ReportWire

Tag: Dermot Mulroney

  • Dermot Mulroney Says He “Didn’t Work for a Year” Due to ‘My Best Friend’s Wedding’ Movie Poster

    Dermot Mulroney Says He “Didn’t Work for a Year” Due to ‘My Best Friend’s Wedding’ Movie Poster

    [ad_1]

    Dermot Mulroney said he knows what’s to blame for not landing another acting role for a year following 1997’s My Best Friend’s Wedding.

    The actor, who starred alongside Julia Roberts, Cameron Diaz and Rupert Everett in the Oscar-nominated rom-com, recently told The New York Times that he had few acting opportunities following its release, despite it being a successful film.

    “I was sitting there ready for the gift with purchase that was supposed to come along with being in a popular movie, and instead, I probably didn’t work for a year,” Mulroney explained. “I chalked it up to me being so tiny on the poster, the little guy on the cake. I thought, gosh, you guys, if you’d made me a little bigger, maybe I could have gotten a job.”

    My Best Friend’s Wedding, directed by P.J. Hogan, follows a woman who realizes she’s in love with her long-time friend after he announces he’s engaged, leading her to try and win him over just days before the wedding.

    However, Mulroney still found a way to continue his Hollywood career after the hit 1997 movie, going on to star in dozens of other projects. And recently, he returned to the romantic comedy genre with Anyone But You, playing Bea’s (Sydney Sweeney) father.

    As a rom-com veteran, he also told the Times that he shared some advice with the movie’s other lead, Glen Powell, about the impact of those types of movies.

    “I didn’t want him to do what I did, which was minimize how important something is that might feel a little light or a little fluff when you’re doing it,” Mulroney said. “‘What these movies mean to people,’ I told Glen, ‘will last for decades.’ It will last until after you’re gone in a way that maybe the other cool stuff he’s doing won’t. It has a different kind of absorption.”

    [ad_2]

    Carly Thomas

    Source link

  • Postcards from Sydney (Australia and Sweeney)

    Postcards from Sydney (Australia and Sweeney)

    [ad_1]

    It’s no secret that the rom-com is an ever-dying genre. One that’s harder and harder to “spoon-feed” audiences that have gotten both younger and more jaded. The last generation to truly “revere” (or at least appreciate) the art of the rom-com (and it is far more of an art than people give it credit for) is probably millennials. Sydney Sweeney, however, is not quite a millennial, having missed the cutoff by just a year. But perhaps as a “geriatric Gen Zer,” she identifies more with the millennial heart, hence her commitment to the role of Beatrice a.k.a. “Bea” (a name that no one who is twenty-six years old would ever have, but 1) it’s a nod to Much Ado About Nothing and 2) that’s the least of one’s suspension-of-disbelief worries). A character given life by co-screenwriters Ilana Wolpert and Will Gluck (who hasn’t written a rom-com since 2011’s Friends With Benefits (itself a foil to No Strings Attached, released earlier the same year; and weirdly, Justin Timberlake probably should have starred in that film instead since NSYNC titled their 2000 album the same thing). And since Anyone But You is earnest about “bringing back the rom-com,” Bea is someone who wastes no time walking right into a meet-cute. 

    While more conventional rom-coms might wait a few scenes instead of just “raw dogging” their audience like that with a meet-cute, Anyone But You takes the plunge for a “good” reason: Bea and the object of her affection, Ben (Glen Powell), are about to hate each other far more than they ever like each other for the brief twelve or so hours they spend on a date. This after Ben does her a solid by pretending she’s his wife so she can jump the line at the coffee shop to be able to buy something, therefore use the bathroom. Then, of course, further hijinks ensue because the sink ends up spraying her entire crotch with water so she has to air dry her jeans by taking them off. Miraculously (and because of rom-com “law”), the jeans are able to fully dry so that she can exit the bathroom without seeming like “the girl who pissed her pants” to Ben. 

    Like many beloved and, at times, “awesomely bad” rom-coms (most of them falling into the subcategory of “teen movie”) of the last few decades (including Just One of the Guys, 10 Things I Hate About You, She’s the Man and Warm Bodies), Anyone But You borrows the core of its plotline from William Shakespeare. Specifically, Much Ado About Nothing. And yet, like 10 Things I Hate About You, the film opts to “pepper in” multiple “little” Easter eggs pertaining to the British bard. For example, after Bea walks out of Ben’s apartment in the morning, there’s a wall she passes that features the manicured graffiti: “Here’s much to do with hate, but more with love.” (Maybe that’s believable enough in an “erudite” town like Boston.) This being extracted from a monologue by Romeo in The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet during which he continues on with a barrage of oxymorons: “Why, then,/O brawling love!/O loving hate!/O any thing, of nothing first create!/O heavy lightness! serious vanity!/Mis-shapen chaos of well-seeming forms!/Feather of lead, bright smoke, cold fire, sick health!/Still-waking sleep, that is not what it is!/This love feel I, that feel no love in this./Dost thou not laugh?” Gluck and Wolpert’s allusion to this monologue from Romeo is an intentional nod to the adage, “There’s a fine line between love and hate” (or “thin line,” depending on who you ask). 

    Obviously, this applies very much to the dynamic between Bea and Ben, who vacillate between the two so-called extremes at any given moment throughout the movie. As far as being anything like a “direct” adaptation of Shakespeare’s play, the crux of what Anyone But You borrows is the idea that various people, particularly one couple, are trying to convince Bea and Ben that each one is in love with the other. 

    This is done by Bea’s sister, Halle (Hadley Robertson), and Ben’s good friend, Claudia (Alexandra Shipp), the ones getting married and choosing to have a destination wedding in Sydney when they do. As for the seemingly “random” location choice on Gluck’s part, he explained to The Hollywood Reporter that it was a mere matter of funneling his love for the city into something. So it was that he stated, “I wanted Anyone But You set specifically in Sydney because I had really fallen in love with the city, starting back in 2018. After making Peter Rabbit in Sydney, I liked it so much that for Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway, I moved my whole family down there.” He also added, “Almost every time you shoot a movie in Sydney, you have to pretend it’s somewhere else and frame out the Opera House and the Harbour Bridge. For Anyone But You, I thought, ‘Why do that?’ We actually wrote this movie one hundred  percent for Sydney—very specific to the destination.” The person, maybe not so much. For Sydney Sweeney’s character could easily be played by just about any current Hollywood ingenue (of which there are surprisingly few compared to the days of 00s-era Hollywood). Except maybe Maude Apatow (a.k.a. Sweeney’s “TV sister”). In any case, Anyone But You does build on a rather lacking selection of mainstream movies set in Sydney (most of them “full-on Australian” fare like Strictly Ballroom or Muriel’s Wedding). Alluring viewers to take a trip there as much as it allures them to play “Unwritten” by Natasha Bedingfield (Gluck clearly has a thing for Bedingfield’s music if we’re also going by Easy A). 

    As for Halle and Claudia, like Bea and Ben, their names are also a callback to Much Ado About Nothing’s Claudio and Hero. The couple theoretically “at the center of it all.” Instead, though, everyone gets into the spirit of trying to manipulate Bea and Ben into falling in love. Or at least falling in like for a couple of days (though the movie, at times, feels as though it takes place over a week). Largely out of convenience and wanting to get through said wedding weekend without hearing any more of their bickering. Which is, per rom-com rules, merely just “Hepburn-Tracy”-esque “repartee” that ultimately acts as a kind of foreplay. Indeed, not giving in immediately to the temptation to fuck the “hate” away is half the fun/appeal for Bea and Ben. 

    In terms of dialogue related to that repartee, as well as the plotline itself, Anyone But You might not have the most stalwart of scripts (despite being “adapted” from the unbesmirched Shakespeare). Nor is it anywhere in the same league as rom-com classic standards like His Girl Friday or Some Like It Hot (and later, movies like Pretty Woman, Clueless [which favors a Jane Austen riff rather than a Shakespeare one], The Wedding Singer and How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days. But what it lacks in substance and “pedigree,” it makes up for in postcard-from-Sydney (Australia and Sweeney) appeal and, well, the sheer fact that it’s a rom-com at all. Because, a​​part from No Hard Feelings, there hasn’t been much in the way of recent rom-com fare for Anyone But You to compete with. In fact, people just seem grateful to bear witness to the existence of a new rom-com at all, what with their increasing unicorn status. It doesn’t have to be anything as “highfalutin” as Shakespeare either. Which Anyone But You certainly isn’t—though it does what it can to “pay tribute.” Mainly through “carefully-curated” lines inserted arbitrarily into the mouths of select characters (e.g., “Some cupids kill with arrows and some with traps”) or on signage where you least expect it (e.g., “Assume thy part in some disguise”). 

    One supposes that’s the height of “sophistication” these days when it comes to a Shakespeare “remake” (though “Shakespeare hodgepodge” seems like the more appropriate phrase—an amalgam of “little references” and “collage-like interpretations” of Shakespeare’s work). Throw in a cute koala and a song that can help a clip go viral on TikTok and, voilà, suddenly you have a hit rom-com on your hands. The song, mind you, is the aforementioned “Unwritten.” Not, say, Olivia Rodrigo’s “bad idea right?,” which soundtracks the trailer (perpetuating a “Rodrigo trend” in trailers if also having “get him back!” played during the Mean Girls 2024 trailer is an indication…but hey, Wolpert did previously work on High School Musical: The Musical: The Series, so perhaps her Olivia love goes way back). 

    Indeed, it’s been said that some people are only going to the movie to make it to the credits scene where “Unwritten” plays in all its…glory? (that can’t be the right word). Then they can film themselves with the outtakes (complete with a koala whose stoic facial expression is translated to: “Please leave me alone”). And here one thought that seeing Dermot Mulroney and Rachel Griffiths (both of whom appeared in rom-com staple My Best Friend’s Wedding) act as Bea’s parents would be enough. But alas, no one seems to remember such “little details” about rom-coms of yore. Which is how rom-coms like Anyone But You might continue to prevail if the studio system agrees to keep making and distributing them in movie theaters instead of just via online platforms. In which case, there’s going to be a need for more “destination movies” to compete with the success of this one. Which has firmly marked its territory, for better or worse, on Sydney (Australia and Sweeney).

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • New York Comes Across As Generically As Woodsboro in Scream VI

    New York Comes Across As Generically As Woodsboro in Scream VI

    [ad_1]

    For all the promotional hype surrounding the latest installment in the Scream franchise (officially poking fun at itself for having become that) and how it takes place in New York, there is surprisingly little riffing on that fact. Indeed, if one had anticipated that New York might be the “fifth character” (à la Sex and the City) among the self-described “Core Four” in Scream VI (stylized so that the Roman numeral serves as the “M” in the title), they would be sorely mistaken.

    To be blunt, the only time we really get a “taste of NYC” is during the clips deliberately accented in the trailer. Apart from those (featuring the requisite “bodega” and “subway” scenes), the closest we get to a sense of place is when Samara Weaving steps in for Drew Barrymore’s (as Casey Becker) memorable opening sequence from the original. Weaving plays Laura Crane, a woman waiting for an app-culled date at some “trendy” bar on “Hudson Street” (not really though—for even that is faked in Montreal). As the two go back and forth about how, essentially, they still feel too “uncool” for New York and places like said bar, they both state that they’ve only been in town for a matter of months. In addition, Laura makes mention of being a Film Studies professor specializing in the slasher genre. Clearly, things really have gotten too niche in our post-post-post-post-post-post-modern world. Particularly in academia (already poked fun of saliently in White Noise). After getting her to believe he’s hopelessly lost and can’t find the restaurant, soon enough, Laura’s “date” is able to lure her outside and into an alley. Of course, it’s not really Laura’s date, and it’s not even really New York either—what with so many locations filmed in Montreal.

    This includes one of the other “indelible” New York moments when Samantha “Sam” Carpenter (Melissa Barrera) and Tara Carpenter (Jenna Ortega) find themselves cornered in a bodega with the latest Ghostface. Called “Abe’s Snake Bodega” (the dead giveaway of it not being “Real New York” is that it feels the need to add “Bodega” into its name at all), the scene was shot in Montreal’s Notre-Dame-de-Grâce neighborhood. As were many others doubling as “the greatest city in the world.” Which, as usual, has shown itself to be highly recreatable in [insert other major city here]. And, contrary to popular belief, it’s not because it’s so “indelible” and “unique,” but because it has mutated into its own worst fear: the average metropolis. Something that other major cities haven’t fallen prey to quite so easily. Even San Francisco, for all the talk of the “tech bros” coming in and changing the face of the landscape with their presence, has not succumbed so effortlessly to a generic makeover as New York, particularly Manhattan and most of North Brooklyn (spreading with more and more ease to South Brooklyn and beyond).

    The vast majority of these two particular “sects” of New York have been overrun with corporate takeovers touting (unspokenly) how great it is not only to sell the city back to itself at an even higher price, but also how “necessary” it is to present the city with an array of new job opportunities for its burgeoning young workforce (emphasis on the word “young,” because that’s the demographic most willing to bend over for low-wage employment). Sam is ostensibly one of those youths, as Tara is certain to call her out for having two shitty jobs and no other real reason for being in town apart from monitoring her sister with stalker-like precision.

    To this point, Tara unwittingly brings up a larger issue about New York: that no one would ever go there without an “ambition.” That to go there “just to be there” is not only unheard of, but rather unhinged (perhaps part of the reason it’s so easy to paint Sam that way). Even as a “la-di-da” artist, it’s unfathomable to arrive in town without some cold, hard “goals.” For, unlike other cities that serve as “artistic havens,” New York isn’t solely about “being an artist” for the mere sake of it. More than any other “bohemia” hotspot, it is a place where you’re not only “supposed to” monetize your art, but where you have to if you want to actually survive without being ejected. And who could possibly want to be exiled from such a “fun” place? Where all worth and value is placed on the money you make (this capitalistic reality being on steroids compared to most other cities). In the alternate version of Scream VI that makes better use of its setting, Ghostface isn’t just out for some petty revenge on any of the remaining characters involved in the “legacy murders.” He’s also got personal beef against all of the pretentious, pseudo-influential fucks roaming the streets trying to “hustle” their so-called talents. Call him Patrick Bateman, but less arbitrary/prone to killing the poorest of the poor (a.k.a. the homeless). This making the randomness of the kills far more rife.

    Alas, some would say Kevin Williamson’s original version was never about such a message—with the core of it cutting to what Randy (Jamie Kennedy) said in the 1996 movie: “It’s the millennium. Motives are incidental.” This adding to the “fear factor” of the slasher behind the mask being anyone, at anytime. And yet, “motives” have remained decidedly not incidental for being in New York. In fact, they’ve remained steadfastly the same: you go there to “become” someone. To “make it.” Rarely, if ever, is being there about “disappearing,” as the Carpenter sisters want to do. For, despite the presence of the huddled masses, NYC is among the most visible places a person could “escape to.” Even so, its “singular” visibility (largely contributed to by everyone taking a picture of themselves on every corner where you could potentially be in the background) doesn’t mean it hasn’t long been recreatable in other locations.

    And sure, filming in more affordable environments meant to be New York is nothing new. In the 80s and 90s, Chicago easily doubled for “Gotham” (literally, in The Dark Knight’s case), even in a film like Escape From New York—with the city itself built right into the title. What’s more, look at what a series such as Friends did to recreate the town in a prophecy-like manner on a Burbank backlot. Friends, for as eye-rolled at as it is in the present, had a crystal ball-like use in foreseeing just how increasingly generic the city would become. This, in large part, thanks to stamping out all traces of the very populations that once made it unique with a little phenomenon called “eugenics of the poor.” And pretty much everyone is poor when they live in New York. The Carpenter sisters included. In effect, it has become easier and easier to bill the city as Anywhere, USA (or, in this instance, Anywhere, Canada) because it has lost all sense of the “personal touches” that once made it stand apart from garden-variety corporate infiltration.

    Even NYU has something of the “corporate effect” on the city it profits from. To that end, the university name “Blackmore” (where Tara attends)—actually Montreal’s McGill University—could very well be a dig at NYU needing to up its Black person “quota.” As for other set design details intended to “serve” New York, the use of a Chock Full o’Nuts ad at a reconstructed subway station reads, “Hipsters Like It. But Drink It Anyway.” This, of course, is meant to lend greater “authenticity” to an ersatz New York, despite the reality that “hipster” is a word that has been rendered so oversaturated that it has become meaningless and irrelevant…almost like New York itself. Another notable “subtlety” that actually has nothing to do with New York is a sign that reads, “Le Domas Financial Group.” This name being too much of a coincidence not to apply to the family moniker in Ready or Not, starring none other than the woman playing the first to be killed: Samara Weaving. But, more to the point, Scream (2022) and Scream VI’s co-directors, Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett also directed Ready or Not. Just as the co-screenwriters of Scream (2022) and Scream VI, Guy Busick and James Vanderbilt, also co-wrote Ready or Not. And yes, James is a member of that illustriously moneyed New York family, the Vanderbilts (no wonder he wrote a script like Ready or Not). So perhaps the transition to NYC as the latest Scream location was his idea.

    Whoever determined the “change-up” environment, one must ask: what was really the purpose of setting Scream VI in New York? Especially if the movie wasn’t going to maximize the erstwhile “uniqueness” of the town to its utmost. After all, a subway scene can be done in any major city (even L.A.). The same goes for filming in darkened streets and alleys. Scream VI proved that much by shooting in Montreal. Where more indelible landmarks, like the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Chrysler Building, etc. (all ideal locations for a stabbing, by the way) can’t be so effortlessly remade “in a pinch” as subway stations and a bodega. To be fair, Scream VI offered a token scene of the Carpenter sisters briefly walking around in “Central Park.” After all, that’s where the movie poster embeds the image of Ghostface’s screaming visage with an overhead shot of the park’s greenery and repositioned lakes. Nonetheless, with a tagline like “New York. New Rules,” one might have been expecting slightly more dependency on the location.

    As only the third Scream movie to take place outside of Woodsboro (with Scream 2 set at the fictional Windsor College in Ohio and Scream 3 set in Los Angeles—used with far more panache and specificity, particularly with the rapey producer angle that eerily mirrored the likes of Harvey Weinstein), the pressure on Scream VI to “really do something” with such a divergent (and non-fictional) location was perhaps too great.

    Admittedly, however, Scream is never really about location. The fact that it began in an Anywhere, USA type of town was meant to highlight that—in addition to providing the chilling idea that “nowhere is safe” (something coronavirus has made good on repeatedly since 2020)—the biggest freaks can so often live outside of major metropolises. But, as for the concept of nowhere being safe, that’s something that’s long been alive and well in NYC—at a zenith in the 1970s, complete with a pamphlet warning tourists, “Welcome to Fear City.” Indeed, the reaper-esque image that appears on the cover of the pamphlet could easily pass for Ghostface himself (call it another botched chance to pay much of any real homage to the city in which Scream VI takes place). And, to be candid, the lily-livered snowflakes who turn out to be Ghostface in Scream VI would have no chance of not getting stabbed themselves in that era that can now be referred to as Pre-Generic New York.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link