ReportWire

Tag: Courteney Cox

  • Jennifer Aniston and Jim Curtis Step Out with Courteney Cox and Johnny McDaid for Malibu Double Date

    [ad_1]

    Jennifer Aniston is embracing date nights with her new boyfriend, Jim Curtis. The actress was spotted enjoying dinner at Nobu in Malibu on Monday, August 18, alongside her best friend Courteney Cox and Cox’s longtime partner, musician Johnny McDaid.

    According to photos obtained by PEOPLE, Cox and McDaid left the restaurant first, followed by Aniston and Curtis. Aniston looked chic in jeans paired with a tied-waist jacket, while Curtis kept it casual in a denim button-down shirt and trousers, walking with the support of a cane. Cox opted for a denim jacket layered over a long satin skirt, while McDaid chose an all-black look.

    Jennifer Aniston and Jim Curtis enjoy Malibu dinner date

    The evening marked another public outing for Jennifer Aniston and Jim Curtis, who have been dating for a few months. The pair first sparked headlines in July when they were photographed vacationing together on a yacht in Mallorca, Spain. Curtis, an author and life coach specializing in hypnotherapy, was even spotted giving Aniston a shoulder massage during the trip.

    Aniston had also included one of his books, Shift Quantum Manifestation Guide: A Workbook for Coding a New Consciousness, in a May Instagram post. Fans later noticed Curtis had left a flirty comment on her social media in April, hinting at their budding relationship.

    Here’s how Jennifer Aniston met Jim Curtis

    A source shared that Aniston and Curtis were introduced by mutual friends. “They were introduced by a friend and started out as friends. Jen had read his book and was familiar with his work. She’s really into self-help and wellness. They are dating, but it’s still casual,” the insider revealed.

    The source added that Aniston is in a positive phase of her life. “She’s been happy on her own, but she’s also open to sharing her life with someone. As long as it feels right. Jen’s in a very good place right now – grounded, fulfilled and very happy.”

    Courteney Cox and Johnny McDaid join the double date

    Courteney Cox and Johnny McDaid, who have been together since 2013, joined the couple for the Malibu outing. This wasn’t the first time Aniston and Curtis have enjoyed a double date. Earlier this month, they dined in New York with Aniston’s close friend Jason Bateman and his wife, Amanda Anka, spending three hours together in the West Village.

    A source told US Weekly, “They are happy and really into each other. They’ve been hanging out a lot, but very much on the DL at her home in LA.”

    ALSO READ: Are Madison Beer and Justin Herbert Dating? NFL Star Spotted on Music Video Set

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Naive Hope Invoked by a New Year As Presented by Counting Crows’ “A Long December”

    The Naive Hope Invoked by a New Year As Presented by Counting Crows’ “A Long December”

    [ad_1]

    In the winter of 1996, the Counting Crows’ lead singer Adam Duritz composed the lyrics for a song that would be called “A Long December,” eventually released on Britney Spears’ birthday (three short years before the world would know who Spears was), December 2nd. Leaving the entire month to let listeners either take the song as a call to suicide based on its sound, or as an urging to have hope for the new year based on the lyrics themselves. The ones that naively assure, “It’s been a long December and there’s reason to believe/Maybe this year will be better than the last.”

    Such a foolish statement to make, of course. Especially for anyone who’s lived more than a decade on this planet. But, as it is said, “Hope dies last” (thus, 28 Days Later proves humans keep going even when they should very clearly commit suicide). They say it’s the greatest testament to human strength and fortitude, but sometimes one can’t help but think it’s the greatest testament to human stupidity…and willful selfishness. The fact that, year after year, the worse the world gets, the more people become invested in the idea of their own personal well-being and “growth.” As though “turning inward” and becoming increasingly blind to the collective injustices wrought upon humanity is the best and only way to cope. Maybe it is. 

    In 1996, the Year of Our “A Long December,” things were still, objectively speaking, slightly more “hunky-dory” than they are now. At least, one has to admit, climate change-wise. Hence, 2023’s transition into 2024 marking headlines like, “World will look back at 2023 as year humanity exposed its inability to tackle climate crisis, scientists say.” But since when has anyone ever listened to scientists (as 2020’s pandemic very clearly demarcated)? Not until it’s too late and the forewarning guidance is effectively rendered useless. Even on the U.S. political front, things were undeniably, let’s say “more manageable.” Not only was it pre-Clinton sex scandal, it was pre-existence-of-Trump-as-a-presidential-thought. With the advent of 2024, and the unfathomable reality that Trump somehow has yet another viable shot at the presidency despite being impeached twice, well, that should be enough to indicate, without a shadow of doubt, to even the most Pollyanna-esque of optimists that things don’t really get better with a new year. The more time wears on, in fact, the more it all has the potential to go horribly awry rather than become increasingly “repaired.” Perhaps that’s why when Duritz sing-speaks, “Maybe this year will be better than the last,” it sounds rather half-hearted and unconvincing. 

    Written in response to a friend being run over by a car and getting badly injured, Duritz’s intent was to reflect on the pain of the past, while also looking forward to the “promise” of the future (even if, the older you get, the more society renders you invisible). At that time, it was Duritz’s glamorous present he might have chosen to reflect on, which, one supposes, he kind of did by including Courteney Cox in the video, directed by Lawrence Carroll. Indeed, it was after appearing in the video that the two started dating…this also being not long after Duritz already dabbled with another “Friend’s” vagina: Jennifer Aniston. So yes, his 90s present offered plenty to feel positive about. So did a lot of people’s 90s present, in fact. It seemed as though a general hopefulness had washed over most of the decade, in spite of it heralding the twenty-four-hour “tabloid news” cycle that would create a new breed of desensitization in the twenty-first century. 

    But before that aspect of political fear-mongering and overexposed celebrity culture became so absurd, Duritz was able to feature Cox in his video with little fanfare (or not as much as there would have been in a post-TMZ world). With the segments divvied up to give both parties essentially the same amount of screen time, Cox is mostly shown in a dark, uber-depressing room that smacks of a prison cell as she sits on a bench next to a table and holds crumpled-up notes in her hand. The video also features a bevy of dates, including August 6th (incidentally, the same day that Hiroshima was bombed), indicating the temporal progress of the year, ergo the forceful and fierce passage of time that eventually portends all of our demises. This much is evoked via the scenes of Duritz and Cox featured throughout the video that soon become nothing more than Polaroid snapshots—the moments of their lives reduced to mere “recorded memories” (so it is that Duritz notes, “I can’t remember all the times I tried to tell my myself/To hold on to these moments as they pass”). The snow falling ambiently for most of the video also emphasizes the point of winter, the ultimate symbolism of “the end” of something. Whether an actual life, or the signal of a new beginning. However mundane or inauspicious it might be. 

    Cox’s “character” in the video gradually grapples with that reality. Slowly coming to accept Duritz’s (and most people grasping at straws for some sliver of hope) philosophy that “life is what you make of it”—or some shit. No matter how ugly it all might get. The important thing, they insist, is to maintain a positive outlook (e.g., “It’s been so long since I’ve seen the ocean/I guess I should”). Yet even Duritz, for as optimistic as he tries to remain throughout this melancholic-sounding song, lets a more than faint trace of “cynicism” trickle in with the line, “And the feeling that it’s all a lot of oysters, but no pearls.” Perhaps the only truly honest observation Duritz makes throughout the still beloved “New Year’s single.” 

    Which is why it’s so fleeting—barely detectable in the song for the undiscerning ear. Instead, all anyone can really hear is the hopeful tinge of, “It’s been a long December and there’s reason to believe/Maybe this year will be better than the last.” Even though, as any pragmatist knows, the lyrics, of course, should go, “It’s been a long December and there’s absolutely no reason to believe/That this year could possibly be better than the last.” The laws of devolution simply can’t make it so. And oh, how the devolution keeps progressing.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • ‘Shining Vale’ Creator Breaks Down That Season 2 Twist — and Courteney Cox’s ‘Holy S—!’ Reaction to It

    ‘Shining Vale’ Creator Breaks Down That Season 2 Twist — and Courteney Cox’s ‘Holy S—!’ Reaction to It

    [ad_1]

    SPOILER ALERT: This story contains spoilers for “Smile,” the fourth episode of Season 2 of “Shining Vale,” now streaming on the Starz app.

    With each passing episode on the set of Starz’s horror comedy “Shining Vale,” Greg Kinnear made a habit of asking co-creator Jeff Astrof how he planned to get the characters out of the spooky corners he backed them into.

    “And every time I told him, ‘Just trust me, we’re gonna get out of it,’” Astrof tells Variety. But even he admits the latest twist required some extra explaining.

    In the final moments of Episode 4, mere minutes after Pat (Courteney Cox) and Terry (Kinnear) tell their children Gaynor (Gus Birney) and Jake (Dylan Gage) they are getting a divorce, Pat learns she is pregnant. The baby could be amnesiac Terry’s, with whom Pat had reconnected before he learned about his wife’s affair –– again. But given the nature of the haunted house series, it is far more likely the baby was conceived during the demonic dream orgy Pat found herself at the center of during last week’s episode.

    After pitching the twist, Astrof says the logical first question that arose in the writers room was a respectful but realistic ”How?” Even Cox, who is 59 years old, questioned the viability of the pregnancy –– if only for a moment.

    “Courteney was, of course, very game for it,” Astrof says. “When I first told her, she said, “Wow, holy shit! How are you going to do that?” I just said, “We’ll do it if you’ll do it!” And she was all in.”

    Astrof confirms Pat’s pregnancy will launch “Shining Vale” into a full-fledged “Rosemary’s Baby” homage –– if that gives viewers any indication of who the father might be. But the twist itself is actually rooted in co-creator Sharon Horgan’s pilot script.

    “Going back to Sharon’s original pages, she has this quote that opens our series that said, ‘Women are more than twice as likely as men to be depressed or demonically possessed –– and the symptoms are the same.’” Astrof says. “I did a deep dive on that, and basically a lot of it is because of hormones. There is something called hormonal schizophrenia, and the other groups that experience these mood changes and almost demonic-like symptoms are adolescents, which we have in Gaynor — and pregnant women. I thought that was fantastic.”

    Courtesy of Hilary Bronwyn Gayle/Starz

    The show has been laying the groundwork for this twist all season, especially with the introduction of Mira Sorvino’s new role as the empathetic, but nosy neighbor, Ruth. The character’s name is a nod to Ruth Gordon, who won an Oscar for playing the sinister neighbor Minnie in 1968’s “Rosemary’s Baby.” After Sorvino played the aptly named Rosemary, the murderous housewife haunting Pat in Season 1, Astrof said he was happy to hand the Oscar winner a new character to feast on. But he struggled with telling her that character would be based on Gordon.

    “Every single person fought me on it but I said, “I’m not having Mira go from playing a ghost who masturbates in a bathtub to playing Ruth Gordon,” he says, laughing. “I just can’t do it! I couldn’t have that conversation with Mira. We wanted to give her more.”

    This led to the introduction of Sorvino’s second new character this season –– Nellie Bly, the real-life journalist who had herself committed to an asylum in 1887 to author an exposé on the treatment of patients. The arrival of the character, who appears to Pat in a dream-like state, finally explains the photo Pat saw as she was being committed in the Season 1 finale — an image of an old asylum orderly who looked a lot like Rosemary.

    “We did a lot of deep dives on women’s sanitariums, and we thought it would be interesting if what Pat saw was real, or at least thought it was real,” Astrof says. “So we thought, let’s have Mira do it.”

    It is Nellie who terrifyingly delivers the news of Pat’s bundle of joy (or dread?) at the end of the episode, written in blood on her arm.

    But “Rosemary’s Baby” won’t be the only classic horror movie given a spotlight this season. In recent episodes, Gaynor has become convinced she inherited the mental instability that landed her mother and her grandmother (Judith Light) in the asylum. This week’s encounter with a man in a black hat standing under a streetlamp outside her window doesn’t convince her otherwise. The image is an instantly recognizable nod to “The Exorcist,” which could mean Gaynor needs a visit from a holier power to break the family cycle.

    “I love Gus as an actor, and I wanted to see how much I could write for her,” Astrof says. “I just don’t think we have found her ceiling yet. Plus, you get claustrophobic sometimes in a haunted house story. How many times can Pat see a ghost that isn’t a ghost? I had family trauma growing up, and it affected me, and who I am. That’s what family trauma does, and we want to explore that with Gaynor.”

    Fresh trauma to sort through could be on the horizon as the Phelps family grapples with the reality of their newest addition, and Astrof took it all as a personal challenge to prove that Pat is not past her “Rosemary’s Baby” prime.

    “I was just excited to see what could happen with this story, and I like the idea that Pat and Terry split up only to then have to face this unexpected life cycle later in life,” he says. “Plus, it gives us a chance to do some really spooky shit.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New York Comes Across As Generically As Woodsboro in Scream VI

    New York Comes Across As Generically As Woodsboro in Scream VI

    [ad_1]

    For all the promotional hype surrounding the latest installment in the Scream franchise (officially poking fun at itself for having become that) and how it takes place in New York, there is surprisingly little riffing on that fact. Indeed, if one had anticipated that New York might be the “fifth character” (à la Sex and the City) among the self-described “Core Four” in Scream VI (stylized so that the Roman numeral serves as the “M” in the title), they would be sorely mistaken.

    To be blunt, the only time we really get a “taste of NYC” is during the clips deliberately accented in the trailer. Apart from those (featuring the requisite “bodega” and “subway” scenes), the closest we get to a sense of place is when Samara Weaving steps in for Drew Barrymore’s (as Casey Becker) memorable opening sequence from the original. Weaving plays Laura Crane, a woman waiting for an app-culled date at some “trendy” bar on “Hudson Street” (not really though—for even that is faked in Montreal). As the two go back and forth about how, essentially, they still feel too “uncool” for New York and places like said bar, they both state that they’ve only been in town for a matter of months. In addition, Laura makes mention of being a Film Studies professor specializing in the slasher genre. Clearly, things really have gotten too niche in our post-post-post-post-post-post-modern world. Particularly in academia (already poked fun of saliently in White Noise). After getting her to believe he’s hopelessly lost and can’t find the restaurant, soon enough, Laura’s “date” is able to lure her outside and into an alley. Of course, it’s not really Laura’s date, and it’s not even really New York either—what with so many locations filmed in Montreal.

    This includes one of the other “indelible” New York moments when Samantha “Sam” Carpenter (Melissa Barrera) and Tara Carpenter (Jenna Ortega) find themselves cornered in a bodega with the latest Ghostface. Called “Abe’s Snake Bodega” (the dead giveaway of it not being “Real New York” is that it feels the need to add “Bodega” into its name at all), the scene was shot in Montreal’s Notre-Dame-de-Grâce neighborhood. As were many others doubling as “the greatest city in the world.” Which, as usual, has shown itself to be highly recreatable in [insert other major city here]. And, contrary to popular belief, it’s not because it’s so “indelible” and “unique,” but because it has mutated into its own worst fear: the average metropolis. Something that other major cities haven’t fallen prey to quite so easily. Even San Francisco, for all the talk of the “tech bros” coming in and changing the face of the landscape with their presence, has not succumbed so effortlessly to a generic makeover as New York, particularly Manhattan and most of North Brooklyn (spreading with more and more ease to South Brooklyn and beyond).

    The vast majority of these two particular “sects” of New York have been overrun with corporate takeovers touting (unspokenly) how great it is not only to sell the city back to itself at an even higher price, but also how “necessary” it is to present the city with an array of new job opportunities for its burgeoning young workforce (emphasis on the word “young,” because that’s the demographic most willing to bend over for low-wage employment). Sam is ostensibly one of those youths, as Tara is certain to call her out for having two shitty jobs and no other real reason for being in town apart from monitoring her sister with stalker-like precision.

    To this point, Tara unwittingly brings up a larger issue about New York: that no one would ever go there without an “ambition.” That to go there “just to be there” is not only unheard of, but rather unhinged (perhaps part of the reason it’s so easy to paint Sam that way). Even as a “la-di-da” artist, it’s unfathomable to arrive in town without some cold, hard “goals.” For, unlike other cities that serve as “artistic havens,” New York isn’t solely about “being an artist” for the mere sake of it. More than any other “bohemia” hotspot, it is a place where you’re not only “supposed to” monetize your art, but where you have to if you want to actually survive without being ejected. And who could possibly want to be exiled from such a “fun” place? Where all worth and value is placed on the money you make (this capitalistic reality being on steroids compared to most other cities). In the alternate version of Scream VI that makes better use of its setting, Ghostface isn’t just out for some petty revenge on any of the remaining characters involved in the “legacy murders.” He’s also got personal beef against all of the pretentious, pseudo-influential fucks roaming the streets trying to “hustle” their so-called talents. Call him Patrick Bateman, but less arbitrary/prone to killing the poorest of the poor (a.k.a. the homeless). This making the randomness of the kills far more rife.

    Alas, some would say Kevin Williamson’s original version was never about such a message—with the core of it cutting to what Randy (Jamie Kennedy) said in the 1996 movie: “It’s the millennium. Motives are incidental.” This adding to the “fear factor” of the slasher behind the mask being anyone, at anytime. And yet, “motives” have remained decidedly not incidental for being in New York. In fact, they’ve remained steadfastly the same: you go there to “become” someone. To “make it.” Rarely, if ever, is being there about “disappearing,” as the Carpenter sisters want to do. For, despite the presence of the huddled masses, NYC is among the most visible places a person could “escape to.” Even so, its “singular” visibility (largely contributed to by everyone taking a picture of themselves on every corner where you could potentially be in the background) doesn’t mean it hasn’t long been recreatable in other locations.

    And sure, filming in more affordable environments meant to be New York is nothing new. In the 80s and 90s, Chicago easily doubled for “Gotham” (literally, in The Dark Knight’s case), even in a film like Escape From New York—with the city itself built right into the title. What’s more, look at what a series such as Friends did to recreate the town in a prophecy-like manner on a Burbank backlot. Friends, for as eye-rolled at as it is in the present, had a crystal ball-like use in foreseeing just how increasingly generic the city would become. This, in large part, thanks to stamping out all traces of the very populations that once made it unique with a little phenomenon called “eugenics of the poor.” And pretty much everyone is poor when they live in New York. The Carpenter sisters included. In effect, it has become easier and easier to bill the city as Anywhere, USA (or, in this instance, Anywhere, Canada) because it has lost all sense of the “personal touches” that once made it stand apart from garden-variety corporate infiltration.

    Even NYU has something of the “corporate effect” on the city it profits from. To that end, the university name “Blackmore” (where Tara attends)—actually Montreal’s McGill University—could very well be a dig at NYU needing to up its Black person “quota.” As for other set design details intended to “serve” New York, the use of a Chock Full o’Nuts ad at a reconstructed subway station reads, “Hipsters Like It. But Drink It Anyway.” This, of course, is meant to lend greater “authenticity” to an ersatz New York, despite the reality that “hipster” is a word that has been rendered so oversaturated that it has become meaningless and irrelevant…almost like New York itself. Another notable “subtlety” that actually has nothing to do with New York is a sign that reads, “Le Domas Financial Group.” This name being too much of a coincidence not to apply to the family moniker in Ready or Not, starring none other than the woman playing the first to be killed: Samara Weaving. But, more to the point, Scream (2022) and Scream VI’s co-directors, Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett also directed Ready or Not. Just as the co-screenwriters of Scream (2022) and Scream VI, Guy Busick and James Vanderbilt, also co-wrote Ready or Not. And yes, James is a member of that illustriously moneyed New York family, the Vanderbilts (no wonder he wrote a script like Ready or Not). So perhaps the transition to NYC as the latest Scream location was his idea.

    Whoever determined the “change-up” environment, one must ask: what was really the purpose of setting Scream VI in New York? Especially if the movie wasn’t going to maximize the erstwhile “uniqueness” of the town to its utmost. After all, a subway scene can be done in any major city (even L.A.). The same goes for filming in darkened streets and alleys. Scream VI proved that much by shooting in Montreal. Where more indelible landmarks, like the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Chrysler Building, etc. (all ideal locations for a stabbing, by the way) can’t be so effortlessly remade “in a pinch” as subway stations and a bodega. To be fair, Scream VI offered a token scene of the Carpenter sisters briefly walking around in “Central Park.” After all, that’s where the movie poster embeds the image of Ghostface’s screaming visage with an overhead shot of the park’s greenery and repositioned lakes. Nonetheless, with a tagline like “New York. New Rules,” one might have been expecting slightly more dependency on the location.

    As only the third Scream movie to take place outside of Woodsboro (with Scream 2 set at the fictional Windsor College in Ohio and Scream 3 set in Los Angeles—used with far more panache and specificity, particularly with the rapey producer angle that eerily mirrored the likes of Harvey Weinstein), the pressure on Scream VI to “really do something” with such a divergent (and non-fictional) location was perhaps too great.

    Admittedly, however, Scream is never really about location. The fact that it began in an Anywhere, USA type of town was meant to highlight that—in addition to providing the chilling idea that “nowhere is safe” (something coronavirus has made good on repeatedly since 2020)—the biggest freaks can so often live outside of major metropolises. But, as for the concept of nowhere being safe, that’s something that’s long been alive and well in NYC—at a zenith in the 1970s, complete with a pamphlet warning tourists, “Welcome to Fear City.” Indeed, the reaper-esque image that appears on the cover of the pamphlet could easily pass for Ghostface himself (call it another botched chance to pay much of any real homage to the city in which Scream VI takes place). And, to be candid, the lily-livered snowflakes who turn out to be Ghostface in Scream VI would have no chance of not getting stabbed themselves in that era that can now be referred to as Pre-Generic New York.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link