ReportWire

Tag: Credit Types/Services

  • The Cost of Doing Business With China? A $40,000 Dinner With Xi Jinping Might Be Just the Start

    The Cost of Doing Business With China? A $40,000 Dinner With Xi Jinping Might Be Just the Start

    [ad_1]

    Updated Nov. 28, 2023 12:54 am ET

    Broadcom Chief Executive Hock Tan shelled out $40,000 to sit at Xi Jinping’s table for the Chinese leader’s recent dinner in San Francisco with the heads of American businesses. Tan had a lot more at stake—a $69 billion deal he was waiting on China to approve.

    For months, Chinese regulators wouldn’t clear the U.S. chipmaker’s bid to buy enterprise software developer VMware, leading Broadcom to put off its date for completion of the deal—first announced in May 2022—three times. Beijing had held up previous mergers involving U.S. companies. Intel’s planned acquisition of Israeli firm Tower Semiconductor, for more than $5 billion, was scuttled in August after Chinese regulators failed to approve it.

    Copyright ©2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stocks Are Poised to Rise Monday

    Stocks Are Poised to Rise Monday

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks are poised to rise on Monday ahead of a week of earnings and economic data releases, including quarterly reports from Tesla, Netflix, and .

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Upstart stock sinks as tough lending landscape drives downbeat earnings outlook

    Upstart stock sinks as tough lending landscape drives downbeat earnings outlook

    [ad_1]

    Upstart Holdings Inc. has struggled to contend with a tougher lending environment, and the company indicated Tuesday that its challenges are expected to continue.

    The financial-technology company, which uses artificial intelligence to inform lending decisions, delivered a lower-than-expected forecast for the current quarter, as Chief Executive David Girouard called out high interest rates and “an environment where banks continue to be super cautious about lending.”

    For the third quarter, Upstart
    UPST,
    -0.42%

    expects $140 million in revenue, while analysts had been anticipating $155 million. The company also models $5 million in adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Ebitda), while analysts were looking for $9.6 million in adjusted Ebitda.

    Upstart shares tumbled more than 19% in Tuesday’s after-hours action.

    See also: Marqeta scores long-awaited Cash App renewal, and its stock is surging

    Chief Financial Officer Sanjay Datta, meanwhile, explained that the “ongoing supply of loans on offer in the secondary markets by sellers anxious for liquidity contributes to a challenging market dynamic, with loan books being sold at bargain prices and creating no shortage of buying opportunities for selected investors.”

    “Our view is that it will take some time for the market to work its way through this surplus of cheap available yield,” he said. “Despite this, we continue to pursue a number of promising discussions with prospective funding partners, aimed at bringing more committed capital to the platform, and believe that we will be well positioned once the loan market returns to a more traditional state of pricing equilibrium.”

    Though Datta said Upstart moved in a “promising direction this past quarter,” he also acknowledged there’s “much work to be done to restore our business to the scale and growth that we aspire to.”

    Read: Toast’s stock heats up after earnings as company hits a milestone

    The company reported a second-quarter net loss of $28.2 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $29.9 million, or 36 cents a share, in the year-earlier period. On an adjusted basis, Upstart earned 6 cents a share, whereas analysts tracked by FactSet were modeling a 7-cent loss per share.

    Revenue fell to $136 million from $228.2 million. The FactSet consensus was for $135.2 million. The company generated $144 million in fee revenue, compared with the $131 million that analysts were expecting.

    Upstart’s lending partners originated 109,447 loans across its platform in the second quarter, totaling $1.2 billion. Conversion on rate requests was 9%, down from 13% in the same period a year prior.

    Though Upstart beat on adjusted earnings, it “signaled that macro pressure is not set to abate in Q3, with credit performance and the funding markets still buffeted by a challenging economic environment,” Barclays analyst Ramsey El-Assal wrote in a note to clients Tuesday. “With a new Q3 guide that came in below Street estimates, we expect shares to be down in tomorrow’s tape.”

    Shares of Upstart have rocketed 291% so far in 2023, through Tuesday’s close, as the S&P 500
    SPX
    has risen 17%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Banc of California is expected to keep leading regional banks higher as PacWest deal ignites sector

    Banc of California is expected to keep leading regional banks higher as PacWest deal ignites sector

    [ad_1]

    Banc of California Inc.’s proposed agreement to acquire PacWest Bancorp. helped send regional-bank stocks considerably higher on Wednesday. But even after a two-day increase of 12% for its shares, the acquiring bank remains the favorite name among analysts covering regional players in the U.S.

    The merger agreement was announced after the market close on Tuesday, but the rumor mill had already sent Banc of California’s
    BANC,
    +0.62%

    stock up by 11% that day. Then on Wednesday, shares of PacWest Bancorp
    PACW,
    +26.92%

    shot up 27% to $9.76, which was above the estimated takeout value of $9.60 a share when the deal was announced. The merger deal, if approved by both banks’ shareholders, will also include a $400 million investment from Warburg Pincus LLC and Centerbridge Partners L.P.

    A screen of regional banks by rating and stock-price target is below.

    Deal coverage:

    With PacWest closing above the initial per-share deal valuation, it is fair to wonder whether or not its shareholders will vote to approve the agreement. In a note to clients on Wednesday, Wedbush analyst David Chiaverini called Banc of California’s offer “fair, but not overwhelmingly attractive,” and wrote that PacWest was “a likely seller before the mini banking crisis occurred in March.”

    While Chiaverini went on to predict the deal’s approval by PacWest’s shareholders, he added that he “wouldn’t be surprised if there were some dissent among a minority of shareholders [which could] possibly open the door to the potential emergence of a third-party bid.”

    More broadly, Odeon Capital analyst Dick Bove wrote to clients on Wednesday that the merger deal, along with increasing involvement of private-equity firms in lending businesses, the expected enhancement of regulatory capital requirements for banks and other factors could lead to more consolidation among smaller banks.

    He went on to write that we might be entering a period for the banking industry similar to the 1990s, “when rules were being changed and acquisitions were rampant,” which “created new investment opportunities.”

    The SPDR S&P Regional Banking exchange-traded fund
    KRE,
    +4.74%

    rose 5% on Wednesday but was still down 17% for 2023, while the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    +0.02%

    was up 19%, both excluding dividends.

    KRE holds 139 stocks, with 98 covered by at least five analysts working for brokerage firms polled by FactSet. Out of those 98 banks, 45 have majority “buy” ratings among the analysts. Among those 45, here are the 10 with the most upside potential over the next 12 months, implied by consensus price targets:

    Bank

    Ticker

    City

    Total assets ($mil)

    July 26 price change

    Share buy ratings

    July 26 closing price

    Consensus price target

    Implied 12-month upside potential

    Banc of California Inc.

    BANC,
    +0.62%
    Santa Ana, Calif.

    $9,370

    1%

    71%

    $14.71

    $18.58

    26%

    Enterprise Financial Services Corp.

    EFSC,
    +1.83%
    Clayton, Mo.

    $13,871

    2%

    80%

    $41.75

    $49.25

    18%

    First Merchants Corp.

    FRME,
    +3.52%
    Muncie, Ind.

    $17,968

    4%

    100%

    $32.38

    $37.33

    15%

    Amerant Bancorp Inc. Class A

    AMTB,
    +3.47%
    Coral Gables, Fla.

    $9,520

    3%

    60%

    $20.26

    $23.30

    15%

    Old Second Bancorp Inc.

    OSBC,
    +3.39%
    Aurora, Ill.

    $5,884

    3%

    100%

    $16.15

    $18.50

    15%

    F.N.B. Corp.

    FNB,
    +2.87%
    Pittsburgh

    $44,778

    3%

    75%

    $12.91

    $14.50

    12%

    Columbia Banking System Inc.

    COLB,
    +3.95%
    Tacoma, Wash.

    $53,592

    4%

    55%

    $22.63

    $25.32

    12%

    Wintrust Financial Corp.

    WTFC,
    +3.43%
    Rosemont, Ill.

    $54,286

    3%

    92%

    $86.05

    $95.33

    11%

    Synovus Financial Corp.

    SNV,
    +6.01%
    Columbus, Ga.

    $60,656

    6%

    75%

    $34.06

    $37.73

    11%

    Home BancShares Inc.

    HOMB,
    +4.56%
    Conway, Ark.

    $22,126

    5%

    57%

    $24.09

    $26.67

    11%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each bank.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Any stock screen can only be a starting point when considering whether or not to invest. If you see any stocks of interest here, you should do your own research to form your own opinion.

    Don’t miss: How you can profit in the stock market from an incredible financial-services trend over the next 20 years

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PacWest stock rockets nearly 40% after Banc of California confirms plan to buy troubled bank

    PacWest stock rockets nearly 40% after Banc of California confirms plan to buy troubled bank

    [ad_1]

    PacWest Bancorp’s stock jumped more than 38% in after-hours trading Tuesday after the company said it had agreed to be acquired by Banc of California Inc. in an all-stock merger backed by two private-equity firms. The merger comes as PacWest looks to put a rocky period behind it.

    Under the terms of the merger agreement, PacWest
    PACW,
    -27.04%

    stockholders will receive 0.6569 of a share of Banc of California common stock for each share of PacWest common stock. Based on closing prices on Tuesday, the deal values PacWest at $9.60 a share, a premium over its closing price of $7.67 a share on Tuesday.

    Warburg Pincus and Centerbridge will provide $400 million in equity.

    PacWest stockholders will own 47% of the outstanding shares of the combined company, while the private-equity investors will own 19% and Banc of California shareholders will have 34%.

    PacWest said that it is the company being acquired and that it will change its name to Banc of California. PacWest said it will be the “accounting acquirer,” with fair-value accounting applied to Banc of California’s balance sheet at closing.

    Banc of California CEO Jared Wolff will retain the same role at the combined company.

    The combined company will repay about $13 billion in wholesale borrowings to be funded by the sale of assets, “which are fully marked as a result of the transaction, and excess cash,” the companies said.

    The merged company is currently projecting about $36.1 billion in assets, $25.3 billion in total loans, $30.5 billion in total deposits and more than 70 branches in California.

    John Eggemeyer, the independent lead director at PacWest, will be chair of the board of the combined company following the merger.

    The board of directors of the combined company will consist of 12 directors: eight from the existing Banc of California board, three from the existing PacWest board and one from the pair of private-equity firms led by Warburg Pincus.

    Citing sources close to the deal, the Wall Street Journal had reported earlier that a tie-up was imminent.

    In regular trading Tuesday, PacWest’s stock ended 27% down; trading was halted for volatility following the report of the deal.

    Banc of California’s stock rose 11% but was later halted for news pending as well. The stock rose more than 9% in after-hours trading on Tuesday.

    At last check, PacWest’s market capitalization was about $1.2 billion, while Banc of California’s was about $764 million. Combined, the business would be worth about $2 billion.

    PacWest’s big share-price move on Tuesday marks the latest in a volatile few months for the Beverly Hills, Calif., bank, which was founded in 1999.

    Investors had speculated that the bank could be the next to fail after Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failed in March and First Republic Bank was taken over by JPMorgan.

    Also on Tuesday, PacWest said it lost $207.4 million, or $1.75 a share, in its second quarter, as it got a hit from items related to loan sales and restructuring of its lending unit Civic. The loss contrasts with earnings of $122 million, or $1.02 a share, in the year-ago period.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected the bank to report a loss of 58 cents a share in the quarter.

    PacWest disclosed in recent months that it was exploring strategic alternatives while it sold off parts of its business to raise cash to strengthen its balance sheet. It sold a loan portfolio to Ares Management Corp.
    ARES,
    +0.92%

    in a move to generate $2 billion.

    Also read: PacWest sells loan portfolio to Ares Management in deal that generates $2 billion ‘to improve liquidity’

    It also sold a portfolio of loans to Kennedy-Wilson Holdings Inc.
    KW,
    -1.70%
    ,
    which then sold part of the portfolio to Canada’s Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
    FFH,
    +1.07%
    .

    Also read: PacWest sparks regional-bank rally after unveiling plan to sell loans worth $2.6 billion

    In May, PacWest sold its real-estate lending portfolio to Roc360.

    Also in May, PacWest’s stock dropped more than 20% after it said it had lost 9.5% of its deposits amid market volatility.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • American Express Posts Record Revenue, Earnings. It’s Still Bracing for Defaults.

    American Express Posts Record Revenue, Earnings. It’s Still Bracing for Defaults.

    [ad_1]



    American Express


    delivered a fifth consecutive quarter of record revenue and all-time high earnings per share, but the group remains cautious on debt struggles among cardholders as it continued to build its reserves for credit losses.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The nation’s biggest banks are gearing up for more consumer struggles ahead

    The nation’s biggest banks are gearing up for more consumer struggles ahead

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Jamie Dimon on Friday said the U.S. economy was basically doing OK, even if customers were spending “a little more slowly.”

    But with rivals like Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and American Express Co. set to report quarterly results this week, recession agita still prevails.

    For evidence, look no further than JPMorgan’s
    JPM,
    +0.60%

    own quarterly results. The bank’s second-quarter profit blew past expectations, but it set aside $2.9 billion during the second quarter to cover potentially bad loans, amid concerns that more consumers could run into more difficulty paying their bills on time as higher prices manage to stick at stores.

    That figure was well up from $1.1 billion in the same quarter last year, although still far below the billions it stowed away when the pandemic first hit. Similarly, Wells Fargo & Co.
    WFC,
    -0.34%

    on Friday set aside $1.7 billion for loan losses in this year’s second quarter, nearly triple what it was a year ago.

    The figures underscore the anxiety over the second half of this year, when many economists expect the economy to tilt into a recession. However, for the 500 companies in the S&P 500 index, Wall Street analysts still expect profit growth.

    Any downturn could be exacerbated by the pressure investors have put on companies, potentially via more layoffs and money-saving technology, to keep prices high and cut costs to replicate the abnormally large profit-margin gains they put up in 2021 and 2022. Businesses have indeed kept prices high, at least for many basic necessities, in an effort to cover their own higher costs and to pad profits.

    When Bank of America
    BAC,
    -1.89%

    reports this week, the results will narrow the lens on lending and spending in the U.S. Results from Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    -0.50%

    and Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    -0.76%

    will fill in the gaps on trading and deal-making. American Express
    AXP,
    -0.49%

    will give a more detailed breakdown of what consumers are still spending their money on, after Delta Air Lines Inc.
    DAL,
    -2.35%

    — which has a partnership with AmEx — said that travel demand remained “robust.”

    Banks shoveled more money into their reserve stockpiles in 2020 to bulk up against the pandemic’s shutdown of the economy. A year later, they started releasing those funds as the economy reopened and recovered. FactSet expects the broader banking sector to plump up its cash cushion during this year’s second quarter to account for more late loan payments or potential defaults.

    In a report on Friday, FactSet said the 15 banking-industry companies in the S&P 500 Index tracked by the firm were on pace to set aside $9.9 billion to cover losses from souring loans in the second quarter. That’s more than double the amount set aside a year ago. And if that $9.9 billion figure, based on actual and projected financial figures, ends up as the actual figure at the end of the quarter, it would mark the highest since the beginning of the pandemic and the third highest in five years, according to FactSet data.

    “The U.S. economy continues to be resilient,” Dimon said in a statement on Friday. “Consumer balance sheets remain healthy, and consumers are spending, albeit a little more slowly. Labor markets have softened somewhat, but job growth remains strong.”

    However, he noted difficulties in JPMorgan’s investment banking segment. And he said consumer savings were slowly eroding as inflation endures.

    As the nation’s biggest bank, JPMorgan has flexed its financial muscle this year, swallowing up First Republic after that bank got into trouble. But as it consolidates power and influence, building thicker armor against shocks to the economy, its financial results might not always reflect the struggles of its smaller rivals, where difficulties are likely felt more acutely. Analysts at Raymond James said that while JPMorgan remained a “best in breed” bank, its outlook pointed to “heightened challenges for smaller banks.”

    See also: Jamie Dimon says U.S. consumers are in ‘good shape.’ This evidence may prove otherwise.

    This week in earnings

    For the week ahead, 60 S&P 500 companies, including five from the Dow, will report quarterly results, according to FactSet. Two big oil companies, Halliburton Co.
    HAL,
    -2.28%

    and Baker Hughes Co.,
    BKR,
    -0.95%

    will report, as oil prices fall from levels seen last year. Results from two transportation giants — trucking company J.B. Hunt Transport Services
    JBHT,
    -0.42%

    and railroad operator CSX Corp.
    CSX,
    -0.27%

    — will also be a proxy for how much people are buying things and having them shipped. United Airlines Holdings Inc.
    UAL,
    -3.42%

    and American Airlines Group
    AAL,
    -1.68%

    will also report.

    The call to put on your calendar

    Netflix results: Hollywood shutdown, ‘slow-growth’ expectations. Hollywood’s writers — and now its actors — have gone on strike, and Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    -1.88%

    reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. The streaming platform will likely face questions over how much content it has left in the tank, as the strike upends studio-production schedules and leaves viewers with vast expanses of reruns. Still, Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen said that the production standstill “may ironically drive even more viewers to streaming services.”

    The writers and actors argue that the studio industry — increasingly consolidated, increasingly publicly traded, increasingly oriented around a handful of film franchises — has profited immensely while skimping on things benefits and streaming residuals. But after a decade-long rise, and a recent shift in investor focus from subscriber growth to profit growth, Netflix has emerged as one of the biggest production powerhouses in the business. And after years of flooding customers with new films and shows, it’s trying to squeeze out sales via more boring ways: things like a password-sharing crackdown and ads.

    Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio at Synovus Trust Co., said Netflix still faced a plenty of streaming competition amid “muted” subscriber growth. But Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter said investors should look at Netflix as a profitable, albeit more mature company.

    “We think Netflix is well-positioned in this murky environment as streamers are shifting strategy, and should be valued as an immensely profitable, slow-growth company,” Pachter said in a research note on Friday.

    “Even while the ad-supported tier is not yet directly accretive (we think it will be accretive over time), the ad-tier should continue to reduce churn and draw new subscribers to the service,” he continued.

    The number to watch

    Tesla sales. Electric-vehicle maker Tesla Inc. also reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. And like streaming, some analysts say the fervor for EVs has faded.

    However, they also said that Tesla
    TSLA,
    +1.25%

    had so far been immune from the malaise. And even though Elon Musk remains preoccupied with Twitter — which now faces competition from Meta Platforms Inc.’s
    META,
    -1.45%

    Threads — Tesla’s second-quarter deliveries were far above expectations. Sales are expected to be big. And one analyst said that price cuts, which Tesla has used to capture more of the auto market in China, were likely “fairly minimal” during the second quarter. But some analysts wondered what the blowout delivery figures would mean for margins. And the industry, broadly, has increasingly tested the patience of profit-minded investors.

    “We’ve now seen a market where demand is constrained, capital has been tighter, and there is less tolerance for EV related losses,” Barclays analysts said in a note last week, adding that there was a “step back from EV euphoria.”

    Claudia Assis contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How hard has it been to cancel Amazon Prime? Start by navigating 4 pages, 6 clicks and 15 options.

    How hard has it been to cancel Amazon Prime? Start by navigating 4 pages, 6 clicks and 15 options.

    [ad_1]

    Signing up for Amazon Prime is as easy as 1-2-3. Canceling it, not so much.

    For years, up until this past April, the online retail giant made customers trying to quit its signature service navigate an odyssey through a labyrinthine system called the “Iliad Flow” named after the epically long and complex masterwork by the Greek poet Homer. 

    According to a civil lawsuit filed Wednesday by the Federal Trade Commission, Amazon customers were required to make their way through a four-page, six-click, 15-option process to stop paying for the service. One wrong click, and they were sent back to the beginning, the lawsuit said.

    The FTC noted that Amazon
    AMZN,
    +3.69%

    maintained the multistep process even though new subscribers in the U.S. to $14.99-a-month or $139-a-year Prime accounts needed only one or two clicks. And even though subscribers could sign up on a multitude of devices, they could only cancel using their desktop computer or mobile phone or by calling customer service.

    The FTC suit also accused Amazon of manipulating millions of customers into inadvertently signing up for Prime and then hitting them with automatic renewals without warning.

    Amazon has dismissed the charges as misguided, adding that the lawsuit is legally and factually inaccurate. It has vowed to fight the FTC.

    The FTC said in court papers that Amazon created the complex “Iliad Flow” exit strategy in 2016 and kept it in place until April of this year, when it caught wind that the agency was preparing to file a lawsuit about the practice.

    During that time frame, Amazon quadrupled the number of global Prime subscribers from around 50 million to more than 200 million. The program brings around $25 billion into Amazon’s coffers every year. 

    The suit described an allegedly maddening process for a customer to actually cancel a subscription. 

    To start, a subscriber first had to find the “Iliad Flow,” which was not made easy, the FTC suit said. A customer had to select the “accounts and list” dropdown menu, navigate to the third column and then select the eleventh option there: Prime Membership.

    That would bring the customer to the Prime Central page. There, one would have to click the “manage membership” button to trigger options that finally included an “end membership” button. But that was only the beginning.

    Only after clicking “end membership” would the customer enter the “Iliad Flow” process. From there, a customer would need to navigate three more pages, each with a multitude of options, to finally complete canceling the subscription.

    This is one of several web pages a Prime customer would need to navigate in order to cancel the service, the FTC said.


    Federal Trade Commission

    On the first page, customers were forced to “take a look back at [their] journey with Prime” — a kind of greatest-hits reel of Prime services used over the years. The page was also loaded with marketing material for a multitude of Prime services, with links reading: “Start shopping today’s deals!” and “You can start watching videos by clicking here!” or “Start listening now!”

    One wrong click would knock the subscriber out of the “Iliad Flow.” 

    If the subscriber managed to navigate to the bottom of the page, he or she would finally find a “continue to cancel” button. That would take them to Page 2.

    According to the FTC, that page would present the customer with a number of discount options, such as switching from monthly to annual payments, or taking advantage of student discounts or discounts for people on government assistance. The page also included warning icons and links stating: “Items tied to your Prime membership will be affected if you cancel your membership,” and “By canceling, you will no longer be eligible for your unclaimed Prime exclusive offers.” 

    Clicking on any of those would take the subscriber out of the “Iliad Flow.”

    At the bottom of that page was another “continue to cancel” button, which would take the user to Page 3.

    If you managed to get to this page, you were only six options away from actually being able to quit Amazon’s Prime service, the FTC suit said.


    Federal Trade Commission

    On this final page, a customer was presented with five options, only the last of which — “end now” — would actually allow the subscription to be canceled. The other options included pausing the subscription or canceling its auto-renewal function. Pressing any of the four other choices would bring the user out of the “Iliad Flow.” They would have to start over if they wanted to continue.

    Only after successfully navigating this maze of web pages would the customer be allowed to actually cancel the service.

    The suit said this process caused cancellations to drop significantly.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cummins spinoff Atmus Filtration’s stock soars 14% in trading debut

    Cummins spinoff Atmus Filtration’s stock soars 14% in trading debut

    [ad_1]

    Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.’s stock soared 14% Friday in its trading debut, after the Cummins Inc. spinoff priced its initial public offering in the middle of its proposed price range.

    The Nashville, Tenn.-based company sold 14.1 million shares priced at $19.50 each to raise $275 million. With 83.3 million shares to be outstanding after the deal, the company’s valuation is $1.6 billion.

    The stock
    ATMU,
    +11.90%

    is trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker ATMU. Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase were lead book-running managers on the deal, with 10 other banks acting as co-managers.

    Although the company is issuing primary shares, Atmus will not receive any of the IPO proceeds; all of the proceeds will go to debt-for-equity exchange parties, namely underwriters Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, and will indirectly pay down parent Cummins’
    CMI,
    +1.03%

    debt, according to the filing documents.

    Atmus makes products for on-highway commercial vehicles and off-highway agriculture, construction, mining and power-generation vehicles and equipment, mostly under the Fleetguard brand. The company had pro forma net income of $34.9 million in the first quarter on sales of $418.6 million.

    About 16% of its 2022 sales went to original-equipment manufacturers, where its filters are used for new vehicles and equipment, and about 84% were aftermarket sales.

    The company was created by Cummins, a maker of diesel and natural-gas engines, in 1958.

    The IPO comes in a thin year for deals. There have been just 44 IPOs this year to raise $7.3 billion in proceeds, according to Renaissance Capital, a provider of IPO exchange-traded funds and institutional research.

    That’s up 29.4% from the same period in 2022, when deal flow slowed to its lightest in decades.

    “Deal flow started at a decent pace but failed to pick back up after the February lull, as hawkish signals from the Fed, renewed recession fears, and turmoil within the banking industry caused a spike in volatility,” Renaissance wrote in April commentary.

    The biggest deal of the year to date was that of Kenvue Inc.
    KVUE,
    -0.11%
    ,
    a spinoff from Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +0.14%
    ,
    which is parent to a number of household brands, including Tylenol, Band-Aid, Listerine and Benadryl.

    For more, see: Kenvue stock cheered in Wall Street debut, as Tylenol and Band-Aid brand parent is valued at $48 billion

    Kenvue raised $3.8 billion after pricing above range and achieving a valuation of $41 billion.

    The Renaissance IPO ETF
    IPO,
    +2.06%

    has gained 18% in the year to date, while the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +1.34%

    has gained 9%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway switched stakes in two banks, and the stocks head in opposite directions

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway switched stakes in two banks, and the stocks head in opposite directions

    [ad_1]

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. made a change in banking targets for investment, sending two banks’ shares in opposite directions Monday afternoon.

    Capital One Financial
    COF,
    +3.22%

    shares rallied more than 5% in after-hours trading while Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
    BK,
    +1.37%

    sold off in the extended session Monday after filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission showed Berkshire
    BRK.B,
    +0.32%

    BRK.A,
    +0.96%

    switched its position. The quarterly filing showed a new stake of 9.9 million shares in Capital One as Berkshire sold off its 25.1 million-share stake in Bank of New York Mellon.

    At Berkshire’s annual meeting, Buffett weighed in on recent scares for regional banks.

    “In terms of owning banks, events will determine their future and you’ve got politicians involved, you’ve got a whole lot of people who don’t really understand how the system works,” he said.

    Other changes included an increased stake in HP Inc.
    HPQ,
    +2.32%
    ,
    which grew by 16% to about 121 million shares. That growth was part of a combination of the holdings of General Re Corp., which Berkshire has owned since 1998 but had previously reported its holdings separately as part of New England Asset Management Inc.

    “Beginning with the Form 13F to be filed later today, the holdings of Gen Re will be included in Berkshire’s 13F filing,” Berkshire said in a news release earlier Monday. “The NEAM Form 13F filings will no longer include Gen Re’s holdings but they will continue to include NEAM client holdings where NEAM is acting as an investment manager.”

    Other holdings affected by that change included Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.29%
    ,
    Bank of America Inc.
    BAC,
    +2.07%

    and Chevron Corp.
    CVX,
    +0.37%
    ,
    Berkshire said in its news release.

    Other stocks that Berkshire made moves with during the first three months of the year included the former Restoration Hardware — RH
    RH,
    +1.89%

    shares fell 3% after Berkshire disclosed selling off its 2.4 million stake. Berkshire also officially reported selling of its 8.3 million stake in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.
    TSM,
    +2.67%
    .

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 20 banks that are sitting on huge potential securities losses—as was SVB

    20 banks that are sitting on huge potential securities losses—as was SVB

    [ad_1]

    Silicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company’s share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.

    Trading of SVB Financial Group’s
    SIVB,
    -60.41%

    stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was “monitoring very carefully.” Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank’s liquidity risk.

    California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.

    Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities — an item that played an important role in SVB’s crisis.

    Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.

    First, a quick look at SVB

    Some media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index
    RUA,
    -1.70%

    as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.

    One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank’s loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because “client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted.”

    SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn’t completed.

    So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.

    Unrealized losses on securities

    Banks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.

    The securities investments are held in two buckets:

    • Available for sale — these securities (mostly bonds) can be sold at any time, and under accounting rules are required to be marked to market each quarter. This means gains or losses are recorded for the AFS portfolio continually. The accumulated gains are added to, or losses subtracted from, total equity capital.

    • Held to maturity — these are bonds a bank intends to hold until they are repaid at face value. They are carried at cost and not marked to market each quarter.

    In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies—FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council’s National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right — or you may be looking at the wrong entity.

    Here’s how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: “Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments.”

    In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB’s available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling “substantially all” of these securities on March 8.

    The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trends

    On the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB’s AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company’s total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank’s total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI — effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.

    Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here’s the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:

    Bank

    Ticker

    City

    AOCI ($mil)

    Total equity capital ($mil)

    AOCI/ TEC – AOCI

    Total assets ($mil)

    Customers Bancorp Inc.

    CUBI,
    -13.11%
    West Reading, Pa.

    -$163

    $1,403

    -10.4%

    $20,896

    First Republic Bank

    FRC,
    -14.84%
    San Francisco

    -$331

    $17,446

    -1.9%

    $213,358

    Sandy Spring Bancorp Inc.

    SASR,
    -2.91%
    Olney, Md.

    -$132

    $1,484

    -8.2%

    $13,833

    New York Community Bancorp Inc.

    NYCB,
    -5.99%
    Hicksville, N.Y.

    -$620

    $8,824

    -6.6%

    $90,616

    First Foundation Inc.

    FFWM,
    -9.11%
    Dallas

    -$12

    $1,134

    -1.0%

    $13,014

    Ally Financial Inc.

    ALLY,
    -5.70%
    Detroit

    -$4,059

    $12,859

    -24.0%

    $191,826

    Dime Community Bancshares Inc.

    DCOM,
    -2.81%
    Hauppauge, N.Y.

    -$94

    $1,170

    -7.5%

    $13,228

    Pacific Premier Bancorp Inc.

    PPBI,
    -1.95%
    Irvine, Calif.

    -$265

    $2,798

    -8.7%

    $21,729

    Prosperity Bancshare Inc.

    PB,
    -4.46%
    Houston

    -$3

    $6,699

    -0.1%

    $37,751

    Columbia Financial, Inc.

    CLBK,
    -1.78%
    Fair Lawn, N.J.

    -$179

    $1,054

    -14.5%

    $10,408

    SVB Financial Group

    SIVB,
    -60.41%
    Santa Clara, Calif.

    -$1,911

    $16,295

    -10.5%

    $211,793

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each bank.

    Read Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Ally Financial Inc.
    ALLY,
    -5.70%

    — the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets — stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.

    To be sure, these numbers don’t mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.

    Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capital

    There are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index
    RUA,
    -1.70%

    that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:

    Bank

    Ticker

    City

    AOCI ($mil)

    Total equity capital ($mil)

    AOCI/ (TEC – AOCI)

    Total assets ($mil)

    Comerica Inc.

    CMA,
    -5.01%
    Dallas

    -$3,742

    $5,181

    -41.9%

    $85,406

    Zions Bancorporation N.A.

    ZION,
    -2.44%
    Salt Lake City

    -$3,112

    $4,893

    -38.9%

    $89,545

    Popular Inc.

    BPOP,
    -1.56%
    San Juan, Puerto Rico

    -$2,525

    $4,093

    -38.2%

    $67,638

    KeyCorp

    KEY,
    -2.55%
    Cleveland

    -$6,295

    $13,454

    -31.9%

    $189,813

    Community Bank System Inc.

    CBU,
    -0.22%
    DeWitt, N.Y.

    -$686

    $1,555

    -30.6%

    $15,911

    Commerce Bancshares Inc.

    CBSH,
    -1.61%
    Kansas City, Mo.

    -$1,087

    $2,482

    -30.5%

    $31,876

    Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc.

    CFR,
    -1.08%
    San Antonio

    -$1,348

    $3,137

    -30.1%

    $52,892

    First Financial Bankshares Inc.

    FFIN,
    -0.90%
    Abilene, Texas

    -$535

    $1,266

    -29.7%

    $12,974

    Eastern Bankshares Inc.

    EBC,
    -3.16%
    Boston

    -$923

    $2,472

    -27.2%

    $22,686

    Heartland Financial USA Inc.

    HTLF,
    -1.26%
    Denver

    -$620

    $1,735

    -26.3%

    $20,244

    First Bancorp

    FBNC,
    -0.31%
    Southern Pines, N.C.

    -$342

    $1,032

    -24.9%

    $10,644

    Silvergate Capital Corp. Class A

    SI,
    -11.27%
    La Jolla, Calif.

    -$199

    $603

    -24.8%

    $11,356

    Bank of Hawaii Corp

    BOH,
    -6.15%
    Honolulu

    -$435

    $1,317

    -24.8%

    $23,607

    Synovus Financial Corp.

    SNV,
    -2.91%
    Columbus, Ga.

    -$1,442

    $4,476

    -24.4%

    $59,911

    Ally Financial Inc

    ALLY,
    -5.70%
    Detroit

    -$4,059

    $12,859

    -24.0%

    $191,826

    WSFS Financial Corp.

    WSFS,
    -2.78%
    Wilmington, Del.

    -$676

    $2,202

    -23.5%

    $19,915

    Fifth Third Bancorp

    FITB,
    -4.17%
    Cincinnati

    -$5,110

    $17,327

    -22.8%

    $207,452

    First Hawaiian Inc.

    FHB,
    -3.48%
    Honolulu

    -$639

    $2,269

    -22.0%

    $24,666

    UMB Financial Corp.

    UMBF,
    -3.35%
    Kansas City, Mo.

    -$703

    $2,667

    -20.9%

    $38,854

    Signature Bank

    SBNY,
    -22.87%
    New York

    -$1,997

    $8,013

    -20.0%

    $110,635

    Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact Comerica Inc.
    CMA,
    -5.01%
    ,
    which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.

    But it is interesting to note that Silvergate Capital Corp.
    SI,
    -11.27%
    ,
    which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.

    Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is Signature Bank
    SBNY,
    -22.87%

    of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.

    Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Car repos are on the rise, thanks to record-high monthly payments, recession warnings

    Car repos are on the rise, thanks to record-high monthly payments, recession warnings

    [ad_1]

    Car repossessions have grown less common in the past two years, but those days may be over. Credit rating agency Fitch Ratings says repossession rates have nearly returned to pre-pandemic levels. Some analysts fear they could grow from there. For the lowest-credit consumers — those who make up the subprime loan market — the repossession rate is now higher than it was in 2019.

    Repossessions fell for a combination of reasons. Lenders grew more lenient with late payments, confident that the pandemic was a temporary disruption. They knew they’d likely make more money by giving people time to adjust than by seizing back cars to sell at lower prices. Government stimulus programs also helped many Americans stay afloat.

    But economic conditions have begun to change.

    High monthly payments meet recession warnings

    Skyrocketing car prices have left consumers with more debt for the same cars. According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, loans that started in 2021 and 2022 have proven particularly hard to afford.

    Loans taken out in those years performed worse than earlier loans “because those consumers had to finance cars once the supply chains were jammed and the prices started to go up,” says Ryan Kelly, acting auto finance program manager for the bureau. The average monthly payment for a new car bought last month is now a shocking $762.

    “Those consumers got hit with inflation twice,” Kelly says. “First, when they had to finance a car after the prices went up, and then when they had to put gas in the car after the Russia-Ukraine conflict started.”

    The CFPB this year warned lenders not to repossess cars before the law allows it.

    Repossession firms seeing new business

    Jeremy Cross, the president of repossession firm International Recovery Systems, calls the last two years “a recipe for disaster.”

    He explains, “Over the last two years, vehicle prices were inflated because there was no new car supply.” But Americans had saved money staying at home under lockdown, and some spent it on more expensive cars.

    Now that the economy may face a downturn, those payments are proving harder to make.

    Now “the volume is picking up, and the remaining companies that are still performing repossessions are very busy,” Cross says. He thinks lenders are preparing for a new wave of repossessions in 2023 and 2024 because they’re beginning to offer his company new incentives “jockeying for position,” knowing that repossession firms will have more business than they can handle.

    See: The big question about new car prices: When will they go down?

    Cox Automotive analysts predict that long-term through 2025, repossessions will remain at or below historical norms. But between now and then, we could see a peak. (Cox Automotive is the parent company of Kelley Blue Book.)

    This story originally ran on KBB.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Eat, drink and be merry: Here’s where shoppers have been spending the most money this holiday season

    Eat, drink and be merry: Here’s where shoppers have been spending the most money this holiday season

    [ad_1]

    Restaurants are set to become the biggest winners of a holiday season that could turn out to be the most normalized since the onset of the pandemic.

    That’s according to a new Mastercard SpendingPulse survey released on Monday, which showed spending at dining establishments surging 15.1% over the 2021 holiday period. Total retail expenditures for the Nov. 1–to–Dec. 24 period in 2022 rose 7.6%, with in-store spending up 6.8% and online spending up 10.6%.

    Restaurant spending beat out several other categories, such as apparel, where spending was up 4.4% from 2021, and electronics and jewelry, where a respective 5.3% and 5.4% less were spent, and department stores, which saw spending rise 1%.

    “This holiday retail season looked different than years past,” said Steve Sadove, senior adviser for Mastercard and former CEO and chairman of Saks Inc. “Retailers discounted heavily but consumers diversified their holiday spending to accommodate rising prices and an appetite for experiences and festive gatherings postpandemic.”

    Government data for November showed consumer spending was up just 0.1%, reflecting cautiousness among households and price cutting by retailers to lure those hesitant shoppers in. But the data also showed more spending on holiday recreation and travel, expected to go in the books as a busy season even if deadly winter storm may have wreaked havoc on the plans of many Americans over the Christmas weekend.

    Of course, even as some merrymakers felt confident enough to make more plans and see more friends and family this year, the virus of course continues to cause illness and death. The U.S. reported 70,000 newly diagnosed cases for the first time since September on Thursday, while 422 people died of COVID-19 on Wednesday.

    Don’t miss: As COVID cases rise, how to steer clear of viruses during the holiday season

    Also see: 4 tips for staying healthy while traveling during this ‘tripledemic’ cold and flu season

    The Mastercard SpendingPulse data measure in-store and online retail sales for all payment forms and are not inflation-adjusted.

    As for the companies that might be benefiting from that increased traffic, the year-end cheer probably won’t be enough to make a dent in what has been a difficult year with would-be consumers juggling worries over inflation, rising interest rates and a war in Europe.

    The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment exchange-traded fund
    PEJ,
    +0.79%
    ,
    whose holdings include Chipotle Mexican Grill
    CMG,
    +0.32%
    ,
    McDonald’s
    MCD,
    +0.68%

    and First Watch Restaurant Group
    FWRG,
    +0.42%
    ,
    has gained 6.5% to date in the fourth quarter and is down 20% for the year as of Thursday. The broad benchmark S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.59%

    is poised for a nearly 20% loss in 2022.

    Read: How a Santa Claus rally, or lack thereof, sets the stage for the stock market in first quarter

    And: Best stock picks for 2023: Here are Wall Street analysts’ most heavily favored choices

     

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Visa CEO Al Kelly to step down from that role in February

    Visa CEO Al Kelly to step down from that role in February

    [ad_1]

    Visa Inc. Chief Executive Al Kelly plans to step down from that role in February, to be replaced by Ryan McInerney, the company’s current president and a veteran of the payments giant for nearly a decade.

    Kelly, who’s been with Visa
    V,
    +0.40%

    in the CEO role since late 2016, said the timing of the change was right for him in a number of ways, as he’s soon to turn 65 and has a “lot of energy” to move into the next chapter of his life. He plans to embrace both his role as a grandfather and to continue to serve Visa through an executive chairman position on the company’s board of directors.

    After working with McInerney for the past six years, Kelly sees him as a worthy successor.

    “He is ready to  be the CEO of this company,” Kelly told MarketWatch. “He’s a phenomenal executive. He has the ability to be extraordinarily strategic and he’s also an incredibly thoughtful, get-in-the-weeds problem solver.”

    Under Kelly’s tenure thus far as CEO, Visa’s market value has increased to $437 billion from $181 billion, while its stock gained 173%.

    He is nearing his 65th birthday next year, as is Visa, based on a popular understanding of the company’s origins.

    Visa framed the transition as reflective of “the board’s very well-established and thoughtful succession plan,” according to comments from John Lundgren, the board’s lead independent director, in a press release.

    “We see this announcement as part of a planned succession and do not think it will be a surprise to investors,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Daniel Perlin wrote in a note to clients.

    McInerney has been responsible for Visa’s global businesses in his role as president, looking over the company’s product team and merchant team, among others. He’s been with Visa for almost a decade and sees “huge opportunity over the next 10 years” in areas like business-to-business transactions, government-to-consumer disbursements, and other payment functions that are newer to Visa.

    In both emerging and developed markets, he told MarketWatch he sees the potential for an “amazing digitalization of what we call ‘new payment flows.’”

    McInerney views Visa founder Dee Hock, who died over the summer at 93, as an “inspiration. Hock was “one of the original disruptors” who “saw things so far in the future that people couldn’t really imagine,” he said.

    See also: He saved credit cards, and now he’s inspiring crypto enthusiasts

    Kelly, who is staying on the company’s board, said he “will not be involved in the day-to-day running of the company,” but that he will be there to serve as a helper and adviser “for as long as it’s valuable to Ryan and his executive team.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I want to retire next year, but I have $25,000 in credit card debt and a major monthly mortgage payment — I also live with my three kids and ex

    I want to retire next year, but I have $25,000 in credit card debt and a major monthly mortgage payment — I also live with my three kids and ex

    [ad_1]

    I’ll be 57 next month and am divorced with three kids living with me. One is 28, she’s working, another is 21 and a senior in college (with a full scholarship) and the youngest is 15 (a sophomore in high school with a full scholarship). 

    I plan to retire at the end of next year with $25,000 in credit card debt and 15 more years to pay my mortgage. The credit cards have 0% interest. I have a good medical benefit when I retire and it will cover my two sons under 26 years old. My monthly expenses are $2,000, including life insurance, utilities, and a car payment.  

    My mortgage is around $4,000 monthly impounded. The interest rate is 2% until January 2022, then 3% until January 2023 and the remaining loan is 4.5%. Is it worth it to refinance to a lower rate? I also plan to just pay the principal and pay interest in December and April. I have two credit cards: one that totals $20,000, where the 0% promo ends in April 2021, and another with $4,500 where the 0% interest promo ends this December. 

    I work for the state and have a pension and 401(k) and 457 investments that total $110,000. I also have one month’s worth of expenses in an emergency fund. I can only apply for a loan to the retirement accounts while employed. 

    I would like to ask if retiring will be a good idea. If so, is it appropriate to take a loan with my investment to pay off the credit card debt before retiring? Based on our benefit, I don’t have to repay the debt (to the 401(k)) after my retirement unless I win the lottery or something. There won’t be a penalty. My annual gross income is $96,000.

    I’m a cohabitant with my ex on the house but get no contribution from him at all. I am working with my lawyer to see if I have the right to kick him out of the house.

    Please help.

    Thank you.

    CDT

    See: I’m a 57-year-old nurse with no retirement savings and I want to retire within seven years. What can I do?

    Dear CDT, 

    You have a lot to juggle, so the fact that you’re reaching out to someone for some financial guidance should be deemed an accomplishment all its own!

    The truth is, you may want to hold off on retiring if you can. Having $110,000 in retirement accounts is great, and you don’t want to have to start dwindling that down while also trying to manage a way to effectively pay down credit card debt and a mortgage. Should an emergency arise, taking a big chunk out of that nest egg could end up hurting you significantly in the long run. 

    “I think she needs to take a hard look at her income and expenses,” said Tammy Wener, a financial adviser and co-founder of RW Financial Planning. “When it comes to retirement, so many things are out of your control, like inflation and investment return. The one thing you do have control over is expenses.” Furthermore, your pension may be enough to maintain your lifestyle — though advisers wondered what exactly you would be getting from that pension every month — but you would still be better off with a larger nest egg to fall back on. 

    Say you retire next year after all, but you still have credit card debt and hefty bills to pay. Any retirement income you have with and outside of your current funds may not be sufficient for your current living expenses, and if in a few years you realize this, you could end up back in the workforce — though it may be hard to get the same or a similar job you already have. 

    Let’s look at your 401(k) and 457 plans for a moment. You said you could take a loan and based on your benefit you don’t need to pay it back, but you should be extremely cautious about this. With 401(k) loans, employees may be required to repay that loan if they’re separated from their employers, so this is a stipulation you should absolutely verify. If there was any misunderstanding as to how a loan is treated, that remaining loan would be treated as taxable income when you left your job, Wener said. 

    Financial advisers usually caution investors not to take loans and withdrawals from retirement accounts if they can avoid it, and in your case, this may be especially true as you plan to retire in the next year. When you take a loan, you may be paying yourself and your account back, but your balance is reduced by the amount of the loan, which means you could lose out on investment returns. In the midst of this pandemic, many of the Americans who took a loan or withdrawal regret it now, a recent survey found. “I would not recommend ‘swapping debt’ by taking a loan from her investments,” said Hank Fox, a financial planner. “Instead, she should pay whatever amount is due each month to avoid the finance charges and continue to pay-down the balances.” 

    Don’t miss: 5 ways to find free financial advice

    Also, consider what would happen if you continued to work: you’d still be able to contribute to a retirement account, boost your savings and, if applicable, reap the rewards with an employer match. You’d also narrow the amount of time you have between retirement and when you can claim Social Security benefits, Fox said. 

    Outside of the retirement accounts, you should try to build a “sizable” emergency fund, Wener said. Financial advisers typically suggest three to six months’ worth of living expenses, though you might want to strive for closer to six to offset any undesirable scenarios. 

    I’m not sure what the motivation was to retire next year, but if you can delay it, this may be the best solution. “The first thing I would recommend is that she reconsider retiring next year,” Fox said. “Since she will be 57 in November and assuming she is in good health, she should expect to be in retirement for 30 years or more.” 

    If postponing retirement is not an option, and it isn’t always, he suggests reducing or eliminating your mortgage, since it’s your largest expense by far. You could refinance, Wener said. Interest rates are very low these days, and while you may end up paying a little more every month for the next two years compared with that 2% rate you currently have, you’d end up paying the same and then less from February 2022 and on. 

    As for your credit cards, having a 0% interest rate is such a huge help in paying off debts faster, so you should try to extend that benefit, either by calling and asking about your options with your current credit card company or looking at alternative 0% interest cards. 

    A financial adviser — specifically, a Certified Financial Planner — could really help you crunch the numbers and find meaningful ways to make the most of the money you have now and will be getting in retirement, said Vince Clanton, principal and investment adviser representative at Chancellor Wealth Management. 

    An adviser can gather information on your current earnings and expenses, retirement savings, potential Social Security benefits and pension and create a financial plan to help you navigate retirement. “Voluntary retirement, and particularly early retirement, are very big decisions,” Clanton said. “It’s extremely important to know and understand all of the variables.” 

    Letters are edited for clarity.

    Have a question about your own retirement savings? Email us at HelpMeRetire@marketwatch.com

    [ad_2]

    Source link