ReportWire

Tag: Diversity Equity & Inclusion

  • Driving Innovation Through Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Insights From Black Book Research’s 2025 Study on Healthcare IT

    Black Book Research’s latest 2025 study, Innovation for Equity: The Transformative Role of DEI in Healthcare IT Success, underscores the critical importance of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in driving innovation, operational excellence, and social accountability within the healthcare IT sector. The report emphasizes that embedding DEI principles into technology, leadership, and organizational culture is no longer optional but a strategic necessity for healthcare IT vendors seeking to enhance patient outcomes and operational fairness.

    The full 19-page report is available for download after a simple registration at https://blackbookmarketresearch.com/the-transformational-role-of-dei-in-healthcare-it-success

    “Integrating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) principles into healthcare IT is essential for building a system that treats all patients equitably and fosters inclusive care delivery,” said Doug Brown, founder of Black Book Research. “Healthcare technology serves as a vital tool in addressing disparities by enabling features like multilingual communication, culturally responsive care plans, and accessibility tools that ensure every patient, regardless of their background, can engage with their care seamlessly.”

    This approach underscores the transformative potential of DEI when applied through vendor-agnostic solutions. By prioritizing fairness and accessibility, healthcare IT can create platforms that support equal treatment for all patients, streamline communication between diverse populations and providers, and improve adherence to care plans. These advancements not only help address systemic inequities but also position technology as a bridge toward a more inclusive and effective healthcare system.

    Research Key Findings and Industry Benchmarks

    Workplace Culture and Leadership Impact: Organizations with robust DEI frameworks report significant improvements in employee satisfaction, client relationships, and financial outcomes. Black Book’s 2025 DEI survey found:

    • A 20% increase in employee retention in DEI-focused organizations responding.

    • A 17% rise in general IT client satisfaction across KPIs since 2020 for top rated vendors, far surpassing industry norms. These metrics reflect the positive effects of fostering inclusive leadership and prioritizing equity in workforce strategies.

    Technology as a Lever for Equity: Vendors embedding DEI into EHR systems, analytics platforms, and interoperability tools are tackling systemic disparities head-on.

    • 84% of surveyed providers reported measurable enhancements in patient outcomes and communication, driven by features like multilingual interfaces, culturally tailored care pathways, and accessibility tools.

    Supplier Diversity and Systemic Inclusion: 100% of the 21 healthcare IT vendors honored actively collaborate with minority-owned suppliers, contributing to more inclusive supply chains and equitable business practices.
    These efforts not only expand access to diverse perspectives but also strengthen the foundation for sustainable equity.

    These advancements highlight the critical role of DEI-integrated healthcare IT systems in fostering inclusivity and equitable care delivery. Furthermore, 68% of healthcare organizations participating in the Black Book survey reported enhanced patient satisfaction and engagement as a direct result of implementing DEI-focused technologies. “These findings underscore the transformative potential of healthcare IT in addressing systemic disparities and ensuring all patients, regardless of background, receive fair and effective treatment,” adds Brown.

    This study synthesized data from 760 respondents across 124 organizations, including HR leaders, compliance officers, union representatives, employee group leads, and C-suite executives. By gathering insights from diverse stakeholders, the report presents a holistic view of how DEI permeates organizational layers, driving impactful outcomes.

    Leading Vendors Setting the Standard

    The report identifies 21 top-performing healthcare IT vendors for their exceptional DEI initiatives. These vendors scored above 90 on Black Book Research’s 100-point DEI scale, assessed across six performance indicators:

    • Workplace inclusivity.

    • Leadership diversity.

    • Effectiveness of DEI training programs.

    • Support for Employee Resource Groups (ERGs).

    • Retention of diverse talent.

    • Stakeholder engagement.

    Top Vendors Recognized for DEI Excellence: Waystar, Vizient, Oracle Health, Epic Systems, Altera Digital Health, GE Healthcare, NextGen Healthcare, athenahealth, Philips Healthcare, IBM Watson Health, Cisco Healthcare, Salesforce Health Cloud, Amazon Web Services (AWS) Healthcare, Google Health, CureMetrix, Health Catalyst, ELLKAY, Bamboo Health, Inovalon, MEDITECH, and Optum/Change Healthcare.

    “The integration of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) principles in healthcare IT has far-reaching implications for advancing health equity, accessibility, and leadership. By embedding Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) into IT solutions, healthcare organizations can address critical challenges such as food insecurity, housing instability, and transportation barriers, promoting equitable care. Additionally, inclusive design features like multilingual interfaces, screen-reader compatibility, and culturally adaptive tools are enhancing access to healthcare technology for underserved populations. Fostering diversity in leadership roles strengthens decision-making and drives innovation, paving the way for systemic progress in the healthcare IT landscape.”

    About Black Book Research

    Renowned for its independent and vendor-neutral evaluations, Black Book Research is deeply committed to advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) within healthcare IT technology, software, and managed services that support U.S. providers and payers. By spotlighting vendors that excel in promoting DEI initiatives, Black Book emphasizes the transformative potential of equitable and inclusive healthcare IT solutions. Their comprehensive studies set industry benchmarks by highlighting strategies that foster equity, inclusivity, and innovation, helping healthcare organizations address systemic disparities. Through this dedication, Black Book advocates for vendors to integrate DEI as a foundational principle, championing equitable access and fairness across diverse demographics, including race, age, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, and more. By doing so, they underscore the vital role healthcare IT plays in creating a more just and effective healthcare ecosystem, ensuring technology and services meet the needs of all individuals and communities.

    Source: Black Book Research

    Source link

  • Could We Have The First Native American Woman Governor? DEI Expert Weighs In On What Allyship Should Look Like If History Is Made. | Entrepreneur

    Could We Have The First Native American Woman Governor? DEI Expert Weighs In On What Allyship Should Look Like If History Is Made. | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As the 2024 election season comes to a close, we’re encountering a year of historic firsts — nationally and locally. If Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz were to win the White House this year, the highest-ranking Native American woman in the country would become the governor of Minnesota. That woman is Peggy Flanagan.

    Lauded as one of Minnesota’s rising stars and currently the highest-ranking Native woman elected to executive office, Peggy Flanagan is a politician, community organizer and Indigenous activist from the White Earth Nation. She has been serving as the lieutenant governor of Minnesota since 2019 and is currently next in line to assume the governorship if Tim Walz becomes vice president.

    So what does this all mean? History could be made this November and help catapult the first Native woman — and consequently, long-overlooked Native issues — into broader American public discourse. It’s perfect timing, too, as we approach Native American History Month this November.

    Even though we’re zooming in on politics in this piece, entrepreneurs across the spectrum can learn something about positioning diverse leaders in the right spaces and supporting their work and advancement throughout their tenure.

    Flanagan needed allies like Walz and others to lift her voice and put her into positions where she could make an impact. We can all learn more about what it means to be a better ally for those who are the “firsts” in their space. Here are three strategies around allyship I recommend to my diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) consultancy clients.

    Related: The Burden of Breaking Barriers is Pushing Black Leaders to Breaking Point. This DEI Expert Reveals Where We Are Going Wrong.

    Let diverse leaders lead

    There have been many firsts in the realm of politics in recent years. There was the first Black president, Barack Obama, in 2008, then the first openly gay governor, Jared Polis, from Colorado in 2019, and potentially, the first woman and Southeast Asian president, Kamala Harris, in 2024.

    All these great firsts had this in common: they had allies and partners that let them take the lead and shine. Peggy Flanagan has been an outstanding leader in the realm of DEI for decades. In 2017, she helped form Minnesota’s first People of Color and Indigenous Caucus (POCI). She worked tirelessly to improve education, health and economic outcomes for Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) in her state.

    In addition, she has been a fearless advocate of Indigenous people’s rights. While serving as a legislator, she sponsored a first-of-its-kind task force focused on Missing Murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW), a phenomenon happening across the country where Indigenous women experience violence and go missing shortly thereafter. Local police municipalities in many states often don’t search for missing Indigenous women or investigate their disappearances. Unfortunately, MMIW cases usually go unsolved. All that is to say that when we let diverse leaders lead, they can do powerful things by raising awareness about issues that may have never crossed our minds. As allies, our job is to lift these leaders up and amplify their work.

    Beware of performative allyship

    While many people want to take credit for knowing the trailblazers in politics and DEI and take pride in having supported them on their way up, the truth is that it can be a lonely journey for many leaders who had to actualize their dreams on their own. They sponsored their legislation and wrote it themselves with their teams. They sat in rooms with decision-makers where they worked hard to get colleagues on board with their bold new initiatives. They attended many thankless events where they carried the burden of organizing, leading and managing the outcomes alone.

    Many people want to take credit for the work BIPOC has been doing by saying they were “there” at the event or “support” so-and-so leaders’ work wholeheartedly. But still, BIPOC individuals are often the people who did all the work, and still, the allies are nowhere to be found. Performative allyship can often look like claiming to be an ally when it’s politically or socially advantageous but not during times when true grit, work, and dedication are required — and the cameras and spotlights are off. Avoid falling into the trap of lifting up leaders like Flanagan when it’s most convenient for you and not for the leaders and their causes.

    Related: How Brands Can Go From Performative Allyship to Actual Allies

    Be a success partner

    What’s most helpful for rising leaders whom you wish to support is not only to say you stand behind certain causes but to actually show up and prove it. Support bills that improve Indigenous health, education and rights. Speak about Flanagan’s work in the public domain, thereby ensuring colleagues who might be interested in those issues are aware of them. Donate to organizations and nonprofits that bolster the work that Indigenous leaders are doing to move the needle on change. It’s not enough to say, “I’m for Indigenous people’s rights,” or to do a land acknowledgment when you haven’t actually done the work, spent the time, or put your money where your mouth is.

    Related: It’s Not Enough to Simply Acknowledge Indigenous People’s Day. Here Are 4 Ways Employers Can Take Action, Help and Support Native Americans.

    Final thoughts

    No matter what happens this November, leaders like Peggy Flanagan are on the rise. When one person moves on to a higher office, BIPOC and LGBTQ+ officials who have been waiting for their moment to shine can finally rise, too. The future is bright for a new generation of leadership in the U.S. that better represents the diversity of the country while inspiring more just, equitable and inclusive policies at local and national levels.

    Nika White

    Source link

  • Latinas Leading, LLC Launches Business to Dismantle Career Barriers for Underrepresented Professionals

    Latinas Leading, LLC Launches Business to Dismantle Career Barriers for Underrepresented Professionals

    Dr. Irma Campos pioneers a revolutionary approach to personal and professional development with customized career and leadership coaching for individuals and organizations.

    Latinas Leading, LLC, a new science-backed coaching and training organization to boost professionals’ engagement and productivity, has launched a career counseling service to help break down career barriers for Latinas, Neurodivergent, and other historically underrepresented professionals. Founded by second-generation Latina American Dr. Irma Campos, PhD, Latinas Leading, LLC’s unique approach combines advanced psychological training and business acumen to redefine career engagement, purpose, and productivity.

    Based in Tampa, Florida, Latinas Leading, LLC creates customized services, including individual career or leadership coaching, group training, and organizational development consulting. Latinas Leading, LLC aims to facilitate increased self-efficacy, leader and employee engagement, goal setting, goal-oriented actions, and organizational productivity.  

    “The goal here is to really transform the career landscape, especially for historically underrepresented professionals,” said Dr. Campos, President and Leadership & Career Consultant at Latinas Leading, LLC. “We fuse science and culture into a powerful tool for professional and personal growth. We offer career, leadership, or organizational development programs to support professionals and help them maximize their potential, well-being, and positive impact.”

    Standardized or interview-based assessments and coaching identify an individual’s strengths and areas for growth. Through coaching with research-based strategies, Latinas Leading, LLC assists people in managing their thoughts and emotions, improving their leadership skills, enhancing productivity and executive functioning skills, and leading culturally diverse teams.

    Group training combines research-based didactic and experiential components to enhance leadership or professional development skills and competencies, facilitated by proven learning and development methods.

    Organizational consulting services assist senior leaders in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives to support Latinx, Neurodivergent, and other underrepresented professionals. Latinas Leading, LLC assesses organizational strengths, opportunities, threats, and weaknesses in creating an inclusive culture.

    Dr. Campos was driven to serve others partly due to her experiences of striving for a sense of belonging and identity as a second-generation Latina American woman. Through her parents’ resilience as immigrants from Panama, she also learned the importance of remaining connected to one’s cultural identity, purpose, and unity with others. She earned a PhD in Counseling Psychology from the University of Florida, a scientist-practitioner program emphasizing social justice. She was trained in doctoral-level statistical analyses, psychology, and qualitative analyses.

    Fluent in English and Spanish, Dr. Campos has over 14 years of experience as a consultant and psychologist. She has designed and implemented consulting programs to improve workplace performance, mental health, and inclusivity. Dr. Campos has published peer-reviewed journal articles and appeared on Tampa’s Bloom TV, Todo Tampa Bay, Psychology Today, and other media outlets to discuss how people can improve their careers, academics, and psychological well-being. 

    To learn about Latinas Leading, LLC, please visit https://latinasleading.com/.

    About Latinas Leading, LLC

    Latinas Leading, LLC aims to dismantle career barriers using research-based coaching and training, serving the United States and abroad.

    Source: Latinas Leading, LLC

    Related Media

    Source link

  • Education Secretary Calls Diversity Program Cuts Latest ‘Boogeyman’ To Divide Schools

    Education Secretary Calls Diversity Program Cuts Latest ‘Boogeyman’ To Divide Schools

    WASHINGTON ― U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said Tuesday that he believes attacks on diversity programs in public schools are part of a larger campaign to “decrease the confidence in our public schools.”

    In a roundtable discussion with Black journalists at the Department of Education building in Washington, Cardona referred to the rollback as a “boogeyman” that opponents of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives have created to sow division in America’s schools — not unlike the debates over COVID masks and the teaching of critical race theory.

    “There are very deliberate attempts to seek division in our schools so that a private option sounds better for parents. So we created a boogeyman,” Cardona said. “Four years ago were the masks. [Critical race theory] was a year after that. [Now,] DEI, banning books. Every year, there’s something to stoke division in an attempt to disrupt our public schools and decrease the confidence in our public schools.”

    Since the beginning of 2023, more than 70 pieces of legislation targeting diversity programs at colleges and universities have been introduced, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education. Public schools in Texas, Florida and other Republican-controlled states have been forced to limit student access to certain books by Black authors. Cardona said he sees the rollback of diversity efforts across public education as a “deliberate” attempt to prevent schools from being inclusive places for all students.

    “The attack on DEI, to me, is a deliberate attack on efforts to try to make sure schools are inclusive, welcoming places for all students — in particular, students from different backgrounds,” the education secretary said. “No different than what I think happened when the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action.”

    Cardona’s belief that the goal is to undermine confidence in public education has been underlined by remarks from conservative activists such as Christopher Rufo, who is behind many of the attacks on DEI. Rufo has been blunt about his desire to create “universal public school distrust” as a way to promote funding for school choice.

    In September, the Department of Education released recommendations to help colleges and universities improve diversity on campuses following the high court’s June gutting of affirmative action in admissions. Emboldened by the court’s decision to end most college affirmative action programs, anti-DEI activists are waging legal wars on diversity initiatives at private businesses and foundations as well.

    “Every year, there’s something to stoke division in an attempt to disrupt our public schools and decrease the confidence in our public schools.”

    – Education Secretary Miguel Cardona

    Cardona said he believes these DEI programs are critical to help students of color feel supported by their institutions. “My rationale around these programs is they make students feel seen, welcome and [can] unapologetically be themselves. The dismantling of those programs, in my opinion, reduces schools’ abilities to provide an inclusive environment for students to learn.”

    The battle over diversity, equity and inclusion programs is largely fought at the state level, with Republican politicians, such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, leading the charge. Cardona acknowledged that states and localities take the lead on how state-funded schools are run.

    “I cannot tell schools you have to have a DEI program, but I could, through data, demonstrate if there’s a decrease in students who have access based on race. And I can attribute that to some of the lack of inclusivity or attacks that maybe students feel there,” he said.

    The education secretary said that his department and the Department of Justice are actively investigating school districts that are systematically ignoring the civil rights of their students.

    “We see deliberate attempts to go after LGBTQ students in our country. We see leaders saying that slavery was a skilled program that people left with skills to do better. We see the majority of banned books having protagonists of color. We see AP Black History under attack,” Cardona said. “It’s very deliberate, very intentional.”

    “It’s getting worse because what people used to do in the shade, they’re now doing in the sunlight,” he said.

    Source link

  • AI Can Be Racist, Sexist and Creepy. Here Are 5 Ways You Can Counter This In Your Enterprise. | Entrepreneur

    AI Can Be Racist, Sexist and Creepy. Here Are 5 Ways You Can Counter This In Your Enterprise. | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    I started my career as a serial entrepreneur in disruptive technologies, raising tens of millions of dollars in venture capital, and navigating two successful exits. Later I became the chief technology architect for the nation’s capital, where it was my privilege to help local government agencies navigate transitioning to new disruptive technologies. Today I am the CEO of an antiracist boutique consulting firm where we help social equity enterprises liberate themselves from old, outdated, biased technologies and coach leaders on how to avoid reimplementing biased in their software, data and business processes.

    The biggest risk on the horizon for leaders today in regard to implementing biased, racist, sexist and heteronormative technology is artificial intelligence (AI).

    Today’s entrepreneurs and innovators are exploring ways to use to enhance efficiency, productivity and customer service, but is this technology truly an advancement or does it introduce new complications by amplifying existing cultural biases, like sexism and racism? 

    Soon, most — if not all — major enterprise platforms will come with built-in AI. Meanwhile, employees will be carrying around AI on their phones by the end of the year. AI is already affecting workplace operations, but marginalized groups, people of color, LGBTQIA+, neurodivergent folx, and disabled people have been ringing alarms about how AI amplifies biased content and spreads disinformation and distrust.

    To understand these impacts, we will review five ways AI can deepen racial bias and social inequalities in your enterprise. Without a comprehensive and socially informed approach to AI in your organization, this technology will feed institutional biases, exacerbate social inequalities, and do more harm to your company and clients. Therefore, we will explore practical solutions for addressing these issues, such as developing better AI training data, ensuring transparency of the model output and promoting ethical design. 

    Related: These Entrepreneurs Are Taking on Bias in Artificial Intelligence

    Risk #1: Racist and biased AI hiring software

    Enterprises rely on AI software to screen and hire candidates, but the software is inevitably as biased as the people in human resources (HR) whose data was used to train the algorithms. There are no standards or regulations for developing AI hiring algorithms. Software developers focus on creating AI that imitates people. As a result, AI faithfully learns all the biases of people used to train it across all data sets.

    Reasonable people would not hire an HR executive who (consciously or unconsciously) screens out people whose names sound diverse, right? Well, by relying on datasets that contain biased information, such as past hiring decisions and/or criminal records, AI inserts all these biases into the decision-making process. This bias is particularly damaging to marginalized populations, who are more likely to be passed over for employment opportunities due to markers of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability status, etc.

    How to address it:

    • Keep socially conscious human beings involved with the screening and selection process. Empower them to question, interrogate and challenge AI-based decisions.
    • Train your employees that AI is neither neutral nor intelligent. It is a tool — not a colleague.
    • Ask potential vendors whether their screening software has undergone AI equity auditing. Let your vendor partners know this important requirement will affect your buying decisions.
    • Load test resumes that are identical except for some key altered equity markers. Are identical resumes in Black zip codes rated lower than those in white majority zip codes? Report these biases as bugs and share your findings with the world via Twitter.
    • Insist that vendor partners demonstrate that the AI training data are representative of diverse populations and perspectives.
    • Use the AI itself to push back against the bias. Most solutions will soon have a chat interface. Ask the AI to identify qualified marginalized candidates (e.g., Black, female, and/or queer) and then add them to the interview list.

    Related: How Racism is Perpetuated within Social Media and Artificial Intelligence

    Risk #2: Developing racist, biased and harmful AI software

    ChatGPT 4 has made it ridiculously easy for information technology (IT) departments to incorporate AI into existing software. Imagine the lawsuit when your chatbot convinces your customers to harm themselves. (Yes, an AI chatbot has already caused at least one suicide.)

    How to address it:

    • Your chief information officer (CIO) and risk management team should develop some common-sense policies and procedures around when, where, how, and who decides what AI resources can be deployed now. Get ahead of this.
    • If developing your own AI-driven software, stay away from public internet-trained models. Large data models that incorporate everything published on the internet are riddled with bias and harmful learning.
    • Use AI technologies trained only on bounded, well-understood datasets.
    • Strive for algorithmic transparency. Invest in model documentation to understand the basis for AI-driven decisions.
    • Do not let your people automate or accelerate processes known to be biased against marginalized groups. For example, automated facial recognition technology is less accurate in identifying people of color than white counterparts.
    • Seek external review from Black and Brown experts on diversity and inclusion as part of the AI development process. Pay them well and listen to them.

    Risk #3: Biased AI abuses customers

    AI-powered systems can lead to unintended consequences that further marginalize vulnerable groups. For example, AI-driven chatbots providing customer service frequently harm marginalized people in how they respond to inquiries.  AI-powered systems also manipulate and exploit vulnerable populations, such as facial recognition technology targeting people of color with predatory advertising and pricing schemes.

    How to address it:

    • Do not deploy solutions that harm marginalized people. Stand up for what is right and educate yourself to avoid hurting people.
    • Build models responsive to all users. Use language appropriate for the context in which they are deployed.
    • Do not remove the human element from customer interactions. Humans trained in cultural sensitivity should oversee AI, not the other way around.
    • Hire Black or Brown diversity and technology consultants to help clarify how AI is treating your customers. Listen to them and pay them well.

    Risk #4: Perpetuating structural racism when AI makes financial decisions

    AI-powered banking and underwriting systems tend to replicate digital redlining. For example, automated loan underwriting algorithms are less likely to approve loans for applicants from marginalized backgrounds or Black or Brown neighborhoods, even when they earn the same salary as approved applicants.

    How to address it:

    • Remove bias-inducing demographic variables from decision-making processes and regularly evaluate algorithms for bias.
    • Seek external reviews from experts on diversity and inclusion that focus on identifying potential biases and developing strategies to mitigate them. 
    • Use mapping software to draw visualizations of AI recommendations and how they compare with marginalized peoples’ demographic data. Remain curious and vigilant about whether AI is replicating structural racism.
    • Use AI to push back by requesting that it find loan applications with lower scores due to bias. Make better loans to Black and Brown folks.

    Related: What Is AI, Anyway? Know Your Stuff With This Go-To Guide.

    Risk #5: Using health system AI on populations it is not trained for

    A pediatric health center serving poor disabled children in a major city was at risk of being displaced by a large national health system that convinced the regulator that its Big Data AI engine provided cheaper, better care than human care managers. However, the AI was trained on data from Medicare (mainly white, middle-class, rural and suburban, elderly adults). Making this AI — which is trained to advise on care for elderly people — responsible for medication recommendations for disabled children could have produced fatal outcomes.

    How to address it:

    • Always look at the data used to train AI. Is it appropriate for your population? If not, do not use the AI.

    Conclusion

    Many people in the AI industry are shouting that AI products will cause the end of the world. Scare-mongering leads to headlines, which lead to attention and, ultimately, wealth creation. It also distracts people from the harm AI is already causing to your marginalized customers and employees.

    Do not be fooled by the apocalyptic doomsayers. By taking reasonable, concrete steps, you can ensure that their AI-powered systems are not contributing to existing social inequalities or exploiting vulnerable populations. We must quickly master harm reduction for people already dealing with more than their fair share of oppression.

    Jamey Harvey

    Source link

  • The Evolution of DEI

    The Evolution of DEI

    By J. Brian Charles
    How the vision of a gathering of Black college administrators created a movement that is now under attack.

    J. Brian Charles

    Source link

  • Matt Gaetz Accuses 2 GOP Reps Of Breaking Party’s ‘Core Covenant’ With Voters

    Matt Gaetz Accuses 2 GOP Reps Of Breaking Party’s ‘Core Covenant’ With Voters

    Fox News host Laura Ingraham teed it up for Gaetz by complaining that the government was “fat and way too happy with woke.” She asked why Republicans had a majority in the House if they weren’t united to cut “ridiculous spending.”

    “This was the core covenant that we have with our voters to get the majority,” Gaetz replied. “And it seems so far too many are willing to violate it.”

    The far-right representative and Ingraham harped on conservative talking points about DEI, claiming it hurts recruitment and military readiness.

    “We went from ‘be all you can be’ … to this embrace of radical gender ideology and radical race ideology,” Gaetz said. “We should not pass another authorizing act for this military that does not uproot all of the wokeness.”

    Fast-forward to 20:12 for Gaetz’s appearance.

    Source link

  • The 6 Do’s and Don’ts for Engaging in Juneteenth Conversations | Entrepreneur

    The 6 Do’s and Don’ts for Engaging in Juneteenth Conversations | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    On June 19, 1865, Black folks in Galveston, Texas, were approached by 2,000 Union soldiers with good news: Slavery had been abolished. For the first time in 300 years, their families would finally know freedom. After the news of the abolishment of slavery had been heard in several other parts of the United States, people in Galveston were the last to know. It marked a new holiday where people all over the country could celebrate the turning of a page in American history: The end of slavery as they knew it.

    Fast forward to today, educating ourselves on historical markers that represented a shift in American culture is under attack. Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a prime example. By definition, CRT is a “set of ideas holding that racial bias is inherent in many parts of western society, especially in its legal and social institutions, based on their having been primarily designed for and implemented by white people.”

    In 2023, we would sum up CRT to mean simply “privilege” or “advantage” on the part of the dominant group in society. CRT asks us to look critically at the ways Juneteenth and other moments in American history came to be and why we should acknowledge the past so as not to replicate it in the present or future.

    Talking about Black history is the first step toward our national healing. When we acknowledge the impact history has had on our collective experience, we can begin to see the light at the end of the tunnel and work towards ending the inequality and injustice that’s plagued our nation.

    This Juneteenth, let’s take baby steps towards that national healing and focus on just having the conversation — the conversation that slavery was abolished not too long ago and that schools, workplaces, and other institutions should be talking about it in order for us to learn from the past and create a more equitable future.

    Here are 6 do’s and don’ts for engaging in conversations about Juneteenth.

    Do: Educate yourself on the holiday ahead of time

    When it comes to conversations on historical topics, not everyone knows every detail of how historical events came to pass. The first thing to do when planning to engage in a conversation about Juneteenth is to educate yourself on the facts. When did Juneteenth happen? How did it happen? Why did it happen? Who authorized the abolishment of slavery? Why did it take so long for the slaves in Galveston, Texas, to hear about it?

    Acquiring answers to these foundational questions ahead of time will arm you with a baseline of information that will inform more thoughtful conversations.

    Do: Allow Black colleagues to speak on their Juneteenth perspectives but don’t put the burden on them to educate everyone

    In 2023, it’s likely you work with a Black American or know one in your personal life. In the case of Juneteenth, don’t make the conversation a teacher-to-pupil dynamic. If a Black person in your life wishes to share their perspective or thoughts on Juneteenth, listen to them. Allow them to talk about their family traditions or how they choose to celebrate the day. You might even attend a Juneteenth celebration in your city and witness how Black folks express joy on the holiday. However, avoid targeting Black colleagues and acquaintances by asking them to educate you or expend mental energy to bring you up to speed. That’s your responsibility, not theirs. Strive for a friend-to-friend or colleague-to-colleague relationship on the topic of Juneteenth, not a teacher-to-pupil relationship.

    Do: Create a safer space for the conversation

    As I’ve shared in other posts, I don’t believe fully “safe” spaces exist. I do believe there are safer spaces where folks walk into a conversation with the best intentions and an open mind. If you choose to discuss Juneteenth in your workplace or institution, consider holding it in an intentional space with thoughtful touches.

    For example, if you’re hosting an in-person conversation, have you thought about including a facilitator or someone who can set some ground rules to maintain a cordial atmosphere while the conversation ensues? In addition, are you aware of the literal temperature of the room? Will it be a physically comfortable space, or will it be too hot or cold for the number of attendees in the space? Are there soothing beverages available like coffee or tea for moments when people could use a sip of something warm? Think about the seating arrangement. Is the room set up in a hierarchical way where all chairs are pointed in one direction in the teacher-to-pupil dynamic that I referred to earlier, or are the chairs set up in a circle so all attendees can be seen and heard?

    If you are choosing to send an email to your colleagues about Juneteenth, have you included a TL;DR or warning at the top of the email informing the recipients that the message they are about to receive contains information about Juneteenth and the history of slavery? As you can see, there are several ways to create a safer space that sets the foundation for a conversation that’s rich and enlightening as opposed to tense and uncomfortable.

    Related: Here’s How to Have the Most Powerful DEI Conversations

    Do: Propose to make Juneteenth a company holiday

    After your in-person or online conversations, consider making a case for why Juneteenth should be a company holiday. Perhaps you have several Black colleagues who would appreciate the day off or, if there is a multicultural coalition of people who also support the idea, come prepared to discuss with leadership or HR to request the holiday be a part of the company’s paid time off roster. Like Labor Day, the 4th of July, and other national holidays, Juneteenth marks a turning point in American history that affected not only Black folx but every American in the U.S. Why not make the case for Juneteenth to be celebrated in the workplace like other national holidays?

    Related: Don’t Phone It In for Black History Month: 5 Ways to Show You’ll Be Dialed In All Year

    Don’t: Make Juneteenth a one-day event

    Like other days involving Black history, companies, and individuals make the mistake of treating Juneteenth like a one-day event. The day comes and then it goes. But holidays like the 4th of July are celebrated over three or four days with an emphasis on pride and celebration. Juneteenth deserves the same acknowledgment. To enhance and elongate the holiday, give colleagues a runway of days during which to absorb historical information. For example, send an email about the history of Juneteenth one week ahead so people have time to absorb the content. You can also set up a small art exhibit or feature books and other historical information in a common space in the preceding month so people have time to reflect on the information. Host a book club featuring a Juneteenth-centered book so colleagues have a meaningful opportunity to be engaged in the history. In essence, preparing colleagues ahead of time will make the day that much richer–not just for your Black colleagues but for everyone involved.

    Don’t: Wear performative clothing to show that you’re “down” with the cause

    A common mistake companies and individuals make during Juneteenth is thinking that performative allyship is the way to celebrate and honor the holiday. That’s not true. Please avoid wearing dashikis or dawning red, green, and black colors on or around Juneteenth. For many Black people, it’s considered offensive and disingenuous. Avoid performative allyship at all costs, whether that’s your personal style choices or your company’s newest product promotion. The way to show Black folks and others who care about Juneteenth that you are engaged and want to pay your respects is by educating yourself, participating in meaningful conversations where you’re truly listening, and sharing this information with others in your life who may not know the history of Juneteenth. Those are steps towards allyship far more meaningful than wearing a dashiki.

    Related: How Brands Can Go From Performative Allyship to Actual Allies

    Final thoughts

    While the celebration of Black history is, in general, condensed into one month in February, Black History Month, we often forget that Black history is American history and that we should be celebrating it year-round. Not everyone does and that’s okay. What we can do is inspire more people to engage by having meaningful conversations about what happened on June 19, 1865, and the historical context in which the event occurred. Only when we can pull the veil off of Black history and see that these events are significant for all Americans do we begin to let down our guard and welcome the truth about our country: That we did some awful things, but we’re learning from them. This Juneteeth, make meaningful conversations a priority.

    Nika White

    Source link

  • Confirmed Schedule of Events & Sponsors for the 14th Annual Juneteenth NY Celebration 2023 ‘Kaleidoscope of Black Culture’

    Confirmed Schedule of Events & Sponsors for the 14th Annual Juneteenth NY Celebration 2023 ‘Kaleidoscope of Black Culture’

    • New York City’s Premier Three-Day Celebration Showcasing the Abundant History and Impact of African Americans Returns to Brooklyn, NY June 16-18.
    • Participating Partners for the Juneteenth NY Celebration include Airbnb, Atlantic Terminal Mall, Black Restaurant Coalition, Brooklyn Nets, Brooklyn Navy Yard, The Drivers Cooperative, The Home Depot Foundation, Liberty Coca-Cola Beverages, New York Liberty, NY State of Health, PacSun and Visa
    • Official Media Broadcast Partner is WABC-TV, the #1 Station in New York and the Most Watched Local Station in the Country

    The 14th Annual Juneteenth NY Celebration – one of New York City’s premier and largest annual events commemorating the federally-recognized holiday – is quickly approaching for an exciting and action-packed three-day celebration, kicking off virtually and in-person on Friday, June 16th through June 18th from the epicenter of Black culture and community in Brooklyn, NY.

    Juneteenth NY Celebration 2023 is proud to announce their exciting partners and sponsors, both nationally and locally recognized brands, who join in solidarity for the continued efforts to bring awareness and visibility to such an important holiday for Black culture. Juneteenth NY organizers and board would like to thank New York City Mayor Eric L. Adams and his Community Affairs Unit for their assistance and partnership this year. For the entire weekend, transportation to and from all events will be sponsored by our exclusive transportation partner, The Drivers Cooperative (download the app here). Additionally, the Black Restaurant Coalition will be providing food and beverage specials all weekend with special pricing to commemorate the Juneteenth holiday. As previously announced, the official media broadcast partner for the Juneteenth NY Celebration is WABC-TV, the #1 station in New York and the most-watched local station in the country, which includes station-wide media coverage on linear, digital and social platforms.

    The Juneteenth NY Celebration was created to empower the Black community, advance the economic and cultural arts in underserved areas, as well as champion small, Black-owned businesses. And this year’s sponsors are continuing to enhance the work being done in and around the Black communities in the area and throughout the country. Attendees of the festive three-day celebration will experience the best in Black culture and community with live performances, exhibitions, authentic local cuisine, wellness and other family fun activities. Over the past 14 years, Juneteenth NY has grown and expanded exponentially from a local gathering to a nationally recognized event with this year’s attendees expected to reach over 37,000+.

    2023 Juneteenth NY Schedule of Events: Friday, June 16th (Day 1)

    ●  Juneteenth NY Celebration will begin the three-day festivities with a free virtual summit from 9am-6pm with topics and conversations from world-class leaders ranging from education and entertainment to healthcare and financial literacy. To register for the free virtual summit, please visit here.

    ●  The Celebration of Black Kings Awards Reception, a private event, will be held at the illustrious Brooklyn Navy Yard. During the annual celebration, Juneteenth NY will honor 28 influential male leaders that have made a significant impact in the New York community through their personal and professional endeavors. Hosted by WABC-7 Anthony Johnson, the signature event will feature honorees, musical performances and much more. The Celebration of Black Kings Awards Reception tickets are 2 for $125, please visit here to purchase tickets. All proceeds will go toward the Destiny Helpers Outreach Inc.

    Saturday, June 17th (Day 2)

    ● The annual Juneteenth Family Fun Day Festival is on Saturday at Linden Park/Gershwin Park in Brooklyn, NY, where locals to the NYC community will gather to enjoy a vibrant day of rich culture through music, dance, poetry, skits, local vendors and fun for the entire family! Our official sports partners, the Brooklyn Nets and New York Liberty, will provide kids’ basketball clinics and include performances from their professional dance teams. To register for the Family Fun Day, please visit here.

    Sunday, June 18th (Day 3)

    ● On Sunday, the free Grand Finale Rally and Concert will begin at 9am at the Grand Army Plaza entrance of Prospect Park in Brooklyn, NY, where community members, local businesspeople and more will march towards the main stage with a local marching band to deliver engaging speeches, including New York City Council Member Farah N. Louis and Jump-In Enrichment as well as Sean Williams, CEO of Dad Gang. Juneteenth NY Concert will start at 12pm at the Nethermead area. An anticipated 15,000+ attendees will enjoy musical performances, a fashion show, food trucks, field day and so much more family fun. To register for the Family Fun Day, please visit here.

    Connect with us on Instagram: @JuneteenthNY; TikTok: @JuneteenthNY; Facebook: Juneteenth Family Day

    For those interested in sponsoring Juneteenth NYC, please email sponsorship@sinclairsocial.com.

    About Juneteenth

    Juneteenth – also known as “Juneteenth Independence Day” or “Freedom Day” – is a holiday that commemorates the June 19, 1865, announcement of the abolition of slavery in Galveston, Texas, and, more generally, the emancipation of African American slaves throughout the Confederate South. The state official celebration is generally celebrated on June 19th and is now recognized as a national holiday. Juneteenth symbolically serves as a reference point from which to measure and appreciate the progress and contributions made by African Americans to society.

    About Juneteenth NY Celebration

    Now in its 14th year, the Juneteenth NY Celebration is one of the longest-running events commemorating Juneteenth and the preeminent celebration of the holiday in the Tri-State area. Located in Brooklyn, the first Juneteenth NY Celebration was held in East New York and hosted by George Walker Jr. in 2009 with Umoja Events entrusted to carry on the Celebration in 2011. The Celebration was designed to celebrate and empower the Black community. Each year features a theme that seeks to educate the Black community on its history while also changing the narrative of the devastating impact of slavery.

    About WABC-TV New York

    WABC-TV has been the leader in local news and entertainment programming in the New York City area for more than 61 years. Producing more than 45 hours of live, local news and weather each week, Channel 7 “Eyewitness News” is the most-watched local news in New York and the United States. WABC-TV also produces “Live with Kelly and Ryan,” weekdays at 9:00 a.m., which is seen in more than 200 markets across the U.S. Quality news and programming, cutting-edge technology and ongoing community outreach are the hallmarks of excellence that have consistently kept WABC-TV New York’s No. 1 station and the most-watched television station in the nation.

    Instagram: @ABC7NY; Twitter: @ABC7NY; Facebook: ABC7NY 

    ###

    Source: Juneteenth NY

    Source link

  • White, Wealthy Students Are Overrepresented Among College Transfer Applicants

    White, Wealthy Students Are Overrepresented Among College Transfer Applicants

    A new report from the Common App finds that the college-transfer process, long promoted as a way to help disadvantaged students earn four-year degrees, disproportionately serves students who are already well represented across higher education.

    The nonprofit, which allows undergraduate applicants to fill out one application and submit it to multiple institutions, started in 1975 with about 15 members and has since grown to more than 1,000 active members. In 2018–19, it released the Common App for transfer platform to make the often difficult process of transferring between colleges more streamlined and less confusing. In an effort to diversify the overall applicant pool, the Common App provided reduced fees and more targeted outreach to minority-serving institutions, which now make up 133 of its active members.

    Our analysis reveals that the majority of applicants on the transfer platform were from traditionally well-served populations.

    The hope was that the nonprofit’s efforts would increase the percentage of transfer applicants from underrepresented backgrounds, including first-generation, older, and low-income students. Those changes have made little impact in the representation of students applying to transfer, at least during the four years the Common App has collected such data. “Our analysis reveals that the majority of applicants on the transfer platform were from traditionally well-served populations,” a summary of the report concluded. “These findings are somewhat concerning given that the college-transfer process should reflect educational mobility for all students, especially for historically excluded groups.”

    The trends the Common App found are consistent with reports that show minority and underrepresented students transferring at lower rates than their more privileged counterparts, said Trent Kajikawa, senior manager of data operations at the Common App.

    “This is just additional evidence that there’s a ton of work in this transfer space when it comes to supporting students,” he said in an interview. Among the steps the nonprofit is taking is making sure that students are aware of transfer-guarantee programs that automatically accept students who meet certain admissions criteria.

    The Common App found that over the four years it studied, only a quarter of applicants were from underrepresented minority groups, a third were the first in their families to attend or graduate from college, and just 6 percent were from ZIP codes with a median household income in the bottom quintile. Fifty-five percent of applicants came from ZIP codes in the top quintile.

    A report last year from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center found that transfer rates took a plunge during the Covid-19 pandemic, in part because of declining enrollments at community colleges. Students also encountered more logistical hurdles getting credits transferred and tracking down transcripts. Historically Black colleges and universities were an exception. Their incoming transfer rates increased nearly 8 percent in 2020 after an 11-percent decline the previous academic year.

    The colleges receiving the most transfer applications through the Common App, according to the new report, were public flagships and selective universities with large student enrollments. Among the most popular destinations were large private, nonprofit universities that admit fewer than one in four applicants. Colleges that admit at least three out of four applicants accounted for less than 30 percent of applications. The findings provided further evidence of how flagship universities are prospering at a time when public regionals are struggling to fill seats.

    While the typical college applicant applies to six colleges, prospective transfers narrowed their pool to two, reflecting “a more focused and deliberate” search, the report said. Most transfer applicants came from community colleges that concentrated more on preparation for four-year degrees than on career and technical programs.

    Katherine Mangan

    Source link

  • This Simple 30-Minute Belonging Exercise Could Boost Student Retention

    This Simple 30-Minute Belonging Exercise Could Boost Student Retention

    Incoming college students who completed a 30-minute online exercise intended to bolster their sense of belonging were more likely to complete their first year of college while enrolled full time, according to a groundbreaking paper published in Science Thursday.

    The study involved 26,911 students at 22 diverse four-year institutions across the country, and it has the potential to help students at a variety of colleges, at little cost. Students in identity groups — based on race or ethnicity and first-generation college status — that have historically struggled more to complete the first year of college at any given institution benefitted the most from the exercise.

    The social-belonging intervention improved first-year retention among students in identity groups who reported feeling medium to high levels of belonging. For example, among students whose identity groups historically struggled to complete the first year of college and who also reported medium to high levels of belonging — the group that benefitted most from the activity — the exercise increased the proportion that completed their first year of college while enrolled full time from 57.2 percent to 59.3 percent.

    But for the 15 percent of students whose identity groups experienced low levels of belonging at their institutions, the exercise did not improve retention rates, indicating that colleges will have to work harder to help those students.

    Higher-education leaders have devoted more resources and attention to improving sense of belonging in recent years in an effort to help students from diverse backgrounds feel welcome on campus and to improve student success.

    Researchers have long known that college students’ sense of belonging is critically linked to outcomes such as persistence, engagement, and mental health. But it can be difficult to measure the specific impact of efforts to improve belonging in a college setting. More recent research has focused on what colleges can do to improve sense of belonging on campus.

    For the Science study, incoming first-year students in 2015 and 2016 spent up to half an hour in the summer before starting college completing an online module on belonging. They read about a survey of older students that showed many had experienced feeling homesick, having trouble finding a lab partner, or having difficulty interacting with professors, for example. The survey explained that those feelings are normal and can improve over time. Next, the students read curated stories from older students describing how such worries eventually got better. The incoming students were then asked to write about their reflections on the stories to help future students.

    The study, which has 37 authors, was conducted by the College Transition Collaborative, a partnership of researchers and practitioners who study ways to support belonging, growth, and equity in college settings. It’s now known as the Equity Accelerator.

    Gregory M. Walton, a professor of psychology at Stanford University and the lead author of the study, said the exercise works by giving students a hopeful map for the transition to college. For students who belong to groups that have struggled historically, the roadmap can provide a buffer when they hit inevitable bumps in their college career. While some students can more easily shrug off such challenges, students from underrepresented minority groups and first-generation college students are more likely to interpret them as evidence that they do not belong in college, which can negatively affect motivation and persistence. The intervention appears to provide a boost to students who have reflected on other students experiencing similar difficulties and getting through them.

    “The fact that it’s effective across these widely generalizable sample institutions is incredibly important,” Walton said. “Everybody should be doing this in some form.”

    Previous studies have shown similar interventions to be effective, but on a smaller scale. One such study found that an hourlong activity focused on struggles to fit in during the transition to college increased the grades of Black students over the next three years and reduced the gap in grade point averages between Black and white students by 52 percent.

    But by showing that the recent social-belonging intervention is effective at a variety of colleges across the country, including public and private colleges with admission rates ranging from 6 percent to 90 percent, the study demonstrates that such exercises are potentially scalable. The authors estimate that if the social-belonging activity were implemented at 749 four-year institutions across the United States that share key characteristics with the 22 colleges in the study, an additional 12,136 students, out of about one million new students, would complete their first year of college enrolled as full-time students.

    The social-belonging exercise is available for free to four-year colleges in the United States and Canada here.

    Adrienne Lu

    Source link

  • 5 Reasons Why Entrepreneurs Are Privileged | Entrepreneur

    5 Reasons Why Entrepreneurs Are Privileged | Entrepreneur

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    As a Black woman entrepreneur, I’ve managed to run a successful diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) consultancy for the past six years. But I promise, it wasn’t easy. For me, becoming an entrepreneur looked like getting a doctorate in organizational leadership and working my way to owning a business. Despite the years I dedicated to my entrepreneurial journey, I still benefited from a level of privilege that many don’t share when it comes to entrepreneurship.

    I’ve talked for years about how Black women don’t receive the support or mentorship they need in the workplace to succeed as well as about the many ways Black entrepreneurs struggle in this space. But we should talk about the privilege that those of us who do succeed in business have. We should also talk about the reasons why people in marginalized communities start businesses from the beginning and how their entrepreneurial endeavors can be long-lasting and successful.

    The complexities of privilege in entrepreneurship are vast but worth discussing. We have to peel back the layers to discover how more entrepreneurs from marginalized communities can lift themselves out of poverty and into prosperity.

    Related: 18 Business Leaders on Creating an Inclusive and Equitable Society

    1. Having start-up funding is a privilege

    How will I fund my business? This question looms over many entrepreneurs. When 66% of them use their own money to start a business and another 33% start with less than $5,000, it’s a perfectly valid concern. This means that if they aren’t born with a silver spoon in their mouths, some folks have to look beyond their personal bank accounts to kickstart their businesses.

    Venture capitalists, friends, family or bank loans are funding options, but most of these come with serious strings attached. It’s a privilege to have access to these resources in the first place, but it can feel oppressive to have to ask, in general. Knowing that the loan you used to start your business will double, triple, or quadruple your personal debt is a daunting realization.

    I was fortunate enough that when I started my DEI consultancy, I didn’t have to struggle for funding. I had the privilege of having a husband who was ahead of me on his entrepreneurial journey. His business endeavors gave me the freedom to build my consultancy without the pressure of needing to contribute to our household income. Not everybody has that opportunity. Equitable access to funding for a business isn’t easy to find and every entrepreneur falls into a different place on the spectrum of privilege and oppression when it comes to funding.

    Related: 6 Ways to Offer Allyship to Black Entrepreneurs

    2. Having other entrepreneurs to look up to is a privilege

    Whether it’s a parent, grandparent, aunt or uncle, having someone in the family who is an entrepreneur helps make the dream of starting a business of your own feel more achievable.

    I didn’t have an entrepreneur in my family, but my husband did. His dad was the example that inspired a ripple effect of entrepreneurs in the family. Seeing his family members start, grow and scale businesses was inspiring to witness. As we all know, representation matters. Watching entrepreneurs who look like us experience the ups and downs of business helps us know our dreams are possible.

    However, if we have never seen entrepreneurs like us, it’s harder to imagine how starting and growing our businesses would be possible. For some of us, having access to a successful entrepreneur in our lives is a privilege that likely impacts the success of the businesses we hope to create.

    3. Having a college education before starting a business is a privilege

    As someone who received her doctorate, I’m in the minority of entrepreneurs: 62% of entrepreneurs have at least a bachelor’s degree while 7% have a doctorate or other degree. I also reap additional financial benefits as a result of my educational privilege. It turns out entrepreneurs with doctoral degrees earn 35% more than those with high school diplomas.

    But not all entrepreneurs have the privilege of going to college. Many people choose entrepreneurship because of the seemingly unlimited earning potential it promises, even those with only a high school diploma. For many marginalized folks who didn’t have access to college or university, entrepreneurship may feel like the only way to pull themselves out of their economic situation and into a brighter future.

    4. Having a business that lasts more than three years is a privilege

    Despite Black women being one of the fastest-growing demographics of entrepreneurs in the U.S., CNBC reported that eight out of 10 Black-owned businesses fail in the first 18 months. Having a great business idea and some funding to boost your journey will help; however, maintaining a business for more than five years is a rarity. Around 49% of women-owned businesses are less than five years old and as they approach the six to 10 year window, that number shrinks to 17.5%.

    There are many reasons why the privilege of business longevity isn’t afforded to all. Funding runs out, an unexpected business emergency shows up or the entrepreneur simply has a change of heart about their venture. Regardless of the reason, having a business that lasts decades is a privilege that some marginalized entrepreneurs only dream of.

    Related: 10 Reasons Why 7 Out of 10 Businesses Fail Within 10 Years

    5. Starting your own business can actually create privilege

    In light of the recent layoffs nationwide across many industries, now is one of the best times to try entrepreneurship. The main motivators for becoming an entrepreneur are the numerous ways it can grow and expand our financial and personal futures. Research shows that women who start their own businesses do so because they are ready to chase their passions and work for themselves.

    Entrepreneurs of color are starting businesses for similar reasons. Dissatisfaction with their boss and the lack of diversity, equity and inclusion in corporate America cause many to start their own businesses.

    Most importantly, for many entrepreneurs, their salary ambitions can reach whole new heights. While the average woman earns 82 cents for every dollar a man earns, the average woman entrepreneur earns 91 cents. Although a one-to-one earning ratio would be the best-case scenario, it’s clear that for many women, starting their own business helps them close the pay gap.

    The lifestyle and flexibility perks of entrepreneurship cannot be overstated either, such as working from home with hours that fit your schedule. The ability to parent or become a caregiver to someone you love or simply being able to avoid microaggressions, pay disparities and unequal treatment at work are all new privileges afforded by starting your own business. For many marginalized folks, this kind of economic and personal freedom is a dream that can only come true with entrepreneurship.

    Related: Why Paying Women An Equal Wage Helps — Not Hurts — Your Business

    Final thoughts

    As marginalized folks balance the pros and cons of becoming an entrepreneur, those of us who have already found success in this space should ask ourselves: What can we do to lift up more entrepreneurs from marginalized communities? How can we leverage our privilege and power to be sensitive to the issues that arise for new entrepreneurs? How can we fund and support them in the most critical stages of their business?

    In my opinion, successful entrepreneurs have an obligation to share their privilege with others and help more folks confidently enter into the entrepreneurial space. Say the names of new entrepreneurs in rooms that matter. Offer a loan or donate capital to entrepreneurs in marginalized communities. Mentor new entrepreneurs and flatten their learning curve so they can be more likely to thrive beyond the five-year mark.

    Sharing entrepreneurial wisdom and offering resources when available can help more women, folks with disabilities, queer and people of color reach entrepreneurial success and grow their careers beyond imagination.

    Nika White

    Source link

  • College DEI Bans Are Showing Up in Republicans’ State Budgets. Not Everyone Is on Board.

    College DEI Bans Are Showing Up in Republicans’ State Budgets. Not Everyone Is on Board.

    Each spring, Missouri’s legislature goes through the familiar ritual of passing a new state budget. This year, Republican lawmakers have mostly wrangled over just one thing related to higher ed: a ban on diversity, equity, and inclusion spending by public colleges and other state institutions.

    The Missouri House wants to bar funding for DEI. The Missouri Senate does not. Both houses are controlled by Republicans.

    The House approved a budget amendment in March that would prohibit funding for “staffing, vendors, consultants, or programs” associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion. But similar language was unsuccessful in the Senate, after hours of debate that lasted until 3 a.m.

    The Senate proposal would have prohibited funding “for intradepartmental ‘diversity, equity, inclusion,’” as well as for “‘diversity, inclusion, belonging’” training, programs, staffing, and hiring. But key Senate Republicans said a DEI ban could have unintended consequences.

    The two chambers are scheduled to meet this week to hash out a compromise. Missouri’s legislative session ends on Friday.

    Legislatures in 20 states have proposed bills this year that seek to curtail diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts on college campuses, according to The Chronicle’s DEI Legislation Tracker.

    Simultaneously, some lawmakers have tried a different tactic: leveraging the budgeting process to enact DEI bans.

    It’s not a new approach. Lawmakers often lobby to have their priorities wrapped into sweeping budget bills.

    The budget is the one must-pass item each session, and legislators may find it easier to tack on policy riders than to try to pass separate bills, said Robert Kelchen, a professor of higher education at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville.

    More lawmakers have used this strategy in recent years, however, said Michael Harris, a higher-education professor at Southern Methodist University.

    “If you’re in a red state, your legislature is either doing this or they’re seriously thinking about doing this — that’s just the reality today,” Harris said.

    A ‘Job Killer’

    In several states, Republican-backed budget provisions that would curtail college DEI spending are facing opposition — including from other Republicans.

    Nearly 200 organizations voiced opposition to the Missouri House’s amendment in an open letter, citing “wide-ranging consequences” from economic concerns to health and economic disparities. “The budget language would jeopardize licensing and accreditation of programs critical to both the well-being of Missourians and our state’s economic competitiveness,” the letter states. The Missouri Chamber of Commerce called the proposal a “job killer.”

    State Sen. Lincoln Hough, a Republican who chairs the Missouri Senate’s Committee on Appropriations, has expressed concern that the DEI provision could “jeopardize” federal funding, as well as state agreements with some contractors and vendors. The ban’s vagueness creates uncertainty, Hough said last week.

    In Kansas, Republican lawmakers added a provision in the state’s budget bill that would have restricted public colleges from asking job applicants about diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the language didn’t make the final cut.

    Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat, used a line-item veto to strike the DEI language on April 21. The Kansas House tried and failed last week to override her decision on that measure.

    South Carolina Republicans also considered, and ultimately voted down, a series of budget amendments that would have banned DEI spending at public colleges.

    While some conservative legislators argued that colleges shouldn’t be using taxpayer dollars to support diversity measures, others expressed concern that a blanket cut in funding would harm students by leading colleges to raise tuition. One lawmaker suggested that the state budget was not the right vehicle for targeting campus diversity programs.

    The Texas House and Senate have both approved anti-DEI language in their respective state-budget proposals, though the provisions differ slightly.

    The House plan would bar public colleges from using state funds for “unconstitutional” DEI programs. The Senate’s would prohibit spending money on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs or trainings.

    The Texas chambers will have to reconcile their proposals before May 29, when the legislative session ends. In addition, at least seven bills have been introduced in the state that would affect diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts on college campuses, according to The Chronicle’s tracker.

    At the same time, Texas lawmakers plan to increase funding for other higher-ed priorities. Community colleges are slated to potentially see a $305-million increase, and another bill would support research efforts at institutions of higher education.

    “There’s a real dichotomy between these efforts to restrict DEI and also substantial increases in funding,” Kelchen said.

    Chilling and Demoralizing

    Even if the DEI spending ban doesn’t end up in Missouri’s final state budget, other legislation could target campus diversity efforts in the state.

    One bill would prohibit institutions from “enforcing a ‘discriminatory ideology’” that “promotes the differential treatment of any individual or group of individuals based on immutable characteristics of race, color, religion, sex, gender ethnicity, national origin, or ancestry” through requiring the submission of diversity, equity, and inclusion statements. Another would ban the instruction of “diversity-equity-inclusion ideologies or materials.”

    A representative from the University of Missouri’s Board of Curators declined to comment on pending legislation.

    The sheer volume of legislative proposals that would affect diversity, equity, and inclusion this year is overwhelming for colleges to keep track of and mitigate behind the scenes, Harris said.

    “It feels like you’re fighting this war on every single front — it’s attacking DEI, it’s attacking tenure, it’s attacking autonomy,” Harris said. “It’s so chilling and it’s so demoralizing, and what’s almost worse is that I think that’s the point.”

    As legislative debates continue this month, Harris said, it’s important to remember that many institutions have begun proactively making changes in diversity and inclusion programs in order to be risk averse — even if legislation doesn’t end up going into effect.

    “If that’s the case, then it almost feels like we don’t quite have our eye on the ball,” Harris said. “We‘re watching the crazy legislation, but if institutions are essentially voluntarily complying, well then it doesn’t matter if the bill didn’t pass.”

    Eva Surovell

    Source link

  • North Dakota Just Enacted a ‘Specified Concepts’ Bill. Here’s What It Says.

    North Dakota Just Enacted a ‘Specified Concepts’ Bill. Here’s What It Says.

    A bill banning mandatory diversity training at public institutions of higher education in North Dakota was signed into law on Monday.

    Gov. Doug Burgum, a Republican, signed Senate Bill 2247 into law with little fanfare. His office issued no press release about its signing. Only the Senate journal includes a communication from the governor stating that he signed the bill along with others. It will go into effect on August 1.

    The new law will prevent institutions under the control of the State Board of Higher Education from mandating noncredit diversity training. An exception for training on federal and state nondiscrimination laws is included. It also prevents institutions from asking about the “ideological or political viewpoint” of students, prospective employees, or those being considered for a promotion or tenure, very likely ending the use of diversity statements in hiring.

    Additionally, the bill prohibits students and college employees from being discriminated against because of their position on a “specified concept,” which is defined in a list of 16 statements, most of them about race, sex, and power. The specified concepts include: the notion that a person’s race or sex is “inherently privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously”; that the idea of meritocracy is “inherently racist or sexist”; and that the United States itself is “fundamentally or irredeemably” racist or sexist. Another specified concept that a student or employee can’t be penalized for refusing to believe or oppose: “The rule of law does not exist, but instead is a series of power relationships and struggles among racial or other groups.”

    The bill also states that if a college employee’s main duties include efforts to improve diversity, part of their job must also encompass “efforts to strengthen and increase intellectual diversity among students and faculty” at their institution.

    The language in the signed bill also states that its provisions shouldn’t be interpreted as restricting faculty members’ academic freedom or preventing them from “teaching, researching, or writing publications about the specified concepts or related topics.”

    Of the 33 diversity, equity, and inclusion-related bills The Chronicle is tracking, North Dakota’s is the first to be signed into law.

    The bill was sponsored by three state senators and three state representatives, all Republicans.

    Two of the bill’s sponsors responded to a request for comment on its passage. State Rep. Bernie Satrom said he was unaware the bill had passed and offered no further comment.

    State Sen. Randy Lemm said he was glad the governor signed the bill because it will ensure students and instructors are not penalized for their views, and that they have free speech.

    Gov. Burgum’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

    Earlier in the legislative process, at a March 7 hearing of the House Education Committee, 17 people testified in opposition to the bill, while three spoke in favor, including one of its sponsors, Sen. Bob Paulson.

    Casey Ryan, chair of the state board, wrote in opposition to the bill: “Personally, I believe the goal of our colleges and universities is to teach students ‘how’ to learn — not ‘what’ to learn.”

    Kate Marijolovic

    Source link

  • Who Leads America’s DEI Offices? Here Are Their Stories.

    Who Leads America’s DEI Offices? Here Are Their Stories.

    At the annual conference of the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education in Baltimore last week, faculty members, staff, and administrators gathered to learn from one another, commiserate, and strategize.

    Lawmakers in at least 19 states have introduced bills in the current legislative sessions that would restrict colleges’ efforts to improve diversity, equity, or inclusion, with six states proposing to ban DEI offices or staff altogether. Those advancing the bills argue that the administrations working to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion are discriminatory and a waste of taxpayer dollars, and that they inhibit academic freedom.

    There were numerous signs at the conference that business was not as usual.

    One audience member received a warm round of applause after introducing himself as working at a college in Florida. A session titled “Slow-Burn Tactical Hell: Doing DEI Work During Situational and Prolonged Crisis Mode” promised practical advice. One keynote speaker, Ijeoma Oluo, who writes and speaks about race, urged the audience to celebrate small victories even while under attack. And one session — closed to the media — focused on how to reclaim the narrative around the framing of diversity, equity, and inclusion in education.

    What does it mean to work in a diversity, equity, and inclusion office on a college campus in 2023? The Chronicle spoke with four administrators at the conference, working in red and blue states, at public and private institutions, both two-year and four-year colleges, from early on in their careers in diversity, equity, and inclusion to the more well-established, about what they do and what they’re thinking about at this critical time in their field.

    Emilio Solano

    In some ways, Emilio Solano, assistant provost for institutional equity and community engagement at Willamette University, has come far from his first jobs as an eighth-grade history and English teacher and later, assistant high-school principal. But Solano has also wound up right where he began, returning to his hometown of Salem, Oregon.

    Solano, who is in his first year as assistant provost, views his role as that of a quarterback and coordinator for all things diversity, equity, and inclusion at Willamette, a private, liberal-arts college with 1,236 undergraduate students, of whom 63 percent are white. In the university’s College of Arts and Sciences, 73 percent of tenure-track faculty are white, 24 percent are people of color, and 4 percent unknown; among those hired since 2016, 79 percent are people of color.

    Solano recently created a website for the Office of Institutional Equity, an office of one. “The office is me,” Solano says, laughing, “and I’m very real with that.”

    André Chung for The Chronicle

    Emilio Solano.

    Willamette recently undertook a strategic-planning process; one goal was to formalize the university’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. Solano is proud of getting the University DEI Committee off the ground and says he’s already seeing departments come together to talk about common challenges such as faculty retention or recruitment. “It’s neat to see, like, the law school and the art school talking to each other [to say] let’s meet on the side and let’s brainstorm because we’re going through the same thing right now,” Solano says.

    Solano says that much of his work is “not always super visible” to students, staff, or faculty. The diversity committee, for example, spent four months defining diversity, equity, and inclusion and figuring out what the terms mean in the context of Willamette. But Solano said that work has helped to get everyone at the university on the same page about goals and language, laying a critical foundation for the work ahead.

    Among the priorities at the top of Solano’s list is thinking about how the university can expand its work with local tribal communities. For example, one faculty member who has built a strong relationship with the Grand Ronde, a federally recognized Native American tribe, including curating art from the tribe at the college’s art museum and teaching about Indigenous studies, will be retiring soon, so Solano has been trying to figure out how to keep Willamette’s partnership going and fill the gap in the curriculum.

    Solano is also looking forward to getting the results of the university’s recent campus-climate survey, the institution’s first since 2019, which asked students, faculty, and staff about their perceptions of the campus climate, including experiences of discrimination and harassment. He’s also started thinking about how the university should measure its success in diversity, equity, and inclusion, and whether to focus on goals related to admissions or retention of faculty and staff, or financial aid, for example.

    When Solano was thinking about whether to take the job, he was warned that most people burn out in such roles after two or three years. “They do something different because they either realize there’s too much to do or the institution doesn’t feel supportive of them, and so they leave,” Solano says. “They realize that they were promised something that is impossible to do.”

    For now, though, Solano is holding on to his belief that institutions can change for the better, to help more students reach their full potential.

    Andrea Abrams

    As an anthropology professor, Andrea Abrams has taught courses on cultural diversity, race, and gender at Centre College in Danville, Ky., which has 1,320 undergraduate students, 72 percent of whom are white. Five years ago, during a sit-in protesting the way the college handled incidents of racial discrimination, students demanded, among other things, an office to oversee diversity and inclusion. Administrators asked Abrams to serve as an interim vice president to the new office.

    Abrams saw it as a good opportunity to apply the theory she had been teaching in anthropology and took the job, intending to stay only until the college had found a permanent hire. But she found the job so rewarding — and challenging — that she decided to stay, while continuing to serve as an associate professor of anthropology.

    Today, as vice president for diversity, equity, and inclusion, Abrams oversees an office with four other staff members. Together they train faculty and staff to create a more inclusive environment, for example, by offering workshops on how to make classrooms more inclusive for neurodiverse and differently abled students and how to help international students feel a sense of belonging. They also handle cultural and social-justice programming for the college, and run the programming for students who want to work in diversity, equity, and inclusion or conduct research in the field. The office also coordinates a half day each November dedicated to helping students, faculty, and staff learn about different perspectives, which includes workshops on talking across political differences and dealing with racial trauma, panels on the experiences of LGBTQ students, and classes on hip-hop dance and making kimchi.

    Andrea Abrams, Vice President of Diversity Equity and Inclusion at Centre College in Kentucky.

    André Chung for The Chronicle

    Andrea Abrams.

    “My job is to make sure that Centre is actually a more diverse place,” says Abrams. That includes ensuring diversity in hiring and making sure that policies are fair, for example.

    Abrams has been watching the attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion at colleges around the country with concern. She recognizes that, as someone at a private college, and with the protection of a Democratic governor (albeit in a mainly red state), she has advantages that some of her counterparts across the country do not. Still, she fears the attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion will hurt all of their work.

    “The point seems to be to vilify diversity, equity, inclusion, to say that it is inherently unequal because you’re privileging a certain group,” Abrams says. If some states succeed in eliminating DEI offices at public universities, she says, there will be a chilling effect at all kinds of institutions.

    Even at private institutions, Abrams says, improving diversity, equity, and inclusion takes constant effort. “It’s still work. There’s still a struggle to get everyone to believe that it’s important, that diversity actually matters, that efforts toward inclusion are, in fact, equitable and necessary.”

    To Abrams, the current attacks are evidence that those efforts have been working, and that college campuses are more diverse and more equitable today than they used to be. More equity, she says, means more sharing of resources and opportunities. Those who used to be able to keep those resources and opportunities to themselves have fewer privileges now and they’re resentful that the privileges they used to take for granted are no longer there, Abrams says. Those changes — coupled with the country’s demographic changes — have sparked the current backlash against diversity, equity, and inclusion work on college campuses, Abrams believes.

    Abrams says her field was caught off guard by how quickly the attacks have come, how quickly they have escalated, and how coordinated the assault has been. She worries about the damage that can be done if those critics get their way. But she also senses a renewed sense of commitment among her colleagues to their work, and a resolve to push back.

    So much good work has already been done to make college a welcoming place for people of all kinds of backgrounds, Abrams says. She hopes it will be enough to keep the current attacks from taking hold.

    Ricardo Nazario-Colón

    Ricardo Nazario-Colón, chief diversity officer at Western Carolina University, says that there is a misconception that he and his colleagues in diversity, equity, and inclusion offices on college campuses across the country only serve certain kinds of students. “If a student comes to my office or any of my colleagues’ offices, regardless of the background of that student, we will provide services to that student,” Nazario-Colón says. “There is no administrator in higher ed who would say oh, I can’t help you — my job description says that I cannot work with you or my job description doesn’t serve you.”

    There’s a lot out there that’s being challenged with really no understanding of the impact that these decisions are making.

    “That is a false narrative,” says Nazario-Colón.

    Nazario-Colón became the first person to serve as chief diversity officer at Western Carolina, a public university with 10,145 undergraduate students, 77 percent of whom are white, in Cullowhee, N.C., close to seven years ago. In May, he will begin a new position as senior vice chancellor for diversity, equity, and inclusion and chief diversity officer for the State University of New York system.

    Ricardo Nazario-Colón, Western Carolina University.

    André Chung for The Chronicle

    Ricardo Nazario-Colón.

    Reflecting on his time at Western Carolina, Nazario-Colón says that he and the university have grown together. Today, it’s second nature at the institution to consider the implications related to diversity, equity, and inclusion in decision-making, rather than thinking of them as competing interests. “The individuals that come to that institution understand that this is a value of the institution,” he says.

    Nazario-Colón sees himself as a guide, helping people figure out how diversity, equity, and inclusion manifest themselves in their areas of work, rather than telling them what they should do. Recently, for example, the university completed its first strategic inclusive-excellence action plan, part of the university’s broader strategic plan. The action plan includes goals around equity, access, and success; climate and belongingness; curriculum and scholarship; infrastructure and commitments; and community and partnerships, with goals and measurable outcomes for each. “I may have been the bus driver on this, but really it took members from across campus and the support of senior leadership to be able to accomplish that,” he says.

    Nazario-Colón believes the very identity of the United States is at stake in the current debate over diversity, equity, and inclusion. He says that those who oppose the work of DEI offices on college campuses don’t realize the broad spectrum of students they serve, including first-generation college students, students with disabilities, and students who receive Pell Grants. “There’s a lot out there that’s being challenged with really no understanding of the impact that these decisions are making.”

    Unnamed, from a Tennessee community college

    One DEI administrator, who works in compliance at a community college in Tennessee, agreed to speak with a reporter on the condition that her name not be used, because she was worried about the potential impact on her job.

    “There is a definite fear,” she says. She even questioned whether she should attend the Nadohe conference this year because she worried about the potential ramifications of going to a convening with the word “diversity” in the title.

    So much of what we deal with is hard, emotional, time-consuming. You have to have a degree of empathy to reflect the entire student body and faculty and staff. That passion is a requirement to do the job.

    Last week, Tennessee’s General Assembly, which drew attention recently for expelling two of its Black members for participating in a gun-control protest, gave final legislative approval on a bill that would allow students and employees to report alleged violations of a divisive-concepts law adopted the previous year. That law states that students and employees may not be penalized for declining to support certain divisive concepts, such as that one race or sex is inherently superior or inferior to another or that an individual by virtue of their race or sex is inherently privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive.

    The current bill, which would allow reports of potential violations, would require institutions to investigate each report and create corrective action plans for any violations. The bill would also require employees whose primary or secondary job duties or job title includes diversity, equity, or inclusion to strengthen and increase intellectual diversity and individual liberty among those with divergent points of view and allocate at least 50 percent of their duties to supporting the academic success of students eligible for Pell Grants.

    Tennessee lawmakers have also introduced bills this year that would end mandatory implicit bias training and prohibit public colleges offering health care-related degrees from requiring diversity, equity, and inclusion training or education as a condition of admission or graduation.

    Some of the DEI administrator’s colleagues have been discussing whether to try to scrub the word diversity from job titles and department names to protect their work.

    If she were younger and just starting out in the field, or lacked the support of family and friends, she would probably be looking for opportunities in the private sector. “No one is in higher education for the money,” she says.

    “The work is too hard to not be committed to it,” she says. “So much of what we deal with is hard, emotional, time-consuming. You have to have a degree of empathy to reflect the entire student body and faculty and staff. That passion is a requirement to do the job.”

    Adrienne Lu

    Source link

  • ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ Is Stripped Out of Florida’s Higher-Ed Reform Bill

    ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’ Is Stripped Out of Florida’s Higher-Ed Reform Bill

    Florida’s state senators edited out some of the most contentious provisions of a much-discussed higher-education bill advancing through the legislature on Wednesday. Lawmakers scrapped all references to “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” eliminated the ability to subject professors to tenure review at any time or for any cause, and shelved language that would have given hiring authority to governing boards.

    HB 999 and its complement Senate Bill 266 were first filed in February after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced that changes to public higher education would be a policy priority of his this year.

    In modifying the bill, Florida lawmakers signaled that some of DeSantis’s most aggressive proposals on higher education may not be realized this year.

    Senators removed all of the bill’s references to “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” rewriting the bill to ban curricula based on “theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and were created to maintain social, political, and economic inequities.” Universities would also be prohibited from using state funding to promote, support, or maintain campus programs or activities that are based on these theories, the bill states.

    The latest version also strips out previous language that would have banned specific majors and minors. The bill had been amended in March to bar universities from offering any major or minor that is “based on or otherwise utilizes pedagogical methodology associated with Critical Theory, including, but not limited to, Critical Race Theory, Critical Race Studies, Critical Ethnic Studies, Radical Feminist Theory, Radical Gender Theory, Queer Theory, Critical Social Justice, or Intersectionality.”

    Most public universities in Florida offer majors or minors in gender studies, and many other disciplines and programs cover topics like race, gender, and intersectionality. Faculty and students expressed concern that these programs were at risk under prior versions of the bill.

    Under prior versions of the senate bill, tenured professors could have been subject to post-tenure review at any time or for any cause. That provision was struck Wednesday by the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Erin Grall, a Republican. Florida established a five-year post-tenure review process last year.

    Despite the revisions, State Sen. Geraldine Thompson , a Democrat, stressed that she believes the bill still represents a step “backwards” for the state.

    Another addition to the senate bill would give university presidents the final authority over hiring decisions for provosts, deans, and full-time faculty members. Presidents would also be responsible for assessing the performance, productivity, and employment practices of the university’s provost and deans and would be encouraged to participate in faculty reporting.

    Previously, the bill would have permitted boards of trustees to make hiring decisions, allowing them to delegate that authority to presidents but forbidding them from delegating to faculty members. The new text lifts that ban.

    Eva Surovell

    Source link

  • New Mexico State’s Beleaguered Chancellor Resigns, Effective Immediately

    New Mexico State’s Beleaguered Chancellor Resigns, Effective Immediately

    New Mexico State University’s chancellor, Dan E. Arvizu, resigned, effective immediately, on Friday during a special meeting of the Board of Regents. The board had agreed in December not to renew Arvizu’s five-year contract, which was to end June 30.

    Instead of waiting for the contract to expire, the board accepted Arvizu’s resignation to smooth and accelerate the transition to a new leader. Arvizu has overseen a period of turmoil at the Hispanic- and minority-serving institution that saw the provost fired, the president leave, and the men’s basketball coach fired and its season canceled. Meanwhile, tensions between the directors of Black Programs and the university’s equity, inclusion, and diversity office resulted in a churn of leaders in that office, and demands from Black student leaders that they be assigned to a different office.

    “This separation is truly mutual,” Arvizu said during the meeting. “For the past five years, my only motivation has been to do what I believe is in the best interest of NMSU, and transitioning now will allow the university to devote the time and effort needed over the next several months for a successful search.”

    “I am not a traditional university administrator. I didn’t grow up in the academy,” he added. “My expertise is in energy research and in materials and process science, development, and deployment. In 2018, I was honored to be selected as chancellor of this great university system. Since then, it has been my privilege to lead this institution through some tough times, navigate a pandemic, and engineer the turnaround. Now, the time has come to accelerate the transition to a new chancellor.”

    The board also announced the selection of Jay Gogue, who served as president of NMSU from 2000 to 2003, as interim chancellor, starting immediately. He also served as president and chancellor of the University of Houston system, as well as Auburn University. Gogue will serve while the board searches for the next permanent chancellor.

    “The Board of Regents appreciates all Chancellor Arvizu has done for our university,” Ammu Devasthali, chair of the regents, said. “As we thank him and wish him well, we, at the same time, welcome Jay and Susie Gogue back to Las Cruces.”

    Katherine Mangan

    Source link

  • What Does It Take to Be a ‘Minority-Serving Institution’?

    What Does It Take to Be a ‘Minority-Serving Institution’?

    A group of researchers has recommended a new classification system for minority-serving institutions that they hope will ultimately direct more money to colleges that are serving minority students well, and not just enrolling them in large numbers.

    The MSI Data Project, the researchers said in a news release Sunday, is a response to “inaccurate and inconsistent data used to identify minority-serving institutions (MSIs) for funding and analysis.”

    “Our hope is … for MSI leaders, advocates, and policymakers to use this body of research, as well as our data dashboards, to make better informed decisions that promote equitable educational outcomes for students,” said Mike Hoa Nguyen, the principal investigator and an assistant professor of education at New York University.

    The data project, launched this month, examines 11 categories of minority-serving institutions. It includes dashboards that detail individual campuses’ eligibility for federal funds, institutional characteristics, enrollment, and graduation metrics over a five-year period, from 2017 to 2021.

    For instance, the dashboard shows, 219 Hispanic-serving institutions received funding from the U.S. Department of Education in 2021, but 462 were eligible for such money. Colleges still have to apply for competitive grants from a limited pool of money. Some applied and were denied, while other colleges may not have even known they were eligible.

    The researchers hope their recommendations will spur changes in how colleges are designated as MSIs and clear up confusion about who should be able to claim that status, and the federal money that can come with it.

    In an accompanying article in Educational Researcher, titled “What Counts as a Minority-Serving Institution?” Nguyen and two of the project’s co-creators raise the concern that federal money isn’t necessarily going to the most deserving institutions.

    “For example, perhaps an institution, not identified as an MSI under the federal statute, is found to serve students of color much better than those that are identified. Such findings could offer important suggestions for policy changes. Additionally, if institutions are receiving federal MSI funds but are not serving students of color well, this would be an important consideration to amend practices and policies so that federal funding is used in the manner in which it was intended.”

    “The MSI landscape is so unbelievably complex, in the way all 11 designations were created over a long period of time, using a patchwork legislative process,” Nguyen said in an interview. By getting everyone “speaking the same language” in how they examine minority-serving institutions, “our hope is that we can find out how well those students are being served” by the federal money set aside and where equity gaps exist.

    Nguyen’s fellow authors were Joseph J. Ramirez, an institutional research and assessment associate at the California Institute of Technology, and Sophia Laderman, an associate vice president at the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association (SHEEO).

    About one in five postsecondary institutions are eligible for federal money as MSIs, but more than half of all undergraduate students of color attend these colleges, the authors wrote. President Biden has pledged significant increases in the amount of money directed toward minority-serving institutions.

    Researchers, including Gina Ann Garcia, an associate professor of educational foundations, organizations, and policy at the University of Pittsburgh, have pointed out that the nation’s demographic changes have resulted in hundreds of campuses being designated as Hispanic serving based on numbers alone. The data-project researchers acknowledge that some colleges engage in “the strategic manipulation of enrollment trends in order to meet eligibility requirements.”

    Hispanic-serving institutions, which were first designated by the federal government in 1994, are among the minority-serving institutions that get that designation based on share of enrollment. For HSIs, the threshold is 25 percent of the undergraduate population.

    By contrast, Historically Black and Tribal-Serving colleges achieve that designation based on their histories and missions. Colleges that weren’t designated in those categories can’t join their ranks, regardless of their own changing demographics. That has caused longstanding tensions between Historically Black and predominantly Black institutions over who should have access to the federal money set aside for minority-serving institutions.

    Among the minority-serving institutions the database tracks are those representing Hispanic students, Asian American and Pacific Islanders, both tribal and non-tribally-controlled Native American colleges, and colleges that are either Historically Black or predominantly Black.

    Many colleges are designated in more than one category, but they may only be able to receive funding under one. Designating their multiple identities is important, the authors write, because it “recognizes the diversity and complexity of the institution, and does not render invisible the students of color who attend that institution.”

    Katherine Mangan

    Source link

  • Disruption of Speech at Stanford Prompts President to Apologize — and Criticize Staff’s Response

    Disruption of Speech at Stanford Prompts President to Apologize — and Criticize Staff’s Response

    A student protest that interrupted a controversial speaker at Stanford University last week led its president and law dean to criticize campus staff, including, apparently, the associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion who joined the speaker at the podium and discussed the students’ concerns.

    Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, was invited to give a talk titled “The Fifth Circuit in Conversation With the Supreme Court: Covid, Guns, and Twitter,” by the law school’s chapter of the Federalist Society, a conservative and libertarian legal organization.

    Duncan was met with a room of loud student protesters who said his history of court rulings had caused harm to LGBTQ+ students, and that giving him a platform on campus diminished their safety. (His confirmation to the Fifth Circuit was opposed by groups like the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, which cited Duncan’s decisions against rights for same-sex couples and against gender-affirming bathroom access for transgender children.)

    But a free-speech advocate contacted by The Chronicle said the protesters took it too far and prevented Duncan from completing the speech he was invited to give, which she said infringed on his speech rights. The situation at Stanford comes amid a national debate over how to balance free expression and student safety. It is common for conservative student groups to invite provocative speakers to give lectures on campus, which then face backlash from protesters.

    “These students [protesters] are free to engage in counter-speech via peaceful protest, asserting that Judge Duncan’s judicial decisions ‘cause harm,’” wrote Alex Morey, the director of campus rights advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, in an email to The Chronicle. “What happened Thursday was not counter-speech. It was censorship.”

    Stanford leaders appeared to agree. President Marc Tessier-Lavigne and Jenny S. Martinez, the dean of Stanford Law School, apologized to Duncan in a joint letter.

    “What happened was inconsistent with our policies on free speech, and we are very sorry about the experience you had while visiting our campus,” the letter read. “We are very clear with our students that, given our commitment to free expression, if there are speakers they disagree with, they are welcome to exercise their right to protest but not to disrupt the proceedings.”

    The letter stated that under Stanford’s disruption policy, students are not allowed to “prevent the effective carrying out” of a public event by “heckling or other forms of interruption.”

    The letter also criticized Stanford staff for their response to the protesters.

    “Staff members who should have enforced university policies failed to do so, and instead intervened in inappropriate ways that are not aligned with the university’s commitment to free speech,” the letter from Stanford leadership read.

    Neither Tessier-Lavigne nor Martinez were made available for comment, but their letter appeared to reference the actions of Tirien Angela Steinbach, the law school’s associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion. As captured in a video of the event, she joined Duncan at the podium after he apparently requested that an administrator assist in quieting the student protesters. At first, Duncan appeared confused when Steinbach identified herself as an administrator.

    Then, Steinbach proceeded to address the crowd for roughly six minutes, as she shared her support for the student protesters but encouraged them to allow Duncan to speak.

    “I’m uncomfortable because this event is tearing at the fabric of this community that I care about and that I’m here to support,” Steinbach said to the crowd. She continued to explain that for many people in the crowd, Duncan’s work had “caused harm.”

    “My job is to create a space of belonging for all people in this institution, and that is hard and messy and not easy and the answers are not black or white or right or wrong,” Steinbach said. “This is actually part of the creation of belonging.”

    Still, she questioned the decision to invite Duncan to speak.

    Steinbach asked Duncan, “Is it worth the pain that this causes and the division that this causes? Do you have something so incredibly important to say about Twitter and guns and Covid that that is worth this impact on the division of these people, who have sat next to each other for years, who are going through what is the battle of law school together?”

    Steinbach said that she believes the right to free speech must be upheld, because if Duncan’s speech were censored it wouldn’t be long before the protesters’ speech was censored as well.

    But she said she understood that some students might want to change Stanford’s policies to prioritize safety and inclusion.

    “I understand why people feel like harm is so great that we might need to reconsider these policies,” Steinbach said. “Luckily they are in a school where they can learn the advocacy skills to advocate for those changes.”

    The Chronicle emailed Steinbach for reaction to the letter from Stanford’s president and law school dean, but received no answer.

    Julian Roberts-Grmela

    Source link

  • DEI Legislation Tracker

    DEI Legislation Tracker

    The Chronicle is tracking legislation that would prohibit colleges from having diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or staff; ban mandatory diversity training; prohibit institutions from using diversity statements in hiring and promotion; or prohibit colleges from using race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in admissions or employment. All four proscriptions were identified in model state legislation proposed this year by the Goldwater and Manhattan Institutes.

    We are tracking 21 bills in 13 states. So far,

    0

    have final
    legislative approval.

    0

    have been signed
    into law by a governor.

    2

    have been tabled
    or failed to pass.

    What Would the Legislation Restrict?

    We Want to Hear From You

    How are people in your state or on your campus reacting to these efforts to restrict diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at public colleges? What are your thoughts on these proposals? And have we missed any relevant bills? Please email Adrienne.lu@chronicle.com and let us know.

    Methodology

    The Chronicle looked for bills introduced in the current legislative sessions on state legislative websites. We searched for bills that would affect diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts identified in the model state legislation proposed by the Goldwater and Manhattan Institutes this year. We supplemented those efforts by looking for articles about relevant legislation in local media outlets.

    In some states, changes in diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at public colleges have come from outside the legislature. For example, in a measure that appears to target diversity statements, the University of North Carolina’s Board of Governors voted in February to prohibit colleges from asking applicants or employees to state or agree with certain viewpoints in hiring or admissions, while the chancellors of the Texas A&M and Texas State systems eliminated requirements for diversity statements in hiring. We did not include measures like those, but focused on state legislation only.

    Data on student enrollment represents only full-time students for the fall of 2021, and it comes from the U.S. Department of Education’s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (Ipeds). Employee numbers also come from Ipeds, and these figures include only full-time employees. Nonwhite students and faculty percentages are calculated by taking the total population minus the white population. People who identified as two or more races, nonresidents, or unknown were removed from these calculations as well. Only data from Title IV, degree-granting institutions within the United States is included.

    Audrey Williams June, Kate Marijolovic, Julian Roberts-Grmela, and Eva Surovell contributed to this article.

    Jacquelyn Elias and Adrienne Lu

    Source link