ReportWire

Tag: dealing

  • ‘Getting on an elevator with no buttons’: How the 2-year Treasury became the financial instrument to watch in March and a Wall Street obsession 

    ‘Getting on an elevator with no buttons’: How the 2-year Treasury became the financial instrument to watch in March and a Wall Street obsession 

    [ad_1]

    It was a two-week trading period like few had ever seen in the $24 trillion Treasury market.

    In a span of roughly nine trading sessions between March 7 and 17, the yield on 2-year Treasury notes — a gauge of where U.S. central bankers are most likely to take interest rates over the next two years — sank a full percentage point to 3.85% from an almost 16-year closing high above 5%, with wide swings in both directions on the way down.

    The 2-year yield’s yearlong upward trajectory made a sudden and dramatic descent, as investors swung from a view that interest rates would remain higher for longer to a scenario in which the Federal Reserve might need to cut borrowing costs to avert a deep recession and repeated bank failures. The wild swing in sentiment turned the 2-year Treasury rate
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    4.178%

    into a roller-coaster ride and made it the most exciting space to watch in the traditionally staid government-debt market. 

    For traders like David Petrosinelli of InspereX in New York, a 25-year veteran of markets, March’s daily volatility was akin to “getting on an elevator with no buttons,” he said. He recalls telling people at his firm, who were worried about the positions they held at the time, that  “a lot of this is a knee-jerk reaction to the unknown” — even if it felt both “eerily reminiscent” of rates volatility seen ahead of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, and “distinctly different’’ because it was driven by rapidly changing market expectations for the Fed and contained within the U.S. regional-banking system. 

    Read: What ‘unprecedented’ volatility in the $24 trillion Treasury market looks like

    For more than a decade, there wasn’t much to say about the 2-year Treasury yield because the U.S. was mired in mostly low interest rates and “no one knew how to trade it,” according to Petrosinelli, 54, who began his career in the late 1990s as a as a portfolio manager focused on asset-backed and residential mortgage-backed securities. It was an overlooked rate in a sleepy corner of the market and nobody paid it much attention. That changed beginning in 2022, when monetary policy makers finally undertook the most aggressive rate-hike campaign in four decades to combat inflation — reinforcing the 2-year yield’s role as the best proxy for where the market thinks interest rates will end up. The 2-year yield rocketed to above 5% in early March from 0.15% in April 2021.

    Suddenly, the 2-year Treasury became the most watched financial indicator on Wall Street, influencing the trajectories of stocks and the U.S. dollar throughout much of 2022. “This thing is relentless,” declared market commentator Jim Cramer on CNBC last year. He told viewers he was buying 2-year notes, not meme stocks. “The run to 4 is probably the most punishing one I can recall for the 2-year.” Other prominent names like Mohamed El-Erian, the former chief executive of PIMCO, and Jeffrey Gundlach, founder of DoubleLine Capital, wanted to talk about it. “If you want to know what’s going to happen in the year, follow the 2-year yield at this point,” El-Erian said on CNBC. “That’s the market indicator that has the most information.” More hedge funds and macro private-equity firms jumped on board and started trading it, said InspereX’s Petrosinelli. And head trader John Farawell of Roosevelt & Cross in New York, said family and friends who never showed much interest in fixed income before began regularly asking him if it was the right time to buy the 2-year Treasury note.

    “Once we started to hit 4% on the 2-year yield last September for the first time since 2007, everyone got interested,” said Farawell, 66, a trader for the past 41 years. He estimates that interest in the 2-year yield among his firm’s clients has gone up about 30% in the past 12 months. “We have seen retail customers suddenly saying they want to put their money to work in the 2-year note because of an interest rate that we have not seen in years.”

    From his office in Midtown Manhattan, Nicholas Colas noticed an abrupt and unexpected shift over the past year and it had to do with the 2-year Treasury. As the co-founder of DataTrek Research, a Wall Street research firm, Colas realized that the 2-year Treasury yield was influencing trading in the stock market. When the 2-year Treasury yield shot higher in 2022, the equity market would become volatile and often drop. In fact, the 2-year Treasury seemed to influence equity-market volatility in both directions. Whenever the 2-year yield briefly stabilized, Colas said, stocks tended to rally since equity investors took the stabilization in the 2-year rate to mean that Fed policy was “no longer as much of a wild card.” 

    To Colas, equity markets appeared to be taking any selloff in the 2-year note, and thus a rise in its corresponding yield, as a sign that the Fed would have to increase interest rates by more than expected and keep them higher for longer. With stocks and U.S. government debt both getting trounced regularly in last year’s selloffs, Colas said his first thought was that “all of a sudden, Treasurys were no longer a safe haven — something that has rarely happened since I started my career in 1983.”

    Trading in government debt, like elsewhere in financial markets, is a two-way street of buyers and sellers. When yields are moving higher, that means the price of the corresponding Treasury security is dropping — and vice versa. The 2-year Treasury note pays out a fixed interest rate every six months until it matures. The trick to trading it, as opposed to buying and holding, is to either sell it before its underlying value gets destroyed by higher interest rates, or to buy it before the Fed starts cutting rates — which would, theoretically, produce a lower yield and make the government note more expensive.

    Throughout the yield’s march higher, investors sold off the underlying 2-year note — a move which diminished the note’s value for existing holders like banks, pension funds, credit unions, foreign central banks, and U.S. corporations. Two-year Treasury notes also constitute about 1% to 2% of the total holdings at the 10 largest actively managed money-market funds, according to Ben Emons, senior portfolio manager and head of fixed income at NewEdge Wealth in New York.

    “Policy expectations are what really drive the 2-year yield,” said Thomas Simons, a U.S. economist at Jefferies, one of the two dozen primary dealers that serve as trading counterparties of the Fed’s New York branch and help to implement monetary policy. “We had a major paradigm shift in terms of what investors’ expectations were for the sustainability of higher inflation and what the Fed would do in response. The impact on markets has been far less appetite for risk than there otherwise would be,” with stocks putting in a dismal performance in 2022, though generating somewhat better 2023 returns.

    Tucked into the note’s selloff, though, was plenty of interest from prospective government-debt buyers, which helped temper the magnitude of the 2-year yield’s rise once the rate got to 4%. Many looking to buy were individual investors hoping to benefit from higher yields and to diversify away from stocks, said traders like Tom di Galoma, a managing director for financial services firm BTIG.

    Historically, banks, mutual funds, hedge funds, foreign investors and even the Fed have been the biggest buyers of Treasurys across the board; some of those players, particularly foreign central banks and money-market mutual funds, are mandated to buy and hold government debt. All two dozen primary dealers are involved as market makers for the 2-year security, stepping in to buy it in the absence of either direct or indirect buyers.

    The 2-year note remains a reliable source of funding for the U.S. government, given the consistent demand for the maturity, which enables the U.S. Treasury Department to “raise a lot of cash quickly, if needed,” said Simons of Jefferies. In 2020, for example, when the government authorized $2.4 trillion in Covid-related spending and relief programs, the amount of 2-year notes sold at auction was one of the biggest of any maturity  — far exceeding the 10- and 30-year counterparts — “because it had the capacity to handle that.’’

    Sources: Treasury Department, Bureau of Public Debt, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

    Currently, the Treasury has $1.421 trillion in total outstanding 2-year notes, representing about 13% of all the debt issued out to 10 years, according to Treasurydirect.gov. The most recent 2-year note auction in March was for $42 billion — more than the 10-year note sale.

    Fallout from the banking sector and worries about a potential recession altered the trajectory of the 2-year starting in March, triggering concerns that the Fed’s rate-hike cycle had gone too far. Fresh buyers poured into the 2-year space and pushed the yield below 4% — driven by the view that rates weren’t likely to go much higher from here and that policy makers might cut them by year-end.

    Substantial downside volatility in the 2-year Treasury yield has actually helped to stabilize stock prices this year, in Colas’ estimation, because it’s been interpreted as the bond market’s sign that the Fed is approaching the end of its rate-hiking cycle. Like InspereX’s Petrosinelli, Colas says he had visions of the 2007-2008 financial crisis during March’s flight-to-quality trade, which occurred amid regional bank failures and “significantly more stress than the market was expecting.

    As of Thursday morning, the 2-year rate was at 4.17%, below the Fed’s benchmark interest-rate target range — implying that traders still believe policy makers will follow through with rate cuts. That’s a turnabout from the thinking that prevailed over most of 2022 through early last month, when the 2-year rate had been on an aggressive march toward 5% as the Fed continued to hike rates to combat inflation.

    Meanwhile, poor liquidity continues to plague the Treasury market broadly, based on Bloomberg’s U.S. Government Securities Liquidity Index, which measures prevailing conditions. According to the New York Fed, the Treasury market was relatively illiquid throughout last year — making it more difficult to trade. As a result, there was a widening in the bid-ask spread — or difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay versus the lowest price a seller is willing to accept — of the 2-year note relative to its average.

    “The volatility we’re seeing in the 2-year, we think, is largely a function of uncertain Fed rate hiking expectations coupled with poor liquidity,” said Lawrence Gillum, the Charlotte, N.C.-based chief fixed income strategist at LPL Financial.

    “The 2-year is the most sensitive to changing policy expectations and since this Fed  is ‘data dependent,’ any and all new data that could potentially change the inflation/economic growth narrative has increased volatility substantially,” Gillum said in an email. “As the Fed’s rate hiking campaign comes to an end (we think there is one more hike and then they’ll be done), we would expect the volatility to decline. Moreover, the Treasury and Fed are looking at ways to improve liquidity, but so far nothing has happened. Hopefully, they will do something, though, since the Treasury market is arguably the most important market in the world.”

    At InspereX, Petrosinelli regards the 2-year note as an “anchor” to any short-term portfolio, and says that “it’s not a bad place for investors to hide out for at least a year.’’ That’s because even if the yield does come down, “investors wouldn’t be getting too hurt price-wise,” he said. “We think the Fed will leave rates elevated for some time.”

    However, the 2-year could continue to dip below the fed-funds rate on soft economic data, especially related to consumption, later this year, Petrosinelli said. In order for the 2-year rate to go above the Fed’s main interest-rate target — now between 4.75% and 5% — “people would have to think the Fed is behind the curve again on inflation.”

    For Farawell of Roosevelt & Cross, which was founded in 1946 and is one of Wall Street’s oldest independently owned municipal-bond underwriters, the 2-year note “has become such an attractive asset class for us’’ that “you almost can’t go wrong with putting money in it.” Friends and family “ask me about this 2-year and say, ‘It sounds good.’ I say, ‘It’s a great rate, you should buy it — until the Fed starts to change course.’” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Americans will dump up to $1.1 trillion in stocks this year, and move the cash to credit and money-market funds, says Goldman.

    Americans will dump up to $1.1 trillion in stocks this year, and move the cash to credit and money-market funds, says Goldman.

    [ad_1]

    This year could mark the end of the affair — between Americans and their stockholdings.

    That’s according to Goldman Sachs analysts who say due to the rise in bond yields since the start of 2022, and increased flows to bond and money-market funds, U.S. households could end up dumping up to $1.1 trillion of equity holdings this year.

    “The current level of market yields clearly shows that the era of TINA (There is No Alternative) has ended and that now there are reasonable alternatives (TARA) to equities,” said a team of strategists led by Cormac Conners and David Kostin.

    “Although equity demand remained resilient amid sharply rising rates in 2022, we believe the YTD [year-to-date] flows into money market and bond funds signal an escalating household shift away from equities and toward the alternatives.”

    Their model of household equity demand is based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield and personal savings rate. The analysts say that higher yields and lower savings tend to be associated with a decrease in demand for equity among households.

    In their base case, they estimate net selling of $750 billion this year, alongside their forecast for the yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.435%

    to rise from around 3.6% currently to 4.2% by the end of this year, and the personal savings rate will rise to 5.3% from 4.5%. Conners and the team said such stock selling would reverse six previous quarters of household equity demand.


    Uncredited

    Should bond yields tilt lower, and the savings rate move higher, Goldman sees that estimate nearly halved to $400 billion in equity sales. In a worst-case scenario, where yields push even higher and the savings rate lower, household selling would reach $1.1 trillion, they cautioned.

    Read: The Fed raised rates for the ninth consecutive time. Here’s what you should be earning on your savings account now (but probably aren’t)

    As for the idea that there are now reasonable alternatives to equities (TARA), Goldman said households tend to buy fixed income products during years in which they sell stocks. They pointed to data showing $51 billion has flowed out of U.S. equity mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, year to date, while $282 billion has poured into U.S. money-market funds and $137 billion into U.S. bond funds.

    Read: Money-market funds swell to record $5.4 trillion as savers pull money from bank deposits

    Picking up some of the slack left by U.S. investors, the Goldman team predict foreign investors and corporations will be net stock buyers of $550 billion and $350 billion, respectively.

    “We expect buyback and cash M&A activity will slow but remain relatively robust this year, driving corporations to be net buyers of U.S. stocks – though a potential [second-half] recovery in equity issuance presents one risk to this forecast. A weaker dollar should drive foreign investors to be net buyers of U.S. stocks in 2023. Pension funds will also be net buyers of $200 billion in equities in 2023,” said the strategists.

    The pace of household buying has been slowing, they noted. Citing the Federal Reserve’s Financial Accounts data, Goldman said households are estimated to own 38% of the total equity market. From the start of 2020 through mid-2022, they bought $1.7 trillion in equities, but in 2022 demand for those assets fell 40% to $480 billion.

    “Adjusting the Fed’s household demand series for our estimate of hedge fund net equity demand (which is included in the household category by default), implies households were net buyers of just $209 billion in equities in 2022, a 78% decline from 2021,” they said.

    Up 2% so far this year, the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.25%

    lost 19% in 2022, the worst year for the index since the global financial crisis of 2008, as a war in Europe added to inflationary pressures across the globe, driving central banks such as the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates sharply. Wednesday’s 25-basis point Fed rate hike marked the ninth rise since March 2022.

    From under 1.5% at the start of 2022, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TY00,
    +0.60%

    has climbed to around 3.468%, levels not seen since the 2008 crisis.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Robinhood accidentally sold short on a meme stock and lost $57 million

    Robinhood accidentally sold short on a meme stock and lost $57 million

    [ad_1]

    Robinhood Markets Inc. accidentally sold short on a small stock as it went on a meme-like ride in December, costing the trading app more than the stock’s current market capitalization, executives disclosed Wednesday.

    Cosmos Health Inc.
    COSM,
    +0.80%

    shares nearly tripled and experienced record trading volume more than seven times any previous day on Dec. 16, as online traders looking for heavily shorted companies accused exchanges of not allowing them to sell their shares into the updraft. Robinhood
    HOOD,
    -0.76%

    executives admitted Wednesday that their trading app actually became part of the frenzy, and ended up down $57 million because of it.

    In an earnings call, Robinhood Chief Executive Vlad Tenev noted a “processing error on a corporate action” that was “really disappointing,” leaving Chief Financial Officer Jason Warnick to spell it out.

    “A processing error caused us to sell shares short into the market, and although it was detected quickly, it resulted in a loss of $57 million as we bought back these shares against a rising stock price,” Warnick said.

    When Cosmos Health effected a 1-for-25 reverse stock split that Friday morning in December, just hours after announcing its intentions, trading portals did not appear prepared. As MarketWatch reported on the day, TD Ameritrade publicly told Twitter users that the company had not received the newly issued shares to dole out to their clients as the stock spiked. A Charles Schwab Corp.
    SCHW,
    -0.71%

    spokesperson emailed MarketWatch the next week to say that the distributions were all taken care of as of the end of the next business day, a Monday.

    The stock gains didn’t last through that Monday, though — after reaching as high as $23.84 on the day that Robinhood was apparently buying, they lost it all in after-hours trading and headed even lower after Cosmos Health announced an equity offering.

    Shares closed Wednesday at $5.04, which gives Cosmos Health a market cap of about $53 million, according to FactSet — less than Robinhood executives said they lost on the Dec. 16 trades.

    Robinhood shares were up in after-hours trading Wednesday after the trading app reported a fourth-quarter miss, but said the company would seek to buy back shares sold to disgraced cryptocurrency-exchange founder Sam Bankman-Fried and executives would forego $500 million in stock compensation. Robinhood stock has declined 21.8% in the past 12 months, as the S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -1.11%

    has dropped 8.9%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why naked short selling has suddenly become a hot topic

    Why naked short selling has suddenly become a hot topic

    [ad_1]

    Short selling can be controversial, especially among management teams of companies whose stocks traders are betting that their prices will fall. And a new spike in alleged “naked short selling” among microcap stocks is making several management teams angry enough to threaten legal action:

    Taking a long position means buying a stock and holding it, hoping the price will go up.

    Shorting, or short selling, is when an investor borrows shares and immediately sells them, hoping he or she can buy them again later at a lower price, return them to the lender and pocket the difference.

    Covering is when an investor with a short position buys the stock again to close a short position and return the shares to the lender.

    If you take a long position, you might lose all your money. A stock can go to zero if a company goes bankrupt. But a short position is riskier. If the share price rises steadily after an investor has placed a short trade, the investor is sitting on an unrealized capital loss. This is why short selling traditionally has been dominated by professional investors who base this type of trade on heavy research and conviction.

    Read: Short sellers are not evil, but they are misunderstood

    Brokers require short sellers to qualify for margin accounts. A broker faces credit exposure to an investor if a stock that has been shorted begins to rise instead of going down. Depending on how high the price rises, the broker will demand more collateral from the investor. The investor may eventually have to cover and close the short with a loss, if the stock rises too much.

    And that type of activity can lead to a short squeeze if many short sellers are surprised at the same time. A short squeeze can send a share price through the roof temporarily.

    Short squeezes helped feed the meme-stock craze of 2021 that sent shares of GameStop Corp.
    GME,
    +10.45%

    and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.
    AMC,
    +2.54%

    soaring early in 2021. Some traders communicating through the Reddit WallStreetBets channel and in other social media worked together to try to force short squeezes in stocks of troubled companies that had been heavily shorted. The action sent shares of GameStop soaring from $4.82 at the end of 2020 to a closing high of $86.88 on Jan. 27, 2021, only for the stock to fall to $10.15 on Feb. 19, 2021, as the seesaw action continued for this and other meme stocks.

    Naked shorting

    Let’s say you were convinced that a company was headed toward financial difficulties or even bankruptcy, but its shares were still trading at a value you considered to be significant. If the shares were highly liquid, you would be able to borrow them through your broker for little or almost no cost, to set up your short trade.

    But if many other investors were shorting the stock, there would be fewer shares available for borrowing. Then your broker would charge a higher fee based on supply and demand.

    For example, according to data provided by FactSet on Jan. 23, 22.7% of GameStop’s shares available for trading were sold short — a figure that could be up to two weeks out-of-date, according to the financial data provider.

    According to Brad Lamensdorf, who co-manages the AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
    HDGE,
    -2.65%
    ,
    the cost of borrowing shares of GameStop on Jan. 23 was an annualized 15.5%. That cost increases a short seller’s risk.

    What if you wanted to short a stock that had even heavier short interest than GameStop? Lamensdorf said on Jan. 23 that there were no shares available to borrow for Carvana Co.
    CVNA,
    +10.63%
    ,
    Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
    BBBY,
    -12.24%
    ,
    Beyond Meat Inc.
    BYND,
    +11.31%

    or Coinbase Global Inc.
    COIN,
    +1.45%
    .
    If you wanted to short AMC shares, you would pay an annual fee of 85.17% to borrow the shares.

    Starting last week, and flowing into this week, management teams at several companies with microcap stocks (with market capitalizations below $100 million) said they were investigating naked short selling — short selling without actually borrowing the shares.

    This brings us to three more terms:

    A short-locate is a service a short seller requests from a broker. The broker finds shares for the short seller to borrow.

    A natural locate is needed to make a “proper” short-sale, according to Moshe Hurwitz, who recently launched Blue Zen Capital Management in Atlanta to specialize in short selling. The broker gives you a price to borrow shares and places the actual shares in your account. You can then short them if you want to.

    A nonnatural locate is “when the broker gives you shares they do not have,” according to Hurwitz.

    When asked if a nonnatural locate would constitute fraud, Hurwitz said “yes.”

    How is naked short selling possible? According to Hurwitz, “it is incumbent on the brokers” to stop placing borrowed shares in customer accounts when supplies of shares are depleted. But he added that some brokers, even in the U.S., lend out the same shares multiple times, because it is lucrative.

    “The reason they do it is when it comes time to settle, to deliver, they are banking on the fact that most of those people are day traders, so there would be enough shares to deliver.”

    Hurwitz cautioned that the current round of complaints about naked short selling wasn’t unusual and even though short selling activity can push a stock’s price down momentarily, “short sellers are buyers in waiting.” They will eventually buy when they cover their short positions.

    “But to really push a stock price down, you need long investors to sell,” he said.

    Different action that can appear to be naked shorting

    Lamensdorf said the illegal naked shorting that Verb Technology Co.
    VERB,
    +69.65%
    ,
    Genius Group Ltd.
    GNS,
    +45.37%

    and other microcap companies have been recently complaining about might include activity that isn’t illegal.

    An investor looking to short a stock for which shares weren’t available to borrow, or for which the cost to borrow shares was too high, might enter into “swap transactions or sophisticated over-the-counter derivative transactions,” to bet against the stock,” he said.

    This type of trader would be “pretty sophisticated,” Lamensdorf said. He added that brokers typically have account minimums ranging from $25 million to $50 million for investors making this type of trade. This would mean the trader was likely to be “a decent-sized family office or a fund, with decent liquidity,” he said.

    Don’t miss: This dividend-stock ETF has a 12% yield and is beating the S&P 500 by a substantial amount

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This dividend-stock ETF has a 12% yield and is beating the S&P 500 by a substantial amount

    This dividend-stock ETF has a 12% yield and is beating the S&P 500 by a substantial amount

    [ad_1]

    Most investors want to keep things simple, but digging a bit into details can be lucrative — it can help you match your choices to your objectives.

    The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
    JEPI,
    +0.20%

    has been able to take advantage of rising volatility in the stock market to beat the total return of its benchmark, the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +1.19%
    ,
    while providing a rising stream of monthly income.

    The objective of the fund is “to deliver a significant portion of the returns associated with the S&P 500 Index with less volatility,” while paying monthly dividends, according to JPMorgan Asset Management. It does this by maintaining a portfolio of about 100 stocks selected for high quality, value and low price volatility, while also employing a covered-call strategy (described below) to increase income.

    This strategy might underperform the index during a bull market, but it is designed to be less volatile while providing high monthly dividends. This might make it easier for you to remain invested through the type of downturn we saw last year.

    JEPI was launched on May 20, 2020, and has grown quickly to $18.7 billion in assets under management. Hamilton Reiner, who co-manages the fund with Raffaele Zingone, described the fund’s strategy, and its success during the 2022 bear market and shared thoughts on what may lie ahead.

    Outperformance with a smoother ride

    First, here’s a chart showing how the fund has performed from when it was established through Jan. 20, against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +1.20%
    ,
    both with dividends reinvested:

    JEPI has been less volatile than SPY, which tracks the S&P 500.


    FactSet

    Total returns for the two funds since May 2020 pretty much match, however, JEPI has been far less volatile than SPY and the S&P 500. Now take a look at a performance comparison for the period of rising interest rates since the end of 2021:

    Rising stock-price volatility during 2022 helped JEPI earn more income through its covered call option strategy.


    FactSet

    Those total returns are after annualized expenses of 0.35% of assets under management for JEPI and 0.09% for SPY. Both funds have had negative returns since the end of 2021, but JEPI has been a much better performer.

    “Income is the outcome.”


    — Hamilton Reiner

    The income component

    Which investors JEPI is designed for? “Income is the outcome,” Reiner responded. “We are seeing a lot of people using this as an anchor tenant for income-oriented portfolios.”

    The fund quotes a 30-day SEC yield of 11.77%. There are various ways to look at dividend yields for mutual funds or exchange-traded funds and the 30-day yield is meant to be used for comparison. It is based on a fund’s current income distribution profile relative to its price, but the income distributions that investors actually receive will vary.

    It turns out that over the past 12 months, JEPI’s monthly distributions have ranged between 38 cents a share and 62 cents a share, with a rising trend over the past six months. The sum of the past 12 distributions has been $5.79 a share, for a distribution yield of 10.53%, based on the ETF’s closing price of $55.01 on Jan. 20.

    JEPI invests at least 80% of assets in stocks, mainly selected from those in the S&P 500, while also investing in equity-linked notes to employ a covered call option strategy which enhances income and lowers volatility. Covered calls are described below.

    Reiner said that during a typical year, investors in JEPI should expect monthly distributions to come to an annualized yield in the “high single digits.”

    He expects that level of income even if we return to the low-interest rate environment that preceded the Federal Reserve’s cycle of rate increases that it started early last year to push down inflation.

    JEPI’s approach may be attractive to investors who don’t need the income now. “We also see people using it as a conservative equity approach,” Reiner expects the fund to have 35% less price volatility than the S&P 500.

    Getting back to income, Reiner said JEPI was a good alternative even for investors who were willing to take credit risk with high-yield bond funds. Those have higher price volatility than investment-grade bond funds and face a higher risk of losses when bonds default. “But with JEPI you don’t have credit risk or duration risk,” he said.

    An example of a high-yield bond fund is the iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
    SHYG,
    -0.10%
    .
    It has a 30-day yield of 7.95%.

    When discussing JEPI’s stock selection, Reiner said “there is a significant active component to the 90 to 120 names we invest in.” Stock selections are based on recommendations of JPM’s analyst team for those that are “most attractively priced today for the medium to long term,” he said.

    Individual stock selections don’t factor in dividend yields.

    Covered call strategies and an example of a covered-call trade

    JEPI’s high income is an important part of its low-volatility total-return strategy.

    A call option is a contract that allows an investor to buy a security at a particular price (called the strike price) until the option expires. A put option is the opposite, allowing the purchaser to sell a security at a specified price until the option expires.

    covered call option is one an investor can write when they already own a security. The strike price is “out of the money,” which means it is higher than the stock’s current price.

    Here’s an example of a covered call option provided by Ken Roberts, an investment adviser with Four Star Wealth Management in Reno, Nev.

    • You bought shares of 3M Co.
      MMM,
      +1.63%

      on Jan. 20 for $118.75.

    • You sold a $130 call option with an expiration date of Jan. 19, 2024.

    • The premium for the Jan. 24, $130 call was $7.60 at the time that MMM was selling for $118.75.

    • The current dividend yield for MMM is 5.03%.

    • “So the maximum gain for this trade before the dividend is $18.85 or 15.87%. Add the divided income and you’ll get 20.90% maximum return,” Roberts wrote in an email exchange on Jan. 20.

    If you had made this trade and 3M’s shares didn’t rise above $130 by Jan. 19, 2024, the option would expire and you would be free to write another option. The option alone would provide income equivalent to 6.40% of the Jan. 20 purchase price in the period of a year.

    If the stock rose above $130 and the option were exercised, you would have ended up with the maximum gain as described by Roberts. Then you would need to find another stock to invest in. What did you risk? Further upside beyond $130. So you would have written the option only if you had decided you would be willing to part with your shares of MMM for $130.

    The bottom line is that the call option strategy lowers volatility with no additional downside risk. The risk is to the upside. If 3M’s shares had doubled in price before the option expired, you would still wind up selling them for $130.

    JEPI pursues the covered call options strategy by purchasing equity-linked notes (ELNs) which “combine equity exposure with call options,” Reiner said. The fund invests in ELNs rather than writing its own options, because “unfortunately option premium income is not considered bona fide income. It is considered a gain or a return of capital,” he said.

    In other words, the fund’s distributions can be better reflected in its 30-day yield, because option income probably wouldn’t be included.

    One obvious question for a fund manager whose portfolio has increased quickly to almost $19 billion is whether or not the fund’s size might make it difficult to manage. Some smaller funds pursuing narrow strategies have been forced to close themselves to new investors. Reiner said JEPI’s 2% weighting limitation for its portfolio of about 100 stocks mitigates size concerns. He also said that “S&P 500 index options are the most liquid equity products in the world,” with over $1 trillion in daily trades.

    Summing up the 2022 action, Reiner said “investing is about balance.” The rising level of price volatility increased options premiums. But to further protect investors, he and JEPI co-manager Raffaele Zingone also “gave them more potential upside by selling calls that were a bit further out of the money.”

    Don’t miss: These 15 Dividend Aristocrat stocks have been the best income builders

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alibaba, XPeng, Goldman Sachs, and More Stock Market Movers Tuesday

    Alibaba, XPeng, Goldman Sachs, and More Stock Market Movers Tuesday

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints

    • Print Article


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • China Regulator Says Futu, Up Fintech Violated Laws

    China Regulator Says Futu, Up Fintech Violated Laws

    [ad_1]

    China Regulator Says Futu, Up Fintech Violated Laws

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  •  Individual Investors Hang On in Wild Year for Stocks While Pros Sell 

     Individual Investors Hang On in Wild Year for Stocks While Pros Sell 

    [ad_1]

    During the wildest year for global markets since 2008, individual investors have been doubling down on stocks. Many professionals, on the other hand, appear to have bailed out.  

    U.S. equity mutual and exchange-traded funds, which are popular among individual investors, have attracted more than $100 billion in net inflows this year, one of the highest amounts on record in EPFR data going back to 2000. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Investors Grow More Confident Fed Will Pull Off a Soft Landing

    Investors Grow More Confident Fed Will Pull Off a Soft Landing

    [ad_1]

    Investors Grow More Confident Fed Will Pull Off a Soft Landing

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Crypto lender BlockFi is suing Sam Bankman-Fried over his shares in Robinhood: report

    Crypto lender BlockFi is suing Sam Bankman-Fried over his shares in Robinhood: report

    [ad_1]

    Just hours after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New Jersey on Monday, cryptocurrency lender BlockFi filed a lawsuit against a holding company by FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried over his shares in trading platform Robinhood, the Financial Times reported.

    The suit was filed against Bankman-Fried’s vehicle Emergent Fidelity Technologies, of whom BlockFi is seeking to recover unpaid collateral.

    The filing – also lodged in New Jersey – says BlockFi entered into a pledge agreement with Emergent on Nov. 9 stating that an unnamed borrower was obliged to pledge “certain shares of common stock” and has breached the agreement by failing to comply with its payment obligations.

    The Financial Times reports the collateral in question is Bankman-Fried’s 7.6% stake in Robinhood which he bought earlier this year.

    “Emergent has defaulted on its obligations under the pledge agreement and failed to satisfy its obligations thereunder despite written notice of default and acceleration,” the lawsuit filing says.

    The lawsuit also named London-based brokerage ED&F Man Capital Markets for refusing to “transfer the collateral” to BlockFi.

    “This is a highly complex matter,” a spokesperson for ED&F Man Capital Markets told MarketWatch in an emailed statement.

    “We cannot comment on matters that are subject to legal proceedings but will of course comply with any direction given by the judge,” they added.

    On Monday, BlockFi, who was once valued at $3 billion, filed for bankruptcy protection after becoming the latest company to be pushed over the edge from the collapse of crypto exchange FTX.

    See also: BlockFi’s big creditors include an indenture trustee firm, FTX and the SEC

    The lawsuit is the latest headache for Bankman-Fried, who is already the subject of a number of investigations in the U.S. and the Bahamas – where FTX was based. The downfall of FTX has triggered a chain reaction of crypto-casualties including crypto financial-services firm Genesis.

    FTX collapse to be focus of Senate hearing Thursday — here’s what to watch for

    BlockFi and representatives of Bankman-Fried did not immediately respond to MarketWatch’s request for comment.

    See also: Bitcoin prices under pressure as cracks spread across crypto industry

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Where Are Markets Headed? Six Pros Take Their Best Guess

    Where Are Markets Headed? Six Pros Take Their Best Guess

    [ad_1]

    A massive selloff in bonds. A plunge in tech stocks. The implosion of cryptocurrencies. The highest inflation in four decades.

    Amid a brutal and uncertain climate, we asked six heavyweights in the world of finance to share their thoughts on the state of the markets, how they have handled this year’s carnage and what they anticipate in the future.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Material risk’ looms over stocks as investors face bear market’s ‘second act,’ warns Morgan Stanley

    ‘Material risk’ looms over stocks as investors face bear market’s ‘second act,’ warns Morgan Stanley

    [ad_1]

    Stock-market investors have been adjusting to the jump in interest rates amid high inflation, but they have yet to cope with profit headwinds faced by the S&P 500, according to Morgan Stanley Wealth Management.

    “While a rate peak may solidify estimates for the equity risk premium and valuation multiples, equity investors still face the bear market’s second act — the earnings outlook,” said Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, in a note Monday. 

    “They have been slow to recognize that pricing power and operating margins, which hit all-time highs in the past two years, are unsustainable,” she said. “Even without a recession, the mean reversion of profits in 2023 translates to a 10%-to-15% decline from current estimates.”


    MORGAN STANLEY WEALTH MANAGEMENT NOTE DATED OCT. 17 2022

    Unprecedented monetary and fiscal stimulus during the throes of the pandemic had led to the largest U.S. companies booking record operating margins that were 150 to 200 basis points above norms seen in the past decade, according to Shalett. 

    See: Stock market’s wild gyrations put earnings in focus as inflation crushes Fed ‘pivot’ hopes

    She said that company profits may now be imperiled by slowing growth, with “demand skewing toward services” after pulling forward toward goods earlier in the pandemic, and a likely reversal in “extremely strong” pricing power as the Fed fights surging inflation with interest-rate hikes.

    “Such risks are not discounted in 2023 consensus yet, constituting a material risk to stocks for the remainder of the year,” Shalett said.

    While many sectors have discounted the potential drop in 2023 profits from current estimates that could stir headwinds even with no recession, “the megacap secular growth stocks that dominate market-cap indexes have not,” she warned. “And those indexes are where risk gets repriced in the bear market’s final stages.”

    Morgan Stanley’s chief U.S. equity strategist Mike Wilson estimates as much as 11% downside from consensus estimates, with his base-case, earnings-per-share forecast for the S&P 500 for 2023 being $212, according to Shalett’s note. 

    U.S. stocks were bouncing Monday, with major stock benchmarks trading sharply higher in the afternoon, after sinking Friday amid inflation concerns as earnings season got under way. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +2.65%

    was up 2.7% in afternoon trading, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +1.86%

    gained 1.9% and the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite surged 3.5%, FactSet data show, last check. 

    In the bond market, Treasury rates were trading slightly lower Monday afternoon, after the 2-year yield hit a 15-year high and the 10-year yield notched a 14-year high on Friday, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Two-year yields ended last week at 4.507%, the highest level since August 8, 2007 based on 3 p.m. Eastern time levels, while the 10-year rate climbed to 4.005% for its highest rate since Oct. 15, 2008.

    The yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.992%

    was down about 1 basis point Monday afternoon at around 4%, while two-year yields
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    4.439%

    fell about five basis points to around 4.45%, FactSet data show, at last check.

    Meanwhile, as investors capitulated to higher inflation, “peak policy rates moved up aggressively in the fed funds futures market, with the terminal rate now at nearly 5%, an aggressive stance that smacks of ‘peak hawkishness,’” according to the Morgan Stanley note.

    “Critically, although the market is still pricing 1.5 cuts in 2023, the January 2024 fed-funds rate is estimated at 4.5%, a comfortable 100 basis points above our forecast” for core inflation measured by the consumer-price index, Shalett wrote.

    “Consider locking in solid short-term yields in bonds and shoring up positions in high growth, dividend-paying stocks,” she said. “Short-duration Treasuries look attractive, especially because the yield is more than 2.5 times that of the dividend yield on the S&P 500.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • JPMorgan profit falls but beats estimates while Wells Fargo misses

    JPMorgan profit falls but beats estimates while Wells Fargo misses

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. shares rose Friday after the megabank beat analyst targets for third-quarter profit and revenue and said it would top forecasts for its net interest in come in the coming quarter.

    In a busy day for bank earnings, Wells Fargo & Co.
    WFC,
    +4.62%

    fell short of earnings target but its stock rose in premarket trades as it beat revenue estimates.

    Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    +3.55%

    shares fell after it missed Wall Street’s targets for earnings and revenue.

    Citigroup Inc.
    C,
    +5.17%

    shares rose after beating its profit mark, although revenue fell 1% after breaking out the impact of divestitures.

    Overall, banks benefited from higher interest rates and strong trading volumes, but investment banking deal activity fell sharply. Banks also channeled more capital into reserves and away from their collective bottom lines to prepare for a potential economic downturn.

    As the largest bank in the U.S. and a bellwether for the sector, JPMorgan Chase
    JPM,
    +5.56%

    turned in a “solid performance” in the latest quarter, in the words of Chief Executive Jamie Dimon.

    The bank said it expects to meet its capital requirements under the international Basel III banking guidelines and resume stock buybacks early in 2023.

    “In the U.S., consumers continue to spend with solid balance sheets, job openings are plentiful and businesses remain healthy,” Dimon said. “However, there are significant headwinds immediately in front of us – stubbornly high inflation leading to higher global interest rates, the uncertain impacts of quantitative tightening, the war in Ukraine, which is increasing all geopolitical risks, and the fragile state of oil supply and prices.”

    Dimon said the bank remains “prepared for bad outcomes” so it can continue to operate even in the most challenging times.

    Dimon’s prepared statement comes a day after the oft-quoted CEO said the U.S. consumer sector remains strong currently, but inflation will start weighing on people by 2023.

    Also Read: JPMorgan CEO Dimon says inflation hasn’t dampened consumer spending yet but give it time

    JPMorgan Chase’s stock rose 2.4% ahead of Friday’s open after it said its third-quarter net income fell 16.7% to $9.74 billion, or $3.12 a share, from $11.69 billion, or $3.74 a share, in the year-ago quarter.

    Third-quarter revenue at the megabank rose to $32.72 billion from $29.65 billion in the year-ago quarter.

    Wall Street analysts expected JPMorgan Chase to earn $2.90 a share on revenue of $32.12 billion, according to estimated compiled by FactSet. T

    The bank said a net credit reserve build of $808 million ate into its net income for the latest quarter, compared with a net reserve release of $2.1 billion in the prior year.

    Net interest income climbed 34% to $17.6 billion and net interest income excluding its Markets unit rose 51% to $16.9 billion on higher interest rates.

    JPMorgan Chase’s total assets under management fell 13% to $2.6 trillion in the face of losses in the equities market and difficult conditions in the bond market.

    Looking ahead, JPMorgan Chase said it expects fourth-quarter net interest income of about $19 billion, ahead of the $18.2 billion analyst estimate.

    Octavio Marenzi, CEO of management consultant company Opimas said the bank’s results were “surprisingly solid” and if you strip away its payments for loan reserves, its profit is basically unchanged.

    “Individual lines of business, such as investment banking and mortgages did predictably badly, but this was more than compensated for by strength in other areas of lending and in trading,” Marenzi said.

    Shares of JPMorgan Chase have lost 30.9% in 2022 compared with a 17.3% drop by the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +2.83%

    and a 23.0% loss by the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +2.60%
    .

    Wells Fargo misses profit target but share rise

    Wells Fargo & Co. shares advanced 2% in Friday’s premarket after the bank posted net income of $3.528 billion, or 85 cents a share, for the quarter to end September, down from $5.122 billion, or $1.17 a share, in the year-earlier quarter.

    The megabank fell short of the earnings-per-share target of $1.09 a share.

    Wells Fargo’s revenue rose to $19.505 billion from $18.834 billion a year ago, ahead of the $18.775 billion FactSet consensus.

    Chief Executive Charlie Scharf said performance was “significantly impacted” by $2 billion, or 45 cents a share, in operating losses “related to litigation, customer remediation, and regulatory matters primarily related to a variety of historical matters.”

    However, the bank is seeing historically low delinquencies and high payment rates, and the “timing of deterioration in those measures due to high inflation remains unclear. “

    The bank set aside $784 million in provisions for loan losses, after reducing them by $1.395 billion a year ago.

    Net interest income rose 36%, while noninterest income fell 25%, as mortgage banking income declined.

    Citi analyst Keith Horowitz said Wells Fargo turned in a “good” quarter overall, although larger-than-expected one-time charges and a reserve build reduced profits. But Wells Fargo also raised its outlook for net interest income “and we still see upside to 2023 consensus,” Horowitz said.

    Shares of Wells Fargo have declined 12% in the year to date.

    Morgan Stanley shares fall on results

    Morgan Stanley fell 2.6% in premarket trades after the investment bank missed Wall Street’s targets for earnings and revenue amid a drop in deal activity.

    Morgan Stanley said its third-quarter net income fell to $2.49 billion, or $1.47 per share, from net income of $3.7 billion, or $1.98 per share in the year-ago quarter.

    Third-quarter revenue dropped to $12.99 billion from $14.75 billion.

    Wall Street analysts were looking for earnings of $1.52 a share and revenue of $13.29 billion, according to FactSet data.

    “Firm performance was resilient and balanced in an uncertain and difficult environment, delivering a 15% return on tangible common equity,” said CEO James Gorman. “Wealth Management added an additional $65 billion in net new assets and produced a pre-tax margin of 28%, excluding integration-related expenses, demonstrating scale and stability despite declining asset values.”

    Morgan Stanley shares have lost 19.2% in 2022.

    Citi beats targets but shares lose ground

    Citigroup shares fell 1.3% in premarket trades Friday after the bank posted stronger-than-expected profit, but revenue fell 1% after breaking out divestiture-related impacts, as growth in net interest income was more than offset by lower non-interest revenue.

    Citi said its third-quarter net income dropped to $3.5 billion, or $1.63 per share, from $4.6 billion, or $2.15 a share, in the year-ago quarter.

    Excluding divestiture-related impacts, earnings were $1.50 a share.

    Total revenue increased to $18.5 billion from $17.4 billion.

    Analysts were looking for earnings of $1.42 a share and revenue of $18.26 billion for Citigroup, according to a FactSet survey.

    Citi said it continues to shrink its operations in Russia, and expects to end nearly all of the institutional banking services offered in the country next quarter. “To be clear, our intention is to wind down our presence in this country,” Chief Executive Jane Fraser said.

    Shares of Citigroup have dropped 28.9% in 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • WSJ News Exclusive | Peloton Co-Founder John Foley Faced Repeated Margin Calls From Goldman Sachs as Stock Slumped

    WSJ News Exclusive | Peloton Co-Founder John Foley Faced Repeated Margin Calls From Goldman Sachs as Stock Slumped

    [ad_1]

    John Foley, the co-founder and former chief executive of Peloton Interactive faced repeated margin calls on money he borrowed against his Peloton holdings before he left the fitness company’s board last month, according to people familiar with the situation.

    As Peloton’s shares slumped over the past year, Goldman Sachs Group asked Mr. Foley several times to provide fresh funds or additional collateral for personal loans the bank had extended to him, the people said. The company’s share price has fallen nearly 95% from its $160 peak in December 2020.

    [ad_2]

    Source link