ReportWire

Tag: David Fincher

  • Brad Pitt & Edward Norton’s Iconic Thriller Movie Arrives on Hulu Very Soon

    [ad_1]

    The Hulu streaming date for a cult classic featuring Brad Pitt and Edward Norton is set for next month. While the Oscar-nominated thriller was not a commercial success, it remains one of the most beloved films with a cultural impact, even nearly three decades after its theatrical release.

    Fight Club starts streaming on Hulu in March

    Fight Club will begin streaming on Hulu from Sunday, March 1, 2026, the streaming giant’s schedule revealed.

    The film is based on Chuck Palahniuk’s eponymous 1996 novel. David Fincher directed it with a screenplay by Jim Uhls. Its cast features Edward Norton, Brad Pitt, Jared Leto, Helena Bonham Carter, and Meat Loaf, among others.

    The story follows an unnamed narrator (Norton), a depressed office worker suffering from insomnia. He feels trapped in his corporate job and attends support groups for illnesses he doesn’t have as a form of therapy. During a business flight, he meets a man called Tyler (Pitt), and the two eventually open a secret underground club where men gather to release frustration. But things spiral out of control after his fight club grows significantly, and the narrator makes a shocking discovery.

    Reportedly, the development of Fight Club began even before the original book was published, per The Ringer. When co-producer Ross Grayson Bell received an early galley copy of the book, he initially hesitated to adapt it because of the book’s violence. But after reading the major plot twist, he sought out several directors to helm it, including David O. Russell, though they denied the offer. Later, Fincher, having read the book by then, agreed to do it.

    Interestingly, Pitt reportedly had his teeth chipped before filming to give his character an imperfect look (via Entertainment Weekly).

    Upon release, Fight Club did not achieve immediate commercial success. But it managed to earn $101.3 million worldwide on a reported budget of $63 million, per Box Office Mojo. Nonetheless, it currently ranks 13th on IMDb’s Top 250 Movies list and is one of the most referenced movies of modern times.

    [ad_2]

    Harsha Panduranga

    Source link

  • Robert Downey Jr.’s Serial Killer Movie Coming to Paramount+ Soon

    [ad_1]

    Robert Downey Jr.’s critically acclaimed serial killer movie, Zodiac, is all set to arrive on the streaming platform, Paramount+, soon. Directed by David Fincher, the thriller was released in theaters across the US on March 2, 2007. It also features other acclaimed actors, like Jake Gyllenhaal, Anthony Edwards, Mark Ruffalo, John Carroll Lynch, and many more.

    Zodiac to stream on Paramount+ soon

    David Fincher’s Zodiac is arriving on Paramount+ next month.

    According to a report by Comicbook.com, the Robert Downey Jr.-led movie will land on the streaming platform on January 1, 2026.

    While Zodiac was a big critical success, it failed to perform satisfactorily at the box office. Released in 2007, it is inspired by true events and took inspiration from the books written by Robert Graysmith.

    As per Box Office Mojo, the movie was made on a reported budget of $65 million. It made an opening collection of over $13.3 million in the US theaters. At the domestic box office, Zodiac managed to earn over $33 million, and grossed $51.7 million in the international market. This took the movie’s total worldwide collection to $84.7 million.

    Despite the disappointing box office performance, Zodiac received immense praise from the critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, it has a score of 90 percent on the Tomatometer based on 264 critic reviews. On the other hand, it received a score of 77 percent on the Popcornmeter based on the audience’s verdict.

    In December 2023, Robert Downey Jr. reunited with Mark Ruffalo on Variety’s Actors on Actors and recalled working with David Fincher on Zodiac. He said, “I called Fincher recently because in retrospect, everything changes.”

    The Avengers: Endgame star further added how working with Christopher Nolan on Oppenheimer made him develop “a new respect for Fincher.” He added how it was the first time he and Ruffalo were working under an “exacting director. A real director, who does things a certain way.”

    [ad_2]

    Ishita Verma

    Source link

  • There Would Be No “Bad Girl” Video Without Diane Keaton

    [ad_1]

    Of all Madonna’s many videos, perhaps one of the most standout (while still being simultaneously underrated) for its cinematic qualities is 1993’s “Bad Girl.” And yes, of course, its cinematic nature is due, in part, to David Fincher serving as the director—though Madonna did originally ask Tim Burton to do it. Perhaps because this was fresh off Burton directing Batman Returns, which had just the kind of “dark,” “gritty” aura that Madonna was seeking in order to capture a concept based on something as unflinching as 1977’s Looking for Mr. Goodbar (with a key plot device from Wings of Desire thrown in for good measure).

    In many ways designed to be a cautionary tale against the pratfalls of being a “wayward” woman that dares to sleep with whomever she pleases (and as often as she likes), Looking for Mr. Goodbar was also meant to tap into the stigmas that remain, to this day, lobbed at any woman with the audacity to be so “free.” That is to say, sexually free. And to “punish” her for that freeness, Looking for Mr. Goodbar holds up Theresa Dunn (Diane Keaton) as the perfect example of what “can and will” happen to such a salope. At the time, this messaging resonated immensely with Madonna (even more so than usual), who was being torn limb from limb by the media for her “diabolical” trifecta of sexually-charged releases (no ejaculation pun intended): Sex, Erotica and Body of Evidence. All three projects seemed to prove to the masses that Madonna had not only run out of/overused her material, but that she was crossing an unspoken line of “good taste” that was not meant to be crossed.

    A line crossed in much the same way as Theresa in Looking for Mr. Goodbar, with her story based on the real-life murder of Roseann Quinn. A murder that ultimately compelled Judith Rossner to write a book inspired by it. Released in 1975, it became a bestseller that quickly led to its adaptation into a film by Richard Brooks. In the lead-up to the film’s release, Keaton took an “oath of secrecy,” as it were, about the finer points of the film’s content, commenting to The New York Times, “Richard Brooks, the director wants it that way. I still don’t know why he chose me for the part. He saw some footage of me in Harry and Walter Go to New York, which didn’t exactly get good reviews. Anyway, it’s done now.” And when it was done, oh how it shocked audiences. Particularly the pearl-clutchers. Even if many of those types would have liked to interpret the film as a “morality plea.” Not just that, but a warning to all women of what “free love” a.k.a. sexual pleasure will result in. Of course, for the viewers, like Madonna, that really understood the core of the film’s message, it isn’t saying that at all.

    No, instead Looking for Mr. Goodbar aims to remind people that, for women, true equality isn’t really possible. Is perhaps as much of a fantasy as any far-fetched sexual one. This because men, beasts that they are, can’t seem to tolerate a woman being free in any way, least of all sexually. It drives them insane, to the point of murder. And hearing a woman mock or berate him in the same way that a man freely does to a woman? Fucking forget it. For that’s what apparently set off John Wayne Wilson, the real murderer of Roseann Quinn, whose account of the events leading up to her murder state that when he couldn’t get hard, she insulted him. Something that, to use understatement, clearly set him off. In the film version of events, it plays out mostly the same way, with Gary Cooper White (Tom Berenger)—yes, the nod to John Wayne Wilson is apparent—also failing to “deliver” as they start fooling around in Theresa’s apartment. Except that, in the movie, they make it so that Gary’s sexuality is homo-leaning to add to his sense of “needing” to overcompensate for that “masculine lack” by being hyper-toxic. Ergo, his over-the-top reaction to Theresa telling him it’s fine that he can’t perform. This “condescending” (from his skewed perspective) comment is what sends him on a tirade that includes the rebuke, “Goddamn women. All you gotta do is lay there. Guy’s gotta do all the work.”

    Theresa quickly loses patience for his “hot takes” about women and sex, telling him to leave. Instead, his rage continues to escalate and he proceeds to overpower her, leading her back onto the bed, stripping her of her clothes and choking her with her own bra (this aspect appearing in the “Bad Girl” video by way of “Louise Oriole” [Madonna] being strangled by a pair of her own stockings). All of this is what ends up arousing him enough to get an erection—violence, evidently the go-to aphrodisiac for men of all sexual orientations.

    As he proceeds to rape her, he asks, “This is what you wanted, right bitch?” Because that’s what it is, to the toxic male, for a woman to want hard dick. It’s for her to be a bitch or a slut who deserves to be treated roughly and cruelly because she wants sex in the same way that men have always been able to get it. And, more than women being “allowed” to make not only their own money, but also more money than men (rare as it is), the idea of a woman being “allowed” to have sex like a man is even more appalling to the quintessential toxic male.

    For Madonna, in 1993, there could have been no such message more appropriate to interweave into one of her videos. Because no one on Earth at that moment in time was being as maligned for their sexual freeness and candor than Ms. Ciccone. So while Madonna may have never formed a direct relationship with Keaton—apart from the direct relationship of Warren Beatty’s “special appendage” slipping into each of them at separate times (Keaton in the late 70s and early 80s, and Madonna in the early 90s)—the actress’ work clearly informed one of her best videos. And though, sure, Looking for Mr. Goodbar could have existed without Diane Keaton, it’s plain to see the movie wouldn’t have had the same impact on someone like Madonna without the subtlety and nuance she brought to the part. Able to convey the underlying missive—that women and men are never going to be “equals” so long as violence informs everything that men do and every reaction that they have—in a manner that obviously spoke to Madonna. In short, there would be no “Bad Girl” video without Diane Keaton.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Alien: Romulus: Rain Lacks the Grit of Ripley

    Alien: Romulus: Rain Lacks the Grit of Ripley

    [ad_1]

    Just when you thought there couldn’t possibly be another installment in the Alien franchise, “20th Century Studios” goes and releases Alien: Romulus. In fact, it was among the only “blockbusters” of Summer 2024 apart from Twisters and Deadpool & Wolverine (and no, Alien: Romulus still couldn’t even manage to topple the latter movie from its number one spot at the box office—such is the power of Marvel). So, in some sense, Earth was “clamoring” for a movie of this nature…being that Hollywood refuses to make anything new when it comes big-budget fare. Though they were at least “adventurous” enough to tap Fede Álvarez (known for another “quiet” movie: Don’t Breathe) as the director and Cailee Spaeny as the lead, Rain Carradine. The “Ellen Ripley replacement,” if you will.

    Unlike Sigourney Weaver stepping right into Ripley’s shoes after a bit part in Annie Hall and the lesser known Madman, Spaeny actually had a few films under her belt before taking on such a weighty role—having already done so with the back-to-back release of Sofia Coppola’s Priscilla and Alex Garland’s Civil War. And yes, she’s been in a blockbuster before, even if it was one that landed with a thud: Pacific Rim Uprising. Later, she took a wrong turn with The Craft: Legacy in 2020 before correcting things with How It Ends the following year. In short, Spaeny has run the gamut of roles before Rain in Alien: Romulus. Which takes place two decades after the destruction the USCSS Nostromo that audiences witnessed in 1979’s Alien. The alpha and the omega of Alien movies. Which is, in part, why Álvarez is so committed to paying homage to it—in addition to remaking Ripley through Rain (another “R” name—and one that Ross Geller famously mocked when Rachel Green suggested it for their baby, replying to her with his imitation of a person with such a name: “Hi my name is Rain. I have my own kiln and my dress is made out of wheat”). Of course, everybody knows that no one can (or will) ever hold a candle to what Weaver did for the part of “leading lady” in Alien, and yet, they can try to present a new-fangled “badass” version of her. Only Rain doesn’t quite come across that way, instead exhibiting the sort of vulnerability and reluctance specific to the current generation. A generation that could never convincingly say, as Ripley does in Aliens, “I can handle myself.”

    Rain’s intrinsic fear of, well, everything is revealed from the outset, when her ex-boyfriend, Tyler (Archie Renaux), has to vehemently convince her to join him and the “crew” he’s assembled to enter an abandoned ship with cryostasis chambers that will allow them to defect from the godforsaken planet they’re stuck working on in favor of Yvaga—a planet where the sun actually shines (side note: the planet they’re on has plenty of dystopian Blade Runner flair). The crew consists of Tyler’s sister, Kay (Isabel Merced), his cousin, Bjorn (Spike Fearn) and Bjorn’s adopted sister, Navarro (Aileen Wu). Of course, it isn’t that they really need Rain to come along, so much as her adopted brother, Andy (David Jonsson)—who just so happens to be an android old enough to know how to interface with an abandoned spacecraft that’s of “Andy’s generation.” Or close enough for him to understand it.

    Still, Tyler does a good job of sweet-talking her into getting some balls by reminding her that Weyland-Yutani is never going to let her leave no matter how much she works, having just fulfilled her contract only to be told that she’s being sent to the mines now (essentially a death warrant), informed she must remain on the planet to work for another “five to six years” before she can again be given the consideration to leave due to a shortage of workers. Thus, as usual, this installment of Alien continues to serve as an undercutting commentary about the callous exploitation of the working class by their oppressive employers. And while Rain might be “Gen Z enough” to lack the same amount of grit as Ripley in the face of adversity, she’s not Gen Z enough to demand a “flexible work schedule” and a “work-life balance” if she’s to be expected to continue working for Weyland-Yutani.

    After all, one of Alien: Romulus’ key goals appears to be to maintain as much of the status quo as it can from the previous films, including pronounced “homages” (even to the less beloved Alien Resurrection, Prometheus and Alien: Covenant). Obviously favoring Ridley Scott’s Alien and James Cameron’s Aliens, what with everyone still thrusting so much undue hate upon David Fincher’s Alien 3—even though it yielded one of the most iconic images from the franchise: a xenomorph up close and personal with Ripley, who turns her face away from its dripping, drooling open maw. In fact, that’s the image Álvarez borrows from for his “nod” to Alien 3—even though, in this case, it doesn’t really work because Rain isn’t pregnant with an alien queen and, thus, there’s no way the alien would take its sweet time about appraising her instead of just snapping her up in its jaws.

    Elsewhere, some of the exact same lines from previous Alien movies are used as “callbacks” designed to provide “fan service,” though it often feels a bit too heavy-handed. Take, for example, Rook: the same (or a similar) model as Ash (Ian Holm, regenerated from beyond the grave) saying, “I can’t lie to you about your chances, but you have my sympathies.” Or Andy echoing Bishop’s (Lance Henriksen) aphorism, “I prefer the term artificial person myself.”

    Indeed, Andy gets far more venomous discrimination for being a “synthetic” than Bishop ever did—mainly from Bjorn, whose prejudice stems from an android not saving his mother from death in the mines, instructed to help twelve other miners instead by its supervisor, sacrificing the lives of two for the greater good of the dozen. It hardly makes Bjorn’s level of contempt justifiable, with the supervisor being the one to place his rage toward, if anyone.

    And, speaking of rage, the perfect opportunity for it to arise (though it never quite does) within Rain comes after another cheesy callback to Aliens, when Tyler teaches her how to use a prototype of the M41A Pulse Rifle the same way Corporal Hicks (Michael Biehn) taught Ripley to use an actual M41A Pulse Rifle. The latter reacts with far more titillation and gusto to learning than Rain, who still comes off as an overly cautious, scared little girl about the whole thing. In part, that “little girl” vibe compared to Ripley is likely because Spaeny is twenty-six to Weaver’s thirty-seven (when filming the indelible gun scenes for 1986’s Aliens). Granted, Weaver wasn’t much older than Spaeny in Alien, filming it when she was twenty-nine. Even so, she looks older in her twenties than Spaeny does in hers—in that way that all people who were in their twenties “back then” look older than people do now (chalk it up to “healthier lifestyles.” Though mental health has ostensibly been sacrificed as a trade for physical health…).

    What’s more, because of the generational divide between the first two Alien movies and the present Alien: Romulus, it’s inherent that Weaver, a product of the time when the films were made (no matter how far into the future it was intended to be), would come across as, let’s say, more tenacious and less fazed by the proverbial horrors—including the ones specific to a human-killing race of aliens. Her coolness under pressure intermingled with unflinching badassery that also exudes an impenetrable “don’t fuck with me” air is something that no Gen Zer (whether on the “geriatric” side of that age group or not) ever stood a chance at emulating, let alone recreating.

    Which is why, ultimately, the hardness of Ripley (even in name alone) can’t be usurped by Rain, a moniker that radiates the kind of hippie-dippy aura the aforementioned Ross Geller was talking about. Some might argue that this is a good thing, that it’s long been time for a heroine with “softness” and delicacy anyway. That women don’t always need to imitate the roughness of men in order for their strength to be taken seriously. Sure, that might be true—but it’s not true for an Alien movie.  

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Barcelona Baby: Dua Lipa Channels Numerous Pop Girls in Video for “Illusion”

    Barcelona Baby: Dua Lipa Channels Numerous Pop Girls in Video for “Illusion”

    [ad_1]

    As Dua Lipa continues to build the anticipation for her long-awaited third album, Radical Optimism, she’s already brought us a third single in the wake of “Houdini” and “Training Season.” The theme of “Illusion,” as it’s called (and in keeping with a title like “Houdini”), is more closely aligned to the one in “Training Season,” with Lipa telling off any man trying to spin some false yarn. In order to help convey that message in visual form is the always impressive Tanu Muino, who has increasingly branched out into collaborating with American musicians in lieu of the Ukrainian ones she started out working for. In fact, it was, of all things, a Katy Perry video (2019’s “Small Talk”) that signaled her transition to working with some of the biggest names in American pop and hip hop/R&B music (including Cardi B [“Up”], Normani [“Wild Side”], Lil Nas X [“Montero”] and Doja Cat [“Attention”]). 

    Dua Lipa only adds to that growing list and, together, her and Muino bring one of their most elaborate music video concepts yet—one that relies on the sumptuous, intoxicating backdrop of Barcelona. Indeed, it’s as though Lipa is beckoning us to join her in “summer mode” despite many locations still being hopelessly trapped in winter mode (spring season or not). And yes, it’s apparent that Radical Optimism is vying for “album of the summer” status, not just with its release date (May 3rd), but its water-filled album cover (featuring Lipa casually swimming near/toward a shark, presented in the Jaws manner of protruding fin only). “Illusion,” too, is water-filled, thanks to being filmed at the Piscina Municipal de Montjuïc. Known for hosting major sporting events, including the 1992 Olympics, the pool’s location on the Montjuïc hill is what affords it such a glorious panoramic view of the city, complete with Gaudí’s Sagrada Família in the background. A feature that Kylie Minogue opted to exclude from her 2003 “Slow” video, during which she also relished the cinematic potential of the location, albeit solely with overhead shots of her writhing seductively around in an orgiastic heap with all the other poolside loungers on towels. Lipa, in this way, makes her first homage to a pop girl—except that she chooses to maximize the location much more than Minogue did. 

    This commences with Muino’s establishing shot of Lipa perched on the network of uniquely structured diving boards amid a sea of muscular men in matching attire (short blue shorts and white tank tops). As the men do various exercise-y poses, Lipa ascends one of the ladders while informing us, “I’ve been known to miss a red flag/I’ve been known to put my lover on a pedestal/In the end, those things just don’t last/And it’s time I take my rose-colored glasses off.” And yet, even if she’s taken them off with regard to her perception of her lover, the city of Barcelona can still be seen through rose-colored glasses even without any on. Drenched in that indelible Spanish sunlight, the cityscape steals the show almost as much as Lipa’s seemingly “Express Yourself”-inspired backup dancers. That’s right, it appears Lipa gives a stylistic nod to Madonna yet again (as she did in the “Houdini” video) with a setup that very much reminds of what M did in her David Fincher-directed masterpiece from 1989. Not to mention the scaffolding-style backdrop of Paula Abdul’s “Cold Hearted,” itself a recent inspiration for Ariana Grande’s “yes, and?” video. The aesthetic relationship between “Express Yourself” (which came out a month before Abdul’s single) isn’t a coincidence, what with Fincher having directed both. 

    Accordingly, each of those videos has plenty of mounting of/gyrating on industrial-looking “rigs” to help highlight the choreo. Of a nature that channels the exuberance Lipa is going for with the record as a whole, stating that she wanted to “capture the essence of youth and freedom and having fun.” The video does achieve that, even if the lyrics are indicative of someone who has been jaded by enough experience with relationships past. In fact, there is even an aura of the “Express Yourself” mantra in Lipa’s coming-of-age tone as she sings the defiant chorus, “Ooh, what you doin’?/Don’t know who you think that you’re confusin’/I be like, ooh, it’s amusin’/You think I’m gonna fall for an illusion.” This leads into her talking about how, at this juncture, she knows exactly what she wants, declaring, “Was a time when that shit might’ve worked/Was a time when I just threw a match and let it burn/Now I’m grown, I know what I deserve/I still like dancin’ with the lessons I already learned.” In other words, “Don’t go for second best, baby/Put your love to the test/You know, you know you’ve got to…” 

    But M isn’t the only pop girl Lipa conjures in “Illusion.” There’s also a clear-cut Britney Spears moment when Muino gives us an overhead shot of Lipa in the pool while lying on a floating circular object as she moves her arms up and down—in clear “Oops!…I Did It Again” fashion. For never was there a more iconic overhead shot of a pop princess lying on a circular ditty and moving her arms around than that. Spears might not have had a slew of synchronized swimmers around her while doing it, but the connection is still there. Plus, Muino is no stranger to orbiting Spears’ world, for she directed 2022’s “Hold Me Closer” (which shares many qualities with “Illusion” in that it wields a city’s—Mexico City’s—backdrop as a key character). Maybe that’s why there’s also echoes of the pool scenes from “Work Bitch,” wherein Britney stands on a circular platform in the center of the water as hammerhead sharks swim around her (this, too, perhaps some unwitting inspo for the Radical Optimism cover). 

    Talking of connections, there’s even one to Miley Cyrus when Lipa is lifted out of the water by the very “O” ring that previously encircled her, giving an immediate flash to the cover of Cyrus’ Endless Summer Vacation album. As the video starts to wrap up, a choreography breakdown in the 00s spirit of what someone like Lindsay Lohan did on the rooftop in the “Rumors” video occurs, with Lipa repeating, “I’d rather dance with the illusion”—than actually invest time in a full-blown, off-the-dancefloor relationship with the real, unvarnished version. Which always turns out to be so disappointing. 

    For one of her big finishes, Lipa mounts a “tower of men” (with some women peppered in between), making her way to the top for another overhead shot where she’s “chillin’ on a circle.” Obviously, it’s a metaphor for how she’s overcome all the necessary emotional obstacles to become secure and confident in knowing exactly what she wants—and what she doesn’t. As for the former, it definitely includes taking dips in Barcelona and repeating the mantra, “Dance all night, dance all night” (not so different from what she said in “Dance the Night”).

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • “Yes, And?” Video Pays Unexpected Tribute to Paula Abdul’s “Cold Hearted”

    “Yes, And?” Video Pays Unexpected Tribute to Paula Abdul’s “Cold Hearted”

    [ad_1]

    “I miss the old Ari. You know, the singer.” So says one of the many invitees (all critics) to Ariana Grande’s performance art piece in Montauk (the location of which is given via the latitude and longitude coordinates on the business card shown at the beginning of the video). This milieu being significant because Grande’s seventh album is titled Eternal Sunshine—an obvious nod to Michel Gondry’s beloved 2004 film of the (almost) same name. Considering Grande’s dating history, the premise of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is rather on point. As is her choreo (courtesy of Will Loftis) throughout the heavily-inspired-by-Paula Abdul video. Indeed, one might as well call “yes, and?” a “modern update” to Abul’s 1989 video for “Cold Hearted,” the fifth single from her debut album, Forever Your Girl

    Directed by none other than David Fincher, “Cold Hearted” continued the trend (established by Madonna, as usual) of pop stars dancing in front of elaborate industrial set pieces (see: the “Express Yourself” video, also directed by David Fincher, and the “Rhythm Nation” video). “yes, and?” builds on that by centering the premise around a “living art exhibition,” of sorts. So it is that, just as is the case in “Cold Hearted,” “yes, and?” offers a caption at the beginning. But instead of reading, “Tuesday 9:45 a.m. The Rehearsal Hall. The Record Company Executives Arrive,” it reads, “11:55 AM. The Critics Arrive.” All of them with something snarky to say (in the spirit of the intro to Missy Elliott’s “Gossip Folks”). Including two critics who have the exchange, “Did she really do that?” “Well I read it on the internet so it must be true.” This replacing the once more relevant go-to line of sarcasm: “I saw it on TV so it must be true.” 

    They then enter the warehouse-y space where a series of “stone sculptures” stand in highly deliberate poses as the critics take their seats. The “Ari sculpture” is at the center of them all, posed with her hands over her eyes to indicate the classic “see no evil” philosophy. Or, in this case, “see no haters.” As the critics start to get impatient with what they’re supposed to be getting out of this little “exhibit,” the sculptures break apart and fall to the ground as the actual people they’re modeled after appear on the scene. Directed by Christian Breslauer (marking his first collaboration with Grande), the camera then focuses in on Grande’s feet before panning up the length of her legs to then reveal an aesthetic that is entirely reminiscent of Keira Knightley’s in Love Actually. Because what is Ari if not adept in the art of pastiche (though perhaps not as much as her one-time collaborator, Lana Del Rey)? As any post-post-post-post-post-post-modern pop star tends to be. 

    Continuing to emulate Abdul and co.’s fierce, defiant choreography, Grande offers occasional moments of “Renaissance painting poses” to keep reiterating the notion of being living art. Or, as Del Rey said, “I had a vision of making my life a work of art.” As such, that technically means she can be critiqued herself as much as the art she actually puts out. Hence, the presence of the critics subbing out Paula Abdul’s record executives. 

    Critics who can’t help “gagging” when Grande urges, “And if you find yourself in a dark situation/Just turn on your light and be like/Yes, and?” The musical breakdown just before she urges people to “turn their light on” sounds a lot like the one in Right Said Fred’s “I’m Too Sexy.” But considering Grande is giving a massive homage to dance and house music of the 90s in general (including, of course, Madonna’s “Vogue”), it’s not out of the question that the “nod” is deliberate. At the moment she talks about people turning their (inner) lights on, a heating lamp lights up above the critics’ head, as though to envelop them in the same warm glow she’s chosen to bask in no matter what gets said about her. Some critics don’t exactly “like” it, with one starting to sweat profusely as he wipes his forehead with a napkin in a manner that could also indicate Grande’s body (“too thin” or not) is getting him hot and bothered (the same way Paula Abdul gets the record executives in her video).

    As all the art critics proceed to start removing articles of clothing under the heat of the lamp, Grande approaches with, let’s call it an “aura tuning fork,” as she calmly recites the bridge of the song: “My tongue is sacred, I speak upon what I like/Protected, sexy, discerning with my time/Your energy is yours and mine is mine/What’s mine is mine/My face is sitting, I don’t need no disguise/Don’t comment on my body, do not reply.”

    Of course, that demand likely won’t stop the usual barrage of body commentary that rakes in the millions for the beauty and fashion industries. In the final line of the bridge, Grande then wields her coup de ​​grâce, “Why do you care so much whose dick I ride/Why?” Probably because the dick is Ethan Slater’s and it’s kind of weird/non sequitur (Wicked co-star or not). Even more than choosing “Cold Hearted” as a piece of pop culture to emulate. 

    But anyway, the “yes, and?” then concludes with another shot re-creation from the “Cold Hearted” video, with the curtain dropping off the window while Ariana and co. return to their same positions as statues made of stone to then await the next batch of critics they’ll perform for. The first batch, meanwhile, has turned from the stone statues they were before walking into the warehouse and into warm hearted lovers of Ariana as one of them shouts with delight to the others going in, “You’ll just love it! You’ll love it.”

    The same “conversion” from hater to lover goes for the record executives in “Cold Hearted,” who enter the building with the cynical exchange, “So have you even seen this dance?” “Uh, I haven’t but, uh, it’s a Bob Fosse kind of thing. It’s gonna be really really hot.” “Yeah but tastefully. It’s tastefully hot. And hey, if there’s any problem, we can always make changes.” The director of the video nervously reminds, “Uh, we’re shootin’ tonight.” But of course, there’s no need to change a thing because, by the end (just as it is the case in “yes, and?”), the execs are left with their jaws dropped. Though, of course, all they can say is it was “nice.” So it is that Abdul’s video concludes with the caption, “The dancers laugh.” Probably at the fact that it’s so hard for critics to admit when something is good (though, in their defense, that’s quite possibly because things rarely are). Especially when the artist in question’s personal life has a tendency to cloud the focus on the work itself. 

    In this sense, pulling from Paul Abdul’s video arsenal does make some sense when tying this message back into the concept of the “Cold Hearted” premise.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Maybe Listening to Depeche Mode Instead of The Smiths Would Make You A Better Hitman: The Killer

    Maybe Listening to Depeche Mode Instead of The Smiths Would Make You A Better Hitman: The Killer

    [ad_1]

    After a project as sentimental (in large part due to being written by Jack Fincher) as David Fincher’s last one, Mank, one might believe that, on the surface, The Killer is an “edgier,” more “hard-boiled” movie. But the truth is, the eponymous killer in question (Michael Fassbender) is just a big teddy bear. Hence, his repeated playing of The Smiths while on the job or otherwise. Of course, listening to The Smiths might not necessarily be a dead giveaway (no pun intended) of a person’s empathy. In fact, based on Morrissey’s more recent “brand” (characterized by a generally white supremacist, “Britain First,” anti-immigrant stance), one could argue that listening to The Smiths is very much the mark of someone willing to kill. And yet, for those who can still only focus on the lyrics sung by Morrissey, rather than the words said by him in a public forum, it’s hard to forget that he was once a spokesperson for the downtrodden and marginalized. Those who were relegated to the fringes of society for their “strangeness.” But naturally, that sort of messaging was bound to evolve into becoming a “security blanket” for serial killers and incels. 

    The Killer, surprisingly, doesn’t fall into the latter category, as we quickly find out after he botches a hit in Paris. But not before he gives the rundown on what it truly “is” to be hitman. Delivering his internal monologues like a clinical “how-to,” the first “chapter” of the movie finds The Killer at his most Patrick Bateman/Tyler Durden-y. Not least of which is because of his calm, stoic tone as he says things like, “If you are unable to endure boredom, this work is not for you.” Indeed, The Killer seems determined to debunk the myth of “hitmanning” as something “glamorous” more for himself than anyone else. And yet, it’s obvious that he can’t deny the glamor it has afforded him. The “culturedness” he feels he possesses as a result of being ping-ponged back and forth between far-flung travel destinations. To places like Paris, where most people will only ever dream of visiting. As a matter of fact, The Killer is sure to wax poetic about said town when he remarks, “Paris awakens unlike any other city. Slowly. Without the diesel grind of Berlin or Damascus. Or the incessant hum of Tokyo.” Such overt love for the unique ways in which Paris sets itself apart (that word is also key to understanding how The Killer sees himself) likely stems from the screenplay, written by Andrew Kevin Walker, being based on French writer Alexis “Matz” Nolent’s graphic novel (illustrated by Luc Jacamon) of the same name. In truth, part of what lends the film such a, let’s say, “Guy Ritchie flair” (no offense to Fincher) is its basis on such source material (side note: Ritchie has a graphic novel series called The Gamekeeper). 

    Despite Paris’ uniqueness, it certainly does attract quite an army of basic bitches (ahem, Emily Cooper—and, quelle surprise, the same block where Emily’s apartment is located in Emily in Paris is also used as the filming location for where The Killer’s mark lives). Which actually makes it the perfect place to hide amongst the “normals.” Not that The Killer sees himself as anything particularly special. As he puts it, “I’m not exceptional. I’m just…apart.” The Killer additionally informs us that there is no such thing as luck, destiny or “justice.” Life is a random smattering of occurrences before which we all eventually die. Such nihilism is befitting of an avid The Smiths listener, but, in reality, more so a Depeche Mode listener. And The Killer might actually have turned out to be more adept at his job had he opted for the latter band as part of his “Work Playlist.” Alas, he favors the electric guitar melancholy of The Smiths to the electronic melancholy of Depeche Mode. 

    To be sure, listening to Depeche Mode as one’s “killing soundtrack” would be more in line with (unknowingly) quoting occultist Aleister Crowley by saying, “In the meantime, ‘Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.’” All of this callous, calculated posturing, we quickly find out, is nothing more than the internal “Jesus Prayer” he repeats to himself on a loop in order to keep doing the job…to keep assuring himself that he wants to do it. And yes, there’s even an official mantra for that “Jesus Prayer”—one he repeats before every kill: “Stick to your plan. Anticipate, don’t improvise. Trust no one. Never yield an advantage. Fight only the battle you’re paid to fight. Forbid empathy. Empathy is weakness. Weakness is vulnerability. Each and every step of the way, ask yourself: what’s in it for me? This is what it takes. What you must commit yourself to. If you want to succeed.” And then, of course, he biffs the shot—missing his intended old rich white man mark so that it instead hits the dominatrix “entertaining” him. This gross error, needless to say, goes against everything The Killer has tried to get both himself and the viewer to believe about who he is up until now. Not to mention the fact that those lines about forbidding empathy because it’s a weakness are in direct contrast to 1) listening to The Smiths ad nauseam and 2) the majority of lyrics written by The Smiths. 

    Yet perhaps what keeps The Killer on the hook with this highly dangerous profession is the obvious masochistic adrenaline rush he gets from it. To that end, it’s apparent that for as blasé and “put upon” as he is by his work, he still “loves” it. Or at least, the aspects of it that require more “creativity” on his part. “Staged accidents, gradual poisonings,” that sort of thing. But more than having “enthusiasm” (of a Daria Morgendorffer nature) for the art of being a hitman, he seems to relish most of all the idea that doing this work is what sets him apart from what he calls “the many.” The plebes, the hoi polloi. Those foolish (or, perhaps more accurately, “nice”) enough to let themselves be exploited. So it is that he warns, “From the beginning, the few have always exploited the many. This is the cornerstone of civilization. The blood in the mortar that binds all bricks. Whatever it takes, make sure you’re one of the few, not one of the many.” In choosing to be a hitman, that’s essentially what The Killer is trying to make sure of for himself. Paired with a steadily applied aura of “I don’t care” and “Nothing means anything,” this is The Killer’s bid to spare himself from any pain…or guilt. At one point, just before taking the botched shot, he even insists, “If I’m effective, it’s because of one simple fact: I. Don’t. Give. A. Fuck.”

    But oh, how he gives a fuck. A big fuck. That’s what the audience is about to witness as the true genre of the The Killer becomes unveiled after “Chapter One”: revenge. A movie trope as tried-and-true as PB&J, The Killer quickly becomes reminiscent of Kill Bill: Vol. 1 as our hitman sets out to seek and destroy the parties responsible for brutalizing his beloved live-in girlfriend, Magdala (Sophie Charlotte). Indeed, the sudden revelation of her existence is, again, counterintuitive to everything he’s tried to tell us about himself. The discovery of her vicious assault (told by a trail of blood throughout their house as Portishead’s “Glory Box” plays loudly) is an unwanted “plot twist” he learns of almost immediately upon returning to Santo Domingo. But then, it was already The Killer who warned us, “Of those who like to put their faith in mankind’s inherent goodness, I have to ask: based on what, exactly?” And based on the state of Magdala, it can be said that there is only inherent evil in this world. Even if some would argue “karma,” “you reap what you sow,” etc. of what happened to The Killer’s girlfriend. Still, it’s not as though Magdala ever hurt anyone (as far as we know). Why should she be the one to suffer the consequences of The Killer’s error?

    Luckily, one supposes, she has a man willing to go on an odyssey to avenge her bodily violation (by the same token, she’s unlucky enough to be in love with a hitman that would create the sort of circumstances in which such a horrible thing could happen to her). An odyssey that takes him through New Orleans, St. Petersburg (Florida, not Russia), Beacon (where Tilda Swinton is given her moment to shine as The Expert) and, finally, Chicago. Right back to the very source of how this whole vicious circle began: the client. A billionaire named Claybourne (Arliss Howard) who swears to The Killer that he has no problem with him. That any “trail scrubbing” that was done had been a result of Hodges’ (Charles Parnell)—The Killer’s “handler”—advisement. Being “green” to the game of taking out a hit, Claybourne readily agreed to such a recommendation…never anticipating that the “blowback” he hoped to avoid would instead come in the form of the hitman himself. 

    Seemingly “satisfied” with the billionaire’s answer, The Killer leaves him unscathed in his deluxe apartment in the sky (funnily enough, the name George Jefferson happens to be one of The Killer’s many aliases). Which might be the most telling of all regarding his weakness, his propensity for being just like one of the “many” so willing to be exploited by the few. 

    From the drab, gray cinematography of the Chicago section, Fincher cuts back to the bright vibrancy of Santo Domingo, where a healed Magdala awaits The Killer poolside in their backyard. Perhaps sensing our preparedness to call him a sellout after all that railing against empathy and vulnerability, The Killer reasons, “Maybe you’re just like me. One of the many” (still a narcissistic way to phrase it; you know, instead of saying, “Maybe I’m just like you”). At this, his eye twitches, as though it pains him to admit it. But admit it he does. And then comes the rolling of the credits to the tune of “There Is A Light That Never Goes Out.” Ironic, considering The Killer’s full-time job was to, let’s say, “dim lights.” 

    But the song lyric from The Smiths that remains most apropos (and which serves as the very first one The Killer plays in the film) is from “Well I Wonder”: “Gasping, dying/But somehow still alive/This is the final stand of all I am.” When applied to The Killer, it’s evident that the final stand of all he is remains merely, ugh, human…and he needs to be loved; hence, weak and vulnerable. So, again, if you want to be a truly cold-blooded hitman: Depeche Mode for the win.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • David Fincher Is Back With ‘The Killer’ Trailer

    David Fincher Is Back With ‘The Killer’ Trailer

    [ad_1]

    The acclaimed director of films like Se7en, Zodiac, and Gone Girl is back with yet another dark thriller. David Fincher’s The Killer has a limited theatrical release on October 27 — that’s today — followed by a Netflix debut on November 10 of 2023.

    The film is based on a French graphic novel of the same name by Alexis Nolent. Based on the latest trailer for the movie, it appears very much like most of Fincher’s other movies. It’s stylish and sleek with tons of quick cuts, while still staying grounded and realistic.

    The main character is an assassin and a very good one at that. He accomplishes his prowess through the suppression of any and all empathy. Of course, that comes along with another host of problems. The film has actually been in the works since 2007. Unfortunately, it took until around 2021 to actually find backers for the project. The final cast consists of Michael Fassbender in the title role, alongside Arliss Howard, Charles Parnell, Kerry O’Malley, Sala Baker, Sophie Charlotte, and Tilda Swinton.

    READ MORE: The Worst Netflix “Blockbusters” Ever

    So far, the film is receiving mostly positive reviews, with praise centering mostly around the direction and the leading man, Michael Fassbender. At the 80th Venice International Film Festival, the film was nominated for a Golden Lion. It also won an award for its soundtrack, composed by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails fame and Atticus Ross.

    You can watch the trailer below:

    Here is the film’s official synopsis:

    After a fateful near-miss an assassin battles his employers, and himself, on an international manhunt he insists isn’t personal.

    The Killer is now playing in select theaters. It premieres on Netflix on November 10.

    The Most Popular Films on Netflix

    These are the ten most popular films (in English), based on hours viewed in their first 28 days on Netflix. (The numbers come from Netflix’s official site.)

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link

  • David Fincher Says Canceled ‘World War Z’ Sequel Would Have Been a “Little Like ‘The Last of Us’”

    David Fincher Says Canceled ‘World War Z’ Sequel Would Have Been a “Little Like ‘The Last of Us’”

    [ad_1]

    David Fincher, who was set to direct a World War Z sequel before it was canceled by Paramount, is revealing some of the plans he had for the follow-up film.

    In an interview with GQ UK, published online Wednesday, the Fight Club filmmaker said the zombie movie would have been a “little like The Last of Us,” the hit HBO series starring Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey that premiered earlier this year

    “I’m glad that we didn’t do what we were doing, because The Last of Us has a lot more real estate to explore the same stuff,” he explained. “In our title sequence, we were going to use the little parasite … they used it in their title sequence, and in that wonderful opening with the Dick Cavett, David Frost-style talk show.”

    The 2013 hit film starring Brad Pitt and directed by Marc Forster was an adaptation of the Max Brooks novel of the same name. It followed former United Nations employee Gerry Lane (Pitt) as he traveled across the world to try and stop a zombie epidemic that is threatening to destroy humanity.

    After the movie grossed $540 million worldwide, a sequel was quickly put into motion, but it went on to face several obstacles, including the initial director, J.A. Bayona, eventually departing the project. Fincher later signed on, but in 2019, Paramount halted preproduction. Sources told The Hollywood Reporter at the time that budgetary issues came to a head.

    When Fincher was later asked by GQ UK if the sequel would have been a closer adaptation to the original book, he responded, “No, no. But there is some talk of doing that.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link