ReportWire

Tag: dominant market position

  • Apple escalates its appeal of a $2 billion fine from a UK antitrust lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Apple isn’t ready to pay a several billion-dollar fine to UK App Store users and is filing an appeal over a major antitrust lawsuit. As first reported by The Guardian, Apple has requested to appeal to the UK’s Court of Appeal, which would escalate the case beyond the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT).

    The latest appeal attempt follows an October decision from the CAT, where the court found that Apple engaged in anticompetitive practices by exploiting its dominant market position with the App Store to charge higher fees. The CAT’s ruling established a £1.5 billion, or roughly $2 billion, fine, but Apple said it planned to appeal and that the court “takes a flawed view of the thriving and competitive app economy.” The CAT didn’t grant Apple the appeal, leading the iPhone maker to seek a higher court to overturn the ruling.

    Apple hasn’t made any official statements about its latest appeal application, but it’s likely that it will argue against the CAT’s proposed App Store developer fee rate of between 15 and 20 percent, which it reached through “informed guesswork,” instead of the existing 30 percent. If the fine does ultimately stick, the $2 billion fine would be split amongst any App Store user in the UK who made purchases between 2015 and 2024, according to The Guardian.

    [ad_2]

    Jackson Chen

    Source link

  • Google ordered to pay $665 million for anticompetitive practices in Germany

    [ad_1]

    Google may have to fork over 572 million euros, or nearly $665 million, to two German companies for “market abuse,” according to a recent ruling from a Berlin court. First reported by Reuters, the tech giant was ordered to pay approximately 465 million euros, or approximately $540 million, to Idealo and another 107 million euros, or roughly $124 million, to Producto, both of which are price comparison platforms based in Germany. According to the ruling, Google abused its dominant market position by favoring Google Shopping in its own search results.

    Idealo pursued legal action against Google, claiming that the Alphabet subsidiary was “self-preferencing” its own platforms, which led to unfair market advantages that hindered competitors. The company first demanded at least 3.3 billion euros, or more than $3.8 billion, in damages in February 2025. To counter, Google said it made changes in 2017 that allowed competing shopping platforms the same opportunity as Google Shopping to display ads through Google Search.

    Idealo said in a press release that it will continue the legal pressure on Google, claiming that “the amount awarded reflects only a fraction of the actual damage.” Albrecht von Sonntag, co-founder and member of Idealo’s advisory board, added in a press release that “abuse of dominance must have consequences and must not be a profitable business model that pays off despite fines and damages.”

    It’s not the first time Google has found itself in legal trouble in Europe. Beyond Google Shopping, Google was accused of favoring its own Google Flights and Google Hotels in search results, leading the European Union to threaten massive fines for violating its Digital Markets Act. A month prior, the European Commission fined Google nearly 3 billion euros, or more than $3.4 billion, for its anticompetitive practices in the advertising tech industry.

    [ad_2]

    Jackson Chen

    Source link

  • Apple loses UK antitrust lawsuit over App Store fees

    [ad_1]

    Apple will owe money to UK users after losing an App Store antitrust lawsuit there on Thursday, according to Financial Times. The Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled that the iPhone maker abused its dominant market position to inflate developer fees.

    The tribunal found that the company has “near absolute market power” for iOS app distribution and in-app payments. The decision declared that Apple has been “abusing its dominant position by charging excessive and unfair prices.” FT reports that Apple will appeal the decision.

    The class action claimants said damages of about £1.5bn would be split between 36 million consumers. A subsequent hearing to determine the process for “resolving any questions relating to the calculation” of damages could come as soon as next month.

    Apple has an increasingly strained relationship with the tighter regulations across the Atlantic. Earlier this week, the company stepped up its attacks on the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), a law designed to protect consumers from Big Tech dominance. And on Wednesday, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) confirmed that Apple has “strategic market status” in the country’s equivalent of the DMA. That gives the CMA authority to “ensure that mobile platforms are open to effective competition.”

    Apple provided the following statement in response to the ruling:

    “We thank the tribunal for its consideration but strongly disagree with this ruling, which takes a flawed view of the thriving and competitive app economy. The App Store has benefited businesses and consumers across the U.K., creating a dynamic marketplace where developers compete and users can choose from millions of innovative apps. This ruling overlooks how the App Store helps developers succeed and gives consumers a safe, trusted place to discover apps and securely make payments. The App Store faces vigorous competition from many other platforms — often with far fewer privacy and security protections — giving developers and consumers many options in how they build, share, and download apps. We intend to appeal.”

    Update, October 23, 2025, 5:30PM ET: This story has been updated to include a statement from Apple on today’s ruling.

    [ad_2]

    Will Shanklin

    Source link