Sam Bankman-Fried (left), founder and CEO of FTX, and Changpeng Zhao, cofounder and CEO of Binance.
Bloomberg
Changpeng Zhao, the billionaire cofounder and CEO of Binance, said on Sunday that his cryptocurrency exchange is selling all its remaining tokens of FTX, fellow billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried’s trading platform, that are worth about $580 million.
Zhao wrote on Twitter that the decision to offload 23 million tokens, called FTT, was due to “recent revelations that have come to light,” without giving more details. He later added that it was “post-exit risk management, learning from Luna,” referring to the failed crypto coin, but stressed that the move was not against a competitor.
Issued by Bahamas-based FTX, FTT tokens grant its holders a discount on trading fees and access to more features on the crypto derivatives trading platform. The cryptocurrency is worth nearly $3 billion over a 24-hour period as of Monday, data on Coingecko shows.
The liquidation is part of Binance’s exit from FTX equity that started last year, when Binance received about $2.1 billion in Binance USD (the stablecoins issued by Binance) and FTT tokens, Zhao disclosed. The latest withdrawal of FTT coins will take a few months to be completed.
Binance was aiming to “de-risk” its platform after seeing “alarming trends” in the balance sheet of companies tied to Bankman-Fried, according to a person close to Binance who asked not to be identified as the information is not public. Binance declined to comment.
Last week, crypto-focused news site Coindesk reported that Alameda Research, the sister quantitative trading firm of FTX, is made up largely of FTT tokens. The claim was later refuted by Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, who said the report failed to reflect another $10 billion worth of the firm’s assets and that it has taken hedges.
Following Zhao’s announcements, Bankman-Fried wrote on Twitter that he respects what people have done to grow the crypto industry and pointed to Zhao. FTX didn’t immediately respond to a request for comments on Monday.
Binance announced its strategic investment in FTX in 2019, shortly after the crypto derivatives exchange was founded in Hong Kong. A year later, Zhao told Forbesthat Binance had given up its equity stake in FTX, saying it’s part of “a normal investment cycle” following FTX’s tremendous growth.
Six months into the crypto meltdown that’s wiped $2 trillion off the market, people are still talking about the chances of a rebound–a “crypto spring” after yet another “winter.” What’s surprising is that the correction hasn’t been enough to inject more realism into the discussion. What the carnage actually reveals is that most blockchain-enabled crypto businesses need to be rethought and rebuilt from top to bottom.
Hopefully, our world of speculators will one day be replaced by pragmatists, who can see the blockchain for what it is: a powerful new technology, but not the new internet.
The blockchain has the potential to help shape the future and power progress and growth–just not in the way it’s typically deployed today. What we’ve witnessed is an industry that often talks of “freedom” and “autonomy”, but just as often tries to use that language to mislead the public. We’ve come across many founders looking to make a quick buck, instead of those willing to commit to the long, multi-year effort to build real value. We’ve seen people wielding a technology that’s casting around for applications, rather than those trying to solve a real and pressing problem.
When the industry rebuilds, we will hopefully see more genuinely mission-driven blockchain entrepreneurs. In the meantime, it’s important to sift the dreams from the delusions.
The trouble began when people started to talk up the potential of crypto to replace the world’s sovereign currencies, destroy the banks, and totally remove the need for corporate governance via distributed autonomous organizations. The industry was soon flush with money reliant on the success of cryptocurrencies–with many players creating conflicts of interest and artificially increasing the value of the businesses by buying up tokens.
“Community” became one of the most used terms in crypto, but too often it’s a byword for pushing bad investments. We love real communities–but a pyramid scheme is not the same as a network effect. Too many crypto entrepreneurs have been incentivized to talk up, overinflate, and generally “pump and dump” various currencies. Rampant speculation became the biggest affliction.
The current environment is based on token issuers getting rich on day one–equivalent to a startup founder selling a chunk of their company and pocketing it before anything has been built. If you move in crypto circles, you might well have encountered those who’ve cashed out and now loiter in self-satisfied cliques at conferences.
To make it worse, regulators have been slow to act, which is in part why crypto has been so attractive. The sad result is that many people have been ruined by the crypto crash, and no one’s been there to protect them.
The good news is that regulation is coming. Companies using blockchain technology need to focus on creating long-term value with the assumption that the normal laws and rules of finance will apply–from “Know Your Customer” to “Anti-Money-Laundering.” Anything that smells off probably is.
Similarly, crypto businesses can’t sidestep the consequences for the climate of how their tokens are maintained with vast amounts of computing power. Any company that relies on some kind of blockchain can’t avoid talking about its environmental impact and building a responsible business model that takes it into account.
The Ethereum blockchain’s recent switch from a “proof-of-work” process to validate transactions to a “proof-of-stake” one–which reduces its energy consumption by 99.9%–is a step in the right direction, and shows how crypto businesses are capable of reform.
The blockchain can still have a bright future. Lots of us at Index were–and continue to be–intrigued by the technology. We see its possibilities as a medium of exchange (being able to transfer ownership between two people without a trusted third party) and a store of value. There is potential in things like open identity verified by cryptography, the secure transfer of digital assets, the possibility of a verified and transparent record of transactions, and institutional-grade solutions.
In that spirit, we have and will continue to make investments in blockchain businesses–staying away from startups that make all of their money through short-term trading, gambling, or taking advantage of investors’ credulity. Instead, we’ll back companies that are building the rails for crypto, as well as those leveraging the technology to create better products and services.
It may take a while before more businesses emerge in these areas, but they’re likely to share a few common characteristics. They will offer products and services to a broad set of businesses and consumers, not just crypto natives; they will provide a clear benefit to users, and solve a real pain point; and they will apply blockchain across every sector, rather than creating a sector of their own.
Fundamentally, we’re agnostic about the choice of technology that sits behind a business. What we care about is what someone is doing with that infrastructure. Once some of crypto’s most intriguing use cases become established, nobody will worry whether they’re blockchain-powered or not. In our view, cryptography is simply an interesting type of technology that can do certain things better–not something that’s going to fundamentally alter the mechanics of our economy and society.
Let’s hope that the present crypto crunch will have a salutary effect in clearing out the many businesses that lack the necessary vision and conviction. There is no doubt that hugely important and influential companies will be built on the back of the blockchain. They just won’t look like most of the businesses kicking around today.
In the meantime, we’ll be cheering on those truly revolutionary founders who want to grab this technology and build something amazing with it.
Danny Rimer is a partner at Index Ventures, a venture capital firm with offices and investments in the U.S., Europe, and Israel.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
Regulatory uncertainty and travel restrictions are forcing the city’s crypto elites to shift their operations to more hospitable jurisdictions.
Sam Bankman-Fried’s time in Hong Kong was relatively brief, but incredibly lucrative. In the three years he spent in the city, the unabashed workaholic known for sleeping in his office established FTX, a crypto derivatives exchange that quickly became one of the world’s busiest trading outlets. And the success of that business turned Bankman-Fried into the richest person in crypto at the age of 29 with a $26.5 billion fortune. And then he left.
In September, Bankman-Fried jetted off to the Bahamas for good. His legions of social media followers were surprised by the unfamiliar sight of him donning a suit as FTX’s management team welcomed the country’s prime minister to their new headquarters. Why the Bahamas?
“It’s really important that we have long-term regulatory guidance and clarity,” he said from the company’s office in the Caribbean archipelago. “Hong Kong has not yet drafted the actual bill…there’s uncertainty about exactly how that is going to turn out.”
Hong Kong has developed into a hotbed for blockchain and crypto-related businesses. Many of the global elites from the crypto industry got their start in Hong Kong, including exchanges Crypto.com, BitMEX, Bitfinex, OSL and others. The world’s largest stablecoin, Tether, was launched from Hong Kong. And the city notched up an astounding $60 billion worth of incoming cryptocurrencies between July 2020 and June 2021, according to blockchain data firm Chainalysis.
But regulatory uncertainty in Hong Kong combined with strict quarantine requirements have become catalysts for some crypto companies to shift their operations to other markets where regulators are moving more swiftly to roll out rules that support the nascent industry.
Singapore is the nearest such locationand it managed to attract a veritable who’s who of the crypto billionaire ranks. Since the city-state opened its door to “crypto tokens” in January 2020,Brian Armstrong’s Coinbase, Changpeng Zhao’s Binance, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss’ Gemini have already set up business units and applied for licenses to operate there.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said that it’s already received 170 applications for crypto-related service providers as of July. Although the financial regulator has turned down two applicants so far, three other candidates, Australia-based exchange Independent Reserve, the brokerage arm of DBS Bank and Singapore’s fintech company Fomo Pay, announced over the past three months that they had secured licenses. Coinhako also said in November that it had received in-principle approval from MAS, making it the latest to begin operating as a regulated crypto exchange in the country. So far, around 70 crypto-related service providers have been granted temporary exemptions that allow them to operate without a license for six months.
Forbes Asia
Crypto.com, the world’s third-largest spot exchange by 24-hour trading volume, according to CoinGecko, shifted its headquarters this year from Hong Kong to Singapore. Eqonex Group, a Nasdaq-listed digital asset financial services firm, established its crypto derivatives exchange last year in Singapore rather than Hong Kong, where it operates much of its other businesses. The firm, formerly known as Diginex, cited Hong Kong’s regulatory regime which bans crypto derivatives and limits trading services to professional investors.
“These were the two things that we really didn’t feel were the right way to go, and in fact were contrary to the way that we had designed our products,” said Richard Byworth, CEO of Eqonex Group.
Hong Kong introduced an opt-in licensing regime in 2018 for platforms that allow investors to buy and sell security tokens, which are traditional stocks and bonds in a digital form. At the time, most cryptocurrencies fell outside the scope of the framework. Furthermore, licensed exchanges are only allowed to serve professional investors with a portfolio of at least HK$8 million ($1 million) in liquid assets. They are also banned from offering traders access to crypto futures and derivatives.
So far, the only firm to be granted a license under Hong Kong’s voluntary regime is crypto trading platform OSL. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) said in November that it has applications from several other firms under consideration.
Wayne Trench, CEO of Hong Kong-based digital asset trading platform OSL.
OSL
Now, the city’s regulators are discussing the possibility of a compulsory licensing regime for exchanges that offer virtual asset trading, including bitcoin and others that were previously excluded. The proposal, however, still suggests limiting exchanges operating in Hong Kong to only offering services to high-net-worth individuals. The restrictions on crypto derivatives are also likely to apply on licensees under the new regime.
“Frankly, it’s not an easy set of rules to comply with. But what the Hong Kong regulations have done is deliver, in my mind, the highest level of investor protection in digital assets anywhere in the world,” said Wayne Trench, CEO of OSL.
But others contend the policy will result in retail investors taking even greater risks if their only option is to resort to using unregulated exchanges to buy and sell cryptocurrencies in Hong Kong. “As much as you want to ban it, people will always find a way to buy crypto, and they will do it somewhere else,” said Henri Arslanian, crypto leader of PwC based in Hong Kong. “It’s just the reality of it, which puts the public more at risk ironically.”
Nearly one-third of Hong Kong’s residents are estimated to have invested in, transferred, or exchanged cryptocurrencies for goods and services, according to a newly published survey by payments giant Visa. Among developed markets, Hong Kong was ranked only behind the U.S. in terms of its residents engagement with the digital assets, the survey shows.
The SFC said last month that they are currently reviewing the rules that block retail investors from using crypto trading platforms as part of its efforts in maintaining a practical approach toward providing a “well-defined” regulatory environment.
Byworth of Eqonex said Hong Kong still has other policies in its favor that make it easier for the city’s businesses to recruit and retain international talent. “Even if Hong Kong goes down on a road of restrictive regulations around crypto and loses a lot of people to Singapore, the city can take quite a lot of market share back at any moment when it decides to change course and reverse into a more flexible regulatory regime,” he said.
Visitors to Hong Kong Fintech Week walk past a booth displaying the symbols for bitcoin and ether on November 4, 2021.
Paul Yeung/Bloomberg
It’s not just the regulatory framework that matters, but also the pandemic travel restrictions that have an impact on Hong Kong’s appeal as a place to do business. The city’s “zero infection” strategy has become a major obstacle for many of the businesses based there. Residents returning to Hong Kong face a mandatory hotel quarantine period of up to three weeks.
The Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association, a lobby group representing some of the world’s biggest banks, said Hong Kong’s status as a financial center was at risk because of its “highly restrictive” quarantine policy. The group said in October that 48% of the companiespolled in a recent survey were contemplating moving staff or functions away from Hong Kong due to the uncertainty over when the restrictions would be lifted.
Meanwhile, Singapore has already opened its border to vaccinated travelers from at least 18 countries. Aside from starting to ease travel restrictions, the city-state’s proactive stance on regulation makes it more attractive as other jurisdictions move in the opposite direction. Singapore is gaining headway as some nearby countries, such as China and South Korea, clamp down on their domestic crypto industries. China recently banned all cryptocurrency transactions and mining, and South Korea shut down nearly 40 exchanges deemed unqualified in September.
Coinbase’s debut in Japan in August shed a positive light on the country, which has been at the forefront of regulating crypto assets since 2017 following the $460 million bitcoin hack on local exchange Mt. Gox. But crypto-related crimes are still a problem for Japan, where trading platform Liquid also became the victim of a cyberattack just months ago.
To be sure, Singapore can’t rest on its laurels just yet. The government still has to decide whether the trading of crypto derivatives will be permitted. The digital instruments range from those that already exist in traditional market like futures and options, to the more innovative ones like “perpetual swaps,” a type of futures contract without an expiry date.
Forbes Asia
The Monetary Authority of Singapore said last year that it will not regulate crypto derivatives unless they are offered on approved trading platforms, and the authority warned retail investors of their risks.
The reality is that only a handful of countries have even begun to discuss crypto derivatives. “There’s no one-size-fits-all perfect crypto regulatory regime out there,” said Arslanian of PwC. “All that the crypto ecosystem wants is clarity and the ability to operate a business.”
The Bahamas is a standout in this regard because it moved quickly in late 2020 to lay out a comprehensive framework across both spot and derivatives trading which gave it a first-mover advantage.
According to Bankman-Fried, the restrictions on services to a local market are less important than restrictions that hinder or even block a business from offering its services to the rest of the world. “Because for most companies, this isn’t just about maximizing how much business can be done directly toward one place’s population, it’s more about where is a good home for a business generally,” he said.
Sam Bankman-Fried, CEO of crypto derivatives exchange FTX.
