ReportWire

Tag: culture

  • Sphere’s ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Walks an Uneasy Line Between Cinematic Enchantment and A.I. Slop

    [ad_1]

    A.I. restoration makes landscapes sharper, but it also pushes Dorothy, her friends and especially the extras toward an uncanny smoothness that feels oddly post-human. Photo: Stephen Garrett for Observer

    Anyone unimpressed with Glinda’s newly gifted vehicular spherical globe in Wicked: For Good might follow the Yellow Brick Road to Las Vegas and its own magic bubble. James Dolan’s Sphere, known mainly for hosting live concerts, is currently the home of a wildly distended, dazzlingly supersized and grotesquely manipulated version of 1939’s classic film The Wizard of Oz.

    All the action unfolds on a 160,000-square-foot LED screen with 16K resolution, dominating its viewers with an image over 300 feet high. (IMAX, eat your heart out.) Capacity for the event is 10,000 for each screening, and audiences have been coming in droves since it opened on August 28. The initial run-through, scheduled to end on March 31, has now been extended through May.

    Not quite the cinematic reinterpretation that the pair of Wicked films offer, this newly bedazzled curio—known formally as The Wizard of Oz at Sphere and presented in 4D—is, in its own way, just as subversive, if not downright corny. Brace for a teeth-rattling tornado sequence with actual wind machines blowing debris all around while your haptic seat shakes and quivers! Dodge the Styrofoam apples that fall from the ceiling when the sentient trees throw their fruit at Dorothy! Feel the Great and Powerful Oz thunder his declarations while white flashes and bursts of flames pop around the venue’s perimeter! And are those mannequin-sized drones buzzing overhead doubling as flying monkeys?

    The butchery is undeniable: This Sphere-ified Oz is 75 minutes long, nearly 30 minutes shorter than the beloved classic. Hope you’re not a big fan of the Cowardly Lion, because his song about being the King of the Forest is totally gone. Other nips and tucks include less time with the villainous Almira Gulch, a truncated visit to Professor Marvel, shortened conversations with Glinda the Good, a condensed version of “Ding-Dong the Witch is Dead,” plus abbreviated introductions to the Scarecrow, the Tin Man and the Cowardly Lion.

    A dark, stormy sky hangs over a massive fortress-like castle as a line of uniformed guards marches across a bridge toward its gate, evoking the Wicked Witch’s castle from The Wizard of Oz.A dark, stormy sky hangs over a massive fortress-like castle as a line of uniformed guards marches across a bridge toward its gate, evoking the Wicked Witch’s castle from The Wizard of Oz.
    Sphere’s version heightens every iconic sequence, amplifying the story’s visual drama far beyond the original. Photo: Stephen Garrett for Observer

    But there’s more than enough spectacle to impress. The film is literally expanded in all directions, giving a truly immersive dimension to Hollywood’s adaptation of Frank L. Baum’s fairy tale. You think the Tin Man gets buffed and shined in the Emerald City? This Oz is digitally zhuzhed and A.I.-enhanced beyond belief, with beautifully crisp landscapes and buildings that feel uncannily real.

    Sepia-toned Kansas is even more starkly handsome, with razor-sharp bales of hay, lifelike barnyard chickens and cows and an expansive copper sky overhead. When Dorothy sings about happy little bluebirds in “Over the Rainbow,” one of those chirping warblers is now soaring above to match her upward gaze.

    And when that twister uses its gale-force winds to lift up Dorothy’s house, we’re no longer on the inside looking out; now we’re in the eye of the storm, watching not only the house fly by but also swirling bovines, airborne men in a rowboat and—in an extended version of the iconic sequence—a bicycling Ms. Gulch transformed into the broomstick-riding Wicked Witch of the West. (Look straight up at Sphere’s domed ceiling, by the way, and you can see right out of the tornado’s cylindrical form and notice a perfectly calm circle of sky.)

    One set piece after another amazes. The Yellow Brick Road looks newly-paved in its bright canary hue; the merry old Land of Oz has vast rolling hills and picture-perfect mountains; candy-colored Munchkinland is an absolutely vibrant village; the Haunted Forest has a vividly menacing darkness; And the Emerald City, with extended towers and ornately expanded walls, shimmers in all its Art Deco glory. The Wizard’s vast, dark green Chamber now has a skylight; the Wicked Witch’s castle looms with extra wickedness. And the ruby slippers shine with vibrant intensity. The glammed-up production design is absolutely astounding.

    There’s only one problem, and it’s a big one: the cast. No amount of digital wizardry (yet) can convincingly re-render actual 1939-era actors into a 2025 production. You can only upconvert the visual resolution of the film’s characters so much—completely wiping away the film grain eliminates skin pores, leaving faces eerily smooth and plastic.

    Dorothy and her trio look like they’ve been peeled off the impeccably revivified Yellow Brick Road and then placed back, like sticker-book figurines. There’s a loss of gravity to their movements. At times, they even seem to be floating. Toto, too, with his shock of matted fur, seems digitally fuzzy. And other people have garish enhancements: the Wicked Witch suddenly has a hugely prominent black hair growing out of the mole on her green chin.

    Even worse are the background actors. The main reason why so many scenes were trimmed and cut from the original film wasn’t necessarily to tighten up the running time; it was also to cannibalize the Extras and reinsert them on the left and right sides of the newly extended, digitally enhanced scenery.

    So Munchkinland now has crowds of people standing behind Dorothy, in an A.I.-sweetened loop where they rock back and forth, waving their arms or shifting their weight endlessly in a computer-generated spell that prolongs their screen time. Some of the Extras’ faces look smeared and oddly deformed, due to those same A.I. enhancements. More than a few times, they even stare, with dead-eyed smiles, straight into the camera. It’s deeply unsettling and more than a little distracting.

    A giant projected head with greenish skin and glowing eyes looms over fiery bursts of red smoke, representing the exaggerated Wizard figure in Sphere’s reimagined version of the film.A giant projected head with greenish skin and glowing eyes looms over fiery bursts of red smoke, representing the exaggerated Wizard figure in Sphere’s reimagined version of the film.
    A.I. augmentation brings new clarity and scale to the film’s world, even as it introduces uncanny distortions. Photo: Stephen Garrett for Observer

    Intriguingly, many scenes have less editing in them: instead of cutting between the Tin Man’s solo dance and a shot of Dorothy and the Scarecrow watching him, for example, all three of them now share the same enormous frame—the Tin Man in the middle, Dorothy and the Scarecrow on the right. Thanks again to A.I., the Tin Man’s entire dance routine is seamless. But now Dorothy and the Scarecrow’s sight lines don’t match. Dorothy actually looks a bit bored, and seems to be staring off into the distance.

    Worst of all is how A.I. has compromised the film’s emotionally poignant climax. In the original film, when Dorothy says goodbye to her companions, the camera fills the frame with them one at a time for each tender farewell. At Sphere, all three stand in a row, waiting for Dorothy to talk to them. Weirdly, each one is slightly out of focus—and each only comes into focus once Dorothy starts to talk to them. When she stops talking to them, they stop emoting and go back out of focus. Then, like the Extras, each one goes into a powered-down mode, shifting back and forth as though in a trance.

    As an example of cutting-edge technology used to turn a national cultural treasure into a gloriously kinetic thrill ride, The Wizard of Oz at Sphere is certainly great and powerful. As a tool for enhancing the power of human connection through storytelling, it needs to keep waving its magic wands. We’re definitely not in Kansas anymore, but we still have a long way to go before we get to Oz.

    Sphere’s ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Walks an Uneasy Line Between Cinematic Enchantment and A.I. Slop

    [ad_2]

    Stephen Garrett

    Source link

  • Opera Traditionalists Will Adore the Met’s Opulent 1980s ‘Arabella’

    [ad_1]

    Evan LeRoy Johnson, Julie Roset, Ben Brady and Ricardo José Rivera as Count Elemer, Fiakermilli, Count Lamoral and Count Dominick. Photo: Marty Sohl/Met Opera

    The Metropolitan Opera’s production style from the 1970s through the 1990s could best be described as lavishly (and expensively) realistic. Audiences enthusiastically applauded works luxuriously mounted by Franco Zeffirelli, who embraced primarily Italian opera, and Otto Schenk, who took care of German opera—most notably Wagner’s masterpieces. Since Peter Gelb took over in 2006, however, there’s been a determined shift toward a sparer, cheaper, more contemporary aesthetic, one that hasn’t always been welcomed by conservative Met audiences.

    After Luc Bondy’s much-reviled Tosca, which replaced Zeffirelli’s, was dropped, Gelb admitted he will never drop the Italian director-designer’s beloved La Bohème and Turandot. The flop of Robert Lepage’s scandalously expensive Ring cycle likely also convinced the Met that it should cancel a provocative new production of Wagner’s Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg by Stefan Herheim and instead revive Schenk’s 1993 version as well as his 1977 Tannhäuser. This season, after an absence of eleven years, November’s delicious revival of Richard Strauss’s Arabella again reminded audiences how much they miss Schenk, who died early this year at 94.

    Arabella, which premiered in 1933, is the sixth and final work created by Strauss with Hugo von Hofmannsthal, one of opera’s most successful composer-librettist partnerships. Of their works that also include Elektra and Die Frau ohne Schatten, Arabella most resembles Der Rosenkavalier, another romantic comedy of manners playing out among the upper echelons of Viennese society. Count Waldner’s family, however, has suffered financial reverses and is desperately trying to hold on by finding a rich husband for Arabella, their eldest daughter. In a quirky Hofmannsthal twist, the younger daughter, Zdenka, has been introduced to all as a boy named Zdenko in a money-saving scheme.

    In the first act, Strauss, who relished composing for female voices, gives one of his most ravishing duets to the soprano sisters who both yearn for “der Richtige” (the Right One), and by the opera’s end, after tragi-comic complications, both will find their ideal mate.

    Later in the opera, Arabella duets with Mandryka, and they are among the most moving moments in all of Strauss. Although Arabella shares Der Rosenkavalier’s fondness for waltzes, it has never achieved the frequent repertoire status of its popular predecessor. Hofmannsthal’s prolix libretto features many trying pages of sumptuously accompanied stark parlando, helpfully translated by the Met’s back-of-the-seat titles.

    A challenge for performances of Arabella remains finding the ideal soprano for its title role, an alluring beauty desired by all men but whose wise self-possession leads her to find her many suitors unworthy until she encounters Mandryka, an outsider with whom she instantly feels an unbreakable bond. The Met’s premiere production in the old house served as a showcase for notable Straussians Eleanor Steber and Lisa Della Casa. After an absence of nearly twenty years, the opera finally returned in 1983 in Schenk’s striking new production for kiri te kanawa. Nearly two decades would pass before the company found its next “Right One”: Renée Fleming.

    A wide view of an opulent nineteenth-century interior set shows two singers standing far apart beneath chandeliers and towering columns, representing a formal scene from the Metropolitan Opera’s staging of Arabella.A wide view of an opulent nineteenth-century interior set shows two singers standing far apart beneath chandeliers and towering columns, representing a formal scene from the Metropolitan Opera’s staging of Arabella.
    Tomasz Konieczny and Rachel Willis-Sørensen as Mandryka and Arabella. Photo: Marty Sohl/Met Opera

    Subsequent Met revivals arrived without their originally planned soprano: by 2014, the elusive Anja Harteros had canceled all her U.S. appearances, and in her place we heard Malin Byström, while this season’s revival was planned for Lise Davidsen, who dropped out to care for twins born in June. In between feedings, she’s preparing her first Isolde, due in Barcelona in January, followed in March by Yuval Sharon’s new Met Tristan.

    In Davidsen’s absence, the company turned to Rachel Willis-Sørense,n who in her first-ever Arabella gave the finest performance of her thus-far uneven Met career, which last season included a wayward Leonora in Verdi’s Il Trovatore. The first act found the American soprano still nervously finding her footing in the duet with Zdenka and her introspective monologue “Mein Elemer.” But when she entered the Coachman’s Ball resplendent in all white, the heretofore chilly Willis-Sørensen melted most winningly as she was introduced to Tomasz Konieczny as her Mandryka.

    Her commanding Arabella clearly knew how to handle men, as we saw in touching farewells to her three unsuccessful suitors, whom the Met cast with special care, each making their Met debuts. Ben Brady suavely pivoted from September’s bravura Rossini in Philadelphia to November’s charming Strauss as Lamoral, while Ricardo José Rivera’s randy Dominik didn’t allow him to display the really impressive baritone we’ve experienced in Teatro Nuovo’s summer revivals.

    Given the best opportunity of the three, Evan LeRoy Johnson nearly stole the show with a handsomely ringing tenor as Elemer. Strauss is kinder to him than to Matteo, Zdenka’s hoodwinked suitor, whose cruelly high music Pavol Breslik tackled with noticeable effort.

    Best known for her Handel, English soprano Louise Alder made her highly successful Met debut as an achingly vulnerable Zdenka, dashing in her male garb while soaring with hidden love for the distracted Matteo. Young French soprano Julie Roset, in the evening’s fifth debut, happily made Fiakermilli’s fits of coloratura frivolity less annoying than they can be.

    A soprano dressed in a dark tailcoat stands face to face with a baritone in a military-style uniform on an ornate staircase set, depicting a scene between Zdenka and Matteo in the Metropolitan Opera’s production of Arabella.A soprano dressed in a dark tailcoat stands face to face with a baritone in a military-style uniform on an ornate staircase set, depicting a scene between Zdenka and Matteo in the Metropolitan Opera’s production of Arabella.
    Louise Alder and Pavol Breslik as Zdenko and Matteo. Photo: Marty Sohl/Met Opera

    Who knew that Karen Cargill was such an accomplished comedienne? As the girls’s irrepressible mother Adelaide, the Scottish mezzo dithered and flirted with zest, leaving Brindley Sherratt, sonorous as her husband Waldner, to fuss and fume amusingly.

    Like Willis-Sørensen, Konieczny found Mandryka a most congenial role, at least since his acclaimed debut as Alberich in 2019. Though his pungent, craggy bass-baritone could never be called beautiful, he readily took on his role’s punishingly high tessitura while his shyly determined courting of Arabella easily won over both her and the audience. His infatuation clearly brought out the best in Willis-Sørensen, whose voice bloomed as he forgave her alleged indiscretions and ended the evening in self-confident triumph as she exclaimed to her future husband: “I cannot help it. Take me as I am!”

    Dylan Evans skillfully revived Schenk’s busy but pleasingly naturalistic staging, but the most popular stars of the revival were the dazzlingly detailed, stage-filling Cinemascope sets of the director’s frequent collaborator Günther Schneider-Siemssen, abetted by entrancing costumes by four-time Oscar winner Milena Canonero. Before both the first and second acts, nakedly inviting applause, the curtain rose in silence. Only after the grateful ovations did conductor Nicholas Carter begin Strauss’s bustling music. The Australian maestro who has been so impressive at the Met in Brett Dean’s Hamlet and Britten’s Peter Grimes drew superbly assured playing from his orchestra, though at times his brisk tempi rushed the singers, particularly Willis-Sørensen, who clearly wanted more leisure to savor Arabella’s grateful music.

    The Met eschews an edition sanctioned by Strauss that eliminates one intermission by joining the second and third acts, which makes for a nearly four-hour opera. Nonetheless, this season’s fresh and vivid cast makes Arabella an especially entertaining enterprise, one that will be shown live in HD in theaters worldwide on 22 November.

    Opera Traditionalists Will Adore the Met’s Opulent 1980s ‘Arabella’

    [ad_2]

    Christopher Corwin

    Source link

  • All the Stars at the 2025 F1 Las Vegas Grand Prix

    [ad_1]

    As Ferris Bueller once told us, life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you might miss it.

    Formula 1 racing can move even faster, and no celebrity wanted to miss it. Gordon Ramsay and Nina Dobrev were among the crowd that descended on Las Vegas this week for the 2025 Formula 1 Las Vegas Grand Prix, not to mention popular drivers like Lewis Hamilton. Twenty drivers from 10 teams will compete to see who is the vroomiest of the vroom, completing 50 laps of a circuit that will see them whizzing past Sin City landmarks like the Bellagio fountain and the Sphere as drivers hit speeds of 200-plus miles per hour on the Strip.

    Of course, the championship race isn’t just about the race itself: The Grand Prix schedule is jam-packed with VIP events for guests to enjoy while they’re not watching the drivers, and there are plenty of chances for stars to show off their fashion, not to mention enjoy the city’s top-notch entertainment and culinary scenes.

    They say that what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, but for this bevy of celebrity F1 fans, we’ll make an exception, just this once. Ahead, some of our favorite stars who came to the races.

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Behind the Scenes of the $236 Million Gustav Klimt Sale at Sotheby’s

    [ad_1]

    But when I was walking through the Breuer lobby, I thought, Who makes the cut? Sotheby’s on York Avenue had space for more than 500 people in the salesroom. In the new salesroom of the Breuer Building, simply due to the size of each floor, there were around 195 seats. It was a tight crew. Not everyone was getting in.

    So who did? I spotted, on an aisle a few rows back, Larry Gagosian, who’s had a gallery a block up on Madison since 1989 and will soon unveil a new space on the ground floor, right next to his still-great sushi joint, Kappo Masa. The adviser Philippe Ségalot was toward the front. The Nahmad family sat in the very front row—Joe Nahmad has a gallery at 980 Madison, and Helly Nahmad has a space at 975 Madison. Dominique Lévy, Brett Gorvy, and Amalia Dayan—they have a gallery off Madison, in the 60s, and were seated toward the center of the action. Emmanuel Di Donna, another local gallerist, was there as well.

    Ryan Murphy was there with his adviser Joe Sheftel, and Jeanne Greenberg Rohatyn, the collector who in 2002 founded the Salon 94 gallery a few blocks up, sat toward the back.

    The Mugrabi family, dealers and collectors both, were right in the middle: David Mugrabi, Tico Mugrabi, and the patriarch, Jose Mugrabi. And there was the house diaspora, the alum who left the citadel to set up their own shops. Former Christie’s global chairman Jussi Pylkkänen, now a private dealer, arrived one lot late and hung out in the back until security whisked him to his seat. Former Sotheby’s rainmaker Amy Cappellazzo was in the front row, left flank; former Sotheby’s contemporary art chairman Gabriela Palmieri was seated in the center; and Patti Wong, the house’s former Asia chairman, was in a chair on the aisle. Noah Horowitz, who left Sotheby’s in 2023 to become CEO of Art Basel, was there as well.

    But it was a tight squeeze.

    “You know what I had to do to get a ticket?” said one collector standing by a man serving Champagne, free of course, by the back of the salesroom. “It was extraordinary.

    [ad_2]

    Nate Freeman

    Source link

  • ‘A Night at Davé’ Captures Fashion’s Favorite Restaurant at Its Height

    [ad_1]

    Long before Lucien became the bistro of choice for Lady Gaga, Bella Hadid, and Chloë Sevigny to nibble on petits filets and French fries, there was Davé—a Chinese restaurant in Paris’s 1st arrondissement that Tai “Davé” Cheung opened in 1982 and closed in 2018. For more than three glittering decades, Davé was the discreet hot spot for the biggest names in fashion, film, art, and music. Helmut Newton and Grace Coddington were early regulars, but as The New York Times recounted in 1998, the real origin story began in the mid-1970s: “Barney Wan, a British Vogue art director, dined at Davé’s father’s Chinese restaurant, Pergola du Bonheur, in Oberkampf, a terribly unfashionable Paris neighborhood, and liked it so much that he took his colleague Coddington to lunch there. Then Davé met a photographer named June Newton and invited her and her husband, Helmut, to the restaurant. They quickly became regulars.” From there, the crowd only grew, with the restaurant playing host to Iggy Pop, Rei Kawakubo, Lou Reed, Yoko Ono, Madonna, Alexander McQueen, Kate Moss, Tina Turner, Janet Jackson, and Mariah Carey over the years.

    The food at Davé was, by most accounts, secondary to the experience. There were no menus, and a sign on the red-and-gold façade read “COMPLET” (“full”), even when it wasn’t. Guests came not for the cuisine but for the atmosphere, late-night mischief, and Davé himself, who swanned about the space, greeting VIPs, taking pictures, and covering the quilted red walls with photos of his famous customers. “My guests are tired, and this is where they can relax at the end of the day and be with each other socially,” he told The Guardian in 2005. “They don’t want to be disturbed by a bunch of tourists.… My job is to make fabulous people feel fabulous. I mean, really, anybody can serve a spring roll.”

    But not everybody could draw a crowd ranging from Allen Ginsberg and Keith Haring to Yves Saint Laurent, Grace Jones, and Leonardo DiCaprio. Davé took Polaroids of them all, often in a proto-selfie style. Now, the new book A Night at Davé offers an inside peek at the hijinks and glamour of the former hot spot through Davé’s own lens. The limited-edition tome, conceived and edited by Charles Morin and Boris Bergmann alongside Davé himself, features a foreword written by Sofia Coppola (her father, Francis Ford Coppola, is a lifelong friend of Davé, and Sofia grew up frequenting the restaurant). Plus, there is an interview with Davé in which he tells the stories behind the photos. For a preview of the book, out now from IDEA, keep scrolling.

    Sofia Coppola and Kirsten Dunst

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Madonna and Alek Keshishian

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Kate Moss, Davé and Johnny Depp

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Tom Ford and André Leon Talley

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Davé, Tim Burton, and Lisa Marie.

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Isabella Rossellini and David Lynch

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Yves Saint Laurent and Davé

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Linda Evangelista and Kyle MacLachlan

    Courtesy of IDEA

    Davé, Miuccia Prada, and David Sims.

    Courtesy of IDEA

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Watch: First trailer for ‘Moana’ live-action remake released

    [ad_1]

    I am Loves my island. the It calls me

    Watch: First trailer for ‘Moana’ live-action remake released

    Updated: 4:39 PM PST Nov 17, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Disney has released the first trailer for its live-action remake of “Moana,” starring Catherine Lagaʻaia as Moana and Dwayne Johnson. Based on the animated version, the live-action version (also titled “Moana”) was announced in 2023 and is slated for release on July 10, 2026. Disney has now released the first trailer for the remake, which follows the same story as the animation, giving fans a first look at the island and people of Motunui.In April 2023, Dwayne Johnson announced that he would be returning as his character, Maui, from the animated original.“Deeply humbled to announce we’re bringing the beautiful story of MOANA to the live action big screen!” he wrote along with a video of him and his two younger daughters, Jasmine and Tiana, at the beach in O‘ahu. “This story is my culture, and this story is emblematic of our people’s grace, mana and warrior strength. I wear our culture proudly on my skin and in my soul, and this once in a lifetime opportunity to reunite with MAUI, inspired by the spirit of my late grandfather, High Chief Peter Maivia, is one that runs very deep for me. We’re honored to partner with @DisneyStudios to tell our story through the realm of music and dance, which at the core is who we are as Polynesian people. Much more to come, but until then What can I saaaaaay except…You’re welcome.”Also featured in the new trailer is Lagaʻaia as Moana, as well as Johnson as the shapeshifting demigod Maui, who can only be seen from behind as he takes on the form of an eagle.Per the trailer, the movie will feature songs from Lin-Manuel Miranda’s original soundtrack, including “I Am Moana”, which Lagaʻaia sings throughout the teaser.Released in 2016, the original Disney Animation Studios film followed the titular character, voiced by Auli’i Cravalho. Moana attempted to restore the heart of the goddess Te Fiti, with the help of demigod Maui.”Moana,” the live-action remake, will release in theaters on July 10, 2026.

    Disney has released the first trailer for its live-action remake of “Moana,” starring Catherine Lagaʻaia as Moana and Dwayne Johnson.

    Based on the animated version, the live-action version (also titled “Moana”) was announced in 2023 and is slated for release on July 10, 2026. Disney has now released the first trailer for the remake, which follows the same story as the animation, giving fans a first look at the island and people of Motunui.

    In April 2023, Dwayne Johnson announced that he would be returning as his character, Maui, from the animated original.

    “Deeply humbled to announce we’re bringing the beautiful story of MOANA to the live action big screen!” he wrote along with a video of him and his two younger daughters, Jasmine and Tiana, at the beach in O‘ahu. “This story is my culture, and this story is emblematic of our people’s grace, mana and warrior strength. I wear our culture proudly on my skin and in my soul, and this once in a lifetime opportunity to reunite with MAUI, inspired by the spirit of my late grandfather, High Chief Peter Maivia, is one that runs very deep for me. We’re honored to partner with @DisneyStudios to tell our story through the realm of music and dance, which at the core is who we are as Polynesian people. Much more to come, but until then What can I saaaaaay except…You’re welcome.”

    Also featured in the new trailer is Lagaʻaia as Moana, as well as Johnson as the shapeshifting demigod Maui, who can only be seen from behind as he takes on the form of an eagle.

    Per the trailer, the movie will feature songs from Lin-Manuel Miranda’s original soundtrack, including “I Am Moana”, which Lagaʻaia sings throughout the teaser.

    Released in 2016, the original Disney Animation Studios film followed the titular character, voiced by Auli’i Cravalho. Moana attempted to restore the heart of the goddess Te Fiti, with the help of demigod Maui.

    “Moana,” the live-action remake, will release in theaters on July 10, 2026.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Two Curators Put Gigantic Confederate Monuments in an LA Contemporary Art Museum. How Did They Pull It Off?

    [ad_1]

    “They double-timed that,” Hamza told me. “The conservation of the one in Arlington Cemetery—this has a really high price ticket on it. And I would say the same with the Pike, I didn’t expect it to go back up so quickly—I think obviously it’s to make a statement, to send a message.”

    Simpson explained that it’s not as if we’re about to see any of the statues in “Monuments” go back up, since they were all acquired from local or state governments, unlike the Albert Pike statue and the Confederate Memorial, which are under federal jurisdiction. “I say jurisdiction and I say, Oh, there’s legal distinctions between these things…but you also know that he doesn’t give a fuck about legal distinction,” Simpson said.

    “Yeah, that’s right,” Hamza said, chuckling nervously.

    “So if it’s expedient or useful for him to say something about anything, he’ll do it, whether it’s real or legal,” Simpson said.

    Trump hasn’t weighed in on the show—yet!—but it’s already angered a few of his favorite outlets, with more invective surely to come. In a Fox News article helpfully labeled Opinion, David Marcus called Unmanned Drone “the most grotesque of the works,” and likened the exhibition to a middle finger to the right. The headline? “LA museum’s desecration of Confederate statues is pure barbarism.”

    Simpson noted that, for all his discussion of barbarism, Marcus—the author of Charade: The COVID Lies That Crushed a Nation—did not mention the massacre in Charleston, the origin point of the show.

    “So the idea that, ‘Well, it’s, like, pure barbarism’…I think you might want to save that for that,” Hamza said.

    It’s unclear from the article whether Marcus visited the show in person. If he had, he might have noticed the subtle moments, the more low-key flexes. It plays with scale in an ingenious way. Statues that were once perched high on pedestals are installed on the ground, allowing one to fully grapple with their high-romantic kitsch.

    [ad_2]

    Nate Freeman

    Source link

  • Your First Look at the 2026 Pirelli Calendar With Tilda Swinton, Irina Shayk & More

    [ad_1]

    Getting asked to shoot the Pirelli Calendar is a career milestone for any photographer. But unlike, say, winning an Academy Award, the honor doesn’t celebrate the success of a creative project; it marks the beginning. “You win a prize, but then you have to go and earn it afterwards,” says Sølve Sundsbø, the Norwegian photographer tasked with creating the 2026 edition of the cultural touchstone known as The Cal. “It’s very flattering, but it’s also quite intimidating.”

    With his appointment, Sundsbø joins a list of photographers that includes Tim Walker, Peter Lindbergh, and Nick Knight, all of whom have contributed their visions throughout the publication’s 60-plus-year history. Initially launched by the Italian tire manufacturer in 1964 as a trade gift, The Cal has evolved into an annual touchstone of culture’s current ideation of beauty and artistry. For the 2026 iteration, Sundsbø tackled the broad concept of nature, enlisting a diverse group of women to bring his vision to life.

    Photograph by Sølve Sundsbø

    Pirelli gave Sundsbø an impressive amount of free rein for the project, though they did have two requests. “They were very liberal with the brief, but they said they wanted women and they wanted it to be about nature,” he told W. In 2025, Ethan James Green included some rare men in his take, but Pirelli wanted this year to be solely focused on women.

    Sundsbø’s calendar features names from a variety of different industries, including Tilda Swinton, FKA Twigs, Isabella Rossellini, Susie Cave, and Gwendoline Christie, many of whom have worked with Sundsbø in the past. “I wanted to work with women I knew because there’s a huge element of trust,” he says. “I’m 55, so I didn’t want to shoot 19-year-old girls. That doesn’t feel natural for me.” Venus Williams, Irina Shayk, Eva Herzigová, Adria Arjona, Du Juan, and Luisa Ranieri round out the cast of models.

    Photograph by Sølve Sundsbø
    Photograph by Sølve Sundsbø

    Sundsbø was able to put his own spin on the nature element as well. While the photographer did head out into the wild—or, more specifically, the beaches of Norfolk and Essex—to capture content, all the images were taken in studio. “It was important to not shoot in nature, because that has been done so many times, and so well, for Pirelli,” he says, calling the decision to shoot a nature-themed editorial solely in studio “a bit twisted.”

    Photograph by Sølve Sundsbø

    The calendar features 11 women representing a range of different elements: water, earth, fire, and wind. Christie took on the challenge of embodying ether. For the most part, the women got to choose which they would represent. Twigs was supposed to take on water until she expressed her utter distaste for the element ahead of the shoot. “She told me, ‘I want to be earth. I want it to be naked, rolling in sand,’” so Sundsbø made it happen.

    Clouds originally shot in Norfolk are projected onto Chinese actress Juan for a Magritte-like effect. Swinton poses among whimsical greenery, while Christie is bathed with light. “Sølve uses modern technology to enhance the creative process rather than replace it,” says Christie, who has worked with Sundsbø many times over the years, but is only now making her debut in The Cal. She reflects on her studio experience, calling it “almost ritualistic.” To create the eerie ether effect, Sundsbø used a long exposure as he dragged a fiber-optic light over Christie. “It was so homemade,” Sundsbø says with a laugh. The results are anything but.

    Photograph by Sølve Sundsbø

    In addition to representing the elements, Sundsbø also hoped to capture human emotion with the 24 images displayed in the calendar, an admittedly Herculean task. “It is impossible,” he admits. “But it is important to be ambitious and set your targets high. You might not achieve them, but you can move towards them. And then sometimes you might hit it.”

    So, did Sundsbø reach his goal with the 2026 Pirelli Calendar?” I can only see the things I could do better,” he says, before pausing for a moment. “But I am very, very happy with it.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elle Fanning & Bill Murray Honor Sofia Coppola at the MoMA Film Benefit Presented by Chanel

    [ad_1]

    The Museum of Modern Art and Chanel held their 17th annual Film Benefit on Wednesday night in New York City—turning MoMA, on 53rd Street and 5th Avenue, into a star-studded banquet hall outfitted with wine-red roses and long, tapered candles decorating the museum. In past years, MoMA has honored legends like Denzel Washington, Cate Blanchett, and Guillermo del Toro. For 2025, director Sofia Coppola was inducted into the gang. Lest anyone need reminding, the Academy Award-winning filmmaker is responsible for generation-defining movies like The Virgin Suicides, Marie Antoinette, and The Bling Ring.

    Of course, a Coppola in the building means there is a hefty guest list: Olivia Wilde, Elle Fanning, Lupita Nyong’o, Bill Murray, and Jason Schwartzman were all in attendance, along with Sofia’s husband Thomas Mars and her two daughters, Cosima and Romy Mars. (It was a true family affair—her brother, Roman Coppola, also came with his children and partner.) After taking photos on the carpet, Romy greeted Anna Sui warmly; the elder sister also chatted with Marc Jacobs and his husband, Char Defrancesco.

    Sofia Coppola, Cosima Croquet, Thomas Mars, and Romy Mars

    BFA

    Josh Hartnett and Lupita Nyong’o

    Getty

    Sofia Coppola and Elvis Costello, who performed during dinner.

    Getty

    The woman of the hour was, without question, Sofia Coppola, who hammed it up for the cameras with Schwartzman and Murray. Wilde, wearing a black velvet column dress, recalled her earliest memories of the filmmaker. “Probably The Virgin Suicides, which provided young women roles that were singular characters,” she said. “And then Lost in Translation became endemic to our generation—the depiction of loneliness was unmatched, still is. She understands the very-difficult-to-describe feeling of a very hollow aloneness, even if you’re surrounded by people. No one else can depict that like Sofia.”

    Fala Chen, Sofia Coppola, Lupita Nyong’o, and Rose Byrne.

    Getty

    Jason Schwartzman and Bill Murray

    BFA

    In his speech, Murray also referred to Coppola’s ability to capture “a metaphysical loneliness.” Schwartzman, who is Coppola’s cousin and spoke alongside Roman, recalled his childhood being introduced to “new bands, books, and magazines,” by the ever-cool Sofia. Elle Fanning spoke of her first time meeting the director: “I was 11 years old—no training bra needed. I picked out jeans, and a sparkly retainer that I often clicked in and out when I was nervous.” After begging her grandmother to see Marie Antoinette in the theater, Fanning got the chance to work with Coppola in Somewhere followed by the period drama The Beguiled alongside Kirsten Dunst, Nicole Kidman, and Colin Farrell. “She made me feel valued,” Fanning said. “I always say, I didn’t go to college, but I went to New Orleans with Sof, Kirsten, and Nicole!”

    While accepting her honors, Coppola looked back on almost three decades of work and thanked her “film family” for giving her a chance. “When I started, I was in my 20s and it was the ’90s L.A. where I was known as the ‘daughter of…’” she said. “This was before nepo babies were charming and most of them ended up in rehab. And I was the amateur actress who singlehandedly ruined The Godfather films. Most people didn’t think I had something to say that mattered but I found a few that did.” Next year, she noted to W, will be the 20th anniversary of Marie Antoinette. “We’re planning some stuff around that, and I hope to re-release it,” she said. “I’ve just been making stuff. I can’t believe that I have a body of work. It’s surreal.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • As AI-Artist Xania Monet Climbs the Charts, Victoria Monét’s Caught in the Uncanny Valley

    [ad_1]

    Grammy-winning singer, songwriter, and producer Victoria Monét has built her career on turning emotion into melody, writing hits for stars like Ariana Grande, Blackpink, and Coco Jones, as well as recording her own deeply personal records. Her songs are intimate, intentional, and overtly shaped by her voice, vision, and human collaboration. So when Xania Monet, an AI-powered R&B “artist” bearing a similar name, reportedly landed a $3 million record deal with Hallwood Media and started charting, the corporeal Monét felt uneasy. “Monet” also sonically evokes the name of another musician, Janelle Monáe, adding an additional layer to the confusion. (Hallwood Media did not respond to a request for comment.)

    Monét can’t definitively say that the AI artist was trained on her music, but the resemblance feels uncanny. “It’s hard to comprehend that, within a prompt, my name was not used for this artist to capitalize on,” she tells Vanity Fair. “I don’t support that. I don’t think that’s fair. When that name starts to ring bells in a certain way, it can easily be mixed up with my brand. It’s not ideal.”

    Even if the similarity is just a coincidence, that’s beside the point. Monét says when one of her friends typed a random prompt into ChatGPT, asking it to create a photo of “Victoria Monét making tacos” in a fictional setting, the image generator produced a woman who looked eerily like the emerging AI artist.

    As the first AI artist to hit a US radio airplay chart, Xania Monet has been met with heavy pushback. In an interview last Wednesday with CBS Mornings, Telisha “Nikki” Jones—the woman and lyricist who created the artificial artist and her sound—defended her practice. “Xania is an extension of me, so I look at her as a real person,” she said. “I just feel like AI…it’s the new era that we’re in. And I look at it as a tool, as an instrument, and utilize it.” (Jones has not yet responded to Vanity Fair’s request for comment.)

    The anxiety surrounding AI’s role in music isn’t new: In September, Kehlani decried Xania Monét landing a record deal. Last fall, Beyoncé told GQ an AI song mimicking her voice “scared” her; the year before that, Cher blasted the tech for using her voice. In a January BBC interview, Paul McCartney said AI isn’t all bad, but it shouldn’t “rip creative people off.” Last year, in a public show of solidarity, more than 200 musicians—including Billie Eilish, Stevie Wonder, Kacey Musgraves, and the estates of Frank Sinatra and Bob Marley—signed an open letter demanding protection against AI systems that imitate artists’ likeness, voice, and sound.

    [ad_2]

    Brea Cubit

    Source link

  • Best of Detroit 2025

    [ad_1]

    Our poll has officially crossed the finish line — and Detroit, you sure burned rubber!

    After weeks of honking, hyping, and high-octane competition, the results of the Metro Times Best of Detroit are in. You nominated your favorite taco slingers, dive-bar legends, tattoo wizards, vinyl pushers, and much more — and now it’s time to crown the true kings and queens of the Motor City.

    The votes have been tallied and the champions are in the winners’ circle. Here’s the best of Detroit, according to you.

    [ad_2]

    Layla McMurtrie

    Source link

  • In Taylor Swift’s ‘End of an Era’ Trailer, Mama Swift Says What We’re All Thinking: “That’s Complicated”

    [ad_1]

    “So it goes ‘New Year’s Day’ verse and chorus, ‘Manuscript’ bridge into ‘Long Live’ bridge, into the down verse of ‘Long Live,’ into ‘Hold on to the memories, they will hold on to you,’ into ‘Long Live’ chorus but slowed down to half time, ‘New Year’s Day’ chords underneath it, into the last verse of ‘The Manuscript,’” Swift rattles off in the trailer’s final clip as her mother watches with a stunned expression that may be one of horror or one of admiration, but is probably both.

    After a beat, Andrea says, “That’s complicated,” not even bothering to remove her balled-up fist from where it’s resting on her chin as she listens to her daughter’s grand plan for the supersized surprise song mash-up that she performed for the final night of the tour in Vancouver on December 8, 2024.

    An incredibly successful artist, Swift occupies a singular position in our cultural consciousness, with her work and very life drawing just as much public criticism as they do fervent fan adoration. She’s incredibly private about her personal life—remember the rumor that she left her apartment building in a gigantic suitcase so as not to be photographed outside? I sure do!—while sharing other experiences and feelings in painstaking detail, whether through her song lyrics and letters or documentaries and interviews. Consider that she spent nearly two hours chatting with then boyfriend Travis Kelce and his brother, Jason Kelce, on their New Heights podcast in August—sharing not only the title, cover art, and release date for her newest album, The Life of a Showgirl, but also Travis’s dream pet, a “really specific type of otter.” (In short: a wild one he rescues, thus earning its unending devotion.)

    After the recording, later in the day, Travis proposed to her. A few short weeks later, she shared that too.

    All of this is to say that just when it seems like Swift has shown all her cards and there’s nothing left to reveal, the singer produces yet more compelling work. The original Eras Tour concert film had its theatrical run extended, then extended again, and you’d think, perhaps, that the appetite for a three-plus-hour filmed show would be sated, but here comes The Eras Tour | The Final Show, another full-length filmed concert, this one including the Tortured Poets Department set that Swift added to the tour after that album’s release. The new concert film will be released on December 12 on Disney+, as will the first two of episodes of the six-installment docuseries, just in time for Swift’s 36th birthday on December 13.

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • Pope Leo XIV Is a Cinephile Who Loves It’s a Wonderful Life, The Sound of Music

    [ad_1]

    Just because you’re the pope, that doesn’t meant mean you can’t have a little fun. The dearly departed Pope Francis had plenty of earthly passions, including soccer and cinema. Fellini’s The Road, Gabriel Axel’s Babette’s Lunch, Kurosawa’s August Rhapsody, and Rossellini’s Rome Open City were among the late pope’s favorite films.

    Apparently his successor, Pope Leo XIV, is not only a White Sox fan but also something of a cinephile. Ahead of a meeting with iconic figures from the film world on Saturday, Leo XIV, the first ever American pope, shared his four favorite movies of all time via a statement from the Vatican. They include a Christmas classic, a beloved musical, an Oscar-winning drama, and an Italian film.

    The first movie on Leo’s list is Frank Capra’s 1946 classic It’s a Wonderful Life—where Jimmy Stewart’s despondent businessman George Bailey learns to appreciate the beauty of life on Christmas. It’s a fitting choice for the Catholic leader for obvious reasons (see: Christmas). Pope Leo XIV’s next choice also makes sense thematically: the 1965 musical The Sound of Music, directed by Robert Wise and based on the Rodgers and Hammerstein Broadway musical. Of course Pope Leo XIV loves the adaptation, which stars Julie Andrews as Maria, a nun-in-training tasked with looking after the seven Von Trapp children as the Nazis begin to invade Austria: singing nuns and escaping the Nazis are catnip to a pope.

    Pope Leo XIV’s next two choices veer a little bit farther from the papacy. He name-checked Robert Redford’s 1980 film Ordinary People, starring Mary Tyler Moore, Donald Sutherland, and Timothy Hutton. Winner of the Oscar for best film, it follows a family of three dealing with the death of their eldest son—decidedly darker fare than either The Sound of Music or It’s A Wonderful Life. Pope Leo XIV’s fourth and final choice is the 1997 film Life Is Beautiful, directed by and starring Roberto Benigni as a Jewish-Italian waiter who is taken to a concentration camp with his young son. The Oscar-winning Italian film makes sense given Leo’s new residency in the Vatican City.

    According to a statement from the Vatican, Leo XIV “has expressed his desire to deepen dialogue with the World of Cinema, and in particular with actors and directors, exploring the possibilities that artistic creativity offers to the mission of the Church and the promotion of human values.” As such, prominent Hollywood figures such as Cate Blanchett, Spike Lee, Monica Bellucci, and Gaspar Noé, as well as Italian cinema staples Marco Bellocchio, Raoul Bova, and Sergio Castellitto, will have an audience with the pope in Vatican City this weekend.

    Perhaps on Saturday, the cinephiles will learn which films just missed the cut for Leo XIV: maybe Sister Act one or two, Doubt, or the recent hit One Battle After Another, in which nuns prominently figure. In any case, it’s clear that it’s time to get Pope Leo XIV on Letterboxd: We’d love to see his Conclave review.

    Original story appeared in VF Italia.

    [ad_2]

    Chiara Pizzimenti

    Source link

  • Truth vs. risk management: How to move forward

    [ad_1]

    Key points:

    In the world of K-12 education, teachers are constantly making decisions that affect their students and families. In contrast, administrators are tasked with something even bigger: making decisions that also involve adults (parents, staff culture, etc.) and preventing conflicts from spiraling into formal complaints or legal issues. Therefore, decisions and actions often have to balance two competing values: truth and risk management.

    Some individuals, such as teachers, are very truth-oriented. They document interactions, clarify misunderstandings, and push for accuracy, recognizing that a single misrepresentation can erode trust with families, damage credibility in front of students, or most importantly, remove them from the good graces of administrators they respect and admire. Truth is not an abstract concept–it is paramount to professionalism and reputation. If a student states that they are earning a low grade because “the teacher doesn’t like me,” the teacher will go through their grade-book. If a parent claims that a teacher did not address an incident in the classroom, the teacher may respond by clarifying the inaccuracy via summarizing documentation of student statements, anecdotal evidence of student conversations, reflective activities, etc.

    De-escalation and appeasement

    In contrast, administrators are tasked with something even bigger. They have to view scenarios from the lens of risk management. Their role requires them to deescalate and appease. Administrators must protect the school’s reputation and prevent conflicts or disagreements from spiraling into formal complaints or legal issues. Through that lens, the truth sometimes takes a back seat to ostensibly achieve a quick resolution.

    When a house catches on fire, firefighters point the hose, put out the flames, and move on to their next emergency. They don’t care if the kitchen was recently remodeled; they don’t have the time or desire to figure out a plan to put out the fire by aiming at just the living room, bedrooms, and bathrooms. Administrators can be the same way–they just want the proverbial “fire” contained. They do not care about their employees’ feelings; they just care about smooth sailing and usually softly characterize matters as misunderstandings.

    To a classroom teacher who has carefully documented the truth, this injustice can feel like a bow tied around a bag of garbage. Administrators usually err on the side of appeasing the irrational, volatile, and dangerous employee, which risks the calmer employee feeling like they were overlooked because they are “weaker.” In reality, their integrity, professionalism, and level-headedness lead administrators to trust the employee will do right, know better, maintain appropriate decorum, rise above, and not foolishly escalate. This notion aligns to the scripture “To whom much is given, much is required” (Luke 12:48). Those with great abilities are judged at a higher bar.

    In essence, administrators do not care about feelings, because they have a job to do. The employee with higher integrity is not the easier target but is easier to redirect because they are the safer, principled, and ethical employee. This is not a weakness but a strength in the eyes of the administration and that is what they prefer (albeit the employee may be dismissed, confused, and their feelings may be hurt, but that is not the administration’s focus at all).

    Finding common ground

    Neither perspective (truth or risk management) is wrong. Risk management matters. Without it, schools would be replete with endless investigations and finger-pointing. Although, when risk management consistently overrides truth, the system teaches teachers that appearances matter more than accountability, which does not meet the needs of validation and can thus truly hurt on a personal level. However, in the work environment, finding common ground and moving forward is more important than finger-pointing because the priority has to be the children having an optimal learning environment.

    We must balance the two. Perhaps, administrators should communicate openly, privately, and directly to educators who may not always understand the “game.” Support and transparency are beneficial. Explaining the “why” behind a decision can go a long way in building staff trust, morale, and intelligence. Further, when teachers feel supported in their honesty, they are less likely to disengage because transparency, accuracy, and an explanation of risk management can actually prevent fires from igniting in the first place. Additionally, teachers and administrators should explore conflict resolution strategies that honor truth while still mitigating risk. This can assist in modelling for students what it means to live with integrity in complex situations. Kids deserve nothing less.

    Lastly, teachers need to be empathetic to the demands on their administrators. “If someone falls into sin, forgivingly restore him, saving your critical comments for yourself. You might be needing forgiveness before the day’s out. Stoop down and reach out to those who are oppressed. Share their burdens, and so complete Christ’s law. If you think you are too good for that, you are badly deceived” (Galatians 6:1-3). This scripture means that teachers should focus less on criticizing or “keeping score” (irrespective of the truth and the facts, and even if false-facts are generated to manage risk), but should work collaboratively while also remembering and recognizing that our colleagues (and even administrators) can benefit from the simple support of our grace and understanding. Newer colleagues and administrators are often in survival mode.

    Latest posts by eSchool Media Contributors (see all)

    [ad_2]

    Dr. Yuvraj Verma, Bessemer City Middle School and William Howard Taft University

    Source link

  • Maude Apatow Steps Into Her Next Big Role

    [ad_1]

    On Thursday night, November 6, in Los Angeles, Maude Apatow was recognized at the Women in Film 2025 WIF Honors with the Max Mara Face of the Future Award. Boasting an impressive list of past recipients—including Zoë Saldana, Katie Holmes, Yara Shahidi, and Lili Reinhart—the award, now celebrating its 20th year, recognizes a young actor at a turning point in her career.

    Apatow, 27, first appeared on-screen in her dad, Judd Apatow’s, 2007 film Knocked Up and has since carved out a space for herself in film and television with roles in Euphoria, The King of Staten Island, and One of Them Days. Now, she’s stepping behind the camera with her directorial debut, Poetic License, a coming-of-age film that earned strong reviews at the Toronto International Film Festival in September.

    “I’m so lucky I had the opportunity to direct,” she tells W. “There are so few female directors. I want to spend my life trying to figure out how to uplift other women.” It’s an aim very much in line with the WIF Honors ceremony. Apatow considers her fellow honorees this year—among them, Jamie Lee Curtis, Tessa Thompson, and Judy Blume—some of her personal heroes. “I do not feel worthy,” she says. “Judy Blume taught me my love for reading. Tessa’s such a badass. I actually cannot believe I’m being honored alongside them.” Another hero? Her grandmother, who, along with her mom Leslie Mann, instilled in her a love of Max Mara. “I hope my grandma gives me her coats someday. They’re forever pieces.”

    Below, Apatow discusses taking her seat in the director’s chair and the style advice from her mom that she struggles to follow.

    Apatow with past WIF Max Mara Face of the Future Award honoree Lili Reinhart.

    Unique Nicole/Getty Images Entertainment/Getty Images

    What was it about Poetic License that inspired you to make it your directorial debut?

    When I first read Poetic License, I thought it was so funny, truthful, and weird. It had a sort of timeless feeling, but it also felt fresh in the way young people were written. I understand the characters and their struggles. I wasn’t searching to direct anything, but it was always in the back of my mind. So when I read the script, I had a moment like, “Oh, I get this. I think I might be able to pull this one off.”

    Your mom, Leslie Mann, plays the main character, Liz, in the film. Was it weird directing her?

    My mom is my best friend. I’ve always admired her so much as an actress. Going into it, we were nervous, but it ended up going so smoothly. We were in sync the entire time. It felt like we could read each other’s minds. I’ve been so lucky that I’ve gotten to watch my parents collaborate. I was young, but collaborating with them, too, was a very special thing. When you know someone so well, you know what they’re capable of, so you can challenge them, and that’s pretty amazing.

    Should we expect more films from you in the future?

    Yeah. I love directing. I’d love to do a musical. I’m a big musical theater girl. I think that’s really hard to capture the magic that you get watching live theater. A few people have. I want to try too, so we’ll see.

    Apatow with the cast of Poetic License.

    Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images Entertainment/Getty Images

    Now for some Style Notes questions. Did you raid your mom’s closet a lot growing up?

    Yeah. We have the same shoe size, so that was major for me. But now she raids my closet. I’m giving back for all the years that I was stealing her stuff.

    You’ve walked a lot of red carpets during your career. Are there any looks you regret?

    I have so many weird ones. When I was a kid, I had no idea what I was wearing. I was dressing myself, and thinking, “Oh, I need a little heel,” even though I was 12. I would go to Target and buy heels because I thought it would make me look sophisticated, but it was a total flop.

    Apatow with her family in August 2012.

    Gregg DeGuire/WireImage/Getty Images

    What is the best style advice you’ve received from your mom?

    My mom always says, “Wear it.” If you buy something nice and you think, “I’ll save this for a special occasion,” you end up forgetting about it. She says, “Just wear it, use it.” I’m still like, “Can I do that?” I’ll get a purse and then I’ll just keep it on my top shelf. Then I’m like, “What am I doing? I’m just looking at it. Just use it.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jennifer Lawrence on Motherhood & the Blurred Line Between Performance & Reality

    [ad_1]

    Her films have grossed more than $6 billion worldwide. She won the Academy Award for best actress at 22 (the second-youngest winner in that category) and holds the Guinness World Records title of highest-grossing action heroine in movie history. In May, she received a Peabody Award. Yet accolades make up only a fraction of who Jennifer Lawrence really is.

    For W’s Art Issue, three masters of their craft—the American painter Elizabeth Peyton, the French multimedia artist Philippe Parreno, and the German photographer Wolfgang Tillmans—conceive of Lawrence, 35, as a work of art unto herself. Painting, film, and photography are woven together into a three-part portfolio exploring the intersection of intimacy and image.

    Seated at one of the many cafés on Manhattan’s West Side for our interview, Lawrence wore a red Charvet sweater, a white tee, and a pair of Still Here blue jeans. She became animated as she spoke about her collaborators for this issue. “It doesn’t really matter what you’re doing,” she said. “You just say yes to genius.”

    The project’s production spanned three cities, over as many months. In Paris, Parreno cast Lawrence in a short film in which she plays a character who is—and isn’t—Jennifer Lawrence. The 37 pages of dialogue that Parreno provided felt “almost Ang Lee–like,” she said. It helped that the legendary Iranian-French cinematographer Darius Khondji served as director of photography. “I called him Dr. Khondji, appropriately,” she said, grinning.

    Dior cape, jeans, and belt; Longines watch; stylist’s own tank top.

    Stills from a short film by Philippe Parreno with cinematography by Darius Khondji

    Tillmans, whose unglamorized imagery earned him a Turner Prize, photographed Lawrence at both his London home and his former studio in London’s East End, now a gallery run by the famed art dealer Maureen Paley. The shoot was surprisingly intimate and spontaneous, even for Tillmans. “I had this idea to put a T-shirt on her from my 2025 Centre Pompidou exhibition. It reads: Nothing could have prepared us / Everything could have prepared us,” he said. “Then I took her out to this roof area where I had the fondest memories of parties. The intimacy of our house beforehand, that old location where I used to throw parties on the roof, the T-shirt from an exhibition—all that was well prepared, but not planned as to what exactly would happen. And she was totally game. It was amazing to be able to ask her, ‘Could you just dial in 5 percent of friendliness, a tiny hint of a smile?’ And I could see in front of my eyes how it really would be dialed in 5 percent—she was so in control of her expressions. It’s a privilege to be one-on-one with someone you feel is of great talent.”

    T-shirt by Wolfgang Tillmans for Centre Pompidou, Paris; The Row long-sleeve top.

    Photographed by Wolfgang Tillmans

    Photographed by Wolfgang Tillmans

    The collaboration furthest from Lawrence’s typical repertoire was, perhaps, with Elizabeth Peyton. Lawrence sat for hours in the painter’s downtown Manhattan studio, chatting and drinking while Elvis played on repeat. “She’s so much smarter than me in every conceivable way,” Lawrence said. “She can have a snippet of wallpaper and think, Oh, yeah, this makes me feel like this. That’s so freeing. At the end of the day, what she does is completely different from me. I mean, I cannot draw.”

    Dior men’s shirt and men’s jeans.

    ‘Jen’ by Elizabeth Peyton, 2025.

    Lawrence paused and then reconsidered: “Well, the only thing I can draw is a horse head profile.” I slid my notebook across the table. “And I will draw,” she declared, before sketching a crude equine form with the charming, elementary proficiency of someone who’s reproduced the same image hundreds of times. “I learned it from my older cousin when I was 5 or 6,” she explained. “I actually ended up tattooing this on my friend’s body once.” She signed the doodle with mock solemnity.

    Lawrence’s artistic abilities are considerably less open to interpretation in Die My Love, a psychological drama that places her physicality front and center. Directed by the Scottish filmmaker Lynne Ramsay—whose previous excursions into the outer limits of mental health include We Need to Talk About Kevin and Ratcatcher—the film stars Lawrence as Grace, a new mother and would-be author unraveling in psychosis. Her husband, Jackson, is played by the Twilight star Robert Pattinson, whom, it should be noted, Peyton depicted in vampiric white face paint in 2009, after the film became a global sensation.

    “My biggest fear is that people are expecting fanfic because it’s me and Rob,” Lawrence said. She conjured an image of legions of YA fans misreading Die My Love—a film one critic described as “placing its hands on the sides of the viewer’s head, violently shaking them, forcing their eyes open like A Clockwork Orange”—as the kind of cinematic crossover event that would’ve sent Tumblr into meltdown circa 2012, when Lawrence starred in The Hunger Games. “Huge mistake to go into this movie with that expectation,” Lawrence playfully warned. “Everybody, pump your brakes and maybe watch a Lynne Ramsay movie before going in.”

    Photographed by Wolfgang Tillmans

    Adapted from a novel by Ariana Harwicz, Die My Love portrays a shattered emotional landscape. Grace’s selfhood unravels slowly at first, as she mumbles, snaps at people, and wields a fly swatter like a medieval bludgeon. Lawrence said one source of inspiration for her portrayal was the TLC series Baylen Out Loud, which follows a young woman who’s living with Tourette’s syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder. (“I’m usually watching that or Little Women.”) She studied the show’s honest portrayal of the mounting tension before a tic, the irresistible urge to act, and the relief that follows—“the visible cycle of buildup and release,” she said.

    Grace soon begins acting out with increasing disorder: hurling herself through a glass door, bashing her head against a mirror, stripping to her underwear at a children’s pool party, setting forest fires in the buff. “She’s terrified of being invisible,” Lawrence said. “She would rather her husband be mad at her than not see her.”

    Stills from a short film by Philippe Parreno with cinematography by Darius Khondji

    At one point, Grace destroys a bathroom in a frenzy of primal fury. On location at a desolate house flanked by the Canadian Rocky Mountains, Lawrence ripped a sink off the wall and clawed down the wallpaper until her fingertips left streaks of blood. “We had only one take, because you can’t un-destroy a destroyed bathroom,” she said. “That was adrenaline-inducing in itself.” Alone in the tiny space with a single camera operator, she didn’t know what she’d do until she was in the moment. “The emotional ‘calling up’ was almost like physical exercise,” she said. The cameraman left with glass in his knee.

    Lawrence’s corporeal characterization, often on all fours and wriggling through grass, evokes both Andrew Wyeth’s midcentury masterwork Christina’s World—depicting a young woman, vulnerable yet indomitable, crawling across a desolate field—and performance art in the tradition of body as both subject and medium.

    In truth, audiences have watched Lawrence wrestle with anatomy and autonomy for decades. The Hunger Games franchise broke records even as Lawrence accumulated injuries across its productions: a wall-run bruise so severe during the making of the first film that it required a CT scan (her trainer worried her spleen had burst); a punctured eardrum and temporary deafness in one ear from underwater stunts for Catching Fire; and near suffocation from a fog-machine malfunction during Mockingjay – Part 1. On the set of Darren Aronofsky’s Mother!, she hyperventilated and dislocated a rib. During Don’t Look Up, shattered glass struck her eyelid.

    Photographed by Wolfgang Tillmans

    Lawrence was deliberate for Die My Love, on- and off-screen, by timing her pregnancy to align with production. “I knew I was going to be doing the movie, and I also knew that I needed a second child before my other son got too old,” she said. Being in the second trimester was the sweet spot for shooting, she explained, because typically “in the first trimester, you’re very sick; and in the second trimester, you start to feel better.” (“Real sexy family planning,” she quipped.)

    Her pregnancy lent the film a dose of cinema verité. She understood, quite literally, how motherhood “takes any kind of veneer off, because now you’re seeing the world through somebody else’s eyes—somebody who’s so much more important than you are,” she said. Yet, to her surprise, those same instincts doubled as roadblocks. When Ramsay directed scenes that required Grace to wake her sleeping newborn out of boredom and other “things no parent would ever do,” Lawrence said, her body rebelled. Ramsay held firm, pushing her to dig deeper into Grace’s instability and confront, in real time, the unresolvable tension between maternal instincts and maternal madness that animates the movie. Just as you can “feel” a car chase with 4D seats, you become so intimate with Grace’s flickering disintegration that a strobe warning for the psyche might be warranted.

    Dior cape, jeans, and belt; Longines watch; stylist’s own tank top.

    Stills from a short film by Philippe Parreno with cinematography by Darius Khondji

    For Lawrence herself, Die My Love was what she called an “eight-dimensional ride”: reading the novel when her first baby was six weeks old, becoming pregnant with her second as the film was greenlighted, shooting while expecting, and then screening it postpartum. She’s still wrestling with “what I thought the movie was while I was doing it, versus viewing it afterward,” she said. “When I’m performing, it all has to be real and straightforward. Everything Grace does has to feel grounded.” But after giving birth, she changed her perspective. “Watching it back, I was like, Oh, maybe that was a fantasy. Maybe that was in her mind. I have different versions of how the whole movie could be interpreted now.”

    The Row top, sweater, and shorts.

    Photographed by Wolfgang Tillmans

    It was Martin Scorsese, the movie’s producer, who urged her to take the role. Scorsese will also direct Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio in an adaptation of Peter Cameron’s What Happens at Night, a psychological ghost story about adoption scheduled to begin production in January 2026. Eventually, she plans to direct. “But, you know, I’m also going to see my kids,” she said, adding with resignation, “at least for a couple minutes.”

    The dark humor feels earned. “When I had my first child, I felt completely connected to my baby,” she said. “But I also realized the world wasn’t designed around that relationship. Suddenly, you’re like, Wait, how am I supposed to go back to work? Get in a car and drive away? Get on an airplane and fly away from my baby? Like, what are you talking about? Everything looks different after that.”

    It’s a postpartum epiphany shared by her character Grace. “She says it in the movie: ‘There’s nothing wrong with me and my baby; it’s the world that’s fucked up,’ ” Lawrence said. “And I don’t know, maybe with a little more time, in retrospect, I’ll be able to tell the difference. I’m still not sure what was acting and what was just me being a mother.”

    Jennifer Lawrence directed by Philippe Parreno. Cinematography by Darius Khondji

    Still from Jennifer Lawrence’s short film by Philippe Parreno.

    Wolfgang Tillmans shoot: Style Director: Allia Alliata di Montereale. Wolfgang Tillmans’s creative team: Olly Shinder, Simon Nicholas Gray. Hair by Gregory Russell at the Wall Group; makeup by Georgie Eisdell at the Wall Group; manicure by Kate Williamson for Dior Vernis at A-Frame Agency.

    Philippe Parreno shoot: Style Director: Allia Alliata di Montereale. Hair by Cyndia Harvey at Art Partner; makeup by Lucia Pica at Art Partner; manicure by Ama Cauvas at Artlist. Sound design: Nicolas Becker; production: AP Studio, Inc.; executive producer: Marie Godeau; producer: Leeloo Turmeau; production manager: Charlotte Thizeau; first assistant camera: Vincent Toubel; second assistant camera: Alejandro Asensio; camera intern: Ulysse G. Castel; gaffer: Thierry Baucheron; spark: Jerôme Robin; key grip: Vincent Blasco; postproduction: Jenny Montgomery at Company 3; fashion assistant: Brice Costa; production coordinator: Gabrielle Lussier; unit manager: Jack Sciacca; production assistants: Alphonse Emery, Robinson Guillermet; hair assistant: Ronke Olaibi; makeup assistant: Vladimir Gueye; sound operator: Ondine Novarese; sound operator assistant: Lou Jullien; tailor: Alice Chastel.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Royalty, Artists, Architects, and More Celebrate the Opening of the Peter Beard Museum Siwa Oasis in Western Egypt

    [ad_1]

    Beard was introduced to Neamatalla, the museum’s founder, by the famed archaeologist Zahi Hawass, the former minister of antiquities for Egypt, and a friend of Nejma’s parents (Hawass is attending the museum’s inauguration). In 2001, Peter, Nejma, and Zara made a trip to Siwa, as well as Luxor, Cairo, and Aswan, and he returned several times.

    As Zara writes in her text for the catalogue, “He did not arrive with conquest in his eyes. He came instead as a witness. As someone who believed that beauty, when glimpsed on the verge of disappearance, becomes a kind of moral imperative. We travelled to Egypt as a family. My father was fascinated by everything: the palimpsest of civilizations, the carved stones still half-buried in sand, the exquisite ruins, the legend of the Oracle, the movement of salt across centuries. To him, beauty was inseparable from time. It was not ornamental but geological, shaped by erosion, intention, and the passage of centuries. Every artifact spoke in echoes.”

    Like the hotel, the museum was hand-built from Siwa mud and is entirely off-grid. Its collection includes Beard’s iconic large-scale photographs, embellished with hand-painted borders by the Hog Ranch Art Department, a collective of Kenyan friends and artists, which was born in Beard’s property near the Ngong Hills. One gallery displays pages from Beard’s famous diaries, each a small collage artwork in itself. Another is filled with his personal family photos.

    Ultimately, the museum is intended to be a “permanent tribute to Peter Beard’s life, his time in Siwa, his work, and as a living testament to the belief that beauty and responsibility to the earth can and must coexist,” as the opening announcement reads. Peter Beard’s legacy may be complex, but there is no doubt of his farsightedness, of his profound understanding of the ways of the world, both natural and human, and of his position as one of the great artists of the 20th century.

    Below, “For the Record of the Living,” a poem by Zara Beard.

    This is not silence—

    It is the desert remembering.

    He gathered what the world chose to forget,

    And laid it down in blood and paper.

    Salt keeps what time cannot

    Love keeps what death cannot.

    Enter as a witness.

    The wild is not gone

    It is only waiting

    To be seen.

    [ad_2]

    Bob Colacello

    Source link

  • Grammy Nominations 2026: Kendrick Lamar, Lady Gaga, and Bad Bunny Dominate

    [ad_1]

    The 68th Grammy Awards nominations were announced via livestream on Friday, November 7, with a slew of past winners, including Sabrina Carpenter, Sam Smith, Chappell Roan, and Doechii making an appearance. This year’s list blends music-industry heavyweights with buzzy newcomers: Kendrick Lamar and Lady Gaga led the pack with nine and seven nominations, respectively, while rising talents such as “Messy” singer Lola Young, cult-favorite pop crossover Addison Rae, child-actor-turned-R&B crooner Leon Thomas, and reality-TV–formed girl group Katseye all made the cut

    Though often overlooked by the Recording Academy, Bad Bunny proved impossible to ignore this year. (The ceremony will air just one week before the 2026 Super Bowl, where the Puerto Rican superstar is headlining the halftime show.) He scored six nominations, including the Recording Academy’s three top categories: Album, Record, and Song of the Year—the first Spanish-language artist to ever do so. Lamar, Gaga, and Carpenter also landed nods across all three.

    The Song of the Year race is particularly stacked, featuring Lady Gaga’s comeback single “Abracadabra,” Doechii’s inescapable “Anxiety,” Sabrina Carpenter’s “Manchild,” Billie Eilish’s “Wildflower,” and even a track from the fictional band KPop Demon Hunters—all vying for one of the night’s most coveted awards.

    Doechii performs during her “Alligator Bites Never Heal” tour

    Photo by Paras Griffin/Getty Images

    Kendrick Lamar and SZA’s sultry duet “Luther” also received a SOTY nod; last year, the Compton rapper’s Drake diss track “Not Like Us” was the anthem of the night, winning both Record and Song of the Year and creating a few viral moments.

    Kendrick Lamar performs with SZA during Apple Music Super Bowl LIX Halftime Show

    Photo by Michael Owens/Getty Images

    Two of the biggest artists on the planet, however, won’t be in the spotlight this time around; after a few years dominated by multiple Beyoncé and Taylor Swift album cycles, neither artist is up for anything. Beyoncé swept the Grammys last year with Cowboy Carter, finally winning Album of the Year after years of being snubbed. She also won Best Country Album, and this year, the Recording Academy has split that award into two categories: Best Traditional Country Album and Best Contemporary Country Album, a move that has unsurprisingly proved controversial.

    While Swift typically cleans up at any awards ceremony she’s part of, her most recent album, The Life of a Showgirl, falls outside this year’s eligibility window due to its October 3 release date.

    The winners will be announced at the Grammy Awards on Sunday, February 1, at the Crypto.com area in Los Angeles, and will air on CBS and stream on Paramount+. The host has yet to be announced (Trevor Noah has been the emcee of the ceremony for the past five years, from 2021 to 2025).

    Below, a list of the major category 2026 Grammy nominees:

    ALBUM OF THE YEAR

    DeBÍ TiRAR MáS FOToS, Bad Bunny

    SWAG, Justin Bieber

    Man’s Best Friend, Sabrina Carpenter

    DeBÍ TiRAR MáS FOToS, Bad Bunny

    SWAG, Justin Bieber

    Man’s Best Friend, Sabrina Carpenter

    CHROMAKOPIA, Tyler, the Creator

    SONG OF THE YEAR

    “Abracadabra,” Lady Gaga

    “Anxiety,” Doechii

    “DtMF,” Bad Bunny

    “Golden,” KPop Demon Hunters

    “luther,” Kendrick Lamar w/ SZA

    “Manchild,” Sabrina Carpenter

    “WILDFLOWER,” Billie Eilish

    RECORD OF THE YEAR

    “Abracadabra,” Lady Gaga

    “luther,” Kendrick Lamar w/ SZA

    “The Subway,” Chappell Roan

    “APT.” Rosé and Bruno Mars

    “DtMF,” Bad Bunny

    “Manchild,” Sabrina Carpenter

    “Anxiety,” Doechii

    “WILDFLOWER,” Billie Eilish

    BEST NEW ARTIST

    Olivia Dean

    Katseye

    The Marias

    Addison Rae

    sombr

    Leon Thomas

    Alex Warren

    Lola Young

    BEST POP SOLO PERFORMANCE

    “Daisies,” Justin Bieber

    “Manchild,” Sabrina Carpenter

    “Disease,” Lady Gaga

    “The Subway,” Chappell Roan

    “Messy,” Lola Young

    BEST POP DUO/GROUP PERFORMANCE

    “Defying Gravity,” Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande

    “Golden,” HUNTR/X: EJAE, Audrey Nuna, REI AMI

    “Gabriela,” Katseye

    “APT.” Rosé and Bruno Mars

    “30 for 30,” SZA w/ Kendrick Lamar

    BEST RAP ALBUM

    Let God Sort Em Out, Clipse, Pusha T and Malice

    Glorious, GloRilla

    God Does Like Ugly, JID

    GNX, Kendrick Lamar

    Chromakopia, Tyler, The Creator

    BEST RAP PERFORMANCE

    “Outside,” Cardi B

    “Chains & Whips,” Clipse, Pusha T & Malice f/ Kendrick Lamar & Pharrell Williams

    “Anxiety,” Doechii

    “tv off,” Kenrick Lamar f/Lefty Gunplay

    “Darling, I,” Tyler, the Creator f/ Teezo Touchdown

    BEST CONTEMPORARY COUNTRY ALBUM

    Patterns, Kelsea Ballerini

    Snipe Hunter, Tyler Childers

    Evangeline Vs. The Machine, Eric Church

    Beautifully Broken, Jelly Roll

    Postcards From Texas, Miranda Lambert

    BEST COUNTRY SOLO PERFORMANCE

    “Nose on the Grindstone,” Tyler Childers

    “Good News,” Shaboozey

    “Bad As I Used to Be,” Chris Stapleton

    “I Never Lie,” Zach Top

    “Somewhere Over Laredo,” Lainey Wilson

    BEST ROCK ALBUM

    private music, Deftones

    I Quit, HAIM

    From Zero, Linkin Park

    NEVER ENOUGH, Turnstile

    Idols, YUNGBLUD

    BEST ROCK PERFORMANCE

    “U Should Not Be Doing That,” Amyl and The Sniffers

    “The Emptiness Machine,” Linkin Park

    “NEVER ENOUGH,” Turnstile

    “Mirtazapine,” Hayley Williams

    “Changes (Live From Villa Park) Back To The Beginning,” YUNGBLUD f/ Nuno Bettencourt, Frank Bello, Adam Wakeman, II

    BEST R&B ALBUM

    BELOVED, GIVĒON

    Why Not More? Coco Jones

    The Crown, Ledisi

    Escape Room, Teyana Taylor

    MUTT, Leon Thomas

    BEST R&B PERFORMANCE

    “YUKON,” Justin Bieber

    “It Depends,” Chris Brown f/ Bryson Tiller

    “Folded,” Kehlani

    “MUTT (Live From NPR’s Tiny Desk),” Leon Thomas

    “Heart Of A Woman,” Summer Walker

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How Performance Management Systems Fail Employees 

    [ad_1]

    Why do we spend millions on performance management systems that everyone—managers, employees, and executives—openly admits are broken? 

    The answer is uncomfortable but simple. We’ve designed these systems for idealized employees who exist only in organizational charts and HR textbooks. Meanwhile, real humans—with their psychological quirks, social needs, and cognitive biases—are forced to navigate processes that work against their nature. 

    As an organizational psychologist who’s spent two decades inside Fortune 500 companies and government agencies, I’ve witnessed this disconnect firsthand. We keep tweaking rating scales and buying new software, hoping to fix a system built on a fundamental misunderstanding of human psychology. 

    The measurement myth 

    Traditional performance management operates on the belief that we can objectively score people on abstract dimensions like “collaboration” or “strategic thinking.” Research reveals this is wishful thinking at best. 

    ​​​​​Studies show that 62 percent of the variance in performance ratings reflects the manager’s personal biases and rating patterns—not the employee’s actual performance. When your “objective” system is mostly measuring the manager, you’re not fixing performance problems. You’re creating them. 

    This isn’t because managers are malicious. It’s because they’re human. We expect them to be perfectly objective rating machines, but they are social beings wired to preserve relationships. They are motivated to inflate ratings to protect their team and avoid the social consequences of delivering difficult news. It’s a perfectly rational response to a poorly designed system. 

    The psychological trap 

    Here’s what most leaders miss: The moment you tie feedback to salary or job security; you trigger a neurological threat response. The brain perceives evaluative conversations as social threats, activating the same fight-or-flight mechanisms our ancestors used to escape predators. 

    This physiological response shuts down the prefrontal cortex—the exact brain region needed for learning, reflection, and growth. In other words, the high-stakes context required for fair compensation decisions makes genuine development neurologically impossible. 

    We’re asking for one process to serve three conflicting masters: evaluation for pay decisions, documentation for legal protection, and development for growth. This creates what psychologists call a “double bind”—a situation where success in one area guarantees failure in another. 

    The innovation killer 

    The most damaging consequence isn’t administrative burden—it’s the systematic elimination of breakthrough thinking. Traditional performance systems reward predictability through clear metrics and risk mitigation. Innovation requires uncertainty through experimentation and intelligent failure. 

    Under organizational pressure, managers default to “threat rigidity,” favoring safe, incremental improvements over transformative ideas. Your most innovative employees—the ones who drive competitive advantage—become liabilities in performance reviews. 

    Engineering a better system 

    The solution isn’t better ratings. It’s better decisions. Instead of asking “How did Jane score on leadership?” start asking “What evidence supports Jane’s readiness for promotion?” 

    This shift transforms performance management from a measurement exercise into a decision-support system focused on three critical business questions: 

    Manage: Which employees need intervention or support?  

    Recognize: Who delivered exceptional impact worth rewarding?  

    Promote: Who demonstrates capability for increased responsibility? 

    By separating these decisions, you eliminate the psychological conflicts that plague traditional systems. Compensation conversations become distinct from developmental ones. Trust grows because criteria are transparent and purposeful. 

    The bottom line 

    Let the evidence guide us. ​​​​The data is clear that our current performance management systems are built on flawed assumptions about human objectivity and motivation. You cannot have a high-stakes evaluation and expect a psychologically safe environment for development to coexist. The solution, therefore, must be equally grounded in science.  

    By applying the principles of psychological ergonomics—designing systems to fit how people actually think and behave—we can move beyond this failed experiment. The question for every leader is whether you will continue to manage by myth, or if you will choose to lead by design. 

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Shonna Waters

    Source link

  • Bartlett Sher On Theater as a Catalyst for Change

    [ad_1]

    The Metropolitan Opera’s season opener brought Michael Chabon’s Pulitzer-winning novel to the stage with an ambitious new adaptation exploring art, politics and survival. Photo: Evan Zimmerman

    In September, the Metropolitan Opera opened its season with The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay. Based on the novel by Michael Chabon, with music by Mason Bates, production by Bartlett Sher and libretto by Gene Scheer. Weeks before the opening, Observer visited an early tech rehearsal to observe Bartlett Sher in his element.

    “Noise! Make noise!” Sher hollered at the stage as the cast of The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay rehearsed a complex party scene with a huge cast of characters. Unusually for a long tech rehearsal, the energy on stage buzzed between run-throughs. Performers bounced from foot to foot, stretched and practiced stage fighting and falls. They waited for the show’s impressive but temperamental new “irising” system—a curtaining technology that opens and closes around a square “eye”—to figure itself out.

    Leaving his lunch uneaten at the director’s stand, Bartlett Sher was constantly in motion. He moved around the stage like a party host, wisecracking, laughing and answering questions. Chatting with Edward Nelson, who plays the opera’s Tracy Bacon, they practiced a balancing move, each showing a different way to hold his body.

    A portrait of a man with gray hair and glasses wearing a black turtleneck and jacket, looking directly at the camera against a plain background.A portrait of a man with gray hair and glasses wearing a black turtleneck and jacket, looking directly at the camera against a plain background.
    Bartlett Sher. Courtesy Bartlett Sher

    A native Californian who speaks with a slight uptalk—his voice rising at the ends of sentences like an invitation—Sher’s conversational mode comes across as a desire to connect with whoever he’s talking to. Describing himself as an “interpretive artist,” Sher told Observer that he sees his talent as being “good at marshalling, pulling together many points of view.” His approach to direction is exploratory rather than single-minded. “I’m leading the exploration, I’m guiding us, I’m helping make choices that bring out the best in everybody’s work—rather than thinking of my vision being fulfilled.”

    This penchant for weaving together diverse threads seems suited to bringing to the Met’s stage a story as soaringly epic as The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay. Chabon’s novel follows two Jewish cousins—a Czech artist and magician, Joe Kavalier and a Brooklyn-born writer, Sam Clay. Joe escapes Nazi-occupied Prague and arrives in Brooklyn a refugee after being torn away from his beloved younger brother (transformed into a sister, Sarah, in the opera). Together the cousins create The Escapist, a comic book about a superhero who fights fascism through Houdini-esque escape tricks. The book is loosely based on the life of Jack Kirby, the creator of Captain America. It covers a wide range of political themes that remain pertinent to our own times, including fascism, homophobia and antisemitism.

    The opera, he said, compresses Chabon’s story into the lives of its principal characters and their relationships, all set against the backdrop of World War II and the Holocaust. Incorporated into the work is the theme of art’s place during times of historical turmoil.

    A stage scene from The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay shows two men at a drafting table examining a drawing, with a large illuminated comic-style projection of a superhero figure behind them.A stage scene from The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay shows two men at a drafting table examining a drawing, with a large illuminated comic-style projection of a superhero figure behind them.
    Comic book imagery and cinematic set design merge onstage, reflecting the story’s fascination with escape, imagination and transformation. Photo: Evan Zimmerman

    “Layered in with essentially Chabon’s own obsession with how much art can help you make sense of or change life,” Sher explained. “Joe Kavalier goes to comic books as a way of handling his pain and maybe transforming his pain. Whether that works or not is a fascinating question. Whether art can actually help you with these things or not becomes a major obsession of the book.”

    The place of art in the political and the political in art has been woven throughout Sher’s career as a director. He’s often sought out politically charged material—from directing a dramatization of Barbara Ehrenreich’s 2001 book Nickeled and Dimed, about the inability to survive on minimum-wage work in America, to politically sensitive revivals of South Pacific, The King and I and My Fair Lady, to Aaron Sorkin’s 2018 adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird.

    “I think theatre is a catalyst for change,” Sher said. “I don’t think you make theatre pieces to tell people how to change. We tell stories that express people’s ability to handle ambiguity, deal with problems, see conflicts and make decisions.”

    The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay approaches politics in a gently coaxing manner. Gene Scheer’s libretto tells a simple story about a handful of relationships in wartime New York and Europe. The epic breadth of Chabon’s novel is conveyed visually. Its density and richness are mirrored in the opera’s textured and complex set design. Layered screens iris in and out, with designs from 59 Studio projected onto them. Towering above the audience are images of midcentury New York in its gloomy noir glory. We see comic book superheroes gleaming in primary colors or animated as elegantly looping works in progress. Haunting the background like a nightmare are greyscale sketches of Nazi death camps, reminiscent of Art Spiegelman’s Maus.

    As a director, Sher uses the entire stage—with all its dimensions and angles—in a cinematic approach to theatre. The vast cast of characters appears on stage with fair frequency, in large groups at parties, battles and crowd scenes. A superhero even flies on a wire. But it’s all conveyed with a subdued elegance, never demanding, always inviting. Sher’s contribution in Kavalier and Clay is conversational: the production’s emotional texture is pliable. He doesn’t tell you how to feel or think.

    Sher’s ever-shifting, multi-perspectival approach feels ideal for our own overwhelming, anxious and information-dense moment. It dances away from ideological definition. “The themes of a kind of creeping fascism and the struggles against art, against the political mind, against who we’ve become, are really critical right now but also very elusive and very hard to figure out how to express themselves.”

    On opening night at the Met, the political charge of our new normal seeped into the opera house. Peter Gelb and Senator Chuck Schumer made speeches on the importance of freedom of expression—the former to cheers, the latter to boos and heckles from frustrated constituents. Even in this historic environment, operating at a political remove now seems impossible.

    “I try to believe that great stories come when you need them most,” Sher concluded. “And it feels to me like we’re lucky that Kavalier and Clay is coming around for us at this time.”

    More in performing arts

    Bartlett Sher On Theater as a Catalyst for Change

    [ad_2]

    Annie Levin

    Source link