ReportWire

Tag: cryptocurrencies

  • Who Is Ruja Ignatova? The FBI’s Most Wanted ‘Crypto Queen’

    Who Is Ruja Ignatova? The FBI’s Most Wanted ‘Crypto Queen’

    [ad_1]

    Disgraced “Crypto Queen” Ruja Ignatova’s time on the run may be coming to an end.


    Cryptoqueen via Facebook

    Ignatova, 42, a German citizen born in Bulgaria, is a former crypto pioneer who vanished in October 2017 after over-promising high returns on her OneCoin crypto token in a $4 billion Ponzi Scheme. She’s now facing several charges of fraud and has been on the run from the FBI for five years.

    Although she hasn’t been seen since her disappearance, a new London apartment listing suggests she’s alive and evading arrest.

    Ignatova, the only woman on the FBI’s most wanted list, was recently found to be connected to an £11 million [$13.6 million] penthouse apartment for sale in Kensington, England, thanks to a new rule change by the UK’s Companies House, which acts similarly to the U.S’s Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

    The rule now requires properties purchased by companies to also list a beneficiary, and while it is believed Ignatova originally purchased the home under a shell company, a new court filing to the UK’s financial regulators lists Ignatova as the “beneficial owner” of the property – inadvertently exposing her whereabouts.

    Ignatova’s connection to the home was first spotted by the host of “The Missing Cryptoqueen” podcast, Jamie Bartlett.

    “[The document] suggests she is still alive, and there are documents out there somewhere which contain vital clues as to her recent whereabouts,” Bartlett told iNews.

    Since Ignatova’s link to the home, which was listed on Knight Frank real estate website, was confirmed, the listing has been removed.

    Here’s what to know about the disgraced “Crypto Queen.”

    RELATED: Who Is FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried and What Did He Do? Everything You Need to Know About the Disgraced Crypto King

    Who is Ruja Ignatova?

    Before Ruja Ignatova become one of 11 women to be on the FBI’s most wanted list in its 72-year history, she was regarded as a rising star in the crypto industry.

    Ignatova was known for liking glitz and glamour, per CNN, and was revered for growing from her humble beginnings in Germany to success as a consultant and then a crypto entrepreneur.

    Together with her business partner Sebastian Greenwood, the pair convinced investors to back their OneCoin crypto token which they said would be more valuable than Bitcoin. However, authorities found that OneCoin defrauded investors out of $4 billion in one of the largest international fraud schemes of all time.

    “OneCoins were entirely worthless … (Their) lies were designed with one goal, to get everyday people all over the world to part with their hard-earned money,” U.S. prosecutors said, according to court documents.

    Furthermore, the court documents reveal that Ignatova and Greenwood intended to deceive their clients from the get-go, calling their own token a “trashy coin” and discussing an exit strategy in private emails.

    Their scheme imploded in 2016 when investors struggled to sell their OneCoins to recoup their investments, alerting the media and investigators to look into the business.

    Then in October 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice charged Ignatova with one count of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering, with a federal judge issuing a warrant for her arrest, court documents state.

    But Ignatova fled on a flight from Sofia, Bulgaria, to Athens, Greece, just two weeks after the warrant was issued and she hasn’t been seen since.

    The FBI has offered a $100,000 reward for information leading to her arrest. Additionally, they said: “Ignatova is believed to travel with armed guards and/or associates. Ignatova may have had plastic surgery or otherwise altered her appearance.”

    What Happened to OneCoin?

    Ruja Ignatova and her cofounder lured people to their OneCoin scheme beginning in 2014 by promising investors around the world a fivefold or tenfold return on their investments.

    Taking advantage of the crypto frenzy at the time, investors gave them $4 billion between 2014 and 2016. However, OneCoin’s value was manipulated by the company and it was never mined like other cryptocurrencies, despite telling investors otherwise, according to CNN.

    Once regulators uncovered the scheme and Ignatova vanished, she left her partners to deal with the fallout.

    Cofounder Sebastian Greenwood was arrested in July 2018. He’s currently in jail after pleading guilty to wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and conspiracy to launder money. He is set to be sentenced in April.

    Ignatova’s brother, Konstantin Ignatov, who was also a part of the business scheme, was arrested in March 2019 and is set to be sentenced in February after pleading guilty to wire fraud conspiracy, money laundering, and fraud charges.

    Since the scandal unraveled, OneCoin has been shut down and its website is no longer active.

    RELATED: What Did Bernie Madoff Do? Everything to Know About the Disgraced Financier Ahead of Netflix’s ‘Madoff: The Monster of Wall’

    What Is Ruja Ignatova’s Net Worth?

    A lawsuit filed by the victims against OneCoin revealed that Ignatova had $500 million in Dubai bank accounts as of 2021, per a report by Financial Finds. It’s unknown how much crypto she holds, but the outlet found that she was paid 230,000 Bitcoins by a member of the Emirati royal family in 2015.

    [ad_2]

    Sam Silverman

    Source link

  • Crypto lender Genesis latest to file for bankruptcy as crypto contagion continues to spread

    Crypto lender Genesis latest to file for bankruptcy as crypto contagion continues to spread

    [ad_1]

    Embattled crypto lender Genesis announced that it had filed for bankruptcy late Thursday, the latest firm to be taken amid a widespread rout among crypto companies driven by plunging prices and charges of fraud at major players like FTX.

    Genesis, which froze customer withdrawals in November following the collapse of FTX, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in federal court in Manhattan for its lending units, saying it was the best way for it to achieve “an optimal outcome for Genesis clients.”

    “While we have made significant progress refining our business plans to remedy liquidity issues caused by the recent extraordinary challenges in our industry, including the default of Three Arrows Capital and the bankruptcy of FTX, an in-court restructuring presents the most effective avenue through which to preserve assets and create the best possible outcome for all Genesis stakeholders,” said Derar Islim, Genesis’ interim chief executive, in a statement on the company’s website.

    According to its bankruptcy filing, Genesis’ lending unit said it had both assets and liabilities in the range of $1 billion to $10 billion and had over 100,000 creditors. The firm said it had about $150 million in cash on hand to support its operations during restructuring.

    Among those creditors is Gemini, the crypto exchange founded by twin brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss in 2014, that had $900 million of its customers’ money tied up with Genesis.

    Genesis was the main partner of Gemini’s “earn” program, in which its retail investors received payments for allowing their crypto assets to be loaned out to others. 

    Cameron Winklevoss welcomed Genesis’ bankruptcy filing, saying it would provide Gemini a better venue for getting its clients’ money back.

    “We will use every tool available to us in the bankruptcy court to maximize recovery for Earn users and any other parties within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction,” he wrote in a post on Twitter.

    Both Genesis and Gemini were charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission last week with illegally selling securities to investors through the Earn program. 

    Genesis and its parent company, Digital Currency Group, had said they were seeking outside investment to help bolster the books and pay customers back in the months before filing for bankruptcy.

    As part of its restructuring, Genesis said it would seek to possibly sell the company and also continue to look for additional investment.

    Shares of bitcoin
    BTCUSD,
    +0.12%

    were little changed at just above $20,000. There have been some concerns that the announcement of another crypto bankruptcy could unravel a recent recovery for the No. 1 cryptocurrency, up 25% so far in 2023. That puts it back above levels seen before FTX imploded last November.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 5 Bear Market Lessons From a Crypto Entrepreneur

    5 Bear Market Lessons From a Crypto Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    2022 was an important year for the crypto space. We will all remember the bankruptcies of major global companies: Luna, Celsius Network, FTX, BlockFi and others that left investors with massive losses. The bear market has dramatically affected the crypto economy and investors’ portfolios.

    Just like in 2013 and 2017, the market moves in cycles. First, we had the crypto summer, where everybody was hyped about their profits and gains. Then came the crypto autumn, and investors started to see red in their portfolios. But investors’ portfolios started bleeding when the crypto winter got underway, and even some big reliable companies went underwater.

    In this article, I want to focus on some of the most important lessons I have taken for myself and my company after living through one more winter of the crypto market.

    Related: Will Crypto Make a Comeback in 2023?

    1. Money management strategies are everything

    2022 is the year of fallen legends. Companies believed to be reliable borrowers, like Alameda Research, borrowed funds without collateral and ultimately went bankrupt due to improper money management. On top of that, other standout names in the crypto space, such as Luna, Celsius Network, FTX, and BlockFi, also went bankrupt against all market expectations.

    2022 showed that different approaches need to be used to track company assets, oversee their liquidity and provide collateral for obligations. The mistake many made was blindly placing faith in a company because of its size and reputation instead of analyzing the fundamentals.

    Related: How to Manage Your Money With Confidence

    2. Stay away from toxic assets

    The future market leaders are the companies who survived unscratched problems related to Luna, Celsius Network, FTX or BlockFi and do not hold toxic assets. These are the companies with the potential to launch new products and ideas.

    From personal experience, I can say that 2022 was when my company delved into exploring new directions. It proved that the standard earning tools on the market just recently have no future. So we chose to focus on developing new products that can fix the ongoing problems of the crypto market. I believe that doing this — answering a pain point of the sector and providing a reliable service to alleviate it — is a crucial step in maintaining your company’s viability in tumultuous market conditions.

    3. Watch out for tokenomics

    When looking at a company, all performance indicators are important. What good is it to have great management and a business model if the tokenomics are not good? People are first and foremost investing in the token itself, making tokenomics an essential piece of providing a stable development.

    Bad tokenomics often gives valuable insight into whether the company’s business model is sustainable over the long term. Look for projects with tokenomics designed to serve the investors, not the developers. Watch out for high inflation rates and other red flags, which are often signs of an unsustainable business model designed to enrich the very few.

    Related: 8 Smart Ways to Analyze Crypto Token Before Investing in It

    4. Don’t follow the hype

    This year proves that the market is often wrong. During the crypto summer, many coins and companies grew on hype. Investors hopped on the train and followed the crowd ignoring the lack of solid fundamentals and prospects of future growth. However, when the bubble popped, their portfolio suffered.

    Luna, for example. The company had $50 million in assets but still promised 20% interest payments in its own stablecoin currency. That meant $10 billion in payouts to people holding funds in its protocols. The business plan was too good to be true, but tons of people fell for it and lost everything when the stablecoin proved not to be that stable after all.

    Related: Is Crypto and NFTs a Passing Fad?

    5. Teamwork is essential

    In times of market turmoil, teamwork is more important than ever. The keyword is flexibility; the market is unpredictable, so it’s the team’s job to adapt to any changes rapidly.

    The market has very short business phases meaning that companies need to be highly flexible and able to adapt to new realities. Bear markets often make it impossible to plan too far ahead. Focus on what’s in front of you, prioritize clients’ objectives, predict what products the next phase of the market will be interested in, and prepare them in advance.

    Furthermore, the bear market can also be a great time to generate revenue and offer products that alleviate investors’ fears. Additionally, with the right money management skills, companies can alleviate clients’ anxiety by investing their funds in discounted assets.

    Stay positive. The bear market will be over soon

    The bear market is not easy, but staying optimistic is essential. Take a step back and realize that earning on the crypto market is a long-term game; that’s the wealth-building secret.

    My opinion is based on analyzing past phases, where typically, the crypto winter lasts 4-6 months, then comes the spring. It will be essential for companies to enter with a big user base, good products and opportunities to scale up their own business.

    Companies need to pay attention to the costs and build teams out of people who believe in the market more than ever. Teams should have crypto enthusiasts that understand the market and products well. Having pros on the team is essential, so do not let them slip through your fingers.

    Related: The Bear Market is A Blessing For Web3’s Future. Here’s Why.

    [ad_2]

    Vladimir Gorbunov

    Source link

  • Web3 in 2023: 6 Trends Towards The Path of Sanity

    Web3 in 2023: 6 Trends Towards The Path of Sanity

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    We came off a euphoric bull run in 2021 to an epic bear market in 2022. A lot has changed in this period, with protocol collapses, regulatory bans, code sanctions, CeFi obliteration, heightened FUD and bad actors causing an industry-wide contagion through acts of fraud.

    There have been many positive developments in this period that lay the platform for blockchain adoption, like venture capitalist posture maturity and new technologies like Optimism and Arbitrum that address scaling issues with blockchain, the emergence of new categories like decentralized platforms and regulatory clarity in many countries. A few notable and likely trends for 2023 are shaping up.

    Related: Web3, Crypto, Cybersecurity, Rural Fintech: Trends To Look Out For

    Stand-alone value matters

    Liquid tokens on a project’s balance sheet cannot drive valuations anymore; companies and projects must show tangible value to create free cash flow and harness network effects. Lately, the focus has been on the standalone ability to generate value versus buying growth using tokens in the short term.

    Emphasis is shifting to user monetization from bought-out growth that has proven unsustainable as market cycles change. Investors view equity as claims to future cash flows and profits (minus liabilities) and tokens as value created from future utility or services delivered by the protocol.

    Given the relative maturity of the market, many protocols have not charted a clear path to sustain value through future delivery of utility, causing a shift in investor mindset. Investors are now emphasizing the quality of revenue, which can raise the value of their equity profile while eventually accruing token value.

    A “Tokuity” model evolves

    Investors like the liquidity associated with the token; its volatility and longevity have been concerning to many. There seems to be a shift from pure short-term and liquidity-driven posture to long-term, value-creating models.

    Investors would like long-term value creation incentivized by a combination of tokens (short-term liquidity) and equity (long-term incentives), reducing volatility and ensuring long-term thinking, i.e., a new model Tokuity (Tokens + Equity).

    Related: Why Your Business Assets Belong on the Blockchain

    ETH killers are unviable

    It was once possible that multiple new players would emerge to overcome Ethereum’s technical shortcomings, slow execution and market dominance. Many Layer 1 protocols squandered their windows of opportunity, failing to drive adoption at scale.

    It may be difficult for a new platform to unseat Ethereum as the dominant player anymore as it embarks on many improvements in the months ahead. Ethereum and Polygon dominate use cases, consumers, enterprises and ecosystems. Users and enterprises will trade off minor technical advantages of other blockchains for security, interoperability and network effects.

    Ethereum, the blockchain everyone loved to hate in the bull market, now has the last laugh for “ETH killers.” Most Ethereum-hating chains have completed or are racing to become EVM compliant (Hedera, Solana, Algorand, Near, etc.). Others like Phantom wallet (Solana’s wallet) and Trader Joe (Avalanche’s DEX) also extend support to the Ethereum ecosystem.

    The future is still multichain

    Even though ETH-killers will not likely deliver the advantages amassed by the Ethereum ecosystem (including Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, etc.), the future will still be multichain.

    The concept of a “multi-chain” system refers to using multiple independent blockchain networks that can interoperate with each other allowing flexibility in application deployment for different transactions or processes. For example, one blockchain might focus on high-speed, low-cost transactions, while another might focus on security and immutability. For Defi, users will want their collateral on one chain and borrow on another. The portability of gaming assets across metaverses is another use case. A multi-chain system could offer the best of both worlds by allowing different blockchains to work together.

    Related: The Future Role of Ethereum in Multi-Chain Technology

    Interoperability is a critical capability required for a true multichain world to manifest. However, the current bridge technology is fragile, leading to security risks and hacks. Blockchains using bridges to Ethereum create more risk and less value with enterprise use cases.

    While niche chains, e.g., Hedera (optimized for enterprise) or Flow (optimized for metaverse and gaming), may co-exist, the market simply cannot afford the number of Layer 1 protocols/blockchains in existence today. The L1 space is crowded, differentiation is limited, and the market is finite. A multichain future requires mature interoperability solutions.

    Layer 2 is the new frontier

    After the Ethereum ‘merge,’ the blockchain landscape is significantly altered by negating competitive differentiation for the ETH-killers. Ethereum is repositioned as the base layer for settlement under multiple Layer 2 protocols, forming a scalable ecosystem.

    Blockchain’s scaling problems are unfolding. As enterprise adoption of blockchains grows, we will enter a magnitude of multi-billion daily transactions, and even baked Layer 2 solutions may not be enough. We will see the rapid evolution of new categories like decentralized platforms and new forms of roll-ups. These will migrate action up the blockchain stack while letting the base protocol accrue its own value. The last few cycles were about Layer 1 and infrastructure; it will now be about scaling, interoperability, and ecosystem maturity. Layer 1 battlefield is now empty with a handful of survivors; layer 2 is the new frontier.

    Decentralized platforms will accelerate ecosystem adoption

    For adoption scale, technology must make it easy by reducing barriers for non-technical users, deploying faster Decentralized Applications (dapp) deployment and faster routes to value creation. The new category of decentralized platforms sits between Layer 2 chains (layer 1 chains) and the fractured landscape of dapps and use cases driving a vibrant ecosystem.

    A dPlat (decentralized platform) can simulate an iOS or Android-like effect, shielding the Layer 1 and Layer 2 chain complexities and abstracting blockchain features to enable ease of development for uses. Many users will not realize the complexities of the layer-one protocol underneath, and protocols will become easier to build on. The dPlat space is one to watch closely.

    Concluding thoughts

    Layer 2 technologies, robust network effects, regulatory considerations, decentralized platforms, and investment outlook changes will help the inherently raw protocols to scale adoption and transactions. The next 12 months bring a lot of positive changes to the ecosystem despite a bull or bear market; let us prepare for the new paradigms.

    [ad_2]

    Nitin Kumar

    Source link

  • Alibaba, XPeng, Goldman Sachs, and More Stock Market Movers Tuesday

    Alibaba, XPeng, Goldman Sachs, and More Stock Market Movers Tuesday

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints

    • Print Article


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why It’s Time For You To Accept Crypto

    Why It’s Time For You To Accept Crypto

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Cryptocurrency is nothing new. While many people discuss the digital asset as an enigma, it is a medium of exchange worth significant value. True, digital coins do not have the same tangible backing as cash, but the security of design, and the blockchain setup, create (or should create) a level of confidence.

    If your business has yet to embrace crypto as a form of payment, it is falling behind and missing valuable opportunities to thrive. While not all companies yet embrace crypto, those that do experience unparalleled access to otherwise distant consumer pools.

    The number of companies embracing crypto is rising, including such names as Gucci, Paypal and Visa. Permitting crypto payment options can expand your market share and improve your position in the marketplace; it can also demystify this legitimate form of payment.

    The reasons crypto is right for your business model

    It is easy to look at the failings of FTX and lose confidence in the system, but investors and businesses need to review the market’s otherwise successful history. Bitcoin is only one asset out of thousands that continues to outperform investor expectations. The folly of one digital coin should not deter innovative businesses from embracing a payment option that proves time and time again its ability to persevere.

    If your company wants to look toward the future, it must embrace crypto because it isn’t going anywhere. The financial “new normal” demands that businesses adapt and embrace changing structures. Besides the need to adjust, there are many reasons businesses benefit from accepting crypto payments.

    Related: 5 Tips for Using Cryptocurrency in Your Small Business

    1. Decrease fraudulent chargebacks

    Many companies are victims of friendly fraud or mistaken consumers. In the digital subscription age, many consumers don’t remember all their purchases and may report an issue of credit card fraud where there is none. Unfortunately, whether friendly mistakes or criminal, chargebacks cost businesses billions yearly.

    Embracing bitcoin payments can reduce fraudulent chargeback risks. Crypto payments report to an immutable public ledger. The payment method does not allow for alteration, meaning once a transaction is complete, nothing can reverse it, eliminating the false claims of fraud on the purchase end.

    Related: The Benefits of Crypto Education for Your Business

    2. Increase security

    Cryptocurrencies exist within the blockchain — a decentralized, distributed digital ledger. All transactions are permanent, unmodifiable, and impossible to delete. The entire crypto concept is a vision for secure monetary assets.

    A business can improve the security and usability of crypto by partnering with blockchain monitoring services. Some payment processors will offer additional security measures; however, even bare-bones, cryptocurrency is more secure than credit cards and other payment methods.

    Accepting crypto shows your consumers that you care about their security and yours. The additional security and finality of digital coins also provide assurances for businesses providing subscriptions or other services in a techno-focused era.

    Related: Crypto vs. Banking: Which Is a Better Choice?

    3. Lower transaction fees

    Credit card fees present a significant thorn in the side of many merchants. Fees represent a profit loss on individual transactions. Besides the on-top percentage taken from the sale, many credit card processors also charge a nominal fee per incoming transaction.

    Cryptocurrency transactions eliminate any additional fee structures when handled on the business end. If you decide to use a payment processor (recommended), you will need to pay a service fee, typically less than traditional processors will charge.

    4. Improve transaction speed, regardless of country of origin

    Besides transaction fees, credit card transactions take time to process. As a business owner, you do not have time to waste. Most cryptocurrency transactions occur in real-time — one of the many perks of a decentralized system.

    Traditional credit card or debit card payments can take several days, depending on a consumer’s location. Crypto is borderless, so location does not affect or inhibit transaction speed. Also, because the digital asset does not involve cross-country settlements or obstacles, there are no costly currency conversions.

    Related: 10 Ways You Can Learn More About Crypto and Blockchain

    5. Improve growth potential

    The growth potential of crypto is twofold for business owners: financial and market share. Any crypto investor can tell you about the exponential growth of digital assets in recent years. For a business owner, the potential valuation increases for some cryptocurrencies are enough to embrace the payment method. Permitting crypto payments means you can potentially earn greater profits from the same volume of purchases.

    Besides the monetary gains, permitting crypto also opens your business to a wealthier consumer pool and buyers who may not have considered your company before. Crypto allows for a level of anonymity and privacy that other payment forms do not. Newer, more private consumers will appreciate your business’s steps to secure their privacy.

    6. Taking crypto means getting cash

    You get cash, not crypto, for your payment by dealing with a reputable payment platform. Trusted platforms will convert crypto payments into cash. And by taking crypto, you’re making it easy for crypto holders to buy products and services, all while receiving cash in your bank account. It’s a win-win and a great cost-effective opportunity to increase your revenue.

    Crypto is the future and the future is now

    Whether a high-end, established retailer or a small, young business, it is time to use cryptocurrency, permitting it as a payment option. Digital currency is more secure than other transaction methods and allows for growth opportunities while maintaining consumer privacy. Embrace crypto and embrace the future of your business.

    [ad_2]

    Richard Iamunno

    Source link

  • How CBDCs Will Transform The World As We Know It

    How CBDCs Will Transform The World As We Know It

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Over the past couple of years, I have been working with my team at Broxus to develop the infrastructure necessary for central banks to deploy digital versions of their currencies. While we have been doing this work, and other projects have been engaged in similar endeavors, the dialogue around CBDCs has taken on something of a life of its own, colored by misconceptions about what Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are and their purpose.

    At their essence, CBDCs are digital versions of a country’s fiat currency that are pegged at a 1-1 ratio with the original currency. For example, if the US were to release a CBDC, that would be in the form of a digital dollar that is always equal to its fiat counterpart. While CBDCs are related to cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, some key distinctions exist.

    CBDCs are, by definition, recognized digital legal tender. That means that, unlike other similar digital assets like stablecoins, CBDCs carry the equivalent legal weight as fiat currencies. This is important as one of the main drivers of CBDC expansion is the shift occurring globally to cashless societies. As more societies become increasingly cashless, the current economic infrastructure has struggled to support local and international economies. CBDCs are a potential way of solving these issues.

    Much of the disconnect has arisen from many’s perceptions concerning cryptocurrencies, and the association CBDCs have in the public’s eye with cryptocurrencies. The truth is, while cryptocurrencies remain primarily speculative, CBDCs are something else entirely. Here, speculation plays no role. CBDCs, if instituted correctly, would be able to optimize financial systems that have grown outdated and been failing to meet the needs of the world’s most vulnerable demographics from a financial perspective.

    While the value of cryptocurrency is often tied to future developments and use cases, with CBDCs, the value is in the here and now. The utility of these digital currencies is something real, something that addresses shortcomings that are palpable around the world right now. I believe that the framework in which we discuss CBDCs needs to change so that ongoing efforts to integrate this technology into the fabric of the world economy may come to fruition.

    Related: $465 Million of Robinhood Shares Linked to FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Are in Question — What Now?

    CBDCs and universal basic income

    Social security systems of the 19th and 20th centuries have all required the construction of a significant state body to redistribute wealth. These bloated governance structures have generally not been able to adequately assist the people who find themselves in the more vulnerable spheres of society. To address this issue, an experiment was conducted in Finland that sought to provide a Universal Basic Income (UBI) to generally unemployed people. Rather than using a welfare model, benefits were given out in Finland through a €560 direct cash deposit each month. On the one hand, this provided direct support to those in need and, on the other hand, reduced the costs of collecting, accounting and spending funds that run high in welfare programs.

    The final results of the Finnish experiment are now in, and the findings are intriguing: the UBI in Finland led to a modest increase in employment, greatly improved results in the material well-being of recipients, and increased positive individual and societal feedback.

    CBDCs can be uniquely positioned to improve the performance of Universal Basic Income (UBI) programs. Since most of the launched pilot projects and prototypes for CBDCs are focused on a 0% deposit rate, i.e., a situation where CBDCs are subject to inflation and depreciation, central banks could gain more effective leverage in managing aggregate demand in the economy by collecting taxes and distributing part of them to UBI recipients. By issuing currency in digital form, central banks will be able to radically reduce the costs of the state to ensure the circulation of the national currency and social support for the population.

    Related: Regulated Blockchain: A New Dawn in Technological Advancement

    Reaching the unbanked

    In 2021, according to the World Bank Group, 1.4 billion adults were still unbanked. That is a massive portion of the world’s population, and the failure to provide these people with adequate banking services is likely to prolong poverty cycles and have a stunting effect on global economic growth.

    This problem is acute in South East Asia, and a good example of it can be seen in The Philippines, an area that we have focused on in our work. Just over half of the adult population in The Philippines has access to banking services. In a healthy economy, small and medium-sized businesses need access to banking services to thrive. With just over half of the population having access to those services, the Filipino economy cannot flourish, leaving the less affluent to bear most of the brunt.

    Related: Crypto vs. Banking: Which Is a Better Choice?

    Lowering the cost of money transfers

    The lack of banking services has led Filipinos to utilize alternative financial methods and seek work in other countries. Nowadays, remittances from Filipinos working overseas and sending money home account for 10% of the Philippine GDP or roughly 70-80 billion dollars. At the same time, the cost of money transfers is approximately 8-10% of the total amount of the transaction.

    Even here, CBDC technology can be effective in improving the situation. As part of our work in CBDC development, we have established a partnership between the Everscale network and DA5, one of the leading authorized direct agents of Western Union in the Philippines. The blockchain remittance service created by Everscale and DA5 will be the first technology in the Philippines capable of speeding up and lowering the cost of this process. As a result, people will no longer have to pay such high fees on their transactions once the service is launched.

    The first phase of the partnership will see the launch of Everscale’s new stablecoin, which will be tied to the Philippine peso. After the stablecoin is released, users in the Philippines can immediately exchange fiat for its digital counterpart at industry-low rates. But this is just a stablecoin; if The Philippines were to launch a CBDC, there would be benefits for all sectors of the economy.

    The privacy debate

    A common argument against CBDCs is their lack of privacy. However, this is only partially true: it can be shown that more centralized systems can allow more privacy than decentralized protocols. The bad privacy properties of Ethereum, in which states are made up of reused addresses, are widely known. In addition, users sometimes use uniquely linked domain names, making their transactions transparent to outside observers.

    There is a trade-off when designing decentralized protocols: complete on-chain privacy can lead to an inflation problem within the protocol that cannot be tracked – because the recipient and quantities are not known. A sidechain like Liquid gets around this problem quite simply: no more bitcoins can be created inside the protocol than were received at the input. In a centralized system, one trusted oracle can be provided that determines the boundaries of the issue.

    Centralized solutions based on Chaumian e-cash could use more advanced cryptographic methods to hide counterparties and quantities and selectively disclose this information at the request of the parties involved in transactions. In addition, there is no limitation on how privacy-enhancing features can be implemented since they are not bound to decentralized protocols with limited network resources and free space on the blockchain.

    Related: Web3, Crypto, Cybersecurity, Rural Fintech: Trends To Look Out For In 2023

    CBDCs as a vehicle for real and necessary economic change

    The issues above are not going away, and as countries worldwide continue to develop, the people affected by them are likely to continue to suffer. Quite simply, governments have never had the tools necessary to implement adequate benefits programs for those who need them. Now, however, that opportunity is here.

    That is the real utility that all of the efforts towards developing CBDCs are based upon, and that should be at the center of the discussion around this new technology.

    [ad_2]

    Sergey Shashev

    Source link

  • Voyager cleared to sell crypto customer accounts to Binance

    Voyager cleared to sell crypto customer accounts to Binance

    [ad_1]

    Voyager Digital Ltd. won court approval to sell its crypto platform to Binance.US for $20 million as part of Voyager’s plan to liquidate in bankruptcy.

    Under terms of the deal, about $1 billion worth of assets that Voyager holds on behalf of customers would be taken over by Binance, which will then give account holders the option to cash out. The deal cannot close until U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael E. Wiles approves the related bankruptcy liquidation plan.

    Customers will have the right to vote on the Binance deal in the coming weeks when they are asked to consider supporting the liquidation plan, Voyager lawyer Christine A. Okike said during a court hearing held by telephone Tuesday.

    Wiles overruled objections from federal regulators and a handful of states, which questioned whether Binance was financially stable enough to close the proposed transaction and how the company would fulfill its pledge to cash out customers. Once minor wording changes are made, Wiles said he would sign a final order allowing Voyager to enter a contract with Binance and to send creditors an outline of the deal and the liquidation plan for a vote.

    The approval brings Voyager one step closer to shutting down after it became an early victim of the severe drop in crypto currency values that began earlier this year.

    Voyager was founded in 2018 as a crypto trading platform and grew rapidly, reaching a peak of 3.5 million users and more than $5.9 billion of cryptocurrency assets, according to court records. It currently has about 1.2 million customer and $1 billion in assets, which are frozen on the platform until the bankruptcy case ends.

    The company originally had a deal to sell its platform to FTX that would have brought Voyager about $51 million in cash, before that crypto firm filed its own bankruptcy amid fraud allegations. After the FTX deal fell apart, Binance made its offer, which would bring in $20 million.

    The bankruptcy is Voyager Digital Holdings Inc., 22-10943, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Digital Currency Group closes wealth division amid trouble

    Digital Currency Group closes wealth division amid trouble

    [ad_1]

    The cryptocurrency conglomerate Digital Currency Group closed its wealth management division, the latest sign of trouble amid a deep and prolonged slump in the crypto industry.

    The Stamford, Connecticut-based firm, which controls the asset manager Grayscale Investments and the brokerage Genesis, among others, is dealing with numerous issues: It had dismissed 10% of its staff toward the end of last year. Genesis also eliminated more than 60 positions in what amounted to 30% of its workforce.

    Barry Silbert, founder and chief executive of Digital Currency Group Inc.

    Joe Buglewicz/Source: Bloomberg

    As part of the latest changes, DCG shuttered its wealth management division called HQ, a company spokesperson confirmed. The closure was first reported by The Information.

    “Due the state of the broader economic environment and prolonged crypto winter presenting significant headwinds to the industry, we made the decision to wind down HQ, effective January 31,” a DCG spokesperson said in an emailed statement. “We’re proud of the work that the team has done and look forward to potentially revisiting the project in the future.”

    The company run by Barry Silbert is dealing with changes and challenges within some of its biggest subsidiaries following the sudden collapse of FTX, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, toward the end of 2022. Genesis has been trying to raise fresh cash for its lending unit, though some investors approached for the lifeline have balked at the interconnectedness between Genesis and other related entities that are part of DCG. Genesis has warned that it might seek bankruptcy protection.

    Gemini Trust Co. Chief Executive Cameron Winklevoss accused Silbert earlier this week of “bad faith stall tactics” and the intermingling of funds within his conglomerate that Winklevoss says have left $900 million in customer assets needlessly in limbo since FTX’s meltdown.

    Gemini customers haven’t been able to access funds in a lending product called Earn, which offered investors the potential to generate as much as 8% in interest on their digital coins. It did so by lending them out to Genesis Global Capital, one of the companies controlled by Digital Currency Group.

    Winklevoss asked Silbert to “publicly commit to working together to solve this problem,” which he says affects more than 340,000 Earn customers, by Jan. 8. He didn’t say what would happen if no agreement was reached by then.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried Likely to Plead Not Guilty to Fraud Charges

    Sam Bankman-Fried Likely to Plead Not Guilty to Fraud Charges

    [ad_1]

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried.


    David Dee Delgado/Getty Images

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried is likely to plead not guilty to fraud and other charges at his arraignment next week, according to people familiar with the matter.

    The U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York earlier this month charged Mr. Bankman-Fried with engaging in criminal conduct that contributed to the cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse, alleging that he oversaw one of the biggest financial frauds in American history. Mr. Bankman-Fried is likely to appear in person in New York to enter his plea on Jan. 3, one of the people said.

    Before his arrest, Mr. Bankman-Fried blamed the loss of customer funds on sloppy record-keeping and a bank-account issue that allowed Alameda Research, an affiliated trading firm, to cover large losses with money destined for FTX. His not guilty plea was widely expected.

    Mr. Bankman-Fried stands at odds with his associates—Caroline Ellison, the former chief executive of Alameda Research, and Gary Wang, FTX’s former chief technology officer—who both pleaded guilty to criminal offenses similar to those Mr. Bankman-Fried was charged with. Both are cooperating with federal investigators.

    The collapse of FTX and its sister trading firm Alameda have rattled the nascent world of crypto. Prosecutors allege that Mr. Bankman-Fried took billions of dollars of FTX.com customer money to pay the expenses and debts of his trading firm Alameda Research. Both companies filed for bankruptcy last month. Individual traders who entrusted FTX with their crypto are likely facing lengthy bankruptcy proceedings before they have a chance at seeing any of their funds back.

    Read the rest of this article in The Wall Street Journal.

    Write to editors@barrons.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Now that Crypto Has Crashed, What’s Next for The Metaverse?

    Now that Crypto Has Crashed, What’s Next for The Metaverse?

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The collapse of the crypto exchange platform FTX is sending shockwaves into the metaverse. The cryptocurrency exchange was once thought of as a stable and responsible leader in an industry which is often fast-changing and unregulated. In the wake of its failure, many wonder what the implications will be on the metaverse.

    While this moment for FTX will likely be viewed as a learning moment for crypto, metaverse and Web3 organizations and projects, it will also probably be seen as a huge opportunity that some saw for what it was while others missed it entirely. It’s essential to recognize that this is a great time to consider what’s possible in the metaverse and how you can best take advantage of it through your personal brand.

    Related: Metaverse: A Game-changing Innovation For Entrepreneurs

    Seize the moment

    The metaverse is only just beginning to take shape. As exciting as the VR and AR experiences offered today are, these are only the embryonic stages of what’s to come. A recent survey showed that 54% of experts expect the metaverse to be a refined and immersive aspect of daily life for a half billion or more people globally by 2040. This would be a cultural shift similar to the rise of the internet.

    As the metaverse develops, AR and VR experiences will be better able to reach and serve consumers than current technologies can. These new technologies will become a more significant part of our lives and offer users opportunities to purchase virtual and physical goods, travel and even receive healthcare. The metaverse will be an expansion of our daily lives.

    In this post-FTX moment, it’s possible that users will spend less in metaverse contexts because of FTX’s challenges on many cryptocurrency holders. This isn’t much different from the effects of an economic downturn, and it isn’t permanent. There will be an impact that’s widely felt, but it won’t last forever, and this momentary setback shouldn’t cloud our vision of what the metaverse will become.

    Now is the time to gain positioning in the metaverse. This technology will be a massive part of the future and offers unique opportunities to shape your brand and connect with consumers. Our lives are increasingly happening in a hybrid of on- and offline spaces. Don’t let fear prevent you from getting a foothold in this important space.

    Related: Why Your Business Needs to Prepare for the Metaverse

    Be real in the metaverse

    A lack of clarity on many levels made the end of FTX particularly shocking to many. The lack of clarity makes it seem like this came out of nowhere. An important lesson to learn here is that clarity is vital to the success of CEOs in metaverse and crypto spaces. People want to know what’s going on. They also need to have things explained to them in a way they can understand.

    The metaverse creates new opportunities to garner connections with customers and clients. Much like social media, the metaverse blends social connection and commerce in a way that allows people to connect with your brand on a human-to-human level. These connections can generate value for you and your customers and clients in new ways through the metaverse.

    Because the metaverse technology is so new, it’s easy to get caught up in the spectacle of the metaverse itself. Keep in mind, however, that customers value quality, authenticity and clarity in the virtual world just as much as they do offline. These things should be central to your brand –– they will help your customers to ease into the new world of the metaverse.

    Now is the perfect time for a reboot. Valuing clarity means being honest with users and customers about your business’s operations and values. This moment is an opportunity to show how things work behind the scenes. 58% of Americans say they do not understand the metaverse and NFTs –– you can be the one to guide them through this new world and get them excited about it.

    Be clear, simple and engaging when it comes to the metaverse. Go off the beaten path when communicating about crypto, NFTs and the metaverse. Emphasize user experience, and get people excited about what you’re doing in the metaverse. Don’t get overly technical; show users and customers that these spaces can be fun and easy to understand.

    Related: Your Brand Can Become Part of the Metaverse. Here’s How.

    Rebuilding trust will take time

    The fall of FTX will certainly have an economic impact within the metaverse since crypto is central to the financial functions of most metaverse platforms. These impacts won’t last forever, though –– economic recovery will occur over time. That being said, this is only one that we will see in the metaverse.

    It will take time to build back trust with investors. The days when the metaverse was seen almost as a get-rich-quick investment by venture capitalists are likely over. Investors will be pickier and more careful about the NFT, crypto and metaverse-based companies and products they choose to invest in.

    Clarity will be necessary to build back trust. Branding that emphasizes authenticity, transparency and clarity will connect with investors who feel less trustworthy of the metaverse. Investors will want to take advantage of the lower investment price in the metaverse we’re seeing right now. The opportunity is there; you just have to be willing and able to close the gap in trust.

    Crypto got its start in the wake of the financial crisis of 2009. It originates in people’s desire for decentralization, clarity and trust. Crypto is fundamentally adaptable, and it is still growing. Recovery is already happening. Remember where crypto came from and what its purpose is. Remain calm, emphasize clarity and trust and connectivity will continue to grow.

    [ad_2]

    Raoul Davis

    Source link

  • Caroline Ellison, associate of Sam Bankman-Fried, says she’s ‘truly sorry’ for stealing billions of FTX customer money

    Caroline Ellison, associate of Sam Bankman-Fried, says she’s ‘truly sorry’ for stealing billions of FTX customer money

    [ad_1]

    Caroline Ellison has apologized for stealing billions in customer deposits at crypto exchange platform FTX to make bets at Alameda Research, the hedge fund she ran.

    ‘I am truly sorry for what I did.’


    — Caroline Ellison, former head of Alameda Research

    Ellison made her comments in front of a judge in New York federal court, as she pleaded guilty to helping Sam Bankman-Fried make away with billions in customer funds while misleading investors and lenders and playing down the risk of their crypto trading platform.

    ‘I knew that it was wrong.’


    — Ellison

    Along with Ellison, Zixiao “Gary” Wang, a former FTX chief technology office and co-founder, 29, pleaded guilty Monday this week during separate hearings.

    Federal authorities and regulators are making the case that Wang wrote software code, at Bankman-Fried’s behest, to create backdoors into FTX’s systems that allowed Ellison’s Alameda access to customer money and prop up FTX’s own token, FTT.

    The pair each potentially face decades in prison sentences if convicted after pleading guilty to charges that included wire fraud, securities and commodities fraud in exchange for leniency.

    Both have agreed to cooperate with authorities to lay the groundwork for Bankman-Fried’s own case as the alleged brains behind of one of the biggest crypto frauds in recent memory.

    On Thursday, Bankman-Fried was released from custody on a $250 million bond, following his first appearance in a U.S., court on fraud charges.

    FTX filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11 when Bankman-Fried was ousted from the company he co-founded in 2019.

    The collapse of FTX was, perhaps, hastened by its competitor, Binance, who announced it was unloading $500 million in FTT tokens in November due to “recent revelations that have come to light” about the company’s books. That triggered mass redemptions by depositors, which FTX couldn’t meet.

    Ellison is a Stanford University graduate who grew up in the suburbs of Boston, the daughter of two MIT economists, according to the Wall Street Journal. After graduation, she worked at quantitative trading firm Jane Street, where she met fellow trader Bankman-Fried. She was rumored to be in a relationship with Bankman-Fried, who is an MIT grad, according to reports.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Sherrod Brown leaves possibility of crypto ban open as momentum builds for stronger regulation

    Sen. Sherrod Brown leaves possibility of crypto ban open as momentum builds for stronger regulation

    [ad_1]

    Cryptocurrency firms reeling from the epic collapse of FTX and its aftereffects received yet another unwelcome development on Sunday’s talk shows. 

    Senator Sherrod Brown, chair of the Senate banking committee, took questions on NBC’s Meet the Press today about how lawmakers should approach cryptocurrencies after the FTX debacle.

    Host Chuck Todd asked the lawmaker whether regulating crypto would give a “green light” to something that many people think should be banned.

    Brown, referring to government agencies—the Treasury, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission—replied, “We want them to do what they need to do…maybe banning.”

    His comments follow ones made by Senator Jon Tester, who serves on the same banking committee and was asked by Todd last weekend whether crypto should be regulated or banned. 

    “One or the other,” he answered. “It’s not been able to pass the smell test for me…I see no reason why this stuff should exist. I really don’t.”

    Crypto an ‘investment in nothing’

    But it isn’t just lawmakers in Washington, D.C.—many top business leaders feel the same way. 

    In September, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon called crypto a “decentralized Ponzi scheme” that’s not “good for anybody.” 

    Charlie Munger, vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and Warren Buffett’s business partner, said this summer: “Crypto is an investment in nothing…I think anybody that sells this stuff is either delusional or evil. I’m not interested in undermining the national currencies of the world.”

    Munger went so far as to praise Chinese leader Xi Jinping for being “smart enough” to ban Bitcoin in China.

    But Brown on Sunday acknowledged banning crypto is “very difficult because it will go offshore and who knows how that will work…This is a complicated, unregulated pot of money.”

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried based his business in the Bahamas, where he reportedly led a lavish penthouse lifestyle and, according to federal prosectors, misused billions of dollars in customer funds.

    Bahamian authorities arrested him on Monday following a formal notification by the U.S. government that it had filed criminal charges against him and would likely request his extradition. The U.S. and the Bahamas have had an extradition process in place since 1994.

    Crypto ‘doesn’t get a free pass’

    Brown this week thanked the U.S. and Bahamian officials behind the arrest, adding in a statement, “I trust that Mr. Bankman-Fried will soon be brought to justice. It is clear he owes the American people an explanation.”

    He added, “Things that look and behave like securities, commodities, or banking products need to be regulated and supervised by the responsible agencies who serve consumers…Crypto doesn’t get a free pass because it’s bright and shiny.”

    Brian Armstrong, CEO of crypto exchange Coinbase, noted in tweet last month that FTX was “an offshore exchange not regulated by the SEC.” 

    His company is based the U.S. and as a publicly traded firm has more transparency than FTX did. This week, Coinbase shares fell to an all-time low.

    “The problem is that the SEC failed to create regulatory clarity here in the US, so many American investors (and 95% of trading activity) went offshore,” he wrote. “Punishing US companies for this makes no sense.”

    Our new weekly Impact Report newsletter examines how ESG news and trends are shaping the roles and responsibilities of today’s executives. Subscribe here.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried will now reverse his decision to fight extradition to the U.S.: Report

    Sam Bankman-Fried will now reverse his decision to fight extradition to the U.S.: Report

    [ad_1]

    Sam Bankman-Fried could soon be headed for a U.S. prison to face fraud charges. The former CEO of FTX—the cryptocurrency exchange that went abruptly bankrupt last month—is currently being held in a jail in the Bahamas.

    Bahamian authorities arrested him on Monday following a formal notification by the U.S. government that it had filed criminal charges against him and would likely request his extradition. The U.S. and the Bahamas have had an extradition process in place since 1994, when a treaty signed by both countries came into force.

    On Tuesday, a Bahamian judge denied him bail, deeming him a flight risk. During the arraignment proceedings, Bankman-Fried’s lawyer said he would fight plans to send him to the U.S., and an extradition hearing was set for Feb. 8.

    But now Bankman-Fried is expected to appear in a Bahamian court on Monday to reverse his decision to contest extradition, Reuters reported.

    Federal prosecutors in New York have charged Bankman-Fried with eight criminal counts, including conspiracy and wire fraud, for allegedly misusing billions of dollars in customers’ funds. He faces up to 115 years in prison if convicted on all eight counts.

    ‘Open and shut case for fraud’

    Last month, billionaire Mark Cuban said he’d “be afraid of going to jail for a long time” if he were Bankman-Fried.

    And earlier this month, Brain Armstrong, CEO of the U.S.-based crypto exchange Coinbase, said it was “baffling” why Bankman-Fried wasn’t already in prison.

    “The DOJ or somebody should be able to make—just based on his public statements, I think there’s a very open and shut case for fraud,” Armstrong said at the a16z crypto Founder Summit.

    FTX’s implosion last month surprised many inside and outside of the crypto sector. The $32 billion exchange had established itself as a leader in the field, having enlisted star athletes like Tom Brady and other celebrities to bolster its image. 

    Bankman-Fried resigned as CEO on Nov. 11, the same day that FTX filed for bankruptcy. A key accusation leveled against him is that he used customer funds from his crypto exchange to fund risky bets at Alameda Research, his misleadingly named crypto hedge fund.

    FTX is based in the Bahamas, where Bankman-Fried reportedly enjoyed a luxurious penthouse lifestyle

    He’s now being held at Fox Hill prison in the Bahamas, according to Reuters, a jail described as “harsh” by the U.S. State Department last year, with overcrowding and a rodent infestation at the time.

    Our new weekly Impact Report newsletter examines how ESG news and trends are shaping the roles and responsibilities of today’s executives. Subscribe here.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried’s ‘I screwed up’ messaging is about lawsuits and penalties vs. jail, says U.S. securities lawyer

    Sam Bankman-Fried’s ‘I screwed up’ messaging is about lawsuits and penalties vs. jail, says U.S. securities lawyer

    [ad_1]

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried went on an “I screwed up” media blitz this week, highlighted by his video appearance at the New York Times DealBook summit on Wednesday and continuing into the Sunday talk shows.

    U.S. securities lawyer James Murphy, speaking to CNN’s Quest Means Business on Thursday, said Bankman-Fried “did a very good job of sticking to his talking points.” 

    Murphy said: “His talking points were, ‘I didn’t do anything wrong intentionally. I may have been negligent. I may have breached fiduciary obligations.’ But those two things get you sued, get you penalized. They don’t get you to jail. And so he steered clear of anything that sounded like intentional misconduct.”

    FTX imploded in spectacular fashion last month, spurring calls for tighter regulation and shaking confidence in the crypto sector. The $32 billion cryptocurrency exchange had established itself as a leader in the field, enlisting star athletes like Stephen Curry and other celebrities to bolster its image. 

    A key accusation leveled against Bankman-Fried is that he used customer funds from his crypto exchange to fund risky bets at affiliate trading arm Alameda Research. 

    ‘Did not ever try to commit fraud’

    In the DealBook interview, Bankman-Fried peppered his statements with legalese, stating that he “did not ever try to commit fraud on anyone,” didn’t “know of times when I lied,” and “didn’t knowingly comingle funds.” 

    Said Murphy of Bankman-Fried sticking to the script: “He’s a very, very bright man and managed to do that for an hour.”

    In a Financial Times interview published Sunday, Bankman-Fried stuck with the theme, saying, “I f****d up big and people got hurt.”

    On ABC’s This Week on Sunday, Bankman-Fried said, “Look, I screwed up. Like I was CEO, I had a responsibility here and a responsibility to be on top of what was going on the exchange. I wish I had done much better at that.” 

    ABC legal analyst Dan Abrams said afterwards, “His basic defense, it sounds like, is, ‘I didn’t have the intent. I wasn’t trying to do it.’ That’s not enough in a lot of cases. That’s not going to protect him necessarily from getting indicted. But it is something we hear from CEOs who get tried, and it almost never works.”

    ‘People will go to jail, and should go to jail’

    Abrams added that Bankman-Fried could be facing a long time in jail. 

    “We’re talking about, by the way, the possibility of up to life in prison,” he said. “When you’re talking about this much money, in the federal sentencing guidelines, you’re talking about the possibility of enhancement after enhancement after enhancement based on the dollar amounts that could lead to something up to life.”

    Earlier this week Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said of Bankman-Fried, “It’s “baffling to me why he’s not in custody already.”

    Mark Cuban, billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks and a prominent crypto investor, recently told TMZ that Bankman-Fried should be worried about prison time.

    Mike Novogratz, CEO of crypto firm Galaxy Digital Holdings, told Bloomberg TV on Thursday, “Sam and his cohorts perpetuated a fraud…He took our money. And so he needs to get prosecuted. People will go to jail, and should go to jail.”

    Securities lawyer Murphy added that prosecutors don’t have to prove that there was securities fraud. “They can go with mail and wire fraud,” he said. “If the money of customers was misappropriated and given to this affiliated company Alameda, that is a fraud and should qualify under the statues. I sincerely hope our Department of Justice is looking at it very hard.” 

    Fortune reached out to Bankman-Fried for comments but did not receive an immediate reply. 

    Our new weekly Impact Report newsletter will examine how ESG news and trends are shaping the roles and responsibilities of today’s executives—and how they can best navigate those challenges. Subscribe here.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • Bill Ackman denies defending Sam Bankman-Fried, says FTX fiasco ‘egregious’ case of ‘gross negligence’ at a minimum

    Bill Ackman denies defending Sam Bankman-Fried, says FTX fiasco ‘egregious’ case of ‘gross negligence’ at a minimum

    [ad_1]

    Bill Ackman said Saturday that his recent comments on Sam Bankman-Fried were misinterpreted. 

    Ackman, founder and chief executive officer of Pershing Square Capital Management LP, faced criticism after he tweeted on Nov. 30 that he believed SBF, as the founder of crypto exchange FTX is known, was telling the truth at the New York Times Dealbook Summit. Bankman-Fried denied trying to perpetrate a fraud, while acknowledging many errors at the helm of the company. 

    FTX imploded last month after the exchange revealed an $8 billion hole in its balance sheet, fueling questions about whether it mishandled customer funds. Since then Bankman-Fried has embarked on an apology tour, accepting that his company broke its own rules but denying fraud. 

    Ackman said Saturday that the collapse of FTX is “at a minimum, the most egregious, large-scale case of business gross negligence that I have observed in my career.” Still, the hedge fund manager said Bankman-Fried could have “civil rather than criminal liability” if he has told the truth.  

    Our new weekly Impact Report newsletter will examine how ESG news and trends are shaping the roles and responsibilities of today’s executives—and how they can best navigate those challenges. Subscribe here.

    [ad_2]

    Susanne Barton, Bloomberg

    Source link

  • Bill Ackman says he sees why FTX victims want Sam Bankman-Fried to ‘suffer’ severe consequences ‘including jail time’

    Bill Ackman says he sees why FTX victims want Sam Bankman-Fried to ‘suffer’ severe consequences ‘including jail time’

    [ad_1]

    Hedge-fund titan Bill Ackman appears to be walking back comments he made via Twitter last week about Sam Bankman-Fried that some interpreted as implicit support for the 30-something who presided over one of the most epic bankruptcies in financial markets in recent memory.

    Last week, Ackman tweeted that Bankman-Fried’s statements made during a widely watched interview, streamed to New York from the crypto founder’s location in the Bahamas, was “believable.”

    “Many have interpreted my tweet to mean that I am defending SBF or somehow supporting him. Nothing could be further from the truth,” Ackman wrote Saturday, referring to Bankman-Fried by his initials SBF.

    Ackman went on to describe the implosion of Bankman-Fried’s crypto exchange FTX, and some of its associated businesses, as “at a minimum, the most egregious, large-scale case of business gross negligence that I have observed in my career.”

    Check out: The Sam Bankman-Fried roadshow rolls on: 10 crazy things the FTX founder has just said

    Ackman, who is the chief executive of Pershing Square Capital, a prominent investor in traditional markets, and an advocate of crypto, last week, tweeted this message following the widely watched interview of Bankman-Fried at the New York Times Dealbook Summit:

    “Call me crazy, but I think SBF is telling the truth.”

    Ackman has been chastised by some for seemingly offering verbal succor to a person who some have accused of, at the least, an epic mismanagement of client assets.

    Speaking against the wishes of his lawyers, Bankman-Fried on Wednesday, during the Dealbook interview, admitted to making mistakes but said that he never intended to mingle client funds with those of the firm to make leveraged bets on crypto via hedge fund Alameda Research, which he founded before he started FTX.

    “I didn’t know exactly what was going on,” Bankman said at the time.

    At least one response to Ackman’s Saturday tweet, questioned whether the hedge funder might be responding to blowback from his own clients.

    It isn’t the first time that Ackman has cast Bankman-Fried’s actions in a positive light. As the implosion of FTX was unfolding, Ackman said, in a now-deleted tweet, that he’d never before seen a CEO take responsibility as the crypto exchange operator did and that he wanted to give him “credit” for his actions. “It reflects well on him and the possibility of a more favorable outcome” for FTX, he wrote.

    On Saturday, one Twitter user asked Ackman if had any ties to Bankman-Fried, which the investor bluntly said he doesn’t.

    Bankman-Fried had been viewed as a financial darling inside and outside the crypto industry until his empire collapsed on Nov. 11 and it was revealed that affiliated hedge fund Alameda lost billions in FTX client money in leveraged crypto bets.

    John Ray, the new chief executive of FTX, in a filing to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, described the state of the crypto platform “as a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Crypto lender BlockFi is suing Sam Bankman-Fried over his shares in Robinhood: report

    Crypto lender BlockFi is suing Sam Bankman-Fried over his shares in Robinhood: report

    [ad_1]

    Just hours after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New Jersey on Monday, cryptocurrency lender BlockFi filed a lawsuit against a holding company by FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried over his shares in trading platform Robinhood, the Financial Times reported.

    The suit was filed against Bankman-Fried’s vehicle Emergent Fidelity Technologies, of whom BlockFi is seeking to recover unpaid collateral.

    The filing – also lodged in New Jersey – says BlockFi entered into a pledge agreement with Emergent on Nov. 9 stating that an unnamed borrower was obliged to pledge “certain shares of common stock” and has breached the agreement by failing to comply with its payment obligations.

    The Financial Times reports the collateral in question is Bankman-Fried’s 7.6% stake in Robinhood which he bought earlier this year.

    “Emergent has defaulted on its obligations under the pledge agreement and failed to satisfy its obligations thereunder despite written notice of default and acceleration,” the lawsuit filing says.

    The lawsuit also named London-based brokerage ED&F Man Capital Markets for refusing to “transfer the collateral” to BlockFi.

    “This is a highly complex matter,” a spokesperson for ED&F Man Capital Markets told MarketWatch in an emailed statement.

    “We cannot comment on matters that are subject to legal proceedings but will of course comply with any direction given by the judge,” they added.

    On Monday, BlockFi, who was once valued at $3 billion, filed for bankruptcy protection after becoming the latest company to be pushed over the edge from the collapse of crypto exchange FTX.

    See also: BlockFi’s big creditors include an indenture trustee firm, FTX and the SEC

    The lawsuit is the latest headache for Bankman-Fried, who is already the subject of a number of investigations in the U.S. and the Bahamas – where FTX was based. The downfall of FTX has triggered a chain reaction of crypto-casualties including crypto financial-services firm Genesis.

    FTX collapse to be focus of Senate hearing Thursday — here’s what to watch for

    BlockFi and representatives of Bankman-Fried did not immediately respond to MarketWatch’s request for comment.

    See also: Bitcoin prices under pressure as cracks spread across crypto industry

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • They Lived Together, Worked Together and Lost Billions Together: Inside Sam Bankman-Fried’s Doomed FTX Empire

    They Lived Together, Worked Together and Lost Billions Together: Inside Sam Bankman-Fried’s Doomed FTX Empire

    [ad_1]

    NASSAU, Bahamas—Sam Bankman-Fried’s $32 billion crypto-trading empire collapsed in an incandescent bankruptcy last week, prompting irate customers, crypto acolytes and Silicon Valley bigwigs to ask how something that seemed so promising could have imploded so fast.

    The emerging picture suggests FTX wasn’t simply felled by a rival, or undone by a bad trade or the relentless fall this year in the value of cryptocurrencies. Instead, it had long been a chaotic mess. From its earliest days, the firm was an unruly agglomeration of corporate entities, customer assets and Mr. Bankman-Fried himself, according to court papers, company balance sheets shown to bankers and interviews with employees and investors. No one could say exactly what belonged to whom. Prosecutors are now investigating its collapse.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supposed $477 million FTX ‘hack’ was actually a Bahamian government asset seizure

    Supposed $477 million FTX ‘hack’ was actually a Bahamian government asset seizure

    [ad_1]

    Remember that hack of nearly half a  billion dollars in cryptocurrency from bankrupt FTX last weekend? Turns out it was actually a government asset seizure.

    The Securities Commission of the Bahamas has now acknowledged that it was behind the removal of $477 million in crypto assets from the bankrupt exchange on Nov. 12.

    “The Securities Commission of the Bahamas, in the exercise of its powers as regulator acting under the authority of an order made by the Supreme Court of the Bahamas, took the action of directing the transfer of all the digital assets of FTX Digital Markets Ltd. to a digital wallet controlled by the commission, for safekeeping,” the agency said in a statement.

    The transfer occurred the day after FTX had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware and immediately sparked concerns of a major hack. The company announced that day that “unauthorized access to certain assets has occurred” and that they were coordinating with law enforcement on the matter.”

    On Thursday, the U.S.-based bankruptcy administrators led by John Ray, III, who have taken control of FTX, said in court filings that they had “credible evidence” that officials in the Bahamas had directed FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried to access FTX’s systems after the Chapter 11 filing, “for the purpose of obtaining digital assets of the debtors.”

    The seizure of assets came amid an emerging fight for control over the direction of the bankruptcy proceeding, with officials in the Bahamas filing a separate Chapter 15 bankruptcy petition in federal court in New York on Nov. 15.

    That filing was on behalf of FTX Digital Markets Ltd., a subsidiary that managed significant aspects of the company’s operations from its headquarters in the Caribbean island nation. 

    A Chapter 15 filing is used typically in cases involving companies with debtors in multiple countries.

    In its statement, the Bahamian Securities Commission said it believed FTX Digital Markets was not part of the Delaware bankruptcy proceeding.

    The administrators of the Delaware bankruptcy have asked the judge in their case to combine the cases, saying that it was duplicative and confusing to keep them separate. The judge scheduled a hearing on the matter for Monday.

    The administrators of the Delaware case have accused Bankman-Fried of attempting to undermine their efforts to sort out the mess he left behind by pushing the second bankruptcy case brought by Bahamian officials. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link