ReportWire

Tag: diana dizoglio

  • DiZoglio to sue MassPort over settlement details

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State Auditor Diana DiZoglio said she plans to sue the agency that oversees Logan International Airport, accusing officials of withholding details of settlements with state employees her office was seeking for a required audit.

    DiZoglio released an audit on Wednesday that found the Massachusetts Port Authority entered into a $1.37 million settlement agreement in 2022 which her office says took advantage of nondisclosure laws to conceal allegations that included gender- and disability-based discrimination as well as unequal pay.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmqFE E96 |6E9F6? s6>@4C2E D2:5 E96 C6G:6H[ C6BF:C65 6G6CJ E9C66 J62CD F?56C DE2E6 =2H[ H2D 9:?56C65 3J E96 BF2D:AF3=:4 286?4J’D C67FD2= E@ EFC? @G6C 56E2:=D @7 E96 a_aa D6EE=6>6?E 2?5 72:=FC6 E@ 5:D4=@D6 @E96C D64C6E:G6 28C66>6?ED E@ 2F5:E@CD]k^Am

    kAm$96 2=D@ 4=2:>65 E92E pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36==’D @77:46 2?5 |2DD!@CE “:>AC@A6C=J” D92C65 56E2:=D 23@FE E96 2F5:E H:E9 6>A=@J66D 2?5 C6E:C66D H9@ H6C6 ?@E :?G@=G65 😕 E96 C6G:6H]k^Am

    kAm“qJ 5@:?8 D@[ E96J :?E6C76C65 H:E9 =2H7F= @G6CD:89E 2?5 92>A6C65 E96 2F5:E AC@46DD[ H9:=6 56=2J:?8[ 2?5 😕 |2DD!@CE’D 42D6 3=@4<:?8[ @FC DE2EFE@C:=J 2FE9@C:K65 2446DD E@ D@>6 @7 E96D6 C64@C5D C6BF:C65 E@ 4@?5F4E @FC 2F5:E[” s:+@8=:@ D2:5 2E 2 3C:67:?8 (65?6D52J]k^Am

    kAmqFE 2 |2DD!@CE DA@<6DH@>2? D2:5 E96 286?4J H2D “7F==J 4@@A6C2E:G6” H:E9 E96 2F5:E@C’D @77:46 5FC:?8 :ED C6G:6H 2?5 A@:?E65 @FE E92E E96 C6A@CE 4@?E2:?65 “:?244FC24:6D” DF49 2D 2 4=2:> E92E E96 a_aa |2DD!@CE D6EE=6>6?E H2D 7F?565 3J E2IA2J6CD] %96 286?4J 😀 7F?565 3J >@?6J 7C@> :ED @H? @A6C2E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“|2DD!@CE[ 2D 2 AF3=:4 6>A=@J6C[ ?@E:7:65 >@C6 E92? `__ 4FCC6?E 2?5 7@C>6C 6>A=@J66D E92E E96 2F5:E@C 925 C6BF6DE65 E@ C6G:6H E96:C 7:=6D 2D C6BF:C65 3J E96 |2DD249FD6EED u2:C x?7@C>2E:@? !C24E:46D p4E[” |2DD!@CE DA@<6DH@>2? y6??:76C |69:82? D2:5] “p D>2== ?F>36C @7 :?5:G:5F2=D @3;64E65[ H9:49 😀 E96:C C:89E[ 2?5 H6 ?@E:7:65 E96 2F5:E@C’D @77:46 @7 E9:D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 |2DD!@CE 2F5:E H2D A2CE @7 2 3C@256C C6G:6H @7 DE2E6 F?:G6CD:E:6D 2?5 4@==686D[ BF2D:DE2E6 286?4:6D 2?5 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= @77:46D[ 4@G6C:?8 E96 A6C:@5 @7 y2?] `[ a_`h[ E9C@F89 s64] b`[ a_ac]k^Am

    kAm~G6C2==[ s:+@8=:@’D @77:46 D2:5 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? C6G62=65 E92E E96 a` 286?4:6D :E C6G:6H65 6?E6C65 :?E@ 2E =62DE aeb 28C66>6?ED E@E2=:?8 23@FE Se]g >:==:@? 😕 E2IA2J6C >@?6J 5FC:?8 2 D:IJ62C A6C:@5]k^Am

    kAmpF5:E@CD D2:5 E96J 7@F?5 2 A2E49H@C< @7 A@=:4:6D E92E 92G6 =2C86=J 2==@H65 E96 286?4:6D E@ D9:6=5 56E2:=D @7 E96 28C66>6?ED 7C@> E96 AF3=:4’D G:6H] $@>6 286?4:6D C67FD65 E@ AC@G:56 56E2:=D @7 2 D6EE=6>6?ED[ E96J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“(:E9@FE 4=62C[ 5@4F>6?E65 A@=:4:6D[ 286?4:6D 42??@E 6?DFC6 D6EE=6>6?ED 2C6 92?5=65 72:C=J[ =682==J[ @C 4@?D:DE6?E=J[” E96 2F5:E@C’D C6A@CE DE2E6D] “%9:D =24< @7 DECF4EFC6 2=D@ >2<6D :E 5:77:4F=E 7@C E96 AF3=:4 E@ F?56CDE2?5 9@H E96:C E2I 5@==2CD 2C6 DA6?E[ H9:=6 :?4C62D:?8 E96 C:D< @7 244@F?E:?8 6CC@CD 3642FD6 E96 ~77:46 @7 E96 r@>AEC@==6C >2J ?@E 36 23=6 E@ AC@A6C=J C6G:6H D6EE=6>6?E A2J>6?ED]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DiZoglio launches effort to pry open Beacon Hill

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — With her voter-approved audit of the Legislature stalled, State Auditor Diana DiZoglio is leading a new effort to pry open Beacon Hill’s secret legislative process.

    The Methuen Democrat has launched a ballot initiative to make the House of Representatives, Senate and the governor’s office subject to the state’s public records law and she said supporters have cleared a major hurdle to the 2026 ballot by collecting more than 100,000 signatures from registered voters.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“*@F A2J E2I6D[ D@ J@F 92G6 2 C:89E E@ 65:2 2??@F?4:?8 E96 677@CE] “%C2?DA2C6?4J[ 244@F?E23:=:EJ[ 2?5 2446DD:3:=:EJ >2EE6C]”k^Am

    kAmp DF>>2CJ @7 s:+@8=:@’D AC@A@D2= D2:5 :E H@F=5 >2<6 “>@DE C64@C5D” 96=5 3J E96 {68:D=2EFC6 2?5 8@G6C?@C’D @77:46 DF3;64E E@ C6BF6DE 3J E96 >65:2 2?5 AF3=:4]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D AC@A@D65 =2H H@F=5 6I6>AE 5@4F>6?ED C6=2E65 E@ E96 56G6=@A>6?E @7 AF3=:4 A@=:4J 2?5 4@>>F?:42E:@?D 36EH66? =68:D=2E@CD 2?5 E96:C 4@?DE:EF6?ED[ :7 E9@D6 4@>>F?:42E:@?D 2C6 C62D@?23=J C6=2E65 E@ 2 4@?DE:EF6?E’D C6BF6DE 7@C 2DD:DE2?46 😕 @3E2:?:?8 8@G6C?>6?EAC@G:565 36?67:ED @C D6CG:46D @C :?E6C24E:?8 H:E9 2 8@G6C?>6?E 286?4J[” E96 AC@A@D2= C625D]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 😀 E96 @?=J DE2E6 😕 E96 4@F?ECJ H96C6 E96 8@G6C?@C’D @77:46[ {68:D=2EFC6 2?5 ;F5:4:2CJ 2== 4=2:> E96J 2C6 6I6>AE 7C@> E96 AF3=:4 C64@C5D =2H] %9:D 92D =65 @A6? 8@G6C?>6?E 8C@FAD E@ 4@?D:DE6?E=J =236= :ED u:CDE p>6?5>6?E AC@E64E:@?D 2D E96 H62<6DE 😕 E96 ?2E:@?]k^Am

    kAm{2H>2<6CD 92G6 7:=65 3:==D 😕 E96 A2DE E@ @A6? FA 2== E9C66 3C2?496D @7 8@G6C?>6?E E@ E96 C64@C5D =2HD[ 3FE E96J 72:=65 E@ 82:? EC24E:@?] v@@5 8@G6C?>6?E 8C@FAD 92G6 C68F=2C=J FC865 v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J 2?5 =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD E@ AC@G:56 >@C6 EC2?DA2C6?4J @7 E96:C :??6C H@C<:?8D]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6’D AF3=:4 C64@C5D =2H H2D @G6C92F=65 😕 a_`e E@ :>AC@G6 2446DD E@ :?7@C>2E:@? 2?5 >2<6 :E 92C56C 7@C DE2E6 2?5 =@42= 8@G6C?>6?E E@ D9:6=5 :?7@C>2E:@?]k^Am

    kAmqFE E96 {68:D=2EFC6 564:565 E@ =62G6 :ED @H? 6I6>AE:@? :?E24E[ 2D H6== 2D E9@D6 7@C E96 8@G6C?@C’D @77:46 2?5 4@FCED]k^Am

    kAmtI6>AE:@?D E@ AF3=:4 C64@C5D 2?5 @A6? >66E:?8 =2HD >62? E96 DE2E6’D E@A 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D 42? 5@ >F49 @7 E96:C H@C< 369:?5 4=@D65 5@@CD]k^Am

    kAms6>@4C2ED H9@ 9@=5 2 >2;@C:EJ 😕 3@E9 E96 DE2E6 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6[ 7@C 6I2>A=6[ 42? 5:D4FDD 3:==D 2?5 E96 DE2E6 3F586E 369:?5 4=@D65 5@@CD] ~7E6?[ ?@ C64@C5D 2C6 <6AE]k^Am

    kAm%96 DE2E6’D @A6? >66E:?8 =2H C6BF:C6D @E96C 8@G6C?>6?E2= 3@5:6D E@ 2==@H E96 AF3=:4 E@ 2EE6?5 2?J >66E:?8 😕 H9:49 2 >2EE6C F?56C :ED ;FC:D5:4E:@? 😀 5:D4FDD65]k^Am

    kAm{2H>2<6CD @7E6? 4@?G6?6 E96? G@E6 E@ 8@ :?E@ 4=@D65 D6DD:@? H:E9 =:EE=6 6IA=2?2E:@?[ 32CC:?8 E96 AF3=:4 2?5 ?6HD C6A@CE6CD]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • GOP candidate files lawsuit over legislative audit

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The state Legislature has been hit with another lawsuit over its refusal to open up the books to allow a voter-approved audit of its inner workings.

    The lawsuit was filed Thursday in Middlesex County Superior Court by Republican candidate for lieutenant governor Anne Brensley, who asked a judge to declare a voter-approved law giving State Auditor Diana DiZoglio the power to audit the Legislature constitutional and invalidate an internal state House of Representatives rule on audits.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“’@E6CD DA@<6 =@F5 2?5 4=62C – E96J H2?E EC2?DA2C6?4J @? 9@H E96:C E2I 5@==2CD 2C6 DA6?E[” qC6?D=6J[ 2 (2J=2?5 $6=64E q@2C5 >6>36C[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “}62C=J 2 J62C =2E6C[ =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD 92G6 :8?@C65 E92E >2?52E6 2?5 C67FD65 E@ 4@>A=J H:E9 E96 =2H] %9:D :D?’E 23@FE A@=:E:4D – :E’D 23@FE 244@F?E23:=:EJ E@ E96 A6@A=6]”k^Am

    kAm%96 =2HDF:E 😀 E96 =2E6DE D66<:?8 E@ 6?7@C46 “F6DE:@? `[ H9:49 2FE9@C:K65 s:+@8=:@ E@ 4@?5F4E 2 A6C7@C>2?46 2?5 7:?2?4:2= 2F5:E @7 E96 {68:D=2EFC6 E@ 6?DFC6 E92E :E 😀 2596C:?8 E@ 8@G6C?>6?E C68F=2E:@?D] %96 C676C6?5F> H2D 2AAC@G65 😕 =2DE J62C’D 6=64E:@? 3J ?62C=J faT[ 244@C5:?8 E@ @77:4:2= C6DF=ED]k^Am

    kAmqFE w@FD6 $A62<6C #@? |2C:2?@ 2?5 $6?2E6 !C6D:56?E z2C6? $A:=<2 92G6 4@?E:?F65 E@ AFD9 324< 282:?DE E96 G@E6C2AAC@G65 =2H[ C6A62E:?8 4=2:>D E92E E96 2F5:E H@F=5 G:@=2E6 E96 D6A2C2E:@? @7 A@H6CD 5@4EC:?6]k^Am

    kAm%96 w@FD6 2AAC@G65 2 >62DFC6 E92E 2FE9@C:K6D s:+@8=:@’D @77:46 E@ 9:C6 2? :?56A6?56?E 2F5:E:?8 7:C> E@ 4@?5F4E 2 7:?2?4:2= C6G:6H @7 E96 492>36C 3FE 67764E:G6=J DEC:AA65 96C @77:46 @7 E96 2FE9@C:EJ E@ 56E6C>:?6 E96 D4@A6 @7 E96 2F5:E]k^Am

    kAms:+@8=:@[ 2 |6E9F6? s6>@4C2E 2?5 =@?8E:>6 4C:E:4 @7 =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD[ 92D 9:C65 2 AC:G2E6 2EE@C?6J 2?5 G@H65 E@ AFCDF6 =682= 24E:@? 282:?DE $A:=<2 2?5 |2C:2?@ 3FE 92D ?@E 7:=65 2 492==6?86 J6E] p DA@<6DA6CD@? 7@C s:+@8=:@’D @77:46 D2:5 D96 😀 2H2C6 @7 qC6?D=6J’D =2HDF:E 3FE 😀 ?@E 2 A2CEJ E@ :E]k^Am

    kAmx? s646>36C[ 7@C>6C #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ r92:C>2? y:> {J@?D 7:=65 2 D:>:=2C =2HDF:E 2D<:?8 E96 DE2E6 $FA6C:@C r@FCE E@ 7@C46 E96 {68:D=2EFC6 E@ @A6? FA :ED 3@@A36== E92E BF6DE:@?65 E96 =682=:EJ @7 E96 G@E6C2AAC@G65 =2H]k^Am

    kAm{J@?D 7:=65 2? 2AA62= @7 E96 CF=:?8 😕 pAC:= 3FE 92D 2=D@ A6E:E:@?65 E96 $FAC6>6 yF5:4:2= r@FCE E@ 8C2?E 2 “5:C64E 2AA6==2E6 C6G:6H” @7 E96 42D6 E@ C6D@=G6 E96 5:DAFE6]k^Am

    kAmqFE qC6?D=6J[ H9@ 😀 C6AC6D6?E:?8 96CD6=7 😕 E96 =2HDF:E[ 2C8F6D E92E D96 😀 5:C64E=J 27764E65 3J E96 {68:D=2EFC6’D C67FD2= E@ 2FE9@C:K6 E96 2F5:E D@ E96 #:89E @7 !F3=:4 s@4EC:?6 4:E65 😕 AC6G:@FD 4@FCE C6;64E:@?D 5@6D ?@E 2AA=J E@ 96C 2D 2 DE2E6 E2IA2J6C 2?5 564=2C65 42?5:52E6 7@C =:6FE6?2?E 8@G6C?@C]k^Am

    kAmx? E96 =2HDF:E[ D96 2C8F6D =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD’ C67FD2= E@ A6C>:E E96 2F5:E “9FCED 96C 23:=:EJ E@ 36EE6C :?7@C> 2?5 DH2J G@E6CD @? 9@H D96 H@F=5 AC6A2C6[ @A6C2E6[ 2?5 C65F46 E96 3F586E 7@C E96 DE2E6 2?5 F=E:>2E6=J H:? E96 6=64E65 A@D:E:@?]”k^Am

    kAm“~E96C =2HDF:ED 72:=65 3642FD6 E96:C A=2:?E:77D 5:5?’E 92G6 2 5:C64E DE2<6[” qC6?D=6J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “x 5@] pD 2 42?5:52E6 7@C DE2E6H:56 @77:46[ x ?665 244FC2E6 3F586E 52E2 E@ AC@A@D6 C62= 7:D42= C67@C>D] %96 {68:D=2EFC6’D C67FD2= E@ 7@==@H E96 =2H 5@6D?’E ;FDE G:@=2E6 G@E6C :?E6?E – :E 24E:G6=J 9:?56CD 72:C 6=64E:@?D 2?5 :?7@C>65 A@=:4J>2<:?8]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Money flowing to ballot questions ahead of election

    Money flowing to ballot questions ahead of election

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Millions of dollars in contributions are continuing to flow to ballot committees behind five statewide referendums ahead of the election Nov. 5.

    Sunday was the deadline for groups raising money for and against the ballot questions to report their hauls from the latest reporting period.

    Fundraising on Question 2 saw the most activity in the most recent period, with groups backing the proposal to scrap the decades-old mandate requiring high school students to pass the MCAS exams to graduate spending more than $9.6 million to date, according to filings with the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance.

    A sizable chunk of funding reported by the Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes has been provided by the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the main proponent of the referendum.

    Much of the funding has come from in-kind contributions for signature gathering, research and other campaign related activities.

    Opponents of Question 2, organized under the Committee to Protect Our Kids’ Future, reported raising more than $2.1 million in the most recent fundraising period.

    Backers of Question 3, which would authorize Uber, Lyft and other ride-hailing drivers to unionize and bargain collectively for better wages and benefits, had raised more than $5.7 million for the campaign as of Sunday, according to the OCPF filings.

    Supporters of Question 1, which asks voters to approve a performance and financial audit of the state Legislature, reported collecting nearly $500,000 as of Sunday, according to the filings.

    The referendum was proposed by Auditor Diana DiZoglio, a Methuen Democrat and former state lawmaker whose efforts to audit the House and Senate have been blocked by legislative leaders who argue the move is unconstitutional. DiZoglio has chipped in more than $100,000 of her own money for the campaign, filings show.

    Meanwhile, backers of Question 5, which calls for paying tipped workers the state’s minimum wage of $15 per hour, raised more than $200,000, not including in-kind contributions from labor unions and others backing the effort, the filings show.

    Unlike contributions to individual candidates, donations to referendum campaigns are unrestricted and corporations often get involved, as do special interests, labor unions and others.

    The money is being mostly spent on campaign advertising, mailers and outreach in an attempt to sway voters ahead of the election.

    Overall figures for this election cycle are expected to rise with committees submitting other rounds of fundraising totals in coming months, and their final, year-end reports after the election.

    Ahead of the 2022 elections, committees behind ballot questions to set the “millionaires tax”, dental benefits, expand retail beer and wine sales, and repeal a state law authorizing state driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants raked in more than $67 million – the most expensive election cycles in recent years.

    In 2020, ballot questions to update the state’s “right to repair” law and authorize ranked-choice voting poured more than $60.7 million into their campaigns.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DiZoglio blasts legislative leaders in audit

    DiZoglio blasts legislative leaders in audit

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The state Legislature lacks transparency and accountability in its dealings, according to a new state audit, which blasts legislative leaders for refusing to open up their books for the performance review.

    The audit, released Monday by Auditor Diana DiZoglio, faults the state House of Representatives and Senate for failing to conduct timely financial reviews of its spending, a lack of transparency in its procurement policies and a website that makes it difficult for the public to navigate, among other criticisms.

    But DiZoglio also leaned into House and Senate leaders for refusing to provide information her office requested for the audit, including tracking year-end budget spending, how they decide which major bills are brought up for a vote and whether the two chambers are following their own rules regarding non-disclosure agreements.

    “It is deeply concerning that legislative leaders have refused to cooperate with our office to help promote transparency and identify ways to improve service to the people of Massachusetts,” the Democrat said in a statement. “Transparency and accountability are cornerstones of our democracy and enable the people to participate in government as intended in our Constitution, in a system of checks and balances.”

    The audit comes as DiZoglio urges voters to approve Question 1, which if approved would force legislative leaders to open up their books for an independent review.

    Under current laws, the auditor has the power to examine “all departments, offices, commissions, institutions and activities of the commonwealth” but the ballot question would expand those powers to specifically include the Legislature.

    The referendum was proposed by DiZoglio, a Methuen Democrat and former state lawmaker, whose high-profile efforts to audit the House and Senate have been blocked by legislative leaders who argue the move is unconstitutional.

    The partial audit released on Monday found that the Senate and House didn’t ensure annual financial audits were completed, filed with required recipients, or made available to the public in a timely way, in an apparent violation of their own rules.

    The review also found that the Legislature’s procurement policies lack transparency, which auditors said limit the public’s ability to hold the Legislature accountable.

    The Massachusetts Legislature’s website also lacks content and is hard to navigate, compared to other state’s legislative bodies, which auditors said “hinders the public’s ability to understand and engage in the legislative process and hold the Legislature accountable for ensuring an equitable mode of making laws.”

    Other concerns flagged by auditors included a lack of details about how legislative leaders appoint committee chairpersons and other posts that bump up lawmaker’s prestige and compensation.

    Legislative leaders were asked to respond to the findings of the audit, but DiZoglio’s office said they declined.

    “The purported audit of the Legislature released by the Auditor today confirms only one thing: the Auditor has abandoned all pretext of faithfully performing her statutory responsibilities in favor of using her office for pure political self-promotion and electioneering,” House Speaker Ron Mariano said in a statement on Monday in response to the report.

    “The Auditor should instead be focusing on her statutorily mandated reviews, as she continues to underperform her predecessors in the completion of that important work,” he added.

    DiZoglio launched her review of the Legislature more than a year ago but said she hasn’t been able to get access to individuals and records her office needs for a forensic investigation.

    Mariano, a Quincy Democrat, and Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, have so far blocked her efforts to conduct the investigation into the House and Senate’s inner workings, calling the proposed audit “unconstitutional” and claiming it would violate the separation of powers.

    DiZoglio has framed the plan as part of a broader effort to improve transparency and accountability in Legislature, which is continuously ranked as one of the least effective and least transparent legislative bodies in the country. It is also one of only four state Legislatures that exempts itself from public records laws, DiZoglio points out.

    The effort was dealt a blow last year when Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office rejected DiZoglio’s request to file a lawsuit to force the audit, saying a review of state laws, judicial rulings and the historical record, suggests she doesn’t have standing to file the legal challenge.

    A panel of six lawmakers who reviewed the proposal issued a report concluding that passage of Question 1 would “undermine the separation of powers between the branches of government.” The report included testimony from constitutional scholars and civics educators who oppose the move.

    Despite that, recent polls have shown voters strongly support Question 1 — one of five referendums on the Nov. 5 ballot — which hasn’t drawn any organized opposition.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State Auditor Diana DiZoglio is hitting the road to rally voter support for her ballot campaign to open up the state Legislature’s financial books.

    DiZoglio said she plans to begin a 141-mile trek across Massachusetts to raise awareness of Question 1, which asks voters in the election Nov. 5 to approve a performance and financial audit of the state Legislature.

    She argues that the audit would ensure the Legislature is operating in accordance with government rules and regulations.

    The Methuen Democrat’s “Walking for Sunshine” sojourn was to get underway Friday night in Great Barrington, where she was to meet supporters at a local bar before hitting the long road to Boston.

    DiZoglio said she will meet with voters at nightly events along the way and urge them to “demand greater transparency for the state Legislature” by approving the referendum.

    DiZoglio, a former state lawmaker, launched her review of the Legislature more than a year ago but said she has not been able to receive access to the people and records her office needs for a forensic investigation. She has framed the plan as part of a broader effort to improve transparency and accountability in state government.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano, D-Quincy, and Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, have so far blocked her efforts to conduct the investigation of the House and Senate’s inner workings, calling the proposed audit “unconstitutional” and claiming it would violate the separation of powers.

    The effort was dealt a blow last year when Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office rejected DiZoglio’s request to file a lawsuit to force the audit, saying a review of state laws, judicial rulings and the historical record suggests she does not have standing to file the legal challenge.

    But DiZoglio and other supporters gathered enough signatures from voters to put the question on the November ballot.

    “We believe taxpayers deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent, and they deserve transparency, accessibility and accountability from elected officials,” the Yes on 1 campaign said in a statement.

    “But instead of taking meaningful action that makes life better in the Commonwealth, they continue to be characterized as one of the least efficient, least productive legislatures in the country, plagued by late-night horse trading and closed-door discussions, with constituencies cut out of the process.”

    The state’s restrictive records law consistently earns Massachusetts failing grades from First Amendment groups.

    In 2016, the state overhauled its public records law for the first time in decades, limiting how much state and local governments and police departments may charge for public records and setting deadlines for agencies to respond to requests for information, among other changes.

    But lawmakers left in place many of the exemptions shielding the Legislature, courts and law enforcement agencies from disclosing certain records.

    Recent polls have shown voters strongly support for Question 1 – one of five referendums on the November ballot – which so far has not drawn any organized opposition.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    DiZoglio hits road to promote ballot question

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State Auditor Diana DiZoglio is hitting the road to rally voter support for her ballot campaign to open up the state Legislature’s financial books.

    DiZoglio said she plans to begin a 141-mile trek across Massachusetts to raise awareness for Question 1, which asks voters in the Nov. 5 elections to approve a performance and financial audit of the state Legislature, which she argues will ensure that it is operating in accordance with government rules and regulations.

    The Methuen Democrat’s “Walking for Sunshine” sojourn gets underway Friday night in Great Barrington, where she will meet supporters at a local bar before hitting the long road to Boston.

    DiZoglio said she will meet with voters at nightly events along the way and urge them to “demand greater transparency for the state Legislature” by approving the referendum.

    A former state lawmaker, DiZoglio launched her review of the Legislature more than a year ago but said she hasn’t been able to get access to individuals and records her office needs for a forensic investigation. She has framed the plan as part of a broader effort to improve transparency and accountability in state government.

    House Speaker Ron Mariano, D-Quincy, and Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, have so far blocked her efforts to conduct the investigation into the House and Senate’s inner workings, calling the proposed audit “unconstitutional” and claiming it would violate the separation of powers.

    The effort was dealt a blow last year when Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office rejected DiZoglio’s request to file a lawsuit to force the audit, saying a review of state laws, judicial rulings and the historical record, suggests she doesn’t have standing to file the legal challenge.

    But DiZoglio and other supporters gathered enough signatures from voters to put the question on the November ballot.

    “We believe taxpayers deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent, and they deserve transparency, accessibility and accountability from elected officials,” the Yes on 1 campaign said in a statement. “But instead of taking meaningful action that makes life better in the Commonwealth, they continue to be characterized as one of the least efficient, least productive legislatures in the country, plagued by late-night horse trading and closed-door discussions, with constituencies cut out of the process.”

    The state’s restrictive records law consistently earns Massachusetts failing grades from First Amendment groups.

    In 2016, the state overhauled its public records law for the first time in decades, limiting how much state and local governments and police departments may charge for public records and setting deadlines for agencies to respond to requests for information, among other changes.

    But lawmakers left in place many of the exemptions shielding the Legislature, courts and law enforcement agencies from disclosing certain records.

    Recent polls have shown voters strongly support for Question 1 — one of five referendums on the November ballot — which so far hasn’t drawn any organized opposition.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Poll shows support for ballot questions

    Poll shows support for ballot questions

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A slim majority of Massachusetts voters support proposals to boost the wages of tipped workers, audit the state Legislature, allow ride-hailing drivers to unionize and legalize psychedelic mushrooms, but are more divided over a plan to scrap the MCAS graduation mandate, according to a new poll.

    The University of New Hampshire survey, which polled more than 500 voters from Sept. 12-16, found about 51% support Question 1, which asks voters in the Nov. 5 election to approve a performance and financial audit of the Legislature.

    Only 10% of those surveyed said they plan to vote no on Question 1, according to the UNH poll, while 39% said they either didn’t know about the proposal or don’t have an opinion.

    The measure was proposed by Auditor Diana DiZoglio, a Methuen Democrat and former state lawmaker whose efforts to audit the House and Senate have been blocked by legislative leaders who argue the move is unconstitutional.

    Question 3, which would authorize Uber, Lyft and other ride-hailing drivers to unionize and bargain collectively for better wages and benefits, is also backed by a slim majority of voters, with 48% saying they will vote yes and 28% saying they will vote no. At least 24% were unsure, pollsters said.

    About 51% said they support Question 4 which would, if approved, decriminalize psilocybin and other psychedelic substances and allow adults 21 and older to use the drugs under supervision at licensed centers. At least 20% of those polled said they will vote no while 28% said they didn’t know about the proposal or didn’t have an opinion.

    Meanwhile, a similar percentage of those polled said they support Question 5, which calls for paying tipped workers the state’s minimum wage $15 per hour, with 55% of voters who participated saying they plan to vote yes on the referendum and 33% opposed. About 15% said they didn’t know.

    But UNH pollsters found that voters were more divided over Question 2, which calls for scraping the decades-old mandate requiring high school students to pass the MCAS exams to graduate. About 40% of those polled say they plan for vote no while 38% said they plan for vote yes on Question 2. About 22% said they were unsure.

    If voters approve Question 2, students would still need to take the 10th-grade MCAS exams but they would no longer need to earn a passing score or other state approval. School districts would instead set their own criteria for graduation based on statewide educational standards, but would not be required to use high-stakes exams.

    Backers of the proposal, which include the Massachusetts Teachers Association, argue that the MCAS testing isn’t a complete picture of a student’s abilities and often leaves behind those who do not pass the test.

    Critics of Question 2, including the Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education, argue that the exams are necessary to expose inequities among students and school districts, measure trends in student outcomes, and gauge readiness for college and the workplace.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link