ReportWire

Tag: danielle j. brown

  • Marylanders for Mickey Mouse: Most write-in candidates not tallied in state elections – WTOP News

    Marylanders for Mickey Mouse: Most write-in candidates not tallied in state elections – WTOP News

    This November, each position up for election in Maryland will feature a “write-in” candidate line where Marylanders can vote for whomever they feel is best qualified for the job — or they can write-in a joke candidate.

    This November, each position up for election in Maryland will feature a “write-in” candidate line where Marylanders can vote for whomever they feel is best qualified for the job — or they can write-in a joke candidate.

    Be it Mickey Mouse for President, Beyoncé for Senate, or Shrek for Mayor, Marylanders have the liberty to vote for whomever they want. Just don’t expect those names to show up in state records.

    That’s because Maryland law requires that candidates must file with the State Board of Elections for officials to keep record of those votes, even if the names do not show up on ballots.

    “You know how you say, ‘Well, how many people vote for Mickey Mouse?’ We don’t keep records of those,” Elections Administrator Jared DeMarinis said. “We only keep records of those that are officially write-in candidates, not anything else.”

    Still, every election cycle thousands of Marylanders pass on the nominated Democratic, Republican and other major party candidates in favor of a write-in. Most states in the U.S. have a process to include write-in candidates in elections, though the requirements vary by state.

    According to DeMarinis, it’s a relatively simple process to file to run as a write-in candidate in Maryland.

    “You just have to submit a certificate of candidacy to the state board of elections within a certain timeline … and then you become an official write-in candidate,” he said. “It’s a simple process. There’s no filing fee for write-in candidates.”

    Robin Rowe, a Baltimore resident and chief technologist at an engineering firm, agrees that it was “surprisingly easy” for him to file as an official write-in candidate to run for Maryland’s open U.S. Senate seat. Since he’s not showing up on the ballot, he did not need to collect signatures or raise money. He just needed to register with the state.

    Rowe started running for office back in 2020, when he lived in Beverly Hills, California. During that time, he ran for city council and for school board, both times unsuccessfully, before moving to Baltimore in April.

    “I felt that in running for office, I affected local politics,” he said.

    The self-identified “Bernie-crat,” aligning his policy positions with U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), decided to throw his name into the Maryland Senate race as an unaffiliated write-in candidate, proposing that he is the choice for people who don’t like either of the leading candidates in the race.

    That would be former Gov. Larry Hogan (R) and Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks (D).

    Rowe knows his chances of winning the Senate race are almost nonexistent, but he finds that there’s value in running by changing the conversation of what elections could look like.

    “I’m too woke, and I am not taking donations,” Rowe said. “So under our current political system, it seems impossible for me to win in any election in this pay-to-win election system that we have. But I can affect the future just by the act of running.”

    Write-ins mostly unnoticed in elections

    DeMarinis noted that the presidential office is usually attracts the most write-in candidates.

    This fall, there are 21 certified write-in candidates for president and four write-in candidates for Senate, which includes Rowe. There are no official write-in candidates for the state’s eight House seats, though the write-in line will be available on every ballot.

    Official write-in candidates for president, for example, have never topped 0.0% of the vote in a general election going back to 2004, according to State Board of Elections data. In 2020, there were 1,117 Marylanders who wrote in music producer and rapper Kanye West in his unsuccessful run president, and in 2012 there were 625 write-in votes for presidential candidate Santa Claus, a man from Nevada.

    But the official write-in candidates are eclipsed every year by “other Write-Ins,” the catch-all category for those who were not registered with the elections board, state records show.

    In the 2020 presidential race, there were 18,045 votes for “other write-ins” in Maryland, about 0.6% of votes for president that year, compared to a total of 2,377 votes for all the official write-in candidates. In 2016, there were 33,263 Marylanders who voted for “other write-ins,” 1.2% of vote, compared to the 11,572 for official write-in candidates for president that year.

    Alexander Pope, an associate professor at Salisbury University and the director of its Institute for Public Affairs and Civic Engagement, believes it makes sense to have a process in place to register as an official write in candidate.

    “I don’t like saying that we shouldn’t count all the votes, but if you think about how broad and diverse even a relatively small state like Maryland is, you know that the people doing the tallying need some sort of structure to it to make sure that … the count is right,” he said.

    “So if someone writes ‘Mickey Mouse,’ and someone writes ‘M. Mouse’ and someone writes ‘Mickey M.,’ they (election officials) would need to know what they are looking for and make sure that those (votes) are going in the right place,” Pope said.

    In Maryland, if there is a misspelling in an official write-in candidate’s name, the vote will still go toward that candidate, so long as election officials can identify the name.

    “You’d also want the the person who’s having their name written in to approve, that they would be willing to serve in that capacity,” Pope added. “Because you don’t want to select someone who is not eligible or otherwise unwilling or unable to take that role.”

    The process requiring candidates to file as a write-in in order for the state to tally their votes became law in 2000, under then SB 73. According to the fiscal note at the time:

    “Following the 1998 general election, a petition was filed with the State Board of Elections requesting that write-in votes cast in the gubernatorial election be counted, and as a result of the petition, the local boards of canvassers were asked to tabulate all write-in votes … The majority of non-certified write-in votes were cast for fictitious characters (e.g. Donald Duck, Superman, etc.) or for other bogus candidates (e.g. Cal Ripken Jr., Richard Nixon, etc.).”

    Pope said that while write-in candidates usually don’t make much of a splash in races, they’re still important for the democratic process.

    “Write-in candidates give people an opportunity to vote for someone outside of the formal structure, which is an important part of democracy,” Pope said. “You can vote for whomever you want. Doesn’t have to be someone that a major political party has said is an acceptable candidate.

    “There’s a lot of conceptual attractiveness of write-in candidates — it feels like a democratic sort of thing,” he said.

    Ana Golden

    Source link

  • Maryland hopes to recruit young dentists to workforce shortage areas – WTOP News

    Maryland hopes to recruit young dentists to workforce shortage areas – WTOP News

    State health officials and dental health advocates say that Baltimore and parts of the Eastern Shore and Western Maryland not only lack dentists, but have other barriers that make it difficult for residents to keep up with their oral health.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    Maryland has about 70 dentists per 100,000 residents, according data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2020, but that doesn’t mean that they are equally distributed across the state.

    State health officials and dental health advocates say that Baltimore and parts of the Eastern Shore and Western Maryland not only lack dentists, but have other barriers that make it difficult for residents to keep up with their oral health.

    The Maryland Department of Health aims to change that with a new program urging dental students to launch their careers in areas with dental health care shortages.

    The Pathways to Bright Futures program, which launched Wednesday, will educate those students about the dentistry profession in hopes of easing shortage in targeted areas.

    Dr. Nilesh Kalyanaraman, the health department’s deputy secretary for public health services said Wednesday that fixing the workforce shortage “won’t be easy and is not going to happen overnight,” but improving access to dental services will help improve overall health equity in Maryland.

    “When I think about our vision for health equity in Maryland, I see everyone in our state having a fair and just opportunity to be as healthy as possible. It’s going to take hard work … to ensure that health equity includes healthy mouths, teeth and gums for all Marylanders,” he said.

    Dr. Debony Hughes, director of the department’s Office of Oral Health, said that many areas in  Western Maryland, the Eastern Shore and Baltimore have fewer than 20 dentists per 100,000 residents, well below the national average of 61 dentists per 100,000 residents.

    “This program is a collaborative effort to work with students and foster their interests in the oral health field and provide support to those who know they want to practice in the profession,” Hughes said Wednesday during the program kickoff at the Dr. Samuel D. Harris National Museum of Dentistry in Baltimore

    Pathways to Bright Futures is funded by a grant to the state from the federal Health Resources and Service Administration. At Wednesday’s event, six dental health students were awarded funds to help pay their dental school tuition.Each of the students plan to practice dentistry in one of the state’s dental shortage areas.

    “Cavities in children and adults, and gum disease especially in adults, are among the most prevalent chronic diseases in the United States,”  Kalyanaraman said. “The main reason why oral disease is so prevalent is that far too many Marylanders experience barriers to preventative and essential dental care.”

    He noted that when Maryland dentists set up their practice, they tend to gather in “more populated and higher income areas, creating significant gaps in access to dental care across other regions of the state.”

    “This shortage creates an uneven distribution of dental professionals across the state, which leads to decreased access to dental care, especially in already underserved communities,” Kalyanaraman said.

    Dr. George Shepley, a general dentist in Baltimore since 1978 who previously served as president of the American Dental Association, said dental care can help identify other health needs.

    “They’re connected. Totally. Especially with things like diabetes and cardiac disease,” Shepley said Wednesday. “And in the world of dentistry, you’ll get insight into well-being overall. You’ll help diagnose other conditions and empower people to really take responsibility for their lives.”

    Mary Backley, CEO of the Maryland Dental Action Coalition, said there are a multitude of logistical and economic barriers that can make it challenging for some Marylanders to get to a dental appointment.

    Besides a lack of equal access to the state’s 4,300 registered dentists,  another issue in dentist shortage areas is transportation, particularly for the more rural communities in Western Maryland and on the Eastern Shore.

    “The biggest barriers, rural-wise, is the distance … It can take miles and miles and miles to get to a provider,” Backley said after Wednesday’s event.

    Baltimore residents are more likely to be face a long waitlist to get a dental appointment, according to Backley. And both rural and city residents may struggle to afford child care or take time off work to go to the dentist in the first place.

    There are also financial hurdles that make it harder for families to afford a trip to the dentist.

    As of January 2023, Medicaid in Maryland began to cover certain dental services for adults.  And the General Assembly this year passed legislation to study the feasibility of including full and partial dentures under Medicaid coverage. Gov. Wes Moore (D) signed the bill in May.

    The state Medicaid expansions can help many low-income families receive dental health care, so long as they have access to a provider that accepts Medicaid. Not all dentists in Maryland do.

    Backley hopes that the Pathways to Bright Futures program will encourage more young people to look to dentistry as a career path and help fill in some of the coverage gaps in the state.

    On the bright side, Backley said that residents and Maryland health officials are taking dental health care seriously.

    “It’s been incremental, but each year there has been progress,” she said. “People understand the importance of oral health. And the importance of oral health to overall health.”

    Ciara Wells

    Source link

  • Md. Senate approves several renter-focused bills on Saturday before Sine Die – WTOP News

    Md. Senate approves several renter-focused bills on Saturday before Sine Die – WTOP News

    In the Senate chamber, lawmakers moved swiftly through dozens of bills in a Saturday afternoon session.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    In the Senate chamber, lawmakers moved swiftly through dozens of bills in a Saturday afternoon session.

    The legislative flow was only disrupted occasionally, due to brief technical errors, confusion over which bills were being discussed, or senators away from their seats when they were supposed to lead floor discussion on legislation.

    As the Senate churned through legislation ahead of the last day of session on Monday, several bills involving renter protection and housing affability received approval from the chamber and will soon head to the desk of Gov. Wes Moore (D), including some of the governor’s priority legislation.

    One of his priority bills, which works to increase affordable housing opportunities, received a last-minute change Saturday.

    House Bill 693, known as the Renters’ Rights and Stabilization Act, would create an Office of Tenants and Landlord Affairs in state government to help tenants know what protections they have under Maryland law and what legal actions they can take to defend themselves, along with other measures.

    Senate Minority Leader Stephen S. Hershey Jr. (R-Upper Shore) offered an amendment to the section of the bill that raises a fee required for a landlord to issue an eviction notice.

    Currently, it costs landlords $8 to issue an eviction notice for failure to pay rent. Moore initially wanted to raise it to $93, which is closer to the national average for such a fee.

    During the legislative process, the bill was amended to change the proposed fee increase to $83, and was then amended again to $43.

    Hershey’s amendment proposed Saturday “simply says that the court may allow a landlord to deduct this surcharge that’s been assessed from the tenant’s security deposit,” he said.

    “It still provides some protection that says that the deduction can be no more than the security deposit. Obviously, the judgement would have to be in the landlord’s favor, but we do think that it is an amendment that will kind of get things a little bit more towards the middle,” Hershey said.

    Sen. William C. Smith Jr. (D-Montgomery), who chairs the Senate Judicial Proceedings committee, was OK with the amendment, even though there is only one more day in the legislative session.

    “We view this as a friendly amendment,” Smith said, eliciting a chorus of “whoa” from a handful senators who were surprised by his willingness to accept this amendment.

    Hershey’s amendment passed. Shortly after, the Senate approved the Renters’ Rights and Stabilization Act on a 35-9 vote.

    Due to the floor amendment, HB 693 will need to be reviewed by the House of Delegates and see if they agree with the change. If so, the bill would head to Moore’s desk for consideration. If not, the two chambers will need to hastily iron out their differences on Monday.

    Moore has two other bills in his 2024 legislative package that aim to create more affordable housing supply in the state.

    HB 538 also received Senate approval Saturday afternoon. It aims to incentivize developers to add affordable housing options in future developments and would allow certain development projects to exceed typical density limits if the new development incorporates a certain percentage of affordable housing units.

    The Senate approved the measure Saturday on a 31-13 vote, with little discussion on the matter.

    Moore’s other housing bill, HB 599, is ready for his signature. Assuming he approves the legislation, it would create the Maryland Community Investment Corporation, a state entity that would make loans or investments aimed at developing and improving low-income communities.

    Some renter advocates are pleased with the passage of HB 1117 Saturday afternoon, a bill that is not part of Moore’s housing package.

    The bill is called the Tenant Safety Act and would make the escrow process more accessible to renters when landlords do not adequately address life-threatening repairs, by enabling tenants to file a complaint with the local district court and put rent payments in escrow while the complaint is adjudicated.

    The tenant advocacy group Renters United Maryland posted on X, the social media website formerly known as Twitter, in celebration of the bill passage.

    “After yrs of advocacy renters celebrate as the Tenant Safety Act passes in the @MDSenate,” the post says.

    The bill passed 30-11, on party lines. It awaits a final review from the House before it goes to the governor’s desk.

    Ivy Lyons

    Source link

  • Landlord-tenant bills provide drama in ‘Crossover Day’ Maryland House action – WTOP News

    Landlord-tenant bills provide drama in ‘Crossover Day’ Maryland House action – WTOP News

    A pair of measures aimed at increasing protections for renters has passed in the Maryland House.

    WTOP’s Valerie Bonk reports that curbing evictions and increasing driver tolls are among the major priorities presented on Crossover Day this year in the Maryland General Assembly.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.

    Debates pitting Maryland’s tenants against landlords ignited in the House Monday over two bills that aim to increase protections for renters.

    One of the bills in question is priority legislation for Gov. Wes Moore (D) as part of his housing package. Moore has testified in both Senate and House committees for his housing bills. Moore’s housing package aims to avoid unnecessary evictions and work to decrease a housing shortage of an estimated 96,000 units.

    HB 693 carries Moore’s Renter’s Rights and Stabilization Act of 2024, which would give tenants residing in a rental property the right of first refusal if the landowner wants to sell the property. Tenants would have an opportunity to purchase the property before a third party could buy it.

    HB 693 would also increase the court fees that a landlord pays to seek a tenant’s eviction, among other measures.

    But House Minority Leader Jason C. Buckel (R-Allegany) argued that the bill might create an unfriendly market for landlords and developers, which could run counter to efforts aiming to increase the supply of affordable housing opportunities.

    “This bill is disincentivizing,” Buckel said in opposition. “How do I know this? Because they all come here and tell us that. Every group that represents people who invest in these types of property into this sector of the economy — multifamily housing, building associations, all of them. They all come here and say ‘this doesn’t work. This is a bad compromise.’”

    Del. Matthew Morgan (R-St. Mary’s) called the bill’s measure to provide tenants the right of first refusal “ridiculous.”

    “This misguided legislation is what happens when we allow activists to write the legislation instead of actual professionals that deal with this every day,” he said.

    Del. Marvin E. Holmes (D-Prince George’s) defended the right of first refusal as chance for tenants to buy the property they live in, only if the landlord is already looking to sell the unit.

    “What we’re trying to do here is make sure that the tenant who was already living in the house has an opportunity to purchase it,” Holmes said.

    HB 693 passed 104-34, with Republicans primarily in opposition.

    The other tenant protection bill that passed the House Monday is called the Tenant Safety Act of 2024, sponsored by Del. Vaughn Stewart (D-Montgomery). That bill is not part of Moore’s priority legislation.

    HB 1117 would make the “renters escrow” process more accessible for situations where landlords do not adequately address life-threatening repairs, by enabling tenants to file a complaint with the local district court and put rent payments in escrow while the complaint is adjudicated.

    “The core problem this bill seeks to salve is, we know that hundreds of thousands of our neighbors, our constituents in Maryland, are living in deplorable conditions that violate our warranty of habitability,” Stewart said. “Which means we that slumlords across the state are breaking their lease and subjecting tenants … to unlivable conditions.”

    He says that only a “tiny fraction” of renters in unlivable conditions file a complaint against the landlord and that the legislation “levels the playing field” so that more tenants can utilize the rent escrow process.

    “No good landlord has anything to worry about with this bill. But slumlords … they should be shaking in their boots right now,” Stewart said.

    “This is about slumlords. This is not about landlord vs. tenant,” he added.

    Morgan opposed Stewart’s bill as well. He said, sarcastically, that he looked forward to when lawmakers decide to legislate against what he called “slum-tenants.”

    “ … And actually force tenants that are not paying their rent, that are tearing up property and destroying stuff and making it harder to rent houses for the overwhelming majority of tenants that are good,” Morgan said. “I’m looking forward to when the body actually cracks down on that.”

    Del. Marc Korman (D-Montgomery), who chairs the Environment and Transportation committee which initially approved HB 1117, argued that committee members try to work with both tenants and landlords to resolve their concerns with housing legislation.

    “We hear a lot from landlords in our committees and we adjust the legislation … to reflect their feedback,” Korman said.

    “But it’s true, we also listen to renters, they are also an important constituency. And making sure that they live in safe and stable and clean housing is a goal that we can all share,” he said.

    The House approved the Tenants’ Safety Act, on a 104-34 party line vote.

    Another piece of Moore’s housing package, which would make it easier for developers of affordable housing to get financing, has already passed the House and was assigned to the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee, where the Senate version of the bill resides. The committee — and the full Senate — is expected to move one of those bills.

    Administration officials are confident that a planning and zoning bill that’s also part of the governor’s affordable housing initiative will also pass soon.

    Matt Small

    Source link