ReportWire

Tag: Diabetes

  • Pfizer to discontinue twice-daily weight loss pill due to high rates of adverse side effects

    Pfizer to discontinue twice-daily weight loss pill due to high rates of adverse side effects

    [ad_1]

    Pfizer on Friday said it would stop developing the twice-daily version of its experimental weight loss pill after obese patients taking the drug lost significant weight but had trouble tolerating the drug in a mid-stage clinical study

    The drugmaker observed high rates of adverse side effects, which were mostly mild and gastrointestinal, among patients. A significant share of patients also stopped taking the drug.

    “At this time, twice-daily danuglipron formulation will not advance into Phase 3 studies,” the company said.

    But Pfizer said it still plans to release phase two trial data on a once-a-day version of the drug in the first half of 2024, which will “inform a path forward.” The pharmaceutical giant will wait to see that data before deciding whether to start a phase three study on the once-daily pill, which Wall Street views as the more competitive form of the treatment.

    Shares of Pfizer fell 4% in premarket trading Friday after it announced the trial results.

    Still, the data on the twice-daily drug is a blow to Pfizer’s hopes to win a $10 billion slice of the booming weight loss drug market, which CEO Albert Bourla has said could grow to $90 billion. The company is betting on a successful weight loss pill to help it rebound from plummeting demand for its Covid products and a roughly 40% share price drop this year. 

    But investors have been pessimistic about Pfizer’s potential in the weight loss drug space since the company scrapped a different once-daily pill in June and proceeded with the less attractive danuglipron. Now, Friday’s data puts Pfizer even further behind the dominant players in the weight loss drug market, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, which are racing to develop more convenient pill versions of their blockbuster weight loss and diabetes injections. 

    Pfizer’s phase two trial on its twice-daily pill followed around 600 obese adults who did not have Type 2 diabetes. The trial examined the drug’s effect on weight loss after 26 or 32 weeks, at different dosage amounts ranging from 40 milligrams to 200 milligrams.

    Like Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy and Ozempic, Pfizer’s pill works by mimicking a hormone produced in the gut called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when a person is full.

    Pfizer said the trial on danuglipron met the primary goal of demonstrating “statistically significant” reductions in body weight.

    Patients who took the pill twice a day lost 6.9% to 11.7% of their body weight on average at 32 weeks, and from 4.8% to 9.4% at 26 weeks.

    Meanwhile, patients on a placebo gained 1.4% of their body weight at 32 weeks and 0.17% at 26 weeks.

    When adjusting for the difference between the weight gain observed in patients who took the placebo, Pfizer’s twice-daily pill caused 8% to 13% weight loss on average at 32 weeks and 5% to 9.5% at 26 weeks.

    The company said high rates of adverse events were observed among patients in the study, with up to 73% experiencing nausea, up to 47% vomiting and up to 25% experiencing diarrhea. More than 50% of patients across all dose sizes stopped taking the pill, compared to roughly 40% among those on the placebo, according to Pfizer.

    No new safety issues were observed, and danuglipron was not associated with increased liver enzymes like Pfizer’s other discontinued weight loss pill.

    Data from the phase two trial will be presented at a future scientific conference or published in a peer-reviewed journal.

    Wall Street’s expectations

    The tolerability issues align with some analysts’ predictions ahead of the data release. 

    Leerink Partners analyst David Risinger wrote in a Monday note that the proportion of patients who discontinue treatment with Pfizer’s twice-daily danuglipron in the phase two trial would likely be higher than those who stopped taking a once-daily pill from Eli Lilly.

    By comparison, 10% to 21% of patients who took Eli Lilly’s pill, orforglipron, in a mid-stage trial discontinued the treatment at 32 weeks due to adverse side effects, he noted.

    Risinger said that’s likely because danuglipron’s total daily dose is far higher, which may cause more adverse effects. Patients on the highest dose size of Pfizer’s pill took 400 milligrams each day, while those on the highest dosage of Eli Lilly’s drug took 45 milligrams a day.

    Pfizer’s phase-two trial also didn’t allow downtitration, or decreasing the dose of a drug over time once a specific response has been achieved. Eli Lilly’s mid-stage trial on its pill did. 

    There is hope that patients will better tolerate the once-daily version of danuglipron compared to the twice-daily form. Pfizer appears to believe a once-daily version of the drug could lessen gastrointestinal side effects, according to some analysts.

    They pointed to Pfizer’s second-quarter earnings call, when the company’s chief scientific officer, Mikael Dolsten, suggested that a once-daily version may improve a patient’s tolerability of the drug, which could lessen the gastrointestinal side effects “that have been seen as limiting” danuglipron.

    But the effects will be unclear until the mid-stage trial data is released next year.

    Notably, the weight loss caused by twice-daily danuglipron appeared to fall short of analysts’ expectations. 

    Ahead of the data release, several analysts said Pfizer’s twice-daily pill has to be about as effective as Eli Lilly’s once-a-day pill to be competitive. That means at least a 14% to 15% weight loss, Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Louise Chen told CNBC earlier this month.

    Risinger also wrote in October that Pfizer’s danuglipron needs to show weight reduction in the “mid-teens” percentages to be considered competitive with Eli Lilly’s pill. 

    Obese or overweight patients who took 45 milligrams of Eli Lilly’s pill once a day lost up to 14.7% of their body weight, or 34 pounds, after 36 weeks, according to the company’s phase-two trial results.

    Eli Lilly’s results appear consistent with the weight reduction caused by a high-dose oral version of Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide – the active ingredient used in the diabetes drug Ozempic and weight loss treatment Wegovy – but came over a shorter trial period.

    More than 2 in 5 adults have obesity, according to the National Institutes of Health. About 1 in 11 adults have severe obesity.

    Clarification: This story was updated to reflect that some weight-loss data was adjusted to include results from the placebo group.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A ‘game-changing’ study backs Wegovy use to cut heart attacks and strokes: ‘This is not just about weight and appearance’

    A ‘game-changing’ study backs Wegovy use to cut heart attacks and strokes: ‘This is not just about weight and appearance’

    [ad_1]

    Novo Nordisk A/S unveiled details from a closely watched study that support use of Wegovy, its blockbuster weight-loss drug, to cut heart attacks and strokes in obesity patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.

    People taking the highest dose of Wegovy saw a drop in blood sugar levels and inflammation — two harbingers of heart disease — that help explain the 20% reduction in cardiovascular events that Novo reported in August. While none of the patients had diabetes, two-thirds started the study with blood sugar levels in the prediabetic range, which is associated with a higher risk of heart disease and death. Patients also saw significant reductions in blood pressure.

    Three-quarters of patients had suffered heart attacks before the study began and a quarter had heart failure. In this highly vulnerable population, the results help cement the argument for using Novo’s drug as a heart treatment alongside statins and blood pressure therapies. Patients on Wegovy also lost weight in the trial.

    The results, presented on Saturday at the American Heart Association’s annual conference in Philadelphia, are “game-changing,” Eugene Yang, the chair of the American College of Cardiology’s prevention section, said in an interview. The room at the city’s Convention Center erupted into several rounds of applause when the data were presented.

    Heart disease is the number one killer in the US and accounts for about a third of deaths globally. While obesity is known to raise the risk for such ailments, Novo’s trial was designed to show whether Wegovy could ward off future heart attacks and strokes in people with established cardiovascular disease.

    Novo said it will seek expanded US approval for reducing risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in adults with a body mass index, or BMI, of 27 or higher and established cardiovascular disease.

    Read More: All About the New Obesity Drugs Causing a Big Stir

    “Increasingly, physicians are understanding that this is not just about weight and appearance,” Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen, Novo’s chief executive officer, said in an interview on Friday before the details were released. “It’s about real health benefits.”

    Weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy, which increased sales more than 700% last quarter, have become a phenomenon this year. Celebrities are touting their benefits, while investors handicap how much they will disrupt a wide swath of sectors that includes apparel companies, restaurants and packaged food producers. Novo is already struggling to keep up with demand. And competition is increasing with Eli Lilly & Co. just receiving approval for its weight-loss drug, Zepbound.

    However, the drugs are expensive. Zepbound will cost about $1,050 for a month’s supply, which is cheaper than Wegovy’s monthly list price of roughly $1,350. The cost is a barrier to widespread access, Yang said. Based on the trial results, to prevent one heart attack or cardiovascular death, 67 people will need to be treated with Wegovy for almost three years and four months, according to a Bloomberg analysis. At list prices, this would cost $3.8 million.

    Along with reducing weight, blood sugar control and anti-inflammatory effects are likely what’s driving the benefit for heart disease shown in the study, Martin Holst Lange, Novo’s development chief, said in an interview. In the trial of more than 17,600 overweight and obese adults who were 45 and older, taking Wegovy lowered body weight by an average of 9.4% over two years, compared to a less than 1% loss in the placebo group. The treatment group also saw reduced weight circumference and blood pressure that’s often associated with shedding pounds.

    At the same time, blood sugar fell into a healthy range in two-thirds of those treated. That was enough to ward off diabetes in about 70% of patients. C-reactive protein, a liver product that’s linked to inflammation, fell about 40% among those taking Wegovy.

    Only 28% of the patients in the trial were women and just 4% were Black, meaning the results may not translate to those populations, according to the ACC’s Yang. About 17% of the patients in the trial stopped taking Wegovy due to side effects. The most common cause was gastrointestinal issues, which were responsible for most of the discontinuations.

    — With assistance from Robert Langreth

    Subscribe to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up for free today.

    [ad_2]

    Madison Muller, Naomi Kresge, Bloomberg

    Source link

  • Antibodies to Cow’s Milk Linked to Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Death

    Antibodies to Cow’s Milk Linked to Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Death

    [ad_1]

    BYLINE: Analyses led by Corinne Keet, MD, PhD, at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, of two longitudinal studies reveal how an increased level of an antibody called immunoglobin (IgE) to cow’s milk is associated to cardiovascular-related death.

    Newswise — CHAPEL HILL, NC – Sensitivity to common food allergens such as cow’s milk and peanuts could be an important and previously unappreciated cause of heart disease, new research suggests – and the increased risk for cardiovascular death includes people without obvious food allergies.

    In a paper published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology that describes analyses led by Corinne Keet, MD, PhD, pediatric allergy and immunology professor in the UNC Department of Pediatrics of two longitudinal studies, the authors show that the people who produced IgE antibodies to cow’s milk and other foods were at significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. This was true even when traditional risk factors for heart disease, such as smoking, high blood pressure, and diabetes were accounted for. The strongest link was for cow’s milk, but IgE to other allergens such as peanut and shrimp were also significant among those who eat the foods.

    This troubling finding represents the first time that IgE antibodies to common foods have been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, the researchers report. The findings do not conclusively prove that food antibodies are causing the increased risk, but the work builds on previous studies connecting allergic inflammation and heart disease.

    “People who had an antibody called IgE to foods that they regularly eat seemed to be at increased risk for dying from heart disease,” said Keet, who is the corresponding author of the paper. “We were surprised by these findings because it is very common to have IgE to foods (about 15% of American adults have IgE to common food allergens), and most people don’t have any symptoms when they eat the food. As allergists, our thinking has been that it is not important if people have IgE to foods, as long as they don’t have symptoms when they eat the food,” she said.

    Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and an AAAAI Faculty Development Award to her collaborator Jeff Wilson at the University of Virginia, this research used two methods to examine the association between IgE sensitization to foods and cardiovascular mortality. Data from 4,414 adults who participated in The National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES) and 960 participants in the Wake Forest site of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort were used. Participants were enrolled in MESA from 2000-2002 and followed for up to 19 years. Participants were enrolled in NHANES from 2005 to 2006 and data on mortality up to 14 years were tracked. Total and specific IgE was measured to cow’s milk, egg, peanut, shrimp, and a panel of aeroallergens for the NHANES group. IgE to cow’s milk, alpha-gal, peanut, dust mite and timothy grass were measured in the MESA group. In NHANES, 229 cardiovascular deaths were recorded and 960 deaths from MESA were also reported. Milk sensitization was particularly associated in both NHANES & MESA. Researchers also discovered that food sensitization to shrimp and peanut were both additional risk factors for heart disease.

    It is also important to note that associations in the findings related to food sensitization rather than clinical allergy. Although researchers did not have access to information about clinical food allergy in either cohort, they expect that individuals who report regularly eating a food allergen on food frequency questionnaires were not showing symptoms of a food allergy. Thus, the findings that showed how associations were strengthened when researchers excluded those who avoided the food suggest that these findings were most relevant to those who have not been diagnosed with food allergy. Keet says the results raise questions about whether these apparently non-allergic individuals may have long-term consequences from consuming foods to which they are sensitized.

    The study states that aside from two recent reports linking IgE to the unusual carbohydrate allergen alpha-gal to coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease had not previously been identified as a long-term complication of food sensitization. However, there is now substantial evidence for the importance of allergic-type immune pathways in normal cardiac physiology and heart disease. Because discovering the link between milk sensitization with cardiovascular mortality is new, Keet says there’s more to explore as far as the relevance of food sensitization and diet in cardiovascular disease development.

    “More research needs to be done about how sensitization to common food allergens is related to cardiovascular disease,” she said. “While this study provides good evidence of an association between sensitization to these allergens and death from cardiovascular disease, there is much work to be done to understand if this is a causal relationship.”

    Media contact: Brittany T. Phillips, Communications Specialist, UNC Health | UNC School of Medicine

     

    [ad_2]

    University of North Carolina Health Care System

    Source link

  • Real-World Analysis of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients

    Real-World Analysis of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients

    [ad_1]

    Highlights

    • Compared with kidney transplant recipients who did not receive sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, those treated with the medications had lower risks of experiencing kidney transplant failure, kidney transplant rejection, major adverse cardiac events, all-cause mortality, and genitourinary infections.
    • Results from the study will be presented at ASN Kidney Week 2023 November 1–November 5. 

    Newswise — Philadelphia, PA (November 4, 2023) Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lower blood sugar levels and have additional beneficial effects on kidney and heart health for individuals with and without diabetes, but little is known about the safety and efficacy of these medications in kidney transplant recipients. Research that examined this will be presented at ASN Kidney Week 2023 November 1–November 5.

    For the study, investigators analyzed the electronic medical records of 3,450 adult kidney transplant recipients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors who were matched to 3,450 similar patients who did not receive SGLT2 inhibitors, using a statistical technique called propensity matching adjusted for demographic data, baseline heart disease and blood test.

    Kidney transplant patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors were 59%, 64%, 33%, and 40% less likely to experience kidney transplant rejection, kidney transplant failure, major adverse cardiac events, and mortality, respectively, over 3 years. They were also 44% less likely to experience urinary tract infections.

    “To date, all major SGLT2 inhibitor studies have excluded kidney transplant patients. This study was the largest observational study demonstrating the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with kidney transplants,” said corresponding author Nageen, Anwar, MD, of the Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. “This study is a big step towards qualifying transplant patients to benefit from the many positive effects of SGLT2 inhibitor use and sets the precedence for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the long-term kidney and cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in kidney transplant patients.” 

    Study: “Outcomes Associated with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Real-World Analysis Using a Global Federated Database” 

    The world’s premier nephrology meeting, ASN Kidney Week, brings together approximately 12,000 kidney professionals from across the world. The largest nephrology meeting provides participants with exciting and challenging opportunities to exchange knowledge, learn the latest scientific and medical advances, and listen to engaging and provocative discussions with leading experts in the field.

    About ASN

    Since 1966, ASN has been leading the fight to prevent, treat, and cure kidney diseases throughout the world by educating health professionals and scientists, advancing research and innovation, communicating new knowledge and advocating for the highest quality care for patients. ASN has nearly 21,000 members representing 140 countries. For more information, visit www.asn-online.org and follow us on Facebook, X, LinkedIn, and Instagram.

     

    # # #

     

     

    [ad_2]

    American Society of Nephrology (ASN)

    Source link

  • Usher uses first Super Bowl performance as ‘cheat sheet’ for 2024 show and urges diabetes screening

    Usher uses first Super Bowl performance as ‘cheat sheet’ for 2024 show and urges diabetes screening

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — While Usher gears up for his 2024 Super Bowl halftime performance, the singer will lean on his previous experience of hitting the NFL’s biggest stage to help prepare for the 13-minute set.

    The Grammy winner said he’s using his appearance with Black Eyed Peas frontman will.i.am in 2011 as a “cheat sheet.” He was recently chosen to headline the halftime festivities from Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas on Feb. 11 — the same day he’s expected to release his ninth studio album “Coming Home.”

    “I got a chance to see a bit of what it felt like,” Usher told The Associated Press in a recent interview. In his first Super Bowl performance, he descended from the stadium ceiling to perform “OMG” in Arlington, Texas.

    Usher’s appearance lasted less than two minutes, but the moment gave him plenty of insight into conducting a show with such limited time. His album “Confessions” ranks among one of the best-selling music projects of all time and launched No. 1 hits such as “Yeah!” with Ludacris and Lil Jon, “Burn” and “Confessions Part II.” He’s had other hits such as “U Got It Bad,” “U Remind Me,” “You Make Me Wanna” and “Love in the Club” — lots of material to cover during one of the year’s biggest cultural moments.

    “Don’t take the moments for granted because you only get 13 of them,” said the singer, who is currently headlining his “Usher: My Way” sold-out residency in Las Vegas. “The hardest part is trying to figure out how to squeeze it all in when you actually have a large catalog, or a lot of records people celebrate and love.”

    Usher called his musical opportunities to perform part of “God’s plan to entertain the world.” As he prepares for the Super Bowl stage, the singer is taking a moment to bring awareness to early Type 1 diabetes screening through The 1 Pledge movement, which launched Wednesday.

    Usher’s child was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes at age 6 in 2014. He wants to urge those to get screened as early as possible.

    “Had I known about this opportunity early, I would feel better,” said Usher, who is a paid spokesperson of the healthcare company Sanofi on the ad campaign. “There’s a range of things that you have to get acclimated to like identifying the doctors, the philosophy of how you want to live your life and manage you blood glucose levels.”

    He added: “It’s not just a journey for the child. It’s a journey for the entire family.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I tried the carnivore diet, it had unexpected health benefits

    I tried the carnivore diet, it had unexpected health benefits

    [ad_1]

    Have you ever wondered about alternative methods for managing chronic conditions like arthritis obesity or even diabetes? In my quest for answers, I often overlooked unconventional approaches; solutions that were right in front of me.

    As a long-time diagnosed diabetic, managing my blood sugar levels had become a daily battle. After following my doctor’s recommended diet and constantly monitoring my glucose levels, I was left feeling overwhelmed and frustrated.

    That’s when I stumbled upon the carnivore diet, a unique eating plan that revolves around consuming only animal-based products.

    Anthony Girouard tried the carnivore diet. He said it turned his diabetes around, gave him greater mental clarity, and he dropped 30lbs in weight.
    Anthony Girouard

    I don’t remember exactly when I first saw the carnivore diet, but I vividly recall reaching out to YouTube for answers. Being someone who has always had a curious mind, but always followed my doctor’s recommendations, I was immediately drawn to this controversial way of eating.

    The idea of consuming solely animal products seemed both enticing and strange, prompting a flurry of questions in my mind. What fascinated me most about the carnivore diet was its direct opposition to conventional nutritional wisdom.

    For years, my doctors have consistently recommended a low-fat diet approach as the key to controlling my diabetes, so it was refreshing—and slightly perplexing—to see an alternative perspective gaining traction. Could it be possible that they have been wrong all along?

    I was intrigued by the idea of reversing my diabetes naturally, so I decided to try this unconventional diet to see if it was the answer I’ve searched for.

    When I first decided to try the diet, I had mixed feelings. On the one hand, I was curious about its potential health benefits, but on the other I couldn’t help but wonder if it would be too restrictive or even sustainable in the long run.

    To my surprise, the first couple of weeks were quite challenging as my body adjusted to the drastic changes, but soon enough I found myself enjoying the simplicity of the diet.

    The meals I relied on were uncomplicated, yet satisfying. Each morning, I delighted in the classic combination of crispy bacon and eggs scrambled in rich butter. And when it came to dinner, I indulged in juicy beef patties adorned generously with a dollop of creamy butter.

    The first few months were the most challenging and the most physically demanding. Initially, my body did struggle to adapt to the different nutritional profile. I experienced flu-like symptoms, digestive problems, fatigue, headaches, and brain fog.

    Adapting to a diet without carbohydrates initially drained my body’s energy levels and it took about three months for my system to get back on track.

    The fourth month brought some unexpected benefits that I couldn’t have foreseen. Apart from the initial weight loss and increased energy levels, which I did expect, I noticed a significant improvement in my mental health.

    As someone who has struggled with concentration issues, this newfound clarity cannot be overstated. Problems that seemed overwhelming before became more manageable. It’s as if a veil has been lifted, allowing me to approach things with a renewed sense of purpose and capability.

    My mind felt like a well-oiled machine ready to tackle anything thrown its way. Furthermore, it was during this time that I began to embrace the simplicity and convenience of the carnivore lifestyle in a world filled with complicated diets and countless food restrictions.

    Being able to rely solely on animal-based products for nutrition provided a sense of ease and freedom. I no longer worry about measuring portions or obsess over calorie counting. It’s just pure simplicity in every meal.

    I was astonished when I stepped on the scale and saw that after six months, I had lost a whopping 30lbs overall. It was incredible to think that my efforts to control my diabetes led to such a significant drop in weight.

    The best part was that I wasn’t even trying to lose weight—it was simply a pleasant side effect of the diet.

    Initially, my main focus was on managing my diabetes. I wanted to take control of my blood sugar levels. Little did I know that this journey would also lead to shedding those extra pounds that had been weighing me down for years.

    As I entered the seventh month of the diet, my weight loss had plateaued. I was expecting to see the same pattern in terms of weight loss and increased energy levels. However, that wasn’t the case. But what came as a complete surprise were other benefits that started popping up.

    First, I noticed a significant Improvement in the quality of my sleep. Gone were the days of tossing and turning. Now I fell asleep quickly and woke up feeling refreshed. This newfound restfulness had a profound impact on my overall health.

    Another unexpected benefit during these months was a noticeable reduction in inflammation throughout my body. Not only did my chronic joint pain diminish drastically, but also things like itchy skin and my high glucose level seemed to vanish overnight.

    It was an unbelievable moment when I realized I could finally let go of my diabetes medication. I went from taking 2,000 milligrams of Metformin twice a day to no diabetes medication at all. This alone solidifies my dedication to this unconventional diet.

    The transition to an all-meat diet has left me quite sensitive to other foods. After a year of mostly eating meat, I have noticed that whenever I deviate and include any type of processed food, I experience issues.

    It’s as if my palette has become finely tuned and even the smallest traces of additives or toxic ingredients trigger rashes, bloating, digestive discomfort, and fatigue.

    This newfound sensitivity forced me to re-evaluate not only my dietary choices but also how I approach food in general. Gone are the days when I could mindlessly indulge in various culinary delights without consequences. Instead, every decision has become deliberate and purposeful, weighing potential repercussions against momentary pleasures.

    While I initially had doubts about the diet’s sustainability and health implications, I was pleasantly surprised by the positive changes it has brought to my overall health.

    It’s important to acknowledge that this diet may not be suitable for everyone, especially those with certain medical conditions or perhaps ethical concerns. Before embarking on any dietary change, it’s crucial to consult with a health care professional for personalized advice.

    Ultimately, this past year highlights to me the importance of personalized nutrition and the need to find a diet that suits an individual’s needs and goals.

    Anthony Girouard is exploring his journey with the carnivore diet through his YouTube channel.

    All views expressed in the article are the author’s own.

    Do you have a unique experience or personal story to share? Email the My Turn team at myturn@newsweek.com.