ReportWire

Tag: credit cards

  • Retail credit card interest rates rise to record highs, topping 30% APR

    Retail credit card interest rates rise to record highs, topping 30% APR

    [ad_1]

    Ahead of holiday shopping season, credit card interest rates hit record highs


    Ahead of holiday shopping season, credit card interest rates hit record highs

    03:49

    Swipe-happy shoppers beware: Those enticing retail credit cards from your favorite merchants may put a bigger dent in your wallet than ever before. 

    That’s according to Bankrate’s annual retail cards survey that shows the annual percentage rate (APR) on retail credit cards this year has hit a record high of 28.93% on average, up from 26.72% in 2022. That’s well above the average APR of 21.19% for all credit cards, the survey shows. 

    The rising APRs come as the Federal Reserve continues to hike interest rates, indirectly increasing the cost of borrowing for consumers and emboldening credit card companies to raise their cards’ interest rates as well, Ted Rossman, Senior Industry Analyst at Bankrate.com, said in a statement. 

    Card companies emboldened by Fed hikes

    “[An APR of] 29.99% was an artificial barrier that few dared to cross — for psychological reasons, mostly, but the market has blown past that threshold given the Fed’s aggressive series of interest rate hikes,” Rossman said. 

    Bankrate surveyed 107 retail credit cards in mid-September 2023, using publicly available terms-and-conditions disclosures. The survey includes each of the 100 largest card-offering retailers, as defined by the National Retail Federation based on 2022 sales. For cards offering an APR range, the midpoint of that range was used to calculate the average APR for all credit cards.

    Retail credit cards are cards offered by a specific retailer alone or in partnership with a major bank that offers shoppers rewards for shopping at their stores, according to Bankrate. But while the cards may offer benefits to frequent shoppers who are able to pay off their card balances immediately — avoiding interest, those same cards can cause a lot of damage to cardholders who rack up interest charges on unpaid balances.

    “If you ever carry a balance, a retail credit card probably isn’t the best choice for you,” Rossman said. 

    Drowning in debt 

    According to Rossman, if a credit card holder finances a $1,000 purchase at the average retail card interest rate of 28.93% and only makes minimum payments, that cardholder will owe $715 and be in debt for 50 months. 

    Most Americans are already in debt as they take out more credit card debt as they struggle with rising inflation, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. In fact, Americans are buried in nearly a trillion dollars in credit card debt now owe nearly a tua record combined $986 billion on their credit cards, or 17% more than what they owed last year, the same data shows. 


    CSP warns public of scam email regarding credit card skimming devices at gas stations

    00:25

    Sky-high APRs

    Sixteen retail credit cards charge an APR of 32.24%, according to the Bankrate poll, some of which include Banter by Piercing Pagoda card, the HSN Credit Card, Ross Mastercard and the Wayfair Mastercard. 

    Two co-branded cards — myWalgreens Mastercard and the Ultamate Rewards Mastercard — follow a graded approach, with rates ranging from 23.24% up to 32.24%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 5 ways merchants are fighting card-swipe fees at the point of sale

    5 ways merchants are fighting card-swipe fees at the point of sale

    [ad_1]

    Payment card interchange, a major factor of the “swipe fees” that average about 2% of each sale, is in the news again as lawmakers and regulators react to claims that the pricing of card payments is unfairly controlled by card networks Visa and Mastercard.

    The existing systems supporting U.S. swipe fees are coming under pressure from at least three directions on political and legal fronts, briefly described below.

    But merchants are also using technologies and policies to offset the cost of payment card swipe fees, helped by the rise of faster payments, new approaches to merchant-funded rewards and new U.S. regulations encouraging open banking.

    “Merchants surprisingly have a lot of levers to push and pull when it comes to controlling how much they pay in payment card interchange,” said Eric Cohen, CEO of Merchant Advocate, a consulting firm based in Colts Neck, New Jersey, which counsels merchants on managing card-processing costs. 

    Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., are co-sponsoring the Credit Card Competition Act, which would give merchants a lower-cost credit card processing option by requiring banks with assets of $100 billion-plus to offer merchants a choice of two unaffiliated card networks that aren’t both Visa or Mastercard. 

    Separately, the Federal Reserve plans to vote this week on revising debit card interchange fees the agency set more than a decade ago as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, affecting banks with at least $10 billion in assets. 

    On another front, the Supreme Court last month agreed to hear a case brought by a North Dakota convenience store challenging the statute of limitations for the Fed’s Regulation II rule enacted in 2011 to implement debit interchange rates as a result of Dodd-Frank.

    Visa and Mastercard argue that swipe fees cover the cost of payment card acceptance, technology and fraud. But card-network rules don’t prevent merchants from exploring alternative strategies to reduce the effect of credit and debit card swipe fees. Here are five examples.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Fitzgerald

    Source link

  • Stocks Are Poised to Rise Monday

    Stocks Are Poised to Rise Monday

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks are poised to rise on Monday ahead of a week of earnings and economic data releases, including quarterly reports from Tesla, Netflix, and .

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Here are 3 ways to avoid paying more than what you actually owe on your credit cards

    Here are 3 ways to avoid paying more than what you actually owe on your credit cards

    [ad_1]

    Given record-high interest rates, now is not the time to be taking on more credit card debt.

    The Federal Reserve is expected to further hike interest rates before the end of the year, and the average credit card interest rate is already at an all-time high. The average rate for existing accounts is at 22.77%, the highest it has been in 30 years, according to WalletHub.

    Automated payment options can help credit card holders bypass late payment fees. While cardholders who use automated payment features typically set them for more than the minimum due, they also tend to pay off less of their monthly balance than customers making manual payments, according to a 2022 study.

    Such cardholders will end up paying more in interest in the long run if they don’t pay their statement balance in full each month, experts say.

    “You can set it up for a lower payment,” said Sara Rathner, credit cards expert and writer at NerdWallet, referring to a monthly automated card payment. “If you still have a balance, [that] will roll over as long as it’s unpaid.” But that unpaid balance will be subject to interest charges.

    More from Personal Finance:
    What workers on strike need to know about unemployment
    From Amazon to Target: What to know about early holiday sales
    Holiday shoppers brace for more financial strain this year

    Avoid paying more in interest and fees by setting up your credit card automated payments to cover the entire statement balance, experts say. If you check your account online, you may also see a “current” balance that includes newer charges, but you only have to pay the statement balance in full each month to avoid interest charges.

    If you can’t pay your statement balance in full, be sure to make smaller payments on a regular basis to keep current and chip away at your overall balance, said Nick Ewen, director of content at The Points Guy. Not doing so can mean hefty late fees in addition to accrued interest.

    You usually can pay off your statement or current balance whenever you like. “There’s no penalty charge on your card if you pay your statement balance before the due date,” Ewen added.

    Here are some of the best practices cardholders should consider:

    1. Move the due date closer to your payday

    Ask your lender if you can change your card payment due date to a few days after your paycheck is deposited, said Rathner. This way, you’re aware of how much money is available in your checking account before a scheduled automatic card payment goes through and you won’t overdraft your account, she added.

    Log into your credit card account online or call a customer service agent to find out what features you have available to facilitate this.

    2. Watch out for penalty APRs

    Zero percent annual percentage rate offers are usually good for 12 to 18 months. However, if a cardholder does not make a minimum payment, the card issuer can revoke the 0% APR offer and push the customer into an APR of 29% or higher, said Ewen.

    Make sure to read the fine print and make all the payments to keep the offer rate. Additionally, pay off the full balance before the promotion expires. Otherwise, you will be hit with interest charges at that point, he added.

    3. Consider a balance transfer or product change

    If you’re carrying credit card debt, consider doing a balance transfer, said Ewen. Some credit cards offer a 0% APR for balance transfers for, as an example, a one-time fee of 3% to 5% or $5, he said. If you transfer a balance from one card to another for a 12-month 0% APR, you have a year to pay off the balance as long as you pay it off by the time the introductory special is over.

    Additionally, if the terms change with one of your existing credit cards, most larger credit card companies will offer you a product change, said Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners in Irvine, California.

    Instead of closing the affected card, move to another card from the issuer that has no annual fee, she added. This is helpful if you have a high-fee credit card and want to keep the overlying credit line high.

    “It doesn’t require credit pool and reduces credit card expenses,” said Sun, a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council. Call the provider and see if a product change is available.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Lawmakers take aim at credit card interest rates, fees as cardholder debt tops $1 trillion

    Lawmakers take aim at credit card interest rates, fees as cardholder debt tops $1 trillion

    [ad_1]

    Luis Alvarez | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    Some lawmakers and regulators are calling for interest rate caps and lower fees on credit cards as debt levels march higher.

    Total credit card debt topped $1 trillion in the second quarter of 2023 for the first time ever.

    The average interest rate for all cardholders jumped to more than 21% in August, the highest on record, according to Federal Reserve data. Some cards — retail store cards, in particular — charge more than 30%, said Ted Rossman, industry analyst for CreditCards.com.

    More from Personal Finance:
    New Labor Department rules will likely target rollovers to IRAs
    What strikers need to know about unemployment benefits
    77-year-old widow lost $661,000 in a common tech scam

    Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced a bill in September to cap credit card rates (also known as the “annual percentage rate,” or APR) at 18%, citing “higher financial burdens” shouldered by working people.

    The legislation — the Capping Credit Card Interest Rates Act — would also aim to prevent card companies from raising other fees to evade a cap.

    Meanwhile, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposed a rule earlier this year to slash fees for late credit-card payments. One prong of the rule would lower fees for a missed payment to $8 from as much as $41.

    In June, four senators — Sens. Richard Durbin, D-Ill.; Roger Marshall, R-Kan.; J.D. Vance, R-Ohio; and Peter Welch, D-Vt. — introduced the Credit Card Competition Act. That act aims to reduce merchant card transaction fees that may get passed on to consumers.

    “I think some of the [political] lines are starting to blur a little bit, at least on credit card issues,” Rossman said.

    However, it’s unclear if these measures will succeed.

    For example, Democrats are “likely to embrace” Hawley’s bill, since progressives have long favored a federal interest-rate cap, Jaret Seiberg, analyst at Cowen Washington Research Group, wrote in a recent research note. But it likely doesn’t have enough support to overcome a filibuster in the Senate and is almost a non-starter in the Republican-controlled House, he said.

    “We do not see a path forward for legislation to cap credit card interest rates,” Seiberg said.

    The CFPB is also embroiled in a legal fight before the Supreme Court that, depending on the outcome, has the potential to erase all agency rulemakings from the books.  

    There’s virtually no federal cap on card rates

    Americans have leaned more on credit cards to pay their bills as pandemic-era inflation raised prices on food, housing and other consumer items at the fastest pace in four decades.

    Credit cards are the “most prevalent form of household debt” — and their use continues to spread, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. There are 70 million more credit card accounts open now than in 2019, it said.

    Rates have moved upward as the Federal Reserve has raised its benchmark interest rate to reduce inflation.

    Credit card interest rates have predominantly remained below 36% due to “self-restraint” by banks, though that’s still “extremely high” for a credit card, said Lauren Saunders, associate director at the National Consumer Law Center.

    However, current federal law generally doesn’t impose a ceiling on rates, she said.

    I think some of the [political] lines are starting to blur a little bit, at least on credit card issues.

    Ted Rossman

    industry analyst for CreditCards.com

    There are some exceptions: The Military Lending Act caps interest for active duty servicemembers and dependents at 36% for consumer credit. Federally chartered credit unions have an 18% limit.  

    Past legislative proposals have also sought to slash interest rates. For example, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y,. introduced a measure in 2019 that would have capped rates at 15%.

    Reps. JesĂşs “Chuy” GarcĂ­a, D-IL, and Glenn Grothman, R-WI, proposed a 36% cap on consumer loans in 2021. Grothman plans to reintroduce the legislation next year, his office said.

    “The 36% interest rate cap for active-duty servicemembers and their families has proven to be a highly effective measure in providing protection against predatory lending practices,” Grothman said in an e-mail. “Why should we not extend these same protections to veterans and all Americans?”

    The financial services industry remains largely opposed to imposing a ceiling.

    Eight trade groups representing lenders like banks and credit unions wrote a letter to Sen. Hawley in September, stating that his proposed cap would have adverse effects like restricting the availability of credit and eliminating or reducing popular card features like cash back rewards.

    Interest income accounts for 80% of company profits on credit cards, according to a 2022 study published by the Federal Reserve.

    How to reduce your personal card rate to 0%

     Rossman’s general advice to consumers: Make your personal credit card rate 0%.

    That means paying your bill in full and on time each month. Such customers don’t get charged interest, while those who carry a balance from month to month generally accrue interest charges.

    That advice wouldn’t change, even if the rate were capped at 15% or 18%, for example, he said.

    “[Such rates] would be better, but no picnic in my estimation,” Rossman said.

    Credit card debt top $1 trillion: Here are ways to help pay it off

    The average credit card balance is almost $6,000, according to TransUnion.

    At 18% interest, cardholders with an average balance who make only the minimum monthly payment would be in debt for 206 months and make $7,575 in total interest expenses, according to Rossman. (The latter figure doesn’t include payments toward principal.)

    “Minimum-payment math is brutal,” he said. “Your debt can drag on for decades.”

    Join CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit on October 12th, where we’ll talk with top advisors, investors, market experts, technologists, and economists about what advisors can do now to position their clients for the best possible outcomes as we head into the last quarter of 2023, and face the unknown in 2024. Learn more and get your ticket today.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How a Bad Billing Descriptor Can Cost You | Entrepreneur

    How a Bad Billing Descriptor Can Cost You | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Do you know that line-item text that shows up on your debit or credit card statement that explains where each charge comes from? That’s commonly referred to as a billing descriptor. It’s a crucial piece of information that outlines the specifics of a transaction and the company associated with the charge.

    A merchant usually establishes the billing descriptor when they set up their bank account. Descriptors may be static or dynamic, meaning that they can change to reflect the specifics of the transaction in question.

    Think of billing descriptors as unique digital identifiers for each business. This numeric marker helps banks and credit institutions recognize the company while also helping buyers differentiate individual transactions.

    Unfortunately, inaccurate, confusing or unclear billing descriptors are a common problem. According to the 2023 Chargeback Field Report, one-third of cardholders say they often found billing descriptors on their bank statements to be confusing or unrecognizable.

    Additionally, nearly three-quarters of merchant respondents did not even know what their billing descriptor looked like. This suggests that merchants are not taking the problem of billing descriptor misidentification as seriously as they should. That’s a problem, as bad descriptors can directly cause chargeback.

    Related: How Banks and Businesses Can Fight Fraud and Chargebacks Should Regulation Fail

    Bad billing descriptors can cost you

    Billing descriptors directly impact a customer’s understanding of their credit card statement. As such, they play a vital role in a customer’s trust and satisfaction with a business. Poorly worded or confusing billing descriptors can pose significant issues for merchants, including:

    • Customer confusion: A vague or unrecognizable billing descriptor can leave customers perplexed. If customers can’t identify a descriptor on their statement, they might not be able to identify the source of the transaction.
    • Chargebacks & disputes: When customers don’t recognize a transaction, they often assume it’s fraud and dispute the charge. This can result in a chargeback to the merchant, which involves loss of revenue from the transaction, plus additional fees.
    • Damage to reputation: Ongoing issues with billing descriptors can harm a company’s reputation. If customers continually face confusion over their billing, they may develop a negative impression of the business, leading to lost future sales.

    Keep in mind the scale of this issue can vary widely. For a small business with a consistent client base, the issue might be manageable. But for a larger enterprise — especially one with a high volume of online sales or a diverse range of products or services — the problem can become substantial.

    Related: How AI and Machine Learning Are Improving Fraud Detection in Fintech

    Why is this a big deal?

    Around 27% of the merchants surveyed in the Chargeback Field Report had no idea where their billing descriptor could be located. A shocking 47% admitted that they’d never even checked their descriptor. For the reasons we listed in the above section, this is an issue that merchants can easily amend to protect their revenue.

    Merchants must keep their chargeback rate below the monthly thresholds established by Visa and Mastercard. Otherwise, they may be relegated to the higher fees and penalties associated with a “high-risk” merchant status. This is why billing descriptors are an essential part of this equation.

    Many customer queries begin with cardholders unable to identify a charge on their monthly bill. Fearing fraudulent activity, they tend to contact their bank, which often leads to a chargeback despite the transaction being valid.

    Ambiguous or seemingly unrelated billing descriptors are at the root of a substantial number of transaction disputes. In the same survey, one-third of cardholders responded with “Somewhat Often” or “Very Often” when asked about how frequently they encountered perplexing or unrecognizable billing descriptors. Interestingly, a small minority (only 6% of consumers) claimed they had never faced this issue.

    Related: Think You Can’t Win Against Chargebacks? Think Again.

    Dynamic billing descriptors could be the answer

    Adjusting one’s billing descriptor to denote the source of each transaction clearly could save merchants a lot of time and money in the long run. This small step can profoundly impact a merchant’s chargeback ratio.

    Adopting dynamic billing descriptors, or otherwise adjusting to make descriptors more immediately identifiable, presents several benefits for merchants:

    • Reduction in chargebacks: A recognizable descriptor can significantly reduce the incidence of chargebacks. Customers can easily identify their purchases by providing specific information about each transaction (like the product purchased or service rendered), leading to fewer disputes and chargebacks.
    • Improved customer experience: Clear billing descriptors enhance the customer experience. Detailed transaction information can increase the customer’s and merchant’s transparency and trust. It eliminates confusion, ensuring customers fully understand their purchases.
    • Greater flexibility: Dynamic billing descriptors offer more flexibility. Merchants can tailor the descriptor to the specifics of each transaction, making it more descriptive and recognizable to customers. For example, each service type could have a unique descriptor for a multi-service business.
    • Enhanced brand recognition: Descriptors can also be a tool for enhancing brand recognition. By including a business name or a product-specific detail in the descriptor, merchants can make their brand more recognizable to their customers.
    • Fewer customer service queries: By providing clear and detailed transaction information, good descriptors can help reduce the volume of customer service inquiries related to unrecognized charges, freeing up resources to handle other aspects of customer service.

    Examining and optimizing one’s billing descriptor can be a vital strategic decision for many merchants. It can help improve operations and enhance customer satisfaction. At the same time, a bad descriptor could be a source of considerable revenue loss.

    [ad_2]

    Monica Eaton

    Source link

  • Credit card APRs are surging ever higher. Here’s how to get a lower rate.

    Credit card APRs are surging ever higher. Here’s how to get a lower rate.

    [ad_1]

    Tracking the impact of interest rate hikes


    How rising interest rates are affecting Americans

    04:58

    Credit card interest rates have soared to levels usually reserved for people with severely damaged credit. 

    Indeed, more than one in three cards carry annual percentage rates (APRs) of 29.99% or higher, according to an analysis by LendingTree. The average interest rate on a new credit card offer is up to 24.45% — the highest level since the online lending marketplace began tracking interest rates across 200 cards. 

    The upshot: Not paying your credit card balance each month adds up fast.

    “There are very few things in life that are more expensive than having crummy credit,” LendingTree credit analyst Matt Schulz told CBS MoneyWatch. “It will cost you thousands of dollars over the course of your life in the form of higher interest rates, more fees on mortgage and car loans, and it can push your insurance premiums higher.”

    A card’s APR determines how much interest the cardholder will be charged if they don’t pay off their balance in full at the end of each month. The good news is that if you pay your balance in full each month,  these rates don’t go into effect. 

    “But that’s not the reality for a whole lot of cardholders in this country,” Schulz said. “However, if you have decent credit, there are options you have to potentially improve your interest rates.”

    Can I get a lower rate?

    For folks struggling with debt, consider a card that offers 0% interest on balance transfers for an introductory period. Also reach out to your credit card issuer and ask for a lower interest rate. A LendingTree survey from earlier this year found that  76% of people who asked for a lower rate got one. The average reduction was roughly six percentage points. 


    Are medical credit cards worth it?

    03:14

    “It can be scary to pick up the phone and negotiate with a giant bank, but your chances of success are better than you realize,” Schulz said.

    And as always, Improve your credit score by paying your bills on time, keeping your balance as low as possible and not applying for too much credit too often, Schulz said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Credit Card Swipe Fees Can Be Costly for Small Businesses | Entrepreneur

    Credit Card Swipe Fees Can Be Costly for Small Businesses | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    It’s one thing that customers love, but small businesses generally hate.

    Although credit cards come with a lot of benefits for customers — points, cash back, exclusive discounts — small businesses don’t quite benefit as much from swiping plastic.

    According to the Merchants Payments Coalition, an organization aimed at payment reform in the U.S., retailers across the county now bear an annual burden of roughly $160 billion in “swipe fees” — charges imposed on merchants for processing card payments. Doug Kantor, a member of the coalition’s executive committee, told NPR that the figure has surged by more than 50% since 2020.

    “It is unfortunately a very unjust system and one that’s hidden from most of us so that we really don’t even know what’s happening,” Kantor told the outlet.

    Related: Bank of America Slammed With $250 Million Fine for Opening Fake Accounts, Double-Dipping Charges — Here’s How to Find Out If You Qualify for Payment

    Swipe fees are typically around 2% and go to the bank that issued the card. These fees generally encompass a percentage of the customer’s purchase, plus a flat fee per transaction.

    For many small businesses, the fees can really add up. Victor Garcia, owner of SolDias ice cream shops around Texas, told NPR he paid $25,000 in swipe fees last year. Jennifer Luna, who owns a local gift shop in Seattle, wrote in a Seattle Times Op-Ed last month that, in 2022, she paid $75,000 in swipe fees — while paying herself $40,000. Aside from rent and employee compensation, Luna says swipe fees are her third-largest expense.

    While some big-name companies can negotiate deals to minimize swipe fees, such as Costco, (which gets a break for only accepting Visa cards), small businesses generally don’t have a choice but to pay the set fee determined by banks.

    “Swipe fees are a cost I can’t control and have a real impact on my business and customers,” Luna wrote.

    A group of lawmakers in Washington D.C., working with the Merchants Payments Coalition, are advocating for a bill, the Credit Card Competition Act, that would mandate major credit card issuers to permit networks other than Visa and Mastercard (which currently dominate the credit card network market) to process transactions, arguing that increased competition would lead to reduced fees.

    [ad_2]

    Madeline Garfinkle

    Source link

  • Weird Facts

    Weird Facts

    [ad_1]

    Those who pay off their credit card balance each month are known as “deadbeats” in the financial world.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Consumer group says Mastercard is selling cardholders’ data without their knowledge

    Consumer group says Mastercard is selling cardholders’ data without their knowledge

    [ad_1]

    Mastercard keeps detailed records of the spending habits of its credit card holders, which it then sells to third-party companies — often without customers’ knowledge.

    That’s according to a report published Thursday by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), which says that Mastercard has built a separate division dedicated to the selling of customer transaction data which has become a huge revenue stream for the global payments technology company. 

    The problem is that most consumers are not aware of the degree to which their data is being tracked and sold or that the sale of such personal data exposes them to identity theft and scams, in addition to “creepily invasive” advertising, the consumer advocacy group warns.

    “Mastercard is so opaque about its data sales it’s almost certain most cardholders don’t realize what the company is doing with their data,” R.J. Cross, policy analyst for U.S. PIRG, told CBS MoneyWatch. 

    The data Mastercard sells is “aggregated and anonymized,” meaning third-parties don’t have customers’ individual information, according to the PIRG report. While that mitigates some of the consumer risks that come with data monetization, it does not prevent companies from “reaching people on an individual level based on data” or being bombarded with annoying ads, according to the consumer agency. 

    With that in mind, consumer advocates from nine organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Digital Democracy, sent a letter to Mastercard CEO Michael Miebach this week asking him to stop selling customers’ data. 

    Mastercard, the nation’s second largest credit card issuer, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from MoneyWatch Thursday. 


    Tech companies using your personal data to train AI

    04:43

    Rise of data brokers

    In the past decade, U.S. companies have come to realize there are big bucks in storing and selling the spending habits of customers. Companies involved in this practice have become known as data brokers.

    Data brokers sell consumer information they’ve collected to third-party marketers who then use the intelligence to build and push targeted ads to individuals based on their race, geography, age, education or other demographics. 

    The data-broker industry, which is expected to reach $462 billion by 2031, has come under increased scrutiny from Congress and regulators in recent years. Lawmakers have probed top executives of major tech companies, as well as smaller data brokers, for information about their handling of consumers’ location data from mobile phones, and the steps they have taken to protect the privacy rights of individuals.


    Federal government is buying your data, report says

    04:50

    From card companies to car companies

    To be sure, Mastercard isn’t the only credit card company engaging in the practice. American Express sells data through third-party analytics company, Wiland, according to news site Marketing Brew. Visa, the nation’s largest credit card issuer, sold its cardholder data for a period, but shut down its private data selling operation in 2021, Marketing Brew reported.

    Cellphone companies also sell data that customers generate from using apps. 

    Automakers are also steeped in consumer data, Cross said. “Cars collect so much personal information it’s shocking  — and they are no stranger to data breaches, too,” she said. 

    Advanced features on cars such as touch sensors, cameras and GPS, collect data from drivers and passengers that is often stored by the car company, according to Mozilla. Car manufacturers sell personal data that they’re willing to share with government agencies or law enforcement without a court order, a Mozilla Foundation study published this month found.

    In 2022, Google agreed to pay a $391.5 million settlement with 40 states in connection with an investigation by state attorneys general into how the company tracked users’ locations. The investigation by the states found that Google continued to track people’s location data even after they selected a privacy setting to block the company from doing so.

    Cross said she recently applied for a Mastercard to see if the company gives customers the option to opt out of having their data sold to third parties. 

    “In all the materials I saw, none of them clearly stated what’s happening and I never was given a box to check saying ‘Yes, I consent to Mastercard selling my data,'” she said. In other words, “By default, just by having a Mastercard, your data is being sold,” Cross said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Federal Reserve may not hike interest rates this week. What that means for you

    The Federal Reserve may not hike interest rates this week. What that means for you

    [ad_1]

    Artistgndphotography | E+ | Getty Images

    The Federal Reserve is likely to skip an interest rate hike when it meets this week, experts predict. But consumers may not feel any relief.

    The central bank has already raised interest rates 11 times since last year — the fastest pace of tightening since the early 1980s.

    Yet recent data is still painting a mixed picture of where the economy stands. Overall growth is holding steady as consumers continue to spend, but the labor market is beginning to loosen from historically tight conditions.

    At the same time, inflation has shown some signs of cooling even though it remains well above the Fed’s 2% target.

    More from Personal Finance:
    Money market funds vs high-yield savings accounts
    Women will accept much lower salaries than men
    Homeowners say 5% is the magic number to move

    Even with a break in rate hikes, “the one thing that remains very clear is that the Fed is nowhere close to cutting rates,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com. “Rates remain really high and will stay there for a while.”

    The federal funds rate, which is set by the U.S. central bank, is the interest rate at which banks borrow and lend to one another overnight. Although that’s not the rate consumers pay, the Fed’s moves still affect the borrowing and savings rates they see every day.

    Here’s a breakdown of how the impact has already been felt:

    Credit card rates top 20%

    Most credit cards come with a variable rate, which has a direct connection to the Fed’s benchmark rate.

    After the previous rate hikes, the average credit card rate is now more than 20% — an all-time high, while balances are higher and nearly half of credit card holders carry the debt from month to month, according to an earlier Bankrate report.

    Mortgage rates are above 7%

    Although 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates are fixed, and tied to Treasury yields and the economy, anyone shopping for a new home has lost considerable purchasing power, partly because of inflation and the Fed’s policy moves.

    The average rates for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage “remain anchored north of 7%,” said Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist. “The reacceleration of inflation and strength in the economy is keeping mortgage rates elevated.”

    Adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, and home equity lines of credit, or HELOCs, are pegged to the prime rate. As the federal funds rate rose, the prime rate did, as well, and these rates followed suit.

    Now, the average rate for a HELOC is up to 9.12%, the highest in 22 years, according to Bankrate. “That HELOC is no longer low-cost debt and it warrants a much higher focus on repayment than it has for a long time,” McBride said.

    Auto loan rates top 7%

    Even though auto loans are fixed, payments are getting bigger because the price for all cars is rising along with the interest rates on new loans.

    The average rate on a five-year new car loan is now 7.46%, the highest in 15 years, according to Bankrate.

    Experts say consumers with higher credit scores may be able to secure better loan terms or shop around for better deals. Car buyers could save an average of $5,198 by choosing the offer with the lowest APR over the one with the highest, according to a recent report from LendingTree. 

    Federal student loans are now at 5.5%

    Federal student loan rates are also fixed, so most borrowers aren’t immediately affected by the Fed’s moves. But undergraduate students who take out new direct federal student loans are now paying 5.50% — up from 4.99% in the 2022-23 academic year and 3.73% in 2021-22.

    For those with existing debt, interest is now accruing again as of Sept. 1. In October, millions of borrowers will make their first student loan payment after a three-year pause.

    Private student loans tend to have a variable rate tied to the Libor, prime or Treasury bill rates — and that means that those borrowers are already paying more in interest. How much more, however, varies with the benchmark.

    Deposit rates at some banks are up to 5%

    While the Fed has no direct influence on deposit rates, the yields tend to be correlated to changes in the target federal funds rate. The savings account rates at some of the largest retail banks, which were near rock bottom during most of the Covid pandemic, are currently up to 0.43%, on average, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC.

    Average rates have risen significantly in the last year, but they are still very low compared to online rates, according to Ken Tumin, founder of DepositAccounts.com.

    Thanks, in part, to lower overhead expenses, top-yielding online savings account rates are now paying over 5%, according to Bankrate, which is the most savers have been able to earn in more than 15 years.

    However, if the Fed skips a rate hike at its September meeting, then those deposit rate increases are likely to slow, Tumin said.

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Republican lawmaker proposes 18% cap on credit card interest rates

    Republican lawmaker proposes 18% cap on credit card interest rates

    [ad_1]

    Credit card companies should be barred from setting interest rates higher than 18%, a Republican lawmaker from Missouri proposed Tuesday. 

    If passed, U.S. Senator Josh Hawley’s bill — the Capping Credit Card Interest Rates Act — would also block credit card companies from introducing new fees aimed at evading the cap and penalize lenders with annual percentage rates (APRs) that exceed 18%. 

    Hawley’s bill comes as Americans are grappling with record-high credit card rates while carrying slightly more than $1 trillion in card debt. The average credit card rate has been inching toward 21% for the past three months and was 20.68% as of last week, making it more expensive for consumers to carry balances, according to Bankrate data. 

    Hawley’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, Hawley said Americans are “being crushed” by credit card debt while financial institutions are enjoying larger profits. 

    “The government was quick to bail out the banks just this spring, but has ignored working people struggling to get ahead,” he said, referring to Silicon Valley Bank and other regional banks that collapsed earlier this year, prompting the federal government to step in. “Capping the maximum credit card interest rate is fair, common-sense, and gives the working class a chance.”

    Higher prices for food, clothing and housing — due to inflation — have forced many Americans to lean more heavily on their credit cards to purchase everyday items. Americans have all but tapped out their savings, and some have shifted their attitudes toward using a credit card from only emergencies to a daily necessity.

    Some card users say they can’t afford to pay off their full statement every month, one survey found, which also can push their total balance higher.

    Bernie Sanders’ 15% cap proposal

    While Hawley’s bill has little chance of passing, he’s using the proposal as a political strategy to further cement himself as a conservative populist, Wall Street analysts said Tuesday. At best, the Senate Banking Committee may bring it to a vote just to get Republican lawmakers on the record as opposing the measure, Jaret Seiberg, an analyst at TD Cowen, said in a research note Tuesday.

    “This is part of a broader populist attack on risk-based pricing,” Seiberg said. “The argument is that it is fundamentally unfair for those with the most to pay the least for credit.”

    Matt Schulz, credit analyst at LendingTree, also said the bill will face tough opposition in Congress. He noted that Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New York, proposed a 15% cap on interest rates in 2019, only to see the measure lose momentum.  

    “These types of proposals, though they have little chance of becoming law, are useful on the campaign trail in providing the candidate another talking point about how they are fighting for the consumer,” Schulz told CBS MoneyWatch. “That type of message is always popular, but perhaps even more so in a time of record credit card debt and sky-high interest rates.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s why Americans can’t stop living paycheck to paycheck

    Here’s why Americans can’t stop living paycheck to paycheck

    [ad_1]

    For many Americans, payday can’t come soon enough. As of June, 61% of adults are living paycheck to paycheck, according to a LendingClub report. In other words, they rely on those regular paychecks to meet essential living expenses, with little to no money left over.

    Almost three-quarters, 72%, of Americans say they aren’t financially secure given their current financial standing, and more than a quarter said they will likely never be financially secure, according to a survey by Bankrate.

    “There are actually millions of people struggling,” said Ida Rademacher, vice president at the Aspen Institute. “It’s not something that people want to talk about, but if you were in a place where your financial security feels superprecarious, you’re not alone.”

    This struggle is nothing new. Principal Financial Group found in 2010 that 75% of workers were concerned about their financial futures. What’s more, since 1979, wages for the bottom 90% of earners had grown just 15%, compared with 138% for the top 1%, according to a 2015 Economic Policy Institute report. But there’s now a renewed focus on wage-earner anxiety amid higher inflation and rising interest rates.

    More from Personal Finance:
    Americans think they need a $233,000 salary, nearly $1.3 million for retirement
    Why Americans are struggling with car loans
    Majority of parents spend 20% or more of household income on child care

    The typical worker takes home $3,308 per month after taxes and benefits, based on the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But when you take a look at the cost of some of the most essential expenses today, it’s easy to see why consumers feel strained.

    The median monthly rent in the U.S. was $2,029 as of June, according to Redfin. That amount already accounts for about 61% of the median take-home pay.

    Meanwhile, the Council for Community and Economic Research reported that the median mortgage payment for a 2,400square-foot house was $1,957 per month during the first quarter of 2023, which accounts for about 59% of the median take-home pay.

    “Inflation is really hurting individuals having stability in their housing,” said certified financial planner Kamila Elliott, co-founder and CEO of Collective Wealth Partners in Atlanta. She is a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council. “If you have uncertainty in your housing, it causes uncertainty everywhere.”

    Combine that with the average $690.75 Americans spend each month on food and out-of-pocket health expenditures that cost the average American $96.42 monthly, and you get a total expense of $2,816.17 for renters and $2,744.17 for homeowners.

    That amount already accounts for just over 85% of the median take-home pay for average American renters and almost 83% for an average homeowner. This is excluding other essential expenses such as transportation, child care and debt payments.

    “So much of managing your financial life in America today is like drinking from a firehose that many households are not able to show up and impose a framework of their own design onto their finances,” said Rademacher. “Many are still in this reactionary space where they’re just trying to figure out how to make ends meet.”

    Watch the video to learn more about why financial security feels so impossible in the U.S. today.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fortnite players can now apply for a portion of its $245 million FTC settlement | CNN Business

    Fortnite players can now apply for a portion of its $245 million FTC settlement | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    New York
    CNN
     — 

    Millions of Fortnite users can now claim their small part of the $245 million that the game’s parent company agreed to pay as part of a settlement with the US Federal Trade Commission.

    Epic Games in December settled allegations with the FTC that it used deceptive tactics that drove users to make unwanted purchases in the multiplayer shooter game that became wildly popular with younger generations a few years ago. The FTC said Tuesday it has now opened the claims process for the more than 37 million potentially affected users who could qualify for compensation.

    Epic Games agreed in December to pay a total of $520 million to settle US government allegations that it misled millions of players, including children and teens, into making unintended purchases and that it violated a landmark federal children’s privacy law.

    In one settlement, Epic agreed to pay $275 million to the US government to resolve claims that it violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act by gathering the personal information of kids under the age of 13 without first receiving their parents’ consent. In a second and separate settlement, Epic also agreed to pay $245 million as refunds to consumers who were allegedly harmed by user-interface design choices that the FTC claimed were deceptive.

    The FTC said in a statement Tuesday that the Fortnite maker “used dark patterns and other deceptive practices to trick players into making unwanted purchases” and also “made it easy for children to rack up charges without parental consent.”

    (“Dark patterns” refer to the gently coercive design tactics used by countless websites and apps that critics say are used to manipulate peoples’ digital behaviors.)

    The FTC is now notifying users who may be eligible to receive part of that $245 million settlement fund. Affected users may receive an email from the FTC over the next month with a claim number, or they can go directly to the settlement site and file a claim using their Epic account ID.

    Here’s who can apply: Users who were charged in-game currency for items they didn’t want between January 2017 and September 2022, parents whose children made charges to their credit cards on Fortnite between January 2017 and November 2018 or users whose accounts were locked sometime between January 2017 and September 2022 after they complained to their credit card company about wrongful charges. Claimants must be 18 years old; for younger users, their parents can submit a claim on their behalf.

    Users have until January 17, 2024, to submit a claim to be included in the settlement class. It is not yet clear how much the individual settlement payments will be.

    Epic’s agreement with the FTC also prohibits the company from using dark patterns or charging consumers without their consent, and forbids Epic from locking players out of their accounts in response to users’ chargeback requests with credit card companies disputing unwanted charges.

    Epic said in a blog post in December when it reached the agreement that, “no developer creates a game with the intention of ending up here.” It added, “We accepted this agreement because we want Epic to be at the forefront of consumer protection and provide the best experience for our players.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Nevada GOP Senate candidate raised money to help other candidates — the funds mostly paid down his old campaign’s debt instead | CNN Politics

    Nevada GOP Senate candidate raised money to help other candidates — the funds mostly paid down his old campaign’s debt instead | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sam Brown created a political action committee to “help elect Republicans” but most of its funds were spent paying down debt from his failed previous campaign. The group donated less than 7% of its funds to the candidates it was set up to support, according to campaign finance records – a move one campaign finance expert likened to using the PAC as a “slush fund.”

    Brown formed the Duty First PAC in July 2022, saying the organization would help Republicans take back Congress. A month earlier, Brown lost the Republican Senate primary to Adam Laxalt after raising an impressive $4.4 million for his upstart campaign, but his campaign was left with more than $300,000 in debt.

    Now Brown is running again in Nevada as a top recruit of Senate Republicans.

    A former Army captain, Brown made lofty promises when launching his PAC, Duty First.

    “With your support, we will: Defeat the socialist Democrats. Help elect Republicans who believe in accountability to the Constitution and service to the people. Stand with the #DutyFirst movement, chip in with a grassroots contribution today,” he said in a tweet announcing the PAC.

    “We’ll ensure that the socialist agenda of the Democrats does not win in November, and the Republicans continue to be held accountable to defending our Constitution and defending our conservative principles. The country’s counting on us,” Brown said in an accompanying video for the PAC’s launch in July 2022.

    Since then, the PAC raised a small amount – just $91,500 – and used the majority of their money – $55,000 – to repay debt from Brown’s failed campaign for Senate, which Brown had transferred over. Campaign finance experts told CNN this falls into a legal gray area.

    Of the $90,000 spent so far, just $6,000 made its way to five Nevadan Republican candidates’ committees. An additional payment for $1,000 was listed as going directly to congressional candidate Mark Robertson as a contribution but lists the amount as being directly paid to the candidate at his home – not to his committee.

    Instead, the Duty First PAC made over a dozen debt payments. A combined $23,000 was spent on website and software services used by Brown’s Senate campaign. Another $11,275 went towards paying down the failed campaign’s credit card, with an additional $3,000 spent on credit card interest fees.

    Duty First paid off over $1,200 in credit card debt accrued at a country club near where Brown previously lived in Dallas, Texas, and ran for the state house in 2014. A spokesman for the Brown campaign said in an email to CNN the “facility fee” charges were for a fundraiser “hosted by supporters of Sam’s campaign.”

    The most recent FEC filing shows Brown is now trying to dispute over $80,000 in remaining debt from the previous campaign, which the spokesman said “will be resolved in due course.” A majority of the disputed debt owed is for direct mail services used by Brown’s previous campaign.

    Duty First PAC is also responsible for eventually repaying Brown $70,000 that he personally loaned his committees.

    The spokesperson for Brown’s campaign defended the PAC’s spending.

    “The PAC promised to support conservative candidates in Nevada, and it did exactly that by donating to every Republican candidate in Nevada’s federal races during the 2022 general election,” they said.

    According to a CNN analysis of Duty First PAC’s FEC filings, of all the money raised, less than 7% went to candidates. When considering Brown’s personal loans, debt the PAC took on from Brown’s campaign, and expenditures, fewer than 2% of the PAC’s funds went towards candidates in 2022

    The money not spent on debt went to a variety of consulting and digital marketing expenses. The PAC spent $1,090 on a storage unit, more than it donated to the winning campaign of Republican Rep. Mark Amodei.

    Despite this, Brown played up his PAC’s donations to candidates in interviews and in posts on social media.

    “I have pledged to help defeat the Democrats in Nevada,” he added in an email, announcing the launch of the PAC.

    The PAC’s donations were from grassroots donors, who typically donated $50 or less.

    Just a day before the 2022 midterm election, Brown announced donations to several candidates running for office in Nevada.

    Records with the FEC show the 2022 donations to House candidates were made on October 31, while the donation to Laxalt’s Senate campaign was made in early September.

    “The Duty First PAC proudly supports conservatives fighting for Nevada,” he said in a tweet after making the donations on November 7, 2022. “This past week, we donated funds to the four Republicans working to take back the House. Join us in supporting them right now!”

    Later, following the 2022 midterms in a late November interview on a local Nevada radio station, Brown played up the PAC’s work and said it would continue to work between election cycles.

    “Duty First is here to kind of work between the cycles, so to speak and help candidates who are running,” Brown said. “In fact this cycle, you know, we had raised money and supported all of our Republican federal candidates, Adam Laxalt, as well as the four Congressionals.”

    “And so, it’s our way of pushing back against the Democrat agenda and their representation,” Brown said. “But, also, it gives Duty First supporters and people that believe in our mission, a sort of platform to remind Republicans what we’re about.”

    Campaign finance experts CNN spoke to said Brown marketing the Duty First PAC as a way for people to financially support conservative candidates was a “creative way” for Brown to pay off old campaign debts behind the scenes.

    “It creates a situation where contributors to a PAC may think that PAC is doing one thing, which is supporting political candidates, when in fact what it’s doing is being used to pay off long standing debts from a previous campaign,” said Stephen Spaulding, vice president of policy at Common Cause and former advisor to an FEC commissioner.

    Since the FEC has not issued an advisory opinion that would “apply to that candidate and any other candidate that has a very similar situation,” Spaulding said transferring debts between campaign committees and PACs is a gray area in campaign finance law. In Brown’s case, his candidate committee was rolled into a PAC, Sam Brown PAC, that was associated with his candidacy, which the campaign finance experts agree is a common maneuver for candidates. But what struck the experts as odd was that Brown terminated the Sam Brown PAC, and transferred his outstanding loans and debts to the Duty First PAC.

    Brown’s 2024 candidate committee, Sam Brown for Nevada, is an entirely new committee with its own FEC filings, despite having the same name as his previous committee. This committee, formed in July 2023, is not affiliated with the Duty First PAC, nor is it obligated to pay off the remaining $271,000 in previous campaign debt and loans.

    “Unfortunately, Sam Brown, like too many other politicians, has given almost no money to other candidates and, instead, has used his PAC as a slush fund,” said Paul S. Ryan, executive director at Funders’ Committee for Civic Participation. “Many donors would understandably be upset if they learned their money wasn’t used to help elect other candidates like Brown – the reason they made their contributions,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Banks lean into credit card growth, pointing to resilient U.S. consumers

    Banks lean into credit card growth, pointing to resilient U.S. consumers

    [ad_1]

    Credit card lenders plan to stay in growth mode, saying they detect few causes for alarm in the consumer sector despite lingering recession fears.

    To be sure, consumer credit quality has deteriorated. Late payments are rising again on credit cards and auto loans, and banks are being forced to charge off some loans. High interest rates are making it tougher for some consumers to pay back debt.

    But the U.S. economy has so far continued to power forward, giving many consumers the ability to keep spending and stay current on their payments. Bank CEOs say consumers have remained resilient despite signs of stress, giving the industry the ability to keep growing credit card loans and avoid a broad contraction of credit.

    “I’d say we’re seeing a more cautious consumer, but not necessarily a recessionary one,” Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said on the bank’s second-quarter earnings call.

    Citi, one of the country’s largest credit card issuers, had some $195 billion of loans in its U.S. personal banking division in the second quarter, up 13% from a year earlier. Credit card growth was strong at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Capital One Financial.

    Consumers remain in “reasonably good shape,” Capital One CEO Richard Fairbank said on Thursday.

    “We have a very watchful eye on all those negatives,” Fairbank said, pointing to persistent worries that the economy will take a turn. But the McLean, Virginia-based lender thinks it’s “a good time to keep leaning in” and expanding its card business.

    That’s not to say the environment is necessarily getting better. Capital One card loans that were 30 or more days late on their payments rose to 3.77% during the second quarter, up from 2.42% in the second quarter of 2022. The company expects some of those delinquencies to turn into actual losses that the bank will end up absorbing.

    But Fairbank described that as part of “normalization,” adding that it’s “very natural” for credit quality to return to pre-pandemic trends.

    Consumer lenders benefited from an unusually healthy credit environment during the pandemic. Many consumers had larger savings buffers — thanks to government stimulus and accumulated savings from staying at home — and used that money to pay down debt. 

    In recent months, however, credit quality has returned or nearly returned to pre-pandemic totals across the industry.

    Delinquency figures at big banks’ credit card divisions are hovering around 2019 levels, and while charge-offs remain below pre-pandemic norms, they rose sharply in the second quarter, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Average credit card charge-offs were at 2.99% during the second quarter, up from 2.69% in the first quarter.

    The quick pace of deterioration is somewhat troubling given that it’s happening even though the economy hasn’t faltered, said Moody’s Senior Vice President Warren Kornfeld. “I really would expect us to be in better shape,” he said.

    Overall, consumer credit remains “solid,” Kornfeld said, but there are “absolutely pockets of consumers that are struggling financially.” 

    Lower-income consumers and those with subprime credit scores have been more likely to see stress. Fifth Third Bancorp has also seen a “divergence” among consumers, with homeowners who locked in low mortgage rates faring better than renters, Timothy Spence, CEO of the Cincinnati, Ohio-based regional bank, told analysts.

    While higher-income cardholders are spending big and racking up reward points, others are having a tough time repaying their cards and their balances are swelling, said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com. That’s a costly proposition given that annual interest rates on credit cards are upwards of 20%.

    “Nobody’s financing purchases at 20% because everything is just going swimmingly,” McBride said. “People are putting purchases on a credit card at 20% out of necessity, not choice.”

    More signs of strain should emerge as the U.S. economy continues to grapple with the fastest pace of interest rate increases in decades, McBride said. Thus far, the country’s employers have continued to add jobs — so consumers are continuing to get the paychecks they need to pay their bills. 

    Optimism among investors that the U.S. will avoid a recession has increased in recent weeks, but a so-called “soft landing” is not yet assured.

    Moody’s expects a modest recession could send credit card defaults to about 5% next year, up from 3.5% in 2019. While that would lead to losses at banks, the losses would be far less severe than the roughly 11% charge-off rate after the 2007-09 financial crisis, Kornfeld noted.

    Though banks have tightened up their underwriting over the past year, Kornfeld said losses will likely be a bit higher if banks continue growing credit card loans at a strong pace. 

    “I don’t see significant weakness, but … there’s a level of concern,” Kornfeld said.

    [ad_2]

    Polo Rocha

    Source link

  • Another interest rate hike is likely coming from the Federal Reserve: Here are 5 ways it could affect you

    Another interest rate hike is likely coming from the Federal Reserve: Here are 5 ways it could affect you

    [ad_1]

    The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building in Washington.

    Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    After a pause last month, experts predict the Federal Reserve likely will raise rates by a quarter of a point at the conclusion of its meeting next week.

    Fed officials have pledged not to be complacent about the rising cost of living, repeatedly expressing concern over the impact on American families.

    Although inflation has started to cool, it still remains well above the Fed’s 2% target.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    Since March 2022, the central bank has hiked its benchmark rate 10 times to a targeted range of 5%-5.25%, the fastest pace of tightening since the early 1980s.

    Most Americans said rising interest rates have hurt their finances in the last year: 77% said they’ve been directly affected by the Fed’s moves, according a report by WalletHub. Roughly 61% said they have taken a financial hit over this time, a separate report from Allianz Life found, while only 38% said they have benefitted from higher interest rates.

    “Rising interest rates can sometimes feel like a double-edged sword,” said Kelly LaVigne, vice president of consumer insights at Allianz Life. “While savings accounts are earning more interest, it is also more expensive to borrow money for big purchases like a home, and many Americans worry that rising interest rates are a harbinger of a recession.”

    Five ways the rate hike could affect you

    If the Fed announces a 25 basis point hike next week as expected, consumers with credit card debt will spend an additional $1.72 billion on interest this year alone, according to the analysis by WalletHub. Factoring in the previous rate hikes, credit card users will wind up paying around $36 billion in interest over the next 12 months, WalletHub found.

    2. Adjustable-rate mortgages

    Adjustable-rate mortgages and home equity lines of credit are also pegged to the prime rate. Now, the average rate for a HELOC is up to 8.58%, the highest in 22 years, according to Bankrate.

    Because 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates are fixed and tied to Treasury yields and the economy, homeowners won’t be affected immediately by a rate hike. However, anyone shopping for a new home has lost considerable purchasing power, partly because of inflation and the Fed’s policy moves.

    The average rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage currently sits at 6.78%, according to Freddie Mac.

    Since the coming rate hike is largely baked into mortgage rates, homebuyers are going to pay roughly $11,160 more over the life of the loan, assuming a 30-year fixed-rate, according to WalletHub’s analysis.

    3. Car loans

    Krisanapong Detraphiphat | Moment | Getty Images

    Even though auto loans are fixed, payments are getting bigger because the price for all cars is rising along with the interest rates on new loans.

    For those planning on purchasing a new car in the next few months, the Fed’s move could push up the average interest rate on a new car loan even more. The average rate on a five-year new car loan is already at 7.2%, the highest in 15 years, according to Edmunds.

    Paying an annual percentage rate of 7.2% instead of last year’s 5.2% could cost consumers $2,273 more in interest over the course of a $40,000, 72-month car loan, according to data from Edmunds.

    “The double whammy of relentlessly high vehicle pricing and daunting borrowing costs is presenting significant challenges for shoppers in today’s car market,” said Ivan Drury, Edmunds’ director of insights.

    4. Student loans

    Federal student loan rates are also fixed, so most borrowers aren’t immediately affected by the Fed’s moves. But as of July, undergraduate students who take out new direct federal student loans will pay an interest rate of 5.50%, up from 4.99% in the 2022-23 academic year.

    For now, anyone with existing federal education debt will benefit from rates at 0% until student loan payments restart in October.

    Private student loans tend to have a variable rate tied to the Libor, prime or Treasury bill rates — and that means that, as the Fed raises rates, those borrowers will also pay more in interest. But how much more will vary with the benchmark.

    5. Savings accounts

    Peopleimages | Istock | Getty Images

    While the Fed has no direct influence on deposit rates, the yields tend to be correlated to changes in the target federal funds rate. The savings account rates at some of the largest retail banks, which were near rock bottom during most of the Covid pandemic, are currently up to 0.42%, on average.

    Thanks, in part, to lower overhead expenses, top-yielding online savings account rates are now at more than 5%, the highest since 2008′s financial crisis, with some short-term certificates of deposit even higher, according to Bankrate.

    However, if this is the Fed’s last increase for a while, “you could see yields start to slip,” according to Greg McBride, Bankrate’s chief financial analyst. “Now’s a good time to be locking that in.”

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • American Express Posts Record Revenue, Earnings. It’s Still Bracing for Defaults.

    American Express Posts Record Revenue, Earnings. It’s Still Bracing for Defaults.

    [ad_1]



    American Express


    delivered a fifth consecutive quarter of record revenue and all-time high earnings per share, but the group remains cautious on debt struggles among cardholders as it continued to build its reserves for credit losses.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This credit card fee could cost shoppers $3 billion during record-breaking back-to-school season, merchants say

    This credit card fee could cost shoppers $3 billion during record-breaking back-to-school season, merchants say

    [ad_1]

    This year, consumers are spending more on back-to-school supplies and coughing up more to cover a particular kind of credit card fee at the same time.

    Total back-to-school spending is expected to reach a record $41.5 billion with another $94 billion in college shopping, according to the National Retail Federation.

    The so-called swipe fees, which companies such as Visa or Mastercard charge businesses every time a credit card is used to make a purchase, could drive up the price of school and college supplies more than $3 billion this year, the Merchants Payments Coalition said Thursday.

    More from Personal Finance:
    Here’s the inflation breakdown for June, in one chart
    Economists say it’s a near certainty that housing inflation will fall
    Buying power rose for first time since March 2021 amid falling inflation

    “Swipe fees are astronomically high and make everything more expensive,” said Doug Kantor, general counsel at the National Association of Convenience Stores and an executive committee member at the Merchants Payments Coalition.

    Swipe fees, also known as interchange fees, have more than doubled over the past decade and jumped $22 billion to a record $160.7 billion last year. When the National Retail Federation first started tracking swipe fees collected by Visa and Mastercard in 2001, they amounted to about $20 billion. 

    “That’s a lot of money,” Kantor said. “Bankers skimming off the top of every transaction.”

    “They’ve made themselves an involuntary equity partner with every Main Street business,” he added.

    Card payments have benefits, too

    Banks and card companies charge the merchant about 2% of the transaction, on average, every time a credit card is used to make a purchase. Now, with margins strained, retailers are passing most, if not all, of that cost on to consumers.

    But with each credit card transaction comes benefits for businesses, such as higher sales, a larger customer base, fraud protection and guaranteed payment, according to the Electronic Payments Coalition.

    “Electronic payments are four times cheaper to process than cash,” said Aaron Stetter, the Electronic Payments Coalition’s executive director. “According to big-box retailers’ own consultants, credit and debit card payments will save them over $7.5 billion on back-to-school shopping this year.” 

    However, most of the value is “happening behind the scenes,” he added. “You don’t necessarily see it at the front end.”

    “Merchants love to hate them,” said Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at CreditCards.com. “But I would argue that credit cards lead to more spending and it’s shortsighted when companies make it harder to use a credit card.”

    There are advantages for consumers, as well. Swipe fees largely fund credit card rewards, he added. There are some grocery rewards cards that can earn you as much as 6% back at supermarkets, while a generic cash-back card will earn you 2%.

    “There’s a lot to be said about the value of rewards,” he said. “I would be wary of biting the hand that feeds you.”

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The nation’s biggest banks are gearing up for more consumer struggles ahead

    The nation’s biggest banks are gearing up for more consumer struggles ahead

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Jamie Dimon on Friday said the U.S. economy was basically doing OK, even if customers were spending “a little more slowly.”

    But with rivals like Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and American Express Co. set to report quarterly results this week, recession agita still prevails.

    For evidence, look no further than JPMorgan’s
    JPM,
    +0.60%

    own quarterly results. The bank’s second-quarter profit blew past expectations, but it set aside $2.9 billion during the second quarter to cover potentially bad loans, amid concerns that more consumers could run into more difficulty paying their bills on time as higher prices manage to stick at stores.

    That figure was well up from $1.1 billion in the same quarter last year, although still far below the billions it stowed away when the pandemic first hit. Similarly, Wells Fargo & Co.
    WFC,
    -0.34%

    on Friday set aside $1.7 billion for loan losses in this year’s second quarter, nearly triple what it was a year ago.

    The figures underscore the anxiety over the second half of this year, when many economists expect the economy to tilt into a recession. However, for the 500 companies in the S&P 500 index, Wall Street analysts still expect profit growth.

    Any downturn could be exacerbated by the pressure investors have put on companies, potentially via more layoffs and money-saving technology, to keep prices high and cut costs to replicate the abnormally large profit-margin gains they put up in 2021 and 2022. Businesses have indeed kept prices high, at least for many basic necessities, in an effort to cover their own higher costs and to pad profits.

    When Bank of America
    BAC,
    -1.89%

    reports this week, the results will narrow the lens on lending and spending in the U.S. Results from Morgan Stanley
    MS,
    -0.50%

    and Goldman Sachs
    GS,
    -0.76%

    will fill in the gaps on trading and deal-making. American Express
    AXP,
    -0.49%

    will give a more detailed breakdown of what consumers are still spending their money on, after Delta Air Lines Inc.
    DAL,
    -2.35%

    — which has a partnership with AmEx — said that travel demand remained “robust.”

    Banks shoveled more money into their reserve stockpiles in 2020 to bulk up against the pandemic’s shutdown of the economy. A year later, they started releasing those funds as the economy reopened and recovered. FactSet expects the broader banking sector to plump up its cash cushion during this year’s second quarter to account for more late loan payments or potential defaults.

    In a report on Friday, FactSet said the 15 banking-industry companies in the S&P 500 Index tracked by the firm were on pace to set aside $9.9 billion to cover losses from souring loans in the second quarter. That’s more than double the amount set aside a year ago. And if that $9.9 billion figure, based on actual and projected financial figures, ends up as the actual figure at the end of the quarter, it would mark the highest since the beginning of the pandemic and the third highest in five years, according to FactSet data.

    “The U.S. economy continues to be resilient,” Dimon said in a statement on Friday. “Consumer balance sheets remain healthy, and consumers are spending, albeit a little more slowly. Labor markets have softened somewhat, but job growth remains strong.”

    However, he noted difficulties in JPMorgan’s investment banking segment. And he said consumer savings were slowly eroding as inflation endures.

    As the nation’s biggest bank, JPMorgan has flexed its financial muscle this year, swallowing up First Republic after that bank got into trouble. But as it consolidates power and influence, building thicker armor against shocks to the economy, its financial results might not always reflect the struggles of its smaller rivals, where difficulties are likely felt more acutely. Analysts at Raymond James said that while JPMorgan remained a “best in breed” bank, its outlook pointed to “heightened challenges for smaller banks.”

    See also: Jamie Dimon says U.S. consumers are in ‘good shape.’ This evidence may prove otherwise.

    This week in earnings

    For the week ahead, 60 S&P 500 companies, including five from the Dow, will report quarterly results, according to FactSet. Two big oil companies, Halliburton Co.
    HAL,
    -2.28%

    and Baker Hughes Co.,
    BKR,
    -0.95%

    will report, as oil prices fall from levels seen last year. Results from two transportation giants — trucking company J.B. Hunt Transport Services
    JBHT,
    -0.42%

    and railroad operator CSX Corp.
    CSX,
    -0.27%

    — will also be a proxy for how much people are buying things and having them shipped. United Airlines Holdings Inc.
    UAL,
    -3.42%

    and American Airlines Group
    AAL,
    -1.68%

    will also report.

    The call to put on your calendar

    Netflix results: Hollywood shutdown, ‘slow-growth’ expectations. Hollywood’s writers — and now its actors — have gone on strike, and Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    -1.88%

    reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. The streaming platform will likely face questions over how much content it has left in the tank, as the strike upends studio-production schedules and leaves viewers with vast expanses of reruns. Still, Macquarie analyst Tim Nollen said that the production standstill “may ironically drive even more viewers to streaming services.”

    The writers and actors argue that the studio industry — increasingly consolidated, increasingly publicly traded, increasingly oriented around a handful of film franchises — has profited immensely while skimping on things benefits and streaming residuals. But after a decade-long rise, and a recent shift in investor focus from subscriber growth to profit growth, Netflix has emerged as one of the biggest production powerhouses in the business. And after years of flooding customers with new films and shows, it’s trying to squeeze out sales via more boring ways: things like a password-sharing crackdown and ads.

    Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio at Synovus Trust Co., said Netflix still faced a plenty of streaming competition amid “muted” subscriber growth. But Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter said investors should look at Netflix as a profitable, albeit more mature company.

    “We think Netflix is well-positioned in this murky environment as streamers are shifting strategy, and should be valued as an immensely profitable, slow-growth company,” Pachter said in a research note on Friday.

    “Even while the ad-supported tier is not yet directly accretive (we think it will be accretive over time), the ad-tier should continue to reduce churn and draw new subscribers to the service,” he continued.

    The number to watch

    Tesla sales. Electric-vehicle maker Tesla Inc. also reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. And like streaming, some analysts say the fervor for EVs has faded.

    However, they also said that Tesla
    TSLA,
    +1.25%

    had so far been immune from the malaise. And even though Elon Musk remains preoccupied with Twitter — which now faces competition from Meta Platforms Inc.’s
    META,
    -1.45%

    Threads — Tesla’s second-quarter deliveries were far above expectations. Sales are expected to be big. And one analyst said that price cuts, which Tesla has used to capture more of the auto market in China, were likely “fairly minimal” during the second quarter. But some analysts wondered what the blowout delivery figures would mean for margins. And the industry, broadly, has increasingly tested the patience of profit-minded investors.

    “We’ve now seen a market where demand is constrained, capital has been tighter, and there is less tolerance for EV related losses,” Barclays analysts said in a note last week, adding that there was a “step back from EV euphoria.”

    Claudia Assis contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link