ReportWire

Tag: Crude oil markets

  • China Is Filling Up Its Oil Reserves Fast

    [ad_1]

    China has spent months building up its oil reserves. That might come in handy in the wake of the new sanctions the U.S. recently imposed on Russian crude.

    During the first nine months of the year, the world’s second-largest economy imported on average more than 11 million barrels of oil a day, an amount above the daily production of Saudi Arabia, according to official customs data. Analysts estimate 1 million to 1.2 million of those barrels were stashed in reserves each day.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Rebecca Feng

    Source link

  • Oil prices jump after drone attack kills U.S. troops, escalating Mideast crisis

    Oil prices jump after drone attack kills U.S. troops, escalating Mideast crisis

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures popped higher Sunday evening, after a drone attack that killed three U.S. service members in northern Jordan, blamed by the White House on Iran-backed militants, marked a major escalation of tensions in the Middle East.

    West Texas Intermediate crude for March delivery
    CL00,
    +1.22%

    CL.1,
    +1.22%

    CLH24,
    +1.22%

    was up $1.09, or 1.4%, at $79.10 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. March Brent crude
    BRN00,
    +1.15%

    BRNH24,
    +1.14%
    ,
    the global benchmark, gained $1.11, or 1.3%, to trade at $84.66 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe.

    Much will ultimately depend on the U.S. response and whether Iran takes action aimed at shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, Tariq Zahir, managing member at Tyche Capital Advisors, told MarketWatch on Sunday afternoon.

    “We are on the cusp of this escalating, which could seriously impact the flow of crude oil,” he said.

    Three U.S. service members were killed and more than two dozen injured in a drone strike on a U.S. base in northeast Jordan, according to U.S. Central Command. They were the first U.S. fatalities in months of attacks on U.S. bases by Iran-backed militias since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October.

    President Joe Biden attributed the Sunday attack to an Iran-backed militia group and said the U.S. “will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner (of) our choosing.” News reports said U.S. officials were still working to conclusively identify the precise group responsible for the attack, but have assessed that one of several Iranian-backed groups is to blame.

    Some congressional Republicans called for direct retaliation on Iran.

    “We must respond to these repeated attacks by Iran & its proxies by striking directly against Iranian targets & its leadership. The Biden administration’s responses thus far have only invited more attacks. It is time to act swiftly and decisively for the whole world to see,” wrote Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, in a post on X.

    Oil futures rallied last week to their highest since November, but with gains attributed in part to production outages in the U.S. and more upbeat expectations around economic growth.

    “Crude already has the wind to its back, so this will only offer further upside,” Chris Weston, head of research at Australian brokerage Pepperstone told MarketWatch in an email.

    With the U.S. election later this year, “Biden needs to strike a balance between increasing aggression that potentially puts U.S. serviceman lives in danger and could potentially raise the cost of living…while also showing a defiant stance that shows his resolve against terror,” Weston said.

    Oil prices have seen short-lived rallies around developments in the Middle East since the start of the Israel-Hamas war, but have failed to build in a lasting geopolitical risk premium. West Texas Intermediate crude
    CL00,
    +1.22%

    CL.1,
    +1.22%
    ,
    the U.S. benchmark, remains around $15 below its 2023 peak in the mid-$90s set in late September. Brent crude
    BRN00,
    +1.15%
    ,
    the global benchmark, pushed back above $80 a barrel last week.

    Attacks by Iran-backed Houthi militants on Red Sea shipping have forced a rerouting of tankers and cargo ships. For crude, that’s had implications for the physical market but hasn’t interrupted the flow of crude from the Middle East.

    A move by Iran aimed at closing off the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s biggest oil-transportation chokepoint, remains a top worry.

    The strait is a narrow waterway that links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. At its narrowest point, the waterway is only 21 miles wide, and the width of the shipping lane in either direction is just two miles, separated by a two-mile buffer zone.


    Energy Information Administration

    Around 21 million barrels a day of crude moved through the waterway in the first half of 2023, equivalent to around a fifth of daily global consumption, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    The U.S. stock market has largely looked past Middle East tensions, with the S&P 500
    SPX
    returning to record territory this month, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    has also set a series of records.

    Dow futures
    YM00,
    -0.20%

    were off 94 points, or 0.3% as Asian trading got under way, while S&P 500 futures
    ES00,
    -0.22%

    fell 12 points, or 0.2%, and Nasdaq-100 futures
    NQ00,
    -0.24%

    lost 0.3%.

    Read: Stock-market rally faces Fed, tech earnings and jobs data in make-or-break week

    Away from oil, there were no signs of a significant surge in demand for instruments that traditionally serve as havens during periods of increased geopolitical tension. Futures on U.S. Treasurys
    TY00,
    +0.21%

    saw a modest rise of 0.2%, while the U.S. dollar
    DXY
    was little changed versus major rivals and gold futures
    GC00,
    +0.41%

    ticked up 0.4%.

    Escalating Middle East tensions won’t go unnoticed by traders, but probably doesn’t warrant a “solid derisking,” Weston said, particularly with investors facing a barrage of major market events in the week ahead.

    For U.S.-focused investors, the week ahead features a Federal Reserve policy meeting, earnings from tech industry heavyweights and a crucial December jobs report.

    The Middle East situation “won’t take us too far off the rates, growth track, but we have an eye on whether this escalates,” Weston said.

    —Associated Press contributed.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Red Sea chaos is driving oil buyers ‘into the arms of U.S. shale producers’

    Why Red Sea chaos is driving oil buyers ‘into the arms of U.S. shale producers’

    [ad_1]

    Attacks by Iran-backed Houthi rebels on vessels in the Red Sea have led to transport disruptions for oil and other goods, but international oil shippers may have found a way to deal with the chaos.

    The latest data from the Energy Information Administration offers a hint to that solution.

    The report from the government agency showed surprisingly large weekly increases in gasoline and distillate supplies, contributing to losses for energy futures on Thursday.

    But Robert Yawger, executive director for energy futures at Mizuho Securities USA, also highlighted another key figure in the data — a weekly jump in U.S. petroleum exports.

    Exports climbed by 1.377 million barrels a day to 5.292 million barrels a day for the week ended Dec. 29, according to the EIA.

    “For the first time since Houthi Yemeni rebels started to attack international shipping in the Red Sea, we are seeing a spike in U.S. exports,” said Yawger, in a Thursday afternoon note.

    The Red Sea chokepoints are critical for international oil and natural-gas flows, according to the EIA.


    U.S. Energy Information Administration

    “Apparently, international shippers are worried about being attacked on the open sea, and are getting beat” on the cost of sailing around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa as an alternative to the passage through the Red Sea, he said. Instead, the “safer and cheaper way to procure supply, especially for EU customers, is to sail the boat to the U.S. Gulf Coast and load up on cheap U.S. [oil] barrels.”

    See: Houthis launch sea drone to attack ships in Red Sea, hours after U.S. issues ‘final warning’

    U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude
    CL.1,
    +0.66%

    CLG24,
    +0.66%

    trades at a discount to global benchmark Brent crude
    BRN00,
    +0.45%

    BRNH24,
    +0.45%
    .
    On Thursday, the February WTI futures contract settled at $72.19 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, while March Brent settled at $77.59 on ICE Futures Europe — a difference of $5.40 a barrel.

    That compares with a “cost of carry” for an Amsterdam/Rotterdam/Antwerp refiner of around $4 a barrel, said Yawger. So “forget about the Houthis/Iranian menace in the Red Sea,” he said. “You don’t need a U.S. Navy escort from danger — just a nice, clean two- to- four-week round-trip journey to the U.S.”

    ‘Ironically, the chaos in the Middle East is driving international crude-oil customers into the arms of the U.S. shale producers.’


    — Robert Yawger, Mizuho

    He expects U.S. petroleum exports to sustain the 5 million plus barrel-per-day level in the coming weeks, with the “geopolitical situation seemingly heating up every day.”

    “Ironically, the chaos in the Middle East is driving international crude-oil customers into the arms of the U.S. shale producers,” said Yawger. “There is a very good chance U.S. exports break the all-time record in coming weeks, just in time for refiners to pull back on the run rate.”

    Weekly U.S. crude-oil exports reached a record 5.629 million barrels a day in the week ended Feb. 24, 2023, based on EIA data going back to February 1991.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices end lower as crude suffers first losing year since 2020

    Oil prices end lower as crude suffers first losing year since 2020

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures ended slightly lower Friday on the final trading day of 2023, capping crude’s first losing year since 2020 as concerns about the demand outlook outweighed potential supply disruptions and efforts by OPEC and its allies to limit production.

    Price action

    • West Texas Intermediate crude for February delivery
      CL00,
      -0.45%

      CL.1,
      -0.45%

      CLG24,
      -0.45%

      fell 12 cents, or 0.1%, to close at $71.65 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

    • March Brent crude
      BRN00,
      +0.05%

      BRNH24,
      +0.05%
      ,
      the global benchmark, fell 11 cents, or 0.1%, to settle at $77.04 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe.

    • Back on Nymex, January gasoline
      RBF24
      rose 0.8% to $2.103 a gallon, while January heating oil
      HOF24
      fell 0.1% to $2.553 a gallon.

    • February natural gas
      NGG24,
      -0.64%

      declined 1.7% to finish at $2.514 per million British thermal units.

    Market drivers

    WTI, the U.S. benchmark, slumped 21.1% in the fourth quarter and suffered a yearly fall of 10.7%. Brent tumbled over 19% in the final three months of the year, posting an annual loss of 10.3%.

    Gasoline futures dropped 14.5% in 2023, while heating oil declined 24.1%. Natural gas plunged nearly 44%.

    Crude had rallied over the summer as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, maintained production cuts, with Saudi Arabia throwing in a voluntary reduction of 1 million barrels a day beginning in July and Russia moving to curb exports. While production cuts have been rolled over into early 2024, oil peaked in late September as expectations for a significant supply deficit failed to materialize.

    Increased production by the U.S., which saw its output hit record levels in 2023, and other non-OPEC producers have also capped the upside for crude, analysts said.

    Read: Why oil may not see a return to $100 a barrel in 2024

    Oil futures jumped in the wake of the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in October on fears that a broader conflict could cramp supplies from the Middle East, but crude failed to challenge its September highs and soon eroded its geopolitical-risk premium. Prices bounced somewhat in December as attacks by Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels on shipping vessels in the Red Sea sparked a round of rerouting, but gains have proven difficult to sustain.

    Instead, investors “have started to focus on the risk that there may be excessive supply in oil markets next year, and insufficient demand,” said Marios Hadjikyriacos, senior investment analyst at XM, in a note.

    “Even though OPEC+ has taken repeated steps to rein in production and support prices, it is unlikely to pursue the same strategy for much longer, as it would forfeit more market share to U.S. producers who have dialed up their own production to record levels,” he wrote.

    Natural-gas prices, meanwhile, have slumped recently on a warmer-than-normal winter, said Lu Ming Pang, senior analyst at Rystad Energy, in a Friday note.

    The number of heating-degree days (HDDs), which reflect the extent of heating required, has been below normal so far, with a deviation of 28 fewer HDDs from the normal reported on Dec. 15, the analyst noted. HDDs are forecast to rise through Jan. 5 but remain slightly below normal.

    “Gas demand for heating is likely to rise as a result but will still remain below seasonal norms,” Pang said. “A combination of warmer weather, high underground-storage levels, and high domestic gas production is expected to keep U.S. prices suppressed.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices post first weekly gain in 8 weeks amid ship attacks in Red Sea

    Oil prices post first weekly gain in 8 weeks amid ship attacks in Red Sea

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures fell on Friday, but finished off the session’s lows to eke out a gain for the week — the first for U.S. and global benchmark crude prices in eight weeks.

    Attacks on ships traveling through the Red Sea, blamed on Yemen’s Houthi rebels, raised the potential for disruptions to the transport of oil and other goods, providing some support for prices.

    Oil saw larger declines early Friday after a Federal Reserve official walked back dovish comments made earlier this week by the Fed Chair Jerome Powell, helping to strengthen the U.S. dollar.

    Price action

    • West Texas Intermediate crude for January
      CL00,
      +0.49%

      CL.1,
      +0.49%

      CLF24,
      +0.49%

      declined by 15 cents, or 0.2%, to settle at $71.43 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, with prices ending 0.3% higher for the week, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    • February Brent crude
      BRN00,
      +0.52%

      BRNG24,
      +0.52%
      ,
      the global benchmark, fell 6 cents, or nearly 0.1%, to $76.55 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe, settling 0.9% higher for the week.

    • January gasoline
      RBF24,
      -0.16%

      added 0.9% to $2.14 a gallon, up almost 4.3% for the week, while January heating oil
      HOF24,
      +0.20%

      climbed 1.1% to $2.62 a gallon on Nymex, marking a weekly rise of 1.5%.

    • Natural gas for January delivery
      NGF24,
      -0.88%

      gained 4.1% to $2.49 per million British thermal units, but still logged a weekly loss of 3.5%.

    Price support

    Danish shipping company A.P. Moeller-Maersk
    MAERSK.A,
    +7.52%

    said it will pause all of its container shipments through the Red Sea until further notice and detour them around Africa, Reuters and Bloomberg reported Friday, amid rising risks to its fleet posed by Houthi militants.

    The Red Sea is “one of the hot pockets of seaborne crude flows,” accounting for approximately 10% of global volume, said Manish Raj, managing director at Velandera Energy Partners. “Although the attackers lack sophistication … shipping crews are even less sophisticated, making them easy targets.” 

    A potential blockage of the Red Sea route would be “chaotic indeed, but not nearly as detrimental as blockage of [the] Strait of Hormuz near Iran, for which there is no viable alternative,” Raj said.

    Read from the AP: How are Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea affecting global trade?

    For now, there is concern over higher insurance costs for these ships, said Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at the Price Futures Group.

    With ships in the Red Sea continuing to be at high risk, ‘it won’t take that much for the market’ to see oil prices spike if an oil tanker should be hit.


    — Phil Flynn, Price Futures Group

    Obviously, the risk to oil supply is large, although “so far, most of the attacks have been on cargo ships and not oil-related ships,” Flynn told MarketWatch.

    However, as ships in the Red Sea continue to be at high risk, “it won’t take that much for the market” to see oil prices spike if an oil tanker is hit, Flynn said.

    For the week, both U.S. and global benchmark crude prices posted gains.

    “The combination of lower U.S. inventories, stronger economic data, and improved OPEC compliance [with production cuts] for the month of November were the highlights of the week,” said Peter McNally, global head of sector analysts at Third Bridge.

    “However, there are ongoing seasonal challenges that forced OPEC to sustain production cuts through the first quarter of 2024, so it remains to be seen if they have done enough to prevent inventories from continuing their upward trend,” he said.

    Read The Year Ahead: Why oil may not see a return $100 a barrel in 2024

    Price pressures

    Oil had been trading lower early Friday after New York Federal Reserve President John Williams told CNBC that it is “premature” to discuss whether it is time to cut interest rates. “We aren’t really talking about cutting interest rates right now,” Williams said.

    That ran contrary to Powell’s comments Wednesday that Fed officials were starting to discuss when to cut rates.

    After the euphoria in the U.S. stock market over the Powell “pivot party” on Wednesday, we got a “wake-up call” from Williams when he pushed back on market expectations for a March rate cut, Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets UK, said in market commentary.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices drop to 2-week lows as doubts linger over OPEC+ production cuts

    Oil prices drop to 2-week lows as doubts linger over OPEC+ production cuts

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures fell Monday to their lowest levels in more than two weeks, building on recent declines that came after a round of voluntary production cuts announced by OPEC+ left traders skeptical about compliance.

    Price action

    • West Texas Intermediate crude for January delivery
      CL00,
      -0.63%

      CL.1,
      -0.63%

      CLF24,
      -0.63%

      fell 85 cents, or 1.2%, to $73.22 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange,

    • February Brent crude
      BRN00,
      -0.44%

      BRNG24,
      -0.44%

      dropped $1.29, or 1.6%, $77.59 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe.

    • January gasoline was down 0.1% at $2.1198 a gallon, while January heating oil
      HOF24,
      +0.85%

      edge down 0.4% to $2.6501 a gallon.

    • January natural gas
      NGF24,
      -4.48%

      declined 5.3% to $2.664 per million British thermal units.

    Market drivers

    The OPEC+ deal last week was “unconvincing, to say the least, and oil prices have been in decline ever since,” said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.

    “With markets seemingly anticipating more of an economic slowdown next year, the announcement simply doesn’t go far enough,” he said in market commentary. “It’s another large cut but how much will actually be delivered on? And are we at the limits of what the alliance is willing to achieve to balance the markets?”

    Crude prices ended last week with back-to-back losses after OPEC+ producers on Thursday agreed to voluntarily cut around 2.2 million barrels a day (mbd) of crude from the market in the first quarter of next year, a figure that included a widely expected extension of Saudi Arabia’s 1 mbd voluntary output cut and Russia’s 300,000 barrel a day cut to crude exports.

    OPEC+ cuts “look like they have rebalanced the market” for the first quarter of next year, but without further OPEC+ cuts in supply from the second quarter, “oil looks to register a 1 mbd surplus in that quarter, analysts at Citi wrote in a note dated Monday.

    The voluntary nature of the overall reductions sparked skepticism around enforcement and compliance, analysts said.

    “Soft price action since the OPEC+ meeting is reflective of an investor cohort that remains perplexed on how to deploy risk. The near-term path of least resistance is lower, given the degree of ambiguity and lack of catalysts,” Michael Tran, commodity and digital intelligence strategist at RBC Capital Markets, said in a Sunday note.

    “Oil has become a ‘show me’ type market. Now here comes the hard part: Prices will likely remain volatile and potentially directionless until the market sees clear data points pertaining to the voluntary output cuts,” he said.

    Those cuts won’t be implemented until next month, with country-level production and export data to follow. That means it will be a “long and volatile” two months before there is even preliminary clarity on compliance — “a long stretch for a market that is seeing a high degree of uncertainty, lack of risk deployment and a liquidity vacuum,” Tran wrote.

    Traders were also monitoring developments in the Middle East following an escalation of maritime attacks related to the Israel-Hamas war.

    Ballistic missiles fired by Yemen’s Houthi rebels hit three commercial ships Sunday in the Red Sea, while a U.S. warship shot down three drones in self-defense during the hourslong assault, according to the U.S. military. The Iranian-backed Houthis claimed two of the attacks.

    Oil futures spiked higher following the Hamas attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7 but failed to challenge their late September highs. Crude subsequently fell back as fears of a broader conflict that could threaten crude flows faded, trading well below levels seen just before the start of the conflict.

    — Associated Press contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Will Israel-Gaza war sink stocks and shake the global economy? Watch oil prices.

    Will Israel-Gaza war sink stocks and shake the global economy? Watch oil prices.

    [ad_1]

    Wall Street on Monday shook off a bout of selling sparked by the Israel-Gaza war.

    That’s in keeping with the historical tendency of investors to look past geopolitical conflict and human tragedy, but it isn’t necessarily the last word. That last word will likely belong to oil traders.

    “Oil rallied today yet remains below the near-term peak from last month. If oil prices rise higher for longer, the global economy could feel a resurgence of inflation during a period when investors are hoping inflation is clearly decelerating,” said Jeffrey Roach, chief economist for LPL Financial, in emailed comments.

    Roach also noted that, in general, markets tend to have difficulty pricing the difference between a temporary shock and a permanent shock.

    For now, however, the jump in oil prices isn’t signaling a permanent shock. Sure, Brent crude
    BRN00,
    +0.11%
    ,
    the global benchmark, jumped 4.2% on Monday to end at $88.15 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate crude
    CL.1,
    +0.07%

    CL00,
    +0.07%

    surged $3.59, or 4.3% to $86.38 a barrel — the biggest one-day jump for both grades since April 3.

    See: Here’s what Israel-Gaza war means for oil prices as fighting continues

    The jump was impressive, but it comes after a big pullback last week that saw both WTI and Brent retreat from 2023 highs near $100 a barrel.

    So if crude can manage to close above those highs — $93.68 a barrel for WTI — investors across other markets will likely take notice.

    What would it take to drive crude back toward the highs? The focus is on Iran.

    The Wall Street Journal on Sunday reported that Iranian security officials helped plan the attack by Hamas. The Israeli military has said there is no concrete evidence of Iranian involvement, according to news reports.

    A direct role by Iran, a longtime ally of Hamas, would raise the threat of a broader conflict.

    Some analysts have put Iranian crude production at more than 3 million barrels a day and exports above 2 million barrels a day — the highest levels since the Trump administration pulled the U.S. out of the Iranian nuclear accord in 2018, according to the Wall Street Journal. Sales fell to around 400,000 barrels a day in 2020 as the U.S. reimposed sanctions.

    “If Israel discovers that Iran played a role in Hamas’ attack, it could retaliate militarily. At the very least, any warming of relations between Iran and the West is now on hold and this will limit incremental oil supply,” said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Monday note.

    It’s a reminder that “while neither Israel nor Gaza are major oil producers, everything that happens geopolitically in the Middle East invariably ends up affecting oil prices,” he said.

    The potential for a broader conflict could lead to a “sharp market correction,” argued Olivier d’Assier, head of applied research, APAC, at Axioma.

    The scale of the conflict, the largest since the Yom Kippur War 50 years ago, renders comparisons with how markets have shaken off past geopolitical incidents, but they may be irrelevant in terms of stress testing, he argued.

    “The closest historical scenarios we could use would be 9/11 and the start of the Ukraine war. But because both took place on Western soil, they might not be adequate,” d’Assier said.

    On Monday, however, remarks by Federal Reserve officials ultimately trumped the rise in crude prices and jitters over the Middle East. Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan and Fed Vice Chair Philip Jefferson both noted the rise in long-term Treasury yields and their role in tightening financial conditions, which investors took as a signal the Fed may not be as likely to further raise interest rates.

    See: An Israel-Hamas war could change what the Fed does about interest rates

    Stocks turned north after a morning dip, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA
    rising nearly 200 points, or 0.6%, while the S&P 500
    SPX
    also advanced 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    gained 0.4%.

    For now, market participants appear set to look ahead to economic data later this week, including September consumer-price index and producer-price index readings.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices jump 4% after Hamas attack on Israel

    Oil prices jump 4% after Hamas attack on Israel

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures opened with strong gains late Sunday as traders reacted to an attack by Hamas on Israel, raising Middle East tensions and stoking worries about the outlook for crude supply.

    Price action

    Market drivers

    Oil traders were focused on Iran after a weekend attack on multiple fronts by Hamas militants, who are backed by Tehran. The Wall Street Journal reported that Iranian security officials helped Hamas plan the attack, which has left more than 700 Israelis dead and saw dozens of Israeli citizens and soldiers abducted. Israel pounded Gaza in retaliation, where the death toll was also reported in the hundreds.

    Analysts said that if Iranian involvement is affirmed, it could lead the U.S. to increase enforcement of sanctions on the country’s crude exports, which have moved back toward pre-2018 levels in recent months.

    “Historical analysis suggests that oil prices tend to experience sustained gains after the Middle East crises,” said Stephen Innes, managing director at SPI Asset Management, in a note.

    Oil fell last week, retreating after Brent moved within a few dollars of the $100-a-barrel threshold last month and WTI briefly topped $95 a barrel for the first time in more than a year.

    Some analysts have put Iranian crude production at more than 3 million barrels a day and exports above 2 million barrels a day — the highest levels since the Trump administration pulled the U.S. out of the Iranian nuclear accord in 2018, according to the Wall Street Journal. Sales fell to around 400,000 barrels a day in 2020 as the U.S. reimposed sanctions.

    See: U.S. stock futures tumble after Hamas attack on Israel

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Fear trade’: What Israel-Hamas war means for oil prices and financial markets

    ‘Fear trade’: What Israel-Hamas war means for oil prices and financial markets

    [ad_1]

    Oil traders on Sunday said crude prices were likely to remain supported in the near term, as investors assessed the fallout from the surprise attack by Hamas on Israel and focused on the role played by Iran and the potential impact on that country’s petroleum exports.

    The conflict may also hold market-moving consequences for talks aimed at normalizing relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel.

    “While in the short term there is no impact directly on supply, it’s obvious how things play out over the next 24 to 48 hours could change that,” Phil Flynn, an analyst at Price Futures Group in Chicago, told MarketWatch.

    Brent crude futures
    BRN00,
    +4.17%
    ,
    the global benchmark, and West Texas Intermediate oil futures
    CL00,
    +4.35%

    CL.1,
    +4.35%

    jumped more than 3% when the market opened Sunday night. U.S. stock-index futures
    ES00,
    -0.66%

    traded lower, while traditional havens, including gold
    GC00,
    +0.98%

    and the U.S. dollar
    DXY
    rose.

    Movements in oil prices, meanwhile, will also serve as a gauge for broader market worries around the conflict, analysts said.

    See: Israeli stocks slump in first day of trade since Gaza attack

    Hamas, the Iran-backed, Palestinian militant group that controls the Gaza Strip, staged a sweeping attack on southern Israel early Saturday. News reports put Israeli deaths at more than 700. The Gaza Health Ministry said 413 people, including 78 children and 41 women, were killed in the territory as Israel retaliated, according to the Associated Press. Injuries in Israel and Gaza were both said to be around 2,000.

    Israeli troops on Sunday were engaged in fierce fighting in an effort to retake territory in southern Israel as Hamas launched further barrages of missiles. Israeli citizens and soldiers were captured and are being held hostage in Gaza, according to the Israeli military.

    Read: Israel declares war, approves ‘significant’ steps to retaliate after surprise attack by Hamas

    The Wall Street Journal reported that Iranian security officials helped Hamas plan the attack. U.S. officials said they haven’t seen evidence of Iran’s involvement, the report said.

    “Iran remains a very big wild card and we will be watching how strongly [Israeli] Prime Minister Netanyahu blames Tehran for facilitating these attacks by providing Hamas with weapons and logistical support,” said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, in a Sunday morning note.

    Iranian crude exports have risen in recent years, indicating the Biden administration has adopted a soft approach to sanctions enforcement, Croft said. Some analysts have put Iranian crude production at more than 3 million barrels a day and exports above 2 million barrels a day — the highest levels since the Trump administration pulled the U.S. out of the Iranian nuclear accord in 2018, according to the Wall Street Journal. Sales fell to around 400,000 barrels a day in 2020 as the U.S. reimposed sanctions.


    RBC Capital Markets

    Hedge-fund manager Pierre Andurand, one of the world’s best energy traders, said in a social-media post that a large price spike for oil isn’t likely in coming days, but emphasized the market focus on Iran.

    “Now, over the last six months we have seen a very large increase in Iranian supply due to weak enforcement of sanctions. As Iran is also behind Hamas’ attacks on Israel, there is a good probability that the U.S. administration will start enforcing those sanctions on Iranian oil exports more tightly,” he wrote. “That would further tighten the oil market. Also the probability that this will lead to direct conflict with Iran is not zero.”

    Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal late Friday reported that Saudi Arabia had told the White House it would be willing to boost oil production next year if crude prices remained high, as part of an effort aimed at winning goodwill in Congress for a deal that would see the kingdom recognize Israel and in return get a defense agreement with the U.S.

    A Saudi production cut of 1 million barrels a day that was implemented in July and recently extended through the end of the year has been given much of the credit for a rally that took global benchmark Brent crude within a few dollars of the $100-a-barrel threshold before retreating this past week. The U.S. benchmark last week briefly topped $95 a barrel for the first time in 13 months.

    In a statement, Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry called on both sides to halt the escalation and exercise restraint, but also recalled its “repeated warnings of the dangers of the explosion of the situation as a result of the continued occupation, the deprivation of the Palestinian people of their legitimate rights, and the repetition of systematic provocations against its sanctities.”

    With the Israeli government vowing an unprecedented response, “it is hard to envision how Saudi normalization talks can run on a parallel track to a ferocious military counteroffensive,” said RBC’s Croft.

    Beyond oil, much will depend on the potential for the conflict to widen.

    Stocks have stumbled, retreating from 2023 highs set in late July, as yields on U.S. Treasurys have jumped. The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond
    BX:TMUBMUSD30Y
    rose 23.2 basis points last week to end Friday at 4.941%, its highest since Sept. 20, 2007. The 10-year Treasury note yield
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    topped 4.80% on Oct. 3, its highest since Aug. 8, 2007, and ended the week at 4.783%. Yields and debt prices move opposite each other.

    The U.S. bond market will be closed Monday for the Columbus Day and Indigenous People’s Day holiday, while U.S. stock markets will be open.

    The S&P 500 index
    SPX
    rose 0.5% last week, breaking a streak of four straight weekly declines, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average 
    DJIA
    fell 0.3% and the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP
    gained 1.6%.

    “I think there will be a negative reaction. However, I don’t see a meltdown,” Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities, told MarketWatch.

    Traditional haven plays, including gold, the dollar and U.S. Treasurys may see a strong move upward, with price gains for Treasurys pulling yields down.

    “Geopolitical crises in the Middle East have usually caused oil prices to rise and stock prices to fall,” said economist Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research Inc., in a note. “More often than not, they’ve also tended to be buying opportunities in the stock market.”

    The broader market reaction will depend on whether the crisis turns out to be a short-term flare-up or “something much bigger, like a war between Israel and Iran,” he said. The latter is unlikely, but tensions between the two are likely to escalate.

    “The price of oil may be a good way to assess the likelihood of a broader conflict,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Exxon expects profit bump from oil prices of around $1 billion in third quarter

    Exxon expects profit bump from oil prices of around $1 billion in third quarter

    [ad_1]

    Exxon Mobil Corp. said in a filing late Wednesday that its third-quarter profit is likely to get a bump of around $1 billion from rising crude prices.

    Exxon
    XOM,
    -3.74%

    estimated between $900 million and $1.3 billion more than second-quarter profit due to crude-price changes, and between $200 million and $400 million in gas-price changes.

    The energy giant is expecting $600 million to $400 million less as a result of thinner margins for its chemicals, however.

    Exxon shares dropped 0.5% in the extended session after ending the regular trading day down 3.7%. The stock late last month ended at a record, according to data going back to November 1972.

    Oil futures prices on Wednesday ended at their lowest in about five weeks, but had been inching closer to $100 a barrel recently.

    Exxon is slated to report third-quarter earnings in early November, with FactSet consensus calling for adjusted earnings of $2.35 a share on sales of $85.6 billion. That would compare with adjusted EPS of $4.45 on sales of $112 billion in the third quarter of 2022.

    So far this year, Exxon shares have gained nearly 2%, compared to an advance of around 10% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why higher oil prices aren’t likely to make it into Fed’s inflation or rate outlook

    Why higher oil prices aren’t likely to make it into Fed’s inflation or rate outlook

    [ad_1]

    With the Federal Reserve preparing to release updated inflation and interest-rate forecasts on Wednesday, the proverbial elephant in the room will probably be missing from the equation: The full impact of rising oil prices, according to investors, traders and strategists.

    Oil prices touched fresh 2023 highs on Tuesday and settled above $90 a barrel, a byproduct of this month’s decision by Russia and Saudi Arabia to extend production cuts into year-end. Just a day ago, Mike Wirth, chief executive of Chevron
    CVX,
    -0.01%
    ,
    put the prospect of oil crossing $100 a barrel on the map and the price at the gas pump went above $6 a gallon in Southern California — reigniting fears about a revival of inflation.

    It’s too soon to say whether the run-up in energy prices will spill over into the narrower core inflation gauges that the Fed cares most about, TD Securities strategist Gennadiy Goldberg said via phone. As a result, policy makers may look past the impact of higher energy prices on their longer-term inflation and rate outlook Wednesday, he said. Fed officials are hesitant to place too much weight on energy or food as components of inflation, anyway, because of their volatile natures.

    In One Chart: Why crude-oil rally can’t be ignored by investors — or the Fed

    However, some traders are worried that such an omission could be a mistake considering all the other price pressures playing out, such as strikes against the three major U.S. automakers.

    UAW strike: Union sets Friday deadline for further possible strikes

    “Is it a mistake to not factor in oil? I personally think it is, but I’m probably in the minority on that,” said Gang Hu, an inflation trader at New York-based hedge fund WinShore Capital. “The combination of oil and strikes by the United Auto Workers presents a structurally unstable inflation picture.”

    “If the Fed is the one that provides insurance against inflation and is not doing anything, the market will seek inflation protection by itself and it will look like inflation expectations are unanchored. This is the risk,” Hu said via phone.

    Nervousness around the prospect of a higher-for-longer message on rates from the Fed helped send the 2-
    BX:TMUBMUSD02Y
    and 10-year Treasury rates
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    to their highest levels in more than a decade on Tuesday. The ICE U.S. Dollar Index was off by less than 0.1%.

    Read: How Fed’s higher-for-longer theme may play out in Treasurys and the dollar on Wednesday

    U.S. stock indexes
    DXY

    SPX

    COMP
    finished lower on Tuesday, led by a 0.3% drop in Dow industrials.

    Investors and traders are expected to zero in on the part of the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections that reflects where the fed-funds rate target, currently between 5.25%-5.5%, could go in 2024. As of June, policy makers penciled in the likelihood of four 25-basis-point rate cuts next year after factoring in more tightening this year, and they saw inflation creeping down toward 2% in 2024 and 2025, as well as over the longer run.

    See: Why Fed’s response to this key question could spark 5% stock-market pullback or ‘solid rally’

    Many in financial markets are clinging to the likelihood of no Fed rate hike on Wednesday, and see some possibility of just one more increase in November or December before rate cuts begin in the middle or final half of next year. But inflation traders now foresee seven straight months of 3%-plus readings on the annual headline CPI rate, from September through next March; that’s up from five consecutive months seen as of last Wednesday and complicates the question of where the Fed will go from here.

    “The Fed’s rate decision on Wednesday was already decided a while ago, when officials started to communicate that a pause would be the likely outcome,” said Mark Heppenstall, chief investment officer of Penn Mutual Asset Management in Horsham, Pa., which oversaw $32 billion as of August.

    “On the margin, we might see higher oil prices make a modest impact on rate projections,” he said via phone. However, “it’s too early for the story to change on disinflation and all the progress made so far.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. oil prices score longest streak of daily gains in over 4 years

    U.S. oil prices score longest streak of daily gains in over 4 years

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures settled higher on Wednesday, with U.S. prices posting a ninth consecutive climb — the longest streak of daily gains since early 2019.

    Prices for U.S. and global benchmark crude futures marked fresh settlement highs for the year so far, following the recent extension of supply cuts by Saudi Arabia and Russia.

    Price action

    Market drivers

    “Saudi…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices end at a 2-week high on reports Saudi Arabia said OPEC+ will do ‘whatever necessary’ to support oil

    Oil prices end at a 2-week high on reports Saudi Arabia said OPEC+ will do ‘whatever necessary’ to support oil

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures settle at their highest in two weeks on Wednesday, finding support after Saudi Arabia’s energy minister reportedly said that the kingdom and its allies will do whatever is necessary to support the oil market.

    The comments from Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman at an OPEC+ seminar was reported by a number of news agencies and follows the Saudi’s announcement Monday that it would extend its voluntary production cut by another month, through August.

    Tensions…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These Drilling Stocks Could Be Gushers as the Oil Industry Rebounds

    These Drilling Stocks Could Be Gushers as the Oil Industry Rebounds

    [ad_1]

    Offshore oil drillers were about the worst place to be in 2020 as oil prices were falling and demand for crude seemed to be seeping away. Now, the stocks may be the ones to own as investors realize that oil will be needed to make the world go around for decades.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices jump more than 2% after Saudi Arabia sets July production cut

    Oil prices jump more than 2% after Saudi Arabia sets July production cut

    [ad_1]

    Oil futures opened sharply higher Sunday evening, after Saudi Arabia agreed to deliver an additional 1 million–barrel daily production cut next month as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies moved to extend existing production targets.

    Price action

    • West Texas Intermediate crude for July delivery
      CL00,
      +0.98%

      CL.1,
      +0.98%

      CLN23,
      +0.98%

      remained up $1.49, or 2.1%, at $73.23 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, after trading as high as $75.06.

    • August Brent crude
      BRN00,
      +0.87%

      BRNQ23,
      +0.87%
      ,
      the global benchmark, gained $1.59, or 2.1%, to trade at $77.72 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe, after touching $78.73 after the open.

    Market drivers

    Saudi Arabia on Sunday said it would cut oil output by 1 million barrels a day in July, and that the reduction could be extended if needed. The announcement came as OPEC+ agreed to extend current production levels through the end of 2024 at a contentious meeting in Vienna.

    See: Saudis to cut oil production by 1 million barrels a day in July as OPEC+ extends output deal

    OPEC+ agreed last October to cut production by 2 million barrels a day. Some OPEC+ members in early April announced further cuts totaling 1.6 million barrels a day through year-end, including 500,000 barrels a day in reductions by Saudi Arabia.

    Saudi Energy Minister Abdulaziz bin Salman last month warned that short sellers should “watch out” and that they would be “ouching” much as they did in early April, when the surprise cuts caused a sharp, but short-lived, spike in crude prices.

    The outcome of the meeting reinforces Saudi Arabia’s “uneasiness with the level of short positions in the market rather than signaling concerns around demand outlook,” said Giacomo Romeo, energy equity analyst at Jefferies, in a Sunday evening note to clients.

    “The open-ended part of the measure was likely put in place to discourage future short positioning,” he wrote.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s how to play oil-industry stocks for long-term growth of 20% or more

    Here’s how to play oil-industry stocks for long-term growth of 20% or more

    [ad_1]

    Oil demand is likely to hold up longer than many people expect during the anticipated transition to electric vehicles. And changes in the industry point to oilfield services companies as good long-term growth investments as offshore production ramps up.

    Below is a list of oil producers and related companies favored by two analysts who have followed the industry for decades.

    U.S….

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Soaring oil prices: 6 things investors need to know about the surprise OPEC+ production cuts

    Soaring oil prices: 6 things investors need to know about the surprise OPEC+ production cuts

    [ad_1]

    The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies said they decided Sunday to cut production in an effort to support oil-market stability, but that offers little comfort to consumers worried about inflation and an expected spike in fuel demand during the coming summer driving season.

    The surprise output reduction by the group known as OPEC+ starting in May also comes at a particularly vulnerable time for the U.S., which may not be able to quickly increase its own production.

    “The nature and timing of the decision are shocking, since prices have been only moderate pressured from the banking mini-crisis and the market is expected to tighten later this year,” said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research.

    “OPEC+, and especially the Saudis, seem to be signaling a strong desire to punish short sellers and pre-empt possible demand weakness,” he told MarketWatch. Also, “the impact on inflation…could mean an anemic summer driving season.”

    What happened?

    OPEC and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, announced voluntary production “adjustments” on Sunday that will take effect starting in May and run through to the end of the year.

    The move was unusual, as there was no indication that any change to production would be made and OPEC+ ministers weren’t scheduled to officially hold an output decision-making meeting until June 4.

    The OPEC+ Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee, however, did hold a meeting on Monday, as it does every two months. The committee has no ability to make decisions on production, but has the authority to request an OPEC and non-OPEC ministerial meeting at any time to address market developments.

    The JMMC had been expected to discuss a number of oil-market issues, and confirm that previously announced cuts of 2 million barrels a day would remain in effect. The committee on Monday indeed reaffirmed its commitment to that previous agreement, but also pointed out Sunday’s announcement.

    “Unlike cuts in the past that were more ‘paper cuts’ to quotas with many countries already producing below quota, these are real voluntary cuts from countries producing at or above quotas,” said Rebecca Babin, senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth U.S., in emailed commentary. That means this will be “far more impactful than the 2 million barrels cut” announced in October 2022.

    Saudi Arabia will take on the biggest reduction, cutting oil output by 500,000 barrels a day. Other barrel-per-day cuts include Iraq with 211,000, United Arab Emirates 144,000, Kuwait 128,000, Kazakhstan 78,000, Algeria 48,000, Oman 40,000 and Gabon 8,000. Those total 1.157 million barrels a day.

    The cuts, however, are in addition to the previous OPEC+ production cuts of 2 million barrels a day, as well as the extension of Russia’s reduction of 500,000 barrels a day in retaliation to western oil-price caps and sanctions. That brings the total output reductions to 3.657 million barrels a day.

    What prompted the cut?

    Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Energy on Sunday, as well as the JMMC in a statement Monday, said that the cuts are a “precautionary measure aimed at supporting the stability of the oil market.”

    Some news reports and analysts have speculated that Saudi Arabia, a member of OPEC and among the world’s top oil producers, and other major oil producers made the surprise move to cut output because of recent comments made by U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm.

    Read: Trigger for Saudi oil production move was comment that U.S. would not refill SPR this year, report says

    On March 23, Granholm said that it may take years for the U.S. to refill its Strategic Petroleum Reserve. She appeared to walk back those comments on March 28, with Reuters reporting that she said the U.S. could start buying back crude oil for the SPR late this year.

    The Biden administration last year announced the emergency sale of 180 million barrels of SPR crude to help lower gasoline prices, and has said it would refill the reserve when oil prices fell to around $70 a barrel.

    U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude oil fell below $70 a barrel to their lowest level in 15 months on March 21.

    Why was the market so surprised?

    The OPEC+ decision took the financial market by surprise.

    “If fully delivered, the announced cut would further tighten an already fundamentally tight oil market, driving the Brent benchmark towards $100 per barrel sooner than previously expected, and would push the price to around $110 per barrel this summer,” said Jorge Leon, senior vice president at Rystad Energy.

    Before the new OPEC+ cuts, Rystad Energy was anticipating the crude-oil market to be in a supply deficit to the “tune of 1.4 million” barrels a day between May and August, he said in emailed commentary. The voluntary cuts will put “upside pressure on prices from a fundamentals perspective, offering support of around $10 per barrel.”

    On Monday, the front-month May WTI oil futures contract
    CLK23,
    -0.01%

    CL.1,
    -0.01%

    climbed 6.4% to trade above $80.50 a barrel ahead of the closing bell on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Global benchmark June Brent oil
    BRNM23,
    -0.18%

    BRN00,
    -0.18%

    rose $4.75, or 6.3%, to close at $80.42 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe.

    “Positioning in crude is extremely light after the recent financial market driven weakness,” said Babin. Last week’s rally was driven primarily by short covering and modest re-engagement from long buyers,” she said, adding that the long position, or bets that oil will rise in value, is “very modest, with the managed money long-short ratio at 2.5, the lowest since December 2022.”

    Large short positions held by speculative traders can make for more explosive rallies as “weak-handed” players are forced to buy futures to close out losing trades.

    Craig Golinowski, managing partner at Carbon Infrastructure Partners, also pointed out to MarketWatch that paper market for oil is “very thin.” Fewer participants and financial flows have created downside pressure on oil, he said, so OPEC is “physically managing production to maintain a tight market to ensure investment into production remains stable, regardless of the paper market for oil.”

    The energy market saw broad gains, with company shares and exchange-traded funds, including the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
    XLE,
    +4.53%
    ,
    rallying in the wake of the OPEC+ news.

    St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard on Monday said the spike in oil prices after the OPEC+ cut announcement may make the central bank’s inflation-fighting job “a little more difficult,” though it is too soon to know for sure.

    The latest spike in oil prices may “play a hand in what the Fed does next regarding its fight against inflation,” particularly if the latest jump in oil is sustained as oil at the current level “won’t be doing the inflation rate any favors,” said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at Kohle Capital Markets.

    Read: Oil-production cuts could force Fed to raise interest rates even higher to fight inflation

    Will OPEC+ lose market share?

    In the past, OPEC+ has been concerned about the loss of oil-market share when it decides to make production cuts.

    This time, however, there is “limited threat to market share,” said CIBC Private Wealth’s Babin.

    Previously, when OPEC+ cut production, they would lose market share to U.S. shale oil producers, she said. “However, “U.S. shale producers have entered a period where growth is limited due to financial discipline.”

    Recent developments in regional banks has “likely lowered shale producers’ ability to quickly get capital to increase production,” said Babin.

    Total U.S. petroleum production stood at 12.2 million barrels a day as of the week ended March 24, down 100,000 barrels per day from a week earlier, according to data from the Energy Information Administration.

    OPEC would usually “hesitate to reduce barrels, with fears of ceding market share to U.S. shale, but the slowing of U.S. production and their dedication to a disciplined approach has alleviated the Saudi’s fear of rapid U.S. growth,” said Alex Hodes, energy analyst at StoneX.

    What are the geopolitical implications?

    Meanwhile, James Swanston, Middle East and North Africa economist at Capital Economics, in a note said the OPEC+ move was likely motivated by geopolitics and Saudi Arabia’s “shift away from the West.”

    Saudi Arabia’s ties with the U.S. are “fraying,” he said.

    Swanston also said the production decision has implications for the future of OPEC+ oil policy, as well as the “patience of members, particularly, the UAE.”

    The U.A.E. agreed to these voluntary output cuts, but it was reported last month that officials were growing impatient at the bearish OPEC+ stance and had discussed internally whether to leave the group, said Swanston.

    The Wall Street Journal: Saudi Arabia and U.A.E. Clash Over Oil, Yemen as Rift Grows

    The U.A.E. wants to “increase oil output sooner rather than later as shown by its move to bring forward its oil production capacity target from 3.1 [million barrels per day] currently to 5 million bpd by 2027,” instead of the year 2030, said Swanston.

    He said the U.A.E. had twice previously threatened to leave OPEC+ and that there was speculation that the U.A.E. was strongly against the Saudi-led decision to cut OPEC+ oil output quotas by 2 million bpd in October.

    “If the OPEC+ strategy of lower oil production persists, then tensions could escalate, and the U.A.E. could ultimately opt to leave OPEC+,” Swanston said.

    What do the cuts say about demand?

    The production cuts will take effect in May, which is “right ahead of Memorial Day and the start of U.S. driving season,” said Stacey Morris, head of energy research with VettaFi.

    Given that, “it could be another summer with painful prices at the [gasoline] pump,” she said.

    The average price for regular unleaded gasoline stood at $3.506 a gallon on Monday, up from $3.439 a week ago, but down from $4.192 a year ago, according to AAA.

    Read: The surprise OPEC+ oil production cuts will increase gas prices — here’s how much

    Still, some traders may interpret the OPEC+ cut as a sign of weaker than expected demand for physical markets, given that OPEC+ possesses “some of the best information available in regards to the global physical oil markets,” said Rob Thummel, portfolio manager at Tortoise.

    However, “ we still expect global oil demand to accelerate throughout 2023, reaching a record high in the second half the year,” he said.

    Global oil inventories are below normal and will likely “remain below normal as higher demand and less supply deplete inventories throughout the year,” Thummel said, noting that Tortoise expects oil prices to be range bound between $85 and $95 for the year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Oil prices soar after Saudi Arabia leads coordinated OPEC+ cuts totaling more than 1 million barrels a day

    Oil prices soar after Saudi Arabia leads coordinated OPEC+ cuts totaling more than 1 million barrels a day

    [ad_1]

    Oil prices spiked late Sunday, after Saudi Arabia led a surprise oil production cut across several OPEC+ nations that will remove more than 1 million barrels of oil a day from May.

    In an announcement on Sunday, Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Energy stated that the kingdom will implement a voluntary cut of 500,000 barrels a day from May until the end of 2023, in conjunction with other countries.

    It said that the “voluntary cut is in addition to the reduction in production” agreed at the OPEC meeting in October and “is a precautionary measure aimed at supporting the stability of the oil market.” OPEC+ agreed in October to cut production by two million barrels a day from November, a move that angered the Biden administration.

    Russia’s deputy prime minister, Alexander Novak, said his country would extend a March production cut of 500,000 barrels a day through the end of the year. OPEC+ is made up of members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, including Russia.

    “Today, the world oil market is experiencing a period of high volatility and unpredictability due to the ongoing banking crisis in the U.S. and Europe, global economic uncertainty and unpredictable and shortsighted energy policy decisions. At the same time, predictability in the global oil market is a key element in ensuring energy security,” Novak said in a statement.

    News of the production cuts sent prices soaring late Sunday. Front-month West Texas Intermediate crude for May delivery
    CL.1,
    +6.81%

    topped $80 a barrel while Brent crude
    BRN00,
    +6.77%
    ,
    the global benchmark, surpassed $85 a barrel.

    The cuts come after a first quarter that saw a sharp decline in crude prices. Oil bulls were disappointed that China’s lifting of strict COVID curbs didn’t provide stronger support to prices, while aggressive tightening by central banks and fears that banking woes in the U.S. and Europe could turn into a full-fledged crisis stoked recession fears.

    West Texas Intermediate crude for May delivery, which ended at $75.678 a barrel on Friday, suffered a March loss of 1.8% and a quarterly decline of 5.7%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Brent crude fell 4.9% in March and 7.2% in the first quarter, ending Friday at $79.77 a barrel.

    Elsewhere, Kuwait’s oil ministry said the country will cut 128, 000 barrels a day, while the United Arab Emirates said it would cut its production by 144,000 barrels a day, according to a statement by Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazrouei, reported by Attaqa Breaking News. Oman said it would implement a voluntary cut of 40,000 barrels a day. Kazakhstan said it would cut by 78,000 barrels a day and Algeria said it would cut by 48,000 barrels a day.

    Ole Hansen, chief commodities strategist at Saxo Bank, said the announcement “came out of the blue.”

    “Producers were clearly frustrated by the recent slump which was speculative more than fundamentally driven. They will likely achieve a return to the $80s while also trying to pre-empt a smaller than expected increase in global oil demand in the coming months. Remember most of the +2 m b/d increase expected for this year is backloaded into the second half with plenty of room for error should economic slowdown be as severe as currently priced in by the market through expectations of U.S. rate cuts,” Hansen told MarketWatch.

    “The Saudi oil minister love[s] to wrong foot the market, especially when it comes to hurting speculative short sellers,” said Hansen.

    The move also comes as the U.S., Europe and elsewhere continue to battle inflation. Oil prices have fallen sharply over the last 12 months, after spiking to more than $120 a barrel following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year. Brent was down roughly 24% from a year earlier at Friday’s close.

    The new cuts, if fully implemented, should make for a significant draw on crude inventories in the second quarter as opposed to previous expectations for an early third-quarter draw, said Giacomo Romeo, energy equity analyst at Jefferies, in a note.

    “The only potential downside to this decision is that bears in the market could perceive the cut as a validation of the recent demand concerns,” he wrote, noting that compliance with past targets has also been in issue.

    The U.A.E., for example, was seen producing around 200,000 barrels a day above its target for a few months, while Russian output in March didn’t see the full 500,000 barrel-a-day reduction announced in February, Romeo noted.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These 20 energy stocks are worth a look if you think oil prices will soar in 2023

    These 20 energy stocks are worth a look if you think oil prices will soar in 2023

    [ad_1]

    Harris Kupperman, the president of Praetorian Capital, made a couple of interesting calls heading into 2022. He predicted that stocks of the giant tech-oriented companies that led the bull market would be sold off, and that oil prices would continue to rise through the end of 2022.

    The first prediction came true, while the second one for oil prices fizzled. After rising to $130 in March, oil prices have fallen back to where they started the year. Then again, that second prediction still could have made you a lot of money because the share prices of oil companies kept rising anyway.

    That leads to a new prediction for 2023 and a related stock screen below.

    Here’s a chart showing the movement of front-month contract prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil
    CL.1,
    -0.62%

    since the end of 2021:


    FactSet

    Even though Kupperman didn’t get his oil price call right, the energy sector of the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -1.20%

    was up 60% for 2022 through Dec. 27, excluding dividends. That is the only one of the 11 S&P 500 sectors to show a gain in 2022. And the energy sector is also cheapest relative to earnings expectations, with a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 9.8, compared with 16.7 for the full S&P 500.

    WTI pulled back from its momentary peak at $130.50 in early March, but that didn’t reverse the long-term trend of low capital spending by oil and natural gas producers, which has given investors confidence that supplies will remain tight.

    Vicki Hollub, the CEO of Occidental Petroleum Corp.
    OXY,
    -3.50%

    the best-performing S&P 500 stock of 2022 — said during a recent interview that there was “no pressure to increase production right now,” citing a $40 per barrel break-even point for oil prices.

    Kupperman now expects strong demand and low supplies to push oil as high as $200 a barrel in 2023.

    At the end of November, these 20 oil companies stood out as reasonable plays for 2023 based on expectations for free-cash-flow generation and dividend payments.

    For this next screen, we are only looking at ratings and consensus price targets among analysts polled by FactSet.

    There are 23 energy stocks in the S&P 500, and you can invest in that group easily by purchasing shares of the Energy Select SPDR ETF
    XLE,
    -2.24%
    .
    We can expand the list of large-cap names by looking at the components of the iShares Global Energy ETF
    IXC,
    -1.91%
    ,
    which holds all the energy stocks in the S&P 500 plus large players based outside the U.S.

    The top five holdings of IXC are:

    Company

    Ticker

    Country

    % of portfolio

    Share “buy” ratings

    Dec. 27 price

    Price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Exxon Mobil Corp.

    XOM,
    -1.64%
    U.S.

    16.4%

    54%

    110.19

    118.89

    7.89%

    Chevron Corp.

    CVX,
    -1.48%
    U.S.

    11.5%

    54%

    179.63

    190.52

    6.06%

    Shell PLC

    SHEL,
    -0.70%
    U.K.

    7.8%

    83%

    23.67

    29.82

    25.99%

    TotalEnergies SE

    TTE,
    -1.40%
    France

    5.6%

    62%

    59.63

    64.40

    8.00%

    ConocoPhillips

    COP,
    -2.67%
    U.K.

    5.4%

    83%

    118.47

    140.84

    18.88%

    Source: FactSet

    Prices on the tables in this article are in local currencies.

    IXC holds 51 stocks. To expand the list for a stock screen, we added the energy stocks in the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index
    MID,
    -1.24%

    and the S&P Small Cap 600 Index
    SML,
    -1.89%

    to bring the list up to 91 companies, which we then pared to 83 covered by at least five analysts polled by FactSet.

    Here are the 20 companies in the list with at least 75% “buy” or equivalent ratings that have the most upside potential over the next 12 months, based on consensus price targets:

    Company

    Ticker

    Country

    Share “buy” ratings

    Dec. 27 price

    Price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    EQT Corp.

    EQT,
    -7.82%
    U.S.

    83%

    36.34

    59.14

    63%

    Green Plains Inc.

    GPRE,
    -2.72%
    U.S.

    80%

    29.80

    43.40

    46%

    Cameco Corp.

    CCO,
    +0.33%
    Canada

    100%

    30.48

    44.25

    45%

    Talos Energy Inc.

    TALO,
    -8.40%
    U.S.

    86%

    19.77

    28.67

    45%

    Ranger Oil Corp. Class A

    ROCC,
    -6.22%
    U.S.

    100%

    41.33

    58.00

    40%

    Tourmaline Oil Corp.

    TOU,
    -4.92%
    Canada

    100%

    71.40

    98.83

    38%

    Civitas Resources Inc.

    CIVI,
    -4.06%
    U.S.

    100%

    58.82

    80.83

    37%

    Inpex Corp.

    1605,
    -2.08%
    Japan

    88%

    1,477.00

    1,965.56

    33%

    Diamondback Energy Inc.

    FANG,
    -2.26%
    U.S.

    84%

    137.58

    181.90

    32%

    Santos Limited

    STO,
    -3.12%
    Australia

    100%

    7.20

    9.26

    29%

    Matador Resources Co.

    MTDR,
    -3.98%
    U.S.

    79%

    57.59

    73.75

    28%

    Targa Resources Corp.

    TRGP,
    -2.63%
    U.S.

    95%

    73.89

    94.05

    27%

    Cenovus Energy Inc.

    CVE,
    -2.55%
    Canada

    84%

    26.24

    33.22

    27%

    Shell PLC

    SHEL,
    -0.70%
    U.K.

    83%

    23.67

    29.82

    26%

    Ampol Limited

    ALD,
    -2.89%
    Australia

    85%

    28.29

    35.01

    24%

    EOG Resources Inc.

    EOG,
    -3.54%
    U.S.

    79%

    132.08

    157.52

    19%

    ConocoPhillips

    COP,
    -2.67%
    U.S.

    83%

    118.47

    140.84

    19%

    Repsol SA

    REP,
    -0.66%
    Spain

    75%

    15.05

    17.88

    19%

    Halliburton Co.

    HAL,
    -3.03%
    U.S.

    86%

    39.27

    45.95

    17%

    Marathon Petroleum Corp.

    MPC,
    -1.97%
    U.S.

    76%

    116.82

    132.56

    13%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more information about the companies.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Closing prices for crude oil, gold and other commodities

    Closing prices for crude oil, gold and other commodities

    [ad_1]

    Benchmark U.S. crude oil for January delivery fell $3.05 to $76.93 a barrel Monday. Brent crude for February delivery fell $2.89 to $82.68 a barrel.

    Wholesale gasoline for January delivery fell 8 cents to $2.20 a gallon. January heating oil fell 17 cents to $3 a gallon. January natural gas fell 70 cents to $5.58 per 1,000 cubic feet.

    Gold for February delivery fell $28.30 to $1,781.30 an ounce. Silver for March delivery fell 83 cents to $22.42 an ounce and March copper fell 5 cents to $3.80 a pound.

    The dollar rose to 136.69 Japanese yen from 134.44 yen. The euro fell to $1.0493 from $1.0534.

    [ad_2]

    Source link