ReportWire

Tag: department of government efficiency

  • DOGE, layoffs, buyouts: How President Trump changed the federal workforce

    [ad_1]

    Before returning to the White House, President Trump campaigned on his America First agenda. He’s come through on *** lot of his campaign promises. The other side of the aisle would say that is horrible. Starting with immigration, we’re going to have the largest. Deportation of criminals in history. In 2025, the Department of Homeland Security reports its enforcement operation led to the arrest of more than 595,000 undocumented immigrants, more than all four years of the Biden administration combined. This is one where I think *** lot of Trump supporters are like, yes, this is exactly what we were looking for. We’re going to tariff the hell out of countries that have been taking advantage of us. And stealing our jobs. The president also slapped tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico, just to name *** few. The Supreme Court is now deciding whether most of those policies are constitutional. In some industries, it has in fact contributed to ongoing inflation and and in some places it may eventually help American manufacturers, but right now it’s ***, it’s *** pretty chaotic picture. Putting pen to paper, President Trump signed his so-called One Big Beautiful bill, including key pieces of his domestic agenda from various tax breaks, funds towards border and national security, and rolling back green energy investments. Wages have been somewhat stagnant. Job growth hasn’t been as pronounced as he would have liked, and of course prices are very high. Inflation remains *** problem throughout the. Past year, the president’s been largely focusing on international conflicts, *** major rebrand for his America First agenda. Well, that is actually one of the biggest things that shows up in the polling and in people’s remarks about him. They don’t like the fact that he’s spending all this time on foreign affairs, from meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, bringing back hostages from Gaza, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. and bombing Iran, voters will show how they feel come November. Donald Trump has fallen through on *** lot of promises. He has kept some, but it’s going to be up to the voters to decide whether or not he’s doing *** good job. The administration has been recently shifting its focus to the economy, which the president claims is surging despite concerns about higher prices. In Washington, I’m Rachel Hirsheimer.

    DOGE, layoffs, buyouts: How President Trump changed the federal workforce

    Updated: 8:34 AM PST Jan 20, 2026

    Editorial Standards

    Before President Donald Trump began his second administration, he vowed to reduce federal bureaucracy. Trump marks his first year back in the White House on Tuesday, during which 322,049 federal government employees have exited the workforce. It is the largest reduction of the federal workforce in the past two decades, according to data from the Office of Personnel Management. The federal government had 2.31 million employees at the end of the 2024 fiscal year, the highest number of federal employees over the past two decades. Now, the government employs 2.08 million people, about 10% less than it did in 2024 when former President Joe Biden was in office. Trump set out to complete his campaign promise on Day 1, signing an executive order creating the Department of Government Efficiency. Guided by Elon Musk, DOGE was tasked with cutting jobs to make the government more efficient. Soon after, Trump signed other executive actions to help federal departments downsize their workforces by offering buyouts, changing hiring practices, eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion offices, implementing reductions in force, and more. Federal employees received an email on Jan. 28, 2025, with the subject line “The Fork in the Road.” In the email, the Office of Personnel Management offered federal employees eight months of pay and benefits through September 2025 if they resigned from their positions. About 149,500 employees resigned from office, making up nearly half of the departures in the first year of this administration.The other top reasons for employee departures were retirement and RIFs (reductions in force); 105,900 employees retired and 10,500 were laid off. While 322,000 federal employees exited the workforce, the Trump administration hired 68,000 new employees. The Department of Defense had the highest number of employees resign and retire. Roughly 44,500 workers chose to part ways, and nearly 31,700 retired. The Department of Veteran Affairs had the second highest in both categories, with 24,700 employees choosing to resign and 15,100 retiring. Both departments account for the highest number of employees making up the federal workforce. Together, both agencies account for 54% of the workforce. Last March, the Department of Health and Human Services announced it would reduce its workforce from 82,000 full-time employees to 62,000. HHS carried out 4,437 RIFs, the most of all the departments. The U.S. Agency for International Development had the second highest with 3,677 RIFs, but USAID was the agency with the highest overall percentage decrease, seeing a reduction of its workforce by 92%. The agency went from 4,800 employees in 2024 to now having 378 employees.The only other department with a higher overall percentage reduction of its workforce was the Department of Education. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the department. The agency downsized from 4,209 full-time positions to roughly 2,500 from 2024 to 2026. Its Federal Student Aid unit lost 660 employees, the most of the department’s subagency. Other subagencies that saw large reductions were the Internal Revenue Service, which lost 19,200 employees, and the Veterans Health Administration, which downsized by 25,000 jobs. Use the Get the Facts Data Team’s tool below to see the breakdown of departments and their subagencies’ change in workforce. PHNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2phdmFzY3JpcHQiPiFmdW5jdGlvbigpeyJ1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ijt3aW5kb3cuYWRkRXZlbnRMaXN0ZW5lcigibWVzc2FnZSIsKGZ1bmN0aW9uKGUpe2lmKHZvaWQgMCE9PWUuZGF0YVsiZGF0YXdyYXBwZXItaGVpZ2h0Il0pe3ZhciB0PWRvY3VtZW50LnF1ZXJ5U2VsZWN0b3JBbGwoImlmcmFtZSIpO2Zvcih2YXIgYSBpbiBlLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdKWZvcih2YXIgcj0wO3I8dC5sZW5ndGg7cisrKXtpZih0W3JdLmNvbnRlbnRXaW5kb3c9PT1lLnNvdXJjZSl0W3JdLnN0eWxlLmhlaWdodD1lLmRhdGFbImRhdGF3cmFwcGVyLWhlaWdodCJdW2FdKyJweCJ9fX0pKX0oKTs8L3NjcmlwdD4=

    Before President Donald Trump began his second administration, he vowed to reduce federal bureaucracy. Trump marks his first year back in the White House on Tuesday, during which 322,049 federal government employees have exited the workforce.

    It is the largest reduction of the federal workforce in the past two decades, according to data from the Office of Personnel Management.

    The federal government had 2.31 million employees at the end of the 2024 fiscal year, the highest number of federal employees over the past two decades. Now, the government employs 2.08 million people, about 10% less than it did in 2024 when former President Joe Biden was in office.

    Trump set out to complete his campaign promise on Day 1, signing an executive order creating the Department of Government Efficiency. Guided by Elon Musk, DOGE was tasked with cutting jobs to make the government more efficient.

    Soon after, Trump signed other executive actions to help federal departments downsize their workforces by offering buyouts, changing hiring practices, eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion offices, implementing reductions in force, and more.

    Federal employees received an email on Jan. 28, 2025, with the subject line “The Fork in the Road.” In the email, the Office of Personnel Management offered federal employees eight months of pay and benefits through September 2025 if they resigned from their positions.

    About 149,500 employees resigned from office, making up nearly half of the departures in the first year of this administration.

    The other top reasons for employee departures were retirement and RIFs (reductions in force); 105,900 employees retired and 10,500 were laid off. While 322,000 federal employees exited the workforce, the Trump administration hired 68,000 new employees.

    The Department of Defense had the highest number of employees resign and retire. Roughly 44,500 workers chose to part ways, and nearly 31,700 retired.

    The Department of Veteran Affairs had the second highest in both categories, with 24,700 employees choosing to resign and 15,100 retiring.

    Both departments account for the highest number of employees making up the federal workforce. Together, both agencies account for 54% of the workforce.

    Last March, the Department of Health and Human Services announced it would reduce its workforce from 82,000 full-time employees to 62,000. HHS carried out 4,437 RIFs, the most of all the departments.

    The U.S. Agency for International Development had the second highest with 3,677 RIFs, but USAID was the agency with the highest overall percentage decrease, seeing a reduction of its workforce by 92%. The agency went from 4,800 employees in 2024 to now having 378 employees.

    The only other department with a higher overall percentage reduction of its workforce was the Department of Education. Back in March, Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the department.

    The agency downsized from 4,209 full-time positions to roughly 2,500 from 2024 to 2026. Its Federal Student Aid unit lost 660 employees, the most of the department’s subagency.

    Other subagencies that saw large reductions were the Internal Revenue Service, which lost 19,200 employees, and the Veterans Health Administration, which downsized by 25,000 jobs.

    Use the Get the Facts Data Team’s tool below to see the breakdown of departments and their subagencies’ change in workforce.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DOGE Cuts and Borked Code Delay Important Energy Report

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk may have left the Trump administration months ago, but his stink still lingers in just about every federal office building. The latest agency to get bogged down by the legacy of the Department of Government Efficiency is the Energy Information Administration (EIA). According to Bloomberg, the department missed the publishing time for the Weekly Petroleum Status Report, a crucial update that is closely watched by players in the energy industry.

    On paper, the delay may not seem like much. The report, which contains weekly data on the state of the US oil market, was slated for 10:30am on Monday but got pushed back until 5pm, after trading markets had closed for the day. But delays are very rare for the report, and the EIA was hit hard by DOGE cuts earlier this year. According to Bloomberg, the agency lost more than 100 of its nearly 350-person staff, leaving those remaining extremely shorthanded as they try to keep everything running smoothly.

    While the report had steadily come out on time, even through the government shutdown, an apparent coding error resulted in the delay. The report was also already technically late, though at no fault of the EIA. Instead, it got bumped from its normal Wednesday release and pushed to Monday thanks to an executive order signed by Donald Trump that declared December 24 and 26 a federal holiday. It joins other once-trusted government reports, like the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ monthly jobs report, as examples of the federal government losing its status as a reliable source of information.

    The delay, blip of a problem though it may be, is a good reminder of just how much damage was done to the underlying infrastructure of the federal government by Trump, Musk, and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. The reality is, as The Guardian recently pointed out, we still have no real idea of how much damage was done.

    Taking DOGE at its word—a dubious decision, given how unreliable its figures have been proven to be—the agency saved about $214 billion in spending by canceling federal contracts, firing workers, and closing departments. Other estimates put that closer to $16 billion, while a report from congressional Democrats suggests DOGE actually created $21.7 billion in waste. Regardless, one effect is real and easy to see: The government is smaller and working less efficiently.

    According to the Trump administration, the federal government will exit 2025 with 300,000 fewer employees than it had at the start of the year. That includes the 100 or so who left the EIA, resulting in the agency losing credibility as it struggles to continue to function. One source told Bloomberg that industries are “rolling their eyes on how inefficient and unpredictable data has become from the US government.” That seems like a bad sign.

    [ad_2]

    AJ Dellinger

    Source link

  • DOGE in review: Did the agency create opportunities for new government efficiencies in 2026? – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The “Department of Government Efficiency” was greenlighted as a means to modernize information technology and slash federal spending while improving productivity, but now that the agency has quietly disbanded, how successful was it?

    President Donald Trump greenlighted the “Department of Government Efficiency” as a means to modernize information technology and slash federal spending while improving productivity, but now that the agency has since been quietly disbanded, how successful was it?

    To find out, WTOP turned to Terry Gerton, who began hosting the Federal News Networks’ “The Federal Drive” earlier this year.

    Before joining FNN, Gerton spent her career working in and with the federal government, including eight years at the National Academy of Public Administration, which assists government leaders in building more efficient and transparent organizations. Gerton also served in the military and in the departments of Labor and Defense.

    To evaluate whether DOGE achieved its goals, Gerton said you have to start with the definition of efficiency. For some people, the bottom line is whether the government costs less — and it might be that in the short run, it does.

    The General Services Administration terminated hundreds of building leases, so they’re not paying rent. Also, fewer people now work for the federal government, although most of those people drew their full salary for the fiscal year before the layoffs and departures took effect.

    Additionally, agencies terminated many contracts, so there’s less money going out the door. But, Gerton said, many of those savings may be offset by legal costs challenging the terminations, and they may be reinstated with penalties.

    But if the definition of efficiency is making government programs work more smoothly and achieve better results, then Gerton said the uniform consensus is, no, nothing right now is working better than it was in 2024.

    Using data to make government function better

    That’s not to say there aren’t opportunities on the horizon for new government efficiencies.

    “A lot of experienced federal workers and good government groups have long argued that there are a lot of ways the government could work smarter and not harder,” Gerton said.

    “And I think as we go into 2026, there actually are some opportunities to really improve government work.”

    One option is using data better.

    Laws and regulations have always prioritized data privacy over data sharing to prevent data breaches, but for better or worse, Gerton said, DOGE broke down all the data silos.

    “As a result, there is now an opportunity to rebuild the government data system that works better for beneficiaries,” she said.

    “And the program managers can use data better to understand the commonality among their beneficiaries, design programs to meet those needs, and to make that process work more smoothly.”

    Gerton said government will still have to prioritized data privacy, but she believes there’s a real opportunity there, and that “people are really engaged in moving that forward.”

    Artificial Intelligence vs. Federal Acquisition Regulation overhaul

    The other big opportunity is the deployment of artificial intelligence. AI has been in the background for a long time, and people have been talking about what will happen with it, but it’s happening now, Gerton said.

    “Sometimes with guardrails, sometimes not, but it’s being tested in lots of different ways,” she said.

    Given how much smaller the federal workforce is right now — somewhere between 200,000 and 300,000 fewer people — Gerton said AI could streamline many processes that used to require humans and instead put humans where they really can make a difference.

    One other positive that emerged in 2025 is the overhaul of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which regulates how the government contracts for the purchase of products and services.

    Gerton said the FAR reform is getting good marks early on, although the formal rulemaking process hasn’t happened yet.

    Acquisition, she said, is one sector where AI is being rolled out quickly, helping contracting officers design and evaluate proposals and helping contractors prepare their proposals to speed up the contract award process.

    In 2026, there will be a lot of watching. Gerton said she will be keeping tabs on the planned reforms by the Office of Personnel Management to streamline the hiring process, many of which have been tried before without success, and checking the details of acquisition reform when they write the rules to see if they match the guidance.

    “Perhaps the biggest thing to watch is what role Congress will play in all of this,” she said. “Will they start to legislate to stabilize the executive branch in the federal workforce?”

    Gerton said there is hope that things will settle down into a new normal, but there are still so many decisions about what happened in 2025 to come, that much remains unresolved.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Jacobs

    Source link

  • DOGE cut jobs, but did it cut government spending? – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Did the Department of Government Efficiency deliver on its promise to cut government spending?

    Did the Department of Government Efficiency deliver on its promise to cut government spending?

    President Donald Trump’s DOGE has disbanded, but not before it cut hundreds of thousands of federal jobs in record time. But while the number of positions cut is one for the record books, Cato Institute Senior Vice President for Policy Alex Nowrasteh said that when it comes to government spending, it really didn’t make a difference.

    In the first 10 months after Trump took office, DOGE reduced federal employment by about 271,000 jobs, which is about 9% of all federal workers.

    “This is a faster and steeper decline in federal employment at any time since the demobilization of the U.S. military and economy at the end of World War II and at the Korean War,” Nowrasteh said. “It’s the biggest in peacetime, ever decline in federal workers over a 10-month period.”

    DOGE brought down federal employment to late 2014 levels over that time period, but with almost 60% of the decline in October, according to the analysis.

    “DOGE reduced federal employment enormously. It did not cut spending, and it couldn’t possibly cut spending just by firing people,” he said. “It just doesn’t show up when you take a look at the budget figures. So, for instance, spending went up in 2025 compared to 2024 and went up by about $250 billion.”

    Nowrasteh said the only likelihood to close the deficit “is by cutting the biggest programs. The biggest programs are Medicare and Social Security, Medicaid and the military.”

    The report put together by Cato, a D.C.-based libertarian think tank, did not focus on budget authority.

    When it comes to the portion of the budget that goes to federal employment, Nowrasteh said it’s only about 10%.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Valerie Bonk

    Source link

  • ‘An absolute farce’: As DOGE closes down, civil servant group gives agency a failing grade – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A nonpartisan, nongovernment organization is giving DOGE a failing grade for how it carried out its mission during its 11 months of existence.

    The Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, is officially out of business. With more than eight months left on its charter, the director of the Office of Personnel Management told Reuters, “that doesn’t exist anymore.”

    Now, a nonpartisan, nongovernment organization is giving DOGE a failing grade for how it carried out its mission during its 11 months of existence.

    “Nothing was saved in the way of money, and real harm was caused to our government’s abilities to solve big problems,” Max Stier told WTOP. He’s president and CEO of the D.C.-based Partnership for Public Service, whose mission is to inspire the next generation of civil servants to transform the way government works. “It was a ‘fire, fire, fire’ effort, rather than a ‘ready, aim fire’ effort.”

    His organization gives DOGE an “F.”

    “It was an absolute farce in terms of its fundamental purpose, which was to make our government work better, when in fact, it was an exercise an absolute destruction,” Stier said. “DOGE’s disbandment eight months early could not have come soon enough.”

    Stier said the Trump administration should have learned from “this deeply destructive and wasteful initiative” and the most important lesson was that destroying the nonpartisan federal workforce “is the exact opposite approach that our country needs to effectively improve the functioning of our government.”

    “To that end, it is encouraging that the administration appears to be ending its arbitrary and haphazard hiring freeze and reduction targets,” he said. “It is vital, however, that merit rather than loyalty be the touchstone for the civil service.”

    Stier said government leaders realized in 1883 that the so-called “spoils system” of political patronage had to be reformed and the current system has worked, with periodic reforms, for more than 150 years until DOGE was enacted.

    “Going to war with the people who are doing the work of government is a bad idea if you want a good outcome,” he added.

    It’s estimated that 300,000 people, or a little less than 10% of the federal workforce, lost their jobs during DOGE’s existence. Thousands of those jobs are in D.C., Virginia and Maryland.

    “Government is about people and what DOGE succeeded in doing was chasing away some of the very best talent we had in government to serve the American people,” Stier said.

    Before he abruptly left government in May, billionaire Elon Musk said DOGE would cut federal spending by up to $2 trillion in its first year. But DOGE’s own calculations put the number at $214 billion. Musk, who helped establish DOGE, once called DOGE “the chain saw for bureaucracy.”

    “The problems that DOGE created are going to be with us for a very long time,” Stier said, including recruiting and training the next generation of federal workers, many who will see federal service as too risky.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Dan Ronan

    Source link

  • DOGE days are over as Trump disbands Elon Musk’s team of federal cost-cutters | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration has disbanded the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, a controversial team of federal cost-cutters previously led by Elon Musk, despite months left of the unit’s mandate.

    Reuters first reported this weekend that DOGE had broken up, ending the months-long effort by Musk and his associates — many recruited from his various private-sector companies — to reduce alleged fraud and waste and cut employees across the federal government. DOGE was created by an executive order signed by President Trump in January. The initiative was expected to run for close to two years.

    As of early November, DOGE “doesn’t exist,” according to Scott Kupor, the director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which serves as the federal government’s human resources department.

    In a tweet on Sunday, Kupor said that DOGE “may not have centralized leadership” anymore under the U.S. Digital Service, but “the principles of DOGE remain alive and well: de-regulation; eliminating fraud, waste and abuse; re-shaping the federal workforce; making efficiency a first-class citizen.”

    Amy Gleason, who was named as the “official” acting administrator of DOGE earlier this year, posted on LinkedIn soon after Kupor’s remarks, featuring a Doge meme with the words, “I’m alive.”

    While active, DOGE claimed to have saved the federal government billions of dollars in wasted taxpayer dollars. But critics, including lawmakers, say DOGE dismantled federal programs and government departments with little to show in terms of quantifiable savings.

    DOGE’s cuts have also been blamed for countless deaths across the world following the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, which provided humanitarian aid and disaster relief. DOGE also accessed federal databases containing highly sensitive personal information belonging to millions of Americans, and was accused of security lapses that put that data at risk from malicious adversaries.

    Musk departed DOGE earlier this year after a public falling out with President Trump.

    According to Politico, several DOGE staffers are said to be fearful that they could face future federal charges without protections from Musk, who might have been able to secure presidential pardons for them if necessary.

    Several DOGE staffers are now working for other U.S. federal government departments, according to Reuters, while other prominent DOGE staffers have said they no longer work for the government. Edward Coristine, whose nickname “Big Balls” went viral, said in a post on X in June that he is “officially out” of DOGE.

    [ad_2]

    Zack Whittaker

    Source link

  • Nearly 1 in 30 clinical trials, including cancer research, affected by NIH cuts, paper says

    [ad_1]

    Nearly 1 in 30 clinical trials were interrupted by funding cuts to the National Institutes of Health, affecting more than 74,000 patients and research into cancer, infectious disease and more, according to a newly published paper. 

    Clinical trials are the best way for researchers to study how medical interventions affect a patient population, doctors say. 

    “The types of trials that are affected are among the most rigorous way that we generate scientific evidence: randomized clinical trials,” said Dr. Anupam B. Jena, a study author and professor at Harvard Medical School. “It would be one thing if studies affected by terminated grants focused on less rigorous or important forms of research, but clinical trials are important, gold-standard in terms of evidence generation, time-intensive, and costly. Those are the last types of studies we would want to stop mid-stream.”  

    The paper, published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, found that 383 clinical trials were interrupted by the funding cuts, which Jena said was “surprisingly high” to the research team. To calculate that number, the researchers looked at all clinical trials that received NIH funding between Feb. 28, 2025, the day of the first reported grant termination, and Aug. 15, 2025. There were about 11,008 clinical trials funded by NIH grants during that time period. 

    More than 36% of the interrupted trials have since been completed. Another 35% were recruiting patients. About 11% of the trials were active and not recruiting patients, while 14% were active but not yet recruiting. The remaining trials were enrolling patients by invitation. Trials that had their funding interrupted had more expected participants enrolled than trials that were not affected, the researchers found.

    Trials that were active and not recruiting, where participants may have been receiving interventions, had a total of 74,311 patients enrolled in them, the researchers said. 

    The researchers looked at the trial details to learn more about what kind of research was being interrupted. Trials conducted outside the U.S. were disproportionately affected, and within the United States, the Northeast had the highest rate of interrupted trials. More than 115 trials studying cancer were interrupted, as well as 97 trials that looked at infectious diseases. Trials studying cardiovascular diseases, mental health and reproductive health were also affected. 

    Jena warned that the interruptions could lead to “avoidable waste” and “impact the future willingness of patients to participate in trials.” 

    Jena said there is no systemic data on how often clinical trials are paused for funding lapses. Termination of federal grant funding was “exceedingly rare” before 2025, he said. 

    “Clinical trials aren’t light switches,” said CBS News medical contributor Dr. Céline Gounder, an editor-at-large for public health at KFF Health News. “You can’t just flip them off without consequences. Cutting off funding mid-trial wastes research dollars and puts patients at risk. This is a breach of trust with every person who volunteers for research.”

    The NIH said it strongly rejected the “intentionally misleading portrayal of our grant management process” in the letter and accused the researchers of having conflicts of interest, though it did not specify what those were. The NIH highlighted the “more than 42,500 active, recruiting, or planned clinical trials across every major disease area” that it currently funds and oversees, and said the paper had a “selective focus on a handful of appropriately paused studies.” 

    “What they fail to mention is that NIH is undergoing a strategic realignment. We are prioritizing high-impact, high-urgency science … The biomedical research enterprise is being refocused and that’s what will keep America at the forefront of global science, safety, and innovation,” the NIH said. The agency also said the terminated or interrupted studies “likely happened because this research prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people.” 

    The NIH is the largest funder of biomedical research. More than $2 billion in federal research grants were canceled by the NIH earlier this year as part of President Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to downsize the federal government. Agency spending has also been slowed, and 1,300 employees have been fired. Thousands of universities and U.S. institutions rely on NIH funding for their research. 

    Former NIH head Dr. Francis Collins, who led the agency for 12 years across three administrations, told CBS News in April that “every dollar that NIH gave out in 2024 to a grant is estimated to have returned $2.46 just in a year.”  

    “When you’re talking about medical research, when you’re talking about people’s lives, when you’re talking about clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease or cancer that may take three or four years, you can’t just go in and decide, ‘I’m going to shut those down and maybe I’ll try something else.’ Those are people’s lives at risk,” Collins told CBS News. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about Trump’s plan to give Americans a $2,000 tariff dividend

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump boasts that his tariffs protect American industries, lure factories to the United States, raise money for the federal government and give him diplomatic leverage.

    Now, he’s claiming they can finance a windfall for American families, too: He’s promising a generous tariff dividend.

    The president proposed the idea on his Truth Social media platform Sunday, five days after his Republican Party lost elections in Virginia, New Jersey and elsewhere largely because of voter discontent with his economic stewardship — specifically, the high cost of living.

    The tariffs are bringing in so much money, the president posted, that “a dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone.’’

    Budget experts scoffed at the idea, which conjured memories of the Trump administration’s short-lived plan for DOGE dividend checks financed by billionaire Elon Musk’s federal budget cuts.

    “The numbers just don’t check out,″ said Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

    Details are scarce, including what the income limits would be and whether payments would go to children.

    Even Trump’s treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, sounded a bit blindsided by the audacious dividend plan. Appearing Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,’’ Bessent said he hadn’t discussed the dividend with the president and suggested that it might not mean that Americans would get a check from the government. Instead, Bessent said, the rebate might take the form of tax cuts.

    The tariffs are certainly raising money — $195 billion in the budget year that ended Sept. 30, up 153% from $77 billion in fiscal 2024. But they still account for less than 4% of federal revenue and have done little to dent the federal budget deficit — a staggering $1.8 trillion in fiscal 2025.

    Budget wonks say Trump’s dividend math doesn’t work.

    John Ricco, an analyst with the Budget Lab at Yale University, reckons that Trump’s tariffs will bring in $200 billion to $300 billion a year in revenue. But a $2,000 dividend — if it went to all Americans, including children — would cost $600 billion. “It’s clear that the revenue coming in would not be adequate,’’ he said.

    Ricco also noted that Trump couldn’t just pay the dividends on his own. They would require legislation from Congress.

    Moreover, the centerpiece of Trump’s protectionist trade policies — double-digit taxes on imports from almost every country in the world — may not survive a legal challenge that has reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

    In a hearing last week, the justices sounded skeptical about the Trump administration’s assertion of sweeping power to declare national emergencies to justify the tariffs. Trump has bypassed Congress, which has authority under the Constitution to levy taxes, including tariffs.

    If the court strikes down the tariffs, the Trump administration may be refunding money to the importers who paid them, not sending dividend checks to American families. (Trump could find other ways to impose tariffs, even if he loses at the Supreme Court; but it could be cumbersome and time-consuming.)

    Mainstream economists and budget analysts note that tariffs are paid by U.S. importers who then generally try to pass along the cost to their customers through higher prices.

    The dividend plan “misses the mark,’’ the Tax Foundation’s York said. ”If the goal is relief for Americans, just get rid of the tariffs.’’

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pete Buttigieg Admits Biden Administration Should’ve Done More To Grow Autonomous Vehicles — Says DOGE-Like Department ‘Makes Tons Of Sense’

    [ad_1]

    Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.

    Biden-era Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg says that the Biden administration could’ve done more to drive growth in the adoption of autonomous vehicles in the U.S.

    “We’re at the point where at least some of these technologies, right now, already, are safer than human beings and that’s only gonna increase and improve,” Buttigieg said during an appearance on the All In Podcast on Thursday, adding that the technology had the potential to “save a huge number of lives.”

    Buttigieg also outlined the differences in safety regulations between aviation and road safety, noting that hundreds of people lose their lives on the road daily in car crashes driven by human drivers. “It’s enough to fill a 737 every day,” Buttigieg said. “Are there things we could, or should have done, to accelerate AV adoption? I think the answer is yes,” Buttigieg said.

    Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it?

    Sharing his insight into the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Buttigieg said that it made “tons of sense” in theory. “I would love, in theory, a Department of Government Efficiency that was actually about government efficiency,” Buttigieg said.

    He added that an ideal DOGE could do a lot of good, but “the DOGE we got, sent an email to every air traffic controller in the country, during an air traffic controller shortage, and suggested they quit being an air traffic controller, and get something “more productive” to do in the private sector,” Buttigieg said, criticizing the Elon Musk-led department that was tasked with cutting down excess federal spending.

    See Also: Missed Nvidia and Tesla? RAD Intel Could Be the Next AI Powerhouse — Invest Now at Just $0.81 a Share

    Recently, Uber Technologies Inc. (NYSE:UBER) CEO Dara Khosrowshahi predicted that most vehicles would be autonomous in 20+ years, comparing driving to “horseback riding” in the future. He also added that human drivers would become less safe than robots as autonomous driving technologies evolve with time.

    Khosrowshahi’s comments come amid a partnership with chipmaker Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), which would target deploying over 100,000 autonomous vehicles by 2027 on Uber’s platform. The vehicles would be powered by Nvidia’s autonomous driving stack, which includes both hardware and software capabilities.

    Meanwhile, Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is slated to begin production of the Cybercab as the EV giant posted multiple job listings on its official website detailing open positions at the company’s Gigafactory in Texas for the Cybercab’s production.

    The Cybercab could also feature a steering wheel and pedals like traditional vehicles, something which wasn’t initially in the plans for Tesla, following comments by Board Chair Robyn Denholm that the company could add them to the vehicle to comply with safety regulations.

    Elsewhere, Alphabet Inc.‘s (NASDAQ:GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG) autonomous vehicle arm Waymo CEO Tekedra Mawakana called for transparency in the autonomous vehicle sector, noting that companies that weren’t transparent were not doing enough to make roads safer.

    Photo courtesy: Rich Koele on Shutterstock.com

    Trending Now:

    Building a resilient portfolio means thinking beyond a single asset or market trend. Economic cycles shift, sectors rise and fall, and no one investment performs well in every environment. That’s why many investors look to diversify with platforms that provide access to real estate, fixed-income opportunities, professional financial guidance, precious metals, and even self-directed retirement accounts. By spreading exposure across multiple asset classes, it becomes easier to manage risk, capture steady returns, and create long-term wealth that isn’t tied to the fortunes of just one company or industry.

    Backed by Jeff Bezos, Arrived Homes makes real estate investing accessible with a low barrier to entry. Investors can buy fractional shares of single-family rentals and vacation homes starting with as little as $100. This allows everyday investors to diversify into real estate, collect rental income, and build long-term wealth without needing to manage properties directly.

    Vinovest lets investors diversify into fine wine — a historically stable, low-volatility asset class that has outperformed the S&P 500 over multiple decades. With professionally managed portfolios, secure storage, and insurance included, users can invest in wine without needing to be experts themselves. Minimums start at $1,000, and investors retain full ownership of their wine, which has the potential to appreciate in value as global demand grows.

    For those seeking fixed-income style returns without Wall Street complexity, Worthy Property Bonds offers SEC-qualified, interest-bearing bonds starting at just $10. Investors earn a fixed 7% annual return, with funds deployed to small U.S. businesses. The bonds are fully liquid, meaning you can cash out anytime, making them attractive for conservative investors looking for steady, passive income.

    Self-directed investors looking to take greater control of their retirement savings may consider IRA Financial. The platform enables you to use a self-directed IRA or Solo 401(k) to invest in alternative assets such as real estate, private equity, or even crypto. This flexibility empowers retirement savers to go beyond traditional stocks and bonds, building diversified portfolios that align with their long-term wealth strategies.

    Moomoo isn’t just for trading — it’s also one of the most attractive places to park cash. New users can earn a promotional 8.1% APY on uninvested cash, combining a 3.85% base rate with a 4.25% booster once activated. On top of that, eligible new users can also score up to $1,000 in free Nvidia stock—but the real draw here is the ability to earn bank-beating interest rates without having to move into riskier assets.

    SoFi gives members access to a wide range of professionally managed alternative funds, covering everything from commodities and private credit to venture capital, hedge funds, and real estate. These funds can provide broader diversification, help smooth out portfolio volatility, and potentially boost total returns over time. Many of the funds have relatively low minimums, making alternative investing accessible.

    Range Wealth Management takes a modern, subscription-based approach to financial planning. Instead of charging asset-based fees, the platform offers flat-fee tiers that provide unlimited access to fiduciary advisors along with AI-powered planning tools. Investors can link their accounts without moving assets, while higher-level plans unlock advanced support for taxes, real estate, and multi-generational wealth strategies. This model makes Range especially appealing to high-earning professionals who want holistic advice and predictable pricing.

    For investors concerned about inflation or seeking portfolio protection, American Hartford Gold provides a simple way to buy and hold physical gold and silver within an IRA or direct delivery. With a minimum investment of $10,000, the platform caters to those looking to preserve wealth through precious metals while maintaining the option to diversify retirement accounts. It’s a favored choice for conservative investors who want tangible assets that historically hold value during uncertain markets.

    This article Pete Buttigieg Admits Biden Administration Should’ve Done More To Grow Autonomous Vehicles — Says DOGE-Like Department ‘Makes Tons Of Sense’ originally appeared on Benzinga.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maryland’s federal job losses climb to 15,100, the most in the nation – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The August job numbers count jobs located in the state, which means Maryland has lost almost 10% of its federal jobs since the start of the year.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    Maryland lost another 2,500 federal jobs in August, the second month in a row that the state has led the nation in federal job losses, according to numbers released Friday by the Maryland Department of Labor.

    The August numbers brought the total number of federal jobs lost in the state to 15,100 since January, when President Donald Trump took office and began his campaign to slash the size of the federal workforce. That year-to-date total is also the most in the U.S., the state said.

    Maryland’s economy is heavily dependent on the federal workforce: An estimated 269,000 Maryland residents were employed by the federal government in 2023, according to a report by the state’s Labor Department, and there were 158,475 federal jobs located in the state that year.

    The August job numbers count jobs located in the state, which means Maryland has lost almost 10% of its federal jobs since the start of the year.

    Jake Pannell, a national business representative for the National Federation of Federal Employees, said many former workers have had to leave the region, and he worries about the lack of private-sector jobs for the variety of skillsets federal workers have.

    “Many of these people have decades of experience. They’re overqualified for other positions,” Pannell said, adding that some federal workers will either have to accept “huge” pay cuts or undergo job re-entry programs — training them for jobs “they’re already greatly experienced at.”

    And the federal job losses are only expected to continue when the September numbers come out. As part of the push to slash the federal workforce, federal employees were offered a deferred resignation option on Jan. 28 that would allow them to receive pay and benefits until Sept. 30.

    “Workforce-wide” declines are expected to show up in the job losses at the end of September and through the end of the year as those jobs come off the books, according to a statement from the Office of Personnel Management.

    Lawmakers this year created an emergency short-term loan program for laid-off federal workers, and the Labor Department has set up a page for former feds looking for work that includes a list of job recruiting events and career workshops.

    “The states are doing everything they have the resources to do,” Pannell said. Many resources put forward by the state, such as unemployment insurance, are federally funded and are at risk of being cut, he added.

    “Those resources aren’t going to be any better than they were before,” Pannell said.

    The federal job cuts were the driving factor behind an overall loss of 3,200 jobs in Maryland for the month, which drove the state’s unemployment rate from 3.4% in July to 3.6% in August. Still, Maryland’s unemployment rate remained below the national average of 4.3% for the month.

    The federal job cuts began on Trump’s first day back in office, when OPM issued a memo directing agencies to identify workers who were still in their probationary period, when it is easier for them to be fired. They continued in February, when Trump ordered reductions in force and agency reorganizations in line with recommendations of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE Service.

    Since taking office, Trump has also unilaterally ended collective bargaining agreements with some federal labor unions and instituted a hiring freeze that has been extended through mid-October, among other actions. All told, about 97,000 federal jobs have been lost nationwide since January 2025, according to a Sept. 5 report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    “If you get rid of all these federal employees within the state of Maryland or in the D.C. metro area, where are they going to go? What are they going to do? Where are the jobs they could take?” Pannell asked.

    [ad_2]

    Jose Umana

    Source link

  • Social Security Admin.’s chief data officer resigns after filing whistleblower complaint

    [ad_1]

    Charles Borges, the chief data officer at the Social Security Administration, resigned Friday — days after filing a whistleblower complaint about Department of Government Efficiency employees at the SSA. 

    He said in the complaint that the DOGE employees had uploaded a copy of the entire country’s Social Security information to a “vulnerable cloud environment.” Borges’ resignation from the SSA was confirmed by the Government Accountability Project, which is providing his legal representation.

    A Social Security Administration spokesperson refuted the claim in a statement, saying that the data referenced had been “walled off” from the internet, and the SSA is “not aware of any compromise to this environment.”

    “The data referenced in the complaint is stored in a long-standing environment used by SSA and walled off from the internet,” the spokesperson said.

    In June, the Supreme Court temporarily lifted a lower court’s injunction and cleared the way to allow DOGE to access sensitive Social Security information. Two labor unions and an advocacy group had filed a complaint claiming that allowing the access would violate the Privacy Act and a federal law. A lower court agreed with the plaintiffs and issued an injunction, and an appellate court also declined to lift the stay. Solicitor General D. John Sauer then appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the injunction was forcing the executive branch to stop federal employees tasked with modernizing government systems from accessing the data contained within them.

    In Borges’ resignation letter, sent Friday to SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano, he wrote that he was resigning involuntarily because of “SSA’s actions against me, which make my duties impossible to perform legally and ethically.” He said his departure constituted a “constructive discharge.” 

    Borges said in his letter that he has faced retaliation since he reported his concerns internally and subsequently submitted his whistleblower complaint. “I have suffered exclusion, isolation, internal strife, and a culture of fear, creating a hostile work environment and making work conditions intolerable,” he wrote. 

    He alleged that “newly installed leadership” in the IT and executive offices at SSA “created a culture of panic and dread, with minimal information sharing, frequent discussions on employee termination.” And Borges claimed that repeated requests for visibility into activities he found questionable were “rebuffed or ignored by agency leadership.”

    Andrea Meza, a GAP attorney representing Borges, said in a statement that Borges “no longer felt that he could continue to work for the Social Security Administration in good conscience given what he had witnessed.” Meza said Borges “will continue to work with the proper oversight bodies.”

    Borges had served as SSA’s chief data officer since January. Before that, he worked at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and was a White House Presidential Innovation fellow during the Biden administration, according to LinkedIn. He had also served in data handling roles in the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division and the Naval Air Systems Command. 

    On LinkedIn Friday, he wrote, “It is never wrong to be morally and ethically right with yourself.”

    Asked about Borges, an SSA spokesperson declined to comment on personnel matters.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Maddow Blog | Whistleblower accuses DOGE team of endangering critical Social Security data

    [ad_1]

    Within weeks of Donald Trump’s second inaugural, members of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency team showed up at the Social Security Administration and started demanding access to files. The efforts were not well received: Michelle King, in her capacity as the acting Social Security commissioner, resigned after she refused a DOGE request to access sensitive government records at the agency.

    The underlying concern did not go away. The New York Times reported:

    Members of the Department of Government Efficiency uploaded a copy of a crucial Social Security database in June to a vulnerable cloud server, putting the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans at risk of being leaked or hacked, according to a whistle-blower complaint filed by the Social Security Administration’s chief data officer. The database contains records of all Social Security numbers issued by the federal government.

    The Times’ report added that the database in question “includes individuals’ full names, addresses and birth dates, among other details that could be used to steal their identities, making it one of the nation’s most sensitive repositories of personal information.”

    It’s an open question as to why, exactly, DOGE would even want to upload such a database. (The controversial operation is ostensibly searching for fraud within the Social Security system, though its previous claims on the matter have fallen apart under scrutiny.)

    The whistleblower in this case is Charles Borges, the Social Security Administration’s chief data officer, who alleges that DOGE members copied the highly sensitive data without any kind of “independent security monitoring,” which in turn created “enormous vulnerabilities.”

    Borges didn’t say that the database had been breached, but his complaint added that there was no oversight to assess how and why DOGE was using the data. The Times’ report added:

    ‘Should bad actors gain access to this cloud environment, Americans may be susceptible to widespread identity theft, may lose vital health care and food benefits, and the government may be responsible for reissuing every American a new Social Security number at great cost,’ Mr. Borges’s complaint said. He alleged that DOGE did not involve him in discussions about the project, despite his role as chief data officer, leaving him to piece together evidence of what had happened after the fact.

    A spokesperson for the department said in a written statement, “Commissioner [Frank] Bisignano and the Social Security Administration take all whistleblower complaints seriously. SSA stores all personal data in secure environments that have robust safeguards in place to protect vital information.

    “The data referenced in the complaint is stored in a long-standing environment used by SSA and walled off from the internet. High-level career SSA officials have administrative access to this system with oversight by SSA’s Information Security team. We are not aware of any compromise to this environment and remain dedicated to protecting sensitive personal data.”

    In recent months, a variety of federal whistleblowers have come forward, and for the most part, the congressional Republican majority has ignored them — even when confirming Bisignano to lead the Social Security Administration. Whether GOP lawmakers express similar indifference to Borges remains to be seen. Watch this space.

    This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump is forming a ‘National Design Studio’ to spruce up government websites

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration is forming a “National Design Studio,” with the aim of improving government websites and the efficiency of digital services at federal agencies. Trump has already signed an executive order to create the studio. According to Reuters, the president will appoint Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia as the head of the new organization, which one of its sources described as a stripped-down version of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

    DOGE, which was once led by Elon Musk, aimed to cut wasteful government spending and modernize its IT systems. It facilitated mass layoffs of hundreds of thousands of federal workers and even dismantled whole agencies. As Reuters has noted, though, its activities have greatly slowed down after Musk left the organization and his role as Trump’s advisor altogether. The White House did not respond to Reuters‘ request for comment, and it’s unclear if DOGE will continue operating once the studio has been formed.

    Gebbia will be apparently be named as the studio’s the Chief Design Officer and will lead its efforts to upgrade the “usability and aesthetics” of federal digital services. The news organization says the studio will standardize design for websites meant to allow people to interact with the government and will advise agencies on how to reduce costs on duplicative designs. Based on Trump’s executive order, the studio will shut down in three years before he steps down from office. While Gebbia will be the Chief Design Officer, an administrator will run the studio and will be in charge of reporting to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

    [ad_2]

    Mariella Moon

    Source link

  • ‘Feds to Eds’ ready for Montgomery Co. classrooms – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A host of former federal workers who lost their jobs in DOGE cuts are starting new careers as educators in the Maryland county.

    Ethan Taylor, who previously worked at the U.S. Department of the Interior, is pivoting to a career in education.
    (WTOP/Kate Ryan)

    WTOP/Kate Ryan

    Paula Martindill teaches a classroom of future educators.
    Paula Martindill teaches a classroom of future educators.
    (WTOP/Kate Ryan)

    WTOP/Kate Ryan

    Glenda Hernandez Tittle, with the School of Education at Montgomery College leads the school’s ACET, Alternative Certification for Effective Teachers program.
    Glenda Hernandez Tittle, with the School of Education at Montgomery College leads the school’s ACET, Alternative Certification for Effective Teachers program.
    (WTOP/Kate Ryan)

    WTOP/Kate Ryan

    Jacob Barock takes notes on techniques for teaching students.
    (WTOP/Kate Ryan)

    WTOP/Kate Ryan

    Ethan Taylor used to work for the U.S. Department of the Interior.

    Abigail Norris used to work at the General Services Administration.

    Jacob Barock planned on a career in federal service while he was working at the National Institutes of Health.

    But all three lost their jobs in the massive cuts carried out by Department of Government Efficiency under the Trump administration.

    Now, they’re days away from starting new careers in classrooms. Taylor and Barock were hired as full time teachers with the Montgomery County Public Schools system.

    Glenda Hernandez Tittle, with the School of Education at Montgomery College, leads the school’s ACET, Alternative Certification for Effective Teachers program.

    Tittle explained there were 18 members in the accelerated ACET program created to help former federal workers make the transition to careers in education.

    “Out of the 18, we have 14 who have been hired already as teachers with Montgomery County Public Schools,” she said. Tittle said that outcome was “very, very exciting considering we just started the program in June.”

    Taylor told WTOP: “I was recently offered — and accepted — a teaching position at Quince Orchard High School in Gaithersburg, Maryland. I will be teaching high school Spanish.”

    It was on the day WTOP visited the ACET classroom in at Montgomery College’s Rockville campus, when Barock learned he’d been hired.

    “I was going to teach high school Bio, and now I’m switching to middle school science at Takoma Park,” middle school, Barock said.

    Barock explained that there were few openings at the high school level, but more opportunities in middle schools. So he shifted his course of study.

    Norris has had a slightly different experience than Taylor and Barock.

    “I’m still putting out applications,” Norris said. “I’ve gotten a couple of callbacks, but nothing concrete yet, which is fine. I’m still early in the process.”

    Since then, Norris has been hired as a long-term substitute teacher at Springbrook High School, where she’ll be teaching English language learners.

    Learning how to teach

    Former federal workers take notes on how to be an effective teacher.
    Former federal workers take notes on how to be an effective teacher. (WTOP/Kate Ryan)

    The three are now classmates in a Montgomery College course taught by Paula Martindill, a veteran of the ACET program and now an assistant principal at Springbrook High School in Silver Spring.

    In front of the class, Martindill models the kind of teaching practices that are designed to create classrooms where students can succeed, and teachers foster engagement and connection.

    After a task where students were given a set time to complete a discussion, Martindill calls out “OK!” And pauses. “That’s time!”

    A student asks for a bit more time.

    “Thirty more seconds?” Martindill shakes her head, smiles and repeats, “That’s time,” signaling that she’s holding to the schedule she’d laid out for them.

    Martindill then gives the class time to shift from their discussions and waits for them to give her their attention.

    “Thank you,” she said, before explaining the next step in the lesson.

    “Peer presentations are happening today, so exciting!” she said.

    This evening, Taylor was among those presenting. He and his partner mirrored the practices Martindill had modeled. Clear instructions. Pauses between directions to make sure students had time to process the information they were getting. And breaking up the content into easy-to-understand pieces.

    In his lesson, Taylor and his partner had students stand up and move to different parts of the room depending on whether they agreed or disagreed with a statement in the lesson.

    It’s a strategy that allows students who spend much of their days sitting at desks, a chance to stretch their legs and literally get a new perspective in the classroom.

    Taylor calls out, “There aren’t any necessarily right or wrong answers,” as students exchange ideas while they take their positions in the classroom.

    Reflecting on the challenges he sees in the field he’s chosen, Taylor said, “To be honest with you, I’m not as concerned about classroom management as I am just the sheer level of preparation that goes into teaching.”

    Martindill said any new classroom teacher can feel overwhelmed as they try to produce lesson plans that will actually hold up when a teacher has as many as 35 students before them.

    ‘A whirlwind’: Steep learning curve for former federal workers

    Jacob Barock, who lost his job at NIH, will teach science in Takoma Park.
    Jacob Barock, who lost his job at NIH, will teach science in Takoma Park. (WTOP/Kate Ryan)

    The ACET program for federal workers, dubbed “Feds to Eds” by the Maryland State Superintendent of Education Carey Wright, has, said Martindill, “been a whirlwind. It started in June, it’s a very fast-paced program, even faster than the regular ACET.”

    Barock, who will be teaching middle school science, said when friends and family learned he was switching from high school to middle school science, some questioned his choice. Middle schoolers have a reputation for being a tough audience, especially for new teachers.

    “Some people think that they’re not the easiest to teach, not the most willing to learn,” Barock said. “I’m looking forward to the challenge, I think it will be good.”

    But he also acknowledged that there was a fairly steep learning curve as he balanced brushing up on the content he’ll be teaching, while taking in how to convey the information to slightly younger students.

    Norris said the program has taught her just how much has changed in education. There’s been a shift away from a top-down model with lots of lecturing, for example.

    “Now there’s so much more project-based learning and students working with each other to learn about a certain topic,” Norris said. “It’s a whole different world now, and I think a better one for learners.”

    ‘I hope to inspire them’

    a figurine of a school bus sits on a desk
    A host of former federal workers who lost their jobs in DOGE cuts are starting new careers as educators in Montgomery County, Maryland, public schools.

    Martindill was asked what tips she gives new teachers. One she said, is to avoid isolation. The first year of teaching is challenging, and in the first weeks, teachers face a fire hose of new information.

    “The grading policy, the technology, the student code of conduct, the employee contract, you’re learning so many things,” she said. “You just have to take a deep breath, find your people,” and she added, “Ask for help.”

    Taylor agreed, saying “Before, I thought I was sort of being thrown to the wolves and would not have the support that I felt I would need to be a successful first year teacher, and I’ve learned quickly that is not the case at all.”

    He’s met with other Spanish teachers in the high school.

    “I’m feeling much better about that than I was, say, four or five weeks ago,” Taylor said.

    Every teacher develops their own style, often based on their personalities. Some veterans advise on leading with a tough exterior. Martindill is not a fan of the “never-let-them-see-you-smile-until-December” approach.

    “I think we need to smile all the time,” Martindill said. “Our children need to know that we’re human, that we’re here for them, that we’re happy they’re here.”

    Norris, who says it’s likely she will substitute for a while before finding a full-time slot, is eager to get to work.

    “For me the privilege of getting to speak French every single day and have fun with the students and help make it engaging for them — that’s like, that’s my why,” she said.

    Barock agreed with part of the attraction to teaching is based on coming up with ways to make a topic — in his case science — interesting to students.

    “Having fun with like, making my own activities that I think the students will enjoy,” Barock said.

    Barock said he has taken the lessons on child development to heart, and wants to make sure that every student — no matter what challenges they face — feels welcome and valued.

    “I want to make their day at school just as easy as possible,” he said.

    Taylor said as he gains more confidence in tackling the challenges that teaching offers, he looks forward to getting started.

    “And I hope to be inspired by my students just as much as I hope to inspire them,” Taylor said.

    Martindill offered one more piece of advice — one that’s not restricted to new teachers. When a lesson plan bombs, when technology fails, when students prove challenging, “Always be kind, and always smile to the children. Even when you’re having a bad day, it makes you have a better day.”

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Ryan

    Source link