ReportWire

Tag: Democratic Party

  • Democratic lawmaker doubles down on fellow Dem, accusing them of ‘election subversion’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., called out her fellow Democrats on Monday for “subverting democracy” with cynical political moves, warning one does not save democracy by bypassing it.

    Gluesenkamp Perez caused political shockwaves on Wednesday by demanding a vote to condemn Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García, D-Ill., for unexpectedly ending his re-election bid, which effectively cleared the way for his chief of staff to run in his place.

    CNN host Jake Tapper recalled Gluesenkamp Perez’s accusation that Garcia’s move was “undermining the process of a free and fair election,” noting that it is rare for a Democrat to turn against a party ally in such a way.

    Gluesenkamp Perez said that she felt the need to speak up.

    DEMOCRAT CIVIL WAR ERUPTS AFTER MODERATE ACCUSES PROGRESSIVE OF UNDERMINING ‘FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS’

    Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., walks up the House steps for the final votes before Congress’ October recess on Sept. 25, 2024. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    “Because I believe election subversion is wrong no matter who’s doing it,” she said. “And I think that right now we’re seeing a profound, very loud call from Americans for transparency and accountability. And it’s part and parcel of that, that you don’t just turn a blind eye to wrongdoing or unethical behavior when it’s, you know, politically convenient, that you do it consistently.”

    The moderate Democrat noted that not only was she dismayed at Garcia’s allegedly tactical political move, but that her fellow Democrats applauded it.

    “One of the disturbing things is that like, immediately after the news broke about how Chuy had basically chosen his successor, I saw a lot of members congratulating him on how clever and slick it was,” she said. “And I think that galvanized me more to say that this is not something to be proud of, or to emulate or copy.”

    She warned that democracy cannot be saved by circumventing it.

    “What use is it to win an election at all costs, even your own integrity, if you are in that process, destroying Americans’ confidence in government? That’s the thing. Like, it’s not a prize that’s worth winning. If you destroy the thing in the process.”

    “Without question, what Congressman Garcia did stinks,” Tapper agreed. “And the voters got screwed without, you know, taking a position on what kind of a politician he is, or his successor, will be. You are right on the facts.” 

    He went on to ask whether the events of the previous election, such as the Democratic Party protecting Biden from primary challengers and then appointing Harris as his successor without a vote, influenced her decision.

    JASMINE CROCKETT DOWNPLAYS JAY JONES’ MURDEROUS TEXTS AS A ‘DISTRACTION’

    Marie Gluesenkamp Perez in the House chamber

    Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., argued that duty to the American people runs deeper than party loyalty, warning that destroying faith in democracy to save it is self-defeating. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    “Yeah. I think there’s one school of thought that’s pretty strong in D.C. That it’s like, ‘The threat to democracy is so real that we have to make choices for people, that Americans aren‘t smart enough to choose their own representatives.’ I think that that lack of confidence in voters it is toxic, and it’s not true,” she said.

    Gluesenkamp Perez, who identifies as Latina herself, was also asked about a recent accusation that she targeted Garcia because he is Latino and progressive. 

    “Identity politics do not justify election subversion,” she said. “Nothing justifies that. If you say that it’s wrong, you have to say that it’s wrong consistently. No matter who’s doing it. This cannot be like a interparty fight. Like that’s not what this is about. You know, it is about confidence of whether we are going to choose to respect voters, whether we’re going to operate with morality.”

    When asked about her initial call to condemn Garcia from the House floor last week, a García spokesperson said the congressman followed all proper election guidelines when making “a deeply personal decision based on his health, his wife’s worsening condition and his responsibility to the grandchildren he is raising after the death of his daughter.”

    “At a moment like this, he hopes his colleagues, especially those who speak about family values, can show the same compassion and respect that any family would want during a health crisis,” the spokesperson said.

    His team did not immediately respond to a follow-up request for comment on Gluesenkamp Perez’s latest remarks.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

    Jesus Garcia speaks

    Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García’s staff defended his decision to retire as “a deeply personal decision based on his health, his wife’s worsening condition, and his responsibility to the grandchildren he is raising after the death of his daughter.” (Ashlee Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times via AP)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News’ Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stephen A. Smith calls out AOC, Schumer, and Newsom for avoiding his show

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Podcast host Stephen A. Smith claimed that high-profile Democrats like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have been ignoring invitations to appear on his show.

    During his show on Friday, Smith addressed the backlash he’s received from close friends over his critiques of Democratic politicians like Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett.

    He stood by his comments and claimed that he had invited several Democrats, like Crockett, AOC and Newsom, along with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, to appear on his show, only to be met with silence.

    STEPHEN A SMITH BLASTS ‘SHAMEFUL’ CRITICS OF HIS JASMINE CROCKETT COMMENTS

    Stephen A. Smith asked Democrats why they seemed more reluctant to come on his show than Republicans. (Lou Rocco/American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. via Getty Images)

    “Jasmine Crockett has been on this air — invited on this show for four months,” Smith said. “AOC has been invited on this show for four months. Gavin Newsom has been invited on this show longer than that. Props to Hakeem Jeffries. He’s a friend of the show, always welcome on here. I like that man. I respect him. Chuck Schumer has been invited on this show. Hasn’t shown up. Where they at?”

    He added, “Every single Republican I have asked to show up on this show has either said yes, or that they’re coming. Not the Dems. Why?”

    STEPHEN A. SMITH CALLS OUT DEMS LIKE AOC AND JASMINE CROCKETT AS BAD LOOK FOR FACE OF THE PARTY

    Fox News Digital reached out to Crockett, Ocasio-Cortez, Newsom, Jeffries and Schumer’s offices for comment.

    AOC, Schumer, Newsom

    Stephen A. Smith claimed Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Chuck Schumer and Gov. Gavin Newsom, have ignored invitations to come onto his podcast. (Shutterstock/AP)

    Of those he referenced, Jeffries was the only Democrat who appeared on his show recently after being interviewed by him in October. However, in the past month, Smith has interviewed other Democrats such as Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Pennsylvania Rep. Madeleine Dean, Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani.

    LIBERAL MEDIA FIGURES TURN ON DEMOCRATS AFTER CONTROVERSIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN VOTE WITH REPUBLICANS

    Regarding Republicans, Smith recently interviewed Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan and House Speaker Mike Johnson earlier this month. He also spoke to Texas Rep. Chip Roy in October.

    Smith has drawn criticism from other folks in the media after he called out Crockett last month for focusing on what he considered performative politics over helping her constituents.

    Stephen A. Smith and Rep. Jasmine Crockett

    Stephen A. Smith later apologized to Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett for his comments. (Paras Griffin/Getty Images; Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    He later posted a video apologizing to Crockett.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Leading Senate Democrat tells Fox News ‘it’s time … for new leadership,’ as Schumer faces growing pressure

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Amid a rising tide of calls from House Democrats and others in the party to remove Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., from his longtime post as Senate Democratic leader, a top Democratic senator says it’s time for “new leadership” in the party. 

    Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, speaking one-on-one with Fox News Digital during a stop in New Hampshire, said it’s also a moment for a younger generation of Democratic leaders to “step up the stage.”

    Booker was interviewed on Friday, four days after seven Senate Democrats and independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with the party, bucked Senate Democratic leaders and voted with the majority Republicans to end the longest federal government shutdown in history.

    Plenty of progressives and center-left Democrats have pilloried the deal to end the shutdown, which didn’t include the Democrats’ top priority: an agreement to extend expiring subsidies that make health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act, known as the ACA or Obamacare, more affordable to millions of Americans.

    DEMOCRATIC SENATOR CALLS FOR ‘MORE EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP’ AS SCHUMER FACES MOUNTING PRESSURE

    Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., is seen after a news conference in the U.S. Capitol on the government shutdown on Wednesday, November 5, 2025. (Tom Williams/Getty)

    And even though he opposed the agreement, Schumer, the top Democrat in the chamber, has faced calls from an increasing number of party members to step down due to his inability to keep Senate Democrats unified.

    But to date, no Senate Democrat has joined those calls for Schumer to step down.

    After the final congressional vote to end the shutdown, Booker wrote that “the Democratic Party needs change. It needs a new generation of leaders to stand up to Trump.”

    SCHUMER FACES FURY FROM THE LEFT OVER DEAL TO END SHUTDOWN

    Asked if those comments were directed at Schumer, Booker said, “I’m pointing these comments at anybody who will listen to me.”

    “Chuck Schumer’s generation, Nancy Pelosi’s generation, John Lewis’s generation. They have so much to be proud of. It is time, though, for new leadership. The other generations, X, millennials, Z, — it’s time for us to step up. The stage is waiting for us to lead, not just the party, but the nation right now.”

    Cory Booker Fox Digital interview

    Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey is interviewed by Fox News Digital at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics, in Manchester, N.H. on Nov. 14, 2025 (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    Booker was interviewed ahead of an event at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics. New Hampshire’s two senators — Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan — were among the Democrats who supported the deal with Republicans.

    Shaheen, who previously supported a bill to extend the ACA subsidies, on Monday defended breaking with her party to support the deal.

    “We’re making sure that the people of America can get the food benefits that they need, that air traffic controllers can get paid, that federal workers are able to come back, the ones who were let go, that they get paid, that contractors get paid, that aviation moves forward,” Shaheen said in a “Fox and Friends” interview.

    SHUTDOWN SHOWDOWN: DEMOCRATIC SENATOR STANDS FIRM AFTER DEFYING PARTY

    Asked about the Democratic senators who bucked the party, Booker, who played Division One football at Stanford University, called for party unity.

    “I played football, and that play is behind me. Now I want everybody back in the huddle, tighten your chin straps, because we’ve got to fight forward and the end zone, for me, is very simple. It is lowering people’s healthcare costs, lowering people’s grocery costs, lowering people’s energy costs, and getting an America that works for everybody, not just the wealthiest of the wealthy,” Booker said.

    And Booker, who broke a Senate record with a 25-hour speech earlier this year as he took aim at President Donald Trump‘s second-term agenda, said: “I’m a big believer, if you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.”

    Sen. Cory Booker in New Hampshire

    Democratic Sen. Cory Booker headlines an event at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics, in Manchester, N.H. on Nov. 14, 2025. (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    But he also lamented the increased animosity between Democrats and Republicans, saying that “the partisanship, as you know, bothers me, because it’s turned to tribalism.”

    As he unsuccessfully ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, Booker spent plenty of time and made lots of friends in New Hampshire, which has held the first-in-the-nation presidential primary for over a century.

    Booker, who is up for re-election next year in blue-leaning New Jersey, is seen by political pundits as a possible contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, which is expected to be a crowded and competitive race.

    “Of course, I’m thinking about it. Haven’t ruled it out. But I’m up on the ballot in New Jersey in ’26 and that is my focus,” Booker said.

    After his Fox News interview, Booker headlined the latest “Stand Up New Hampshire Town Hall.” The speaking series, organized by top New Hampshire Democratic elected officials and party leaders, is seen as an early cattle call for potential White House contenders.

    And later in the day, he gave the keynote address at a major fundraising gala for the New Hampshire Democratic Party.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Booker called next year’s elections, when the Democrats will try to win back majorities in the House and Senate, “vitally important.”

    “Don’t talk to me about ’28 until you show me where you stand and who you stand for in ’26. I stand for New Jersey. I stand for America and an America that works for everybody,” Booker emphasized.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats mocked for ‘out of touch’ comments dismissing no tax on tips: ‘Peak elitism’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Nevada Democratic representatives Dina Titus, Susie Lee and Steven Horsford are being mocked as “out of touch” for keeping silent after a national Democratic Party spokesperson dismissed no tax on tips as mere “crumbs.”

    In a Politico article about the importance of the no tax on tips policy in congressional races in Nevada, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Lindsay Reilly appeared to dismiss the policy, saying, “D.C. Republicans are giving temporary crumbs to working families.”

    Reilly added, “Meanwhile, millions of families are at risk of losing their health care, hundreds of hospitals could close, and countless Americans could lose their jobs — all to pay for permanent tax cuts for billionaires.”

    The no-tax-on-tips provision in the big, beautiful bill establishes an income tax deduction of up to $25,000 on qualified tipped income through 2028.

    WATCH: DEM LAWMAKERS ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN WHY STOCK MARKET IS BOOMING DESPITE TRUMP TARIFFS

    Left to right: Nevada Democratic Reps. Susie Lee, Steven Horsford and Dina Titus (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images); Mandel NGAN / AFP; Rep. Susie Lee official House of Representatives official website)

    With Nevada being the state with the highest share of tipped workers in the country, these comments ignited a firestorm of criticisms from Republican voices online.

    “Marvel at just how out of touch Democrats are with reality. The DCCC thinks no taxes on tips is ‘crumbs,’” wrote conservative commentator Steve Guest.

    “What makes this so bad, is that this is ACTUALLY what the Democrat party thinks,” wrote White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson.

    National Republican Senatorial Committee advisor Nathan Brand added, “Nancy Pelosi peddled this same elitist ‘crumbs’ message in 2017 after Trump and Republicans cut taxes for nearly all working families.”

    The Republican Congressional Leadership Fund challenged Titus, Lee and Horsford, saying, “Will you denounce the @dccc’s statement that cutting taxes on tips amounts to ‘crumbs?’ Many of your constituents rely on tips to support their families.”

    National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Christian Gonzalez wrote, “The @dccc sneering that No Tax on Tips is ‘crumbs’ is peak Democrat elitism.”

    KAMALA HARRIS-ENDORSED CANDIDATE IN HOT SEAT FOR MILLION-DOLLAR DC HOME HUNDREDS OF MILES OUTSIDE DISTRICT

    Nancy Pelosi speaks in New York City

    Nancy Pelosi speaks onstage during the 2025 Concordia Annual Summit at Sheraton New York Times Square on Sept. 23, 2025 in New York City.  (Riccardo Savi/Getty Images for Concordia Annual Summit)

    Though all three Democrats have advocated for the no tax on tips policy, they voted against the big, beautiful bill in which the policy was included.

    Gonzalez said that the Nevada Democrats’ “voting record says it all” and that “Out of touch Democrats Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Steven Horsford are too scared of their radical, latte-sipping bosses in D.C. to stand with the workers who keep Nevada running.”

    “Only a party run by latte-liberals who refuse to go into the office thinks hard-earned tip money is pocket lint,” he said.

    The NRCC itself also asked: “Will Titus, Lee, and Horsford stand with workers?”

    “National Democrats just mocked Nevada’s servers, bartenders, cooks, housekeepers, dealers, and hospitality workers, sneering that their right to keep their own hard-earned tip money amounts to nothing more than ‘crumbs,’” the NRCC said in a statement.

    “This is the shameless party of Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Steven Horsford. They can’t hide from their vote AGAINST No Tax on Tips for hardworking Nevadans. If Titus, Lee, and Horsford actually stood with workers, they’d condemn these comments and stand up for workers keeping more of their hard-earned money,” the NRCC went on.

    ‘SQUAD’ DEM SPENDS EYE-POPPING AMOUNT ON LUXURY LIMO SERVICES IN ONE YEAR

    Susie Lee

    Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., walks down the House steps at the Capitol after the last votes of the week on Friday, April 1, 2022.  (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    After its passage, Lee wrote in the Las Vegas Sun that she “rushed back to Washington to vote against the One Big Beautiful Bill,” calling it “one of the least popular pieces of legislation in modern American history, giving massive, permanent tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans and temporary crumbs for working families in Southern Nevada.”

    In August, the three sent a letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent “to ensure the successful implementation” of the no-tax-on-tips policy. In a statement, Lee’s office said the letter highlighted that “the version of ‘No Tax on Tips’ passed by Republicans in Washington does not fully meet the needs of Nevadans.”

    In a statement to Fox News Digital, Lee said, “I believe that no one should lose out on tips they earned. That’s why I support the TIPS Act to PERMANENTLY end taxes on tips.”

    She said that earlier this year, she “called on Speaker [Mike] Johnson to bring the permanent fix ‘No Tax on Tips Act’ — which unanimously passed the Senate — to the House floor for a vote.”

    PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS TURN ON PARTY LEADERSHIP AFTER GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENDS WITHOUT HEALTHCARE GUARANTEES

    A man's hand holds five $1 bills to give to a waitress holding a carrying tray at a restaurant.

    The no-tax-on-tips provision in the big, beautiful bill establishes an income tax deduction of up to $25,000 on qualified tipped income through 2028. (iStock)

    “Instead, Republican leaders held it hostage so they could provide cover for themselves as they voted to pass the largest transfer of wealth in American history,” she said, adding, “The Republican ‘no tax on tips’ provision is a raw deal for tipped earners — it’s temporary, capped, and so much smaller than the tax breaks the wealthiest Americans got out of the Big Bulls**t Bill.”

    “Let me be clear — our service workers can’t benefit from no tax on tips if they aren’t receiving tips thanks to our tourism slump or if they’ve lost their jobs,” she said.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    DCCC spokeswoman Lindsay Reilly also responded to the backlash, telling Fox News Digital “it’s sad that the out-of-touch operatives at the NRCC are having a meltdown when confronted with the facts.”

    “Everyone knows the Big, Ugly Bill is a massive tax giveaway for the wealthiest few that sticks working families with the bill. That is fact, and it’s why everyone hates it,” she said, adding, “Voters can see through Republicans’ cheap spin and people know their bill fails to deliver meaningful relief to everyday Americans, while the billionaires cash out.”

    In response to the knock on her 2017 “crumbs” comment, Pelosi’s office shared a statement from 2018, which accused President Donald Trump’s first-term tax breaks of being a scam and “a monumental theft from the middle class to enrich the wealthiest 1 percent.”

    Fox News Digital also reached out to Titus and Horsford, but did not immediately receive a response.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump avoids addressing Epstein files on camera, but calls for more investigation online

    [ad_1]

    President Trump now says it’s worth digging deeper into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but only as it pertains to Democrats.CBS News’ Scott MacFarlane and Aaron Navarro have more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Weekly Roundup: Anatomy of a Cave and a $2,000 Check?

    [ad_1]

    It’s the end of the week that marked the end of a record-breaking government shutdown. Federal workers went back to their jobs yesterday.

    Here’s a look at what we covered this week.

    Monday 

    Olivier scrutinized President Donald Trump’s pledge of a $2,000 “dividend” for most Americans from the revenues his import duties have generated.

    “We are taking in Trillions of Dollars and will soon begin paying down our ENORMOUS DEBT, $37 Trillion,” he said on social media. “A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone.”

    We … have some questions.

    “Analysts say the payout could total $300 billion or more,” Olivier wrote. “The Treasury Department’s final fiscal year 2025 report says the government collected $195 billion from all customs duties currently in effect. The Budget Lab at Yale University estimates Trump’s tariffs could generate an average of $260 billion annually through 2035.”

    Tuesday 

    The biggest news of the week was the end of the government shutdown, so Olivier detailed some key features of the deal, including Democrats caving on their primary ask.

    “Democrats’ main goal in rejecting Republican spending legislation and shutting down the government had been to force the GOP to negotiate over the renewal of Obamacare subsidies that are due to expire, which would send premiums rocketing skyward for millions of Americans,” Olivier wrote. “What Democrats settled for instead was a promise of a Senate vote on renewing the subsidies.”

    Other notable bits include the resumption of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and bringing back air traffic controllers who were furloughed during the shutdown.

    But, as always, don’t get too comfortable. The deal only funds the government into January.

    Wednesday 

    Artificial intelligence hasn’t caused vast economy-wide negative effects on jobs… yet.

    That’s according to a recent study we examined here from the Budget Lab at Yale University.

    “Overall, our metrics indicate that the broader labor market has not experienced a discernible disruption since ChatGPT’s release 33 months ago, undercutting fears that AI automation is currently eroding the demand for cognitive labor across the economy,” the report says.

    AI doomer Olivier noted, however, that “just because the report did not find sweeping effects from AI to date, that doesn’t mean that AI won’t eventually bring about those kinds of changes.”

    The report acknowledges that “it is too soon to tell how disruptive the technology will be to jobs.”

    Thursday 

    In Olivier’s regional rundown, he detailed the latest development in the GOP’s efforts to push for redistricting in multiple states in an effort to keep their majority in the House. In Utah, a federal judge ruled this week that an electoral map drawn up by legislators to strengthen the GOP hold unfairly favored Republicans.

    Meanwhile, a new study on the impact of a cell phone ban at a large urban district in Florida found average test scores rose by 1.1 percentiles in schools with previously high student cell phone usage in 2024-25, the year after a cell phone ban took effect.

    Lastly, the Colorado Sun reported this week that the Centennial State’s efforts to grow its wolf population are struggling, hampered by federal regulations and the death of a 10th reintroduced wolf.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    [ad_2]

    Cecelia Smith-Schoenwalder

    Source link

  • Chris Matthews blames Democratic Party ‘snobbery and attitude’ for losing working class voters to Trump

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews pointed to the Democrats’ “snobbery and attitude” as a reason why working people voted for President Donald Trump during an interview Wednesday.

    MSNBC host Katy Tur asked Matthews about how the Democratic Party should bridge the divide between the working class and the college-educated voters.

    “I don’t know the whole answer. [Pennsylvania Gov.] Josh Shapiro said, ‘All right, we’re going to stop this a little bit. We’re going to get rid of the law that you have to be some college graduate to get a job in the state government.’ Pennsylvania doesn’t have that law anymore,” Matthews said.

    “It isn’t just for college grads. And I think there’s a lot to that. The town vs. gown has gotten to be political. The people that didn’t get to college are voting for Trump. Why? Because the snobbery and attitude,” he said.

    Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews speaks during the Democratic presidential primary debate Feb. 19, 2020, in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

    CHRIS MATTHEWS SAYS DEMOCRATS ‘FALLING INTO A TRAP OF DEFENDING WHAT’S INDEFENSIBLE’ ON CRIME

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro issued an executive order in 2023 after taking office to establish that 92% of state government jobs would no longer require a college degree, according to CBS News

    Matthews has been critical of the Democratic Party amid President Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory, calling on lawmakers to focus on the economy.

    While discussing the Democratic Party’s low popularity on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in August, Matthews pointed in part to the Biden administration’s poor handling of illegal immigration as a reason, saying, “The polling will tell you, the open border — what seemed like an open border for four years.

    “Today, the border has been closed since January and not a peep out of any Hispanic leader. Nobody has complained because they know that surge at the border was killing the Democrats,” he said.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

    Identifying another possible factor in Democrats’ sinking approval, Matthews back in August cited how transgender policies impacted the 2024 presidential election.

    “On the issue of trans people playing women’s sports, that ad ran in every sports event, starting with the World Series. It never stopped. It showed up around the third quarter, and everybody’s like, ‘What’s that? That’s insane.’”

    CNN HOST SAYS SHE STUDIES ‘CONSPIRACY THEORIES’ TO EFFECTIVELY TALK WITH CONSERVATIVES

    The ex-MSNBC host said issues such as transgender participation in sports were 80/20 issues before calling for a renewed focus on the economy.

    New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill speaks during an election night party

    Then-New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill speaks during an election night party in East Brunswick, N.J., Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. She ultimately won her race and was elected governor.  (Matt Rourke/AP Photo)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Democrats won elections in New Jersey, New York, and Virginia that largely focused on economic anxiety and affordability issues. 

    New Jersey Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill defeated Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli in the New Jersey governor’s race, while former Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger defeated Republican challenger Winsome Earle-Sears in the Virginia gubernatorial race. In the Empire State, democratic socialist New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani claimed victory over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an Independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa. 

    Matthews previously hosted “Hardball” on MSNBC and resigned from the network in 2020 after facing backlash over multiple controversies.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hakeem Jeffries blames Trump and Republicans for government shutdown before House vote

    [ad_1]



    Hakeem Jeffries blames Trump and Republicans for government shutdown before House vote – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke as the House debated the Senate’s version of a bill to fund the government and end the shutdown.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Fetterman defends his voting record despite pushback from Democrats:

    [ad_1]

    Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman defended his voting record and addressed the criticism he’s received from some in his own party for meeting and sometimes voting with President Trump.

    “I vote a 91% Democratic line, and if Democrats have a problem with somebody that votes 91% of the same times as you are, more than nine out of 10 times, then maybe our party has a bigger problem,” he said in an interview that aired Wednesday on “CBS Mornings.”

    Fetterman voted with Republicans over a dozen times to fund the government and end the government shutdown while most Senate Democrats held out. The effort failed 14 times over the past 42 days. During that time, Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, and independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with Democrats, also backed the House-passed funding bill.

    The Senate finally passed a bill Monday with support from seven Democrats, including Fetterman, as well as King, and it is now moving toward passage in the House.

    The deal reached in the Senate would extend government funding until Jan. 31, to give Congress more time to pass full appropriations bills. The bill does not extend health care tax credits for Affordable Care Act insurance, which Democrats had been demanding, but does guarantee a vote on the issue. The credits are set to expire at the end of the year, when over 20 million Americans who purchase their own insurance through the ACA will see their premiums spike.

    The agreement also includes three full funding bills that lawmakers have been working on for months. The three bills include funding for military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs; the Department of Agriculture and FDA; and operations for the legislative branch. It would also ensure federal workers who were not paid during the shutdown will receive back pay. The bill will also reverse the layoffs that the Trump administration implemented during the government shutdown and prevents any cuts until the end of January. 

    Fetterman said his views are reflected in his vote.

    He suggested Democrats should be “the big tent party that people need,” and he distanced himself from some his colleagues’ rhetoric.

    “I refuse to call people, like whether it’s President Trump or other people, as they’re Nazis or that they’re fascists, or that we’re trying to destroy our country. … I refuse to use that kind of rhetoric and I know that there’s parts of my base that they want that. And there’s some people, my colleagues, that even monetize that kind of outrage right now.”

    Unlike many of his Democratic colleagues, Fetterman voted to confirm some of Mr. Trump’s Cabinet picks, including Attorney General Pam Bondi.

    Nearly one year into the president’s term, Fetterman admitted he’s “incredibly disappointed” with Bondi, but added, “voting for someone does not mean that you agree with them on all of those things.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Did Democrats Win the Shutdown After All?

    [ad_1]

    The shutdown is not yet over: once the bill is through the Senate, it must pass the House—where Democratic leaders appear in no mood to compromise and the G.O.P. majority is slim—before Trump can sign off. But Senate Democrats’ resistance is over, and so this is an opportune moment to evaluate where the shutdown has left the Party. The impression that it contrived not only to snatch a snivelling defeat from the jaws of certain victory but to do so just as it had finally secured some electoral momentum is widespread, intuitive, and appealing—an exquisitely on-the-nose regression to the Party’s hapless recent mean. But I’m not sure that’s what happened here.

    First, if the central Democratic goal was to be seen to be fighting back, then the Party already did that: over the weekend, the shutdown passed the forty-day mark, making it the longest in U.S. history. (The previous longest was thirty-five days, in Trump’s first term.) And, at least to some extent, I think Democrats did succeed on the merits, too: not only in focussing attention on health care as a pocketbook issue but in tying it to broader concerns about Trump’s unprecedented corruption, albeit in a more roundabout way than the direct rhetorical fusion that Klein initially proposed. Trump himself helped with this, by hauling down a wing of the White House to build an opulent ballroom and hosting a “Great Gatsby”-themed party at Mar-a-Lago while attempting to withhold food aid from millions of low-income Americans. As the election results filtered in last week, a narrative emerged, including a version among Republicans, that Trump had lost because he had become more fixated on the trappings of power than on high prices.

    Presidents typically get a honeymoon period. Joe Biden’s seemed to end in August, 2021, when he was perceived as having botched the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Trump’s appeared to last longer, at least in terms of élite consensus. I’ve thought a lot about why this was, and have concluded that the diffuseness of crises that he provoked had a lot to do with it—preventing the concentration of attention on one singular debacle. The shutdown alone did not cut through this dynamic. But it played heavily into the story of the recent elections, which did. The media is now asking whether Trump, finally, might be walking and quacking like a lame duck.

    If Democrats’ goal was to guarantee Republican concessions on the health-care subsidies, then they would appear to have failed. Yet I’m not sure that Democrats holding out for longer would have got them much further. Trump did get the jitters, but responded, as The Atlantic’s Jonathan Chait noted, not by caving on health care but by ranting about the filibuster, ultimately picking a different way of doubling down. (And, as Klein has pointed out, at least in a very cynical political sense, a deal on the subsidies might not have been advantageous for Democrats politically, if it saved Republicans from an acute electoral vulnerability during next year’s midterms.)

    Both Chait and Klein argued this week that Democrats should nonetheless have fought on: Chait suggested that an internecine G.O.P. war over the filibuster would have intensified, possibly leading to its elimination (which Democrats ought to welcome, because the filibuster sucks); Klein wrote that the shutdown had only just succeeded in its goal of concentrating attention on Trump’s fecklessness, and that shutdown-induced chaos ruining people’s Thanksgiving trips would have underscored it. But I don’t think Senate Republicans would likely have scrapped the filibuster to end the impasse. (Their leader, John Thune, has at least been clear that the caucus wouldn’t have supported it.) And I don’t see why, at this point, the Democrats need this shutdown to continue marshalling attention—they have made sure that the health-care debate will continue outside that framework, and the Senate deal funds much of the government only through January, at which point Democrats could shutter it again. One could also make the case that by appearing to cave now, the Democrats have forfeited any credit they built for fighting in the first place. But pressing on with this particular fight forever wouldn’t have been costless: the shutdown has inflicted real harm on federal workers and SNAP recipients, among others. There are trade-offs, of course—rising Obamacare premiums will harm people, too.

    [ad_2]

    Jon Allsop

    Source link

  • Social media erupts after far-left mayor gives victory speech in foreign language: ‘Humiliating’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Newly re-elected Minneapolis Democratic Mayor Jacob Frey is facing backlash from conservatives for giving a victory speech in Somali and saying that Minneapolis welcomes Somalians.

    In a video of the speech posted online, Frey can be seen leading chants in Somali as the crowd responds and applauds.

    Popular conservative influencer Paul Szypula ripped into the progressive mayor, writing, “The pandering here is insane.”

    “Mayor Jacob Frey, as he won reelection, spoke almost a minute in Somalia then said Minneapolis belongs to Somalia,” said Szypula.

    MINNEAPOLIS MAYOR’S RACE ADVANCES TO RANKED CHOICE VOTING AFTER NO CANDIDATE REACHES 50%

    Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey speaks during a press conference at City Hall following a mass shooting at Annunciation Catholic School on Aug. 28, 2025 in Minneapolis.  (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

    In a second round of nonpartisan ranked-choice voting, Frey narrowly defeated a challenge from socialist Minneapolis state Sen. Omar Fateh. Fateh is the first Somali American and first Muslim to serve in the state senate.

    Fateh had the backing of the Twin Cities’ chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America and “Squad” member Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., who represents Minneapolis in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Meanwhile, Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., who was former Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate last year and is up for re-election next year, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., endorsed Frey’s campaign this year.

    While speaking with a crowd of Somali residents after his victory, Frey repeatedly thanked the crowd in Somali.

    ILHAN OMAR ERUPTS AT OWN PARTY FOR RENEGING ON SOCIALIST CANDIDATE’S ENDORSEMENT: ‘INEXCUSABLE’

    Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh

    Then Democratic socialist mayoral candidate Omar Fateh is seen in Minneapolis, Minnesota on July 19, 2025. (Omar Fateh campaign)

    “To the great people of Minneapolis, and I say that very intentionally, because no matter where you are from, Minneapolis should be a place where you are proud to call home,” he said.

    He then proceeded to list off a number of Somalian regions, saying, “Whether you are from Bosaso or Mogadishu, whether you are from Hargeisa or Garowe, whether you are from Beledweyne or southwest, Minneapolis is a place where you come to seek prosperity, where you come to raise your family.”

    “Here is what this election means, this election means this is a moment for unity, where the entire Somali community can come together and say, ‘This is our people, this is our city, we are united behind each other,” he said.

    Conservative pundit Gerry Callahan slammed Frey’s speech, saying, “This is an American politician, raised in America, educated in America, ostensibly representing Americans, prostrating himself in front of bunch of foreigners. Could be the most humiliating thing I’ve ever seen.” 

    Podcaster Matt Walsh also chimed in, writing, “As I have said many times now, politicians in this country should be required by law to speak English when addressing the public in an official capacity. There should never be a time when Americans can’t understand what their elected leaders are saying.”

    MINNEAPOLIS BECOMES FIRST MAJOR US CITY TO ALLOW MUSLIM CALLS TO PRAYER AT ALL HOURS

    Political campaign signs on fence in Cedar–Riverside Minneapolis

    Campaign signs for Minneapolis mayoral and city council candidates, including Omar Fateh and Jacob Frey, line a fence in Cedar–Riverside. (Michael Dorgan/Fox News Digital)

    Nick Sortor wrote, “I don’t know how large ICE’s presence in Minneapolis is, but it needs to be much, MUCH larger.” 

    Fox News Digital reached out to Frey’s team for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    This is not the first time Frey has garnered criticism over Somali-language political messaging. He was also widely criticized in September for releasing a campaign ad in Somali. 

    Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, commented on the ad, saying, “This must be stopped.” 

    Rep. Mike Collins, R-Ga., also reacted to the ad, posting a disapproving gif. 

    Kari Lake simply wrote, “WTAF?” which is an acronym for “what the actual f—.”

    Having entered office in 2018, Frey was elected to his third term as Minneapolis mayor on Tuesday. He is best known for marching with protesters during the 2020 Black Lives Matter riots, which were particularly destructive in Minneapolis, the city in which George Floyd died. Frey was also seen kneeling and weeping by Floyd’s casket at a memorial service.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • House Dem reveals why she hijacked Speaker Johnson’s presser with viral outburst

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., defended her interruption of Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson’s press conference that went viral this week, arguing her rage was justifiable because Johnson has been unwilling to negotiate with Democratic Party leaders to reopen the government.

    GOP lawmakers have argued the two warring parties could agree to a budget resolution and negotiate public healthcare subsidies – which Democrats are holding out for – down the road. But Houlahan suggested she disagreed despite Democratic Party Senate leader Chuck Schumer unveiling a plan Friday afternoon to extend the Obamacare subsidies in question for just a year and develop a committee to negotiate further how to handle the subsidies once the government is open. 

    “Because I believe that he’s our Speaker, the Speaker of the House and it’s important that he do his job,” Houlahan responded when asked why she decided to interrupt Johnson’s press conference. “And as near as I can tell, in the more than forty days [of the government shutdown], he hasn’t picked up a phone call and tried to speak to more than half of the country.”

    “Democrats could end this in the Senate if they would just pass the CR and then handle healthcare separate,” the congresswoman was then pressed. “Why do you see these as connected?” 

    SCHUMER, DEMS UNVEIL ALTERNATIVE SHUTDOWN PLAN, ASK FOR ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO OBAMACARE SUBSIDIES

    Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., is blocked by Capitol Police while interrupting Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., during a House Republican news conference about the government shutdown on the House steps of the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    “I believe them to be inextricably connected,” Houlahan responded. “This is literally the healthcare – the livelihood and ability of people to thrive in our country, and I think this is the time to have this conversation.”

    Houlahan went on to say that the Trump administration “has been slowly strangling the American people” and said that by shutting down the government it is “trying to complete the job.”

    “Over the last nine months this administration has been slowly strangling the American people,” she said. “Shutting back down the government by itself and now it’s trying to complete the job.”

    When pressed further, Houlahan’s staff stepped in and said she needed to go and could not answer any more questions.

    THUNE SAYS ‘WHEELS CAME OFF’ AS REPUBLICANS MULL NEXT SHUTDOWN MOVE 

    The Democrat became viral earlier this week when House Speaker Johnson’s press conference outside the capitol building briefly descended into chaos once she got into a heated exchange with the Speaker demanding he meet with her caucus to end the shutdown. Houlahan was jeered back at and at a certain point Johnson told her to respect his free speech rights.

    Speaker Mike Johnson clashing with Rep. Chrissy Houlahan

    Democrat Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, right, crashed Speaker Mike Johnson’s daily government shutdown press conference on Nov. 5, 2025 (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    “You should respect free speech,” Houlahan clapped back. “I’m asking you a question if you’re ready to have a conversation with the other side. You represent all of us. You are the speaker for all of us, sir.”

    Johnson attempted to take a question from a reporter but told them, “I can’t hear you because we have someone who doesn’t respect the rights of their colleagues.”

    Meanwhile, Houlahan kept shouting over the speaker even as he tried to call order.

    “You have an obligation not just to speak lies to the American people, you have an obligation to call the leadership of both parties and bring us together, and solve this problem together,” she yelled.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The following day, Houlahan participated in a Democratic Party press conference of her own on the steps of the capitol, during which no interruptions appeared to take place, according to recordings posted online. Houlahan referred to the viral moment between her and the speaker as a “dialogue,” during her comments. 

    “I like to think of it as a dialogue more than a confrontation,” she said of the pair’s exchange during the press conference. “He reminded me and the American people that he has literally not sat down and talked to Democratic leaders since before the shutdown. They refuse to sit down with us, and they refuse to tell the American public the truth.”

    Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind and Kelly Phares contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nancy Pelosi, former House speaker, to retire from Congress after this term

    [ad_1]

    Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has wielded enormous power in Congress and in the Democratic Party for decades, announced on Thursday that she will not seek reelection and will retire from Congress after her term ends in early 2027.

    Pelosi, 85, made her decision public in a video released Thursday morning that begins as a letter to the people of the San Francisco area, whom she has represented in the House since she was first elected in 1987. 

    “I will not be seeking reelection to Congress,” Pelosi says in the nearly six-minute video. “With a grateful heart, I look forward to my final year of service as your proud representative.”

    “As we go forward, my message to the city I love is this: San Francisco, know your power,” Pelosi says. “We have made history. We have made progress. We have always led the way. And now we must continue to do so by remaining full participants in our democracy, and fighting for the American ideals we hold dear.”

    Pelosi’s decision was months in the making. While she had drawn some Democratic challengers in her San Francisco area district, she has repeatedly expressed confidence that she would once again win her party’s nomination, should she run again. 

    Pelosi served as speaker from 2007 to 2011 and again from 2019 to 2023. She was the first woman to ever serve as House speaker and built a reputation for both legislative success, including passage of the Affordable Care Act, and for shrewd leadership, with her influence over House Democrats widely seen as unusually strong, even as she sometimes faced critics and complaints. Since leaving the speakership, she has remained a confidant and ally of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is spearheading Democratic efforts to win back the majority in 2026.

    As recently as last month, Jeffries told CBS News he had not had any conversations with Pelosi about whether she should run for reelection or retire.  

    “I strongly support any decision that she makes,” Jeffries said. “She is a legendary member of Congress, a legendary public servant.”

    House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar, a member of the California delegation, also praised Pelosi’s contributions, including her efforts this week to pass Proposition 50, a ballot redistricting initiative that could net additional Democratic seats in the state.   

    “Nobody wants to get in her way when she wants to achieve a political outcome, and she played that role and lifted up the delegation and gave us the help and support that we needed, truly a team effort,” Aguilar said. “She’s the greatest of all time.” 

    Pelosi’s video announcement was not only a reveal of her decision, but a testament to her career and accomplishments.

    Speaking over a montage of San Francisco landmarks, Pelosi says in the video that the city has “always been synonymous with the future” and with diversity. Pelosi then praises the city for addressing challenges head on, including HIV/AIDS, which has long been a focal point for her in Congress, where she advocated for policy changes and funding. 

    She then speaks in the video over soft, piano music with reflections that weave together her perspectives on her district and the country with an urgent, future-focused message about the continued need for leadership, be it on domestic policy or foreign policy, where she built a career as an outspoken proponent of human rights.

    Pelosi also cites her Roman Catholic faith as a keystone of her political life and quotes St. Francis of Assisi.

    Former President Joe Biden on Thursday hailed Pelosi as the “best Speaker of the House in American history.”

    “When I was President, we worked together to grow our economy, create millions of jobs, and make historic investments in our nation’s future,” Biden said in a statement. “She has devoted much of her life to this country, and America will always be grateful.”

    Former President Barack Obama said Pelosi “has served the American people and worked to make our country better.”

    “No one was more skilled at bringing people together and getting legislation passed – and I will always be grateful for her support of the Affordable Care Act,” Obama said in a statement Thursday.

    Former Secretary of  State Hillary Clinton echoed those sentiments.

    “There will be so many things to say about the legendary Nancy Pelosi’s transformational tenure in Congress—but for now, let’s start with ‘Thank you, Madam Speaker,'” Clinton said.

    At White House event Thursday, President Trump struck a different tone. Asked about Pelosi’s retirement, Mr. Trump said, “I think she’s an evil woman. I’m glad she’s retiring.”

    [ad_2]

    Robert Costa

    Source link

  • Examining why Democrats swept 2025 elections

    [ad_1]

    On Tuesday, Democrats Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill won their gubernatorial races and exceeded pollsters’ expectations. Political strategists Alex Conant and Ofirah Yheskel, along with CBS News political director Fin Gómez, join with analysis.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Senate Democrats discussing ways to end record government shutdown

    [ad_1]

    On Day 37 of the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, Senate Democrats held a caucus meeting to try to figure out ways to end the stalemate with Republicans over funding. CBS News congressional correspondent Nikole Killion has more from Capitol Hill.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats celebrate major victories in New York City, New Jersey and Virginia

    [ad_1]

    On the day after election night, Democrats are celebrating major victories in Virginia, New Jersey, California and New York City. Ed O’Keefe breaks it down.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Democrats’ 2025 election victories reportedly unnerve Republicans

    [ad_1]

    Democrats won big in Tuesday night’s elections in New Jersey, Virginia, New York City, and California. Marianna Sotomayor, congressional reporter for The Washington Post, and Deepa Shivaram, White House correspondent for NPR, join “The Takeout” to discuss how Republicans are reacting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warning signs for the GOP, lessons for Democrats: How Tuesday’s results will shape the 2026 midterms

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — Democrats’ dominance in Tuesday’s elections reset expectations ahead of next year’s midterm battle for House and Senate control, reinvigorating a party that has been in the political wilderness and leaving Republicans lamenting that the gains President Donald Trump made a year ago with key portions of the electorate all but evaporated.

    “Last night, if that wasn’t a message to all Republicans, then we’ve got our head jammed in the ground,” said West Virginia GOP Sen. Jim Justice.

    The list of Democratic winners spanned the party’s ideological spectrum — from Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist elected mayor of New York City, to Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill, the moderates with strong national security credentials elected governors of Virginia and New Jersey, respectively.

    Their wins could rally Democrats in competitive House, Senate and governor’s races next year around a message all three made central to their campaigns, in different forms: pledges to reduce the cost of living.

    But the playing field won’t be easy for Democrats. Strategists in both parties agree that control of the House will be in play, but the net effect of redistricting moves around the country — particularly if the Supreme Court decides to weaken the Voting Rights Act — could leave fewer competitive seats for Democrats. And the 2026 Senate map includes only a handful of GOP-held seats that appear to be in play and multiple seats Democrats will have to defend.

    Still, Tuesday’s results may embolden Democrats to continue their strategy in the ongoing government shutdown, while igniting new debates over what kinds of candidates can win, and where.

    Margie Omero, a Democratic pollster, said the elections should be viewed within the broader context of a year in which the party’s voters have packed town halls and rallies, won key races like the Wisconsin Supreme Court contest in the spring and a slew of special elections, and scored candidate recruitment victories for next year’s midterms.

    “Take the whole year into account and it tells a pretty similar story, which is that Democrats are motivated and Republicans are less motivated,” Omero said.

    Trump, she said, “lost popularity and he’s lost altitude on all of his top issues, like the economy and immigration.”

    “Where does that leave his supporters in a midterm or off-year election?” Omero said. “What are they coming out for, if he’s less popular and his policies are less popular and his agenda’s less popular?”

    Voters cast their ballots at a polling station in Arlington, Virginia, on November 4. Credit: Alex Wong / Getty Images via CNN Newsource

    In addition to the wins in governor’s races and mayoral elections, and a critical victory in a statewide vote to green-light a redistricting effort to add five more seats that favor Democrats in California, the party also scored a long list of lower-profile victories on Tuesday.

    They broke the GOP’s supermajority in the Mississippi state Senate. They flipped two seats on Georgia’s Public Service Commission. They defeated a voter identification ballot initiative in Maine. Their incumbent Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices prevailed in retention votes.

    The results showed that many of the gains Trump had made in 2024 have evaporated. In New Jersey, Republican gubernatorial nominee Jack Ciattarelli couldn’t match Trump’s support levels with Latino and Black voters. In Virginia, Spanberger notched the most impressive Democratic performance in recent years — besting the margins of the party’s last two presidential nominees and carrying a scandal-plagued nominee for attorney general, Jay Jones, to victory on her coattails.

    For the GOP, the fallout could come in a number of forms — including altering the party’s push for redistricting to add winnable congressional seats in deep-red states, and changing how Republicans in competitive midterm races approach Trump.

    “The picture is pretty clear,” said Republican pollster Whit Ayres. “It is not a muddled message.”

    Ayres pointed to several lessons Republicans should take from Tuesday’s results. In Virginia and New Jersey, two states Trump lost in all three of his presidential runs, Republican gubernatorial candidates tied themselves to the president, a “losing strategy from the start,” he said.

    Republicans might also be inclined to rethink their strategy on redistricting, he said.

    “Given the Democratic margins yesterday, about the last thing you want to do if you want to hold on to the House is weaken Republican incumbent House members, and that’s exactly what will happen if you’re trying to carve out more Republican districts,” he said.

    Trump world deflects blame

    For his part, Trump and his top allies publicly downplayed the election results, with the president noting on social media that he wasn’t on the ballot. He partially blamed the ongoing federal government shutdown, telling Republican lawmakers in a closed-door session Wednesday morning that they are getting “killed” politically by the impasse, a source told CNN.

    Vice President JD Vance said that “it’s idiotic to overreact to a couple of elections in blue states.” But he also warned that the GOP needs “to do better at turning out voters than we have in the past.”

    “I said it in 2022, and I’ve said it repeatedly since: our coalition is ‘lower propensity’ and that means we have to do better at turning out voters than we have in the past,” Vance said Wednesday morning on X.

    Vance also urged Republicans to focus on affordability. He said the Trump administration “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden and Rome wasn’t built in a day.”

    Trump adviser Alex Bruesewitz called the election results a “great lesson for the Republican Party,” blaming the losing Virginia gubernatorial nominee, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, for failing to excite Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement.

    “Your candidate needs to be able to turn out ALL FACTIONS of our party, and they do that by being MAGA all the way,” he wrote on X.

    Though Tuesday’s GOP losses were wide-ranging, Republicans focused on elevating one Democratic winner: Mamdani, the 34-year-old Muslim and democratic socialist mayor-elect of New York City.

    House Majority Leader Steve Scalise called Mamdani “the new leader of the Democrat Party.”

    House Speaker Mike Johnson said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is “apparently a socialist now,” since Jeffries endorsed Mamdani.

    Democratic ideological rifts remain

    Mamdani’s victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York City emboldened the left wing of the Democratic Party. Usamah Andrabi, a spokesperson for Justice Democrats, a group created to oust “corporate Democrats” and elect progressives, said Mamdani’s win marks a “turning point” for their movement and shows the importance of competitive races.

    One long-simmering debate Tuesday’s results didn’t settle is the ideological battle within the Democratic Party over the way forward, with a host of competitive House and Senate primaries just months away and the 2028 presidential primary already looming large.

    “Democratic primaries can and should be the battleground for the control of our party’s direction,” Andrabi said.

    A supporter for independent mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo watches election night returns during a watch party for Cuomo in New York on Tuesday. Credit: Heather Khalifa / AP via CNN Newsource

    However, in New Jersey and Virginia, the winning Democratic candidates are moderates with strong national security credentials. Spanberger, the Virginia governor-elect, criticized Mamdani in an interview with CNN just days before the election, suggesting his proposals aimed at reducing the cost of living will ultimately disappoint his supporters.

    “We don’t need to settle,” said Omero, the Democratic pollster. “We’re able to have more moderate candidates in some places and more progressive candidates in some places. That feels like an important lesson.”

    One area where Democrats appeared broadly on the same page Wednesday is the ongoing government shutdown — fueled in part by Democrats’ demand that Republicans make concessions on health care funding in order to pass a measure that would fund the government.

    Connecticut Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy wrote on X that it is “not a coincidence these big wins came at the exact moment when Democrats are using our power to stand for something and be strong. A huge risk to not learn that lesson.”

    [ad_2]

    Eric Bradner, Arit John and CNN

    Source link

  • A Next-Generation Victory for Democrats

    [ad_1]

    None of the three Democrats who won convincingly on Tuesday was in politics when Donald Trump was first elected President. In 2016, Abigail Spanberger, the governor-elect of Virginia, had recently left the C.I.A. and was working for an educational consultancy. Mikie Sherrill, who just won the race to be New Jersey’s next governor, was a helicopter pilot turned federal prosecutor. Zohran Mamdani, the thirty-four-year-old state assemblyman who will soon be New York City’s mayor, was rapping as Young Cardamom and volunteering for left-wing City Council candidates. For much of the past decade, the Democratic Party has seemed stuck in a pre-Trump past; Tuesday seemed like the turning of a generational page. At his victory party on Tuesday night, Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist and the most ideological of the trio, was the most explicit about the shift: “We are breathing in the air of a city that has been reborn.”

    The 2025 elections were always going to be about the Democrats, not just because this year’s major races were set in blue places but because the Party has been adrift since last year’s Presidential election. Lately, the most reliable rhythm in political news has been commentators explaining what the Democrats “should” and “must” do. (“The Democrats must add to their collective vocabulary two words . . . equality and oligarchy,” Fintan O’Toole wrote, in The New York Review of Books, urging a more populist turn. More ecumenically, Ezra Klein wrote, in the Times, “The Democratic Party does not need to choose to be one thing. It needs to choose to be more things.”) For some more centrist Democrats, what the Party needed was to avoid being tagged with Mamdani’s more expansive left-wing views. Asked on CNN whether Mamdani was the future of the Party, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries pointedly said no. (“Good to know,” Mamdani said, when told about Jeffries’s comment.) Senator Chuck Schumer refused to say who he voted for. “People do want us to be aspirational and dream big,” Spanberger said of Mamdani, a few days before the election. “They also don’t want us to lie to them.”

    But despite all the prickly talk and the very careful factional positioning—left versus center—the Democrats who won Tuesday all shared the same theme: that the most important things cost too much. Asked to define his closing message, Mamdani said it was “the same message that we opened with, which is that this is the most expensive city in the United States of America, and it’s time to make it affordable.” NBC News, following Spanberger during the last days of her campaign, found her “laser-focussed” on an economic message, because, as she put it, “We see the hardships of this moment.” In Sherrill’s final ad, she said, “I’ll serve you as governor to drive your costs down.” Mamdani’s support of a rent freeze was seen as a socialist-style proposal, but Sherrill had herself campaigned on declaring a state of emergency on her first day in office, in order to freeze utility costs for New Jersey families, including suburban homeowners. These ideas came from opposite factions in the Party, but, when you listened to them, they sounded very much the same.

    Set aside the endless and sometimes annoyingly abstract debate over whether the Democrats should move to the left or to the center, and a pair of insights emerge from Tuesday’s results, both of which might give some hope to a Party that has lately been starved for it. First, the prospect that the 2024 election marked an electoral “realignment,” in which young and nonwhite voters without college degrees moved inexorably toward the Republicans, now seems increasingly unlikely. The margins in Virginia, where Spanberger won by about fifteen percentage points, and New Jersey, where Sherrill won by twelve, suggested that these weaknesses had been largely circumstantial, with some racially diverse areas that had been drifting away from the Democrats, such as Hudson County, in New Jersey, swinging back toward them on Thursday. In the Washington Post/ABC News poll taken shortly before the election, sixty-six per cent of young voters disapproved of the job that President Trump is doing, as did more than seventy per cent of racial minorities. (“That’s not screaming realignment,” the analyst Ronald Brownstein noted.) Exit polls published by NBC had Spanberger and Sherrill winning men under twenty-nine—the demographic most thought to be fleeing to the right—by ten points. Mamdani won them by forty. This time, it was the New York socialist who brought new voters into the political process.

    Maybe more significant, as Mamdani, Sherrill, and Spanberger all seemed to recognize, Trump has handed them not just an issue but a theme that the Party might carry through to the midterms. Having won the Presidency in part because of concerns about the escalating cost of living, Trump has governed in ways that have deepened the problem. His so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act amounted to a vast transfer of money from the poor to the rich. He has been personally fixated on an escalation of tariffs that has made ordinary goods much more expensive. During the ongoing government shutdown, he has at one point refused a court order requiring his Administration to disburse funds to pay food-stamp recipients, as lines at food pantries grow. Millions of people now stand to lose health insurance because of the President’s hard-line position in budget negotiations. The most natural campaign for Democrats to run—one that the Party was built to run in the twentieth century—is ordinary people against the rich. Trump is handing it back to them. Cue the ads: the billionaire pardoned after investing in the Trump family’s crypto projects; the twenty billion dollars sent away to bolster the Argentinean President, a political ally of the White House, at the expense of American farmers; the bulldozers razing the East Wing in a project underwritten by Trump’s donors.

    How much more optimistic should Democrats allow themselves to be? Trump is still the President, and the pressures of his policies and his authoritarian tendencies are still mounting. Tuesday’s elections took place mostly in safely Democratic cities and states, among an off-year electorate that has recently tended to be bluer than in Presidential years, and the Party is still full of contradictory instincts and mutual antipathy. Even so, the winning campaigns suggested the themes that might help renew the Party, and their margins of victory offered hope for a strong midterm. Tuesday night on CNN had begun with Dick Cheney’s death and ended with a live stream hosted by Ben Shapiro and Charlamagne tha God. The old system was under pressure everywhere. “I am young, despite my best efforts to grow older,” Mamdani told his Election Night party. For the first time in a while, he might have said the same of his party, too. ♦

    [ad_2]

    Benjamin Wallace-Wells

    Source link

  • Key takeaways from the 2025 elections

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    After last year’s stunning electoral setbacks, Democrats needed a big night on Tuesday.

    And they got it.

    “Democrats Sweep Election Night, Fueling Momentum Going Into 2026 Midterms,” screamed the headline from a Democratic National Committee (DNC) email late in the evening, as the party pointed to double-digit victories in the gubernatorial elections in blue-leaning New Jersey and Virginia, and convincing victories in crucial ballot box showdowns in Democrat-dominated California and battleground Pennsylvania.

    In arguably the most closely watched election this autumn, democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani made history as the first Muslim and first Millennial elected New York City mayor.

    HEAD HERE FOR FOX NEWS ELECTION 2025 COVERAGE

    New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill speaks during an election night party in East Brunswick, N.J., Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. (Matt Rourke/AP Photo)

    While Mamdani’s victory in the nation’s most populous city is a shot in the arm for the rise of the socialist movement, it also appears to be a political gift for Republicans.

    Here are three key takeaways from Election Night 2025.

    1. The Mamdani factor

    Since Mamdani’s Democratic mayoral primary victory in June, Republicans have repeatedly aimed to make the now-34-year-old Ugandan-born state lawmaker from New York City the new face of the Democratic Party, as they work to characterize Democrats as far-left socialists.

    And as Mamdani was on his way to a roughly 9-point win in Tuesday’s general election over former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who was running as an independent, the GOP struck again.

    HEAD HERE FOR FOX NEWS LIVE UPDATES ON THE 2025 BALLOT BOX SHOWDOWNS

    “Democrats have officially handed New York City over to a self-proclaimed Communist, and hardworking families will be the ones paying the price,” Republican National Committee (RNC) chair Joe Gruters claimed in a statement. “His election is proof that the Democrat Party has abandoned common sense and tied themselves to extremism.”

    National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spokesman Mike Marinella charged that “the Democrat Party has surrendered to radical socialist Zohran Mamdani and the far-left mob who are now running the show.”

    Zohran Mamdani celebrating

    Socialist Zohran Mamdani won his New York City mayoral race over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa. (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)

    And as Fox News Digital first reported on Wednesday morning, the NRCC immediately launched ads linking Mamdani to House Democrats who face challenging re-elections in next year’s midterms, when the GOP aims to defend its fragile majority in the chamber.

    Longtime Republican strategist Colin Reed told Fox News Digital that Democrats “are now going to have an ascendant and emboldened Mayor-elect Mamdani dominating the national spotlight.”

    WHAT THE RESULTS OF THE 2025 ELECTIONS MAY MEAN FOR DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS

    But veteran Democratic strategist Joe Caiazzo, pointing to the gubernatorial victories by moderate Democrats Rep. Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey and former Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, emphasized “tonight proved that the Democrats’ pathway back to majorities in both chambers and the White House runs directly through the idea of building a big enough tent to encompass moderates and progressives.”

    2. Did Democrats get their mojo back?

    Democrats lost control of the White House and Senate and failed to win back the House majority in last year’s elections, as Republicans made major gains with key parts of the Democratic Party base, including minorities and younger voters.

    And Democrats have been mostly powerless to blunt President Donald Trump‘s unprecedented and explosive second-term agenda.

    But Democrats see Tuesday’s impressive victories as the first step in a political rebound, and an affirmation of the party’s campaign trail emphasis this year on the issue of affordability.

    “American voters just delivered a Democratic resurgence. A Republican reckoning. A Blue Sweep. And it happened because our Democratic candidates, no matter where they are, no matter how they fit into our big tent party, are meeting voters at the kitchen table, not the gilded ballroom,” DNC chair Ken Martin highlighted.

    And Martin argued, “To all the Republicans who have bowed a cowardly knee to Trump all year, consider this: We’re coming after your jobs next.”

    Abigail Spanberger celebrates Virginia gubernatorial win

    Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate, former Rep. Abigail Spanberger celebrates as she takes the stage during her election night rally at the Greater Richmond Convention Center on Nov. 04, 2025. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    Caiazzo said that the Democrats’ ballot box victories show that “voters are hungry for candidates that speak to their concerns and offer to unite, not divide.”

    But Reed countered that “Democrat candidates winning in blue parts of the country isn’t unexpected. The fact that there was any suspense at all heading into the evening was the more surprising development.”

    And he pointed out that “the battle for next year’s midterms is taking place in friendlier terrain.”

    3. No MAGA momentum

    While he lost both New Jersey and Virginia in last year’s presidential election, Trump made major gains in both states.

    And a big question heading into the 2025 elections was whether MAGA supporters, who tend to be low-propensity voters, would cast ballots in an off-election year when Trump wasn’t on the ballot.

    Many didn’t.

    The president, in a quote on social media that he attributed to “pollsters,” said that “TRUMP WASN’T ON THE BALLOT, AND SHUTDOWN, WERE THE TWO REASONS THAT REPUBLICANS LOST ELECTIONS TONIGHT.”

    Veteran Republican strategist Chris LaCivita, who served as a co-campaign manager of Trump’s 2024 White House bid, highlighted, “Candidate quality matters. Tonight was a great lesson for the Republican Party: running squishy Rs who are lukewarm on Trump and MAGA, even in “purple” states, doesn’t work.”

    Winsome Sears cheers

    Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears greets supporters on Election Night in Leesburg, Virginia. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    LaCivita specifically called out Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, the GOP gubernatorial nominee who lost to Spanberger by 15 points.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    And he warned that “Republicans must get smart and run only MAGA candidates moving forward; otherwise, there will be massive turnout problems when @realDonaldTrump is not on the ballot!”

    Reed emphasized that for the GOP, “the task remains re-assembling the winning Trump coalition without his name on the ballot. The good news for the Republican side is the deep bench of talented and proven leaders to carry that flag into battle.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link