ReportWire

Tag: david gordon green

  • Ben Stiller to Produce, Star in Pickleball Comedy ‘The Dink’

    Ben Stiller to Produce, Star in Pickleball Comedy ‘The Dink’

    [ad_1]

    After their collaboration on Nutcrackers, Ben Stiller’s Red Hour Films and Rivulet Films will re-team for the pickleball comedy The Dink.

    Jake Johnson has nabbed the leading role as he plays a washed-up tennis pro who, to save a club in crisis and win his father’s respect, does the one thing he swore he’d never do: play pickleball.  The cast includes Mary Steenburgen and Ed Harris, while Stiller and former tennis champion Andy Roddick will have key supporting roles.

    Johnson is coming off Self Reliance, his feature length directorial debut that he also wrote and stars in. Josh Greenbaum will direct The Dink from an original screenplay from Sean Clements, with production to start in Los Angeles in November.

    John Lesher and Stiller are producing through their Red Hour Films banner, alongside Rivulet’s Rob Paris and Mike Witherill. Johnson will also produce. Stiller and Rivulet Films most recently worked together on David Gordon Green’s Nutcrackers, which opened the Toronto Film Festival and was picked up by Hulu.

    Nutcrackers marked Stiller’s first starring role in a movie since Mike White’s Brad’s Status and Noah Baumbach’s Netflix family drama The Meyerowitz Stories in 2017, as the Hollywood veteran has focused on directing and producing in recent years.

    Rivulet is financing The Dink, with Rick Steele, Clements and Greenbaum executive producing.

    Johnson is repped by UTA, while Stiller by repped by WME. Steenburgen by repped by UTA and Entertainment 360, and Harris is repped by CAA, and Greenbaum is repped by UTA and Entertainment 360. Clements is repped by by UTA.

    [ad_2]

    Etan Vlessing

    Source link

  • Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt opening night of Toronto Film Festival

    Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt opening night of Toronto Film Festival

    [ad_1]

    TORONTO (AP) — Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupted an opening night screening at the Toronto International Film Festival, chanting “Stop the genocide!” during opening remarks.

    At the screening for the David Gordon Green comedy “Nutcrackers” on Thursday evening, four protesters walked down the center aisle of the Princess of Wales Theatre, carrying signs and flashlights while shouting criticism of festival sponsor Royal Bank of Canada. “Cut ties with RBC,” they yelled.

    Cameron Bailey, festival director, was speaking at the podium on stage when the protest began. He tried to maintain order, urging the protestors, “We are here to start the festival.” Numerous crowd members booed the protesters.

    The protest lasted for a handful of minutes before the demonstrators were ushered out by security. Several attendees posted videos online of the episode.

    Representatives for the festival didn’t respond to requests for comment.

    In a statement, RBC said: “We respect the right of individuals to make their voices heard, but it’s unfortunate to see activist groups attempting to co-opt this important cultural event. Protestors targeting corporate sponsors are shifting attention from the work of artists and weakening support for essential arts and cultural programs.”

    The bank added: “The humanitarian crisis in Israel and Gaza continues to have a devastating impact and we feel deeply for everyone who is affected.”

    At last year’s TIFF, a campaign called RBC Off Screen also protested the festival sponsor. An open letter to TIFF urged the festival to reconsider its relationship with RBC. Signees included Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams and Joaquin Phoenix. They criticized the bank’s funding of the oil and gas industry.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Every ‘Exorcist’ Sequel Has a Negative Rotten Tomatoes Score

    Every ‘Exorcist’ Sequel Has a Negative Rotten Tomatoes Score

    [ad_1]

    The Exorcist is one of the most iconic horror movies ever. In fact, it’s an iconic movie period. Unfortunately, none of the sequels have really captured the magic of the original.

    The director, William Friedkin, was right off of the absolute classic The French Connection. He was just one part of the equation though. William Peter Blatty’s novel of the same name had just been published in 1971, and the novel flew off the shelves. Friedkin’s film won multiple Oscars and Golden Globes.

    Unfortunately, every sequel to the original movie has either received middling feedback or been panned outright — including the new The Exorcist: Believer which opens this weekend and has gotten absolutely brutal reviews. Let’s go ahead and check out exactly how these shake out on Rotten Tomatoes (with their critics and audience ratings):

    • The Exorcist —  89% / 91%
    • Exorcist II: The Heretic 09% / 13%
    • The Exorcist III — 58% / 57% 
    • Exorcist: The Beginning — 11% / 27%
    • Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist — 30% / 25%
    • The Exorcist: Believer — 23% / TBD
    Exorcist II: The Heretic
    Warner Bros.

    READ MORE: A Company Paid Critics For Rotten Tomatoes Reviews

    As you can see above, most of the movies in the franchise have brutally low scores. That being said, The Exorcist III has been reappraised to a certain degree and is gaining steam as a cult classic. That’s mostly due to Brad Dourif’s stellar performance as the Gemini Killer.

    The only exception here is The Exorcist TV show that ran on television from 2016 to 2017. That project has an 89 percent critic score, with an impressive 91 percent audience score. If you’re a fan of the franchise, that’s probably the one to check out.

    On the other hand, the new Exorcist by director David Gordon Green is receiving some pretty disappointing feedback. Most of the criticism claims that the film tries really hard to stick close to the original movie, while also not reaching the same highs. There are supposed to be two more Exorcist sequels on the way, so only time will tell how the trilogy turns out.

    Matt Singer wrote in ScreenCrush’s review…

    Believer swiftly descends into bad horror movie hell. Although I have no first-hand knowledge about the production, it appears that this Exorcist may have been heavily truncated and reworked in post-production — most obviously in a scene where Burstyn delivers a two-minute monologue almost entirely off-screen while the camera focuses on an endless closeup of Odom’s face.

    The Exorcist: Believer opens in theaters tomorrow.

    The Worst Sequels Ever

    These sequels ruined the reputations of some great movies.

    Gallery Credit: Matt Singer

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link

  • Linda Blair’s Role in New ‘Exorcist’ Sequel Revealed

    Linda Blair’s Role in New ‘Exorcist’ Sequel Revealed

    [ad_1]

    The new Exorcist movie, The Exorcist: Believer, is a direct sequel from the 50-year-old original film. It co-stars Ellen Burstyn, reprising her role as Chris MacNeil, the mother of the little girl Regan who was possessed by a demon in the original film. But there’s no trace of Regal — or the actress who played her, Linda Blair, in the trailer. That has fans speculating whether Regan will make a surprise appearance in the film.

    When asked by Entertainment Weekly whether or not Linda Blair would make a return, director David Gordon Green shared the following.

    We were lucky and had Linda as a technical advisor. She helped us bring excellent performances out of young actresses. It was really valuable having a relationship with her and being able to get her as a part of this conversation.

     

    THE EXORCIST: BELIEVER
    Universal Pictures

    READ MORE: The Worst Horror Movie Cliches

    He also explains that the movie alludes to her character throughout in meaningful ways. He didn’t outright say that she wouldn’t be back, so fans are taking that as an indication that she may be back in the future, whether that be in Believer or upcoming sequels that have already been announced. He was also asked about how much influence the new trilogy would take from sequels to the original film.

    To be honest, I’m not avoiding any of them, but I don’t know them very well. I’ve seen all of them. I’ve seen Exorcist III more than any of them. I know that one very well. Say what you will about Exorcist II, but it ain’t shy. It is a fearless epic of ideas, but [we’re] not necessarily following a character from Exorcist: The Beginning. We’re not looking into that. It’s not that type of a franchise that needs to check boxes.

    The Exorcist: Believer is scheduled to open in theaters on October 13.

    Horror Movies That Could Never Be Made Today

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link

  • Hungry Love: Bones and All

    Hungry Love: Bones and All

    [ad_1]

    Despite the alleged increasing “openness” of society to those who are “different,” there remains a paucity of films about cannibals. And even literary tales of such ilk remain scarce… which is why Camille DeAngelis’ 2015 novel, Bones and All, was such a unique revelation. Too unique for someone like Luca Guadagnino to pass up the chance to turn it into a cinematic tour de force, in addition to the opportunity to reteam with screenwriter David Kajganich. Notably, Kajganich also wrote the scripts for the Guadagnino films A Bigger Splash and Suspiria. Both movies being horror-esque (Suspiria obviously more so), Bones and All feels like a natural fit for the expansion of their collaborative filmography. For, while Bones and All is not outright “horror,” there is something altogether slow-burn terrifying about what happens to Maren Yearly (Taylor Russell) in this fantastical coming-of-age narrative. Because, yes, Guadagnino manages to imbue cannibalism with a sense of the fantastical and the Blink-182 adage “I guess this is growing up.” Or maybe “fucked-up fairy tale” is a more appropriate term than fantastical.  

    Flipping the scenario from the book, wherein Maren goes in search of her father, Kajganich adapts the material so that it’s actually her mother that abandoned her and her dad, Frank (André Holland), when she was a child, and who she now seeks out with the information Frank left behind after also ditching her in the end. Yet, “at least” he waits until his parental responsibility for her is legally over, choosing to bounce right when she turns eighteen (in the novel, Maren’s mother leaves the night after her sixteenth birthday—far crueler, no?). For anyone who ever said parental love was unconditional must have been extremely naïve. This latest abandonment doesn’t do much to make Maren feel better about the constant guilt she has over her need to feed upon human flesh. Most recently doing so at a sleepover where she bites the finger off a would-be friend apropos of nothing. It’s so absent-minded as to make it come across as it truly is: like complete second nature to Maren.  

    Among the things Frank left behind for her to help uncover who she really is and how to deal with it includes her birth certificate with her mother’s name and city of birth on it, as well as a tape (because, don’t forget, this is the 1980s) recounting all the victims Maren collected over the years. Per Frank’s rehashing, the first time she ate human flesh was as a baby of three years old. The victim in question was her babysitter, whose face Maren ate. This also marked the first time Frank had to pick up and move them to another state, never using the same last name from that instant forward. In the book, the babysitter, named Penny Wilson, is given far more thought by Maren, who notes of what she did, “I loathed myself even then. I don’t remember any of this, but I know it.”

    And yet, when she happens upon her first fellow “eater,” the ultra-creepy and disgusting Sully (Mark Rylance), after being left to her own devices, she begins to give in more fully to who and what she is. Even though seeing Sully in his underwear eating the dying old woman he “smelled” from afar and preyed upon doesn’t really make her feel all that “great” either. Nor does Sully’s ominous warning of her attempts to quell her urges, “Whatever you and I got, it’s gotta be fed.” So it is that Maren does join in on eating the now-dead old lady, but she doesn’t stick around much longer to engage with Sully, who eerily refers to himself in the third person, indicating some kind of split personality or dissociation technique from what he does. Though, lucidly enough, he assures Maren, “I got rules. Number one is never, never, ever eat an Eater.” Famous last words, as a certain character says in the movie.

    Mercifully, on her Greyhound route (for she’s on her way to the Minnesota town where her mother was born) that stops in Indiana, Maren encounters a far less disgusting (at least physically and aura-wise) eater in Lee (Timothée Chalamet). As the two both rally to verbally defend a woman shopping at the grocery store from being harassed by some dickhead, Lee is the one to lure him outside under the pretense of getting into a garden-variety fight. But what Maren sees later on after leaving the store is that Lee clearly ate this man. Therefore, his own number one rule seems to be: target assholes only. Thereby using his “condition” for some good, one supposes.

    Upon confirming his “predilection,” Maren is quick to join Lee in the truck of the victim, “Barry Cook” (as his ID indicates), and ask if he can help her, essentially, figure out how to “be.” As for Lee’s own “post-eating” ritual, it usually entails going to the home where his victim lived to double-check that they don’t have anyone in their life who might notice their absence. And so, at Barry’s porno poster-filled house, Lee puts on “Lick It Up” by KISS. Just one of the many pointed musical selections designed to remind us that this is the 80s (along with a macabre Americana score from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross). Not to mention the wielding of politicians like Rudy Giuliani and Ronald Reagan in the background of it all.

    Another moment of overpowering sonic 80s-ness is when Lee and Maren finally succumb to their overt attraction to one another at a carnival, kissing on the Ferris wheel to the tune of Joy Division’s “Atmosphere.” It’s then that Maren confesses, “I’m hungry, Lee.” So Lee does what men have been programmed to do since time immemorial: hunt food for “his” woman. The ensuing experience of eating a carnival worker together is in direct contrast to what Maren felt with Sully, of whom she describes to Lee at a diner as, “…creepy, I guess.” Lee ripostes, “Did that dawn on you before or after you ate Mrs. Herman together?” She corrects, “Mrs. Harmon.” He scoffs, “Does that help? Memorizing their names?” Lee obviously being in total disagreement with Maren’s incessant need to moralize her inherent nature—as though there’s actually something she can do about it.

    The guilt hits her again after realizing that the carnie worker, an on the downlow gay (quite easy for someone with Chalamet’s aesthetic to lure), actually had a wife and child that Maren discovers at his address when they perform Lee’s post-eating ritual. Forced to reconcile every time with this feeling of culpability and sin, Lee’s presence becomes a source of comfort to Maren as they persist on her journey to Minnesota. One that results in yet another heartbreaking epiphany. So much so that Maren feels obliged to go her own way for a while, deserting Lee similarly to how she did with Sully. Except, this time, it’s much more callous because it’s evident the two have fallen in love. Even if that love has formed almost entirely from a bond of profound mutual alienation from society.

    As Guadagnino’s first movie shot in the U.S. (the milieu one automatically associates with the “road movie”), the subtlety with which he conveys the acute loneliness of being in this landscape is only further accented by the duo possessing the added burden of being cannibals. Despite the Shakespearean quality of Bones and All painting Maren and Lee as a pair of doomed “star-crossed lovers,” Guadagnino asserted that it’s also “a very romantic story, about the impossibility of love and yet, the need for it. Even in extreme circumstances” (see also: Badlands).

    Alas, the greatest “sin” of this particular set of Eaters is their reluctant assumption that they can “have nice things,” like love. Which is why, after reuniting in the third act, Lee foolishly inquires of Maren, “You wanna be people? Let’s be people.” Maren agrees, “Yeah, let’s be them for a while.” A.k.a. normies with jobs and a fixed residence. One that turns out to be in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as Maren manages to secure a job at a bookstore. Of course, these attempts to “go straight” are inevitably in vain. Because nothing is going to prevent the tragic fate that awaits them both in the final minutes of a film that may just end up prompting The Silence of the Lambs to step aside as the “premier” book and movie about cannibal life.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Halloween Ends, Evil Never Does

    Halloween Ends, Evil Never Does

    [ad_1]

    A year after the events of 2018’s (rather lackluster) Halloween Kills, mild-mannered Corey Cunningham (Rohan Campbell) is asked to babysit a boy named Jeremy (Jaxon Goldenberg) on Halloween night. Usually employed by his parents, the Allens (played by Candice Rose and Jack William Marshall), to do yard work, Mr. Allen jokes that he hopes Corey’s a better babysitter than he is at yard maintenance. The joke turns out to be all too prescient as Jeremy starts to play a little game of hide and seek with Corey after warning him that Michael Meyers kills babysitters. Even “ugly-ass” ones like Corey. Panicked when he hears a series of doors opening and shutting after Jeremy goes missing from the living room, Corey follows the sound of Jeremy crying out for help into the attic. Once he’s lured there, Jeremy locks him in and starts taunting him about how, sooner or later, Michael is going to get him. As it turns out, Jeremy’s prediction will come true in ways he couldn’t have imagined. And will never be able to… for as Corey proceeds to kick the door repeatedly to open it, when it finally does, it causes Jeremy to fly over the staircase railing and plunge to his death just as the Allens arrive back home. Almost makes the sexist case for women being better caretakers, doesn’t it?

    Although Corey had big plans to go to college, wanting to use some of that babysitting money toward the funds, three years later, we see he’s still stuck in Haddonfield, working at his father Ronald’s (Rick Moose) mechanic shop and living at home. Much to the schadenfreude-oriented delight of his mother, Joan (Joanne Baron). Having turned into something of a DC villain origin story (think: Joker) at this juncture, we can see that the main focus of Halloween Ends will be on Corey’s “transformation”—from innocent youth to jaded adult to full-tilt evil entity. For many, that’s the main beef with this particular “final” installment (at least, as far as this trilogy is concerned). That it doesn’t focus “enough” on Michael Meyers. And yet, the entire purpose of Paul Brad Logan, Chris Bernier, Danny McBride and David Gordon Green’s script is to emphasize that Meyers remains omnipresent. Not just in the sense that he’s a boogeyman feared whether he’s truly around or not, but in the sense that evil never dies—it just transfers and reanimates (e.g., Stalin to Putin).

    This is something Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis, especially “on her game” throughout)—in all her wisdom about coming face to face with evil—can sense and recognize in Corey. But before she realizes this fact, it’s already too late. She’s quite literally dragged him into the doctor’s office where her granddaughter, Allyson (Andi Matichak), works as a nurse. Now living together, Allyson and Laurie have grown even closer after the death of Karen (Judy Greer) a.k.a. Allyson’s mother and Laurie’s daughter. Having sacrificed herself to Michael to spare Allyson in Halloween Kills, it’s a guilt she lives with every day. Much like the guilt Corey lives with, albeit of an entirely different variety. From the second they see one another in the office, it’s a guilt and sadness that connects them right away. And from that moment on, their relationship becomes the stuff of Lana Del Rey songs.

    At first, Laurie, who rescued him from the bullying torment of local high schoolers Terry (Michael Barbieri), Stacy (Destiny Mone), Billy (Marteen) and Margo (Joey Harris), is glad to see Allyson opening up to someone. That is, until she catches sight of Corey standing next to the bushes ominously outside her house the exact same way Michael did all those decades ago. In that instant, she understands that something evil has been born inside of Corey.

    But by that time, it’s already too late, for Corey has come to apologize to Allyson about the night before, when he completely went off on her for bringing him to a public space (namely, Lindsey Wallace’s [Kyle Richards] bar) for a Halloween party. Because the second he took off his scarecrow mask (you’re seeing where that little detail is going, right?) to go order more drinks, he runs into Mrs. Allen, who berates him for daring to have a good time. To display joy of any kind while she suffers every day over her loss. It’s this reminder that sends Corey into what will become a permanently dark place… one, it can be argued, that was likely always there behind the “sweet disposition.”

    Perhaps that’s why there’s a seemingly innocuous moment at the beginning of the movie when Corey grapples with the urge to pull a beer out of the refrigerator after Jeremy verbally abuses him or, instead, opt for the chocolate milk. At that point, when he’s still pure, he ends up choosing the chocolate milk—a very symbol of wholesomeness. Later on in the movie, at the convenience store, he buys some in a glass bottle that eventually shatters as he squeezes it in his hand, buckling under the rage of being bullied by the aforementioned quartet of high schoolers. Tired of his pariah status—seen by the entire town as a monster—it’s as though he decides to just fully embrace being one, since nobody will ever look past the myth of him being a kid killer anyway.

    It’s a sudden “fuck it” attitude that an encounter with Michael Meyers in a sewer beneath a Haddonfield bridge solidifies that night after leaving Allyson at the Halloween party. Meyers, who ordinarily kills anyone that he manages to entrap in that lair, lets Corey go, for “whatever reason.” But, of course, the reason is clear: evil recognizes evil. And it’s obvious he’s found a conduit to transfer his own to, perhaps finally sensing the frailty of his old age and wanting to ensure there’s a “successor.” Except that little theory is negated when Michael shows up to one of Corey’s killings (by now, he’s embraced wearing the scarecrow mask to do so) and seems to be competing with him in the kill—this being the least credible aspect of the storyline and its “universe.” Though some disgruntled viewers would say the entire story is a load of hooey. Not so. For the message behind Halloween Ends is a timelessly resonant one, especially as we watch the frequent swapping of world leaders that result in no change, just a different mask (see: British prime ministers). Fittingly enough, Halloween III: Season of the Witch was also among the least well-received in the Halloween series for its lack of Michael Meyers appearances (which, again, Halloween Ends has plenty of).

    In lieu of that, writer-director Tommy Lee Wallace put the focus on the idea of masks themselves, how people act when wearing them—and this time involving the ritual sacrifice of children. The special effects artist for the movie, Don Post, appropriately commented, “Every society in every time has had its masks that suited the mood of the society, from the masked ball to clowns to makeup. People want to act out a feeling inside themselves—angry, sad, happy, old. It may be a sad commentary on present-day America that horror masks are the best sellers.” And, undoubtedly, both Michael Meyers and Corey Cunningham (notice the alliteration in each name) are just another product of that commentary. The opening credits to Halloween Ends featuring a series of pumpkins with ever-changing faces of malevolence only further speaks to that motif: evil merely shifts from one husk to another, like an infection.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • ‘Halloween Ends’ Reviews Say the Series Should Be Laid to Rest

    ‘Halloween Ends’ Reviews Say the Series Should Be Laid to Rest

    [ad_1]

    Unfortunately for fans of the Halloween franchise, it seems that The Shape should have just stayed in prison. The David Gordon Green trilogy has been nothing if not divisive, with a strong start, a middling middle, and apparently, a pretty disappointing ending. While John Carpenter gave this trilogy his blessing, either even he couldn’t save it, or he was mostly hands-off.

    In the new trilogy, Michael Myers is thoroughly conflated with the concept of evil itself. That was painfully made clear by the constant chanting of “Evil dies tonight!” in Halloween Kills. While conscious horror that functions as an allegory for real-world problems can be extremely effective in the right hands, it can also bore you to death. In Halloween Ends, it seems that the nature of cyclical and intergenerational trauma is put under the microscope. Just not in a particularly satisfying, or even logical, way.

    Here are a sampling of the early reviews of the film. Although there were a few positive notices, most were pretty negative:

    As you can plainly tell from this selection of reviews, critics are divided so far. If any consensus is to be gleaned at all, it’s that this movie is … odd. While some were shocked at the final outcome to the trilogy, others were extremely annoyed at what they considered to be an all-too-predictable ending. On October 14, you can head to the theater (or watch on Peacock) for yourself and form your own opinion.

    The 10 Worst Horror Movie Cliches Of All Time

    While the horror film genre has expanded immensely over the past few decades, there’s still some annoying stereotypes that just won’t go away. Here are the worst clichés in scary movie history.

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link