expected to be made at a later date.

    “This confirms our intent to appeal, and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing that filing in the coming weeks,” a rep for Drake said in a statement to Variety.

    As previously reported, U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled earlier this month that the lyrics of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” are expressions of opinion rather than statements of fact.

    “A reasonable listener could not have concluded that ‘Not Like Us’ was conveying objective facts about Drake,” she ruled.

    Aubrey’s legal battle came to encompass more than just UMG’s alleged defamation, with his team demanding internal documents tied to allegations of domestic violence against Lamar and probing the nature of Dave Free’s relationship with Lamar’s children. Drake’s lawyers sought “All Documents and Communications … relating to allegations of domestic violence … committed by Kendrick Lamar” in those filings, also requesting materials on “David Isaac Friley (a/k/a Dave Free) and his relationship with Kendrick Lamar and Kendrick Lamar’s children.”

    The Toronto native also accused UMG of orchestrating a “financial conspiracy” by promoting Lamar’s music at the expense of his brand, making secret payments, and reducing licensing offers to third parties to suppress Drake’s value during contract talks. His team went on to demand UMG produce redacted versions of Lamar’s record contract (claiming it was unfairly censored), and documentation involving prior label censorship (citing Pusha T’s “Story of Adidon”) as precedent.

    However, in her ruling, Judge Vargas refused to treat rap-battle lyrics as binding statements of fact, emphasizing that diss tracks use hyperbolic, provocative language by nature:

    “The average listener is not under the impression that a diss track is the product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation,” she wrote, according to The Hollywood Reporter. She added that the “rhetorical style, tone, and context, full of profanity and rhetorical flourish, clearly mark the song as expressive opinion rather than factual assertion.”

    [ad_2]

    Rebecah Jacobs

    Source link

  • Drake trolls Shohei Ohtani, Dodgers as Blue Jays take 3-2 World Series lead

    [ad_1]

    Rap star Drake trolled Los Angeles Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani after the Toronto Blue Jays took a 3-2 series lead in the World Series.

    The Canadian-born rapper is known for representing his nation’s sports teams, and with the Blue Jays on the verge of winning a title, there is no secret which side he is supporting.

    Once the Blue Jays clinched their spots in the World Series by beating the Seattle Mariners in seven games, Drake posted a video on his story celebrating the final out of the ALCS. “One strike away, we’re going to the big show,” Drake said in the video. “Get the boys a pizza and some Cokes.”

    More news: Dodgers All-Star Sends Message to LA Offense Amid Struggles

    After the Dodgers lost 6-1 to the Jays in Game 5, Drake took to social media to post a photo of Ohtani, captioned “ONE MORE!!!!”

    Loading twitter content…

    Drake has some extra stakes in this World Series, considering one of the narratives going around is based on his dramatic rap battle loss to Compton-based artist Kendrick Lamar.

    Lamar famously released “Not Like Us,” a hit song that attacked Drake’s character and persona. It has been played at multiple Dodger games, and Lamar is known for representing the city of Los Angeles, throwing out the first pitch at a Dodgers game before, and sporting their signature baseball cap.

    More news: Red Sox Prospect Suddenly Retires at 25 Years Old

    Given the nature of the conflict between the artists and the fact that both teams are in the World Series, their music has been featured on the Fox broadcast.

    In the lead-up to the World Series, Ohtani was asked about the Drake-Kendrick Lamar narrative, though he did not seem well-informed on the topic.

    “I’m not too knowledgeable of music,” Ohtani said.

    The Dodgers will get the chance to even up the series on Friday, Oct. 31, where Ohtani and the city of Los Angeles will want to give another loss to Drake and his city of Toronto.

    More news: Dodgers’ Shohei Ohtani Has 6-Word Response to Drake vs Kendrick Lamar Debate

    For all the latest MLB news and rumors, head over to Newsweek Sports.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Time Flies! Fans React To Updated Photo Of Adonis As Drake & Sophie Brussaux Link Up To Celebrate His 8th Birthday (VIDEOS)

    [ad_1]

    Fans are reacting to an updated photo of Adonis Mahbed Graham as Drake and his mom, Sophie Brussaux, recently linked up to celebrate his 8th birthday.

    RELATED: Awww! The Game & Shaniece Hairston Link Up To Celebrate Son Blaze Taylor’s First Birthday (VIDEO)

    Drake & Sophie Brussaux Link Up To Celebrate Adonis Graham’s 8th Birthday As Drake Shares Updated Photo Of His Son

    On Sunday, October 12, The Shade Room reposted footage filmed at the birthday celebration for Drake and Brussaux’s son, Adonis. Furthermore, the clip showed Adonis standing between his parents as they posed for photos as as Drake held a knife up to his cowboy-themed birthday cake. To note, the trio appeared with all smiles for the occasion.

    Then, on the evening of Sunday, October 12, Drake took to his Instagram Story to share an updated photo of Adonis.

    Social Media Reacts To Updated Photo Of Adonis

    Social media users reacted to the footage of Adonis’ birthday party, Drake and Sophie Brussaux linking up, and the updated photo of the 8-year-old in TSR’s comment section.

    Instagram user @x.xxii wrote, Somebody said ‘That Justin Timberlake biopic role is his!’ 😂”

    While Instagram user @stylesbynailahalnisa added,I kno she well taken care of I don’t hear a peep out of her 😂”

    Instagram user @amacieforever wrote, He is so cute!”

    While Instagram user @goddess.sunshiine added, Awww he’s a little handsome feller”

    Instagram user @sadity_beauti wrote, I know drake lovesss his son down but still pissed that’s his baby mama🤣! He’s such a cutie🫶🏾”

    While Instagram user @superchargedelliot21 added,That boy made a reincarnated Justin Timberlake”

    Instagram user @royaly_destined_85 wrote, I know Drake (and the world lol) was iffy in the beginning, but Adonis is definitely growing into being his twin!!!”

    While Instagram user @s_w4944 added, He’s 8?! Geez I remember when Pusha T told the world about him”

    Instagram user @tee.monae_ wrote, Awww look at Lil Jimmy 🩵#WhateverItTakes”

    Before His 8th Birthday, Adonis & Drake Last Turned Heads At A Raptors Game In 2022

    The last time Adonis and Drake made headlines was when they popped out to a Toronto Raptors NBA game in 2022. As The Shade Room previously reported, at the time, Adonis was 5 years old, and cameras captured the pair sharing an adorable father-son moment.

    RELATED: WATCH: Drake And Adonis Share Adorable Father-Son Moment At Raptors Game

    What Do You Think Roomies?

    [ad_2]

    Jadriena Solomon

    Source link

  • Judge Dismisses Drake’s Defamation Suit Over “Not Like Us”

    [ad_1]

    Drake’s claims that “Not Like Us” lyrics were defamatory dismissed because they are opinion

    On Thursday, Federal Judge Jeannette A. Vargas dismissed Drake’s lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) over Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us”. The lawsuit alleged that UMG intentionally promoted the song even though it contained false and defamatory pedophilia allegations against Drake, Lamar was not named in the suit.

    Drake mentioned that the song tarnished his reputation, decreased the value of his brand overall, and encouraged violence against him. The song’s cover pictured Drake’s house, which he believed led to the multiple attempted break-ins at his house last year, as well as the shooting of his security guard at his Toronto home. 

    The suit was filed in January, and in March UMG filed to have the motion dismissed stating that Drake “lost a rap battle that he provoked and in which he willingly participated” and “instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often claims to be, he has sued his own record label in a misguided attempt to salve his wounds”. UMG is the parent label for both Interscope Records, Lamar’s record label and Drake’s record label, Republic Records. The judge acknowledged the feud, which began in April 2024, marking that Drake mocked Lamar’s height and shoe size and questioned his success in “Push Ups,” while Lamar insulted Drake’s fashion sense in that same month on “Euphoria” and with the insults escalating from then becoming “vicious, personal” attacks.

    Drake’s “Family Matters” accused Lamar of domestic violence and claimed that Lamar’s music producer was the biological father of Lamar’s son. Lamar’s response, “meet the grahams” accused Drake of being a sexual predator, lying about Lamar’s family, and having a second secret child. Lamar dropped “Not Like Us” a day later, accusing Drake of pedophilia. Drake responded quickly, denying all of Lamar’s accusations, but at that point, it was too late.

    Lamar was widely regarded as the winner of the feud, and the information spread quickly, as “Not Like Us” continued to grow in popularity, garnering five Grammys and a spot in Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show lineup, which was the most-watched halftime show ever. 

    Drake’s concern over “Not Like Us” revolves around the song falsely accusing him of being a sex offender and pedophile. Lamar’s track has multiple lyrics regarding this point, including “I hear you like ‘em young”, and in reference to Drake’s album “Certified Lover Boy? Certified pedophiles”. While the judge acknowledged that “the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one” within “the overall context in which the statements in the recording were made, the court holds that it cannot” be taken as factual statements. 

    This ruling marks the concerning statements as “non-actionable opinion” because “Not Like US” is “replete with profanity, trash-talking, threats of violence, and figurative and hyperbolic language” and would not be taken by a reasonable person to be fact. The ruling absolves UMG of responsibility for promoting “Not Like Us”. Upon the dismissal of the lawsuit, UMG released a statement in agreement with the ruling, stating that “from the outset this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day”. Drake’s only response to the ruling was a statement from a spokesperson stating, “we intend to appeal today’s ruling and we look forward to the court of appeals reviewing it”. Drake’s spokesperson conveyed “we intend to appeal today, ruling and we look forward to the court of appeals reviewing it” through a statement.

    [ad_2]

    Taylor Ford

    Source link

  • Aww Give Him A Hug: Drake Gets CLOWNED (AGAIN) After Losing His Defamation Lawsuit Against UMG Over Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us’

    [ad_1]

    One L After Another!

    Source: Kevin Winter/Getty Images

    Social media is ABLAZE over Drake losing his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group in response to Kendrick Lamar‘s now-iconic diss track, ‘Not Like Us.’

    The Hollywood Reporter reports that U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled that the lyrics of “Not Like Us” are expressions of opinion rather than statements of fact.

    “A reasonable listener could not have concluded that ‘Not Like Us’ was conveying objective facts about Drake,” she ruled.

    As previously reported, Drake accused UMG of orchestrating a “financial conspiracy” by promoting Lamar’s music at the expense of his brand, making secret payments, and reducing licensing offers to third parties to suppress Drake’s value during contract talks.

    His team also demanded UMG produce redacted versions of Lamar’s record contract (claiming it was unfairly censored) and documentation involving prior label censorship (citing Pusha T’s “Story of Adidon”) as precedent.

    But in her ruling, Judge Vargas refused to treat rap battle lyrics as binding statements of fact.

    The Hollywood Reporter notes that Vargas emphasized that diss tracks by nature use hyperbolic, provocative language:

    “The average listener is not under the impression that a diss track is the product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation,” she wrote. She added that the “rhetorical style, tone, and context, full of profanity and rhetorical flourish, clearly mark the song as expressive opinion rather than factual assertion.”

    For those keeping score at home, this is all started back in November 2024 when Drake alleged that UMG and Spotify deployed bots to “artificially inflate” the success of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” violating the RICO Act.

    When that fizzled out, the Canadian rapper filed another lawsuit accusing the music giant of knowingly defaming him.

    His complaint centered around “Not Like Us,” which famously referred to Drake as a “child predator,” prompting the hitmaking artist to allege that UMG not only distributed this song but promoted it through “illegal means.”

    Naturally, UMG vehemently denied the claims, asserting that the notion they would “seek to harm the reputation of any artist—let alone Drake—is illogical.”

    “Plaintiff, one of the most successful recording artists of all time, lost a rap battle that he provoked and in which he willingly participated,” UMG’s lawyers wrote in a filing asking for a dismissal. “Instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often claims to be, he has sued his own record label in a misguided attempt to salve his wounds.”

    If you were advising Drake, what would you recommend he do next? Tell us down below and peep the social media hysteria over Drake’s latest L on the flip.

    [ad_2]

    Alex Ford

    Source link

  • Another Major L? Judge Dismisses Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit Against UMG Over ‘Not Like Us’ (UPDATE)

    [ad_1]

    Drake is again walking away holding an L(oss) from a battle involving Kendrick Lamar. On Thursday (October 9), a judge dismissed the defamation lawsuit Drizzy filed against Universal Music Group (UMG) over the hit song, ‘Not Like Us.’ The federal official ruled that Kenny’s lyrics were opinion, per the Associated Press. While Drake hasn’t spoken out yet, others involved in making the track, including Mustard, seemingly have!

    RELATED: Yikes! Social Media Goes OFF After Kendrick Lamar Clowns Drake With THIS Skit At First Tour Stop (VIDEO)

    Judge Explains Why She Tossed Drake’s Lawsuit Against UMG 

    As previously reported, Drake’s and Kendrick Lamar’s rap beef exploded in the spring of 2024. The superstars traded shots from the booth for several rounds. Then, in May, Lamar put a nail in Drizzy’s metaphorical coffin with ‘Not Like Us.’ The song became a cultural phenomenon and ate the charts up—same energy for the music video he released in July. Even celebrities once tight with Drake, such as LeBron James, picked sides. And, spoiler alert, it often wasn’t the Canadian rapper’s!

    ‘Not Like Us,’ which calls out Drake by name, attacks him as “a colonizer” of rap culture. It also makes serious allegations about his sex life, including “I hear you like ’em young” — a claim Drake has rejected. This week, Judge Jeannette A. Vargas acknowledged in her written opinion that ‘Not Like Us’ explicitly branded Drake as a pedophile. However, Vargas said a reasonable listener could not have concluded that the song revealed objective facts about Drake.

    “Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff,” Judge Vargas wrote.

    An aerial photo depicting Drake’s mansion doubles as the song’s cover art. The photo, per the judge, had “an overlay of more than a dozen sex offender markers,” but Vargas said it was “obviously exaggerated and doctored.”

    “No reasonable person would view the Image and believe that, in fact, law enforcement had designated thirteen residents in Drake’s home as sex offenders,” Judge Vargas wrote.

    Judge Vargas also pointed out that Drizzy, too, took low blows in the rap beef. Before ‘Not Like Us,’ she said Drake mocked Kendrick Lamar’s height and shoe size. Additionally, he questioned Lamar’s success in the April 2024 track ‘Push Ups.’ Meanwhile, Kendrick Lamar insulted Drizzy’s fashion sense that same month in ‘Euphoria.’ Judge Vargas wrote that the insults escalated from there, becoming “vicious, personal.”

    Considering the medium the rappers used to insult each other, Judge Vargas concluded that the average listener knows better. She said listeners would not consider a diss track “a product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation, conveying to the public fact-checked verifiable content.”

    Per AP, Vargas wrote that ‘Not Like Us’ was “replete with profanity, trash-talking, threats of violence, and figurative and hyperbolic language, all of which are indicia of opinion.” A reasonable listener, she added, “would conclude that Lamar is rapping hyperbolic vituperations.”

    Drake’s Team & UMG Reacts To Lawsuit Dismissal

    After the decision, Drake’s legal team issued a statement: “We intend to appeal today’s ruling, and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it.”

    For context, Drizzy filed the lawsuit in January. It does not name Kendrick Lamar. Instead, the paperwork alleges Universal Music Group (UMG) intentionally published and promoted ‘Not Like Us,’ despite knowing the lyrics contained false and defamatory allegations. The lawsuit claims the song messed up his reputation and decreased the value of his brand. Additionally, Drake alleged that the song encourages listeners to use vigilante justice against him. He even blamed ‘Not Like Us’ for attempted break-ins and the shooting of a security guard at his Toronto home.

    UMG immediately denied the allegations. Interestingly, Universal Music Group is the parent record label for both Drake and Kendrick Lamar. It released a statement following the lawsuit dismissal.

    “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day,” UMG said. “We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

    Mustard Shares THIS Post After Dismissal 

    It’s no debate that ‘Not Like Us’ was one of 2024’s biggest songs. Even Judge Vargas described it as having a “catchy beat and propulsive bassline.” Outside of court, Kendrick Lamar’s diss won record of the year and song of the year at the Grammys. It also helped make this year’s Super Bowl halftime show the most-watched ever, as fans speculated whether Lamar would actually perform it. He did, but with altered lyrics and the acknowledgment of the UMG lawsuit!

    Mustard, who produced the diss, joined Kenny on the Super Bowl stage. He’s stuck by the artist’s rivalry with Drake. After the dismissal news on Thursday, Mustard took to X with a post that has fans thinking it’s a response to the legal update!

    Meanwhile, social media users on the same platform haven’t stopped cuttin’ up YET. See additional reactions HERE.

    RELATED: Bye King! Drake Ditches LeBron James Tattoo For New Tribute To Canadian NBA Baller (PHOTO)

    Associated Press writers Larry Neumeister, Andrew Dalton and Jennifer Peltz contributed to this report via AP Newsroom. 

    What Do You Think Roomies?

    [ad_2]

    Cassandra S

    Source link

  • Drake’s ‘Not Like Us’ defamation lawsuit against UMG dismissed by judge | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    A United States federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that Drake brought against Universal Music Group (UMG), accusing the record company of defamation over its distribution and promotion of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track, Not Like Us.

    District Judge Jeannette Vargas dismissed the suit after she said Lamar’s Not Like Us was a “nonactionable opinion” that is not considered defamatory.

    The feud between two of hip-hop’s biggest stars erupted in the spring of 2024, with the pair trading a series of tracks that culminated in Lamar landing the “metaphorical killing blow” with his megahit that May, Vargas said in her written opinion Thursday.

    “The fact that the Recording was made in the midst of a rap battle is essential to assessing its impact on a reasonable listener,” Vargas wrote. “Even apparent statements of fact may assume the character of statements of opinion … when made in public debate, heated labor dispute, or other circumstances in which an audience may anticipate the use of epithets, fiery rhetoric or hyperbole.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    While the track’s lyrics explicitly branded Drake as a pedophile, Vargas said, a reasonable listener could not have concluded that Not Like Us was conveying objective facts about the Canadian superstar.

    “Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that Not Like Us imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff,” Vargas wrote.

    Recapping “perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre’s history,” Vargas noted that before Not Like Us, Drake mocked Lamar’s height and shoe size and questioned his success in an April 2024 track called Push Ups, while Lamar insulted Drake’s fashion sense that same month in Euphoria.

    From there, Vargas wrote, the insults escalated, becoming “vicious, personal.”

    The judge said she considered the forum in which the insults occurred and concluded that the average listener does not think a diss track “is the product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation, conveying to the public factchecked verifiable content.”


    Click to play video: 'Lawsuit reveals new details about shooting at Drake’s Toronto home'


    Lawsuit reveals new details about shooting at Drake’s Toronto home


    After the ruling, a spokesperson for UMG told Variety that, “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day. We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    Drake’s representatives told the outlet that they intend to appeal Thursday’s ruling, “and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it.”

    For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

    Get breaking National news

    For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

    Not Like Us — described by Vargas as having a “catchy beat and propulsive bassline” — was one of 2024’s biggest songs.

    It won record of the year and song of the year at the Grammys and helped make this year’s Super Bowl halftime show the most watched ever, as fans speculated on whether Lamar would actually perform it. (He did, but with altered lyrics.)


    In January, Drake filed the defamation lawsuit against UMG, the record label he and rival Lamar are both signed to.

    The Toronto rapper referred to the release of Lamar’s diss track as an example of “corporate greed over the safety and well-being of its artists,” according to the New York Times.

    In his filing, Drake’s team said the diss track aimed at the Canadian rapper spreads the “false and malicious narrative” that he is a pedophile. The filing stated that Drake is “not a pedophile” and has “never engaged in any acts that would require him to be ‘placed on neighborhood watch.’”

    “Drake has never engaged in sexual relations with a minor. Drake has never been charged with, or convicted of, any criminal acts whatsoever,” the suit read.

    Story continues below advertisement

    The lawsuit went on to detail a shooting at Drake’s home a few days after the song was released, resulting in a security guard being seriously injured.

    “During the nearly 30 minutes it took for the ambulance to arrive, Drake and others laboured to keep the man alive by applying pressure to the gunshot wound with towels. Blood was everywhere,” the filing read.

    According to the suit, nothing like that had happened to Drake or his family during the two decades that he had been working in the music industry.

    The lawsuit also stated that the multiple break-in attempts on his home that happened following the release of the song were caused by UMG’s actions.

    “With the palpable physical threat to Drake’s safety and the bombardment of online harassment, Drake fears for the safety and security of himself, his family, and his friends,” according to the suit.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Drake’s team made it known that the lawsuit was not directed at Lamar and clearly placed the blame on Universal for releasing, distributing and promoting the song.

    “This lawsuit is not about the artist who created Not Like Us,” the suit read. “It is, instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood were not only false, but dangerous.”

    The feud between Drake and Lamar is among the biggest in hip-hop in recent years, with two of the genre’s biggest stars at its centre.

    The two were occasional collaborators more than a decade ago, but Lamar began taking public jabs at Drake starting in 2013. The fight escalated steeply earlier last year.

    With files from The Associated Press

    Curator Recommendations

    &copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Katie Scott

    Source link

  • Judge dismisses Drake’s lawsuit against UMG over Kendrick Lamar diss track “Not Like Us”

    [ad_1]

    A federal judge in New York tossed out a defamation lawsuit that Drake brought against Universal Music Group, ruling that lyrics branding the superstar as a pedophile in Kendrick Lamar’s Grammy-winning diss track “Not Like Us” were opinion.

    Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on Thursday rejected the suit in a written opinion that began by citing “the vitriolic war of words” and saying the case arose “from perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre’s history.”

    Filed in January, the lawsuit alleged that UMG published and promoted “Not Like Us” even though it included false pedophilia allegations against Drake and suggested listeners should resort to vigilante justice.

    The lawsuit also alleged that the track tarnished his reputation and decreased the value of his brand.

    Lamar was not named in the lawsuit.  

    Universal Music Group, the parent record label for both artists, had denied the allegations.

    “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day,” a UMG spokesperson told CBS News in a statement Thursday. “We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

    A spokesperson for Drake told CBS News in a statement, “We intend to appeal today’s ruling, and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it.”

    CBS News has also reached out to representatives for Lamar for comment.

    UMG owns both Interscope, Lamar’s label, and Republic Records, where Drake has spent his entire career. 

    In February, Drake reached a settlement with iHeartMedia in a separate court complaint filed in Texas over “Not Like Us.”

    In that complaint, Drake alleged that iHeartMedia had received illegal payments from UMG to boost radio airplay for “Not Like Us.” iHeartMedia and UMG denied the allegations.

    And in November 2024, Drake also filed a similar complaint in New York against streaming giant Spotify and UMG, accusing them of conspiring to inflate streams of “Not Like Us.” Both companies have also denied those claims.

    Lamar and Drake have been beefing for years, with the two rappers releasing several diss tracks about one another. The feud appeared to reach its height when Lamar called out Drake during his Super Bowl Halftime Show in February.

    In “Not Like Us,” which was released in May 2024, Lamar makes disturbing accusations about Drake allegedly having inappropriate conduct with minors. He also makes similar allegations about Drake’s friends and continues to question Drake’s talent.

    In his own responding diss track, Drake denied these allegations, as well as allegations about having a daughter. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Judge Tosses Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit Against Universal Music Over Rap Beef With Kendrick Lamar – KXL

    [ad_1]


    NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge tossed out a defamation lawsuit that Drake brought against Universal Music Group on Thursday, ruling that lyrics branding the superstar as a pedophile in Kendrick Lamar’s dis track “Not Like Us” were opinion.

    Judge Jeannette A. Vargas rejected the suit in a written opinion that began by citing “the vitriolic war of words” and saying the case arose “from perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre’s history.”

    Filed in January, the lawsuit alleged that UMG published and promoted “Not Like Us” even though it included false pedophilia allegations against Drake and suggested listeners should resort to vigilante justice.

    The lawsuit also alleged that the track tarnished his reputation and decreased the value of his brand.

    Universal Music Group, the parent record label for both artists, denied the allegations.

    “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day,” UMG said in a statement. “We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

    Lamar was not named in the lawsuit.

    There was no immediate response to mails sent to representatives for Drake seeking comment.

    More about:


    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link

  • Oktoberfest’s Very Own: Drake Lands In Germany For Annual Festival, Serves Certified Lederhosen Boy Looks

    [ad_1]

    Source: Simone Joyner / Getty

    Drake is October’s very own, and to prove it he made his way to Germany’s annual Oktoberfest for some fun times with his woes.

    The rapper posted a photo dump featuring himself and his homies holding big mugs of beer while partying with the locals all while The Boy himself sported a custom Chanel lederhosen for the festive occasion. It seems that Drake is really loving being anywhere other than stateside these days and is showing his European fans all of the love he can muster.

    He’s been popping up in several countries making his appreciation for his international fans known, even going as far as crowing the UK with the crown for having the best rappers of any location. Though many called cap, the London OVO supporters ate it right up.

    With the release of his next album, The Iceman, looming, it remains to be seen if he’ll offer up something to his American fans, who it seems are still rocking with him and anticipating the music he’ll release after last year’s highly publicized rap battle. In the meantime, he’s living it up across the pond with Party Next Door.

    His Euro tour stops are all but complete and he’s been leaving breadcrumbs for his adoring fans but what will the next era of Drake really be? Some say he’ll address all of his new enemies much like he did on the track “What Did I Miss?” while others believe he’ll put everything from last year behind him and get back to what made him a superstar. Either way, his fans will likely have a new album to listen to before the year’s end.

    It’ll also be interesting to see how he chooses to roll out the new music, as many artists are abandoning the surprise release approach (made popular by Beyoncé in 2013). Many recently went back to traditional marketing while adding in new technological elements like drone drop-offs and social media challenges. Though his popularity may have waned slightly, we have no doubt that Drake will make a big splash back onto the Billboard charts.

    [ad_2]

    imannmilner

    Source link

  • ‘Always Love’: LeBron James Speaks On Relationship With Drake Post Kendrick Beef

    [ad_1]

    LeBron James has broken his silence on whether or not his friendship with Drake is OVA.

    Source: Cole Burston / Getty

    After much speculation and some very thinly veiled hits from the Canadian rapper, James finally addressed the elephant in the room of his and Drake’s one-time friendship. During a sit-down with Complex‘s Speedy Mormon, the four-time NBA champion squashed any claims of bad blood from his perspective.

    “Always wish him the best,” James said. “Obviously [we’re in] different places right now, currently. He’s doing his thing, I’m doing mine, but it’s always love for sure.”

    His comments seem to be in direct opposition to what fans have speculated are direct hits to James on Drake’s latest single, “What Did I Miss?” as well as a freestyle aptly titled “Fighting Irish Freestyle.” The latter was released online and seemed to be talking directly to the basketball superstar as his high school team was none other than the Fighting Irish.

    “The world fell in love with the gimmicks, even my brothers got tickets, seemed like they loved every minute/ Just know the s–t is personal to us and wasn’t just business/ Analyzing behavioral patterns is somewhat suspicious,” Drake raps on the track.

    The drama commenced amid Kendrick Lamar’s public belt to behind rap battle with Drake during which James popped out at Kung Fu Kenny’s sold out Juneteenth show and was seen living it up with his wife, Savannah, to “They Not Like Us.” Several athletes were in attendance with players like DeMar DeRozan and Russell Westbrook joining Kendrick onstage.

    However, Lebron’s presence was a little more shocking as he and Drake had appeared to have a close relationship throughout the years. At one point, Drake walked through the crowd during his It Was All A Blur tour with LeBron and his son, Bronny James, after the younger basketball phenom suffered a frightening cardiac incident while attending USC.

    Drizzy even went as far as covering up his tattoo of James’ high school jersey with new ink tributing Canadian basketball sensation and newly minted NBA champion Shai Gilgeous-Alexander instead. Everybody knows when you get the tattoo covered up, the breakup is real. Fans of the two were quick to jump in the Complex comments to call cap on James’ politically correct response to the question. Many reminded the King that he danced to a song calling Drake a “p*dophile” on more than one occasion. The internet receipts are forever.

    Nonetheless, LeBron is gearing up for his 23rd season of basketball and may not have time for beefs for the next six to seven months. Though there were talks of him possibly leaving the Los Angeles Lakers during the offseason, he’ll lace up his Nikes for the purple and gold again alongside his son when the season commences. But maybe there will be room for reconciliation between him and Drake once they’re both done “doing their thing.” We will be hoping for the best between these two former besties.

    Check out LeBron’s full interview on 360 With Speedy below.

    [ad_2]

    imannmilner

    Source link

  • Drake BBLasts Ab Sculpting Allegations, But Admits To ‘Maybe ‘ Using FaceTune To Enhance His Features In Photos

    [ad_1]

    Even after years of speculation and allegations, Drake isn’t admitting to having any work done on his body.

    Source: Prince Williams / Getty

    The Toronto rapper sat down for another interview with Bobbi Althoff on her new podcast, Not This Again. During the conversation, Drake opened up about his current opinions of the music industry, which, of course, included the influx of allegations around his physique.

    On the subject of ab sculpting–a rumor that came to light years ago and was highlighted again during his recent beef with Kendrick Lamar–Drake insists he hasn’t gotten any work done, but he did admit to using a little FaceTune to make his pictures “pop.”

    Althoff told the rapper that a lot of people think he “got a procedure done,” before outright asking him, “Did you do that?” to which he responded, “No.”

    He went on to refer to a shirtless picture he posted back in June, which received a lot of backlash. With the ab sculpting rumors at the front of fans’ mind, a lot of people pointed out that the rest of his physique didn’t match up with his abs, only making the allegations gain more traction.

    Instead of addressing the idea that his muscles are mismatched, Drake seemed to run with the idea that his abs seemed too good to be true in that photo, which is when he admitted to a little editing.

    “I think it was just like I came from the gym. I was sweaty in that pic,” he said, going on to explain that he might have used the Facetune app to edit the photo. “Maybe I heightened the saturation or something on it. I hit it too hard. They don’t look like that. You saw them.”

    He went on to say that Althoff “asked to see” his abs “the other day.” She interjected, “During an interview,” to which he laughed and said, “This is our first interview. I don’t know what she’s talking about…She asked me to see my abs, and I showed them to her.”

    “The first thing I did when I got off the plane was like, ‘Can I see your abs?’ And then you were like, ‘Sure,’” she replied. “And that was it, and I was like, ‘Wow, you’re so hot.’”

    “You were like, ‘They look good, they just don’t look like that pic,’” Drake replied.

    “That’s exactly what happened. He’s so smart,” Althoff said.

    The Canadian also addressed the speculation that he got a BBL, thought he only jokingly responded to the rumors.

    “They call me BBL Drizzy, so that’s true,” he quipped. I don’t know if my wagon looked crazy when I walked in here, but did it?”

    Althoff told him she “didn’t look” at his body when he walked in, so she couldn’t confirm or deny.

    Elsewhere in the interview, Drake also touched on being labeled a “culture vulture,” a label he admits genuinely bothers him.

    The rapper said that his frustration around the topic comes from the disconnect between perception and reality, pointing to the ways he’s contributed to the culture over the years. Though he didn’t name names, he hinted at his early collaborations with artists like Migos, A$AP Rocky, and more, all artists who went on to dominate the industry.

    Check out the full interview to hear more from Drake down below:

    [ad_2]

    Rebecah Jacobs

    Source link

  • Tems Brings Her Born In The Wild Tour to 713 Music Hall

    Tems Brings Her Born In The Wild Tour to 713 Music Hall

    [ad_1]

    “The energy is crazy right now,” laughed Tems as she stared at the audience in awe. “I just love Houston. My family is from Houston. My family is out there right now.”

    The singer stood basking in the applause took a step back as the spotlights focused on her. The room filled with the reverberation of cheers as the singer tried to hold back her expressions of joy.

    A few days ago Tems revealed a secret to the world about her chart-topping song with Drake and Future.
    “Maybe now it’s time for me to confess that it was always I won’t wait for you,” said the Nigerian singer via X formally known as Twitter. “But it’s want it in a British accent so it came out as wun. It officially I will wait now though. I just thought it was funny.”

    Temilande Openiyl has been burning up the charts under the stage name Tems since the release of her two EPs For Broken Ears and If Orange Was A Place. That first EP contained the song “Higher” which Atlanta rapper Future sampled for his single “Wait For U”. The song debuted on Billboard’s Hot 100 giving Tems songwriting credit on a multiplatinum, Grammy Award winning album.

    That same year she was featured on afrobeat’s superstar Wizkid’s track “Essence” a four times platinum chart-topper which earned a Grammy nomination and multiple awards in its own right. The two songs earned Tems critical acclaim and exposed her to a worldwide audience looking for more of the sultry singer with the powerful voice.

    click to enlarge

    The “Higher” singer brought her powerful voice to Houston fans.

    Photo by Darrin Clifton

    Tems answer was Born in the Wild, her 2024 debut album. The tour came to 713 Music Hall Wednesday night. The tour was almost like a homecoming for the singer who, as mentioned earlier, has ties to the city. She went through singles like obvious crowd favorites “Turn Me Up,” “Found,” and “Ice T” showing stage presence in between songs. She not only went through the new album but made sure to give hits to her fans that have been there from the beginning.

    “I’m going to test y’all,” laughed the singer. “I’m going to do something for my day ones. This is my first song, from me to you. Who knows about Mr. Rebel?”

    The singer has a deadpan delivery but even with her straightforward nature she exudes her personality throughout the performance. She would almost break out in laughter during a song as she looked at signs made my fans in the audience. Emphasis on “almost” because Tems sounds unchangingly like her records.

    As she moved across the stage throughout the night her voice never wavered, showing just how gifted and talented she is with her stage performance. At one point she came down into the crowd to speak with excited audience members making sure to pick ones that had been enthusiastic all night. When she handed the mic to a fan named Carl, he immediately screamed how proud he was of her. Tems responded by serenading him incorporating his name into the song. She did that for two more fans, walking amongst the crowd and creating personalized tunes before returning to the stage.

    While “Found” got a huge response the room filled with the voices from the audience as she went through the song that started it all. “Higher” had the audience singing so loudly you could hear the chorus drifting though the lobby of 713 Music Hall and out into the humid Houston night.

    If Wednesday is any indication, fans can expect to see more and more Tems. Her powerful voice and stage presence kept the crowd on their feet and wanting more.

    click to enlarge

    Tems looks over the audience at the downtown venue.

    Photo by Darrin Clifton

    Setlist
    Crazy Tings
    Avoid Things
    Free Fall
    Replay
    Damages
    Wickedest
    Turn Me Up
    Burning
    Ice T
    Gangsta
    Mr Rebel
    Unfortunate
    Forever
    Ready
    Found
    Higher
    Not an Angel
    Love Me JeJe
    Essence
    Me & U
    Free Mind

    [ad_2]

    DeVaughn Douglas

    Source link

  • Will Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo Work It Out on the Remix?

    Will Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo Work It Out on the Remix?

    [ad_1]

    We’re in the best of times (brat summer), but we’re also in the worst of times (constantly fielding articles by Some Guy about how brat summer is dead). But how could brat summer be over if I feel it in my heart? If they’re still playing “Guess ft. Billie Eilish” at Tenants of the Trees in LA (where Charli XCX herself had her birthday party for some reason)? And if the impact of brat summer is still causing ripples through the culture it cannot be over.


    No, I’m not talking about Kamala’s brat green rebrand. I’m talking about something more substantial — the very same thing that had last summer in the same chokehold: the infectious and irresistible power of girlhood.

    Last summer caused a vibe shift. Culture started catering to women. Let’s be real: Women have been the drivers of pop culture for a long time. I, for one, will never forget that artists like The Beatles and Elvis, who are still taken seriously as iconic musical artists today, caused fanatical frenzies, not unlike artists like Justin Bieber and One Direction. Yet, despite our clear good taste, women have historically been written off as fickle while culture catered to men.

    Just think of how the 2000s were defined by blockbuster summer movies. Usually, an action movie would dominate, followed by a “chick flick” that was relegated to date nights or the whims of teenage girls. Yet, when
    Barbenheimer resurrected this dynamic, one had a clear chokehold on the internet and the world. And since I haven’t seen Oppenheimener-flavored Olipops, no prizes for guessing which one it was.

    This summer isn’t defined by movies (Twisters and It Ends With Us aren’t the Barbenheimer redux we wanted) it’s characterized by music. And while the guys gave it the old college try — Kendrick did release the ultimate hater anthem with Not Like Us in the Spring — the girls take it yet again.

    And despite seasonal albums from established pop stars like
    Dua Lipa and Ariana Grande, queer (or queer-coded) female artists have blown up this summer. All of them have also been grafting behind the scenes for years before finally getting their flowers. But now the world is listening. We’re learning. And we’re obsessed.

    Of course, there’s the princess of the summer,
    Sabrina Carpenter, who is the latest Disney veteran to make it big. We’ll get to her Disney drama later, but this summer, it’s all about our Short n Sweet queen’s infectious earworms. We called it earlier this year: she is the moment. Her rise to fame has been inevitable.

    Then there’s the surprise star of the year,
    Chappell Roan. So glad bisexual women decided not to gatekeep this absolute star. The fact that I’ve been listening to Chappell since 2020 and I’m still not tired of “Pink Pony Club” says a lot.

    But
    Charli XCX’s mainstream moment is arguably the most surprising. Charli is a giant to music lovers and, of course, the queer community. A real dyed-in-the-wool party girl, she grew up in the clubs and doesn’t just talk the talk, she throws the parties. Despite her collaborations with literally everyone, her Grammys, and her hits, Charli XCX is only now becoming a household name. Why? Because we’re finally ready for her.

    Girlhood is brat. Brat is girlhood. Girl, it’s so confusing, but it’s about being a girl

    Girlhood is the name of the game and Charli writes for the girls and the gays. Her album speaks to the desire to hold on to the feeling of youth juxtaposed with the realities of growing up. Who can’t relate? She talks about themes integral to girlhood: going on vacation and thinking it will change your life, going to a party and thinking it will change your life, and having dinner with a girl and thinking she hates you.

    @thepopupdates The best duo everrrr #charlixcx #lorde #girlsoconfusing #brat #popmusic #music #foryou #foryoupage #fyp #viral ♬ original sound – Pop Throwbacks & Updates

    The latter was the impetus for the internet-breaking track “The girl, so confusing version with lorde.” After Charli released the original version of “girl, so confusing,” the internet rightly assumed it was about her years-long pseudo-beef with
    Lorde. Lyrics like: “I’m all about throwing parties / You’re all about writing poems,” and “People say we’re alike, they say we’ve got the same hair,” added fuel to the fire of their reported feud. So imagine our surprise when Charli released a version with Lorde herself. Like Miss Ella, honestly, we were speechless.

    Lorde knew what she was doing when she said: “When we put this to bed, the internet will go crazy.” Sure enough, the internet erupted. And it did the same once again when footage was released of the two scream-singing their instant classic of a collab at Charli’s birthday party. What a way to put the feud rumors to bed.

    Will Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo work it out on the remix?

    @ce__1l girl girl 💚 // #ce__1l #fyp #foryoupage #lyricsvideo #music #sabrinacarpenter #oliviarodrigo #brat ♬ Girl, so confusing featuring lorde – Charli xcx & Lorde

    After Lorde and Charli worked out their decade of competition over a Jack Antonoff beat, the internet speculated: who would be next to quell their beef with the power of song? If it seems like the plot of a Disney movie, get in for the ride — the Disney of it all has just begun.

    A few weeks ago, sources reported that former Disney stars turned stadium-selling pop stars Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter might be collaborating on a song. With the upcoming release of Carpenter’s highly anticipated album sneaking up on us, fans speculate that this could be a surprise track waiting on the record.

    If you don’t understand how earth-shattering this is, let me take you back to 2021, when
    Olivia Rodrigo first took the world by storm with her song “drivers license.” The song, and subsequent album, chronicled her heartbreak about how her costar and ex-boyfriend Joshua Bassett left her for “that blonde girl.” The blonde in question? Sabrina Carpenter.

    That’s right. Our very own me espresso was the villain in
    the “drivers license” saga. And you mean to tell me the two of them have put their boy drama aside to collaborate? Please, please, please tell me if this is true. If it is, I’ll be sat watching it unfold. As if I needed another reason to eagerly await the release of Short N Sweet.

    In the meantime, I’m making a list and checking it twice about all the other celebs I want to see quell their beef. And yes, the list gets more and more unhinged as you go down, tis the summer of collabs. And our favorite artists are proving that magic can be made if they do it together. Billie and Charli did it. Kendrick and the entire rap community did it. Who is next?

    @kittywaless their lore😍 (pls keep the comments respectful) #catherineprincessofwales #princessofwales #princesscatherine #princesskate #catherinemiddleton #katemiddleton #duchessofcambridge #brat #girlsoconfusing #britishroyalfamily ♬ Girl, so confusing featuring lorde – Charli xcx & Lorde

    People we want to see work it out on the remix:

    One Direction

    This is my ultimate dream. The
    Paris Olympics may have made you fantasize about what life would be like if you hadn’t quit JV basketball, but it made me dream about seeing my beloved One Direction again. After all, I can’t watch an opening ceremony without thinking about their performance at the 2012 London Games. Stranger things have happened than a boyband reuniting. The second they announce a tour, I’m quitting my job and dedicating my life to following them around on tour. Hold me to that.

    Hilary Duff and Lindsay Lohan

    The Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo feud is the closest our generation will ever get to experiencing the magnitude of drama caused by Lindsay Lohan and Hilary Duff. As the two defining Disney sensations turned movie stars of their time, Duff and Lohan were pitted against each other by the media. Everybody knew it: the two were rivals in their careers and in their relationships. We’ll never experience that kind of TMZ-stoked animosity again. But we’re older now. Duff and Lohan are both in new phases of their careers. If they worked it, the (millennial side of the) internet really would go crazy.

    Shawn Mendes and Justin Bieber

    These two divas have been competing to be the prince of pop for years. And their silent feud runs deep. In a radio interview at the beginning of Shawn’s career, Justin responded to a question about the other Canadian crooner with the dismissive and deadly, “who’s Shawn Mendes?” Then, after Mendes appeared with Hailey Baldwin at the Met Gala in 2018, Bieber quickly reignited his relationship with our favorite nepo baby and married her. Talk about winning the battle. The two already have a song together, “
    Monster,” but no one is buying that they’ve really worked it out. I want to see Shawn at Justin and Hailey’s baby shower or bust.

    Justin Bieber and Harry Styles

    Speaking of pop feuds, Bieber and Styles have been toeing a tension-laden line since 2012. Rumors swirled that One Direction was supposed to open for Bieber on his
    Believe tour but the plans were canceled — and dreams died. Reasons abound as to why but I suppose we’ll never know. As someone who attended that Believe tour, I have been waiting for them to work it out on the remix ever since.

    Selena Gomez and Demi Lovato and Miley Cyrus and The Jonas Brothers

    Other feuds from my childhood I want fixed: the Disney Channel stars involved in the seminal sustainability single, “Send It On.” That was our Fleetwood Mac
    Rumors. With loyalties crossed, relationships breaking friendships, and a whole lot of teen angst going on, the Disney Channel producers had one song and one song only to change lives. While we were watching “Send It On” play during Disney breaks, we had no clue about the drama simmering beneath the surface. But imagine if they put that to bed? The internet would go crazy.

    Joe Jonas and Taylor Swift

    Of all of Taylor’s exes, she’s clearly already worked it out with Taylor Lautner — who was backflipping across her Eras tour stages for a brief stint last summer. But the reconciliation I really want is between Taylor and Joe. Sure, she’s written some scathing songs about him. And she told the world on
    Ellen that he broke up with her in 17 seconds. And she’s befriended Sophie Turner. But for a brief moment, Taylor made up with Kanye West, so stranger things have happened. Can you imagine a mashup between “SOS” by The Jonas Brothers and “The Story of US” by Taylor Swift? My Spotify Wrapped would become unshareable.

    Katy Perry and Taylor Swift

    Though allegedly this feud started due to the backup dancers, Perry has become one of
    Swift’s famed list of enemies. And as the queen of “Karma,” Swifties know that all of Taylor’s adversaries never fare well — just look at Ye or Scooter Braun. Katy Perry’s comeback might be another one of these casualties. Ouch. If the two managed to reconcile their “Bad Blood,” imagine the album Katy Perry would create.

    Nelly Furtado and Fergie

    Remember the song “
    Give It To Me” by Timbaland, Nelly Furtado, and Justin Timberlake? Thanks to TikTok, the song experienced a recent resurgence. But did you know the entire song is a diss track? Justin Timberlake’s verse is about Prince (more insane than “what tour? The world tour”), Timbaland’s verse is about Scott Storch, and Nelly Furtado’s verse is about Fergie. But what if we stopped pitting two pop icons against each other and instead begged them both to have a comeback … together?

    The Don’t Worry Darling Cast

    The
    Don’t Worry Darling press tour pitted all our favorite stars against each other in the public arena: Harry Styles, Florence Pugh, Olivia Wilde, Chris Pine, and Gemma Chan. And while that trainwreck of a movie doesn’t need a sequel, I would animatedly watch one just to keep keen eyes on the press tour.

    The It Ends With Us Cast

    If we thought there would never be another press tour as dramatic as
    Don’t Worry Darling, Justin Baldoni of the It Ends With Us cast just hired Johnny Depp’s lawyer — so it’s inarguably surpassed its dramatic predecessor. With Blake Lively and Baldoni both waging a press war, some are hoping It Ends With Us will just … end. But I need a little entertainment to tide me over into fall. And if the movie itself won’t provide it, the hope of a last-gasp reconciliation might.

    Kendrick Lamar and Drake

    I know this will never happen. In fact, if it did, I’d
    lose some respect for Kendrick, honestly. But sometimes I like to imagine that all of this was just marketing for a joint album a la “Watch the Throne.”

    [ad_2]

    LKC

    Source link