ReportWire

Tag: Democratic politicians

  • Democrat consultants tell politicians to stop using terms like ‘LGBTQIA’ and ‘cisgender’

    [ad_1]

    If you ask this consulting firm, Democrats aren’t unpopular because they compromise with Republicans to maintain their corporate interests — it’s because they talk about the rights of LGBTQ+ people and other minorities too much.

    Centrist think tank Third Way recently released a list of words it believes Democratic politicians should avoid, referring to them as “wildly out-of-touch social positions.” The list includes even neutral community descriptors such as “LGBTQIA” and “BIPOC.”

    “The effect of this language is to sound like the extreme, divisive, elitist, and obfuscatory, enforcers of wokeness,” the group wrote. “To please the few, we have alienated the many — especially on culture issues, where our language sounds superior, haughty and arrogant.”

    Words on the list include: privilege, triggering, othering, microaggression, holding space, body shaming, subverting norms, systems of oppression, cultural appropriation, existential threat, the unhoused, food insecurity, housing insecurity, person who immigrated, birthing person, cisgender, deadnaming, heteronormative, patriarchy, LGBTQIA+, BIPOC, allyship, and incarcerated people.

    Third Way insisted that it is “not out to police language, ban phrases or create our own form of censorship” — though its list is eerily similar to Donald Trump‘s list of banned words. His administration issued the guidance after he signed executive orders removing all references to DEI in the federal government, as well as mandating that the federal government deny the existence of trans people by recognizing only two sexes despite the scientific and medical consensus that sex is a spectrum.

    Trump’s banned words include: advocate, assigned at birth, assigned female at birth, assigned male at birth, biologically female, biologically male, Black, breastfeed + people, breastfeed + person, chestfeed + people, chestfeed + person, female, females, feminism, gender, gender based, gender based violence, gender diversity, gender identity, gender ideology, gender-affirming care, genders, immigrant, LGBT, LGBTQ, men who have sex with men, MSM, Mx, non-binary, nonbinary, people + uterus, pronoun, pronouns, segregation, sex, sexual preferences, sexuality, they/them, trans, transgender, transsexual, and women.

    Both Third Way and Trump take issue with gender neutral parenting terms, with the former specifically criticizing “birthing person” and the latter banning terms like “breastfeed” or “uterus” if the word “person” is attached to them.

    There is no evidence to suggest that supporting legal rights for trans people have cost Democrats politically. Whereas Kamala Harris’ 2024 presidential campaign largely ignored trans issues, the GOP spent over $215 million on anti-trans attack ads — about $77 for every trans person in the U.S. — which a post election study showed had no impact on voters’ decisions. Only 18 percent of registered voters in a separate September Gallup poll said candidates’ positions on trans rights is “extremely important” to them.

    While some Democrats have attempted to distance themselves from the trans community by using the same GOP talking points about “men in women’s sports,” many have harshly condemned the strategy as not only cruel, but short-sighted and ineffective. Illinois Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker said during an April party dinner: “Those same do-nothing Democrats want to blame our losses on our defense of Black people, of trans kids, of immigrants — instead of their own lack of guts and gumption.”

    This article originally appeared on Advocate: Democrat consultants tell politicians to stop using terms like ‘LGBTQIA’ and ‘cisgender’

    RELATED

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump Isn’t Bluffing

    Trump Isn’t Bluffing

    [ad_1]

    Mandel Ngan / Getty

    We’ve become inured to his rhetoric, but his message has grown darker.

    Editor’s Note: This article is part of “If Trump Wins,” a project considering what Donald Trump might do if reelected in 2024.

    “We pledge to you that we will root out the Communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical-left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country, that lie and steal and cheat on elections,” Donald Trump said this past November, in a campaign speech that was ostensibly honoring Veterans Day. “The real threat is not from the radical right; the real threat is from the radical left … The threat from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous, and grave than the threat from within. Our threat is from within.”

    What immediately leaps out here is the word vermin, with its echoes of Hitler and Mussolini. But Trump’s inflammatory language can overshadow and distract from the substance of what he’s saying—in this case, appearing to promise a purge or repression of those who disagree with him politically.

    Explore the January/February 2024 Issue

    Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.

    View More

    This sort of language isn’t entirely new. Trump spoke in Manichaean terms throughout his first campaign and term, encouraging chants to lock up Hillary Clinton in 2016, and in 2018 referring to undocumented immigrants as “animals” who would “infest our country.” Over time, the shock of Trump’s rhetoric has worn off, making it easy to miss the fact that his message has grown even darker.

    Trump himself has changed, too—the old Trump seemed to be running for office partly for fun and partly in service of his signature views, such as opposition to immigration and support for protectionism. Today’s Trump is different. His fury over his 2020 election defeat, the legal cases against him, and a desire for revenge against political opponents have come to eclipse everything else.

    In the past few months, the former president has described himself as a “very proud election denier.” He has repeatedly threatened and intimidated judges, witnesses, prosecutors, and even the family of prosecutors involved in the cases against him, going so far as to say that his legal opponents will be consigned to mental asylums if he’s reelected. He has suggested that the man he picked for chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff deserves to be executed on grounds of treason. He’s called for investigating NBC and possibly yanking the network off the air, also on grounds of treason—one of his most direct attacks on the First Amendment. And he’s vowed to arrest and indict President Joe Biden and other political opponents for no apparent reason other than that they oppose him.

    The fact that Trump’s ideas have become more authoritarian is not yet fully appreciated. One reason is people have heard Trump say outlandish things for so long that they can’t identify what’s new, or they’ve become numb. Another is venue: Once Trump left the White House and stopped tweeting, his vitriol became less noticeable to anyone who didn’t attend his rallies, seek out videos of them, or join Trump’s own Truth Social network.

    Even when a comment is so extreme that it does break into the mainstream, what happens next is predictable. The first time Trump says something, people react with shock and compare him to Hitler. The second time, people say Trump is at it again. By the third time, it becomes background noise—an appalling but familiar part of the Trump shtick.

    This is just the sort of “normalization” that Trump’s critics warned against from the start, but it’s also a natural human response to repeated exposure. The result is that Trump has been able to acclimate the nation to authoritarianism by introducing it early and often. When a second-term President Trump directs the Justice Department to lock up Democratic politicians or generals or reporters or activists on flimsy or no grounds at all, people will wring their hands, but they’ll also shrug and wonder why he didn’t do it sooner. After all, he’s been promising to do it forever, right?


    This article appears in the January/February 2024 print edition with the headline “Trump Isn’t Bluffing.”

    [ad_2]

    David A. Graham

    Source link