ReportWire

Tag: dan aykroyd

  • Dan Aykroyd on UFOs and the Wonder of What’s Out There – Houston Press

    As The Unbelievable returns for its third season, few hosts could guide audiences through stories of the strange and supernatural with as much curiosity and charm as Dan Aykroyd. The comedy legend — whose career has spanned GhostbustersThe Blues Brothers, and countless other classics — has long been fascinated by the unseen and unexplained. And this latest season continues that tradition, mixing wonder, science, and storytelling in a way only Aykroyd can.

    When I caught up with him, Aykroyd was as thoughtful and engaging as ever — equal parts scientist, historian, and storyteller.

    “Every human being is astounded by unbelievable acts of survival, unbelievable weather events, and stories that just drop your jaw,” he said. “As a human being interested in what’s going on with my fellow man — climate, weather, disasters — I thought, I’m definitely going to enjoy presenting and researching cases I hadn’t even heard of.”

    He continued, “When they came to me with this show, I thought, this is a great opportunity to entertain people, educate people, and inspire them to do their own research. And yeah,” he added with a grin, “to blow minds. That’s a big part of why I got on board.”


    The new season of The Unbelievable explores more of those “mind-blowing” cases — including the now-famous 1994 Ariel School sighting in Zimbabwe, where dozens of children reported seeing the same UFO.

    “I’ve followed that story for years,” Aykroyd said. “I’m a MUFON subscriber — that’s the Mutual UFO Network, the primary scientific body that researches these things. From the very beginning, I knew that the Ariel sighting would be a great story to include.”

    He leaned in, describing the case with fascination. “Two vessels landed, two sets of beings got out — according to some of the kids. And when they went back and interviewed them in their twenties, the stories held up. Some were terrified, but others said they received telepathic messages: watch the trees, take care of the planet. There was a tall being and a short being — and they seemed to have friction between them. It’s a wonderful story. And true or not,” he added, “I believe it’s true.”


    Aykroyd’s fascination with UFOs goes far beyond the show. It’s something that’s been part of his family for generations.

    “My mother had a sighting in Ottawa in 1947,” he recalled. “She was walking down Spark Street after work — she was a secretary for the Minister of Munitions and Supply during World War II — and she looked up and saw an orb, like a Christmas tree bulb blinking green and red. It hovered there for almost a minute before shooting straight up into the sky and disappearing.”

    He said those stories stuck with him — the magazines she kept around the house, the headlines about alien encounters — and eventually led to his own experiences. “I had a sighting in Martha’s Vineyard with three other people,” he said. “Two glowing orbs moving in formation across the night sky — silent, fast, deliberate. I woke everyone up to see it. You could tell it wasn’t a meteor. It was directed flight. I’d say they were moving 20,000 miles an hour.”

    He continued, “Then there was one in Montreal. My friend and I were in a hotel room, 20th floor, looking out over the St. Lawrence River. We saw this gray, rectangular object — probably 150 feet long — just hovering outside the window. It had lights underneath, like a bunch of grapes, and made no sound at all. It slowly turned and drifted away over the river until it vanished. It was beautiful, really.”

    And as if that weren’t enough, there was one more. “Years later on my farm, I saw this little red light above the power lines. I thought it was a helicopter checking the cables, but then it started moving over the lake — completely silent. I flashed my headlights, and it came right over me. Seventy feet up, no sound, no propulsion, just light. It hovered there for a few seconds, then drifted away. I wasn’t scared,” he said. “I was just fascinated. I think they were recharging — maybe drawing power from the lines. The other one in Montreal? Probably just sightseeing.”

    He laughed. “I don’t think I was chosen or anything. I just happened to be looking in the right direction.”

    With the U.S. government now openly discussing “UAPs,” or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, I asked if the rebranding and new transparency felt validating.

    “It does,” Aykroyd said. “I think the new term — unexplainable aerial platform — just sounds more scientific. I call them hyperdynamic, super-advanced vessels operated by who knows what or who. Nobody knows for sure, and I’m not going to presume to say who’s behind the wheel. But yes, it’s validating. For years people like me have been talking about these things, and now governments are admitting: we can’t explain it either.”

    For Aykroyd, this fascination isn’t about fear — it’s about curiosity and humility.

    “Why did they land in a schoolyard?” he wondered aloud. “Maybe innocence is where truth lives. Maybe they were reminding us of something about our planet, about empathy. Whatever they are, they keep us asking questions — and that’s what keeps us human.”

    Before we wrapped, Aykroyd offered one last grin and a perfectly on-brand sign-off:
    “If you do consume beverage alcohol,” he said, “remember Crystal Head Vodka. Made in Canada. Zero additives. Only sixty-five calories a shot.”

    Even after decades of fame, film, and fascination, Dan Aykroyd remains exactly what you hope he’d be — equal parts believer, entertainer, and storyteller, still looking to the skies and asking the right questions.

    Brad Gilmore

    Source link

  • Dan Aykroyd says estates of late stars should be compensated for AI-generated videos – National | Globalnews.ca

    Dan Aykroyd says he’s not opposed to an AI-generated alter ego extending his screen career into the afterlife.

    The “Ghostbusters” star and founding “SNL” cast-member says he’d be open to the idea as long as his estate is compensated for any likenesses created by artificial intelligence.

    Aykroyd is currently hosting a second season of the History Channel’s wild-but-true series “The UnBelievable with Dan Aykroyd,” which he mused could be a good candidate for such experiments.

    “Certainly if History Channel and AI want to generate me after I’m gone and have me out there doing the show, they can. But they have to pay my estate, my family, to do so,” Aykroyd said in a recent video call from his family’s Ontario farm in the Thousand Islands.

    Aykroyd floated the notion when asked for his thoughts on a proliferation of online videos in which late stars are posthumously positioned in invented scenarios, among them Tupac Shakur, Sammy Davis Jr., Michael Jackson and Robin Williams, whose daughter recently lambasted the trend.

    Story continues below advertisement


    Dan Aykroyd is shown in this undated handout image from The History Channel series “The UnBelievable with Dan Aykroyd.”

    Handout/The Canadian Press

    Aykroyd said it’s up to legal reps for deceased stars to go after platforms that run unauthorized material, drawing an analogy to copyright violations in music.

    Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

    Get daily National news

    Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

    “The legal representatives of these individuals are going to have to go to the carriers and say there has to be some kind of rights compensation,” Aykroyd said.

    Aykroyd executive produces History’s non-fiction series in which wild historical events are dramatized with archival images and re-enactments, and bolstered with expert commentary.

    An episode breakdown for this season touts tales about wild prison escapes, a family cursed with blue skin and the time a lawn mower killed a spectator at a football game.

    “A lot of these stories bring up an interest in history, in science and technology and (the combination of) information, education and entertainment, I think, makes for a very great success,” says the Ottawa native, who splits his time with Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts.

    Story continues below advertisement

    New episodes air Fridays and stream on StackTV.

    Aykroyd also appears on Flavour Network’s “A History of the World in Six Glasses,” streaming on StackTV.

    That series dovetails with his expertise in spirits as co-founder of Crystal Head Vodka, which he proudly says is made in Newfoundland.


    Aykroyd suspects a buy-local movement has helped domestic sales of the product famous for its skull-shaped bottle, as cross-border economic tensions largely removed U.S. alcohol from Canadian store shelves, bars and restaurants.

    He bemoaned sovereignty threats and ongoing U.S. tariffs on some Canadian goods, but said he’s mindful of preserving his vodka’s U.S. sales.

    “We want to keep our market in the States alive. It’s too bad that this is where we’re at,” said Aykroyd.

    “But obviously the U.S. administration sees that they can get revenues and certainly I think some tariff adjustment was necessary in some of the bigger industries.

    “As far as Canada becoming the 51st state, I will say that Canada is not for sale, but we do have lots of things to sell. So I encourage the chief executive of the United States, who is a deal-maker going way back in his career, to come up and make some deals and accept our deals.”

    &copy 2025 The Canadian Press

    Globalnews Digital

    Source link

  • Dan Aykroyd Calls ‘Saturday Night’ Movie a “Stand-Alone Masterpiece”

    Dan Aykroyd Calls ‘Saturday Night’ Movie a “Stand-Alone Masterpiece”

    Dan Aykroyd has officially given Saturday Night his stamp of approval.

    The actor and original Saturday Night Live castmember took to X, formerly Twitter, on Friday to share his thoughts on director Jason Reitman‘s latest film, which centers on the 90 minutes leading up to the sketch comedy show’s first broadcast in 1975.

    “Cracking a Head to applaud Jason Reitman’s triumphant SNL film. Wow!” Aykroyd wrote after watching the movie at his local theater. “What a propulsive, engaging, funny, beautifully cast and acted, suspenseful, adventurous, music-filled ride.  A perfect window into the creative process at its highest level. Pretty accurate too.”

    The Ghostbusters actor continued, “I was there that night and got to relive it wonderfully again. Congratulations Gil, Jason and Blumie. Don’t miss it whether you know the show or not. It is a stand-alone masterpiece and surefire candidate for Best Picture.”

    Saturday Night takes place on Oct. 11, 1975, the day SNL premiered, and follows a ferocious troupe of young comedians and writers who change television forever. Dylan O’Brien plays Aykroyd, alongside Gabriel LaBelle (Lorne Michaels), Rachel Sennott (Rosie Shuster), Cory Michael Smith (Chevy Chase), Ella Hunt (Gilda Radner), Emily Fairn (Laraine Newman), Matt Wood (John Belushi), Lamorne Morris (Garrett Morris), Kim Matula (Jane Curtin), Nicholas Braun (Andy Kaufman) and Andrew Barth Feldman (Neil Levy).

    Reitman previously told The Hollywood Reporter that finding the movie’s Aykroyd was the most difficult, saying, “It was genuinely scary.” The filmmaker said the actor had a “very unique sex appeal,” so when he learned that “there was an appreciation of Dylan O’Brien” among women, Reitman knew he found the right guy for the role.

    Aykroyd also noted on social media that he was “excited to see how Jason’s hilarious yet suspenseful story turned out” because he was the “only original crew member who had a chance to read the script.”

    Saturday Night is currently playing in theaters.

    Carly Thomas

    Source link

  • Dan Aykroyd Defends ‘Ghostbusters’ All-Female Reboot Starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig

    Dan Aykroyd Defends ‘Ghostbusters’ All-Female Reboot Starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig

    Dan Aykroyd, one of the original Ghostbusters, is defending 2016’s all-female reboot of Ghostbusters, which was met with racist and sexist criticism from online trolls following its debut.

    The actor and screenwriter, who starred as Dr. Ray Stantz in the 1984 movie as well as penned the script, opened up in a recent interview with People about his appreciation for the entire franchise, including the Paul Feig-directed installment starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones.

    “I liked the movie Paul Feig made with those spectacular women,” Aykroyd said. “I was mad at them at the time because I was supposed to be a producer on there and I didn’t do my job and I didn’t argue about costs. And it cost perhaps more than it should, and they all do. All these movies do.”

    “But boy, I liked that film,” the Saturday Night Live alum continued. “I thought that the villain at the end was great. I loved so much of it. And of course, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones and Melissa McCarthy and Kristen Wiig, you’re never going to do better than that. So I go on the record as saying I’m so proud to have been able to license that movie and have a hand and have a part in it, and I’m fully supportive of it, and I don’t besmirch it at all. I think it works really great amongst all the ones that have been made.”

    The cast of the 2016 reboot have previously spoken out about the hateful comments they received, including McCarthy and Jones. The latter recalled the “online abuse” in her memoir, Leslie F*cking Jones, last year, saying she “got taken through the ringer.”

    “Why are people being so evil to each other? How can you sit and type ‘I want to kill you.’ Who does that?” Jones added in her memoir. “Sad keyboard warriors living in their mother’s basements hated the fact that this hallowed work of perfect art now featured — gasp! horror! — women in the lead roles. Worst of all, of course, was that one of the lead characters was a Black woman. For some men this was the final straw.”

    At the time, the Coming 2 America star also slammed Jason Reitman, the director of 2021’s Ghostbusters: Afterlife, for saying he was “not making the Juno of Ghostbusters movies” and was “trying to go back to original technique and hand the movie back to the fans.”

    Though Reitman later clarified that his comments “came out wrong,” Jones wrote in her memoir that “the damage was done.”

    Carly Thomas

    Source link

  • Reviews For The Easily Distracted: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire

    Reviews For The Easily Distracted: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire

    Title: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire

    Describe This Movie In One Fake Watchmen Quote:

    DR. MANHATTAN: The year is 1989, I am watching Road House and the new Ghostbusters. The year is 2024, I am watching Road House and the new Ghostbusters.

    Brief Plot Synopsis: Ghooooooooost ice.

    Rating Using Random Objects Relevant To The Film: 2.5 Honk If You’re Horny marquees out of 5.

    Tagline: N/A

    Better Tagline: “There are *non-evil* Spin Doctors CDs?”

    Not So Brief Plot Synopsis: When last we left the Grooberson/Spenglers (Paul Rudd, Carrie Coon, Finn Wolfhard — if that’s his real name —, McKenna Grace), they were in Oklahoma. So how they came to occupy Ghostbusters HQ in New York City is an exercise best left to those unconcerned with the appearance of an ancient freeze god. Or that same god’s connection to an antiquarian adventurers’ society. And if none of that interests you, just hang around and maybe Venkman will show up.“Critical” Analysis: Most film franchises operate on a principle of diminishing returns. The original entries are (usually rightfully) fondly remembered, and followed by the inevitable cash grab. Subsequent movies fail to capture that initial magic (though may be perfectly okay in their own regard), while the series limps along until the nostalgia is no longer profitable.

    Is Ghostbusters at this stage yet? Probably not, but you can see the end from here. Frozen Empire doesn’t wallow in nostalgia the way Afterlife did, and follows a (mostly) more coherent story, while many of the movie’s good feelings come from the return of the original Busters.

    The weight of the film is largely carried by Grace’s Phoebe, who chafes at being excluded from the specter battling shenanigans because of New York’s strict paranormal child labor laws, or something. Her relationship with a young ghost (Emily Alyn Lind) looking to reunite with her family grounds the story, but is that a good thing? Haven’t all the GB films aside from the original and 2016 been too emotionally heavy?

    And what the hell is Podcast (Logan Kim) doing here? Getting past the fact his name is “Podcast,” why is he in NYC at all? For that matter, why is Trevor’s erstwhile girlfriend Lucky (Celeste O’Connor)? It’s understandable that Callie and the kids would want to return to her father Egon’s haunted home, but these two feel like child endangerment.

    Which is also the angle used by the NYC Mayor (hint: you know him, you loathe him, from such ’80s classics as Die Hard and Real Genius) to threaten to shut the Ghostbusters down for good. It’s slightly less egregious an offense than making Phoebe your main character and relegating her to fourth banana on the movie poster.

    click to enlarge

    A perfect time to say they’re “getting too old for this.”

    As a direct sequel to Afterlife, Frozen Empire’s an improvement. It doesn’t wallow in nostalgia as much, and when it does, it’s with a respectable amount of irreverence. Yes, the original (surviving) Ghostbusters all return, capably aided by Janine (Annie Potts), but with actual meat on the bones for the roles of Ray (Dan Aykroyd) and Winston (Ernie Hudson).

    Bill Murray returns, too. He’s introduced in one of the movie’s many callbacks (the ESP testing scene) but is otherwise used sparingly. It’s definitely the correct approach, as a little Venkman goes a long way.

    At least he’s having a good time. Frozen Empire suffers from the same problem of just about the rest of the GB sequels: it takes itself so seriously. It’s still a comedy, but there’s little of the anarchic whimsy that was a highlight of the 1984 original. In addition to Grace, Coon has the best arc, balancing her kids’ desire to follow in granddad’s footsteps with attempting to be a responsible mother.

    And yet it all feels weirdly abbreviated. The original Ghostbusters went out of its way to show the city-wide effects of a trans-dimensional cross-rip, but aside from one establishing shot, we don’t get any real feel for the effects of an extra-dimensional god releasing the spectral hounds. There’s no rallying the city behind the Ghostbusters (until the end), and no real connection between the rise of our unfriendly god with anyone beyond the movie’s inner circle.

    But writers Jason Reitman and Gil Kenan (who also directs) have their formula. The core of this group can stick around for multiple flicks, or until Wolfhard gets bored or Grace wises up.

    Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire is in theaters today.

    Pete Vonder Haar

    Source link

  • We’re Half-Awake in Our Fake (Ghostbusters: Frozen) Empire

    We’re Half-Awake in Our Fake (Ghostbusters: Frozen) Empire

    It would be impossible to look at the latest installment in the Ghostbusters “legacyquel” without ruminating on the franchise’s past. In fact, Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire seems to immediately want its audience to reflect not only on the story’s history, but also New York’s itself. Hence, director and co-writer Gil Kenan (writing alongside “Ivan’s boy” Jason Reitman) commences the tale in New York, 1904. Specifically, at the Ghostbusters firehouse, long before it ever became that. Instead, it’s but an ordinary firehouse, where we see firefighters being dispatched to a members only club for the colonialist-type rich fucks who liked to show one another their stolen/pillaged spoils after returning from far-flung, overpriced adventures.

    Among the spoils during this session is a metal sphere (made, more to the point, of copper). One that, unbeknownst to the richies, imprisons the ancient warrior known as Garraka. A supernatural being who gained the power to freeze empires like the one he was proverbially “iced out” of even after fighting for it. In this regard, part of the movie’s message seems to be that you should reward people for the work they do rather than punish them for it, otherwise they end up stealing your sex tape and selling it on a still-germinal internet. Or, in this case, freezing all of New York. 

    Which Garraka came close to doing in 1904, but only managed to freeze the entire room, at which point a mysterious ancient soldier-looking guy (or gal) in the corner appears to have regained control of the orb, startling the investigating firefighters when he opens his eyes abruptly. The “authorities,” of course, are useless in matters such as these (and most others), and end up getting partially frozen as well. 

    That general uselessness is also conveyed in the next scene, when the Spengler family, now consisting of Gary Grooberson (Paul Rudd), Callie Spengler (Carrie Coon), Trevor Spengler (Finn Wolfhard) and Phoebe Spengler (Mckenna Grace), speeds down a busy NYC street wreaking havoc in pursuit of a ghostly dragon. The police watch them whiz by, eager to let them handle it without interfering, lest any blame or responsibility be put on them. Indeed, one of the main distinctions between present-day New York and 80s-era New York is how much more concerned the former is with property damage. If one thought that concern was bad in the 80s, it certainly seems tenfold now. This speaking to both a lack of punk rockness in local government (long gone are the days of Ed Koch) and a general vibe of empty coffers everywhere despite constantly collecting from the public.

    Things in New York have gotten so “by the book,” in fact, that Walter Peck (William Atherton), reprising his role from Ghostbusters, even prevents Phoebe from continuing to work as a Ghostbuster by citing her involvement as child labor. Considering how much ghostbusting has become a major aspect of her identity, this little shutdown enrages her to no end. Because in the time since 2021’s Ghostbusters: Afterlife, Phoebe has come even more into her own on the ghostbusting front, while Trevor is clearly meant to be the beleaguered do-nothing of the operation. And, despite being certain to tell his mother he’s eighteen now and can’t be told what to do, it would seem he doesn’t know how to function otherwise. 

    In the midst of this dynamic, Gary is trying to find his footing on the shaky ground between “Mother’s boyfriend” and full-on “dad.” This cast of main characters is rounded out by a quartet of OGs from the original films: Ray Stantz (Dan Aykroyd), Winston Zeddemore (Ernie Hudson), Peter Venkman (Bill Murray, whose abuse allegations couldn’t shake him from this gig) and Janine Melnitz (Annie Potts). The latter clearly subbing out for the spot where Egon Spengler (Harold Ramis) used to be (and since his ghost was already used as a gimmick in Afterlife, Melnitz was up to bat). 

    As if that weren’t already enough main characters to “service,” so to speak, another important character, Nadeem Razmaadi (Kumail Nanjiani), is introduced as the “Firemaster”—an obvious nod to the Keymaster role that Louis Tully (Rick Moranis) took on in 1984’s Ghostbusters. Then there is Phoebe’s new ghost friend, Melody (Emily Alyn Lind, who also appears in another New York-related reboot, Gossip Girl). She makes Phoebe’s acquaintance after trying to scare her during a game of ghost chess in Washington Square Park (miraculously deserted at night, even though it never is in real life). And it doesn’t take long for things between them to quickly start leaning toward a sexual tension vibe, just one of many “modern updates” to the franchise. 

    Somewhere in between all these cast members is stuffed yet another character: New York. Because Ghostbusters is to NYC as Sex and the City is—it would be difficult to reconcile one without the other (though that’s what audiences did for Afterlife). And yet, perhaps the only truly standout scenes involving the city from Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire are, as we already saw in the trailer, the moment when the lion of the NYPL (who, what do you know, additionally cameos in the Sex and the City movie) comes to life and attacks and the moment when the Wonder Wheel is stopped, just before those frolicking in the dubious waters of Coney Island are sent running for the sand again as the “death chill” invoked from Garraka proceeds to freeze everything. Unfortunately, Bananarama’s “Cruel Summer” is only playing in the trailer and not the actual movie when this all goes down. 

    As for the buildup to Garraka’s inevitable unleashing from the sphere, which is sold to Ray by Nadeem, who mentions it was part of his now-dead grandma’s collection, it’s filled with ominous forewarnings. Including the fact that the Containment Unit is starting to act a bit, let’s say, fickle when additional ghosts are deposited. Phoebe, realizing that the chamber hasn’t been “cleansed” since it was first installed, asks the valid question of whether or not anyone considered what that might result in without a backup plan. Melnitz is the first to quip, “It was the 80s, people weren’t thinkin’ too much about the future.” Except, apparently, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale when they wrote Back to the Future. Faint allusions to the headier days of NYC life are also made by Melnitz when she says that a bunch of homeless people in the 90s ripped off any copper they might have had at the firehouse. Brass—another metal agent known for trapping demonic and supernatural forces—will have to do for outfitting the proton packs in a way that will have any kind of effect on Garraka. Specifically, the brass Phoebe siphons from the pole they usually slide down when there’s a specter-related emergency. 

    While there is some sense of “all hell breaking loose” (even though it’s ice we’re talking about), there’s also a generally blasé attitude about the bizarre goings-on. Even when the lion comes to life at the New York Public Library, there isn’t that much shock about it from any passersby. This portrayal being almost like a subconscious nod to how desensitized New Yorkers have become to all calamities. Half-awake in their increasingly fake empire, as it were (side note: never forget the on-the-nose absurdity of Barack Obama actually using an instrumental version of The National’s “Fake Empire” for an election campaign video—of which Aaron Dessner remarked, “When they first asked permission to use ‘Fake Empire’ we wondered, ‘Do they know it’s about how fucked up America is and wanting to leave?’”). 

    But perhaps the threat of The Day After Tomorrow-esque plot of Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire could be enough to shake them from their half-awake reverie (for, yes, one can’t help but feel a subliminal climate change message here). If not, perhaps there are worse fates than freezing to death. Like OD’ing on nostalgia because looking to the future seems to be a lost cause. To put it in The National lead vocalist Matt Berninger’s words, “…you can’t deal with the reality of what’s really going on, so let’s just pretend that the world’s full of bluebirds and ice skating.” Oh so much ice skating in this particular scenario.

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Crossroads and Britney Spears As Unwilling Method Actor

    Crossroads and Britney Spears As Unwilling Method Actor

    Of all the films Britney Spears could have “gone all Method” for, a “frothy” (but actually fundamentally deep) teen road movie called Crossroads probably wouldn’t have seemed worth it to most “serious” actors. Or even “serious” moviegoers. And Spears would likely tell you that her sudden “morphing” into Lucy Wagner on and off the set had nothing to do with acting, so much as “what acting did to [her] mind.” As Spears retells it in The Woman in Me, “I think I started Method acting—only I didn’t know how to break out of my character. I really became this other person. Some people do Method acting, but they’re usually aware of the fact that they’re doing it. But I didn’t have any separation at all.” 

    Spears’ unwitting (and unwilling) commitment to the “character” (not so far off from herself if the dancing to Madonna in her underwear scene is an indication), however, was not very appreciated by critics. Most of whom panned the project as shallow, insipid teen girl bullshit that served as a thinly-veiled puff piece for Spears. They even went so far as to deride her positive messaging about a girl finding her voice amid a world of oppressive patriarchal figures, with one female critic insisting, “…the film’s mealy-mouthed messages about feminine empowerment will almost certainly fall on deaf ears, since even eleven-year-olds know Spears’ power resides largely in her taut torso.” Indeed, Crossroads was lumped together with the badness of another film starring a pop star around the same time: Glitter. But at least Brit’s movie had the benefit of being released several months after 9/11, instead of just ten days later (with its soundtrack also being released on 9/11). And yes, both movies are, to this day, often shown as a campy double bill. But that’s not really fair to Crossroads. Because Spears’ performance does offer an emotional intelligence that Carey’s simply does not (despite her having “lived the tale” of a sob story childhood and subsequent breaking into the music business with the help of a possessive producer…in this case, Timothy Walker [Terrence Howard], before the plot becomes more A Star Is Born when another producer, Julian “Dice” Black [Max Beesley], enters the picture). And while, like Carey’s film project, there are similarities between Spears and the lead character (including an oppressive father steering the course of her life and keeping her from doing normal “teen girl things” or how Lucy spells “dryer” as “drier”), the difference is that one can see Spears isn’t relying on their similarities as her sole crutch for playing this part. 

    In fact, what she relied on for the role appears to be something far closer to the divine. Laugh as movie critics might at such an assessment. But when Spears writes, “This is embarrassing to say, but it’s like a cloud or something came over me and I just became this girl named Lucy,” there’s no arguing that something more mystical was involved. Even if that “mysticism” related to her mind’s power. Spears continued, “When the camera came on, I was her, and then I couldn’t tell the difference between when the camera was on and when it wasn’t. I know that seems stupid, but it’s the truth. I took it that seriously. I took it seriously to the point where Justin [Timberlake] said, ‘Why are you walking like that? Who are you?’” Yet another small anecdote that makes Justin come across like kind of an asshole for basically making fun of her uncontrollable commitment to the part in a movie that found room for her to show support for Justin’s goddamn boy band. All simply by placing “Bye Bye Bye” at the center of a light-heartedly contentious scene over what music her and her friends want to listen to while their driver/Lucy’s budding love interest, Ben Kimble (Anson Mount), keeps trying to change the station back to his “angsty rock” music (this, by the way, was the crux of warring musical identities in the late 90s and early 00s). 

    And though detractors would also argue that Spears does little to stretch her acting abilities in a role that finds her character auditioning for a record contract, the character biography Spears herself took pains to write in Britney Spears’ Crossroads Diary wouldn’t have been so thorough in spelling out the differences if she didn’t feel intrinsically separate from this person. Specifically, she states, “I play Lucy, an only child who lives with her dad, Pete, in a small town in Georgia. Lucy’s parents got divorced when she was much younger, and her mom lives out in Arizona. They don’t communicate. Lucy is the kind of girl who doesn’t make waves. She’s spent her whole life following the path her dad has laid out for her. She’s smart and gets good grades: she’s planning to be a doctor. But she really loves to sing and to write. She’s a poet and is kind of obsessive about her journal.” While it can be pointed out that, in many regards, Spears, too, was a girl who didn’t make waves, always listening to “the adults” and doing what she was told despite being the true agent of her success (Spears herself admits in The Woman in Me, “I was committed to not rocking the boat, and to not complaining even when something upset me”), Lucy is more overtly obedient and, yes, virginal. In fact, that’s the word one of her ex-friends, Kit (Zoe Saldana), hurls at her as an insult in the hallway of the school. In contrast to Spears, who played with that persona of being virginal via more sexually-tinged irony, Lucy is someone who wants her first time to be special, even though her high school lab partner, Henry (Justin Long), desperately wants her to keep her word that they’ll lose their virginity to one another so as not to go off to college all “naive.” 

    Lucy’s naïveté is also something that sets her apart from Spears, who, by age twenty in 2001 (the year the movie was being made and the Britney album was released), was already plenty worldly—and about to get even more so in the wake of Justin’s imminent portrayal of her as a “harlot” to his “golden boy” in the 2002 song (and video), “Cry Me A River.” The Diane Sawyer interview of 2003 would turn that worldliness into all-out jadedness. That all of this happened after Crossroads seemed cruelly poetic in that the film is about a teenage girl coming to terms with the terrifying responsibilities and potential landmines of womanhood. But what Spears endured was above and beyond the conventional horrors of becoming a woman. Lucy was lucky that, as a civilian (at least in the story we get to see before she potentially lands a record deal), she would never have to know what it was to be scrutinized not just over her body, but over every minute detail of her personal life. Besides, Lucy’s sartorial style isn’t exactly in keeping with Spears’, who also commented on that in Britney Spears’ Crossroads Diary by saying, “[My assistant,] Fe calls [Lucy’s clothes] ‘casual frumpy’—jeans, sneakers, cotton button-down shirt under a sweatshirt. Accessorized with a yellow canvas pocketbook and a bucket cap. They’re the opposite of what I usually wear.” To be sure, even when Spears’ was “off-duty,” she was always fond of low-rise, midriff-baring ensembles. 

    And then there was Lucy’s inherent knowledge of all things automotive thanks to her dad (Dan Aykroyd) being a mechanic. As Spears is sure to call out in her diary, “Me? Let’s just say that on a recent road escapade with Felicia, it took the two of us twenty minutes to figure out how to put gas in the car!” So yes, there are many nuanced differences between the two women, ones that ultimately overtook Spears’ own spirit for quite some time. 

    It was, apparently, CVS that cured her. Or rather, buying some makeup there with a friend. As Spears recalls, “After the movie wrapped, one of my girlfriends from a club in LA came to visit me. We went to CVS. I swear to God, I walked into the store, and as I talked to her while we shopped, I finally came back to myself. When I came outside again I was cured of the spell that movie had cast. It was so strange. My little spirit showed back up in my body. That trip to buy makeup with my friend was like waving some magic wand.” Undeniably, this is what would be called a symptom of psychosis. Schizophrenia even. And yes, Spears’ tendency to bisect her personality as a defense mechanism came into play early on here. With her portrayal of Lucy, Spears tapped into that precarious split between thinking, memory, personality and perception. As such, Spears put it best when she said, “All I can say is it’s a good thing Lucy was a sweet girl writing poems about how she was ‘not a girl, not yet a woman,’ and not a serial killer. I ended up walking differently, carrying myself differently, talking differently. I was someone else for months while I filmed Crossroads.”

    This was something she seemed to notice and give voice to even at the time of filming, with one entry in her diary noting, “I’m doing another one of those really hard scenes. I’m crying and talking to Anson (Ben). It’s very emotional. I couldn’t pick my spirits up afterward.” The scene in question happens after Lucy’s mother (played by Kim Cattrall, though, at the time, there were rumors Madonna would do it—as if!) tells her that she never wanted her in the first place—that her father “made her” have a baby. Meanwhile she appears perfectly happy with her new set of children in Tucson. Spears describes getting into character for the emotionalism of that scene, explaining, “How did I do it? I remembered things that made me sad, but mostly I just put myself in Lucy’s place. I thought about how I’d feel if my mom didn’t love me, and I just hurt for her. Feeling the way Lucy would feel brought on the tears.” Tragically enough, it can presently be argued that maybe Lynne Spears really didn’t love Britney all that much to allow what happened to her with the conservatorship. Not just allow it, but help conspire to make it happen. 

    While Lynne made plenty of appearances on the set, it was, as usual, Spears’ assistant, Felicia, who was the most ever-present. It was she who prompted Spears to write, “She told me that she can see me getting more confident about acting. It’s true, I’m less worried about all this movie stuff—sometimes I even feel like an old pro!” That seemed to be true enough when, soon after Crossroads, she auditioned for the role of Allie in The Notebook. It came down to her and Rachel McAdams, with the latter obviously winning out. A result Spears was pleased with, commenting, “…I’m glad I didn’t do it. If I had, instead of working on my album In the Zone I’d have been acting like a 1940s heiress night and day. “Although Spears was briefly hoping to make a “proper go” of becoming a singer/actress, in The Woman in Me, she concludes of that profession, “I hope I never get close to that occupational hazard again. Living that way, being half yourself and half a fictional character, is messed up. After a while you don’t know what’s real anymore.”

    Funnily enough, Spears could just as easily be describing the bifurcation between her stage persona and her real self or, during her early Instagram days when the conservatorship was still not being questioned, her social media self and her real self. Thus, the great search for “the real Britney” has been a decades-long one.

    As for Crossroads and what she sacrificed emotionally for it, it obviously still means something to Spears. Not only because she goes into such detail about it in her memoir, but because it was the only attempt at promoting the book Spears offered up: rereleasing Crossroads in theaters (in addition to a special edition of the soundtrack…with NSYNC’s “Bye Bye Bye” still noticeably missing). Once again, however, it went unappreciated. Audiences just can’t seem to appropriately embrace or honor Spears’ uncontrollable Method acting abilities. 

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Ghostbusters is based on one actor’s spooky family history (16 Photos)

    Ghostbusters is based on one actor’s spooky family history (16 Photos)

    When there’s something strange, in your neighbourhood, who ya gonna call? The University of Manitoba Archives! Wait, what?

    As it turns out, that may not be such a bad idea since one Ghostbuster had several pieces of his family’s history with the paranormal donated to the university.

    Jon

    Source link