ReportWire

Tag: David Bailey

  • Blockbuster NFL Draft Trade Would Change Detroit Lions Defense In A Heartbeat

    On paper, it’s the kind of move that makes Detroit Lions fans sit up straight. A massive trade-up. A blue-chip edge rusher. A defense that suddenly looks terrifying. According to Mike Payton of A to Z Sports, there’s a blockbuster NFL Draft scenario that would reshape Detroit’s defense instantly.

    But while the idea is fun, and the upside is obvious, the reality is much more complicated.

    And frankly? There’s almost no chance this trade actually happens.

    The trade proposal

    Payton floated the idea of the Lions making a bold move with the Arizona Cardinals, jumping from No. 17 all the way to No. 3 in the 2026 NFL Draft.

    Proposed trade:

    • Lions receive:
    • Cardinals receive:
      • No. 17 and No. 50 in the 2026 NFL Draft
      • A 2027 second-round pick
      • A 2027 third-round pick

    With that No. 3 pick, Payton suggests Detroit would select David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech, a highly productive pass rusher coming off a monster 2025 season.

    Payton’s reasoning is clear: add another elite edge across from Aidan Hutchinson and watch the Lions’ pass rush go nuclear.

    Why the idea is appealing for Detroit

    Let’s start with what Payton gets right—because there is real appeal here.

    Bailey’s production jumps off the page:

    • 81 pressures
    • 15 sacks
    • 40 run stops in 2025

    Pairing a high-upside edge with Aidan Hutchinson would instantly give Detroit one of the most dangerous pass-rush tandems in the NFL. The Lions were already a top-five sack team in 2025. Add another premium edge, and you’re talking about a unit that could legitimately lead the league.

    From a pure football standpoint, the logic tracks.

    The problem: the trade value isn’t even close

    Here’s where the proposal falls apart.

    Moving from No. 17 to No. 3 is an enormous leap, one of the most expensive jumps in the entire draft. When you run this proposal through NFL Draft trade value charts, the package simply doesn’t come close to matching what Arizona would be giving up.

    Historically, a move of this magnitude usually requires:

    • A future first-round pick, not just seconds and thirds
    • Or a proven veteran player included in the deal

    The Cardinals would be passing on a franchise cornerstone at No. 3. They’re not doing that for a package headlined by a mid-first, a late second, and future Day 2 picks. That’s not how teams operate at the top of the draft, especially teams still building.

    In short: Arizona would laugh this offer out of the room.

    The David Bailey question

    There’s another major issue that can’t be ignored.

    David Bailey is productive. He’s intriguing. He’s explosive.

    But he is far from a can’t-miss prospect.

    Top-three picks are usually reserved for players viewed as near-lock franchise changers, players with rare traits, elite consistency, and minimal projection risk. Bailey, while exciting, still has evaluators split on his overall ceiling, technique refinement, and translation to the NFL level.

    Trading a king’s ransom for a player who isn’t universally viewed as elite is exactly how teams set themselves back.

    For the Lions, who have built their roster patiently and intelligently, that kind of gamble would feel wildly out of character.

    Why this doesn’t align with Brad Holmes’ philosophy

    Brad Holmes has been aggressive when it makes sense. He’s also been disciplined when it doesn’t.

    This trade would require:

    • Overpaying in draft capital
    • Betting heavily on a non-consensus elite prospect
    • Sacrificing future flexibility for a move that isn’t necessary

    Detroit already has a strong defensive front. They don’t need to force a top-three pick to “fix” anything. Holmes has shown time and again that he prefers value, flexibility, and control over headline-grabbing moves.

    That’s why this scenario, while fun to discuss, doesn’t feel realistic.

    The bottom line

    Mike Payton deserves credit for throwing out a bold, creative idea—and there’s no question that landing a talent like David Bailey would supercharge Detroit’s defense overnight.

    But when you step back and look at:

    • The massive jump from No. 17 to No. 3
    • The mismatch in draft value
    • The risk profile of the player involved

    …it becomes clear that this trade lives firmly in “fun thought experiment” territory.

    If the Lions are going to make a big swing, it’ll be one that makes sense on both the board and the balance sheet. This one? Not quite.

    Don Drysdale

    Source link

  • In Arles, the Rencontres de la Photographie Showcases the Vernacular, the Archive and the Contemporary

    David Armstrong, Johnny, Provincetown, late 1970s. Courtesy of the Estate of David Armstrong

    The Rencontres de la Photographie in Arles has been an annual magnet during the summer season for professionals and amateurs alike since it began in 1970 in the south of France. The small city—which has become both more international and more gentrified since a towering Frank Gehry-designed arts center opened in 2021—mounts diverse exhibitions in churches, former middle schools, cloisters, museums, a crypt and even a Monoprix (the French equivalent of Target). The 2025 edition, which runs through October 5, is umbrellaed by the theme “Disobedient Images,” a kind of counterpoint to the existing status quo.

    In a reframing of national narrative, “On Country: Photography from Australia” is a group show of artists exploring their country’s identity, subtly or explicitly addressing its heritage of colonialism over First Nations people. Per the wall text, “on Country” indicates “more than just being situated somewhere, it is about being shaped by that place, connected to it, and having a responsibility to care for it.” wani toaishara lovingly portrays Black citizens from the African diaspora in Melbourne while Adam Ferguson sensitively showcases varied populations, from coal miners to contract shearers, based on his 150,000 kilometers of travel across the country. The images by Indigenous photographer Michael Cook are jarring and provocative, replicating a single figure in politically symbolic spaces to underline minority discrimination and lack of visibility.

    A vintage black-and-white photograph shows two women in swimsuits on a beach joyfully kicking their legs and raising their arms as they face the camera.A vintage black-and-white photograph shows two women in swimsuits on a beach joyfully kicking their legs and raising their arms as they face the camera.
    Anonymous amateur photographer, Untitled, Houlgate, France, 1931. Courtesy of the former Marion and Philippe Jacquier Collection / Donation from the Fondation Antoine de Galbert to the Musée de Grenoble

    A very different group show, “In Praise Of Anonymous Photography,” is a fascinating repository of vintage vernacular images divorced from their once-owners. They all come from the collection of Marion and Philippe Jacquier, who were gallerists for over twenty years outside of Paris and self-describe as being “in the business of ‘image hunting.’” They specialize in uncovering amateur photography ranging from pinup girls to animal bestiaries and own a compendium of 10,000 silver prints. Here, the selected images and series are especially enigmatic and often eccentric. One woman (“Lucette”) had 850 photos taken of her during her travels—never backgrounded by anything remarkable, often blurry—between 1954 and 1977. Who she is, the purpose of her documentation, and who took the photos is unknown. In another series, a pharmacist circa the 1950s used a spy camera to photograph his day-to-day customers unbeknownst to them, using a trigger system activated behind the cash register. Though the photos are pedestrian and innocent-seeming, the ethics behind this endeavor are suspect. In another series, a 20-year-old man returns to places he spent time in with a lover before she moved to Tahiti, photographing urban geography and chronicling what happened there (crying, kissing, etc.). Is he a sweet romantic or a creepy obsessive?

    Also archival but less inscrutable, “The World of Louis Stettner (1922–2016)” presents the photographer as bridging American street photography and French humanist photography. Born in Brooklyn in 1922, Stettner trained at the Photo League, which he described as “the first progressive, left-wing photography organization in the United States.” His 1946 series on the New York subway captured with his Rolleiflex is fascinating, and the MTA sure looked better then: men in hats and women in fur coats sitting primly between Coney Island and Times Square. His series Nancy is a study of an insouciant adolescent living in Greenwich Village, her life characterized by “sleeping late, odd jobs, money scrounging and partying.” She’s photographed playfully upturning a glass in her mouth or lounging in bed with a radio. Stettner also mixed with French photographers (Willy Ronis, Édouard Boubat, Brassaï); he himself settled in Paris in the middle of the 20th Century for several years, and again late in life.

    A black-and-white portrait shows a young man in glasses and a suit jacket sitting sideways and gazing intently at the camera.A black-and-white portrait shows a young man in glasses and a suit jacket sitting sideways and gazing intently at the camera.
    Irving Penn, Yves Saint Laurent, Paris, 1957. Courtesy of The Irving Penn Foundation / Fondation Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent

    Featuring another man who moved to France, the “Yves Saint Laurent and Photography” show is a splashy one. Saint Laurent himself was almost relentlessly photographed, snapped by Irving Penn, David Bailey, Robert Doisneau and—in a then-scandalous nude portrait from 1971Jeanloup Sieff, amongst many others. These photographs unquestionably contributed to Yves Saint Laurent’s renown. Some 80 works trace the evolution of Saint Laurent’s creations in the media (like Richard Avedon’s Dovima with Elephants featuring a F/W 1955 Yves Saint Laurent for Christian Dior dress or Jean-Claude Sauer’s images of bright Pop Art cocktail dresses from the haute couture F/W 1966 collection) as well as iconic portraits of the couturier himself (the show opens with a wallpaper reproduction of Helmut Newton black-and-white 1971 contact sheets and ends with a photo from 2000 by Juergen Teller). Nestled within this exhibition is a panorama of 200 archival items from the Musée Yves Saint Laurent Paris, including passports, paper dolls, scrapbooks of fashion shows, advertising for the opening of the ready-to-wear boutique, covers of Paris Match from when YSL stepped down as a designer and a 42-page special from when he died in 2008. The paraphernalia provides a dense and completist look of someone who was fully documenting his life as it unfolded and had a public-facing persona as much as his collections did.

    A diptych presents on the left a color photograph of a person in a white slip dress curled up on a sofa with their head in their hands, and on the right a marble sculpture of two figures embracing and kissing.A diptych presents on the left a color photograph of a person in a white slip dress curled up on a sofa with their head in their hands, and on the right a marble sculpture of two figures embracing and kissing.
    Nan Goldin, Young Love, 2024. Courtesy of the artist / Gagosian

    Focusing on a different veteran icon, Nan Goldin presents a contemporary work at Église Saint-Blaise: showings of “Stendhal Syndrome” (2024) loop on the half hour, with limited seating. The Goldin-narrated photo slideshow has a soundtrack composed by Soundwalk Collective, and the film juxtaposes cropped snapshots of classical, renaissance and baroque masterpieces taken within the collections of international museums (the Louvre, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Galleria Borghese, the National Gallery), interspersed with Goldin’s portfolio of intimate portraits. Stendhal syndrome is a kind of aesthetic affliction named after the 19th-century French author who felt weak in the face of overwhelming beauty. Goldin’s “Stendhal Syndrome” creates parallels between centuries-old gestures and contemporary poses, instilling a meaningful sense of both artistic continuity and sensitive humanism.

    Nan Goldin was the guest artistic director of the Rencontres in 2009, and at the time introduced an exhibition featuring work by David Armstrong. Fifteen years later, the two are part of the same festival again: David Armstrong’s photos are on view at LUMA Arles, curated by Mathieu Humery (who also curated the Diane Arbus show last year, which is now in New York until August 17). In the 1970s, Armstrong studied photography and eventually became associated with a larger group of avant-garde artists known as the Boston School. An exquisite portraitist, Armstrong (who died in 2014) captured striking moments amongst his coterie of queer misfits—messy hair, direct gazes and fabulous outfits.

    A color photograph shows a performer with silver-painted skin and black straps across their body balancing upside down on the floor while looking toward the camera.A color photograph shows a performer with silver-painted skin and black straps across their body balancing upside down on the floor while looking toward the camera.
    Lila Neutre, Edwin Xtravaganza (Latex Ball No. 1), Sculpting the Self – The Rest is Drag series, 2015. Courtesy of the artist

    For a more contemporary take on queer culture, Lila Neutre’s work is a tribute to LGBTQIA+ nightlife. “Dancing on Ashes (Open Fire)” juxtaposes two series of photographs completed about ten years apart: Twerk Nation and The Rest is Drag, a vision of parties and performance through queer community, including the collective La Famille Maraboutage in Marseille and their quest for inclusivity. These figures affirmingly shrug off social normativity in patent leather red heels, silver lipstick and sparkly accessories, although the disco ball hanging in the exhibition is on the nose.

    One approach that consistently did not deliver across three exhibitions was the “reinvention” of archival material through modern interpretations. The archives remain superior. One such example was Agnès Geoffray’s “They Stray, They Persist, They Thunder.” Geoffray’s portraits of young women are based on research pertaining to underage girls in France imprisoned between the end of the 19th Century and the middle of the 20th Century for deviating from gender norms. Geoffray’s work is shown alongside a selection of historical documents—photographs, articles, administrative paperwork—which are layered in an alarm-red coating. The records themselves are fascinating, but the contemporary portraits feel hollow relative to the originals.

    Similarly, a contemporary series on U.S. Route 1 by Anna Fox and Karen Knorr reprises a journey undertaken by Berenice Abbott between July and September 1954; Abbott drove and documented her journey back and forth from Fort Kent, Maine, to the Florida Keys. Route 1 offered, according to Abbott, “a realistic picture of a true cross-section of American life.” Her experiences—never published—reflected the increasing standardization of the mid-century American landscape. In turn, Anna Fox and Karen Knorr photographed small towns, motels and diners along the same route, timed to Trump’s first presidential campaign and the country’s fast-rising zeal for conservative politics. Their images portray an America that is vulgar, ramshackle and stagnant. Unlike the images by Abbott, they feel cliché; there’s déjà vu. Lastly, Carmen Winant’s exploration of the lesbian separatist communities of the 1970s connected her with Carol Newhouse, co-founder of WomanShare, a lesbian feminist community on the West Coast. Winant and Newhouse pursued several collaborative projects, including new work on view here: shooting jointly on the same roll of film sent back and forth, doubly exposing and layering images. The result—deemed, in the wall text, a reclamation of feminist photographic strategies—is not nearly as powerful as the black-and-white photos from the 1970s by Newhouse, which reveal a sense of solidarity and camaraderie.

    In Arles, the Rencontres de la Photographie Showcases the Vernacular, the Archive and the Contemporary

    Sarah Moroz

    Source link

  • Trump proposes strategic national crypto stockpile: ‘Never sell your bitcoin’

    Trump proposes strategic national crypto stockpile: ‘Never sell your bitcoin’

    Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump walks off stage after speaking at a campaign rally at the Van Andel Arena in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on July 20, 2024.

    Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

    NASHVILLE — Former President Donald Trump said that if he were returned to the White House, he would ensure that the federal government never sells off its bitcoin holdings. But he stopped short of proposing a formal federal reserve of digital currency.

    “For too long our government has violated the cardinal rule that every bitcoiner knows by heart: Never sell your bitcoin,” Trump said during his keynote speech at this year’s Bitcoin Conference in Nashville, the biggest bitcoin conference of the year.

    The former president’s remarks came as the race to capture the votes and the campaign cash of America’s frontline fintech adopters takes center stage in the 2024 presidential contest.

    “This afternoon I’m laying out my plan to ensure that the United States will be the crypto capital of the planet and the bitcoin superpower of the world and we’ll get it done,” Trump said.

    But Trump’s pledge to simply maintain the U.S. government’s current bitcoin holdings was a less radical pitch to the crypto crowd relative to other proposals at the conference.

    Third-party candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for instance, during his Friday Bitcoin Conference speech promised to launch a reserve of 4 million bitcoin, starting with the bitcoin holdings that the U.S. government already has stockpiled from criminal seizures. Kennedy said he would mandate the government purchase 550 bitcoin a day until the reserve reached 4 million.

    Shortly after Trump’s speech, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wy., read out her own legislative proposal to amass an official U.S. federal reserve of 1 million bitcoin over five years.

    “It will be held for a minimum of 20 years and can be used for one purpose: Reduce our debt,” Lummis said.

    The price of bitcoin briefly dipped during Trump’s speech, but recovered and was up slightly for the day, as of 5:15 p.m. E.T.

    Throughout his remarks, the former president worked to draw contrasts between the Republican Party’s growing embrace of crypto versus the hardline regulatory approach that has characterized the Biden administration.

    “The Biden-Harris administration’s repression of crypto and bitcoin is wrong and it’s very bad for our country,” Trump said. “Let me tell you if they win this election, every one of you will be gone. They will be vicious. They will be ruthless. They will do things that you wouldn’t believe.”

    Trump went on to list a series of crypto-friendly promises to a crowd of cheering bitcoin supporters, promising to dismantle what he called the “anti-crypto crusade” of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

    “On day one, I will fire Gary Gensler,” Trump said, referencing the Biden-appointed chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission who has taken an aggressive approach to crypto regulation.

    The president does not have the power to fire appointed commissioners. Even if Trump were to appoint a new SEC chairman, Gensler would remain a commissioner on the independent agency.

    The former president also pledged to create a “bitcoin and crypto presidential advisory council.”

    “The rules will be written by people who love your industry, not hate your industry,” Trump said.

    The Republican presidential nominee also held an accompanying fundraiser in Nashville, with tickets topping out at $844,600. In June, BTC Inc. CEO David Bailey, who organized the conference, pledged to raise $100 million and turn out more than 5,000,000 voters for the Trump re-election effort, as the bitcoin sector increasingly turns to the Trump camp for support.

    Trump taking the main stage to directly address the bitcoin community is the latest in a months-long campaign to appeal to the crypto contingent, including accepting donations in virtual tokens, pledging to end President Joe Biden’s “war on crypto,” and advocating that all future bitcoin be made in America. It is also quite the about-face by the Republican presidential nominee.

    Trump very publicly dismissed bitcoin when he was in the White House. In July 2019, he said he was “not a fan” of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. He said that tokens aren’t money, that their value was “based on thin air,” and warned that unregulated crypto assets could help facilitate the drug trade, among “other illegal activity.”

    “Bitcoin just seems like a scam,” he told Fox in a phone interview in 2021. “I don’t like it because it’s another currency competing against the dollar.”

    “I want the dollar to be the currency of the world, that’s what I’ve always said,” continued Trump in his conversation with Fox.

    But five years, a lost presidential election, and millions of dollars from the crypto lobby later, the Republican presidential nominee sung the praises of the digital currency at the biggest bitcoin conference of the year in Nashville, which kicked off on Thursday.

    “Bitcoin stands for freedom, sovereignty and independence from government coercion and control,” Trump said during his keynote speech.

    Trump’s shift on bitcoin comes as the Republican Party pledges to lift the red tape of the Biden-Harris administration, working to turn crypto regulation into a voting issue for November, especially as inflation consistently ranks as a top voter priority in polls.

    As crypto lobbyists and supporters become more of a presence in Washington, it raises questions on whether the Democratic Party will dig into the hardline regulatory approach of the past several years or ease its position.

    “Every presidential candidate needs to understand, digital asset, pro-innovation voters are here to stay,” Democratic Rep. Wiley Nickel of North Carolina told CNBC in an interview, adding that crypto regulation should not become a “partisan political football.”

    “I want to keep this as a bipartisan issue. I don’t want Donald Trump to politicize this issue,” Rep. Nickel said.

    Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Ca., echoed Rep. Nickel’s sentiment, saying that crypto should not turn into a partisan talking point but will require regulation like any technology.

    “I don’t really see why it’s partisan. Being against bitcoin is like being against cell phones. It’s like being against AI. It’s like being against laptops,” Khanna told CNBC. “It’s a technology. Have thoughtful regulation on the technology, but it’s a technology that has appreciated from about $10,000 to $80,000.”

    Reps. Khanna and Nickel were two of the only Democrats to attend the Bitcoin Conference.

    Bitcoin 2024 conference organizers say they were briefly in talks to have Vice President Kamala Harris appear at the conference, though she ultimately declined. But billionaire businessman Mark Cuban posted on X that the Harris campaign had reached out with questions about crypto, so it appears the vice president is looking into this space and potentially figuring out where her policies, if elected president, could land.

    “I think we’re going to hear from Vice President Harris soon on this. And I’m very optimistic we’re gonna get a reset. And that I think, will matter in a major way,” Rep. Nickel said. “This issue isn’t going anywhere. And we’ve got to make sure we continue to embrace this in bipartisan way.”

    Harris’ team has already begun to reach out to people close to crypto companies to set up meetings, the Financial Times reported on Saturday.

    Bitcoin surges as namesake conference welcomes Donald Trump to Nashville

    Trump’s 180 on bitcoin

    The recent thaw in Trump’s sentiment for the digital asset space has coincided with a sudden influx of interest and cash from the country’s top tech talent.

    He has raised more than $4 million in a mix of cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, ether, the U.S. dollar pegged stablecoin USDC, and various memecoins, with contributors hailing from 12 states, including a few battlegrounds. 

    Crypto billionaire twins and venture investors Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss led the charge, each contributing 15.57 bitcoin, or just over $1 million at the time of their donation, according to a filing with the Federal Election Commission — though they received a partial refund, because contributions surpassed the $844,600 limit.

    There are a number of other venture capitalists who are pro-crypto, and they’ve pledged millions to the Trump campaign, as well.

    Venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz told employees of Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) that they plan to make significant donations to political action committees supporting  Trump’s campaign. The partners of Sequoia Capital are backing Trump, as is venture investor David Sacks, who helped the former president raise $12 million at a fundraiser he hosted in his San Francisco home. The chief legal officers for centralized crypto exchange Coinbase and blockchain giant Ripple were both there.

    These members of the tech elite are also heavily contributing to pro-crypto super PACs like Fairshake, which has raised more than $200 million dollars to elect pro-crypto candidates up and down the ballot, and on both sides of the aisle.

    But reporting from NBC News finds that the vice president’s team is looking to win over support from some of big tech’s undecided donors, many of whom remained on the sidelines while President Joe Biden remained in the race. Their tune may be changing now that the vice president is the de facto nominee for the party.

    It helps that Harris has a long track record in California. 

    She has been fundraising in the tech community for years, including from those working at Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Apple.

    “The pivot that has occurred in the last three days is dramatic,” Steve Westly, a venture capitalist and one-time gubernatorial candidate for California, told NBC News. “I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a surge of enthusiasm in any campaign I’ve been involved with.” 

    This comes as Trump’s running mate for vice president, JD Vance, is set to hold a fundraiser of his own in Palo Alto on Monday. 

    CNBC’s Rebecca Picciotto contributed to this report.

    Bitcoin 2024 conference underway: Here's what to know

    Source link