ReportWire

Tag: David Corenswet

  • See How David Corenswet Became Superman in His Audition Tape

    The world was abuzz with speculation just a few years ago when it came time for James Gunn to cast his new Superman. Even before the part ultimately went to David Corenswet, he was being floated around as a likely candidate, and now you can watch how he got the part.

    YouTube account 21Casting posted the actor’s audition tape, which he performed with his wife Julia Warner. The three-minute video features him as Clark Kent being interviewed as Superman by Lois Lane over his intervention in Biayla—not Jarnanphur, as it is in the finished film—and early parts of their argument that helps inform the film’s core philosophy about the hero’s place in the world.

    In a GQ cover story prior to Superman’s release, Gunn revealed he’d basically already picked Corenswet the moment he saw the audition, calling him “the guy to beat from the very beginning.” (It didn’t hurt that he sent Gunn a handwritten letter after the audition, too.) Turns out, quite a few people have spent years thinking he’d be good for Superman, and the only one who needed convincing was Corenswet himself: he previously told People that Warner thought he was a shoo-in once they made the tape. “I thought she was crazy, but she felt it from the beginning,” he told the magazine. “So if anything, I knew that she would be even more excited than I was.”

    Corenswet’s not the only one with an audition tape hitting the internet this year: last week, we got to see how Britt Lower auditioned to play Helly R. in Severance, and we saw former Superman Henry Cavill’s old tryout for Bond back when the hunt was on pre-Casino Royale.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Philly’s David Corenswet seen in costume on ‘Superman’ set

    Philly’s David Corenswet seen in costume on ‘Superman’ set

    Big superhero productions come with a litany of set photos to excite the masses, and “Superman” starring Philly native David Corenswet is the latest to go under internet scrutiny.

    Throughout June and July, Corenswet and his co-stars have been spotted on the Cleveland set of the superhero movie, and the public has been able to take an unfiltered look at Corenswet’s take on the Man of Steel, critiquing his costume while also speculating on the plot.


    MORE: ‘Welcome to Wrexham’ to get spinoff series following Mexico’s Club Necaxa


    While DC fans have already commented on Corenswet’s Superman costume after the movie’s writer and director James Gunn shared an official look at it, they’ve had mixed responses after seeing it in action in more candid photos from outlets including JustJared.

    Commentators online have complimented the overall comic-book accuracy of Corenswet’s suit, such as the red trunks and the yellow crest on the back of his cape.

    On the other hand, criticisms of the costume aim at its design, particularly the lines, which commentators believe are unnecessary. A fair number of comments also argue that the costume looks baggy and loose, compared to the tighter costume worn by previous Superman actor Henry Cavill.

    Observers point out that the suit could look very different in the final product, with color grading, reshoots and post-production CGI touch-ups perhaps addressing concerns. Superhero movie set photos tend to look silly out of context, such as a few shots of Corenswet preparing to take flight as Superman.

    Photographer Erik Drost captured a few images of Corenswet as Superman’s civilian alter ego Clark Kent. In these photos, Corenswet sports a pair of glasses and a broccoli-style haircut to distinguish himself from his secret superhero persona.

    On Wednesday, the Greater Cleveland Partnership shared additional photos of Corenswet on set for a crowded scene in the fictional city of Metropolis. One curious photo shows Corenswet’s Superman literally sinking to a new low.

    On Friday and Saturday, filming moved to Progressive Field, where the production is shooting what appears to be a battle sequence. Those who are extremely sensitive to potential spoilers should exercise caution if they don’t even want a hint of what’s going on in these scenes.

    Earlier this week, Gunn shared an image of the Superman emblem, also giving a reminder that the film will be released next year on July 11, 2025. Corenswet can be seen next on the big screen in “Twisters,” which hits theaters July 19.

    Chris Compendio

    Source link

  • ‘Superman: Legacy’: Pom Klementieff, Miriam Shor Join James Gunn’s Man of Steel Movie (Exclusive)

    ‘Superman: Legacy’: Pom Klementieff, Miriam Shor Join James Gunn’s Man of Steel Movie (Exclusive)

    Pom Klementieff and Miriam Shor are the latest to join the growing cast of James Gunn’s Superman: Legacy.

    The Man of Steel feature is due to be the kickoff for the much ballyhooed DC Studios slate when it hits theaters in July 2025 and has been casting up furiously since the end of the actors strike in November.

    Skyler Gisondo, Sara Sampaio and Sean Gunn are among those who have joined in recent weeks, with Nicholas Hoult, who’ll be playing villain Lex Luthor, being officially announced as having his deal done by Gunn on Instagram Monday.

    David Corenswet is starring as Clark Kent/Superman while Rachel Brosnahan is playing intrepid reporter Lois Lane. Anthony Carrigan, Isabel Merced, and Nathan Fillion are also in the cast as heroes Metamorpho, Hawkgirl, and Guy Gardner/Green Lantern, respectively.

    Details of Klementieff and Shor’s roles are being kept in the Fortress of Solitude. DC declined to comment.

    Both, however, are part of the Gunn family. Klementieff became a scene-stealing breakout when she played alien empath Mantis in Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy movies and also had a cameo in the filmmaker’s 2021 DC movie The Suicide Squad. Shor, meanwhile, played a henchwoman known as Recorder Vim in this summer’s Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.

    Klementieff was last seen trying to kill Tom Cruise in Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One. She is repped by CAA, Linden Entertainment, Two Management, and Goodman Genow.

    Shor has an enviable awards season ahead of her as she co-stars in both Maestro, Bradley Cooper’s Leonard Bernstein biopic from Netflix, and American Fiction, the satire from Cord Jefferson that won the People’s Choice Award at the Toronto International Film Festival. She is repped by Gersh, Impression Entertainment, and Schreck Rose.

    Borys Kit

    Source link

  • Did Superman Legacy director James Gunn approach Henry Cavill for a new DC role? Find out

    Did Superman Legacy director James Gunn approach Henry Cavill for a new DC role? Find out

    DC fans across the globe were quite disheartened by the exit of Henry Cavill, the popular Hollywood star from the upcoming Superman film. Initially, it was reported that Cavill will return to DCU to play the legendary character once again in the much-awaited project Man of Steel 2. However, things did not materialize, and the project was soon scrapped. Later, popular filmmaker James Gunn, who joined DC Studios last year, stepped in to direct the new film in the franchise, which has been titled Superman Legacy.

    James Gunn to rope in Henry Cavill for a new DCU role?

    If the latest updates are to be believed, James Gunn, however, is not ready to let a highly sought-after talent like Henry Cavill part ways with DC Studios. According to recent reports by Fandom Wire, the filmmaker is keen to rope in the talented actor for a new DCU role, after his exit from Superman films. However, it has been confirmed that Cavill no longer plays Clark Kent aka Superman in another DC film. 

    James Gunn, who is highly active on social media, has not reacted to the reports yet. However, the grapevine suggests that the director is actively in talks with Henry Cavill, and is keen to bring him back to DCU with another plum project. However, the actor is clearly not excited to return, after the massive disappointment he faced with the Man of Steel 2. The rumors suggest that he is reportedly looking forward to joining hands with Marvel Studios for a superhero project, instead.

    Henry Cavill is not playing Frankenstein

    In March this year, it was rumored that Henry Cavill is set to join hands with DC once again to play the titular role in the upcoming project Frankenstein. However, James Gunn immediately put the rumors to rest with a social media post and confirmed that The Witcher actor is not approached for the role.  

    David Corenswet steps into Henry Cavill’s shoes as the new Superman

    As reported earlier, young actor David Corenswet is set to step into Henry Cavill’s shoes as the new Clark Kent aka Superman in the upcoming project, Superman Legacy. Reportedly, the Pearl actor clearly impressed both James Gunn and the team DC with his excellent screentest and bagged the part. Rachel Brosnahan, on the other hand, is set to play Lois Lane in the film which will start rolling in the beginning of 2024.

    ALSO READ: Superman Legacy: James Gunn calls David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan ‘clear protagonists’; shuts down rumors

    1136847

    Source link

  • Superman Legacy: James Gunn calls David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan ‘clear protagonists’; shuts down rumors

    Superman Legacy: James Gunn calls David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan ‘clear protagonists’; shuts down rumors

    Superman Legacy, the highly anticipated fantasy superhero film is one of the most anticipated upcoming Hollywood projects. The much-awaited DCU project is set to mark the prestigious studio’s first onscreen collaboration with James Gunn, the renowned director. Superman Legacy found its lead pair recently, after extensive auditions. David Corenswet has been roped in to play the titular character Superman aka Clark Kent in the film, which will feature Rachel Brosnahan as his lady love and Daily Planet reporter, Lois Lane.

    Will Clark Kent and Lois Lane get sidelined in Superman Legacy?

    The recent reports on the inclusion of other famous DC superheroes like Green Lantern, Hawkgirl, and Mister Terrific in the film had left audiences skeptical, about the importance of the lead actors David Corenswet and Rachel Brosnahan’s roles in Superman Legacy. It was even rumored that director James Gunn is planning to follow the narrative style of his famous MCU project Guardians of the Galaxy for the upcoming DC project, by introducing more superheroes to the narrative.

    The speculations deeply upset the loyal DCU fans, who were already struggling to accept the fact that celebrated star Henry Cavill will not be returning to the role of Superman in the film. Recently, a group of audiences expressed their displeasure over ‘sidelining’ Clark Kent and Lois Lane to include an ensemble star cast in Superman Legacy on social networking app Threads and opined that this move might take away the real essence of DCU. 

    ALSO READ: Will Daniel Craig play the role of Lex Luthor in Superman Legacy? Director James Gunn reacts to rumors

    James Gunn puts rumors to rest, reveals ‘clear protagonists’ of Superman Legacy

    However, director James Gunn, who is highly active on Threads these days, immediately rubbished the speculations and put all rumors by making a major revelation. The celebrated filmmaker confirmed that David Corenswet and Rachel Brosnahan are the ‘clear protagonists’ of Superman Legacy,  as the narrative will focus on the journeys of Superman aka Clark Kent and Lois Lane, like the previous films.

    “I’ve never used one movie to set up another movie. The other characters are there because they help to tell Superman’s story better, not so we can set up separate projects in the franchise. Superman and Lois Lane are the very clear protagonists,” replied the director to a fan’s question, brushing off rumors surrounding the film’s plot. James Gunn’s revelation came out as a great relief for the DC fans, who were worried about the authenticity of Superman Legacy.

    ALSO READ: Superman Legacy: David Corenswet aka Clark Kent to lock horns with The Authority in James Gunn’s film?

    1136847

    Source link

  • ‘Superman: Legacy’: Frontrunners Emerge As Casting Begins

    ‘Superman: Legacy’: Frontrunners Emerge As Casting Begins

    By Brent Furdyk.

    Casting is underway for “Superman: Legacy”, James Gunn’s upcoming feature in which the DC Studios head will reboot the iconic superhero franchise.

    According to The Hollywood Reporter, frontrunners are emerging for the primary roles of Clark Kent/Superman, Daily Planet reporter Lois Lane and super-villain Lex Luthor.

    THR reports that David Corenswet — recently seen alongside Mia Goth in horror film “Pearl” — is one of the top contenders to portray the Man of Steel, with “multiple sources” claiming he’s advanced to the stage of filming screen tests.


    READ MORE:
    James Gunn’s Making ‘Private List’ Of Actors Who Could Play The Next Superman

    Two other frontrunners are also reported to be in close contention for the role, but their identities aren’t known.

    Meanwhile, the opportunity to play Lois Lane has attracted some of Hollywood’s most sought-after actresses. Among those to have auditioned are Emma Mackey (“Sex Education”), Phoebe Dynevor (“Bridgerton”), Samara Weaving (“Scream VI”) and Rachel Brosnahan of “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel”.

    THR‘s source indicated that Brosnahan’s audition was “outstanding,” but given her age, 32, she may be too old for the film, which features the characters in their 20s.

    The role of Lex Luthor, however, is rumoured to be the closest to being filled, with Nicholas Hoult (currently seen in “Renfield”) said to be the top choice.


    READ MORE:
    James Gunn To Direct ‘Superman: Legacy’ After Saying ‘No’ Years Ago: ‘I’m Incredibly Excited’

    This wouldn’t be Hoult’s first association with DC Studios, with THR reminding that he was the runner-up to play the Dark Knight in Matt Reeves’ “The Batman”, with the role ultimately going to Robert Pattinson. “The studio has loved him since ‘Fury Road’,” a source told the outlet.

    However, another source cautioned that these names should all be taken with a considerable grain of salt, dismissing some of the names as “a chatroom list.”

    Warner Bros. offered no comment, while another source claimed that the studio and filmmakers “are nowhere near a decision.”

    Brent Furdyk

    Source link

  • Pearl Proves What Eminem Said Long Ago: “You Only Get One Shot”

    Pearl Proves What Eminem Said Long Ago: “You Only Get One Shot”

    Of all the movies released in the past year to end up offering a prequel and a sequel, X seemed among the least likely. After all, one initially reads it as “just” another A24 horror special. Unique in its singular brand of fucked-upness. But Ti West and Mia Goth clearly thought, as Lestat (Tom Cruise) in Interview With the Vampire did of a certain dead old woman, “There’s still life in the old lady yet!” And the old lady in question here is Pearl (Goth), whose moniker the latest installment in the X “saga” is named after (complete with the subtitle: An X-traordinary Origin Story). Because, clearly, there was a root to what caused this evil, nymphomaniacal old woman to be that way. Starting with the curse of “daring” to have a noticeable sexual appetite in the year 1918, where the Pearl narrative unfolds on the very same farm in X.

    It doesn’t take long to realize that, in addition to being burdened with sexual desires that a girl isn’t “supposed to” have, Pearl is also the daughter of German immigrants, living in rural Texas at a time of peak anti-German sentiment as the end of World War I came to a close (soon to set the stage for the Germans inciting World War II in retaliation for their raw deal in the Treaty of Versailles). Blaming the “krauts” for the entire war, discrimination ensued during this period, and Pearl’s parents are no exception. Plus, with Pearl’s father (Matthew Sunderland) paralyzed and incapable of speech or caring for himself, the responsibility has become even harder on her mother, Ruth (Tandi Wright), as a woman trying to “run things” without additional prejudice.

    So it is that she’s harder on Pearl than perhaps she ought to be. Expecting her to pick up the slack despite knowing she’s a lazy dreamer of a girl. A characteristic we see from the first moments of the film, opening on a scene of Pearl playing dress up in her mother’s finer clothes and posing in the mirror—something about it very much reminding well-versed viewers of the deranged “Baby” Jane (Bette Davis) in What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? Indeed, Pearl feels like a spawn of that particular “psycho biddy” progenitor. And yes, just the same as Future Pearl, a large part of Jane’s bitter rage stemmed from no longer being seen as desirable by men. A quality that goes hand in hand with making it in show business. Even still, but most especially at the outset of cinema (and through the “Golden Age” of Hollywood). Which Pearl had the great misfortune of seeing unfold. One says “misfortune” because, perhaps if she had been born before the dawn of silent film, her head wouldn’t have been so filled with “big dreams” and her narcissism wouldn’t have had a place to be channeled. Perhaps she would’ve suppressed it like the rest of the masses.

    But no, she is as taken with “the movies” as so many in America were, starting from the inception of phenomena like nickelodeons. Ironically, the upper classes were the ones who turned their noses up at newsreels and “actualities” shown to the public in such venues, viewing it as cheap and vulgar fare. Not for the “elite.” Of course, the so-called elite would go on to make their money off the hoi polloi’s love of cinema eventually. After working-class immigrants such as Adolph Zukor (who produced one of the U.S.’ first feature-length movies in 1913, The Prisoner of Zenda), Samuel Goldwyn and Carl Laemmle (himself a German like Pearl’s parents) already saw the opportunity to do so long before anyone else. That Pearl should exist at a moment in time like this, during the “excitement” and the “hustle and bustle” of an industry so new, was to her detriment rather than her advantage. For it gave her the false hope that she might be capable of having “more.”

    Her obsessive delusions with escaping the drudgery of farm life are manifest in every little act she does. Even something as simple as feeding the animals in the barn. “Y’all see me for who I really am!” she shouts to the perplexed “audience” as she runs up to mount a pile of hay bales and conclude, “A star!” With a pitchfork over her head, the image is ominous, to say the least, and foreshadows the fate of the innocent goose that walks up to see what all that fanfare is in the barn. Needless to say, Pearl doesn’t care for such “interlopers.” And, in keeping with the pattern of most standard-issue serial killers, it’s no surprise that Pearl should start with animals and work her way up to humans.

    Just as she plans to work her way up the show biz ladder, even if it’s by starting with something as middling as a touring church troupe (this is, after all, Texas). Plus, with the influenza pandemic “winding down” (though it wouldn’t really do so until 1920, it was assumed “safe” to start gallivanting again—even if most of the “background people” in Pearl are seen wearing masks, an all too eerie and resonant vision for the “COVID enduring” audience watching the familiar sight and dialogue. Including Pearl’s sister-in-law, Mitsy (Emma Jenkins-Purro), noting to Pearl, “All this isolation has been enough to make one mad.” This after she and her mother bring a pig to the farm as an offering of goodwill. Ruth only sees it as unwanted charity and leaves it on the porch. But before Howard’s (played by Stephen Ure in X and Alistair Sewell in Pearl) family departs, Mitsy gives Pearl the “hot tip” about a dance audition for the church’s Christmas chorus line “to bring merriment to folks throughout the state during the holidays.” Mitsy ought to have known better than to tell Pearl anything about it, for she instantly puts all her eggs in that basket, running up to the cow, Charlie, kissing him on the mouth and saying, “This could be it!”

    Alas, because it’s supposed to be 1918, it wouldn’t be appropriate to use Eminem’s signature song from 8 Mile, “Lose Yourself,” as part of the soundtrack. And yet, that’s exactly what one can hear going on in Pearl’s mind as she refuses to let anything or anyone stand in her way as she prepares for her “big” audition. The thing she sees as her sole ticket—apart from living in her fantasy world—out of the homestead. Much as Dorothy Gale (Judy Garland) only had literal dreaming to escape from her own dreary, black-and-white location.

    Although The Wizard of Oz was a demarcation of Hollywood’s Golden Age, Pearl, despite taking place in the heyday of chorus lines and silent movies, is awash in that “flavor.” Albeit with an extremely perverse, macabre slant—right down to “our Dorothy,” Pearl, dancing around with a scarecrow and then fucking it as she imagines it to be the projectionist (David Corenswet) she just met in town. The one who eventually shows her a notorious stag movie of the day (called A Free Ride) when she returns to the theater after-hours. This obviously being another nod to Maxine Minx’s (also played by Goth) own future in the porn industry, which we’ll soon see further unfold in MaXXXine.

    The fact that Pearl herself isn’t scandalized by the images (which would have been extremely shocking to any garden-variety woman back in the day) is yet another testament to her “off” nature—as well as her parallel with Maxine. Hell, if Pearl could become a star based on these kinds of films, she would do it. But such a “genre” was still too much, too soon for a repressed America only just getting accustomed to normal “sinful” movies that eventually prompted the conservative “moral majority” to invoke the Hays code. A stifling barrage of film limitations that Pearl will never have to worry about, for she’ll never hit the big time. A revelation that slowly creeps into her mind as she states during what is sure to become ranked among one of cinema’s greatest monologues, “Sometimes I wake in the middle of the night and fear washes over me ‘cause what if this is it? What if this is right where I belong?”

    Of course, she knows deep down that this is it, she’ll be condemned to the farm forever. And it has nothing to do with how she only tried at being in “show business” once and failed, and everything to do with the arcane awareness that those born into a certain family and class will never be able to escape the curse of that station.

    As many stories before Pearl have proffered as a moral: all sources of pain and suffering can be traced to attempts at “reaching for the stars.” In other words, trying to extricate oneself from their circumstance of birth. Something that Ruth warns Pearl not to bother with when she says, “One day you’ll understand that getting what you want isn’t what’s important. Making the most of what you have is. Life rarely turns out how you expect. You need to be prepared for that if you ever want to be happy.”  

    But Pearl can’t be told such things. Like most, she’s inclined to learn the hard way. Building up the pressure in her mind with the internal mantra, “Look, if you had one shot/Or one opportunity/To seize everything you ever wanted/In one moment/Would you capture it/Or just let it slip?/You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow/This opportunity comes once in a lifetime.” For Pearl, the lifetime that follows after that “one opportunity” is an existence of bleak, vengeful despair. But clearly, she at least has Howard, who returns home from the war to find her with a plastered-on smile, to accept her for what she is: a monster. Turned that way as a lot of ordinary people are when they realize life just ain’t how it is in the movies.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link