ReportWire

Tag: Death Penalty

  • Suspect left note saying he planned to kill Charlie Kirk, later confessed in texts, prosecutor says

    [ad_1]

    Prosecutors brought a murder charge Tuesday against the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk and outlined evidence, including a text message confession to his partner and a note left beforehand saying he had the opportunity to kill one of the nation’s leading conservative voices “and I’m going to take it.”DNA on the trigger of the rifle that killed Kirk also matched that of Tyler Robinson, Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray said while outlining the evidence and announcing charges that could result in the death penalty if Robinson is convicted.The prosecutor said Robinson, 22, wrote in one text that he spent more than a week planning the attack on Kirk, a prominent force in politics credited with energizing the Republican youth movement and helping Donald Trump win back the White House in 2024.”The murder of Charlie Kirk is an American tragedy,” Gray said.Kirk was gunned down Sept. 10 while speaking with students at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors allege Robinson shot Kirk in the neck with a bolt-action rifle from the roof of a nearby building on the campus in Orem, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) south of Salt Lake City. Robinson appeared briefly Tuesday before a judge by video from jail. He nodded slightly at times but mostly stared straight ahead as the judge read the charges against him and appointed an attorney to represent him. Robinson’s family has declined to comment to The Associated Press since his arrest.Was Charlie Kirk targeted over anti-transgender views?Authorities have not revealed a clear motive in the shooting, but Gray said that Robinson wrote in a text about Kirk to his partner: “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”Robinson also left a note for his partner hidden under a keyboard that said, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it,” according to Gray.The prosecutor declined to answer whether Robinson targeted Kirk for his anti-transgender views. Kirk was shot while taking a question that touched on mass shootings, gun violence and transgender people.”That is for a jury to decide,” Gray said.Robinson was involved in a romantic relationship with his roommate, who investigators say was transgender, which hasn’t been confirmed. Gray said the partner has been cooperating with investigators.Robinson’s partner appeared shocked in the text exchange after the shooting, according to court documents, asking Robinson “why he did it and how long he’d been planning it.”Parents said their son became more politicalWhile authorities say Robinson hasn’t been cooperating with investigators, they say his family and friends have been talking.Robinson’s mother told investigators that their son had turned left politically in the last year and became more supportive of gay and transgender rights after dating someone who is transgender, Gray said.Those decisions prompted several conversations in the household, especially between Robinson and his father. They had different political views and Robinson told his partner in a text that his dad had become a “diehard MAGA” since Trump was elected.Robinson’s mother recognized him when authorities released a picture of the suspect and his parents confronted him, at which time Robinson said he wanted to kill himself, Gray said.The family persuaded him to meet with a family friend who is a retired sheriff’s deputy, who persuaded Robinson to turn himself in, the prosecutor said.Robinson was arrested late Thursday near St. George, the southern Utah community where he grew up, about 240 miles southwest of where the shooting happened.Robinson detailed movements after the shootingIn a text exchange with his partner released by authorities, Robinson wrote: “I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.”Then he wrote: “Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hopefully they have moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it.” After that, he sent: “I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t wanna chance it.”He also was worried about losing his grandfather’s rifle and mentioned several times in the texts that he wished he had picked it up, according to the texts shared in court documents, which did not have timestamps. It was unclear how long after the shooting Robinson was texting.”To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you,” Robinson wrote in another text to his partner.Prosecutor says Robinson told partner to delete textsRobinson discarded the rifle and clothing and asked his roommate to conceal evidence, Gray said.Robinson was charged with felony discharge of a firearm, punishable by up to life in prison, and obstructing justice, punishable by up to 15 years in prison.He also was charged with witness tampering because he had directed his partner to delete their text messages and told his partner to stay silent if questioned by police, Gray said.Kash Patel says investigators will look at everyoneFBI Director Kash Patel said Tuesday that agents are looking at “anyone and everyone” who was involved in a gaming chatroom on the social media platform Discord with Robinson. The chatroom involved “a lot more” than 20 people, he said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington.”We are investigating Charlie’s assassination fully and completely and running out every lead related to any allegation of broader violence,” Patel said in response to a question about whether the Kirk shooting was being treated as part of a broader trend of violence against religious groups.The charges filed Tuesday carry two enhancements, including committing several of the crimes in front of or close to children and carrying out violence based on the subject’s political beliefs.Gray declined to say whether Robinson’s partner could face charges or whether anyone else might face charges.Kirk, a dominant figure in conservative politics, became a confidant of President Donald Trump after founding Arizona-based Turning Point USA, one of the nation’s largest political organizations. He brought young, conservative evangelical Christians into politics.In the days since Kirk’s assassination, Americans have found themselves facing questions about rising political violence, the deep divisions that brought the nation here and whether anything can change.Despite calls for greater civility, some who opposed Kirk’s provocative statements about gender, race and politics criticized him after his death. Many Republicans have led the push to punish anyone they believe dishonored him, causing both public and private workers to lose their jobs or face other consequences at work.___Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio.

    Prosecutors brought a murder charge Tuesday against the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk and outlined evidence, including a text message confession to his partner and a note left beforehand saying he had the opportunity to kill one of the nation’s leading conservative voices “and I’m going to take it.”

    DNA on the trigger of the rifle that killed Kirk also matched that of Tyler Robinson, Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray said while outlining the evidence and announcing charges that could result in the death penalty if Robinson is convicted.

    The prosecutor said Robinson, 22, wrote in one text that he spent more than a week planning the attack on Kirk, a prominent force in politics credited with energizing the Republican youth movement and helping Donald Trump win back the White House in 2024.

    “The murder of Charlie Kirk is an American tragedy,” Gray said.

    Kirk was gunned down Sept. 10 while speaking with students at Utah Valley University. Prosecutors allege Robinson shot Kirk in the neck with a bolt-action rifle from the roof of a nearby building on the campus in Orem, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) south of Salt Lake City.

    Robinson appeared briefly Tuesday before a judge by video from jail. He nodded slightly at times but mostly stared straight ahead as the judge read the charges against him and appointed an attorney to represent him. Robinson’s family has declined to comment to The Associated Press since his arrest.

    FBI

    Tyler Robinson, suspect in Charlie Kirk’s assassination

    Was Charlie Kirk targeted over anti-transgender views?

    Authorities have not revealed a clear motive in the shooting, but Gray said that Robinson wrote in a text about Kirk to his partner: “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

    Robinson also left a note for his partner hidden under a keyboard that said, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it,” according to Gray.

    The prosecutor declined to answer whether Robinson targeted Kirk for his anti-transgender views. Kirk was shot while taking a question that touched on mass shootings, gun violence and transgender people.

    “That is for a jury to decide,” Gray said.

    Robinson was involved in a romantic relationship with his roommate, who investigators say was transgender, which hasn’t been confirmed. Gray said the partner has been cooperating with investigators.

    Robinson’s partner appeared shocked in the text exchange after the shooting, according to court documents, asking Robinson “why he did it and how long he’d been planning it.”

    Parents said their son became more political

    While authorities say Robinson hasn’t been cooperating with investigators, they say his family and friends have been talking.

    Robinson’s mother told investigators that their son had turned left politically in the last year and became more supportive of gay and transgender rights after dating someone who is transgender, Gray said.

    Those decisions prompted several conversations in the household, especially between Robinson and his father. They had different political views and Robinson told his partner in a text that his dad had become a “diehard MAGA” since Trump was elected.

    Robinson’s mother recognized him when authorities released a picture of the suspect and his parents confronted him, at which time Robinson said he wanted to kill himself, Gray said.

    The family persuaded him to meet with a family friend who is a retired sheriff’s deputy, who persuaded Robinson to turn himself in, the prosecutor said.

    Robinson was arrested late Thursday near St. George, the southern Utah community where he grew up, about 240 miles southwest of where the shooting happened.

    Robinson detailed movements after the shooting

    In a text exchange with his partner released by authorities, Robinson wrote: “I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.”

    Then he wrote: “Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hopefully they have moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it.” After that, he sent: “I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t wanna chance it.”

    He also was worried about losing his grandfather’s rifle and mentioned several times in the texts that he wished he had picked it up, according to the texts shared in court documents, which did not have timestamps. It was unclear how long after the shooting Robinson was texting.

    “To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you,” Robinson wrote in another text to his partner.

    Prosecutor says Robinson told partner to delete texts

    Robinson discarded the rifle and clothing and asked his roommate to conceal evidence, Gray said.

    Robinson was charged with felony discharge of a firearm, punishable by up to life in prison, and obstructing justice, punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

    He also was charged with witness tampering because he had directed his partner to delete their text messages and told his partner to stay silent if questioned by police, Gray said.

    Kash Patel says investigators will look at everyone

    FBI Director Kash Patel said Tuesday that agents are looking at “anyone and everyone” who was involved in a gaming chatroom on the social media platform Discord with Robinson. The chatroom involved “a lot more” than 20 people, he said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington.

    “We are investigating Charlie’s assassination fully and completely and running out every lead related to any allegation of broader violence,” Patel said in response to a question about whether the Kirk shooting was being treated as part of a broader trend of violence against religious groups.

    The charges filed Tuesday carry two enhancements, including committing several of the crimes in front of or close to children and carrying out violence based on the subject’s political beliefs.

    Gray declined to say whether Robinson’s partner could face charges or whether anyone else might face charges.

    Kirk, a dominant figure in conservative politics, became a confidant of President Donald Trump after founding Arizona-based Turning Point USA, one of the nation’s largest political organizations. He brought young, conservative evangelical Christians into politics.

    In the days since Kirk’s assassination, Americans have found themselves facing questions about rising political violence, the deep divisions that brought the nation here and whether anything can change.

    Despite calls for greater civility, some who opposed Kirk’s provocative statements about gender, race and politics criticized him after his death. Many Republicans have led the push to punish anyone they believe dishonored him, causing both public and private workers to lose their jobs or face other consequences at work.

    ___

    Seewer reported from Toledo, Ohio.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutors seeking death penalty in Charlie Kirk murder. What is the law in Utah?

    [ad_1]

    Prosecutors say they will seek the death penalty in the case against the man accused of killing conservative political activist Charlie Kirk.

    Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray called the murder of Kirk “an American tragedy” Tuesday in a press conference announcing aggravated murder and other charges against 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson.

    In Utah, aggravated murder is the only crime subject to the death penalty. The law contains a list of circumstances under which prosecutors could charge a person with that offense including, “the murderer knowingly created a great risk of death to a person other than the victim and the murderer.”

    The aggravated murder charge against Robinson reads he “intentionally or knowingly caused the death of Charlie Kirk under the following circumstance: The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to another individual other than Charlie Kirk and the defendant,” according to court documents.

    Charlie Kirk hands out hats before he was shot during Turning Point USA’s visit to Utah Valley University in Orem on Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2025. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News

    Robinson allegedly fatally shot Kirk with a high-powered rifle from a rooftop as he spoke at an outdoor event at Utah Valley University last Wednesday.

    Gray filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty Tuesday after Robinson made his first court appearance.

    “I do not take this decision lightly and it is a decision I have made independently as county attorney based solely on the available evidence and circumstances and nature of the crime,” he said.

    Gray said he was not pressured by either the Trump administration or Utah Gov. Spencer Cox’s office to seek the death penalty.

    Utah capital punishment law

    Robinson First Appearance_SGW_01134 copy.jpg

    Tyler Robinson, 22, the suspect in the shooting death of Charlie Kirk, appears by camera before Judge Tony Graf in Utah’s 4th District Court on Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025, for his initial appearance in Provo, Utah. | Scott G Winterton, Deseret News

    Lethal injection is the primary method of execution in Utah but firing squad is an alternative method. Executions are carried out at the Utah State Correctional Facility in Salt Lake City.

    In 2004, Utah removed the right of the condemned to choose the method of execution and left lethal injection as the only option. But in 2015, the state restored the firing squad as a legal means of execution if it’s unable to obtain the necessary lethal injection drugs within 30 days of a scheduled execution.

    Because the law was not retroactive, death-row inmates who chose the firing squad before February 2004 are still to be executed in that manner.

    In 2022, two Republican state lawmakers sought to abolish the death penalty in Utah, but the bill failed to advance out of a House committee.

    Utah prosecutors are pursuing the death penalty less frequently. There are only two active capital cases in the state, both involving men accused of killing police officers.

    Executions in Utah

    Convicted killer Ralph Menzies, who has dementia, was scheduled to die by firing squad on Sept. 5. But the Utah Supreme Court vacated his death warrant, ruling that the district court erred by not allowing him a new competency hearing.

    Utah was the first state to execute someone after the United States reinstated capital punishment in 1976. A firing squad shot convicted killer Gary Gilmore on Jan. 17, 1977 at the Utah State Prison.

    Since then, the state has executed seven men; the last one was Taberon Honie on Aug. 8, 2024. There are currently four men on death row in the state. The average length of stay on death row is about 34 years.

    Utah is one of only three states to have ever carried out executions by firing squad and one of only two to do so after the moratorium on capital punishment ended, the other being South Carolina.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecutors will seek death penalty for suspect in killing of Charlie Kirk

    [ad_1]

    Prosecutors will seek the death penalty for Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old man accused of killing Charlie Kirk with a single shot at Utah Valley University, officials announced Tuesday.

    “I do not take this decision lightly,” Utah County Atty. Jeffrey Gray said during a news conference. “It’s a decision I made independently as county attorney.”

    Robinson has been charged with seven counts, Gray said, including one count of aggravated murder and two counts of obstruction of justice, for allegedly hiding the rifle used in the killing and disposing of his clothes.

    • Share via

    Robinson is also facing two counts of witness tampering after he allegedly instructed his roommate to delete incriminating texts, and asking them not to talk to investigators if they were questioned by authorities.

    Kirk, 31, was an influential figure in conservative and right-wing circles, winning praise for his views on heated topics, including abortion, immigration and gender identity.

    His death by a single gunshot during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University shocked the nation and has led to vigorous debate over the motivations of his accused killer.

    The FBI said it collected a screwdriver containing Robinson’s DNA on the rooftop of a building at Utah Valley University and a firearm wrapped in a towel that had been discarded in a nearby wooded area. The towel also had Robinson’s DNA on it, FBI Director Kash Patel said, adding that the firearm was still being processed for forensic evidence.

    As Robinson was set to appear in court for the first time, Patel appeared before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, where he faced harsh questioning and criticism over his handling of the agency and the immediate investigation into Kirk’s killing.

    Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee, accused Patel of releasing incorrect information about the shooting in order to take credit for the arrest.

    “Director Patel again sparked mass confusion by incorrectly claiming on social media that the shooter was in custody — which he then had to walk back with another social media post,” Durbin said in his opening remarks. “Mr. Patel was so anxious to take credit for finding Mr. Kirk’s assassin that he violated one of the basics of effective law enforcement: at critical stages of an investigation, shut up and let the professionals do their job.”

    But Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) defended Patel’s handling of the Kirk probe.

    “I’ve seen no reason for the armchair quarterbacks to be criticizing his performance,” Cornyn said. “I mean, it took roughly 33 hours to arrest the killer. And you know, there’s always a certain fog that goes along with emergency situations like this. So I know initially they thought they had their man, but turned out not.”

    During the hearing, Patel said investigators had interviewed numerous people tied to Robinson, including relatives, friends and his partner.

    Patel confirmed Robinson’s partner was transitioning from male to female.

    He added that the source and reasoning behind engravings on the shell casings is still under investigation.

    Officials are still examining whether “anyone was involved as an accomplice.”

    Agents are also interviewing people who interacted with the suspect online, Patel said.

    That includes a Discord chat that seems to have involved more than 20 people moments after the shooting.

    “We’re running them all down,” Patel said.

    The FBI, he said, is “going to be investigating anyone and everyone involved in that Discord chat.”

    [ad_2]

    Salvador Hernandez, Richard Winton

    Source link

  • Charlie Kirk’s widow vows to continue his mission after his killing

    [ad_1]

    Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has vowed to continue her husband’s mission after he was shot and killed at an event in Utah, with police arresting 22-year-old Tyler Robinson for the murder.”If you thought my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea, you just have no idea what you have unleashed across this entire country,” Erika Kirk said. Vigils were held across the country last night in honor of the late conservative activist. The FBI has been searching Robinson’s home for evidence and clues. Investigators say Robinson fired a single round from a bolt-action rifle, leaving behind the weapon and bullet casings engraved with messages like, “Hey fascist, catch.” Authorities say Robinson had grown increasingly political in recent years, telling family members he knew Kirk would be on the Utah Valley University campus and criticizing the conservative activist.Police say it was Robinson’s father who recognized his son as the suspect after the FBI released photos. He encouraged Robinson to turn himself in. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said, “A family member of Tyler Robinson reached out to a family friend who contacted the Washington County Sheriff’s Office with information that Robinson had confessed to them or implied that he had committed the incident.”Robinson is due in court Tuesday on murder charges. Both President Trump and Utah’s governor have expressed their desire for prosecutors to pursue the death penalty.Voter registration records show that Robinson is registered to vote unaffiliated with any party, although he is listed as an “inactive” voter, meaning he hasn’t voted in at least the most recent two general elections.Kentucky Rep. James Comer said people feel safer now that the suspect is in custody, but there are still concerns from lawmakers about the rise of political violence. Some lawmakers have changed or canceled their political events. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are calling for calmer rhetoric and more security, something that is being considered on Capitol Hill.

    Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, has vowed to continue her husband’s mission after he was shot and killed at an event in Utah, with police arresting 22-year-old Tyler Robinson for the murder.

    “If you thought my husband’s mission was powerful before, you have no idea, you just have no idea what you have unleashed across this entire country,” Erika Kirk said.

    Vigils were held across the country last night in honor of the late conservative activist.

    The FBI has been searching Robinson’s home for evidence and clues. Investigators say Robinson fired a single round from a bolt-action rifle, leaving behind the weapon and bullet casings engraved with messages like, “Hey fascist, catch.”

    Authorities say Robinson had grown increasingly political in recent years, telling family members he knew Kirk would be on the Utah Valley University campus and criticizing the conservative activist.

    Police say it was Robinson’s father who recognized his son as the suspect after the FBI released photos. He encouraged Robinson to turn himself in.

    Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said, “A family member of Tyler Robinson reached out to a family friend who contacted the Washington County Sheriff’s Office with information that Robinson had confessed to them or implied that he had committed the incident.”

    Robinson is due in court Tuesday on murder charges. Both President Trump and Utah’s governor have expressed their desire for prosecutors to pursue the death penalty.

    Voter registration records show that Robinson is registered to vote unaffiliated with any party, although he is listed as an “inactive” voter, meaning he hasn’t voted in at least the most recent two general elections.

    Kentucky Rep. James Comer said people feel safer now that the suspect is in custody, but there are still concerns from lawmakers about the rise of political violence. Some lawmakers have changed or canceled their political events. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are calling for calmer rhetoric and more security, something that is being considered on Capitol Hill.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says administration will seek death penalty in all DC murder cases. That could be difficult in practice. – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The president did not immediately outline any specifics, but called capital punishment a “very strong preventative” measure. The D.C. Superior Court traditionally handles the bulk of murder cases in the city.

    This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
    In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

    Pirro doubles down on crime stats, while DC leaders want ‘false narrative’ to end

    (CNN) — President Donald Trump said that his administration will seek the death penalty in all murder cases in Washington, DC, a move that could run into significant obstacles with city juries.

    “Anybody murders something in the capital, capital punishment. Capital, capital punishment. If somebody kills somebody in the capital, Washington, DC, we’re going to be seeking the death penalty,” the president said during a meeting with Cabinet members Tuesday.

    The president did not immediately outline any specifics, but called capital punishment a “very strong preventative” measure. States, he said, “are going to have to make their own decision,” though in the nation’s capital, prosecutors would seek the death penalty.

    “We have no choice,” he said.

    Traditionally, the DC Superior Court handles the bulk of murder cases in the city, and it would be bound by the city code that does not authorize capital punishment.

    However, the US attorney’s office in DC, which prosecutes crimes in both the local and federal court in the city – unlike any other jurisdiction in the country – could bring federal charges in many capital-eligible cases and seek the death penalty.

    “We will use all legal sanctions and sentences called for by law,” US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said at a press conference on Tuesday, when asked about her office seeking capital punishment in DC cases.

    Actually getting a death sentence, though, might not be so easy, as prosecutors would have to convince jurors to sign off. Historically, prosecutors have faced challenges in convincing special juries to impose capital punishment in DC, even if they vote unanimously to convict the defendants, multiple people in Washington’s legal community have told CNN in recent weeks.

    “It’s going to be difficult to find 12 people in DC who are going to do that,” said Jon Jeffress, a former federal public defender-turned-private defense lawyer in the city.

    The federal court in the District of Columbia hasn’t held a death penalty trial since 2003, when Rodney L. Moore was convicted of 10 killings and Kevin L. Gray was convicted of 19 killings, according to multiple people familiar with the court and that case. In that case, the jurors said they couldn’t agree unanimously on death sentences for the two men rather than life imprisonment, court records show.

    Asked about the unwillingness of juries in the past to approve the death penalty in DC cases, Pirro said: “We’re going to follow the law, the deliberative process, present the evidence … whether DC is inclined to do it or not, it’s not a political issue.”

    “This is an issue that’s sanctioned by the law, and gives us the power to do that. If not us, then who?” she added.

    In recent months, the Justice Department has indicated in at least three cases in DC’s federal court that it may seek the death penalty, according to court records.

    One of those cases is against Elias Rodriguez, who is accused of shooting two Israeli embassy staff members leaving a Jewish community event in May.

    The Department of Justice is also actively considering seeking the death penalty in DC District Court for two Mexican nationals who were charged in 2008 in a gang case and recently brought to the US, and for two young men who were indicted for a 2023 carjacking, according to court records.

    This comes at a time where the federal death row is down to three, after President Joe Biden commuted the sentences of about three dozen federal inmates who had been sentenced to death. Trump has vowed since the first day of this administration to restore the use of capital punishment in the US, directing the attorney general to pursue the death penalty for crimes wherever possible.

    This story has been updated with additional developments.

    The-CNN-Wire
    ™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WTOP Staff

    Source link

  • Alabama inmate set to die by nitrogen gas asks for firing squad, hanging to avoid

    [ad_1]

    An Alabama inmate, who officials say is scheduled to die in October by nitrogen hypoxia, is pushing for execution by firing squad, hanging or medical-aid-in-dying instead.

    Anthony Boyd has filed a lawsuit challenging the relatively new and controversial execution method that uses lethal gas to cause suffocation, arguing its application is unconstitutionally cruel — something multiple inmates facing the same fate in Alabama have tried to prove with legal actions. 

    Witnesses to previous nitrogen gas executions have raised concerns about whether the method results in unnecessary suffering. So far, no cases arguing against its use have been successful in court.

    Boyd is on death row for the 1993 murder of Gregory Huguley, according to court filings, which show he was one of four men convicted in the crime. Prosecutors said in those filings that Huguley was burned to death after failing to make a payment for cocaine.

    Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey announced Boyd’s execution date on Monday in a letter addressed to Alabama Corrections Commissioner John Hamm. The letter referenced an execution warrant filed by the state’s Supreme Court that set a timeframe for Boyd’s death to be carried out between Oct. 23 and 24. Neither Ivey’s letter nor the warrant specifies nitrogen hypoxia as the execution method, but a spokesperson for the governor’s office confirmed it in an email to reporters.

    Attorneys for Boyd are pushing for an alternative execution method in his lawsuit against the state, which accuses Alabama of lacking “sufficient safeguards to prevent conscious suffocation from happening” when nitrogen hypoxia is used. The lawsuit has proposed executions by firing squad, hanging or medical-aid-in-dying as alternatives.

    Nitrogen hypoxia originally emerged as an experimental execution method in Alabama in 2018, after the state, like others that still used the death penalty, had struggled to obtain lethal injection drugs and faced widespread public scrutiny over botched procedures. At the time, all inmates on its death row were given a choice to elect nitrogen hypoxia over lethal injection, the default method, and Boyd was among a handful of them who chose it, despite not knowing what it entailed, records show. Alabama eventually released a redacted protocol for nitrogen gas executions in 2023, and started to carry out such executions at the beginning of last year.

    Alabama has executed five inmates using the nitrogen protocol, and a sixth is scheduled to die by that method before Boyd’s execution date in October. While secrecy laws allow most details about the procedure to remain hidden from the public, and the inmates themselves, what is known about nitrogen hypoxia indicates that condemned individuals are forced to breathe pure nitrogen through a gas mask until asphyxiation occurs.

    In Boyd’s lawsuit, attorneys argued that each inmate previously executed using Alabama’s nitrogen hypoxia protocol “was observed to gasp for air and struggle against their harness for several minutes after the nitrogen would begin to flow” and “showed signs of conscious suffocation, terror, and pain.” 

    Responding to criticisms and scrutiny over the procedure, Alabama officials have maintained that inmates put to death by nitrogen hypoxia lose consciousness quickly and do not experience pain that meets constitutional criteria for cruel and unusual punishment.

    Outside of Alabama, only Louisiana has used nitrogen hypoxia to execute a death row inmate. Arkansas, Mississippi and Oklahoma technically allow the procedure.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. declines to pursue death penalty against trio of accused Mexican cartel kingpins

    [ad_1]

    Federal authorities in the United States revealed Tuesday that they will not seek the death penalty against three reputed Mexican drug cartel leaders, including an alleged former partner of the infamous “El Chapo” and the man accused of orchestrating the killing of a Drug Enforcement Administration agent.

    Court filings showed decisions handed down in the trio of prosecutions, all being held in Brooklyn, N.Y.

    The cases involve drug and conspiracy charges against Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, 75, charged with running a powerful faction of Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel; Rafael Caro Quintero, 72, who allegedly masterminded the DEA agent’s torture and murder in 1985; and Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, 62, also known as El Viceroy, who is under indictment as the ex-boss of the Juárez cartel.

    Prosecutors from the Eastern District of New York filed a letter in each case “to inform the Court and the defense that the Attorney General has authorized and directed this Office not to seek the death penalty.”

    The decision comes despite calls by President Trump use capital punishment against drug traffickers and the U.S. government ratcheting up pressure against Mexico to dismantle organized crime groups and to stanch the flow of fentanyl and other illicit drugs across the border.

    A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    It’s rare for the death penalty to be in play against high-level Mexican cartel figures. Mexico long ago abolished capital punishment and typically extradites its citizens on the condition that they are spared death.

    In Zambada’s case, the standard restrictions did not apply because he was not extradited. Zambada was brought to the U.S. in July 2024 by a son of his longtime associate, Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. Zambada alleges he was ambushed and kidnapped in Sinaloa by Joaquín Guzmán López, who forced him onto an airplane bound for a small airport outside El Paso.

    Zambada has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and remains jailed in Brooklyn while his case proceeds. A court filing in June said prosecutors and the defense had “discussed the potential for a resolution short of trial,” suggesting plea negotiations are underway.

    We’re going to be asking [that] everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts

    — President Trump in 2022

    Frank Perez, the lawyer representing Zambada, issued a statement Tuesday to The Times that said: “We welcome the government’s decision not to pursue the death penalty against our client. This marks an important step toward achieving a fair and just resolution.”

    Federal authorities announced in May that Guzmán López, 39, an accused leader of the Sinaloa cartel faction known as “Los Chapitos,” would also not face the death penalty. He faces an array of drug smuggling and conspiracy charges in a case pending before the federal court in Chicago.

    Another son of El Chapo, Ovidio Guzmán López, 35, pleaded guilty to drug trafficking, money laundering and firearms charges last month in Chicago. Court filings show he has agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities in other investigations.

    Caro Quintero and Carrillo Fuentes were two of the biggest names among a group of 29 men handed over by Mexico to the U.S. in February. The unusual mass transfer was conducted outside the typical extradition process, which left open the possibility of the death penalty.

    Reputed to be a founding member of Mexico’s powerful Guadalajara cartel in the 1980s, Caro Quintero is allegedly responsible for the brutal slaying of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena 40 years ago.

    The killing, portrayed on the Netflix show “Narcos: Mexico” and recounted in many books and documentaries, led to a fierce response by U.S. authorities, but Caro Quintero managed to elude justice for decades. Getting him on U.S. soil was portrayed as a major victory by Trump administration officials.

    Derek Maltz, the DEA chief in February, said in a statement that Caro Quintero had “unleashed violence, destruction, and death across the United States and Mexico, has spent four decades atop DEA’s most wanted fugitives list.”

    Carrillo Fuentes is perhaps best known as the younger brother of another Mexican drug trafficker, Amado Carrillo Fuentes, the legendary “Lord of the Skies,” who died in 1997. Once close to El Chapo, El Mayo and other Sinaloa cartel leaders, the younger Carrillo Funtes split off to form his own cartel in the city of Juárez, triggering years of bloody cartel warfare.

    Kenneth J. Montgomery, the lawyer for Carrillo Fuentes, said Tuesday that his client was “extremely grateful” for the government’s decision to not seek the death penalty. “I thought it was the right decision,” he said. “In a civilized society, I don’t think the death penalty should ever be an option.”

    Trump has been an ardent supporter of capital punishment. In January, he signed an order that directs the attorney general to “take all necessary and lawful action” to ensure that states have enough lethal injection drugs to carry out executions.

    The executive order directed the attorney general to pursue the death penalty in cases that involve the killing of law enforcement officers, among other factors. For years, Trump has loudly called for executing convicted drug traffickers. He reiterated the call for executions again in 2022 when announcing his intent to run again for president.

    “We’re going to be asking [for] everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts,” Trump said.

    Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions in February, reversing a policy that began under the Biden administration. In April, Bondi announced intentions to seek the death penalty against Luigi Mangione, the man charged with assassinating a UnitedHealthcare executive in New York City.

    Bonnie Klapper, a former federal narcotics prosecutor in the Eastern District of New York, reacted with surprise upon learning that the Trump administration had decided to not pursue capital cases against the accused kingpins, particularly Caro Quintero.

    Klapper, who is now a defense attorney, speculated that Mexico is strongly opposed to executions of its citizens and officials may have exerted diplomatic pressure to spare the lives of the three men, perhaps offering to send more kingpins in the future.

    “While my initial reaction is one of shock given this administration’s embrace of the death penalty, perhaps there’s conversations taking place behind the scenes in which Mexico has said, ‘If you want more of these, you can’t ask to kill any of our citizens.’”

    [ad_2]

    Keegan Hamilton

    Source link

  • ‘This Isn’t Over’: Death Penalty Abolitionists Celebrate Stay in Robert Roberson Execution

    ‘This Isn’t Over’: Death Penalty Abolitionists Celebrate Stay in Robert Roberson Execution

    [ad_1]

    Robert Roberson, theTexas death row inmate believed by many to be innocent, did not die as scheduled Thursday night. Despite a handful of challenges from a state that seemed intent on killing him, the Texas Supreme Court granted a last-minute stay of execution for the East Texas man who has spent more than two decades awaiting lethal injection…

    [ad_2]

    Emma Ruby

    Source link

  • New novel paints fresh picture of Phoenix’s most famous murders

    New novel paints fresh picture of Phoenix’s most famous murders

    [ad_1]

    The murder was grisly and grotesque. Two young women were shot and killed, and their bodies stuffed into luggage — one of them cut into pieces to fit — and shipped on a train from Phoenix to Los Angeles…

    [ad_2]

    Geri Koeppel

    Source link

  • Marcellus Williams’ Death: Political Execution of a Black Man Carried Out by the Supreme Court

    Marcellus Williams’ Death: Political Execution of a Black Man Carried Out by the Supreme Court

    [ad_1]

    In a damning display of justice gone wrong, Marcellus Williams, a Missouri death row inmate, was executed, despite overwhelming evidence suggesting his innocence. His death by lethal injection has sparked outrage, with the blame falling squarely on the shoulders of former President Donald Trump, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Missouri Governor Mike Parson, and the conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices who refused to halt the execution.

    Williams, 55, was convicted in 2001 for the 1998 murder of Felicia Gayle in her St. Louis apartment. However, no DNA evidence ever tied him to the crime. The St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, which urged a stay of execution, had supported his legal team in its tenacious fight for clemency. The victim’s own family had requested Williams’ sentence be commuted to life without parole, writing, “Marcellus’ execution is not necessary.”

    Yet, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court—Chief Justice John Roberts, Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—voted to deny Williams a stay. Their decision condemned an innocent man to death, and it is a stark reminder of how deeply broken the justice system has become under their influence. Liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, recognizing the glaring miscarriage of justice.

    This execution didn’t happen in a vacuum. It is a direct result of the political power play that Trump and McConnell orchestrated. Trump’s appointment of three ultra-conservative justices—Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—solidified a Supreme Court more interested in ideology than fairness. McConnell’s refusal to consider Barack Obama’s 2016 nominee, Merrick Garland, to replace Justice Antonin Scalia was a pivotal move in ensuring this conservative stronghold. He later rushed through Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation weeks before Trump’s election loss, fully aware of the long-term consequences.

    Gov. Mike Parson, a staunch MAGA Republican, ignored every plea for mercy, including those from the prosecutor’s office and over a million citizens and faith leaders who called for clemency. Despite abundant evidence of Williams’ innocence, Parson’s decision to carry out the execution was viewed by many as cruel and motivated by bloodlust.

    “This was a lynching. Make no mistake, this was state-sanctioned murder of an innocent Black man,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson declared. “Governor Parson had the responsibility to save a life, and he didn’t. When DNA evidence exonerates a man, capital punishment is not justice—it is murder. Trump, McConnell, and the conservative Supreme Court justices now have blood on their hands.”

    Johnson added that Williams’ final moments were a tragic reminder of the human cost of this injustice. Reportedly, Williams lay conversing with a spiritual advisor as the lethal injection took effect. His chest heaved a few times before he went still, as his son and two attorneys watched helplessly from another room. No one from Gayle’s family was present to witness the execution—likely because they had asked for his life to be spared.

    Cori Bush, Missouri’s Democratic Representative and staunch opponent of the death penalty, minced no words in condemning Parson’s role. “Governor Parson didn’t just end Marcellus Williams’ life—he demonstrated how the death penalty is wielded without any regard for innocence, compassion, equity, or humanity,” Bush stated. “He ignored the facts, the evidence, and the pleas from all sides. The so-called ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard was tossed out, because Marcellus was a Black man in a system rigged against him.”

    Many also said the hypocrisy of the so-called “pro-life” conservatives was laid bare. A U.S. Army veteran and activist, Charlotte Clymer blasted the justices responsible, saying, “These people don’t care about life. They only care about control.”

    Williams’ case, much like so many others involving Black men and the death penalty, exposed the deep racial bias embedded in America’s legal system. His attorneys had raised significant concerns about racial discrimination during jury selection, and the lack of credible evidence—especially DNA that didn’t match Williams—only underscored the injustice of his conviction. Yet, the political machinery of Trump, McConnell, Parson, and the Supreme Court moved forward without pause, ensuring his death.

    As Bush and others stated, Williams’s death wasn’t just an issue of a broken justice system—this was a political execution. Like Parson, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to ignore the evidence, the pleas, and the humanity of Williams. A litany of social media users posted comments demanding that Williams’ blood is on the hands of Republicans, and the country must reckon with the brutal truth that our highest court, and the leaders who enable it, can no longer be trusted to protect the innocent.

    Williams’ execution, despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence, is a searing indictment of a broken system where political power and racial bias outweigh truth and justice, Bush noted. ‘This was not just an execution,” she railed. “This was a state-sponsored lynching, and every person responsible for it must be held accountable.’”

    [ad_2]

    Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent

    Source link

  • Oklahoma city to pay over $7 million to cleared death row inmate who spent almost half a century in prison

    Oklahoma city to pay over $7 million to cleared death row inmate who spent almost half a century in prison

    [ad_1]

    Edmund, Okla. — An Oklahoma city has agreed to pay more than $7 million to a former death row inmate who was exonerated after nearly 50 years in prison, making him the longest-serving inmate to be declared innocent of a crime.

    The Edmond City Council voted without comment on Monday to settle the lawsuit filed by Glynn Ray Simmons, 71, against the Oklahoma City suburb and a former police detective for $7.15 million.

    “Mr. Simmons spent a tragic amount of time incarcerated for a crime he did not commit,” his attorney, Elizabeth Wang, said in a statement. “Although he will never get that time back, this settlement with Edmond will allow him to move forward” with his life.

    He was 22 years old when he was convicted, CBS Oklahoma City affiliate KWTV points out.

    The lawsuit makes similar claims against Oklahoma City and a retired Oklahoma City detective who also investigated the robbery and shooting that wound up putting Simmons behind bars. Those claims aren’t affected by the settlement and are still pending.

    Wang noted in her statement that, “We are very much looking forward to holding them accountable at trial in March,” according to KWTV.

    A spokesperson for Oklahoma City said Wednesday that the city doesn’t comment on pending litigation.

    The lawsuit alleges police falsified a report by stating that a witness who was wounded in the shooting identified Simmons and co-defendant Don Roberts as the two who robbed a store and shot a clerk.

    The lawsuit also alleges police withheld evidence that the witness identified two other people as suspects.

    Simmons was released from prison in July 2023 after a judge vacated his conviction and sentence and ordered a new trial.

    District Attorney Vickie Behenna announced in September that she wouldn’t retry the case because there is no longer physical evidence against Simmons.

    In December, a judge exonerated Simmons, saying there was “clear and convincing evidence” that he didn’t commit the crime and Simmons has received $175,000 from the state of Oklahoma for wrongful conviction.

    Simmons served 48 years, one month and 18 days, making him the longest imprisoned U.S. inmate to be exonerated, according to data kept by The National Registry of Exonerations.

    Simmons, who has maintained that he was in Louisiana at the time of the crime, and Roberts were both convicted of the murder of the liquor store clerk, Carolyn Sue Rogers, and sentenced to death.

    Their sentences were reduced to life in prison in 1977 after U.S. Supreme Court rulings related to capital punishment and Roberts was released on parole in 2008.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Newsom leaves the Vatican with pope’s praise for refusing to impose the death penalty

    Newsom leaves the Vatican with pope’s praise for refusing to impose the death penalty

    [ad_1]

    In an opulent hall in the Apostolic Palace framed in marble and adorned with Renaissance murals, Gov. Gavin Newsom waited in a line of governors, mayors and scientists for an opportunity to greet Pope Francis.

    The queue wasn’t the ideal setup envisioned by the governor’s advisors. Newsom traveled more than 6,000 miles from California to the Vatican to give a speech before — and hopefully talk with — the pope about climate change.

    Pope Francis, however, had other topics on his mind besides the warming planet.

    “I was struck by how he immediately brought up the issue of the death penalty and how proud he was of the work we’re doing in California,” Newsom said afterward. “I was struck by that because I wasn’t anticipating that, especially in the context of this convening.”

    The talk was brief and informal. But the politically astute head of the Roman Catholic Church still took advantage of the moment to support one of Newsom’s most controversial actions as governor.

    Through executive order two months after his inauguration, Newsom issued a temporary moratorium on the death penalty and ordered the dismantling of the state’s execution chambers at San Quentin State Prison. Families of murder victims criticized the decision, and legal scholars called it an abuse of power.

    Newsom’s refusal to impose the death penalty could hurt him politically if he runs for president.

    As a Catholic, however, the governor’s decree is in line with the church and the pope’s teachings.

    In an interview with The Times after he left the Vatican, Newsom said he has yet to propose a statewide ballot measure to abolish the death penalty because he doesn’t have confidence that it would pass. California voters rejected measures to ban executions in 2012 and 2016.

    Newsom said recent polls conducted by his political advisors show soft support for a ban.

    “We constantly put it in our surveys that I do,” Newsom said in an interview with The Times. “It’s in the margin. But I’m thinking a lot about this beyond that because we’re reimagining death row. I’m thinking about when I’m leaving; I mean, I’ve been pretty honest about that. I’m trying to figure out what more can I do in this space.”

    There were more than 730 inmates on death row when Newsom took office. Death row at San Quentin was the largest of any prison in the Western Hemisphere. Under his plan to reform the prison to emphasize rehabilitation, Newsom said California is just weeks from emptying death row entirely.

    The governor said he was outspoken about his opposition to capital punishment when he campaigned in 2018. He endorsed the 2012 and 2016 ballot measures to abolish the death penalty.

    “I campaigned very openly as lieutenant governor, as governor. I went out of my way to say, ‘If you elect me, this is what I’m going to do,’” Newsom said. “And also I have the legal authority. So I wasn’t challenging that.”

    Currently, 21 of the 50 states impose the death penalty. The remaining 29 either have no death penalty or paused executions due to executive action — including California, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

    Newsom’s moratorium might not play well with voters in some swing states in a potential presidential campaign, adding to perceptions that leftist California and the Democratic governor are soft on crime and misaligned with the rest of the nation. The governor has repeatedly dismissed speculation that he’s eyeing the White House, and he has actively campaigned for President Biden’s reelection.

    Kevin Eckery, a political consultant who has worked with the Catholic Church in California, said the death penalty isn’t going to be a deciding factor in an election.

    “Nationally, the death penalty has been carried out so infrequently for the last 50 years that I don’t see people voting based on your position on [the] death penalty,” Eckery said. “They are going to vote on pocketbook issues. They are going to vote on other things, but not that issue.”

    The Catholic Church has long said the death penalty could be justified only in rare situations. Francis updated church doctrine in 2018 to say “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.”

    Newsom lunched in an arched courtyard covered in jasmine at the American Academy in Rome after he, in a speech at the Vatican, accused former President Trump of “open corruption” by soliciting campaign donations from oil executives.

    Sitting in a weathered wood chair under the shade of a tree, the governor explained how his Catholic background and the inequities in the criminal justice system influenced his refusal to sign off on executions as governor.

    His paternal grandparents were devout Catholics, and his late father, William Newsom, who served as a state appellate court justice, went to church every day growing up, he said.

    Later in life, Newsom’s father considered himself “a Catholic of the distance,” the governor said, and “kind of pushed away” because of the politics of the church.

    Newsom said Jesuit teachings at Santa Clara University, where he attended college, spoke a language he appreciated “of faith and works.” His own religious beliefs, he said, have always been exercised “around a civic frame.”

    “The Bible teaches many parts, one body,” Newsom said, mentioning a quote he often references. “One part suffers, we all suffer, and this notion of communitarianism.

    “You can’t get out of Santa Clara University without the requisite studies and sort of a religious baseline: God and common thought type frames,” he said.

    As a Catholic and San Francisco native, Newsom said his beliefs follow “the Spirit of St. Francis” and the idea of being good to others, but not necessarily a strict religious doctrine.

    The governor said he attended the private Catholic school École Notre Dame des Victoires in San Francisco for a short time during early elementary school. He said his family often attended Glide Memorial, a nondenominational church in San Francisco. The governor said he attended church on Easter with his family.

    Newsom mentioned religion at other points during his trip, telling reporters outside the hall where he spoke at the Vatican about the importance of the bridge between science and the pope’s moral authority on climate change.

    “As we know from church, it’s faith and works,” Newsom said. “So, as we pray, we move our feet. It’s that action with our passion.”

    Daniel Philpott, a professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame, said it’s smart for politicians in either party to talk about faith.

    “We’ve learned over the last 30 years that presidential candidates in general benefit when they can be shown to be religious, or practicing their religious faith,” Philpott said.

    Newsom said he didn’t want to overplay the influence of religion on his position on the death penalty, which his father also opposed.

    His father and grandfather were involved in the case of Pete Pianezzi, a friend who was wrongfully convicted of first-degree murder in the shooting and killing a gambler and busboy in Los Angeles in 1937.

    Pianezzi escaped the death penalty by a single vote and served 13 years in prison. He was later exonerated.

    Even if it were possible to limit inequity and wrongful convictions in the criminal justice system, Newsom said he would still be against the death penalty.

    “It just never made sense to me, the basic paradigm, that we were going to kill people to communicate to the general public that killing is wrong,” he said. “I could never understand that. I could never sanction that.”

    [ad_2]

    Taryn Luna

    Source link

  • Richard Allen Davis, convicted of killing Polly Klaas in 1993, seeks to have death sentence overturned

    Richard Allen Davis, convicted of killing Polly Klaas in 1993, seeks to have death sentence overturned

    [ad_1]

    Man who killed Polly Klaas seeks to have death sentence overturned


    Man who killed Polly Klaas seeks to have death sentence overturned

    03:22

    SAN JOSE – More than three decades after 12-year-old Polly Klaas of Petaluma was kidnapped and murdered, the man convicted of killing her is seeking to overturn his death sentence.

    Lawyers representing Richard Allen Davis were in a Santa Clara County courtroom Friday. Davis was convicted of killing Polly and sentenced to death in 1996.

    But because of a California law that took effect in 2022, Davis is now trying to have his death sentence overturned.

    Federal public defenders argued that Senate Bill 483–which invalidates sentencing enhancements for some prior convictions for nonviolent and drug convictions—should be applied to Davis’s case.

    richard-allen-davis.jpg
    Richard Allen Davis

    California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation


    A Sonoma County prosecutor said granting Davis a whole new penalty phase trial is outside the scope of what the law intended.

    Davis did not attend Friday’s hearing.

    Marc Klaas, Polly’s father, never thought he would have to be back in a Santa Clara County courthouse to relive the horrific case of how his daughter was kidnapped at knifepoint, sexually assaulted, and murdered.

    polly_klaas_100213.jpg
    Polly Klaas, photographed with her father Marc Klaas, disappeared from a sleepover in Petaluma on October 1, 1993. 

    CBS


    “It’s been terrible. I believe that 28 years ago, you and I stood almost exactly the same place, and I might have said something to the effect that this is finally over,” Klaas told CBS News Bay Area on Friday. “Yet here we are 30 years later.”

    The judge said he’ll take time to consider the law and the arguments he heard Friday. The court’s ruling is scheduled for May 31.

    In 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order placing a moratorium on the state’s use of the death penalty. 

    [ad_2]

    CBS San Francisco

    Source link

  • Georgia Resumes Death Penalty with Execution of Willie Pye For Murder Back in 1993

    Georgia Resumes Death Penalty with Execution of Willie Pye For Murder Back in 1993

    [ad_1]

    GEORGIA – On Wednesday, the state of Georgia carried out the execution of Willie Pye, a man on death row found guilty of murdering Alicia Lynn Yarbrough in 1993.

    Executed by lethal injection at 11:03 p.m. in a Jackson prison, located approximately 50 miles south of Atlanta, as announced by the Georgia Department of Corrections in a press release, Pye refrained from issuing a last statement, as per the announcement.

    Pye, aged 59, faced execution following the rejection of his ultimate legal challenges by the US Supreme Court late on Wednesday. Pye and his legal team had previously submitted requests for clemency and various legal documents, arguing against his execution on the grounds of an intellectual disability, a difficult childhood, and the ineffectiveness of his legal representation.

    Rejection of Willie Pye ultimate legal challenges by US Supreme Court

    January 1997: The Louisiana State Penitentiary’s execution chamber utilized this gurney for lethal injections. (Image courtesy of Shepard Sherbell/Corbis via Getty Images) RELATED ARTICLE Opinion: Witnessing an execution led to regret, but now my perspective has shifted.

    This event marks the first execution in Georgia since January 2020, as noted by the Death Penalty Information Center, a non-profit organization. The pause in executions was attributed to the Covid-19 pandemic by the American Bar Association.

    In 1996, Pye was convicted for the murder of Yarbrough, alongside charges of kidnapping causing bodily harm, armed theft, burglary, and rape, stemming from a tumultuous romantic relationship with the victim, as indicated by court documents.

    Leading up to the execution, a series of urgent legal appeals were made, a common scenario in capital punishment cases, including two appeals to the US Supreme Court, which were eventually dismissed.

    In one appeal, Pye contended that his execution should be halted due to a pandemic-related agreement between the Georgia Attorney General’s Office and lawyers for the defense, which temporarily suspended executions in the state until certain criteria were met.

    His legal team argued that excluding him from this agreement unfairly discriminated against him, breaching the 14th Amendment’s equal protection and due process clauses. However, the state contested Pye’s appeal, pointing to a state court’s finding that he was not a party to the agreement.

    Pye’s second appeal was based on his claim of having an intellectual disability, arguing that executing someone with such a disability is unconstitutional. Yet, Georgia’s standard requires proof of intellectual disability beyond a reasonable doubt—a threshold Pye’s lawyers deemed excessively stringent and unconstitutional.

    The Supreme Court chose not to stop Pye’s execution without providing an explanation, a common practice in emergency appeals, with no dissenting opinions noted.

    The Murder of Alicia Lynn Yarbrough

    Pye and two associates planned to rob a man who was living with Yarbrough, driven by Pye’s anger towards the man for signing the birth certificate of a child Pye claimed as his. Prior to the crime, Pye acquired a .22 caliber pistol, and the trio, disguised with ski masks, approached the man’s residence, finding Yarbrough alone with the baby.

    After forcibly entering the home and holding Yarbrough at gunpoint, Pye and his accomplices robbed her of a ring and necklace, then kidnapped her to a motel where they raped her. Later, they took Yarbrough to a secluded dirt road, where Pye commanded her to lie face down before shooting her three times, as detailed in court documents.

    One of Pye’s associates later confessed and provided testimony against him, with DNA evidence from the victim’s body matching Pye.

    The jury in Pye’s case recommended the death penalty, leading to his sentence of death along with three life sentences plus 20 years, according to the Georgia Attorney General’s Office.

    Both of Pye’s accomplices are currently serving life sentences for their involvement in Yarbrough’s murder, as per records from the Georgia Department of Corrections.

    Inmate Argued Trial Lawyer ‘Abandoned His Post’

    Pye’s petition for clemency argued for his sentence to be reduced to life imprisonment, highlighting the ineffectiveness of his trial attorney, who passed away in 2000.

    Three jurors from Pye’s trial expressed opposition to his execution, citing factors about his background that his public defender, described as overwhelmed and ineffective in the clemency petition, failed to present.

    Despite these arguments, the state parole board denied clemency after a meeting on Tuesday, stating that it had “thoroughly considered all of the facts and circumstances of the case” in its decision, as mentioned in a press release.

    At the time, Pye’s attorney was single-handedly managing all indigent defense services in Spalding County, Georgia, under a lump-sum contract, the petition noted. With only one other attorney and an investigator, he was juggling hundreds of felony cases alongside his private practice, including representing clients in four other capital cases simultaneously. This workload led to the attorney “effectively abandoning his post.”

    Source: CNN

    [ad_2]

    Srdjan Ilic

    Source link

  • Casa Grande man gets 4 life sentences for butchering his family

    Casa Grande man gets 4 life sentences for butchering his family

    [ad_1]

    Inside a courtroom in Florence on Friday, tearful relatives of Richard David Wilson IV asked a judge to accept the recommendation of prosecutors and sentence the killer to life in prison for slaughtering his family in 2022.

    Pinal County Superior Court Judge Steven Fuller agreed.

    Wilson, 23, pleaded guilty in January to four counts of first-degree murder for the slayings of his father, Richard Wilson III, 47; his mother, Ellen Otterman, 50; his 16-year-old sister Rudy Wilson; and ReNaya White, a five-year-old girl who was living with the family.

    The Pinal County Attorney’s Office initially sought the death penalty. But prosecutors reversed course on Jan. 8, entering into a plea agreement with Wilson — in part due to his documented history as a diagnosed schizophrenic.

    On Sept. 4, 2022, deputies responded to a frantic 911 call from Rudy Wilson, according to a 27-page incident report from the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office. Wilson said her brother was “crazy” and had just beat up her mother. She screamed, and the phone went dead.

    Deputies later found the four victims knifed to death in the Casa Grande house Wilson shared with them. Two of the victims were beheaded, according to the incident report. Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb called the killings “an act of depraved violence.”

    Wilson, in shackles and jailhouse sweats, sat expressionless throughout the hearing on Friday. Fuller said he was inclined to accept the terms of the plea agreement and invited the killer’s relatives to speak.

    Wilson’s grandmother Renetta Mandan, a short woman with her gray hair tied in a neat bun, spoke first. She mentioned Wilson’s “significant mental condition” and pleaded with the court to order prison officials to continue providing Wilson with his medical treatments.

    “I love my grandson,” she said, crying. “I’ll always stand by him. I want him to remember to be strong.”

    Other family members described the efforts of Wilson’s parents to get their son treatment. They said he was taken to mental health facilities on at least 11 occasions, but he was always released after two days with instructions to take his medications.

    Wilson’s uncle, Hubert Heart, a heavy-set man with a beard and glasses, said the mental health system failed his nephew.

    “It wouldn’t have happened if he’d gotten the treatment he needed,” Heart said.

    Ultimately, Fuller agreed that the plea agreement was “correct.” Wilson then received four consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole.

    “I don’t see this as a capital case,” Fuller said. He “strongly urged” the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry to continue Wilson’s treatment for schizophrenia.

    Fuller said he could “feel the emotion in the courtroom” and the grief for the “four souls who are no longer with us.”

    Wilson was then led away by sheriff’s deputies to the sound of weeping family members. He nodded to his family. Bobbi Falduto, his lead attorney, hugged Wilson before he was taken into an adjoining room.

    click to enlarge

    Richard Wilson killed four of his family members in their Casa Grande home in 2022.

    Courtesy Fox10

    Wilson left behind a bloody house of horrors

    Following the hearing, Falduto told Phoenix New Times that the sentencing was “bittersweet,” citing the family’s futile efforts to have Wilson treated for his mental illness.

    A defense sentencing memorandum from Falduto said Wilson was diagnosed “as early as 2017” with schizophrenia, a disorder that can lead to patients suffering from a “psychotic break” with reality, ending in “devastating results.”

    Additionally, Wilson had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and fetal alcohol syndrome, a condition that occurs when a person is exposed to alcohol before birth through the mother’s umbilical cord. Wilson also had an “intellectual disability,” according to the memo. It listed his IQ as 68.

    “When Richard was first evaluated at the jail, he was found to be improperly medicated,” the memo said. “Since Richard’s incarceration, his medications were changed, and he was prescribed a strong antipsychotic medication … and he began responding in a positive manner.”

    A mental health evaluation submitted by prosecutors disputed some portions of Falduto’s memo. In it, Scottsdale psychologist James Seward wrote that Wilson “was never diagnosed with an intellectual disability” and was “more abled than portrayed by defense experts.”

    But Seward wrote that Wilson’s “inconsistent cooperation” prevented him from completing the evaluation. He conceded that Wilson had been “diagnosed with a psychological disorder” and that his mental health history supported the finding that Wilson sometimes “displays evidence of psychosis, where he was out of touch with reality.”

    Seward also wrote that Wilson had a “cannabis use disorder,” and that both his mother and a psychiatrist “linked his marijuana use to his mental health problems.”

    Falduto denied that Wilson was addicted to marijuana.

    “My understanding is that he smoked a little bit of pot,” she said. “It was not something that made him psychotic or anything.”

    During the hearing, Patrick Johnson — lead capital attorney with the Pinal County Attorney’s Office — cited Seward’s findings as one reason prosecutors didn’t pursue the death penalty. Wilson’s mental illness and his “willingness to accept responsibility for the murders” were factors in not seeking the death penalty, Johnson added.

    Still, Johnson asked the court not to lose sight of the loss of life and the “brutal, cruel, heinous” nature of the killings.

    Indeed, the language in the prosecution’s sentencing memorandum, authored by Deputy County Attorney Vince Goddard, offered a dramatic account of the carnage wrought by Wilson.

    “Wilson was inside his family home, moving from one room to the next, hunting each victim as they ran away from him, trying to escape their inevitable fate,” Goddard wrote in the memo. “Nothing would stop Wilson from exacting his unknown revenge on his family. He would kick in doors and chase down his prey. When Wilson caught them, he used a large knife to hack at them, ignoring them, begging and cowering for their lives. The defendant beheaded two of his victims. One of the decapitated victims was a little girl, still in her ‘Star Wars’ pajamas.”

    The incident report detailed the bloody house of horrors deputies found after responding to the 911 call.

    Inside the home were dead bodies, in pools of blood, in various stages of butchery. Police found Wilson’s father in one bedroom, on the floor, one leg on the bed, with his severed head lying “about a foot away from the body.”

    The decapitated child was next to Otterman, whose neck was severed “but not cut through all the way,” according to the report.

    In a bathroom, they discovered Wilson’s apparent murder weapon, which was “a large Winchester hunting knife.”

    Deputies encountered Wilson before entering the house. Wilson immediately surrendered and demanded to be taken to jail. Because of Wilson’s size, deputies had to use two sets of handcuffs to restrain him.

    Asked who was inside the residence, Wilson said, “Go look.”

    After being transported to the sheriff’s office’s headquarters in Florence, Wilson asked for medication for schizophrenia and other prescriptions.

    “I’m washed up, I’m never getting out, dude,” Wilson told deputies, according to the report.

    click to enlarge Pinal County Attorney Kent Volkmer

    Pinal County Attorney Kent Volkmer said he hoped the sentencing of Richard Wilson would help relatives begin to heal from the heinous killings.

    Pinal County Attorney’s Office

    ‘If I’ve ever seen a capital case, this is it’

    In a telephone interview before the hearing on Friday, Pinal County Attorney Kent Volkmer told New Times that his office struggled with whether or not to seek the death penalty of Wilson.

    Volkmer lives in Casa Grande and visited the crime scene the day the murders happened. He said one of his wife’s closest friends is the principal at Casa Grande’s Desert Willow Elementary School, where Wilson’s father performed maintenance work. White attended kindergarten at the school.

    “If I’ve ever seen a capital case, this is it,” Volkmer said. “That was my initial assessment.”

    But Wilson’s attorneys shared information about their client’s mental health and allowed prosecutors to perform their own mental health assessment of Wilson.

    The wishes of Wilson’s family also were a factor, since his victims also were family members, Volkmer observed.

    “The family the whole time is saying, please, our family members were taken from us, and we don’t want to lose a family member,” Volkmer said. “Certainly victims don’t get to make that final call, but we give a lot of weight to what those victims are asking for.”

    The county attorney also considered whether or not a death sentence for Wilson would hold up on appeal.

    Volkmer noted Wilson’s desire to take responsibility for his crime. Seeking the death penalty would have resulted in “years and years” of delay. Wilson’s sentence ensures that “he’ll never see the light of day,” Volkmer added.

    “Here, there’s at least closure, resolution,” Volkmer said. “Hopefully the family members can begin the healing process and go forward with finality.”

    Falduto said the prosecution’s reversal on seeking the death penalty was “the right thing to do.”

    If the prosecution had continued pursuing the death penalty for Wilson, Falduto said the defense would have asked a judge to determine whether Wilson was intellectually disabled.

    “If the judge made that finding, then it could not be a death penalty case,” she said.

    Though she disagreed with the four life sentences, she conceded that the state was “reasonable” in heeding the conclusions of medical experts for both parties. Her team also supplied the court with “hundreds and hundreds of pages of documentation” of Wilson’s involuntary commitments and his family’s attempts to have him committed for longer periods.

    “This young man, he was troubled,” Falduto said. “But he had a family that was trying really hard. … trying so hard, and it still just didn’t work out.”

    [ad_2]

    Stephen Lemons

    Source link

  • Kenneth Eugene Smith executed by nitrogen hypoxia in Alabama, marking a first for the death penalty

    Kenneth Eugene Smith executed by nitrogen hypoxia in Alabama, marking a first for the death penalty

    [ad_1]

    Alabama carried out its planned execution of the condemned inmate Kenneth Eugene Smith on Thursday night using nitrogen hypoxia, a controversial and widely-contested death penalty method used for the first time in the United States. The execution took place at the William C. Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore at 8:25 p.m. local time, officials said. 

    In a news briefing, Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner John Q. Hamm said that the execution began at 7:53 p.m., and the nitrogen mask was kept on Smith for about five minutes after he flatlined. 

    A reporter stated that Smith “appeared to shake and writhe on the gurney for at least two minutes at the start of the execution,” asking Hamm whether that was “expected” or an indication of “suffering.”

    “It appeared that, one, Smith was holding his breath for as long as he could,” Hamm responded. “And then there’s also information out there that he struggled against his restraints a little bit, but there’s some involuntary movement and some angled breathing. So that was all expected and is in the side effects that we’ve seen, researched, with nitrogen hypoxia.”

    In explaining an approximately 45-minute delay from the time that the Supreme Court allowed the execution to proceed to when witnesses were taken into the chamber, Hamm said that “there was a little hiccup on the EKG lines providing a good reading.”

    In a statement provided to CBS News following the execution, Smith’s legal team wrote, “We are deeply saddened that the state of Alabama and the Alabama Department of Corrections have executed Kenneth Eugene Smith.”

    “Kenny was subject to the death penalty only because his trial judge applied a since-repealed Alabama statute to override the jury’s 11 to 1 determination that his life should be spared – a practice that not only is unavailable under current Alabama law but also has since been declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court,” the statement went on. “There currently are efforts in the Alabama legislature to ensure that inmates like Kenny, who are on death row only because a judge overrode a jury’s measured determination to spare their lives, won’t suffer the same fate that he did today. Unfortunately, those efforts, if successful, will be too late for Kenny.”

    In a separate statement, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey said that she made the decision not to grant Smith clemency.

    “The execution was lawfully carried out by nitrogen hypoxia, the method previously requested by Mr. Smith as an alternative to lethal injection,” Ivey wrote. “At long last, Mr. Smith got what he asked for, and this case can finally be put to rest.”

    Smith and his spiritual adviser, the Rev. Jeff Hood, said in a statement Thursday afternoon prior to the execution that “the eyes of the world are on this impending moral apocalypse.”

    “Our prayer is that people will not turn their heads. We simply cannot normalize the suffocation of each other,” statement said.

    Smith’s legal team had challenged Alabama’s plan to use nitrogen in the death chamber without documented evidence of its repercussions and called on the state to halt the execution altogether. His attorneys accused the state of using Smith as a “test subject” for an experimental execution in one request to stop it that was ultimately rejected.

    Nitrogen hypoxia is a process that aims to cause asphyxiation by forcing an individual to inhale pure nitrogen or lethally high concentrations of it through a gas mask. 

    U.S. courts across multiple levels of government rejected stay requests. The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that Alabama was within its constitutional rights to carry out the execution. On Thursday, the Supreme Court allowed the execution to proceed as planned, over the public dissent of the court’s three liberal members.

    Smith’s execution came after he had already survived a botched lethal injection in November 2022.   

    “Having failed to kill Smith on its first attempt, Alabama has selected him as its ‘guinea pig’ to test a method of execution never attempted before,” Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote

    Besides the legal challenges, the execution took place in the face of mounting criticism from human rights experts – including the top human rights official at the United Nations, who said earlier this month that “putting an inmate to death with nitrogen gas could possibly amount to torture under international treaties.” 

    What is nitrogen hypoxia?

    Alabama is one of three U.S. states that technically allows nitrogen hypoxia as an alternative to lethal injection and other, more traditional capital punishment methods. Oklahoma and Mississippi are the only other states that have authorized executions by nitrogen hypoxia, which is relatively new as a form of capital punishment. Before Thursday, no states had used the method to conduct an execution.  

    Its application inside the execution chamber in Alabama had been criticized as experimental and, potentially, unnecessarily painful and dangerous for the condemned person and others in the room. UN experts cited concerns about the possibility of grave suffering that execution by pure nitrogen inhalation may cause. They said there was no scientific evidence to prove otherwise.

    The consequences of too much nitrogen inhalation —usually accidentally in industrial settings— are well-documented. A colorless and odorless gas, nitrogen is only safe to inhale when it is mixed with an appropriate concentration of oxygen; otherwise, breathing it is toxic. Veterinarians have refused to use nitrogen asphyxiation to euthanize animals because of its “distressing” effects and potential risks to people around.

    What did Kenneth Eugene Smith do?

    Smith was accused of being a hitman and was sentenced to death following his conviction in the 1989 murder of Elizabeth Dorlene Sennett, a preacher’s wife, in northwestern Alabama’s Colbert County. 

    Prosecutors said in 1988 that Smith and John Forrest Parker each received $1,000 to carry out the slaying on behalf of Elizabeth’s husband, Rev. Charles Sennett, Sr., the pastor of the Westside Church of Christ in the city of Sheffield. 

    The pastor had been having an affair and found himself in significant debt before taking out a large life insurance policy on his wife, authorities said. Sennett then sought to collect the money by having his wife killed. Sennett committed suicide one week after his wife’s murder, once the investigation got underway and authorities began to consider him as a suspect, according to court documents.

    The prosecution alleged that Rev. Sennett originally hired another man, Billy Williams, for the job, and Williams in turn recruited Smith and Parker. All three men were promised equal compensation, a ruling filed in 2021 by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in response to one of the legal challenges Smith brought.

    Smith and his accomplices planned to kill Elizabeth Dorlene Sennett in the home she and her husband shared and tried to make the crime look like a burglary. On March 18, 1988, Elizabeth was murdered. Smith took a video cassette recorder from the Sennett residence, which investigators later found in Smith’s home and played a role in the state’s case against him. 

    Smith argued in subsequent appeals authorities did not have a legitimate search warrant to enter the home where the cassette was found. Court records show that Smith confessed to his role in Elizabeth’s murder in interviews with police – and that was the piece that ultimately led to his conviction.

    Smith was convicted of capital murder in an initial verdict and sentenced to death. That was overturned by the Alabama Court of Appeals, and convicted again of capital murder during a second trial that took place in the 90s. Still, the jury in that trial voted to recommend a sentence of life imprisonment without parole instead of the death penalty. A judge overruled the jury’s recommendation and again sentenced Smith to be executed by the state. His accomplice Parker was executed in June 2010 for his part in the killings, according to the Alabama Department of Corrections.

    His execution on Thursday would not be possible if Smith’s trial happened today: in 2017 Alabama became the last U.S. state to strike its law allowing judges to override jury recommendations when it comes to capital punishment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First U.S. execution by nitrogen gas set for Thursday

    First U.S. execution by nitrogen gas set for Thursday

    [ad_1]

    First U.S. execution by nitrogen gas set for Thursday – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Kenneth Eugene Smith, a death row inmate in Alabama, is expected to become the first person in the U.S. executed with nitrogen gas. Manuel Bojorquez reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Iran executes 2022 protester for murder

    Iran executes 2022 protester for murder

    [ad_1]

    Human rights advocates criticise Mohammad Ghobadlou’s conviction, saying he did not get a fair trial.

    Iran has executed a man who ran over and killed a policeman, and injured five other people, during nationwide protests in 2022.

    Mohammad Ghobadlou was executed on Tuesday after being found guilty of the killing during mass protests two years ago, according to the judiciary’s Mizan news agency. However, human rights advocates criticised his conviction, saying he did not get a fair trial.

    “After being upheld by the Supreme Court, the death penalty against defendant Mohammad Ghobadlou has been implemented early this morning,” Mizan reported.

    The policeman was killed amid the huge protests that followed the death in police custody of Mahsa Amini, a Kurdish-Iranian woman who was arrested for violating Iran’s strict dress code for women.

    Ghobadlou was initially sentenced to death in November 2022 after being convicted of “corruption on earth” for attacking police in Tehran with a car.

    The Supreme Court granted him a stay of execution in February 2023, and later ordered consideration of his mental health, according to Mehr news agency.

    Mizan reported on Tuesday that the Supreme Court had upheld the death sentence, which was carried out under Iran’s Islamic law of retribution.

    Hundreds died during the 2022 protests, including dozens of security personnel, and thousands were arrested over what officials labelled as foreign-instigated “riots”.

    Ghobadlou is the eighth person executed after being convicted of murder or other violence against security forces during the demonstrations.

    ‘Unfair sham trials’

    However, human rights group Amnesty International said the 22-year-old’s right to a fair trial was violated, and his bipolar condition was not taken into consideration by the judicial system.

    “Ghobadlou received two death sentences after grossly unfair sham trials marred by torture-tainted ‘confessions’ and failure to order rigorous mental health assessments despite his mental disability,” Amnesty said.

    However, Mizan said claims of mental disability were wrong. Ghobadlou, it noted, had allegedly rejected the suggestion during his trial.

    Earlier this month, dozens of people, including Ghobadlou’s family, demonstrated in front of a prison in the Iranian city of Karaj against his sentencing as well as that of another young man.

    “My child is sick, he has a medical file, but they don’t want to accept,” Ghobadlou’s mother shouted in one video of the event at that time, which was verified by Al Jazeera.

    Iran executes more people per year than any other country except China, according to Amnesty, and usually does so by hanging.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump Calls Kim Kardashian ‘World’s Most Overrated Celebrity’ – Says He Only Worked With Her For Kanye! – Perez Hilton

    Donald Trump Calls Kim Kardashian ‘World’s Most Overrated Celebrity’ – Says He Only Worked With Her For Kanye! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    Bridge burned! Bridge absolutely OBLITERATED with napalm!

    Don’t expect Donald Trump to seek the endorsement of Kim Kardashian this time around! The former POTUS famously worked with his fellow reality star on prison commutations during his first term in office. It was one of the few positive things he did, really — and all at the behest of Kim as we understood it.

    The SKIMS founder used all her cache as a celebrity to appeal to Trump’s starf**ker nature and got him to do something worthwhile with his power and grant clemency to Alice Marie Johnson and others… something he definitely never actually believed in. We mean, JFC, the new, more totalitarian drug policy he’s running on would have seen Alice sentenced to death!

    Related: Trump Turned Into An Angry Teen Influencer In UNHINGED Fraud Trial Testimony!

    In his new book ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl tries to get to the bottom of the strange bedfellows that saved Alice and others. Per a source cited in Tired of Winning: Donald Trump and the End of the Grand Old Party, it was even sketchier than it looked from the outside. The insider told Karl “Trump listened to her requests and demanded a straight-up quid pro quo”:

    “He would grant the commutations, he told Kardashian, if she leveraged her celebrity connections to get football stars who were friends of hers to come visit him at the White House.”

    Wow. It wasn’t enough to get the implicit blessing of Kim, he wanted NFL stars. Karl writes:

    “Kardashian actually tried to do what Trump demanded, seeing it as a small price to pay to get justice for people she believed were serving unjust sentences. But all the players she approached declined. Trump had become too toxic. In the final two weeks of his presidency, nobody wanted to be anywhere near him.”

    Well, Trump didn’t like being called “toxic”! Remember, he’s the YUGEST and everyone loves him!

    The former president jumped on Truth Social to hit back — not just at the author but at Kim Kardashian herself! He wrote:

    “Failed ABC Fake News reporter Jonathan Karl just wrote another bad book. He works sooo hard, but has sooo little talent – Some people have it, and some people don’t. In the “book” he has the World’s most overrated celebrity, Kim Kardashian, supposedly telling me that she “would leverage her celebrity to get football stars to come to the White House,” if I would commute the sentences of various prisoners.”

    “The World’s most overrated celebrity”?! DAYUM! He continued:

    “This story is Fake News in that she would be the last person I asked to get football players. I’ve had many teams, from all sports and leagues, in the White House. If there was even a slight reluctance, I would immediately withdraw the invitation, there would be NO Negotiation – But this did not happen often.”

    It didn’t happen often, but they had a standing policy for being rejected. LOLz! We love that the policy was “immediately withdraw the invitation” so they couldn’t refuse. Like when a guy asks you out and as soon as you say you can’t, he calls you a bitch and says he didn’t want to go with you anyway. Pathetic!

    Trump did show some love for Kanye West though, proving that relationship is still alive despite Donnie initially distancing himself from the antisemitism. Maybe they’ll have dinner together with a neo-Nazi again yet! He continued:

    “I did help with prisoner commutation, but only if deserving, and much more so for Kanye West than for Kim, who probably voted for Crooked Joe Biden, and look at the mess our Country is in now. Many other false stories in Karl’s very boring book, but nothing worth mentioning!”

    Such a reasonable response! Ha! This man was actually our Commander-in-Chief! Wild. We laugh to keep from crying.

    Nope. We’re crying, too. Sigh…

    [Image via Johnny Louis/Nicky Nelson/MEGA/WENN.]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • Oklahoma executes Anthony Sanchez for killing of college dance student Juli Busken in 1996

    Oklahoma executes Anthony Sanchez for killing of college dance student Juli Busken in 1996

    [ad_1]

    Oklahoma to resume execution by lethal injection


    Oklahoma to resume execution by lethal injection

    00:48

    Oklahoma executed Anthony Sanchez on Thursday for the 1996 killing of Juli Busken, a University of Oklahoma dance student, according to the Associated Press. Sanchez, 44, was convicted of raping and murdering Busken in 2006 after his DNA was matched to the slaying while he was serving a burglary sentence.

    Sanchez was executed by lethal injection, which the state resumed using after a six-year-moratorium. He was pronounced dead at 10:19 a.m. CDT.

    Even though Sanchez long said he didn’t kill Busken, he didn’t seek clemency from Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, telling the Associated Press “it doesn’t go well for the inmates” no matter what the governor decides. He did ask Stitt for a 60-day reprieve so his new attorneys could review his case, according to The Oklahoman newspaper.

    Sanchez’s attorneys also sought a stay of execution in federal court to have more time to go through evidence from the case. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the request before Thursday’s execution.

    Earlier this year, Sanchez accused his late father of killing Busken, citing an alleged confession revealed by an ex-girlfriend of Sanchez’s dad, Thomas Glen Sanchez.

    “Once he said he … enjoyed watching her die,” Charlotte Beattie wrote in a sworn statement, according to the Oklahoman. “Glen said that he regretted Anthony was on death row for something Glen did. But he said that Anthony was tough and could deal with being locked up, whereas Glen wasn’t strong enough to adapt to being incarcerated.”

    The state’s attorney general said as recently as last month that there was “no conceivable doubt” that the younger Sanchez killed Busken and the DNA recovered from the killing belonged to him.

    [ad_2]

    Source link