ReportWire

Tag: corruption

  • Panamanian investigators remove documents from offices of co

    [ad_1]

    PANAMA CITY — Panamanian investigators carried documents Thursday out of offices belonging to a Hong Kong-owned company that operated ports at either end of the Panama Canal until its concession was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court last month.

    Public prosecutor Azael Samaniego, of the anti-corruption office, told local media outlets that visits were made to three offices of the Panama Ports Company in Panama City and that the Panama Maritime Authority and investigators from the National Directorate of Judicial Investigation also participated. The Panama Ports Company is the local subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison.

    Samaniego said his office had information pointing to the possible commission of a crime, but he did not specify what the crime could be. He said an investigation was in its early stages.

    The Panama Ports Company did not respond to requests for comment, nor did Panamanian law enforcement agencies.

    The investigation comes days after the Maritime Authority seized the Balboa and Cristobal ports from the Panama Ports Company. The company has previously rejected the court’s ruling and the Chinese government has accused Panama’s government of bowing to United States pressure.

    The ports, which have been operated by the company since 1997, became embroiled in a legal dispute after getting caught in the middle of the U.S. and China’s competition for influence in the region.

    The Trump administration objected to the ports being controlled by a Chinese company and accused China of running the canal, something both Panama and China deny.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Kenya’s economy exhibits unique traits and magic

    [ad_1]

    Audio By Vocalize

    Illustrating Kenya’s economic model without AI. [XN Iraki]

    Kenya is a magical country, not because of the wildlife and landscape. It’s magical because of our economic model.

    We can add the co-existence and adherence to two contradicting beliefs: we were created by God, but we are also the cradle of mankind, and we evolved.  

    Back to the economic model. We know Kenya’s economy is largely informal. About 80 per cent of the jobs are in that sector.

    Dig deeper, and the magic appears. It is assumed that the small and micro enterprises that define the Kenyan economy are independent. But they are linked to the formal economy. 

    Simply put, lots of informal sector businesses are owned by the formal economy. That is Kenya’s sweet spot, the magic or uniqueness.

    Lots of employed Kenyans own small businesses, their side hustles. In one study, I found that 65 per cent of a sample of employed Kenyans own side hustles.

    Even independent SMEs most likely got their funding from the formal sector, loans or donations from employed relatives.

     Why is this magical?

    We can experiment with entrepreneurship in the safety of formal employment. Some run the parallel programme until the side hustle pays off, and they leave employment.

    Others have one family member, often the spouse run the side hustle.

    This model, it‘s argued stop us from taking big risks and perhaps explains why we have the “missing middle” in Africa, firms between the many SMEs and big multinational corporations. Seeing entrepreneurship as part-time stymies its growth.

    Why are our entrepreneurs risk-averse and going through an intermediary step?  

    If we gave them more support, they would take bigger risks. The biggest support is buying their goods or services.

    But we rarely support them, sometimes out of petty jealousy. That is why entrepreneurs, far away from home, immigrants, do so well. That anonymity is an asset. 

    Unfortunately, the model creates avenues for corruption, from stealing employers‘ time to shifting business to side hustles. In which sectors is this notorious?

    Branding by big firms endears them to us, at the expense of SMEs. We are willing to pay a premium for their goods and services, even for water! 

    This sweet spot, where formal and informal economies meet, has been ignored by scholars, treating the two as mutually exclusive.

    It has defined Kenya‘s uniqueness and magic. Should we separate the two or let the tango continue? Have you been in this sweet spot? Talk to us. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • South Korea’s Former First Lady Sentenced to 20 Months in Prison for Corruption

    [ad_1]

    SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — A South Korean court sentenced former first lady Kim Keon Hee to 20 months in prison for corruption Wednesday ahead of the verdict for disgraced former President Yoon Suk Yeol over his martial law imposition a year ago.

    The Seoul Central District Court sentenced Kim for receiving bribes from the Unification Church in return for business favors.

    The ruling comes about three weeks before the court delivers its verdict on the rebellion charge against Yoon.

    The independent counsel earlier demanded the death sentence for Yoon.

    Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – January 2026

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • The Battle for One of the Richest and Smallest Counties in Texas

    [ad_1]

    The incidents made visible the growing schism between Skeet Jones and his nephew, Brandon Jones, the county constable. Skeet’s faction maintains that they have been the subjects of political persecution. Brandon—who is widely suspected of being the livestock investigator’s confidential informant—has argued that his uncle runs the town as though he’s above the law. (Brandon declined to comment on the identity of the informant.) Both sides have filed a flurry of lawsuits and countersuits naming each other. (The filings, with their absurdly heightened rhetoric, can make for odd reading. In an application for a temporary restraining order and injunction against Brandon, one of Skeet’s allies claimed, among other things, that Brandon raised his eyebrows “in an intimidating manner” during a proceeding.)

    Elections have become proxy battles in the family war, with each side furnishing candidates for local offices. (Loving County is, on the whole, a deeply conservative place, but a number of its elected officials—including Skeet—run as Democrats, as if the political realignments of the past seventy years had bypassed the county while its residents were consumed by more local concerns.) “Any voter can challenge the registration of any other voter, and, in Loving County, just about every vote we have has some kind of civil challenge,” David Landersman, the county sheriff, said. He also serves as the county’s voter registrar.

    The feud in Loving County is marked by both intensity and stasis, with the two sides locked in a small-town version of trench warfare. One recent election was won by a single vote; another resulted in a tie. Then, in 2024, a third element entered the system, in the unlikely form of a hustle-culture evangelist from Indiana named Malcolm Tanner.

    In 2023, Teresa, a woman living in South Carolina, was driving a snaking road down a mountain when a word popped into her head: “Texas.” Two years later, it happened again. This time, the word was “West.” Shortly afterward, she saw a social-media post by Tanner, a tall and confident self-proclaimed C.E.O. and real-estate mogul. Tanner spoke in a blend of political rabble-rousing and entrepreneurial uplift. He urged his three hundred thousand Facebook followers to head to a place that Teresa was hearing about for the first time: Loving County. “See you in Texas soon,” he wrote in a post. “Thank you all for saying YES to finding a true political home with us!”

    Owing to its wealth, the county had caught the attention of political interlopers in the past. In 2005, a handful of libertarians attempted, with little success, to wrest control of the government. The idea of taking over the county occasionally circulates on X and YouTube as “the craziest deal in America.”

    Tanner had pitched a number of grand visions in recent years. He was going to develop a dilapidated former Y.M.C.A. building in central Indiana into a hotel; he was going to host a Million Man March, also in Indiana; he was going to run for President and institute reparations for what he referred to as “melanated people.” None of his schemes panned out. Then, in 2024, he turned his attention to Loving County. Tanner’s followers could move to Texas, win elected positions, and receive “free political homes,” he claimed. (He also suggested a new name: Tanner County.) On Clubhouse, the live voice-chat platform, he hosted raucous, engaging meetings twice a day. “I retired, I was bored, and it was just something to do. I was meeting a lot of people, you know, melanated people from all over the world—good people,” Erica Marshall, a former member of Tanner’s circle who has become one of his most vocal critics, told me. Tanner was “very manipulative,” she said. “He’s managed to have people quit their jobs, leave their homes. They sold all of their things except the stuff that they could fit in their car, and they went to Loving County, just like that.” (Marshall never made it to Texas.)

    In October, I drove to Mentone. It was my first time in Loving County and, given all I’d heard about the sparse population, I was expecting tumbleweeds and eerie Panhandle silence. But the town was bustling, the roads full of pickup trucks and heavy equipment; at the gas station, I had to wait in line for a pump, as oil workers commuted to and from work.

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Monroe

    Source link

  • How police departments’ loosely-written and poorly-enforced rules enable off-duty police misconduct

    [ad_1]

    There were suspicions, but nobody knew for sure whose side Eddie Villarreal was on until the night he pulled over the two FBI agents.

    By day, Villarreal was a Dallas Police officer. By night, he had a different job —  moonlighting as a security guard for Alfredo Hinojosa, a nightclub mogul who federal authorities suspected was involved in a cartel-connected drug ring.

    Inside the restroom stalls of three of Hinojosa’s clubs, dealers sold hundreds of small bags of cocaine every weekend, according to federal court records. Agents suspected Villarreal was protecting the owner’s enterprise. To test him, they tailed one of the club’s leaders to see if he interfered.

    When the blue and red lights of Villarreal’s black Chevy Tahoe flashed behind them, they had their answer. The moonlighting officer had chosen his other boss.

    After being pulled over, the FBI agents fed Villarreal a few false details about their investigation.

    Soon after, Villarreal called Hinojosa to relay what he had learned — unaware that the FBI was listening on a wiretap.

    “You know there’s drugs in the bathroom. I know there’s drugs in the bathroom,” the police officer told the club owner.

    In the years leading up to Villarreal’s nighttime stop, Dallas Police heard multiple warning signs about the officer’s off-duty behavior. Investigators found that he routinely broke one of the department’s moonlighting rules by working inside the club instead of the parking lot. Two patrons accused him of brutal assaults. And in 2002, a fellow officer worried that he might alert a different club owner before police vice raids.

    Despite the repeated warnings, the department continued allowing him to moonlight.

    Villarreal and his lawyers did not respond to repeated requests for comment from CBS News.

    How a Dallas Police Officer wound up protecting a nightclub magnate

    Click or use the buttons below to navigate this timeline of Eddie
    Villarreal’s career and the warning signs along the way.

    April 15, 2002

    Senior Corporal Edward Anaya alleges that Villarreal tipped off the owners of another club to planned raids from the vice squad and state alcohol regulators. Dallas Police Department’s internal affairs unit investigates the complaint and eventually finds no violation of police policy.

    Villarreal’s case exposes the potential oversight gaps and ethical hazards when police officers work off-duty security jobs. Moonlighting has long offered police officers a financial lifeline — extra income to help their families. But in some departments, the failure to adopt strong oversight rules for lucrative private side jobs can leave officers and the public vulnerable to corruption and danger. Loyalties may be tested in ways not seen on regular duty.

    An investigation by CBS News and the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism at Arizona State University found many U.S. police agencies rely on moonlighting rules that are vague, poorly enforced and vulnerable to abuse.

    The investigation examined off-duty employment policies at more than 100 law enforcement agencies of various sizes across the country, finding that less than a quarter check officers’ disciplinary history before permitting them to moonlight. More than half don’t require body cameras for off-duty work and most fail to track officers’ off-duty hours.

    Five departments, including Boston Police, permit officers suspended for misconduct to continue working off-duty — performing police-like duties for private businesses even while barred from regular shifts. That contradicts best practices recommended by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which suggest restricting off-duty work to officers who “are not the subject of ongoing disciplinary action that would be considered serious or egregious.”

    Some departments, including the San Diego County Sheriff’s Office and the Michigan State Police, ban off-duty security work.

    In Dallas, records show leaders largely failed to act after two city audits cited their lax oversight of off-duty employment — and warned of consequences.

    Instead, a CBS News review of agency records shows Dallas Police loosened moonlighting rules and let more than 800 officers with red flags — criminal investigations, violations of the department’s off-duty policy and alerts from the agency’s early warning system — keep working off-duty jobs since 2010.

    Dallas Police Department leadership declined to comment on the findings of this story.

    The leader of the city’s largest police union, Jaime Castro, acknowledged the department previously struggled tracking officers’ moonlighting work, but said recent policy changes — including a new app to track the extra jobs — could help curb some of the problems.

    Castro argued off-duty work boosts public safety and the extra cash incentivizes recruits to join the police force — and stay. News reports document moonlighting officers across the country earning between $45 to $175 an hour, far outpacing the median pay for officers, which was about $37.15 an hour in 2024.

    “Once officers join the department they see the benefit. They see the freedom that it gives you and that sense of financial security it gives you,” said Castro, a 27-year Dallas Police veteran. “It’s a retention tool.”

    But without proper oversight, experts and police groups warn off-duty work can enable abuse and erode public safety.

    “If you do not track what your employees are doing, and if you do not supervise them as they do it, and if you do not provide that level of approval and administrative oversight, then what are you doing?” asked Seth Stoughton, a former Tallahassee, Fla., police officer who is now faculty director of the Excellence in Policing & Public Safety program at the University of South Carolina.

    “You’re setting the stage for officers to sink to the lowest common denominator.”

    Missed warnings

    To examine the oversight gap in one city, CBS News reviewed Dallas Police documents and data spanning decades.

    The department’s policy has long stated that off-duty work is a “privilege, not a right.” Until recently, supervisors were required to consider whether officers had a “high frequency level of complaints” before approving off-duty jobs.

    Despite these rules, officers with disciplinary problems routinely got approval. Since 2011, nearly 400 Dallas officers investigated for crimes — including assault, theft, and sexual misconduct — were allowed to continue to moonlight. In at least 59 cases, officers were allowed to work off-duty jobs within a day of the start of their criminal investigations.

    The department also approved side jobs for at least 396 officers even after alerts from its own early-warning system identified them as a potential threat to themselves or others.

    “If you’re wearing your uniform performing a role as a police officer and the department has knowledge that you could be problematic, then the department is — or at least should be — liable for the outcome of whatever occurs,” said Dennis Kenney, a professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

    In 2005, city auditors found Dallas Police’s oversight of moonlighting “not effective,” recommending stronger monitoring and charging businesses fees to recover costs. The department did not adopt most of their recommendations.

    Read the full audit here.

    Thirteen years later, in 2018, auditors again found lax oversight and uncovered nearly 3,200 cases of officers moonlighting while on paid sick leave.

    In 2023, auditors reported the department still hadn’t implemented many of the tracking reforms. Only last year did Dallas Police introduce a tool to prevent officers from working off-duty jobs while on sick or injury leave.

    Few officers illustrate the breakdowns in Dallas more than Ray Cunningham.

    Since 1987, Dallas Police records show that Cunningham has been accused of violating police policy at least 68 times, including 15 times for excessive force and five for breaking moonlighting rules.

    In 1996, an anonymous complainant wrote a letter to Dallas Police alleging that Cunningham was double billing for the same hours at three different apartment complexes. Police investigators found that “sufficient evidence exists” to suggest that Cunningham had committed felony theft, but a grand jury did not indict him, according to the agency’s disciplinary records.

    Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, multiple apartment complex residents alleged that Cunningham harassed and assaulted them — including one incident where the officer beat a handcuffed man and put him into a sleeper hold.

    In 2017, city records show the department’s early warning system alerted supervisors that Cunningham had racked up five misconduct complaints in 12 months, indicating “the officer’s performance may need to be reviewed.”

    Asked about his disciplinary history by CBS News, Cunningham wrote only, “No comment.”

    Read the full anonymous letter here.

    Stoughton, the policing scholar, said Cunningham’s history opens the department up to potential legal liability.

    “I don’t know how you look at that — at that officer, at that pattern — and justify not doing anything,” he said.

    On May 28, 2021, investigators issued Cunningham a 10-day suspension after he failed to seek permission to work an off-duty job at an apartment complex 83 times in nine months.

    The following night, records show the department allowed him to work off duty at the same apartments.

    Accountability gaps nationwide

    Dallas is not unique. In dozens of departments, reporters found accountability measures for officers working off duty are looser than when they’re on duty.

    One example: body cameras.

    Most agencies require cameras on duty, yet only 43% of the departments studied by CBS News and the Howard Center mandate them for moonlighting officers. Some agencies, including Chicago Police and the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, ban them outright.

    In some cities, moves to require cameras on off-duty jobs met resistance. After a federal attempt to mandate them in Cleveland, police asked a judge to make wearing body cameras on off-duty jobs optional. The reason: the police union opposed them. Cleveland still does not require cameras for its moonlighting officers.

    After an off-duty Baltimore County officer shot a shoplifting suspect in 2018, Maryland lawmakers proposed mandatory body cameras for moonlighting. But the bill failed.

    County police spokesperson Trae Corbin said the department believes cameras violate state wiretapping law. But nearby departments, including Baltimore City police, allow or require them for off-duty work.

    Unregulated payments for moonlighting also can create problems.

    In 2017, Dallas Police Officer Raphyael Tyson began coordinating fellow officers to work at a construction site. No one suspected anything wrong with the job until three years later.

    The company intended to pay the officers $75 an hour for their security services. But Tyson had only been passing $45 an hour to the other officers.

    Agency investigators said the difference totaled tens of thousands of dollars.

    The department fired Tyson, but he told CBS News he broke no laws, only department rules about completing a few timecards, and he considered the arrangement his private business.

    “I’m not in any obligation to also tell them what I make as a contractor,” he said.

    Dallas, like many departments, allows officers to coordinate off-duty jobs with minimal oversight. The department does not track pay rates or payments. It even permits coordinators to distribute cash directly to other officers.

    In Minneapolis, a 2023 Justice Department review found supervisors may avoid disciplining subordinates when they controlled lucrative off-duty jobs. That same year, Derek Chauvin —the Minneapolis officer convicted of the 2020 murder of George Floyd — pleaded guilty to felony tax evasion for failing to report nearly $96,000 in cash earned from moonlighting and coordinating off-duty gigs.

    Many departments fail to track how much officers earn or how many hours they work off duty, according to the CBS News and Howard Center policy review.

    Most agencies claim to cap off-duty hours to prevent fatigue, but only 50 out of more than 100 departments track those hours. Decades of research confirm excessive off-duty work contributes to fatigue and poor decision-making, threatening public safety.

    In Texas, El Paso Police policy caps hours worked off duty each week at 25 hours. But reporters analyzed off-duty payroll data and found more than 250 officers exceeded that cap at least once between 2021 and 2024.

    Auditors in Dallas, San Jose, Miami and Minneapolis found officers routinely worked beyond permitted limits — problems missed due to lack of tracking.

    Failures in oversight have led to serious abuse. Jersey City suspended its off-duty program for two years after discovering officers were paid for off-duty jobs while they were supposed to be on duty. In New Orleans, investigators from the U.S. Department of Justice found officers skipped on-duty shifts for off-duty jobs. And Philadelphia Inquirer reporters uncovered city officers on sick leave working strenuous second jobs.

    Not every city takes a hands-off approach. Some, like San Francisco, have adopted systems endorsed by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, where businesses pay the department, the city keeps a processing fee and then pays the officers — often at overtime rates.

    In Delaware, the Newark Police ban direct payment from private employers to officers.

    “Who are you working for in that capacity at that time?” Lieutenant Gregory D’Elia asked. “Are you working for the police department if you’re fully in uniform? Or are you working for the bar?”

    Former Dallas Police Chief Renee Hall, now vice president of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, insists tracking off-duty assignments is essential for accountability. Technology, such as a new early-warning system Hall tried to implement in Dallas, makes that possible.

    “We need to know who an officer is working for, what establishment that is, what kind of work, and what kind of income that they’re bringing in,” she said.

    Divided loyalties

    It took a yearslong investigation — dubbed “Operation Closing Time” — to expose Villarreal’s corruption in Dallas despite the years of unheeded warning signs.

    P.J. Meitl, the assistant U.S. Attorney who led the prosecutions, told CBS News that it takes strong oversight to deter lawless behavior from officers working off-duty jobs.

    “If the DOJ doesn’t pursue cases like the one against Villarreal, he would have continued and his corruption would have continued to spread,” Meitl said.

    After he pulled over the FBI agents, prosecutors confronted Villarreal and offered him a deal — resign and cooperate or face more serious charges.

    But even after leaving the department and facing the possibility of years in prison, prosecutors presented evidence that he continued to help bar owners. An FBI agent testified at his sentencing hearing that agents were forced to abort an undercover operation at a bar after they were spotted by Villarreal.

    Hinojosa was convicted in 2021 and sentenced to 16 years. A year later, Villarreal got 30 months in prison — six times higher than sentencing guidelines.

    “If you allow law enforcement officers at any level to break the law and not have consequences,” Sam Lindsay, the federal judge who heard his case, told CBS News, “then that only breeds contempt and disrespect for the law.”

    About the data

    CBS News investigative data journalist Ari Sen obtained and analyzed five datasets from the Dallas Police Department to produce the numbers in this story:

    1. Internal Affairs data (1977–2024), showing officers accused of misconduct and case outcomes. “More than 800 officers with red flags” reflects only substantiated off-duty policy violations, filtered to cases received on or after Jan. 1, 2010.
    2. Public Integrity Unit data (2010–2024), showing officers investigated for criminal conduct.
    3. Early Warning System data (May 2011–Sep 2021), identifying potentially problematic officers.
    4. Off-duty employment data (2009–2024, excluding 2014–2015).
    5. Rosters of current and former Dallas Police officers, including demographics, hire date, and separation date when applicable.

    The numbers in this story likely miss some instances of misconduct. All case records that could not be clearly linked to a unique badge number were excluded from the analysis and the department did not always supply complete records in response to CBS News’ records requests.

    Journalists with the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism and CBS News obtained moonlighting and related policies from more than 100 police departments and worked to compare the policies against recommended best practices. For more details on the process of analyzing these policies, please refer to the methodology in Part 2.

    UP NEXT

    Credits

    Reporting by Ari Sen, Brian New and Lexi Salazar for
    CBS News and Tallulah Anne, Chad Bradley, Kaylin Cantu, Emma Croteau, Sam Ellefson, Aspen Ford, Naomi Jordan, Tag Lee, Christopher Lomahquahu, Nicole Macias Garibay, Isabelle Marceles, Shayla McKenzie, Anna Olp, Madison Perales, Eshaan Sarup for the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism. Data analysis by Ari Sen for CBS News and Tallulah Anne and Emma Croteau for the Howard
    Center. Field production by Laura Geller, Nicole Vap and Donald Leonard for CBS News and Tallulah Anne, Chad Bradley and Aspen Ford for the
    Howard Center. Graphics, design and development by Taylor Johnston for CBS News. Photojournalism by Mike Lozano and Jose Sanchez for CBS News. Video editing by Scott Fralicks of CBS News. Editing
    and project leadership by John Kelly, Scott Pham, Matt Mosk, Laura Geller and Nicole Vap for CBS News and Mark Greenblatt, Lauren Mucciolo and Angela M. Hill for the Howard Center.

    The Howard Center for Investigative Journalism at ASU is funded by the
    The Scripps Howard Foundation.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Founder of Indonesian ride-hailing app Gojek stands trial over Chromebooks procurement

    [ad_1]

    JAKARTA, Indonesia — An Indonesian court on Monday opened the trial of a co-founder of the country’s ride-hailing and payments company Gojek, who is accused of corruption in a government project to procure Google Chromebook laptops for schools.

    Nadiem Anwar Makarim, 41, was a former education, culture, research and technology minister when he was arrested Sept. 7. His arrest came during an investigation by the attorney general’s office in Jakarta into an alleged $125 billion corruption scandal linked to the project.

    The laptop procurement initiated under the government’s “digitalization of schools” policy aimed to equip schools in remote areas with digital devices and infrastructure.

    Makarim, who was education minister between 2019 and 2024, allegedly favored Google’s Chromebook despite a ministry research team refusing to recommend the laptop model due to ineffectiveness in regions lacking internet access.

    The indictment claims Makarim steered the nationwide procurement in 2020–2021 “entirely for personal business interests.” Prosecutors said he pressed Google to invest in PT Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa, known as PT AKAB. The company is the parent of Gojek.

    Makarim received about 809 billion rupiah ($48.2 million) in connection with the program, prosecutors claimed.

    He faces a possible sentence of life imprisonment for causing state losses and misusing public funds under Indonesia’s 2001 Corruption Law.

    “The procurement ignored proper pricing benchmarks and technical needs, especially for remote or under-resourced regions,” lead prosecutor Muhammad Fadli Paramajeng told a panel of three judges at Jakarta’s Corruption Court on Monday.

    The purchase of more than 1.2 million Chromebooks was designed to strengthen Google’s dominance in Indonesia’s education tech ecosystem and linked to subsequent Google investments of about $787 million in PT AKAB through Google Asia Pacific, he said.

    Makarim, a Harvard University graduate, was a tech CEO who co-founded Gojek in 2009 and remained until 2019, when the company was valued at over $10 billion. He stepped down to join the cabinet of former Indonesia President Joko Widodo.

    Prosecutors allege his resignation from PT AKAB and Gojek was a “strategic concealment” to mask conflicts of interest while Makarim appointed close associates as directors and “beneficial owners,” allowing him to maintain indirect control over company decisions.

    Makarim has denied the allegations, saying he did not personally receive funds from the Chromebook procurement or related services.

    Makarim’s defense attorneys argue Google’s investment largely predated his ministerial tenure and was routine corporate activity that was not tied to the laptop deal.

    Makarim divested from PT AKAB upon taking office, his wealth fell by more than 50% during his term and procurement decisions were made by technical teams and officials, not the minister, they said.

    “The defendant was not involved in the procurement process, as his role was limited solely to formulating policy,” defense lawyer Ari Yusuf Amir told the court. He called the indictment “unclear, inaccurate and incomplete,” saying it conflated Makarim’s ministerial authority with the work of other government officials.

    Two former education ministry officials and a former tech consultant also were charged in the case, while another staff member is wanted by authorities but remains at large.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • How cocaine, corruption led to Maduro’s indictment

    [ad_1]

    A newly unsealed U.S. Justice Department indictment accuses captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of running a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by a drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S. with thousands of tons of cocaine. The arrest of Maduro and his…

    [ad_2]

    By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER and LARRY NEUMEISTER – Associated Press

    Source link

  • How cocaine and corruption led to the indictment of Maduro

    [ad_1]

    A newly unsealed U.S. Justice Department indictment accuses captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of running a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by an extensive drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S. with thousands of tons of cocaine.The arrest of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in a stunning military operation early Saturday in Venezuela sets the stage for a major test for U.S. prosecutors as they seek to secure a conviction in a New York courtroom against the longtime leader of the oil-rich South American nation.Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on X that Maduro and Flores “will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts.”Here’s a look at the accusations against Maduro and the charges he faces:Drug and weapons chargesMaduro is charged alongside his wife, his son and three others. Maduro is indicted on four counts: narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices.Maduro is facing the same charges as in an earlier indictment brought against him in Manhattan federal court in 2020, during the first Trump presidency. The new indictment unsealed Saturday, which adds charges against Flores, was filed under seal in the Southern District of New York just before Christmas.Maduro is due to make his first appearance Monday in federal court in Manhattan. A video posted Saturday night on social media by a White House account showed Maduro, smiling, as he was escorted through a U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration office in New York by two federal agents grasping his arms. He was expected to be detained while awaiting trial at a federal jail in Brooklyn.’Cocaine-fueled corruption’ flourishedThe indictment accuses Maduro of partnering with “some of the most violent and prolific drug traffickers and narco-terrorists in the world” to allow for the shipment of thousands of tons of cocaine into the U.S.Authorities allege powerful and violent drug-trafficking organizations, such as the Sinaloa Cartel and Tren de Aragua gang, worked directly with the Venezuelan government and then sent profits to high-ranking officials who helped and protected them in exchange.But a U.S. intelligence assessment published in April, which drew on input from the 18 agencies that comprise the intelligence community, found no coordination between Tren de Aragua and the Venezuelan government.Maduro allowed “cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish for his own benefit, for the benefit of members of his ruling regime, and for the benefit of his family members,” the indictment alleges.U.S. authorities allege that Maduro and his family “provided law enforcement cover and logistical support” to cartels moving drugs throughout the region, resulting in as much as 250 tons of cocaine trafficked through Venezuela annually by 2020, according to the indictment.Drugs were moved on go-fast vessels, fishing boats and container ships or on planes from clandestine airstrips, the indictment says.”This cycle of narcotics-based corruption lines the pockets of Venezuelan officials and their families while also benefiting violent narco-terrorists who operate with impunity on Venezuelan soil and who help produce, protect, and transport tons of cocaine to the United States,” the indictment says.Successive U.S. administrations have warned about Venezuela’s role as a transit point for cocaine and a haven for criminal gangs, terrorist groups and drug-smuggling leftist rebels from neighboring Colombia. While reliable data is hard to ascertain, the vast majority of cocaine departs South America from Colombia and Ecuador, making its way northward through the eastern Pacific Ocean, not the Caribbean.Allegations of kidnappings and murders orderedThe U.S. accuses Maduro and his wife of ordering kidnappings, beatings and murders “against those who owed them drug money or otherwise undermined their drug trafficking operation.” That includes the killing of a local drug boss in Caracas, according to the indictment.Maduro’s wife is also accused of accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in 2007 to arrange a meeting between “a large-scale drug trafficker” and the director of Venezuela’s National Anti-Drug Office. In a corrupt deal, the drug trafficker then agreed to pay a monthly bribe to the director of the anti-drug office as well as about $100,000 for each cocaine-carrying flight “to ensure the flight’s safe passage.” Some of that money then went to Maduro’s wife, the indictment says.Nephews of Maduro’s wife were heard during recorded meetings with confidential U.S. government sources in 2015 agreeing to send “multi-hundred-kilogram cocaine shipments” from Maduro’s “presidential hanger” at a Venezuelan airport. The nephews during the recorded meetings explained “that they were at ‘war’ with the United States,” the indictment alleges. They were both sentenced in 2017 to 18 years in prison for conspiring to send tons of cocaine into the U.S. before being released in 2022 as part of a prisoner swap in exchange for seven imprisoned Americans.Rubio calls operation a ‘law enforcement function’During a news conference, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, cast the military raid that captured Maduro and his wife as an action carried out on behalf of the Department of Justice. Caine said the operation was made “at the request of the Justice Department.”Rubio, as he responded to a question about whether Congress had been notified, said the U.S. raid to get the couple was “basically a law enforcement function,” adding that it was an instance in which the “Department of War supported the Department of Justice.” He called Maduro “a fugitive of American justice with a $50 million reward” over his head.

    A newly unsealed U.S. Justice Department indictment accuses captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of running a “corrupt, illegitimate government” fueled by an extensive drug-trafficking operation that flooded the U.S. with thousands of tons of cocaine.

    The arrest of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in a stunning military operation early Saturday in Venezuela sets the stage for a major test for U.S. prosecutors as they seek to secure a conviction in a New York courtroom against the longtime leader of the oil-rich South American nation.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a post on X that Maduro and Flores “will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts.”

    Here’s a look at the accusations against Maduro and the charges he faces:

    Drug and weapons charges

    Maduro is charged alongside his wife, his son and three others. Maduro is indicted on four counts: narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices.

    Maduro is facing the same charges as in an earlier indictment brought against him in Manhattan federal court in 2020, during the first Trump presidency. The new indictment unsealed Saturday, which adds charges against Flores, was filed under seal in the Southern District of New York just before Christmas.

    Maduro is due to make his first appearance Monday in federal court in Manhattan. A video posted Saturday night on social media by a White House account showed Maduro, smiling, as he was escorted through a U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration office in New York by two federal agents grasping his arms. He was expected to be detained while awaiting trial at a federal jail in Brooklyn.

    ‘Cocaine-fueled corruption’ flourished

    The indictment accuses Maduro of partnering with “some of the most violent and prolific drug traffickers and narco-terrorists in the world” to allow for the shipment of thousands of tons of cocaine into the U.S.

    Authorities allege powerful and violent drug-trafficking organizations, such as the Sinaloa Cartel and Tren de Aragua gang, worked directly with the Venezuelan government and then sent profits to high-ranking officials who helped and protected them in exchange.

    But a U.S. intelligence assessment published in April, which drew on input from the 18 agencies that comprise the intelligence community, found no coordination between Tren de Aragua and the Venezuelan government.

    Maduro allowed “cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish for his own benefit, for the benefit of members of his ruling regime, and for the benefit of his family members,” the indictment alleges.

    U.S. authorities allege that Maduro and his family “provided law enforcement cover and logistical support” to cartels moving drugs throughout the region, resulting in as much as 250 tons of cocaine trafficked through Venezuela annually by 2020, according to the indictment.

    Drugs were moved on go-fast vessels, fishing boats and container ships or on planes from clandestine airstrips, the indictment says.

    “This cycle of narcotics-based corruption lines the pockets of Venezuelan officials and their families while also benefiting violent narco-terrorists who operate with impunity on Venezuelan soil and who help produce, protect, and transport tons of cocaine to the United States,” the indictment says.

    Successive U.S. administrations have warned about Venezuela’s role as a transit point for cocaine and a haven for criminal gangs, terrorist groups and drug-smuggling leftist rebels from neighboring Colombia. While reliable data is hard to ascertain, the vast majority of cocaine departs South America from Colombia and Ecuador, making its way northward through the eastern Pacific Ocean, not the Caribbean.

    Allegations of kidnappings and murders ordered

    The U.S. accuses Maduro and his wife of ordering kidnappings, beatings and murders “against those who owed them drug money or otherwise undermined their drug trafficking operation.” That includes the killing of a local drug boss in Caracas, according to the indictment.

    Maduro’s wife is also accused of accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in 2007 to arrange a meeting between “a large-scale drug trafficker” and the director of Venezuela’s National Anti-Drug Office. In a corrupt deal, the drug trafficker then agreed to pay a monthly bribe to the director of the anti-drug office as well as about $100,000 for each cocaine-carrying flight “to ensure the flight’s safe passage.” Some of that money then went to Maduro’s wife, the indictment says.

    Nephews of Maduro’s wife were heard during recorded meetings with confidential U.S. government sources in 2015 agreeing to send “multi-hundred-kilogram cocaine shipments” from Maduro’s “presidential hanger” at a Venezuelan airport. The nephews during the recorded meetings explained “that they were at ‘war’ with the United States,” the indictment alleges. They were both sentenced in 2017 to 18 years in prison for conspiring to send tons of cocaine into the U.S. before being released in 2022 as part of a prisoner swap in exchange for seven imprisoned Americans.

    Rubio calls operation a ‘law enforcement function’

    During a news conference, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, cast the military raid that captured Maduro and his wife as an action carried out on behalf of the Department of Justice. Caine said the operation was made “at the request of the Justice Department.”

    Rubio, as he responded to a question about whether Congress had been notified, said the U.S. raid to get the couple was “basically a law enforcement function,” adding that it was an instance in which the “Department of War supported the Department of Justice.” He called Maduro “a fugitive of American justice with a $50 million reward” over his head.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Zelensky names spy chief to head presidential office after corruption row

    [ad_1]

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has named spy chief Kyrylo Budanov as his new chief of staff, just over a month after his previous top aide resigned amid a corruption row.

    “At this time, Ukraine needs greater focus on security issues,” Zelensky said in a post on social media, publishing a photo of his meeting with Budanov in Kyiv.

    Budanov, 39, has until now led the Hur military intelligence, which has claimed a number of highly-effective strikes against Russia.

    Zelensky also said he intended to replace his defence minister Denys Shmyhal, appointing his current minister of digital transformation Mykhaylo Fedorov to take up the post.

    Budanov’s predecessor, Andriy Yermak, wielded enormous political influence throughout Russia’s full-scale invasion launched in 2022. He also led Ukraine’s negotiating team in crucial talks with the US aimed at ending the war.

    In Friday’s post on social media, Zelensky wrote: “At this time, Ukraine needs greater focus on security issues, the development of the defence and security forces of Ukraine, as well as on the diplomatic track of negotiations.

    “Kyrylo has specialist experience in these areas and sufficient strength to deliver results.”

    The president added that he had already instructed his new office chief to update and present key documents regarding “the strategic foundations” of Ukraine’s defence.

    The chief of presidential staff in Ukraine is historically a very powerful position. There was a time in the 2000s when a presidential administration head in Ukraine wielded about as much power as the president himself.

    Ostensibly administrative, the role traditionally offered not just close access to the head of state, but also plentiful opportunities to pull the strings of government.

    For example, the chief of presidential staff could lobby for government appointments and apply pressure to business circles, often resulting in personal gain.

    General Budanov’s appointment suggests an intention to overhaul the role. It puts the president’s office on a war footing – it will very likely be much more focused on security and the war with Russia.

    Later on Friday, Zelensky announced other changes to his top team. He said Fedorov had been nominated to serve as his new defence minister because he had “decided to change the structure of the Ukrainian ministry of defence”.

    Federov, aged 34, is the youngest minister in the Ukrainian government. His key achievement so far is the development and implementation of Diya, a centralised digital platform for government services.

    He is “deeply involved with drones”, and will be tasked in particular with training more drone operators, Zelensky said in his evening address.

    He added that Shmyhal remains “part of the team” and will be moved to another area of work.

    Zelensky said Budanov was being replaced by 56-year-old foreign intelligence chief Oleh Ivashchenko.

    Budanov’s predecessor, former chief of staff Yermak, 54, stepped down on 28 November, and his departure was seen as a major blow to Zelensky.

    Yermak quit shortly after his home in Kyiv was raided by the country’s anti-corruption agencies.

    He is not accused of any wrongdoing, and the anti-corruption bureau Nabu and specialised anti-corruption prosecutor’s office Sap did not explain why they searched his property.

    In the past few months investigators have linked several high-profile figures to an alleged $100m (£75m) embezzlement scandal in the energy sector.

    They said they had uncovered an extensive scheme to take kickbacks and influence state-owned companies including state nuclear energy firm Enerhoatom.

    The corruption scandal has rocked Ukraine, weakening Zelensky’s own position and jeopardising the country’s negotiating position at a delicate time.

    Kyiv, backed by its European allies, is seeking to change the terms of a US-led draft peace plan originally seen as heavily slanted towards Russia.

    Russian officials have seized on the scandal, talking up corruption claims.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bulgaria to become the 21st country to join the euro, deepening EU ties despite fears

    [ad_1]

    SOFIA, Bulgaria — On New Year’s Day, Bulgaria becomes the 21st country to join the euro currency union, furthering its integration into the European Union. But the historic milestone arrives amid political instability and skepticism among ordinary people fueled by fears of price rises.

    Supporters of switching to the euro from the old currency, the lev, are praising the move as one of the greatest achievements since the 1989 transition from a Soviet-style economy to democracy and free markets. They hope it will make the country more attractive for investors and strengthen its orientation toward wealthier Western Europe.

    But many people are uneasy, in a country where corruption is rife and trust in the authorities is low. One fear is that merchants will round prices up or otherwise use the changeover to worsen inflation, at a time when inflation has rebounded to 3.7%.

    An EU Eurobarometer poll from March showed that 53% of 1,017 people surveyed opposed joining the eurozone, while 45% were in favor. A separate Eurobarometer poll, taken between Oct. 9 and Nov. 3 on a similar sample, showed that about half of Bulgarians opposed the single currency while 42% were in favor. The margin of error was about plus or minus 3.1 percentage points for the March poll.

    The government successfully completed the euro adoption process by beating inflation down to 2.7% earlier this year to comply with EU rules and win approval from EU leaders. But clearing that hurdle was followed by a new chapter of political chaos. The government resigned after less than a year in office amid nationwide anti-corruption protests. This left the country without a regular budget for next year and is hampering plans for long-overdue structural reforms and decisions on use of EU support funds. A new election — the eighth in five years — is expected to be held next spring.

    Nevelin Petrov, 64, said he welcomed the euro. “Bulgaria is a full member of the European Union, and its rightful place is alongside the other developed and democratic European nations,” he said. “I am convinced that the adoption of the euro will contribute to the long-term prosperity of our country,” he said.

    Others, like Darina Vitova, who runs a pedicure salon in Sofia, said things were moving too fast although she welcomed the change “in principle.”

    “The standard of living and incomes in our country are far from those in the richest European countries, while prices here are rising and life for the average person will become more difficult,” she said. She acknowledges that when heading to the beaches in neighboring Greece, it will be more convenient to pay with the same “pocket money” she uses at home.

    Bulgaria, with its 6.4 million people, is one of the poorest members of the 27-country European union. The average monthly wage is 1,300 euros ($1,530).

    Countries that join the EU commit to the euro, but actually joining can take years and some members are in no hurry. Poland in particular has seen strong economic growth since joining the EU in 2004 without adopting the euro.

    Opponents of joining have fed fears that the changes will allegedly lead to more poverty and loss of national identity. Social media has spread disinformation such as false claims that the euro could lead to confiscation of bank accounts. Nationalist and pro-Russian groups exploit these fears.

    European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has said that countries have experienced a slight, transient rise in prices of 0.2%-0.4% right after joining. Price rises can be more apparent than real, as cafe and hairdressers may put off printing new menus and price lists ahead of the change, so that increases are only delayed, not caused by the euro.

    Anti-euro rallies in May and September were organized by the pro-Russian Vazrazhdane party but remained smaller than the mass protests that toppled the government. While the anti-euro protests were supported by older people based on economic anxiety, the mass protests that toppled the government appeared to represent a younger electorate fed up with corruption and eager to integrate with Europe.

    Anti-euro disinformation spread by pro-Russian politicians and social media aim “to reduce support for the European Union, NATO and Ukraine,” said Dimitar Keranov, program coordinator for engaging Central Europe at the German Marshall Fund in Berlin.

    Bulgaria’s European integration “is not in Moscow’s interest at all, so if it can somehow polarize society and weaken support for the European Union that’s what it tries to achieve,” he said.

    Euro adoption is another way to combat Russian influence, he said: “The further Bulgaria advances in its European integration, the harder it becomes for Russia to influence the country.”

    Petar Ganev, an analyst at the Sofia-based Institute for Market Economics, says that that by stepping down the outgoing government has sent a signal of uncertainty to foreign investors.

    “Instead of capitalizing on euro adoption as a strong and positive signal to the international community—investors, debt holders, and those investing in Bulgarian assets and economic activity—we risk sending the opposite message,” Ganev said in an interview with the Associated Press.

    Ganev believes that eurozone membership should be regarded as an opportunity, an additional mechanism to address corruption and the rule of law, although it alone cannot resolve Bulgaria’s chronic cycle of elections and political fragmentation and instability.

    Local economists think that joining the euro will not bring dramatic changes to Bulgaria’s economy. That is because the lev has been pegged since 1999 to the euro by law, at a fixed rate of 1 lev for every 51 euro cents.

    The lev and the euro will be in dual use for cash payments for the whole month of January, but people will receive only euros in change.

    ___

    McHugh reported from Frankfurt, Germany. Valentina Petrova in Sofia contributed to this report

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Today in Chicago History: Chicago resident Jack Johnson becomes first Black heavyweight boxing champ

    [ad_1]

    Here’s a look back at what happened in the Chicago area on Dec. 26, according to the Tribune’s archives.

    Is an important event missing from this date? Email us.

    Weather records (from the National Weather Service, Chicago)

    • High temperature: 61 degrees (2019)
    • Low temperature: Minus 11 degrees (1983)
    • Precipitation: 0.98 inches (1888)
    • Snowfall: 5.6 inches (2009)
    Boxing legend Jack Johnson in an undated photo. (Chicago Tribune historical photo)

    1908: Jack Johnson — who lived in Chicago and owned a short-lived cafe in the Bronzeville neighborhood — became the first Black heavyweight boxing champion. Johnson defeated Tommy Burns in the 14th round by decision in Sydney, Australia, “when the police took a hand in the affair and stopped the uneven battle,” the Tribune reported.

    Five years later, an all-white jury in Chicago convicted Johnson of traveling with his white girlfriend, Lucille Cameron, in violation of the Mann Act, which made it illegal to transport women across state lines for “immoral” purposes.

    Boxing legend Jack Johnson and his wife Lucille in an undated photo. (Chicago Tribune historical photo)
    Boxing legend Jack Johnson and his wife Lucille in an undated photo. (Chicago Tribune historical photo)

    The case would later be held up as a deplorable example of institutional racism in early 20th-century America. He was sentenced to a year and a day in prison in June 1913, but fled to Canada with Cameron, whom he married while free on bond. He remained a fugitive for seven years, traveling from Europe to Mexico, where he fought bulls and ran a bar called the Main Event.

    Johnson returned to the United States in 1920 and turned himself in. He served about a year in federal prison in Leavenworth, Kansas, and was released in July 1921 — arriving back in Chicago a few days later to 35,000 people cheering him on. Johnson died on June 10, 1946, in an auto crash in North Carolina, after storming out of a diner where he’d been asked to sit in a rear section reserved for Blacks. He is buried in Graceland Cemetery.

    How many presidential pardons or sentence commutations have been granted to people from Illinois?

    President Donald Trump granted a rare posthumous pardon to Johnson on May 24, 2018, clearing Johnson’s name more than 100 years after what many see as his racist conviction. The case had been brought to Trump’s attention by “Rocky” star Sylvester Stallone.

    "The Glass Menagerie" by Tennessee Williams debuted at the Civic Theatre in Chicago on Dec. 26, 1944, and received a rave review by the Tribune's Claudia Cassidy. (Chicago Tribune)
    “The Glass Menagerie” by Tennessee Williams debuted at the Civic Theatre in Chicago on Dec. 26, 1944, and received a rave review by the Tribune’s Claudia Cassidy. (Chicago Tribune)

    1944: Tennessee Williams’ “The Glass Menagerie” — “which tells a worried mother’s problems in marrying off her crippled daughter,” the Tribune earlier reported — held its world premiere at the Civic Theatre in Chicago. The four-character play starred Eddie Dowling, Laurette Taylor, Julie Haydon and Robert Stevenson. The cost of the production was expected to be $40,000 (or roughly $728,000 in today’s dollars).

    On Dec. 27, 1944, the feature pages of the Tribune offered a review of the new play. The headline read: “Fragile Drama Holds Theater in Tight Spell.” The reviewer was Claudia Cassidy.

    Chicago Tribune theater critic Claudia Cassidy in the 1940s. (Chicago Tribune historical archive)
    Chicago Tribune theater critic Claudia Cassidy in the 1940s. (Chicago Tribune historical archive)

    “Paradoxically, it is a dream in the dusk and a tough little play that knows people and how they tick,” Cassidy wrote in her review. “Etched in the shadows of a man’s memory, it comes alive in theater terms of words, motion, lighting, and music. If it is your play, as it is mine, it reaches out tentacles, first tentative, then gripping, and you are caught in its spell.”

    1969: A gunman hijacked Chicago-bound United Airlines Flight 929 — a Boeing 727 with 32 people on board — and forced it to fly to Havana from New York City. Pilot Axel D. Paulsen was ordered, “Take this ship to Cuba — and no funny business.”

    A spokesperson for the airline said Paulsen told dispatch: “The guy’s got a gun but he’s pretty cool.”

    The plane touched down in Havana at 10:03 p.m. then flew to Miami at 1:23 a.m. Chicago time. It was the 33rd American plane hijacked that year.

    Former Ald. Daniel Solis arrives at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, Nov. 25, 2024, to take the stand in the Michael Madigan corruption trial. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune)
    Former Ald. Daniel Solis arrives at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, Nov. 25, 2024, to take the stand in the Michael Madigan corruption trial. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune)

    2018: Retiring Chicago Ald. Daniel Solis signed a secret agreement with federal prosecutors admitting to taking bribes from real estate developers in exchange for his help on zoning issues. The terms of the unprecedented, deferred prosecution agreement that Solis signed with the U.S. attorney’s office that day weren’t made public until April 2022. He became a government mole by wearing an undercover wire to help federal investigators build cases against 14th Ward Ald. Edward Burke and ex-House Speaker Michael Madigan.

    The Dishonor Roll: Chicago officials

    Solis entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. attorney’s office, which agreed to drop bribery charges against him in 2025 if he continues to cooperate.

    Want more vintage Chicago?

    Subscribe to the free Vintage Chicago Tribune newsletter, join our Chicagoland history Facebook group, stay current with Today in Chicago History and follow us on Instagram for more from Chicago’s past.

    Have an idea for Vintage Chicago Tribune? Share it with Kori Rumore and Marianne Mather at krumore@chicagotribune.com and mmather@chicagotribune.com

    [ad_2]

    Kori Rumore

    Source link

  • A Chinese whistleblower now living in the US is being hunted by Beijing with US tech

    [ad_1]

    MIDLAND, Texas — Retired Chinese official Li Chuanliang was recuperating from cancer on a Korean resort island when he got an urgent call: Don’t return to China, a friend warned. You’re now a fugitive.

    Days later, a stranger snapped a photo of Li in a cafe. Terrified South Korea would send him back, Li fled, flew to the U.S. on a tourist visa and applied for asylum. But even there — in New York, in California, deep in the Texas desert — the Chinese government continued to hunt him down with the help of surveillance technology.

    Li’s communications were monitored, his assets seized and his movements followed in police databases. More than 40 friends and relatives — including his pregnant daughter — were identified and detained, even by tracking down their cab drivers through facial recognition software. Three former associates died in detention, and for months shadowy men Li believed to be Chinese operatives stalked him across continents, interviews and documents seen by The Associated Press show.

    “They track you 24 hours a day. All your electronics, your phone — they’ll use every method to find you, your relatives, your friends, where you live,” Li said. “No matter where you are, you’re under their control.”

    The Chinese government is using an increasingly powerful tool to cement its power at home and vastly amplify it abroad: Surveillance technology, much of it originating in the U.S., an AP investigation has found.

    Within China, this technology helped identify and punish almost 900,000 officials last year alone, nearly five times more than in 2012, according to state numbers. Beijing says it is cracking down on corruption, but critics charge that such technology is used in China and elsewhere to stifle dissent and exact retribution on perceived enemies.

    Outside China, the same technology is being used to threaten wayward officials, along with dissidents and alleged criminals, under what authorities call Operations “Fox Hunt” and “Sky Net.” The U.S. has criticized these overseas operations as a “threat” and an “affront to national sovereignty.” More than 14,000 people, including some 3,000 officials, have been brought back to China from more than 120 countries through coercion, arrests and pressure on relatives, according to state information.

    “They’re actively pursuing those people who fled China. … as a way to demonstrate power, to show there’s no way you can escape,” said Yaqiu Wang, a fellow at the University of Chicago. “The chilling effect is enormously effective.”

    The technology used to control officials at home and abroad over the past decade came from Silicon Valley companies such as IBM, Oracle and Microsoft, according to a review of hundreds of leaked emails, government procurements, and internal corporate presentations obtained exclusively by AP. This technology mines texts, payments, flights, calls, and other data to identify the friends and family of officials and their assets.

    Among the agencies pursuing Li and his family is China’s economic crimes police, which hunts corruption suspects domestically and abroad. IBM said in internal slides that it sold the i2 surveillance software program to this Economic Crime Investigation Bureau, and procurement records show Oracle and Microsoft software was sold to that same division. Leaked emails show i2 software was copied by a former IBM partner, Landasoft, and sold to China’s disciplinary commissions, which investigate officials. None of the sales violated U.S. sanctions.

    IBM said in a statement that it sold its division making the i2 program in 2022, and has “robust processes” to ensure its technology is used responsibly. Oracle declined comment, and Microsoft did not respond.

    China’s State Council, Ministry of Public Security, National Supervision Commission, and Supreme People’s Court and Prosecutorate did not respond to faxed requests for comment. China’s foreign ministry told AP that Chinese authorities protect the rights of suspects, handle cases lawfully and respect foreign sovereignty.

    “We urge relevant countries to drop double standards and avoid becoming a safe haven for corrupt officials and their assets,” it said.

    Li’s story is a rare firsthand account from a former Chinese official. Beijing has accused Li of corruption totaling around $435 million, but Li says he’s being targeted for openly criticizing the Chinese government and denies criminal charges of taking bribes and embezzling state funds. A review of thousands of pages of legal, property, and corporate records, interrogation transcripts, and Li’s medical and travel files obtained exclusively by AP, as well as interviews with nine lawyers, support key parts of his story, showing distorted charges, blocked access to evidence, coercive confessions, and altered legal records.

    Li drew ire because as a former official, he knew well and exposed the inner workings of local politics, including naming names. While in the U.S., he also started what he called the Chinese Tyrannical Officials Whistleblower Center.

    “China places enormous emphasis on the political discipline of even former officials and (Communist) Party members,” said Jeremy Daum, Senior Fellow at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center. “So when one becomes a vocal critic of the country’s leadership, it doesn’t go over well.”

    At a pro-democracy gathering in California in 2020, Li said, he was tailed and questioned by a stranger who knew his identity. That November, an activist secretly working for Beijing asked Li to a meeting and added him to a dissident group chat monitored by China’s police, a 2025 FBI indictment later revealed. In June, an FBI letter identified Li as the possible victim of a crime involving an unregistered Chinese agent.

    Both the FBI and the White House did not comment on Li’s specific case. But the White House said it pursues any violations of U.S. law, and the FBI told AP it considers China’s efforts to retaliate against people in the U.S. who exercise their rights “unacceptable.”

    Li’s future in the U.S. is unclear. The Trump administration has paused all asylum applications. If he doesn’t return, he could face trial in absentia; if convicted and deported, he could face life in prison.

    “Electronic surveillance is the arteries for China to project power into the world … each step that every one of your relatives takes is being monitored and analyzed with big data,” Li said. “It’s absolutely terrifying.”

    Li, a stocky and well-built man who projects authority, rose through the ranks through the 1990s and 2000s, when China’s growing prosperity also brought corruption. Beijing formed a new “economic crime investigation bureau” and established what it called “Golden Tax,” “Golden Finance,” and “Golden Audit” systems to track businesses and officials across the country, using tech from Silicon Valley companies.

    Li worked as a state accountant in his hometown, Jixi, in far northeastern China, where he signed off on contracts to purchase American technology. “Bulwark against corruption,” the local media dubbed him.

    Li’s family prospered, investing in apartment complexes and renting out forklifts and bulldozers, raising questions over whether he used his position to enrich relatives. Li and his lawyers don’t deny conflicts of interest or civil violations, but say profits were made from legal, regular business operations and deny criminal charges of embezzlement and bribery.

    The same technology to fight corruption was also used for surveillance. Police accessed banking records, financial transactions, “Golden Tax,” “Golden Finance,” and “Golden Audit” data along with their own digital policing systems to sift through the finances of wide swaths of the population.

    Officials began deploying surveillance technology against each other. China’s former top security official was found to have wiretapped political opponents. And a former vice state security minister colluded with a businessman to leak tapes of a political competitor having sex with a mistress.

    In June 2011, Jixi gained a new leader: Xu Zhaojun, a local party boss.

    Months later, Li was named vice mayor of Jixi. He soon heard stories about Xu, his new boss.

    In January 2012, Xu splurged on an extravagant family getaway to China’s tropical Hainan Island, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars of public money on first-class tickets, lavish seafood dinners, and luxury suites, according to photos and receipts obtained by Li and seen by AP. They brought a maid, bought gold jewelry, and used the VIP airport terminal.

    At first Li stayed silent. But Xu kept spending: Luxury cars. Clothes from Louis Vuitton. A high-roller trip to Vegas, with paid escorts and expensive watches.

    Xu allegedly colluded with property developers to demolish an apartment complex, a culture center and a thriving shopping plaza for new construction, standing to earn millions in the process, documents show.  More than 100 people complained.

    But rather than investigate Xu, the Jixi authorities went after the protesters, and police said they were “strictly preventing” residents from complaining to the central government in Beijing, documents show.

    The funds Li had earmarked for Jixi’s surveillance apparatus was being turned on ordinary people. He was aghast.

    “It only became clear after I became vice mayor,” Li said. “From top to bottom, it’s all corrupt.”

    It all changed in 2012, when Xi Jinping became China’s top leader.

    Gifts of watches, cigarettes and high-end liquor were curbed. Private clubs shuttered, upscale restaurants closed. Banquets were canceled, red carpets rolled up, and thousands arrested.

    Back in Jixi, Xu ordered more seizures: Investors wanted to privatize a funeral home. When staff discussed making formal complaints, Xu had some arrested.

    Li knew the risks of reporting his boss were high. But in early 2013, Xi called on the party to catch “tigers and flies” in corruption — officials high-ranking and low.

    Li gathered evidence: photos, memos, and piles of receipts. He typed out a letter about Xu, accusing his boss and his cronies of embezzling more than $100 million. “They’re not just greedy for the money of the living, but they also eat the money of the dead,” he wrote.

    The daring gambit backfired at first.

    The party demoted Xu but didn’t arrest him. Furious, Xu sought revenge, and Li found himself and his relatives the target of state scrutiny. Li’s family was threatened, and his siblings were fired from their government jobs.

    But Li’s complaint against Xu had opened the floodgates, with accusations from others mounting. In August 2014, an official from Beijing asked Li for a meeting about Xu. They spoke well into the night.

    Within a week, Xu was arrested. He was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

    Xu is in prison and could not be reached. Chinese authorities did not respond to a request for an interview with Xu.

    Party officials asked Li if he wanted a new post. But he had lost faith in the party.

    “I saw through the nature of the system,” Li said. “So I quit.”

    In 2014 and 2015, the launch of operations Fox Hunt and Sky Net began ensnaring hundreds of former officials and their business partners abroad.

    Beijing set up big data centers to track money and relationships and established an online portal to report “fleeing party members and government officials.”

    A playbook emerged: Trawl through police databases to find transactions or property that could be deemed suspicious. Identify friends and family who could be coerced to confess. Then announce corruption charges.

    A leaked photo of the internal police software used to hunt officials suggests the moniker “Sky Net” was inspired by an American movie, “The Terminator,” about a cyborg assassin that hunts humans.

    At first, the U.S. government was open to cooperating with Beijing’s requests for information and extradition, said Holden Triplett, FBI attache in Beijing from 2014 to 2017. But soon, the U.S. realized China’s anti-corruption campaign was often about stifling dissent.

    “It was such a low level of information, not even really evidence, it was not enough for us to take any action ever,” Triplett told AP. “What they tended to focus on were things that frankly were threatening to the state and threatening to the party potentially, or somehow would make the party look bad.”

    In 2015, Washington complained that Chinese agents were flying to the U.S. and stalking targets without approval, including U.S. permanent residents. Agents brought night goggles from China, snapped photos and taped threatening messages on doors.

    Marketing documents and a leaked copy of software used against officials fleeing abroad show how American technology enabled Beijing’s playbook.

    IBM marketed i2 to Chinese police to allow them to flag officials based on the value of their assets and that of their families, according to a slideshow whose metadata identifies it as being from 2018. They customized financial software to add a function for Chinese officials to “sign off” on orders.

    i2 was also copied by an IBM Chinese reseller, Landasoft, which developed its own software that drew connections to flag “suspicious individuals,” such as relatives connected to a targeted official. A leaked copy of Landasoft software showed one button was called “associated persons management.” Another showed special functions for Valentine’s Day and other holidays, when loved ones were more likely to call.

    Landasoft systems flagged suspicious transactions and tracked suspected prostitutes or when two people of the opposite gender booked the same hotel room. Landasoft did not respond to a request for comment.

    Monitoring and threatening family was key to getting back anyone who had fled.

    “A fugitive is like a kite,” said Li Gongjing, a captain in the economic crime investigation division of the Shanghai police, in an interview with state media. “He may be abroad, but the string is in China, and he can always be found through his family.”

    After Li quit the party, auditors trawled through his finances — usual practice for departing officials. Three years later, in 2017, they declared him clean.

    The next year, Xi removed term limits, allowing him to rule for life. He used the anti-corruption campaign to sideline rivals and eliminate opposition.

    Soon, even those who were hunting other officials fell victim to the government.

    In 2018, Chinese police official Meng Hongwei was detained in Beijing, abruptly ending a two-year term as Interpol president during which the international policing organization issued hundreds of Red Notices requested by China. Red Notices alert global law enforcement to look out for a criminal suspect, upon request of a member country, but Interpol has spent years trying to prevent abuse of the system for hunting down political asylum-seekers.

    In February 2020, agents came for Li’s friend and former deputy, district chief Kong Lingbao, who had criticized Beijing’s censorship of key information in the COVID-19 pandemic. A rival secretly recorded Kong saying during a private dinner that he could no longer work for the party. Kong was summoned to the local discipline inspection office and never came out: he was being investigated for “inappropriate remarks”.

    Kong’s arrest prompted a friend to ring Li in Korea and warn him. That July, Chinese authorities opened an investigation into Li.

    A month later, Li told The Epoch Times, a dissident Chinese publication, that he had quit the party, and portrayed himself as a dissident. He says he did not know he was under investigation at the time.

    A week after the interview was published, strangers stalked Li at the unveiling of a sculpture dedicated to pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong, asking menacing questions and tailing him by car. Agents identified the address of one of his safe houses.

    In early September, the party publicly accused Li of embezzling “huge amounts” of state funds, paying money for sex and fleeing abroad. It was “only a matter of time”, authorities declared, before Li would be arrested.

    “We advise all corrupt officials who have fled abroad, including Li Chuanliang, that no matter how cunning a fox is, it cannot escape the eyes of the hunter,” it said.

    Official statements and interviews with four people familiar with Li’s case show Xi and the central government got directly involved after Li spoke out.

    Beijing tapped phones, seized assets and installed cameras outside the homes of friends and family. Some detained were denied surgery or other medical care, even those recovering from heart disease, cancer, and other illnesses. Li’s aunt was released from a hospital in a vegetative state with bruises on her head and all over her body. Even the Li family grave was dug up.

    Li’s friend, Kong, was sentenced to over a decade in prison for allegedly taking bribes. The party claimed he had watched porn and ignored his work, which they blamed for the spread of COVID in his district. Furious, Li kept speaking out.

    In December 2020, a man from Shanghai posing as a private investigator approached Zheng Cunzhu, vice chairman of the dissident China Democracy Party. The man offered $100,000 in bribes for information on Li and promised more if he obstructed Li’s bid for asylum, Zheng said in an interview and a letter.

    In February 2021, Li learned the Chinese government had asked Interpol to issue a Red Notice declaring to police worldwide that Li was a wanted man. Interpol retracted the Red Notice after Li filed a complaint.

    Li began donning masks and hats in public and carrying multiple phones, wary of surveillance. He floated from safe house to safe house with Christians across the United States.

    In October 2024, a Chinese court announced that Li was suspected of corruption totaling over 3.1 billion RMB, or roughly $435 million. The government claimed they seized 1,021 properties, 38 vehicles, and 18 companies belonging to Li and charged his relatives and associates with crimes related to Li. The lawyers who reviewed the case told AP there were serious anomalies with the charges.

    Many of the lawyers Li has tried to hire were rejected, threatened, and put under surveillance. At least three were summoned by Chinese legal authorities. They were told Li’s case was “political” and important to leaders from Beijing, and warned against speaking publicly, according to memos viewed by AP.

    “Once you get to the point that you’re criticizing the party, it’s no holds barred,” said Ryan Mitchell, a law professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. “Resistance is punished.”

    In a courthouse in China, Li’s friends and family faced legal proceedings tied to his corruption charges. A plainclothes officer outside stopped an AP reporter from taking photos, saying a “sensitive political case” was being heard.

    “They didn’t show any evidence. Instead, they told a story,” one of the lawyers told AP, declining to be named because they were warned against speaking to the press. “They wouldn’t even show us the accusations.”

    Authorities in Heilongjiang, where the proceedings were held, did not respond to a faxed request for comment.

    Li is now cut off from friends and family, denied legal assistance and clueless even to the details of the charges against him. So he is once again resorting to speaking out — this time on YouTube.

    Li acknowledges the situation seems hopeless. But he’s pressing on.

    “Why am I speaking up?” he said. “Today, it’s me. Tomorrow, it might be you.”

    __

    Independent investigative journalists Myf Ma in New York and Yael Grauer in Phoenix and AP journalists Serginho Roosblad in Texas, Garance Burke in San Francisco and Byron Tau in Washington contributed to this report.

    —-

    Contact AP’s global investigative team at Investigative@ap.org or https://www.ap.org/tips/.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Supreme Court poised to strike down Watergate-era campaign finance limits

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court’s conservatives signaled Tuesday they are likely to rule for Republicans and President Trump by throwing out a Watergate-era limit on campaign funding by political parties.

    The court has repeatedly said campaign money is protected as free speech, and the new ruling could allow parties to support their candidate’s campaigns with help from wealthy donors.

    For the second day in a row, Trump administration lawyers urged the justices to strike down a law passed by Congress. And they appeared to have the support of most of the conservatives.

    The only doubt arose over the question of whether the case was flawed because no current candidate was challenging the limits.

    “The parties are very much weakened,” said Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. “This court’s decisions over the years have together reduced the power of political parties, as compared to outside groups, with negative effects on our constitutional democracy.”

    He was referring to rulings that upheld unlimited campaign spending by wealthy donors and so-called super PACs.

    In the Citizens United case of 2010, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and four other conservatives struck down the long-standing limits on campaign spending, including by corporations and unions. They did so on the theory that such spending was “independent” of candidates and was protected as free speech under the 1st Amendment.

    They said the limits on contributions to candidates were not affected. Those limits could be justified because the danger of corruption where money bought political favors. This triggered a new era of ever-larger political spending but most of it was separate from the candidates and the parties.

    Last year, billionaire Elon Musk spent more than $250 million to support Donald Trump’s campaign for reelection. He did so with money spent through political action committees, not directly to Trump or his campaign.

    Meanwhile the campaign funding laws limit contributions to candidates to $3,500.

    Lawyers for the National Republican Senatorial Committee pointed out this trend and told the Supreme Court its decisions had “eroded” the basis for some of the remaining the 1970s limits on campaign funding.

    At issue Tuesday were the limits on “coordinated party spending.” In the wake of the Watergate scandal, Congress added limits on campaign money that could be given to parties and used to fund their candidates. The current donation limit is $44,000, the lawyers said.

    Washington attorney Noel Francisco, Trump’s solicitor general during his first term, urged the court strike down these limits on grounds they are outdated and violate the freedom of speech.

    “The theory is that they’re needed to prevent an individual donor from laundering a $44,000 donation through the party to a particular candidate in exchange for official action,” he said.

    If a big-money donor hopes to win a favor from a congressional candidate, the “would-be briber would be better off just giving a massive donation to the candidate’s favorite super PAC,” Francisco said.

    The suit heard Tuesday was launched by then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio and other Republican candidates, and it has continued in his role as vice president and possibly a presidential candidate in 2028.

    Usually, the Justice Department defends federal laws, but in this instance, the Trump administration switched sides and joined the Republicans calling for the party spending limits to be struck down.

    Precedents might have stood in the way.

    In 2001, the Supreme Court had narrowly upheld these limits on the grounds that the party’s direct support was like a contribution, not independent spending. But the deputy solicitor general, Sarah Harris, told the justices Tuesday that the court’s recent decisions have “demolished” that precedent.

    “Parties can’t corrupt candidates, and no evidence suggests donors launder bribes by co-opting parties’ coordinated spending with candidates,” she said.

    Marc Elias, a Democratic attorney, joined the case in the support of the court limits. He said the outcome would have little to do with speech or campaign messages.

    “I think we’re underselling the actual corruption” that could arise, he said. If an individual were to give $1 million to political party while that person has business matter before the House or Senate, he said, it’s plausible that could influence “a deciding or swing vote.”

    The only apparent difficulty for the conservative justices arose over questions of procedure.

    Washington attorney Roman Martinez was asked to defend the law, and he argued that neither Vance nor any other Republicans had legal standing to challenge the limits. Vance was not a current candidate, and he said the case should be dismissed for that reason.

    Some legal observers noted that the limits on parties arose in response to evidence that huge campaign contributions to President Nixon’s reelection came from industry donors seeking government favors.

    “Coordinated spending limits are one of the few remaining checks to curb the influence of wealthy special interests in our elections,” said Omar Noureldin, senior vice president for litigation at Common Cause. “If the Supreme Court dismantles them, party leaders and wealthy donors will be free to pour nearly unlimited money directly into federal campaigns, exactly the kind of corruption these rules were created to stop.”

    Daniel I. Weiner, an elections law expert at the Brennan Center, said the justices were well aware of how striking down these limits could set the stage for further challenges.

    “I was struck by how both sides had to acknowledge that this case has to be weighed not in isolation but as part of a decades-long push to strike down campaign finance rules,” he said. “Those other decisions have had many consequences the court itself failed to anticipate.”

    [ad_2]

    David G. Savage

    Source link

  • Trump to Pardon Honduran Ex-President Serving 45-Year Drug Sentence

    [ad_1]

    Planned pardon of Hernández, convicted for cocaine trafficking, comes before the country’s election.

    [ad_2]

    José de Córdoba

    Source link

  • Opinion | Ukraine Corruption and U.S. Interests

    [ad_1]

    Another corruption scandal is roiling Ukraine, and there’s no denying corruption exists there as it does in most of the former Soviet states. The question is whether this should override U.S. strategic interests in supporting Ukraine, especially if there are reasonable safeguards against the theft of U.S. assistance.

    President Volodymr Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, resigned Friday after corruption authorities conducted a search at his home.. He said in a Telegram post he is cooperating with investigators, but his resignation comes as the Kremlin and Trump Administration are raising the pressure on Ukraine to cede territory to Russia. Mr. Yermak has been Ukraine’s toughest negotiator in peace talks, holding out against bad ideas.

    Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

    [ad_2]

    The Editorial Board

    Source link

  • Zelensky’s Top Aide Resigns as Corruption Probe Deepens

    [ad_1]

    The departure of Ukraine’s top negotiator—the president’s right-hand man Andriy Yermak—comes at a pivotal moment for the country.

    [ad_2]

    Ian Lovett

    Source link

  • Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s chief of staff Andriy Yermak has home raided by anti-corruption officials

    [ad_1]

    Ukrainian anti-corruption units have raided the home of Andriy Yermak, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s chief of staff, amid a major investigation into a $100 million energy sector corruption scandal involving top Ukrainian officials. Two national agencies fighting entrenched corruption in Ukraine said they had searched Yermak’s office. 

    Yermak himself — a powerful figure in Ukraine and a key participant in ongoing talks with the U.S., as the Trump administration pushes for a ceasefire to end Russia’s nearly four-year war on the country — also confirmed that authorities had searched his apartment.

    “The investigators are facing no obstacles,” Yermak wrote in a post on the messaging app Telegram. He added that he was cooperating fully with them and his lawyers were present.

    The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office are Ukrainian anti-corruption watchdogs.

    Andriy Yermak was present at top-level peace negotiations between U.S. and Ukraine in Geneva this past weekend.

    Martial Trezzini/AP


    Two of Yermak’s former deputies — Oleh Tatarov and Rostyslav Shurma — left the government in 2024 after watchdogs investigated them for financial wrongdoing. A third deputy, Andrii Smyrnov, was investigated for bribes and other wrongdoing but still works for Yermak.

    The scandal has heaped more problems on Zelenskyy as he seeks continued support from Western countries for Ukraine’s war effort and tries to ensure continued foreign funding. The European Union, which Ukraine wants to join, has told Zelenskyy he must crack down on corruption.

    Zelenskyy faced an unprecedented rebellion from his own lawmakers earlier this month after investigators published details of their energy sector investigation. 

    In July, Zelenskyy faced the first major protests against himself and his government since Russia launched its full-scale invasion over a bill he signed into law giving Ukraine’s prosecutor general, a political appointee roughly equivalent to the U.S. attorney general, more power over the two anti-corruption agencies.

    Some critics argued that the new law was political retribution following the charges being filed against his former deputy Smyrnov, and the move fueled concern that Ukraine could backslide into some degree of the authoritarianism that was the default under former, pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, who was known for his close ties to oligarchs.

    U.S. Senators visits Ukraine's Kyiv

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (center) meets with U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (3rd from right), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (4th from left) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (3rd from left) in Kyiv, Ukraine, Jan. 20, 2023. Head of the Presidential Administration of Ukraine Andriy Yermak (2nd from left) and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitro Kuleba (right) also attended the meeting.

    Ukrainian Presidency/Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty


    Although Yermak has not been accused of any wrongdoing, several senior lawmakers in Zelenskyy’s party said Yermak should take responsibility for the energy sector scandal in order to restore public trust. Some said that if Zelenskyy didn’t fire him, the party could split, threatening the president’s parliamentary majority. But Zelenskyy defied them.

    The president urged Ukrainians to unite and “stop the political games” in light of the U.S. pressure to reach a settlement with Russia.

    Yermak met Zelenskyy over 15 years ago when he was a lawyer venturing into the TV production business and Zelenskyy was a famous Ukrainian comedian and actor. He oversaw foreign affairs as part of Zelenskyy’s first presidential team and was promoted to chief of staff in February 2020.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Things to Know About the Growing Pressures Facing Zelenskyy During a Crucial Week of Diplomacy

    [ad_1]

    KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faces a crucial week of diplomacy, testing his abilities to stand his ground while demonstrating to the United States that he is willing to compromise.

    Since a draft of a 28-point U.S.-Russia brokered peace plan was leaked to the press on Thursday, Ukraine and its European allies have been trying to buy time and ensure their interests are represented in any deal. The draft has triggered alarm in Kyiv and European capitals for favoring Russian demands and goals. It includes points on limiting the size of Ukraine’s army as well as handing over Ukrainian territory that Russia has occupied, and Kyiv relinquishing any justice for the thousands of recorded alleged war crimes committed by Moscow. The dial appeared to swing back somewhat more favorably for Kyiv after a U.S. and Ukrainian delegation met in Geneva on Sunday. Both sides said discussions were “productive” and would continue. Zelenskyy said he felt Trump was “hearing” Ukraine in a statement late Sunday after the Geneva talks ended. All this is playing out as Zelenskyy tries to stem public anger from a major corruption scandal and Russia makes slow but steady advances across parts of the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and relentlessly bombs Ukraine’s power plants, causing severe electricity shortages as colder weather sets in. Here are some things to know about the growing pressures confronting Zelenskyy.


    Ukraine and Europe politely push back

    After the plan was leaked, U.S. President Donald Trump set a hard deadline for Kyiv to sign on to it before Thanksgiving, jolting Ukraine and Europe. Ukraine and European leaders made a series of statements, stressing how grateful they are to Trump for his efforts to end the war while stating the need to ensure Kyiv has input into any deal. In a joint statement on Friday, European leaders, together with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, said they welcomed the plan, saying it contained “important elements” and could be used as “a basis that will require additional work.” The U.S. and Ukraine dispatched delegations to Geneva with the aim of hashing out an agreement on Sunday. Speaking after the Geneva talks, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared to roll back on the hard deadline, saying that “more time is needed.”

    The U.S. and Ukraine said the talks were “productive” but neither side shared details of the issues still unresolved. “It is important that European partners support our positions and our people,” Zelenskyy said on Monday, emphasizing his reliance on European support in the face of U.S. pressure and at times open hostility from Trump, who claimed Sunday that Zelenskyy showed “zero gratitude” for U.S. support.


    Peace talks distract from Zelenskyy’s domestic woes

    Zelenskyy sent his beleaguered presidential chief of staff, Andrii Yermak, to Geneva for talks with Rubio on Sunday, glossing over intense pressure to fire him.

    Zelenskyy faced an unprecedented rebellion from his own lawmakers last week after investigators revealed a $100 million corruption scandal involving top Ukrainian officials.

    Although Yermak was not accused of any wrongdoing, several senior lawmakers in Zelenskyy’s party said Yermak should take responsibility for the debacle to restore public trust. Some said that if Zelenskyy didn’t fire him, the party could split, threatening the president’s parliamentary majority. But Zelenskyy resisted, saying Yermak was key to the negotiation process, according to a leading party lawmaker, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly. On Friday, Zelenskyy urged Ukrainians to unite and “stop the political games” in light of the U.S. pressure.

    “All of us together must not forget or confuse who exactly is the enemy of Ukraine today,” Zelenskyy said in an address to the nation.


    Zelenskyy is not under imminent threat

    Despite the recent week of unprecedented criticism, including rebellion from within his own party, Zelenskyy’s own position has not come under fire. Even if Zelenskyy’s grip on parliament weakens and his popularity plummets, it would be nearly impossible to legally unseat him while the war is still going on — unless he voluntarily resigns. Russia’s invasion triggered martial law in Ukraine, indefinitely postponing presidential and parliamentary elections.

    Ukraine’s presidential term is normally five years and before the war the next elections had been scheduled for the spring of 2024.

    But Zelenskyy will need support from parliament to push through any peace deal and questions about Yermak could resurface. And if he were to seek reelection after the war, his chances could be hurt if Yermak is still in the picture, political analysts say.


    Pressure on the front and across the country

    Against this backdrop, Russia’s better equipped army has scaled up attacks along the front line and against energy facilities in the rear, putting further strain on Ukraine.

    The Russian army continues to steadily advance in multiple areas. Russian forces are pushing into the towns of Kupiansk and Pokrovsk, where the fiercest battles rage.

    Russian attacks on Ukraine’s power plants in November have resulted in some of the worst electricity shortages since the war began. Meanwhile, after Russia destroyed much of Ukraine’s gas extraction capabilities in two mass attacks this year, its state gas company, Naftogaz, has had to raise emergency funds to import expensive gas.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump paints Zelenskyy into a corner with his new plan to end Russia’s war on Ukraine

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON — With his new 28-point plan to end Russia’s war in Ukraine, President Donald Trump is resurfacing his argument that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy doesn’t “have the cards” to continue on the battlefield and must come to a settlement that heavily tilts in Moscow’s favor.

    Trump, who has demonstrated low regard for Zelenskyy dating back to his first term, said Friday he expects the Ukrainian leader to respond to his administration’s new plan to end the war by next Thursday.

    “We think we have a way of getting peace,” Trump told reporters in an Oval Office appearance. “He’s going to have to approve it.”

    Buffeted by a corruption scandal in his government, battlefield setbacks and another difficult winter looming as Russia continues to bombard Ukraine’s energy grid, Zelenskyy says Ukraine is now facing perhaps the most difficult choice in its history.

    Zelenskyy has not spoken with Trump since the plan became public this week, but has said he expects to talk to the Republican president in coming days. It’s likely to be another in a series of tough conversations the two leaders have had over the years.

    The first time they spoke, in 2019, Trump tried to pressure the then newly minted Ukrainian leader to dig up dirt on Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 election. That phone call sparked Trump’s first impeachment.

    Trump made Biden’s support for Ukraine a central issue in his successful 2024 campaign, saying the conflict had cost U.S. taxpayers too much money and vowing he would quickly bring the war to an end.

    Then early this year in a disastrous Oval Office meeting, Trump and Vice President JD Vance tore into Zelenskyy for what they said was insufficient gratitude for the more than $180 billion the U.S. had appropriated for military aid and other assistance to Kyiv since the start of the war. That episode led to a temporary suspension of U.S. assistance to Ukraine.

    And now with the new proposal, Trump is pressing Zelenskyy to agree to concessions of land to Moscow, a massive reduction in the size of Ukraine’s army, and agreement from Europe to assert that Ukraine will never be admitted into the NATO military alliance.

    “Now Ukraine may find itself facing a very difficult choice: either loss of dignity, or the risk of losing a key partner,” Zelenskyy said in a video address Friday.

    At the center of Trump’s plan is the call on Ukraine to concede the entirety of its eastern Donbas region, even though a vast swath of that land remains in Ukrainian control. Analysts at the independent Institute for the Study of War have estimated it would take several years for the Russian military to completely seize the territory, based on its current rate of advances.

    Trump, nevertheless, insists that the loss of the region — which includes cities that are vital defense, industrial and logistics hubs for Ukrainian forces — is a fait accompli.

    “They will lose in a short period of time. You know so,” Trump said Friday when asked during a Fox News Radio interview about his push on Ukraine to give up the territory. “They’re losing land. They’re losing land.”

    The Trump proposal was formally presented to Zelenskyy in Kyiv on Thursday by Dan Driscoll, the U.S. Army secretary. The plan itself was a surprise to Driscoll’s staffers, who were not aware as late as Wednesday that their boss would be going to Ukraine as part of a team to present the plan to the Ukrainians.

    Army officials walked away from that meeting with the impression that the Ukrainians were viewing the proposal as a starting point that would evolve as negotiations progressed, according to a U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks.

    It’s unclear how much patience Trump has for further negotiation. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that Trump’s new plan reflects “the realities of the situation” and offers the “best win-win scenario, where both parties gain more than they must give.”

    Asked about Zelenskyy’s initial hesitant response to the proposal, Trump recalled the February Oval Office blow-up with Zelenskyy: “You remember, right in the Oval Office, not so long ago, I said, ‘You don’t have the cards.’”

    The mounting pressure from Trump comes as Zelenskyy is dealing with fallout over $100 million in kickbacks for contracts with the state-owned nuclear energy company. The scandal led to resignations of top Cabinet ministers and implicated other Zelenskyy associates.

    Konstantin Sonin, a political economist and Russia expert at the University of Chicago, said “what Donald Trump is certainly extremely good at is spotting weak spots of people.”

    One of the 28 elements of Trump’s proposal calls for elections to be held within 100 days of enactment of the agreement.

    “I think it’s a rationalistic assessment that there is more leverage over Zelenskyy than over Putin,” Sonin said. He added, “Zelenskyy’s back is against the wall” and “his government could collapse if he agrees” to the U.S. proposal.

    All the while, Ukraine is increasingly showing signs of strain on the battlefield after years of war against a vastly larger and better equipped Russian military. Ukraine is desperately trying to fend off relentless Russian aerial attacks that have brought rolling blackouts across the country on the brink of winter.

    Kyiv is also grappling with doubts about the way ahead. A European plan to finance next year’s budget for Ukraine through loans linked to frozen Russian funds is now in question.

    The Trump proposal in its current form also includes several elements that would cut deeply into Ukrainian pride, said David Silbey, a military historian at Cornell University.

    One provision calls on Russia and Ukraine to abolish “all discriminatory measures and guarantee the rights of Ukrainian and Russian media and education,” and “all Nazi ideology and activities must be rejected and prohibited.” That element could be seen by the Ukrainian side as giving credence to Putin’s airing of distorted historical narratives to legitimize the 2022 invasion.

    Putin has said the war is in part an effort to “denazify” Ukraine and complained of the country’s “neo-Nazi regime” as a justification for Russia’s invasion. In fact, in Ukraine’s last parliamentary election in 2019, support for far-right candidates was 2%, significantly lower than in many other European countries.

    The plan’s provision is “very clearly an attempt to build up Putin’s claim to Russian cultural identity within Ukraine,” Silbey said. He added, “From territory loss to the substantial reduction of the Ukrainian military to cultural concessions that have been demanded, I just don’t think Zelenskyy could do this deal and look his public in the eye again.”

    ————

    AP writers Michelle L. Price and Konstantin Toropin contributed reporting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Latest Push for Peace Is Zelensky’s Toughest Moment Since Start of War

    [ad_1]

    The Ukrainian leader is trying to prepare his people for “a very difficult choice” after almost four years of full-scale conflict with Russia.

    [ad_2]

    Ian Lovett

    Source link