ReportWire

Tag: court case

  • Commentary: A California lawyer takes the civil rights fight home to Minneapolis

    [ad_1]

    How do you find the missing?

    If you do find them, how can you help?

    Oakland civil rights attorney James Cook has been on the ground in Minnesota for months figuring out answers to these question as he goes.

    A fast-talking Minneapolis native who still lives in the Twin Cities part time, Cook is one of a handful of attorneys who have dropped everything to aid (for free) those caught up in the federal crackdown — protesters, immigrants and detained citizens — too many of whom have found themselves facing deportation, arrest or even been disappeared, at least for a time.

    Civil rights attorney James Cook in the rear view mirror as he makes phone calls in his car in Minneapolis.

    (Caroline Yang/For The Times)

    “They are leaders that are on the ground really helping people through this process,” Minnesota school board member Chauntyll Allen told me.

    She’s one of the protesters arrested inside a local church, charged with conspiracy to deprive others of their constitutional rights by Pam Bondi’s politicized Department of Justice, which also Friday arrested journalist Don Lemon for the same incident. Cook is one of the lawyers now representing Allen.

    “It shows us that the judicial arm, or some of the judicial arm of our democracy, is willing to step up and ensure that our democracy stands strong,” Allen said of Cook and others like him.

    While it’s the images of clashes in the streets that captivate media and audiences, it’s lawyers like Cook who are fighting an existential battle in the background to preserve the rule of law in a place where it is increasing opaque, to put it gently.

    The legal work behind detentions has largely been an overlooked battlefield that will likely rage on years after ICE departs the streets, leaving in its wake hundreds if not thousands of long-and-winding court cases.

    Beyond the personal fates they will determine, the outcome of the civil litigation Cook and others are spearheading will likely force whatever transparency and accountability can be pulled from these chaotic and troubling times.

    It’s time-consuming and complicated work vital not just to people, but history.

    Or, as Cook puts it, “I’ll be 10 years older when all this s— resolves.”

    Federal agents stand guard against a growing wall of protesters on Jan. 24 in Minneapolis.

    Federal agents stand guard against a growing wall of protesters on Jan. 24 in Minneapolis, just hours after Alex Pretti was shot by federal agents.

    (Caroline Yang/For The Times)

    Cook told me this while on his way to the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building where some detainees are being held, maybe. It’s hard to find out. A few years ago, when immigration enforcement in Minnesota ramped up under the first Trump term, activists tried to get the name of the building changed, arguing Whipple, the first Protestant Episcopal bishop in the state, had been an advocate of the marginalized and wouldn’t want his name associated with what the feds were up to.

    It didn’t work, but the movement’s slogan, “What would Whipple do?” still has resonance in this town, where two American citizens, Alex Pretti and Renee Good, have been fatally shot while protesting — incidents ugly enough that Bruce Springsteen wrote a song about them.

    Cook is well aware that the guns carried by the federal agents are not for show, even without the Boss’ new ballad. Just a few days ago, one of the first times he drove his beat-up truck up to the gate, the federal guards at Whipple pointed their guns at him.

    “I’m like, ‘Hey, I’m going to take my keys out of the ignition, drop them on the ground. So please don’t shoot,’” he said.

    They lowered the guns, but Cook was scared, a feeling that doesn’t come easy.

    Long before his law degree, when he was a punk-rock loving teen in the 1980s, fresh out of Southwest High, the public school not too far from Whipple, a former coach convinced him to give up college dreams and instead pursue a shot at making the first Muay Thai kickboxing team at the Olympics.

    The martial art ended up not making it as an official Olympic sport, but the experience launched Cook into a professional boxing and kickboxing career that took him to competitions around the world, and taught him fear is not a reason to back down.

    But, “Father Time is undefeated,” Cook said. “I got older and I started losing fights, and I was like, all right, time to get back to life.”

    That eventually led him to obtaining a law degree in San Francisco, where after an intern stint as a public defender, he decided he wanted to be a trial attorney, fighting in court.

    Civil rights attorney James Cook steps into his car to warm up and make phone calls in Minneapolis.

    Civil rights attorney James Cook has been doing pro bono immigration work since the crackdown began in Minneapolis.

    (Caroline Yang/For The Times)

    He started cold-calling John Burris, another Bay Area lawyer who is an icon of civil rights and police misconduct cases. Burris, who has been called the “Godfather of Police Litigation,” was involved in the “Oakland Riders” case in 2000, when officers were discovered to have planted evidence. He also represented Rodney King, the family of Oscar Grant, and the family of Joseph Mann among many others.

    But Burris, a boxing fan, didn’t respond to Cook’s calls until the young lawyer offered him free tickets to one of his fights, which he was still doing on the side.

    “And then immediately I got a call back,” Cook said.

    Burris said Cook’s history as a fighter intrigued him, but “I did say to James, you can’t be a fighter and lawyer. You can’t get punched in your head all the time.”

    Cook did not take this advice.

    Still, Burris said, “It was his persistence that I admired, because the type of work we’re involved in, you need people who are dedicated, who have some real commitment to the work, and he showed that kind of consistency and dedication.”

    Cook’s been working with Burris more than 20 years now, but until recently, the labyrinth of the immigration system wasn’t his area of expertise. It’s been a crash course for him, he said, on the often arcane laws that govern who gets to stay in America and who doesn’t.

    It’s also been a crash course on what a civil rights emergency looks like. Along with his work looking for locked-up immigrants, Cook spends a lot of time on the streets at protests, helping people understand their rights — and limitations — and seeing first hand what is happening.

    “If you ever wondered what you would have done in Germany, now is the time,” he said. “Now is the time to do something. People are being interned.”

    In the hours after Pretti was shot, Cook was at the location of the shooting, in the middle of the tear gas, offering legal help to anyone who needed it and bearing witness to conduct that will almost certainly face scrutiny one day, even if government leaders condone it now.

    Law enforcement officers launch tear gas canisters in Minneapolis on Jan. 24.

    Law enforcement officers launch tear gas canisters as they work to push the crowd back and expand their perimeter in Minneapolis on Jan. 24.

    (Caroline Yang/For The Times)

    “The way the officers chase people down, protesters who were really just protesting lawfully and were beaten and pepper sprayed and gassed — all those are civil rights violations,” Burris said. “And so the law is the guardrails. So there has to be lawyers who are prepared to protect those guardrails and to stand as centurions, as I refer to us.”

    Cook has tried to calm protesters, he told me, and prevent clashes. But people are mad, and resolute. His greatest fear is summer — when warm weather could bring even larger crowds if enforcement is still ongoing. He’s worried that the actions of the federal agents will spill over into anger at local cops enforcing local laws, leading to even more chaos.

    “I’ve always supported cops as long as they do their job correctly,” Cook said.

    For now, he’s taking it one day at a time, one case at a time, one name at a time.

    Protesters raise an inverted American flag as law enforcement officers launch tear gas canisters in Minneapolis.

    Protesters raise an inverted American flag as law enforcement officers launch tear gas canisters in Minneapolis after Alex Pretti was killed by federal agents.

    (Caroline Yang/For The Times)

    Tuesday, Cook passed through the armed checkpoint at Whipple carrying a list of about seven people, folks who have been picked up by federal agents for one reason or another, or reasons unknown, and now cannot be located. They are not in the public online system that is meant to track detainees, and family and friends have not heard from them.

    If he’s lucky, Cook will get information on one or two, that they are indeed inside, or maybe at a detention center in Texas, where many have been sent. But there will be more whose location remains unknown. He’ll make calls, fill out forms and come back tomorrow. And the tomorrow after that.

    “This is what we do,” he said. “I’m always in it for the long run. I mean, you know, shoot, yeah, that’s kind of the way it works.”

    [ad_2]

    Anita Chabria

    Source link

  • Cowboy Carter Curbs Court! Beyoncé’s $3 Million IRS Battle Continues After Tax Trial Delay

    Cowboy Carter Curbs Court! Beyoncé’s $3 Million IRS Battle Continues After Tax Trial Delay

    [ad_1]

    Beyoncé, who has been basking in the success of her eighth studio album, Cowboy Carter, is now facing a legal battle. The court postponed Beyoncé’s tax trial for the staggering sum of nearly $3 million.

    Source: Michael Buckner / Getty

    Per RadarOnline, the IRS issued a Notice of Deficiency to the renowned “16 Carriages” singer in January 2023. The notice claimed that Beyoncé had not made proper payments on two tax returns, resulting in a debt of $2.7 million, including taxes, penalties, and interest. The IRS alleges she owes  $805,000 in taxes and $161,000 in penalties for 2018, $1.4 million in taxes, and $288,00 in penalties for 2019.

    Challenging the IRS’s claims, the mother of three filed a petition in April 2023 with the U.S. Tax Courts, denying any debt to the IRS. She argued that the reported figures were incorrect and that she was unfairly denied deductions amounting to millions of dollars. The singer stated that the IRS denied her deduction of nearly $870,000 in charitable donations and $473,000 in legal fees.

    According to RadarOnline, Queen Bey is not willing to pay the penalty fees. She reportedly believes the penalty fees shouldn’t apply to her because she meant no harm and “acted reasonably and in good faith.”

    A representative from the IRS denied each allegation in the filed petition and defended the hefty tax bill. They are also asking the judge to deny her petition. Seemingly, both parties are unwilling to back down, causing the case to go to trial.

    Beyoncé’s Tax Trial Delayed

    Beyoncé’s day in court was scheduled for May 2024 but has recently been delayed. The 42-year-old filed a motion for continuance on April 2, 2024. The IRS agreed to honor the motion. Her legal team did not give a reason for filing the continuance. The case has no new start date yet and longer appears on the court calendar.

    In court documents, Judge Maurice B. Foley stated, “This case is stricken from the trial session. The undersigned retains jurisdiction. The parties shall file a status report or proposed stipulated decision by 07/05/24.”

    If the two parties cannot reach a decision by July 2024, this case will go to trial in the U.S. Tax Courts. Both sides will have to convince the judge, as a jury will not be present.

    Beyoncé, represented by Michael C. Cohen, has not made a public statement regarding her tax woes. RadarOnline also reported that Jay-Z is not indicated in the case because they do not file joint taxes.

    If the singer cannot prove her case, the court will order her to pay the $2.7 million tab. The singer reportedly racked in over $500 million during her Renaissance World Tour, and fans already anticipate an upcoming summer tour of her new country-esque album, Cowboy Carter. Nevertheless, if the court orders Bey to pay, the tax bill won’t put a dent in her billionaire status

    [ad_2]

    Kerbi Lynn

    Source link

  • Keke Palmer's Restraining Order & Criminal Case Against 'Abusive' Ex Darius Jackson Still Active As They Pursue Mediation

    Keke Palmer's Restraining Order & Criminal Case Against 'Abusive' Ex Darius Jackson Still Active As They Pursue Mediation

    [ad_1]

    Despite inaccurate reports that Keke Palmer “dropped” her restraining order against her “abusive” baby daddy, Darius Jackson, they only pushed back the next court date.

    Source: Monica Schipper/Paras Griffin / Getty

    The famous former had their next court date scheduled for Dec. 5, but Keke and Darius agreed to postpone it. Less than a month ago, the Big Boss star filed a restraining order against her ex for allegations of abuse. After escalated public drama and family feuding, RadarOnline reports Keke hopes for a private resolution to the case.

    The Dec. 5 hearing would be the next step in making Keke’s temporary restraining order against Darius permanent. A court granted her sole custody of their son Leodis and ordered Darius to maintain a 100-yard distance from both.

    In a new court filing, the exes agreed to attend mediation together instead of court.

    “Both parties are concurrently filing a Stipulation and Order to continue The Court’s Order to Participate in Mediation currently set for November 29, 2023, and Petitioner’s Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order, which is currently set for December 5, 2023, to allow the parties time to attend mediation,” the court documents stated.

    “The parties request that the Mediation and Petitioner’s DVRO be continued on a mutually agreeable date.”

    Following the couple’s break-up in October, an incident on Nov. 5 prompted Keke to request a Domestic Violence Restraining Order. The Nope actress claimed she called her mother, Sharon Palmer, after Darius screamed in her face. He allegedly got physical after Sharon checked him over the phone.

    “At that point, he lunged at me, grabbing at my neck and face, knocked me backwards over the couch, stole my phone out of my hands, and then ran out of the house,” she said.

    The restraining order filing described another alleged assault in February 2020. Keke claimed a photo she took in a bikini upset Darius, who went into a rage and “body slammed” her.

    “In the bedroom, he slammed me on the floor and slapped my head from side to side. The next morning, he was standing at the bottom of the stairs near the front door, screaming at me as I was coming down the stairs. When I was almost at the bottom of the stairs, he grabbed me around the neck and body slammed me back onto the stairs,” she said.

    The multitalented mogul’s restraining order petition included photos and security camera footage to corroborate her claims. The bombshell allegations inspired an outpouring of support for Keke, overwhelming scrutiny, and Darius seemingly threatening retaliation.

    Check out a source close to Keke Palmer confirming the active restraining order and criminal investigation against Darius Jackson after the flip!

    Keke Palmer’s Court Date With Darius Jackson Remains On The Calendar Despite Agreement To Mediation

    Soul Train Awards 2023 - Show

    Source: Paras Griffin / Getty

    Many comments expressed concerns about Keke possibly “dropping” the restraining order. However, a source reportedly clarified that she’s trying to protect her and Leo’s privacy and safety. Darius could still face criminal charges regardless of the outcome of their upcoming mediation.

    “The restraining order that Keke was granted remains in full force and effect and will NOT be dropped. Keke will continue to protect her safety and the safety of Leo above all else. Keke has pressed charges, the poilice report has been filed, the criminal investigation by the police is continuing,” the source revealed to The Shade Room.

    Like Teyana Taylor, who was “heartbroken” at her secret divorce filing going public, Keke reportedly just wants to protect her peace and her family.

    “The hearing is still on the calendar, as planned. Darius’ lawyer is not available on Dec. 5, so the calendar date will move to January,” the insider continued.

    “Keke is concerned about her privacy, Leo’s privacy, and the privacy of her family so her preference is to resolve the situation privately rather than in open court if possible, but if not possible, the hearing remains on the calendar and Keke will stop at nothing to ensure a safe and healthy outcome for herself and Leo.”

    It looks like this legal battle is far from over, even if it does continue privately.

    [ad_2]

    lexdirects

    Source link

  • 'Shankgiving' Shenanigans: Derek Chauvin Stuck Like A Pig 22 Times By Inmate Who Picked 'Black Friday' To Symbolize 'BLM'

    'Shankgiving' Shenanigans: Derek Chauvin Stuck Like A Pig 22 Times By Inmate Who Picked 'Black Friday' To Symbolize 'BLM'

    [ad_1]

    Welp, knife comes at you fast! The inmate accused of stabbing Derek Chauvin 22 times planned a “Black Friday” attack to symbolize “Black Lives Matter,” according to federal prosecutors.

    Source: Hennepin County Jail / Hennepin County Jail

    That certainly gives a new meaning to “reason for the season.” Authorities identified the federal inmate behind the “Shanksgiving” stabbing as John Turscak. He reportedly plotted on the ex-cop convicted of murdering George Floyd for a month.

    When the big day finally came, Turscak was allegedly ready for Chauvin with an “improvised knife.” NBC News reports Turscak faces charges of attempted murder, assault with intent to commit murder, assault with a dangerous weapon and assault resulting in serious bodily injury.

    As BOSSIP previously reported, a fellow prisoner tried to carve Chauvin like a turkey on Nov. 24, the day after Thanksgiving. Unlike George Floyd, who suffocated to death for nine minutes, Chauvin received “life-saving measures” from staff at Federal Correctional Institution, Tucson. He was transferred to a nearby hospital in stable condition.

    As soon as news of Chauvin’s stabbing made headlines, speculation spread about it helping him overturn his conviction. The attack came only one week after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected his appeal.

    US-RACISM-POLICE-TRIAL

    Source: CHANDAN KHANNA / Getty

    Now that prosecutors have identified the inmate who stabbed Chauvin, there are even more questions than answers.

    Find out more about John Turscak and his connections to the FBI and the Mexican Mafia after the jump.

    Who Is John Turscak, And What Did He Have To Do With The Mexican Mafia And FBI Before Allegedly Stabbing Derek Chauvin?

    Prisoner in handcuffs

    Source: Peter Dazeley / Getty

    Many who wish nothing but the worst for Derek Chauvin celebrated his previously unknown attacker as a vigilante. Now that we know the man behind the “Shanksgiving” stabbing, some say it’s looking funny in the light. Chauvin’s supporters claim it proved his innocence. Meanwhile, several of the killer cop’s critics wonder how his attacker missed 22 times.

    Federal prosecutors claimed that John Turscak planned a “Black Friday” assault for the “Black Hand,” a symbol associated with the Mexican Mafia. According to court documents, he joined the Mexican Mafia in 1990.

    Per the Los Angeles Times, he greenlit “assaults of individuals for infractions of Mexican Mafia rules.” He also reportedly collected “taxes” from drug dealers and street gangs in “return for Mexican Mafia protection and permission to engage in narcotics trafficking.”

    Turscak took credit for the murder of a man in Folsom Prison in 1990. He claimed to authorize another man’s murder in 1998. In 1997, the FBI recruited him as an informant. The investigation led to indictments of more than 40 alleged Mexican mafia members and associates.

    However, working for the feds only got him in more trouble. Federal prosecutors dropped him for admitting to “dealing drugs, extorting money, and authorizing assaults” while on their payroll. He pleaded guilty to racketeering and conspiracy to commit murder for a 30-year sentence. Turscak’s time was almost up. His release date was scheduled for June 3, 2026.

    Turscak waived his Miranda rights in his interview with FBI agents on Nov. 26. Although he reportedly claimed responsibility for planning out the assault and stabbing Chauvin 22 times, Turscak “denied wanting to kill” him. So he did all this for shanks and giggles?

    Some suspect Turscak knew he’d be safer with a life sentence than as a free man who turned on the feds and the Mexican Mafia. After all, he reportedly admitted to choosing Chauvin for his status. He reportedly spent a month thinking about a date and symbolic motive that would guarantee more major headlines. Then he wasted no time telling FBI agents all about it.

    Either way, Chauvin survived his serious injuries and remains in federal custody for the rest of his two decades behind bars. With these new charges against Turscak, he could face just as much additional time or more for the “Shanksgiving” shenanigans. Maybe that’s what Turscak wanted all along.

    [ad_2]

    Bossip Staff

    Source link

  • Sam Bankman-Fried lived lush lifestyle prior to FTX downfall

    Sam Bankman-Fried lived lush lifestyle prior to FTX downfall

    [ad_1]

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried Fresh continued to live an extravagant life while his trading firm, Alameda Research, was facing severe financial challenges, court documents reveal.

    FTX’s intricate web of spending and suspicion

    Bankman-Fried was living the high life thanks to billions of dollars worth of customer funds from FTX, prosecutors allege in a fresh set of court documents.

    The disgraced FTX founder and his associates indulged in extravagant spending on investments, donations, and real estate — even in the months leading up to the collapse of the crypto exchange.

    Among the events Bankman-Fried enjoyed:

    • Meeting with President Bill Clinton in midtown Manhattan.
    • A dinner with the head of Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund.
    • An invitation from Anthony Scaramucci to attend a Steelers game.
    • A private dinner hosted by K5 Global co-founder Michael Kives, in which Hillary Clinton, singer Katy Perry, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, actor Leonardo DiCaprio, and reality star Kendall Jenner also attended.

    Bankman-Fried’s social status skyrocketed at a time when his trading firm, Alameda Research, was running out of funds. 

    In the trial’s third week, prosecutors provided evidence, such as emails, bank statements, wire transfers and Bankman-Fried’s own notes to outline how FTX funds were purportedly used without customer permission or knowledge.

    These records depicted Bankman-Fried’s attempts to expand his influence among elite circles through investments, political contributions, and donations.

    To bolster their case, prosecutors enlisted forensic accountants, including an FBI agent and University of Notre Dame professor Peter Easton, who testified about tracing the expenses back to FTX customer funds. 

    The defense countered these claims, citing inconsistencies in whether the expenses were truly covered by customer funds and raising doubts about the accuracy of expert analyses and accounting methods.

    Big spender

    During the trial, prosecutors argued that FTX customer funds were utilized for investments. They presented an excerpt from the September 2022 investment agreement between Alameda and SkyBridge Capital, the firm founded by Scaramucci — the 10-day White House communications director for former President Donald Trump. 

    The deal preceded FTX’s bankruptcy filing by two months. 

    This agreement served as additional evidence that investment spending continued despite Alameda’s negative balance at that time, prosecutors claimed.

    In court, details also emerged from an investment agreement revealing that Bankman-Fried had committed to investing in Knives’ K5.

    The agreement was characterized as a fraudulent scheme aimed at enriching executives. 

    FTX’s bankruptcy lawyers took legal action against K5 to reclaim the money Bankman-Fried had invested. 

    This $700 million investment marked one of the largest amounts contributed by the FTX founder to any group, undertaken to enhance his political and social influence.

    Moreover, prosecutors emphasized Bankman-Fried’s political contributions funded by Alameda.

    The chart revealed donations to Protect Our Future, a Democratic political action committee primarily backed by the former FTX billionaire, and One Nation, a nonprofit group associated with Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell. 

    Bankman-Fried faced accusations of utilizing customer funds for political donations, allegedly aiming to influence crypto-friendly regulations in Washington, DC.

    Bankman-Fried trial continues

    During day 12 of the trial, prosecutors claimed that Bankman-Fried misled in-house lawyers and funneled FTX customer funds to Alameda, while also lending $2.2 billion to himself and other executives. 

    The former top lawyer of FTX, Can Sun, testified that Bankman-Fried asked him to come up with legal justifications for why $7 billion in customer funds were missing four days before the company declared bankruptcy. Sun said that he told Bankman-Fried that he could not identify any legal justifications.

    Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried’s ex-girlfriend and former CEO of Alameda, testified that Bankman-Fried arranged for executives to divert funds from FTX customers to other purposes, including paying back billions of dollars in loans to Alameda.

    Ellison said that Bankman-Fried ultimately called the shots. The defense attorneys maintain that Bankman-Fried did not intend to defraud anyone and acted in good faith in trying to build and run FTX.

    The trial is ongoing, and it remains to be seen what the outcome will be.

    The bankruptcy of FTX has left many investors with frozen funds, and the situation is still unfolding. It is unclear whether investors will be able to recoup any of their losses, and the tax implications of the bankruptcy are also uncertain.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Ogwu Osaemezu Emmanuel

    Source link