ReportWire

Tag: COVID-19

  • RFK Jr.’s Sister Condemns His Remarks About COVID ‘Targeting’ White And Black People

    RFK Jr.’s Sister Condemns His Remarks About COVID ‘Targeting’ White And Black People

    [ad_1]

    Kerry Kennedy, the sister of Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., criticized his baseless remarks at a press dinner last week, where he claimed COVID-19 “ethnically targeted” certain groups.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a known conspiracy theorist who has been vocal about his anti-vaccine stance, claimed in a now-viral video obtained by the New York Post that the virus has a “genetic structure” that is used “to attack Caucasians and Black people.”

    On Monday, his sister, the president of nonprofit organization Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, released a statement in response to her brother’s controversial comments at the press dinner, which was already publicly marred by drinking and flatulence.

    “I strongly condemn my brother’s deplorable and untruthful remarks last week about Covid being engineered for ethnic targeting,” the statement read. “His statements do not represent what I believe or what Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights stand for, with our 50+-year track record of protecting rights and standing against racism and all forms of discrimination.”

    His nephew, former congressman Joe Kennedy III, also criticized the presidential candidate’s dinnertime rant on Monday.

    “My uncle’s comments were hurtful and wrong. I unequivocally condemn what he said,” his Twitter post read.

    At the dinner, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had also baselessly claimed that “the people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.”

    Later in his ramble, he added that he was not sure if Black and white people were “deliberately targeted or not.”

    The Democratic presidential candidate also claimed that the United States was funding efforts, including labs in Ukraine that sought to store Russian DNA, “so we can target people by race.” The BBC reported in 2022 that there was no evidence to support the claim that the U.S. and Ukraine were working on creating biological weapons.

    Similarly, experts have bashed the idea that COVID-19 “targeted” certain ethnic groups.

    “Jewish or Chinese protease consensus sequences are not a thing in biochemistry, but they are in racism and antisemitism,” Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan, posted on Twitter on Saturday.

    The same day, the CEO of the American Jewish Committee and former U.S. Rep. Ted Deutch tweeted in response to the presidential candidate’s remarks, referring to them as both “deeply offensive and incredibly dangerous.”

    “Every aspect of his comments reflects some of the most abhorrent antisemitic conspiracy theories throughout history and contributes to today’s dangerous rise of antisemitism,” Deutch wrote.

    RFK Jr. has received attention for his outlandish claims in the past.

    At an anti-vaccine rally in 2022, he said that “Hitler’s Germany” had looser restrictions than the ones imposed in the U.S. during the height of the pandemic — a remark that even drew criticism from his wife.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. condemned over false claims that COVID-19 was

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. condemned over false claims that COVID-19 was

    [ad_1]

    Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is facing widespread criticism from political leaders and civil rights organizations after a video surfaced of him making false claims that COVID-19 was designed to attack certain ethnic groups while sparing Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people — a conspiracy theory that drew accusations of antisemitism and racism.

    “COVID-19. There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately,” Kennedy said at a recent dinner in New York City. The remarks were videotaped and first published by the New York Post

    “COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese,” he continued, adding, “We don’t know whether it was deliberately targeted or not but there are papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact.”

    Kennedy, a former environmental attorney and a nephew of President John F. Kennedy, announced in April that he was running for the Democratic presidential nomination, in a challenge to President Biden. He has over the last 15 years become an outspoken voice of the anti-vaccine movement and a known conspiracy theorist whose claims have brought criticism from public health officials and his relatives alike. 

    His latest remarks prompted a range of leading Democrats to speak out.

    “These are deeply troubling comments and I want to make clear that they do not represent the views of the Democratic Party,” Jaime Harrison, chair of the Democratic National Committee, tweeted on Saturday.

    Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida said Kennedy’s claims boiled down to “vile antisemitic tropes and Sinophobia” and “insulted countless families who lost loved ones to the virus,” while Rep. Ted Lieu of California pointed out, “Millions and millions of people died from COVID-19 worldwide, including Americans who were Jewish or of Chinese descent.”

    “If you still support the wacky, narcissistic, racist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., then that says more about you than it does about him,” Lieu said.

    Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey called Kennedy “a disgrace to the Kennedy name and the Democratic Party” in a tweet responding to the video. 

    “For the record, my whole family, who is Jewish, got Covid,” Gottheimer wrote. “Speaker McCarthy and Jim Jordan should disinvite this antisemite from testifying before Congress and spewing his misinformation and hate.”

    The Anti-Defamation League, a civil rights organization that fights antisemitism and extremism, also denounced Kennedy’s comments.

    “The claim that COVID-19 was a bioweapon created by the Chinese or Jews to attack Caucasians and Black people is deeply offensive and feeds into sinophobic and antisemitic conspiracy theories about COVID-19 that we have seen evolve over the last three years,” a spokesperson for the organization said Sunday in an email.

    Jane Shim, director of the Stop Asian Hate Project, criticized Kennedy’s “dangerous rhetoric,” in comments to The Washington Post, calling his comments “irresponsible” and “hateful.” CBS News has reached out to the group but has not yet received a reply.

    Kennedy attempted to respond to the criticism of his initial comments in a tweet shared on Saturday evening, where he said the New York Post’s “story is mistaken.”

    But that message repeated most of the same false theories Kennedy was heard sharing in the video, including one that mirrors debunked Russian propaganda linked to the war in Ukraine, which claims the U.S. is “developing ethnically targeted bioweapons.” Kennedy also linked to a scientific study that, he claimed, showed how certain properties of the virus made “ethnic Chinese, Finns and Ashkenazi Jews” less susceptible to it than Black or Caucasian people. 

    Scientists went on to discredit his statements about the study.

    “Enzymes like furin are not differentially compatible with different ethnicities,” Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan, replied on Twitter. “Jewish or Chinese protease consensus sequences are not a thing in biochemistry, but they are in racism and antisemitism.”

    Kennedy’s latest comments were not the first time he’s sparked outrage with comments about COVID-19 and Jewish people. In a 2022 speech, he compared public health measures to “fascism” and claimed, “Even in Hitler’s Germany, you could cross the Alps to Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.”

    “These analogies are historically specious and hurtful to Jews and, frankly, to anyone who has a historical memory of who the Nazis were and what they did,” Aryeh Tuchman of the ADL’s Center on Extremism told The Associated Press at the time. “Anything in the pursuit of his agenda.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rev. Jesse Jackson Steps Down As Leader Of Civil Rights Group

    Rev. Jesse Jackson Steps Down As Leader Of Civil Rights Group

    [ad_1]

    CHICAGO (AP) — The Rev. Jesse Jackson announced Saturday that he will step down as president of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, the Chicago-based civil rights group he founded more than 50 years ago.

    Jackson, 81, announced his resignation during a quiet farewell speech at the organization’s annual convention, where the group paid tribute to him with songs, kind words from other Black activists and politicians, and a video montage of Jackson’s 1984 and 1988 presidential campaigns.

    Jackson, who has dealt with several health problems in recent years and uses a wheelchair, capped the proceedings with muted remarks. Flanked by his daughter, Santita Jackson, and his son, U.S. Rep. Jonathan Jackson, the once-fiery orator spoke so softly it was difficult to hear him.

    “I am somebody,” he said. “Green or yellow, brown, Black or white, we’re all perfect in God’s eyes. Everybody is somebody. Stop the violence. Save the children. Keep hope alive.”

    Rev. Jesse Jackson announces that he is stepping down as president of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, Saturday, July 15, 2023, in Chicago.

    Paul Beaty via Associated Press

    The Rev. Frederick Douglass Haynes, “a long-time student of Rev. Jackson and supporter” of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, will take over as the group’s leader, the coalition said in a statement. Haynes is the pastor at Friendship-West Baptist Church in Dallas, according to the church’s website.

    Jesse Jackson was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease eight years ago. He suffered a host of health setbacks in 2021, beginning with gallbladder surgery, a COVID-19 infection that landed him in a physical therapy-focused facility and a fall at Howard University that caused a head injury.

    Jackson has been a powerful advocate for civil rights and a strong voice in American politics for decades.

    A protégé of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., he broke with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1971 to form Operation PUSH, initially named People United to Save Humanity, on Chicago’s South Side. The organization was later renamed the Rainbow PUSH Coalition. The group’s mission ranges from promoting minority hiring in the corporate world to voter registration drives in communities of color.

    Jackson has been a driving force in the modern civil rights movement, pushing for voting rights and education. Among other things, he joined George Floyd’s family at a memorial for the slain Black man and has participated in COVID-19 vaccination drives to counter Black hesitancy about the drugs.

    Before Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, Jackson had been the most successful Black presidential candidate. He won 13 primaries and caucuses in his push for the 1988 Democratic nomination, which went to Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis.

    Rev. Jesse Jackson addresses supporters in Washington, D.C., Thursday, Nov. 3, 1983, after he announced he would seek the Democratic presidential nomination. Jackson plans to step down from leading the Chicago civil rights organization Rainbow PUSH Coalition he founded in 1971, his son's congressional office said Friday, July 14, 2023.
    Rev. Jesse Jackson addresses supporters in Washington, D.C., Thursday, Nov. 3, 1983, after he announced he would seek the Democratic presidential nomination. Jackson plans to step down from leading the Chicago civil rights organization Rainbow PUSH Coalition he founded in 1971, his son’s congressional office said Friday, July 14, 2023.

    Ira Schwarz via Associated Press

    Jackson said in his remarks that he plans to continue working on social justice issues, including advocating for three survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre who this week saw a judge dismiss their lawsuit seeking reparations.

    “We’re resigning, we’re not retiring,” Jackson said.

    Ron Daniels, who works with the National African-American Reparations Commission, a panel working for financial payments to Black people as compensation for slavery, told convention-goers that Jackson is a “synthesis” of King and another 1960s civil rights leader, Malcolm X.

    “He is an authentic genius,” Daniel said. “(Jackson) had the unparalleled capacity to frame and articulate … political strategy in a way common, ordinary people could understand it.”

    Marcia Fudge, secretary of the U.S. Department Housing and Urban Development, thanked Jackson for paving the way for Black politicians like herself.

    “Most people talk a good game but they have no courage,” she said. “But you never left us, no matter how hard (things became).”

    Santita Jackson implored convention-goers to follow her father’s lead and continue to fight for equality.

    “Rev. Jackson has run his leg,” she said. “What are you going to do?”

    Richmond reported from Madison, Wisconsin. Associated Press reporter Gary Fields in Washington contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I Have Lyme Disease & Long COVID: 6 Things Helping My Immune System Rebound

    I Have Lyme Disease & Long COVID: 6 Things Helping My Immune System Rebound

    [ad_1]

    From whole foods to compression boots.

    [ad_2]

    Danielle Pashko

    Source link

  • Biden administration to provide free Covid vaccines to uninsured Americans this fall through end of 2024

    Biden administration to provide free Covid vaccines to uninsured Americans this fall through end of 2024

    [ad_1]

    A healthcare worker prepares a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine at a vaccination clinic in the Peabody Institute Library in Peabody, Massachusetts, on Wednesday, Jan. 26, 2022.

    Vanessa Leroy | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The Biden administration on Thursday announced a program to provide free Covid vaccines to uninsured Americans through December 2024 after the federal government’s supply of shots runs out this fall.

    Those free shots, which the government is purchasing at a discount, will be available to the uninsured at pharmacies and 64 state and local health departments.

    The Health and Human Services Department also is hoping that vaccine makers will donate shots to pharmacies as part of the program.

    There are between 25 to 30 million uninsured adults in the United States and other Americans whose insurance will not cover free Covid products this fall, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Currently, the government has an inventory of vaccines purchased from three manufacturers, Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax, and those companies do not sell the shots to health-care providers.

    In the fall, the companies will begin selling shots directly to health providers, and the government’s supply is expected to run out.

    The Health and Human Services Department in April first announced the Bridge Access Program, but had not said when the program would stop providing shots for free to the uninsured until Thursday.

     The program reflects a broad shift on the pandemic’s effects worldwide. As Covid cases and deaths have dropped to new lows, governments have rolled back stringent health mandates like masking and social distancing, and the rate at which people get Covid vaccines has slowed to a crawl over the past year.

    Earlier this year, the World Health Organization declared an end to the global Covid public health emergency earlier this year. In May, HHS declared an end to the emergency in the United States.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pride Month Reaches Its Grand Crescendo On City Streets From New York To San Francisco

    Pride Month Reaches Its Grand Crescendo On City Streets From New York To San Francisco

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Thousands of effusive marchers danced to club music in New York City streets Sunday as bubbles and confetti rained down, and fellow revelers from Toronto to San Francisco cheered through Pride Month’s grand crescendo.

    New York’s boisterous throng strolled and danced down Fifth Avenue to Greenwich Village, cheering and waving rainbow flags to commemorate the 1969 Stonewall uprising, where a police raid on a gay bar triggered days of protests and launched the modern movement for LGBTQ+ rights.

    While some people whooped it up in celebration, many were mindful of the growing conservative countermovement, including new laws banning gender-affirming care for transgender children.

    “I’m trying not to be very heavily political, but when it does target my community, I get very, very annoyed and very hurt,” said Ve Cinder, a 22-year-old transgender woman who traveled from Pennsylvania to take part in the country’s largest Pride event.

    “I’m just, like, scared for my future and for my trans siblings. I’m frightened of how this country has looked at human rights, basic human rights,” she said. “It’s crazy.”

    Parades in New York, Chicago and San Francisco are among events that roughly 400 Pride organizations across the U.S. are holding this year, with many focused specifically on the rights of transgender people.

    One of the grand marshals of New York City’s parade is nonbinary activist AC Dumlao, chief of staff for Athlete Ally, a group that advocates on behalf of LGBTQ+ athletes.

    “Uplifting the trans community has always been at the core of our events and programming,” said Dan Dimant, a spokesperson for NYC Pride.

    People participate in the Annual New York Pride March on June 25, 2023 in New York City.

    Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images

    San Francisco Pride, another of the largest and best known LGBTQ+ celebrations in the United States, drew tens of thousands of spectators to the city Sunday.

    The event, kicked off by the group Dykes on Bikes, featured dozens of colorful floats, some carrying strong messages against the wave of anti-transgender legislation in statehouses across the country.

    Organizers told the San Francisco Chronicle that this year’s theme emphasized activism. The parade included the nation’s first drag laureate, D’Arcy Drollinger.

    “When we walk through the world more authentic and more fabulous, we inspire everyone,” Drollinger said at a breakfast before the parade.

    Along Market Street, House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Adam Schiff of Burbank were spotted riding together.

    In Chicago, a brief downpour at the beginning of the parade didn’t deter parade goers, who took shelter under awnings, trees and umbrellas.

    “A little rain can’t stop us!” tweeted Brandon Johnson, the city’s newly elected mayor.

    Chicago’s 52nd annual celebration on Sunday featured drag performers Marilyn Doll Traid and Selena Peres, as well as Young Bud Billiken dancers, who received loud praise from the crowd as they represented the celebration of Black roots in Chicago’s South Side.

    A dancer participates in the 51st Chicago Pride Parade in Chicago, Sunday, June 26, 2022.
    A dancer participates in the 51st Chicago Pride Parade in Chicago, Sunday, June 26, 2022.

    Jon Durr via Associated Press

    Thousands of people also flooded the streets Saturday night in Houston to celebrate pride parades and embrace the LGBTQ+ community.

    “Houston is one big diverse family. Today is about celebrating people who are themselves, their authentic selves and letting everyone know that this is a city full of love, not division, not hate,” said Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner.

    San Antonio also celebrated its Pride parade Saturday night, with hundreds of people lining downtown streets.

    “This year’s theme is ‘Just Say Gay.’ We feel so strongly about the legislation that’s occurring, not only here in Texas, but in other states throughout the United States that are trying to put us back in the closet,” Phillip Barcena, Pride San Antonio president, told KSAT.

    Also Saturday, first lady Jill Biden made an appearance at the Pride parade in Nashville, Tennessee, where she told the crowd “loud and clear that you belong, that you are beautiful, that you are loved.”

    Many other cities held their marquee events earlier this month, including Boston, which hosted its first parade after a three-year hiatus that began with COVID-19 but extended through 2022 because the organization that used to run it dissolved under criticism that it excluded racial minorities and transgender people.

    A key message this year has been for LGBTQ+ communities to unite against dozens, if not hundreds, of legislative bills now under consideration in statehouses across the country.

    Lawmakers in 20 states have moved to ban gender-affirming care for children, and at least seven more are considering doing the same, adding increased urgency for the transgender community, its advocates say.

    “We are under threat,” Pride event organizers in New York, San Francisco and San Diego said in a statement joined by about 50 other Pride organizations nationwide. “The diverse dangers we are facing as an LGBTQ community and Pride organizers, while differing in nature and intensity, share a common trait: they seek to undermine our love, our identity, our freedom, our safety, and our lives.”

    Earlier Sunday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a bill that would make the state a “safe haven” for transgender youth and forbid law enforcement agencies from providing information that could undermine the ability for a child to get gender-affirming care.

    NYC Mayor Adams made a similar move this week, issuing an executive order preventing city resources from being used to cooperate with out-of-state authorities in detaining anyone receiving gender-affirming care in the city.

    The Anti-Defamation League and GLAAD, a national LGBTQ+ organization, reported 101 anti-LGBTQ+ incidents in the first three weeks of this month, about twice as many as in the full month of June last year.

    Sarah Moore, who analyzes extremism for the two civil rights groups, said many of the incidents coincided with Pride events.

    Nevertheless, Roz Gould Keith, who has a transgender son, is heartened by the increased visibility of transgender people at marches and celebrations across the country.

    “Ten years ago, when my son asked to go to Motor City Pride, there was nothing for the trans community,” said Keith, founder and executive director of Stand with Trans, a group formed to support and empower young transgender people and their families.

    This year, she said, the event was “jam-packed” with transgender people.

    AP writers Juan Lozano in Houston; Erin Hooley in Chicago; Trân Nguyễn in Sacramento, California; James Pollard in Columbia, South Carolina; Geoff Mulvihill in Cherry Hill, New Jersey; Trisha Ahmed in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut, contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • No direct evidence COVID began in Wuhan lab, US intelligence report says

    No direct evidence COVID began in Wuhan lab, US intelligence report says

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. intelligence community has found no direct evidence of a “biosafety incident” or of the pre-pandemic presence of the virus that causes COVID-19 at a laboratory in Wuhan, China, according to a report released Friday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).   

    The newly declassified document added details to a growing body of inconclusive evidence about the origins of the pandemic. 

    The 10-page report, which was mandated by legislation passed by Congress and signed into law in March by President Biden, looked specifically at potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, but did not make an assessment of the likelihood the outbreak began there.  

    While some lab researchers heightened their risk of accidental exposure to viruses at WIV through insufficient safety precautions, and “several” fell ill in the fall of 2019, the report found, U.S. intelligence agencies remain divided on whether the pandemic began through natural transmission or by accident. 

    The report notes that some scientists at the institute genetically engineered coronaviruses through common practices, but that there was “no information” indicating such work was done on the virus that causes COVID-19. “Almost all” the agencies studying the issue assess the virus “was not genetically engineered,” it said.  

    The report also says that several WIV researchers showed some symptoms “consistent with but not diagnostic of COVID-19” in the fall of 2019, with some showing symptoms unrelated to the disease, and some confirmed to have been sick with other, unrelated illnesses.  

    The timing and type of the workers’ illnesses “neither supports nor refutes either hypothesis of the pandemic’s origins because the researchers’ symptoms could have been caused by a number of diseases and some of the symptoms were not consistent with COVID-19,” the report said.  

    China has consistently denied that the virus originated in the Wuhan lab and a spokesperson for its Foreign Ministry previously accused the U.S. of a “politicization of origin tracing.”  

    In a pair of declassified assessments released last year, ODNI revealed that U.S. intelligence agencies had coalesced around two “plausible” theories – that the virus was the result of natural transmission or the result of a lab accident.  

    In Friday’s report, their breakdown was consistent. Five U.S. intelligence entities continue to believe that the virus originated naturally. Two, the FBI and the Department of Energy, favor the lab leak theory, albeit “for different reasons.” And the CIA and another agency have been unable to make a determination without additional information.  

    “The Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army have some serious explaining to do,” said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner and Chairman of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Brad Wenstrup in a joint statement, adding their view that ODNI’s report added “credence” to the lab leak theory. 

    “While we appreciate the report from ODNI, the corroboration of all available evidence along with further investigation into the origins of COVID-19 must continue,” they said.   

    In public testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in March, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said the lack of cooperation from the Chinese government was a “key, critical gap” in explaining the pandemic’s origins.  

    “It is a really challenging issue,” Haines told the panel in March. “And I think our folks honestly are trying to do the best that they can to figure out what, exactly, happened, based on the information they have available to them.”  

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Grab cuts 1,000 jobs, its biggest round of layoffs since the pandemic

    Grab cuts 1,000 jobs, its biggest round of layoffs since the pandemic

    [ad_1]

    The headquarters of Grab Holdings Ltd., in Singapore. Grab Holdings Ltd., reported its latest earnings on Feb. 23, 2023.

    Bryan van der Beek | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Singapore-based Grab Holdings is cutting over 1,000 jobs, its CEO said Tuesday, in a bid to manage costs and reorganize the company in a competitive landscape.

    In an email to staff, CEO Anthony Tan said the layoffs are a “painful but necessary step” that the ride-hailing and food delivery app operator must take to remain competitive in the future.

    “The primary goal of this exercise is to strategically reorganize ourselves, so that we can move faster, work smarter, and rebalance our resources across our portfolio in line with our longer term strategies,” said Tan.

    This is the group’s largest round of layoffs since 2020, when it cut 360 jobs in response to Covid-19 pandemic challenges.

    Even without layoffs, Tan said Grab is on track to hit breakeven this year on group adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. In February, the company said it was bringing forward its target to the fourth quarter of 2023, half a year earlier than its previous guidance.

    The CEO said the job cuts are not a “shortcut to profitability” but will enable Grab to adapt to the business environment and rapid emergence of A.I.

    Tan said Grab will provide severance payment of half a month for every six months of completed service, or based on local statutory guidelines, whichever is higher. Laid off workers will also receive medical insurance coverage until the end of the year, repatriation support as well as career transition and development support, among other measures.

    The announcement comes after Grab’s COO Alex Hungate told Reuters in September that the company does not expect to conduct mass layoffs despite weaker economic conditions. Hungate said Grab was “very careful and judicious about any hiring.”

    Major U.S. tech firms like Amazon and Meta went on a hiring spree during the pandemic as lockdowns boosted business. Many later laid off thousands of workers as business conditions reverted to or approached pre-pandemic conditions.

    Grab posted strong revenue growth and narrowed losses for 2022, citing a rebound in mobility demand.

    Tuesday’s announcement is the latest round of layoffs from a major Southeast Asian tech company. In March, Indonesia’s GoTo announced it was laying off 600 employees to boost profitability, Reuters reported, while Singapore-based Sea cut more than 7,000 jobs in the last six months of 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Forecasts and Black Swans: Generative AI Company AIMdyn, Inc. Uses Koopman Operator Approach to AI in CDC Covid-19 Challenge

    Forecasts and Black Swans: Generative AI Company AIMdyn, Inc. Uses Koopman Operator Approach to AI in CDC Covid-19 Challenge

    [ad_1]

    AIMdyn Inc showed a substantial improvement in forecasting capability using a 3rd-wave class of AI technologies based on Koopman operator approach to Artificial Intelligence.

    AIMdyn Inc., a generative AI company, developed a suite of adaptive, context recognizing AI algorithms that can be used for forecasting dynamical processes with complex evolution, such as the spread of disease, and used for playing online games (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9483027). In the latest development, the AIMdyn team took on the challenge of forecasting disease evolution and applied the methodology to the CDC challenge data on COVID-19.

    The quote “‘It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future‘” is attributed to a baseball-playing philosopher, Yogi Berra. And yet, we always try, with more or less success.

    In the latest contribution, the AI and Data Analytics company AIMdyn, Inc. compared one week ahead predictions of COVID-19 cases on the CDC COVID-19 challenge (https://covid19forecasthub.org/) made by a variety of prominent research groups.

    Different scientific teams utilized different approaches to the problem. AIMdyn’s is somewhat unique in that it recognizes (http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13601) the limits on predictability enshrined in Berra’s comment. Namely, it incorporates the idea that “black swan” events (N. N. Taleb, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Penguin Books, 2008) are unpredictable, and thus, the best one can hope for is to recognize the change of environment and adapt the prediction algorithm.

    Utilizing the underlying mathematical methodology, the AIMdyn team obtained results that beat the next best algorithm by more than 20%, a very substantial improvement in week-ahead prediction capability.

    The methodology is based on the Koopman operator approach to artificial intelligence that enables self-supervised creation of generative models which fall into the latest, 3rd-wave class of AI technologies.

    The same methodology was previously applied to power an AI approach to network security via an algorithm that was licensed to Mixmode.ai, a leading AI network security provider protecting networks of large corporate and government customers.

    “Perhaps the prediction science is not as dismal as Berra stated – as long as one recognizes its limits and bounds the uncertainty associated with them,” said Dr. Igor Mezic, the co-Founder of AIMdyn.

    Acknowledgements:
    This work was partially supported under DARPA contract HR001116C0116, DARPA contract HR00111890033, NIH/NIAAA grant R01AA023667, and DARPA SBIR Contract No. W31P4Q-21-C-0007. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the DARPA SBIR Program Office. The support of scientific research of the University of Rijeka, project No. uniri-prirod-18-118-1257, and the Croatian Science Foundation through grant IP-2019-04-6268.

    Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)

    Source: AIMdyn Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s how the Federal Reserve’s pause in interest rate hikes affects your money

    Here’s how the Federal Reserve’s pause in interest rate hikes affects your money

    [ad_1]

    After more than a year of steady rate hikes, the Federal Reserve held its target federal funds rate steady Wednesday.

    For households, however, that offers little relief from record-high borrowing costs.

    “It’s not like rates will go down,” said Tomas Philipson, University of Chicago economist and a former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

    In fact, borrowing costs are likely to climb higher in the second half of the year: Fed officials projected another two quarter percentage point moves are on the way before the end of 2023.

    More from Personal Finance:
    Even as inflation rate subsides, prices may stay higher
    Here’s the inflation breakdown for May 2023, in one chart
    Who does inflation hit hardest? Experts weigh in

    Since March 2022, the central bank has hiked its benchmark rate 10 consecutive times to a targeted range of 5%-5.25%, the fastest pace of tightening since the early 1980s. Inflation has started to cool but still remains well above the Fed’s 2% target.

    At the same time, borrowers are paying more on credit cards, student loans and other types of debt.

    What the federal funds rate means for you

    Wage growth hasn’t been able to keep pace with higher prices for many Americans. As a result, most households are getting squeezed and are going into debt just when borrowing rates reach record highs, Philipson said.

    “They are getting hammered,” he added.

    The exterior of the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building is seen in Washington, D.C., June 14, 2022.

    Sarah Silbiger | Reuters

    The federal funds rate, which is set by the central bank, is the interest rate at which banks borrow and lend to one another overnight.

    Although that’s not the rate consumers pay, the Fed’s moves still affect the borrowing and savings rates they see every day. The Fed’s current benchmark rate is at its highest since August 2007.

    Here’s a breakdown of how that affects consumers:

    Credit cards

    Since most credit cards have a variable rate, there’s a direct connection to the Fed’s benchmark. As the federal funds rate rose, the prime rate did, as well, and credit card rates followed suit.

    Credit card annual percentage rates are now more than 20%, on average — an all-time high. Further, with most people feeling strained by higher prices, more cardholders carry debt from month to month.

    Today’s credit card rates are likely as high as they’ve been in decades.

    Matt Schulz

    chief credit analyst at LendingTree

    For those who carry a balance, there’s not much relief in sight, according to Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree.

    “The truth is that today’s credit card rates are likely as high as they’ve been in decades, and they’re probably going to still creep higher in the immediate future, even though the Fed chose not to raise rates this month,” he said.

    Home loans

    Although 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates are fixed, and tied to Treasury yields and the economy, anyone shopping for a new home has lost considerable purchasing power, partly because of inflation and the Fed’s policy moves.

    Rates are now off their recent peak but not by much. The average rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage currently sits near 6.7%, according to Freddie Mac, down slightly from October’s high but still well above a year ago.

    “Mortgage rates decreased after a three-week climb,” said Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist. “While elevated rates and other affordability challenges remain, inventory continues to be the biggest obstacle for prospective homebuyers.”

    Other home loans are more closely tied to the Fed’s actions. Adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, and home equity lines of credit, or HELOCs, are pegged to the prime rate. Most ARMs adjust once a year after an initial fixed-rate period. But a HELOC rate adjusts right away. And already, the average rate for a HELOC is up to 8.3%, the highest in 22 years, according to Bankrate.

    Auto loans

    Even though auto loans are fixed, payments are getting bigger because the prices for all cars are rising along with the interest rates on new loans. So if you are planning to buy a car, you’ll still shell out more in the months ahead.

    The average rate on a five-year new car loan is now 6.87%, the highest since 2010, according to Bankrate.

    Keeping up with the higher cost has become a challenge, research shows, with more borrowers falling behind on their monthly loan payments.

    Student loans

    Darren415 | Istock | Getty Images

    Federal student loan rates are also fixed, so most borrowers aren’t immediately affected by the Fed’s moves. But as of July, undergraduate students who take out new direct federal student loans will see interest rates rise to 5.50% — up from 4.99% in the 2022-23 academic year and 3.73% in 2021-22.

    For now, anyone with existing federal education debt will benefit from rates at 0% until the payment pause ends, which the U.S. Department of Education expects could happen in the fall.

    Private student loans tend to have a variable rate tied to the Libor, prime or Treasury bill rates — and that means that those borrowers are already paying more in interest. How much more, however, varies with the benchmark.

    Savings accounts

    While the Fed has no direct influence on deposit rates, the yields tend to be correlated to changes in the target federal funds rate. The savings account rates at some of the largest retail banks, which were near rock bottom during most of the Covid pandemic, are currently up to 0.4%, on average.

    Thanks, in part, to lower overhead expenses, top-yielding online savings account rates are now over 5%, the highest since 2008′s financial crisis, according to Bankrate.

    Since the Fed skipped a rate hike at this meeting, those deposit rate increases are likely to slow, according to Ken Tumin, founder of DepositAccounts.com.

    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Great Grift: 5 things to know about how COVID-19 relief aid was stolen or wasted

    The Great Grift: 5 things to know about how COVID-19 relief aid was stolen or wasted

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The greatest grift in U.S. history was brazen, even simple. Criminals and gangs grabbed the money. So did an U.S. soldier in Georgia, the pastors of a defunct church in Texas, a former state lawmaker in Missouri and a roofing contractor in Montana.

    Over the last three years, thieves plundered billions of dollars in federal COVID-19 relief aid intended to combat the worst pandemic in a century and to stabilize an economy in free fall.

    Here are some key takeaways from an Associated Press analysis of what may have been stolen or wasted.

    HOW MUCH WAS STOLEN?

    An Associated Press analysis found that fraudsters potentially stole more than $280 billion in COVID-19 relief funding; another $123 billion was wasted or misspent. Combined, the loss represents a jarring 10% of the $4.2 trillion the U.S. government has so far disbursed in COVID-relief aid.

    That number is certain to grow as investigators dig deeper into thousands of potential schemes.

    There are myriad reasons for the staggering loss. Investigators and outside experts say the government, in seeking to quickly spend trillions in relief aid, conducted too little oversight during the pandemic’s early stages and instituted too few restrictions on applicants. In short, they say, the grift was just way too easy.

    “Here was this sort of endless pot of money that anyone could access,” said Dan Fruchter, chief of the fraud and white-collar crime unit at the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Washington. “Folks kind of fooled themselves into thinking that it was a socially acceptable thing to do, even though it wasn’t legal.”

    The U.S. government has charged more than 2,230 defendants with pandemic-related fraud crimes and is conducting thousands of investigations.

    The pilfering was wide but not always as deep as the eye-catching headlines about cases involving many millions of dollars. But all of the theft, big and small, illustrate an epidemic of scams and swindles at a time America was grappling with overrun hospitals, school closures and shuttered businesses. Since the pandemic began in early 2020, more than 1.13 million people in the U.S. have died from COVID-19, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    WHERE DID SCAM ARTISTS GET THE MONEY?

    Before leaving office, former President Donald Trump approved emergency aid measures totaling $3.2 trillion, according to figures from the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee. President Joe Biden’s 2021 American Rescue Plan authorized the spending of another $1.9 trillion. About a fifth of the $5.2 trillion has yet to be fully paid out, according to the committee’s most recent accounting.

    Never has so much federal emergency aid been injected into the U.S. economy so quickly. “The largest rescue package in American history,” U.S. Comptroller General Gene Dodaro told Congress.

    WHAT AGENCIES WERE HIT THE HARDEST?

    The health crisis thrust the Small Business Administration, an agency that typically gets little attention, into an unprecedented role. In the seven decades before the pandemic struck, for example, the SBA had doled out $67 billion in disaster loans.

    When the pandemic struck, the agency was assigned to manage two massive relief efforts –the COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan and Paycheck Protection programs, which would swell to more than a trillion dollars. SBA’s workforce had to get money out the door, fast, to help struggling businesses and their employees. COVID-19 pushed SBA’s pace from a walk into an Olympic sprint. Between March 2020 and the end of July 2020, the agency granted 3.2 million COVID-19 economic injury disaster loans totaling $169 billion, according to an SBA inspector general’s report, while at the same time implementing the huge new Paycheck Protection Program.

    In the haste, guardrails to protect federal money were dropped. Prospective borrowers were allowed to “self-certify” that their loan applications were true. The CARES Act also barred SBA from looking at tax return transcripts that could have weeded out shady or undeserving applicants, a decision eventually reversed at the end of 2020.

    “If you open up the bank window and say, give me your application and just promise me you really are who you say you are, you attract a lot of fraudsters and that’s what happened here,” said Michael Horowitz, the U.S. Justice Department inspector general who chairs the federal Pandemic Response Accountability Committee.

    WHAT COULD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAVE DONE BETTER TO COMBAT FRAUD?

    Horowitz criticized the government’s failure early on to use the “Do Not Pay” Treasury Department database, designed to keep government money from going to debarred contractors, fugitives, felons or people convicted of tax fraud. Those reviews, he said, could have been done quickly.

    “It’s a false narrative that has been set out, that there are only two choices,” Horowitz said. “One choice is, get the money out right away. And that the only other choice was to spend weeks and months trying to figure out who was entitled to it.”

    In less than a few days, a week at most, Horowitz said, SBA might have discovered thousands of ineligible applicants.

    “24 hours? 48 hours? Would that really have upended the program?” Horowitz said. “I don’t think it would have. And it was data sitting there. It didn’t get checked.”

    WHO IS TO BLAME?

    On politically divided Capitol Hill, lawmakers have not put the pandemic behind them and are engaged in a fierce debate over the success of the relief spending and who’s to blame for the theft.

    Too much government money, Republicans argue, breeds fraud, waste and inflation. Democrats have countered that all the financial muscle from Washington saved lives, businesses and jobs.

    Republicans and Democrats did, however, did find common ground last year on bills to year to give the federal government more time to catch fraudsters. Biden in August signed legislation to increase the statute of limitations from five to 10 years on crimes involving the two major programs managed by the SBA.

    The extra time will help federal prosecutors untangle pandemic fraud cases, which often involve identity theft and crooks overseas. But there’s no guarantee they’ll catch everyone who jumped at the chance for an easy payday. They’re busy, too, with crimes unrelated to pandemic relief funds.

    Gene Sperling, the White House American Rescue Plan coordinator, said any future crisis that requires government intervention doesn’t have to be a choice between helping people in need and stopping fraudsters.

    “The prevention strategy going forward is that in a crisis, you can focus on fast delivery to people in desperate situations without feeling that you can only get that speed by taking down common sense anti-fraud guardrails,” he said.

    ___

    McDermott reported from Providence, R.I.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Great Grift: 5 things to know about how COVID-19 relief aid was stolen or wasted

    The Great Grift: 5 things to know about how COVID-19 relief aid was stolen or wasted

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The greatest grift in U.S. history was brazen, even simple. Criminals and gangs grabbed the money. So did an U.S. soldier in Georgia, the pastors of a defunct church in Texas, a former state lawmaker in Missouri and a roofing contractor in Montana.

    Over the last three years, thieves plundered billions of dollars in federal COVID-19 relief aid intended to combat the worst pandemic in a century and to stabilize an economy in free fall.

    Here are some key takeaways from an Associated Press analysis of what may have been stolen or wasted.

    HOW MUCH WAS STOLEN?

    An Associated Press analysis found that fraudsters potentially stole more than $280 billion in COVID-19 relief funding; another $123 billion was wasted or misspent. Combined, the loss represents a jarring 10% of the $4.2 trillion the U.S. government has so far disbursed in COVID-relief aid.

    That number is certain to grow as investigators dig deeper into thousands of potential schemes.

    There are myriad reasons for the staggering loss. Investigators and outside experts say the government, in seeking to quickly spend trillions in relief aid, conducted too little oversight during the pandemic’s early stages and instituted too few restrictions on applicants. In short, they say, the grift was just way too easy.

    “Here was this sort of endless pot of money that anyone could access,” said Dan Fruchter, chief of the fraud and white-collar crime unit at the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Washington. “Folks kind of fooled themselves into thinking that it was a socially acceptable thing to do, even though it wasn’t legal.”

    The U.S. government has charged more than 2,230 defendants with pandemic-related fraud crimes and is conducting thousands of investigations.

    The pilfering was wide but not always as deep as the eye-catching headlines about cases involving many millions of dollars. But all of the theft, big and small, illustrate an epidemic of scams and swindles at a time America was grappling with overrun hospitals, school closures and shuttered businesses. Since the pandemic began in early 2020, more than 1.13 million people in the U.S. have died from COVID-19, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    WHERE DID SCAM ARTISTS GET THE MONEY?

    Before leaving office, former President Donald Trump approved emergency aid measures totaling $3.2 trillion, according to figures from the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee. President Joe Biden’s 2021 American Rescue Plan authorized the spending of another $1.9 trillion. About a fifth of the $5.2 trillion has yet to be fully paid out, according to the committee’s most recent accounting.

    Never has so much federal emergency aid been injected into the U.S. economy so quickly. “The largest rescue package in American history,” U.S. Comptroller General Gene Dodaro told Congress.

    WHAT AGENCIES WERE HIT THE HARDEST?

    The health crisis thrust the Small Business Administration, an agency that typically gets little attention, into an unprecedented role. In the seven decades before the pandemic struck, for example, the SBA had doled out $67 billion in disaster loans.

    When the pandemic struck, the agency was assigned to manage two massive relief efforts –the COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan and Paycheck Protection programs, which would swell to more than a trillion dollars. SBA’s workforce had to get money out the door, fast, to help struggling businesses and their employees. COVID-19 pushed SBA’s pace from a walk into an Olympic sprint. Between March 2020 and the end of July 2020, the agency granted 3.2 million COVID-19 economic injury disaster loans totaling $169 billion, according to an SBA inspector general’s report, while at the same time implementing the huge new Paycheck Protection Program.

    In the haste, guardrails to protect federal money were dropped. Prospective borrowers were allowed to “self-certify” that their loan applications were true. The CARES Act also barred SBA from looking at tax return transcripts that could have weeded out shady or undeserving applicants, a decision eventually reversed at the end of 2020.

    “If you open up the bank window and say, give me your application and just promise me you really are who you say you are, you attract a lot of fraudsters and that’s what happened here,” said Michael Horowitz, the U.S. Justice Department inspector general who chairs the federal Pandemic Response Accountability Committee.

    WHAT COULD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAVE DONE BETTER TO COMBAT FRAUD?

    Horowitz criticized the government’s failure early on to use the “Do Not Pay” Treasury Department database, designed to keep government money from going to debarred contractors, fugitives, felons or people convicted of tax fraud. Those reviews, he said, could have been done quickly.

    “It’s a false narrative that has been set out, that there are only two choices,” Horowitz said. “One choice is, get the money out right away. And that the only other choice was to spend weeks and months trying to figure out who was entitled to it.”

    In less than a few days, a week at most, Horowitz said, SBA might have discovered thousands of ineligible applicants.

    “24 hours? 48 hours? Would that really have upended the program?” Horowitz said. “I don’t think it would have. And it was data sitting there. It didn’t get checked.”

    WHO IS TO BLAME?

    On politically divided Capitol Hill, lawmakers have not put the pandemic behind them and are engaged in a fierce debate over the success of the relief spending and who’s to blame for the theft.

    Too much government money, Republicans argue, breeds fraud, waste and inflation. Democrats have countered that all the financial muscle from Washington saved lives, businesses and jobs.

    Republicans and Democrats did, however, did find common ground last year on bills to year to give the federal government more time to catch fraudsters. Biden in August signed legislation to increase the statute of limitations from five to 10 years on crimes involving the two major programs managed by the SBA.

    The extra time will help federal prosecutors untangle pandemic fraud cases, which often involve identity theft and crooks overseas. But there’s no guarantee they’ll catch everyone who jumped at the chance for an easy payday. They’re busy, too, with crimes unrelated to pandemic relief funds.

    Gene Sperling, the White House American Rescue Plan coordinator, said any future crisis that requires government intervention doesn’t have to be a choice between helping people in need and stopping fraudsters.

    “The prevention strategy going forward is that in a crisis, you can focus on fast delivery to people in desperate situations without feeling that you can only get that speed by taking down common sense anti-fraud guardrails,” he said.

    ___

    McDermott reported from Providence, R.I.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Novak Djokovic Wins Men’s Record 23rd Grand Slam Title In French Open Final

    Novak Djokovic Wins Men’s Record 23rd Grand Slam Title In French Open Final

    [ad_1]

    PARIS (AP) — Novak Djokovic made clear for years this was his goal. What drove him. What inspired him. The biggest titles from his sport’s biggest stages were Djokovic’s main aim and now he finally stands alone — ahead of Rafael Nadal, ahead of Roger Federer, ahead of every man who ever has swung a racket.

    If Djokovic could wait this long to hold this record, he certainly could wait for the half-hour or so it took to straighten out his strokes in the French Open final. And so, after a bit of a shaky start in thick, humid air and under foreboding clouds Sunday, he imposed himself. The opponent at Court Philippe Chatrier, Casper Ruud, never really stood a serious chance after that.

    Djokovic earned his men’s-record 23rd Grand Slam singles championship, breaking a tie with Nadal and moving three in front of the retired Federer, with a 7-6 (1), 6-3, 7-5 victory over Ruud that was not in doubt for most of its 3 hours, 13 minutes.

    Djokovic puts this one alongside the French Open titles he earned in 2016 and 2021, making him the only man with at least three from each major. He won his very first at the 2008 Australian Open and now possesses a total of 10 trophies from there, seven from Wimbledon and three from the U.S. Open.

    “I knew that going into the tournament, going into the match, especially, today, that there is history on the line, but I try to focus my attention and my thoughts into preparing for this match in the best way possible to win, like any other match,” Djokovic said, wearing a red jacket with “23” stitched on the chest. “Of course I would lie if I say that I didn’t think about the finish line that is right there and that one more match is needed to win a trophy — a historic one.”

    Also worth noting: He again is halfway to a calendar-year Grand Slam — winning all four majors in one season — something no man has achieved since Rod Laver in 1969. Djokovic came close in 2021, when he won the Australian Open, French Open and Wimbledon and made it all the way to the title match at the U.S. Open before losing to Daniil Medvedev.

    Djokovic will resume that pursuit at Wimbledon, which begins on the grass of the All England Club on July 3.

    “He has this software in his head that he can switch (on) when a Grand Slam comes,” said his coach, Goran Ivanisevic. “The day we arrived here, he was better, he was more motivated, he was more hungry. Every day, he played better and better.”

    Entering the 2011 season, this is how the Slam count looked: 16 for Federer, nine for Nadal, one for Djokovic.

    “Pretty decent 12 years, I must say, for me,” Djokovic said with a smile.

    The climb began with a trio that year and accelerated lately: He has clutched the trophy at 11 of the last 20 Slams, a remarkable run made even more so when considering that he did not participate in two majors during that span because he did not get vaccinated against COVID-19. Djokovic was deported in January 2021 before the Australian Open, and he was not allowed to fly to the United States ahead of last year’s U.S. Open under a rule that since has been lifted.

    Getting to 23 not only sets the mark for men, but it also lets Djokovic equal Serena Williams, who wrapped up her career last year, for the most by anyone in the Open era, which began in 1968. Margaret Court won some of her all-time record of 24 Slam trophies in the amateur era.

    At 20 days past his 36th birthday, the Serb is the oldest singles champion at Roland Garros, considered the most grueling of the majors because of the lengthy, grinding points required by the red clay, which is slower than the grass or hard courts underfoot elsewhere.

    Nadal’s 22nd major arrived in Paris a year ago, two days after he turned 36. He has been sidelined since January by a hip injury and had arthroscopic surgery on June 2.

    “Many congrats on this amazing achievement,” Nadal tweeted shortly after the final concluded. “23 is a number that just a few years back was (impossible) to think about, and you made it!”

    Djokovic’s triumph on Sunday means he will return to No. 1 in the ATP rankings on Monday, replacing Carlos Alcaraz. Djokovic already has spent more weeks at the top spot than any player — man or woman — since the inception of computerized tennis rankings a half-century ago.

    It was Djokovic who eliminated Alcaraz in the semifinals on Thursday, wearing him down over two thrilling sets until the 20-year-old Spaniard’s body cramped up badly. Alcaraz continued to play, but the scores of the last two sets of the four-set match told the story: 6-1, 6-1.

    This was the third Slam final in the past five events for Ruud, a 24-year-old from Norway, but he is now 0-3. He lost to Nadal at the French Open a year ago and to Alcaraz at the U.S. Open last September.

    Perhaps due to an awareness of all that was at stake, Djokovic, in his 34th major final, was the one who got off to a shaky start.

    “Maybe feeling a bit nervous, little stressed,” Ruud said about his opponent.

    But by the close of the first set, Djokovic was downright Djokovic-esque, as he was while taking 12 of the last 13 points of the match, most accompanied by spectators’ thunderous chants of his two-syllable nickname, “No-le! No-le! No-le!”

    When one last miscue from Ruud landed out, Djokovic dropped onto his back with limbs spread wide.

    “He kind of pressures you, in a way, to go for more risks, and that’s tough,” Ruud said. “He just stepped up, like he knows how to do.”

    At first, though, Djokovic kept missing forehands — into the net, wide, long — then made a different sort of mistake, shanking an overhead from near the net way beyond the opposite baseline to get broken and trail 2-0.

    For whatever reason, that shot always has been Djokovic’s “bête noire,” and he missed another overhead later in the set.

    Soon, Ruud led 4-1, thanks in part to Djokovic’s troubles. By then, Djokovic accumulated 13 unforced errors, while Ruud made just four.

    And then everything changed.

    After finishing the first set with 18 unforced errors, Djokovic recalibrated himself, with merely 14 over the last two sets combined.

    Then it was Ruud’s turn to flub an overhead, rocking back and depositing his into the net to end a 29-stroke point. Djokovic’s first service break made it 4-3, and he shook his right fist.

    “A bit devastating,” Ruud called it.

    They went to a tiebreaker, truly Djokovic’s dominion. When the import rises, along with the tension, he simply excels.

    “He sort of just goes into this mode,” Ruud said, “where he just becomes like a wall.”

    During the first-to-7 segment, Djokovic contributed four winners and zero unforced errors.

    That made his career mark in tiebreakers 308-162, a winning percentage of .655. In 2023, he is 15-4, including 6-0 in Paris — there were 55 points played across that half-dozen, and Djokovic’s sum total of unforced errors was zero.

    “He just steps up,” Ruud said. “Either he plays ridiculous defense or he plays beautiful winners. Just doesn’t do any mistakes.”

    That set alone lasted 1 hour, 21 minutes, chock full of extended exchanges, the sort of points about which entire stories could be written. There were those that lasted 20, 25, 29 strokes. One was won by Ruud with the help of a back-to-the-net, between-the-legs shot. On another, Djokovic tumbled behind the baseline, smudging his red shirt, blue shorts and skin with the rust-colored clay.

    Djokovic’s scrambling and stretching and bending and twisting on defense shows up on the scoreboard, for sure. But all of the long points also sap an opponent’s energy and will.

    “It’s just annoying for me,” Ruud said, “but it’s very, very impressive.”

    When Djokovic broke to lead 3-0 in the second set, his powers now on full display, he jabbed his right index finger against his temple over and over and over. He wheeled to face his nearby box in the stands, where the group included Ivanisevic, Djokovic’s wife and two children, his parents, his agent and even seven-time Super Bowl champion Tom Brady.

    The retired Brady is widely viewed as the NFL’s “Greatest Of All Time” — or “GOAT,” for short — and there has been a debate in the tennis world for quite some time over which among Djokovic, Nadal or Federer deserves that sobriquet.

    If the barometer is Grand Slam championships, no one can argue against Djokovic’s status at the moment.

    “I leave those kind of discussions of ‘who is the greatest?’ to someone else. I have, of course, huge faith and confidence and belief (in) myself and for everything that I am and who I am and what I am capable of doing,” Djokovic said at his news conference, the Coupes des Mousquetaires at arm’s length. “So this trophy obviously is another confirmation of the quality of tennis that I’m still able to produce, I feel.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • More Students Want Virtual-Learning Options. Here’s Where the Debate Stands.

    More Students Want Virtual-Learning Options. Here’s Where the Debate Stands.

    [ad_1]

    Concentrating in large lecture halls has always been a challenge for Harper Chambers, a rising senior studying neuroscience at Princeton University. That’s because Chambers has autism, which he said makes him extra sensitive to light and noise. But when Chambers got a concussion last fall, his “acute” sensitivity temporarily became even more severe.

    Side conversations and the clicking of keyboards drowned out his professor’s lecture and soon became indistinguishable white noise. Lights from peers’ laptop screens and overhead lamps were distracting and gave him a headache. Sunglasses and noise-canceling headphones didn’t help much.

    “I couldn’t be in the room and be able to fully focus on the lecture,” Chambers said.

    He went to the university’s disability office to ask for permission to attend class on Zoom — a policy he remembered from the year before, when Covid exposures and infections would often force students into quarantine or isolation.

    Then Chambers learned that Princeton no longer required faculty to provide Zoom accommodations for any reason.

    After the 2021-22 academic year, when faculty across the country reported “stunning” levels of student disengagement, Princeton and other colleges with a lot of residential undergraduates sought to reestablish the norms and atmosphere of college from before the pandemic. At the University of Oregon, a senior administrator was direct in an email to the campus: “Students need to hear that attendance is important to their learning.”

    For some faculty, the need to accommodate students — some of whom kept attending their mostly in-person classes online, Covid or no Covid — was ballooning their workloads. Instructors had to figure out how to record lectures, measure participation, and facilitate small-group activities simultaneously in-person and online. And instructors feared that academic rigor was suffering.

    This eagerness to return to “normal” coincided with a growing demand from many students for virtual learning.

    While adult learners have long preferred such flexibility, students and others told The Chronicle that more 18- to 24-year-olds also want online courses — as well as hybrid courses, where they can attend a class in-person one day and virtually the next. Some, like Chambers, are disabled students; others are students with jobs or caretaking responsibilities.

    The share of students enrolled only in online courses nearly doubled between 2019 and 2021, according to a recent analysis by The Chronicle. Some college officials told The Chronicle this spring that they are continuing to expand remote and hybrid options.

    It’s clear that the conversation about flexibility in learning, and how to help faculty offer it, will persist even as the pandemic era recedes into the distance.

    ‘The World Opening Up’

    Last fall, Princeton officially ended hybrid learning and began requiring all students to attend all classes in person. (The university doesn’t offer fully online degree programs.)

    “Those who miss more than two weeks of instruction — for any reason — are encouraged to take a leave of absence,” Jill S. Dolan, dean of the college at Princeton, wrote in a September 2022 essay. Asked for further comment, a Princeton spokesperson referred The Chronicle to the essay.

    Disability-rights student groups had urged Princeton to preserve Covid-era accommodations. But Dolan said those adaptations just weren’t working for students or faculty.

    Learning happens best during “present-time interactions with faculty and other students,” Dolan said, where students have “the chance to see, in real time, our collective minds transform.”

    “Virtual learning makes taking a meaningful stand more difficult, because we’re not breathing the same air and we can’t see the nuances of one another’s expressions and reactions as we can when we’re present, live, together,” Dolan wrote.

    Hybrid teaching in particular was a burden for Princeton’s faculty, who reported “stress and disruption,” Dolan said. In addition to creating “technical and administrative burdens,” simultaneously teaching two audiences — the in-person students and those online — was difficult for some lecturers, she said.

    Some instructors reported learning loss among their students, while others noted constant requests for Zoom attendance for different reasons, as well as growing disengagement in class.

    “In other words, once that Zoom window opened, faculty found their courses suddenly defenestrated,” Dolan wrote.

    For Ellen Li, though, virtual learning was an opportunity to actually participate in class.

    “I think it’s important to recognize that for a lot of people, quarantine was the daily state of our lives, and then having everything transitioned to Zoom was actually the world opening up and not closing down,” said Li, a comparative literature student and a co-founder of Princeton’s Disability Collective.

    Li started to struggle with chronic illness during her second year at Princeton. Her chronic-fatigue syndrome and dysautonomia affected her mobility, energy, and ability to sit upright in the classroom. In in-person classes, “taking a meaningful stand,” as Dolan described, became difficult for Li.

    During the fall of 2019, Li’s illnesses caused her to miss about a quarter of required lectures, she said. When Princeton went online the following spring due to the pandemic, she said she finally felt like she could “meaningfully engage” with peers again. Remote options had been part of the reason she remained enrolled at Princeton after getting sick, she said.

    For some disabled students, remote learning “opens up learning possibilities that simply did not exist before, or were very, very burdensome on the student,” said Paul Grossman, a former board member at the Association on Higher Education and Disability, or Ahead, and an adjunct professor of disability law at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco.

    I think it’s great to open up options so that people can make their own individual choices about what works well for them.

    Jamie Axelrod, the former president of Ahead and the director of disability resources at Northern Arizona University, said that it is “hard to make generalizations” about which student populations benefit from online learning. While some disabled students thrive in a remote environment, others — such as those with attention-deficit or executive-functioning issues — struggle, Axelrod said.

    Still, for students who find it complicated to get to and spend time in public settings, remote learning can be a big help, Axelrod said. That group includes students with chronic illnesses, mobility issues, gastrointestinal issues, and certain mental-health conditions.

    “I think it’s great to open up options so that people can make their own individual choices about what works well for them,” Axelrod said.

    Li, who helped advocate for the university to preserve remote options last spring with Princeton’s disability collective, said she understands why many of her classmates prefer in-person learning. For some disabled students, though, Li said the options are “online or nothing.”

    “Providing no online option is equivalent to denying disabled students, and teachers, any place in the university,” Li said.

    Meeting Demand

    While some colleges aim to put Zoom classes in the past, others are taking advantage of the rising demand among students for remote and hybrid learning — in part as an enrollment strategy.

    Vermont State University, the soon-to-be-formed institution unifying three public colleges that were losing students, is making a bet on flexibility. Sylvia Plumb, a spokesperson, wrote in an email that “remote/hybrid learning plays a vital role in our mission to provide high-quality, accessible education that is affordable and tailored to the needs of our diverse student population.”

    At the University of Maine at Orono, the share of remote-course offerings doubled between 2019 and this spring, from 14 to 28 percent, officials said. The share of students learning fully online increased 14 percentage points, to 20 percent, between 2017 and 2021, according to The Chronicle‘s recent analysis.

    Richard Roberts, executive director of academic-program support and online learning at Maine, said the decision to expand was based on demand from students who inceasingly want a combination of in-person, hybrid, and fully remote courses.

    “When we offer remote versions of our on-campus courses, or fully online versions of our existing degrees, they often reach capacity well before the on-campus sections,” Roberts said.

    Roberts said the university has been able to expand remote options “without sacrificing academic rigor or credential value.”

    “We have a robust infrastructure to support fully remote students and in-person students seeking a variety of hybrid and remote options,” Roberts said. “Most importantly, our online degrees and courses are not separate from the on-campus offerings, and so our fully remote students take the same classes, learn from the same prestigious research-intensive faculty, and earn the same degrees as our on-campus students.”

    Roberts said Maine also has a dedicated advising team for supporting online students so they feel less “like a number.”

    He said the university is committed to meeting the needs of the state. “Maine is a predominantly rural state, and many students are geographically place-bound, yet they still deserve the option to earn a quality education,” Roberts said.

    You’re able to take your classes and not have to worry about that commute, and therefore having to fill up your tank.

    Remote options don’t only benefit students with disabilities, some learning experts said. They also expand access for commuter students, students with jobs, and students who care for family members, said Antija M. Allen, an assistant professor of psychology at Pellissippi State Community College, in Tennessee. Allen, an expert in education technology, also serves as director of the Pellissippi Academic Center for Excellence.

    “We’ve seen quite a few prices go up, including gas prices,” Allen said, referring to the barriers for commuters who live far away. Remote classes offer an affordable and time-saving way to continue learning, she said: “You’re able to take your classes and not have to worry about that commute, and therefore having to fill up your tank.”

    Jasmine Whaley, a 20-year-old sophomore at Ozark Technical Community College, in Missouri, lives an hour away from her college by car and works full-time at a restaurant near her home.

    Whaley, who’s studying biological science, said she strongly prefers remote classes because they save her gas money and time, and allow her to learn at times that are convenient, when she isn’t working. Whaley responded to a Chronicle callout this spring for students who opt for remote learning.

    Whaley, who has anxiety, said she also prefers remote classes for her mental health; her “grades are always better online.” In person, Whaley said, “I can’t even concentrate because I’m anxious the whole entire class period.”

    A Balancing Act

    Going forward, learning experts said, colleges must understand that teaching effectively in online and hybrid environments takes resources: training, technology, and help from teaching assistants, among other things.

    Managing in-person classes with some students on Zoom is what faculty most often cite as a burden. In those settings, colleges and instructors have to grapple with when — and for whom — online-learning options are necessary, said Grossman, the disability-law expert.

    There are students with suppressed immunity or mobility issues who might prefer to Zoom in to their class for a week if they’ve had a chronic illness flare up. And then there are able-bodied students who might want to sleep in and tune in to the lecture when they want. Drawing distinctions between required accommodations and convenience isn’t easy.

    Allen, who leads faculty development at Pellissippi State, has heard from faculty members who want to accommodate students’ remote requests for in-person courses but are unsure how to properly do so.

    “Some people struggle with engaging the people on Zoom at the same time as engaging the people who are sitting here in the room,” Allen said. “Again, that’s a skill that has to be developed.”

    Online teaching can be just as productive as in-person instruction when done well, said Karen Costa, a faculty-development consultant and online teaching expert.

    “In an on-site class, we often only hear from the most-confident extroverted learners,” said Costa, who’s an adjunct faculty member at Southern New Hampshire University and the University of Maryland Global Campus, and has been teaching online for over a decade. But in remote classes, she said she can hear from all of her students.

    Additionally, Costa said the chat function on platforms like Zoom provides an opportunity for extroverts to participate in the lesson without causing disruptions. “We can have students sharing resources as we’re teaching in a way that would be kind of disruptive and chaotic in an on-site class,” she said.

    When teaching online, Costa said, it is important for faculty to actively reach out to students and create opportunities for them to engage with the course content and with one another.

    But instructors need support to do that, she said. College leaders, she said, need to answer to “how they are supporting their faculty not only in developing their online pedagogy, but also in these questions of burnout, trauma, and stress.”

    [ad_2]

    Julian Roberts-Grmela

    Source link

  • I’m Part Of The ‘Graduating Class Of COVID.’ This Is What Sets Us Apart.

    I’m Part Of The ‘Graduating Class Of COVID.’ This Is What Sets Us Apart.

    [ad_1]

    There was no fanfare, interview or phone call — just a letter in a white embossed envelope confirming my college application’s success. I couldn’t celebrate with anyone physically, as we were locked down. I had a glass of wine on my balcony overlooking the park, alone.

    Like many students who started college in July 2020, I did the bulk of my degree under COVID conditions, graduating in March 2023 just as things began to open up. Though COVID-19 is being officially declared “over” worldwide, this graduating class is entering the workforce with a unique skill set borne of unprecedented conditions.

    My courses were completely online in the first year, including orientation week. Presenters spoke about how they met their future partners or made lifelong friends during their time in college. I couldn’t even see my classmates’ profile pictures. We had to keep the cameras off in our Zoom sessions to stop the screen from freezing. Most of the time I was staring at gray boxes.

    I sat at my manual stand-up desk in my spare room week after week, watching the pre-recorded lectures and live-streamed tutorials on my laptop, many of which seemed hastily cobbled together. I was 42 when I started college, so I had a lot of life experience beforehand. But this wasn’t the college experience I signed up for.

    My degree was supposed to be on campus. The pandemic meant mandatory online learning, which removed my choice of study mode. The group and environmental cues I normally rely on in a classroom setting were also gone. Though online learning isn’t new, courses designed specifically for virtual delivery have effective and existing systems in place to support students.

    COVID conditions required lecturers to quickly adapt the content they were used to teaching in-person to an online format using unfamiliar platforms. We lost valuable time figuring out how to work the system at the expense of the knowledge and practical activities we were there for.

    I expected lively debates that would spark ideas and strengthen or change my viewpoint. It’s hard to have a spirited discussion when the bandwidth only supports one person speaking at a time. I saw myself hanging out with my classmates in the library as we individually worked on our assignments, sharing the creative energy our ideas generated. Social distancing killed that vibe.

    As a writing student, I was lucky that my courses didn’t require hands-on experience. My friends studying nursing, dentistry and exercise physiology struggled to learn anatomy and course procedures through books and demonstration videos, while their specially equipped labs and workshops remained dormant.

    After eight months, we were told we’d be returning to some in-person classes on campus. Having studied only remotely, I found the transition stressful, abrupt and jarring. At home, I had everything set up for my comfort: drinks and snacks, two monitors, background music and effective temperature control. I could stop the videos when I needed a break or go back and listen to something I missed. Live tutorials don’t come with a pause button or 10-second rewind.

    I found myself simultaneously craving social connections with my peers and struggling to be around them. As much as I enjoyed the interaction of being back on campus, there was a sense of unease that was hard to ignore. Masks were uncomfortable to wear, made conversations challenging and served as a physical reminder of the unknown. I found the uncertainty mentally and emotionally draining.

    After the first year, a handful of on-campus events proceeded with strictly enforced conditions. I and a small number of other people volunteered with the Student Guild to help staff them. Volunteering is how I met most of my college friends. None of them was studying for the same degree as I was. I feel like I missed the chance to make more friends because of the lockdowns.

    This was my first time at college, so it’s hard to know what my experience could have been. I envisioned more parties, movie nights and random celebrations where I could meet people from different backgrounds. I imagined discussions and complaining about assignments over lunch or coffee. If they were still running, there might have also been opportunities for internships and projects to develop my skill set. I’m certain I would have gotten to know my peers better.

    Despite my challenges, I was fortunate to have a strong support network in my non-college friends. Knowing I had suffered from depression, panic attacks and anxiety in the past, I shared this and asked them to check in occasionally. These checks helped to keep me grounded and provided a break from academia.

    The pandemic pushed me to grow in ways I never imagined. I had always been an extrovert, thriving on social interaction and connecting with others. But with lockdowns and social-distancing measures in place, I was forced to confront my internal struggles on my own.

    I had to learn to open up and be vulnerable because the only way I could get through this unprecedented time was to ask for help when I was struggling. Since I was always striving for the illusion of perfection, that was a hard lesson to learn.

    Very few people escaped learning how to manage and adapt to change to survive the last few years. Higher education students who started or continued to study under COVID conditions also had the added pressure of doing it in an unpredictable environment while trying to train for our future roles. I believe this is what will set us apart from other generations.

    The students who rolled with change, who were resourceful and persevered with their degrees are better positioned to succeed. Those who can repurpose their pandemic experience into tangible abilities employers seek, like critical thinking, problem-solving and collaboration, will have a competitive edge.

    An article in the Higher Education Quarterly reports that the uneven recovery of global economies and industries post-COVID significantly affects graduates’ negative career outlooks. Over two-thirds of the 2,871 survey participants admitted struggling with job prospects after graduation because of the pandemic, despite feeling qualified for the jobs they applied for.

    My experiences are similar, although I am fortunate enough that my degree gives me a freelancing option. But the skills I developed have prepared me for uncertainty. The constant changes I encountered as we entered and exited multiple lockdown periods built resilience, the ability to think critically, to solve problems and to collaborate with others. These are also skills valued in any workplace.

    Though I may never have the experience of sitting in a lecture theater surrounded by hundreds of other students or engaging in the on-campus activities that were available pre-COVID, I believe that resilience and adaptability are survival skills that will serve me and every pandemic graduate in the future.

    Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Braless Years: How the Pandemic Changed How We Wear Underwear for Good

    The Braless Years: How the Pandemic Changed How We Wear Underwear for Good

    [ad_1]

    “Am I showing off my boobs? Or do I just have boobs…and exist?” asks TikTok creator Rachel Levin in a viral video from November 2021. Even though the clip is nearly two years old, the audio has continued to resonate among the platform’s users—nearly 11,000 posts using the sound bite exist, many of which feature women in tops of varying necklines, pondering the exact same question.

    This content is imported from Tiktok. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    Questioning how we view breasts—and exactly how visible they can be to remain “appropriate”—is nothing new. The “Free the Nipple” campaign began in 2012, and a film of the same name was released in 2014. The image of the “bra-burning feminist” is synonymous with the Women’s Liberation Movement of the 1960s and 1970s, although the actual burning of bras has since been proven to be a myth. But perhaps the most significant event regarding how society views wearing bras in recent history has been the COVID-19 pandemic. Beginning in March 2020, when offices shut down worldwide and remote work protocols were put into place, working in sweatpants, and often, braless, from one’s living room (or bed) became the new normal for many. In the years since the pandemic began, a shift away from traditional bras is tangible: remote work is still common, fashion trends like backless tops and sheer dresses are gracing red carpets, the body positivity movement is continuing to evolve, and bodily autonomy, in the wake of the overturn of Roe v. Wade, is at the forefront of our minds.

    Julia Fox in L.A. on May 11, 2023.

    Rachpoot/Bauer-Griffin

    For some, the onset of the pandemic was, in fact, the catalyst for saying goodbye to bras, and the practice has stuck. “I’m a 42H and I haven’t worn a bra since June 2020,” reveals Agnes Bebon, a marketing manager based in Montreal, who added that she overhauled her wardrobe when she made the decision to go braless because she “was finally dressing for myself and not hiding my body.” (Though she also notes that she does wear sports bra-like tops now, following back-to-office mandates.) “Bras were always uncomfortable, never fit right, and left marks on me. I stopped wearing them around the same time that I started making real efforts to like my body, and part of that was me accepting that, yeah, my boobs are big and they sag a bit, but that’s fine and I’m hot.”

    For Suze Heller, a writer and baker based in Asheville, North Carolina, letting go of bras during the early days of lockdown was for more than comfort. “Part of it was figuring out what was gender-affirming as my body changed in the last few years,” they said, noting that they went from wearing bralettes before the pandemic began to “no bra for a while and then binders and now sports bras.” The singularity of what is considered office appropriate has changed now that hybrid work is common, in that multiple people I interviewed mentioned wearing bralette-type undergarments to the office—something they never would have thought to do before COVID-19.

    The reasons for reevaluating one’s relationship with bras are plentiful, but a common thread appears to be a journey toward body neutrality. Victoria Paris, an influencer based in Los Angeles, also said she started wearing bras less frequently in 2020. “I think I just stopped caring as much about the way I looked because…I wasn’t going into an office, I wasn’t going to school. I wasn’t worried about how people saw me,” she says of her early COVID uniform, which consisted of oversized shirts and tank tops with no bra. Paris, who is known largely for her fashion, travel, and home decorating content and has had partnerships with brands like Urban Outfitters and Anthropologie, frequently posts photos of her outfits, many of them braless.

    And as confident as she may appear, the creator also admits that it wasn’t easy to start. As a teen and into her early twenties, “I was extremely insecure about not wearing a bra and the way that looked…even my breast shape,” Paris says. However, since she started going braless more frequently over the past three years, she’s felt empowered to start embracing the way her breasts look naturally. “For the longest time, I was so caught up over, ‘I don’t want saggy boobs,’ even though there’s nothing wrong with having saggy boobs. It’s natural, it’s beautiful, it’s womanly.” And when she posts a photo in which her nipples show or it’s clear she’s not wearing a bra? “Honestly, I feel like [my followers] never see me in a bra, so they wouldn’t even clock it. That’s just how they see me.”

    Unsurprisingly, the fashion world is catching on. Stacey Chia, a New York City-based communications manager at the fashion label Tanya Taylor says she’s noticed trends like “thicker fabrics on tops, backless dresses, [and] deep V-necklines that really mean you can’t wear a bra, and if you wanted some sort of coverage, you’d have to use nipple covers,” over the past few years that signify a cultural shift away from bras. As far as her own preferences go, she says she often opted for bralettes before the pandemic, but once it began, “I even found myself even ditching the bralettes, since I had a uniform of loose button-downs” throughout COVID, adding, “I think the pandemic opened us up to a new level of comfort with our bodies and other aspects of our lives as well.”

    brasserie ad

    A vintage brasserie ad.

    CSA Images

    Aja Barber, a London-based stylist and author of Consumed: The Need for Collective Change: Colonialism, Climate Change, and Consumerism, on the other hand, let go of bras years before the pandemic began, although lockdown did solidify her shift away from them for the long term. By her late twenties, in fact, Barber had become fed up with uncomfortable clothing, including tight-fitting trousers, heeled shoes, and, of course, bras. “I’ve never been a super keen bra wearer,” she says. “I’ve never been that excited about it. I’ve always thought that bra shopping was burdensome and annoying and money that I really didn’t want to spend in that direction.”

    As a way to still feel fashionable and put-together, “I would buy summer dresses that normally have some sort of tightness in the chest area to push things together and keep [my breasts] up. That’s how you get away with not wearing a bra,” she says of how her habit of going braless began. “But I fully expect that in my later years I will become that braless old woman, and I do not care at all.”

    Since Barber primarily works from home, her bralessness doesn’t pose any issues to her level of professionalism. Though she raises the point that there’s a great degree of privilege when it comes to who can go braless in professional or formal settings and still be taken seriously, reflecting on a former co-worker who was an “older white woman who would wear sweatpants and an old sweater and never a bra.” Barber notes, “I do think that there’s a bit of white privilege wrapped up in the ability to come to work looking that way. As a Black person, I don’t think I have that privilege ever.”

    Similarly, there’s a great deal of privilege when it comes to size, given that fatphobia remains present both in the workplace and the fashion industry. “I think it’s more acceptable for smaller breasted people to go braless, but I feel like if I [a D/DD] went braless, it would be very frowned upon,” says Megan Watson, a Chicago-based environmental consultant. “And especially for fat and plus size people—I feel like it adds to the anti-fat rhetoric if we don’t wear bras, i.e., we don’t care about our appearances, we don’t put in the effort, etc…,” she adds.

    Conversely, the early days of quarantine have pushed some to discover a new appreciation for the pulled-together feeling that wearing a bra can provide. “At the beginning of quarantine, I relished in the ability to wear leggings and a sweater and call it a day,” says Caldwell Harden, a client services manager based in New York City. “But as quarantine lagged on, I just grew tired of not making an effort with my outfits and I started really thinking about how I got dressed every day. Soon, I started seeing a correlation in the effort I put into my outfit and my outlook towards the day.” Eventually, Harden returned to wearing a bra on a daily basis.

    “I find when I don’t wear a bra, I usually am putting less effort into my appearance generally, and I just feel less prepared to take on the day,” Harden says. “My clothes and style are a type of armor for me to face the world, and my bras and undergarments are the chainmail.”

    paris, france march 01 rihanna attends the jean paul gaultier show as part of the paris fashion week womenswear fallwinter 2014 2015 on march 1, 2014 in paris, france photo by michel dufourwireimage

    Rihanna attends Jean Paul Gaultier’s fall/winter 2014/2015 show during Paris Fashion Week.

    Michel Dufour

    Wearing (or not wearing) a bra is a personal choice, of course, though it’s also worth considering what its fundamental purpose is. “Bras can be helpful for women who have breast pain, which is very common, because, if properly fitted, the bra can provide support to the breast and can help reduce discomfort,” says Dr. Deanna J. Attai, MD, FACS, an associate clinical professor in the Department of Surgery at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine and the UCLA Health Burbank Breast Care. She also mentioned that a supportive bra is usually recommended for “at least during the immediate postoperative period” for people who have undergone surgery. Otherwise, Dr. Attai says, “There are no good medical reasons for or against wearing a bra.”

    If there are no serious health risks to going braless, and if not wearing a bra is now considered acceptable, and even stylish in many circumstances given the cultural shift of the past three years, it might be time to rethink what we believe is palatable when it comes to breasts, what feels comfortable, sexy, and gender-affirming, and, most importantly, who really gets to decide what we do with our breasts.

    ElleElle Lettermark logo

    Madeline Diamond a writer and editor with bylines in Buy Side from WSJ, New York magazine, Travel + Leisure, and more. Originally from Southern California, she now lives in Brooklyn and can often be found in her favorite park, cappuccino in hand.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Consumers are starting to fire up China’s pandemic-battered economy, two ETF experts find

    Consumers are starting to fire up China’s pandemic-battered economy, two ETF experts find

    [ad_1]

    China’s pandemic-battered economy is starting to see consumers open their wallets wider, according to KraneShares’ Brendan Ahern.

    “We’re seeing the incremental rebound from the Chinese consumer,” the firm’s chief investment officer told “ETF Edge” this week. “[But] it’s not like turning on a light switch.”

    The National Bureau of Statistics of China reports retail sales have been increasing since last November.

    Ahern, who’s involved with the firm’s China-focused ETFs, expects quarterly earnings for Chinese companies to improve with each consecutive quarter — a forecast that may already be unfolding.

    Tech giants Baidu and Tencent beat revenue expectations for the fiscal first quarter of 2023. Alibaba, on the other hand, missed revenue estimates.

    “We’re actually hearing that for many of the companies … in the management calls, they’re speaking to how Q2 already is outpacing Q1, which outpaced Q4 of last year,” Ahern said.

    China’s reopening is also anticipated to have a positive impact on the airline industry.

    Singapore Airlines, Japan’s All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines all noted demand from China as a factor in future earnings while reporting net profits earlier this month for the financial year ended March 2023.

    GraniteShares’ Will Rhind sees a similar growth trajectory.

    “Domestic travel [is] rebounding … but we’ve yet to see that from the international sector,” the ETF provider’s CEO said. “It will come, but maybe just not yet.”

    Rhind told CNBC in a special interview later in the week that international travel from China could start to rebound this summer following a sluggish start.

    His forecast comes as a government-backed epidemiologist said the country’s new Covid wave could infect 65 million a week by the end of next month.

    Rhind believes the recent Covid surge won’t affect the reopening’s trajectory, adding past lockdowns seen across China are “very, very much unlikely to be repeated.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • DeSantis And Trump Fight Over Who Handled The COVID-19 Pandemic Worse

    DeSantis And Trump Fight Over Who Handled The COVID-19 Pandemic Worse

    [ad_1]

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and Donald Trump, both declared candidates in the 2024 presidential election, are swatting back and forth at each other over how each handled the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Though most critics of Trump’s actions during the pandemic have accused him of undermining public health guidance, downplaying the severity of the disease and pushing a litany of unverified treatments, DeSantis claimed during a podcast appearance Thursday that Trump had actually delegated too much power to Dr. Anthony Fauci, then the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, throughout the pandemic.

    “I think he did great for three years, but when he turned the country over to Fauci in March of 2020, that destroyed millions of people’s lives,” DeSantis said of Trump on “The Glenn Beck Program,” a day after announcing his candidacy. “And in Florida, we were one of the few that stood up, cut against the grain, took incoming fire from media, bureaucracy, the left, even a lot of Republicans, had school open, preserved businesses.”

    In reality, Florida had the third-highest number of COVID-related deaths in 2021, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In terms of deaths per capita, Florida ranked 18th among the states for that year. In general, blue states had the lower rates of deaths while red states had the highest, data shows.

    Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis talk to each other at a 2018 “Make America Great Again” rally in Tampa, Florida, when DeSantis was running for governor.

    CARLOS BARRIA via Reuters

    Trump also repeatedly ignored and undermined Fauci’s guidance on the pandemic and loudly criticized him when the doctor’s comments on the health crisis veered from Trump’s vision for reopening the economy.

    In a campaign video Thursday, Trump took his own swipe at DeSantis, saying he was the one who poorly managed the COVID-19 response.

    “When the Ron ‘DeSanctimonious’ facts come out, you will see that he is better than most Democrat governors but very average, at best, compared to Republican governors, who have done a fantastic job,” Trump said in a campaign video.

    “Even [former New York Gov. Andrew] Cuomo did better,” Trump hurled at DeSantis, referencing COVID-19 deaths in each state. “He shut down everything, including the beaches.”

    From a public health perspective, neither Trump nor DeSantis did a good job of protecting people during the COVID-19 pandemic, and both put many people at risk for the sake of political gain, critics and infectious disease experts say.

    DeSantis jabbed at Trump again during an appearance on “The Ben Shapiro Show” on Friday.

    “He responded [to the pandemic] by elevating Anthony Fauci and really turning over the reins to Dr. Fauci, and I think to terrible consequences for the United States.”

    DeSantis asserted that he would have ousted Fauci had he been in Trump’s position during the first years of the pandemic.

    “If I’m president — somebody like Fauci is in the government, I will bring them in and I will tell them two things. You’re fired,” the Florida governor said, even though the president would not actually have the power to directly fire someone like Fauci, who was not a political appointee.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pfizer’s Paxlovid still free, for now, after FDA grants full approval to COVID drug

    Pfizer’s Paxlovid still free, for now, after FDA grants full approval to COVID drug

    [ad_1]

    The Biden administration will continue to manage the distribution of free courses of Pfizer’s Paxlovid treatment for COVID-19 for at least another few months, the drugmaker said, even after the Food and Drug Administration granted Pfizer full approval Thursday to market the pills.

    “At this time, the U.S. government will continue to oversee the distribution of PAXLOVID, and U.S. residents eligible for PAXLOVID will continue to receive the medicine at no charge,” Pfizer said in a release.

    Federal officials have previously said that the widely-expected approval of the drug, as well as the unwinding of the public health emergency earlier this month, would have no immediate impact on distribution of government-bought supplies of the pills. 

    “We bought a little bit more anticipating a winter surge that never really materialized. And we don’t want the American people to pay twice,” Dawn O’Connell, head of the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, said at an event hosted by the Health Affairs journal last week.

    O’Connell’s agency, ASPR, has distributed nearly 14 million courses of Pfizer’s pills to date. Around 9.3 million of those have been reported administered to patients across the country. 

    The Biden administration still has around 9.6 million courses of the pills in its stockpile that have yet to be distributed.

    “If we’ve purchased it for them with their taxpayer dollars, we want to make what we’ve purchased available to them for free, as we’ve been promising,” said O’Connell. 

    Planning to end free Paxlovid

    O’Connell said officials have been actively planning for the end of their supply of free Paxlovid, which would mean Pfizer’s drug would switch to the commercial market

    That means Americans’ access to the drug would now become the same as other medications that require navigating insurance and pharmacies to fill their prescriptions. 

    “We weren’t designed, nor has there been an expectation that we would continue to do that ad infinitum for future generations of vaccines and therapies. And we know that we’ve not been funded to do that,” said O’Connell. 

    Pfizer has not disclosed a list price for its Paxlovid pills for once they launch commercially in the U.S. later this year. 

    The company had been selling it in China for reportedly around $292, state media reported in January. The Biden administration had paid around $530 per course for its supply, which is close to the range outside experts said would be cost-effective for the drug.

    Pfizer has said it plans to “help ensure the appropriate patient support programs are in place” for underinsured Americans who cannot afford the drugs. The U.S. also plans to cover administration costs of the drug as part of its “bridge access program” through pharmacies.

    Both the drugmaker and O’Connell said that switch will likely come by the end of this year, dictated in part by when government stocks run low. Health authorities are also preparing to end distribution of current government-bought vaccines, ahead of expected updates this fall.

    “There’s a lot of complexity here. So simply thinking about this: vaccine, probably in the fall, treatment, probably sometime in the late summer or fall, we’ll start seeing that switch over,” then-White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha said earlier this month, in a webinar published by the Annals of Internal Medicine journal.

    No off-label Paxlovid yet

    The FDA’s approved label for Paxlovid is limited to treating infected “adults who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19.” 

    Doctors typically have the freedom to prescribe fully approved drugs “off-label” for other reasons to their patients, beyond the FDA’s approval.

    But because Paxlovid has only been allowed under emergency use authorization, doctors could not prescribe the drug for any unapproved reason outside of clinical trials, like for treating long COVID symptoms or to try and prevent infections

    Since all current U.S. supplies of the drug were labeled under emergency use authorization, this restriction will effectively remain for now.

    The agency will continue its emergency authorization to allow Paxlovid for eligible children ages 12 and older, as well as to permit pharmacists to prescribe it. 

    “PAXLOVID that is labeled for use under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) remains subject to the terms and conditions of the EUA,” James McKinney, an FDA spokesperson, said in a statement.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Broadway attendance recovers to pre-pandemic levels

    Broadway attendance recovers to pre-pandemic levels

    [ad_1]

    Attendance figures for New York City’s Broadway theaters rose about 45% this past season compared to the year before, indicating a return to pre-pandemic levels, according to numbers released Tuesday.

    For the 2022-23 season, Broadway attendance reached 12.28 million, according to the Broadway League, a trade association for the theater industry. The season, which ran from May 2022 to April 2023, marked the first full season since Broadway returned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Those numbers were a significant increase from the shortened 2021-22 season, which saw attendance reach 6.73 million, the Broadway League reported.

    Broadway was shuttered by the pandemic for about a year-and-a-half, from March of 2020 to September of 2021.

    Broadway Moulin Rouge
    The cast during the curtain call of “Moulin Rouge! The Musical” on Broadway at The Al Hirschfeld Theatre on April 11, 2023, in New York City. 

    Bruce Glikas/Getty Images


    The 2022-23 season saw Broadway gross $1.578 billion in box office revenue, up from $845 million the year before, per the Broadway League.

    88.4% of seats were filled for the 11,506 performances of the 2022-23 season, the Broadway League added.

    “Broadway is making a strong rebound as audiences are returning to New York City to experience extraordinary live theatre,” said Charlotte St. Martin, President of The Broadway League, in a statement.

    For comparison, in 2018-19, attendance hit 14.77 million and the box office gross totaled $1.829 billion, both Broadway records.

    Broadway had 40 new shows open last season, along with 35 returning productions. Of those new shows, 15 were musicals and 24 were plays, according to the Broadway League. Last month, “The Phantom of the Opera,” the longest running show in Broadway history, held its final performance. The show had been on Broadway since January of 1988. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link